1290 Funds

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

March 1, 2023

Fund	Share Class (Ticker)
1290 Diversified Bond Fund	Class A (TNUAX); Class T (TNUCX)*; Class I (TNUIX); Class R (TNURX)
1290 Essex Small Cap Growth Fund	Class A (ESCFX); Class T (ESCHX)*; Class I (ESCJX); Class R (ESCKX)
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund	Class A (TNVAX); Class T (TNVCX)*; Class I (TNVIX); Class R (TNVRX)
1290 High Yield Bond Fund	Class A (TNHAX); Class T (TNHCX)*; Class I (TNHIX); Class R (TNHRX)
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income Fund**	Class A (TNXAX); Class T (TNXCX)*; Class I (TNVDX); Class R (TNYRX)
1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund	Class A (TNMAX); Class T (TNMCX)*; Class I (TNMIX); Class R (TNMRX)
1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund	Class A (TNBAX); Class T (TNBCX)*; Class I (TNBIX); Class R (TNBRX)

(each, a “Fund” and together, the “Funds”)

This Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) is not a prospectus. It should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus for the Funds dated March 1, 2023, as applicable, as it may be supplemented from time to time, which may be obtained without charge by calling the 1290 Funds toll-free at 1-888-310-0416 or writing to the 1290 Funds at 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10104. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms have the meanings given to them in the Prospectus.

The Funds’ audited financial statements for the year ended October 31, 2022, including the financial highlights, appearing in the 1290 Funds’ Annual Report to Shareholders (available without charge, upon request by calling toll-free 1-888-310-0416), filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, 2022 (File No. 811-22959), are incorporated by reference and made a part of this document.

Class T shares currently are not offered for sale.

Effective August 19, 2022, 1290 DoubleLine Dynamic Allocation Fund was restructured and renamed 1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income Fund.

Description of the 1290 Funds

The 1290 Funds (the “1290 Funds” or the “Trust”) is an open-end management investment company and is registered as such under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940 Act”). The 1290 Funds was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on March 1, 2013. (See “Other Information.”)

Equitable Investment Management, LLC (“EIM II” or the “Adviser”) serves as the investment adviser for the 1290 Funds.

The 1290 Funds has registered Class A, Class T, Class I and Class R shares on behalf of sixteen (16) funds. This SAI contains information with respect to shares of the following Funds:

1290 Diversified Bond Fund
1290 Essex Small Cap Growth Fund
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
1290 High Yield Bond Fund
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income Fund
1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund
1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund

Prior to March 1, 2017, Class T shares were known as Class C shares and included different 12b-1 fees and certain other expenses. In the Prospectus for the Funds dated March 1, 2023, the performance of Class T shares for periods prior to March 1, 2017 has been adjusted to reflect the current sales charges applicable to Class T shares. For each Fund, Class T shares currently are not offered for sale. The 1290 Funds’ Board of Trustees (“Board”) is permitted to create additional funds or classes. The assets of the 1290 Funds received for the issue or sale of shares of each Fund and all income, earnings, profits and proceeds thereof, subject to the rights of creditors, are allocated to the Fund, and constitute the assets of the Fund. The assets of each Fund are charged with the liabilities and expenses attributable to the Fund, except that liabilities and expenses may be allocated to a particular class. Any general expenses of the 1290 Funds are allocated between or among any one or more Funds or classes.

Each class of shares is offered under the 1290 Funds’ multi-class distribution system, which is designed to allow promotion of investing in the Funds through alternative distribution channels. Under the 1290 Funds’ multi-class distribution system, shares of each class of a Fund represent an equal pro rata interest in that Fund and, generally, will have identical voting, dividend, liquidation, and other rights, preferences, powers, restrictions, limitations, qualifications and terms and conditions, except that each class may differ with respect to sales charges, if any, distribution and/or service fees, if any, other expenses allocable exclusively to each class, voting rights on matters exclusively affecting that class, and its exchange privilege and/or conversion features, if any. Each share of a Fund is entitled to participate equally in dividends, other distributions and the proceeds of any liquidation of that Fund; however, the income attributable to each class and the dividends payable on the shares of each class will be reduced by the amount of the distribution fee or service fee, if any, payable by that class. The distribution-related fees paid with respect to any class will not be used to finance the distribution expenditures of another class. Sales personnel may receive different compensation for selling different classes of shares.

Each Fund is classified as a “diversified” fund under the 1940 Act. Currently under the 1940 Act, a diversified fund may not, with respect to 75% of its total assets, invest in a security if, as a result of such investment, more than 5% of the fund’s total assets would be invested in the securities of any one issuer or the fund would hold more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer. These percentage limitations do not apply to securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies and instrumentalities or to securities issued by other investment companies. With respect to the remaining 25% of its total assets, a diversified fund may invest more than 5% of its total assets in the securities of one issuer. Repurchase agreements will not be considered to be subject to the above-stated 5% limitation if the collateral underlying the repurchase agreements consists exclusively of obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities. In addition, mortgage- and asset-backed securities will not be considered to have been issued by the same issuer by reason of the securities having the same sponsor, and mortgage- and asset-backed securities issued by a finance or other special purpose subsidiary that are not guaranteed by the parent company will be considered to be issued by a separate issuer from the parent company. The 1940 Act provides that a fund may not

change its classification from diversified to non-diversified unless authorized by the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the fund.

1290 Funds Investment Policies

Fundamental Restrictions

Each Fund has adopted certain investment restrictions that are fundamental and may not be changed without approval by a “majority” vote of such Fund’s shareholders. Such majority is defined in the 1940 Act as the lesser of: (i) 67% or more of the voting securities of such Fund present in person or by proxy at a meeting, if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities are present or represented by proxy; or (ii) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of such Fund. Set forth below are each of the fundamental restrictions adopted by the Funds.

Each Fund will not:

(1)

issue senior securities to the extent such issuance would violate the 1940 Act, and the rules thereunder, as interpreted or modified by regulatory authority having jurisdiction from time to time, and any applicable exemptive relief.

(2)

borrow money, except as permitted under the 1940 Act, and the rules thereunder, as interpreted or modified by regulatory authority having jurisdiction from time to time, and any applicable exemptive relief.

(3)

engage in the business of underwriting securities issued by others, except to the extent that the sale of portfolio securities by the Fund may be deemed to be an underwriting or as otherwise permitted by the 1940 Act, and the rules thereunder, as interpreted or modified by regulatory authority having jurisdiction from time to time, and any applicable exemptive relief.

(4)

concentrate its investments in a particular industry or group of industries, as the term “concentration” is used in the 1940 Act, and the rules thereunder, as interpreted or modified by regulatory authority having jurisdiction from time to time, and any applicable exemptive relief.

(5)

purchase or sell real estate, except that the Fund may purchase and sell securities or other instruments that are secured by, or linked to, real estate or interests therein, securities of real estate investment trusts, mortgage-related securities and securities of issuers engaged in the real estate business, and the Fund may purchase and sell real estate acquired as a result of the ownership of securities or other instruments.

(6)

purchase or sell physical commodities to the extent prohibited by the 1940 Act and other applicable laws, and the rules thereunder, as interpreted or modified by regulatory authorities having jurisdiction from time to time, and any applicable exemptive relief.

(7)

make loans to other persons to the extent prohibited by the 1940 Act, and the rules thereunder, as interpreted or modified by regulatory authority having jurisdiction from time to time, and any applicable exemptive relief.

Notations Regarding the Funds’ Fundamental Restrictions

Each Fund’s fundamental restrictions are written and will be interpreted broadly. From time to time, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and members of its staff, and others, issue formal or informal views on various provisions of the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder, including through no-action letters and exemptive orders. For flexibility, each Fund’s fundamental restrictions will be interpreted with regard to these interpretations or modifications, as they are given from time to time. Therefore, it is possible that the interpretation of a Fund’s fundamental restrictions could change in the future.

The following notations are not considered to be part of a Fund’s fundamental restrictions and are subject to change without shareholder approval.

Senior Securities and Borrowing (notations regarding the fundamental restrictions set forth in (1) and (2) above)

“Senior securities” generally are obligations that have a priority over a fund’s shares with respect to the distribution of fund assets or the payment of dividends. Borrowings are viewed as involving the creation of a senior security. Under the 1940 Act, an open-end

fund currently may not issue senior securities, except that a fund is permitted to borrow money in an amount not in excess of 33⅓% of the fund’s total assets (including the amount of the senior securities issued but reduced by any liabilities not constituting senior securities) at the time of the issuance or borrowing, and except that a fund may borrow up to an additional 5% of its total assets (not including the amount borrowed) for temporary purposes, such as clearance of fund transactions and share redemptions. Any Fund borrowings that come to exceed these amounts will be reduced in accordance with applicable law.

Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act (“Rule 18f-4” or the “Derivatives Rule”) governs the use of derivatives by registered investment companies. Rule 18f-4 imposes limits on the amount of derivatives a fund can enter into and replaces the asset segregation framework previously used by funds to comply with the limitations on the issuance of senior securities imposed by Section 18 of the 1940 Act. Rule 18f-4 permits a fund, provided that the conditions imposed by the rule are met, to engage in derivatives transactions and certain other transactions that might otherwise be considered to create senior securities. For more information about these practices, see the “Derivatives” section.

Underwriting (notations regarding the fundamental restriction set forth in (3) above)

A Fund engaging in transactions involving the acquisition or disposition of portfolio securities may be considered to be an “underwriter” under certain federal securities laws. Although it is not believed that the application of the federal securities laws so described would cause the Funds to be engaged in the business of underwriting, the fundamental restriction will be interpreted not to prevent the Funds from engaging in transactions involving the acquisition or disposition of portfolio securities, regardless of whether a Fund may be considered to be within the technical definition of an underwriter under the federal securities laws or is otherwise engaged in the underwriting business to the extent permitted under applicable law.

Concentration (notations with respect to the fundamental restriction set forth in (4) above)

While the 1940 Act does not define what constitutes “concentration” in an industry, the SEC staff has taken the position that investment of 25% or more of a fund’s total assets in one or more issuers conducting their principal business activities in the same industry or group of industries constitutes concentration. The fundamental restriction does not apply to securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities, or obligations the interest on which is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes issued or guaranteed by a U.S. territory or possession or a state or local government, or a political subdivision of any of the foregoing. Private activity municipal securities are not included within the exclusion for political subdivisions. In addition, investments in other investment companies are not considered an investment in any particular industry for purposes of the fundamental restriction. Industries generally are determined by reference to the classifications of industries set forth in the Funds’ shareholder reports. With respect to each Fund’s investments in options, futures, swaps and other derivative transactions, industries may be determined by reference to the industry of the reference asset. Each Fund may invest in securities of other investment companies or investment vehicles that may concentrate their assets in one or more industries. Each Fund may consider the concentration of such investment companies and investment vehicles in determining compliance with the fundamental restriction.

Commodities (notations with respect to the fundamental restriction set forth in (6) above)

The 1940 Act generally does not prohibit a Fund from investing in commodities or commodity-related instruments. A Fund is, however, limited in the amount of illiquid assets it may purchase, and certain commodities, especially physical commodities, may be considered to be illiquid. Each Fund may purchase or sell currencies and securities or other instruments backed by physical commodities and may purchase, sell or enter into options, futures, forward and spot currency contracts, swap transactions and other financial contracts or derivative instruments, including commodity-linked derivative instruments. Each Fund may, consistent with the fundamental restriction, transact in securities of exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”) or similar instruments that provide exposure to physical commodities. In addition, a Fund will not qualify as a “regulated investment company” under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”) (a “RIC”), in any taxable year for which more than 10% of its gross income consists of certain “non-qualifying” income, which includes gains from selling physical commodities (or options or futures contracts thereon unless the gain is realized from certain hedging transactions). To remain within that limitation, a Fund may need to limit its purchases of commodity-related investments that generate non-qualifying income, hold such an investment to avoid realizing non-qualifying income, sell such an investment at a loss, or take other actions, such as sell other investments, when for investment reasons it would not otherwise do so. A Fund would not intend to sell commodity-related investments when doing so would cause it to fail to qualify as a RIC.

Loans (notations with respect to the fundamental restriction set forth in (7) above)

The fundamental restriction allows each Fund to engage in all forms of lending (including loans of cash and portfolio securities) — and thus become a creditor — to the full extent permitted under the 1940 Act and related interpretations, as in effect from time to time. For purposes of the fundamental restriction, the acquisition of bonds, debentures, other debt securities or instruments, or participations or other interests therein and investments in government obligations, commercial paper, certificates of deposit, bankers’ acceptances or similar instruments and repurchase agreements will not be considered the making of a loan. In addition, the fundamental restriction would allow each Fund to engage in interfund lending, subject to SEC approval of an exemptive application. Interfund lending would allow each Fund to temporarily lend cash to another fund of 1290 Funds, subject to certain conditions of the exemptive relief. An interfund borrowing and lending program may provide the opportunity for a borrowing fund to pay an interest rate lower than what would be typically available from a bank, and the opportunity for a lending fund to receive an interest rate higher than what could be typically expected from investing cash in short-term instruments for cash management purposes. While the Funds have not applied for interfund lending relief, they may do so in the future.

Non-Fundamental Restrictions

The following investment restrictions apply generally to each Fund but are not fundamental. They may be changed for any Fund by the Board and without a vote of that Fund’s shareholders.

A Fund does not currently intend to purchase any investment if, as a result, more than 15% of its net assets would be invested in illiquid investments as such term is defined by Rule 22e-4 of the 1940 Act. If, through a change in values, net assets, or other circumstances, a Fund were in a position where more than 15% of its net assets were invested in illiquid investments, the Fund, in accordance with Rule 22e-4(b)(1)(iv), will report the occurrence to both the Board and the SEC and take steps to bring the aggregate amount of illiquid investments back within the prescribed limitation within a reasonable period of time.

If shares of a Fund are purchased by another fund in reliance on Section 12(d)(1)(G) of the 1940 Act, for so long as shares of the Fund are held by such fund, the Fund will not purchase securities of registered open-end investment companies or registered unit investment trusts in reliance on Section 12(d)(1)(F) or Section 12(d)(1)(G) of the 1940 Act.

A Fund may, notwithstanding any fundamental or non-fundamental investment policy or limitation, invest all of its assets in the securities of a single open-end management investment company with substantially the same investment objective, policies and limitations as the Fund.

The 1290 Diversified Bond Fund, 1290 Essex Small Cap Growth Fund, 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund, 1290 High Yield Bond Fund and 1290 SmartBeta Equity Fund each has a policy that it will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus borrowings for investment purposes, in a particular type of investment, as more fully set forth in the Funds’ Prospectus. Each such policy is subject to change only upon at least sixty (60) days’ prior notice to shareholders of the affected Fund to the extent required by SEC rules.

Certain of the Funds have investment policies, limitations, or practices that are applicable “normally” or under “normal circumstances” or “normal market conditions” (as stated above and elsewhere in this SAI or in the Funds’ Prospectus). Pursuant to the discretion of the Adviser and a Fund’s sub-adviser(s), if any (“Sub-Adviser(s)”), these investment policies, limitations, or practices may not apply during periods of abnormal purchase or redemption activity or during periods of unusual or adverse market, economic, political or other conditions.

Such market, economic or political conditions may include periods of abnormal or heightened market volatility, strained credit and/or liquidity conditions, or increased governmental intervention in the markets or industries. These conditions may impact the markets or economy broadly or may be more focused in impacting particular industries, groups or parties, including impacting the 1290 Funds alone. During such periods, a Fund may not invest according to its principal investment strategies or in the manner in which its name may suggest, and may be subject to different and/or heightened risks. It is possible that such unusual or adverse conditions may continue for extended periods of time.

Investment Strategies and Risks

In addition to the Funds’ principal investment strategies discussed in the Prospectus, each Fund may engage in other types of investment strategies as further described below. Each Fund may invest in or utilize any of these investment strategies and instruments or engage in any of these practices except where otherwise prohibited by law or a Fund’s own investment restrictions.

The 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund operates under a “fund of funds” structure, under which the Fund invests primarily in exchange-traded securities of other registered investment companies or investment vehicles (“Underlying ETFs”) comprising various asset categories or strategies. The Fund may also invest in other instruments as set forth in its Prospectus and as permitted by applicable law. By investing in Underlying ETFs, the Fund will indirectly bear fees and expenses charged by the Underlying ETFs in addition to the direct fees and expenses of the Fund. In addition, the performance of the Fund is directly related to the ability of the Underlying ETFs to meet their respective investment objectives, as well as the Adviser’s allocation among the Underlying ETFs. Accordingly, the investment performance of the Fund will be influenced by the investment strategies of, and the risks and fees associated with, the Underlying ETFs in direct proportion to the amount of assets the Fund allocates to the Underlying ETFs utilizing such strategies. The Fund’s Prospectus contains certain information about Underlying ETFs. For additional information regarding the Underlying ETFs, see their respective prospectuses and SAIs. In this section, the term “Fund” may include the Funds, an Underlying ETF or both.

Asset-Backed Securities. Asset-backed securities represent direct or indirect participations in, or are secured by and payable from, pools of assets such as, among other things, motor vehicle installment sales contracts, installment loan contracts, leases of various types of real and personal property, and receivables from revolving credit (credit card) agreements, or a combination of the foregoing. These assets are securitized through the use of trusts and special purpose corporations. Asset-backed securities can also be collateralized by a single asset (e.g. a loan to a specific corporation). Asset-backed securities that represent an interest in a pool of assets provide greater credit diversification than those representing an interest in a single asset. Asset-backed securities may include securities backed by pools of loans made to borrowers with blemished credit histories (“subprime” loans). The underwriting standards for subprime loans may be lower and more flexible than the standards generally used by lenders for borrowers with non-blemished credit histories with respect to the borrower’s credit standing and repayment history. Asset-backed securities present certain risks. For instance, in the case of credit card receivables, these securities are generally unsecured and the debtors are entitled to the protection of a number of state and federal consumer credit laws, many of which give such debtors the right to set off certain amounts owed on the credit cards, thereby reducing the balance due. Certain collateral may be difficult to locate in the event of default, and recoveries of depreciated or damaged collateral may not fully cover payments due on such collateral. In the case of automobile loans, most issuers of automobile receivables permit the servicers to retain possession of the underlying obligations. If the servicer were to sell these obligations to another party, there is a risk that the purchaser would acquire an interest superior to that of the holders of the related automobile receivables. In addition, because of the large number of vehicles involved in a typical issuance and technical requirements under state laws, the trustee for the holders of the automobile receivables may not have a proper security interest in all of the obligations backing such receivables. Therefore, there is the possibility that recoveries on repossessed collateral may not, in some cases, be available to support payments on these securities. If a Fund purchases asset-backed securities that are “subordinated” to other interests in the same pool of assets, the Fund as a holder of those securities may only receive payments after the pool’s obligations to other investors have been satisfied. The subordinated securities may be more illiquid and less stable than other asset-backed securities.

The credit quality of asset-backed securities depends primarily on the quality of the underlying assets, the rights of recourse available against the underlying assets and/or the issuer, the level of credit enhancement, if any, provided for the securities, and the credit quality of the credit-support provider, if any. To lessen the effect of failures by obligors on underlying assets to make payments, the securities may contain elements of credit support which fall into two categories: (i) liquidity protection and (ii) protection against losses resulting from ultimate default by an obligor on the underlying assets. Liquidity protection refers to the provision of advances, generally by the entity administering the pool of assets, to ensure that the receipt of payments on the underlying pool occurs in a timely fashion. Protection against losses resulting from ultimate default ensures payment through insurance policies or letters of credit obtained by the issuer or sponsor from third parties. A Fund will not pay any additional or separate fees for credit support. The degree of credit support provided for each issue is generally based on historical information respecting the level of credit risk associated with the underlying assets. Delinquency or loss in excess of that anticipated or failure of the credit support could adversely affect the return on an investment in such a security. In addition, the risk of default by borrowers is greater during times of rising interest rates and/or unemployment rates and generally is higher in the case of asset pools that include subprime assets.

Asset-backed securities may be subject to interest rate risk and prepayment risk. In a period of declining interest rates, borrowers may prepay the underlying assets more quickly than anticipated, thereby reducing the yield to maturity and the average life of the asset-backed securities. Moreover, when a Fund reinvests the proceeds of a prepayment in these circumstances, it will likely receive a rate of interest that is lower than the rate on the security that was prepaid. In a period of rising interest rates, prepayments of the underlying assets may occur at a slower than expected rate, creating maturity extension risk. This particular risk may effectively change a security that was considered short- or intermediate-term at the time of purchase into a longer-term security. Since the value of longer-term securities generally fluctuates more widely in response to changes in interest rates than does the value of shorter-term securities, maturity extension risk could increase the volatility of a Fund.

Due to the possibility that prepayments (on automobile loans and other collateral) will alter the cash flow on asset-backed securities, it is not possible to determine in advance the actual final maturity date or average life. Faster prepayment will shorten the average life and slower prepayments will lengthen it. However, it is possible to determine what the range of that movement could be and to calculate the effect that it will have on the price of the security. In selecting these securities, the Sub-Advisers will look for those securities that offer a higher yield to compensate for any variation in average maturity.

Bonds. Bonds are fixed or variable rate debt obligations, including bills, notes, debentures, money market instruments and similar instruments and securities. Mortgage- and asset-backed securities are types of bonds, and certain types of income-producing, non-convertible preferred stocks may be treated as bonds for investment purposes. Bonds generally are used by corporations, governments and other issuers to borrow money from investors. The issuer pays the investor a fixed or variable rate of interest and normally must repay the amount borrowed on or before maturity. Many preferred stocks and some bonds are “perpetual” in that they have no maturity date.

Bonds are subject to interest rate risk and credit risk. In addition, significant securities market disruptions related to outbreaks of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic have led, and may continue to lead, to dislocation in the market for a variety of fixed income securities (including, without limitation, commercial paper, corporate debt securities, certificates of deposit, asset-backed debt securities and municipal obligations), which has decreased liquidity and sharply reduced returns. To the extent that a Fund purchases illiquid corporate debt securities or securities which are restricted as to resale, such Fund may incur additional risks and costs.

Interest rate risk is the risk that interest rates will rise and that, as a result, bond prices will fall, lowering the value of a Fund’s investments in bonds. If interest rates move sharply in a manner not anticipated by a Fund’s management, the Fund’s investments in bonds could be adversely affected. In general, bonds having longer durations are more sensitive to interest rate changes than are bonds with shorter durations. Duration is a measure of a bond’s price sensitivity to a change in its yield. The change in the value of a fixed income security or portfolio can be approximated by multiplying its duration by a change in interest rates. For example, if a bond has a 5-year duration and its yield rises 1%, the bond’s value is likely to fall about 5%. Similarly, if a bond portfolio has a 5-year average duration and the yield on each of the bonds held by the portfolio rises 1%, the portfolio’s value is likely to fall about 5%. For portfolios with exposure to foreign markets, there are many reasons why all of the bond holdings do not experience the same yield changes. These reasons include: the bonds are spread off of different yield curves around the world and these yield curves do not move in tandem; the shapes of these yield curves change; and sector and issuer yield spreads change. Other factors can influence a bond portfolio’s performance and share price. Accordingly, a bond portfolio’s actual performance will likely differ from the example. During periods of rising interest rates, the average life of certain bonds is extended because of slower than expected principal payments. This may lock in a below-market interest rate and extend the duration of these bonds, especially mortgage-related securities, making them more sensitive to changes in interest rates. As a result, in a period of rising interest rates, these securities may exhibit additional volatility and lose value. This is known as extension risk.

Credit risk is the risk that an issuer will not make timely payments of principal and interest on the bond. The degree of credit risk depends on the issuer’s financial condition and on the terms of the debt securities. Changes in an issuer’s credit rating or the market’s perception of an issuer’s creditworthiness may also affect the value of a Fund’s investment in that issuer.

Collateralized Debt Obligations. Collateralized bond obligations (“CBOs”), collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), other collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) and other similarly structured securities are types of asset-backed securities. A CBO is ordinarily issued by a trust or other special purpose entity (“SPE”) and is typically backed by a diversified pool of high risk, below investment grade fixed income securities. The collateral can be from many different types of fixed income securities such as high yield debt, residential privately issued mortgage-related securities, commercial privately issued mortgage-related securities, trust preferred securities and emerging market debt. A CLO is ordinarily issued by a trust or other SPE and is typically collateralized

by a pool of loans, which may include, among others, domestic and foreign senior secured loans, senior unsecured loans, and subordinate corporate loans, including loans that may be rated below investment grade or equivalent unrated loans. Other CDOs are trusts backed by other types of assets representing obligations of various parties. Although certain CDOs may benefit from credit enhancement in the form of a senior-subordinate structure, overcollateralization or bond insurance, such enhancement may not always be present, and may fail to protect a Fund against the risk of loss upon default of the collateral. Certain CDO issuers may use derivatives contracts to create “synthetic” exposure to assets rather than holding such assets directly, which entails the risks of derivative instruments described elsewhere in this SAI. CBOs, CLOs and other CDOs may charge management fees and administrative expenses, which are in addition to those of a Fund.

For CBOs, CLOs and other CDOs, the cash flows from the trust or SPE are split into two or more portions, called tranches, varying in risk and yield. The riskiest portion is the “equity” tranche, which bears the bulk of defaults from the bonds or loans in the trust and serves to protect the other, more senior tranches from default in all but the most severe circumstances. Since it is partially protected from defaults, a senior tranche from a CBO trust or CLO trust or trust of another CDO typically has higher ratings and lower yields than its underlying securities, and may be rated investment grade. Despite the protection from the equity tranche, CBO, CLO or other CDO tranches can experience substantial losses due to actual defaults, downgrades of the underlying collateral by rating agencies, forced liquidation of the collateral pool due to a failure of coverage tests, increased sensitivity to defaults due to collateral default and disappearance of protecting tranches, market anticipation of defaults, as well as aversion to CBO, CLO or other CDO securities as a class. Interest on certain tranches of a CDO may be paid in kind or deferred and capitalized (paid in the form of obligations of the same type rather than cash), which involves continued exposure to default risk with respect to such payments.

The risks of an investment in a CDO can be significant and depend largely on the type of the collateral securities and the class of the instrument in which a Fund invests. Normally, CDOs are privately offered and sold, and thus, are not registered under the securities laws.

As a result, investments in CDOs may be characterized by the Funds as illiquid securities; but, an active dealer market may exist for CDOs allowing them to qualify as Rule 144A (under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“1933 Act”)) transactions. In addition to the normal risks associated with fixed income securities and asset-backed securities discussed elsewhere in this SAI and the Funds’ Prospectus (e.g., interest rate risk and credit risk), CDOs carry additional risks including, but not limited to: (i) the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments; (ii) the quality of the collateral may decline in value or default or be downgraded if rated by a rating agency; (iii) the Funds may invest in tranches of CDOs that are subordinate to other classes; (iv) the complex structure of the security may not be fully understood at the time of investment and may produce disputes with the issuer or unexpected investment results; (v) the investment return achieved by a Fund could be significantly different from return predicted by financial models and (vi) the lack of a readily available secondary market for CDOs.

Convertible Securities. A convertible security is a bond, debenture, note, preferred stock or other security that may be converted into or exchanged for a prescribed amount of common stock or other equity security of the same or a different issuer within a particular period of time at a specified price or formula. A convertible security generally entitles the holder to receive interest paid or accrued on debt or the dividend paid on preferred stock until the convertible security matures or is redeemed, converted or exchanged. Before conversion, convertible securities have characteristics similar to nonconvertible fixed income securities in that they ordinarily provide a stream of income with generally higher yields than those of common stocks of the same or similar issuers, but lower yields than comparable nonconvertible securities. The value of a convertible security is influenced by interest rate changes, with investment values declining as interest rates increase and increasing as interest rates decline. The credit standing of the issuer and other factors also may have an effect on the convertible security’s investment value. Convertible securities are subordinate in rank to any senior debt obligations of the same issuer and, therefore, an issuer’s convertible securities entail more risk than its debt obligations. To the extent a Fund invests in securities that may be considered “enhanced” convertible securities, some or all of these risks may be more pronounced.

Convertible securities have unique investment characteristics in that they generally (1) have higher yields than common stocks, but lower yields than comparable nonconvertible securities, (2) are less subject to fluctuation in value than the underlying stock because they have fixed income characteristics and (3) provide the potential for capital appreciation if the market price of the underlying common stock increases. While no securities investment is without some risk, investments in convertible securities generally entail less risk than the issuer’s common stock. However, the extent to which such risk is reduced depends in large measure upon the degree to which the convertible security sells above its value as a fixed income security.

If the convertible security’s “conversion value,” which is the market value of the underlying common stock that would be obtained upon the conversion of the convertible security, is substantially below the “investment value,” which is the value of a convertible security viewed without regard to its conversion feature (i.e., strictly on the basis of its yield), the price of the convertible security is governed principally by its investment value.

If the conversion value of a convertible security increases to a point that approximates or exceeds its investment value, the value of the security will be principally influenced by its conversion value. A convertible security will sell at a premium over its conversion value to the extent investors place value on the right to acquire the underlying common stock while holding an income-producing security.

A convertible security may be subject to redemption at the option of the issuer at a price established in the convertible security’s governing instrument. If a convertible security held by a Fund is called for redemption, the Fund will be required to permit the issuer to redeem the security, convert it into underlying common stock or sell it to a third party. Certain convertible debt securities may provide a put option to the holder, which entitles the holder to cause the security to be redeemed by the issuer at a premium over the stated principal amount of the debt security under certain circumstances.

Convertible securities are often rated below investment grade or not rated because they fall below debt obligations and just above common equity in order of preference or priority on an issuer’s balance sheet. Investments by certain of the Funds in convertible debt securities are not subject to any ratings restrictions, although each Sub-Adviser will consider such ratings, and any changes in such ratings, in its determination of whether a Fund should invest and/or continue to hold the securities.

Contingent Convertible Securities. Contingent convertible securities (“CoCos”) have equity and debt characteristics. A CoCo is typically issued by a non-U.S. bank and, upon the occurrence of a specified trigger event, may be (i) convertible into equity securities of the issuer at a predetermined share price; or (ii) written down in liquidation value. Trigger events are identified in the document’s requirements. CoCos are designed to behave like bonds in times of economic health yet absorb losses when the trigger event occurs.

With respect to CoCos that provide for conversion of the CoCo into common shares of the issuer in the event of a trigger event, the conversion would deepen the subordination of the investor, subjecting a Fund to a greater risk of loss in the event of bankruptcy. In addition, because the common stock of the issuer may not pay a dividend, investors in such instruments could experience reduced yields (or no yields at all). With respect to CoCos that provide for the write-down in liquidation value of the CoCo in the event of a trigger event, it is possible that the liquidation value of the CoCo may be adjusted downward to below the original par value or written off entirely under certain circumstances. For instance, if losses have eroded the issuer’s capital levels below a specified threshold, the liquidation value of the CoCo may be reduced in whole or in part. The write-down of the CoCo’s par value may occur automatically and would not entitle holders to institute bankruptcy proceedings against the issuer. In addition, an automatic write-down could result in a reduced income rate if the dividend or interest payment associated with the CoCo is based on par value. Coupon payments on CoCos may be discretionary and may be canceled by the issuer for any reason or may be subject to approval by the issuer’s regulator and may be suspended in the event there are insufficient distributable reserves.

CoCos are subject to the credit, interest rate, high yield securities, foreign securities and market risks associated with bonds and equity securities, and to the risks specified to convertible securities in general. They are also subject to other specific risks. CoCos typically are structurally subordinated to traditional convertible bonds in the issuer’s capital structure, which increases the risk that a Fund may experience a loss. In certain scenarios, investors in CoCos may suffer a loss of capital ahead of equity holders or when equity holders do not. CoCos are generally speculative and the prices of CoCos may be volatile. There is no guarantee that a Fund will receive return of principal on CoCos.

Credit and Liquidity Enhancements. A Fund may invest in securities that have credit or liquidity enhancements or may purchase these types of enhancements in the secondary market. Such enhancements may be structured as demand features that permit a Fund to sell the instrument at designated times and prices. These credit and liquidity enhancements may be backed by letters of credit or other instruments provided by banks or other financial institutions whose credit standing affects the credit quality of the underlying obligation. Changes in the credit quality of these financial institutions could cause losses to a Fund and affect its share price. The credit and liquidity enhancements may have conditions that limit the ability of a Fund to use them when the Fund wishes to do so.

Cybersecurity and Operational Risks. With the increased use of technologies such as the Internet to conduct business, a Fund is susceptible to operational, information security and related risks, including potential damage to computer systems (including shareholder computer systems). Operational risks include processing errors and human errors, inadequate or failed internal or external processes, failures in systems and technology errors or malfunctions, changes in personnel, and errors caused by a Fund’s Adviser, Sub-Adviser(s), third-party service providers or counterparties. A Fund attempts to mitigate such risks; however, it is not possible to identify all of the risks that may affect a Fund.

In general, cyber incidents can result from deliberate attacks or unintentional events. Cyber attacks include, but are not limited to, gaining unauthorized access to digital systems (e.g., through “hacking” or malicious software coding) for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, corrupting data, or causing operational disruption. Cyber attacks may also be carried out in a manner that does not require gaining unauthorized access, such as causing denial-of-service attacks on websites (i.e., efforts to make network services unavailable to intended users). Cybersecurity failures or breaches by a Fund’s Adviser, Sub-Adviser(s) and other service providers (including, but not limited to, Fund accountants, custodians, transfer agents and administrators), and the issuers of securities in which a Fund invests, have the ability to cause disruptions and impact business operations, potentially resulting in financial losses, interference with a Fund’s ability to calculate its net asset value, impediments to trading, the inability of Fund shareholders to transact business, violations of applicable privacy and other laws, regulatory fines, penalties, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, or additional compliance costs. In addition, substantial costs may be incurred in order to prevent any cyber incidents in the future. While a Fund has established business continuity plans in the event of, and risk management systems to prevent, such cyber attacks, there are inherent limitations in such plans and systems including the possibility that certain risks have not been identified. There is also a risk that cyber attacks are not detected. Furthermore, a Fund cannot control the cybersecurity plans and systems put in place by service providers to the Fund and issuers in which the Fund invests. In certain situations, a Fund, the Adviser, a Sub-Adviser, or a service provider may be required to comply with law enforcement in responding to a cybersecurity incident, which may prevent the Fund from fully implementing its cybersecurity plans and systems, and (in certain situations) may result in additional information loss or damage. A Fund and their shareholders could be negatively impacted as a result.

Depositary Receipts. Depositary receipts represent ownership interests in securities of foreign companies (an “underlying issuer”) that have been deposited with a bank or trust and that trade on an exchange or over-the-counter. Depositary receipts are not necessarily denominated in the same currency as the underlying securities. Depositary receipts include American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”), Global Depositary Receipts (“GDRs”) European Depositary Receipts (“EDRs”) and other types of depositary receipts (which, together with ADRs, GDRs and EDRs, are hereinafter collectively referred to as “Depositary Receipts”). ADRs are dollar-denominated Depositary Receipts typically issued by a U.S. financial institution which evidence ownership interests in a security or pool of securities issued by a foreign issuer. ADRs are listed and traded in the United States. GDRs and other types of Depositary Receipts are typically issued by foreign banks or trust companies, although they also may be issued by U.S. financial institutions, and evidence ownership interests in a security or pool of securities issued by either a foreign or a U.S. corporation. EDRs, which are sometimes called Continental Depositary Receipts, are receipts issued in Europe, typically by foreign banks or trust companies, that evidence ownership of either foreign or domestic underlying securities. Generally, Depositary Receipts in registered form are designed for use in the U.S. securities market and Depositary Receipts in bearer form are designed for use in securities markets outside the United States. Investments in Depositary Receipts involve many of the same risks associated with direct investments in the foreign securities.

Depositary Receipts may be “sponsored” or “unsponsored.” Sponsored Depositary Receipts are established jointly by a depositary and the underlying issuer, whereas unsponsored Depositary Receipts may be established by a depositary without participation by the underlying issuer. Holders of an unsponsored Depositary Receipt generally bear all the costs associated with establishing the unsponsored Depositary Receipt. In addition, the issuers of the securities underlying unsponsored Depositary Receipts are not obligated to disclose information that is, in the U.S., considered material. Therefore, there may be less information available regarding such issuers and there may not be a correlation between such information and the market value of the Depositary Receipts. Depositary Receipts may be less liquid or may trade at a lower price than the securities of the underlying issuer. Depositary Receipts are subject to the risk of fluctuation in the currency exchange rate if, as is often the case, the underlying foreign securities are denominated in foreign currency. For purposes of a Fund’s investment policies, the Fund’s investment in Depositary Receipts will be deemed to be investments in the underlying securities except as noted.

Derivatives. In general terms, a “derivative” instrument is an investment contract the value of which is linked to (or is derived from), in whole or in part, the value of an underlying asset, reference rate or index (e.g., stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies,

interest rates and market indexes). If a portfolio manager is incorrect in his or her judgment on market values, interest rates or other economic factors in using a derivative instrument or strategy, a Fund may have lower net income and a net loss on the investment. Losses on certain derivative instruments are potentially unlimited. There can be no assurance that using any derivative instrument or derivative strategy will succeed, and a Fund might not use any derivative instruments or derivative strategies.

There have been numerous recent legislative and regulatory initiatives to implement a new regulatory framework for the derivatives markets. In particular, effective August 19, 2022 (the “Compliance Date”), Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act (the “Derivatives Rule” or “Rule 18f-4”) replaced the asset segregation regime of Investment Company Act Release No. 10666 (“Release 10666”) with a new framework for the use of derivatives by registered investment companies. As of the Compliance Date, the SEC rescinded Release 10666 and withdrew no-action letters and similar guidance addressing a Fund’s use of derivatives and began requiring a Fund to satisfy the requirements of the Derivatives Rule. As a result, a Fund may, but is no longer required to, engage in “segregation” or “coverage” techniques with respect to derivatives transactions but will comply with the applicable requirements of the Derivatives Rule. Rule 18f-4 permits a Fund to enter into Derivatives Transactions (as defined below) and certain other transactions notwithstanding the restrictions on the issuance of senior securities under Section 18 of the 1940 Act. Section 18 of the 1940 Act, among other things, prohibits open-end funds, including the Funds, from issuing or selling any “senior security,” other than borrowing from a bank (subject to a requirement to maintain 300% “asset coverage”).

Under Rule 18f-4, “Derivatives Transactions” include the following: (1) any futures contract, forward contract, option (excluding purchased options), swap, security-based swap, any combination of the foregoing, or any similar instrument, under which a Fund is or may be required to make any payment or delivery of cash or other assets during the life of the instrument or at maturity or early termination, whether as margin or settlement payment or otherwise; (2) any short sale borrowing; (3) any reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions, if a Fund elects to treat these transactions as Derivatives Transactions under Rule 18f-4; and (4) when-issued or forward-settling securities (e.g., firm and standby commitments, including to-be-announced commitments, and dollar rolls) and non-standard settlement cycle securities, unless such transactions meet the Delayed-Settlement Securities Provision (as defined below). Further information about these instruments and the risks involved in their use is included under the description of each of these instruments in this SAI.

The Derivatives Rule mandates that a Fund adopt and/or implement: (i) value-at-risk limitations (“VaR”); (ii) a written derivatives risk management program; (iii) new Board oversight responsibilities; and (iv) new reporting and recordkeeping requirements. In the event that a Fund’s derivatives exposure is 10% or less of its net assets, excluding certain currency and interest rate hedging transactions, it can elect to be classified as a limited derivatives user (“Limited Derivatives User”) under the Derivatives Rule, in which case a Fund is not subject to the full requirements of the Derivatives Rule. Limited Derivatives Users are excepted from VaR testing, implementing a derivatives risk management program, and certain Board oversight and reporting requirements mandated by the Derivatives Rule. However, a Limited Derivatives User is still required to implement written compliance policies and procedures reasonably designed to manage its derivatives risks.

The Derivatives Rule also provides special treatment for reverse repurchase agreements, similar financing transactions and unfunded commitment agreements. Under the Derivatives Rule, when a Fund trades reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions, it must either (i) aggregate the amount of indebtedness associated with all reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions with the aggregate amount of any other senior securities representing indebtedness (e.g., borrowings, if applicable) when calculating the Fund's asset coverage ratio or (ii) treat all such transactions as Derivatives Transactions. Furthermore, under the Derivatives Rule, a Fund will be permitted to enter into an unfunded commitment agreement, and such unfunded commitment agreement will not be subject to the asset coverage requirements under the 1940 Act, if the Fund reasonably believes, at the time it enters into such agreement, that it will have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet its obligations with respect to all such agreements as they come due. In addition, under the Derivatives Rule, a Fund may invest in a security on a when-issued or forward-settling basis, or with a non-standard settlement cycle, and the transaction will be deemed not to involve a senior security, provided that: (i) the Fund intends to physically settle the transaction; and (ii) the transaction will settle within 35 days of its trade date (the “Delayed-Settlement Securities Provision”). A Fund may otherwise engage in when-issued, forward-settling and non-standard settlement cycle securities transactions that do not meet the conditions of the Delayed-Settlement Securities Provision so long as the Fund treats any such transaction as a Derivatives Transaction for purposes of compliance with the Derivatives Rule.

The requirements of the Derivatives Rule are intended to reduce derivatives risk, but they may not work as intended. Analyses, judgments and decisions made in connection with administering the derivatives risk management program may be incorrect

or otherwise may not produce the desired results. In addition, changes in market conditions, which may occur rapidly and unpredictably, may adversely affect the administration of the program. Complying with the Derivatives Rule may increase the cost of a Fund’s investments and cost of doing business, which could adversely affect investors, and the full impact of the Derivatives Rule remains uncertain.

For purposes of its investment policies and restrictions, a Fund may value derivative instruments at mark-to-market value, notional value or full exposure value. Mark-to-market value is the current market value or fair value reflecting the price at which the derivative could be expected to be liquidated. In contrast, the notional value of a derivative instrument, such as a futures contract, is equal to the contract size (number of units per contract) multiplied by the current (spot) unit price of the reference asset underlying the contract. Full exposure value is the sum of the notional amount for the contract plus the market value. A Fund could also use a combination of the foregoing (e.g., notional value for purposes of calculating the numerator and market value for purposes of calculating the denominator for compliance with a particular policy or restriction). The investment exposure that a Fund obtains through a derivative investment measured based on notional value may exceed the mark-to-market value of the derivative investment. The manner in which certain securities or other instruments are valued by a Fund for purposes of applying its investment policies and restrictions may differ from the manner in which those investments are valued by other types of investors.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), enacted in 2010, initiated a dramatic revision of the U.S. financial regulatory framework and covers a broad range of topics, including (among many others) a reorganization of federal financial regulators; a process intended to improve financial systemic stability and the resolution of potentially insolvent financial firms; rules for derivatives clearing and trading; the creation of a consumer financial protection watchdog; the registration and additional regulation of hedge and private equity fund managers; and federal requirements for residential mortgage loans. Although many of the implementing regulations mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act have been finalized, various U.S. Government entities, including the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and the SEC, are in the process of adopting and implementing additional regulations governing derivatives markets required by, among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act.

The statutory provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act significantly changed in several respects the ways in which investment products are marketed, sold, settled (or “cleared”) or terminated. In particular, the Dodd-Frank Act mandates the elimination of references to credit ratings in numerous securities laws, including the 1940 Act. Certain swaps have been and other swaps may be mandated for central clearing under the Dodd-Frank Act, which likely will require technological and other changes to the operations of registered investment companies and the market in which they will trade. Central clearing also entails the use of assets of a registered investment company to satisfy margin calls and this may have an effect on the performance of such a fund. The regulators have not yet issued final regulations implementing clearing mandates for all standardized swaps. The banking regulators and the CFTC have issued regulations requiring the posting of initial and variation margin for uncleared swaps. The CFTC adopted regulations so that the minimum transfer amount for margin postings can be measured at the account level rather than the entity level, which may be useful if the Funds employ multiple account managers to trade their portfolios.

The regulators that have been charged with the responsibility for implementing the Dodd-Frank Act (i.e., the SEC, the CFTC and the banking regulators) have been active in proposing and adopting regulations and guidance on the use of derivatives by registered investment companies. Regulations adopted by the banking regulators require certain banks to include in a range of financial contracts, including derivative instruments trading agreements, terms delaying or restricting default, termination and other rights in the event that the bank and/or its affiliates become subject to certain types of resolution or insolvency proceedings. The regulations could limit a Fund’s ability to exercise a range of cross-default rights if its counterparty, or an affiliate of the counterparty, is subject to bankruptcy or similar proceedings. Such regulations could further negatively impact a Fund’s use of derivative instruments.

Pursuant to rules adopted under the Commodity Exchange Act by the CFTC, the Funds must either operate within certain guidelines and restrictions with respect to the Funds’ use of futures, options on such futures, commodity options and certain swaps, or the Adviser will be subject to registration with the CFTC as a “commodity pool operator” (“CPO”). The Adviser claims an exclusion (under CFTC Regulation 4.5) from the definition of a CPO with respect to the Funds. To qualify for an exclusion under CFTC Regulation 4.5, if a Fund uses commodity interests (such as futures contracts, options on futures contracts, and swaps) other than for bona fide hedging purposes (as defined by the CFTC), the aggregate initial margin and premiums required to establish these positions, determined at the time the most recent position was established, may not exceed 5% of the Fund’s net asset value (“NAV”) (after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized losses on any such positions and excluding the amount

by which options that are “in-the-money” at the time of purchase are “in-the-money”) or, alternatively, the aggregate net notional value of those positions, determined at the time the most recent position was established, may not exceed 100% of the Fund’s NAV (after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized losses on any such positions). In addition, to qualify for an exclusion, a Fund must satisfy a marketing test, which requires, among other things, that a Fund not hold itself out as a vehicle for trading commodity interests.

The Adviser intends to comply with one of the two alternative trading limitations described above and the marketing limitation with respect to each Fund. Complying with the trading limitations may restrict the Adviser’s ability to use derivative instruments as part of these Funds’ investment strategies. Although the Adviser expects to be able to execute each of these Fund’s investment strategies within the limitations, a Fund’s performance could be adversely affected. In addition, rules under the Dodd-Frank Act may limit the availability of certain derivative instruments, may make the use of derivative instruments by the Funds more costly, and may otherwise adversely impact the performance and value of derivative instruments. The Adviser is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser under the 1940 Act. The Adviser also is registered with the CFTC as a CPO under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended. Being subject to dual regulation by the SEC and the CFTC may increase compliance costs and may affect Fund returns.

Equity Securities. Certain of the Funds may invest in one or more types of equity securities. Equity securities include common stocks, most preferred stocks and securities that are convertible into them, including common stock purchase warrants and rights, equity interests in trusts, partnerships, joint ventures or similar enterprises and depositary receipts. Common stocks, the most familiar type, represent an equity (ownership) interest in a corporation.

Different types of equity securities provide different voting and dividend rights and priority in the event of the bankruptcy and/or insolvency of the issuer. Preferred stock has certain fixed income features, like a bond, but actually is an equity security that is senior to a company’s common stock. Convertible bonds may include debentures and notes that may be converted into or exchanged for a prescribed amount of common stock of the same or a different issuer within a particular period of time at a specified price or formula. Some preferred stocks also may be converted into or exchanged for common stock. Depositary receipts typically are issued by banks or trust companies and evidence ownership of underlying equity securities.

While past performance does not guarantee future results, equity securities historically have provided the greatest long-term growth potential of an investment in a company. However, stock markets are volatile, and the prices of equity securities generally fluctuate more than other securities and reflect changes in a company’s financial condition as well as general market, economic and political conditions and other factors. The value of an equity security may also be affected by changes in financial markets that are relatively unrelated to the issuing company or its industry, such as changes in interest rates or currency exchange rates. Common stocks generally represent the riskiest investment in a company. Even investments in high quality or “blue chip” equity securities or securities of established companies with large market capitalizations (which generally have strong financial characteristics) can be negatively impacted by poor economic conditions. It is possible that a Fund may experience a substantial or complete loss on an individual equity investment. While this is also possible with bonds, it is less likely.

Eurodollar and Yankee Dollar Obligations. Eurodollar bank obligations are U.S. dollar-denominated certificates of deposit and time deposits issued outside the U.S. capital markets by foreign branches of U.S. banks and by foreign banks. Yankee dollar bank obligations are U.S. dollar-denominated obligations issued in the U.S. capital markets by foreign banks.

Eurodollar and Yankee dollar obligations are subject to the same risks that pertain to domestic issues; notably credit risk, market risk and liquidity risk. Additionally, Eurodollar (and to a limited extent, Yankee dollar) obligations are subject to certain sovereign risks. One such risk is the possibility that a sovereign country might prevent capital, in the form of dollars, from flowing across its borders. Other risks include adverse political and economic developments; the extent and quality of government regulation of financial markets and institutions; the imposition of foreign withholding taxes; and the expropriation or nationalization of foreign issuers.

Event-Linked Bonds. Event-linked bonds are fixed income securities, for which the return of principal and payment of interest is contingent on the non-occurrence of a specific “trigger” event, such as a hurricane, earthquake, or other physical or weather-related phenomenon. They may be issued by government agencies, insurance companies, reinsurers, special purpose corporations or other on-shore or off-shore entities. If a trigger event causes losses exceeding a specific amount in the geographic region and time period specified in a bond, a Fund investing in the bond may lose a portion or all of its principal invested in the bond. If no trigger event occurs, a Fund will recover its principal plus interest. For some event-linked bonds, the trigger event

or losses may be based on company-wide losses, index fund losses, industry indices, or readings of scientific instruments rather than specified actual losses. Often the event-linked bonds provide for extensions of maturity that are mandatory, or optional at the discretion of the issuer, in order to process and audit loss claims in those cases where a trigger event has, or possibly has, occurred. In addition to the specified trigger events, event-linked bonds may also expose a Fund to certain unanticipated risks, including issuer (credit) default, counterparty risk, adverse regulatory or jurisdictional interpretations, and adverse tax consequences.

Event-linked bonds are a relatively new type of financial instrument. As such, there is no significant trading history of these securities, and there can be no assurance that a liquid market in these instruments will develop. See “Illiquid Securities or Non-Publicly Traded Securities” below. Lack of a liquid market may impose the risk of higher transaction costs and the possibility that a Fund may be forced to liquidate positions when it would not be advantageous to do so. Event-linked bonds are typically rated, and a Fund will only invest in event-linked bonds that meet the credit quality requirements for the Fund.

Floaters and Inverse Floaters. Floaters and inverse floaters are securities with a floating or variable rate of interest, i.e., the rate of interest varies with changes in specified market rates or indices, such as the prime rate, or at specified intervals. The interest rate on a floater resets periodically. Because of the interest rate reset feature, floaters provide a Fund with a certain degree of protection against rises in interest rates, but a Fund will participate in any declines in interest rates as well. Certain floaters may carry a demand feature that permits the holder to tender them back to the issuer of the underlying instrument, or to a third party, at par value prior to maturity. When the demand feature of certain floaters represents an obligation of a foreign entity, the demand feature will be subject to certain risks discussed under “Foreign Securities.”

In addition, a Fund may invest in inverse floating rate obligations, which are securities that have coupon rates that vary inversely at a multiple of a designated floating rate. See “LIBOR Rate Risk” below for more information on the phasing out of the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and the transition to alternative reference rates. Any rise in the reference rate of an inverse floater (as a consequence of an increase in interest rates) causes a drop in the coupon rate while any drop in the reference rate of an inverse floater causes an increase in the coupon rate. Inverse floaters may exhibit substantially greater price volatility than fixed rate obligations having similar credit quality, redemption provisions and maturity, and inverse floater collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) exhibit greater price volatility than the majority of mortgage-related securities. In addition, some inverse floater CMOs exhibit extreme sensitivity to changes in prepayments. As a result, the yield to maturity of an inverse floater CMO is sensitive not only to changes in interest rates but also to changes in prepayment rates on the related underlying mortgage assets.

Foreign Currency. A Fund may purchase securities denominated in foreign currencies, including the purchase of foreign currency on a spot (or cash) basis. A change in the value of any such currency against the U.S. dollar will result in a change in the U.S. dollar value of a Fund’s assets and income. In addition, although a portion of a Fund’s investment income may be received or realized in such currencies, the Fund will be required to compute and distribute its income in U.S. dollars. Therefore, if the exchange rate for any such currency declines after a Fund’s income has been earned and computed in U.S. dollars but before conversion and payment, the Fund could be required to liquidate portfolio securities to make such distributions.

Although a Fund values its assets daily in terms of U.S. dollars, it does not intend to convert its holdings of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars on a daily basis. A Fund will convert foreign currencies to U.S. dollars and vice versa from time to time, and investors should be aware of the costs of currency conversion. Although foreign exchange dealers do not charge a fee for conversion, they do realize a profit based on the difference (“spread”) between the prices at which they are buying and selling various currencies. Thus, a dealer may offer to sell a foreign currency to a Fund at one rate, while offering a lesser rate of exchange should the Fund desire to resell that currency to the dealer.

Currency exchange rates may be affected unpredictably by intervention (or the failure to intervene) by U.S. or foreign governments, central banks or supranational entities and by currency controls or political developments in the United States or abroad. Foreign currencies in which a Fund’s assets are denominated may be devalued against the U.S. dollar, resulting in a loss to the Fund. Currency positions are not considered to be an investment in a foreign government for industry concentration purposes.

Certain Funds may also invest in foreign currency transactions using derivative instruments such as forwards, futures, options (including listed and OTC options), and options on futures, in order to seek to enhance returns or hedge against a change in the value of a currency. Hedging transactions involve costs and may result in losses. Certain of the Funds may also write call options on foreign currencies to offset some of the costs of hedging those currencies. A Fund’s ability to engage in hedging and related option transactions may be limited by federal income tax considerations (see the section of this SAI entitled “Taxation”).

Foreign currency options provide the holder the right to buy or to sell a currency at a fixed price on or before a future date. Listed options are third-party contracts (performance is guaranteed by an exchange or clearing corporation) which are issued by a clearing corporation, traded on an exchange and have standardized prices and expiration dates. OTC options are two-party contracts and have negotiated prices and expiration dates. A futures contract on a foreign currency is an agreement between two parties to buy and sell a specified amount of the currency for a set price on a future date. Options traded in the OTC market may not be as actively traded as those on an exchange, so it may be more difficult to value such options. In addition, it may be difficult to enter into closing transactions with respect to options traded over the counter. A Fund will engage in OTC options transactions on foreign currencies only when appropriate exchange traded transactions are unavailable and when, in the Sub-Adviser’s opinion, the pricing mechanism and liquidity are satisfactory and the participants are responsible parties likely to meet their contractual obligations. For more information on OTC options, see the section on “Over-the-Counter Options.”

Hedging against a change in the value of a currency does not eliminate fluctuations in the prices of portfolio securities or prevent losses if the prices of such securities decline. These hedging transactions also preclude the opportunity for gain if the value of the hedged currency should rise. In addition, the price of any foreign currency futures or foreign currency options contract and, therefore, the potential profit and loss thereon, may be affected by any variance in the foreign exchange rate between the time a Fund’s order is placed and the time it is liquidated, offset or exercised. Whether a foreign currency hedge benefits a Fund will depend on the ability of a Fund’s Sub-Adviser to predict future currency exchange rates.

The writing of an option on foreign currency will constitute only a partial hedge, up to the amount of the premium received, and a Fund could be required to purchase or sell foreign currencies at disadvantageous exchange rates, thereby incurring losses. The purchase of an option on foreign currency may constitute an effective hedge against fluctuations in exchange rates although, in the event of rate movements adverse to a Fund’s position, it may forfeit the entire amount of the premium plus related transaction costs.

Options on futures transactions may be effected to hedge the currency risk on non-U.S. dollar-denominated securities owned by a Fund, sold by a Fund but not yet delivered or anticipated to be purchased by a Fund. As an illustration, a Fund may use such techniques to hedge the stated value in U.S. dollars of an investment in a Japanese yen-denominated security. In these circumstances, a Fund may purchase a foreign currency put option enabling it to sell a specified amount of yen for dollars at a specified price by a future date. To the extent the hedge is successful, a loss in the value of the dollar relative to the yen will tend to be offset by an increase in the value of the put option.

Participation in foreign currency futures and foreign currency options transactions may involve the execution and clearing of trades on or subject to the rules of a foreign board of trade. Foreign government exchange controls and restrictions on repatriation of currency can negatively affect currency transactions. These forms of governmental actions can result in losses to a Fund if it is unable to deliver or receive currency or monies to settle obligations. Neither the National Futures Association nor any domestic exchange regulates activities of any foreign boards of trade, including the execution, delivery and clearing of transactions, or has the power to compel enforcement of the rules of a foreign board of trade or any applicable foreign law. This is true even if the exchange is formally linked to a domestic market so that a position taken on the market may be liquidated by a transaction on another market. Moreover, such laws or regulations will vary depending on the foreign country in which the foreign currency futures or foreign currency options transaction occurs. For these reasons, when a Fund trades foreign currency futures or foreign currency options contracts, it may not be afforded certain of the protective measures provided by the Commodity Exchange Act, the CFTC’s regulations and the rules of the National Futures Association and any domestic exchange, including the right to use reparations proceedings before the CFTC and arbitration proceedings provided by the National Futures Association or any domestic exchange. In particular, funds received from a Fund for foreign currency futures or foreign currency options transactions may not be provided the same protections as funds received in respect of transactions on U.S. futures exchanges.

The cost to a Fund of engaging in foreign currency transactions varies with such factors as the currencies involved, the length of the contract period and the prevailing market conditions. Since transactions in foreign currency exchanges usually are conducted on a principal basis, no fees or commissions are involved with such transactions.

A Fund will not hedge a currency substantially in excess of the market value of the securities denominated in that currency which it owns or the expected acquisition price of securities which it anticipates purchasing. OTC options on foreign currency also are considered to be swaps. However, options on foreign currency traded on a national securities exchange are not classified as swaps and are regulated by the SEC. For information concerning the risks associated with swaps please see the section on “Swaps.”

For information on how Funds may use foreign currency forwards, see the section on “Forward Foreign Currency Transactions.” For more information on forwards, futures, and options, see the sections on “Forward Commitments,” “Futures Transactions,” and “Options Transactions.”

Forward Commitments, When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Securities. Forward commitments including “TBA” (to be announced), when-issued and delayed delivery transactions arise when securities are purchased by a Fund with payment and delivery taking place in the future in order to secure what is considered to be an advantageous price or yield to the Fund at the time of entering into the transaction. However, the price of or yield on a comparable security available when delivery takes place may vary from the price of or yield on the security at the time that the forward commitment or when-issued or delayed delivery transaction was entered into. Agreements for such purchases might be entered into, for example, when a Fund anticipates a decline in interest rates and is able to obtain a more advantageous price or yield by committing currently to purchase securities to be issued later. When a Fund purchases securities on a forward-commitment, when-issued or delayed delivery basis, it does not pay for the securities until they are received. Forward commitments may be considered securities in themselves and involve a risk of loss if the value of the security to be purchased declines prior to the settlement date, which risk is in addition to the risk of decline in the value of a Fund’s other assets. Where such purchases are made through dealers, a Fund relies on the dealer to consummate the sale. The dealer’s failure to do so may result in the loss to a Fund of an advantageous yield or price. Pursuant to recommendations of the Treasury Market Practices Group, which is sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, a Fund or its counterparty generally is required to post collateral when entering into certain forward-settling transactions, including without limitation TBA transactions.

A Fund will only enter into forward commitments and make commitments to purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis with the intention of actually acquiring the securities. However, a Fund may sell these securities before the settlement date if it is deemed advisable as a matter of investment strategy. Forward commitments and when-issued and delayed delivery transactions are generally expected to settle within three months from the date the transactions are entered into, although a Fund may close out its position prior to the settlement date by entering into a matching sales transaction. In general, a Fund does not earn interest on the securities it has committed to purchase until they are paid for and delivered on the settlement date.

A Fund may purchase forward commitments and make commitments to purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis for any number of reasons, including to protect the value of portfolio investments, as a means to adjust the Fund’s overall exposure, and to enhance the Fund’s return. Purchases made in an effort to enhance a Fund’s return may involve more risk than purchases made for other reasons. For example, by committing to purchase securities in the future, a Fund subjects itself to a risk of loss on such commitments as well as on its portfolio securities. Also, a Fund may have to sell assets that have been set aside in order to meet redemptions. In addition, if a Fund determines it is advisable as a matter of investment strategy to sell the forward commitment or when-issued or delayed delivery securities before delivery, that Fund may incur a gain or loss because of market fluctuations since the time the commitment to purchase such securities was made. When the time comes to pay for the securities to be purchased under a forward commitment or on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis, a Fund will meet its obligations from the then available cash flow or the sale of securities, or, although it would not normally expect to do so, from the sale of the forward commitment or when-issued or delayed delivery securities themselves (which may have a value greater or less than a Fund’s payment obligation).

Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act permits a Fund to enter into when-issued or forward-settling securities (e.g., firm and standby commitments, including TBA commitments, and dollar rolls) and non-standard settlement cycle securities notwithstanding the limitation on the issuance of senior securities in Section 18 of the 1940 Act, provided that the transaction satisfies the Delayed-Settlement Securities Provision. If a when-issued, forward-settling or non-standard settlement cycle security does not satisfy the Delayed-Settlement Securities Provision, then it is treated as a Derivatives Transaction under Rule 18f-4. For more information about these practices, see the “Derivatives” section.

Forward Foreign Currency Transactions. A forward foreign currency exchange contract (“FX forward contract”) involves an obligation to purchase or sell a specific currency at a future date, which may be any fixed number of days from the date of the contract agreed upon by the parties, at a price set at the time of the contract.

A Fund may enter into FX forward contracts for a variety of purposes in connection with the management of the foreign securities portion of its portfolio. A Fund’s use of such contracts will include, but not be limited to, the following situations.

First, when a Fund enters into a contract for the purchase or sale of a security denominated in or exposed to a foreign currency, it may desire to “lock in” the U.S. dollar price of the security. By entering into an FX forward contract for the purchase or sale, for a fixed amount of dollars, of the amount of foreign currency involved in the underlying security transaction, a Fund will be able to protect itself against a possible loss resulting from an adverse change in the relationship between the U.S. dollar and the subject foreign currency during the period between the date the security is purchased or sold and the date on which payment is made or received.

Second, when a Fund’s Sub-Adviser believes that one currency may experience a substantial movement against another currency, including the U.S. dollar, it may enter into an FX forward contract to sell or buy the amount of the former foreign currency, approximating the value of some or all of the Fund’s portfolio securities denominated in or exposed to such foreign currency. Alternatively, where appropriate, a Fund may hedge all or part of its foreign currency exposure through the use of a basket of currencies, multinational currency units, or a proxy currency where such currency or currencies act as an effective proxy for other currencies. In such a case, a Fund may enter into an FX forward contract where the amount of the foreign currency to be sold exceeds the value of the securities denominated in or exposed to such currency. The use of this basket hedging technique may be more efficient and economical than entering into separate FX forward contracts for each currency held in a Fund.

The precise matching of the FX forward contract amounts and the value of the securities involved will not generally be possible since the future value of such securities in foreign currencies will change as a consequence of market movements in the value of those securities between the date the FX forward contract is entered into and the date it matures. The projection of short-term currency market movement is extremely difficult, and the successful execution of a short-term hedging strategy is highly uncertain. Under normal circumstances, consideration of the prospect for currency parities will be incorporated into the diversification strategies. However, the Sub-Advisers to the Funds believe that it is important to have the flexibility to enter into such FX forward contracts when they determine that the best interests of the Funds will be served.

A Fund may enter into FX forward contracts for any other purpose consistent with the Fund’s investment objective and program. For example, a Fund may use foreign currency options and FX forward contracts to increase exposure to a foreign currency or shift exposure to foreign currency fluctuations from one country to another.

At the maturity of an FX forward contract, a Fund may sell the portfolio security and make delivery of the foreign currency, or it may retain the security and either extend the maturity of the FX forward contract (by “rolling” that contract forward) or may initiate a new FX forward contract. If a Fund retains the portfolio security and engages in an offsetting transaction, the Fund will incur a gain or a loss (as described below) to the extent that there has been movement in FX forward contract prices. If a Fund engages in an offsetting transaction, it may subsequently enter into a new FX forward contract to sell the foreign currency.

Should forward prices decline during the period between a Fund’s entering into an FX forward contract for the sale of a foreign currency and the date it enters into an offsetting contract for the purchase of the foreign currency, the Fund will realize a gain to the extent the price of the currency it has agreed to sell exceeds the price of the currency it has agreed to purchase. Should forward prices increase, a Fund will suffer a loss to the extent the price of the currency it has agreed to purchase exceeds the price of the currency it has agreed to sell.

A Fund may engage in a deliverable FX forward contract. The consummation of deliverable FX forward contracts requires the actual exchange of the principal amounts of the two currencies in the contract (i.e., settlement on a physical basis). Because deliverable FX forward contracts are physically settled through an exchange of currencies, they are traded in the interbank market directly between currency traders (usually large commercial banks) and their customers. A deliverable FX forward contract generally has no deposit requirement, and no commissions are charged at any stage for trades; foreign exchange dealers realize a profit based on the difference (the spread) between the prices at which they are buying and the prices at which they are selling various currencies. When a Fund enters into a deliverable FX forward contract, it relies on the counterparty to make or take delivery of the underlying currency at the maturity of the contract. Failure by the counterparty to do so would result in the loss of any expected benefit of the transaction. A Fund may be required to obtain the currency that it must deliver under the deliverable FX forward contract through the sale of portfolio securities denominated in such currency or through conversion of other assets of a Fund into such currency. Although FX forward contracts settled on a physical basis are generally not classified as swaps, these transactions must be reported to a swap data repository under the Dodd-Frank Act. In addition, swap dealers must observe business conduct standards under the Dodd-Frank Act for such transactions and all FX forward contracts are subject to the prohibitions on fraud and manipulation under the Dodd-Frank Act.

A Fund may engage in non-deliverable FX forward contracts (“NDFs”). NDFs are cash-settled, short-term forward contracts on foreign currencies (each a “Reference Currency”) that are non-convertible and that may be thinly traded or illiquid. NDFs are classified as swaps and regulated as such under the Dodd-Frank Act. NDFs involve an obligation to pay an amount (the “Settlement Amount”) equal to the difference between the prevailing market exchange rate for the Reference Currency and the agreed upon exchange rate (the “NDF Rate”), with respect to an agreed notional amount. NDFs have a fixing date and a settlement (delivery) date. The fixing date is the date and time at which the difference between the prevailing market exchange rate and the agreed upon exchange rate is calculated. The settlement (delivery) date is the date by which the payment of the Settlement Amount is due to the party receiving payment.

Although NDFs are similar to deliverable FX forward contracts, NDFs do not require physical delivery of the Reference Currency on the settlement date. Rather, on the settlement date, the only transfer between the counterparties is the monetary settlement amount representing the difference between the NDF Rate and the prevailing market exchange rate. NDFs typically may have terms from one month up to two years and are settled in U.S. dollars.

NDFs are subject to many of the risks associated with derivatives in general and forward currency transactions, including risks associated with fluctuations in foreign currency and the risk that the counterparty will fail to fulfill its obligations. See the sections on “Derivatives” and “Foreign Currency.” Although NDFs historically have been traded over-the-counter, currently some NDFs are centrally cleared and are exchange-traded on swap execution facilities and designated contract markets. With respect to NDFs that are centrally-cleared, while central clearing is intended to decrease counterparty risk, an investor could lose margin payments it has deposited with the clearing organization as well as the net amount of gains not yet paid by the clearing organization if the clearing organization breaches its obligations under the NDF, becomes insolvent or goes into bankruptcy. In the event of bankruptcy of the clearing organization, the investor may be entitled to the net amount of gains the investor is entitled to receive plus the return of margin owed to it only in proportion to the amount received by the clearing organization’s other customers, potentially resulting in losses to the investor. Even if some NDFs remain traded OTC, they will be subject to margin requirements for uncleared swaps and counterparty risk common to other swaps. For more information about the risks associated with utilizing swaps, please see the section on “Swaps” below.

Foreign Securities. Certain of the Funds may invest in foreign securities or engage in certain types of transactions related to foreign securities, such as Depositary Receipts, Eurodollar and Yankee dollar obligations, and foreign currency transactions, including forward foreign currency transactions, foreign currency options and foreign currency futures contracts and options on futures. Further information about these instruments and the risks involved in their use is contained under the description of each of these instruments in this SAI.

Foreign investments involve certain risks that are not present in domestic securities. For example, foreign securities may be subject to currency risks or to foreign income or other withholding taxes that reduce their attractiveness. There may be less information publicly available about a foreign issuer than about a U.S. issuer, and a foreign issuer is not generally subject to uniform accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards and practices comparable to those in the United States. In addition, the governments of certain countries may prohibit or impose substantial restrictions on foreign investing in their capital markets or in certain industries. Other risks of investing in such securities include political or economic instability in the country involved, the difficulty of predicting international trade patterns and the possibility of imposition of exchange controls or limitations on the removal of funds or assets. The prices of such securities may be more volatile than those of domestic securities. With respect to certain foreign countries, there is a possibility of expropriation of assets or nationalization, imposition of withholding taxes on dividend or interest payments, difficulty in obtaining and enforcing judgments against foreign entities or diplomatic developments which could affect investment in these countries. Legal remedies available to investors in certain foreign countries may be less extensive than those available to investors in the United States or other foreign countries.

Losses and other expenses may be incurred in converting between various currencies in connection with purchases and sales of foreign securities. Generally, when the U.S. dollar rises in value against a foreign currency, a security denominated in that currency loses value because the currency is worth fewer U.S. dollars. Conversely, when the U.S. dollar decreases in value against a foreign currency, a security denominated in that currency gains value because the currency is worth more U.S. dollars. This risk, generally known as “currency risk,” means that a stronger U.S. dollar will reduce returns for U.S. investors while a weak U.S. dollar will increase those returns.

Foreign stock markets are generally not as developed or efficient as, and may be more volatile than, those in the United States. While growing in volume, they usually have substantially less volume than U.S. markets and a Fund’s investment securities may

be less liquid and subject to more rapid and erratic price movements than securities of comparable U.S. companies. Equity securities may trade at price/earnings multiples higher than comparable U.S. securities and such levels may not be sustainable. There is generally less government supervision and regulation of foreign stock exchanges, brokers, banks and listed companies abroad than in the United States. Moreover, settlement practices for transactions in foreign markets may differ from those in U.S. markets. Such differences may include delays beyond periods customary in the United States and practices, such as delivery of securities prior to receipt of payment, which increase the likelihood of a “failed settlement,” which can result in losses to a Fund.

The economies of certain foreign markets often do not compare favorably with that of the U.S. with respect to such issues as growth of gross national product, reinvestment of capital, resources, and balance of payments position. Certain such economies may rely heavily on particular industries or foreign capital and are more vulnerable to diplomatic developments, the imposition of economic sanctions against a particular country or countries, changes in international trading patterns, trade barriers, and other protectionist or retaliatory measures.

The value of foreign investments and the investment income derived from them may also be affected unfavorably by changes in currency exchange control regulations. Although the Funds will invest only in securities denominated in foreign currencies that are fully exchangeable into U.S. dollars without legal restriction at the time of investment, there can be no assurance that currency controls will not be imposed subsequently. In addition, the value of foreign fixed income investments may fluctuate in response to changes in U.S. and foreign interest rates.

A Fund that invests in foreign securities is subject to the risk that its share price may be exposed to arbitrage attempts by investors seeking to capitalize on differences in the values of foreign securities trading on foreign exchanges that may close before the time the Fund’s net asset value is determined. If such arbitrage attempts are successful, a Fund’s net asset value might be diluted. A Fund’s use of fair value pricing in certain circumstances (by adjusting the closing market prices of foreign securities to reflect what the Board believes to be their fair value) may help deter such arbitrage activities. The effect of such fair value pricing is that foreign securities may not be priced on the basis of quotations from the primary foreign securities market in which they are traded, but rather may be priced by another method that the Board believes reflects fair value. As such, fair value pricing is based on subjective judgment and it is possible that fair value may differ materially from the value realized on a sale of a foreign security. It is also possible that use of fair value pricing will limit an investment adviser’s ability to implement a Fund’s investment strategy (e.g., reducing the volatility of a Fund’s share price) or achieve its investment objective.

Foreign brokerage commissions, custodial expenses and other fees are also generally higher than for securities traded in the United States. Consequently, the overall expense ratios of international or global funds are usually somewhat higher than those of typical domestic stock funds.

Moreover, investments in foreign government debt securities, particularly those of emerging market country governments, involve special risks. Certain emerging market countries have historically experienced, and may continue to experience, high rates of inflation, high interest rates, exchange rate fluctuations, large amounts of external debt, balance of payments and trade difficulties and extreme poverty and unemployment. See “Emerging Market Securities” below for additional risks.

Fluctuations in exchange rates may also affect the earning power and asset value of the foreign entity issuing a security, even one denominated in U.S. dollars. Dividend and interest payments will be repatriated based on the exchange rate at the time of disbursement, and restrictions on capital flows may be imposed.

In less liquid and less well developed stock markets, such as those in some Eastern European, Southeast Asian, and Latin American countries, volatility may be heightened by actions of a few major investors. For example, substantial increases or decreases in cash flows of mutual funds investing in these markets could significantly affect stock prices and, therefore, share prices. Additionally, investments in emerging market regions or the following geographic regions are subject to more specific risks, as discussed below.

The transmission of COVID-19 and efforts to contain its spread have resulted in significant disruptions to business operations, supply chains and customer activity, widespread business closures and layoffs, international, national and local border closings, extended quarantines and stay-at-home orders, event cancellations, service cancellations, reductions and other changes, significant challenges in healthcare service preparation and delivery, as well as general concern and uncertainty that has negatively affected the global economy. These circumstances are evolving, and further developments could result in additional disruptions and uncertainty. These impacts also have caused significant volatility and declines in global financial markets, which have caused losses for investors. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic may last for an extended period of time and could result in a substantial

economic downturn or recession. Health crises caused by pandemics, such as the COVID-19 outbreak, may exacerbate other pre-existing political, social, economic, and financial risks. The impact of the coronavirus outbreak, and other epidemics and pandemics that may arise in the future, could result in a general decline in the global economy, and negatively affect the performance of individual countries, industries, or sectors in significant and unforeseen ways. Although promising vaccines have been released and many global economies have begun to re-open, some countries, including countries with limited access to vaccines, have struggled to control the spread of the virus and re-open their economies. The prevalence of new COVID-19 variants, a failure to achieve herd immunity, or other unforeseen circumstances may result in the continued spread of the virus throughout unvaccinated populations or a resurgence in infections among vaccinated individuals.

Emerging Market Securities. Certain of the Funds may invest in emerging market securities. Investments in emerging market country securities involve special risks. The economies, markets and political structures of a number of the emerging market countries in which the Funds can invest do not compare favorably with the United States and other mature economies in terms of wealth and stability. Therefore, investments in these countries may be riskier. Some economies are less well developed and less diverse (for example, Latin America, Eastern Europe and certain Asian countries), and more vulnerable to the ebb and flow of international trade, trade barriers and other protectionist or retaliatory measures. Similarly, many of these countries are grappling with severe inflation or recession, high levels of national debt, fluctuations in currency exchange rates and government instability. Investments in countries that have begun moving away from central planning and state-owned industries toward free markets, such as the Eastern European, Russian or Chinese economies, should be regarded as speculative.

Certain emerging market countries may experience (i) less developed securities markets with low or non-existent trading volume, resulting in a lack of liquidity and increased volatility in prices for emerging market securities; (ii) less organized settlement systems for trading securities, resulting in delayed settlements of trades and reduced liquidity for emerging market securities; (iii) uncertain national policies, increasing the potential for expropriation of assets, confiscatory taxation, high rates of inflation or unfavorable diplomatic developments; (iv) possible fluctuations in exchange rates, differing legal systems and the existence or possible imposition of exchange controls, custodial restrictions or other foreign or U.S. governmental laws or restrictions applicable to such investments; (v) national policies that may limit a Fund’s investment opportunities such as restrictions on investment in issuers or industries deemed sensitive to national interests; and (vi) the lack or relatively early development of legal structures governing private and foreign investments and private property. In addition to withholding taxes on investment income, some countries with emerging markets may impose differential capital gains taxes on foreign investors.

Political and economic structures in emerging market countries may be undergoing significant evolution and rapid development, and these countries may lack the social, political and economic stability characteristics of more developed countries. In such a dynamic environment, there can be no assurance that any or all of these capital markets will continue to present viable investment opportunities for a Fund. In the past, governments of such nations have expropriated substantial amounts of private property, and most claims of the property owners have never been fully settled. In such an event, it is possible that a Fund could lose the entire value of its investments in the affected market. As a result, the risks described above, including the risks of nationalization or expropriation of assets, may be heightened.

The issuer or governmental authority that controls the repayment of an emerging market country’s debt may not be able or willing to repay the principal and/or interest when due in accordance with the terms of such debt. A debtor’s willingness or ability to repay principal and interest due in a timely manner may be affected by, among other factors, its cash flow situation, and, in the case of a government debtor, the extent of its foreign reserves, the availability of sufficient foreign exchange on the date a payment is due, the relative size of the debt service burden to the economy as a whole and the political constraints to which a government debtor may be subject. Government debtors may default on their debt and may also be dependent on expected disbursements from foreign governments, multilateral agencies and others abroad to reduce principal and interest arrearages on their debt. Holders of government debt may be requested to participate in the rescheduling of such debt and to extend further loans to government debtors.

If such an event occurs, a Fund may have limited legal recourse against the issuer and/or guarantor. Remedies must, in some cases, be pursued in the courts of the defaulting party itself, and the ability of the holder of foreign government fixed income securities to obtain recourse may be subject to the political climate in the relevant country. In addition, no assurance can be given that the holders of commercial bank debt will not contest payments to the holders of other foreign government debt obligations in the event of default under their commercial bank loan agreements.

The economies of individual emerging market countries may differ favorably or unfavorably from the U.S. economy in such respects as growth of gross domestic product, rate of inflation, currency depreciation, capital reinvestment, resource self-sufficiency and balance of payments position. Further, the economies of developing countries generally are heavily dependent upon international trade and, accordingly, have been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by trade barriers, exchange controls, managed adjustments in relative currency values and other protectionist measures imposed or negotiated by the countries with which they trade. These economies also have been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by economic conditions in the countries with which they trade. Many of these countries are also sensitive to world commodity prices. Emerging market economies may develop unevenly or may never fully develop.

The assessment of investment opportunities in certain emerging market securities markets may be more difficult in light of limitations on available information and different accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards. Investing in emerging market countries may entail purchasing securities issued by or on behalf of entities that are insolvent, bankrupt, in default or otherwise engaged in an attempt to reorganize or reschedule their obligations, and in entities that have little or no proven credit rating or credit history. In any such case, the issuer’s poor or deteriorating financial condition may increase the likelihood that the investing Fund will experience losses or diminution in available gains due to bankruptcy, insolvency or fraud.

Eastern European and Russian Securities. Investing in the securities of Eastern European and Russian issuers is highly speculative and involves risks not usually associated with investing in the more developed markets of Western Europe. Political and economic reforms are too recent to establish a definite trend away from centrally planned economies and state-owned industries. Investments in Eastern European countries may involve risks of nationalization, expropriation, and confiscatory taxation. Many Eastern European countries continue to move towards market economies at different paces with appropriately different characteristics. Most Eastern European markets suffer from thin trading activity, dubious investor protections, and often a dearth of reliable corporate information. Information and transaction costs, differential taxes, and sometimes political or transfer risk give a comparative advantage to the domestic investor rather than the foreign investor. In addition, these markets are particularly sensitive to social, political, economic, and currency events in Western Europe and Russia and may suffer heavy losses as a result of their trading and investment links to these economies and currencies.

Additionally, Russia has attempted to assert its influence in the region through economic and even military measures. Russia's military invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the resulting responses by the United States and other countries, and the potential for wider conflict have had, and could continue to have, severe adverse effects on regional and global economies and could further increase volatility and uncertainty in the financial markets. These events have had and may continue to have significant adverse effects on regional and global economic markets for securities and commodities, including adverse effects on global markets’ performance and liquidity, thereby negatively affecting the value of a Fund’s investments beyond any direct exposure to Russian issuers. Disruptions caused by Russian military action or other actions (including cyberattacks and espionage) or resulting actual and threatened responses to such activity, including purchasing and financing restrictions, boycotts or changes in consumer or purchaser preferences, sanctions, tariffs or cyberattacks on the Russian government, Russian companies or Russian individuals, including politicians, have impacted and may continue to impact Russia’s economy and Russian issuers of securities in which the Funds invest. Actual and threatened responses to such military action may also impact the markets for certain Russian commodities, such as oil and natural gas, as well as other sectors of the Russian economy, and may likely have collateral impacts on such sectors globally.

Governments in the United States and many other countries have imposed economic sanctions, which consist of prohibiting certain securities trades, certain private transactions in the energy sector, asset freezes, bans on Russian airlines and ships from using other countries’ airspace and ports, and prohibition of all business against certain Russian individuals, including politicians, and Russian corporate and banking entities. Additionally, the European Union and certain other countries have committed to remove selected Russian banks from the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications (“SWIFT”), the electronic banking network that connects banks globally, and imposed restrictive measures to prevent the Russian Central Bank from undermining the impact of the sanctions. A number of large corporations and U.S. states have announced plans to divest interests or otherwise curtail business dealings with certain Russian businesses. The United States has banned oil and other energy imports from Russia, and the United Kingdom made a commitment to phase out oil imports from Russia by the end of 2022. These sanctions, and the imposition or threat of further sanctions, may result in the further decline of the value and liquidity of Russian securities, a further weakening of the ruble, downgrades in Russia’s credit rating, or other adverse consequences to the Russian economy. These sanctions could also result in the immediate freeze of Russian securities, commodities, resources and/or funds invested in prohibited assets, impairing the ability of the Funds to buy, sell, receive or deliver those securities and/or assets. Sanctions could

also result in Russia taking counter measures or retaliatory actions which may further impair the value and liquidity of Russian securities, including cyber actions. As a result, a Fund’s performance may be adversely affected.

In some of the countries of Eastern Europe, there is no stock exchange or formal market for securities. Some Eastern European countries may have government exchange controls, currencies with no recognizable market value relative to the established currencies of Western market economies, little or no experience in trading in securities, no accounting or financial reporting standards, a lack of banking and securities infrastructure to handle such trading and a legal tradition that does not recognize rights in private property. Credit and debt issues and other economic difficulties affecting Western Europe and its financial institutions can negatively affect Eastern European countries.

Eastern European economies may also be particularly susceptible to the international credit market due to their reliance on bank related inflows of foreign capital, and especially their continued dependence on the Western European zone for credit and trade, which may have a negative effect on a Fund’s investments in the region. Over the past century, Russia has experienced political, social and economic turbulence and has endured decades of communist rule under which tens of millions of its citizens were collectivized into state agricultural and industrial enterprises. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia’s government has been faced with the task of stabilizing its domestic economy, while transforming it into a modern and efficient structure able to compete in international markets and respond to the needs of its citizens. To date, many of the country’s economic reform initiatives have been unsuccessful. In this environment, there is a risk that the government will abandon the current program of economic reform and replace it with different political and economic policies that would be detrimental to the interests of foreign investors. This could entail a return to a centrally planned economy and nationalization of private enterprises similar to what existed under the Soviet Union.

Compared to most national stock markets, the Russian securities market suffers from a variety of problems not encountered in more developed markets. There is little long-term historical data on the Russian securities market because it is relatively new and a substantial proportion of securities transactions in Russia are privately negotiated outside of stock exchanges. The inexperience of the Russian securities market and the limited volume of trading in securities in the market may make obtaining accurate prices on portfolio securities from independent sources more difficult than in more developed markets. Additionally, there is little solid corporate information available to investors. As a result, it may be difficult to assess the value or prospects of an investment in Russian companies. Poor accounting standards, inept management, pervasive corruption, insider trading and crime, and inadequate regulatory protection for the rights of investors all pose additional risk, particularly to foreign investors.

Because of the relatively recent formation of the Russian securities market as well as the underdeveloped state of the banking and telecommunications systems, settlement, clearing and registration of securities transactions are subject to significant risks not normally associated with securities transactions in the United States and other more developed markets. Prior to 2013, there was no central registration system for equity share registration in Russia and registration was carried out by either the issuers themselves or by registrars located throughout Russia. Such registrars were not necessarily subject to effective state supervision nor were they licensed with any governmental entity, thereby increasing the risk that a Fund could lose ownership of its securities through fraud, negligence, or even mere oversight. With the implementation of the National Settlement Depository (“NSD”) in Russia as a recognized central securities depository, title to Russian equities is now based on the records of the NSD and not the registrars. Although the implementation of the NSD is generally expected to decrease the risk of loss in connection with recording and transferring title to securities, issues resulting in loss still might occur. Russian securities laws may not recognize foreign nominee accounts held with a custodian bank, and therefore the custodian may be considered the ultimate owner of securities they hold for their clients. In addition, issuers and registrars are still prominent in the validation and approval of documentation requirements for corporate action processing in Russia. Because the documentation requirements and approval criteria vary between registrars and/or issuers, there remain unclear and inconsistent market standards in the Russian market with respect to the completion and submission of corporate action elections. Furthermore, significant delays or problems may occur in registering the transfer of securities, which could cause a Fund to incur losses due to a counterparty’s failure to pay for securities a Fund has delivered or a Fund’s inability to complete its contractual obligations because of theft or other reasons. To the extent that a Fund suffers a loss relating to title or corporate actions relating to its portfolio securities, it may be difficult for the Fund to enforce its rights or otherwise remedy the loss. In addition, there is the risk that the Russian tax system will not be reformed to prevent inconsistent, retroactive, and/or exorbitant taxation, or, in the alternative, the risk that a reformed tax system may result in the inconsistent and unpredictable enforcement of the new tax laws.

The Russian economy is heavily dependent upon the export of a range of commodities including most industrial metals, forestry products, oil, and gas. Accordingly, it is strongly affected by international commodity prices and is particularly vulnerable to any weakening in global demand for these products. Decreases in the prices of commodities, which have in the past pushed the whole economy into recession, have demonstrated the sensitivity of the Russian economy to such price volatility. Russia continues to face significant economic challenges, including weak levels of investment and a sluggish recovery in external demand, that had been exacerbated following the 2008 global financial crisis. In addition to the significant adverse effects stemming from the war in Ukraine discussed above, over the long term, Russia faces challenges including a shrinking workforce, a high level of corruption, and difficulty in accessing capital for smaller, non-energy companies and poor infrastructure in need of large investments.

Foreign investors also face a high degree of currency risk when investing in Russian securities and a lack of available currency hedging instruments. The Russian ruble has been subject to significant devaluation as a result of actions taken in response to the invasion of Ukraine and there is a risk of significant further devaluation. In addition, there is the risk that the Russian government may impose capital controls on foreign portfolio investments in the event of extreme financial or political crisis. Such capital controls may prevent the sale of a portfolio of foreign assets and the repatriation of investment income and capital. These risks may cause flight from the ruble into U.S. dollars and other currencies.

European Securities. The EU’s Economic and Monetary Union, which is comprised of EU members that have adopted the euro currency, requires eurozone countries to comply with restrictions on interest rates, deficits, debt levels, and inflation rates, fiscal and monetary controls, and other factors, each of which may significantly impact every European country and their economic partners. Decreasing imports or exports, changes in governmental or other regulations on trade, changes in the exchange rate of the euro (the common currency of the EU), the threat of default or actual default by one or more EU member countries on its sovereign debt, and/or an economic recession in one or more EU member countries may have a significant adverse effect on the economies of other EU member countries and their trading partners.

The European financial markets have experienced volatility and adverse trends due to concerns relating to economic downturns, rising government debt levels and national unemployment and the possible default of government debt in several European countries. In order to prevent further economic deterioration, certain countries, without prior warning, can institute “capital controls.” Countries may use these controls to restrict volatile movements of capital entering and exiting their country. Such controls may negatively affect a Fund’s investments. A default or debt restructuring by any European country would adversely impact holders of that country’s debt and sellers of credit default swaps linked to that country’s creditworthiness, which may be located in other countries and can affect exposures to other EU countries and their financial companies as well. In addition, the credit ratings of certain European countries were downgraded in the past. These events have adversely affected the value and exchange rate of the euro and may continue to significantly affect the economies of every country in Europe, including countries that do not use the euro and non-EU member states. Responses to the financial problems by European governments, central banks and others, including austerity measures and reforms, may not produce the desired results, may result in social unrest and may limit future growth and economic recovery or have other unintended consequences. Further defaults or restructurings by governments and other entities of their debt could have additional adverse effects on economies, financial markets and asset valuations around the world. In addition, one or more countries may abandon the euro and/or withdraw from the EU. The impact of these actions, especially if they occur in a disorderly fashion, is not clear but could be significant and far-reaching and could adversely impact the value of a Fund’s investments in the region.

The full impact of the United Kingdom's (“UK”) withdrawal from the EU, commonly referred to as “Brexit,” and the nature of the future relationship between the UK and the EU remain unclear. The effects of Brexit on the UK and EU economies could be significant, resulting in negative impacts, such as business and trade disruptions, increased volatility and illiquidity, and potentially lower economic growth of markets in the UK and the EU. Brexit has also led to legal uncertainty and could lead to politically divergent national laws and regulations as a new relationship between the U.K. and EU is defined and the U.K. determines which EU laws to replace or replicate. Until the full economic effects of Brexit become clearer, there remains a risk that Brexit may negatively impact a Fund’s investments and cause it to lose money. In the short term, financial markets may experience heightened volatility, particularly those in the U.K. and Europe, but possibly worldwide. In the longer term, there is likely to be a period of significant political, regulatory and commercial uncertainty as the U.K. continues to negotiate the terms of its future trading relationships.

Secessionist movements, such as the Catalan movement in Spain and the independence movement in Scotland, as well as government or other responses to such movements, may also create instability and uncertainty in the region. In addition, the national politics of countries in the EU have been unpredictable and subject to influence by disruptive political groups and ideologies.

The governments of EU countries may be subject to change and such countries may experience social and political unrest. Unanticipated or sudden political or social developments may result in sudden and significant investment losses. The occurrence of terrorist incidents throughout Europe also could impact financial markets. The impact of these events is not clear but could be significant and far-reaching and could adversely affect the value and liquidity of a Fund’s investments.

Russia's military invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the resulting responses by the United States and other countries, and the potential for wider conflict have had, and could continue to have, severe adverse effects on regional and global economies and could further increase volatility and uncertainty in the financial markets. Disruptions caused by Russian military action or other actions (including cyberattacks and espionage) or resulting actual and threatened responses to such activity, including purchasing and financing restrictions, boycotts or changes in consumer or purchaser preferences, sanctions, tariffs or cyberattacks on Russian entities or individuals, including politicians, have had and could continue to have a severe adverse effect on both the region and the global economy, including significant negative impacts on the economy and the markets for certain securities and commodities, such as oil and natural gas, as well as other sectors. For example, exports in Eastern Europe have been disrupted for certain key commodities, pushing commodity prices to record highs, and energy prices in Europe have increased significantly. How long such military action and related events will last cannot be predicted. These events may result in further significant adverse effects on regional and global economic markets for securities and commodities, including adverse effects on global markets’ performance and liquidity, thereby negatively affecting the value of a Fund’s investments beyond any direct exposure to Russian issuers.

Latin America

Inflation — Most Latin American countries have experienced, at one time or another, severe and persistent levels of inflation, including, in some cases, hyperinflation. This has, in turn, led to high interest rates, extreme measures by governments to keep inflation in check, and a generally debilitating effect on economic growth. Recent persistent inflation and tightening global financial conditions could lead to decelerating economic growth in the region.

Political Instability — Certain Latin American countries have historically suffered from social, political, and economic instability, and volatility, currency devaluations, government defaults and high unemployment rates. For investors, this has meant additional risk caused by periods of regional conflict, political corruption, totalitarianism, protectionist measures, nationalization, hyperinflation, debt crises, sudden and large currency devaluation, and intervention by the military in civilian and economic spheres. However, in some Latin American countries, a move to sustainable democracy and a more mature and accountable political environment is under way. Domestic economies have been deregulated, privatization of state-owned companies is almost completed and foreign trade restrictions have been relaxed.

Nonetheless, there can be no guarantee that such trends will continue or that the desired outcomes of these developments will be successful. In addition, to the extent that events such as those listed above continue in the future, they could reverse favorable trends toward market and economic reform, privatization, and removal of trade barriers, and result in significant disruption in securities markets in the region. Investors in the region continue to face a number of potential risks. Governments of many Latin American countries have exercised and continue to exercise substantial influence over many aspects of the private sector. Governmental actions in the future could have a significant effect on economic conditions in Latin American countries, which could affect the companies in which a Fund invests and, therefore, the value of Fund shares.

Additionally, an investment in Latin America is subject to certain risks stemming from political and economic corruption, which may affect negatively the country or the reputation of companies domiciled in a certain country. For certain countries in Latin America, political risks have created significant uncertainty in financial markets and may further limit the economic recovery in the region. For example, in Mexico, the long-term implications of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, the 2020 successor to NAFTA, are yet to be determined. This uncertainty may have an adverse impact on Mexico’s economic outlook and the value of a Fund’s investments in Mexico. Additionally, recent political and social unrest in Venezuela has resulted in a massive disruption in the Venezuelan economy, including a deep recession and hyperinflation.

Dependence on Exports and Economic Risk — Certain Latin American countries depend heavily on exports to the U.S., investments from a small number of countries, and trading relationships with key trading partners including the U.S., Europe, Asia and other Latin American countries. Accordingly, these countries may be sensitive to fluctuations in demand, protectionist trade policies, exchange rates and changes in market conditions associated with those countries. The economic growth of most Latin American countries is highly dependent on commodity exports and the economies of certain Latin

American countries, particularly Mexico and Venezuela, are highly dependent on oil exports. As a result, these economies are particularly susceptible to fluctuations in the price of oil and other commodities and currency fluctuations. The prices of oil and other commodities experienced volatility driven, in part, by a continued global slowdown of growth in China and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. If growth in China remains slow, or if global economic conditions worsen, prices for Latin American commodities may experience increased volatility and demand may continue to decrease. Although certain of these countries have recently shown signs of recovery, such recovery, if sustained, may be gradual. In addition, prolonged economic difficulties may have negative effects on the transition to a more stable democracy in some Latin American countries.

Sovereign Debt — Latin American economies generally are heavily dependent upon foreign credit and loans, and may be more vulnerable to diplomatic developments, the imposition of economic sanctions against a particular country or countries, changes in international trading patterns, trade barriers, and other protectionist or retaliatory measures. In addition to risk of default, debt repayment may be restructured or rescheduled, which may impair economic activity. Moreover, the debt may be susceptible to high interest rates and may reach levels that would adversely affect Latin American economies. In addition, certain Latin American economies have been influenced by changing supply and demand for a particular currency, monetary policies of governments (including exchange control programs, restrictions on local exchanges or markets and limitations on foreign investment in a country or on investment by residents of a country in other countries), and currency devaluations and revaluations. A relatively small number of Latin American companies represents a large portion of Latin America’s total market and thus may be more sensitive to adverse political or economic circumstances and market movements. A number of Latin American countries are among the largest debtors of developing countries and have a history of reliance on foreign debt and default. The majority of the region’s economies have become dependent upon foreign credit and loans from external sources to fund government economic plans. Historically, these plans have frequently resulted in little benefit accruing to the economy. Most countries have been forced to restructure their loans or risk default on their debt obligations. In addition, interest on the debt is subject to market conditions and may reach levels that would impair economic activity and create a difficult and costly environment for borrowers. Accordingly, these governments may be forced to reschedule or freeze their debt repayment, which could negatively affect local markets. While the region has recently had mixed levels of economic growth, recovery from past economic downturns in Latin America has historically been slow, and such growth, if sustained, may be gradual. The ongoing effects of the European debt crisis, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, and persistent low growth in the global economy may reduce demand for exports from Latin America and limit the availability of foreign credit for some countries in the region. Planned increases in interest rates may also negatively affect the ongoing recovery and increase the region’s debt-servicing costs. As a result, a Fund’s investments in Latin American securities could be harmed if economic recovery in the region is limited.

Pacific Basin Region. Many Asian countries may be subject to a greater degree of social, political and economic instability than is the case in the U.S. and Western European countries. Such instability may result from, among other things, (i) authoritarian governments or military involvement in political and economic decision-making, including changes in government through extra-constitutional means; (ii) popular unrest associated with demands for improved political, economic and social conditions; (iii) internal insurgencies; (iv) hostile relations with neighboring countries; and (v) ethnic, religious and racial disaffection. In addition, the Asia Pacific geographic region has historically been prone to natural disasters. The occurrence of a natural disaster in the region, including the subsequent recovery, could negatively impact the economy of any country in the region. The existence of overburdened infrastructure and obsolete financial systems also presents risks in certain Asian countries, as do environmental problems.

The economies of most of the Asian countries are heavily dependent on international trade and are accordingly affected by protective trade barriers and the economic conditions of their trading partners, principally, the U.S., Japan, China and the EU. The enactment by the U.S. or other principal trading partners of protectionist trade legislation, reduction of foreign investment in the local economies and general declines in the international securities markets could have a significant adverse effect upon the securities markets of the Asian countries. The economies of certain Asian countries may depend to a significant degree upon only a few industries and/or exports of primary commodities and, therefore, are vulnerable to changes in commodity prices that, in turn, may be affected by a variety of factors. In addition, certain developing Asian countries, such as the Philippines and India, are especially large debtors to commercial banks and foreign governments. Many of the Pacific Basin economies may be intertwined, so an economic downturn in one country may result in, or be accompanied by, an economic downturn in other countries in the region. Furthermore, many of the Pacific Basin economies are characterized by high inflation, underdeveloped financial services sectors, heavy reliance on international trade, frequent currency fluctuations, devaluations, or restrictions, political and social instability, and less efficient markets.

The securities markets in Asia are substantially smaller, less liquid and more volatile than the major securities markets in the U.S. A high proportion of the shares of many issuers may be held by a limited number of persons and financial institutions, which may limit the number of shares available for investment by a Fund. In some countries, there is no established secondary market for securities. Therefore, liquidity of securities may be generally low and transaction costs generally high. Similarly, volume and liquidity in the bond markets in Asia are less than in the U.S. and, at times, price volatility can be greater than in the U.S. A limited number of issuers in Asian securities markets may represent a disproportionately large percentage of market capitalization and trading value. The limited liquidity of securities markets in Asia may also affect a Fund’s ability to acquire or dispose of securities at the price and time it wishes to do so. In addition, the Asian securities markets are susceptible to being influenced by large investors trading significant blocks of securities.

Many stock markets are undergoing a period of growth and change which may result in trading volatility and difficulties in the settlement and recording of transactions, and in interpreting and applying the relevant law and regulations. With respect to investments in the currencies of Asian countries, changes in the value of those currencies against the U.S. dollar will result in corresponding changes in the U.S. dollar value of a Fund’s assets denominated in those currencies. Certain developing economies in the Asia Pacific region are characterized by frequent currency fluctuations, devaluations, and restrictions; unstable employment rates; rapid fluctuation in, among other things, inflation and reliance on exports; and less efficient markets. Currency fluctuations or devaluations in any one country can have a significant effect on the entire Asia Pacific region. Holding securities in currencies that are devalued (or in companies whose revenues are substantially in currencies that are devalued) will likely decrease the value of a Fund’s investments.

Some developing Asian countries prohibit or impose substantial restrictions on investments in their capital markets, particularly their equity markets, by foreign entities such as a Fund. For example, certain countries may require governmental approval prior to investments by foreign persons or limit the amount of investment by foreign persons in a particular company or limit the investment by foreign persons to only a specific class of securities of a company which may have less advantageous terms (including price and shareholder rights) than securities of the company available for purchase by nationals of the relevant country. There can be no assurance that a Fund will be able to obtain required governmental approvals in a timely manner. In addition, changes to restrictions on foreign ownership of securities subsequent to a Fund’s purchase of such securities may have an adverse effect on the value of such shares. Certain countries may restrict investment opportunities in issuers or industries deemed important to national interests.

Chinese Companies. Investing in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan involves a high degree of risk and special considerations not typically associated with investing in other more established economies or securities markets. Such risks may include: (a) the risk of nationalization or expropriation of assets or confiscatory taxation; (b) greater social, economic and political uncertainty (including the risk of war); (c) dependency on exports and the corresponding importance of international trade; (d) the increasing competition from Asia’s other low-cost emerging economies; (e) greater price volatility, substantially less liquidity and significantly smaller market capitalization of securities markets, particularly in China; (f) currency exchange rate fluctuations and the lack of available currency hedging instruments; (g) higher rates of inflation; (h) controls on foreign investment and limitations on repatriation of invested capital and on a Fund’s ability to exchange local currencies for U.S. dollars; (i) greater governmental involvement in and control over the economy, and greater intervention in the Chinese financial markets, such as the imposition of trading restrictions; (j) the risk that the Chinese government may decide not to continue to support the economic reform programs and could return to the completely centrally planned economy that was in place prior to 1978; (k) the fact that Chinese companies, particularly those located in China, may be smaller, less seasoned and newly-organized; (l) the difference in, or lack of, auditing and financial reporting standards which may result in unavailability of material information about issuers, particularly in China; (m) the fact that statistical information regarding the Chinese economy may be inaccurate or not comparable to statistical information regarding the U.S. or other economies; (n) the less extensive, and still developing, regulation of the securities markets, business entities and commercial transactions; (o) the fact that the settlement period of securities transactions in foreign markets may be longer; (p) uncertainty surrounding the willingness and ability of the Chinese government to support the Chinese and Hong Kong economies and markets; (q) the risk that it may be more difficult or impossible, to obtain and/or enforce a judgment than in other countries; (r) the rapidity and erratic nature of growth, particularly in China, resulting in inefficiencies and dislocations; and (s) the risk that, because of the degree of interconnectivity between the economies and financial markets of China, Hong Kong and Taiwan, any sizable reduction in the demand for goods from China, or an economic downturn in China could negatively affect the economies and financial markets of Hong Kong and Taiwan, as well.

There has been increased attention from the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) with regard to international auditing standards of U.S.-listed companies with operations in China as well as PCAOB-registered auditing firms in China. The Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (“HFCAA”), requires the SEC to identify reporting public companies that use public accounting firms with a branch or office located in a foreign jurisdiction that PCAOB determines that it is unable to inspect or investigate completely because of a position taken by a governmental entity in that jurisdiction (“Commission-Identified Issuers”). If an issuer is identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer for three consecutive years, the issuer's shares will be prohibited in U.S. exchange and over-the-counter markets. On March 8, 2022, pursuant to the implementing regulations established by the SEC as required by the HFCAA, the SEC began to identify companies as provisional Commission-Identified Issuers. Listing and other regulatory requirements applicable to foreign issuers, including Chinese issuers are evolving and any future legislation, regulations or rules may require a Fund to change its investment process, which could result in substantial investment losses.

Investment in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan is subject to certain political risks. China’s economy has transitioned from a rigidly central-planned state-run economy to one that has been only partially reformed by more market-oriented policies. Although the Chinese government has implemented economic reform measures, reduced state ownership of companies and established better corporate governance practices, a substantial portion of productive assets in China are still owned by the Chinese government. The government continues to exercise significant control in regulating industrial development and, ultimately, control over China’s economic growth through the allocation of resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies.

The current political climate has intensified concerns about trade tariffs and a potential trade war between China and the United States, despite the United States’ signing a partial trade agreement with China that reduced some U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods while boosting Chinese purchases of American goods. However, this agreement left in place a number of existing tariffs, and it is unclear whether further trade agreements may be reached in the future. The ability and willingness of China to comply with the trade deal may determine to some degree the extent to which its economy will be adversely affected, which cannot be predicted at the present time. Future tariffs imposed by China and the United States on the other country’s products, or other escalating actions, may trigger a significant reduction in international trade, the oversupply of certain manufactured goods, substantial price reductions of goods and possible failure of individual companies and/or large segments of China’s export industry with a potentially negative impact to a Fund.

On June 3, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order prohibiting U.S. persons from entering into transactions in publicly traded securities, as well as derivatives and securities designed to provide investment exposure to any securities, of issuers designated “Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies” by the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Control. This executive order superseded a prior similar order from then-President Trump. A number of Chinese issuers have been designated under this program and more could be added. Certain implementation matters related to the scope of, and compliance with, the executive order have not yet been resolved, and the ultimate application and enforcement of the executive order may change due to, among other things, the change in the U.S. presidential administration. Under current guidance, U.S. investors may purchase interests in an investment fund that does not make any new purchases of designated securities and is “seeking to” divest its holdings of such securities during the applicable divestment period. As a result, the executive order and related guidance may significantly reduce the liquidity of such securities, force a Fund to sell certain positions at inopportune times or for unfavorable prices, and restrict future investments by a Fund. U.S. investment advisors are permitted to advise non-U.S. funds and non-U.S. persons that purchase and sell such prohibited securities, provided this activity does not indirectly expose U.S. persons to such companies.

Although China adopted a plan in 2019 designed to encourage foreign investment in Chinese financial systems, China continues to limit direct foreign investments generally in industries deemed important to national interests. Foreign investment in domestic securities are also subject to substantial restrictions. Some believe that China’s currency is undervalued. Currency fluctuations could significantly affect China and its trading partners. China continues to exercise control over the value of its currency, rather than allowing the value of the currency to be determined by market forces. This type of currency regime may experience sudden and significant currency adjustments, which may adversely impact investment returns.

For decades, a state of hostility has existed between Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China. Beijing has long deemed Taiwan a part of the “one China” and has made a nationalist cause of recovering it. This situation poses a threat to Taiwan’s economy and could negatively affect its stock market. By treaty, China has committed to preserve Hong Kong’s autonomy and its economic, political and social freedoms until 2047. However, if China would exert its authority so as to alter the economic, political or legal structures or the existing social policy of Hong Kong, investor and business confidence in Hong Kong could be negatively affected,

which in turn could negatively affect markets and business performance. As demonstrated by protests in Hong Kong in 2019 and 2020 over political, economic, and legal freedoms, and the Chinese government’s response to the protests, there continues to be a great deal of political unrest, which may result in economic disruption.

China could be affected by military events on the Korean peninsula or internal instability within North Korea. North Korea and South Korea each have substantial military capabilities, and historical tensions between the two countries present the risk of war. Any outbreak of hostilities between the two countries could have a severe adverse effect on the South Korean economy and securities market. These situations may cause uncertainty in the Chinese market and may adversely affect performance of the Chinese economy.

China A-Shares. China A-shares are equity securities of companies based in mainland China that trade on Chinese stock exchanges such as the Shanghai Stock Exchange (“SSE”) and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (“SZSE”) (“A-shares”). Foreign investment in A-shares on the SSE and SZSE is historically not permitted other than through a license granted under regulations in the People’s Republic of China known as the Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (“QFII”) and Renminbi Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (“RQFII”) systems. Regulations that came into effect on June 6, 2020 supersede certain post-registration rules applicable to QFII and RQFII regimes and remove prior quota restrictions on investment in A-shares. However, as of the date of this SAI, this is a relatively new development, and there is no guarantee that the quotas will continue to be relaxed.

Because restrictions continue to exist and capital therefore cannot flow freely into and out of the A-Share market, it is possible that in the event of a market disruption, the liquidity of the A-Share market and trading prices of A-Shares could be more severely affected than the liquidity and trading prices of markets where securities are freely tradable and capital therefore flows more freely. A Fund cannot predict the nature or duration of such a market disruption or the impact that it may have on the A-Share market and the short-term and long-term prospects of its investments in the A-Share market. In the event that a Fund invests in A-Shares directly, a Fund may incur significant losses, or may not be able fully to implement or pursue its investment objectives or strategies, due to investment restrictions on RQFIIs and QFIIs, illiquidity of the Chinese securities markets, or delay or disruption in execution or settlement of trades. A-Shares may become subject to frequent and widespread trading halts.

The Chinese government has in the past taken actions that benefitted holders of A-Shares. As A-Shares become more available to foreign investors, such as a Fund, the Chinese government may be less likely to take action that would benefit holders of A-Shares.

The regulations which apply to investments by RQFIIs and QFIIs, including the repatriation of capital, are relatively new. The application and interpretation of such regulations are therefore relatively untested. In addition, there is little precedent or certainty evidencing how such discretion may be exercised now or in the future; and even if there were precedent, it may provide little guidance as PRC authorities would likely continue to have broad discretion. Although the relevant QFII/RQFII regulations have recently been revised to relax the limitation on repatriation of capital, it is a relatively new development and therefore subject to uncertainties as to whether and how it will be implemented in practice.

Investment in eligible A-shares listed and traded on the SSE is now permitted through the Stock Connect program, though such securities may lose their eligibility at any time. Stock Connect is a securities trading and clearing program established by Hong Kong Securities Clearing Company Limited, the SSE and Chinese Securities Depositary and Clearing Corporation that aims to provide mutual stock market access between China and Hong Kong by permitting investors to trade and settle shares on each market through their local exchanges. Certain Funds may invest in other investment companies that invest in A-shares through Stock Connect or on such other stock exchanges in China which participate in Stock Connect from time to time. Under Stock Connect, a Fund’s trading of eligible A-shares listed on the SSE would be effectuated through its Hong Kong broker.

Although no individual investment quotas or licensing requirements apply to investors in Stock Connect, trading through Stock Connect’s Northbound Trading Link is subject to aggregate and daily investment quota limitations that require that buy orders for A-shares be rejected once the remaining balance of the relevant quota drops to zero or the daily quota is exceeded (although a Fund will be permitted to sell A-shares regardless of the quota balance). These limitations may restrict a Fund from investing in A-shares on a timely basis, which could affect a Fund’s ability to effectively pursue its investment strategy. Investment quotas are also subject to change. Investment in eligible A-shares through Stock Connect is subject to trading, clearance and settlement procedures that could pose risks to a Fund. A-shares purchased through Stock Connect generally may not be sold or otherwise transferred other than through Stock Connect in accordance with applicable rules. In addition, Stock Connect will only operate on days when both the Chinese and Hong Kong markets are open for trading and when banks in both markets are open on the corresponding settlement days. Therefore, an investment in A-shares through Stock Connect may subject a Fund to a risk of

price fluctuations on days where the Chinese market is open, but Stock Connect is not trading. In addition, there is no assurance that the necessary systems required to operate Stock Connect will function properly or will continue to be adapted to changes and developments in both markets. In the event that the relevant systems do not function properly, trading through Stock Connect could be disrupted.

China Variable-Interest Entities. Investments in Chinese companies may be made through a special structure known as a variable interest entity (“VIE”) that is designed to provide foreign investors, such as a Fund, with exposure to Chinese companies that operate in certain sectors in which China restricts or prohibits foreign investments. Investments in VIEs may pose additional risks because the investment is made through an intermediary shell company that has entered into service and other contracts with the underlying Chinese operating company in order to provide investors with exposure to the operating company, and therefore does not represent equity ownership in the operating company. The value of the shell company is derived from its ability to consolidate the VIE into its financials pursuant to contractual arrangements that allow the shell company to exert a degree of control over, and obtain economic benefits arising from, the VIE without formal legal ownership. The contractual arrangements between the shell company and the operating company may not be as effective in providing operational control as direct equity ownership, and a foreign investor’s rights may be limited, including by actions of the Chinese government which could determine that the underlying contractual arrangements are invalid. While VIEs are a longstanding industry practice and are well known by Chinese officials and regulators, the structure has not been formally recognized under Chinese law and it is uncertain whether Chinese officials or regulators will withdraw their implicit acceptance of the structure. It is also uncertain whether the contractual arrangements, which may be subject to conflicts of interest between the legal owners of the VIE and foreign investors, would be enforced by Chinese courts or arbitration bodies. Prohibitions of these structures by the Chinese government, or the inability to enforce such contracts, from which the shell company derives its value, would likely cause the VIE-structured holding(s) to suffer significant, detrimental, and possibly permanent loss, and in turn, adversely affect a Fund’s returns and net asset value.

On December 24, 2021, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (“CSRC”) published for consultation the Provisions of the State Council on the Administration of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies (Draft for Comments) and Administrative Measures for the Filing of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies (Draft for Comments) (together, the “Draft Rules”), which, in effect, require Chinese companies that pursue listings outside of mainland China, including those that do so using the VIE structure, to make a filing with the CSRC. The Draft Rules propose that companies that are already listed using an existing VIE structure will be grandfathered. Although the Draft Rules effectively signal the CSRC’s acknowledgment of the VIE structure, they are not an endorsement. Further, there is no guarantee that the Draft Rules will ultimately be enacted in their current form and the final version of the Draft Rules may set out more stringent requirements that interfere with the operation of VIE structures by listed Chinese companies. Finally, it is unclear how the Draft Rules, and other laws and regulations promulgated by the CSRC and other government authorities from time to time, might impact Chinese companies that are currently using VIE structures, including how companies operating in “prohibited industries” will be affected, as well as investor appetite for such companies. Despite the Draft Rules and the CSRC’s publications that they do not object to the use of VIE structures for mainland Chinese companies to raise capital from non-Chinese investors, there is no guarantee that the mainland Chinese government or a mainland Chinese regulator will not otherwise interfere with the operation of VIE structures.

China Bond Connect. Certain Funds may invest in Chinese interbank bonds traded on the China Interbank Bond Market through the China-Hong Kong Bond Connect program (“Bond Connect”). Bond Connect provides a channel for overseas investors to invest in the Chinese bond market through investment links between Hong Kong and mainland China. In China, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority Central Money Markets Unit holds Bond Connect securities on behalf of the ultimate investors (such as a Fund) in accounts maintained with a China-based custodian (either the China Central Depository & Clearing Co. or the Shanghai Clearing House). This recordkeeping system subjects a Fund to numerous risks, including the risk that a Fund may have a limited ability to enforce its rights as a bondholder and the risks of settlement delays and counterparty default of the Hong Kong sub-custodian. Trading through Bond Connect is subject to other restrictions and risks. For example, Bond Connect is generally only available on business days when both the China and Hong Kong markets are open, which may limit a Fund’s ability to trade when it would be otherwise attractive to do so. Investing through Bond Connect also subjects a Fund to the clearance and settlement procedures associated with Bond Connect, which could pose risks to the Fund. Furthermore, securities purchased through Bond Connect generally may not be sold, purchased or otherwise transferred other than through Bond Connect in accordance with applicable rules.

Futures Transactions. Futures contracts (a potentially high-risk investment) enable a Fund to buy or sell an asset in the future at an agreed upon price. This may include the purchase and sale of foreign currency futures contracts as a hedge against

possible variations in foreign exchange rates.

A futures contract is a bilateral agreement to buy or sell a security or other commodity (or deliver a cash settlement price, in the case of a contract relating to a rate or an index or otherwise not calling for physical delivery at the end of trading in the contracts) for a set price in the future. Futures contracts are listed for trading by boards of trade that have been designated “contracts markets” by the CFTC.

No purchase price is paid or received when the contract is entered into. Instead, a Fund upon entering into a futures contract (and to maintain the Fund’s open positions in futures contracts) would be required to designate the segregation, either on the records of the Adviser, the applicable Sub-Adviser or with the Trust’s custodian, in the name of the futures broker an amount of cash, United States Government securities, suitable money market instruments, or liquid, high-grade debt securities, known as “initial margin.” The minimum margin required for a particular futures contract is set by the exchange on which the contract is traded, and may be significantly modified from time to time by the exchange during the term of the contract. An individual broker, known as a futures commission merchant (“FCM”), may require a greater amount of margin for a particular customer depending upon an assessment of creditworthiness. Futures contracts are customarily purchased and sold on margin that may range upward from less than 5% of the value of the contract being traded. By using futures contracts as a risk management technique, given the greater liquidity in the futures market than in the cash market, it may be possible to accomplish certain results more quickly and with lower transaction costs.

If the price of an open futures contract changes (by increase in the case of a sale or by decrease in the case of a purchase) so that the loss on the futures contract reaches a point at which the margin on deposit does not satisfy the maintenance margin level, the FCM will issue a margin call to restore the account to the initial margin level. However, if the value of a position increases because of favorable price changes in the futures contract so that the margin deposit exceeds the required margin, the FCM will transfer the excess to a Fund. These subsequent payments called “variation margin,” to and from the FCM, may be required to be made on a daily or even intraday basis as the price of the underlying assets fluctuate making the long and short positions in the futures contract more or less valuable, a process known as “marking to the market.” A Fund expects to earn interest income on its accounts that exceeds the margin level required by the FCM. However, any such income may be limited or minimal in a low interest rate environment.

A Fund will incur brokerage fees when it purchases and sells futures contracts. Transaction costs associated with investments in futures contracts may be significant, which could cause or increase losses or reduce gains. Positions taken in the futures markets are not normally held until delivery or cash settlement is required, but are instead liquidated through offsetting transactions, which may result in a gain or a loss. While futures positions taken by a Fund will usually be liquidated in this manner, the Fund may instead make or take delivery of underlying securities whenever it appears economically advantageous for the Fund to do so. A clearing organization associated with the exchange on which futures are traded assumes responsibility for closing out transactions and guarantees that as between the clearing members of an exchange, the sale and purchase obligations will be performed with regard to all positions that remain open at the termination of the contract.

Positions in futures contracts may be closed out only on an exchange or a board of trade which provides the market for such futures. Although the Funds, specified in the Prospectuses, intend to purchase or sell futures only on exchanges or boards of trade where there appears to be an active market, there is no guarantee that such will exist for any particular contract or at any particular time. If there is not a liquid market at a particular time, it may not be possible to close a futures position at such time, and, in the event of adverse price movements, a Fund would continue to be required to make daily cash payments of variation margin. If a Fund has insufficient cash, it may have to sell securities from its portfolio at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so. However, in the event futures positions are used to hedge portfolio securities, the securities will not be sold until the futures positions can be liquidated. In such circumstances, an increase in the price of securities, if any, may partially or completely offset losses on the futures contracts.

The prices of futures contracts are volatile and are influenced, among other things, by actual and anticipated changes in the market and interest rates, which in turn are affected by fiscal and monetary policies and national and international political and economic events. Most U.S. futures exchanges limit the amount of fluctuation permitted in futures contract prices during a single trading day. The daily limit establishes the maximum amount that the price of a futures contract may vary either up or down from the previous day’s settlement price at the end of a trading session. Once the daily limit has been reached in a particular type of futures contract, no trades may be made on that day at a price beyond that limit. The daily limit governs only price movement during a particular trading day and therefore does not limit potential losses, because the limit may prevent the liquidation of

unfavorable positions. Futures contract prices have occasionally moved to the daily limit for several consecutive trading days with little or no trading, thereby preventing prompt liquidation of futures positions and subjecting some futures traders to substantial losses.

Because of the low margin deposits required, futures trading involves an extremely high degree of leverage. As a result, a relatively small price movement in a futures contract may result in immediate and substantial loss, as well as gain, to the investor. For example, if at the time of purchase, 10% of the value of the futures contract is deposited as margin, a subsequent 10% decrease in the value of the futures contract would result in a total loss of the margin deposit, before any deduction for the transaction costs, if the account were then closed out. A 15% decrease would result in a loss equal to 150% of the original margin deposit, if the contract were closed out. Thus, a purchase or sale of a futures contract may result in losses in excess of the amount invested in the futures contract.

A decision of whether, when, and how to hedge involves skill and judgment, and even a well-conceived hedge may be unsuccessful to some degree because of unexpected market behavior, market trends or interest rate trends. There are several risks in connection with the use by a Fund of futures contracts as a hedging device. One risk arises because of the imperfect correlation between movements in the prices of the futures contracts and movements in the prices of the underlying instruments which are the subject of the hedge. The Adviser or Sub-Adviser will, however, attempt to reduce this risk by entering into futures contracts whose movements, in its judgment, will have a significant correlation with movements in the prices of the Fund’s underlying instruments sought to be hedged.

Successful use of futures contracts by a Fund for hedging purposes is also subject to the Adviser’s or Sub-Adviser’s ability to correctly predict movements in the direction of the market and other economic factors. It is possible that, when a Fund has sold futures to hedge its portfolio against a decline in the market, the index, indices, or instruments underlying futures might advance and the value of the underlying instruments held in the Fund’s portfolio might decline. If this were to occur, a Fund would lose money on the futures and also would experience a decline in value in its underlying instruments.

Interest Rate Futures Contracts. Interest rate futures contracts are exchange-traded contracts for which the underlying reference asset is an interest-bearing fixed income security or an inter-bank deposit. Two examples of common interest rate futures contracts are U.S. Treasury futures contracts and Eurodollar futures contracts. The underlying reference asset for a U.S. Treasury futures contract is a U.S. Treasury security. The underlying reference asset for a Eurodollar futures contract, as of March 1, 2023, is the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”); Eurodollar futures contracts enable the purchaser to obtain a fixed rate for the lending of funds over a stated period of time and the seller to obtain a fixed rate for a borrowing of funds over that same period. To the extent a reference rate is based on LIBOR, a Fund will be exposed to additional risk. See the “LIBOR Rate Risk” section for additional information on the phasing out of LIBOR.

Interest rate futures contracts may be purchased or sold for hedging purposes to attempt to protect against the effects of interest rate changes on a Fund’s current or intended investments in fixed income securities. For example, if a Fund owned long-term bonds and interest rates were expected to increase, the Fund might sell interest rate futures contracts. Such a sale would have much the same effect as selling some of the long-term bonds in the Fund’s portfolio. However, since the market for interest rate futures contracts may generally be more liquid than the cash market for individual bonds, the use of interest rate futures contracts as a hedging technique allows the Fund to hedge its interest rate risk without having to sell its portfolio securities. If interest rates were to increase, the value of the debt securities in the portfolio would decline, but the value of the Fund’s interest rate futures contracts would be expected to increase at approximately the same rate, thereby keeping the net asset value, or NAV, of the Fund from declining as much as it otherwise would have. On the other hand, if interest rates were expected to decline, interest rate futures contracts could be purchased to hedge in anticipation of subsequent purchases of long-term bonds at higher prices. Because the fluctuations in the value of the interest rate futures contracts should be similar to those of long-term bonds, the Fund could protect itself against the effects of the anticipated rise in the value of long-term bonds without actually buying them until the necessary cash becomes available or the market has stabilized. At that time, the interest rate futures contracts could be liquidated and the Fund’s cash reserves could then be used to buy long-term bonds on the cash market.

Securities Index Futures Contracts. A securities index futures contract is a contract to buy a certain number of units of the relevant index at a specified future date at a price agreed upon when the contract is made. A unit is the value at a given time of the relevant index. Purchases or sales of securities index futures contracts may be used in an attempt to increase a Fund’s total investment return or to protect a Fund’s current or intended investments from broad fluctuations in securities prices. Additionally, through the use of index futures, a Fund may maintain a pool of assets with diversified risk without incurring the substantial brokerage

costs that may be associated with investment in multiple issuers. This may permit a Fund to avoid potential market and liquidity problems (e.g., driving up or forcing down the price by quickly purchasing or selling shares of a portfolio security) that may result from increases or decreases in positions already held by a Fund. A securities index futures contract does not require the physical delivery of securities, but merely provides for profits and losses resulting from changes in the market value of the contract to be credited or debited at the close of each trading day to the respective accounts of the parties to the contract. On the contract’s expiration date a final cash settlement occurs and the futures positions are simply closed out. Changes in the market value of a particular index futures contract reflect changes in the specified index of securities on which the future is based.

By establishing an appropriate “short” position in index futures, a Fund may also seek to protect the value of its portfolio against an overall decline in the market for such securities. Alternatively, in anticipation of a generally rising market, a Fund can seek to avoid losing the benefit of apparently low current prices by establishing a “long” position in securities index futures and later liquidating that position as particular securities are in fact acquired. To the extent that these hedging strategies are successful, a Fund will be affected to a lesser degree by adverse overall market price movements than would otherwise be the case.

A broad-based security index will generally have at least ten component issues, while a narrow-based security index will generally have nine or fewer. Futures contracts on a broad-based security index are subject to exclusive regulatory jurisdiction of the CFTC, while futures contracts on a narrow-based security index are a class of “security futures” subject to joint SEC-CFTC jurisdiction.

Hybrid Instruments. Hybrid instruments (a type of potentially high-risk derivative) combine the elements of futures contracts or options with those of debt, preferred equity or a depositary instrument. Generally, a hybrid instrument will be a debt security, preferred stock, depositary share, trust certificate, certificate of deposit or other evidence of indebtedness on which a portion of or all interest payments, and/or the principal or stated amount payable at maturity, redemption or retirement, is determined by reference to prices, changes in prices, or differences between prices, of securities, currencies, intangibles, goods, articles or commodities (collectively “Underlying Assets”) or by another objective index, economic factor or other measure, such as interest rates, currency exchange rates, commodity indices, and securities indices (collectively “Benchmarks”). Thus, hybrid instruments may take a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, debt instruments with interest or principal payments or redemption terms determined by reference to the value of a currency or commodity or securities index at a future point in time, preferred stock with dividend rates determined by reference to the value of a currency, or convertible securities with the conversion terms related to a particular commodity. Under certain conditions, the redemption value of such an instrument could be zero. Hybrid instruments can have volatile prices and limited liquidity and their use by a Fund may not be successful.

Hybrid instruments may bear interest or pay preferred dividends at below market (or even relatively nominal) rates. Alternatively, hybrid instruments may bear interest at above market rates but bear an increased risk of principal loss (or gain). The latter scenario may result if “leverage” is used to structure the hybrid instrument. Leverage risk occurs when the hybrid instrument is structured so that a given change in a Benchmark or Underlying Asset is multiplied to produce a greater value change in the hybrid instrument, thereby magnifying the risk of loss as well as the potential for gain.

Hybrid instruments can be an efficient means of creating exposure to a particular market, or segment of a market, with the objective of enhancing total return. For example, a Fund may wish to take advantage of expected declines in interest rates in several European countries, but avoid the transaction costs associated with buying and currency-hedging the foreign bond positions. One solution would be to purchase a U.S. dollar-denominated hybrid instrument whose redemption price is linked to the average three year interest rate in a designated group of countries. The redemption price formula would provide for payoffs of greater than par if the average interest rate was lower than a specified level, and payoffs of less than par if rates were above the specified level. Furthermore, a Fund could limit the downside risk of the security by establishing a minimum redemption price so that the principal paid at maturity could not be below a predetermined minimum level if interest rates were to rise significantly. The purpose of this arrangement, known as a structured security with an embedded put option, would be to give a Fund the desired European bond exposure while avoiding currency risk, limiting downside market risk, and lowering transaction costs. Of course, there is no guarantee that the strategy will be successful and a Fund could lose money if, for example, interest rates do not move as anticipated or credit problems develop with the issuer of the hybrid instrument.

Although the risks of investing in hybrid instruments reflect a combination of the risks of investing in securities, options, futures and currencies, hybrid instruments are potentially more volatile and carry greater market risks than traditional debt instruments. The risks of a particular hybrid instrument will, of course, depend upon the terms of the instrument, but may include, without limitation, the possibility of significant changes in the Benchmarks or the prices of Underlying Assets to which the instrument is linked. Such risks generally depend upon factors which are unrelated to the operations or credit quality of the issuer of the

hybrid instrument and which may not be readily foreseen by the purchaser, such as economic and political events, the supply and demand for the Underlying Assets and interest rate movements. The issuer or guarantor of a hybrid instrument may be unable or unwilling to make timely principal, interest or settlement payments, or otherwise honor its obligations. A Fund that invests in hybrid instruments is subject to varying degrees of risk that the issuers of the securities will have their credit rating downgraded or will default, potentially reducing a Fund’s share price and income level.

Various Benchmarks and prices for Underlying Assets have been highly volatile, and such volatility may be expected in the future.

Hybrid instruments may also carry liquidity risk since the instruments are often “customized” to meet the portfolio needs of a particular investor, and therefore, the number of investors that are willing and able to buy such instruments in the secondary market may be smaller than that for more traditional debt securities. In addition, because the purchase and sale of hybrid instruments could take place in an OTC market without the guarantee of a central clearing organization or in a transaction between a Fund and the issuer of the hybrid instrument, the creditworthiness of the counterparty or issuer of the hybrid instrument would be an additional risk factor which a Fund would have to consider and monitor. Hybrid instruments also may not be subject to regulation of the CFTC, which generally regulates the trading of commodity futures and most swaps by persons in the United States, the SEC, which regulates the offer and sale of securities by and to persons in the United States, or any other governmental regulatory authority. The various risks discussed above, particularly the market risk of such instruments, may in turn cause significant fluctuations in the net asset value of a Fund.

Illiquid Securities or Non-Publicly Traded Securities. A Fund may invest in illiquid securities or non-publicly traded securities. The inability of a Fund to dispose of illiquid or not readily marketable investments promptly or at a reasonable price could impair a Fund’s ability to raise cash for redemptions or other purposes. Generally, an illiquid security is any investment that may not reasonably be expected to be sold or disposed of in current market conditions in seven calendar days or less without the sale or disposition significantly changing the market value of the investment. Illiquid securities may include unregistered securities, securities subject to contractual or legal restrictions on resale or other restricted securities and repurchase agreements maturing in greater than seven days. Illiquid securities may also include commercial paper under section 4(2) of the 1933 Act, and Rule 144A securities (restricted securities that may be traded freely among qualified institutional buyers pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the securities laws); these securities generally are considered illiquid unless the Adviser or Sub-adviser determines they are liquid. Most such securities held by a Fund are deemed liquid. Generally, foreign securities freely tradable in their principal market are not considered restricted or illiquid even if they are not registered in the United States. Illiquid securities may be difficult for a Fund to value or dispose of due to the absence of an active trading market. The sale of some illiquid securities by a Fund may be subject to legal restrictions, which could be costly to the Fund.

A Fund may invest in “restricted securities,” which generally are securities that may be resold to the public only pursuant to an effective registration statement under the 1933 Act or an exemption from registration. Regulation S under the 1933 Act is an exemption from registration that permits, under certain circumstances, the resale of restricted securities in offshore transactions, subject to certain conditions, and Rule 144A under the 1933 Act is an exemption that permits the resale of certain restricted securities to qualified institutional buyers.

Rule 144A is designed to facilitate trading of restricted securities among qualified institutional investors. To the extent restricted securities held by a Fund qualify under Rule 144A and an institutional market develops for those securities, the Fund expects that it will be able to dispose of the securities without registering the resale of such securities under the 1933 Act. However, to the extent that a robust market for such 144A securities does not develop, or a market develops but experiences periods of illiquidity, investments in Rule 144A securities could increase the level of a Fund’s illiquidity. A Fund may find these investments difficult to value. In addition, a Fund might have to register restricted securities in order to dispose of them, resulting in additional expense and delay. Adverse market conditions could impede such a public offering of securities.

There is a large institutional market for certain securities that are not registered under the 1933 Act, which may include markets for repurchase agreements, commercial paper, foreign securities, municipal securities, loans and corporate bonds and notes. Institutional investors depend on an efficient institutional market in which the unregistered security can be readily resold or on an issuer’s ability to honor a demand for repayment. The fact that there are contractual or legal restrictions on resale to the general public or to certain institutions may not be indicative of the liquidity of such investments.

To the extent that a Fund acquires shares of a registered investment company in accordance with Section 12(d)(1)(F) of the 1940 Act, the registered investment company is not obligated to redeem its shares in an amount exceeding 1% of its shares outstanding

during any period of less than 30 days. Shares held by a Fund in excess of 1% of a registered investment company’s outstanding securities therefore may, under certain circumstances, be considered not readily marketable securities, which, together with other such securities, are subject to the 15% limitation described above.

Inflation-Indexed Securities. Inflation-indexed securities are debt securities the principal value of which is adjusted periodically in accordance with changes in a measure of inflation. Inflation-indexed securities issued by the U.S. Treasury use the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. See “U.S. Government Securities” below. Inflation-indexed securities issued by a foreign government are generally adjusted to reflect a comparable inflation index, calculated by that government. Two structures for inflation-indexed securities are common: the U.S. Treasury and some other issuers utilize a structure that adjusts the principal value of the security according to the rate of inflation; most other issuers pay out the Consumer Price Index adjustments as part of a semi-annual coupon.

In the first, the interest rate on the inflation-indexed bond is fixed, while the principal value rises or falls semi-annually based on changes in a published measure of inflation. Repayment of the original bond principal upon maturity (as adjusted for inflation) is guaranteed in the case of U.S. Treasury inflation-indexed bonds. For bonds that do not provide a similar guarantee, the adjusted principal value of the bond repaid at maturity may be less than the original principal. In the second, the inflation adjustment for certain inflation-indexed bonds is reflected in the semiannual coupon payment. As a result, the principal value of these inflation-indexed bonds does not adjust according to the rate of inflation.

In general, the value of inflation-indexed securities increases in periods of general inflation and declines in periods of general deflation. If inflation is lower than expected during the period a Fund holds an inflation-indexed security, the Fund may earn less on it than on a conventional bond. Inflation-indexed securities are expected to react primarily to changes in the “real” interest rate (i.e., the nominal, or stated, rate less the rate of inflation), while a typical bond reacts to changes in the nominal interest rate. Accordingly, inflation-indexed securities have characteristics of fixed-rate U.S. Treasury securities having a shorter duration. Changes in market interest rates from causes other than inflation will likely affect the market prices of inflation-indexed securities in the same manner as conventional bonds.

Any increase in the principal value of an inflation-indexed security is taxable in the taxable year the increase occurs, even though its holders do not receive cash representing the increase until the security matures, and the amount of that increase for a Fund generally must be distributed each taxable year to its shareholders. See the “Taxation” section of this SAI. Thus, each Fund that invests therein could be required, at times, to liquidate other investments in order to satisfy its distribution requirements.

Insured Bank Obligations. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insures the deposits of federally insured banks and savings and loan associations (collectively referred to as “banks”) up to $250,000. A Fund may purchase bank obligations which are fully insured as to principal by the FDIC. Currently, to remain fully insured as to principal, these investments must be limited to $250,000 per bank; if the principal amount and accrued interest together exceed $250,000, the excess accrued interest will not be insured. Insured bank obligations may have limited marketability. Unless a Fund determines that a readily available market exists for such obligations, a Fund will treat such obligations as subject to the limit for illiquid investments unless such obligations are payable at principal amount plus accrued interest on demand or within seven days after demand.

Investment Company Securities. Certain of the Funds may invest in the securities of other investment companies, to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder and by any applicable exemptive orders issued by the SEC. Investment company securities include securities of other open-end, management investment companies (commonly called mutual funds), ETFs, closed-end investment companies, and unit investment trusts. Section 12(d)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act, in relevant part, prohibits a registered investment company (such as a Fund) from acquiring shares of an investment company if after such acquisition the securities represent more than 3% of the total outstanding voting stock of the acquired company, more than 5% of the total assets of the acquiring company, or, together with the securities of any other investment companies, more than 10% of the total assets of the acquiring company, except in reliance on certain exceptions contained in the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. The 1940 Act further prohibits an investment company from acquiring in the aggregate more than 10% of the total outstanding voting shares of any registered closed-end investment company. Notwithstanding the foregoing restrictions, Rule 12d1-4 under the 1940 Act permits a Fund to invest in other investment companies beyond the statutory limits discussed above, subject to certain conditions. Rule 12d1-4 includes conditions related to (i) limits on control and voting; (ii) required evaluations and findings related to investments in other investment companies; (iii) agreements between an acquiring and an acquired investment company; and (iv) limits on complex structures. Investing in other investment companies involves substantially the same risks as investing directly in the underlying instruments, but the total return on such investments at the investment company

level will be reduced by the operating expenses and fees of such other investment companies, including advisory fees. In addition, certain types of investment companies, such as closed-end investment companies and ETFs, trade on a stock exchange or over the counter at a premium or a discount to their net asset value per share. Such a premium or discount may impact the performance of a Fund’s investment. Further, the securities of other investment companies may be leveraged. As a result, a Fund may be indirectly exposed to leverage through an investment in such securities. An investment in securities of other investment companies that use leverage may expose a Fund to higher volatility in the market value of such securities and the possibility that the Fund’s long-term returns on such securities will be diminished.

Passive Foreign Investment Companies. Certain Funds may purchase the securities of “passive foreign investment companies” (“PFICs”). In general, such companies have been the only or primary way to invest in countries that limit, or prohibit, all direct foreign investment in the securities of companies domiciled therein. However, the governments of some countries have authorized the organization of investment funds to permit indirect foreign investment in such securities. In addition to bearing their proportionate share of a Fund’s expenses (management fees and operating expenses), shareholders will also indirectly (through the Fund) bear similar expenses of such funds. PFICs in which a Fund may invest may also include foreign corporations other than such investment funds. Like other foreign securities, interests in PFICs also involve the risk of foreign securities, as described above, as well as certain federal income tax consequences (see the section of this SAI entitled “Taxation”).

ETFs. Certain of the Funds may invest in ETFs and other pooled investment vehicles. These are a type of investment company (or similar entity) the shares of which are bought and sold on a securities exchange and that hold a portfolio of securities or other financial instruments. An index-based ETF represents a portfolio of securities (or other assets) generally designed to track a particular market index or other referenced asset. As discussed above in “Investment Company Securities”, Rule 12d1-4 permits a Fund to invest in other investment companies, including ETFs, beyond certain statutory limits in the 1940 Act, subject to certain conditions. The risks of owning an index-based ETF generally reflect the risks of owning the underlying securities it is designed to track, although lack of liquidity in an ETF could result in it being more volatile, and ETFs have fees which increase their costs. In addition, there is the risk that an index-based ETF may fail to closely track the index, if any, that it is designed to replicate. ETFs may also be actively managed. Actively managed ETFs are subject to management risk and may not achieve their objective if the ETFs manager’s expectations regarding particular securities or markets are not met. By investing in a Fund that invests in ETFs, you will indirectly bear fees and expenses charged by the ETFs in which the Fund invests in addition to the Fund’s direct fees and expenses.

Investment Grade Securities. Investment grade securities are securities rated Baa or higher by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), BBB or higher by Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings (“S&P”), or BBB or higher by Fitch Ratings Ltd. (“Fitch”), securities that are comparably rated by another rating agency, or unrated securities determined by the Adviser or Sub-Adviser to be of comparable quality. Bonds rated in the lower investment grade rating categories (or determined to be of comparable quality by the Adviser or Sub-Adviser) have speculative characteristics. This means that changes in economic conditions or other circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity to make principal and interest payments than is the case for higher rated debt securities. If a security is downgraded, the Adviser or Sub-Adviser will reevaluate the holding to determine what action, including the sale of such security, is in the best interests of a Fund.

Non-Investment Grade Securities or “Junk Bonds.” Non-investment grade securities are securities rated Ba1 or lower by Moody’s or BB+ or lower by S&P or Fitch, securities that are comparably rated by another rating agency, or unrated securities determined by the Adviser or Sub-Adviser to be of comparable quality. Non-investment grade securities are commonly known as “junk bonds” and are considered predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer’s ability to pay interest and repay principal. Junk bonds may be issued as a consequence of corporate restructuring, such as leveraged buyouts, mergers, acquisitions, debt recapitalizations, or similar events or by smaller or highly leveraged companies and in other circumstances.

Non-investment grade securities generally offer a higher current yield than that available for investment grade securities; however, they involve greater risks than investment grade securities in that they are especially sensitive to, and may be more susceptible to, real or perceived adverse changes in general economic conditions and in the industries in which the issuers are engaged, changes in the financial condition of, and individual corporate developments of, the issuers, and price fluctuations in response to changes in interest rates. Because a Fund’s investments in non-investment grade securities involve greater investment risk than its investments in higher rated securities, achievement of the Fund’s investment objective will be more dependent on the Adviser’s or Sub-Adviser’s analysis than would be the case if the Fund were investing in higher rated securities.

Non-investment grade securities generally will be susceptible to greater risk when economic growth slows or reverses and when inflation increases or deflation occurs. Lower rated securities may experience substantial price declines when there is an expectation

that issuers of such securities might experience financial difficulties. As a result, the yields on lower rated securities can rise dramatically. However, those higher yields may not reflect the value of the income stream that holders of such securities expect. Rather, those higher yields may reflect the risk that holders of such securities could lose a substantial portion of their value due to financial restructurings or defaults by the issuers. There can be no assurance that those declines will not occur.

During periods of economic downturn or rising interest rates, highly leveraged issuers may experience financial stress that could adversely affect their ability to make payments of interest and principal and increase the possibility of default. In addition, such issuers may not have more traditional methods of financing available to them and may be unable to repay debt at maturity by refinancing. The risk of loss due to default by such issuers is significantly greater because such securities frequently are unsecured by collateral and will not receive payment until more senior claims are paid in full. Non-investment grade securities may contain redemption or call provisions. If an issuer exercises these provisions in a declining interest rate market, a Fund would have to replace the security with a lower yielding security, resulting in a decreased return. Conversely, a non-investment grade security’s value will decrease in a rising interest rate market, as will the value of a Fund’s investment in such securities. If a Fund experiences unexpected net redemptions, this may force it to sell its non-investment grade securities, without regard to their investment merits, thereby decreasing the asset base upon which the Fund’s expenses can be spread and possibly reducing the Fund’s rate of return.

In addition, the market for non-investment grade securities generally is thinner and less active than that for higher rated securities, which may limit a Fund’s ability to sell such securities at fair value in response to changes in the economy or financial markets. This potential lack of liquidity may make it more difficult for the Adviser or Sub-Adviser to value accurately certain portfolio securities. Adverse publicity and investor perceptions, whether or not based on fundamental analysis, may also decrease the values and liquidity of non-investment grade securities, especially in a thinly traded market. In periods of reduced market liquidity, junk bond prices may become more volatile and may experience sudden and substantial price declines. Also, there may be significant disparities in the prices quoted for junk bonds by various dealers. Under such conditions, a Fund may find it difficult to value its junk bonds accurately. Under such conditions, a Fund may have to use subjective rather than objective criteria to value its junk bond investments accurately and rely more heavily on the judgment of the Adviser. It is the policy of the Adviser and each Sub-Adviser not to rely exclusively on ratings issued by credit rating agencies but to supplement such ratings with their own independent and ongoing review of credit quality.

Prices for junk bonds also may be affected by legislative and regulatory developments. For example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act includes a provision limiting the deductibility of “business interest” expense, and from time to time, Congress has considered legislation to regulate corporate restructuring such as takeovers, mergers or leveraged buyouts. Such legislation could depress the prices of outstanding junk bonds.

Credit Ratings. Moody’s, S&P, Fitch and other rating agencies are private services that provide ratings of the credit quality of bonds, including municipal bonds, and certain other securities. A description of the ratings assigned to commercial paper and corporate bonds by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch is included in Appendix A to this SAI. The process by which Moody’s, S&P and Fitch determine ratings generally includes consideration of the likelihood of the receipt by security holders of all distributions, the nature of the underlying assets, the credit quality of the guarantor, if any, and the structural, legal and tax aspects associated with these securities. Not even the highest such rating represents an assessment of the likelihood that principal prepayments will be made by obligors on the underlying assets or the degree to which such prepayments may differ from that originally anticipated, nor do such ratings address the possibility that investors may suffer a lower than anticipated yield or that investors in such securities may fail to recoup fully their initial investment due to prepayments.

Credit ratings attempt to evaluate the safety of principal and interest payments, but they do not evaluate the volatility of a bond’s value or its liquidity and do not guarantee the performance of the issuer. Rating agencies may fail to make timely changes in credit ratings in response to subsequent events, so that an issuer’s current financial condition may be better or worse than the rating indicates. There is a risk that rating agencies may downgrade a bond’s rating. Subsequent to a bond’s purchase by a Fund, it may cease to be rated or its rating may be reduced below the minimum rating required for purchase by the Fund. Any subsequent change in a rating assigned by any rating service to a security (or, if unrated, deemed to be of comparable quality), or change in the percentage of portfolio assets invested in certain securities or other instruments, or change in the average duration of a Fund’s investment portfolio, resulting from market fluctuations or other changes in a Fund’s total assets will not require a Fund to dispose of an investment. A Fund may use these ratings in determining whether to purchase, sell or hold a security. It should be emphasized, however, that ratings are general and are not absolute standards of quality. Consequently, bonds with the same maturity, interest rate and rating may have different market prices.

In addition to ratings assigned to individual bond issues, the Adviser or the applicable Sub-Adviser will analyze interest rate trends and developments that may affect individual issuers, including factors such as liquidity, profitability and asset quality. The yields on bonds are dependent on a variety of factors, including general money market conditions, general conditions in the bond market, the financial condition of the issuer, the size of the offering, the maturity of the obligation and its rating. There is a wide variation in the quality of bonds, both within a particular classification and between classifications. An issuer’s obligations under its bonds are subject to the provisions of bankruptcy, insolvency and other laws affecting the rights and remedies of bond holders or other creditors of an issuer; litigation or other conditions may also adversely affect the power or ability of issuers to meet their obligations for the payment of interest and principal on their bonds.

LIBOR Rate Risk. Many debt securities, derivative instruments and other financial instruments have historically used LIBOR as the reference or benchmark rate for variable interest rate calculations. However, concerns have arisen regarding LIBOR’s viability as a benchmark, due to manipulation allegations beginning in 2012 and, subsequently, reduced activity in the financial markets that it measures. Publication of LIBOR benchmarks for most maturities and currencies ceased as of December 31, 2021, and publication of the remaining benchmarks is scheduled to be phased out on June 30, 2023.

Since the announcement that most tenors of U.S. dollar LIBOR would continue to be published through June 30, 2023, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, including its ex officio members from the Federal Reserve Board and New York Federal Reserve, has emphasized that the extension to June 2023 does not alter the regulatory perspective on new loan issuances and that market participants should already be using language that provides for an automatic switch from LIBOR to a replacement in new loan agreements (or should start immediately), and that June 30, 2023 should be the target for the cessation of new loans based on LIBOR.

The Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) has been selected by a committee established by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to replace LIBOR as a reference or benchmark rate in the United States. SOFR is discussed in further detail below. Bank working groups and regulators in other countries have suggested other alternatives for their markets, including the Sterling Overnight Interbank Average Rate (“SONIA”) in England.

Various financial industry groups are transitioning away from LIBOR, but there are obstacles to converting certain longer term securities and transactions to a new benchmark, as well as risks associated with using a new reference or benchmark rate with respect to new investments and transactions. Transition planning is ongoing, and neither the effect of the transition process nor its ultimate success can yet be known. While some LIBOR-based instruments may contemplate a scenario in which LIBOR is no longer available by providing for an alternative rate-setting methodology and/or increased costs for certain LIBOR-related instruments or financing transactions, not all may have such provisions and there may be significant uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of any such alternative methodologies, resulting in prolonged adverse market conditions for a Fund. The willingness and ability of issuers to include enhanced provisions in new and existing contracts or instruments also remains uncertain. The transition process might lead to increased volatility and illiquidity in markets that currently rely on the LIBOR to determine interest rates. It could also lead to a reduction in the value of some LIBOR-based investments and reduce the effectiveness of new hedges placed against existing LIBOR-based instruments. Since the usefulness of LIBOR as a benchmark could deteriorate during the transition period, these effects could occur prior to LIBOR ceasing to be published. Additionally, the transition away from LIBOR also introduces operational complexities that may require market participants to make significant changes to their IT systems or operational processes, including enhancements or modifications to systems, controls, procedures, and risk or valuation models associated with the transition to a new reference rate or benchmark. Market participants that have fallen behind on software releases may need to undertake systems upgrades, convert to new systems, or outsource the work in advance of vendor changes for LIBOR. Such efforts may take a significant amount of time and resources to complete.

SOFR is a broad measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by U.S. treasury securities, and has been published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York since April 2018. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has also been publishing historical indicative Secured Overnight Financing Rates from 2014. Historical changes or trends in SOFR may not be reliable as indicators of future changes in SOFR. While term SOFR for various maturities has begun to be adopted by some parties and for some types of transactions, the composition and characteristics of SOFR are not the same as those of LIBOR, and SOFR is fundamentally different from LIBOR because (1) SOFR is a secured rate, while LIBOR is an unsecured rate, and (2) SOFR is an overnight rate, while LIBOR is a forward-looking rate that represents interbank funding over different maturities. As a result, there can be no assurance that SOFR will perform in the same way as LIBOR would have at any time, including, without limitation, as a result of changes in interest and yield rates in the market, market volatility or global or regional economic, financial, political, regulatory,

judicial or other events. Certain existing contracts provide for a spread adjustment when transitioning to SOFR from LIBOR, but there is no assurance that it will provide adequate compensation. Term SOFR rates for various maturities may not be available, recommended, or operationally feasible at the applicable benchmark replacement date.

Additionally, daily changes in SOFR have, on occasion, been more volatile than daily changes in other benchmark or market rates, such as LIBOR. The return on and value of an investment in notes or other investments linked to SOFR may fluctuate more than the value of investments that are linked to less volatile rates. In addition, the volatility of SOFR has reflected the underlying volatility of the overnight U.S. Treasury repo market. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has at times conducted operations in the overnight U.S. Treasury repo market in order to help maintain the federal funds rate within a target range. There can be no assurance that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York will continue to conduct such operations in the future, and the duration and extent of any such operations is inherently uncertain. The effect of any such operations, or of the cessation of such operations to the extent they are commenced, is uncertain and could result in losses to a Fund.

SOFR is published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York based on data that is receives from various sources. There can be no guarantee, particularly given its relatively recent introduction, that SOFR will not be discontinued or fundamentally altered in a manner that is materially adverse to the interests of investors in a Fund. If the manner in which SOFR is calculated is changed, that change may result in a reduction in the amount of interest payable on a Fund’s investments and the trading prices of those investments. In addition, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York may withdraw, modify or amend published SOFR data in its sole discretion and without notice. The interest rate for any interest period typically will not be adjusted for any modifications or amendments to SOFR data that may be published after the interest rate for that interest period has been determined.

Since SOFR is a relatively new reference rate, a Fund’s investments in debt securities and other instruments linked to SOFR may not have an established trading market, and an established trading market may never develop or may not be very liquid. Market terms for instruments linked to SOFR, such as the spread over the base rate reflected in interest rate provisions or the manner of compounding the base rate, may evolve over time, and trading prices for such instruments may be lower than those of later-issued SOFR-based debt instruments as a result. Similarly, if SOFR does not prove to be widely used, the trading price of investments linked to SOFR may be lower than those of investments linked to reference rates that are more widely used. A Fund may not be able to sell the investments at all or may not be able to sell them at prices that will provide a yield comparable to similar investments that have a developed secondary market, and may consequently suffer from increased pricing volatility and market risk.

Loans, Loan Participations, Assignments, and Other Direct Debt Instruments. Direct debt includes interests in loans, notes and other interests in amounts owed to financial institutions by borrowers, such as corporations and governments. Corporate and sovereign loans typically are structured and negotiated by a group of financial institutions and other investors that provide capital to the borrowers. In return, the borrowers pay interest and repay the loan’s principal. Purchasers of loans and other forms of direct indebtedness depend primarily upon the creditworthiness of the borrower for payment of principal and interest. The borrower may be in financial distress or may default. If a Fund does not receive scheduled interest or principal payments on such indebtedness, the Fund’s share price and yield could be adversely affected. Loans and other direct debt instruments may pay fixed rates of interest or may pay floating interest rates that are reset periodically on the basis of a floating base lending rate, such as the LIBOR plus a premium, a particular bank’s prime rate, the 90-day Treasury Department Bill rate, the rate of return on commercial paper or bank CDs, an index of short-term tax-exempt rates or some other objective measure. See “LIBOR Rate Risk” for more information on the phasing out of LIBOR. Corporate loans are made generally to finance internal growth, mergers, acquisitions, stock repurchases, leveraged buy-outs and other corporate activities. Unlike corporate loans, which are often secured, sovereign loans are typically unsecured. A Fund may invest in secured and unsecured loans.

A Fund may acquire a loan (1) directly at the time of the loan’s closing, (2) through a participation interest, which gives the Fund the right to receive payments of principal, interest and/or other amounts only from the lender selling the participation interest and only when the lender receives the payments from the borrower, or (2) through an assignment in which a Fund succeeds to the rights of the assigning lender and becomes a lender under the loan agreement.

Participation Interests — In purchasing a loan participation, a Fund acquires some or all of the interest of a bank or other lending institution in a loan to a borrower. A Fund’s rights under a participation interest with respect to a particular loan may be more limited than the rights of original lenders or of investors who acquire an assignment of that loan. In purchasing participation interests, a Fund will have the right to receive payments of principal, interest and any fees to which

it is entitled only from the lender selling the participation interest (the “participating lender”) and only when the participating lender receives the payments from the borrower.

In a participation interest, a Fund will usually have a contractual relationship only with the selling institution and not the underlying borrower. A Fund normally will have to rely on the participating lender to demand and receive payments in respect of the loans, and to pay those amounts on to the Fund; thus, a Fund will be subject to the risk that the lender may be unwilling or unable to do so. In such a case, a Fund would not likely have any rights against the borrower directly. As a result, a Fund will assume the credit risk of both the borrower and the lender that is selling the participation. In addition, a Fund generally will have no right to object to certain changes to the loan agreement agreed to by the participating lender.

In buying a participation interest, a Fund might not directly benefit from the collateral supporting the related loan and may be subject to any rights of set off the borrower has against the selling institution. In the event of bankruptcy or insolvency of the borrower, the obligation of the borrower to repay the loan may be subject to certain defenses that can be asserted by the borrower as a result of any improper conduct of the participating lender. As a result, a Fund may be subject to delays, expenses and risks that are greater than those that exist when the Fund is an original lender or assignee.

Assignments — When a Fund purchases a loan by assignment, the Fund typically succeeds to the rights of the assigning lender under the loan agreement and becomes a lender under the loan agreement. Subject to the terms of the loan agreement, a Fund typically succeeds to all the rights and obligations under the loan agreement of the assigning lender. However, assignments may be arranged through private negotiations between potential assignees and potential assignors, and the rights and obligations acquired by the purchaser of an assignment may differ from, and be more limited than, those held by the assigning lender.

Creditworthiness — A Fund’s ability to receive payment of principal, interest and other amounts due in connection with loans will depend primarily on the financial condition of the borrower (and, in some cases, the lending institution from which it purchases the loan). In evaluating the creditworthiness of borrowers, the Adviser or Sub-Adviser may consider, and may rely in part, on analyses performed by others. Because loan interests may not be rated by independent rating agencies, the decision to invest in a particular loan may depend heavily on the credit analysis of the borrower by the Adviser or Sub-Adviser or the original lending institution. In selecting the loans and other direct indebtedness that a Fund will purchase, the Adviser or Sub-Adviser will rely on its own credit analysis of the borrower and not solely on a lending institution’s credit analysis of the borrower. Indebtedness of borrowers whose creditworthiness is poor involves substantially greater risks and may be highly speculative. Borrowers that are in bankruptcy or restructuring may never pay off their indebtedness, or may pay only a small fraction of the amount owed. In connection with the restructuring of a loan or other direct debt instrument outside of bankruptcy court in a negotiated work-out or in the context of bankruptcy proceedings, equity securities or junior debt securities may be received in exchange for all or a portion of an interest in the security.

In buying a participation interest, a Fund assumes the credit risk of both the borrower and the participating lender. If the participating lender fails to perform its obligations under the participation agreement, a Fund might incur costs and delays in realizing payment and suffer a loss of principal or interest. If a participating lender becomes insolvent, a Fund may be treated as a general creditor of that lender. As a general creditor, a Fund may not benefit from a right of set off that the lender has against the borrower. A Fund acquiring a participation interest will evaluate the creditworthiness of the participating lender or other intermediary participant selling the participation interest.

Agents — Loans are typically administered by a bank, insurance company, finance company or other financial institution (the “agent”) for a lending syndicate of financial institutions. In a typical loan, the agent administers the terms of the loan agreement and is responsible for the collection of principal and interest and fee payments from the borrower and the apportionment of these payments to all lenders that are parties to the loan agreement. In addition, an institution (which may be the agent) may hold collateral on behalf of the lenders. Typically, under loan agreements, the agent is given broad authority in monitoring the borrower’s performance and is obligated to use the same care it would use in the management of its own property. In asserting rights against a borrower, a Fund normally will be dependent on the willingness of the lead bank to assert these rights, or upon a vote of all the lenders to authorize the action.

If an agent becomes insolvent, or has a receiver, conservator, or similar official appointed for it by the appropriate regulatory authority, or becomes a debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding, the agent’s appointment may be terminated and a successor

agent would be appointed. If an appropriate regulator or court determines that assets held by the agent for the benefit of the purchasers of loans are subject to the claims of the agent’s general or secured creditors, a Fund might incur certain costs and delays in realizing payment on a loan or suffer a loss of principal and/or interest. A Fund may be subject to similar risks when it buys a participation interest or an assignment from an intermediary.

Collateral — Loans that are fully secured offer a Fund more protection than an unsecured loan in the event of non-payment of scheduled interest or principal. However, there is no assurance that the collateral from a secured loan in which a Fund invests can be promptly liquidated, or that its liquidation value will be equal to the value of the debt. In most loan agreements there is no formal requirement to pledge additional collateral if the value of the initial collateral declines. As a result, a loan may not always be fully collateralized and can decline significantly in value.

If a borrower becomes insolvent, access to collateral may be limited by bankruptcy and other laws. Borrowers that are in bankruptcy may pay only a small portion of the amount owed, if they are able to pay at all. If a secured loan is foreclosed, a Fund will likely be required to bear the costs and liabilities associated with owning and disposing of the collateral. There is also a possibility that a Fund will become the owner of its pro rata share of the collateral which may carry additional risks and liabilities. In addition, under legal theories of lender liability, a Fund potentially might be held liable as a co-lender. In the event of a borrower’s bankruptcy or insolvency, the borrower’s obligation to repay the loan may be subject to certain defenses that the borrower can assert as a result of improper conduct by the lending agent. Some loans are unsecured. If the borrower defaults on an unsecured loan, a Fund will be a general creditor and will not have rights to any specific assets of the borrower.

Liquidity — Loans are generally subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Loans are not currently listed on any securities exchange or automatic quotation system, and there may not be an active trading market for some loans. As a result, a Fund may be unable to sell such investments at an opportune time or may have to resell them at less than fair market value. The lack of a liquid secondary market may have an adverse impact on a Fund’s ability to dispose of particular assignments or participations when necessary to meet redemptions of Fund shares, to meet the Fund’s liquidity needs or when necessary in response to a specific economic event, such as deterioration in the creditworthiness of the borrower. In addition, transactions in loan investments may take a significant amount of time to settle (i.e., more than seven days and up to several weeks or longer). Accordingly, the proceeds from the sale of a loan investment may not be available to make additional investments or to meet redemption obligations until potentially a substantial period after the sale of the loan. The extended trade settlement periods could force a Fund to liquidate other securities to meet redemptions and may present a risk that the Fund may incur losses in order to timely honor redemptions. To the extent that the Adviser or Sub-Adviser determines that any such investments are illiquid, they will be subject to a Fund’s restrictions on investments in illiquid securities.

Prepayment Risk — The borrower in a loan arrangement may, either at its own election or pursuant to the terms of the loan documentation, prepay amounts of the loan from time to time. Due to prepayment, the actual maturity of loans is typically shorter than their stated final maturity calculated solely on the basis of the stated life and payment schedule. The degree to which borrowers prepay loans, whether as a contractual requirement or at their election, may be affected by general business conditions, the financial condition of the borrower and competitive conditions among lenders, among other things. As such, prepayments cannot be predicted with accuracy. Upon a prepayment, either in part or in full, the actual outstanding debt on which a Fund derives interest income will be reduced. The effect of prepayments on a Fund’s performance may be mitigated by the receipt of prepayment fees, and the Fund’s ability to reinvest prepayments in other loans that have similar or identical yields. However, there is no assurance that a Fund will be able to reinvest the proceeds of any loan prepayment at the same interest rate or on the same terms as those of the prepaid loan.

Borrower Covenants — Loan agreements, which set forth the terms of a loan and the obligations of the borrower and lender, contain certain covenants that mandate or prohibit certain borrower actions, including financial covenants that dictate certain minimum and maximum financial performance levels. Covenants that require the borrower to maintain certain financial metrics during the life of the loan (such as maintaining certain levels of cash flow and limiting leverage) are known as “maintenance covenants.” These covenants are included to permit the lender to monitor the financial performance of the borrower and declare an event of default if certain criteria are breached, allowing the lender to renegotiate the terms of the loan based upon the elevated risk levels or take other actions to help mitigate losses. “Covenant lite” loans contain fewer maintenance covenants than traditional loans, or no maintenance covenants at all, and may not include terms that permit the lender to monitor the financial performance of the borrower and declare an event of default if certain criteria

are breached. This may hinder a Fund’s ability to reprice credit risk associated with the borrower and reduce a Fund’s ability to restructure a problematic loan and mitigate potential loss. A Fund may experience relatively greater difficulty or delays in enforcing its rights on its holdings of certain covenant lite loans than its holdings of loans with the usual covenants. As a result, a Fund’s exposure to losses on covenant lite loans may be increased, especially during a downturn in the credit cycle.

Available Information — Loans normally are not registered with the SEC or any state securities commission or listed on any securities exchange. As a result, the amount of public information available about a specific loan historically has been less extensive than if the loan were registered or exchange traded. Loans and certain other forms of direct indebtedness may not be considered “securities” under the federal securities laws, and therefore purchasers of such instruments (such as a Fund) may not be entitled to the protections against fraud and misrepresentation contained in the federal securities laws. In the absence of definitive regulatory guidance, a Fund relies on the Adviser’s or Sub-Adviser’s research in an attempt to avoid situations where fraud and misrepresentation could adversely affect a Fund.

Fees and Expenses — A Fund may be required to pay and may receive various commissions and fees in the process of purchasing, holding and selling loans. The fee component may include any, or a combination of, the following elements: assignment fees, arrangement fees, nonuse fees, facility fees, letter of credit fees, and ticking fees. Arrangement fees are paid at the commencement of a loan as compensation for the initiation of the transaction. A non-use fee is paid based upon the amount committed but not used under the loan. Facility fees are on-going annual fees paid in connection with a loan. Letter of credit fees are paid if a loan involves a letter of credit. Ticking fees are paid from the initial commitment indication until loan closing if for an extended period. The amount of fees is negotiated at the time of closing. In addition, a Fund may incur expenses associated with researching and analyzing potential loan investments, including legal fees.

Leveraged Buy-Out Transactions — Loans purchased by a Fund may represent interests in loans made to finance highly leveraged corporate acquisitions, known as “leveraged buy-out” transactions, leveraged recapitalization loans and other types of acquisition financing. The highly leveraged capital structure of the borrowers in such transactions may make such loans especially vulnerable to adverse changes in economic or market conditions.

Obligations to Make Future Advances — Certain of the loans and other direct indebtedness acquired by a Fund may involve unfunded commitments of the lenders or revolving credit facilities under which a borrower may from time to time borrow and repay amounts up to the maximum amount of the facility. In such cases, a Fund would have an obligation to advance its portion of such additional borrowings upon the terms specified in the loan documentation. Such an obligation may have the effect of requiring a Fund to increase its investment in a company at a time when a Fund might not otherwise decide to do so (including at a time when the company’s financial condition makes it unlikely that such amounts will be repaid).

Master Limited Partnerships. Master limited partnerships (“MLPs”) are limited partnerships (or similar entities, such as limited liability companies) in which the ownership units (e.g., limited partnership interests) are publicly traded. MLP units are registered with the SEC and are freely traded on a securities exchange or in the OTC market. Many MLPs operate in oil and gas related businesses, including energy processing and distribution. Many MLPs are pass-through entities that generally are taxed at the unitholder level and are not subject to federal or state income tax at the entity level. Annual income, gains, losses, deductions and credits of such an MLP pass through directly to its unitholders. Distributions from an MLP may consist in part of a return of capital. Generally, an MLP is operated under the supervision of one or more general partners. Limited partners are not involved in the day-to-day management of an MLP. Investing in MLPs involves certain risks related to investing in their underlying assets and risks associated with pooled investment vehicles. MLPs holding credit-related investments are subject to interest rate risk and the risk of default on payment obligations by debt issuers. MLPs that concentrate in a particular industry or a particular geographic region are subject to risks associated with such industry or region. Investments held by MLPs may be relatively illiquid, limiting the MLPs’ ability to vary their portfolios promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. MLPs may have limited financial resources, their securities may trade infrequently and in limited volume, and they may be subject to more abrupt or erratic price movements than securities of larger or more broadly based companies. The risks of investing in an MLP are generally those inherent in investing in a partnership as opposed to a corporation. For example, state law governing partnerships is different than state law governing corporations. Accordingly, there may be fewer protections afforded investors in an MLP than investors in a corporation. For example, although unitholders of an MLP are generally limited in their liability, similar to a corporation’s shareholders, creditors typically have the right to seek the return of distributions made to unitholders if the liability in question arose before the distributions were paid. This liability may stay attached to a unitholder even after it sells its units.

Mortgage-Backed or Mortgage-Related Securities. Mortgage-related securities (i.e., mortgage-backed securities) (“MBS”) represent direct or indirect participations in, or are secured by and payable from, pools of mortgage loans. Those securities may be guaranteed by a U.S. Government agency or instrumentality (such as the Government National Mortgage Association, or “Ginnie Mae”); issued and guaranteed by a government-sponsored stockholder-owned corporation, though not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States (such as by the Federal National Mortgage Association, or “Fannie Mae”, or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or “Freddie Mac” (collectively, the “GSEs”), and described in greater detail below); or issued by fully private issuers. Private issuers are generally originators of and investors in mortgage loans and include savings associations, mortgage bankers, commercial banks, investment bankers, and special purpose entities. Private MBS may be supported by various forms of insurance or guarantees, including individual loan, title, pool and hazard insurance and letters of credit, which may be issued by governmental entities, private insurers or the mortgage poolers.

Government-related guarantors (i.e., not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government) include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Fannie Mae is a government-sponsored corporation owned by stockholders. It is subject to general regulation by the Federal Housing Finance Authority (“FHFA”). Fannie Mae purchases residential mortgages from a list of approved seller/servicers that include state and federally chartered savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, commercial banks, credit unions and mortgage bankers. Fannie Mae guarantees the timely payment of principal and interest on pass-through securities that it issues, but those securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.

Freddie Mac is a government-sponsored corporation owned by stockholders. Freddie Mac issues Participation Certificates (“PCs”), which represent interests in mortgages from Freddie Mac’s national portfolio. Freddie Mac guarantees the timely payment of interest and ultimate collection of principal on the PCs it issues, but those PCs are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac also securitize reperforming loans (“RPLs”), which are loans that have previously been delinquent but are current at the time they are securitized. For example, in Fannie Mae’s case, the RPLs are single-family, fixed rate reperforming loans that generally were previously placed in a mortgage backed securities trust guaranteed by Fannie Mae, purchased from the trust by Fannie Mae and held as a distressed asset after four or more months of delinquency, and subsequently became current (i.e., performing) again. Such RPLs may have exited delinquency through efforts at reducing defaults (e.g., loan modification). In selecting RPLs for securitization, Fannie Mae follows certain criteria related to the length of time the loan has been performing, the type of loan (single-family, fixed rate), and the status of the loan as first lien, among other things. Fannie Mae may include different loan structures and modification programs in the future.

The U.S. Treasury historically had the authority to purchase obligations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. However, in 2008, due to capitalization concerns, Congress provided the U.S. Treasury with additional authority to lend the GSEs emergency funds and to purchase their stock. In September 2008, those capital concerns led the U.S. Treasury and the FHFA to announce that the GSEs had been placed in conservatorship. Since that time, the GSEs have received significant capital support through U.S. Treasury preferred stock purchases as well as U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve purchases of their MBS. While the MBS purchase programs ended in 2010, the U.S. Treasury announced in December 2009 that it would continue its support for the entities’ capital as necessary to prevent a negative net worth. However, no assurance can be given that the Federal Reserve, U.S. Treasury, or FHFA initiatives will ensure that the GSEs will remain successful in meeting their obligations with respect to the debt and MBS they issue into the future.

In 2012, the FHFA initiated a strategic plan to develop a program related to credit risk transfers intended to reduce Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s overall risk through the creation of credit risk transfer assets (“CRTs”). CRTs come in two primary series: Structured Agency Credit Risk (“STACRs”) for Freddie Mac and Connecticut Avenue Securities (“CAS”) for Fannie Mae, although other series may be developed in the future. CRTs are typically structured as unsecured general obligations of either entity guaranteed by a government-sponsored stockholder-owned corporation, though not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States (such as by GSEs or special purpose entities), and their cash flows are based on the performance of a pool of reference loans. Unlike traditional residential MBS securities, bond payments typically do not come directly from the underlying mortgages. Instead, the GSEs either make the payments to CRT investors, or the GSEs make certain payments to the special purpose entities and the special purpose entities make payments to the investors. The risks associated with these investments are different than the risks associated with an investment in mortgage-backed securities issued by GSEs or a private issuer. In certain structures, the special purpose entities make payments to the GSEs upon the occurrence of credit events with respect to the underlying mortgages, and the obligation of the special purpose entity to make such payments to the GSE is senior to the obligation of the special purpose

entity to make payments to the CRT investors. CRTs are typically floating rate securities and may have multiple tranches with losses first allocated to the most junior or subordinate tranche. This structure results in increased sensitivity to dramatic housing downturns, especially for the subordinate tranches. In the event of a default on the obligations to noteholders, noteholders have no recourse to the underlying mortgage loans. In addition, some or all of the mortgage default risk associated with the underlying mortgage loans is transferred to noteholders. As a result, there can be no assurance that losses will not occur on an investment in GSE credit risk transfer securities, and a Fund investing in these instruments may be exposed to the risk of loss on their investment. In addition, these investments are subject to prepayment risk. Many CRTs also have collateral performance triggers (e.g., based on credit enhancement, delinquencies or defaults, etc.) that could shut off principal payments to subordinate tranches. Generally, GSEs have the ability to call all of the CRT tranches at par in 10 years.

There remains significant uncertainty as to whether (or when) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will emerge from conservatorship, which has no specified termination date. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac also are the subject of several continuing class action lawsuits and investigations by federal regulators, which (along with any resulting financial restatements) may adversely affect the guaranteeing entities. In addition, the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is in question as Congress may consider reforms of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which could address their structure, mission, portfolio limits and guarantee fees, among other issues. The potential impact of these developments is unclear, but they could cause a Fund to lose money.

In late 2020, the FHFA issued a new capital rule requiring Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to hold $283 billion in unadjusted total capital as of June 30, 2020, based on their assets at the time. In January 2021, the FHFA and the U.S. Treasury agreed to amend the preferred stock purchase agreements for the shares in the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that the federal government continues to hold. The amendments permit Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to retain all earnings until they have reached the requirements set by the 2020 capital rule.

On June 3, 2019, under the FHFA’s “Single Security Initiative,” Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ceased issuing their own mortgage-based securities and started issuing uniform mortgage-backed securities (“UMBS”). The Single Security Initiative seeks to align the characteristics of certain Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage-based securities and to support the overall liquidity in certain markets. Each UMBS will have a 55-day remittance cycle and can be used as collateral in either a Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac security or held for investment. In addition, investors may be approached to convert existing mortgage-backed securities into UMBS, possibly with an inducement fee being offered to holders of Freddie Mac mortgage-backed securities. The effects that the Single Security Initiative may have on the market and other mortgage-backed securities are uncertain.

Unlike MBS issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or one of the GSEs, MBS issued by private issuers do not have a government or GSE guarantee. Private issuers may purchase various forms of private insurance or guarantees, including individual loan, title, pool and hazard insurance, to support the timely payment of principal and interest of the underlying mortgage loans. However, there can be no assurance that the private insurers or guarantors can meet their obligations under the insurance policies or guarantee arrangements. In addition, privately issued MBS are not traded on an exchange and there may be a limited market for the securities, especially when there is a perceived weakness in the mortgage and real estate market sectors. Without an active trading market, private MBS may be particularly difficult to value because of the complexities involved in assessing the value of the underlying mortgage loans.

The value of MBS may change due to shifts in the market’s perception of issuers and changes in interest rates. In addition, statutory and/or regulatory tax and/or other changes may adversely affect the mortgage securities market as a whole. Privately issued MBS may offer higher yields than those issued by government entities, but also may be subject to greater price changes than government issues. MBS have yield and maturity characteristics corresponding to the underlying assets. Certain MBS may include securities backed by pools of mortgage loans made to borrowers with blemished credit histories (“subprime” loans). The underwriting standards for subprime loans may be lower and more flexible than the standards generally used by lenders for borrowers with non-blemished credit histories with respect to the borrower’s credit standing and repayment history. The risk of non-payment is greater for MBS that are backed by mortgage pools that contain subprime loans, but a level of risk exists for all loans. Market factors adversely affecting mortgage loan repayments may include a general economic downturn, high unemployment, a general slowdown in the real estate market, a drop in the market prices of real estate, or an increase in interest rates resulting in higher mortgage payments by holders of adjustable rate mortgages. Unlike traditional debt securities, which may pay a fixed rate of interest until maturity, when the entire principal amount comes due, payments on certain MBS include both interest and a partial repayment of principal. Besides the scheduled repayment of principal, repayments of principal may result from the voluntary prepayment, refinancing, or foreclosure of the underlying mortgage loans.

MBS are subject to prepayment risk. Prepayment, which occurs when unscheduled or early payments are made on the underlying mortgages, may shorten the effective maturities of these securities and may lower their returns. If property owners make unscheduled prepayments of their mortgage loans, these prepayments will result in early payment of the applicable MBS. In that event, a Fund may be unable to invest the proceeds from the early payment of the MBS in an investment that provides as high a yield as the MBS. Consequently, early payment associated with MBS may cause these securities to experience significantly greater price and yield volatility than that experienced by traditional fixed income securities. The occurrence of mortgage prepayments is affected by factors including the level of interest rates, general economic conditions, the location and age of the mortgage and other social and demographic conditions. During periods of falling interest rates, the rate of mortgage prepayments tends to increase, thereby tending to decrease the life of MBS. During periods of rising interest rates, the rate of mortgage prepayments usually decreases, thereby tending to increase the life of MBS. Since the value of long-term securities generally fluctuates more widely in response to changes in interest rates than that of shorter-term securities, maturity extension could increase the inherent volatility of a Fund. This is known as extension risk. If the life of a MBS is inaccurately predicted, a Fund may not be able to realize the rate of return it expected. Under certain interest rate and prepayment scenarios, a Fund may fail to recoup fully its investment in MBS notwithstanding any direct or indirect governmental or agency guarantee.

MBS are less effective than other types of securities as a means of “locking in” attractive long-term interest rates. One reason is the need to reinvest prepayments of principal; another is the possibility of significant unscheduled prepayments resulting from declines in interest rates. Prepayments may cause losses on securities purchased at a premium. At times, some of the MBS in which a Fund may invest will have higher than market interest rates and, therefore, will be purchased at a premium above their par value. Unscheduled prepayments, which are made at par, will cause a Fund to experience a loss equal to any unamortized premium.

A Fund may invest in CMOs and stripped MBS that represent a participation in, or are secured by, mortgage loans. Some MBS, such as CMOs, make payments of both principal and interest at a variety of intervals; others make semiannual interest payments at a predetermined rate and repay principal at maturity (like a typical bond). MBS are based on different types of mortgages including those on commercial real estate or residential properties.

CMOs may be issued by a U.S. government agency or instrumentality or by a private issuer. Although payment of the principal of, and interest on, the underlying collateral securing privately issued CMOs may be guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies or instrumentalities, these CMOs represent obligations solely of the private issuer and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities or any other person or entity. Prepayments could cause early retirement of CMOs. CMOs are designed to reduce the risk of prepayment for investors by issuing multiple classes of securities (or “tranches”), each having different maturities, interest rates and payment schedules, and with the principal and interest on the underlying mortgages allocated among the several classes in various ways. Payment of interest or principal on some classes or series of CMOs may be subject to contingencies or some classes or series may bear some or all of the risk of default on the underlying mortgages. CMOs of different classes or series are generally retired in sequence as the underlying mortgage loans in the mortgage pool are repaid. If enough mortgages are repaid ahead of schedule, the classes or series of a CMO with the earliest maturities generally will be retired prior to their maturities. Thus, the early retirement of particular classes or series of a CMO held by a Fund would have the same effect as the prepayment of mortgages underlying other MBS. Conversely, slower than anticipated prepayments can extend the effective maturities of CMOs, subjecting them to a greater risk of decline in market value in response to rising interest rates than traditional debt securities, and, therefore, potentially increasing the volatility of a Fund that invests in CMOs.

Stripped MBS are created when a U.S. government agency or a financial institution separates the interest and principal components of a MBS and sells them as individual securities. The securities may be issued by agencies or instrumentalities of the U.S. government and private originators of, or investors in, mortgage loans, including savings and loan associations, mortgage banks, commercial banks, investment banks and special purpose entities of the foregoing. Stripped MBS are usually structured with two classes that receive different portions of the interest and principal distributions on a pool of mortgage loans. The holder of the “principal-only” security (“PO”) receives the principal payments made by the underlying MBS, while the holder of the “interest-only” security (“IO”) receives interest payments from the same underlying security. A Fund may invest in both the IO class and the PO class. The prices of stripped MBS may be particularly affected by changes in interest rates. The yield to maturity on an IO class of stripped MBS is extremely sensitive not only to changes in prevailing interest rates but also to the rate of principal payments (including prepayments) on the underlying assets. As interest rates fall, prepayment rates tend to increase, which tends to reduce prices of IOs and increase prices of POs. Rising interest rates can have the opposite effect.

Prepayments may also result in losses on stripped MBS. A rapid rate of principal prepayments may have a measurable adverse effect on a Fund’s yield to maturity to the extent it invests in IOs. If the assets underlying the IO experience greater than anticipated prepayments of principal, a Fund may fail to recoup fully its initial investments in these securities. Conversely, POs tend to increase in value if prepayments are greater than anticipated and decline if prepayments are slower than anticipated. The secondary market for stripped MBS may be more volatile and less liquid than that for other MBS, potentially limiting a Fund’s ability to buy or sell those securities at any particular time.

As CMOs have evolved, some classes of CMO bonds have become more common. For example, a Fund may invest in parallel-pay and planned amortization class (“PAC”) CMOs and multi-class pass through certificates. Parallel-pay CMOs and multi-class passthrough certificates are structured to provide payments of principal on each payment date to more than one class. These simultaneous payments are taken into account in calculating the stated maturity date or final distribution date of each class, which, as with other CMO and multi-class pass-through structures, must be retired by its stated maturity date or final distribution date but may be retired earlier. PACs generally require payments of a specified amount of principal on each payment date. PACs are parallel-pay CMOs with the required principal amount on such securities having the highest priority after interest has been paid to all classes. Any CMO or multi-class pass through structure that includes PAC securities must also have support tranches — known as support bonds, companion bonds or non-PAC bonds— which lend or absorb principal cash flows to allow the PAC securities to maintain their stated maturities and final distribution dates within a range of actual prepayment experience. These support tranches are subject to a higher level of maturity risk compared to other mortgage-related securities, and usually provide a higher yield to compensate investors. If principal cash flows are received in amounts outside a pre-determined range such that the support bonds cannot lend or absorb sufficient cash flows to the PAC securities as intended, the PAC securities are subject to heightened maturity risk. Consistent with a Fund’s investment objectives and policies, the Fund may invest in various tranches of CMO bonds, including support bonds.

A Fund may also invest in directly placed mortgages including residential mortgages, multifamily mortgages, mortgages on cooperative apartment buildings, commercial mortgages, and sale-leasebacks. These investments are backed by assets such as office buildings, shopping centers, retail stores, warehouses, apartment buildings and single-family dwellings. In the event that a Fund forecloses on any non-performing mortgage, it could end up acquiring a direct interest in the underlying real property and the Fund would then be subject to the risks generally associated with the ownership of real property. There may be fluctuations in the market value of the foreclosed property and its occupancy rates, rent schedules and operating expenses. Investment in direct mortgages involve many of the same risks as investments in mortgage-related securities. There may also be adverse changes in local, regional or general economic conditions, deterioration of the real estate market and the financial circumstances of tenants and sellers, unfavorable changes in zoning, building, environmental and other laws, increased real property taxes, rising interest rates, reduced availability and increased cost of mortgage borrowings, the need for anticipated renovations, unexpected increases in the cost of energy, environmental factors, and other factors which are beyond the control of a Fund or the Adviser or any Sub-Adviser. Hazardous or toxic substances may be present on, at or under the mortgaged property and adversely affect the value of the property. In addition, the owners of the property containing such substances may be held responsible, under various laws, for containing, monitoring, removing or cleaning up such substances. The presence of such substances may also provide a basis for other claims by third parties. Costs of clean-up or of liabilities to third parties may exceed the value of the property. In addition, these risks may be uninsurable. In light of these and similar risks, it may be impossible to dispose profitably of properties in foreclosure.

Mortgage Dollar Rolls. A Fund may enter into mortgage dollar rolls in which a Fund sells securities for delivery in the current month and simultaneously contracts with the same counterparty to repurchase similar (same type, coupon and maturity) but not identical securities on a specified future date at a pre-determined price. During the roll period, a Fund loses the right to receive principal (including prepayments of principal) and interest paid on the securities sold. However, the Fund would benefit to the extent of any difference between the price received for the securities sold and the lower forward price for the future purchase (often referred to as the “drop”) or fee income plus the interest earned on the cash proceeds of the securities sold until the settlement date of the forward purchase. Unless such benefits exceed the income, capital appreciation and gain or loss due to mortgage prepayments that would have been realized on the securities sold as part of the mortgage dollar roll, the use of this technique will diminish the investment performance of a Fund compared with what such performance would have been without the use of mortgage dollar rolls. Accordingly, the benefits derived from the use of mortgage dollar rolls depend upon the Adviser’s or Sub-Adviser’s ability to manage mortgage prepayments. There is no assurance that mortgage dollar rolls can be successfully employed. A “dollar roll” transaction can be viewed as a collateralized borrowing in which a Fund pledges a mortgage-related security to a dealer to obtain cash. However, in a “dollar roll” transaction, the dealer with which a Fund enters into a transaction

is not obligated to return the same securities as those originally sold by the Fund, but generally only securities which are “substantially identical.” To be considered “substantially identical,” the securities returned to a Fund generally must: (1) be collateralized by the same types of underlying mortgages; (2) be issued by the same agency and be part of the same program; (3) have a similar original stated maturity; (4) have identical net coupon rates; (5) have similar market yields (and therefore price); and (6) satisfy “good delivery” requirements, meaning that the aggregate principal amounts of the securities delivered and received back must be within 0.01% of the initial amount delivered. If the dealer files for bankruptcy or becomes insolvent, a Fund’s right to repurchase or sell securities may be limited. Mortgage dollar rolls may be subject to leverage risks. In addition, mortgage dollar rolls may increase interest rate risk and result in an increased portfolio turnover rate, which would increase costs and may increase a Fund’s realized net gains that must be distributed to its shareholders. All cash proceeds from dollar roll transactions will be invested in instruments that are permissible investments for a Fund. Because dollar roll transactions may be for terms ranging between one and six months, dollar roll transactions may be deemed “illiquid” and subject to the risks of investing in illiquid securities as well as to a Fund’s overall limitations on investments in illiquid securities.

Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act permits a Fund to enter into when-issued or forward-settling securities (e.g., dollar rolls and firm and standby commitments, including TBA commitments) and non-standard settlement cycle securities notwithstanding the limitation on the issuance of senior securities in Section 18 of the 1940 Act, provided that the transaction satisfies the Delayed-Settlement Securities Provision. If a when-issued, forward-settling or non-standard settlement cycle security does not satisfy the Delayed-Settlement Securities Provision, then it is treated as a Derivatives Transaction under Rule 18f-4. For more information about these practices, see the “Derivatives” section.

Municipal Securities. A Fund may invest in municipal securities (“municipals”), including residual interest bonds, which are debt obligations issued by local, state and regional governments that provide interest income that is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes (“excludable interest”). Municipals include both municipal bonds (those securities with maturities of five years or more) and municipal notes (those with maturities of less than five years). Municipal bonds are issued for a wide variety of reasons, including: to construct public facilities, such as airports, highways, bridges, schools, hospitals, mass transportation, streets, water and sewer works; to obtain funds for operating expenses; to refund outstanding municipal obligations; and to loan funds to various public institutions and facilities. Certain private activity bonds (“PABs”) are also considered municipals if the interest thereon is excludable interest (even though that interest may be an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax). PABs are issued by or on behalf of public authorities to obtain funds for various privately operated manufacturing facilities, housing, sports arenas, convention centers, airports, mass transportation systems and water, gas or sewer works. PABs are ordinarily dependent on the credit quality of a private user, not the public issuer.

The value of municipal securities can be affected by changes in the actual or perceived credit quality of the issuer, which can be affected by, among other things, the financial condition of the issuer, the issuer’s future borrowing plans and sources of revenue, the economic feasibility of the revenue bond project or general borrowing purpose, and political or economic developments in the region where the instrument is issued. Local and national market forces — such as declines in real estate prices or general business activity — shifting demographics or political gridlock may result in decreasing tax bases, growing entitlement budgets, and increasing construction and/or maintenance costs and could reduce the ability of certain issuers of municipal securities to repay their obligations. Those obligations are subject to the provisions of bankruptcy, insolvency and other laws affecting the rights and remedies of creditors. Congress or state legislatures may seek to extend the time for payment of principal or interest, or both, or to impose other constraints upon enforcement of such obligations. Budgetary constraints may cause municipal securities to be more susceptible to downgrade, default and bankruptcy. In addition, difficulties in the municipal securities markets could result in increased illiquidity, volatility and credit risk, and a decrease in the number of municipal securities investment opportunities. There is also the possibility that as a result of litigation or other conditions, the power or ability of issuers to meet their obligations for the payment of interest and principal on their municipal securities may be materially affected or their obligations may be found to be invalid or unenforceable. These and other factors may adversely affect the value of a Fund’s investments in municipal securities.

The perceived increased likelihood of default among issuers of municipal securities has resulted in constrained liquidity, increased price volatility and credit downgrades of issuers of municipal securities. Certain issuers of municipal securities have also been unable to obtain additional financing through, or must pay higher interest rates on, new issues, which may reduce revenues available for issuers of municipal securities to pay existing obligations. In addition, the lack of disclosure rules in this area can make it difficult for investors to obtain reliable information on the obligations underlying municipal securities. Adverse developments in the municipal securities market may negatively affect the value of all or a substantial portion of a Fund’s holdings in municipal securities.

Options Transactions. A Fund may write and purchase put and call options. An option (a potentially high-risk security) is a contract that gives the holder of the option, in return for a premium, the right, but not the obligation, to buy from (in the case of a call) or sell to (in the case of a put) the writer of the option the asset underlying the option at a predetermined price, often at any time during the term of the option for American options or only at expiration for European options. (The writer of a put or call option would be obligated to buy or sell the underlying asset at a predetermined price during the term of the option.)

Writing Call Options. A call option is a contract which gives the purchaser of the option (in return for a premium paid) the right to buy, and the writer of the option (in return for a premium received) the obligation to sell, the underlying security at the exercise price at any time prior to the expiration of the option, regardless of the market price of the security during the option period.

A Fund may write covered call options both to reduce the risks associated with certain of its investments and to increase total investment return through the receipt of premiums. In return for the premium income, a Fund will give up the opportunity to profit from an increase in the market price of the underlying security above the exercise price so long as its obligations under the contract continue, except insofar as the premium represents a profit. Moreover, in writing the call option, a Fund will retain the risk of loss should the price of the security decline. The premium is intended to offset that loss in whole or in part.

Unlike the situation in which a Fund owns securities not subject to a call option, a Fund, in writing call options, must assume that the call may be exercised at any time prior to the expiration of its obligation as a writer, and that in such circumstances the net proceeds realized from the sale of the underlying securities pursuant to the call may be substantially below the prevailing market price.

When a Fund writes a call option, an amount equal to the premium received by the Fund is included in the Fund’s financial statements as an asset and an equivalent liability. The amount of the liability is subsequently marked-to-market to reflect the current market value of the option written. A Fund may terminate its obligation under an option it has written by buying an identical option. Such a transaction is called a “closing purchase transaction.” When an option expires on its stipulated expiration date or a Fund enters into a closing purchase or sale transaction, the Fund realizes a gain (or loss) without regard to any unrealized gain or loss on the underlying security, and the liability related to such option is extinguished. When an option is exercised, a Fund realizes a gain or loss from the sale of the underlying security, and the proceeds of sale are increased by the premium originally received, or reduced by the price paid for the option.

A closing purchase transaction for exchange-traded options may be made only on a national securities exchange (“exchange”). There is no assurance that a liquid secondary market on an exchange will exist for any particular option, or at any particular time, and for some options, such as OTC options, no secondary market on an exchange may exist. A liquid secondary market for particular options, whether traded OTC or on an exchange may be absent for reasons which include the following: there may be insufficient trading interest in certain options; restrictions may be imposed by an exchange on opening transactions or closing transactions or both; trading halts, suspensions or other restrictions may be imposed with respect to particular classes or series of options or underlying securities; unusual or unforeseen circumstances may interrupt normal operations on an exchange; the facilities of an exchange or the Options Clearing Corporation may not at all times be adequate to handle current trading volume; or one or more exchanges could, for economic or other reasons, decide or be compelled at some future date to discontinue the trading of options (or a particular class or series of options), in which event the secondary market on that exchange (or in that class or series of options) would cease to exist, although outstanding options that had been issued by the Options Clearing Corporation as a result of trades on that exchange would continue to be exercisable in accordance with their terms. If a Fund is unable to effect a closing purchase transaction, the Fund will not sell the underlying security until the option expires or the Fund delivers the underlying security upon exercise.

Writing Put Options. The writer of a put option becomes obligated to purchase the underlying security at a specified price during the option period if the buyer elects to exercise the option before its expiration date. A Fund may write put options either to earn additional income in the form of option premiums (anticipating that the price of the underlying security will remain stable or rise during the option period and the option will therefore not be exercised) or to acquire the underlying security at a net cost below the current value (e.g., the option is exercised because of a decline in the price of the underlying security, but the amount paid by a Fund, offset by the option premium, is less than the current price). The risk of either strategy is that the price of the underlying security may decline by an amount greater than the premium received. The premium which a Fund receives from writing a put option will reflect, among other things, the current market price of the underlying security, the relationship of the exercise price to that market price, the historical price volatility of the underlying security, the option period, supply and demand and interest rates.

A Fund may effect a closing purchase transaction to realize a profit on an outstanding put option or to prevent an outstanding put option from being exercised.

Purchasing Put and Call Options. A Fund may purchase put options on securities to increase the Fund’s total investment return or to protect its holdings against a substantial decline in market value. The purchase of put options on securities will enable a Fund to preserve, at least partially, unrealized gains in an appreciated security in its portfolio without actually selling the security. In addition, a Fund will continue to receive interest or dividend income on the security. A Fund may also purchase call options on securities to protect against substantial increases in prices of securities that a Fund intends to purchase pending their ability to invest in an orderly manner in those securities. A Fund may sell put or call options they have previously purchased, which could result in a net gain or loss depending on whether the amount received on the sale is more or less than the premium and other transaction costs paid on the put or call option which was bought.

Options on Futures Contracts. A Fund may purchase and write exchange-traded call and put options on futures contracts of the type which the Fund is authorized to enter into. These options are traded on exchanges that are licensed and regulated by the CFTC for the purpose of options trading. A call option on a futures contract gives the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to purchase a futures contract (assume a “long” position) at a specified exercise price at any time before the option expires. A put option gives the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to sell a futures contract (assume a “short” position), for a specified exercise price, at any time before the option expires.

Options on futures contracts can be used by a Fund to hedge substantially the same risks as might be addressed by the direct purchase or sale of the underlying futures contracts. If a Fund purchases an option on a futures contract, it may obtain benefits similar to those that would result if it held the futures position itself. Purchases of options on futures contracts may present less risk in hedging than the purchase and sale of the underlying futures contracts since the potential loss is limited to the amount of the premium plus related transaction costs.

Upon the exercise of a call option, the writer of the option is obligated to sell the futures contract (to deliver a “long” position to the option holder) at the option exercise price, which will presumably be lower than the current market price of the contract in the futures market. Upon exercise of a put, the writer of the option is obligated to purchase the futures contract (deliver a “short” position to the option holder) at the option exercise price which will presumably be higher than the current market price of the contract in the futures market. When the holder of an option exercises it and assumes a long futures position, in the case of a call, or a short futures position, in the case of a put, its gain will be credited to its futures margin account, while the loss suffered by the writer of the option will be debited to its account and must be immediately paid by the writer. However, as with the trading of futures, most participants in the options markets do not seek to realize their gains or losses by exercise of their option rights. Instead, the holder of an option will usually realize a gain or loss by buying or selling an offsetting option at a market price that will reflect an increase or a decrease from the premium originally paid.

If a Fund writes options on futures contracts, the Fund will receive a premium but will assume a risk of adverse movement in the price of the underlying futures contract comparable to that involved in holding a futures position. If the option is not exercised, the Fund will realize a gain in the amount of the premium, which may partially offset unfavorable changes in the value of securities held in or to be acquired for the Fund. If the option is exercised, the Fund will incur a loss in the option transaction, which will be reduced by the amount of the premium it has received, but which will offset any favorable changes in the value of its portfolio securities or, in the case of a put, lower prices of securities it intends to acquire.

Securities Index Options. A Fund may write put and call options and purchase call and put options on securities indices for the purpose of increasing the Fund’s total investment return or hedging against the risk of unfavorable price movements adversely affecting the value of a Fund’s securities or securities it intends to purchase. Unlike a stock option, which gives the holder the right to purchase or sell a specified stock at a specified price, an option on a securities index gives the holder the right to receive a cash “exercise settlement amount” equal to the difference between the exercise price of the option and the value of the underlying stock index on the exercise date, multiplied by a fixed “index multiplier.”

The 1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income Fund writes only “covered” options. A call option on a securities index is considered covered, for example, if, so long as a Fund is obligated as the writer of the call, it holds securities the price changes of which are, in the opinion of the Fund’s Adviser or Sub-Adviser, expected to replicate substantially the movement of the index or indices upon which the options written by the Fund are based. A put option on a securities index written by a Fund will be considered covered

if, so long as it is obligated as the writer of the put, the Fund segregates, either on the records of the Adviser or Sub-Adviser or with the Fund’s custodian, cash or other liquid assets having a value equal to or greater than the exercise price of the option.

Securities index options are subject to exclusive SEC jurisdiction.

A securities index fluctuates with changes in the market value of the securities so included. For example, some securities index options are based on a broad market index such as the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Index (“S&P 500 Index”) or the NYSE Composite Index, or a narrower market index such as the S&P 100 Index (a subset of the S&P 500 Index). Indices may also be based on an industry or market segment such as the NYSE Arca Oil and Gas Index or the NASDAQ Computer Index.

The effectiveness of hedging through the purchase of securities index options will depend upon the extent to which price movements in the portion of the securities portfolio being hedged correlate with price movements in the selected securities index. Perfect correlation is not possible because the securities held or to be acquired by a Fund will not exactly match the composition of the securities indices on which options are written. There are a number of factors which may prevent derivatives or other strategies used by a Fund from achieving desired correlation (or inverse correlation) with an index. These may include, but are not limited to: (i) the impact of a Fund’s fees, expenses and transaction costs, including borrowing and brokerage costs/bid-ask spreads, which are not reflected in index returns; (ii) differences in the timing of daily calculations of the value of an index and the timing of the valuation of derivatives, securities and other assets held by a Fund and the determination of the net asset value of the Fund’s shares; (iii) disruptions or illiquidity in the markets for derivative instruments or securities in which a Fund invests; (iv) a Fund having exposure to or holding less than all of the securities in the underlying index and/or having exposure to or holding securities not included in the underlying index; (v) large or unexpected movements of assets into and out of a Fund (due to share purchases or redemptions, for example), potentially resulting in the Fund being over- or under-exposed to the index; (vi) the impact of accounting standards or changes thereto; (vii) changes to the applicable index that are not disseminated in advance; (viii) a possible need to conform a Fund’s portfolio holdings to comply with investment restrictions or policies or regulatory or tax law requirements; and (ix) fluctuations in currency exchange rates. In the purchase of securities index options the principal risk is that the premium and transaction costs paid by a Fund in purchasing an option will be lost if the changes (increase in the case of a call, decrease in the case of a put) in the level of the index do not exceed the cost of the option.

Over-the-Counter Options. A Fund may engage in over the counter put and call option transactions. Options traded in the OTC market may not be as actively traded as those on an exchange, so it may be more difficult to value such options. In addition, it may be difficult to enter into closing transactions with respect to such options. Such OTC options, and any securities used as “cover” for such options, may be considered illiquid securities. A Fund may enter into contracts (or amend existing contracts) with primary dealers with whom they write OTC options. The contracts will provide that a Fund has the absolute right to repurchase an option it writes at any time at a repurchase price which represents the fair market value, as determined in good faith through negotiation between the parties, but which in no event will exceed a price determined pursuant to a formula contained in the contract. Although the specific details of the formula may vary between contracts with different primary dealers, the formula will generally be based on a multiple of the premium received by a Fund for writing the option, plus the amount, if any, of the option’s intrinsic value (i.e., the amount the option is “in-the-money”). The formula will also include a factor to account for the difference between the price of the security and the strike price of the option if the option is written “out-of-the-money.” Although the specific details of the formula may vary with different primary dealers, each contract will provide a formula to determine the maximum price at which a Fund can repurchase the option at any time. A Fund may be subject to the risk that firms participating in such transactions will fail to meet their obligations. Unless the parties provide for it, no central clearing or guaranty function is involved in an OTC option. As a result, if a counterparty fails to make or take delivery of the security, currency or other instrument underlying an OTC option it has entered into with a Fund or fails to make a cash settlement payment due in accordance with the terms of that option, the Fund will lose any premium it paid for the option as well as any anticipated benefit of the transaction. In instances in which a Fund has entered into agreements with respect to the OTC options it has written, and such agreements would enable the Fund to have an absolute right to repurchase at a pre-established formula price the OTC option written by it, the Fund would treat as illiquid only securities equal in amount to the formula price described above less the amount by which the option is “in-the-money,” i.e., the amount by which the price of the option exceeds the exercise price. Certain OTC options are considered to be swaps. For information concerning the risks associated with utilizing swaps, please see the section on “Swaps.”

Participatory Notes. A Fund may invest in participatory notes (commonly known as “P-Notes”) issued by banks or broker-dealers that are designed to replicate the performance of certain issuers and markets. Participatory notes are a type of equity-linked derivative which generally are traded over-the-counter. The performance results of participatory notes will not replicate exactly

the performance of the issuers or markets that the notes seek to replicate due to transaction costs and other expenses. Investments in participatory notes involve the same risks associated with a direct investment in the shares of the companies the notes seek to replicate. In addition, participatory notes are subject to counterparty risk, which is the risk that the broker-dealer or bank that issues the notes will not fulfill its contractual obligation to complete the transaction with a Fund. Participatory notes constitute general unsecured contractual obligations of the banks or broker-dealers that issue them, and a Fund relies on the creditworthiness of such banks or broker-dealers and has no rights under a participatory note against the issuers of the securities underlying such participatory notes. Participatory notes involve transaction costs. A Fund’s ability to redeem or exercise a participation note generally is dependent on the liquidity in the local trading market for the security underlying the participation note. Participatory notes may be considered illiquid and, therefore, participatory notes considered illiquid will be subject to a Fund’s percentage limitation on investments in illiquid securities.

Preferred Stocks. Preferred stocks have the right to receive specified dividends before the payment of dividends on common stock. Preferred stock is subject to issuer-specific and market risks applicable generally to equity securities. In addition, in the event an issuer is liquidated or declares bankruptcy, the claims of owners of the issuer’s bonds take precedence over the claims of owners of the issuer’s preferred and common stock. For this reason, the value of preferred stock will usually react more strongly than bonds and other debt to actual or perceived changes in the company’s financial condition or prospects. Preferred stock of smaller companies may be more vulnerable to adverse developments than preferred stock of larger companies. If interest rates rise, the specified dividend on preferred stocks may be less attractive, causing the price of such stocks to decline. The value of preferred stocks is sensitive to changes in interest rates and to changes in the issuer’s credit quality. Unlike interest payments on debt securities, preferred stock dividends are payable only if declared by the issuer’s board of directors. Preferred stock also may be subject to optional or mandatory redemption provisions. Cumulative preferred stock requires the issuer to pay stockholders all prior unpaid dividends before the issuer can pay dividends on common stock, whereas non-cumulative preferred stock does not require the issuer to do so. Some preferred stocks also participate in dividends paid on common stock. Preferred stocks may provide for the issuer to redeem the stock on a specified date. A Fund may treat such redeemable preferred stock as a fixed income security.

Precious Metals. Precious metals, such as gold and silver, generate no interest or dividends, and the return from investments in such precious metals will be derived solely from the gains and losses realized upon sale. Prices of precious metals may fluctuate, sharply or gradually, and over short or long periods of time. The prices of precious metals may be significantly affected by factors such as changes in inflation or expectations regarding inflation in various countries, the availability of supplies and demand, changes in industrial and commercial demand, developments in the precious metals mining industries, precious metals sales by governments, central banks or international institutions, investment speculation, hedging activity by producers, currency exchange rates, interest rates, and monetary and other economic policies of various governments. In addition, because the majority of the world’s supply of gold and silver is concentrated in a few countries, such investments may be particularly susceptible to political, economic and environmental conditions and events in those countries.

Real Estate Industry Investing. Investments in securities of issuers engaged in the real estate industry entail special risks and considerations. In particular, securities of such issuers may be subject to risks associated with the direct ownership of real estate. These risks include: the cyclical nature of real estate values, including the decline in the value of real estate, risks related to general and local economic conditions, overbuilding and increased competition, increases in property taxes and operating expenses, demographic trends and variations in rental income, changes in zoning laws, casualty or condemnation losses, environmental risks, regulatory limitations on rents, changes in neighborhood values, changes in the appeal of properties to tenants, increases in interest rates and other real estate capital market influences. To the extent that assets underlying a Fund’s investments are concentrated geographically, by property type or in certain other respects, the Fund may be subject to certain of the foregoing risks to a greater extent. Generally, increases in interest rates will increase the costs of obtaining financing, which could directly and indirectly decrease the value of a Fund’s investments.

Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). REITs pool investors’ funds for investment primarily in income-producing real estate or real estate related loans or interests. REITs may concentrate their investments in specific geographic areas or in specific property types, i.e., hotels, shopping malls, residential complexes and office buildings. A REIT is not taxed on net income and net realized gains that it distributes to its owners if it complies with statutory and regulatory federal income tax requirements relating to its management, organization, ownership, assets and income and a statutory requirement that it distribute to its owners at least 90% of the sum of its REIT taxable income and certain other income for each taxable year. Various other countries have also adopted REIT-like structures that receive comparable tax treatment, provided that certain requirements are met. Failure by a REIT or REIT-like

structure to meet such requirements may have adverse consequences on a Fund that invests therein. Generally, REITs can be classified as equity REITs, mortgage REITs or hybrid REITs. Equity REITs invest the majority of their assets directly in real property and derive their income primarily from rents and capital gains from appreciation realized through property sales. Equity REITs are further categorized according to the types of real estate they own, e.g., apartment properties, retail shopping centers, office and industrial properties, hotels, health-care facilities, manufactured housing and mixed-property types. Mortgage REITs invest the majority of their assets in real estate mortgages and derive their income primarily from interest payments. Hybrid REITs combine the characteristics of both equity and mortgage REITs.

A shareholder in any Fund, by investing in REITs indirectly through the Fund, will bear not only its proportionate share of the expenses of the Fund, but also, indirectly, the management expenses of the underlying REITs. In addition, equity REITs may be affected by changes in the values of the underlying property they own, while mortgage REITs may be affected by the quality of credit extended. REITs are dependent upon management skills, may not be diversified and are subject to the risks of financing projects and risks inherent in investments in a limited number of properties, in a narrow geographic area, or in a single property type. REITs are also subject to heavy cash flow dependency, defaults by borrowers, self-liquidation and, with respect to domestic REITs, the possibility of failing (1) to qualify for tax-free “pass-through” under the Code of net investment income and net realized gains distributed to shareholders and (2) to maintain exemption from the 1940 Act. If an issuer of debt securities collateralized by real estate defaults, it is conceivable that the REITs holding those securities could end up holding the underlying real estate.

Investing in certain REITs, which often have small market capitalizations, may also involve the same risks as investing in other small capitalization companies. REITs may have limited financial resources and their securities may trade less frequently and in limited volume and may be subject to more abrupt or erratic price movements than larger company securities. Historically, small capitalization stocks, such as REITs, have been more volatile in price than the larger capitalization stocks such as those included in the S&P 500 Index. The management of a REIT may be subject to conflicts of interest with respect to the operation of the business of the REIT and may be involved in real estate activities competitive with the REIT. REITs may own properties through joint ventures or in other circumstances in which the REIT may not have control over its investments. REITs may incur significant amounts of leverage.

Risks associated with investments in securities of real estate companies include those discussed above in “Real Estate Industry Investing.”

Recent Market Conditions. U.S. and international markets have experienced significant volatility in recent months and years. As a result of such volatility, investment returns may fluctuate significantly. Global economies and financial markets are highly interconnected, which increases the possibility that conditions in one country or region might adversely impact issuers in a different country or region.

Interest rates were unusually low in recent years in the United States and abroad, but the interest rate environment changed dramatically in 2022 as interest rates moved significantly higher. Aggressive stimulus measures in 2020 and 2021, rising demand for goods and services, tight labor markets, and supply chain disruptions contributed to a surge of inflation in many sectors of the U.S. and global economies. Due to concerns regarding high inflation, the U.S. Federal Reserve (“Fed”) and many foreign governments and monetary authorities have raised interest rates and implemented other policy initiatives in an effort to control inflation, and they may continue to do so. It is difficult to predict accurately the pace at which central banks or monetary authorities may increase interest rates or the timing, frequency, or magnitude of any such further increases, and the evaluation of macro-economic and other conditions could cause a change in approach in the future. Rising interest rates may present a greater risk than has historically been the case due to the effect of government fiscal and monetary policy initiatives and potential market reaction to those initiatives. As such, fixed-income and related markets may continue to experience heightened levels of interest rate volatility. Inflation risk is the uncertainty over the future real value (after inflation) of an investment. A Fund’s investments may not keep pace with inflation, and the value of an investment in a Fund may be eroded over time by inflation. Changes in government or central bank policies could negatively affect the value and liquidity of a Fund’s investments and cause it to lose money, and there can be no assurance that the initiatives undertaken by governments and central banks will be successful.

The Fed’s or foreign central banks’ actions may result in an economic slowdown in the United States and abroad. There are concerns that monetary policy may provide less support should economic growth slow. An economic slowdown may negatively affect national and global economies, as well as national and global securities and commodities markets, and may continue for an extended period of time and have unforeseen impacts. Any deterioration in economic fundamentals may increase the risk of

default or insolvency of particular companies, negatively impact market values, increase market volatility, cause credit spreads to widen, and reduce liquidity.

Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the resulting responses by the United States and other countries, and the potential for wider conflict have had, and could continue to have, severe adverse effects on regional and global economies and could further increase volatility and uncertainty in the financial markets. The United States and other countries have imposed broad-ranging economic sanctions on Russia and certain Russian individuals, banking entities and corporations as a response to its invasion of Ukraine. The United States and other countries have also imposed economic sanctions on Belarus and may impose sanctions on other countries that provide military or economic support to Russia. These sanctions, as well as any other economic consequences related to the invasion, such as additional sanctions, boycotts or changes in consumer or purchaser preferences or cyberattacks on governments, companies or individuals, may further decrease the value and liquidity of certain Russian securities and securities of issuers in other countries that are subject to economic sanctions related to the invasion. To the extent that a Fund has exposure to Russian investments or investments in countries affected by the invasion, the Fund’s ability to price, buy, sell, receive or deliver such investments may be impaired. In addition, any exposure that a Fund may have to counterparties in Russia or in countries affected by the invasion could negatively impact the Fund’s investments. The extent and duration of military actions and the repercussions of such actions (including any retaliatory actions or countermeasures that may be taken by those subject to sanctions) are impossible to predict. These events have resulted in, and could continue to result in, significant market disruptions, including in certain industries or sectors such as the oil and natural gas markets, and may further strain global supply chains and negatively affect inflation and global growth. These and any related events could significantly impact a Fund’s performance and the value of an investment in a Fund beyond any direct exposure a Fund may have to Russian issuers or issuers in other countries affected by the invasion.

Certain illnesses spread rapidly and have the potential to significantly and adversely affect the global economy and have material adverse impacts on a Fund. The impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic caused significant volatility and severe losses in global financial markets. The COVID-19 pandemic and efforts to contain its spread resulted, and may continue to result, in significant disruptions to business operations, supply chains and customer activity, higher default rates, widespread business closures and layoffs, travel restrictions and border closings, extended quarantines and stay-at-home orders, event and service cancellations, labor shortages, and significant challenges in healthcare service preparation and delivery, as well as general concern, uncertainty and social unrest. Other outbreaks of infectious diseases or other public health issues that may arise in the future may have similar or worse effects. The impact of any outbreak may last for an extended period of time.

Public health crises caused by outbreaks of infectious diseases or other public health issues, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may exacerbate other pre-existing economic, political, and social tensions and risks, disrupt market conditions and operations and economies around the world, and negatively affect market performance and the value of investments in individual companies in significant and unforeseen ways. The impact of infectious diseases may be greater in countries that do not move effectively to control them or that have limited access to or popular uptake of vaccines, which may occur because of a lack of health care or economic resources or for political or other reasons.

Additionally, public health crises caused by outbreaks of infectious diseases or other public health issues, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, could impair the information technology and other operational systems upon which the Adviser relies, and could otherwise disrupt the ability of a Fund’s service providers to perform essential tasks. Such impacts could impair a Fund’s ability to maintain operational standards (including with respect to satisfying redemption requests), disrupt the operations of a Fund’s service providers, and negatively impact a Fund’s performance.

High public debt in the United States and other countries creates ongoing systemic and market risks and policymaking uncertainty, and there has been a significant increase in the amount of debt due to the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and ensuing economic relief and public health measures. Economic, political and other developments may result in a further increase in the amount of public debt, including in the United States. The long-term consequences of high public debt are not known, but high levels of public debt may negatively affect economic conditions and the value of markets, sectors and companies in which a Fund invests.

Political and diplomatic events within the United States, including a contentious domestic political environment, changes in political party control of one or more branches of the U.S. government, the U.S. government's inability at times to agree on a long-term budget and deficit reduction plan, the threat of a U.S. government shutdown, and disagreements over, or threats not to increase, the U.S. government's borrowing limit (or “debt ceiling”), as well as political and diplomatic events abroad, may affect investor

and consumer confidence and may adversely impact financial markets and the broader economy, perhaps suddenly and to a significant degree. A downgrade of the ratings of U.S. government debt obligations, or concerns about the U.S. government's credit quality in general, could have a substantial negative effect on the U.S. and global economies. Moreover, although the U.S. government has honored its credit obligations, there remains a possibility that the United States could default on its obligations. The consequences of such an unprecedented event are impossible to predict, but it is likely that a default by the United States would be highly disruptive to the U.S. and global securities markets and could significantly impair the value of the Funds' investments.

Slowing global economic growth, the rise in protectionist trade policies, and changes to some major international trade agreements could affect the economies of many countries in ways that cannot necessarily be foreseen at the present time. For example, the full impact of the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) withdrawal from the European Union (the “EU”), commonly referred to as “Brexit,” and the nature of the future relationship between the UK and the EU remain unclear. The effects of Brexit on the UK and EU economies and the broader global economy could be significant, resulting in negative impacts, such as business and trade disruptions, increased volatility and illiquidity, and potentially lower economic growth of markets in the UK, the EU and globally, which could negatively impact the value of a Fund’s investments. The United States has developed increasingly strained relations with a number of foreign countries. If relations with certain countries deteriorate, it could adversely affect U.S. issuers as well as non-U.S. issuers that rely on the United States for trade. Financial markets in the United States and China have been sensitive to the outlook for resolving ongoing U.S.-China trade disputes, a trend that may continue in the future.

In addition, global climate change may have an adverse effect on property and security values. A rise in sea levels, an increase in powerful storms and/or an increase in flooding could cause coastal properties to lose value or become unmarketable altogether. Economists warn that, unlike previous declines in the real estate market, properties in affected coastal zones may never recover their value. Large wildfires have devastated, and in the future may devastate, entire communities and may be very costly to any business found to be responsible for the fire or conducting operations in affected areas. Regulatory changes and divestment movements in the United States and abroad tied to concerns about climate change could adversely affect the value of certain land and the viability of industries whose activities or products are seen as accelerating climate change. Losses related to climate change could adversely affect corporate borrowers and mortgage lenders, the value of mortgage-backed securities, the bonds of municipalities that depend on tax revenues and tourist dollars generated by such properties, and insurers of the property and/or of corporate, municipal or mortgage-backed securities. Because property and security values are driven largely by buyers’ perceptions, it is difficult to know the time period over which these effects might unfold.

Certain countries have experienced negative interest rates. Extremely low or negative interest rates may persist or become more prevalent. In that event, to the extent a Fund has a bank deposit or holds a debt instrument with a negative interest rate to maturity, the Fund would generate a negative return on that investment. Similarly, negative rates on investments by a fund that is a money market fund would make it difficult, if not impossible, for the fund to maintain a stable $1.00 net asset value per share without financial support from the fund’s sponsor or other persons. There is no assurance that such support would be provided, which could lead to losses on investments in the fund, including on investments by a Fund to the extent that it uses the fund as an investment option for the Fund’s uninvested cash. While negative yields may reduce the demand, liquidity and valuation of fixed income investments, investors may be willing to continue to purchase such investments for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to, price insensitivity, arbitrage opportunities across fixed income markets or rules-based investment strategies. If negative interest rates persist or become more prevalent, investors may over time seek to reallocate assets to other income-producing assets or equity investments that pay a dividend, which may cause the price of such instruments to rise while triggering a corresponding decrease in yield and the value of debt instruments over time.

All of these risks may have a material adverse effect on the performance and financial condition of the companies and other issuers in which a Fund invests, and on the overall performance of a Fund.

Repurchase Agreements. A repurchase agreement is a transaction in which a Fund purchases securities or other obligations from a bank or securities dealer (or its affiliate) and simultaneously commits to resell them to a counterparty at an agreed-upon date or upon demand and at a price reflecting a market rate of interest unrelated to the coupon rate or maturity of the purchased obligations. The difference between the total amount to be received upon repurchase of the obligations and the price that was paid by a Fund upon acquisition is accrued as interest and included in the Fund’s net investment income. Repurchase agreements generally result in a fixed rate of return insulated from market fluctuation during the holding period, and generally are used as a means of earning a return on cash reserves for periods as short as overnight.

Repurchase agreements may have the characteristics of loans by a Fund. During the term of a repurchase agreement, a Fund, among other things, (i) retains the securities or other obligations subject to the repurchase agreement, either through its regular custodian or through a special “tri-party” custodian or sub-custodian that maintains separate accounts for both the Fund and its counterparty, as collateral securing the seller’s repurchase obligation, (ii) continually monitors on a daily basis the market value of the securities or other obligations subject to the repurchase agreement and (iii) requires the seller to deposit with the Fund collateral equal to any amount by which the market value of the securities or other obligations subject to the repurchase agreement falls below the resale amount provided under the repurchase agreement.

A Fund intends to enter into repurchase agreements only in transactions with counterparties (which may include brokers-dealers, banks, U.S. government securities dealers and other intermediaries) believed by the Adviser and the Sub-Advisers to present minimal credit risks. A Fund generally will not enter into a repurchase agreement maturing in more than seven days. Repurchase agreements that mature in more than seven days are generally considered illiquid.

Repurchase agreements carry certain risks, including risks that are not associated with direct investments in securities. If a seller under a repurchase agreement were to default on the agreement and be unable to repurchase the security subject to the repurchase agreement, a Fund would look to the collateral underlying the seller’s repurchase agreement, including the securities or other obligations subject to the repurchase agreement, for satisfaction of the seller’s obligation to the Fund. A Fund’s right to liquidate the securities or other obligations subject to the repurchase agreement in the event of a default by the seller could involve certain costs and delays and, to the extent that proceeds from any sale upon a default of the obligation to repurchase are less than the repurchase price (e.g., due to transactions costs or a decline in the value of the collateral), the Fund could suffer a loss. In addition, if bankruptcy proceedings are commenced with respect to the seller, realization of the collateral may be delayed or limited and a loss may be incurred. Repurchase agreements involving obligations other than U.S. government securities (such as commercial paper and corporate bonds) may be subject to special risks and may not have the benefit of certain protections in the event of the counterparty’s insolvency.

Reverse Repurchase Agreements, Dollar Rolls and Sale-Buyback Transactions. A Fund may enter into reverse repurchase agreements and dollar rolls with brokers, dealers, domestic and foreign banks and/or other financial institutions. A Fund may also enter into sale-buyback transactions and other economically similar transactions. Reverse repurchase agreements, dollar rolls and sale-buyback transactions may be viewed as the borrowing of money by a Fund. See “Fundamental Restrictions” for more information concerning restrictions on borrowing by each Fund. Reverse repurchase agreements are considered to be borrowings under the 1940 Act.

In a reverse repurchase agreement, a Fund sells a security and agrees to repurchase it at a mutually agreed upon date and price, reflecting the interest rate effective for the term of the agreement. During the term of the agreement, a Fund retains ownership of the security and will continue to receive any principal and interest payments on the underlying security. A Fund may enter into a reverse repurchase agreement only if the interest income from investment of the proceeds is greater than the interest expense of the transaction and the proceeds are invested for a period no longer than the term of the agreement. If interest rates rise during a reverse repurchase agreement, it may adversely affect a Fund’s net asset value.

In “dollar roll” transactions, a Fund sells fixed income securities for delivery in the current month and simultaneously contracts to repurchase similar but not identical (same type, coupon and maturity) securities on a specified future date at a pre-determined price. During the roll period, a Fund would forego principal and interest paid on such securities. A Fund would be compensated by the difference between the current sales price and the forward price for the future purchase, as well as by the interest earned on the cash proceeds of the initial sale. See “Mortgage Dollar Rolls” for more information.

A Fund also may effect simultaneous purchase and sale transactions that are known as “sale buybacks.” A sale-buyback is similar to a reverse repurchase agreement, except that in a sale-buyback, the counterparty who purchases the security is entitled to receive any principal or interest payments made on the underlying security pending settlement of a Fund’s repurchase of the underlying security. A Fund’s obligations under a sale-buyback typically would be offset by liquid assets in an amount not less than the amount of the Fund’s forward commitment to repurchase the subject security.

Reverse repurchase agreements, dollar rolls and sale-buybacks represent a form of leverage and their use by a Fund may increase the Fund’s volatility. Reverse repurchase agreements, dollar rolls and sale-buybacks involve the risk that the market value of the securities retained in lieu of sale may decline below the price of the securities a Fund has sold but is obligated to repurchase. In addition, when a Fund invests the proceeds it receives in a reverse repurchase agreement, dollar roll or sale buy-back, there

is a risk that those investments may decline in value. Reverse repurchase agreements, dollar rolls and sale-buybacks also involve the risk that the buyer of the securities sold by a Fund might be unable or unwilling to deliver them when that Fund seeks to repurchase, which may result in losses to the Fund. In the event the buyer of securities under a reverse repurchase agreement, dollar roll or sale-buyback files for bankruptcy or becomes insolvent, such buyer or its trustee or receiver may receive an extension of time to determine whether to enforce a Fund’s obligation to repurchase the securities, and a Fund’s use of the proceeds of the agreement may effectively be restricted pending such decision, which could adversely affect the Fund.

Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act permits a Fund to enter into reverse repurchase agreements notwithstanding the limitation on the issuance of senior securities in Section 18 of the 1940 Act, provided that the Fund either (i) complies with the 300% asset coverage ratio with respect to such transactions and any other borrowings in the aggregate, or (ii) treats all such transactions as Derivatives Transactions under Rule 18f-4. For more information about these practices, see the “Derivatives” section.

Securities Lending. A Fund may lend securities to brokers, dealers or other institutional investors needing to borrow securities to complete certain transactions. In connection with such loans, a Fund remains the owner of the loaned securities and continues to be entitled to payments in amounts equal to the interest, dividends or other distributions payable on loaned securities. A Fund has the right to terminate a loan at any time. If a Fund terminates a loan, it will forgo any income on the loan after the termination. A Fund does not have the right to vote on securities while they are on loan, but the Fund’s Adviser or Sub-Adviser may attempt to terminate loans in time to vote those proxies the Adviser or Sub-Adviser has determined are material to the Fund’s interests. A Fund has the right to call each loan and obtain the securities on one standard settlement period’s notice or, in connection with the securities trading on foreign markets, within such longer period for purchases and sales of such securities in such foreign markets. A lending Fund will receive collateral consisting of cash, U.S. government securities, letters of credit or such other collateral as may be permitted under a Fund’s investment program and applicable law, which will be maintained at all times in an amount at least equal to 100% of the current market value of the loaned securities. If the collateral consists of cash, a Fund will reinvest the cash and pay the borrower a pre-negotiated fee or “rebate” from any return earned on investment. If the collateral consists of a letter of credit or securities, the borrower will pay a Fund a loan premium fee. A Fund may participate in securities lending programs operated by financial institutions, which act as lending agents (“Lending Agent”). The Lending Agent will receive a percentage of the total earnings of a Fund derived from lending the Fund’s securities. Should the borrower of securities fail financially, a Fund may experience delays in recovering the loaned securities or in exercising its rights in the collateral. Additional risks include the possible decline of the value of the securities acquired with cash collateral. This risk is increased when a Fund’s loans are concentrated with a single borrower or a limited number of borrowers. A Fund seeks to minimize this risk by limiting the investment of cash collateral to high quality instruments with short maturities, repurchase agreements, money market funds or similar private investment vehicles.

Short Sales. Certain of the Funds may enter into a short sale. A “short sale” is the sale by a Fund of a security which has been borrowed from a third party on the expectation that the market price will drop. To complete such a transaction, a Fund must borrow the security to make delivery to the buyer. The Fund then is obligated to replace the security borrowed by purchasing it at the market price at or prior to the time of replacement. The price at such time may be more or less than the price at which the security was sold by a Fund. Until the security is replaced, a Fund is required to prepay the lender any dividends or interest that accrue during the period of the loan. To borrow the security, a Fund also may be required to pay a premium, which would increase the cost of the security sold short. The net proceeds of a short sale will be retained by the Sub-Adviser (or by the Fund’s custodian), to the extent necessary to meet margin requirements, until the short position is closed out. The Funds will incur transaction costs in effecting short sales.

A Fund may, but is not required to, engage in short sales that are “covered”. In a covered short sale, a Fund either (1) enters into a “short sale” of securities in circumstances in which, at the time the short position is open, the Fund owns an equal amount of the securities sold short or owns securities convertible or exchangeable, without payment of further consideration, into an equal number of securities sold short (also known as a short sale “against the box”), or (2) deposits in a segregated account cash, U.S. government securities, or other liquid securities in an amount equal to the market value of the securities sold short. A short sale may be entered into by a Fund to, for example, lock in a sale price for a security the Fund does not wish to sell immediately. To the extent that a Fund engages in short sales, it will provide collateral to the broker-dealer arranging the short sale and (except in the case of short sales “against the box”) will maintain additional asset coverage in the form of segregated or “earmarked” assets that the Adviser or Sub-Adviser determines to be liquid in accordance with procedures established by the Fund’s Board and that is equal to the current market value of the securities sold short, or will ensure that such positions are covered by “offsetting” positions, until the Fund replaces the borrowed security.

A Fund will incur a loss as a result of a short sale if the price of the security increases between the date of the short sale and the date on which the Fund replaces the borrowed security. A Fund may realize a gain if the security declines in price between those dates. The amount of any gain will be decreased, and the amount of any loss increased, by the amount of the premium, dividends, interest or expenses a Fund may be required to pay in connection with a short sale. There can be no assurance that a Fund will be able to close out a short position at any particular time or an acceptable price.

A Fund must comply with Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act with respect to its short sale borrowings, which are considered Derivatives Transactions under the rule. For more information about these practices, see the “Derivatives” section.

Short-Term Investments. Short-term investments include investments in various types of U.S. government securities and high-quality, short-term debt securities with remaining maturities of one year or less (“money market instruments”). This type of short-term investment generally is made to provide liquidity for the purchase of new investments and to effect redemptions of shares. The money market instruments in which a Fund may invest include but are not limited to: government obligations, certificates of deposit, time deposits, bankers’ acceptances, commercial paper, short-term corporate securities and repurchase agreements. A Fund may invest in both foreign and domestic money market instruments, including foreign currency, foreign time deposits and foreign bank acceptances of domestic branches of foreign banks and savings and loan associations and similar institutions. For cash management purposes, a Fund also may invest in money market funds, including money market funds managed by the Adviser. Generally, these investments offer less potential for gains than other types of investments.

Small Company Securities and Micro-Cap Company Securities. Investing in securities of small companies may involve greater risks since these securities may have limited marketability and, thus, may be more volatile. Because smaller companies normally have fewer shares outstanding than larger companies, it may be more difficult for a Fund to buy or sell significant amounts of shares without an unfavorable impact on prevailing prices. In addition, small companies often have limited product lines, markets or financial resources and are typically subject to greater changes in earnings and business prospects than are larger, more established companies. There is typically less publicly available information concerning smaller companies than larger, more established ones, and smaller companies may be dependent for management on one or a few key persons.

Micro-capitalization companies represent the smallest sector companies based on market capitalization. Micro-capitalization companies may be in their earliest stages of development and may offer unique products, services or technologies or may serve special or rapidly expanding niches. Micro-capitalization companies may be less able to weather economic shifts or other adverse developments than larger, more established companies and may have less experienced management and unproven track records. Micro-capitalization companies also may be more susceptible to setbacks or economic downturns. Micro-capitalization securities are generally subject to the same risks as small-capitalization securities. However, micro-capitalization securities may involve even greater risk because they trade less frequently than larger stocks and may be less liquid, subjecting them to greater price fluctuations than larger company stocks.

Small-cap and emerging growth securities will often be traded only in the OTC market or on a regional securities exchange and may not be traded every day or in the volume typical of trading on a national securities exchange. As a result, the disposition by a Fund of portfolio securities to meet redemptions or otherwise may require the Fund to make many small sales over a lengthy period of time, or to sell these securities at a discount from market prices or during periods when, in the Adviser’s or Sub-Adviser’s judgment, such disposition is not desirable.

Structured Products. A Fund may invest in structured products, including instruments such as credit-linked securities, commodity-linked notes and structured notes, which are potentially high-risk derivatives. For example, a structured product may combine a traditional stock, bond, or commodity with an option or forward contract. Generally, the principal amount, amount payable upon maturity or redemption, or interest rate of a structured product is tied (positively or negatively) to the price of some commodity, currency or securities index or another interest rate or some other economic factor (each a “benchmark”). The interest rate or (unlike most fixed income securities) the principal amount payable at maturity of a structured product may be increased or decreased, depending on changes in the value of the benchmark. An example of a structured product could be a bond issued by an oil company that pays a small base level of interest with additional interest that accrues in correlation to the extent to which oil prices exceed a certain predetermined level. Such a structured product would be a combination of a bond and a call option on oil.

Structured products can be used as an efficient means of pursuing a variety of investment goals, including currency hedging, duration management, and increased total return. Structured products may not bear interest or pay dividends. The value of a

structured product or its interest rate may be a multiple of a benchmark and, as a result, may be leveraged and move (up or down) more steeply and rapidly than the benchmark. These benchmarks may be sensitive to economic and political events, such as commodity shortages and currency devaluations, which cannot be readily foreseen by the purchaser of a structured product. Under certain conditions, the redemption value of a structured product could be zero. Thus, an investment in a structured product may entail significant market risks that are not associated with a similar investment in a traditional, U.S. dollar-denominated bond that has a fixed principal amount and pays a fixed rate or floating rate of interest. The purchase of structured products also exposes a Fund to the credit risk of the issuer of the structured product. These risks may cause significant fluctuations in the net asset value of a Fund.

Credit-Linked Securities. Credit-linked securities are issued by a limited purpose trust or other vehicle that, in turn, invests in a basket of derivative instruments, such as credit default swaps, interest rate swaps and other securities, in order to provide exposure to certain high yield or other fixed income markets. For example, a Fund may invest in credit-linked securities as a cash management tool in order to gain exposure to the high yield markets and/or to remain fully invested when more traditional income producing securities are not available. Like an investment in a bond, investments in credit-linked securities represent the right to receive periodic income payments (in the form of distributions) and payment of principal at the end of the term of the security. However, these payments are conditioned on the trust’s receipt of payments from, and the trust’s potential obligations to, the counterparties to the derivative instruments and other securities in which the trust invests. For instance, the trust may sell one or more credit default swaps, under which the trust would receive a stream of payments over the term of the swap agreements provided that no event of default has occurred with respect to the referenced debt obligation upon which the swap is based. If a default occurs, the stream of payments may stop and the trust would be obligated to pay the counterparty the par (or other agreed upon value) of the referenced debt obligation. This, in turn, would reduce the amount of income and principal that a Fund would receive as an investor in the trust. A Fund’s investments in these instruments are indirectly subject to the risks associated with derivative instruments, including, among others, credit risk, default or similar event risk, counterparty risk, interest rate risk, leverage risk and management risk. It is expected that the securities will be exempt from registration under the 1933 Act. Accordingly, there may be no established trading market for the securities and they may constitute illiquid investments.

Commodity-Linked Notes. Commodity-linked notes are privately negotiated structured debt securities the amount of principal repayment and/or interest payments for which are linked to the return of an index that is representative of the commodities market or a segment thereof. They are available from a limited number of approved counterparties, and all invested amounts are exposed to the dealer’s credit risk. As such, commodity-linked notes are also subject to counterparty risk. Commodity-linked notes may be leveraged. Investments linked to the prices of commodities, including commodity-linked notes, are considered speculative. The values of commodity-linked notes are affected by events that might have less impact on the values of stocks and bonds. Prices of commodities and related contracts may fluctuate significantly over short periods due to a variety of factors, including changes in supply and demand relationships, weather, agriculture, fiscal, and exchange control programs, disease, pestilence, and international economic, political, military and regulatory developments. In addition, the commodity markets may be subject to temporary distortions and other disruptions due to, among other factors, lack of liquidity, the participation of speculators, and government regulation and other actions. These circumstances could adversely affect the value of the commodity-linked notes and make them more volatile than other types of investments. Commodity-linked notes may have substantial risks, including risk of loss of a significant portion of their principal value. Investments therein can also have adverse federal income tax consequences.

Exchange-Traded Notes (ETNs). ETNs are generally notes representing debt of the issuer, usually a financial institution. ETNs combine both aspects of bonds and ETFs. An ETN’s returns are based on the performance of one or more underlying assets, reference rates or indices, minus fees and expenses. Similar to ETFs, ETNs are listed on an exchange and traded in the secondary market. However, unlike an ETF, an ETN can be held until the ETN’s maturity, at which time the issuer will pay a return linked to the performance of the specific asset, index or rate (“reference instrument”) to which the ETN is linked minus certain fees. This type of debt security differs from other types of bonds and notes because ETN returns are based upon the performance of a market index minus applicable fees, no period coupon payments are distributed, and no principal protection exists. The value of an ETN may be influenced by time to maturity, level of supply and demand for the ETN, volatility and lack of liquidity in underlying commodities or securities markets, changes in the applicable interest rates, changes in the issuer’s credit rating and economic, legal, political or geographic events that affect the referenced commodity or security. As a result, there may be times when an ETN share trades at a premium or discount to its market benchmark or strategy. A Fund’s decision to sell its ETN holdings may also be limited by the availability of a secondary market. If a Fund must sell some or all of its ETN holdings and the secondary market is weak, it may have to sell such holdings at a discount. There may be restrictions on a Fund’s right to redeem its investment

in an ETN, which are generally meant to be held until maturity. ETNs are also subject to counterparty credit risk and fixed income risk. Investments in ETNs may also have adverse federal income tax consequences. No assurance can be given that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) will accept, or a court will uphold, how a Fund characterizes and treats ETNs and the net income and net realized gains therefrom for federal income tax purposes. Further, the IRS and Congress have, from time to time, considered proposals that would change the timing of recognition and character of net income and net realized gains from ETNs.

Structured Notes. Structured notes are derivative debt instruments, the terms of which may be “structured” by the purchaser and the borrower issuing the note. The amount of principal repayment and/or interest payments on structured notes is based upon the movement of one or more factors. Structured notes are interests in entities organized and operated solely for the purpose of restructuring the investment characteristics of debt obligations. This type of restructuring involves the deposit with or purchase by an entity, such as a corporation or trust, of specified instruments (such as commercial bank loans) and the issuance by that entity of one or more classes of securities backed by, or representing interests in, the underlying instruments. The cash flow on the underlying instruments may be apportioned among the newly issued structured notes to create securities with different investment characteristics such as varying maturities, payment priorities and interest rate provisions, and the extent of the payment made with respect to structured notes is dependent on the extent of the cash flow on the underlying instruments. The credit risk of structured notes that involve no credit enhancement generally will be equivalent to that of the underlying instruments. In addition, a class of structured notes that is subordinated to the right of payment of another class typically has higher yields and presents greater risks than a class of structured notes that is unsubordinated. Structured notes may also be more volatile, less liquid, and more difficult to price accurately than less complex securities and instruments or more traditional debt securities. In addition, the terms of structured notes may provide that in certain circumstances no principal is due at maturity, which may result in a loss of invested capital. Certain issuers of structured notes may be deemed to be “investment companies” as defined in the 1940 Act. As a result, a Fund’s investment in these structured notes may be limited by restrictions contained in the 1940 Act. Structured notes are typically sold in private placement transactions, and there currently is no active trading market for structured notes. The possible lack of a liquid secondary market for structured notes and the resulting inability of a Fund to sell a structured note could expose the Fund to losses and could make structured notes more difficult for the Fund to value accurately.

Swaps. Swap agreements are two party contracts entered into primarily by institutional investors for periods ranging from a few weeks to more than one year. Cleared swaps are transacted through FCMs that are members of central clearinghouses with the clearinghouse serving as a central counterparty similar to transactions in futures contracts. A “standard” swap contract is an agreement between two parties to exchange the return generated by one asset for the return (or differential in rate of return) generated by another asset. The payment streams are calculated by reference to a specified asset, such as a specified security or index, and agreed upon “notional amount” (e.g., a particular dollar amount invested in a specified security or index). The “notional amount” of the swap agreement is used as a basis on which to calculate the obligations that the parties to a swap agreement have agreed to exchange. The term “specified index” includes, but is not limited to, currencies, fixed interest rates, prices and total return on interest rate indices, price indices, fixed income indices, stock indices and commodity indices (as well as amounts derived from arithmetic operations on these indices). For example, a Fund may agree to swap the return generated by a fixed income index for the return generated by a second fixed income index or to swap a single or periodic fixed amount(s) (or premium) for periodic amounts based on the movement of a specified index.

With respect to swaps, if the underlying reference asset is a broad-based security index (generally, an index of securities having at least 10 component issues), the instrument will generally be classified as a swap, which means that it is fully subject to CFTC jurisdiction. If the underlying reference asset is a narrow-based security index (generally, an index of securities having nine or fewer component issues), the instrument will generally be classified as a “security-based swap,” which is subject to the antifraud, antimanipulation and insider trading jurisdiction of the SEC. However, if the parties to the transaction or a third-party created the underlying index, and the transaction’s governing documents permit substitution of the component stocks comprising the index, the index would always be deemed narrow-based, even if it had 10 or more component securities at all times, and even if no actual substitution of component stocks were made. If the underlying reference asset is a narrow-based security index, the instrument will be classified as a security-based swap and subject only to the full jurisdiction of the SEC.

Swap agreements historically have been individually negotiated and most swap agreements are currently traded over the counter. Certain standardized swaps currently are, and more in the future will be, centrally cleared and traded on either a swap execution facility or a designated contract market. Central clearing is expected to decrease counterparty risk and increase liquidity compared to uncleared swaps because central clearing interposes the central clearinghouse as the counterparty to each participant’s swap. However, central clearing does not eliminate counterparty risk or illiquidity risk entirely. For example, swaps that are centrally

cleared are subject to the creditworthiness of the clearing organization involved in the transaction. For example, an investor could lose margin payments it has deposited with its FCM as well as the net amount of gains not yet paid by the clearing organization if the clearing organization becomes insolvent or goes into bankruptcy. In the event of bankruptcy of the clearing organization, the investor may be entitled to the net amount of gains the investor is entitled to receive plus the return of margin owed to it only in proportion to the amount received by the clearing organization’s other customers, potentially resulting in losses to the investor. As noted above, regulators have adopted regulations governing margin on uncleared swaps. Although margin posting requirements may vary depending on the size of a portfolio and other factors, the initial margin required for uncleared swaps is likely to exceed the amount required under the rules of a clearinghouse and by a clearing member FCM, because the timeframe that initial margin on uncleared swaps is designed to cover is longer than for cleared swaps.

To the extent a swap is not centrally cleared, the use of a swap involves the risk that a loss may be sustained as a result of the insolvency or bankruptcy of the counterparty or the failure of the counterparty to make required payments or otherwise comply with the terms of the agreement. If a counterparty’s creditworthiness declines, the value of the swap might decline, potentially resulting in losses to a Fund. Changing conditions in a particular market area, whether or not directly related to the referenced assets that underlie the swap agreement, may have an adverse impact on the creditworthiness of the counterparty. If a default occurs by the counterparty to such a transaction, a Fund may have contractual remedies pursuant to the agreements related to the transaction.

A Fund will usually enter into swaps on a net basis (i.e., the two payment streams are netted out in a cash settlement on the payment date or dates specified in the instrument, with the Fund receiving or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the two payments). Thus, a Fund’s obligations (or rights) under a swap agreement generally will be equal only to the net amount to be paid or received under the agreement based on the relative values of the positions held by each party to the agreement (the “net amount”). A Fund’s obligations under a swap agreement will be accrued daily (offset against any amounts owing to the Fund). A Fund may enter into swap transactions in accordance with guidelines established by the Board of Trustees. Pursuant to these guidelines, a Fund may only enter into swap transactions where its Adviser or Sub-Adviser has deemed the counterparties to be creditworthy and such counterparties have been approved by the Adviser.

Swaps generally do not involve the delivery of securities, other underlying assets, or principal. Accordingly, unless there is a counterparty or clearing house default, the risk of loss with respect to swaps is limited to the net amount of payments a Fund is contractually obligated to make. If the other party to a swap defaults, a Fund’s risk of loss consists of the net amount of payments that the Fund contractually is entitled to receive. The swap market has grown substantially in recent years, with a large number of banks and investment banking firms acting both as principals and as agents utilizing standardized swap documentation and in some cases transacting in swaps that are centrally cleared and exchange traded. As a result, the swap market has become relatively liquid. Certain swap transactions involve more recent innovations for which standardized documentation has not yet been fully developed and generally will not be centrally cleared or traded on an exchange and, accordingly, they are less liquid than traditional swap transactions. For purposes of applying a Fund’s investment policies and restrictions (as stated in the Prospectus and this SAI), swap agreements generally are valued by the Fund at market value. In addition, because they are two party contracts and because they may have terms greater than seven days, some swap agreements may be considered to be illiquid.

The use of swaps is a highly specialized activity that involves investment techniques and risks (such as counter-party risk) different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. If a Fund’s Adviser or Sub-Adviser is incorrect in its forecasts of applicable market factors, such as market values, interest rates, and currency exchange rates, the investment performance of the Fund would be less favorable than it would have been if this investment technique were not used. The swaps market was largely unregulated prior to the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act on July 21, 2010. The Dodd-Frank Act changed the way the U.S. swap market is supervised and regulated. Developments in the swaps market, including implementing regulations adopted under the Dodd-Frank Act, will adversely affect a Fund’s ability to enter into certain swaps in the OTC market (and require that certain of such instruments be exchange-traded and centrally-cleared). Dodd-Frank Act developments also could adversely affect a Fund’s ability to support swap trades with collateral, terminate new or existing swap agreements, or realize amounts to be received under such instruments. As discussed above, regulations have been adopted by the CFTC and banking regulators that require a Fund to post margin on OTC swaps, and would eventually require posting of initial margin if a Fund has a “material swaps exposure,” and clearing organizations and exchanges require minimum margin requirements for exchange-traded and cleared swaps. These changes under the Dodd-Frank Act may increase the cost of a Fund’s swap investments, which could adversely affect Fund investors.

A Fund may enter into a variety of swap transactions, including total return swaps, inflation swaps, currency swaps, interest rate swaps, caps, floors, swaptions, credit default swaps, and contracts for difference. Total return swap agreements are contracts in which one party agrees to make periodic payments to another party during a specified period of time based on the change in market value of the assets underlying the contract, which may include a specified security, basket of securities or securities indices, in return for periodic payments based on a fixed or variable interest rate or the total return from other underlying assets. Total return swap agreements are often used to obtain exposure to a security or market without owning or taking physical custody of such security or investing directly in such market. The value of the swap position as well as the payments required to be made by a Fund or a counterparty will increase or decrease depending on the changes in the value of the underlying asset(s).

Inflation swaps into which a Fund may enter generally are contracts in which one party agrees to pay the cumulative percentage increase in a price index (the Consumer Price Index with respect to CPI swaps) over the term of the swap (with some lag on the inflation index), and the other party pays a compounded fixed rate.

Currency swaps involve the exchange by one party with another party of a series of payments in specified currencies. Currency swaps usually involve the delivery of the entire principal value of one designated currency in exchange for the other designated currency. Therefore, the entire principal value of a currency swap is subject to the risk that the other party to the swap will default on its contractual delivery obligations. In addition, a Fund may enter into currency swaps that involve an agreement to pay interest streams in one currency based on a specified index in exchange for receiving interest streams denominated in another currency. Currency swaps may involve initial and final exchanges that correspond to the agreed upon notional amount.

Interest rate swaps involve the exchange between two parties of payments calculated by reference to specified interest rates (e.g., an exchange of floating rate payments for fixed rate payments). The purchase of an interest rate cap entitles the purchaser, to the extent that a specified index exceeds a predetermined interest rate, to receive payments of interest on a notional principal amount from the party selling such interest rate cap. The purchase of an interest rate floor entitles the purchaser, to the extent that a specified index falls below a predetermined interest rate, to receive payments of interest on a notional principal amount from the party selling such interest rate floor. Caps and floors may be less liquid than swaps. In addition, the value of interest rate transactions will fluctuate based on changes in interest rates.

An option on a swap agreement, also called a “swaption,” is an option that gives the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to enter into a swap on a future date in exchange for paying a market-based “premium.” A receive swaption gives the owner the right to receive the total return of a specified asset, reference rate, or index. A payer swaption gives the owner the right to pay the total return of a specified asset, reference rate, or index. A purchaser of a swaption risks losing only the amount of the premium it has paid should it decide to let the option expire, whereas the seller of a swaption is subject to the risk that it will become obligated if the option is exercised. Swaptions also include options that allow an existing swap to be terminated or extended by one of the counterparties.

A Fund also may enter into credit default swap agreements. The credit default swap agreement may have as reference obligations one or more securities that are not currently held by a Fund. The protection “buyer” in a credit default contract is generally obligated to pay the protection “seller” an upfront or a periodic stream of payments over the term of the contract, which is typically between one month and ten years, provided that no credit event, such as a default, on a reference obligation has occurred. If a credit event occurs, the seller generally must pay the buyer the “par value” (full notional value) of the swap in exchange for an equal face amount of deliverable obligations of the reference entity described in the swap, or the seller may be required to deliver the related net cash amount, if the swap is cash settled. A Fund may be either the buyer or seller in the transaction. If a Fund is a buyer and no credit event occurs, the Fund may recover nothing if the swap is held through its termination date. However, if a credit event occurs, the Fund generally may elect to receive the full notional value of the swap in exchange for an equal face amount of deliverable obligations of the reference entity whose value may have significantly decreased. In this connection, there is a risk that instability in the markets can threaten the ability of a buyer to fulfill its obligation to deliver the underlying securities to the seller. As a seller, a Fund generally receives an upfront payment or a fixed rate of income throughout the term of the swap provided that there is no credit event. However, if a credit event occurs, the Fund generally must pay the buyer the full notional value of the swap in exchange for an equal face amount of deliverable obligations of the reference entity that may have little or no value. As the seller, a Fund would effectively add leverage because, in addition to its total net assets, a Fund would be subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap.

Credit default swap agreements involve greater risks than if a Fund had invested in the reference obligation directly since, in addition to general market risks, credit default swaps are subject to illiquidity risk, counterparty risk and credit risk. A Fund will enter into

credit default swap agreements only with counterparties that meet certain standards of creditworthiness. A buyer generally also will lose its investment and recover nothing should no credit event occur and the swap is held to its termination date. If a credit event were to occur, the value of any deliverable obligation received by the seller, coupled with the upfront or periodic payments previously received, may be less than the full notional value it pays to the buyer, resulting in a loss of value to the seller. A Fund’s obligations under a credit default swap agreement will be accrued daily (offset against any amounts owing to the Fund).

In the case of a credit default swap sold by a Fund (i.e., where the Fund is selling credit default protection), the Fund may value the credit default swap at its notional amount in applying certain of the Fund’s investment policies and restrictions, but may value the credit default swap at market value for purposes of applying certain of the Fund’s other investment policies and restrictions.

A contract for difference (“CFD”) offers exposure to price changes in an underlying security (e.g., a single security, stock basket or index) without ownership of such security, typically by providing investors the ability to trade on margin. A CFD is a privately negotiated contract between two parties, buyer and seller, stipulating that the seller will pay to or receive from the buyer the difference between the notional value of the underlying instrument at the opening of the contract and that instrument’s notional value at the end of the contract. The buyer and seller are both required to post margin, which is adjusted daily, and adverse market movements against the underlying instrument may require the buyer to make additional margin payments. The buyer will also pay to the seller a financing rate on the notional amount of the capital employed by the seller less the margin deposit. A CFD is usually terminated at the buyer’s initiative.

By entering into a CFD, a Fund could incur losses because it would face many of the same types of risks as owning the underlying instrument directly. Also, there may be liquidity risk if the underlying instrument is illiquid because the liquidity of a CFD is based on the liquidity of the underlying instrument. A further risk is that adverse movements in the underlying security will require the buyer to post additional margin, and this may be on short notice. If additional margin is not provided in time, the seller may liquidate the positions at a loss for which a Fund would be liable. As with other types of swap transactions, CFDs also carry counterparty risk, which is the risk that the counterparty to the CFD transaction may be unable or unwilling to make payments or to otherwise honor its financial obligations under the terms of the contract, in which case the value of the contract, and of a Fund’s shares, may be reduced.

A Fund must comply with Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act with respect to its swap and security-based swap transactions, which are considered Derivatives Transactions under the rule. For more information about these practices, see the “Derivatives” section.

Time and Demand Deposits. Time deposits are interest-bearing, non-negotiable deposits at a bank or a savings and loan association that have a specific maturity date. A time deposit earns a specific rate of interest over a definite period of time. Time deposits may be withdrawn on demand by the investor, but may be subject to early withdrawal penalties that vary depending upon market conditions and the remaining maturity of such deposits. There are no contractual restrictions on the right to transfer a beneficial interest in a time deposit to a third party, but there is no secondary market for such deposits. Demand deposits are accounts at banks and financial institutions from which deposited funds can be withdrawn at any time without notice to the depository institution. The majority of demand deposit accounts are checking and savings accounts. A Fund may invest in fixed time deposits, whether or not subject to withdrawal penalties; however, investment in such deposits which are subject to withdrawal penalties, other than overnight deposits, are subject to the limits on illiquid securities.

Time deposits are subject to the same risks that pertain to domestic issuers of money market instruments, most notably credit risk (and to a lesser extent, income risk, market risk, and liquidity risk). In addition, time deposits of foreign branches of U.S. banks and foreign branches of foreign banks may be subject to certain sovereign risks. One such risk is the possibility that a sovereign country might prevent capital, in the form of dollars, from flowing across its borders. Other risks include adverse political and economic developments, the extent of government regulation of financial markets, and expropriation or nationalization of foreign issuers. Demand deposits are subject to general market and economic risks as they are usually considered part of the money supply. In addition, demand deposits are subject to risks of fraud. As access to demand deposits (e.g., via ATMs and online banking) has increased, so have the ways to carry out fraudulent schemes. Demand deposit fraud can take many forms, such as phishing schemes, cross-channel and check fraud.

Temporary Investment. If a Fund believes that economic or market conditions are unfavorable to investors, it may temporarily invest up to 100% of its assets in certain defensive strategies, including holding a substantial portion of the Fund’s assets in cash, cash equivalents or other highly rated short-term securities, including securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government,

its agencies or instrumentalities. As discussed in this SAI, a Fund may also invest in affiliated money market and/or short-term bond funds for temporary cash management purposes.

U.S. Government Securities. U.S. government securities include direct obligations of the U.S. Treasury (such as Treasury bills, notes or bonds) and obligations issued or guaranteed as to principal and interest (but not as to market value) by the U.S. government, its agencies or its instrumentalities. Examples of obligations issued or guaranteed as to principal and interest by the U.S. government, its agencies or its instrumentalities include securities issued or guaranteed by government agencies that are supported by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government (e.g., securities issued by the Federal Housing Administration, Export-Import Bank of the U.S., Small Business Administration, and Ginnie Mae); securities issued and guaranteed by a government-sponsored stockholder-owned corporation, though not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States (e.g., securities issued by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac); and securities issued or guaranteed by government agencies that are supported primarily or solely by the credit of the particular agency (e.g., Interamerican Development Bank, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Tennessee Valley Authority). As a result of market influences, yields of short-term U.S. Treasury debt instruments are near historic lows. No assurance can be given that the U.S. government will provide financial support to U.S. government agencies, instrumentalities or sponsored enterprises in the future, and the U.S. government may be unable to pay debts when due.

U.S. government securities also include Treasury inflation-indexed securities (originally known as Treasury inflation-protected securities or “TIPS”), which are Treasury bonds on which the principal value is adjusted daily in accordance with changes in the Consumer Price Index. TIPS have maturities of five, ten or thirty years, although it is possible that securities with other maturities will be issued in the future. Interest on TIPS is payable semiannually on the inflation-adjusted principal value. The periodic adjustment to the principal value of TIPS is tied to the CPI-U, which is calculated monthly by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The CPI-U is a measurement of changes in the cost of living, made up of components such as housing, food, transportation and energy. There can be no assurance that the CPI-U will accurately measure the real rate of inflation in the prices of goods and services. The principal value of TIPS would decline during periods of deflation and consequently the interest payable on these securities (calculated with respect to a smaller principal amount) will be reduced, but the principal amount payable at maturity would not be less than the original par amount. The value of TIPS is expected to change in response to changes in real interest rates. Real interest rates in turn are tied to the relationship between nominal interest rates and the rate of inflation. Therefore, if inflation were to rise at a faster rate than nominal interest rates, real interest rates might decline, leading to an increase in value of inflation-indexed bonds. In contrast, if nominal interest rates increased at a faster rate than inflation, real interest rates might rise, leading to a decrease in value of inflation-indexed bonds. While these securities are expected to be protected from long-term inflationary trends, short-term increases in inflation may lead to a decline in value. If interest rates rise due to reasons other than inflation (for example, due to changes in currency exchange rates), investors in these securities may not be protected to the extent that the increase is not reflected in the bond’s inflation measure. If inflation is lower than expected while a Fund holds TIPS, the Fund may earn less on the TIPS than it would on conventional Treasury bonds. Any increase in the principal value of TIPS is taxable in the taxable year the increase occurs, even though holders do not receive cash representing the increase at that time.

U.S. government securities also include separately traded principal and interest components of securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury, which are traded independently under the Separate Trading of Registered Interest and Principal of Securities (“STRIPS”) program. Under the STRIPS program, the principal and interest components are individually numbered and separately issued by the U.S. Treasury at the request of depository financial institutions, which then trade the component parts independently. The market prices of STRIPS generally are more volatile than that of U.S. Treasury bills with comparable maturities.

In August 2011, S&P downgraded its long-term sovereign credit rating on the U.S. from “AAA” to “AA+”. A further downgrade of the ratings of U.S. government debt obligations, or concerns about the U.S. government’s credit quality in general, could result in higher interest rates for individual and corporate borrowers, cause disruptions in bond markets and have a substantial negative effect on the U.S. economy.

Variable Rate Notes. The commercial paper obligations a Fund may buy are unsecured and may include variable rate notes. The nature and terms of a variable rate note (i.e., the “Master Note”) permit a Fund to invest fluctuating amounts at varying rates of interest pursuant to a direct arrangement between the Fund as lender and the issuer as borrower. It permits daily changes in the amounts borrowed. A Fund has the right at any time to increase, up to the full amount stated in the note agreement, or to decrease the amount outstanding under the note. The issuer may prepay at any time and without penalty any part of or the full amount of the note. The note may or may not be backed by one or more bank letters of credit. Because these notes are direct

lending arrangements between a Fund and the issuer, it is not generally contemplated that they will be traded; moreover, there is currently no secondary market for them. There are no limitations on the type of issuer from whom these notes will be purchased; however, in connection with such purchase and on an ongoing basis, the Adviser or Sub-Adviser will consider the earning power, cash flow and other liquidity ratios of the issuer, and its ability to pay principal and interest on demand, including a situation in which all holders of such notes made demand simultaneously.

Warrants. Warrants are securities that give the holder the right, but not the obligation, to purchase equity issues of the company issuing the warrants, or a related company, at a fixed price either on a date certain or during a set period. At the time of issue, the cost of a warrant is substantially less than the cost of the underlying security itself, and price movements in the underlying security are generally magnified in the price movements of the warrant. This effect enables the investor to gain exposure to the underlying security with a relatively low capital investment but increases an investor’s risk in the event of a decline in the value of the underlying security and can result in a complete loss of the amount invested in the warrant. In addition, the price of a warrant tends to be more volatile than, and may not correlate exactly to, the price of the underlying security. If the market price of the underlying security is below the exercise price of the warrant on its expiration date, the warrant will generally expire without value.

The equity security underlying a warrant is authorized at the time the warrant is issued or is issued together with the warrant. Investing in warrants can provide a greater potential for profit or loss than an equivalent investment in the underlying security, and, thus, can be a high risk investment. The value of a warrant may decline because of a decline in the value of the underlying security, the passage of time, changes in interest rates or in the dividend or other policies of the company whose equity underlies the warrant or a change in the perception as to the future price of the underlying security, or any combination thereof. Warrants do not carry with them the right to dividends or voting rights with respect to the securities that they entitle their holder to purchase, and they do not represent any rights in the assets of the issuer. A warrant ceases to have value if it is not exercised prior to its expiration date. As a result, warrants may be considered more speculative than certain other types of investments.

Zero-Coupon Bonds and Payment in-Kind Bonds. Zero-coupon bonds are issued at a significant discount from their principal amount (referred to as “original issue discount” or “OID”), generally pay interest only at maturity rather than at intervals during the life of the security, and are redeemed at face value when they mature. Payment-in-kind bonds allow the issuer, at its option, to make current interest payments on the bonds in additional bonds rather than in cash. Zero-coupon and payment-in-kind bonds thus allow an issuer to avoid the need to generate cash to meet current interest payments. Accordingly, those bonds may involve greater credit risks, and their value is subject to greater fluctuation in response to changes in market interest rates, than bonds that pay current interest in cash. Even though such bonds do not pay current interest in cash, a Fund that invests in them is nonetheless required annually to accrue as interest income a portion of the OID on zero-coupon bonds and to include in gross income the “interest” on payment-in-kind bonds for federal income tax purposes and generally to distribute the amount of that interest at least annually to its shareholders. See the “Taxation” section of this SAI. Thus, each Fund that invests in such bonds could be required, at times, to liquidate other investments in order to satisfy its distribution requirements.

Portfolio Turnover. The length of time a Fund has held a particular security is not generally a consideration in investment decisions. A change in the securities held by a Fund is known as “portfolio turnover.” High portfolio turnover may result from the strategies of the Adviser, Sub-Advisers or when one Sub-Adviser replaces another, necessitating changes in the Fund it advises. Portfolio turnover may vary significantly from year to year due to a variety of factors, within and outside the control of a Fund, the Adviser and a Sub-Adviser, including a fluctuating volume of shareholder purchase and redemption orders, market conditions, investment strategy changes, changes in the Adviser’s or a Sub-Adviser’s investment outlook or changes in the Sub-Adviser managing the Fund, as well as changes in roll transaction volume. A high turnover rate (100% or more) increases transaction costs (e.g., brokerage commissions) which must be borne by the Fund and its shareholders. A Fund’s Adviser or Sub-Adviser will consider the economic effects of portfolio turnover but generally will not treat a Fund’s annual portfolio turnover rate as a factor preventing a sale or purchase when the Adviser or a Sub-Adviser believes investment considerations warrant such sale or purchase. Decisions to buy and sell securities for a Fund are made by the Adviser or a Sub-Adviser, as applicable, independently. Thus, one Sub-Adviser could decide to sell a security when another Sub-Adviser decides to purchase the same security, thereby increasing a Fund’s portfolio turnover rate. Portfolio turnover may vary greatly from year to year as well as within a particular year. The portfolio turnover rates for a Fund are disclosed in the sections “Portfolio Turnover” and “Financial Highlights” of the Fund’s Prospectus.

1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income Fund experienced significant variation in its portfolio turnover rate over the past two fiscal years ended October 31, 2021 and 2022, which was primarily due to portfolio transaction activity related to a change in the Fund's Sub-Adviser and repositioning the Fund.

A Fund may engage in roll-timing strategies where the Fund seeks to extend the expiration or maturity of a position, such as a forward contract, futures contract or to-be-announced (“TBA”) transaction, on an underlying asset by closing out the position before expiration and contemporaneously opening a new position with respect to the same underlying asset that has substantially similar terms except for a later expiration date. Such “rolls” enable a Fund to maintain continuous investment exposure to an underlying asset beyond the expiration of the initial position without delivery of the underlying asset. Similarly, as certain standardized swap agreements transition from over-the-counter trading to mandatory exchange-trading and clearing due to the implementation of Dodd-Frank Act regulatory requirements, a Fund may “roll” an existing over-the-counter swap agreement by closing out the position before expiration and contemporaneously entering into a new exchange-traded and cleared swap agreement on the same underlying asset with substantially similar terms except for a later expiration date. These types of new positions opened contemporaneously with the closing of an existing position on the same underlying asset with substantially similar terms are collectively referred to as “Roll Transactions.” Certain investment restrictions, which normally apply at the time of investment, do not apply to Roll Transactions. A Fund will test for compliance at the time of the Fund’s initial entry into a position, but percentage limitations and absolute prohibitions may not be applicable to a Fund’s subsequent acquisition of securities or instruments through a Roll Transaction.

Portfolio Holdings Disclosure Policy

The 1290 Funds (the “Trust”) has adopted this Portfolio Holdings Disclosure Policy (the “Policy”) to govern the disclosure of the portfolio holdings of each Fund. It is the policy of the Trust to protect the confidentiality of material, non-public information about each Fund’s portfolio holdings and to prevent the selective disclosure of such information.

Each Fund will publicly disclose its holdings in accordance with regulatory requirements in filings with the SEC, including the annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders which are transmitted to shareholders within 60 days after the end of each fiscal year and fiscal half-year, respectively, for which the reports are made, and filed with the SEC on Form N-CSR within ten days after the reports are transmitted to shareholders. Monthly portfolio holdings reports on Form N-PORT are filed with the SEC within 60 days after the end of each fiscal quarter, and each Fund’s complete portfolio holdings as of its first and third fiscal quarter ends are made publicly available 60 days after the end of each quarter. Reports on Forms N-CSR and N-PORT are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The Trust’s annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders are also available without charge on its website at www.1290funds.com.

The Trust generally makes publicly available top portfolio holdings (typically, each Fund’s top fifteen (15) holdings) on a quarterly basis at the following website: www.1290Funds.com. Copies of such information are also available upon request to the 1290 Funds. Except as noted below, all such information generally is released with a 15-day lag time, meaning the top fifteen (15) portfolio holdings information as of the end of the quarter generally is not released until the 15th day following such quarter-end.

The Trust, through the Adviser, may provide non-public portfolio holdings data to certain third-parties prior to the release of such information to the public as described above. There are ongoing arrangements with the Sub-Administrator (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.), the Custodian (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.), execution management services provider (Neovest, Inc.), certain third-party data services (Bloomberg PLC), website hosting services (ALPS Funds Services Inc.), and mutual fund evaluation services (Morningstar, Inc.). Each of these third parties receives portfolio holdings information at month end, with the exception of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Neovest, Inc. and Bloomberg PLC which receive such information daily. Each of these third parties, either by explicit agreement or by virtue of its respective duties to the 1290 Funds, is subject to a duty to treat non-public portfolio holdings information confidentially and a duty not to trade on such information.

In addition, current non-public portfolio holdings information may be provided as frequently as daily as part of the legitimate business purposes of each Fund to service providers that have contracted to provide services to the 1290 Funds, and other organizations, which may include, but are not limited to: Equitable Financial Life Insurance Company; the Adviser; the Sub-Advisers;, transition managers; the independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP; counsel to the Funds or the non-interested trustees of the 1290 Funds (K&L Gates LLP, and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, respectively); regulatory authorities and courts; the Investment Company Institute; peer analysis services; performance review services (eVestment Alliance); back office services (SunGard Financial, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, FIS Global); research tool/quote system (Thomson Reuters); trade execution management and/or analysis (Elkins McSherry Inc., FX Transparency, LLC); data consolidator (Electra); trade order management services (Investment Technology Group Inc., Macgregor XIP, Charles River); books and records vendor; GIPS auditor; marketing research services (Strategic Insight); portfolio analysis services (Barra TotalRisk System); commission

tracking; accounting systems or services (Advent Software, Eagle Investment Systems Corp., Portia); transition management/brokerage services software vendors (CDS/Computer, The Abernathy MacGregor Group, OMGEO LLC, Radianz); analytic services or tools (Confluence Technologies, Inc., FactSet Research Systems Inc., Investment Technology Group, Inc., MSCI Inc., Citigroup Analytics, Inc., Wilshire Analytics/Axiom, Wilshire (Compass)); legal services (Financial Recovery Technologies); compliance services (TerraNua); corporate actions and trade confirmation (Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.); over-the-counter derivative products and portfolio holdings (State Street Bank and Trust Company); ratings agencies (Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies), Moody’s Investor Service, Inc.); index providers; consulting firms (Ernst & Young, ACA Compliance); data providers (InvestorForce); broker-dealers who provide execution or research services to the Funds; broker-dealers who provide quotations that are used in pricing; financial printers (Donnelley Financial Solutions); proxy voting services (Riskmetrics Group, Inc., Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., Glass Lewis & Co., Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc.); marketing services (Primelook, Inc.); 401k administrator (Fidelity); tax services (PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, Deloitte); and liquidity risk management services (BlackRock, Inc.). The Sub-Advisers may contract with additional third parties to provide services to the 1290 Funds. The entities to which each Fund voluntarily provides portfolio holdings information, either by explicit agreement or by virtue of their respective duties to each Fund, are subject to a duty to treat non-public portfolio holdings information confidentially and a duty not to trade on such information.

On a case-by-case “need to know” basis, the 1290 Funds’ Chief Financial Officer or Vice President, subject to the approval of the Adviser’s Legal and Compliance Group and the 1290 Funds’ Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”), may approve the disclosure of additional portfolio holdings information if such information is in the best interests of Fund shareholders. In all cases, the approval of the release of non-public portfolio holdings information by the Adviser’s Legal and Compliance Group must be based on a determination that such disclosure is in the best interests of the Funds and their shareholders, that there is a legitimate business purpose for such disclosure and that the party receiving such information is subject to a duty to treat the information confidentially and a duty not to trade on such information. The 1290 Funds does not disclose its portfolio holdings to the media.

The Adviser is responsible for administering the release of portfolio holdings information with respect to the Funds. Until particular portfolio holdings information has been released to the public, and except with regard to the third parties described above, no such information may be provided to any party without the approval of the Adviser’s Legal and Compliance Group, which approval is subject to the conditions described above. No compensation is received by the 1290 Funds, the Adviser or any other person in connection with their disclosure of portfolio holdings information.

The Adviser’s Legal and Compliance Group and the 1290 Funds’ CCO monitor and review any potential conflicts of interest between the Funds’ shareholders and the Adviser, distributor and their affiliates that may arise from the potential release of portfolio holdings information. The 1290 Funds’ Board has approved this policy and determined that it is in the best interest of the Funds. The Board must also approve any material change to this policy. The Board oversees implementation of this policy and receives from the 1290 Funds’ CCO quarterly reports regarding any violations or exceptions to this policy that were granted by the Adviser’s Legal and Compliance Group.

Management of the 1290 Funds

The Board of Trustees

The 1290 Funds’ Board is responsible for the overall management of the 1290 Funds and the Funds, including general supervision and review of the Funds’ investment activities and their conformity with federal and state law as well as the stated policies of the Funds. The Board elects the officers of the 1290 Funds who are responsible for administering the 1290 Funds’ day-to-day operations. The Trustees of the 1290 Funds are identified in the table below along with information as to their principal business occupations held during the last five years and certain other information. The registered investment companies in the fund complex include EQ Premier VIP Trust, EQ Advisors Trust and the 1290 Funds. All of the Trustees are also Trustees of the two other registered investment companies in the fund complex.

The Trustees

Name, Address and Year of Birth	Position(s) Held With Fund	Term of Office** and Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee†	Other Directorships Held by Trustee
Interested Trustee
Steven M. Joenk* 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York (1958)	Trustee and Chief Executive Officer	From October 1, 2017 to present, Trustee and Chief Executive Officer; from June 2014 through February 2020, President, and from June 9, 2014 through September 30, 2017, Trustee, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of EIM II (December 2022 to present); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of EIM (May 2011 to present); President of EIM II (June 2022 to December 2022); President of EIM (May 2011 to November 2021); Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of AXA Financial, Inc. (April 2017 to 2019); and Chief Investment Officer (April 2017 to present) and employee (September 1999 to present) of Equitable Financial.	125	None.
Independent Trustees
Mark A. Barnard c/o 1290 Funds 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10104 (1949)	Trustee	From February 27, 2017 to present	Retired. Previously, Managing Director – Private Investments, Howard Hughes Medical Institute,2001 to 2016 (and, prior thereto, Director of Private Investments from 1998 to 2001, and Manager of Private Investments from 1995 to 1998).	125	None.
Thomas W. Brock c/o 1290 Funds 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104 (1947)	Trustee	From January 1, 2016 to present	Retired. Previously, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of Silver Bay Realty Trust Corp., June 2016 to May 2017 (and, prior thereto, Director and interim President and Chief Executive Officer from January 2016 to June 2016).	125	Liberty All-Star Funds (2)

Name, Address and Year of Birth	Position(s) Held With Fund	Term of Office** and Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee†	Other Directorships Held by Trustee
Michael B. Clement c/o 1290 Funds 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104 (1957)	Trustee	From January 1, 2019 to present	Professor of Accounting, University of Texas, from 1997 to 2002 and from 2004 to present (Department of Accounting Chair from 2018 to 2022); Visiting Professor, Harvard Business School, 2023 to present.	125	New York Mortgage Trust
Donald E. Foley c/o 1290 Funds 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104 (1951)	Trustee	From June 9, 2014 to present	Retired. Previously, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Wilmington Trust Corporation, 2010 to 2011; Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Director of Tax, ITT Corporation, 1996 to 2010.	125	BioSig Technologies, Inc.; Wilmington Funds (12)
Patricia M. Haverland c/o 1290 Funds 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10104 (1956)	Trustee	April 2022 to present	Retired. Previously, Vice President and Chief Investment Officer North America Pensions, Siemens, 2009 to 2018.	125	None.
H. Thomas McMeekin c/o 1290 Funds 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104 (1953)	Trustee	From June 9, 2014 to present	Managing Partner and Founder, Griffin Investments, LLC, 2000 to present; CEO of Blue Key Services, LLC., 2015 to present; previously, Chief Investment Officer, AIG Life & Retirement and United Guaranty Corporation and Senior Managing Director of AIG Asset Management, 2009 to 2012.	125	None.
Jeffery S. Perry c/o 1290 Funds 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10104 (1965)	Trustee	April 2022 to present	Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Lead Mandates LLC (business and leadership advisory firm). Retired, Global Client Service Partner, Ernst & Young LLP, 2004 to 2020.	125	Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.; MasterBrand, Inc.

	Page
Description of the 1290 Funds	3
1290 Funds Investment Policies	4
Investment Strategies and Risks	7
Portfolio Holdings Disclosure Policy	65
Management of the 1290 Funds	66
Investment Management and Other Services	78
Brokerage Allocation and Other Strategies	89
Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures	92
Conflicts of Interest	93
Purchase, Redemption and Pricing of Shares	100
Taxation	105
Other Information	111
Other Services	113
Financial Statements	114
Appendix A — Ratings of Corporate Debt Securities	A-1
Appendix B — Portfolio Manager Information	B-1
Appendix C — Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures	C-1
Appendix D — Control Persons and Principal Holders of Securities	D-1
Appendix E — Securities Lending Activities	E-1