STATEMENT
OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
November
1, 2024
MUTUAL
FUND SERIES TRUST
Catalyst
Insider Buying Fund
Class A:
INSAX Class C: INSCX Class I: INSIX
Catalyst
Energy Infrastructure Fund
Class A:
MLXAX Class C: MLXCX Class I: MLXIX
Catalyst/MAP
Global Equity Fund
Class A:
CAXAX Class C: CAXCX Class I: CAXIX
Catalyst/Lyons
Tactical Allocation Fund
Class A:
CLTAX Class C: CLTCX Class I: CLTIX
Catalyst
Dynamic Alpha Fund
Class A:
CPEAX Class C: CPECX Class I: CPEIX
4221 North
203rd Street, Suite 100
Elkhorn,
Nebraska 68022
This
Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) is not a prospectus. It should be
read in conjunction with the Prospectus of the Catalyst Insider Buying Fund (the
“Insider Buying Fund”), Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (the “Energy
Infrastructure Fund”), Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund (the “Global Equity
Fund”), Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund (the “Tactical Allocation Fund”)
and Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund (the “Dynamic Alpha Fund”) (each a “Fund” and,
collectively, the “Funds”) dated November 1, 2024. Each Fund is a separate
series of Mutual Fund Series Trust (“Trust”), an open-end management company
organized as an Ohio business trust. The Funds’ Financial
Statements to shareholders for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, are
incorporated herein by reference and are available on the Funds’ website
www.catalystmf.com. This SAI has been incorporated in its entirety into the
Prospectus. Copies of the Prospectus and Financial Statements may be obtained at
no charge from the Trust by writing to the above address or calling
1-866-447-4228.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
INVESTMENT
RESTRICTIONS |
4 |
OTHER INVESTMENT
POLICIES |
5 |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT
INVESTMENTS AND RISKS |
6 |
DISCLOSURE OF PORTFOLIO
HOLDINGS |
25 |
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS |
26 |
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS |
32 |
ADVISOR AND SUB-ADVISORS |
40 |
CODE OF ETHICS |
47 |
TRANSFER AGENT, FUND ACCOUNTING AGENT
AND ADMINISTRATOR |
47 |
COMPLIANCE SERVICES |
49 |
CUSTODIAN |
49 |
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM |
49 |
COUNSEL |
50 |
DISTRIBUTOR |
50 |
ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION TO FINANCIAL
INTERMEDIARIES |
53 |
PROXY VOTING POLICY |
54 |
PORTFOLIO TURNOVER |
55 |
PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS |
55 |
PURCHASE AND REDEMPTION OF
SHARES |
57 |
REDUCTION OF UP-FRONT SALES CHARGE ON
CLASS A SHARES |
58 |
WAIVERS OF UP-FRONT SALES CHARGE ON
CLASS A SHARES |
59 |
EXCHANGE PRIVILEGE |
59 |
SALES CHARGE WAIVERS AND REDUCTIONS
AVAILABLE THROUGH |
59 |
NET ASSET VALUE |
60 |
TAX INFORMATION |
61 |
INVESTMENTS IN FOREIGN
SECURITIES |
62 |
BACKUP WITHHOLDING |
63 |
FOREIGN SHAREHOLDERS |
63 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
63 |
Appendix A—Description of Commercial
Paper and Bond Ratings |
64 |
Appendix B |
66 |
Appendix C |
71 |
Appendix D |
81 |
Appendix E |
84 |
Appendix F |
88 |
MUTUAL
FUND SERIES TRUST
The Trust,
an Ohio business trust, is registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”) as an open-end management investment company (or mutual
fund). The Trust was formed by an Agreement and Declaration of Trust on February
27, 2006. The Trust Agreement permits the Board of Trustees of the Trust
(“Board”) to issue an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest of
separate series without par value. The Dynamic Alpha Fund and Energy
Infrastructure Fund are each separate non-diversified series of the Trust and
the Insider Buying Fund, Tactical Allocation Fund, and Global Equity Fund are
each diversified series of the Trust. There are currently several other series
(or funds) and additional series may be created by the Board from time to
time.
Catalyst
Capital Advisors LLC ( “Advisor”) acts as advisor to the Funds.
Managed
Assets Portfolios, LLC (“MAP”) serves as the investment sub-advisor to the
Global Equity Fund.
Lyons Wealth
Management, LLC (“Lyons”) serves as the investment sub-advisor to the Tactical
Allocation Fund.
Cookson
Peirce & Co., Inc. (“CP”) serves as the investment sub-advisor to the
Dynamic Alpha Fund.
SL Advisors,
LLC (“SL Advisors”) serves as the investment sub-advisor to the Energy
Infrastructure Fund.
As used
herein, “Sub-Advisor” may refer to any of MAP, Lyons, CP or SL
Advisors.
The Trust
does not issue share certificates. All shares are held in non-certificate form
registered on the books of the Trust and the Trust’s transfer agent for the
account of the shareholder. Each share of a series represents an equal
proportionate interest in the assets and liabilities belonging to that series
with each other share of that series and is entitled to such dividends and
distributions out of income belonging to the series as are declared by the
Board. The shares do not have cumulative voting rights or any preemptive or
conversion rights, and the Board has the authority from time to time to divide
or combine the shares of any series into a greater or lesser number of shares of
that series so long as the proportionate beneficial interest in the assets
belonging to that series and the rights of shares of any other series are in no
way affected. In case of any liquidation of a series, the holders of shares of
the series being liquidated will be entitled to receive as a class a
distribution out of the assets, net of the liabilities, belonging to that
series. Expenses attributable to any series are borne by that series. There can
be no assurance that a series will grow to an economically viable size, in which
case the Board may determine to liquidate the series at a time that may not be
opportune for shareholders. Any general expenses of the Trust not readily
identifiable as belonging to a particular series are allocated by or under the
direction of the Board in such manner as the Board determine to be fair and
equitable. No shareholder is liable to further calls or to assessment by the
Trust without his or her express consent.
Each Fund
offers four classes of shares: Class A, Class C, Class I and Class T Shares. As
of the date of this SAI only Class A, Class C and Class I Shares are available
for sale. Each share class represents an interest in the same assets of a Fund,
has the same rights and is identical in all material respects except that (i)
each class of shares may bear different distribution fees; (ii) each class of
shares may be subject to different (or no) sales charges; (iii) certain other
class specific expenses will be borne solely by the class to which such expenses
are attributable; and (iv) each class has exclusive voting rights with respect
to matters relating to its own distribution arrangements. The Board may classify
and reclassify the shares of a Fund into additional classes of shares at a
future date.
INVESTMENT
RESTRICTIONS
The
following investment restrictions are fundamental policies of each Fund and
cannot be changed with respect to a Fund unless the change is approved by the
lesser of (a) 67% or more of the shares present at a meeting of shareholders if
the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding voting shares of that Fund are
present or represented by proxy or (b) more than 50% of the outstanding voting
shares of that Fund.
As a matter
of fundamental policy, each Fund, except as otherwise noted, may not:
(a)
borrow money, except as permitted
under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), and as
interpreted or modified by regulatory authority having jurisdiction, from time
to time;
(b)
issue senior securities, except as
permitted under the 1940 Act, and as interpreted or modified by regulatory
authority having jurisdiction, from time to time;
(c)
engage in the business of underwriting
securities issued by others, except to the extent that a Fund may be deemed to
be an underwriter in connection with the disposition of portfolio
securities;
(d)
purchase or sell real estate, which
does not include securities of companies which deal in real estate or mortgages
or investments secured by real estate or interests therein, except that each
Fund reserves freedom of action to hold and to sell real estate acquired as a
result of the Fund’s ownership of securities;
(e)
purchase or sell physical commodities
or forward contracts relating to physical commodities;
(f)
make loans to other persons, except
(i) loans of portfolio securities, and (ii) to the extent that entry into
repurchase agreements and the purchase of debt instruments or interests in
indebtedness in accordance with a Fund’s investment objective and policies may
be deemed to be loans;
(g) invest
25% or more of its total assets in a particular industry or group of industries.
This limitation is not applicable to investments in obligations issued or
guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies and instrumentalities or
repurchase agreements with respect thereto. A Fund will consider the investments
of underlying investment companies when determining its compliance with this
restriction;
(h)
(Insider Buying Fund, Tactical
Allocation Fund and Global Equity Fund Only) with respect to 75% of the
Fund’s total assets, purchase the securities of any issuer, except securities
issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or any of its agencies or
instrumentalities or securities issued by other investment companies, if, as a
result (i) more than 5% of the Fund’s total assets would be invested in
securities of that issuer, or (ii) the Fund would hold more than 10% of the
outstanding voting securities of that issuer.
The 1940 Act
limits a Fund’s ability to borrow money, prohibiting the Fund from issuing
senior securities, except the Fund may borrow from any bank provided that
immediately after any such borrowing there is an asset coverage of at least 300%
for all borrowings by the Fund and provided further, that in the event that such
asset coverage shall at any time fall below 300%, the Fund shall, within three
days thereafter or such longer period as the SEC may prescribe by rules and
regulations, reduce the amount of its borrowings to such an extent that the
asset coverage of such borrowing shall be at least 300%.
With respect
to interpretations of the SEC or its staff described in paragraph (b) above, the
SEC and its staff have identified various securities trading practices and
derivative transactions used by mutual funds that give rise to potential senior
security issues under Section 18(f) of the 1940 Act. However, rather than
rigidly deeming all such practices as impermissible forms of issuing a “senior
security” under Section 18(f), the SEC has adopted Rule 18f-4 under the 1940
Act, which permits a fund to enter into derivatives transactions and certain
similar transactions notwithstanding the prohibitions and restrictions on the
issuance of senior securities under Section 18(f) of the 1940 Act, subject to
the conditions of the Rule.
Rule 18f-4
imposes limits on the amount of derivatives a Fund can enter into, eliminates
the asset segregation framework previously used by the Funds to comply with
Section 18 of the 1940 Act, treats derivatives as senior securities and requires
a Fund to maintain a comprehensive derivative risk management program and
appoint a derivatives risk manager if its exposure to derivatives is above a
specified amount.
OTHER
INVESTMENT POLICIES
The
following investment policies are not fundamental and may be changed by the
Board without the approval of the shareholders of the Funds:
(a) No
Fund will purchase securities or evidences of interest thereon on “margin.” This
limitation is not applicable to short-term credit obtained by a Fund for the
clearance of purchases and sales or redemption of securities, or to arrangements
with respect to transactions involving futures contracts, and other permitted
investments and techniques;
(b)
No Fund will mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or in
any manner transfer, as security for indebtedness, any assets of the Fund except
as may be necessary in connection with permitted borrowings. The Fund shall
maintain asset coverage of 300% of all borrowing. Margin deposits, security
interests, liens and collateral arrangements with respect to transactions
involving options, futures contracts, short sales, securities lending and other
permitted investments and techniques are not deemed to be a mortgage, pledge or
hypothecation of assets for purposes of this limitation;
(c)
No Fund will purchase any security while
borrowings representing more than one third of its total assets are
outstanding;
(d)
(Global Equity Fund only) Under normal market
conditions, the Fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets plus any borrowings for investment
purposes in equity securities;
(e) (Energy
Infrastructure Fund only) Under normal conditions, the Fund will invest at
least 80% of the Fund’s net assets plus any borrowings for investment purposes
in the securities of companies that derive a majority of their revenue from
energy infrastructure activities;
(f)
(Global Equity Fund only) Under normal
conditions, at least 40% of the Fund’s assets will be in securities of issuers
domiciled in at least 3 countries outside of the United States.
If a
restriction on a Fund’s investments is adhered to at the time an investment is
made, a subsequent change in the percentage of Fund assets invested in certain
securities or other instruments, or change in average duration of the Fund’s
investment portfolio, resulting from changes in the value of the Fund’s total
assets, will not be considered a violation of the restriction; provided,
however, that the asset coverage requirement applicable to borrowings shall be
maintained in the manner contemplated by applicable law.
Pursuant to
Rule 22e-4, no Fund will invest more than 15% of its net assets in investments
for which there are legal or contractual restrictions on resale and other
illiquid investments. Rule 144A securities with registration rights are not
considered to be illiquid. If illiquid investments exceed 15% of a Fund’s net
assets, the Fund will take corrective action consistent with Rule
22e-4.
Temporary
Defensive Positions
From time to
time, a Fund may take temporary defensive positions, which are inconsistent with
the Fund’s principal investment strategies, in attempting to respond to adverse
market, economic, political, or other conditions. For example, a Fund may hold
all or a portion of its assets in money market instruments, including cash, cash
equivalents, U.S. government securities, other investment grade fixed income
securities, certificates of deposit, bankers acceptances, commercial paper,
money market funds and repurchase agreements. While a Fund is in a defensive
position, the opportunity to achieve its investment objective will be limited.
If a Fund invests in a money market fund, the shareholders of the Fund generally
will be subject
to
duplicative advisory fees. Although a Fund would do this only in seeking to
avoid losses, the Fund will be unable to pursue its investment objective during
that time, and it could reduce the benefit from any upswing in the market. A
Fund also may also invest in money market instruments at any time to maintain
liquidity or pending selection of investments in accordance with its policies.
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION ABOUT INVESTMENTS AND RISKS
Unless
restricted by the fundamental policies of any Fund, the following policies
supplement the investment objective and policies of the Funds as set forth in
the Prospectus. Each reference to “Advisor” in the section below includes, where
applicable, the Fund’s sub-advisor.
Common
Stocks. The Funds may invest in common stocks, which include the common
stock of any class or series of domestic or foreign corporations or any similar
equity interest, such as a trust or partnership interest. These investments may
or may not pay dividends and may or may not carry voting rights. Common stock
occupies the most junior position in a company’s capital structure. The Funds
may also invest in warrants and rights related to common stocks.
Investments
in Small and Unseasoned Companies. Unseasoned and small companies may
have limited or unprofitable operating histories, limited financial resources,
and inexperienced management. In addition, they often face competition from
larger or more established firms that have greater resources. Securities of
small and unseasoned companies are frequently traded in the over-the-counter
market or on regional exchanges where low trading volumes may result in erratic
or abrupt price movements. To dispose of these securities, a Fund may need to
sell them over an extended period or below the original purchase price.
Investments by a Fund in these small or unseasoned companies may be regarded as
speculative.
Securities
of Other Investment Companies. The Funds may invest in securities issued
by other investment companies. Each Fund intends to limit its investments in
accordance with applicable law or as permitted by Rule 12d1-4 under the 1940
Act. Among other things, such law would limit these investments so that, as
determined immediately after a securities purchase is made by a Fund: (a) not
more than 5% of the value of its total assets will be invested in the securities
of any one investment company; (b) not more than 10% of the value of its total
assets will be invested in the aggregate in securities of investment companies
as a group; (c) not more than 3% of the outstanding voting stock of any one
investment company will be owned by the Fund; and (d) not more than 10% of the
outstanding voting stock of any one closed-end investment company will be owned
by the Fund together with all other investment companies that have the same
advisor. Under certain sets of conditions, different sets of restrictions may be
applicable. As a shareholder of another investment company, a Fund would bear,
along with other shareholders, its pro rata portion of that investment company’s
expenses, including advisory fees. These expenses would be in addition to the
advisory and other expenses that a Fund bears directly in connection with its
own operations. Investment companies in which a Fund may invest may also impose
a sales or distribution charge in connection with the purchase or redemption of
their Shares and other types of commissions or charges. Such charges will be
payable by the Fund and, therefore, will be borne directly by
Shareholders.
Section
12(d)(1)(F) and Rule 12d1-4 under the 1940 Act which in conjunction with one
another allow registered investment companies (such as the Funds) to exceed the
limitations described above, provided the aggregate sales loads any investor
pays (i.e., the combined distribution expenses of both the acquiring fund and
the acquired funds) does not exceed the limits on sales loads established by the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) for funds of funds and the
registered investment company “mirror votes” any securities purchased pursuant
to Section 12(d)(1)(F).
Exchange
Traded Funds. Each Fund may invest in a range of exchange-traded funds
(“ETFs”). An ETF is an investment company that offers investors a proportionate
share in a portfolio of stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies or other
securities. Like individual equity securities, ETFs are traded on a stock
exchange and can be bought and sold throughout the day. Traditional ETFs attempt
to achieve the same investment return as that of a particular market index, such
as the S&P 500 Index. To mirror the performance of a market index, an ETF
invests either in all of the securities in the index or a representative sample
of
securities
in the index. Some ETFs also invest in futures contracts or other derivative
instruments to track their benchmark index. Unlike traditional indexes, which
generally weight their holdings based on relative size (market capitalization),
enhanced or fundamentally weighted indexes use weighting structures that include
other criteria such as earnings, sales, growth, liquidity, book value or
dividends. Some ETFs also use active investment strategies instead of tracking
broad market indexes. Investments in ETFs are considered to be investment
companies, see “Securities of Other Investment Companies” above.
When a Fund
invests in ETFs, it is subject to the specific risks of the underlying
investment of the ETF. These risks could include those associated with small
companies, illiquidity risk, sector risk, foreign and emerging market risk,
short selling, leverage as well as risks associated with fixed income
securities, real estate investments, and commodities. ETFs in which the Fund
invests will not be able to replicate exactly the performance of the indices or
sector they track because the total return generated by the securities will be
reduced by transaction costs incurred in adjusting the actual balance of the
securities. In addition, the ETFs in which the Fund invests will incur expenses
not incurred by their applicable indices. Certain securities comprising the
indices tracked by the ETFs may, from time to time, temporarily be unavailable,
which may further impede the ETFs’ ability to track their applicable
indices.
When a Fund
invests in sector ETFs, there is a risk that securities within the same group of
industries will decline in price due to sector-specific market or economic
developments. If a Fund invests more heavily in a particular sector, the value
of its shares may be especially sensitive to factors and economic risks that
specifically affect that sector. As a result, a Fund’s share price may fluctuate
more widely than the value of shares of a mutual fund that invests in a broader
range of industries. Additionally, some sectors could be subject to greater
government regulation than other sectors. Therefore, changes in regulatory
policies for those sectors may have a material effect on the value of securities
issued by companies in those sectors. The sectors in which each Fund may be more
heavily invested will vary.
To offset
the risk of declining security prices, the Funds may invest in inverse ETFs.
Inverse ETFs are funds designed to rise in price when stock prices are
falling. Inverse ETF index funds seek to provide investment results that
will match a certain percentage of the inverse of the performance of a specific
benchmark on a daily basis. For example, if an inverse ETFs current
benchmark is the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index and the ETF meets its
objective, the value of the ETF will tend to increase on a daily basis when the
value of the underlying index decreases (e.g., if the Russell 2000 Index goes
down 5% then the inverse ETF’s value should go up 5%).
ETFs or
Inverse ETFs may employ leverage, which magnifies the changes in the underlying
stock index upon which they are based. Any strategy that includes inverse
or leveraged securities could cause a Fund to suffer significant
losses.
Closed-End
Investment Companies. The Funds may invest in “closed-end” investment
companies (or “closed-end funds”), subject to the investment restrictions set
forth below. The Funds, together with any company or companies controlled by the
Funds, and any other investment companies having a sub-advisor as an investment
advisor, may purchase only up to 10% of the total outstanding voting stock of
any closed-end fund. Typically, the common shares of closed-end funds are
offered to the public in a one-time initial public offering by a group of
underwriters who retain a spread or underwriting commission. Such securities are
then listed for trading on a national securities exchange or in the
over-the-counter markets. Because the common shares of closed-end funds cannot
be redeemed upon demand to the issuer like the shares of an open-end investment
company (such as the Funds), investors seek to buy and sell common shares of
closed-end funds in the secondary market. The common shares of closed-end funds
may trade at a price per share which is more or less than the net asset value
(“NAV”) per share, the difference representing the “market premium” and the
“market discount” of such common shares, respectively.
There can be
no assurance that a market discount on common shares of any closed-end fund will
ever decrease. In fact, it is possible that this market discount may increase
and a Fund may suffer realized or unrealized capital losses due to further
decline in the market price of the securities of such closed-end funds, thereby
adversely affecting the NAV of that Fund’s shares. Similarly, there can be no
assurance that the common shares of closed-end funds which trade at a premium
will continue to trade at a premium or that
the premium
will not decrease subsequent to a purchase of such shares by the Funds. The
Funds may also invest in preferred shares of closed-end funds.
Investors
in the Funds
should recognize that they may invest directly in closed-end funds and that by
investing in closed-end funds indirectly through the Funds they will bear not
only their proportionate share of the expenses of the Funds (including operating
costs and investment advisory and administrative fees) but also, indirectly,
similar fees of the underlying closed-end funds. An investor may incur increased
tax liabilities by investing in the a Fund rather than directly in the
underlying funds.
Business
Development Companies (BDCs) and Special Purpose Acquisition Companies
(SPACs). The Funds may invest in BDCs and SPACs. Federal securities laws
impose certain restraints upon the organization and operations of BDCs and
SPACs. For example, BDCs are required to invest at least 70% of their total
assets primarily in securities of private companies or in thinly traded U.S.
public companies, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and high
quality debt instruments that mature in one year or less. SPACs typically hold
85% to 100% of the proceeds raised from their IPO in trust to be used at a later
date for a merger or acquisition. The SPAC must sign a letter of intent for a
merger or acquisition within 18 months of the IPO. Otherwise it will be forced
to dissolve and return the assets held in the trust to the public stockholders.
However, if a letter of intent is signed within 18 months, the SPAC can close
the transaction within 24 months. In addition, the target of the acquisition
must have a fair market value that is equal to at least 80% of the SPAC’s assets
at the time of acquisition and a majority of shareholders voting must approve
this combination with no more than 20% of the shareholders voting against the
acquisition and requesting their money back. When a deal is proposed, a
shareholder can stay with the transaction by voting for it or elect to sell his
shares in the SPAC if voting against it. SPACs are more transparent than private
equity as they may be subject to certain SEC regulations, including registration
statement requirements under the Securities Act of 1933 and 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K
financial reporting requirements. Since SPACs are publicly traded, they provide
limited liquidity to an investor (i.e. investment comes in the form of common
shares and warrants which can be traded). Other than the risks normally
associated with IPOs, SPACs’ public shareholders’ risks include limited
liquidity of their securities (as shares are generally thinly traded), loss of
0-15% of their investments (resulting from the SPACs operating costs) if no
deals are made and lack of investment diversification as assets are invested in
a single company.
Undertakings
in Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS) Funds. The
Funds may invest in affiliated and unaffiliated UCITS funds, open-ended pooled
or collectively investment undertakings established in accordance with the UCITS
Directive adopted by members of the European Union. The underlying investments
of a UCITS fund must have sufficient liquidity to fulfill redemptions at the
request of shareholders, either directly or indirectly out of the underlying
investments. The assets of a UCITS fund are entrusted to an independent
custodian or depositary for safekeeping and held on a segregated basis. To the
extent a Fund holds interests in a UCITS fund, the Fund will bear two layers of
asset-management fees and expenses (directly at the Fund level and indirectly at
the UCITS fund level) and a single layer of incentive fees (at the UCITS fund
level).
Options
on Securities. Each Fund may purchase put or call options on equity
securities (including securities of ETFs). Each Fund may also write call options
and put options on stocks only if they are covered, as described below, and such
options must remain covered so long as the Fund is obligated as a writer. Option
transactions can be executed either on a national exchange or through a private
transaction with a broker-dealer (an “over-the-counter” transaction). Each Fund
may write (sell) “covered” call options and purchase options in a spread to
hedge (cover) written options, and to close out options previously written by
it.
A call
option gives the holder (buyer) the “right to purchase” a security at a
specified price (the exercise price) at any time until a certain date (the
expiration date). So long as the obligation of the writer (seller) of a call
option continues, the writer may be assigned an exercise notice by the
broker-dealer through whom such option was sold, requiring the writer to deliver
the underlying security against payment of the exercise price. This obligation
terminates upon the expiration of the call option, or such earlier time at which
the writer effects a closing purchase transaction by purchasing an option
identical to that previously sold. To secure the obligation to deliver the
underlying security upon exercise of a call option subject to the
Options
Clearing
Corporation (“OCC”), a writer is required to deposit in escrow the underlying
security or other assets in accordance with OCC rules.
The purpose
of writing covered call options is to generate additional premium income for a
Fund. This premium income will serve to enhance a Fund’s total return and will
reduce the effect of any price decline of the security involved in the option.
Covered call options will generally be written on securities which, in the
opinion of the Advisor, are not expected to make any major price moves in the
near future but which, over the long-term, are deemed to be attractive
investments for the particular Fund.
A Fund may
write only call options that are “covered.” A call option is “covered” if the
Fund either owns the underlying security or has an absolute and immediate right
(such as a call with the same or a later expiration date) to acquire that
security on the same economic terms. If a Fund writes a call option, the
purchaser of the option has the right to buy (and the Fund has the obligation to
sell) the underlying security at the exercise price throughout the term of the
option. The initial amount paid to a Fund by the purchaser of the option is the
“premium.” A Fund’s obligation as the writer of a call option to deliver the
underlying security against payment of the exercise price will terminate either
upon expiration of the option or earlier if the Fund is able to effect a
“closing purchase transaction” through the purchase of an equivalent option.
There can be no assurance that a closing purchase transaction can be effected at
any particular time or at all. A Fund would not be able to effect a closing
purchase transaction after it had received notice of exercise. Fund securities
on which call options may be written will be purchased solely on the basis of
investment considerations consistent with a Fund’s investment objective. The
writing of covered call options is a conservative investment technique believed
to involve relatively little risk (in contrast to the writing of naked or
uncovered options, which the Funds will not do), but capable of enhancing a
Fund’s total return. When writing a covered call option, a Fund, in return for
the premium, gives up the opportunity for profit from a price increase in the
underlying security above the exercise price, but retains the risk of loss
should the price of the security decline. Unlike one who owns securities not
subject to an option, a Fund has no control over when the Fund may be required
to sell the underlying securities, since it may be assigned an exercise notice
at any time prior to the expiration of its obligation as a writer. If a call
option which a Fund has written expires, the Fund will realize a gain in the
amount of the premium; however, such gain may be offset by a decline in the
market value of the underlying security during the option period. If the call
option is exercised, the Fund will realize a gain or loss from the sale of the
underlying security.
The premium
received is the market value of an option. The premium a Fund will receive from
writing a call option will reflect, among other things, the current market price
of the underlying security, the relationship of the exercise price to such
market price, the historical price volatility of the underlying security, and
the length of the option period. Once the decision to write a call option has
been made, the Advisor, in determining whether a particular call option should
be written on a particular security, will consider the reasonableness of the
anticipated premium and the likelihood that a liquid secondary market will exist
for such option. The premium received by a Fund for writing covered call options
will be recorded as a liability in the Fund’s statement of assets and
liabilities. This liability will be adjusted daily to the option’s current
market value which is the mean of the closing bid and asked prices, after
closing rotation is completed (i.e., after such closing prices are
computed, currently at 4:02 p.m. and 4:15 p.m., depending on the type of
contract), the closing prices as of the time at which the net asset value per
share of the Fund is computed (the close of the New York Stock Exchange). The
liability will be extinguished upon expiration of the option, the purchase of an
identical option in a closing transaction, or delivery of the underlying
security upon the exercise of the option.
Closing
transactions will be effected in order to realize a profit on an outstanding
call option, to prevent an underlying security from being called, or to permit
the sale of the underlying security. Furthermore, effecting a closing
transaction will permit a Fund to write another call option on the underlying
security with either a different exercise price or expiration date or both. If a
Fund desires to sell a particular security from its portfolio on which it has
written a call option, the Fund will seek to effect a closing transaction prior
to, or concurrently with, the sale of the security. There is, of course, no
assurance that a Fund will be able to effect such closing transactions at a
favorable price. If a Fund cannot effect such a closing transaction, the Fund
may be required to hold a security that it might otherwise have sold, in which
case it would continue to be at market risk on the security. A Fund will pay
transaction costs in connection
with the
writing of options to close out previously written options. Such transaction
costs are normally higher than those applicable to purchases and sales of
portfolio securities.
The exercise
price of the options may be below, equal to, or above the current market values
of the underlying securities at the time the options are written. From time to
time, a Fund may purchase an underlying security for delivery in accordance with
an exercise notice of a call option assigned to the Fund, rather than delivering
such security from its portfolio. In such cases, additional costs will be
incurred.
A Fund will
realize a profit or loss from a closing purchase transaction if the cost of the
transaction is less or more than the premium received from the writing of the
option. It is possible that the cost of effecting a closing transaction may be
greater than the premium received by a Fund for writing the option. Because
increases in the market price of a call option will generally reflect increases
in the market price of the underlying security, any loss resulting from the
purchase of a call option is likely to be offset in whole or in part by
appreciation of the underlying security owned by a Fund.
In order to
write a call option, a Fund is required to comply with OCC rules and the rules
of the various exchanges with respect to collateral requirements.
A Fund may
also purchase put options so long as they are listed on an exchange. If a Fund
purchases a put option, it has the option to sell the subject security at a
specified price at any time during the term of the option.
Purchasing
put options may be used as a portfolio investment strategy when the Advisor
perceives significant short-term risk but substantial long-term appreciation for
the underlying security. The put option acts as an insurance policy, as it
protects against significant downward price movement while it allows full
participation in any upward movement. If a Fund is holding a stock that the
Advisor feels has strong fundamentals, but for some reason may be weak in the
near term, it may purchase a listed put on such security, thereby giving itself
the right to sell such security at a certain strike price throughout the term of
the option. Consequently, a Fund will exercise the put only if the price of such
security falls below the strike price of the put. The difference between the put
option’s strike price and the market price of the underlying security on the
date a Fund exercises the put, less transaction costs, will be the amount by
which the Fund will be able to hedge against a decline in the underlying
security. If, during the period of the option the market price for the
underlying security remains at or above the put option’s strike price, the put
will expire worthless, representing a loss of the price a Fund paid for the put,
plus transaction costs. If the price of the underlying security increases, the
profit a Fund realizes on the sale of the security will be reduced by the
premium paid for the put option less any amount for which the put may be
sold.
A Fund may
write put options on a fully covered basis on a stock the Fund intends to
purchase. If a Fund writes a put option, the purchaser of the option has the
right to sell (and the Fund has the obligation to buy) the underlying security
at the exercise price throughout the term of the option. The initial amount paid
to a Fund by the purchaser of the option is the “premium.” A Fund’s obligation
to purchase the underlying security against payment of the exercise price will
terminate either upon expiration of the option or earlier if the Fund is able to
effect a “closing purchase transaction” through the purchase of an equivalent
option. There can be no assurance that a closing purchase transaction can be
effected at any particular time or at all.
A Fund may
purchase a call option or sell a put option on a stock (including securities of
ETFs) it may purchase at some point in the future. The purchase of a call option
or sale of a put option is viewed as an alternative to the purchase of the
actual stock. The number of option contracts purchased multiplied by the
exercise price times the option multiplier will normally not be any greater than
the number of shares that would have been purchased had the underlying security
been purchased. If a Fund purchases a call option, it has the right but not the
obligation to purchase (and the seller has the obligation to sell) the
underlying security at the exercise price throughout the term of the option. The
initial amount paid by a Fund to the seller of the call option is known as the
“premium.” If during the period of the option the market price of the underlying
security remains at or below the exercise price, a Fund will be able to purchase
the security at the lower market price. The profit or loss a Fund may realize on
the eventual sale of a security purchased by
means of the
exercise of a call option will be reduced by the premium paid for the call
option. If, during the period of the call option, the market price for the
underlying security is at or below the call option’s strike price, the call
option will expire worthless, representing a loss of the price a Fund paid for
the call option, plus transaction costs.
Stock
Index Options. A Fund will write call options on stock indexes only if
on such date it holds a portfolio of stocks at least equal to the value of the
index times the multiplier times the number of contracts.
Transactions
in Stock Options. Purchase and sales of options involves the risk that
there will be no market in which to effect a closing transaction. An option
position may be closed out only on an exchange that provides a secondary market
for an option of the same series or if the transaction was an over-the-counter
transaction, through the original broker-dealer. Although a Fund will generally
buy and sell options for which there appears to be an active secondary market,
there is no assurance that a liquid secondary market on an exchange will exist
for any particular option, or at any particular time, and for some options no
secondary market on an exchange may exist. If the Fund, as a covered call or put
option writer, is unable to effect an offsetting closing transaction in a
secondary market, it will, for a call option it has written, not be able to sell
the underlying security until the call option expires and, for a put option it
has written, not be able to avoid purchasing the underlying security until the
put option expires.
Options
on Stock Indexes. Each Fund’s purchase and sale of options on stock
indexes will be subject to risks described above under “Transactions in Stock
Options.” In addition, the distinctive characteristics of options on stock
indexes create certain risks that are not present with stock options.
Since the
value of a stock index option depends upon the movements in the level of the
stock index, rather than the price of a particular stock, whether a Fund will
realize a gain or loss on the purchase or sale of an option on a stock index
depends upon movements in the level of stock prices in the stock market
generally or in an industry or market segment rather than movements in the price
of a particular stock. Accordingly, successful use by a Fund of options on stock
indexes is subject to the advisor’s ability to correctly predict movements in
the direction of the stock market generally or of a particular industry or
market segment. This requires skills and techniques different from predicting
changes in the price of individual stocks.
Stock index
prices may be distorted if trading of certain stocks included in the stock index
is interrupted. Trading in the stock index options also may be interrupted in
certain circumstances, such as if trading were halted in a substantial number of
stocks included in the stock index. If this occurred, a Fund would not be able
to close out options that it had purchased or written and, if restrictions on
exercise were imposed, might not be able to exercise an option that it was
holding, which could result in substantial losses to the Fund. It is the policy
of each Fund to purchase or write options only on stock indexes that include a
number of stocks sufficient to minimize the likelihood of a trading halt in the
stock index, for example, the S&P 100 or S&P 500 index
option.
Although the
markets for certain stock index option contracts have developed rapidly, the
markets for other stock index options are still relatively illiquid. The ability
to establish and close out positions on such options will be subject to the
development and maintenance of a liquid secondary market. It is not certain that
this market will develop in all stock index option contracts. A Fund will not
purchase or sell stock index option contracts unless and until, in the Advisor’s
opinion, the market for such options has developed sufficiently that the risk in
connection with these transactions is no greater than the risk in connection
with options on stock.
Hedging.
Hedging is a means of transferring risk that an investor does not wish
to assume during an uncertain market environment. The Funds are permitted to
enter into these transactions solely: (a) to hedge against changes in the market
value of portfolio securities and against changes in the market value of
securities intended to be purchased, (b) to close out or offset existing
positions, or (c) to manage the duration of a portfolio’s fixed income
investments.
Hedging
activity in a Fund may include buying or selling (writing) put or call options
on stocks, shares of exchange traded funds or stock indexes, entering into stock
index futures contracts or buying or selling options on stock index futures
contracts or financial futures contracts, such as futures contracts on U.S.
Treasury securities and interest related indices, and options on financial
futures. The Fund will buy or sell options on stock index futures traded on a
national exchange or board of trade and options on securities and on stock
indexes traded on national securities exchanges or through private transactions
directly with a broker-dealer. The Fund may hedge a portion of its portfolio by
selling stock index futures contracts or purchasing puts on these contracts to
limit exposure to an actual or anticipated market decline. A Fund may hedge
against fluctuations in currency exchange rates, in connection with its
investments in foreign securities, by purchasing foreign forward currency
exchange contracts. All hedging transactions must be appropriate for reduction
of risk and they cannot be for speculation.
The Funds
may engage in transactions in futures contracts and options on futures
contracts.
Convertible
Securities. The Funds may invest in convertible securities, including
debt securities or preferred stock that may be converted into common stock or
that carry the right to purchase common stock. Convertible securities entitle
the holder to exchange the securities for a specified number of shares of common
stock, usually of the same company, at specified prices within a certain period
of time. They also entitle the holder to receive interest or dividends until the
holder elects to exercise the conversion privilege.
The terms of
any convertible security determine its ranking in a company’s capital structure.
In the case of subordinated convertible debentures, the holder’s claims on
assets and earnings are generally subordinate to the claims of other creditors,
and senior to the claims of preferred and common stockholders. In the case of
convertible preferred stock, the holder’s claims on assets and earnings are
subordinate to the claims of all creditors and are senior to the claims of
common stockholders. As a result of their ranking in a company’s capitalization,
convertible securities that are rated by nationally recognized statistical
rating organizations are generally rated below other obligations of the company
and many convertible securities are not rated.
Preferred
Stock. The Funds may invest in preferred stock. Preferred stock,
unlike common stock, offers a stated dividend rate payable from the issuer’s
earnings. Preferred stock dividends may be cumulative or non-cumulative,
participating, or auction rate. If interest rates rise, the fixed dividend on
preferred stocks may be less attractive, causing the price of the preferred
stocks to decline. Preferred stock may have mandatory sinking fund provisions,
as well as call/redemption provisions prior to maturity, a negative feature when
interest rates decline.
Warrants.
The Funds may invest in warrants. A Fund may purchase warrants issued by
domestic and foreign companies to purchase newly created equity securities
consisting of common and preferred stock. Warrants are securities that give the
holder the right, but not the obligation to purchase equity issues of the
company issuing the warrants, or a related company, at a fixed price either on a
certain date or during a set period. The equity security underlying a warrant is
authorized at the time the warrant is issued or is issued together with the
warrant.
Investing in
warrants can provide a greater potential for profit or loss than an equivalent
investment in the underlying security, and, thus, can be a speculative
investment. At the time of issue, the cost of a warrant is substantially less
than the cost of the underlying security itself, and price movements in the
underlying security are generally magnified in the price movements of the
warrant. This leveraging effect enables the investor to gain exposure to the
underlying security with a relatively low capital investment. This leveraging
increases an investor’s risk, however, in the event of a decline in the value of
the underlying security and can result in a complete loss of the amount invested
in the warrant. In addition, the price of a warrant tends to be more volatile
than, and may not correlate exactly to, the price of the underlying security. If
the market price of the underlying security is below the exercise price of the
warrant on its expiration date, the warrant will generally expire without value.
The value of a warrant may decline because of a decline in the value of the
underlying security, the passage of time, changes in interest rates or in the
dividend or other policies of the company whose equity underlies the warrant or
a change in the perception as to the future
price of the
underlying security, or any combination thereof. Warrants generally pay no
dividends and confer no voting or other rights other than to purchase the
underlying security.
United
States Government Obligations. The Funds may invest in obligations
issued or guaranteed by the United States government, or by its agencies or
instrumentalities. Obligations issued or guaranteed by federal agencies or
instrumentalities may or may not be backed by the “full faith and credit” of the
United States. Securities that are backed by the full faith and credit of the
United States include Treasury bills, Treasury notes, Treasury bonds, and
obligations of the Government National Mortgage Association, the Farmers Home
Administration, and the Export-Import Bank. In the case of securities not backed
by the full faith and credit of the United States, the Funds must look
principally to the agency issuing or guaranteeing the obligation for ultimate
repayment and may not be able to assert a claim against the United States itself
in the event the agency or instrumentality does not meet its commitments.
Securities that are not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States
include, but are not limited to, obligations of the Tennessee Valley Authority,
the Federal National Mortgage Association and the United States Postal Service,
each of which has the right to borrow from the United States Treasury to meet
its obligations, and obligations of the Federal Farm Credit System and the
Federal Home Loan Banks, both of whose obligations may be satisfied only by the
individual credits of each issuing agency.
Foreign
Government Obligations. The Funds may invest in short-term obligations
of foreign sovereign governments or of their agencies, instrumentalities,
authorities or political subdivisions. These securities may be denominated in
United States dollars or in another currency. See “Foreign Investments ”
below.
Bank
Obligations. Each Fund may invest in bank obligations such as bankers’
acceptances, certificates of deposit, and time deposits.
Bankers’
acceptances are negotiable drafts or bills of exchange typically drawn by an
importer or exporter to pay for specific merchandise, which are “accepted” by a
bank, meaning, in effect, that the bank unconditionally agrees to pay the face
value of the instrument on maturity. Investments will be in bankers’ acceptances
guaranteed by domestic and foreign banks having, at the time of investment,
capital, surplus, and undivided profits in excess of $100,000,000 (as of the
date of their most recently published financial statements).
Certificates
of deposit are negotiable certificates issued against funds deposited in a
commercial bank or a savings and loan association for a definite period of time
and earning a specified return.
Commercial
Paper. Commercial paper consists of unsecured promissory notes,
including master notes, issued by corporations. Issues of commercial paper
normally have maturities of less than nine months and fixed rates of return.
Master notes, however, are obligations that provide for a periodic adjustment in
the interest rate paid and permit daily changes in the amount
borrowed.
Master notes
are governed by agreements between the issuer and the Advisor acting as agent,
for no additional fee, in its capacity as Advisor to a Fund and as fiduciary for
other clients for whom it exercises investment discretion. The monies loaned to
the borrower come from accounts maintained with or managed by the Advisor or its
affiliates pursuant to arrangements with such accounts. Interest and principal
payments are credited to such accounts. The Advisor, acting as a fiduciary on
behalf of its clients, has the right to increase or decrease the amount provided
to the borrower under an obligation. The borrower has the right to pay without
penalty all or any part of the principal amount then outstanding on an
obligation together with interest to the date of payment. Since these
obligations typically provide that the interest rate is tied to the Treasury
bill auction rate, the rate on ,master notes is subject to change. Repayment of
master notes to participating accounts depends on the ability of the borrower to
pay the accrued interest and principal of the obligation on demand which is
continuously monitored by the Advisor. Master notes typically are not rated by
credit rating agencies.
The Funds
may purchase commercial paper consisting of issues rated at the time of purchase
within the three highest rating categories by a nationally recognized
statistical rating organization (an “NRSRO”).
The Funds
may also invest in commercial paper that is not rated but is determined by the
Advisor, under guidelines established by the Board, to be of comparable
quality.
Other
Fixed Income Securities. Other fixed income securities in which the
Funds may invest include nonconvertible preferred stocks and nonconvertible
corporate debt securities.
The Funds
may invest in short-term investments (including repurchase agreements
“collateralized fully,” as provided in Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act;
interest-bearing or discounted commercial paper, including dollar denominated
commercial paper of foreign issuers; and any other taxable and tax-exempt money
market instruments, including variable rate demand notes, that are “Eligible
Securities” as defined in Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act).
Variable
Amount Master Demand Notes. Variable amount master demand notes are
unsecured demand notes that permit the indebtedness thereunder to vary and
provide for periodic readjustments in the interest rate according to the terms
of the instrument. They are also referred to as variable rate demand notes.
Because master demand notes are direct lending arrangements between a Fund and
the issuer, they are not normally traded. Although there is no secondary market
in the notes, a Fund may demand payment of principal and accrued interest at any
time or during specified periods not exceeding one year, depending upon the
instrument involved, and may resell the note at any time to a third-party. The
Advisor will consider the earning power, cash flow, and other liquidity ratios
of the issuers of such notes and will continuously monitor their financial
status and ability to meet payment on demand.
Variable
and Floating Rate Notes. A variable rate note is one whose terms provide
for the readjustment of its interest rate on set dates and which, upon such
readjustment, can reasonably be expected to have a market value that
approximates its par value. A floating rate note is one whose terms provide for
the readjustment of its interest rate whenever a specified interest rate changes
and which, at any time, can reasonably be expected to have a market value that
approximates its par value. Such notes are frequently not rated by credit rating
agencies. These notes must satisfy the same quality standards as commercial
paper investments. Unrated variable and floating rate notes purchased by a Fund
must be determined by the Advisor under guidelines approved by the Board to be
of comparable quality at the time of purchase to rated instruments eligible for
purchase under the Fund’s investment policies. In making such determinations,
the Advisor will consider the earning power, cash flow and other liquidity
ratios of the issuers of such notes (such issuers include financial,
merchandising, bank holding and other companies) and will continuously monitor
their financial condition. Although there may be no active secondary market with
respect to a particular variable or floating rate note purchased by a Fund, a
Fund may resell the note at any time to a third-party. The absence of an active
secondary market, however, could make it difficult for a Fund to dispose of a
variable or floating rate note in the event the issuer of the note defaulted on
its payment obligations and a Fund could, as a result or for other reasons,
suffer a loss to the extent of the default. Variable or floating rate notes may
be secured by bank letters of credit.
Foreign
Investments. The Funds may invest in certain obligations or securities
of foreign issuers. Certain of these investments may be in the form of American
Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”), European Depositary Receipts (“EDRs”), Global
Depositary Receipts (“GDRs”), other similar depositary receipts, and ETFs or
other investment companies that invest in foreign securities, Yankee
Obligations, and U.S. dollar-denominated securities issued by foreign branches
of U.S. and foreign banks. Foreign investments may subject a Fund to investment
risks that differ in some respects from those related to investment in
obligations of U.S. domestic issuers. Such risks include future adverse
political and economic developments, possible seizure, nationalization, or
expropriation of foreign investments, less stringent disclosure requirements,
the possible establishment of exchange controls or taxation at the source or
other taxes, and the adoption of other foreign governmental
restrictions.
Additional
risks include less publicly available information, less government supervision
and regulation of foreign securities exchanges, brokers and issuers, the risk
that companies may not be subject to the accounting, auditing and financial
reporting standards and requirements of U.S. companies, the risk that foreign
securities markets may have less volume and that therefore many securities
traded in these markets may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than
U.S. securities, and the risk that custodian and
brokerage
costs may be higher. Foreign issuers of securities or obligations are often
subject to accounting treatment and engage in business practices different from
those respecting domestic issuers of similar securities or obligations. Foreign
branches of U.S. banks and foreign banks may be subject to less stringent
reserve requirements than those applicable to domestic branches of U.S. banks.
Certain of these investments may subject the Funds to currency fluctuation
risks.
Other
investment risks include the possible imposition of foreign withholding taxes on
certain amounts of a Fund’s income which may reduce the net return on non-U.S.
investments as compared to income received from a U.S. issuer, the possible
seizure or nationalization of foreign assets and the possible establishment of
exchange controls, expropriation, confiscatory taxation, other foreign
governmental laws or restrictions which might affect adversely payments due on
securities held by the Fund, the lack of extensive operating experience of
eligible foreign subcustodians and legal limitations on the ability of the Fund
to recover assets held in custody by a foreign subcustodian in the event of the
subcustodian’s bankruptcy.
In addition,
there may be less publicly-available information about a non-U.S. issuer than
about a U.S. issuer, and non-U.S. issuers may not be subject to the same
accounting, auditing and financial record-keeping standards and requirements as
U.S. issuers. In particular, the assets and profits appearing on the financial
statements of an emerging market country issuer may not reflect its financial
position or results of operations in the way they would be reflected had the
financial statements been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. In addition, for an issuer that keeps accounting records
in local currency, inflation accounting rules may require, for both tax and
accounting purposes, that certain assets and liabilities be restated on the
issuer’s balance sheet in order to express items in terms of currency of
constant purchasing power. Inflation accounting may indirectly generate losses
or profits. Consequently, financial data may be materially affected by
restatements for inflation and may not accurately reflect the real condition of
those issuers and securities markets.
Finally, in
the event of a default of any such foreign obligations, it may be more difficult
for a Fund to obtain or enforce a judgment against the issuers of such
obligations. The manner in which foreign investors may invest in companies in
certain emerging market countries, as well as limitations on such investments,
also may have an adverse impact on the operations of a Fund. For example, a Fund
may be required in certain of such countries to invest initially through a local
broker or other entity and then have the shares purchased re-registered in the
name of a Fund. Re-registration may in some instances not be able to occur on a
timely basis, resulting in a delay during which the Fund may be denied certain
of its rights as an investor.
Depositary
Receipts. Each Fund’s investments may include securities of foreign
issuers in the form of sponsored or unsponsored ADRs, GDRs and EDRs. ADRs are
depositary receipts typically issued by a United States bank or trust company
which evidence ownership of underlying securities issued by a foreign
corporation. EDRs and GDRs are typically issued by foreign banks or trust
companies, although they also may be issued by United States banks or trust
companies, and evidence ownership of underlying securities issued by either a
foreign or a United States corporation. Generally, depositary receipts in
registered form are designed for use in the United States securities market and
depositary receipts in bearer form are designed for use in securities markets
outside the United States Depositary receipts may not necessarily be denominated
in the same currency as the underlying securities into which they may be
converted. Ownership of unsponsored depositary receipts may not entitle a Fund
to financial or other reports from the issuer of the underlying security, to
which it would be entitled as the owner of sponsored depositary
receipts.
Emerging
Markets. Each Fund may invest in securities of issuers located in
“emerging markets” (lesser developed countries located outside of the U.S.) or
ETFs or other investment companies that invest in emerging market securities.
Investing in emerging markets involves not only the risks described above with
respect to investing in foreign securities, but also other risks, including
exposure to economic structures that are generally less diverse and mature than,
and to political systems that can be expected to have less stability than, those
of developed countries. Other characteristics of emerging markets that may
affect investment include certain national policies that may restrict investment
by foreigners in issuers or industries deemed sensitive to relevant national
interests and the absence of developed structures governing private and foreign
investments and private property. The typically small size of the markets of
securities of issuers
located in
emerging markets and the possibility of a low or nonexistent volume of trading
in those securities may also result in a lack of liquidity and in price
volatility of those securities.
When-Issued
and Delayed Delivery Securities. The Funds may purchase securities on a
when-issued or delayed delivery basis. Delivery of and payment for these
securities may take as long as a month or more after the date of the purchase
commitment. The value of these securities is subject to market fluctuation
during this period and no interest or income accrues to a Fund until settlement.
When entering into a when-issued or delayed delivery transaction, a Fund will
rely on the other party to consummate the transaction; if the other party fails
to do so, the Fund may be disadvantaged.
Lower
Rated or Unrated Securities. Securities rated Baa by Moody’s or BBB by
S&P or lower, or deemed of comparable quality by the Advisor, may have
speculative characteristics. Securities rated below investment grade,
i.e., below Baa or BBB, or deemed of comparable quality by the Advisor,
have higher yields but also involve greater risks than higher rated securities.
Under guidelines used by rating agencies, securities rated below investment
grade, or deemed of comparable quality, have large uncertainties or major risk
exposures in the event of adverse conditions, which features outweigh any
quality and protective characteristics. Securities with the lowest ratings are
considered to have extremely poor prospects of ever attaining any real
investment standing, to have a current identifiable vulnerability to default, to
be unlikely to have the capacity to pay interest and repay principal when due in
the event of adverse business, financial or economic conditions, and/or to be in
default or not current in the payment of interest or principal. Such securities
are considered speculative with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest
and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the obligations.
Accordingly, it is possible that these types of factors could, in certain
instances, reduce the value of such securities held by a Fund with a
commensurate effect on the value of its shares.
The
secondary market for lower rated securities is not as liquid as that for higher
rated securities. This market is concentrated in relatively few market makers
and participants in the market are mostly institutional investors, including
insurance companies, banks, other financial institutions and investment
companies. In addition, the trading market for lower rated securities is
generally lower than that for higher-rated securities, and that for which the
secondary markets could contract under adverse market or economic conditions
independent of any specific adverse changes in the condition of a particular
issuer. These factors may have an adverse effect on a Fund’s ability to dispose
of these securities and may limit its ability to obtain accurate market
quotations for purposes of determining the value of its assets. If the Fund is
not able to obtain precise or accurate market quotations for a particular
security, it will become more difficult to value its portfolio, requiring them
to rely more on judgment. Less liquid secondary markets may also affect a Fund’s
ability to sell securities at their fair value. Each Fund may invest up to 15%
of its net assets, measured at the time of investment, in illiquid investments,
which may be more difficult to value and to sell at fair value. If the secondary
markets for high yield debt securities are affected by adverse economic
conditions, the proportion of a Fund’s assets invested in illiquid investments
may increase.
In the case
of corporate debt securities, while the market values of securities rated below
investment grade and comparable unrated securities tend to react less to
fluctuations in interest rate levels than do those of higher-rated securities,
the market values of certain of these securities also tend to be more sensitive
to individual corporate developments and changes in economic conditions than
higher-rated securities. Price volatility in these securities will be reflected
in a Fund’s share value. In addition, such securities generally present a higher
degree of credit risk. Issuers of these securities often are highly leveraged
and may not have more traditional methods of financing available to them, so
that their ability to service their debt obligations during an economic downturn
or during sustained periods of rising interest rates may be impaired. The risk
of loss due to default by such issuers is significantly greater than with
investment grade securities because such securities generally are unsecured and
frequently are subordinated to the prior payment of senior
indebtedness.
A
description of the quality ratings of certain NRSROs is contained in Appendix
A.
Zero
Coupon Securities. The Funds may invest in “zero coupon” U.S. Treasury,
foreign government and U.S. and foreign corporate convertible and nonconvertible
debt securities, which are bills,
notes and
bonds that have been stripped of their unmatured interest coupons and custodial
receipts or certificates of participation representing interests in such
stripped debt obligations and coupons. A zero coupon security pays no interest
to its holder prior to maturity. Accordingly, such securities usually trade at a
deep discount from their face or par value and will be subject to greater
fluctuations of market value in response to changing interest rates than debt
obligations of comparable maturities that make current distributions of
interest. Each Fund anticipates that it will not normally hold zero coupon
securities to maturity. Redemption of shares of a Fund that require it to sell
zero coupon securities prior to maturity may result in capital gains or losses
that may be substantial. Federal tax law requires that a holder of a zero coupon
security accrue a portion of the discount at which the security was purchased as
income each year, even though the holder receives no interest payment on the
security during the year. Such accrued discount will be includible in
determining the amount of dividends a Fund must pay each year and, in order to
generate cash necessary to pay such dividends, a Fund may liquidate portfolio
securities at a time when it would not otherwise have done so.
Forward
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts. A Fund may enter into forward
foreign currency exchange contracts in connection with its investments in
foreign securities. A forward contract may be used by a Fund only to hedge
against possible variations in exchange rates of currencies in countries in
which it may invest. A forward foreign currency exchange contract (“forward
contract”) involves an obligation to purchase or sell a specific currency at a
future date, which may be any fixed number of days from the date of the contract
agreed upon by the parties, at a price set at the time of the contract. Forward
contracts are traded in the interbank market directly between currency traders
(usually large commercial banks) and their customers. A forward contract
generally has no deposit requirement, and no commissions are charged at any
stage for trades.
Futures
Contracts. A Fund may invest in futures contracts and options thereon
(stock index futures contracts, exchange traded Bitcoin and Ethereum futures
contracts, interest rate futures contracts or currency futures contracts or
options thereon) to hedge or manage risks associated with the Fund’s securities
investments. When a futures contract is executed, each party deposits with a
futures commission merchant (“FCM”) or broker a specified percentage of the
contract amount, called the initial margin, and during the term of the contract,
the amount of the deposit is adjusted based on the current value of the futures
contract by payments of variation margin to or from the FCM or broker. In the
case of options on futures, the holder of the option pays a premium and receives
the right, upon exercise of the option at a specified price during the option
period, to assume the option writer’s position in the futures contract and
related margin account. If the option is exercised on the last trading day, cash
in an amount equal to the difference between the option exercise price and the
closing level of the relevant index, interest rate or currency price, as
applicable, on the expiration date is delivered.
Positions in
futures contracts may be closed out only on an exchange that provides a
secondary market for such futures. However, there can be no assurance that a
liquid secondary market will exist for any particular futures contract at any
specific time. Thus, it may not be possible to close a futures position. In the
event of adverse price movements, a Fund would continue to be required to make
daily cash payments to maintain its required margin. In such situations, if a
Fund had insufficient cash, it might have to sell portfolio securities to meet
daily margin requirements at a time when it would be disadvantageous to do so.
In addition, a Fund might be required to make delivery of the instruments
underlying futures contracts it holds. The inability to close positions in
futures or options thereon also could have an adverse impact on a Fund’s ability
to hedge or manage risks effectively.
Successful
use of futures by a Fund is also subject to the Advisor’s ability to predict
movements correctly in the direction of the market. There is typically an
imperfect correlation between movements in the price of the future and movements
in the price of the securities that are the subject of the hedge. In addition,
the price of futures may not correlate perfectly with movement in the cash
market due to certain market distortions. Due to the possibility of price
distortion in the futures market and because of the imperfect correlation
between the movements in the cash market and movements in the price of futures,
a correct forecast of general market trends or interest rate movements by the
Advisor may still not result in a successful hedging transaction over a short
time frame.
The trading
of futures contracts is also subject to the risk of trading halts, suspension,
exchange or clearing house equipment failures, government intervention,
insolvency of a commodities or brokerage firm or clearing house or other
disruption of normal trading activity, which could at times make it difficult or
impossible to liquidate existing positions or to recover excess variation margin
payments.
The purchase
and sale of futures contracts or related options will not be a primary
investment technique of the Funds. A Fund will purchase or sell futures
contracts (or related options thereon) in accordance with the regulations of the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) described above.
Interest
Rate Futures. A Fund may purchase an interest rate futures contract as a
hedge against changes in interest rates. An interest rate futures contract
provides for the future sale by one party and the purchase by the other party of
a certain amount of a specific interest rate sensitive financial instrument
(debt security) at a specified price, date, time and place. Generally, if market
interest rates increase, the value of outstanding debt securities declines (and
vice versa). Thus, if a Fund holds long-term debt obligations and the Advisor
anticipates a rise in long-term interest rates, the Fund could, instead of
selling its debt obligations, enter into an interest rate futures contract for
the sale of similar long-term securities. If interest rates rise, the value of
the futures contract would also rise, helping to offset the price decline of the
obligations held by the Fund. A Fund might also purchase futures contracts as a
proxy for underlying securities that it cannot currently buy.
Stock
Index Futures. A Fund may purchase and sell stock index futures
contracts as a hedge against changes resulting from market conditions in the
values of securities that are held in its portfolio or that it intends to
purchase or when such purchase or sale is economically appropriate for the
reduction of risks inherent in advising the Fund. A stock index futures contract
is an agreement in which one party agrees to deliver to the other an amount of
cash equal to a specific dollar amount times the difference between the value of
a specific stock index at the close of the last trading day of the contract and
the price at which the agreement is made.
A Fund may
hedge a portion of its portfolio by selling stock index futures contracts or
purchasing puts on these contracts to limit exposure to an actual or anticipated
market decline. This provides an alternative to liquidation of securities
positions. Conversely, during a market advance or when the Advisor anticipates
an advance, a Fund may hedge a portion of its portfolio by purchasing stock
index futures, or options on these futures. This affords a hedge against a Fund
not participating in a market advance when it is not fully invested and serves
as a temporary substitute for the purchase of individual securities, which may
later be purchased in a more advantageous manner.
A Fund’s
successful use of stock index futures contracts depends upon the Advisor’s
ability to predict the direction of the market and is subject to various
additional risks. The correlation between movement in the price of the stock
index future and the price of the securities being hedged is imperfect and the
risk from imperfect correlation increases as the composition of a Fund’s
portfolio diverges from the composition of the relevant index. In addition, if a
Fund purchases futures to hedge against market advances before it can invest in
common stock in an advantageous manner and the market declines, there may be a
loss on the futures contracts. In addition, the ability of a Fund to close out a
futures position or an option on futures depends on a liquid secondary market.
There is no assurance that liquid secondary markets will exist for any
particular futures contract or option on a futures contract at any particular
time. The risk of loss to a Fund is theoretically unlimited when the Fund sells
an uncovered futures contract because there is an obligation to make delivery
unless the contract is closed out, regardless of fluctuations in the price of
the underlying security.
Foreign
Currency Futures Transactions. Unlike forward foreign currency exchange
contracts, foreign currency futures contracts and options on foreign currency
futures contract are standardized as to amount and delivery period and may be
traded on boards of trade and commodities exchanges or directly with a dealer
which makes a market in such contracts and options. It is anticipated that such
contracts may provide greater liquidity and lower cost than forward foreign
currency exchange contracts. As part of their financial futures transactions,
the Funds may use foreign currency futures contracts and options on
such
futures
contracts. Through the purchase or sale of such contracts, the Funds may be able
to achieve many of the same objectives as through investing in forward foreign
currency exchange.
Foreign
Currency Options. A foreign currency option provides the option buyer
with the right to buy or sell a stated amount of foreign currency at the
exercise price at a specified date or during the option period. A call option
gives its owner the right, but not the obligation, to buy the currency, while a
put option gives its owner the right, but not the obligation, to sell the
currency. The option seller (writer) is obligated to fulfill the terms of the
option sold if it is exercised. However, either seller or buyer may close its
position during the option period in the secondary market for such options at
any time prior to expiration.
A Fund may
write only foreign currency options that are “covered.” A call option is
“covered” if the Fund either owns the underlying currency or has an absolute and
immediate right (such as a call with the same or a later expiration date) to
acquire that currency on the same economic terms. In addition, a Fund will not
permit the option to become uncovered prior to the expiration of the option or
termination through a closing purchase transaction as described in “Options
on Securities” above.
A foreign
currency call option rises in value if the underlying currency appreciates.
Conversely, a foreign currency put option rises in value if the underlying
currency depreciates. While purchasing a foreign currency option may protect a
Fund against an adverse movement in the value of a foreign currency, it would
not limit the gain which might result from a favorable movement in the value of
the currency. For example, if a Fund were holding securities denominated in an
appreciating foreign currency and had purchased a foreign currency put to hedge
against a decline in the value of the currency, it would not have to exercise
its put. In such an event, however, the amount of the Fund’s gain would be
offset in part by the premium paid for the option. Similarly, if a Fund entered
into a contract to purchase a security denominated in a foreign currency and
purchased a foreign currency call to hedge against a rise in the value of the
currency between the date of purchase and the settlement date, the Fund would
not need to exercise its call if the currency instead depreciated in value. In
such a case, the Fund would acquire the amount of foreign currency needed for
settlement in the spot market at a lower price than the exercise price of the
option.
REITs.
The Funds may invest in securities of real estate investment trusts
(“REITs”). REITs are publicly traded corporations or trusts that specialize in
acquiring, holding and managing residential, commercial or industrial real
estate. A REIT is not taxed at the entity level on income distributed to its
shareholders or unitholders if it distributes to shareholders or unitholders at
least 95% of its taxable income for each taxable year and complies with
regulatory requirements relating to its organization, ownership, assets and
income.
REITs
generally can be classified as “Equity REITs,” “Mortgage REITs” and “Hybrid
REITs.” An Equity REIT invests the majority of its assets directly in real
property and derives its income primarily from rents and from capital gains on
real estate appreciation which are realized through property sales. A Mortgage
REIT invests the majority of its assets in real estate mortgage loans and
services its income primarily from interest payments. A Hybrid REIT combines the
characteristics of an Equity REIT and a Mortgage REIT. Although the Fund can
invest in all three kinds of REITs, its emphasis is expected to be on
investments in Equity REITs.
Investments
in the real estate industry involve particular risks. The real estate industry
has been subject to substantial fluctuations and declines on a local, regional
and national basis in the past and may continue to be in the future. Real
property values, and income from real property continue to be in the future.
Real property values and income from real property may decline due to general
and local economic conditions, overbuilding and increased competition, increases
in property taxes and operating expenses, changes in zoning laws, casualty or
condemnation losses, regulatory limitations on rents, changes in neighborhoods
and in demographics, increases in market interest rates, or other factors.
Factors such as these may adversely affect companies that own and operate real
estate directly, companies that lend to such companies, and companies that
service the real estate industry.
Direct
investments in REITs also involve risks. Equity REITs will be affected by
changes in the values of and income from the properties they own, while Mortgage
REITs may be affected by the credit
quality of
the mortgage loans they hold. In addition, REITs are dependent on specialized
management skills and on their ability to generate cash flow for operating
purposes and to make distributions to shareholders or unitholders REITs may have
limited diversification and are subject to risks associated with obtaining
financing for real property, as well as to the risk of self-liquidation. REITs
also can be adversely affected by their failure to qualify for tax-free
pass-through treatment of their income under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended, or their failure to maintain an exemption from registration under
the 1940 Act. By investing in REITs indirectly through a Fund, a shareholder
bears not only a proportionate share of the expenses of the Fund, but also may
indirectly bear similar expenses of some of the REITs in which it
invests.
Structured
Securities. The Funds may purchase any type of publicly traded or
privately negotiated fixed income security, including mortgage-backed
securities; structured notes, bonds or debentures; and assignments of and
participations in loans.
Mortgage-Backed
Securities. The Funds may invest in mortgage-backed securities, such as
those issued by the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”), Federal
National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
(“FHLMC”) or certain foreign issuers. Mortgage-backed securities represent
direct or indirect participations in, or are secured by and payable from,
mortgage loans secured by real property. The mortgages backing these securities
include, among other mortgage instruments, conventional 30-year fixed-rate
mortgages, 15-year fixed-rate mortgages, graduated payment mortgages and
adjustable rate mortgages. The government or the issuing agency typically
guarantees the payment of interest and principal of these securities. However,
the guarantees do not extend to the securities’ yield or value, which are likely
to vary inversely with fluctuations in interest rates, nor do the guarantees
extend to the yield or value of a Fund’s shares. These securities generally are
“pass-through” instruments, through which the holders receive a share of all
interest and principal payments from the mortgages underlying the securities,
net of certain fees.
Yields on
pass-through securities are typically quoted by investment dealers and vendors
based on the maturity of the underlying instruments and the associated average
life assumption. The average life of pass-through pools varies with the
maturities of the underlying mortgage loans. A pool’s term may be shortened by
unscheduled or early payments of principal on the underlying mortgages. The
occurrence of mortgage prepayments is affected by various factors, including the
level of interest rates, general economic conditions, the location, scheduled
maturity and age of the mortgage and other social and demographic conditions.
Because prepayment rates of individual pools vary widely, it is not possible to
predict accurately the average life of a particular pool. For pools of
fixed-rate 30-year mortgages in a stable interest rate environment, a common
industry practice in the U.S. has been to assume that prepayments will result in
a 12-year average life, although it may vary depending on numerous factors. At
present, pools, particularly those with loans with other maturities or different
characteristics, are priced on an assumption of average life determined for each
pool. In periods of falling interest rates, the rate of prepayment tends to
increase, thereby shortening the actual average life of a pool of
mortgage-related securities. Conversely, in periods of rising rates the rate of
prepayment tends to decrease, thereby lengthening the actual average life of the
pool. However, these effects may not be present, or may differ in degree, if the
mortgage loans in the pools have adjustable interest rates or other special
payment terms, such as a prepayment charge. Actual prepayment experience may
cause the yield of mortgage-backed securities to differ from the assumed average
life yield. Reinvestment of prepayments may occur at higher or lower interest
rates than the original investment, thus affecting a Fund’s yield.
The rate of
interest on mortgage-backed securities is lower than the interest rates paid on
the mortgages included in the underlying pool due to the annual fees paid to the
servicer of the mortgage pool for passing through monthly payments to
certificate holders and to any guarantor, such as GNMA, and due to any yield
retained by the issuer. Actual yield to the holder may vary from the coupon
rate, even if adjustable, if the mortgage-backed securities are purchased or
traded in the secondary market at a premium or discount. In addition, there is
normally some delay between the time the issuer receives mortgage payments from
the servicer and the time the issuer makes the payments on the mortgage-backed
securities, and this delay reduces the effective yield to the holder of such
securities.
Asset-Backed
Securities. The Funds may invest in asset-backed securities, which
represent participations in, or are secured by and payable from, assets such as
motor vehicle installment sales, installment loan contracts, leases of various
types of real and personal property and receivables from revolving credit
(credit card) agreements. Such assets are securitized through the use of trusts
and special purpose corporations. Payments or distributions of principal and
interest may be guaranteed up to certain amounts and for a certain time period
by a letter of credit or a pool insurance policy issued by a financial
institution unaffiliated with the trust or corporation.
Asset-backed
securities present certain risks that are not presented by other securities in
which the Funds may invest. Automobile receivables generally are secured by
automobiles. Most issuers of automobile receivables permit the loan servicers to
retain possession of the underlying obligations. If the servicer were to sell
these obligations to another party, there is a risk that the purchaser would
acquire an interest superior to that of the holders of the asset-backed
securities. In addition, because of the large number of vehicles involved in a
typical issuance and technical requirements under state laws, the trustee for
the holders of the automobile receivables may not have a proper security
interest in the underlying automobiles. Therefore, there is the possibility that
recoveries on repossessed collateral may not, in some cases, be available to
support payments on these securities. Credit card receivables are generally
unsecured, and the debtors are entitled to the protection of a number of state
and federal consumer credit laws, many of which give such debtors the right to
set off certain amounts owed on the credit cards, thereby reducing the balance
due. In addition, there is no assurance that the security interest in the
collateral can be realized.
Structured
Notes, Bonds and Debentures. The Funds may invest in structured notes,
bonds and debentures. Typically, the value of the principal and/or interest on
these instruments is determined by reference to changes in the value of specific
currencies, interest rates, commodities, indexes or other financial indicators
(the “Reference”) or the relevant change in two or more References. The interest
rate or the principal amount payable upon maturity or redemption may be
increased or decreased depending upon changes in the applicable Reference. The
terms of the structured securities may provide that in certain circumstances no
principal is due at maturity and, therefore, may result in the loss of a Fund’s
entire investment. The value of structured securities may move in the same or
the opposite direction as the value of the Reference, so that appreciation of
the Reference may produce an increase or decrease in the interest rate or value
of the security at maturity. In addition, the change in interest rate or the
value of the security at maturity may be a multiple of the change in the value
of the Reference so that the security may be more or less volatile than the
Reference, depending on the multiple. Consequently, structured securities may
entail a greater degree of market risk and volatility than other types of debt
obligations.
Assignments
and Participations. The Funds may invest in assignments of and
participations in loans issued by banks and other financial
institutions.
When a Fund
purchases assignments from lending financial institutions, the Fund will acquire
direct rights against the borrower on the loan. However, since assignments are
generally arranged through private negotiations between potential assignees and
potential assignors, the rights and obligations acquired by the Fund as the
purchaser of an assignment may differ from, and be more limited than, those held
by the assigning lender.
Participations
in loans will typically result in a Fund having a contractual relationship with
the lending financial institution, not the borrower. The Fund would have the
right to receive payments of principal, interest and any fees to which it is
entitled only from the lender of the payments from the borrower. In connection
with purchasing a participation, a Fund generally will have no right to enforce
compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement relating to the
loan, nor any rights of set-off against the borrower, and a Fund may not benefit
directly from any collateral supporting the loan in which it has purchased a
participation. As a result, a Fund purchasing a participation will assume the
credit risk of both the borrower and the lender selling the participation. In
the event of the insolvency of the lender selling the participation, the Fund
may be treated as a general creditor of the lender and may not benefit from any
set-off between the lender and the borrower.
A Fund may
have difficulty disposing of assignments and participations because there is no
liquid market for such securities. The lack of a liquid secondary market will
have an adverse impact on the value of such securities and on a Fund’s ability
to dispose of particular assignments or participations when necessary to meet
the Fund’s liquidity needs or in response to a specific economic event, such as
a deterioration in the creditworthiness of the borrower. The lack of a liquid
market for assignments and participations also may make it more difficult for a
Fund to assign a value to these securities for purposes of valuing the Fund’s
portfolio and calculating its net asset value.
A Fund may
invest in fixed and floating rate loans (“Loans”) arranged through private
negotiations between a foreign government (a “Borrower”) and one or more
financial institutions (“Lenders”). The majority of a Fund’s investments in
Loans are expected to be in the form of participations in Loans
(“Participations”) and assignments of portions of Loans from third parties
(“Assignments”). Participations typically will result in a Fund having a
contractual relationship only with the Lender, not with the Borrower. The Fund
will have the right to receive payments of principal, interest and any fees to
which it is entitled only from the Lender selling the Participation and only
upon receipt by the Lender of the payments from the Borrower. In connection with
purchasing Participations, a Fund generally will have no right to enforce
compliance by the Borrower with the terms of the loan agreement relating to the
Loan, nor any rights of set-off against the Borrower, and the Fund may not
directly benefit from any collateral supporting the Loan in which it has
purchased the Participation. As a result, a Fund will assume the credit risk of
both the Borrower and the Lender that is selling the Participation. In the event
of the insolvency of the Lender selling a Participation, a Fund may be treated
as a general creditor of the Lender and may not benefit from any set-off between
the Lender and the Borrower. A Fund will acquire Participations only if the
Lender interpositioned between the Fund and the Borrower is determined by the
Advisor to be creditworthy.
When a Fund
purchases Assignments from Lenders, the Fund will acquire direct rights against
the Borrower on the Loan. However, since Assignments are generally arranged
through private negotiations between potential assignees and potential
assignors, the rights and obligations acquired by the Fund as the purchaser of
an Assignment may differ from, and be more limited than, those held by the
assigning Lender.
There are
risks involved in investing in Participations and Assignments. The Fund may have
difficulty disposing of them because there is no liquid market for such
securities. The lack of a liquid secondary market will have an adverse impact on
the value of such securities and on the Fund’s ability to dispose of particular
Participations or Assignments when necessary to meet the Fund’s liquidity needs
or in response to a specific economic event, such as a deterioration in the
creditworthiness of the Borrower. The lack of a liquid market for Participations
and Assignments also may make it more difficult for the Fund to assign a value
to these securities for purposes of valuing the Fund’s portfolio and calculating
its net asset value.
Restricted
and Illiquid Investments. A Fund may acquire, in privately negotiated
transactions, securities that cannot be offered for public sale in the United
States without first being registered under the Securities Act of 1933
(“Securities Act”). Restricted securities are subject to restrictions on resale
under federal securities law. Because of these restrictions, a Fund may not be
able to readily resell these securities at a price equal to what it might obtain
for similar securities with a more liquid market. A Fund’s valuation of these
securities will reflect relevant liquidity considerations. Under criteria
established by the Board, certain restricted securities sold pursuant to Rule
144A under the Securities Act may be determined to be liquid. To the extent that
restricted securities are not determined to be liquid, each Fund will limit its
purchase, together with other illiquid investments including non-negotiable time
deposits and repurchase agreements providing for settlement in more than seven
days after notice, to no more than 15% of its net assets.
Restricted
securities in which a Fund may invest may include commercial paper issued in
reliance on the exemption from registration afforded by Section 4(a)(2) of the
Securities Act. Section 4(a)(2) commercial paper is restricted as to disposition
under federal securities law, and is generally sold to institutional investors,
such as the Funds, who agree that they are purchasing the paper for investment
purposes and not with a view to public distribution. Any resale by the purchaser
must be in an exempt transaction. Section 4(a)(2) commercial paper is normally
resold to other institutional investors like the
Funds
through or with the assistance of the issuer or investment dealers who make a
market in Section 4(a)(2) commercial paper, thus providing liquidity. The
Advisorbelieves that Section 4(a)(2) commercial paper and possibly certain other
restricted securities which meet the criteria for liquidity established by the
Board are quite liquid. The Funds intend, therefore, to treat the restricted
securities which meet the criteria for liquidity established by the Board,
including Section 4(a)(2) commercial paper, as determined by the Advisor, as
liquid and not subject to the investment limitations applicable to illiquid
investments.
Repurchase
Agreements. Securities held by a Fund may be subject to repurchase
agreements. These transactions permit a Fund to earn income for periods as short
as overnight. The Fund could receive less than the repurchase price on any sale
of such securities. Under the terms of a repurchase agreement, a Fund would
acquire securities from member banks of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation and registered broker-dealers and other financial institutions that
the Advisor deems creditworthy under guidelines approved by the Board, subject
to the seller’s agreement to repurchase such securities at a mutually
agreed-upon date and price. The repurchase price would generally equal the price
paid by a Fund plus interest negotiated on the basis of current short-term
rates, which may be more or less than the rate on the underlying portfolio
securities. The seller under a repurchase agreement will be required to maintain
continually the value of collateral held pursuant to the agreement at not less
than the repurchase price (including accrued interest). If the seller were to
default on its repurchase obligation or become insolvent, the Fund holding such
obligation would suffer a loss to the extent that the proceeds from a sale of
the underlying portfolio securities were less than the repurchase price under
the agreement, or to the extent that the disposition of such securities by the
Fund were delayed pending court action. Additionally, there is no controlling
legal precedent confirming that a Fund would be entitled, as against a claim by
such seller or its receiver or trustee in bankruptcy, to retain the underlying
securities, although the Trust believes that, under the regular procedures
normally in effect for custody of the Funds’ securities subject to repurchase
agreements and under federal laws, a court of competent jurisdiction would rule
in favor of the Trust if presented with the question. Securities subject to
repurchase agreements will be held by the Funds’ Custodian or another qualified
custodian or in the Federal Reserve/Treasury book-entry system. Repurchase
agreements are considered to be loans by a Fund under the 1940 Act.
Reverse
Repurchase Agreements. The Funds may enter into reverse repurchase
agreements. In a reverse repurchase agreement, a Fund sells a security and
agrees to repurchase it at a mutually agreed upon date and at a price reflecting
the interest rate effective for the term of the agreement. This may also be
viewed as the borrowing of money by the Fund. The Funds will not invest the
proceeds of a reverse repurchase agreement for a period which exceeds the
duration of the reverse repurchase agreement.
Reverse
repurchase agreements involve the risk that the market value of the securities
retained by a Fund may decline below the price of the securities it has sold but
is obligated to repurchase under the agreement. In the event the buyer of
securities under a reverse repurchase agreement files for bankruptcy or becomes
insolvent, a Fund’s use of proceeds from the agreement may be restricted pending
a determination by the other party or its trustee or receiver whether to enforce
the Fund’s obligation to repurchase the securities.
Loans
of Portfolio Securities. Each Fund may lend securities if such loans are
secured continuously by liquid assets consisting of cash, U.S. government
securities or other liquid debt securities or by a letter of credit in favor of
a Fund at least equal at all times to 100% of the market value of the securities
loaned, plus accrued interest. While such securities are on loan, the borrower
will pay the Fund any income accruing thereon. Loans will be subject to
termination by the Fund in the normal settlement time, currently three Business
Days after notice, or by the borrower on one day’s notice (as used herein,
“Business Day” shall denote any day on which the New York Stock Exchange and the
custodian are both open for business). Any gain or loss in the market price of
the borrowed securities that occurs during the term of the loan inures to the
lending Fund and its shareholders. The Funds may pay reasonable finders’ and
custodial fees, including fees to the Advisor or its affiliates, in connection
with loans. In addition, the Funds consider all facts and circumstances
including the creditworthiness of the borrowing financial institution, and the
Funds will not lend their securities to any director, officer, employee, or
affiliate of the Advisor, the Administrator, or the Distributor, unless
permitted by applicable law. Loans of portfolio securities involve risks, such
as delays or
an inability
to regain the securities or collateral adjustments in the event the borrower
defaults or enters into bankruptcy.
Short
Sales “Against the Box.” The Funds may engage in short sales “against
the box.” In a short sale, a Fund sells a borrowed security and has a
corresponding obligation to the lender to return the identical security. The
seller does not immediately deliver the securities sold and is said to have a
short position in those securities until delivery occurs. The Funds may engage
in a short sale if at the time of the short sale a Fund owns or has the right to
obtain without additional cost an equal amount of the security being sold short.
This investment technique is known as a short sale “against the box.” It may be
entered into by the Fund to, for example, lock in a sale price for a security
the Fund does not wish to sell immediately. No more than 10% of the Fund’s net
assets (taken at current value) may be held as collateral for short sales
against the box at any one time.
The Fund may
make a short sale as a hedge, when it believes that the price of a security may
decline, causing a decline in the value of a security owned by the Fund (or a
security convertible or exchangeable for such security). In such case, any
future losses in the Fund’s long position should be offset by a gain in the
short position and, conversely, any gain in the long position should be reduced
by a loss in the short position. The extent to which such gains or losses are
reduced will depend upon the amount of the security sold short relative to the
amount the Fund owns. There will be certain additional transaction costs
associated with short sales against the box, but the Fund will endeavor to
offset these costs with the income from the investment of the cash proceeds of
short sales.
If the Fund
effects a short sale of securities at a time when it has an unrealized gain on
the securities, it may be required to recognize that gain as if it had actually
sold the securities (as a “constructive sale”) on the date it effects the short
sale. However, such constructive sale treatment may not apply if the Fund closes
out the short sale with securities other than the appreciated securities held at
the time of the short sale and if certain other conditions are satisfied.
Uncertainty regarding the tax consequences of effecting short sales may limit
the extent to which the Fund may effect short sales.
Short
Sales (excluding Short Sales “Against the Box”). The Funds may sell
securities short or purchase ETFs that sell securities short. A short sale is a
transaction in which the Fund sells securities it does not own in anticipation
of a decline in the market price of the securities.
To deliver
the securities to a buyer, a Fund must arrange through a broker to borrow the
securities and, in so doing, the Fund becomes obligated to replace the
securities borrowed at their market price at the time of replacement, whatever
that price may be. The Fund will make a profit or incur a loss as a result of a
short sale depending on whether the price of the securities decreases or
increases between the date of the short sale and the date on which the Fund
purchases the security to replace the borrowed securities that have been sold.
The amount of any loss would be increased (and any gain decreased) by any
premium or interest the Fund is required to pay in connection with a short
sale.
A Fund’s
obligation to replace the securities borrowed in connection with a short sale
will be secured by cash or liquid securities deposited as collateral with the
broker.
Municipal
Securities. Municipal securities are debt obligations issued to obtain
funds for various public purposes, including the construction of a wide range of
public facilities such as airports, bridges, highways, housing, hospitals, mass
transportation, schools, streets and water and sewer works. Other public
purposes for which municipal securities may be issued include refunding of
outstanding obligations, obtaining funds for general operating expenses and
obtaining funds to loan to other public institutions and facilities. In
addition, certain types of industrial development bonds are issued by or on
behalf of public authorities to obtain funds to provide privately-operated
housing facilities, sports facilities, convention or trade show facilities,
airport, mass transit, port or parking facilities, air or water pollution
control facilities and certain local facilities for water supply, gas,
electricity, or sewage or solid waste disposal. Such obligations, which may
include lease arrangements, are included within the term “municipal securities”
if the interest paid thereon qualifies as exempt from federal income tax. Other
types of industrial development bonds, the proceeds of which are used for the
construction, equipment, repair or improvement of privately
operated
industrial or commercial facilities, may constitute municipal securities,
although the current federal tax laws place substantial limitations on the size
of such issues.
The two
principal classifications of municipal securities are “general obligation” and
“revenue” bonds. General obligation bonds are secured by the issuer’s pledge of
its full faith, credit and taxing power for the payment of principal and
interest. Revenue bonds are payable only from the revenues derived from a
particular facility or class of facilities or, in some cases, from the proceeds
of a special excise or other specific revenue source. Industrial development
bonds that are municipal securities are in most cases revenue bonds and do not
generally involve the pledge of the credit of the issuer of such bonds. There
are, of course, variations in the degree of risk of municipal securities, both
within a particular classification and between classifications, depending upon
numerous factors.
The yields
on municipal securities are dependent upon a variety of factors, including
general money market conditions, general conditions of the municipal securities
market, size of particular offering, maturity of the obligation and rating of
the issue. The ratings of Moody’s and S&P represent their opinions as to the
quality of the municipal securities which they undertake to rate. It should be
emphasized, however, that ratings are general and are not absolute standards of
quality. Consequently, municipal securities with the same maturity, coupon and
rating may have different yields, while municipal securities of the same
maturity and coupon with different ratings may have the same yield.
Each Fund
may invest in “private activity” bonds. Each Fund may also purchase
participation interests in municipal securities (such as industrial development
bonds) from financial institutions, including banks, insurance companies and
broker-dealers. A participation interest gives a Fund an undivided interest in
the municipal securities in the proportion that the Fund’s participation
interest bears to the total principal amount of the municipal securities. These
instruments may be variable or fixed rate.
Provisions
of the federal bankruptcy statutes relating to the adjustment of debts of
political subdivisions and authorities of states of the United States provide
that, in certain circumstances, such subdivisions or authorities may be
authorized to initiate bankruptcy proceedings without prior notice to or consent
of creditors, which proceedings could result in material and adverse
modification or alteration of the rights of holders of obligations issued by
such subdivisions or authorities.
Litigation
challenging the validity under state constitutions of present systems of
financing public education has been initiated or adjudicated in a number of
states, and legislation has been introduced to effect changes in public school
finances in some states. In other instances there has been litigation
challenging the issuance of pollution control revenue bonds or the validity of
their issuance under state or federal law which litigation could ultimately
affect the validity of those municipal securities or the tax-free nature of the
interest thereon.
DISCLOSURE
OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
The Board
has adopted policies and procedures for the public and nonpublic disclosure of
the Funds’ portfolio securities.
As a general
matter, no information concerning the portfolio holdings of the Funds may be
disclosed to any unaffiliated third-party except (1) to service providers that
require such information in the course of performing their duties (for example,
the Funds’ custodian, administrator, Advisor, Sub-Advisor, independent public
accountants, attorneys, officers and trustees) and are subject to a duty of
confidentiality including duties not to trade on non-public information, and (2)
pursuant to certain exceptions that serve a legitimate business purpose. These
exceptions may include: (1) disclosure of portfolio holdings only after such
information has been publicly disclosed on the Fund’s website, in marketing
materials (provided the portfolio holdings disclosed in the materials are at
least 15 days old) or through filings with the SEC as described below and (2) to
third-party vendors, that (a) agree to not distribute the portfolio holdings or
results of the analysis to third parties, other departments or persons who are
likely to use the information for purposes of purchasing or selling the Fund
before the portfolio holdings or results of the analysis become publicly
available; and (b) sign a written confidentiality agreement. The confidentiality
agreement must
provide, but
is not limited to, that the recipient of the portfolio holdings information
agrees to limit access to the portfolio holdings information to its employees
who, on a need to know basis are (1) authorized to have access to the portfolio
holdings information and (2) subject to confidentiality obligations, including
duties not to trade on non-public information, no less restrictive that the
confidentiality obligations contained in the confidentiality
agreement.
The Funds’
portfolio holdings are currently disclosed to the public through filings with
the SEC. The Funds disclose their portfolio holdings by delivering the annual
and semi-annual reports, or notice of electronic availability thereof, to
shareholders approximately two months after the end of the fiscal year and
semi-annual period. In addition, the Funds disclose their portfolio holdings
reports on Forms N-CSR two months after the end of each quarter/semi-annual
period and Form N-PORT within 30 days after each fiscal quarter end.
Neither the
Funds nor the Advisor may enter into any arrangement providing for the
disclosure of non-public portfolio holding information for the receipt of
compensation or benefit of any kind. Any exceptions to the policies and
procedures may only be made by the consent of the Trust’s chief compliance
officer upon a determination that such disclosure serves a legitimate business
purpose and is in the best interests of the Funds and will be reported to the
Board at the Board’s next regularly scheduled meeting.
TRUSTEES
AND OFFICERS
The Board
manages the business and affairs of the Trust and appoints or elects officers
responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Trust and the execution of
policies established by Board resolution or directive. In the absence of such
provisions, the respective officers have the powers and discharge the duties
customarily held and performed by like officers of corporations similar in
organization and business purposes.
The Trustees
who are not “interested persons” (for regulatory purposes) of the Trust or the
Advisor or the Distributor (the “Independent Trustees”) are charged with, among
other functions, recommending to the full Board approval of the distribution,
transfer agency and accounting services agreements and the investment advisory
agreements. When considering approval or renewal of advisory and sub-advisory
agreements, the Independent Trustees evaluate the nature and quality of the
services provided by the Advisor and the Sub-Advisors, the performance of the
Funds, the costs and the profitability of the agreements to the Advisor and
Sub-Advisors, ancillary benefits to the Advisor and Sub-Advisors or their
affiliates in connection with their relationship to the Funds and the amount of
fees charged in comparison to those of other investment companies.
The Board
currently has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Risk and
Compliance Committee and the Nominating Committee. In addition, the Board has a
Special Committee that oversees litigation matters on behalf of the Trust. Each
committee is described below.
The term of
office for each Trustee is for the duration of the Trust or until death,
removal, resignation or retirement. The term of office of each officer is until
the successor is elected.
Information
pertaining to the Trustees and officers of the Trust, including their principal
occupations for the last five years, is set forth below.
Independent
Trustees
Name,
Address Year of Birth |
Position(s) Held with Registrant |
Term and Length Served* |
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years |
Number
of Portfolios Overseen in the Fund Complex** |
Other
Directorships Held During Past 5 Years |
Tobias
Caldwell c/o Mutual Fund Series Trust 36 N. New
York Avenue, Huntington, NY 11743 Year of Birth:
1967 |
Lead
Trustee, Chairman of the Audit Committee and Nominating
Committee |
Since
6/2006 |
Manager,
Genovese Family Enterprises, LLC (and affiliates, family office)
1999-present, Managing Member, Bear Properties, LLC (real
estate firm) (2006-present) |
48 |
Chairman
of the Board, Mutual Fund and Variable Insurance Trust since 2016;
Chairman of the Board, Strategy Shares since 2016; Trustee, IDX Funds Trust (formerly,
M3Sixty Funds Trust) since 2016; Chairman of the Board, Catalyst Strategic
Income Opportunities Fund since April 2024; Chairman of the Board of
AlphaCentric Prime Meridian Income Fund from 2018 to August
2023.
|
Stephen
P. Lachenauer c/o Mutual Fund Series Trust 36 N. New
York Avenue, Huntington, NY 11743 Year of Birth:
1967 |
Trustee |
Since
4/2022 |
Attorney,
private practice since 2010. |
48 |
Trustee
and Chairman of the Audit and Risk and Compliance Committees since 2016,
and Chairman of the Investment Committee since November 2020, Mutual Fund
and Variable Insurance Trust; Trustee and Chairman of the Audit and Risk
and Compliance Committees since 2016, and Chairman of the Investment
Committee since November 2020, Strategy Shares; Trustee and Chairman of
the Audit Committee, Catalyst Strategic Income Opportunities Fund since
2024; Trustee and Chairman of the Audit and Risk and Compliance Committees
from 2018 to 2023, and Chairman of the Investment Committee from 2020 to
2023, AlphaCentric Prime Meridian Income Fund. |
Tiberiu
Weisz c/o Mutual Fund Series Trust 36 N. New
York Avenue, Huntington, NY 11743 Year of Birth:
1949 |
Trustee,
Chairman of the Risk and Compliance Committee |
Since
6/2006 |
Attorney
since 1982. |
34 |
Trustee
and Chairman of the Risk and Compliance Committee, Catalyst Strategic
Income Opportunities Fund since April 2024. |
Interested
Trustee*** and Officers
Name,
Address, Year of Birth |
Position(s) Held with Registrant |
Term
and Length Served* |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Number
of Portfolios Overseen In The Fund Complex** |
Other Directorships Held
During Past 5 Years |
Jerry
Szilagyi 53 Palmeras St. Suite 601 San Juan, PR 00901 Year
of Birth: 1962 |
Chairman
of the Board
|
Trustee
since 7/2006; President 2/2012-3/2022
|
President
of the Trust, 2/2012—3/2022; President, Rational Advisors, Inc., since
2016; Chief Executive Officer, Catalyst Capital Advisors LLC, since 2006;
Member, AlphaCentric Advisors LLC, since 2014; Managing Member, MFund
Distributors LLC, since 2012; Managing Member, MFund Services LLC, since
2012; CEO, Catalyst International Advisors LLC, since 2019; CEO, Insights
Media LLC, since 2019; CEO, MFund Management LLC, since 2019.
|
34
|
None
|
Michael
Schoonover 53 Palmeras St. Suite 601 San Juan,
PR 00901 Year of Birth: 1983 |
President
|
Since
3/2022
|
Vice
President of the Trust, 2018—2022; Chief Operating Officer, Catalyst
Capital Advisors LLC and Rational Advisors, Inc., June 2017 to present;
Portfolio Manager, Catalyst Capital Advisors LLC 12/2013 to 5/2021;
Portfolio Manager, Rational Advisors, Inc. 1/2016 to 5/2018; President,
MFund Distributors LLC, 1/2020 to present; COO, Catalyst International
Advisors LLC, 11/2019 to present; COO, Insights Media LLC, 11/2019 to
present; COO, MFund Management LLC, 11/2019 to present; COO, AlphaCentric
Advisors LLC, since 1/2021.
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Alex
Merino 53 Palmeras St. Suite 601 San Juan, PR 00901 Year
of Birth: 1985 |
Vice
President
|
Since
3/2022
|
Investment
Operations Manager, MFund Management LLC, 1/2022 to present; Investment
Operations Analyst, MFund Management LLC, 9/2020 to 12/2021; Tax Senior
Associate, PwC Asset & Wealth Management NY Metro,
7/2016-6/2019.
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Erik
Naviloff 4221 North 203rd Street,
Suite
100, Elkhorn, NE 68022 Year of Birth: 1968 |
Treasurer
|
Since
4/2012
|
Vice
President – Fund Administration, Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC, since
2011.
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian
Curley 4221 North 203rd Street, Suite 100, Elkhorn,
NE 68022 Year of Birth: 1970 |
Assistant
Treasurer
|
Since
11/2013
|
Vice
President – Fund Administration, Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC since
1/2015.
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sam
Singh 4221 North 203rd Street, Suite 100, Elkhorn,
NE 68022 Year of Birth: 1976 |
Assistant
Treasurer
|
Since
2/2015
|
Vice
President – Fund Administration, Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC since
1/2015.
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frederick
J. Schmidt 36 N. New York Avenue Huntington,
NY 11743
Year
of Birth: 1959 |
Chief
Compliance Officer |
Since
5/2015 |
Director
of Compliance Services, MFund Services LLC since 5/2015.
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer
A. Bailey 36 N. New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Year of
Birth: 1968 |
Secretary
|
Since
4/2014 |
Director
of Legal Services, MFund Services LLC, since 2012. |
N/A |
N/A |
| * |
The
term of office of each Trustee is indefinite. |
| ** |
The
‘Fund Complex’ includes the Trust, Variable Insurance Trust, Mutual Fund
and Variable Insurance Trust, and Strategy Shares, each a registered
investment company. During the period reflected in the table above, the
“Fund Complex” also included the AlphaCentric Prime Meridian Income Fund
(“ACPMIF”). ACPMIF was deregistered as a closed-end investment company
with the SEC on August 23, 2023 and liquidated on September 1,
2023. |
| *** |
The
Trustee who is an “interested person” of the Trust as defined in the 1940
Act is an interested person by virtue of being an officer of the to
certain series of the Trust. |
Leadership
Structure. The Trust is led by Jerry Szilagyi, who has served as the
Chairman of the Board since 2010. Mr. Szilagyi is an interested person by virtue
of his controlling interest in the Advisor and AlphaCentric Advisors LLC,
investment advisers to certain series of the Trust. The Board is comprised of
Mr. Szilagyi, an Interested Trustee, and Tobias Caldwell, Stephen Lachenauer and
Tiberiu Weisz, each an Independent Trustee. Mr. Caldwell serves as the Lead
Independent Trustee. The Lead Independent Trustee serves as a key point person
for dealings between management and the Independent Trustees and assists in
setting the agendas for Board meetings. The Independent Trustees meet in
executive session at each Board meeting. Under the Trust’s bylaws and governance
guidelines, the Chairman of the Board is responsible for (a) chairing Board
meetings, (b) setting the agendas for these meetings and (c) providing
information to Trustees in advance of each Board meeting and between Board
meetings. The Board believes this is the most appropriate leadership structure
for the Trust given Mr. Szilagyi’s background in the investment management
industry and his experience in providing both advisory and administrative
services to other mutual funds. Additionally, as the Managing Member of MFund
Services LLC, which provides management and legal administrative services to the
Trust, Mr. Szilagyi is well positioned and informed regarding issues requiring
the attention of the Board, and as the leader of the Board, can ensure such
issues are included in the Board’s agenda for meetings and that appropriate time
is allocated to discuss such issues and take any necessary actions.
Risk
Oversight. In its risk oversight role, the Board oversees risk management,
and the full Board engages in discussions of risk management and receives
reports on investment and compliance risk at quarterly meetings and on an ad hoc
basis, when and if necessary. The Board, directly or through its Audit Committee
and Risk and Compliance Committee, reviews reports from among others, the
Advisor, sub-advisors, the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer, the Trust’s
independent registered public accounting firm, and the Independent Trustees’
counsel, as appropriate, regarding risks faced by the Trust and the Fund and the
risk management programs of the Trust, the advisors and certain service
providers. The full Board regularly engages in discussions of risk management
and receives compliance reports that inform its oversight of risk management
from the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer at quarterly meetings and on an ad hoc
basis, when and if necessary. The Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer also meets at
least quarterly in executive session with the Independent Trustees. The actual
day-to-day risk management with respect to each Fund resides with the Advisor
and other service providers to the Fund. Although the risk management policies
of the advisor and the service providers are designed to be effective, those
policies and their implementation vary among service providers and over time,
and there is no guarantee that they will be effective. Generally, the Board
believes that its oversight of material risks is adequately maintained through
the risk-reporting chain where the Chief Compliance Officer is the primary
recipient and communicator of such risk-related information.
The Board
also considers liquidity risk management issues as part of its general oversight
responsibilities and oversees the Fund’s liquidity risk through, among other
things, receiving periodic reporting and presentations by the Liquidity Risk
Management (“LRM”) Program Administrator that address liquidity matters. As
required by Rule 22e-4 under the 1940 Act, the Board, including a majority of
the Independent Trustees, has approved the Trust’s LRM Program, which is
reasonably designed to assess and
manage the
Trust’s liquidity risk, and has appointed the LRM Program Administrator that is
responsible for administering the LRM Program. The Board also reviews, no less
frequently than annually, a written report prepared by the LRM Program
Administrator that addresses, among other items, the operation of the program
and assesses its adequacy and effectiveness of implementation.
Audit
Committee. Mr. Caldwell, Mr. Lachenauer and Mr. Weisz serve on the Board’s
Audit Committee. The Board’s Audit Committee is a standing independent committee
with a separate chair. The primary function of the Audit Committee is to
assist the full Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities to
shareholders and the investment community relating to fund accounting, reporting
practices and the quality and integrity of the financial reports. To satisfy
these responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviews with the independent
auditors, the audit plan and results and recommendations following independent
audits, reviews the performance of the independent auditors and recommends
engagement or discharge of the auditors to the full Board, reviews the
independence of the independent auditors, reviews the adequacy of the Funds’
internal controls and prepares and submits Audit Committee meeting minutes and
supporting documentation to the full Board. During the fiscal year ended June
30, 2024, the Audit Committee met four times.
Risk and
Compliance Committee. Mr. Caldwell, Mr. Lachenauer and Mr. Weisz serve on
the Board’s Risk and Compliance Committee. The Risk and Compliance Committee is
a standing independent committee with a separate chair. The primary function of
the Risk and Compliance Committee is to assist the full Board in fulfilling its
oversight responsibilities to the shareholders and the investment community
relating to the adequacy and effectiveness of the Trust’s compliance program and
to oversee the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer. The Risk and Compliance
Committee meets as often as necessary, and no less than quarterly. During the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, the Risk and Compliance Committee met four
times.
Nominating
Committee. Mr. Caldwell, Mr. Lachenauer and Mr. Weisz serve on the Board’s
Nominating Committee. The Board’s Nominating Committee is a standing independent
committee with a separate chair. The primary functions of the Nominating
Committee are to assist the Board in carrying out its responsibilities relating
to (i) the identification and selection of qualified individuals to become Board
members and members of Board committees and (ii) the development, adoption and
periodic monitoring and updating of criteria and characteristics relating to the
consideration, nomination and selection of interested and non-interested
trustees. The Nominating Committee meets as often as necessary. During the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, the Nominating Committee meets as often as
necessary.
Special
Committee. Mr. Caldwell, Mr. Lachenauer and Mr. Weisz serve on a Special
Committee responsible for reviewing the allegations contained in any class
action lawsuit filed against the Trust, demand for books and records served upon
the Trust, or any derivative lawsuit that may be filed against the Trust. The
Special Committee is also responsible for taking such other actions that may be
referred to it from time to time by the Board. The Special Committee met as
needed during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Background
and Qualifications of the Trustees. Mr. Szilagyi is the managing member of
the Advisor, an original sponsor of the Trust. Mr. Szilagyi is the Managing
Member of AlphaCentric Advisors, LLC, an investment advisor to certain series of
the Trust. Mr. Szilagyi is also the President of Rational Advisors, Inc., an
investment advisor to other series in the Fund Complex. He is also President of
MFund Services LLC, which provides management and legal administrative services
to the Trust. Mr. Szilagyi has many years of experience managing mutual funds
and providing administrative services to other mutual funds. His experience in
the investment management industry makes him uniquely qualified to serve as the
Board’s Chairman.
Mr. Caldwell
is the manager of the Genovese family office and a managing member of a real
estate management firm. Mr. Caldwell’s experience in the investment and real
estate industries provides the Board with an additional perspective and
understanding of investment strategies used by advisors to the Funds. Mr.
Caldwell also serves on the boards of other affiliated and unaffiliated mutual
fund trusts.
Mr.
Lachenauer has been an attorney in private practice for over fifteen years,
providing advice and counsel to small businesses and individuals on real estate,
commercial contracts, general business and financial matters. Mr. Lachenauer’s
previous experience at large law firms and as an attorney at a large investment
bank provides the Board with knowledge of financial and investment regulatory
matters. Mr. Lachenauer also serves on the boards of other registered investment
companies in the Fund Complex.
Mr. Weisz is
an attorney and provides the Board with general insight regarding its duties and
standards of care.
Share
Ownership in the Funds
Fund
Shares Owned by Trustees as of December 31, 2023
Name
of Trustee |
Mr.
Caldwell |
Mr.
Weisz |
Mr.
Lachenauer |
Mr.
Szilagyi |
Dollar
Range of Equity Securities in Insider Buying Fund |
None |
None |
None |
Over
$100,000 |
Dollar
Range of Equity Securities in Energy Infrastructure Fund |
None |
None |
None |
Over
$100,000 |
Dollar
Range of Equity Securities in Global Equity Fund |
None |
None |
None |
Over
$100,000 |
Dollar
Range of Equity Securities in Tactical Allocation Fund |
$10,001
- $50,000 |
None |
None |
Over
$100,000 |
Dollar
Range of Equity Securities in Dynamic Alpha Fund |
$10,001
- $50,000 |
None |
None |
Over
$100,000 |
Aggregated
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in all Registered Investment Companies
overseen by Trustee in the Trust |
Over
$100,000 |
None |
None |
Over
$100,000 |
Compensation
of the Board of Trustees
The
Independent Trustees are paid a quarterly retainer and receive compensation for
each special in-person meeting attended. The fees paid to the Independent
Trustees for their attendance at a meeting are shared equally by the Funds of
the Trust. The Lead Independent Trustee of the Trust and the Chairmen of the
Trust’s Audit Committee and Risk and Compliance Committee each receives an
additional quarterly retainer.
The
following table describes the compensation paid to the Trustees during the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. The Trust has no retirement or pension plans.
Compensation
Table |
Name
of Person, Position(s) |
Mr.
Caldwell |
Mr.
Weisz |
Mr.
Lachenauer |
Mr.
Szilagyi** |
Aggregate
Compensation from the Insider Buying Fund |
$5,893 |
$4,766 |
$4,484 |
$0 |
Aggregate
Compensation from the Energy Infrastructure Fund |
$5,893 |
$4,766 |
$4,484 |
$0 |
Aggregate
Compensation from the Global Equity Fund |
$5,893 |
$4,766 |
$4,484 |
$0 |
Aggregate
Compensation from the Tactical Allocation Fund |
$5,893 |
$4,766 |
$4,484 |
$0 |
Aggregate
Compensation from the Dynamic Alpha Fund |
$5,893 |
$4,766 |
$4,484 |
$0 |
Total
Compensation from Fund and Fund Complex* |
$305,996 |
$169,063 |
$261,996 |
$0 |
| * |
The
‘Fund Complex’ includes the Trust, Variable Insurance Trust, Mutual Fund
and Variable Insurance Trust, and Strategy Shares, each a registered
investment company. |
| ** |
Mr.
Szilagyi is compensated by Catalyst for advisory services and MFund
Services LLC for management and legal administrative support services to
the Trust. Please see the “Transfer Agent, Fund Accounting and
Administrator” section for more details. |
PRINCIPAL
SHAREHOLDERS
Persons
controlling a Fund can determine the outcome of any proposal submitted to the
shareholders for approval, including changes to a Fund’s fundamental policies or
the terms of the advisory agreement with the Advisor. Persons owning 25% or more
of the outstanding shares of a Fund (or a class of shares of a Fund) may be
deemed to control the Fund (or class of the Fund). Persons owning 5% or more of
the outstanding shares of the Fund (or a class of shares of the Fund) may be
deemed principal shareholders of the Fund (or class of the Fund). Below are the
beneficial and/or record holders of 5% or more of each fund.
Insider
Buying Fund Class A Shares
Shareholders
known by the Trust to own of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the
Insider Buying Fund Class A shares on October 3, 2024 and the percentage of the
outstanding shares owned on that date are listed below.
Name
and Address of Beneficial or
Record Owner |
Number
of Record and Beneficial
(Shares) |
Percent (%) of
Class |
UBS WM
USA
1000
Harbor Blvd
Weehawken,
NJ 07086 |
42,825.3990 |
8.88% |
LPL
Financial
4707
Executive Drive
San
Diego, CA 92121 |
50,701.6500 |
10.52% |
Raymond
James
Attn:
Courtney Waller
880
Carillon Parkway
Saint
Petersburg, FL 33716 |
51,229.3070 |
10.63% |
Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.
211
Main Street
San
Francisco, CA 94105 |
54,491.4200 |
11.30% |
Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.
211
Main Street
San
Francisco, CA 94105 |
40,066.2860 |
8.31% |
As of
October 3, 2024, securities of the Insider Buying Fund Class A shares owned by
all officers and trustees, including beneficial ownership, as a group
represented less than 1% of the outstanding Class A shares of the
Fund.
Insider
Buying Fund Class C Shares
Shareholders
known by the Trust to own of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the
Insider Buying Fund Class C shares on October 3, 2024 and the percentage of the
outstanding shares owned on that date are listed below.
Name
and Address of Beneficial or
Record Owner |
Number
of Record and Beneficial
(Shares) |
Percent (%) of
Class |
LPL
Financial
4707
Executive Drive
San
Diego, CA 92121 |
11,694.3560 |
14.22% |
Raymond
James
Attn:
Courtney Waller
880
Carillon Parkway
Saint
Petersburg, FL 33716 |
6,973.1820 |
8.48% |
| |
|
As of
October 3, 2024, securities of the Insider Buying Fund Class C shares owned by
all officers and trustees, including beneficial ownership, as a group
represented less than 1% of the outstanding Class C shares of the
Fund.
Insider
Buying Fund Class I Shares
Shareholders
known by the Trust to own of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the
Insider Buying Fund Class I shares on October 3, 2024 and the percentage of the
outstanding shares owned on that date are listed below.
Name
and Address of Beneficial or
Record Owner |
Number
of Record and Beneficial
(Shares) |
Percent (%) of
Class |
LPL
Financial
4707
Executive Drive
San
Diego, CA 92121 |
37,948.6440 |
14.44% |
Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.
211
Main Street
San
Francisco, CA 94105 |
31,129.7970 |
11.84% |
National
Financial Services LLC
499
Washington Boulevard
Jersey
City, NJ 07310 |
13,839.1090 |
5.27% |
Jerry
& Isobel Szilagyi
200
Dorado Beach Drive, Apt. 3642
Dorado,
PR 00646 |
18,498.0650 |
7.04% |
Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.
211
Main Street
San
Francisco, CA 94105 |
15,694.7210 |
5.97% |
As of
October 3, 2024, securities of the Insider Buying Fund Class I shares owned by
all officers and trustees, including beneficial ownership, as a group
represented 7.04% of the outstanding Class I shares of the Fund.
Energy
Infrastructure Fund Class A Shares
Shareholders
known by the Trust to own of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the
Energy Infrastructure Fund Class A shares on October 3, 2024 and the percentage
of the outstanding shares owned on that date are listed below.
Name
and Address of Beneficial or
Record Owner |
Number
of Record and Beneficial
(Shares) |
Percent (%) of
Class |
UBS WM
USA
1000
Harbor Blvd
Weehawken,
NJ 07086 |
93,310.4900 |
6.80% |
LPL
Financial
4707
Executive Drive
San
Diego, CA 92121 |
290,122.5410 |
21.15% |
Raymond
James
Attn:
Courtney Waller
880
Carillon Parkway
Saint
Petersburg, FL 33716 |
168,139.6780 |
12.26% |
Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.
211
Main Street
San
Francisco, CA 94105 |
96,154.5870 |
7.01% |
| * |
May be
deemed to control Class A shares of the Fund because holds more than 25%
of the outstanding Class A shares. |
As of
October 3, 2024, securities of the Energy Infrastructure Fund Class A shares
owned by all officers and trustees, including beneficial ownership, as a group
represented less than 1% of the outstanding Class A shares of the
Fund.
Energy
Infrastructure Fund Class C Shares
Shareholders
known by the Trust to own of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the
Energy Infrastructure Fund Class C Shares on October 3, 2024 and the percentage
of the outstanding shares owned on that date are listed below.
Name
and Address of Beneficial or
Record Owner |
Number
of Record and Beneficial
(Shares) |
Percent (%) of
Class |
LPL
Financial
4707
Executive Drive
San
Diego, CA 92121 |
335,408.5140 |
27.77%* |
Raymond
James
Attn:
Courtney Waller
880
Carillon Parkway
Saint
Petersburg, FL 33716 |
87,468.9620 |
7.24% |
Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.
211
Main Street
San
Francisco, CA 94105 |
232,556.0950 |
19.26% |
| * |
May be
deemed to control Class C shares of the Fund because holds more than 25%
of the outstanding Class C shares. |
As of
October 3, 2024, securities of the Energy Infrastructure Fund Class C shares
owned by all officers and trustees, including beneficial ownership, as a group
represented less than 1% of the outstanding Class C shares of the
Fund.
Energy
Infrastructure Fund Class I Shares
Shareholders
known by the Trust to own of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the
Energy Infrastructure Fund Class I shares on October 3, 2024 and the percentage
of the outstanding shares owned on that date are listed below.
Name
and Address of Beneficial or
Record Owner |
Number
of Record and Beneficial
(Shares) |
Percent (%) of
Class |
UBS WM
USA
1000
Harbor Blvd
Weehawken,
NJ 07086 |
747,821.9670 |
7.80% |
LPL
Financial
4707
Executive Drive
San
Diego, CA 92121 |
3,759,907.6500 |
39.23%* |
Raymond
James
Attn:
Courtney Waller
880
Carillon Parkway
Saint
Petersburg, FL 33716 |
1,108,111.5360 |
11.56% |
Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.
211
Main Street
San
Francisco, CA 94105 |
505,691.1690 |
5.28% |
| * |
May be
deemed to control Class I shares of the Fund because holds more than 25%
of the outstanding Class I shares. |
As of
October 3, 2024, securities of the Energy Infrastructure Fund Class I shares
owned by all officers and trustees, including beneficial ownership, as a group
represented less than 1% of the outstanding Class I shares of the
Fund.
Global
Equity Fund Class A Shares
Shareholders
known by the Trust to own of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the
Global Equity Fund Class A shares on October 3, 2024 and the percentage of the
outstanding shares owned on that date are listed below.
Name
and Address of Beneficial or
Record Owner |
Number
of Record and Beneficial
(Shares) |
Percent (%) of
Class |
LPL
Financial
4707
Executive Drive
San
Diego, CA 92121 |
85,188.4770 |
15.74% |
RBC
Capital Markets LL
Sarah
G Armstrong Rev Trust
563
Washington Place
Highland
Park, IL 60035 |
86,455.6050 |
15.98% |
Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.
211
Main Street
San
Francisco, CA 94105 |
44,168.6770 |
8.16% |
As of
October 3, 2024, securities of the Global Equity Fund Class A shares owned by
all officers and trustees, including beneficial ownership, as a group
represented less than 1% of the outstanding Class A shares of the
Fund.
Global
Equity Fund Class C Shares
Shareholders
known by the Trust to own of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the
Global Equity Fund Class C shares on October 3, 2024 and the percentage of the
outstanding shares owned on that date are listed below.
Name
and Address of Beneficial or
Record Owner |
Number
of Record and Beneficial
(Shares) |
Percent (%) of
Class |
LPL
Financial
4707
Executive Drive
San
Diego, CA 92121 |
87,500.5100 |
21.58% |
RBC
Capital Markets LLC
PBO:
Debra A. Portwood
IRA
26555
Thistle Lane
Hemet,
CA 92544 |
24,936.5300 |
6.15% |
Charles
Schwab & Co. , Inc.
211
Main Street
San
Francisco, CA 94105 |
32,257.4740 |
7.95% |
As of
October 3, 2024, securities of the Global Equity Fund Class C shares owned by
all officers and trustees, including beneficial ownership, as a group
represented less than 1% of the outstanding Class C shares of the
Fund.
Global
Equity Fund Class I Shares
Shareholders
known by the Trust to own of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the
Global Equity Fund Class I shares on October 3, 2024 and the percentage of the
outstanding shares owned on that date are listed below.
Name
and Address of Beneficial or
Record Owner |
Number
of Record and Beneficial
(Shares) |
Percent (%) of
Class |
UBS WM
USA
1000
Harbor Blvd, 5th FL
Weehawken,
NJ 07086 |
267,494.8900 |
8.34% |
LPL
Financial
4707
Executive Drive
San
Diego, CA 92121 |
815,089.2590 |
25.40% |
Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.
211
Main Street
San
Francisco, CA 94105 |
1,207,288.8710 |
37.62%* |
| * |
May be
deemed to control Class I shares of the Fund because holds more than 25%
of the outstanding Class I shares. |
As of
October 3, 2024, securities of the Global Equity Fund Class I shares owned by
all officers and trustees, including beneficial ownership, as a group
represented 2.03% of the outstanding Class I shares of the Fund.
Tactical
Allocation Fund Class A Shares
Shareholders
known by the Trust to own of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the
Tactical Allocation Fund Class A shares on October 3, 2024 and the percentage of
the outstanding shares owned on that date are listed below.
Name
and Address of Beneficial or
Record Owner |
Number
of Record and Beneficial
(Shares) |
Percent (%) of
Class |
LPL
Financial
4707
Executive Drive
San
Diego, CA 92121 |
58,621.9340 |
12.63% |
Raymond
James
Attn:
Courtney Waller
880
Carillon Parkway
Saint
Petersburg, FL 33716 |
151,984.7590 |
32.76% |
| |
|
Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.
211
Main Street
San
Francisco, CA 94105 |
38,914.3080 |
8.39% |
As of
October 3, 2024, securities of the Tactical Allocation Fund Class A shares owned
by all officers and trustees, including beneficial ownership, as a group
represented less than 1% of the outstanding Class A shares of the
Fund.
Tactical
Allocation Fund Class C Shares
Shareholders
known by the Trust to own of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the
Tactical Allocation Fund Class C shares on October 3, 2024 and the percentage of
the outstanding shares owned on that date are listed below.
Name
and Address of Beneficial or
Record Owner |
Number
of Record and Beneficial
(Shares) |
Percent (%) of
Class |
LPL
Financial
4707
Executive Drive
San
Diego, CA 92121 |
42,142.6010 |
6.34% |
| |
|
As of
October 3, 2023, securities of the Tactical Allocation Fund Class C shares owned
by all officers and trustees, including beneficial ownership, as a group
represented less than 1% of the outstanding Class C shares of the
Fund.
Tactical
Allocation Fund Class I Shares
Shareholders
known by the Trust to own of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the
Tactical Allocation Fund Class I shares on October 3, 2023 and the percentage of
the outstanding shares owned on that date are listed below.
Name
and Address of Beneficial or
Record Owner |
Number
of Record and Beneficial
(Shares) |
Percent (%) of
Class |
UBS WM
USA
1000
Harbor Blvd
Weehawken,
NJ 07086 |
49,812.8090 |
8.10% |
LPL
Financial
4707
Executive Drive
San
Diego, CA 92121 |
47,833.7070 |
7.78% |
Raymond
James
Attn:
Courtney Waller
880
Carillon Parkway
Saint
Petersburg, FL 33716 |
152,314.0270 |
24.76%* |
Szilagyi
2015 Family Trust
5
Abbington Drive
Huntington,
NY 11743 |
48,359.1930 |
7.86% |
Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.
211
Main Street
San
Francisco, CA 94105 |
90,491.7430 |
14.71% |
| * |
May be
deemed to control Class I shares of the Fund because holds more than 25%
of the outstanding Class I shares. |
As of
October 3, 2024, securities of the Tactical Allocation Fund Class I shares owned
by all officers and trustees, including beneficial ownership, as a group
represented 10.45% of the outstanding Class I shares of the Fund.
Dynamic
Alpha Fund Class A Shares
Shareholders
known by the Trust to own of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the
Dynamic Alpha Fund Class A shares on October 3, 2024 and the percentage of the
outstanding shares owned on that date are listed below.
Name
and Address of Beneficial or
Record Owner |
Number
of Record and Beneficial
(Shares) |
Percent (%) of
Class |
LPL
Financial
4707
Executive Drive
San
Diego, CA 92121 |
166,134.8880 |
6.26% |
Raymond
James
Attn:
Courtney Waller
880
Carillon Parkway
Saint
Petersburg, FL 33716 |
342,270.6270 |
12.90% |
Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.
211
Main Street
San
Francisco, CA 94105 |
1,009,740.1570 |
38.05%* |
Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.
211
Main Street
San
Francisco, CA 94105 |
142,909.7960 |
6.28% |
| * |
May be
deemed to control Class A shares of the Fund because holds more than 25%
of the outstanding Class A shares. |
As of
October 3, 2024, securities of the Dynamic Alpha Fund Class A shares owned by
all officers and trustees, including beneficial ownership, as a group
represented less than 1% of the outstanding Class A shares of the
Fund.
Dynamic
Alpha Fund Class C Shares
Shareholders
known by the Trust to own of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the
Dynamic Alpha Fund Class C shares on October 3, 2024 and the percentage of the
outstanding shares owned on that date are listed below.
Name
and Address of Beneficial or
Record Owner |
Number
of Record and Beneficial
(Shares) |
Percent (%) of
Class |
LPL
Financial
4707
Executive Drive
San
Diego, CA 92121 |
274,613.9150 |
28.55% |
Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.
Special
Custody Acct FBO Customers
211
Main Street
San
Francisco, CA 94105 |
56,638.2270 |
6.53% |
| * |
May be
deemed to control Class C shares of the Fund because holds more than 25%
of the outstanding Class C shares. |
As of
October 3, 2024, securities of the Dynamic Alpha Fund Class C shares owned by
all officers and trustees, including beneficial ownership, as a group
represented less than 1% of the outstanding Class C shares of the
Fund.
Dynamic
Alpha Fund Class I Shares
Shareholders
known by the Trust to own of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the
Dynamic Alpha Fund Class I shares on October 3, 2024 and the percentage of the
outstanding shares owned on that date are listed below.
Name
and Address of Beneficial or
Record Owner |
Number
of Record and Beneficial
(Shares) |
Percent (%) of
Class |
LPL
Financial
4707
Executive Drive
San
Diego, CA 92121 |
377,651.0840 |
20.53% |
Raymond
James
Attn:
Courtney Waller
880
Carillon Parkway
Saint
Petersburg, FL 33716 |
261,627.9060 |
14.23% |
Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc.
Special
Custody Acct FBO Customers
211
Main Street
San
Francisco, CA 94105 |
627,412.1180 |
34.12%* |
| * |
May be
deemed to control Class I shares of the Fund because holds more than 25%
of the outstanding Class I shares. |
As of
October 3, 2024, securities of the Dynamic Alpha Fund Class I shares owned by
all officers and trustees, including beneficial ownership, as a group
represented 1.96% of the outstanding Class I shares of the Fund.
ADVISOR
AND SUB-ADVISORS
Catalyst
Capital Advisors LLC has been retained by the Trust, on behalf of the Funds
under an investment advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) to act as each
Fund’s advisor, subject to the oversight of the Board. The Advisor was organized
under the laws of New York on January 24, 2006. The Advisor oversees the
day-to-day investment decisions for the Funds and continuously reviews,
supervises and administers each Fund’s investment program. The address of the
Advisor is 53 Palmeras St. Suite 601, San Juan, PR 00901. Jerry Szilagyi, a
Trustee of the Trust, is the controlling member of the Advisor. The Advisor is
under common control with AlphaCentric Advisors LLC and Rational Advisors, Inc.,
the investment advisers of other funds in the same group of investment companies
also known as a “Fund Complex”, and with MFund Services LLC, a provider of
management, legal administration and compliance services to the Funds and each
other fund in the Fund Complex.
The Advisory
Agreement provides that the Advisor will provide each Fund with investment
advice and supervision and will continuously furnish an investment program for
each Fund consistent with the investment objectives and policies of the Fund.
The Advisor is responsible for the payment of the salaries and expenses of all
of its personnel, office rent and the expenses of providing investment advisory
and related clerical expenses.
Under the
terms of the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor directs the investment of the
assets of each Fund in conformity with the investment objectives and policies of
that Fund. It is the responsibility of the Advisor to make investment decisions
for the applicable Fund and to provide continuous supervision of the investment
portfolios of the Fund.
For its
services under the Advisory Agreement, each Fund pays the Advisor a monthly
advisory fee based on its average daily net assets at the annual rates set forth
below:
Fund |
Contractual Advisory Fee |
Insider
Buying Fund |
1.00% |
Energy
Infrastructure Fund |
1.25% |
Global
Equity Fund |
1.00% |
Tactical
Allocation Fund |
1.25% |
Dynamic
Alpha Fund |
1.00% |
The Advisor
pays expenses incurred by it in connection with acting as advisor, other than
costs (including taxes and brokerage commissions, borrowing costs, costs of
investing in underlying funds and extraordinary expenses, if any) of securities
purchased for the Funds and other expenses paid by the Funds as detailed in each
Fund’s Advisory Agreement. The Advisor pays for all employees, office space and
facilities required by it to provide services under the Advisory Agreement,
except for specific items of expense referred to below.
Except for
the expenses described above that have been assumed by the Advisor, all expenses
incurred in administration of the Funds will be charged to a particular Fund,
including investment advisory fees; fees and expenses of the Board; interest
charges; taxes; brokerage commissions; expenses of valuing assets; expenses of
continuing registration and qualification of the Funds and the shares under
federal and state law; share issuance expenses; fees and disbursements of
independent accountants and legal counsel; fees and expenses of custodians,
including sub-custodians and securities depositories, transfer agents and
shareholder account servicing organizations; expenses of preparing, printing and
mailing prospectuses, reports, proxies, notices and statements sent to
shareholders; expenses of shareholder meetings; costs of investing in underlying
funds; and insurance premiums. Each Fund is also liable for nonrecurring
expenses, including litigation to which it may from time to time be a party.
Expenses incurred for the operation of a particular Fund, including the expenses
of communications with its shareholders, are paid by that Fund.
The Advisor
has contractually agreed to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses but only to the
extent necessary to maintain the Funds’ total annual operating expenses
(excluding brokerage costs; borrowing costs, such as (a) interest and (b)
dividends on securities sold short; taxes; underlying fund expenses, and
extraordinary expenses, such as regulatory inquiry and litigation expenses) at
the levels set forth in the table below through October 31, 2025.
Fund |
Expense
Limitation |
Insider
Buying Fund |
Class
A – 1.53%
Class
C – 2.28%
Class
I – 1.28% |
Energy
Infrastructure Fund |
Class
A – 1.68%
Class
C – 2.43%
Class
I – 1.43% |
Global
Equity Fund |
Class
A – 1.21%
Class
C – 1.96%
Class
I – 0.96% |
Tactical
Allocation Fund |
Class
A – 1.53%
Class
C – 2.28%
Class
I – 1.28% |
Dynamic
Alpha Fund |
Class
A – 1.38%
Class
C – 2.13%
Class
I – 1.13% |
Each waiver or reimbursement by
the Advisor is subject to repayment by the Fund within the three years following
the date on which that particular expense is incurred, if the Fund is able to
make the repayment without exceeding the lesser of the expense limitation in
effect at the time of the waiver or the expense limitation in effect at the time
of recoupment and the repayment is approved by the Board.
The Advisory
Agreement with each Fund continued in effect for an initial two-year term and
then continues from year to year as long as its continuation is approved at
least annually by the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees,”
or by the shareholders of the applicable Fund. Each Advisory Agreement may be
terminated at any time upon 60 days’ written notice by the relevant Fund or by a
majority vote of the outstanding shares or 90 days’ written notice by the
advisor and will terminate automatically upon assignment. A discussion of the
matters considered by the Board in connection with the renewal of the Advisory
Agreement for each Fund can be found in the Funds’ Financial Statements for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Each
Advisory Agreement provides that the Advisor shall not be liable for any error
of judgment or mistake of law or for any loss suffered by the Trust in
connection with the performance of its duties, except a loss resulting from a
breach of fiduciary duty with respect to the receipt of compensation for
services or a loss resulting from willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross
negligence on the part of the Advisor in the performance of its duties, or from
reckless disregard of its duties and obligations thereunder.
The table
below provides information about the advisory fees paid to the Advisor for the
last three fiscal years ended June 30:
Fund |
|
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
Insider
Buying Fund |
Total
Advisory Fee |
$382,286 |
$153,537 |
$158,508 |
Waiver |
$106,821 |
$114,421 |
$111,701 |
Net
Advisory Fee |
$275,465 |
$39,116 |
$46,807 |
Energy
Infrastructure Fund |
Total
Advisory Fee |
$2,247,559 |
$2,910,987 |
$3,138,815 |
Waiver |
$88,950 |
$145,542 |
$126,735 |
Net
Advisory Fee |
$2,158,609 |
$2,765,445 |
$3,012,080 |
Global
Equity Fund |
Total
Advisory Fee |
$762,920 |
$753,715 |
$743,630 |
Waiver |
$277,805 |
$285,664 |
$291,573 |
Net
Advisory Fee |
$485,115 |
$468,051 |
$452.057 |
Tactical
Allocation Fund |
Total
Advisory Fee |
$655,078 |
$462,314 |
$405,229 |
Waiver |
$196,082 |
$175,583 |
$170,596 |
Net
Advisory Fee |
$458,996 |
$286,731 |
$234,633 |
Dynamic
Alpha Fund |
Total
Advisory Fee |
$1,622,681 |
$1,259,773 |
$1,200,337 |
Waiver |
$177,953 |
$172,829 |
$154,667 |
Net
Advisory Fee |
$1,444,728 |
$1,086,944 |
$1,045,670 |
Sub-Advisor
– Energy Infrastructure Fund
SL Advisors,
LLC, an investment advisory firm founded in 2009 and registered as an investment
advisor with the SEC on October 8, 2014, has been retained to act as the
sub-advisor to the Fund under an Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement
(“Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with the Advisor. SL Advisors is controlled by Simon
Lack. In addition to serving as the investment sub-advisor to the Fund, SL
Advisors provides investment advice to another registered investment company,
individuals, family offices and institutions.
As
compensation for the sub-advisory services it provides to the Fund, the Advisor
pays SL Advisors 50% of the net advisory fees earned by the Advisor from the
Fund. For this purpose, “net advisory fees” means advisory fees collected from
the Fund (net of fee waivers due to expense caps) less any revenue sharing and
asset-based fees paid to broker-dealers or custodians with assets in the Fund.
The fee paid to SL Advisors by the Advisor are paid from the Advisor’s advisory
fee and is not an additional cost to the Fund. The Sub-Advisory Agreement was
effective for an initial two year period and continues in effect for successive
twelve-month periods, provided that the Board annually approves it for
continuance. A discussion of the matters considered by the Board in connection
with the renewal of the Sub-Advisory Agreement is in the Fund’s Financial
Statements for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2024. For the fiscal years ended
June 30, 2022, June 30, 2023, and June 30, 2024, SL Advisors received
$1,079,304, $1,382,723, and $1,506,040, respectively, in sub-advisory fees for
its services to the Energy Infrastructure Fund.
Sub-Investment
Advisor –Global Equity Fund
Managed
Asset Portfolios, LLC, an investment advisory firm founded in 2000, has been
retained to act as the sub-advisor to the Fund under an Investment Sub-Advisory
Agreement (“Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with the Advisor. MAP is controlled by
Michael Dzialo, MAP’s President and Managing Member. MAP also provides
investment advisory services to high net worth individuals, institutions,
pension and profit-sharing plans and charitable organizations.
As
compensation for the sub-advisory services it provides to the Fund, the Advisor
pays MAP 50% of the net advisory fees earned by the Advisor from the Fund. For
this purpose, “net advisory fees” means advisory fees collected from the Fund
(net of fee waivers due to expense caps) less any revenue sharing and
asset-based fees paid to broker-dealers or custodians with assets in the Fund.
The fee paid to MAP by the Advisor are paid from the Advisor’s advisory fee and
is not an additional cost to the Fund. The Sub-Advisory Agreement was effective
for an initial two-year period and continues in effect for successive
twelve-month periods, provided that the Board annually approves it for
continuance. A discussion of the matters considered by the Board in connection
with the renewal of the Sub-Advisory Agreement is in the Fund’s Financial
Statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. For the fiscal years ended
June 30, 2022, June 30, 2023, and June 30, 2024 MAP received $242,557, $234,025,
and $226,029, respectively, in sub-advisory fees for its services to the Global
Equity Fund.
Sub-Investment
Advisor –Tactical Allocation Fund
Lyons Wealth
Management LLC, an investment advisory firm founded in 2009, has been retained
to act as the sub-advisor to the Tactical Allocation Fund under an Investment
Sub-Advisory Agreement (“Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with the Advisor. Lyons is
controlled by Alexander Read. Lyons also provides investment advisory services
to high net worth individuals and associated trusts, estates, pension and
profit-sharing plans.
As
compensation for the sub-advisory services it provides to the Tactical
Allocation Fund, the Advisor pays Lyons 50% of the net advisory fees earned by
the Advisor from the Fund. For this purpose, “net advisory fees” means advisory
fees collected from the Fund (net of fee waivers due to expense caps) less any
revenue sharing and asset-based fees paid to broker-dealers or custodians with
assets in the Fund. The fee paid to Lyons by the Advisor are paid from the
Advisor’s advisory fee and is not an additional cost to the Fund. The
Sub-Advisory Agreement was effective for an initial two-year period and
continues in effect for successive twelve-month periods, provided that the Board
annually approves it for continuance. A discussion of the matters considered by
the Board in connection with the renewal of the Sub-Advisory Agreement is in the
Fund’s Financial Statements for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2024. For the
fiscal years ended June 30, 2022, June 30, 2023, and June 30, 2024, Lyons
received $229,498, $143,365, and $117,316, respectively, in sub-advisory fees
for its services to the Tactical Allocation Fund.
Sub-Investment
Advisor – Dynamic Alpha Fund
Cookson,
Peirce & Co., Inc., an investment advisory firm founded in 1984, has been
retained to act as the sub-advisor to the Dynamic Alpha Fund under an Investment
Sub-Advisory Agreement (“Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with the Advisor. Over the
last 20 years, CP has managed the assets of some of the country’s most prominent
families and institutions.
As
compensation for the sub-advisory services it provides to the Dynamic Alpha
Fund, the Advisor pays CP a minimum of 50% of the net advisory fees earned by
the Advisor from the Fund. For this purpose, “net advisory fees” means advisory
fees collected from the Dynamic Alpha Fund (net of fee waivers due to expense
caps) less any revenue sharing and asset-based fees paid to broker-dealers or
custodians with assets in the Fund. The fee paid to CP by the Advisor are paid
from the Advisor’s advisory fee and is not an additional cost to the Dynamic
Alpha Fund. The Sub-Advisory Agreement was effective for an initial two-year
period and continues in effect for successive twelve-month periods, provided
that the Board annually approves it for continuance. A discussion of the matters
considered by the Board in connection with the renewal of the Sub-Advisory
Agreement is in the Fund’s Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2024. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2022, June 30, 2023, and June 30,
2024, CP received $863,120, $659,498, and $656,342, respectively, in
sub-advisory fees for its services to the Dynamic Alpha Fund.
Portfolio
Manager –Insider Buying Fund
Subject to
the oversight and approval of the Advisor, David Miller and Charles Ashley are
the portfolio managers responsible for the day-to-day management of the Insider
Buying Fund’s portfolio. Mr. Miller’s compensation from the Advisor
is based on a percentage of the overall profits of the Advisor. He is
also entitled to a portion of the proceeds if the Advisor sells all or a portion
of the Advisor’s business. He also participates in a pension plan. Mr. Ashley’s
compensation from the Advisor is a fixed base salary and a discretionary bonus
based on the discretion of the Advisor.
Portfolio
Managers –Global Equity Fund
Subject to
the oversight and approval of the Advisor, Michael Dzialo, Peter Swan, Karen
Culver and Zachary S. Fellows, as portfolio managers, have primary
responsibility for the day-to-day management of the Global Equity Fund’s
portfolio. Mr. Dzialo’s compensation is based on a salary plus the overall
profits of MAP. He is the sole owner of the firm and therefore benefits from any
increase in value of the firm. Mr. Swan’s compensation is based on a salary plus
a percentage of the profits from MAP’s mutual fund business and is a member of
the firm’s long term key employee performance incentive and retention plan. Ms.
Culver’s compensation is based on a salary plus a percentage of the profits from
MAP’s mutual fund business and is a member of the firm’s long term key employee
performance incentive and retention plan. Mr. Fellows compensation is based on a
salary plus a percentage of the profits from MAP’s mutual fund business and is a
member of the firm’s long term key employee performance incentive and retention
plan.
Portfolio
Managers –Tactical Allocation Fund
Subject to
the oversight and approval of the Advisor, Alexander Read and Matthew Ferratusco
are jointly and primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the
Tactical Allocation Fund’s portfolio. Messrs. Read and Ferratusco’s
compensation from Lyons is based on a salary plus a discretionary bonus
based on the overall profits of the firm.
Portfolio
Managers – Dynamic Alpha Fund
Subject to
the oversight and approval of the Advisor, Bruce W. Miller, Cory S. Krebs and
Luke O’Neill are the portfolio managers responsible for the day-to-day
management of the Dynamic Alpha Fund’s portfolio. Messrs. Miller, Krebs and
O’Neill’s compensation from CP is based on a fixed salary plus
bonus based on the overall profits of CP. They are also entitled to a portion of
the proceeds if CP sells all or a portion of its business. They also participate
in a 401(k) retirement plan.
Portfolio
Manager - Energy Infrastructure Fund
Subject to
the oversight and approval of the Advisor, Simon Lack and Henry Hoffman are
jointly and primary responsible for the day-today management of the Fund’s
portfolio. Messrs. Lack and Hoffman’s compensation is based on a percentage of
the overall profits plus bonus based on a percentage of overall profits of SL
Advisors.
Portfolio
Managers’ Other Accounts Managed – All Funds
As of June
30, 2024, the number of, and total assets in all registered investment
companies, other pooled investment vehicles, and other accounts overseen by
David Miller, Charles Miller, Simon Lack, Henry Hoffman, Michael Dzialo, Peter
Swan, Karen Culver, Zachary Fellows, Alexander Read, Matthew Ferratusco, Bruce
W. Miller, Cory S. Krebs, and Luke O’Neill are as follows:
Name
of Portfolio Manager |
Registered
Investment Companies |
Other
Pooled Investment Vehicles Managed |
Other
Accounts Managed |
Number |
Total
Assets |
Number |
Total
Assets |
Number |
Total
Assets (millions) |
David
Miller |
7 |
$1,600 |
0 |
$0 |
0 |
$0 |
Charles
Ashley |
6 |
$1,600 |
0 |
$0 |
0 |
$0 |
Simon
Lack |
2 |
$299 |
0 |
$0 |
55 |
$60 |
Henry
Hoffman |
2 |
$299 |
0 |
$0 |
55 |
$60 |
Michael
Dzialo |
2 |
$89.7 |
1 |
$9.5 |
1935 |
$966.5 |
Peter
Swan |
2 |
$89.7 |
0 |
$9.5 |
1935 |
$966.5 |
Karen
Culver |
2 |
$89.7 |
1 |
$9.5 |
1935 |
$966.5 |
Zachary
S. Fellows |
2 |
$89.7 |
1 |
$9.5 |
1935 |
$966.5 |
Alexander
Read |
1 |
$35 |
0 |
$0 |
275 |
$150 |
Matthew
Ferratusco |
1 |
$35 |
0 |
$0 |
275 |
$150 |
Cory
S. Krebs |
1 |
$129 |
0 |
$0 |
2189 |
$2,104 |
Bruce
W. Miller |
1 |
$129 |
0 |
$0 |
2189 |
$2,104 |
Luke
O’Neill |
1 |
$129 |
0 |
$0 |
2189 |
$2,104 |
The advisory
fee for the registered investment companies, other pooled investment vehicles or
other accounts managed by each of the portfolio managers listed above, are not
based on the performance of the respective account.
The
following table shows the dollar range of equity securities of the Funds
beneficially owned by each portfolio manager as of June 30, 2024.
Name
of Portfolio Manager |
Fund
Name |
Dollar
Range of Equity Securities in the Funds |
David
Miller |
Insider
Buying Fund |
None |
Charles
Ashley |
Insider
Buying Fund |
None |
Simon
Lack |
Energy
Infrastructure Fund |
$100,001-$500,000 |
Henry
Hoffman |
Energy
Infrastructure Fund |
$100,001-$500,000 |
Michael
Dzialo |
Global
Equity Fund |
None |
Peter
Swan |
Global
Equity Fund |
$100,001
- $500,000 |
Karen
Culver |
Global
Equity Fund |
$1 -
$10,000 |
Zachary
S. Fellows |
Global
Equity Fund |
None |
Alexander
Read |
Tactical
Allocation Fund |
$10,001
- $25,000 |
Matthew
Ferratusco |
Tactical
Allocation Fund |
None |
Bruce
W. Miller |
Dynamic
Alpha Fund |
$50,001
– $100,000 |
Cory
S. Krebs |
Dynamic
Alpha Fund |
$500,001
- $1,000,000 |
Luke
O’Neill |
Dynamic
Alpha Fund |
$100,001
- $500,000 |
Potential
Conflicts of Interest – Advisor and Sub-Advisors
Actual or
apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day
advisory responsibilities with respect to more than one fund or other accounts.
Advising multiple accounts may result in a portfolio manager devoting unequal
time and attention to each account. Advising multiple funds and accounts also
may give rise to potential conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have
different objectives, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees as the portfolio
manager must allocate his time and investment ideas across multiple funds and
accounts.
With respect
to securities transactions for the Funds, the Advisor or Sub-Advisor
determines which broker to use to execute each order, consistent with the duty
to seek best execution of the transaction. The portfolio managers may
execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely impact the
value of securities held by the Funds. Securities selected for funds or
accounts other than the Funds may outperform the securities selected for
the Funds.
The
appearance of a conflict of interest may arise where the Advisor or Sub-Advisor
has an incentive, such as a performance-based advisory fee. The management of
personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest; there is no
assurance that the Funds’ code of ethics will adequately address such
conflicts. One of the portfolio manager’s
numerous responsibilities is to assist in the sale of
Fund
shares.
Because each portfolio manager’s compensation is indirectly linked
to the sale of Fund shares, they may have an incentive to devote time
to marketing efforts designed to increase sales of Fund shares.
Each of the
Funds has adopted a code of ethics that, among other things, permits personal
trading by employees under conditions where it has been determined that such
trades would not adversely impact client accounts. Nevertheless, the management
of personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest, and there
is no assurance that these codes of ethics will adequately address such
conflicts.
The Funds
may invest in affiliated funds advised by the Advisor. The Advisor is subject to
conflicts of interest in allocating the Funds’ assets among the affiliated
funds. The Advisor will receive more revenue when it selects an affiliated fund
rather than an unaffiliated fund for inclusion in a Fund’s portfolio. This
conflict may provide an incentive for the Advisor to invest Fund assets in
affiliated funds that perform less well than unaffiliated funds. The Advisor may
have an incentive to allocate the Funds’ assets to those affiliated funds for
which the net advisory fees payable to the Advisor are higher than the fees
payable by other affiliated funds.
The Advisor,
each Sub-Advisor and the Funds have adopted certain compliance procedures which
are designed to address these types of conflicts. However, there is no
guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a
conflict arises.
CODE OF
ETHICS
The Advisor,
MAP, Lyons, CP, SL Advisors, Northern Lights Distributors, LLC and the Funds
have adopted codes of ethics under Rule 17j-1(c) of the 1940 Act. The
purpose of each code is to avoid potential conflicts of interest and to prevent
fraud, deception or misconduct with respect to the Funds. Such codes of
ethics permit personnel covered by the codes to invest in securities that may be
purchased by the Funds, subject to the restrictions of the code. The codes are
filed as exhibits to the Trust’s registration statement.
TRANSFER
AGENT, FUND ACCOUNTING AGENT AND ADMINISTRATOR
Ultimus Fund
Solutions, LLC (“Ultimus”), which has its principal office at 225 Pictoria
Drive, Suite 450, Cincinnati, Ohio 45246, serves as administrator, fund
accountant and transfer agent for the Funds pursuant to the Fund Services
Agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Trust and subject to the supervision of the
Board. Ultimus is primarily in the business of providing administrative, fund
accounting and transfer agent services to retail and institutional mutual funds.
Ultimus is an affiliate of the distributor.
Ultimus may
also provide persons to serve as officers of the Trust. Such officers may be
directors, officers or employees of Ultimus or its affiliates.
The
Agreement was in effect for an initial term of three years from the effective
date for the Funds, and continues in effect for successive twelve-month periods
provided that such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by a
majority of the Board. The Agreement is terminable by the Board or Ultimus on 90
days’ written notice and may be assigned by either party, provided that the
Trust may not assign this agreement without the prior written consent of
Ultimus. The Agreement provides that Ultimus shall be without liability for any
action reasonably taken or omitted pursuant to the Agreement.
Under the
Agreement, Ultimus performs administrative services, including: (1) monitoring
the performance of administrative and professional services rendered to the
Trust by others service providers; (2) monitoring Fund holdings and operations
for post-trade compliance with the Fund registration statement and applicable
laws and rules; (3) preparing and coordinating the printing of semi-annual and
annual financial statements; (4) preparing selected management reports for
performance and compliance analyses; (5) preparing and disseminating materials
for and attending and participating in meetings of the Board; (6) determining
income and capital gains available for distribution and calculating
distributions required to meet regulatory, income, and excise tax requirements;
(7) reviewing the Trust’s federal, state, and local tax returns as prepared
and signed by the Trust’s independent public accountants; (8) preparing and
maintaining the Trust’s operating expense budget to determine proper expense
accruals to be charged to the Fund to calculate
its daily
net asset value; (9) assisting in and monitoring the preparation, filing,
printing and where applicable, dissemination of periodic reports to the Board,
shareholders and the SEC, notices pursuant to Rule 24f-2, proxy materials and
reports to the SEC on Forms N-CEN, N-CSR, N-PORT and N-PX; (10) coordinating the
Trust’s audits and examinations by assisting the Funds’ independent public
accountants; (11) determining, in consultation with others, the jurisdictions in
which shares of the Trust shall be registered or qualified for sale and
facilitate such registration or qualification; (12) monitoring sales of shares
and ensuring that the shares are properly and duly registered with the SEC; (13)
monitoring the calculation of performance data for the Funds; (14) preparing, or
causing to be prepared, expense and financial reports; (15) preparing
authorization for the payment of Trust expenses and paying, from Trust assets,
all bills of the Trust; (16) providing information typically supplied in the
investment company industry to companies that track or report price, performance
or other information with respect to investment companies; (17) upon request,
assisting the Funds in the evaluation and selection of other service providers,
such as independent public accountants, printers, EDGAR providers and proxy
solicitors (such parties may be affiliates of Ultimus); and (18) performing
other services, recordkeeping and assistance relating to the affairs of the
Trust as the Trust may, from time to time, reasonably request.
Ultimus also
provides the Funds with accounting services, including: (i) daily computation of
net asset value; (ii) maintenance of security ledgers and books and records as
required by the 1940 Act; (iii) production of each Fund’s listing of portfolio
securities and general ledger reports; (iv) reconciliation of accounting
records; (v) calculation of yield and total return for each Fund; (vi)
maintenance of certain books and records described in Rule 31a-1 under the 1940
Act, and reconciliation of account information and balances among the Funds’
custodian and Advisor; and (vii) monitoring and evaluation of daily income and
expense accruals, and sales and redemptions of shares of the Funds.
Ultimus also
acts as transfer, dividend disbursing, and shareholder servicing agent for the
Funds pursuant to the Agreement. Under the Agreement, Ultimus is responsible for
administering and performing transfer agent functions, dividend distribution,
shareholder administration, and maintaining necessary records in accordance with
applicable rules and regulations.
For these
services, each of the Funds pays Ultimus an annual asset-based fee of 0.13% of
net assets up to $50 million, with lower fees at higher asset levels, plus
reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.
Prior to
November 15, 2021, Gemini Fund Services, LLC (“GFS”), an affiliate of Ultimus,
provided administrator, fund accountant and transfer agent services to the
Funds. The Funds paid the following fees for these services for the fiscal years
ended June 30:
Fund |
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2022 |
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2023 |
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2024 |
Insider
Buying Fund |
$33,213 |
$26,242 |
$26,635 |
Energy
Infrastructure Fund |
$80,382 |
$94,321 |
$94,078 |
Global
Equity Fund |
$45,275 |
$52,490 |
$53939 |
Tactical
Allocation Fund |
$35,976 |
$32,460 |
$31,068 |
Dynamic
Alpha Fund |
$70,102 |
$60,293 |
$54,660 |
MFund
Services LLC (“MFund”) provides the Funds with various management and legal
administrative services under a Management Services Agreement. For these
services, the Funds pay MFund an annual
asset-based fee in accordance with the schedule set forth below applied at the
Fund family level (i.e., all the Funds in the Trust advised by the
Advisor):
0.10%
of net assets up to $50 million;
0.07%
of net assets from $50 million to $100 million;
0.05%
of net assets from $100 million to $250 million;
0.04%
of net assets from $250 million to $500 million;
0.03%
of net assets from $500 million to $1 billion;
0.02%
of net assets from $1 billion to $5 billion;
0.01%
of assets from $5 billion and above
In addition,
the Funds reimburse MFund for any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
the performance of its duties under the Management Services Agreement. Jerry
Szilagyi is the controlling member of MFund Services, the controlling member of
Catalyst and of AlphaCentric Advisors LLC, and a Trustee of the Trust. For the
last three fiscal years ended June 30, the Funds paid MFund the following fees
for its management services:
Fund |
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2022 |
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2023 |
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2024 |
Insider
Buying Fund |
$13,049 |
$3,026 |
$2,966 |
Energy
Infrastructure Fund |
$46,994 |
$47,152 |
$46,349 |
Global
Equity Fund |
$22,430 |
$15,261 |
$13,735 |
Tactical
Allocation Fund |
$16,651 |
$7,519 |
$6,078 |
Dynamic
Alpha Fund |
$42,935 |
$25,455 |
$22,059 |
COMPLIANCE
SERVICES
MFund
provides the Chief Compliance Officer and certain compliance related services to
the Trust pursuant to a Compliance Services Agreement. During the fiscal years
ended June 30, 2022, June 30, 2023, and June 30, 2024, the Funds paid MFund
Services the following amounts for compliance services:
Fund |
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2022 |
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2023 |
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2024 |
Insider
Buying Fund |
$6,585 |
$6,002 |
$6,152 |
Energy
Infrastructure Fund |
$13,889 |
$16,391 |
$16,861 |
Global
Equity Fund |
$9,455 |
$10,630 |
$10,642 |
Tactical
Allocation Fund |
$11,656 |
$12,593 |
$12,156 |
Dynamic
Alpha Fund |
$14,513 |
$14,126 |
$13,999 |
CUSTODIAN
Pursuant to
a Custody Agreement between the Trust and U.S. Bank National Association (the
“Custodian”), 1555 N. Rivercenter Drive, Suite 302, Milwaukee, WI 53212, the
Custodian serves as the custodian of the Funds. The Custodian has custody of all
securities and cash of the Funds. The Custodian, among other things, attends to
the collection of principal and income and payment for and collection of
proceeds of securities bought and sold by the Funds.
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Funds’
independent registered public accounting firm is Cohen & Company, Ltd., 1835
Market Street, Suite 310, Philadelphia, PA 19103. Shareholders will receive
annual financial statements, together with a report of the independent
accountants, and semiannual unaudited financial statements of the Funds. Cohen
& Company, Ltd. will report on the Funds’ annual financial statements,
review certain regulatory reports and the Funds’ income tax returns, and perform
other professional accounting, auditing, tax and advisory services when engaged
to do so by the Funds.
COUNSEL
Thompson
Hine LLP, 41 South High Street, Suite 1700, Columbus, OH 43215, serves as
counsel for the Trust.
DISTRIBUTOR
Northern
Lights Distributors, LLC, located at 225 Pictoria Drive, Suite 450, Cincinnati,
Ohio 45246 (the “Distributor”), serves as the principal underwriter and national
distributor for the shares of the Funds pursuant to an Underwriting Agreement
with the Trust (the “Underwriting Agreement”). The Distributor is registered as
a broker-dealer under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and each state’s
securities laws and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
(“FINRA”). The offering of the Funds’ shares is continuous. The Underwriting
Agreement provides that the Distributor, as agent in connection with the
distribution of Fund shares, will use reasonable efforts to facilitate the sale
of the Funds’ shares.
The
Underwriting Agreement provides that, unless sooner terminated, it will continue
in effect for two years initially and thereafter shall continue from year to
year, subject to annual approval by (a) the Board or a vote of a majority of the
outstanding shares, and (b) by a majority of the Trustees who are not interested
persons of the Trust or of the Distributor by vote cast in person at a meeting
called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
The
Underwriting Agreement may be terminated by a Fund at any time, without the
payment of any penalty, by vote of a majority of the entire Board or by vote of
a majority of the outstanding shares of a Fund on 60 days’ written notice to the
Distributor, or by the Distributor at any time, without the payment of any
penalty, on 60 days’ written notice to a Fund. The Underwriting Agreement will
automatically terminate in the event of its assignment.
12b-1
Plans
The Trust,
on behalf of the Funds, has adopted Distribution and Shareholder Servicing Plans
pursuant to Rule 12b—1 under
the 1940 Act (the “Plans”). Rule 12b—1 provides that any payments made by a
Fund in connection with the distribution of its shares may be made only pursuant
to a written plan describing all material aspects of the proposed financing of
the distribution and also requires that all agreements with any person relating
to the implementation of a plan must be in writing. Under each Fund’s Plan
related to the Class A Shares, the Funds incur an annual fee of up to 0.50% of
the average daily net assets of the respective Fund’s Class A Shares (the “Class
A 12b-1 Fee”). Class A Shares of the Funds are currently incurring an annual fee
of up to 0.25% of its average daily net assets. If authorized by the Board and
upon notice to shareholders, the Funds may increase the percentage paid under
the Plan up to the Class A 12b-1 Fee amount. Under each Fund’s Plan related to
the Class C Shares, the Funds incur an annual fee of up to 1.00% of the average
daily net assets of the respective Fund’s Class C Shares (the “Class C 12b-1
Fee”) (the Class A 12b-1 Fee and Class C 12b-1 Fee are collectively referred to
as the “12b-1 Fees”).
Each
12b—1 Fee may be used to pay a fee
on a quarterly basis to broker-dealers, including the Distributor and affiliates
of the Distributor, the Advisor, banks and savings and loan institutions and
their affiliates and associated broker-dealers that have entered into Service
Agreements with the Distributor (“Service Organizations”) of annual amounts of
up to 0.25% of the average net asset value of all shares of the respective Fund
owned by shareholders with whom the Service Organization has a servicing
relationship. The 12b-1 Fees may also be used to reimburse parties for
shareholder services and distribution related expenses.
Each Fund’s
Plan continues in effect from year to year, provided that each such continuance
is approved at least annually by a vote of the Board, including a majority of
the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and have no direct or
indirect financial interest in the operation of the Plan or in any agreements
entered into in connection with the Plan (the “Qualified Trustees”). Each Fund’s
Plan may be terminated at any time, without penalty, by vote of a majority of
the Qualified Trustees of a Fund or by vote of a majority of the outstanding
shares of the Fund. Any amendment to a Plan to increase materially
the
amount the
Fund is authorized to pay thereunder would require approval by a majority of the
outstanding shares of the respective Fund. Other material amendments to a Fund’s
Plan would be required to be approved by vote of the Board, including a majority
of the Qualified Trustees. The Distributor may at its own discretion waive a
portion of its fees from time to time, although such waiver is not
required.
Dealers who
are holders or dealers of record for accounts in one or more of the Funds may
receive payments from 12b-1 Fees. A dealer’s marketing support services may
include business planning assistance, educating dealer personnel about the Funds
and shareholder financial planning needs, placement on the dealer’s preferred or
recommended fund list, and access to sales meetings, sales representatives and
management representatives of the dealer. Dealers are compensated differently
depending upon, among other factors, the level and/or type of marketing support
provided by the dealer. From time to time, the Advisor or a Sub-Advisor, at its
expense, may provide additional compensation to dealers that sell or arrange for
the sale of shares of a Fund. Such compensation provided by the Advisor or
Sub-Advisor may include financial assistance to dealers that enable the Advisor
or Sub-Advisor to participate in and/or present at conferences or seminars,
sales or training programs for invited registered representatives and other
employees, client and investor events and other dealer-sponsored events. Other
compensation may be offered to the extent not prohibited by state laws or any
self-regulatory agency, such as the FINRA. The Advisor or Sub-Advisor make
payments for events they deem appropriate, subject to applicable law. These
payments may vary depending upon the nature of the event.
The table
below states the amounts paid by each Fund’s Class A and Class C shares under
the distribution plan for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Fund |
Class A Shares |
Class C Shares |
Insider
Buying Fund |
$23,068 |
$20,224 |
Energy
Infrastructure Fund |
$72,580 |
$283,622 |
Global
Equity Fund |
$24,378 |
$75,784 |
Tactical
Allocation Fund |
$13,935 |
$131,215 |
Dynamic
Alpha Fund |
$144,688 |
$222,819 |
The table
below states the principal types of activities for which each Fund made payments
under the distribution plan for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
Fund |
Advertising
|
Printing
& Mailing of Prospectuses |
Compensation to Underwriters |
Compensation to
Broker Dealers |
Compensation to
Sales Personnel |
Interest, Carrying or
other Financial Charges |
Other
- Marketing |
Other- Accrued
and Unpaid Expenses |
Insider
Buying Fund
Class
A |
— |
— |
— |
$17,315 |
— |
— |
$5,120 |
$633 |
Class
C |
— |
— |
— |
$20,271 |
— |
— |
|
$(47) |
Energy
Infrastructure Fund
Class
A |
|
|
|
$64,639 |
— |
— |
$5,881 |
$2,060 |
Class
C |
|
|
|
$273,798 |
— |
— |
|
$9,824 |
Global
Equity Fund
Class
A |
— |
— |
— |
$19,092 |
— |
— |
$5,568 |
$(282) |
Class
C |
— |
— |
— |
$74,762 |
— |
— |
|
$1,022 |
Tactical
Allocation Fund
Class
A |
— |
— |
— |
$12,185 |
— |
— |
$1,248 |
$502 |
Class
C |
— |
— |
— |
$132,482 |
— |
— |
|
$(1,267) |
Dynamic
Alpha Fund
Class
A |
— |
— |
— |
$120,718 |
— |
— |
$30,915 |
$(6,945) |
Class
C |
— |
— |
— |
$221,503 |
— |
— |
|
$1,316 |
Distribution Agent. Alt Fund
Distributors LLC (“Distribution Agent”), located at 140 East 45th
Street, Suite 15B, New York, NY 10017, an affiliate of the Advisor, provides
marketing and other services intended to result in the sale of Fund shares
pursuant to the Wholesale and Distribution Agent Agreement between the Trust,
Advisor, Distributor and Distribution Agent. For such services, Distribution
Agent is entitled to receive 0.005% on the sale of Fund shares from the Advisor,
a portion of which may be offset by dealer reallowances, and 12b-1 fees. For the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, the Distribution Agent received the amounts set
forth below:
Fund |
Net Underwriting Discounts
and Commissions |
Insider
Buying Fund |
$2,388 |
Energy
Infrastructure Fund |
$20,888 |
Global
Equity Fund |
$1,718 |
Tactical
Allocation Fund |
$1,424 |
Dynamic
Alpha Fund |
$10,347 |
ADDITIONAL
COMPENSATION TO FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES
The Funds
may directly enter into agreements with “financial intermediaries” pursuant to
which a Fund will pay the financial intermediary for services such as networking
or sub-transfer agency, including the maintenance of “street name” or omnibus
accounts and related sub-accounting, record-keeping and administrative services
provided to such accounts. Payments made pursuant to such agreements are
generally based on either: (1) a percentage of the average daily net assets of
clients serviced by such financial intermediary, or (2) the number of accounts
serviced by such financial intermediary. Any payments made pursuant to such
agreements are in addition to, rather than in lieu of, Rule 12b-1 or shareholder
service fees the financial intermediary may also be receiving. From time to
time, the Advisor or its affiliates may pay a portion of the fees for networking
or sub-transfer agency at its or their own expense and out of its or their
legitimate profits. These payments may be material to financial intermediaries
relative to other compensation paid by the Funds and/or the Underwriter, the
Advisor and their affiliates. The payments described above may differ and may
vary from amounts paid to the Fund’s transfer agent or other service providers
for providing similar services to other accounts. The financial intermediaries
are not audited by the Funds, the Advisor or their service providers to
determine whether such intermediaries are providing the services for which they
are receiving such payments.
The Advisor
or affiliates of the Advisor may also, at their own expense and out of their own
legitimate profits, provide additional cash payments to financial intermediaries
who sell shares of the Fund. These additional cash payments are payments over
and above sales commissions or reallowances, distribution fees or servicing fees
(including networking, administration and sub-transfer agency fees) payable to a
financial intermediary which are disclosed elsewhere in the prospectus or this
SAI. These additional cash payments are generally made to financial
intermediaries that provide sub- accounting, sub-transfer agency, shareholder or
administrative services or marketing support. Marketing support may include: (i)
access to sales meetings or conferences, sales representatives and financial
intermediary management representatives; (ii) inclusion of the Funds on a sales
list, including a preferred or select sales list, or other sales programs to
which financial intermediaries provide more marketing support than to other
sales programs on which the Advisor or its affiliates may not need to make
additional cash payments to be included; (iii) promotion of the sale of the
Funds’ shares in communications with a financial intermediary’s customers, sales
representatives or management representatives; and/or (iv) other specified
services intended to assist in the distribution and marketing of the Funds’
shares. These additional cash payments also may be made as an expense
reimbursement in cases where the financial intermediary provides shareholder
services to Fund shareholders. The Advisor and its affiliates may also pay cash
compensation in the form of finders’ fees or referral fees that vary depending
on the dollar amount of shares sold.
The amount
and value of additional cash payments vary for each financial intermediary. The
availability of these additional cash payments, the varying fee structure within
a particular additional cash payment arrangement and the basis for and manner in
which a financial intermediary compensates its sales representatives may create
a financial incentive for a particular financial intermediary and its sales
representatives to recommend the Funds’ shares over the shares of other mutual
funds based, at least in part, on the level of compensation paid. A financial
intermediary and its sales representatives may have similar financial incentives
to recommend a particular class of the Fund’s shares over other classes of the
Funds’ shares. You should consult with your financial advisor and review
carefully any disclosure by the financial firm as to compensation received by
your financial advisor.
Although the
Funds may use financial firms that sell its shares to effect portfolio
transactions for the Funds, the Funds and the Advisor will not consider the sale
of Fund shares as a factor when choosing financial firms to effect those
transactions.
SECURITIES
LENDING TRANSACTIONS
The dollar
amounts of income and fees and compensation paid to all service providers in
connection with the Funds’ securities lending activities during the most recent
fiscal year were as follows:
|
Insider
Buying Fund |
Dynamic
Alpha Fund |
Gross
income from securities lending activities (including income from cash
collateral reinvestment) |
$227,354 |
$861,302 |
Fees
and/or compensation for securities lending activities and related
services |
|
|
Fees
paid to securities lending agent from a revenue split |
$(1,564) |
$(8,229) |
Fees
paid for any cash collateral management service (including fees deducted
from a pooled cash collateral reinvestment vehicle) that are not
included in the revenue split |
$(1,230) |
$(4,645) |
Administrative
fees not included in revenue split |
|
|
Indemnification
fees not included in revenue split |
|
|
Rebate
(paid to borrower) |
$(218,305) |
$(815,514) |
Other
fees not included in revenue split |
|
|
Aggregate
fees/compensation for securities lending activities |
$(221,099) |
$(828,389) |
Net
income from securities lending activities |
$6,255 |
$32,913 |
The Energy
Infrastructure Fund, Global Equity Fund and Tactical Allocation Fund did not
engage in securities lending activities during the fiscal year ended June 30,
2024.
PROXY
VOTING POLICY
The Board
has delegated responsibilities for decisions regarding proxy voting for
securities held by the Funds to the Advisor or sub-advisor, as
follows:
Fund |
Responsible Party |
Insider
Buying Fund |
Catalyst
|
Energy
Infrastructure Fund |
SL
Advisors |
Global
Equity Fund |
MAP |
Tactical
Allocation Fund |
Lyons |
Dynamic
Alpha Fund |
CP |
The proxy
voting delegates may further delegate such proxy voting to a Sub-Advisor or a
third-party proxy voting service provider. The proxy voting delegates will vote
such proxies in accordance with their proxy policies and procedures. In some
instances, the proxy voting delegates may be asked to cast a proxy vote that
presents a conflict between its interests and the interests of a Fund’s
shareholders. In such a
case, the
Trust’s policy requires that the proxy voting delegate abstain from making a
voting decision and to forward all necessary proxy voting materials to the Trust
to enable the Board to make a voting decision. When the Board is required to
make a proxy voting decision, only the Trustees without a conflict of interest
with regard to the security in question or the matter to be voted upon shall be
permitted to participate in the decision of how the Fund’s vote will be cast.
Each proxy voting delegate has developed a detailed proxy voting policy that has
been approved by the Board. A copy of the proxy voting policies are attached
hereto as Appendix B through Appendix G.
Information
on how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities is available
without charge, upon request, by calling 1-866-447-4228 or on the SEC’s internet
site at www.sec.gov. In addition, a copy of the Funds’ proxy voting policies and
procedures is also available by calling 1-866-447-4228 and will be sent within
three business days of receipt of a request.
PORTFOLIO
TURNOVER
Turnover
rates are primarily a function of the Funds’ response to market conditions. The
portfolio turnover rate of the Funds for the last three fiscal years ended June
30 were as follows:
Fund |
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2022 |
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2023 |
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2024 |
Insider
Buying Fund |
66% |
214% |
183% |
Energy
Infrastructure Fund |
25% |
18% |
22% |
Global
Equity Fund |
10% |
27% |
22% |
Tactical
Allocation Fund |
54% |
94% |
17% |
Dynamic
Alpha Fund |
85% |
79% |
63% |
The decrease
in the Tactical Allocation Fund’s portfolio turnover rate from 94% in the 2023
fiscal year to 17% in the 2024 fiscal year was the result of the Fund’s tactical
investment strategy.
PORTFOLIO
TRANSACTIONS
Purchases
and sales of securities on a securities exchange are effected by brokers, and
the Funds pay a brokerage commission for this service. In transactions on stock
exchanges, these commissions are negotiated. In the over-the-counter market,
securities (e.g., debt securities) are normally traded on a “net” basis with
dealers acting as principal for their own accounts without a stated commission,
although the price of the securities usually includes a profit to the dealer. In
underwritten offerings, securities are purchased at a fixed price, which
includes an amount of compensation to the underwriter, generally referred to as
the underwriter’s concession or discount.
The primary
consideration in placing portfolio security transactions with broker-dealers for
execution is to obtain and maintain the availability of execution at the most
favorable prices and in the most effective manner possible. The Advisor and
Sub-Advisors attempt to achieve this result by selecting broker-dealers to
execute portfolio transactions on behalf of each Fund on the basis of the
broker-dealers’ professional capability, the value and quality of their
brokerage services and the level of their brokerage commissions.
Although
commissions paid on every transaction will, in the judgment of the Advisor or
Sub-Advisors, be reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage services
provided, under each Advisory Agreement and as permitted by Section 28(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Advisor or Sub-Advisor may cause a Fund to
pay a commission to broker-dealers who provide brokerage and research services
to the Advisor or Sub-Advisor for effecting a securities transaction for a Fund.
Such commission may exceed the amount other broker-dealers would have charged
for the transaction, if the Advisor or Sub-
Advisor
determines in good faith that the greater commission is reasonable relative to
the value of the brokerage and the research and investment information services
provided by the executing broker-dealer viewed in terms of either a particular
transaction or the Advisor’s or Sub-Advisor’s overall responsibilities to the
Funds and to their other clients. Such research and investment information
services may include advice as to the value of securities, the advisability of
investing in, purchasing or selling securities, the availability of securities
or of purchasers or sellers of securities, furnishing analyses and reports
concerning issuers, industries, securities, economic factors and trends,
portfolio strategy and the performance of accounts, and effecting securities
transactions and performing functions incidental thereto such as clearance and
settlement.
Research
provided by brokers may be used for the benefit of all of the clients of the
Advisor or Sub-Advisor and not solely or necessarily for the benefit of the
Funds. The Advisor’s or Sub-Advisor’s investment management personnel attempt to
evaluate the quality of research provided by brokers. Results of this effort may
be used by the Advisor or Sub-Advisor as a consideration in the selection of
brokers to execute portfolio transactions.
The
investment advisory fees that the Funds pay to the Advisor or Sub-Advisor will
not be reduced as a consequence of the Advisor’s or Sub-Advisor’s receipt of
brokerage and research services. To the extent a Fund’s portfolio transactions
are used to obtain such services, the brokerage commissions paid by the Fund
will exceed those that might otherwise be paid, by an amount, which cannot be
presently determined. Such services would be useful and of value to the Advisor
or Sub-Advisor in serving both the Funds and other clients and, conversely, such
services obtained by the placement of brokerage business of other clients would
be useful to the Advisor or Sub-Advisor in carrying out its obligations to the
Funds.
Certain
investments may be appropriate for the Funds and also for other clients advised
by the Advisor or Sub-Advisor. Investment decisions for the Funds and other
clients are made with a view to achieving their respective investment objectives
and after consideration of such factors as their current holdings, availability
of cash for investment and the size of their investments generally.
Occasionally, a particular security may be bought or sold for one or more
clients in different amounts. In such event, and to the extent permitted by
applicable law and regulations, such transactions with respect to the Advisor or
Sub-Advisor, will be allocated among the clients in a manner believed to be
equitable to each. Ordinarily, such allocation will be made on the basis of the
weighted average price of such transactions effected during a trading
day.
Each Fund
has no obligation to deal with any broker or dealer in the execution of its
transactions. However, each Fund may place a significant portion of its
transactions, both in stocks and options, with affiliates of the Advisor or
Sub-Advisor. As the level of option writing or stock trading increases, the
level of commissions paid by each Fund to the affiliates increases. Such
transactions will be executed at competitive commission rates through the
affiliated broker’s clearing broker. Because the affiliates receive compensation
based on the amount of transactions completed, there could be an incentive on
the part of the Advisor or Sub-Advisor to effect as many transactions as
possible, thereby maximizing the commissions and premiums it receives. In
connection with the execution of transactions, subject to its policy of best
execution, a Fund may pay higher brokerage commissions to the affiliate than it
might pay to unaffiliated broker-dealers.
In order for
the affiliated broker to effect any portfolio transactions for the Funds on an
exchange, the commissions, fees or other remuneration received by the affiliated
broker must be reasonable and fair compared to the commissions, fees or other
remuneration paid to other brokers in connection with comparable transactions
involving similar securities being purchased or sold on an exchange during a
comparable period of time. This standard would allow the affiliated broker to
receive no more than the remuneration that would be expected to be received by
an unaffiliated broker in a commensurate arms-length transaction.
Under the
1940 Act, persons affiliated with the Advisor, the Sub-Advisor, the Distributor
or an affiliate of the Advisor, Sub-Advisors or Distributor, may be prohibited
from dealing with the Funds as a principal in the purchase and sale of
securities.
The Advisory
Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement provides that affiliates of the
Advisor or the Sub-Advisors, as applicable, may receive brokerage commissions in
connection with effecting such transactions for the Funds. In determining the
commissions to be paid to an affiliated broker, it is the policy of the Trust
that such commissions will, in the judgment of the Board, be (a) at least as
favorable to a Fund as those which would be charged by other qualified brokers
having comparable execution capability and (b) at least as favorable to a Fund
as commissions contemporaneously charged by the affiliated broker on comparable
transactions for its most favored unaffiliated customers, except for customers
of the affiliated broker considered by a majority of the Independent Trustees
not to be comparable to the Fund. The Independent Trustees from time to time
review, among other things, information relating to the commissions charged by
an affiliated broker to a Fund and its other customers, and rates and other
information concerning the commissions charged by other qualified
brokers.
The Advisory
Agreement, the Distribution Agreement, and the Sub-Advisory Agreements do not
provide for a reduction of the Distributor’s, Advisor’s, or Sub-Advisor’s fee by
the amount of any profits earned by an affiliated broker from brokerage
commissions generated from portfolio transactions of the Funds. While other
brokerage business may be given from time to time to other firms, the affiliated
brokers will not receive reciprocal brokerage business as a result of the
brokerage business placed by the Funds with others.
A Fund will
not acquire portfolio securities issued by, or enter into repurchase agreements
or reverse repurchase agreements with, the Advisor, a Sub-Advisor, the
Distributor or their affiliates.
The Funds
paid the following amounts in commissions on the purchase and sale of securities
for the last three fiscal years ended June 30. No commissions were paid to the
Distributor or any affiliate of the Advisor, a Sub-Advisor, or the
Distributor.
Fund |
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2022 |
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2023 |
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 2024 |
Insider
Buying Fund |
$66,358 |
$66,358 |
$28,357 |
Energy
Infrastructure Fund |
$68,465 |
$68,465 |
$72,237 |
Global
Equity Fund |
$10,858 |
$10,858 |
$16,552 |
Tactical
Allocation Fund |
$6,629 |
$6,629 |
$1,684 |
Dynamic
Alpha Fund |
$27,750 |
$27,750 |
$14,090 |
Purchase
and Redemption of Shares
Fund shares
may be purchased from investment dealers who have sales agreements with a Fund’s
Distributor or from the Distributor directly. As described in the Prospectus,
the Funds provide you with alternative ways of purchasing Fund shares based upon
your individual investment needs and preferences by offering Class A shares as
described below.
Class A
Shares
You may
purchase Class A shares at a public offering price equal to the applicable net
asset value per share plus an up-front sales charge imposed at the time of
purchase as set forth in the Prospectus. Set forth below is an example of the
method of computing the offering price of the Class A shares of the
Funds.
Shares may
be purchased at the public offering price through any securities dealer having a
sales agreement with the Distributor. Shares may also be purchased through banks
and certain other financial institutions that have agency agreements with the
Distributor. These financial institutions will receive transaction fees that are
the same as the commissions to dealers and may charge their customers service
fees relating to investments in a Fund. Purchase requests should be addressed to
the dealer or agent from which
this
Prospectus was received which has a sales agreement with the Distributor. Such
dealer or agent may place a telephone order with the Distributor for the
purchase of Fund shares. It is a dealer’s or broker’s responsibility to promptly
forward payment and registration instructions (or completed applications) to the
Transfer Agent for shares being purchased in order for investors to receive the
next determined net asset value (or public offering price). Reference should be
made to the wire order to ensure proper settlement of the trade. Payment for
redemptions of shares purchased by telephone should be processed within three
business days. Payment must be received within seven days of the order or the
trade may be canceled, and the dealer or broker placing the trade will be liable
for any losses.
18f-1
Election
The Trust
has elected to be governed by Rule 18f-1 under the 1940 Act pursuant to which
the Trust is obligated during any 90 day period to redeem shares for any one
shareholder of record solely in cash up to the lesser of $250,000 or 1% of the
NAV of a Fund at the beginning of such period. The Trust has made this election
to permit certain funds of the Trust to deliver, in lieu of cash, readily
marketable securities from its portfolio should a redemption exceed such
limitations. The securities delivered will be selected at the sole discretion of
such Fund, will not necessarily be representative of the entire portfolio and
may be securities, which a Fund would otherwise sell. The redeeming shareholder
will usually incur brokerage costs in converting the securities to cash. The
method of valuing securities used to make the redemptions in kind will be the
same as the method of valuing portfolio securities and such valuation will be
made as of the same time the redemption price is determined. However, the Board
has determined that, until otherwise approved by the Board, all redemptions in
the Funds be made in cash only. If the Board determines to allow the Funds to
redeem in kind in the future, the Funds will provide shareholders with notice of
such change to the redemption policy.
Reduction
of Up-Front Sales Charge on Class A Shares
Letters
of Intent
An investor
may qualify for a reduced sales charge on Class A shares immediately by
stating his or her intention to invest in Class A shares of one or more of
the Funds, during a 13-month period, an amount that would qualify for a reduced
sales charge shown in the Funds’ Prospectus under “How to Buy Shares —
Class A Shares” and by signing a non-binding Letter of Intent, which may be
signed at any time within 90 days after the first investment to be included
under the Letter of Intent. After signing the Letter of Intent, each investment
in Class A shares made by an investor will be entitled to the sales charge
applicable to the total investment indicated in the Letter of Intent. If an
investor does not complete the purchases under the Letter of Intent within the
13-month period, the sales charge will be adjusted upward, corresponding to the
amount actually purchased. When an investor signs a Letter of Intent, Class A
shares of a Fund with a value of up to 5% of the amount specified in the Letter
of Intent will be restricted. If the total purchases of Class A shares made by
an investor under the Letter of Intent, less redemptions, prior to the
expiration of the 13-month period equals or exceeds the amount specified in the
Letter of Intent, the restriction on the shares will be removed. In addition, if
the total purchases of Class A shares exceed the amount specified and qualify
for a further quantity discount, the Distributor will make a retroactive price
adjustment and will apply the adjustment to purchase additional Class A shares
at the then current applicable offering price. If an investor does not complete
purchases under a Letter of Intent, the sales charge is adjusted upward, and, if
after written notice to the investor, he or she does not pay the increased sales
charge, sufficient Class A restricted shares will be redeemed at the
current NAV to pay such charge.
Rights of
Accumulation
A right of
accumulation (“ROA”) permits an investor to aggregate shares (of any class)
owned by the investor, his spouse, children and grandchildren under 21
(cumulatively, the “Investor”) in some or all of the Funds to reach a breakpoint
discount. This includes accounts held with other financial institutions and
accounts established for a single trust estate or single fiduciary account,
including a qualified retirement plan such as an IRA, 401(k) or 403(b) plan
(some restrictions may apply). The value of shares eligible for
a cumulative
quantity discount equals the cumulative cost of the shares purchased (not
including reinvested dividends) or the current account market value; whichever
is greater. The current market value of the shares is determined by multiplying
the number of shares by the previous day’s NAV.
For example,
if an investor owned Class C shares of the Global Equity Fund worth $40,000 at
the current NAV and purchased an additional $10,000 of Class A shares of the
Dynamic Alpha Fund, the sales charge for the $10,000 purchase would be at the
rate applicable to a single $50,000 purchase.
To qualify
for a ROA on a purchase of Class A shares through a broker-dealer, when each
purchase is made, the individual investor or the broker-dealer must provide the
respective Fund with sufficient information to verify that the purchase
qualifies for the discount.
Investments
of $1 Million or More
For each
Fund, with respect to Class A shares, if you invest $1 million or more, either
as a lump sum or through our rights of accumulation quantity discount or letter
of intent programs, you can buy Class A shares without an initial sales charge.
However, you may be subject to a 1% CDSC on shares redeemed within two years of
purchase (excluding shares purchased with reinvested dividends and/or
distributions).
Waivers
of Up-Front Sales Charge on Class A Shares
The
Prospectus describes the classes of persons that may purchase shares without an
up-front sales charge. The elimination of the up-front sales charge for
redemptions by certain classes of persons is provided because of anticipated
economies of scale and sales related efforts.
To qualify
for a waiver of the up-front sales charge on a purchase of Class A shares
through a broker-dealer, when each purchase is made, the individual investor or
the broker-dealer must provide the respective Fund with sufficient information
to verify that the purchase qualifies for the discount.
The Funds
make available, free of charge, more information about sales charge reductions
and waivers through the prospectus.
Exchange
Privilege
As described
in the Funds’ Prospectus under “How To Redeem Shares—Exchange Privilege,” each
Fund offers an exchange privilege pursuant to which a shareholder in a Fund may
exchange some or all of his shares in any of the funds in the Trust, in the same
class shares at NAV, provided the account registration information of the other
Fund is the same. The exchange privilege may be changed or discontinued upon 60
days’ written notice to shareholders and is available only to shareholders where
such exchanges may be legally made. A shareholder considering an exchange should
obtain and read the prospectus of the fund and consider the differences between
it and the Fund whose shares he owns before making an exchange. For further
information on how to exercise the exchange privilege, contact the Transfer
Agent.
SALES
CHARGE WAIVERS AND REDUCTIONS AVAILABLE THROUGH
CERTAIN
FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES
The
availability of certain sales charge waivers and discounts may depend on whether
you purchase your shares directly from the Fund or through a financial
intermediary. Intermediaries may impose different sales charges and may have
different policies and procedures regarding the availability of sales load and
waivers or reductions. Such intermediary-specific sales charge variations are
described in Appendix A to the Prospectus, titled “Intermediary-Specific Sales
Charge Reductions and Waivers.” Appendix A is incorporated by reference into (or
legally considered part of) the Prospectus.
In all
instances, it is the shareholder’s responsibility to notify the Fund or the
shareholder’s financial intermediary at the time of purchase of any relationship
or other facts qualifying the shareholder for sales
charge
reductions or waivers. For reductions and waivers not available through a
particular intermediary, shareholders will have to purchase Fund shares directly
from the Fund or through another intermediary to receive these reductions or
waivers.
NET ASSET
VALUE
For each
Fund, NAV per share is determined by dividing the total value of that Fund’s
assets, less any liabilities, by the number of shares of that Fund
outstanding.
The net
asset value per share of each Fund is determined by the Administrator as of the
close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (normally 4:00 p.m.,
Eastern Time) on each day when the New York Stock Exchange is open for trading.
The New York Stock Exchange is closed on the following holidays: New Year’s Day,
Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, Presidents’ Day, Good Friday, Memorial Day,
Juneteenth, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day, as
observed.
Assets for
which market quotations are available are valued, by independent pricing
services, as follows:
| ● |
Exchange-traded
domestic equity securities are generally valued at the last sales price on
a national securities exchange (except the Nasdaq Stock Market). Domestic
equity securities traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market are generally valued
at the Nasdaq Official Closing Price (NOCP) on the date of valuation.
Domestic equity securities that are not traded on an exchange are
generally valued at the last sales price. Exchange-traded foreign equity
securities are generally valued, in the appropriate currency, at the last
quoted sales price on the relevant exchange. Foreign equity securities
that are not exchange-traded are generally valued, in the appropriate
currency, at the last sales price. Rights and warrants are valued at the
last sales price on a national securities exchange.
|
| ● |
Debt
securities, including foreign debt securities, are valued by an approved
independent pricing service. Debt securities with remaining maturities of
60 days or less may be valued at amortized cost unless it is determined
that amortized cost does not represent fair value (e.g., securities
that are not expected to mature at par). Debt securities with remaining
maturities of 60 days or less that are not valued based on amortized cost
are valued based on prices provided by approved independent pricing
services. |
| ● |
Shares
of ETFs and closed-end registered investment companies are valued in the
same manner as other equity securities. Mutual funds are valued at their
net asset values. |
| ● |
Foreign
currencies are valued at the last quoted foreign exchange London close
quotation from an approved independent pricing service. The value of
assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S.
dollar are translated into their U.S. dollar equivalent values at such
last foreign exchange quotation. |
| ● |
Exchange-listed
swaps and total return swaps on exchange-listed securities are generally
valued at the last quoted sales price. Other swaps are valued by an
approved independent pricing service. If no valuation is available from an
approved independent pricing service, then at the price received from the
broker-dealer/counterparty that issued the swap.
|
| ● |
Exchange-traded
options are generally valued at the closing price or last sale price on
the primary exchange for that option as recorded by an approved
independent pricing service. Exchange-traded options that are part of a
straddle are valued at the mean price provided by an approved independent
pricing service. Over-the-counter index options and other derivative
contracts (other than swaps as set forth above) on securities, currencies
and other financial instruments are generally valued at mean prices
provided by an approved independent pricing service. In the absence of
such a value, such derivatives contracts are valued at the
marked-to-market price (or the evaluated price if a
|
|
|
marked-to-market
price is not available) provided by the broker-dealer with which the
option was traded (which may also be the
counterparty). |
| ● |
Futures
contracts are valued at their settlement price on the exchange on which
they are traded. If settlement price is not available, the contracts are
priced at the last trade price prior to the close. If the settlement price
or last trade price is not available, then at the mean of the quoted bid
and asked prices on such exchange. |
| ● |
Foreign
currency forward contracts are valued by an approved independent pricing
service at the current day’s interpolated foreign exchange rate, as
calculated using the current day’s spot rate and the prevailing forward
rates, and converted to U.S. dollars at the exchange rate of such
currencies against the U.S. dollar, as of the close of regular trading on
the London Stock Exchange (usually 11:00 a.m. Eastern
Time). |
When
approved by the Trustees, certain securities may be valued on the basis of
valuations provided by an independent pricing service when the Board believes
such prices reflect the fair value of such securities. Securities that are fair
valued by a Fund’s valuation designee are normally those, which have no
available recent market value, have few outstanding shares and therefore
infrequent trades, or for which there is a lack of consensus on the value, with
quoted prices covering a wide range. The lack of consensus would result from
relatively unusual circumstances such as no trading in the security for long
periods of time, or a company’s involvement in merger or acquisition activity,
with widely varying valuations placed on the company’s assets or stock. Prices
provided by an independent pricing service may be determined without exclusive
reliance on quoted prices and may take into account appropriate factors such as
institutional-size trading in similar groups of securities, yield, quality,
coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics and other market
data.
In the
absence of an ascertainable market value, assets are valued at their fair value
as determined by the Advisor using methods and procedures reviewed and approved
by the Trustees.
TAX
INFORMATION
Each Fund
intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, or “RIC,” under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Qualification generally
will relieve a Fund of liability for federal income taxes. If for any taxable
year the Fund does not qualify for the special tax treatment afforded regulated
investment companies, all of its taxable income will be subject to federal tax
at regular corporate rates (without any deduction for distributions to its
shareholders). In such event, dividend distributions would be taxable to
shareholders to the extent of the Fund’s earnings and profits, and would be
eligible for the dividends-received deduction for corporations.
Each Fund’s
net realized capital gains from securities transactions will be distributed only
after reducing such gains by the amount of any available capital loss
carryforwards. Capital losses may now be carried forward indefinitely and retain
the character of the original loss. Capital loss carryforwards are available to
offset future realized capital gains. To the extent that these carryforwards are
used to offset future capital gains it is probable that the amount offset will
not be distributed to shareholders.
At June 30,
2024, the Funds below had capital loss carry forwards for federal income tax
purposes available to offset future capital gains and utilized capital loss
carryforwards as follows:
|
Short-Term |
Long-Term |
Total |
CLCF
Utilized |
Insider
Buying Fund |
$46,321,777 |
$1,435,212 |
$47,756,989 |
$4,616,119 |
Energy
Infrastructure Fund |
$9,772,352 |
$16,011,709 |
$25,784,061 |
$11,245,502 |
Global
Equity Fund |
$
— |
$
— |
$
— |
$
— |
Tactical
Allocation Fund |
$624,187 |
$846,422 |
$1,470,609 |
$
— |
Dynamic
Alpha Fund |
$
— |
$
— |
$
— |
$287,660 |
Certain U.S.
shareholders, including individuals and estates and trusts, will be subject to
an additional 3.8% Medicare tax on all or a portion of their “net investment
income,” which should include dividends from the Fund and net gains from the
disposition of shares of the Fund. U.S. shareholders are urged to consult their
own tax advisors regarding the implications of the additional Medicare tax
resulting from an investment in the Funds.
INVESTMENTS
IN FOREIGN SECURITIES
The Funds
may be subject to foreign withholding taxes on income from certain foreign
securities. This, in turn, could reduce a Fund’s income dividends paid to you.
Pass-Through
of Foreign
Tax Credits. A Fund may be subject to certain taxes imposed by
the countries in which it invests or operates. If a Fund qualifies as a
regulated investment company and if more than 50% of the value of the Fund’s
total assets at the close of any taxable year consists of stocks or securities
of foreign corporations, that Fund may elect, for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, to treat any foreign taxes paid by the Fund that qualify as income or
similar taxes under U.S. income tax principles as having been paid by the Fund’s
shareholders. It is not likely that the Funds will be able to do so. For
any year for which a Fund makes such an election, each shareholder will be
required to include in its gross income an amount equal to its allocable share
of such taxes paid by the Fund and the shareholders will be entitled, subject to
certain limitations, to credit their portions of these amounts against their
U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, or to deduct their portions from
their U.S. taxable income, if any. No deduction for foreign taxes may be claimed
by individuals who do not itemize deductions. In any year in which it elects to
“pass through” foreign taxes to shareholders, the Fund will notify shareholders
within 60 days after the close of the Fund’s taxable year of the amount of such
taxes and the sources of its income. Furthermore, the amount of the foreign tax
credit that is available may be limited to the extent that dividends from a
foreign corporation qualify for the lower tax rate on “qualified dividend
income.”
Effect
of Foreign Debt Investments and Hedging on Distributions. Under the
Code, gains or losses attributable to fluctuations in exchange rates, which
occur between the time a Fund accrues receivables or liabilities denominated in
a foreign currency, and the time the Fund actually collects such receivables or
pays such liabilities, generally are treated as ordinary income or ordinary
loss. Similarly, on disposition of debt securities denominated in a foreign
currency and on disposition of certain options and futures contracts, gains or
losses attributable to fluctuations in the value of foreign currency between the
date of acquisition of the security or contract and the date of disposition also
are treated as ordinary gain or loss. These gains when distributed are taxable
to you as ordinary income, and any losses reduce a Fund’s ordinary income
otherwise available for distribution to you. This treatment could increase or
decrease a Fund’s ordinary income distributions to you, and may cause some or
all of the Fund’s previously distributed income to be classified as a return of
capital. A return of capital generally is not taxable to you, but reduces
the tax basis of your shares in a Fund. Any return of capital in excess of your
basis, however, is taxable as a capital gain.
PFIC
securities. Each Fund may invest in securities of foreign entities that
could be deemed for tax purposes to be passive foreign investment companies
(“PFICs”). In general, a foreign corporation is classified as a PFIC if at least
one-half of its assets constitute investment-type assets, or 75% or more of its
gross income is investment-type income. When investing in PFIC securities, each
Fund may elect to mark-to-market a PFIC and recognize any gains at the end of
its fiscal and excise (described above) tax years. Deductions for losses are
allowable only to the extent of any current or previously recognized gains.
These gains (reduced by allowable losses) are treated as ordinary income that a
Fund is required to distribute, even though it has not sold the securities. You
should also be aware that distributions from a PFIC are generally not eligible
for the reduced rate of tax on “qualified dividend income.” In the alternative,
a Fund may elect to treat the PFIC as a “qualified electing fund” (a “QEF
election”), in which case a Fund would be required to include its share of the
company’s income and net capital gains annually, regardless of whether it
receives distributions from the company. The QEF and mark-to-market elections
may require a Fund to sell securities it would have otherwise continued to hold
in order to make distributions to shareholders to avoid any Fund-level tax.
Income from investments in PFICs generally will not qualify for treatment as
qualified dividend income.
BACKUP
WITHHOLDING
The Funds
may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax at the fourth lowest tax
rate applicable to unmarried individuals (currently 24%) of all reportable
payments, including dividends, capital gain distributions and redemptions
payable to shareholders who fail to provide the Fund with their correct taxpayer
identification number or to make required certifications, or who have been
notified by the IRS that they are subject to backup withholding. Corporate
shareholders and certain other shareholders specified in the Code generally are
exempt from such backup withholding. Backup withholding is not an additional
tax. Any amounts withheld may be credited against the shareholder’s U.S. federal
income tax liability.
Other
Reporting and Withholding Requirements. Payments to a
shareholder that is either a foreign financial institution (“FFI”) or a
non-financial foreign entity (“NFFE”) within the meaning of the Foreign Account
Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”) may be subject to a generally nonrefundable 30%
withholding tax on: (a) income dividends paid by a Fund and (b) certain capital
gain distributions and the proceeds arising from the sale of Fund shares paid by
the Fund. FATCA withholding tax generally can be avoided: (a) by an FFI,
subject to any applicable intergovernmental agreement or other exemption, if it
enters into a valid agreement with the IRS to, among other requirements, report
required information about certain direct and indirect ownership
of foreign financial accounts held by U.S. persons with the FFI and
(b) by an NFFE, if it: (i) certifies that it has no substantial U.S. persons as
owners or (ii) if it does have such owners, reports information relating to
them. A Fund may disclose the information that it receives from its shareholders
to the IRS, non-U.S. taxing authorities or other parties as necessary to comply
with FATCA. Withholding also may be required if a foreign entity that
is a shareholder of a Fund fails to provide the Fund with appropriate
certifications or other documentation concerning its status under
FATCA.
FOREIGN
SHAREHOLDERS
The United
States imposes a withholding tax (at a 30% or lower treaty rate) on all Fund
dividends of ordinary income. Capital gain dividends paid by a Fund from its net
long-term capital gains and exempt-interest dividends are generally exempt from
this withholding tax.
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
The
financial statements of each Fund and the independent registered public
accounting firm’s report appearing in the Financial
Statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024 are incorporated herein
by reference. You can obtain the Financial Statements without charge by calling
the Funds at 1-866-447-4228.
Appendix
A—Description of Commercial Paper and Bond Ratings
Description
of Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), Short-Term Debt
Ratings
Prime-1.
Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-1 (“P-1”) have a
superior ability for repayment of senior short-term debt obligations. P-1
repayment ability will often be evidenced by many of the following
characteristics: leading market positions in well-established industries; high
rates of return on funds employed; conservative capitalization structure with
moderate reliance on debt and ample asset protection; broad margins in earnings
coverage of fixed financial charges and high internal cash generation;
well-established access to a range of financial markets and assured sources of
alternate liquidity.
Prime-2.
Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-2 (“P-2”) have a strong
ability for repayment of senior short-term debt obligations. This will normally
be evidenced by many of the characteristics cited above but to a lesser degree.
Earnings trends and coverage ratios, while sound, may be more subject to
variation. Capitalization characteristics, while still appropriate, may be more
affected by external conditions. Ample alternate liquidity is
maintained.
Description
of S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”), Commercial Paper
Ratings
A. Issues
assigned this highest rating are regarded as having the greatest capacity for
timely payment. Issues in this category are delineated with the numbers 1, 2,
and 3 to indicate the relative degree of safety. A-1. This designation indicates
that the degree of safety regarding timely payment is strong. Those issues
determined to possess extremely strong safety characteristics are denoted with a
plus (+) sign designation. A-2. Capacity for timely payment on issues with this
designation is satisfactory. However, the relative degree of safety is not as
high for issues designated A-1.
Description
of Moody’s Long-Term Debt Ratings
Aaa. Bonds
which are rated Aaa are judged to be of the best quality. They carry the
smallest degree of investment risk and are generally referred to as “gilt
edged.” Interest payments are protected by a large or by an exceptionally stable
margin, and principal is secure. While the various protective elements are
likely to change, such changes as can be visualized are most unlikely to impair
the fundamentally strong position of such issues; Aa. Bonds which are rated Aa
are judged to be of high quality by all standards. Together with the Aaa group
they comprise what are generally known as high-grade bonds. They are rated lower
than the best bonds, because margins of protection may not be as large as in Aaa
securities or fluctuation of protective elements may be of greater amplitude or
there may be other elements present which make the long-term risk appear
somewhat larger than the Aaa securities; A. Bonds which are rated A possess many
favorable investment attributes and are considered as upper-medium-grade
obligations. Factors giving security to principal and interest are considered
adequate, but elements may be present which suggest a susceptibility to
impairment some time in the future; Baa. Bonds which are rated Baa are
considered as medium-grade obligations (i.e., they are neither highly
protected nor poorly secured). Interest payments and principal security appear
adequate for the present, but certain protective elements may be lacking or may
be characteristically unreliable over any great length of time. Such bonds lack
outstanding investment characteristics and in fact have speculative
characteristics as well; Ba. Bonds which are rated Ba are judged to have
speculative elements; their future cannot be considered as well-assured. Often
the protection of interest and principal payments may be very moderate and
thereby not well safeguarded during both good and bad times over the future.
Uncertainty of position characterizes bonds in this class; B. Bonds which are
rated B generally lack characteristics of the desirable investment. Assurance of
interest and principal payments or of maintenance of other terms of the contract
over any long period of time may be small; Caa. Bonds which are rated Caa are of
poor standing. Such issues may be in default or there may be present elements of
danger with respect to principal or interest; Ca. Bonds which are rated Ca
represent obligations which are speculative in a high degree. Such issues are
often in default or have other marked shortcomings; C. Bonds which are rated C
are the lowest rated class of bonds, and issues so rated can be regarded as
having extremely poor prospects of ever attaining any real investment
standing.
Note:
Moody’s applies numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 in each generic rating
classification from Aa to B. The modifier 1 indicates that the company ranks in
the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a
mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates that the company ranks in the
lower end of its generic rating category.
Description
of S&P Corporate Debt Ratings
AAA. Debt
rated AAA has the highest rating assigned by S&P. Capacity to pay interest
and repay principal is extremely strong; AA. Debt Rated AA has a very strong
capacity to pay interest and repay principal and differs from the higher rated
issues only in small degree; A. Debt rated A has a strong capacity to pay
interest and repay principal although it is somewhat more susceptible to the
adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions
than debt in
higher rated categories; BBB. Debt rated BBB is regarded as having an adequate
capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Whereas it normally exhibits
adequate protection parameters, adverse economic conditions or changing
circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity to pay interest and
repay principal for debt in this category than in higher rated categories; BB,
B, CCC, CC, C. Debt Rated BB, B, CCC, CC, and C is regarded, on balance, as
predominantly speculative with respect to capacity to pay interest and repay
principal in accordance with the terms of the obligation. BB indicates the
lowest degree of speculation and C the highest degree of speculation. While such
debt will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these are
out-weighed by large uncertainties or major risk exposures to adverse
conditions; BB. Debt rated BB has less near-term vulnerability to default than
other speculative issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or
exposure of adverse business, financial, or economic conditions which could lead
to inadequate capacity to meet timely interest and principal payments. The BB
rating category is also used for debt subordinated to senior debt that is
assigned an actual or implied BBB- rating; B. Debt rated B has a greater
vulnerability to default but currently has the capacity to meet interest
payments and principal repayments. Adverse business, financial, or economic
conditions will likely impair capacity or willingness to pay interest and repay
principal. The B rating category is also used for debt subordinated to senior
debt that is assigned an actual or implied BB or BB- rating; CCC. Debt rated CCC
has a currently identifiable vulnerability to default and is dependent upon
favorable business, financial, and economic conditions to meet timely payment of
interest and repayment of principal. In the event of adverse business,
financial, or economic conditions, it is not likely to have the capacity to pay
interest and repay principal. The CCC rating category is also used for debt
subordinated to senior debt that is assigned an actual or implied B or B-
rating; CC. The rating CC is typically applied to debt subordinated to senior
debt that is assigned an actual or implied CCC rating; C. The rating C is
typically applied to debt subordinated to senior debt which is assigned an
actual or implied CCC- debt rating. The C rating may be used to cover a
situation where a bankruptcy petition has been filed, but debt service payments
are continued; CI. The rating CI is reserved for income bonds on which no
interest is being paid; D. Debt rated D is in payment default. The D rating
category is used when interest payments or principal payments are not made on
the date due even if the applicable grace period has not expired, unless S&P
believes that such payments will be made during such grace period. The D rating
also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition if debt service
payments are jeopardized.
Appendix
B
CATALYST
CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC
PROXY
VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Pursuant to
the recent adoption by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”)
of Rule 206(4)-6 (17 CFR 275.206(4)-6) and amendments to Rule 204-2 (17 CFR
275.204-2) under the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 (the “Act”), it is a
fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative act, practice or course of business,
within the meaning of Section 206(4) of the Act, for an investment advisor to
exercise voting authority with respect to client securities, unless (i) the
advisor has adopted and implemented written policies and procedures that are
reasonably designed to ensure that the advisor votes proxies in the best
interests of its clients, (ii) the advisor describes its proxy voting procedures
to its clients and provides copies on request, and (iii) the advisor discloses
to clients how they may obtain information on how the advisor voted their
proxies.
Day-to-day
administration of proxy voting may be provided internally or by a third-party
service provider, depending on client type, subject to the ultimate oversight of
the Advisor. The Advisor shall supervise the relationships with its proxy voting
services, ISS. ISS apprises the Advisor of shareholder meeting dates, and casts
the actual proxy votes. ISS also provides research on proxy proposals and voting
recommendations. ISS serves as the Advisor’s proxy voting record keepers and
generate reports on how proxies were voted. The Advisor periodically reviews
communications from ISS to determine whether ISS voted the correct amount of
proxies, whether the votes were cast in a timely manner, and whether the vote
was in accordance with the Policies or the Advisor’s specific
instructions.
In order to
fulfill its responsibilities under the Act, Catalyst Capital Advisors, LLC
(hereinafter “we” or “our”) has adopted the following policies and procedures
for proxy voting with regard to companies in investment portfolios of our
clients.
KEY OBJECTIVES
The key
objectives of these policies and procedures recognize that a company’s
management is entrusted with the day-to-day operations and longer term strategic
planning of the company, subject to the oversight of the company’s board of
directors. While “ordinary business matters” are primarily the responsibility of
management and should be approved solely by the corporation’s board of
directors, these objectives also recognize that the company’s shareholders must
have final say over how management and directors are performing, and how
shareholders’ rights and ownership interests are handled, especially when
matters could have substantial economic implications to the
shareholders.
Therefore,
we will pay particular attention to the following matters in exercising our
proxy voting responsibilities as a fiduciary for our clients:
Accountability.
Each company should have effective means in place to hold those entrusted with
running a company’s business accountable for their actions. Management of a
company should be accountable to its board of directors and the board should be
accountable to shareholders.
Alignment
of Management and Shareholder Interests. Each company should endeavor to
align the interests of management and the board of directors with the interests
of the company’s shareholders. For example, we generally believe that
compensation should be designed to reward management for doing a good job of
creating value for the shareholders of the company.
Transparency.
Promotion of timely disclosure of important information about a company’s
business operations and financial performance enables investors to evaluate the
performance of a company and to make informed decisions about the purchase and
sale of a company’s securities.
Climate
Change:
Say on Climate (SoC) Management
Proposals: Vote case-by-case on management proposals that request
shareholders to approve the company’s climate transition action plan, taking
into account the completeness and rigor of the plan. Information that will be
considered where available includes the following:
| ● |
The
extent to which the company’s climate related disclosures are in line with
TCFD recommendations and meet other market
standards; |
| ● |
Disclosure
of its operational and supply chain GHG emissions (Scopes 1, 2, and
3); |
| ● |
The
completeness and rigor of company’s short-, medium-, and long-term targets
for reducing operational and supply chain GHG emissions (Scopes 1, 2, and
3 if relevant); |
| ● |
Whether
the company has sought and received third-party approval that its targets
are science-based; |
| ● |
Whether
the company has made a commitment to be “net zero” for operational and
supply chain emissions (Scopes 1, 2, and 3) by
2050; |
| ● |
Whether
the company discloses a commitment to report on the implementation of its
plan in subsequent years; |
| ● |
Whether
the company’s climate data has received third-party
assurance; |
| ● |
Disclosure
of how the company’s lobbying activities and its capital expenditures
align with company strategy; |
| ● |
Whether
there are specific industry decarbonization challenges;
and |
| ● |
The
company’s related commitment, disclosure, and performance compared to its
industry peers. |
Say on Climate (SoC) Shareholder
Proposals: Vote case-by-case on shareholder proposals that request
the company to disclose a report providing its GHG emissions levels and
reduction targets and/or its upcoming/approved climate transition action plan
and provide shareholders the opportunity to express approval or disapproval of
its GHG emissions reduction plan. taking into account information such as the
following:
| ● |
The
completeness and rigor of the company’s climate-related
disclosure; |
| ● |
The
company’s actual GHG emissions performance; |
| ● |
Whether
the company has been the subject of recent, significant violations, fines,
litigation, or controversy related to its GHG emissions;
and |
| ● |
Whether
the proposal’s request is unduly burdensome (scope or timeframe) or overly
prescriptive. |
Climate Change/Greenhouse Gas (GHG)
Emissions: Generally vote for resolutions requesting that a company
disclose information on the financial, physical, or regulatory risks it faces
related to climate change on its operations and investments or on how the
company identifies, measures, and manages such risks, considering:
| ● |
Whether
the company already provides current, publicly-available information on
the impact that climate change may have on the company as well as
associated company policies and procedures to address related risks and/or
opportunities; ▪ |
| ● |
The
company’s level of disclosure compared to industry peers; and
▪ |
| ● |
Whether
there are significant controversies, fines, penalties, or litigation
associated with the company’s climate change-related
performance. |
Generally
vote for proposals requesting a report on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from
company operations and/or products and operations, unless:
| ● |
The
company already discloses current, publicly-available information on the
impacts that GHG emissions may have on the company as well as associated
company policies and procedures to address related risks and/or
opportunities; ▪ The company’s level of disclosure is comparable to that
of industry peers; and ▪ |
| ● |
There
are no significant, controversies, fines, penalties, or litigation
associated with the company’s GHG emissions. |
Vote
case-by-case on proposals that call for the adoption of GHG reduction goals from
products and operations, taking into account:
| ● |
Whether
the company provides disclosure of year-over-year GHG emissions
performance data; |
| ● |
Whether
company disclosure lags behind industry peers; |
| ● |
The
company’s actual GHG emissions performance |
| ● |
The
company’s current GHG emission policies, oversight mechanisms, and related
initiatives; and |
| ● |
Whether
the company has been the subject of recent, significant violations, fines,
litigation, or controversy related to GHG
emissions. |
Energy Efficiency: Generally vote
for proposals requesting that a company report on its energy efficiency
policies, unless:
| ● |
The
company complies with applicable energy efficiency regulations and laws,
and discloses its participation in energy efficiency policies and
programs, including disclosure of benchmark data, targets, and performance
measures; or |
| ● |
The
proponent requests adoption of specific energy efficiency goals within
specific timelines. |
Renewable Energy: Generally vote
for requests for reports on the feasibility of developing renewable energy
resources unless the report would be duplicative of existing disclosure or
irrelevant to the company’s line of business.
Generally
vote against proposals requesting that the company invest in renewable energy
resources. Such decisions are best left to management’s evaluation of the
feasibility and financial impact that such programs may have on the
company.
Generally
vote against proposals that call for the adoption of renewable energy goals,
taking into account:
| ● |
The
scope and structure of the proposal; |
| ● |
The
company’s current level of disclosure on renewable energy use and GHG
emissions; and |
| ● |
The
company’s disclosure of policies, practices, and oversight implemented to
manage GHG emissions and mitigate climate change
risks. |
DECISION METHODS
No set of
proxy voting guidelines can anticipate all situations that may arise. In special
cases, we may seek insight from our managers and analysts on how a particular
proxy proposal may impact the financial prospects of a company, and vote
accordingly.
We believe
that we invest in companies with strong management. Therefore we will tend to
vote proxies consistent with management’s recommendations. However, we will vote
contrary to management’s recommendations if we believe those recommendations are
not consistent with increasing shareholder value.
SUMMARY OF PROXY VOTING
GUIDELINES
Election
of the Board of Directors
We believe
that good corporate governance generally starts with a board composed primarily
of independent directors, unfettered by significant ties to management, all of
whose members are elected annually. We also believe that turnover in board
composition promotes independent board action, fresh approaches to governance,
and generally has a positive impact on shareholder value. We will generally vote
in favor of non-incumbent independent directors.
The election
of a company’s board of directors is one of the most fundamental rights held by
shareholders. Because a classified board structure prevents shareholders from
electing a full slate of directors annually, we will generally support efforts
to declassify boards or other measures that permit shareholders to remove a
majority of directors at any time, and will generally oppose efforts to adopt
classified board structures.
Approval
of Independent Auditors
We believe
that the relationship between a company and its auditors should be limited
primarily to the audit engagement, although it may include certain closely
related activities that do not raise an appearance of impaired
independence.
We will
evaluate on a case-by-case basis instances in which the audit firm has a
substantial non-audit relationship with a company to determine whether we
believe independence has been, or could be, compromised.
Equity-based
compensation plans
We believe
that appropriately designed equity-based compensation plans, approved by
shareholders, can be an effective way to align the interests of shareholders and
the interests of directors, management, and employees by providing incentives to
increase shareholder value. Conversely, we are opposed to plans that
substantially dilute ownership interests in the company, provide participants
with excessive awards, or have inherently objectionable structural
features.
We will
generally support measures intended to increase stock ownership by executives
and the use of employee stock purchase plans to increase company stock ownership
by employees. These may include:
1. Requiring
senior executives to hold stock in a company.
2. Requiring
stock acquired through option exercise to be held for a certain period of
time.
These are
guidelines, and we consider other factors, such as the nature of the industry
and size of the company, when assessing a plan’s impact on ownership
interests.
Corporate
Structure
We view the
exercise of shareholders’ rights, including the rights to act by written
consent, to call special meetings and to remove directors, to be fundamental to
good corporate governance.
Because
classes of common stock with unequal voting rights limit the rights of certain
shareholders, we generally believe that shareholders should have voting power
equal to their equity interest in the company and should be able to approve or
reject changes to a company’s by-laws by a simple majority vote.
We will
generally support the ability of shareholders to cumulate their votes for the
election of directors.
Appendix
C
Managed
Asset Portfolios, LLC
PROXY
VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
APPENDIX
II
PROXY
VOTING
Amended:
October 13, 2023
POLICY
Managed
Asset Portfolios, LLC (hereinafter “the Adviser” or “MAP”) acts as discretionary
investment adviser to high-net-worth individuals and institutional accounts
(“clients”). Our policy is to exercise voting authority with respect to clients’
securities only if a client has authorized us to exercise such discretion
pursuant to the client’s advisory contract or otherwise in writing. Clients may
instruct MAP that they will vote proxies for the securities in their account.
Unless otherwise requested by the client in writing, Adviser shall have the
authority to vote proxies on all securities held in client accounts.
Our policy
is to vote proxies in the best interests of clients. In pursuing this policy, we
vote in a manner that is intended to maximize the value of client’s assets. Our
investment strategies are predicated on the belief that the quality of
management is often the key to ultimate success or failure of a
business.
PHILOSOPHY
These
guidelines are intended to provide an overview of how we may vote on particular
corporate governance issues.
Our
high-level principle guidelines:
| 1. |
MAP
holds directors accountable - as our elected representatives, one of the
most impactful votes we can cast is to support or withhold our support for
those nominated to represent our clients. |
| 2. |
We do
not like to micromanage, but when directors are not representing our
clients not only will we vote against or withhold support, but we will
support shareholder proposals that we believe may lead to long-term value
creation. |
| 3. |
MAP
generally likes more transparency - except in extraordinary circumstances,
we believe access to more information, of higher quality, helps us make
better investment decisions. |
| 4. |
MAP
expects the companies we invest in to enact strong corporate controls and
to conduct business in an ethical manner. |
OUR APPROACH TO ENGAGEMENT AND PROXY
VOTING
In addition
to proxy voting, we view constructive engagement with boards and management
teams as an important part of our approach to investment stewardship. When
appropriate, we will directly engage with companies on corporate governance
matters to discuss specific concerns we may have. We believe companies need to
maintain good communications with shareholders through open dialogue during
conference calls, investor relations calls, and investor days.
INTERNATIONAL VOTING
MAP
considers corporate governance as part of our investment approach. MAP seeks to
vote all U.S. proxies. Proxies for companies outside the U.S. are also voted,
provided there is sufficient time and information available. We may not exercise
our voting authority if voting would impose costs on Managed Asset Portfolios,
including opportunity costs. We have therefore drafted our guidelines to be
globally applicable, but acknowledge there may be variations in practice among
local laws and regulations.
The
procedures and guidelines described below are intended to implement this proxy
voting policy.
PROCEDURES
Managed
Asset Portfolios has contracted Broadridge to implement these custom proxy
voting guidelines and to refer back to MAP on certain case-by-case agenda items,
as needed. It is the responsibility and obligation of MAP employees to monitor
and report any conflicts that have arisen between clients and the firm that
could affect the proxy voting process, including (a) significant client
relationships; (b) other potential material business relationships; and (c)
material personal and family relationships.
Our
Operations Team, utilizing alerts set up with Broadridge’s ProxyEdge product, is
responsible for monitoring corporate actions and ensuring that all proxies are
received and forwarded to the Portfolio Management Team. It is here that the
ProxyEdge product provides MAP with a platform that enables the firm to manage
voting mechanisms more efficiently and improve record retention. From there, the
Portfolio Management Team must hold a meeting to discuss the matter in a timely
manner and do any necessary research on the issue. The decision as to how to
vote is communicated to the Operations Team who then enter the vote into
ProxyEdge. In some circumstances, the Portfolio Management Team may become aware
that an issuer subject to a vote intends to file or has filed additional
soliciting materials setting forth the issuer’s views regarding the vote. These
materials may or may not reasonably be expected to affect the Portfolio
Management Team’s voting determination and they may become available after or
around the same time that the Portfolio Management Team’s votes have been cast
but before the submission deadline for proxies to be voted at the shareholder
meeting. In the event this occurs sufficiently in advance of the submission
deadline and such information would reasonably be expected to affect MAP’s vote,
the Portfolio Management Team would consider such information prior to
exercising voting authority. Managed Asset Portfolio is not responsible for
voting proxies it does not receive, but will make reasonable efforts to obtain
missing proxies.
As with all
votes, when we internally review an agenda, MAP considers the long-term
financial merits of the proposal and takes into account relevant environmental
or social impacts that may result from supporting the proposal. Consideration of
high governance standards and board controls in proxy voting does not alter our
long-standing, traditional and fundamental investment analysis, value philosophy
and strategies.
Proxy voting
decisions will be determined solely by the Portfolio Management Team. The
ProxyEdge service does not include any Broadridge recommendations as to the
manner in which MAP should vote or the factors that MAP should consider when
voting on any issue, candidate or ballot proposition. In instances where the
client(s) has directed MAP to hold a specific security(ies), but have elected
MAP to vote their proxies, the Portfolio Management Team will vote according to
the Proxy Voting Process described herein except in instances of case-by-case
issues where we will defer to management and vote according to their
recommendation. Issues not covered by these guidelines or any deviations from
these guidelines must be discussed with and reviewed by the Portfolio Management
Team. Any decision requires a unanimous vote, except for those where the client
has directed MAP to hold a specific security.
MAP may
determine not to vote a particular proxy if the costs and burdens exceed the
benefits of voting (e.g., when securities are subject to loan or to share
blocking restrictions).
PROXY VOTING PROCESS
The
following sections detail how MAP votes on the primary and most prevalent topics
presented to shareholders at annual and special meetings:
CORPORATE
Non-Audit
Fees – Vote against the ratification of auditors when a company’s non-audit
fees (i.e., consulting fees) are greater than 50 percent of total fees paid to
the auditor.
Auditor
Tenure – We do not factor in tenure in auditor ratification
proposals.
SHAREHOLDER EQUITY
Authorized
Capital Increase – Requests for additional capital are analyzed on a
case-by-case basis after considering the company’s use of authorized shares
during the last three years, disclosure in the proxy statement of the specific
purposes of the proposed increase, disclosure in the proxy statement of specific
and severe risks to shareholders of not approving the request, and the dilutive
impact of the request.
Blank
Check Preferred – MAP generally opposes authorization of “blank check”
preferred stock since it may be a possible entrenchment or anti-takeover device.
MAP may support blank check share issuances where the company has committed to
not use it for anti-takeover and has a legitimate need for the financing with
this being an advantageous method.
Equal
Voting Rights – Generally, shareholders should be entitled to votes in
proportion to their economic interests. Companies with multiple share classes
should regularly engage shareholders on the topic.
Increase
or Issuance of Preferred Stock – MAP generally supports proposals to
increase or issue preferred stock in cases where the company specifies the
voting, dividend, conversion, and other rights of such stock and where the terms
of the preferred stock appear reasonable.
Reverse
Stock Splits - Vote for management proposals to implement a reverse stock
split.
Share
Repurchase Programs - Vote for management proposals to institute open-market
share repurchase plans in which all shareholders may participate on equal terms,
or to grant the board authority to conduct open-market repurchases, in the
absence of company-specific concerns.
Vote
Case-By-Case on Shareholder Proposals and to Repurchase Shares Directly from
Specified Shareholders.
ENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL
Shareholder
proposals in the environmental and social categories tend to fall into two
categories: those requesting reports or additional disclosure, and those that
are more prescriptive such as requests for policies or the company to take
action beyond issuing a report. Generally speaking, MAP supports requests for
additional disclosure, and we evaluate requests for action beyond that on a
case-by-case basis. In both circumstances, MAP relies on its assessment of the
financial relevance of the matter.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Adjourn
Meeting - Generally support unless the agenda items are not aligned with
shareholders’ best long-term economic interests.
Amendment
to Charter/Articles/Bylaws - Shareholders should generally have the right to
vote on key governance concerns and amendments. When voting MAP considers the
stated rationale; the company’s governance profile and history; relevant
jurisdictional laws; and situational or contextual circumstances.
Exclusive
Forum Provisions - MAP generally supports exclusive forum for certain
shareholder litigation.
IPO
Governance - One vote for one share is our preferred structure for public
companies.
Other
Business - We oppose these proposals since we may not have an opportunity to
review and understand those measures and carry out an appropriate
review.
Poison
Pill Plans - Although MAP opposes most plans, we may support plans that
include:
| ● |
Shareholder
ratification of the pill and stipulate a sunset provision whereby the pill
expires unless it is renewed; |
| ● |
A
reasonable “qualifying offer clause”; |
| ● |
An
all-cash bid for all shares that includes a fairness opinion and evidence
of financing does not trigger the pill; |
| ● |
Where
it is protecting tax or economic benefits. |
For
shareholder proposals, MAP generally votes to rescind poison pills.
Proxy
Access - MAP believes that shareholders should be able to nominate directors
on the company’s proxy card. MAP generally supports proxy access proposals which
allow a shareholder (or group of up to 20 shareholders) holding three percent of
a company’s outstanding shares for at least three years the right to nominate
the greater of up to two directors or 20%
of the board.
Reincorporation
- MAP generally supports management and prefers to understand the strategic
rationale behind the proposal to reincorporate.
Greenmail
– MAP is supportive of management and shareholder proposals seeking adoption
of anti-green mail charters or bylaw amendments.
Simple
Majority Voting - MAP generally favors a simple majority requirement to pass
proposals. MAP supports the reduction or the elimination of supermajority
voting, although in situations where there is a substantial or dominant
shareholder, supermajority voting may be protective of minority
shareholders.
Virtual
Meetings - Shareholders should be able to participate in annual and special
meetings and virtual meetings may facilitate accessibility, inclusiveness, and
efficiency. We are concerned however if the technology is used to limit
shareholder participation.
COMPENSATION
Claw Back
Proposals - MAP generally favors recoupment from compensation based on
faulty financial reporting or deceptive business practices.
Management
Say-on-Pay – MAP generally supports management proposals seeking advisory
votes on executive compensation with closer scrutiny on pay magnitude and
performance alignment, internal pay disparity, performance-based equity, and
problematic change-in-control and/or severance provisions.
Equity-Based
Compensation Plans – MAP generally votes with management on certain
equity-based compensation plans depending on a combination of certain plan
features and equity grant practices.
Incentive
Bonus Plans - Generally vote for proposals to amend executive cash, stock,
or cash and stock incentive plans.
Frequency
of “Say on Pay” Advisory Resolutions - Generally support annual advisory
votes.
Golden
Parachutes - Golden parachutes may encourage management to consider
transactions that might be beneficial to shareholders. However, a large
potential pay-out presents risk of a sub-optimal sale price. When evaluating a
golden parachute plan, we consider whether the triggering event is in the
interest of shareholder.
Option
Exchanges - There may be instances where underwater options create an
overhang on a company’s capital structure and a repricing or option exchange may
be warranted.
Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plans - MAP may support shareholder proposals
requesting to put supplemental executive retirement plans (“SERP”) benefits to a
shareholder vote.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
MAP’s
starting position is one of support for the Board. However, we may at times
determine that the Board is not representing our clients’ interests, and in
those cases, we may withhold our support or vote against.
Board
Diversity – MAP is supportive of diverse boards. On this matter, as with
others, we believe in voicing our view via engagement with boards and management
teams in addition to our proxy vote. If we determine a company has failed to
make sufficient efforts or demonstrate progress towards a more diverse director
slate, we may escalate our
concerns and
vote against key directors, such as the chair of the nominating committee. MAP
may also consider supporting shareholder requests for increased reporting on
company efforts to diversify the board.
Board
Independence - The majority of the Board should be comprised of independent
Directors. In situations where this is not the case, MAP will vote against the
Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board.
Board
Size - MAP typically defers setting the size of the board to the board.
However, boards that are too small or too large may not function
efficiently.
Contests
for Control - Assessed on a case-by-case basis, MAP considers the
qualifications of the candidates on both slates, the validity of the concerns
identified by the dissident, the viability of the plans from the competing
slates, the likelihood that the dissident’s plan will produce the desired
impact, and whether the dissident represents the best option for enhancing
long-term shareholder value.
CEO and
Management Succession Planning - MAP supports transparency into the
executive succession planning process, including Board responsibility;
recognizing appropriate sensitivity, we tend to defer to the Nominating and
Governance Committee of the Board.
Classified
/ Staggered Board - MAP believes that directors should be elected annually
but may support staggered boards on a case-by-case basis.
Cumulative
Voting - MAP believes that a majority vote standard is in the best long-term
interests of shareholders but tend to defer to management.
Director
Participation – MAP believes directors must be actively engaged and in
attendance for at least 75% of board meetings throughout the year. If director
nominees fail to attend board meeting, MAP will vote against the
nominee.
Director
Compensation - Compensation for directors should be structured to attract,
retain and align directors’ interests with shareholders. It should be linked
with long - term value creation and directors should build share ownership over
time.
Director
Tenure - Tenure is not a factor in our classifying directors.
Independent
Chair and Separation of CEO/Chair Positions – MAP has a preference for
independent chairs or an independent lead director. We take into consideration
the following: The scope and rationale of the proposal;
| ● |
The
company’s current board leadership structure; |
| ● |
The
company’s governance structure and practices; |
| ● |
Company
performance; and |
| ● |
Any
other relevant factors that may be applicable. |
Key
Committee Independence - MAP tends to vote against or withhold votes from
non-independent director nominees if they serve on the audit, compensation, or
nominating
committee or
if the company lacks a key board committee so that the full board functions as
that committee.
Majority
Vote Requirements - MAP prefers directors to be elected by a majority of the
shares voted.
Over
Boarding - MAP evaluates the number of boards that a director is on, and
would contemplate voting against a director if they had too many roles with
other firms. We believe that they will not perform their duties to the best of
their ability if they are too stretched. This is evaluated on a case-by-case
basis.
Reimbursement
of Expenses for Successful Shareholder Campaigns - We generally support
shareholder proposals seeking the reimbursement of proxy contest expenses if the
contest is well merited in our view.
Risk
Oversight Failure - MAP may vote against directors due to failure to manage
environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks.
Responsiveness
to Shareholders - If MAP believes a board has not been responsive to
shareholders, we may vote against the responsible committee or individual
director, and if the circumstances merit, the entire board.
Shareholder
Rights - MAP expects a board to act with integrity and to uphold governance
best practices. Where we believe a board has not acted in the best interests of
its shareholders, we may vote against the responsible committee or individual
director, and if the circumstances merit, the entire board.
CORPORATE ACTIONS – MERGERS &
ACQUISITIONS
Vote
case-by-case considering the following features:
| ● |
The
premium relative to the unaffected share price; |
| ● |
A
clear strategic, operational, and / or financial rationale;
|
| ● |
Unanimous
board approval and arm’s-length negotiations; |
| ● |
The
fairness opinion of a reputable financial advisor assessing the value of
the transaction to shareholders in comparison to recent similar
transactions. |
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The Adviser
is sensitive to conflicts of interest that may arise in the proxy
decision-making process and has identified the following potential conflicts of
interest:
| ● |
A
principal of the Adviser or any person involved in the proxy
decision-making process who currently serves on the company’s
Board. |
| ● |
An
immediate family member of a principal of the Adviser or any person
involved in the proxy decision-making process who currently serves as a
director or executive officer of the company. |
| ● |
The
company is a client of the Adviser (or an affiliate of a client), provided
that any client relationship that represents less than 2.5% of the firm’s
revenues or less than $75,000 in annual revenues shall be presumed to be
immaterial. |
This list is
not intended to be exclusive. All employees of the Adviser are obligated to
disclose any potential conflict to the Chief Compliance Officer.
If a
material conflict is identified, proxies will be voted for that company in the
following manner:
| ● |
If our
Voting Guidelines indicate a vote “For” or “Against” a specific issue, MAP
will vote in accordance with such predetermined
guidelines. |
| ● |
If the
Guidelines do not cover an issue or indicate a “case-by-case” analysis,
MAP will either seek the consent of applicable clients or the written
recommendation of an independent third party. |
RECORDKEEPING
Members of
Compliance, the Operations Department and Investment Team are responsible for
maintaining records as indicated below:
Compliance
| ● |
Proxy
voting policies and procedures |
Operations
| ● |
Proxy
statements (provided, however, that the Adviser may rely on the Securities
and Exchange Commission’s (the “SEC”) EDGAR system if the company filed
its proxy statements via EDGAR or may rely on a third party as long as the
third party has provided the Adviser with an undertaking to provide a copy
of the proxy statement promptly upon request); |
| ● |
Records
of client requests for voting information |
Investment
Team
| ● |
Any
records prepared by the Adviser that were material to a proxy voting
decision or that memorialized a decision. |
DISCLOSURE
The Adviser
will describe these Policies and Procedures in Part 2A of its Form ADV and
indicate that these Policies and Procedures are available to clients upon
request. The Adviser will also advise clients in Part 2A of its Form ADV how a
client may obtain information on how the Adviser voted with respect to that
client’s securities. The Adviser will send the initial summary of these Policies
and Procedures and the other information described in this Section to existing
clients by separate notice.
CATALYST/MAP MUTUAL
FUNDS
Copies of
all proxies voted must be maintained by fund year in data order for each fund.
In addition, details of each vote cast for each fund must be maintained in
spreadsheet form and submitted to the Fund Compliance Department
annually.
INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS
For those
institutional clients that request it, copies of all proxies voted must be
maintained in date order. In addition, details of each vote cast for each
account must be maintained in spreadsheet form and submitted to the applicable
Compliance Officer at requested intervals.
Appendix
D
COOKSON,
PEIRCE & Co., Inc.
PROXY
VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Objective
Cookson,
Peirce & Co., Inc. (Advisor) recognizes that corporate governance and
shareholder proposals can directly affect shareholder values. The purpose of
this policy is to ensure that the Advisor proxies for shares held in their
mutual fund are voted in the best interest of the Advisor’s clients so as to
maximize portfolio values over time.
Delegation
The Chief
Investment Officer (CIO) has the responsibility for proxy voting and
administration.
The CIO may
delegate such responsibility to professional members of the investment staff who
are qualified to analyze proxy issues and exercise prudence when discretion is
required to vote proxies. The CIO or designees are responsible for insuring that
they understand thoroughly the issues that arise in how proxies are voted. When
appropriate, the CIO or the designee may consult with consultants or
advisors.
Control
The CIO or
the designee will vote proxies in a timely manner in accordance with this policy
unless it is in the best interest of the Advisor’s clients to vote otherwise.
The staff will maintain a record of votes on all proxy issues. If a proxy item
on a substantial issue is voted for which no standard exists in this policy, a
proxy exceptions report will be prepared and maintained in the proxy file. The
exceptions report will document the reasons behind the vote and date of each
corporate meeting at which the exception votes were cast. For the purposes of
this policy, an issue is considered “substantial” when an outcome of the
proposal could reasonably be expected or perceived to have a probable impact on
the longtime value of the Advisor’s clients’ holdings in the company. The
following items shall be maintained in a readily accessible record in the form
of the proxy-voting file:
1. A record
of all proxies voted during the preceding five years will be maintained in an
easily accessible place, to include two years of records retained in the
proxy-voting file onsite in the Advisor’s offices. The file will contain a copy
of how a proxy was voted.
2. Any
exceptions to the proxy policy will also be contained in this file.
3. A record
of any proxies received but not voted due to special circumstances, including
untimely receipt, re-registration, or blocking.
Use of
Independent Service(s)
Use of an
outside service(s) to administer and vote proxies in accordance with the
Advisor’s proxy voting policy is authorized. The contract with such an agency
will incorporate the Advisor’s proxy voting policy.
Specific
Voting Standards
The
following proxy issues are governed by a “For or Against” standard:
Corporate
Governance Issues
| ● |
Approve
classified board |
Against |
| ● |
Submit
Shareholder Rights Plan (Poison Pill) to Shareholder Vote |
For |
| ● |
Eliminate
or Limit Shareholders’ Right to Call a Special Meeting |
Against |
| ● |
Eliminate
of Limit Shareholders’ Right to Act By Written Consent |
Against |
| ● |
Adopt
or Increase Super Majority Vote Requirement |
Against |
| ● |
Allow
Board to Consider Non-financial Effect of Merger |
Against |
| ● |
Adopt
Fair Price Provision |
Against |
Board of
Directors Related Corporate Governance Issues
| ● |
Restore
or Provide for Cumulative Voting |
For |
| ● |
Require
Majority of Independent Directors on Board |
For |
| ● |
Adopt
Director Indemnification Provision |
For |
| ● |
Adopt
Director Liability Provision |
For |
| ● |
Vote
for Director(s) Missing 75% or More of Meetings |
Against |
Compensation
Issues
| ● |
Allow
for Repricing or Exchange of Underwater Options |
Against |
Routine
Corporate Administrative Issues
| ● |
Ratification
or Appointment of Auditors |
For |
Stock-related
Corporate Governance Issues
| ● |
Eliminate
Pre-emptive Rights |
For |
General
Voting Standards
Certain
proxy issues involve complex business matters that require subjective
decision-making. These proxy issues will be voted on a case-by-case basis using
the standards outlined below. Other proxy issues not mentioned in this policy
will be voted in the best interest of the Advisor’s clients.
Board of
Directors-related Corporate Governance Issues
| ● |
Election
of Directors and Compensation of Corporate Boards &
Committees |
The Advisor
will generally vote with management but will monitor the make up of corporate
boards of directors, as well as the relative numbers of inside and independent
directors serving on the audit, compensation, and nominating committees of such
boards. If it is perceived that it is in the shareholders’ best interest to seek
a greater number of independent directors on a board or its committees, the
Advisor will vote in a manner to encourage an increase in the number of
independent directors required on the board or committees.
| ● |
Increase
or Reduce Size of Board |
The Advisor
will generally vote for management proposals related to the size of boards given
a reasonable explanation for the change.
Compensation
Issues
| ● |
All
other compensation issues including stock options, stock purchase plans,
bonus plans |
The Advisor
generally supports compensation packages which represent long-term incentives,
are related to objective performance measures, and which reflect the
requirements and best practices of the current marketplace. The Advisor
generally supports integrated, competitive compensation packages, which are
governed by objective, performance-based standards for setting executive
compensation levels.
Restructurings
| ● |
Mergers,
Acquisitions, Restructurings, or Sale of Assets |
Proposals to
restructure, merge with, be acquired by, or sell significant assets, or acquire
significant assets of other companies submitted for shareholder approval will be
evaluated individually, using the assistance of the Advisor’s investment staff
to determine whether the transaction is in the best interest of the Advisor’s
clients.
The
Advisor’s proxies will be voted against proposals to reincorporate in a
different jurisdiction if a reincorporation would likely result in a significant
adverse effect on shareholder rights or values. The Advisor’s proxies may be
voted for proposals to reincorporate that would likely result in more effective
and less costly corporate governance without significantly affecting shareholder
rights or values.
Stock-related
Corporate Governance Issues
| ● |
Increase,
decrease, amend, authorize common or preferred
stock |
The Advisor
will support proposed changes in capital structure so long as the number of
shares that would be authorized to be issued is reasonable in relation to the
purposes for which the authorization is requested, a legitimate business purpose
exists, and the proposal is not opposed to the best interest of the Advisor’s
clients. As an example, it is often reasonable for a company to increase the
number of authorized shares to implement a stock split, pay a stock dividend,
raise new capital, effect a merger or acquisition, or make shares available for
stock option plans. The Advisor will specifically not support shareholder
proposals involving a) private issues of additional equity or equity type
securities that would be issued as an anti-takeover measure, b) a change of
control that is reasonably expected not to be in the best interest of the
Advisor’s clients, c) excessive dilution of common shares providing no clear
benefit to the company, d) any new issue or increase in previously issued blank
check preferred stock (preferred stock with rights to be determined by the board
at the time of issuance), or e) an increase in dual class shares.
| ● |
Approved
Common/Preferred Stock Issuance |
a)
Authorization of preferred stock
The Advisor
will support a new class of preferred stock only if the issuance has a specific
business purpose and only after evaluation of the rights and preferences of
holders of the new preferred stock including any limitations on payments to the
common shareholders. The Advisor proxies will not be voted in favor of issuing
blank check preferred stock.
b)
Authorization of common stock
The Advisor
will vote proxies in favor of issuing new classes of common stock when there is
a clearly specified rationale that promotes the interest of existing
shareholders or at least not opposed to such interests. Because the
creation of
new classes of common stock may affect dividend, conversion, or other rights of
existing shareholders, the proposal will be evaluated considering all relevant
facts and circumstances.
c) Share
repurchases
The Advisor
will generally support share repurchase plans so long as they have a rationale
that promotes long term interest of the shareholders.
d) Approve
or reverse stock split
The Advisor
will generally support stock split proposals so long as they have a rationale
that promotes the long-term interest of existing shareholders.