Virtus ETF Trust II
VIRTUS DUFF & PHELPS CLEAN
ENERGY ETF
VIRTUS NEWFLEET ABS/MBS ETF
VIRTUS NEWFLEET HIGH YIELD BOND
ETF
VIRTUS SEIX SENIOR LOAN ETF
VIRTUS TERRANOVA U.S. QUALITY MOMENTUM
ETF
SEMI-ANNUAL
REPORT
January
31, 2022
Table of Contents
|
Page (s) |
1 | |
2 | |
|
|
Schedules of Investments |
|
3 | |
4 | |
7 | |
11 | |
14 | |
16 | |
17 | |
18 | |
21 | |
26 | |
33 | |
39 |
1
Dear Shareholder:
On behalf of Virtus ETF Advisers LLC (the “Adviser”), I am pleased to present the shareholder report for the Virtus ETF Trust II (the “Trust”) for the semiannual fiscal period ended January 31, 2022.
The Adviser is part of Virtus Investment Partners, a distinctive partnership of boutique investment managers singularly committed to the long-term success of individual and institutional investors.
The report provides financial statements and portfolio information for the following funds within the Trust:
•Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN) – This fund commenced operations on August 3, 2021 and seeks capital appreciation by investing in equity securities of clean energy companies.
•Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS)
•Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF (BLHY)
•Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX)
•Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET)
On behalf of the Adviser and our fund Sub-Advisers, thank you for your investment. If you have questions, please contact your financial adviser, or call 1-888-383-0553. For more information about the funds, we invite you to visit our website, www.virtusetfs.com.
Sincerely,
William Smalley
President
Virtus ETF Trust II
This material must be accompanied or preceded by the prospectus.
2
We believe it is important for you to understand the impact of costs on your investment. All funds have operating expenses. As a shareholder of the Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF, Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF, Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF, Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF and Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (each, a “Fund”) you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, which include brokerage commissions that you pay when purchasing or selling shares of the Fund; and (2) ongoing costs, which include advisory fees and other fund expenses, if any. The following example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars and cents) of investing in a Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other funds. The examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held throughout the entire period (August 1, 2021 to January 31, 2022).
Actual expenses
The first line under each Fund in the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line for your Fund under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The second line under each Fund in the table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on each Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not each Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in each Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as brokerage commissions paid on purchases and sales of Fund shares. Therefore, the second line under each Fund in the table is useful in comparing ongoing Fund costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.
In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
|
|
Beginning |
|
Ending |
|
Annualized |
|
Expenses |
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
$1,000.00 |
|
$832.00 |
|
0.59% |
|
$2.68(4) |
Hypothetical(1) |
|
$1,000.00 |
|
$1,021.87 |
|
0.59% |
|
$3.01 |
|
||||||||
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
$1,000.00 |
|
$990.90 |
|
0.39% |
|
$1.96 |
Hypothetical(1) |
|
$1,000.00 |
|
$1,023.24 |
|
0.39% |
|
$1.99 |
|
||||||||
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
$1,000.00 |
|
$992.60 |
|
0.49% |
|
$2.46 |
Hypothetical(1) |
|
$1,000.00 |
|
$1,022.74 |
|
0.49% |
|
$2.50 |
|
||||||||
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
$1,000.00 |
|
$1,022.30 |
|
0.57% |
|
$2.91 |
Hypothetical(1) |
|
$1,000.00 |
|
$1,022.33 |
|
0.57% |
|
$2.91 |
|
||||||||
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
$1,000.00 |
|
$986.90 |
|
0.29% |
|
$1.45 |
Hypothetical(1) |
|
$1,000.00 |
|
$1,023.74 |
|
0.29% |
|
$1.48 |
(1)Assuming 5% return before expenses.
(2)Annualized expense ratios reflect expenses net of waived fees or reimbursed expenses, if applicable.
(3)Expenses are calculated using each Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value for the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the six-month period).
(4)Actual expenses are calculated using the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value for the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the period August 3, 2021 to January 31, 2022).
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
Security Description |
|
Shares |
|
Value |
|
COMMON STOCKS – 99.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Staples – 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
Darling Ingredients, Inc.* |
|
831 |
|
$52,993 |
|
Energy – 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
Enviva, Inc. |
|
417 |
|
29,182 |
|
Industrials – 25.4%† |
|
|
|
|
|
Aker Carbon Capture ASA (Norway)* |
|
25,581 |
|
56,244 |
|
Chart Industries, Inc.* |
|
375 |
|
45,701 |
|
Fluence Energy, Inc.* |
|
1,785 |
|
33,379 |
|
ITM Power PLC (United Kingdom)* |
|
10,959 |
|
39,854 |
|
Plug Power, Inc.* |
|
7,030 |
|
153,746 |
|
Prysmian SpA (Italy) |
|
2,700 |
|
90,180 |
|
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy SA (Spain)* |
|
2,985 |
|
64,035 |
|
Sunrun, Inc.* |
|
2,831 |
|
73,408 |
|
Vestas Wind Systems A/S (Denmark) |
|
6,721 |
|
179,568 |
|
Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Class H (China) |
|
9,000 |
|
15,583 |
|
Xylem, Inc. |
|
545 |
|
57,236 |
|
Total Industrials |
|
|
|
808,934 |
|
Information Technology – 18.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
Enphase Energy, Inc.* |
|
1,600 |
|
224,752 |
|
First Solar, Inc.* |
|
1,360 |
|
106,597 |
|
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.* |
|
636 |
|
151,508 |
|
Xinyi Solar Holdings Ltd. (China) |
|
76,000 |
|
120,866 |
|
Total Information Technology |
|
|
|
603,723 |
|
Materials – 2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
MP Materials Corp.* |
|
1,695 |
|
67,698 |
|
Utilities – 50.6%† |
|
|
|
|
|
AES Corp. (The) |
|
4,550 |
|
100,919 |
|
China Longyuan Power Group Corp. Ltd. |
|
23,000 |
|
46,430 |
|
Clearway Energy, Inc. Class C |
|
2,685 |
|
90,431 |
|
Dominion Energy, Inc. |
|
1,085 |
|
87,516 |
|
EDP - Energias de Portugal SA (Portugal) |
|
23,852 |
|
121,629 |
|
EDP Renovaveis SA (Spain) |
|
2,425 |
|
50,727 |
|
Encavis AG (Germany) |
|
3,426 |
|
53,384 |
|
Enel SpA (Italy) |
12,748 |
|
97,115 |
|
Security Description |
|
Shares |
|
Value |
|
COMMON STOCKS (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Utilities (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exelon Corp. |
|
1,520 |
|
$ 88,084 |
|
Iberdrola SA (Spain) |
|
13,449 |
|
153,509 |
|
Iberdrola SA - Interim shares (Spain)* |
|
224 |
|
2,557 |
|
NextEra Energy, Inc. |
|
731 |
|
57,106 |
|
Orsted AS (Denmark)(1) |
|
1,945 |
|
205,278 |
|
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. |
|
1,250 |
|
83,162 |
|
RWE AG (Germany) |
|
1,866 |
|
78,215 |
|
SSE PLC (United Kingdom) |
|
6,189 |
|
131,721 |
|
Sunnova Energy International, Inc.* |
|
1,194 |
|
23,474 |
|
Verbund AG (Austria) |
|
915 |
|
96,422 |
|
Xcel Energy, Inc. |
|
660 |
|
45,976 |
|
Total Utilities |
|
|
|
1,613,655 |
|
Total Common Stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $3,731,993) |
|
|
|
3,176,185 |
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS – 99.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $3,731,993) |
|
|
|
3,176,185 |
|
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities – 0.4% |
|
|
|
12,823 |
|
Net Assets – 100.0% |
|
|
|
$3,189,008 |
|
*Non-income producing security.
†Amounts represent investments in particular sectors. No industry within these sectors represented more than 25% of the Fund’s total assets at the time of investment.
(1)Security was purchased pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and may not be resold subject to that rule except to qualified institutional buyers. Unless otherwise noted, 144A securities are deemed to be liquid. At January 31, 2022, the aggregate value of these securities was $205,278, or 6.4% of net assets.
Portfolio Composition |
January 31, 2022 (unaudited) |
Asset Allocation as of 01/31/2022 (based on net assets)
Utilities |
|
50.6 |
%† |
Industrials |
|
25.4 |
%† |
Information Technology |
|
18.9 |
% |
Materials |
|
2.1 |
% |
Consumer Staples |
|
1.7 |
% |
Energy |
|
0.9 |
% |
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities |
|
0.4 |
% |
Total |
|
100.0 |
% |
†Amounts represent investments in particular sectors. No industry within these sectors represented more than 25% of the Fund’s total assets at the time of investment.
The following table summarizes valuation of the Fund’s investments under the fair value hierarchy levels as of January 31, 2022.
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
Asset Valuation Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stocks |
|
$3,173,628 |
|
$2,557 |
|
$— |
|
$3,176,185 |
Total |
|
$3,173,628 |
|
$2,557 |
|
$— |
|
$3,176,185 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
|
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES – 53.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
ACC Auto Trust, Class C, Series 2021-A, 3.79%, 04/15/27(1) |
|
$460,000 |
|
$453,528 |
|
ACC Trust, Class C, Series 2021-1, 2.08%, 12/20/24(1) |
|
150,000 |
|
148,265 |
|
Affirm Asset Securitization Trust, Class A, Series 2021-A, 0.88%, 08/15/25(1) |
|
100,000 |
|
99,787 |
|
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust, Class C, Series 2021-3, 0.98%, 11/15/27(1) |
|
450,000 |
|
442,290 |
|
American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust, Class E, Series 2022-1, 3.64%, 03/13/28(1) |
|
160,000 |
|
160,441 |
|
Aqua Finance Trust, Class C, Series 2019-A, 4.01%, 07/16/40(1) |
|
120,000 |
|
121,898 |
|
Avis Budget Rental Car Funding AESOP LLC, Class A, Series 2019-3A, 2.36%, 03/20/26(1) |
|
37,000 |
|
37,515 |
|
Avis Budget Rental Car Funding AESOP LLC, Class A, Series 2020-2A, 2.02%, 02/20/27(1) |
|
600,000 |
|
599,743 |
|
Avis Budget Rental Car Funding AESOP LLC, Class D, Series 2021-2A, 3.04%, 09/22/25(1) |
|
65,000 |
|
63,992 |
|
Business Jet Securities LLC, Class A, Series 2021-1A, 2.16%, 04/15/36(1) |
|
99,961 |
|
97,524 |
|
Cajun Global LLC, Class A2, Series 2021-1, 3.93%, 11/20/51(1) |
|
220,000 |
|
217,020 |
|
Carvana Auto Receivables Trust, Class D, Series 2021-N3, 1.58%, 06/12/28 |
|
310,000 |
|
302,632 |
|
CFMT Issuer Trust, Class A, Series 2021-GRN1, 1.10%, 03/20/41(1) |
|
78,597 |
|
77,392 |
|
CLI Funding VI LLC, Class A, Series 2020-1A, 2.08%, 09/18/45(1) |
|
107,125 |
|
105,098 |
|
Consumer Loan Underlying Bond Credit Trust, Class B, Series 2019-P1, 3.28%, 07/15/26(1) |
|
6,442 |
|
6,446 |
|
CPS Auto Receivables Trust, Class E, Series 2019-D, 3.86%, 10/15/25(1) |
|
65,000 |
|
66,252 |
|
Dext ABS LLC, Class A, Series 2020-1, 1.46%, 02/16/27(1) |
|
312,006 |
|
311,658 |
|
Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust, Class D, Series 2017-3A, 5.28%, 10/15/24(1) |
|
130,000 |
|
132,070 |
|
Fair Square Issuance Trust, Class A, Series 2020-AA, 2.90%, 09/20/24(1) |
|
100,000 |
|
100,071 |
|
FAT Brands Royalty LLC, Class A2, Series 2021-1A, 4.75%, 04/25/51(1) |
|
70,000 |
|
69,401 |
|
Flagship Credit Auto Trust, Class C, Series 2020-1, 2.24%, 01/15/26(1) |
|
120,000 |
|
120,808 |
|
Flagship Credit Auto Trust, Class C, Series 2020-4, 1.28%, 02/16/27(1) |
|
300,000 |
|
298,325 |
|
Foursight Capital Automobile Receivables Trust, Class C, Series 2021-2, 1.57%, 07/15/27(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
39,004 |
|
GLS Auto Receivables Issuer Trust, Class D, Series 2019-4A, 4.09%, 08/17/26(1) |
|
120,000 |
|
122,417 |
|
HIN Timeshare Trust, Class C, Series 2020-A, 3.42%, 10/09/39(1) |
|
144,263 |
|
146,904 |
|
Hotwire Funding LLC, Class C, Series 2021-1, 4.46%, 11/20/51(1) |
|
325,000 |
|
320,821 |
|
Lendmark Funding Trust, Class A, Series 2019-1A, 3.00%, 12/20/27(1) |
|
100,000 |
|
100,760 |
|
Mariner Finance Issuance Trust, Class A, Series 2019-AA, 2.96%, 07/20/32(1) |
|
100,000 |
|
100,935 |
|
Mercury Financial Credit Card Master Trust, Class A, Series 2021-1A, 1.54%, 03/20/26(1) |
150,000 |
|
149,513 |
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
|
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Mission Lane Credit Card Master Trust, Class A, Series 2021-A, 1.59%, 09/15/26(1) |
|
$300,000 |
|
$296,760 |
|
Navient Private Education Refi Loan Trust, Class A, Series 2021-EA, 0.97%, 12/16/69(1) |
|
534,790 |
|
518,996 |
|
NBC Funding LLC, Class A2, Series 2021-1, 2.99%, 07/30/51(1) |
|
298,500 |
|
292,395 |
|
Oasis Securitization Funding LLC, Class A, Series 2021-1A, 2.58%, 02/15/33(1) |
|
64,484 |
|
64,702 |
|
Octane Receivables Trust, Class B, Series 2021-1A, 1.53%, 04/20/27(1) |
|
50,000 |
|
48,847 |
|
Onemain Direct Auto Receivables Trust, Class C, Series 2018-1A, 3.85%, 10/14/25(1) |
|
750,000 |
|
750,872 |
|
Oportun Funding XIV LLC, Class B, Series 2021-A, 1.76%, 03/08/28(1) |
|
300,000 |
|
297,664 |
|
Oscar US Funding XII LLC, Class A4, Series 2021-1A (Japan), 1.00%, 04/10/28(1) |
|
120,000 |
|
117,361 |
|
Planet Fitness Master Issuer LLC, Class A2II, Series 2018-1A, 4.67%, 09/05/48(1) |
|
120,938 |
|
123,124 |
|
Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust, Class D, Series 2020-2, 2.22%, 09/15/26 |
|
55,000 |
|
55,518 |
|
Skopos Auto Receivables Trust, Class C, Series 2019-1A, 3.63%, 09/16/24(1) |
|
102,606 |
|
103,407 |
|
Upstart Securitization Trust, Class B, Series 2021-3, 1.66%, 07/20/31(1) |
|
225,000 |
|
220,941 |
|
USASF Receivables LLC, Class B, Series 2020-1A, 3.22%, 05/15/24(1) |
|
125,000 |
|
125,767 |
|
Veros Auto Receivables Trust, Class B, Series 2021-1, 1.49%, 10/15/26(1) |
|
300,000 |
|
295,595 |
|
Westlake Automobile Receivables Trust, Class D, Series 2019-1A, 3.67%, 03/15/24(1) |
|
46,566 |
|
47,004 |
|
ZAXBY’S Funding LLC, Class A2, Series 2021-1A, 3.24%, 07/30/51(1) |
|
154,225 |
|
153,578 |
|
Total Asset Backed Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $8,663,349) |
|
|
|
8,525,041 |
|
MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES – 44.2% |
|
|
|
| |
Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities – 10.2% |
|
|
|
| |
ACRES Commercial Realty Corp., Class B, Series 2020-RSO8, 1.91%, (SOFR + 1.86%), 03/15/35(1)(2) |
|
100,000 |
|
100,069 |
|
BBCMS Mortgage Trust, Class A, Series 2018-TALL, 0.83%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 0.72%), 03/15/37(1)(2) |
|
125,000 |
|
123,874 |
|
BPR Trust, Class A, Series 2021-KEN, 1.36%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 1.25%), 02/15/29(1)(2) |
|
375,000 |
|
375,263 |
|
CHC Commercial Mortgage Trust, Class A, Series 2019-CHC, 1.23%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 1.12%), 06/15/34(1)(2) |
|
228,333 |
|
227,943 |
|
COMM Mortgage Trust, Class D, Series 2012-CR2, 4.83%, 08/15/45(1)(2)(3) |
|
30,000 |
|
29,612 |
|
GS Mortgage Securities Corp. Trust, Class A, Series 2012-ALOH, 3.55%, 04/10/34(1) |
|
100,000 |
|
100,005 |
|
Motel Trust, Class B, Series 2021-MTL6, 1.31%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 1.20%), 09/15/38(1)(2) |
|
600,000 |
|
599,617 |
|
Stack Infrastructure Issuer LLC, Class A2, Series 2019-1A, 4.54%, 02/25/44(1) |
|
66,017 |
|
67,991 |
|
Total Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities |
|
|
|
1,624,374 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
Schedule of Investments — Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (continued)
January 31, 2022 (unaudited)
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
|
MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES (continued) |
|
|
| ||
Residential Mortgage Backed Securities – 34.0% |
|
|
|
| |
American Homes 4 Rent Trust, Class A, Series 2015-SFR1, 3.47%, 04/17/52(1) |
|
$100,657 |
|
$103,971 |
|
Angel Oak Mortgage Trust, Class A1, Series 2021-2, 0.99%, 04/25/66(1)(2)(3) |
|
31,824 |
|
31,471 |
|
Angel Oak Mortgage Trust, Class A2, Series 2021-3, 1.31%, 05/25/66(1)(2)(3) |
|
96,032 |
|
94,760 |
|
Angel Oak Mortgage Trust, Class A1, Series 2021-8, 1.82%, 11/25/66(1)(2)(3) |
|
527,249 |
|
521,532 |
|
BRAVO Residential Funding Trust, Class A1, Series 2021-A, 1.99%, 01/25/24(1)(4) |
|
88,976 |
|
87,913 |
|
CAFL Issuer LLC, Class A1, Series 2021-RTL1, 2.24%, 03/28/29(1)(4) |
|
150,000 |
|
146,504 |
|
Cascade MH Asset Trust, Class A1, Series 2021-MH1, 1.75%, 02/25/46(1) |
|
111,241 |
|
108,345 |
|
COLT Mortgage Loan Trust, Class A1, Series 2021-2R, 0.80%, 07/27/54(1) |
|
65,220 |
|
65,004 |
|
COLT Mortgage Loan Trust, Class A1, Series 2020-1R, 1.26%, 09/25/65(1)(2)(3) |
|
81,993 |
|
81,422 |
|
CoreVest American Finance Trust, Class A, Series 2020-3, 1.36%, 08/15/53(1) |
|
198,325 |
|
191,857 |
|
CSMC Trust, Class A1, Series 2021-AFC1, 0.83%, 03/25/56(1)(2)(3) |
|
74,437 |
|
73,259 |
|
CSMC Trust, Class A1, Series 2021-RPL3, 2.00%, 01/25/60(1)(2)(3) |
|
312,655 |
|
312,215 |
|
Deephaven Residential Mortgage Trust, Class A1, Series 2020-2, 1.69%, 05/25/65(1) |
|
10,888 |
|
10,907 |
|
Ellington Financial Mortgage Trust, Class A2, Series 2021-1, 1.00%, 02/25/66(1)(2)(3) |
|
78,880 |
|
83,304 |
|
FirstKey Homes Trust, Class D, Series 2021-SFR1, 2.19%, 08/17/38(1) |
|
130,000 |
|
125,811 |
|
LHOME Mortgage Trust, Class A1, Series 2021-RTL2, 2.09%, 06/25/26(1)(4) |
|
100,000 |
|
99,667 |
|
MetLife Securitization Trust, Class A1A, Series 2019-1A, 3.75%, 04/25/58(1)(2)(3) |
|
93,493 |
|
95,427 |
|
New Residential Mortgage Loan Trust, Class B1, Series 2018-4A, 1.16%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 1.05%), 01/25/48(1)(2) |
|
572,987 |
|
576,507 |
|
New Residential Mortgage Loan Trust, Class A3, Series 2017-2A, 4.00%, 03/25/57(1)(2)(3) |
|
40,576 |
|
42,245 |
|
New Residential Mortgage Loan Trust, Class A1B, Series 2019-1A, 3.50%, 10/25/59(1)(2)(3) |
|
130,689 |
|
134,394 |
|
Progress Residential, Class C, Series 2021-SFR1, 1.56%, 04/17/38(1) |
|
100,000 |
|
94,959 |
|
Progress Residential Trust, Class A, Series 2019-SFR2, 3.15%, 05/17/36(1) |
|
149,342 |
|
148,889 |
|
Progress Residential Trust, Class A, Series 2020-SFR2, 2.08%, 06/17/37(1) |
|
250,000 |
|
249,580 |
|
PRPM LLC, Class A1, Series 2021-2, 2.12%, 03/25/26(1)(2)(3) |
|
127,067 |
|
125,653 |
|
PRPM LLC, Class A1, Series 2021-RPL1, 1.32%, 07/25/51(1)(2)(3) |
|
140,156 |
|
137,174 |
|
Residential Mortgage Loan Trust, Class A1, Series 2020-1, 2.38%, 01/26/60(1)(2)(3) |
|
37,845 |
|
37,812 |
|
Roc Mortgage Trust, Class A1, Series 2021-RTL1, 2.49%, 08/25/26(1)(2)(3) |
|
100,000 |
|
98,367 |
|
SG Residential Mortgage Trust, Class A1, Series 2019-3, 2.70%, 09/25/59(1)(2)(3) |
8,410 |
|
8,382 |
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
|
MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES (continued) |
|
|
| ||
Residential Mortgage Backed Securities (continued) |
|
|
| ||
SG Residential Mortgage Trust, Class A1, Series 2021-1, 1.16%, 07/25/61(1)(2)(3) |
|
$63,151 |
|
$62,006 |
|
SG Residential Mortgage Trust, Class A3, Series 2021-1, 1.56%, 07/25/61(1)(2)(3) |
|
42,101 |
|
41,261 |
|
Star Trust, Class A1, Series 2021-1, 1.22%, 05/25/65(1)(2)(3) |
|
80,887 |
|
80,658 |
|
Towd Point HE Trust, Class M1, Series 2021-HE1, 1.50%, 02/25/63(1)(2)(3) |
|
54,345 |
|
54,197 |
|
Towd Point Mortgage Trust, Class A1, Series 2016-3, 2.25%, 04/25/56(1)(2)(3) |
|
1,153 |
|
1,154 |
|
Towd Point Mortgage Trust, Class A1, Series 2018-4, 3.00%, 06/25/58(1)(2)(3) |
|
65,246 |
|
66,420 |
|
Tricon American Homes Trust, Class B, Series 2020-SFR2, 1.83%, 11/17/39(1) |
|
130,000 |
|
122,661 |
|
VCAT LLC, Class A1, Series 2021-NPL4, 1.87%, 08/25/51(1)(4) |
|
283,377 |
|
278,197 |
|
Verus Securitization Trust, Class A1, Series 2020-INV1, 1.98%, 03/25/60(1)(2)(3) |
|
39,510 |
|
39,513 |
|
Verus Securitization Trust, Class A1, Series 2020-4, 1.50%, 05/25/65(1)(4) |
|
139,527 |
|
138,729 |
|
Verus Securitization Trust, Class A1, Series 2021-2, 1.03%, 02/25/66(1)(2)(3) |
|
92,761 |
|
91,563 |
|
Verus Securitization Trust, Class A1, Series 2021-3, 1.05%, 06/25/66(1)(2)(3) |
|
343,800 |
|
338,749 |
|
Visio Trust, Class A1, Series 2020-1R, 1.31%, 11/25/55(1) |
|
110,975 |
|
110,102 |
|
VOLT XCIV LLC, Class A1, Series 2021-NPL3, 2.24%, 02/27/51(1)(4) |
|
74,194 |
|
73,539 |
|
VOLT XCV LLC, Class A1, Series 2021-NPL4, 2.24%, 03/27/51(1)(4) |
|
60,518 |
|
59,892 |
|
Total Residential Mortgage Backed Securities |
|
|
|
5,445,972 |
|
Total Mortgage Backed Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $7,172,233) |
|
|
|
7,070,346 |
|
FOREIGN BOND – 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
Financials – 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
Doric Nimrod Air Alpha 2013-1 Class A Pass-Through Trust, 5.25%, 05/30/23 (Guernsey)(1) |
|
192,980 |
|
192,788 |
|
(Cost $193,455) |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS – 98.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $16,029,037) |
|
|
|
15,788,175 |
|
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities – 1.3% |
|
|
|
204,643 |
|
Net Assets – 100.0% |
|
|
|
$15,992,818 |
|
(1)Security was purchased pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and may not be resold subject to that rule except to qualified institutional buyers. Unless otherwise noted, 144A securities are deemed to be liquid. At January 31, 2022, the aggregate value of these securities was $15,430,025, or 96.5% of net assets.
(2)Variable rate instrument. The interest rate shown reflects the rate in effect at January 31, 2022.
(3)Adjustable rate security with an interest rate that is not based on a published reference index and spread. The rate is based on the structure of the agreement and current market conditions.
(4)Represents step coupon bond. Rate shown reflects the rate in effect as of January 31, 2022.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
Schedule of Investments — Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (continued)
January 31, 2022 (unaudited)
Abbreviations:
LIBOR — London InterBank Offered Rate
SOFR — Secured Overnight Financing Rate
USD — United States Dollar
Portfolio Composition | |||
January 31, 2022 (unaudited) | |||
Asset Allocation as of 01/31/2022 (based on net assets) | |||
Asset Backed Securities |
|
53.3 |
% |
Mortgage Backed Securities |
|
44.2 |
% |
Foreign Bond |
|
1.2 |
% |
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities |
|
1.3 |
% |
Total |
|
100.0 |
% |
The following table summarizes valuation of the Fund’s investments under the fair value hierarchy levels as of January 31, 2022.
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
Asset Valuation Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Backed Securities |
|
$— |
|
$8,525,041 |
|
$— |
|
$8,525,041 |
Mortgage Backed Securities |
|
— |
|
7,070,346 |
|
— |
|
7,070,346 |
Foreign Bond |
|
— |
|
192,788 |
|
— |
|
192,788 |
Total |
|
$— |
|
$15,788,175 |
|
$— |
|
$15,788,175 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
7
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
|
CORPORATE BONDS – 80.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
Communication Services – 8.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
CCO Holdings LLC / CCO Holdings Capital Corp., 5.13%, 05/01/27(1) |
|
$40,000 |
|
$41,054 |
|
CCO Holdings LLC / CCO Holdings Capital Corp., 4.75%, 03/01/30(1) |
|
45,000 |
|
44,715 |
|
CCO Holdings LLC / CCO Holdings Capital Corp., 4.50%, 08/15/30(1) |
|
5,000 |
|
4,883 |
|
CommScope, Inc., 7.13%, 07/01/28(1) |
|
25,000 |
|
23,344 |
|
CommScope, Inc., 4.75%, 09/01/29(1) |
|
5,000 |
|
4,797 |
|
Directv Financing LLC / Directv Financing Co-Obligor, Inc., 5.88%, 08/15/27(1) |
|
25,000 |
|
25,152 |
|
Frontier Communications Holdings LLC, 6.75%, 05/01/29(1) |
|
45,000 |
|
45,192 |
|
iHeartCommunications, Inc., 8.38%, 05/01/27 |
|
21,420 |
|
22,431 |
|
Level 3 Financing, Inc., 3.63%, 01/15/29(1) |
|
50,000 |
|
45,594 |
|
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., 4.75%, 10/15/27(1) |
|
30,000 |
|
29,625 |
|
McGraw-Hill Education, Inc., 5.75%, 08/01/28(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
38,054 |
|
McGraw-Hill Education, Inc., 8.00%, 08/01/29(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
37,452 |
|
Millennium Escrow Corp., 6.63%, 08/01/26(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
34,765 |
|
Northwest Fiber LLC / Northwest Fiber Finance Sub, Inc., 4.75%, 04/30/27(1) |
|
5,000 |
|
4,772 |
|
Northwest Fiber LLC / Northwest Fiber Finance Sub, Inc., 6.00%, 02/15/28(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
32,984 |
|
ROBLOX Corp., 3.88%, 05/01/30(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
14,539 |
|
TripAdvisor, Inc., 7.00%, 07/15/25(1) |
|
30,000 |
|
31,462 |
|
Twitter, Inc., 3.88%, 12/15/27(1) |
|
55,000 |
|
54,966 |
|
Total Communication Services |
|
|
|
535,781 |
|
Consumer Discretionary – 17.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., 6.50%, 04/01/27 |
|
45,000 |
|
46,418 |
|
At Home Group, Inc., 4.88%, 07/15/28(1) |
|
10,000 |
|
9,572 |
|
At Home Group, Inc., 7.13%, 07/15/29(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
37,563 |
|
Caesars Entertainment, Inc., 6.25%, 07/01/25(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
15,542 |
|
Caesars Entertainment, Inc., 8.13%, 07/01/27(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
16,166 |
|
Caesars Entertainment, Inc., 4.63%, 10/15/29(1) |
|
25,000 |
|
23,980 |
|
Carnival Corp., 7.63%, 03/01/26(1) |
|
70,000 |
|
71,527 |
|
Carriage Services, Inc., 4.25%, 05/15/29(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
39,056 |
|
Carvana Co., 5.63%, 10/01/25(1) |
|
30,000 |
|
28,506 |
|
Carvana Co., 5.88%, 10/01/28(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
14,119 |
|
Clarios Global LP / Clarios US Finance Co., 8.50%, 05/15/27(1) |
|
25,000 |
|
26,174 |
|
Dornoch Debt Merger Sub, Inc., 6.63%, 10/15/29(1) |
|
25,000 |
|
24,188 |
|
Ford Motor Co., 3.25%, 02/12/32 |
|
10,000 |
|
9,532 |
|
Ford Motor Co., 4.75%, 01/15/43 |
|
15,000 |
|
15,353 |
|
Gap, Inc. (The), 3.88%, 10/01/31(1) |
|
45,000 |
|
41,834 |
|
Golden Nugget, Inc., 8.75%, 10/01/25(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
40,926 |
|
Hilton Grand Vacations Borrower Escrow LLC / Hilton Grand Vacations Borrower Esc, 5.00%, 06/01/29(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
39,870 |
|
International Game Technology PLC, 5.25%, |
|
5,000 |
|
5,116 |
|
Jacobs Entertainment, Inc., 6.75%, 02/15/29(1) |
20,000 |
|
20,226 |
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
|
CORPORATE BONDS (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Discretionary (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Legends Hospitality Holding Co. LLC / Legends Hospitality Co.-Issuer, Inc., 5.00%, 02/01/26(1) |
|
$40,000 |
|
$39,906 |
|
M/I Homes, Inc., 4.95%, 02/01/28 |
|
40,000 |
|
40,459 |
|
Metis Merger Sub LLC, 6.50%, 05/15/29(1) |
|
30,000 |
|
28,760 |
|
Michaels Cos, Inc. (The), 5.25%, 05/01/28(1) |
|
5,000 |
|
4,828 |
|
Michaels Cos, Inc. (The), 7.88%, 05/01/29(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
13,750 |
|
Mohegan Gaming & Entertainment, 8.00%, 02/01/26(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
40,726 |
|
NMG Holding Co., Inc. / Neiman Marcus Group LLC, 7.13%, 04/01/26(1) |
|
50,000 |
|
51,590 |
|
Premier Entertainment Sub LLC / Premier Entertainment Finance Corp., 5.63%, 09/01/29(1) |
|
45,000 |
|
42,467 |
|
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., 4.25%, 07/01/26(1) |
|
20,000 |
|
18,700 |
|
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., 5.50%, 08/31/26(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
14,649 |
|
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., 5.50%, 04/01/28(1) |
|
10,000 |
|
9,726 |
|
Scientific Games International, Inc., 8.25%, 03/15/26(1) |
|
20,000 |
|
20,901 |
|
Scientific Games International, Inc., 7.00%, 05/15/28(1) |
|
20,000 |
|
21,035 |
|
SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc., 5.25%, 08/15/29(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
39,036 |
|
Station Casinos LLC, 4.50%, 02/15/28(1) |
|
30,000 |
|
29,189 |
|
Tenneco, Inc., 5.38%, 12/15/24 |
|
15,000 |
|
14,723 |
|
Tenneco, Inc., 5.13%, 04/15/29(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
32,464 |
|
Vista Outdoor, Inc., 4.50%, 03/15/29(1) |
|
45,000 |
|
43,741 |
|
Weekley Homes LLC / Weekley Finance Corp., 4.88%, 09/15/28(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
34,479 |
|
Total Consumer Discretionary |
|
|
|
1,066,797 |
|
Consumer Staples – 3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
Albertsons Cos., Inc. / Safeway, Inc. / New Albertsons LP / Albertsons LLC, 4.63%, 01/15/27(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
35,873 |
|
Chobani LLC / Chobani Finance Corp., Inc., 7.50%, 04/15/25(1) |
|
30,000 |
|
30,659 |
|
H-Food Holdings LLC / Hearthside Finance Co., Inc., 8.50%, 06/01/26(1) |
|
30,000 |
|
29,655 |
|
HLF Financing Sarl LLC / Herbalife International, Inc., 4.88%, 06/01/29(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
33,212 |
|
Triton Water Holdings, Inc., 6.25%, 04/01/29(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
14,081 |
|
Turning Point Brands, Inc., 5.63%, 02/15/26(1) |
|
55,000 |
|
54,801 |
|
Vector Group Ltd., 5.75%, 02/01/29(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
32,396 |
|
Total Consumer Staples |
|
|
|
230,677 |
|
Energy – 15.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
Alliance Resource Operating Partners LP / Alliance Resource Finance Corp., 7.50%, 05/01/25(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
40,562 |
|
Antero Midstream Partners LP / Antero Midstream Finance Corp., 5.75%, 01/15/28(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
40,846 |
|
Antero Resources Corp., 8.38%, 07/15/26(1) |
|
11,000 |
|
12,282 |
|
Antero Resources Corp., 7.63%, 02/01/29(1) |
|
3,000 |
|
3,274 |
|
Antero Resources Corp., 5.38%, 03/01/30(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
15,542 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
8
Schedule of Investments — Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF (continued)
January 31, 2022 (unaudited)
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
|
CORPORATE BONDS (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Energy (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Ascent Resources Utica Holdings LLC / ARU Finance Corp., 8.25%, 12/31/28(1) |
|
$40,000 |
|
$41,951 |
|
Callon Petroleum Co., 8.00%, 08/01/28(1) |
|
5,000 |
|
5,102 |
|
Calumet Specialty Products Partners LP / Calumet Finance Corp., 8.13%, 01/15/27(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
35,199 |
|
Cheniere Energy, Inc., 4.63%, 10/15/28 |
|
25,000 |
|
25,417 |
|
Chesapeake Energy Corp., 5.50%, 02/01/26(1) |
|
45,000 |
|
46,447 |
|
Chesapeake Energy Corp., 5.88%, 02/01/29(1) |
|
10,000 |
|
10,443 |
|
CrownRock LP / CrownRock Finance, Inc., 5.63%, 10/15/25(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
35,311 |
|
CrownRock LP / CrownRock Finance, Inc., 5.00%, 05/01/29(1) |
|
30,000 |
|
30,329 |
|
CSI Compressco LP / CSI Compressco Finance, Inc., 7.50%, 04/01/25(1) |
|
55,000 |
|
55,247 |
|
DCP Midstream Operating LP, 3.25%, 02/15/32 |
|
35,000 |
|
33,130 |
|
DT Midstream, Inc., 4.13%, 06/15/29(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
34,589 |
|
Energy Transfer LP, Series H, 6.50%, (US 5 Year CMT T- Note + 5.69%), 11/15/70, perpetual(2)(3) |
|
35,000 |
|
35,886 |
|
EQM Midstream Partners LP, 6.00%, 07/01/25(1) |
|
10,000 |
|
10,339 |
|
EQM Midstream Partners LP, 6.50%, 07/01/27(1) |
|
10,000 |
|
10,476 |
|
Hilcorp Energy I LP / Hilcorp Finance Co., 5.75%, 02/01/29(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
35,758 |
|
Hilcorp Energy I LP / Hilcorp Finance Co., 6.00%, 02/01/31(1) |
|
25,000 |
|
25,469 |
|
Magnolia Oil & Gas Operating LLC / Magnolia Oil & Gas Finance Corp., 6.00%, 08/01/26(1) |
|
25,000 |
|
25,587 |
|
Nabors Industries Ltd., 7.25%, 01/15/26(1) |
|
30,000 |
|
28,768 |
|
Nabors Industries, Inc., 7.38%, 05/15/27(1) |
|
5,000 |
|
5,137 |
|
Occidental Petroleum Corp., 5.50%, 12/01/25 |
|
5,000 |
|
5,313 |
|
Occidental Petroleum Corp., 3.50%, 08/15/29 |
|
30,000 |
|
29,617 |
|
Occidental Petroleum Corp., 6.63%, 09/01/30 |
|
40,000 |
|
47,014 |
|
Occidental Petroleum Corp., 6.13%, 01/01/31 |
|
45,000 |
|
52,014 |
|
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc., 5.15%, 11/15/29 |
|
40,000 |
|
40,562 |
|
Southwestern Energy Co., 5.38%, 02/01/29 |
|
40,000 |
|
40,740 |
|
Targa Resources Partners LP / Targa Resources Partners Finance Corp., 4.88%, 02/01/31 |
|
15,000 |
|
15,700 |
|
Transocean, Inc., 11.50%, 01/30/27(1) |
|
13,000 |
|
12,916 |
|
USA Compression Partners LP / USA Compression Finance Corp., 6.88%, 04/01/26 |
|
20,000 |
|
20,333 |
|
Venture Global Calcasieu Pass LLC, 3.88%, |
|
5,000 |
|
5,000 |
|
Venture Global Calcasieu Pass LLC, 4.13%, |
|
35,000 |
|
35,289 |
|
Total Energy |
|
|
|
947,589 |
|
Financials – 7.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
Acrisure LLC / Acrisure Finance, Inc., 7.00%, 11/15/25(1) |
|
30,000 |
|
30,004 |
|
Acrisure LLC / Acrisure Finance, Inc., 4.25%, 02/15/29(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
33,094 |
|
Ally Financial, Inc., Series B, 4.70%, (US 5 Year CMT T- Note + 3.87%), perpetual(2)(3) |
|
34,000 |
|
33,720 |
|
BroadStreet Partners, Inc., 5.88%, 04/15/29(1) |
|
50,000 |
|
47,734 |
|
Cobra AcquisitionCo. LLC, 6.38%, 11/01/29(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
39,003 |
|
Coinbase Global, Inc., 3.63%, 10/01/31(1) |
40,000 |
|
34,924 |
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
|
CORPORATE BONDS (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Financials (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Icahn Enterprises LP / Icahn Enterprises Finance Corp., 6.25%, 05/15/26 |
|
$10,000 |
|
$10,290 |
|
Icahn Enterprises LP / Icahn Enterprises Finance Corp., 5.25%, 05/15/27 |
|
55,000 |
|
55,519 |
|
Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP / Ladder Capital Finance Corp., 4.25%, 02/01/27(1) |
|
55,000 |
|
53,654 |
|
Navient Corp., 5.88%, 10/25/24 |
|
25,000 |
|
25,969 |
|
Navient Corp., 5.50%, 03/15/29 |
|
5,000 |
|
4,886 |
|
OneMain Finance Corp., 7.13%, 03/15/26 |
|
25,000 |
|
27,525 |
|
Prospect Capital Corp., 3.71%, 01/22/26 |
|
45,000 |
|
44,954 |
|
Total Financials |
|
|
|
441,276 |
|
Health Care – 8.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
Akumin, Inc., 7.00%, 11/01/25(1) |
|
60,000 |
|
55,432 |
|
Avantor Funding, Inc., 3.88%, 11/01/29(1) |
|
10,000 |
|
9,618 |
|
Bausch Health Cos., Inc., 6.13%, 02/01/27(1) |
|
5,000 |
|
5,027 |
|
Bausch Health Cos., Inc., 5.75%, 08/15/27(1) |
|
20,000 |
|
20,096 |
|
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., 6.63%, 02/15/25(1) |
|
25,000 |
|
25,885 |
|
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., 6.88%, 04/15/29(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
14,855 |
|
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., 6.13%, 04/01/30(1) |
|
20,000 |
|
19,072 |
|
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., 5.25%, 05/15/30(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
39,899 |
|
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., 4.75%, 02/15/31(1) |
|
20,000 |
|
19,163 |
|
DaVita, Inc., 4.63%, 06/01/30(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
34,103 |
|
Encompass Health Corp., 4.50%, 02/01/28 |
|
35,000 |
|
34,987 |
|
Lannett Co., Inc., 7.75%, 04/15/26(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
11,702 |
|
Legacy LifePoint Health LLC, 4.38%, 02/15/27(1) |
|
20,000 |
|
19,636 |
|
Mozart Debt Merger Sub, Inc., 3.88%, 04/01/29(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
14,477 |
|
Mozart Debt Merger Sub, Inc., 5.25%, 10/01/29(1) |
|
5,000 |
|
4,872 |
|
Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. / Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics SA, 7.38%, 06/01/25(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
15,738 |
|
Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. / Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics SA, 7.25%, 02/01/28(1) |
|
6,000 |
|
6,419 |
|
Prime Healthcare Services, Inc., 7.25%, 11/01/25(1) |
|
5,000 |
|
5,222 |
|
Surgery Center Holdings, Inc., 6.75%, 07/01/25(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
40,101 |
|
Team Health Holdings, Inc., 6.38%, 02/01/25(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
31,554 |
|
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 4.88%, 01/01/26(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
15,084 |
|
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 6.25%, 02/01/27(1) |
|
30,000 |
|
30,728 |
|
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 5.13%, 11/01/27(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
15,056 |
|
Total Health Care |
|
|
|
488,726 |
|
Industrials – 8.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
Allied Universal Holdco LLC / Allied Universal Finance Corp., 6.63%, 07/15/26(1) |
|
45,000 |
|
46,266 |
|
American Airlines Group, Inc., 5.00%, 06/01/22(1) |
|
20,000 |
|
20,171 |
|
American Airlines, Inc., 11.75%, 07/15/25(1) |
|
55,000 |
|
66,665 |
|
BCPE Ulysses Intermediate, Inc., 7.75%, 04/01/27, 7.75% Cash or 8.50% PIK(1)(4) |
|
35,000 |
|
34,220 |
|
BlueLinx Holdings, Inc., 6.00%, 11/15/29(1) |
|
20,000 |
|
19,775 |
|
Boeing Co. (The), 5.93%, 05/01/60 |
|
30,000 |
|
38,133 |
|
Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., 7.88%, 03/01/23(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
38,794 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
9
Schedule of Investments — Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF (continued)
January 31, 2022 (unaudited)
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
|
CORPORATE BONDS (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Industrials (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
CP Atlas Buyer, Inc., 7.00%, 12/01/28(1) |
|
$40,000 |
|
$38,103 |
|
Deluxe Corp., 8.00%, 06/01/29(1) |
|
20,000 |
|
20,698 |
|
Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC, 6.50%, 10/01/25(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
35,997 |
|
Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC, 9.75%, 08/01/27(1) |
|
10,000 |
|
10,962 |
|
LBM Acquisition LLC, 6.25%, 01/15/29(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
14,318 |
|
OT Merger Corp., 7.88%, 10/15/29(1) |
|
20,000 |
|
19,470 |
|
Standard Industries, Inc., 4.38%, 07/15/30(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
33,488 |
|
TransDigm, Inc., 6.25%, 03/15/26(1) |
|
20,000 |
|
20,670 |
|
TransDigm, Inc., 5.50%, 11/15/27 |
|
20,000 |
|
20,133 |
|
Vertiv Group Corp., 4.13%, 11/15/28(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
39,050 |
|
Total Industrials |
|
|
|
516,913 |
|
Information Technology – 3.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc., 6.00%, 10/15/26(1) |
|
10,000 |
|
10,315 |
|
Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc., 6.50%, 10/15/28(1) |
|
10,000 |
|
10,272 |
|
MicroStrategy, Inc., 6.13%, 06/15/28(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
38,252 |
|
Minerva Merger Sub, Inc., 6.50%, 02/15/30(1) |
|
10,000 |
|
9,991 |
|
Plantronics, Inc., 4.75%, 03/01/29(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
36,346 |
|
Rocket Software, Inc., 6.50%, 02/15/29(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
33,216 |
|
Science Applications International Corp., 4.88%, 04/01/28(1) |
|
50,000 |
|
50,318 |
|
Total Information Technology |
|
|
|
188,710 |
|
Materials – 4.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
Chemours Co. (The), 5.75%, 11/15/28(1) |
|
40,000 |
|
40,694 |
|
Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc., 6.75%, 03/15/26(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
15,743 |
|
Eco Material Technologies, Inc., 7.88%, 01/31/27(1) |
|
10,000 |
|
10,182 |
|
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., 5.45%, 03/15/43 |
|
30,000 |
|
35,328 |
|
Glatfelter Corp., 4.75%, 11/15/29(1) |
|
30,000 |
|
30,286 |
|
Mauser Packaging Solutions Holding Co., 7.25%, 04/15/25(1) |
|
60,000 |
|
59,728 |
|
New Enterprise Stone & Lime Co., Inc., 9.75%, 07/15/28(1) |
|
20,000 |
|
21,103 |
|
Trident TPI Holdings, Inc., 9.25%, 08/01/24(1) |
|
20,000 |
|
20,696 |
|
Trident TPI Holdings, Inc., 6.63%, 11/01/25(1) |
|
20,000 |
|
19,951 |
|
WR Grace Holdings LLC, 5.63%, 08/15/29(1) |
|
15,000 |
|
14,513 |
|
Total Materials |
|
|
|
268,224 |
|
Real Estate – 2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
GLP Capital LP / GLP Financing II, Inc., 3.25%, 01/15/32 |
|
8,000 |
|
7,741 |
|
iStar, Inc., 4.25%, 08/01/25 |
|
40,000 |
|
39,780 |
|
MPT Operating Partnership LP / MPT Finance Corp., 3.50%, 03/15/31 |
|
35,000 |
|
33,834 |
|
Service Properties Trust, 7.50%, 09/15/25 |
|
35,000 |
|
36,933 |
|
Total Real Estate |
|
|
|
118,288 |
|
Utilities – 1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrellgas LP / Ferrellgas Finance Corp., 5.38%, 04/01/26(1) |
|
10,000 |
|
9,489 |
|
Ferrellgas LP / Ferrellgas Finance Corp., 5.88%, 04/01/29(1) |
15,000 |
|
13,824 |
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
|
CORPORATE BONDS (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Utilities (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
TerraForm Power Operating LLC, 5.00%, 01/31/28(1) |
|
$30,000 |
|
$30,436 |
|
Vistra Corp., 8.00%, (US 5 Year CMT T- Note + 6.93%), perpetual(1)(2)(3) |
|
35,000 |
|
36,368 |
|
Total Utilities |
|
|
|
90,117 |
|
Total Corporate Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $4,955,182) |
|
|
|
4,893,098 |
|
TERM LOANS – 8.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace – 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
American Airlines, Inc., 5.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.75%), 04/20/28(2) |
|
5,000 |
|
5,197 |
|
Mileage Plus Holdings LLC, 6.25%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 5.25%), 06/21/27(2) |
|
50,000 |
|
52,863 |
|
Total Aerospace |
|
|
|
58,060 |
|
Financials – 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
Asurion LLC, 5.36%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 5.25%), 01/31/28(2) |
|
20,000 |
|
20,050 |
|
Forest Prod/Containers – 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
Kloeckner Pentaplast of America, Inc., 5.25%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.75%), 02/12/26(2) |
|
24,813 |
|
24,720 |
|
Gaming/Leisure – 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
ECL Entertainment LLC, 8.25%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 7.50%), 05/01/28(2) |
|
9,950 |
|
10,215 |
|
Playa Resorts Holding B.V., 3.75%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 2.75%), 04/29/24(2) |
|
24,030 |
|
23,674 |
|
Total Gaming/Leisure |
|
|
|
33,889 |
|
Health Care – 1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
LSCS Holdings, Inc., 5.00%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.50%), 11/23/28(2) |
|
35,000 |
|
35,197 |
|
One Call Corp., 6.25%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 5.50%), 04/22/27(2) |
|
34,825 |
|
34,908 |
|
Viant Medical Holdings, Inc., 3.86%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 3.75%), 07/02/25(2) |
|
39,591 |
|
37,799 |
|
Total Health Care |
|
|
|
107,904 |
|
Information Technology – 1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
Applied Systems, Inc., 6.25%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 5.50%), 09/19/25(2) |
|
60,000 |
|
60,534 |
|
Boxer Parent Co, Inc., 6.00%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 5.50%), 03/23/26(2) |
|
15,000 |
|
15,138 |
|
Infinite Bidco LLC, 7.50%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 7.00%), 03/02/29(2) |
|
15,000 |
|
15,075 |
|
Total Information Technology |
|
|
|
90,747 |
|
Manufacturing – 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
Arcline FM Holdings LLC, 5.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.75%), 06/23/28(2) |
|
19,950 |
|
19,962 |
|
Arcline FM Holdings LLC, 9.00%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 8.25%), 06/15/29(2) |
|
25,000 |
|
25,063 |
|
Total Manufacturing |
|
|
|
45,025 |
|
Media/Telecom - Telecommunications – 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
Securus Technologies Holdings, Inc., 5.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.50%), 11/01/24(2) |
|
19,794 |
|
19,350 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
Schedule of Investments — Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF (continued)
January 31, 2022 (unaudited)
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
|
TERM LOANS (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Service – 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Grab Holdings, Inc., 5.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.50%), 01/29/26(2) |
|
$39,700 |
|
$39,805 |
|
Sweetwater Borrower LLC, 5.50%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 4.75%), 08/07/28(2) |
|
20,000 |
|
20,025 |
|
Total Service |
|
|
|
59,830 |
|
Utilities – 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
Lightstone Holdco LLC, 4.75%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 3.75%), 01/30/24(2) |
|
37,864 |
|
32,546 |
|
Lightstone Holdco LLC, 4.75%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 3.75%), 01/30/24(2) |
|
2,136 |
|
1,836 |
|
Total Utilities |
|
|
|
34,382 |
|
Total Term Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $486,048) |
|
|
|
493,957 |
|
FOREIGN BONDS – 6.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
Communication Services – 0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
Telesat Canada / Telesat LLC, 6.50%, 10/15/27 (Canada)(1) |
|
20,000 |
|
12,348 |
|
Energy – 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
BP Capital Markets PLC, 4.88%, (US 5 Year CMT T- Note + 4.40%), perpetual (United Kingdom)(2)(3) |
|
40,000 |
|
42,350 |
|
Coronado Finance Pty Ltd., 10.75%, 05/15/26 (Australia)(1) |
|
36,000 |
|
38,876 |
|
Northriver Midstream Finance LP, 5.63%, 02/15/26 (Canada)(1) |
|
25,000 |
|
25,414 |
|
Total Energy |
|
|
|
106,640 |
|
Health Care – 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
Teva Pharmaceutical Finance Netherlands III BV, 3.15%, 10/01/26 (Netherlands) |
|
35,000 |
|
32,200 |
|
Industrials – 1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
Bombardier, Inc., 7.50%, 12/01/24 (Canada)(1) |
|
45,000 |
|
46,640 |
|
Bombardier, Inc., 6.00%, 02/15/28 (Canada)(1) |
|
20,000 |
|
19,406 |
|
Seaspan Corp., 5.50%, 08/01/29 (Marshall Islands)(1) |
|
5,000 |
|
4,953 |
|
Titan Acquisition Ltd. / Titan Co.-Borrower LLC, 7.75%, 04/15/26 (Multinational)(1) |
|
35,000 |
|
35,701 |
|
Total Industrials |
|
|
106,700 |
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
|
FOREIGN BONDS (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Materials – 2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
Eldorado Gold Corp., 6.25%, 09/01/29 (Canada)(1) |
|
$40,000 |
|
$40,050 |
|
Nufarm Australia Ltd. / Nufarm Americas, Inc., 5.00%, 01/27/30 (Australia)(1) |
|
25,000 |
|
24,909 |
|
Taseko Mines Ltd., 7.00%, 02/15/26 (Canada)(1) |
|
60,000 |
|
60,921 |
|
Total Materials |
|
|
|
125,880 |
|
Total Foreign Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $376,954) |
|
|
|
383,768 |
|
MONEY MARKET FUND – 4.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
JP Morgan U.S. Government Money Market Institutional Shares,
0.01%(5) |
|
248,999 |
|
248,999 |
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS – 99.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $6,067,183) |
|
|
|
6,019,822 |
|
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities – 0.7% |
|
|
|
42,570 |
|
Net Assets – 100.0% |
|
|
|
$6,062,392 |
|
(1)Security was purchased pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and may not be resold subject to that rule except to qualified institutional buyers. Unless otherwise noted, 144A securities are deemed to be liquid. At January 31, 2022, the aggregate value of these securities was $4,257,942, or 70.2% of net assets.
(2)Variable rate instrument. The interest rate shown reflects the rate in effect at January 31, 2022.
(3)Perpetual security with no stated maturity date.
(4)Payment in-kind security.
(5)The rate shown reflects the seven-day yield as of January 31, 2022.
Abbreviations:
CMT — Constant Maturity Treasury Index
LIBOR — London InterBank Offered Rate
PIK — Payment in-Kind
USD — United States Dollar
Portfolio Composition | |||
January 31, 2022 (unaudited) | |||
Asset Allocation as of 01/31/2022 (based on net assets) | |||
Corporate Bonds |
|
80.7 |
% |
Term Loans |
|
8.2 |
% |
Foreign Bonds |
|
6.3 |
% |
Money Market Fund |
|
4.1 |
% |
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities |
|
0.7 |
% |
Total |
|
100.0 |
% |
The following table summarizes valuation of the Fund’s investments under the fair value hierarchy levels as of January 31, 2022.
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
Asset Valuation Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Bonds |
|
$— |
|
$4,893,098 |
|
$— |
|
$4,893,098 |
Term Loans |
|
— |
|
493,957 |
|
— |
|
493,957 |
Foreign Bonds |
|
— |
|
383,768 |
|
— |
|
383,768 |
Money Market Fund |
|
248,999 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
248,999 |
Total |
|
$248,999 |
|
$5,770,823 |
|
$— |
|
$6,019,822 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
TERM LOANS – 85.2% |
|
|
|
|
Basic Materials – 5.3% |
|
|
|
|
Domtar Corp., 0.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 10/01/28(1) |
|
$700,000 |
|
$699,125 |
Luxembourg Investment Co 428 Sarl, 5.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 5.00%), 01/03/29(2) |
|
500,000 |
|
501,250 |
Manchester Acquisition Sub LLC, 6.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 5.75%), 11/16/26(2) |
|
600,000 |
|
589,500 |
Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc., 4.50%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 3.75%), 02/09/28(2) |
|
447,750 |
|
446,071 |
Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc., 0.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 02/09/28(1) |
|
299,248 |
|
298,126 |
Sylvamo Corp., 5.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 4.50%), 08/18/28(2) |
|
546,667 |
|
552,931 |
Total Basic Materials |
|
|
|
3,087,003 |
Communications – 12.5% |
|
|
|
|
Diamond Sports Group LLC, 3.36%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 3.25%), 08/24/26(2) |
|
98,737 |
|
40,822 |
Digital Media Solutions LLC, 5.75%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 5.00%), 05/25/26(2) |
|
398,000 |
|
396,010 |
Directv Financing LLC, 5.75%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 5.00%), 08/02/27(2) |
|
782,000 |
|
784,080 |
Intelsat Jackson Holdings SA, 0.00%, (SOFR + 0.00%), 01/26/29(1) |
|
500,000 |
|
498,188 |
LendingTree LLC, 0.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 09/15/28(1) |
|
400,000 |
|
401,000 |
LogMeIn, Inc., 4.86%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 4.75%), 08/31/27(2) |
|
230,996 |
|
229,448 |
LogMeIn, Inc., 4.86%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 4.75%), 08/31/27(2) |
|
65,999 |
|
65,557 |
LogMeIn, Inc., 0.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 08/31/27(1) |
|
398,992 |
|
396,319 |
MJH Healthcare Holdings LLC, 0.00%, (SOFR + 0.00%), 12/17/28(1) |
|
600,000 |
|
598,875 |
NortonLifeLock, Inc., 0.00%, (SOFR + 0.00%), 01/28/29(1) |
|
500,000 |
|
498,125 |
ORBCOMM, Inc., 5.00%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.25%), 06/17/28(2) |
|
250,000 |
|
250,937 |
ORBCOMM, Inc., 5.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 4.25%), 06/17/28(2) |
|
248,750 |
|
249,683 |
Ping Identity Corp., 4.25%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 3.75%), 11/17/28(2) |
|
500,000 |
|
500,937 |
Summer BC Holdco B SARL, 5.25%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.50%), 12/04/26(2) |
|
498,750 |
|
500,698 |
Univision Communications, Inc., 4.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 3.25%), 03/15/26(2) |
|
398,000 |
|
398,151 |
Venga Finance Sarl, 0.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 11/03/28(1) |
|
600,000 |
|
587,061 |
Xplornet Communications, Inc., 4.50%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 4.00%), 10/02/28(2) |
|
897,750 |
|
897,683 |
Total Communications |
|
|
|
7,293,574 |
Consumer, Cyclical – 8.0% |
|
|
|
|
AAdvantage Loyalty IP Ltd., 5.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.75%), 04/20/28(2) |
|
600,000 |
|
623,667 |
AI Aqua Merger Sub, Inc., 0.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 07/31/28(1) |
|
6,667 |
|
6,693 |
Allen Media LLC, 5.63%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 5.50%), 02/10/27(2) |
596,962 |
|
596,141 |
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
TERM LOANS (continued) |
|
|
|
|
Consumer, Cyclical (continued) |
|
|
|
|
AP Core Holdings II LLC, 6.25%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 5.50%), 09/01/27(2) |
|
$ 750,000 |
|
$757,736 |
Autokiniton US Holdings, Inc., 5.00%, (6-Month USD LIBOR + 4.50%), 03/26/28(2) |
|
796,000 |
|
797,592 |
Crocs, Inc., 0.00%, (SOFR + 0.00%), 01/26/29(1) |
|
600,000 |
|
597,000 |
Jo-Ann Stores LLC, 5.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.75%), 07/07/28(2) |
|
98,503 |
|
97,549 |
Michaels Cos., Inc. (The), 0.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 04/15/28(1) |
|
400,000 |
|
395,000 |
Mileage Plus Holdings LLC, 6.25%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 5.25%), 06/21/27(2) |
|
750,000 |
|
792,937 |
Total Consumer, Cyclical |
|
|
|
4,664,315 |
Consumer, Non-cyclical – 20.3% |
|
|
|
|
AG Group Holdings, Inc., 0.00%, (SOFR + 0.00%), 12/29/28(1) |
|
500,000 |
|
501,172 |
AHP Health Partners, Inc., 4.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 3.50%), 08/24/28(2) |
|
997,500 |
|
1,000,463 |
Albion Acquisitions Ltd., 5.75%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 5.25%), 07/31/26(2) |
|
600,000 |
|
598,593 |
American Public Education, Inc., 6.25%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 5.50%), 10/28/27(2) |
|
197,500 |
|
197,500 |
APX Group, Inc., 5.75%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 2.50%), 07/10/28(2) |
|
278 |
|
278 |
APX Group, Inc., 4.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 3.50%), 07/10/28(2) |
|
598,222 |
|
597,848 |
ASP Dream Acquisition Co. LLC, 4.85%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.25%), 11/22/28(2) |
|
500,000 |
|
500,000 |
Bengal Debt Merger Sub LLC, 0.00%, (SOFR + 0.00%), 01/18/30(1) |
|
500,000 |
|
505,125 |
Cano Health LLC, 4.51%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.00%), 11/23/27(2) |
|
497,750 |
|
498,238 |
Employbridge LLC, 5.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.75%), 07/19/28(2) |
|
498,750 |
|
499,102 |
Envision Healthcare Corp., 3.86%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 3.75%), 10/10/25(2) |
|
498,715 |
|
388,040 |
ICON Luxembourg Sarl, 2.75%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 2.25%), 07/03/28(2) |
|
654,095 |
|
653,523 |
ICU Medical, Inc., 0.00%, (SOFR + 0.00%), |
|
400,000 |
|
401,500 |
Indivior Finance Sarl, 6.00%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 5.25%), 06/30/26(2) |
|
497,500 |
|
494,597 |
MPH Acquisition Holdings LLC, 4.75%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.25%), 08/17/28(2) |
|
748,125 |
|
728,116 |
National Mentor Holdings, Inc., 4.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 3.75%), 02/18/28(2) |
|
277,371 |
|
274,770 |
National Mentor Holdings, Inc., 4.50%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 3.75%), 02/18/28(2) |
|
221,437 |
|
219,361 |
Packaging Coordinators Midco, Inc., 4.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 3.75%), 11/30/27(2) |
|
498,744 |
|
499,419 |
PRA Health Sciences, Inc., 2.75%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 2.25%), 07/03/28(2) |
|
162,968 |
|
162,826 |
Primary Products Finance LLC, 0.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 10/25/28(1) |
|
500,000 |
|
503,875 |
Signal Parent, Inc., 4.25%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 3.50%), 04/03/28(2) |
|
298,500 |
|
291,691 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
Schedule of Investments — Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (continued)
January 31, 2022 (unaudited)
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
TERM LOANS (continued) |
|
|
|
|
Consumer, Non-cyclical (continued) |
|
|
|
|
Team Health Holdings, Inc., 3.75%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 2.75%), 02/06/24(2) |
|
$698,168 |
|
$676,001 |
Travelport Finance Luxembourg Sarl, 9.75%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 8.75%), 02/28/25(2) |
|
14,313 |
|
14,731 |
VC GB Holdings I Corp., 4.00%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 3.50%), 07/21/28(2) |
|
500,000 |
|
497,275 |
VC GB Holdings I Corp., 7.25%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 6.75%), 07/23/29(2) |
|
500,000 |
|
493,752 |
Whole Earth Brands, Inc., 5.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.50%), 02/05/28(2) |
|
596,246 |
|
594,258 |
Total Consumer, Non-cyclical |
|
|
|
11,792,054 |
Energy – 4.4% |
|
|
|
|
BCP Raptor LLC, 0.00%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 06/24/24(1) |
|
553,031 |
|
554,223 |
BCP Raptor LLC, 5.25%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 4.25%), 06/24/24(2) |
|
446,969 |
|
447,932 |
BCP Renaissance Parent LLC, 0.00%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 10/31/24(1) |
|
508,033 |
|
508,353 |
BCP Renaissance Parent LLC, 4.50%, (2-Month USD LIBOR + 3.50%), 10/31/24(2) |
|
491,967 |
|
492,277 |
CONSOL Energy, Inc., 4.61%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 4.50%), 09/27/24(2) |
|
543,885 |
|
534,415 |
Total Energy |
|
|
|
2,537,200 |
Financials – 7.2% |
|
|
|
|
Acrisure LLC, 4.75%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.25%), 02/15/27(2) |
|
500,000 |
|
500,937 |
Altisource Sarl, 5.00%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.00%), 03/29/24(2) |
|
500,000 |
|
459,790 |
Astra Acquisition Corp., 5.75%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 5.25%), 10/25/28(2) |
|
750,000 |
|
742,969 |
Nuvei Technologies Corp., 3.00%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 2.50%), 09/29/25(2) |
|
597,000 |
|
593,269 |
OneDigital Borrower LLC, 4.75%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.25%), 11/16/27(2) |
|
500,000 |
|
500,938 |
Paysafe Holdings US Corp., 3.25%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 2.75%), 06/28/28(2) |
|
398,000 |
|
390,165 |
Superannuation & Investments US LLC, 0.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 10/31/28(1) |
|
600,000 |
|
602,925 |
Superannuation & Investments US LLC, 4.25%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 3.75%), 10/31/28(2) |
|
400,000 |
|
401,950 |
Total Financials |
|
|
|
4,192,943 |
Industrials – 10.1% |
|
|
|
|
Ali Group North America Corp., 0.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 10/13/28(1) |
|
600,000 |
|
597,312 |
ASP LS Acquisition Corp., 8.25%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 7.50%), 04/30/29(2) |
|
800,000 |
|
807,500 |
Daseke Cos., Inc., 4.75%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 4.00%), 03/09/28(2) |
|
446,625 |
|
447,371 |
Dynasty Acquisition Co., Inc., 3.72%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 3.50%), 04/06/26(2) |
|
389,214 |
|
381,917 |
First Student Bidco, Inc., 3.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 3.00%), 07/21/28(2) |
|
657,353 |
|
654,615 |
First Student Bidco, Inc., 3.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 3.00%), 07/21/28(2) |
242,647 |
|
241,636 |
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
TERM LOANS (continued) |
|
|
|
|
Industrials (continued) |
|
|
|
|
Grinding Media, Inc., 4.75%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.00%), 09/22/28(2) |
|
$584,751 |
|
$586,215 |
Grinding Media, Inc., 4.75%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.00%), 09/22/28(2) |
|
163,374 |
|
163,784 |
II-VI, Inc., 0.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 12/08/28(1) |
|
500,000 |
|
500,158 |
KKR Apple Bidco LLC, 6.25%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 5.75%), 09/21/29(2) |
|
250,000 |
|
254,480 |
KKR Apple Bidco LLC, 0.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 09/21/29(1) |
|
141,176 |
|
143,706 |
LABL, Inc., 5.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 5.00%), 10/30/28(2) |
|
550,000 |
|
553,867 |
Standard Aero Ltd., 3.72%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 3.50%), 04/06/26(2) |
|
209,255 |
|
205,331 |
Standard Industries, Inc., 3.00%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 2.50%), 08/06/28(2) |
|
320,125 |
|
320,748 |
Total Industrials |
|
|
|
5,858,640 |
Technology – 17.4% |
|
|
|
|
Altar Bidco, Inc., 0.00%, (SOFR + 0.00%), 11/16/29(1) |
|
500,000 |
|
504,168 |
athenahealth, Inc., 0.00%, (SOFR + 0.00%), |
|
607,101 |
|
604,952 |
athenahealth, Inc., 0.00%, (SOFR + 0.00%), |
|
102,899 |
|
102,534 |
ConnectWise LLC, 4.00%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 3.50%), 09/29/28(2) |
|
500,000 |
|
499,778 |
ConvergeOne Holdings, Inc., 5.11%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 5.00%), 01/04/26(2) |
|
746,296 |
|
731,079 |
Digi International, Inc., 0.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 12/15/28(1) |
|
500,000 |
|
500,470 |
Dun & Bradstreet Corp. (The), 0.00%, (SOFR + 0.00%), 01/05/29(1) |
|
750,000 |
|
749,531 |
Electronics For Imaging, Inc., 0.00%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 07/02/26(1) |
|
369,828 |
|
366,886 |
Grab Holdings, Inc., 5.50%, (6-Month USD LIBOR + 4.50%), 01/29/26(2) |
|
397,000 |
|
398,054 |
MA FinanceCo LLC, 5.25%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.25%), 06/05/25(2) |
|
242,464 |
|
242,767 |
Magenta Buyer LLC, 9.00%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 8.25%), 05/03/29(2) |
|
350,000 |
|
350,292 |
MKS Instruments, Inc., 0.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 10/20/28(1) |
|
500,000 |
|
499,923 |
Orchid Finco LLC, 0.00%, (SOFR + 0.00%), |
|
500,000 |
|
482,500 |
Peraton Corp., 4.50%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 3.75%), 02/01/28(2) |
|
446,625 |
|
447,152 |
Pitney Bowes, Inc., 4.11%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 4.00%), 03/17/28(2) |
|
347,375 |
|
348,136 |
Redstone Holdco 2 LP, 8.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 7.75%), 04/27/29(2) |
|
60,000 |
|
53,895 |
Skillsoft Finance II, Inc., 5.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.75%), 07/14/28(2) |
|
500,000 |
|
504,375 |
Taboola, Inc., 4.50%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 4.00%), 08/18/28(2) |
|
498,750 |
|
497,503 |
UKG, Inc., 3.75%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 3.25%), 05/04/26(2) |
|
1,000,000 |
|
998,860 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
Schedule of Investments — Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (continued)
January 31, 2022 (unaudited)
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
TERM LOANS (continued) |
|
|
|
|
Technology (continued) |
|
|
|
|
UKG, Inc., 5.75%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 5.25%), 05/03/27(2) |
|
$200,000 |
|
$202,166 |
UST Global, Inc., 4.25%, (3-Month USD LIBOR + 3.75%), 11/02/28(2) |
|
500,000 |
|
499,585 |
Vision Solutions, Inc., 0.00%, (1-Month USD LIBOR + 0.00%), 04/24/28(1) |
|
500,000 |
|
499,688 |
Total Technology |
|
|
|
10,084,294 |
Total Term Loans |
|
|
|
|
(Cost $49,243,571) |
|
|
|
49,510,023 |
CORPORATE BONDS – 11.3% |
|
|
|
|
Basic Materials – 3.2% |
|
|
|
|
Sylvamo Corp., 7.00%, 09/01/29(3) |
|
600,000 |
|
615,666 |
TMS International Corp., 6.25%, 04/15/29(3) |
|
1,330,000 |
|
1,284,980 |
Total Basic Materials |
|
|
|
1,900,646 |
Communications – 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
Audacy Capital Corp., 6.50%, 05/01/27(3) |
|
215,000 |
|
204,708 |
Gray Television, Inc., 4.75%, 10/15/30(3) |
|
300,000 |
|
288,180 |
TEGNA, Inc., 4.63%, 03/15/28 |
|
500,000 |
|
491,160 |
Total Communications |
|
|
|
984,048 |
Consumer, Non-cyclical – 3.1% |
|
|
|
|
Emergent BioSolutions, Inc., 3.88%, 08/15/28(3) |
|
650,000 |
|
599,004 |
MPH Acquisition Holdings LLC, 5.75%, 11/01/28(3) |
|
250,000 |
|
225,279 |
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 6.13%, 10/01/28(3) |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,005,000 |
Total Consumer, Non-cyclical |
|
|
|
1,829,283 |
Industrials – 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
Graham Packaging Co., Inc., 7.13%, 08/15/28(3) |
|
600,000 |
|
609,813 |
Patrick Industries, Inc., 4.75%, 05/01/29(3) |
|
500,000 |
|
483,262 |
Total Industrials |
|
|
|
1,093,075 |
Technology – 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
Austin BidCo, Inc., 7.13%, 12/15/28(3) |
|
200,000 |
|
203,397 |
NCR Corp., 5.13%, 04/15/29(3) |
|
600,000 |
|
599,718 |
Total Technology |
|
|
|
803,115 |
Total Corporate Bonds |
|
|
|
|
(Cost $6,907,082) |
|
|
6,610,167 |
Security Description |
|
Principal |
|
Value |
FOREIGN BONDS – 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
Communications – 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
Altice Financing SA, 5.00%, 01/15/28 |
|
$500,000 |
|
$466,320 |
Iliad Holding SASU, 6.50%, 10/15/26 (France)(3) |
|
500,000 |
|
507,220 |
Total Communications |
|
|
|
973,540 |
Total Foreign Bonds |
|
|
|
|
(Cost $1,021,385) |
|
|
|
973,540 |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS – 98.2% |
|
|
|
|
(Cost $57,172,038) |
|
|
|
57,093,730 |
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities – 1.8% |
|
|
|
1,032,765 |
Net Assets – 100.0% |
|
|
|
$58,126,495 |
(1)The loan will settle after January 31, 2022. The interest rate, based on the LIBOR and the agreed upon spread on trade date, will be determined at the time of settlement.
(2)Variable rate instrument. The interest rate shown reflects the rate in effect at January 31, 2022.
(3)Security was purchased pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and may not be resold subject to that rule except to qualified institutional buyers. Unless otherwise noted, 144A securities are deemed to be liquid. At January 31, 2022, the aggregate value of these securities was $7,092,547, or 12.2% of net assets.
Abbreviations:
LIBOR — London InterBank Offered Rate
SOFR — Secured Overnight Financing Rate
USD — United States Dollar
Portfolio Composition | |||
January 31, 2022 (unaudited) | |||
Asset Allocation as of 01/31/2022 (based on net assets) | |||
Term Loans |
|
85.2 |
% |
Corporate Bonds |
|
11.3 |
% |
Foreign Bonds |
|
1.7 |
% |
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities |
|
1.8 |
% |
Total |
|
100.0 |
% |
The following table summarizes valuation of the Fund’s investments under the fair value hierarchy levels as of January 31, 2022.
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
Asset Valuation Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loans |
|
$— |
|
$49,510,023 |
|
$— |
|
$49,510,023 |
Corporate Bonds |
|
— |
|
6,610,167 |
|
— |
|
6,610,167 |
Foreign Bonds |
|
— |
|
973,540 |
|
— |
|
973,540 |
Total |
|
$— |
|
$57,093,730 |
|
$— |
|
$57,093,730 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
14
Security Description |
|
Shares |
|
Value |
COMMON STOCKS – 99.6% |
|
|
|
|
Communication Services – 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
Alphabet, Inc. Class A* |
|
375 |
|
$1,014,776 |
Meta Platforms, Inc. Class A* |
|
3,223 |
|
1,009,637 |
Total Communication Services |
|
|
|
2,024,413 |
Consumer Discretionary – 8.1% |
|
|
|
|
CarMax, Inc.* |
|
9,040 |
|
1,004,977 |
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.* |
|
709 |
|
1,053,276 |
DR Horton, Inc. |
|
11,121 |
|
992,215 |
Etsy, Inc.* |
|
6,565 |
|
1,031,230 |
Home Depot, Inc. (The) |
|
2,799 |
|
1,027,177 |
Lennar Corp. Class A |
|
10,253 |
|
985,416 |
Target Corp. |
|
4,498 |
|
991,494 |
Tesla, Inc.* |
|
1,035 |
|
969,505 |
Tractor Supply Co. |
|
4,673 |
|
1,020,163 |
Ulta Beauty, Inc.* |
|
2,797 |
|
1,017,381 |
Total Consumer Discretionary |
|
|
|
10,092,834 |
Consumer Staples – 4.8% |
|
|
|
|
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. |
|
14,175 |
|
1,063,125 |
Costco Wholesale Corp. |
|
2,029 |
|
1,024,909 |
Estee Lauder Cos., Inc. (The) Class A |
|
3,290 |
|
1,025,789 |
Hershey Co. (The) |
|
4,878 |
|
961,307 |
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) |
|
6,009 |
|
964,144 |
Tyson Foods, Inc. Class A |
|
10,867 |
|
987,702 |
Total Consumer Staples |
|
|
|
6,026,976 |
Energy – 3.4% |
|
|
|
|
ConocoPhillips |
|
11,814 |
|
1,046,957 |
EOG Resources, Inc. |
|
9,711 |
|
1,082,582 |
ONEOK, Inc. |
|
16,696 |
|
1,013,113 |
Pioneer Natural Resources Co. |
|
4,723 |
|
1,033,818 |
Total Energy |
|
|
|
4,176,470 |
Financials – 17.7% |
|
|
|
|
Arch Capital Group Ltd.* |
|
21,625 |
|
1,001,670 |
Ares Management Corp. Class A |
|
13,433 |
|
1,070,879 |
Arthur J Gallagher & Co. |
|
6,339 |
|
1,001,182 |
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. Class B* |
|
3,202 |
|
1,002,290 |
Blackstone, Inc. |
|
8,902 |
|
1,174,797 |
Brown & Brown, Inc. |
|
15,480 |
|
1,026,014 |
Charles Schwab Corp. (The) |
|
10,956 |
|
960,841 |
Chubb Ltd. |
|
5,089 |
|
1,003,958 |
Cincinnati Financial Corp. |
|
8,538 |
|
1,006,033 |
First Republic Bank |
|
5,828 |
|
1,011,683 |
Franklin Resources, Inc. |
|
30,711 |
|
981,831 |
Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (The) |
|
14,097 |
|
1,013,151 |
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. |
|
7,778 |
|
985,161 |
Markel Corp.* |
|
802 |
|
988,657 |
Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. |
|
6,222 |
|
955,948 |
Moody’s Corp. |
|
2,858 |
|
980,294 |
Regions Financial Corp. |
|
44,219 |
|
1,014,384 |
S&P Global, Inc. |
|
2,344 |
|
973,276 |
SVB Financial Group* |
|
1,680 |
|
980,952 |
T Rowe Price Group, Inc. |
|
6,120 |
|
945,112 |
Truist Financial Corp. |
|
15,898 |
|
998,712 |
W R Berkley Corp. |
|
11,840 |
|
1,000,480 |
Total Financials |
|
|
22,077,305 |
Security Description |
|
Shares |
|
Value |
COMMON STOCKS (continued) |
|
|
|
|
Health Care – 19.0% |
|
|
|
|
Abbott Laboratories |
|
7,766 |
|
$989,854 |
AbbVie, Inc. |
|
7,404 |
|
1,013,534 |
Agilent Technologies, Inc. |
|
7,107 |
|
990,147 |
Align Technology, Inc.* |
|
2,112 |
|
1,045,355 |
Anthem, Inc. |
|
2,213 |
|
975,911 |
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Class A* |
|
1,669 |
|
1,000,949 |
Centene Corp.* |
|
12,668 |
|
985,064 |
Danaher Corp. |
|
3,485 |
|
995,978 |
Dexcom, Inc.* |
|
2,315 |
|
996,561 |
Edwards Lifesciences Corp.* |
|
8,675 |
|
947,310 |
Gilead Sciences, Inc. |
|
14,264 |
|
979,651 |
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.* |
|
1,947 |
|
987,713 |
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.* |
|
3,626 |
|
1,030,437 |
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings* |
|
3,598 |
|
976,353 |
Moderna, Inc.* |
|
6,105 |
|
1,033,760 |
Pfizer, Inc. |
|
18,512 |
|
975,397 |
Quest Diagnostics, Inc. |
|
7,096 |
|
958,102 |
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* |
|
1,573 |
|
957,312 |
ResMed, Inc. |
|
4,156 |
|
950,062 |
STERIS PLC |
|
4,292 |
|
963,125 |
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. |
|
1,684 |
|
978,909 |
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. |
|
2,119 |
|
1,001,376 |
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. |
|
2,657 |
|
1,044,786 |
Zoetis, Inc. |
|
4,878 |
|
974,576 |
Total Health Care |
|
|
|
23,752,222 |
Industrials – 10.9% |
|
|
|
|
AMETEK, Inc. |
|
7,163 |
|
979,684 |
Cintas Corp. |
|
2,575 |
|
1,008,190 |
Dover Corp. |
|
5,631 |
|
956,763 |
Equifax, Inc. |
|
4,331 |
|
1,038,401 |
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. |
|
8,411 |
|
962,891 |
Fastenal Co. |
|
17,290 |
|
979,997 |
IDEX Corp. |
|
4,459 |
|
960,647 |
Ingersoll Rand, Inc. |
|
17,064 |
|
959,167 |
JB Hunt Transport Services, Inc. |
|
4,912 |
|
945,757 |
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. |
|
3,292 |
|
993,954 |
Rockwell Automation, Inc. |
|
3,110 |
|
899,474 |
United Parcel Service, Inc. Class B |
|
4,839 |
|
978,494 |
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. |
|
10,818 |
|
961,720 |
WW Grainger, Inc. |
|
1,982 |
|
981,308 |
Total Industrials |
|
|
|
13,606,447 |
Information Technology – 23.1% |
|
|
|
|
Accenture PLC Class A |
|
2,912 |
|
1,029,625 |
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.* |
|
8,225 |
|
939,706 |
Amphenol Corp. Class A |
|
12,686 |
|
1,009,679 |
Analog Devices, Inc. |
|
6,126 |
|
1,004,480 |
Applied Materials, Inc. |
|
7,236 |
|
999,870 |
Arista Networks, Inc.* |
|
8,238 |
|
1,024,066 |
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. |
|
4,501 |
|
927,971 |
Broadcom, Inc. |
|
1,833 |
|
1,073,918 |
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.* |
|
6,590 |
|
1,002,603 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
15
Schedule of Investments — Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (continued)
January 31, 2022 (unaudited)
Security Description |
|
Shares |
|
Value |
COMMON STOCKS (continued) |
|
|
|
|
Information Technology (continued) |
|
|
|
|
CDW Corp. |
|
5,292 |
|
$1,000,453 |
Cisco Systems, Inc. |
|
17,241 |
|
959,806 |
Dell Technologies, Inc. Class C* |
|
17,586 |
|
999,061 |
EPAM Systems, Inc.* |
|
2,103 |
|
1,001,322 |
F5, Inc.* |
|
4,417 |
|
917,057 |
Fortinet, Inc.* |
|
3,386 |
|
1,006,455 |
Intuit, Inc. |
|
1,849 |
|
1,026,620 |
Keysight Technologies, Inc.* |
|
5,635 |
|
951,301 |
KLA Corp. |
|
2,620 |
|
1,019,887 |
Lam Research Corp. |
|
1,613 |
|
951,541 |
Micron Technology, Inc. |
|
11,928 |
|
981,317 |
Microsoft Corp. |
|
3,301 |
|
1,026,545 |
NVIDIA Corp. |
|
4,181 |
|
1,023,760 |
Paychex, Inc. |
|
8,235 |
|
969,754 |
QUALCOMM, Inc. |
|
5,925 |
|
1,041,378 |
Shopify, Inc. Class A (Canada)* |
|
1,108 |
|
1,068,378 |
Synopsys, Inc.* |
|
3,222 |
|
1,000,431 |
TE Connectivity Ltd. |
|
6,476 |
|
926,133 |
Tyler Technologies, Inc.* |
|
2,150 |
|
1,018,670 |
Zebra Technologies Corp. Class A* |
|
1,977 |
|
1,006,530 |
Total Information Technology |
|
|
|
28,908,317 |
Materials – 6.2% |
|
|
|
|
Celanese Corp. |
|
6,083 |
|
947,184 |
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. |
|
23,841 |
|
887,362 |
International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc. |
|
7,016 |
|
925,550 |
Linde PLC (United Kingdom) |
|
3,091 |
|
985,040 |
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. |
|
2,556 |
|
994,591 |
Nucor Corp. |
|
10,502 |
|
1,064,903 |
Sherwin-Williams Co. (The) |
|
3,337 |
|
956,084 |
Vulcan Materials Co. |
|
5,253 |
|
999,698 |
Total Materials |
|
|
7,760,412 |
Security Description |
|
Shares |
|
Value |
Real Estate – 4.8% |
|
|
|
|
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. |
|
4,971 |
|
$968,550 |
Extra Space Storage, Inc. |
|
4,999 |
|
990,752 |
Prologis, Inc. |
|
6,287 |
|
985,927 |
Public Storage |
|
2,766 |
|
991,694 |
Sun Communities, Inc. |
|
5,190 |
|
980,702 |
Weyerhaeuser Co. |
|
25,710 |
|
1,039,455 |
Total Real Estate |
|
|
|
5,957,080 |
Total Common Stocks |
|
|
|
|
(Cost $121,410,729) |
|
|
|
124,382,476 |
TOTAL INVESTMENTS – 99.6% |
|
|
|
|
(Cost $121,410,729) |
|
|
|
124,382,476 |
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities – 0.4% |
|
|
|
552,094 |
Net Assets – 100.0% |
|
|
|
$124,934,570 |
*Non-income producing security.
Portfolio Composition | |||
January 31, 2022 (unaudited) | |||
Asset Allocation as of 01/31/2022 (based on net assets) | |||
Information Technology |
|
23.1 |
% |
Health Care |
|
19.0 |
% |
Financials |
|
17.7 |
% |
Industrials |
|
10.9 |
% |
Consumer Discretionary |
|
8.1 |
% |
Materials |
|
6.2 |
% |
Consumer Staples |
|
4.8 |
% |
Real Estate |
|
4.8 |
% |
Energy |
|
3.4 |
% |
Communication Services |
|
1.6 |
% |
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities |
|
0.4 |
% |
Total |
|
100.0 |
% |
The following table summarizes valuation of the Fund’s investments under the fair value hierarchy levels as of January 31, 2022.
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
Asset Valuation Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stocks |
|
$124,382,476 |
|
$— |
|
$— |
|
$124,382,476 |
Total |
|
$124,382,476 |
|
$— |
|
$— |
|
$124,382,476 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
16
|
|
Virtus |
|
Virtus Newfleet |
|
Virtus |
|
Virtus Seix |
|
Virtus Terranova |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments, at cost |
|
$3,731,993 |
|
$16,029,037 |
|
$6,067,183 |
|
$57,172,038 |
|
$121,410,729 |
|
Investments, at value |
|
3,176,185 |
|
15,788,175 |
|
6,019,822 |
|
57,093,730 |
|
124,382,476 |
|
Cash |
|
29,736 |
|
200,900 |
|
7,711 |
|
10,322,933 |
|
199,970 |
|
Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and interest |
|
5,563 |
|
20,500 |
|
94,731 |
|
296,131 |
|
54,339 |
|
Due from Adviser |
|
882 |
|
5,431 |
|
19,288 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Investment securities sold |
|
111 |
|
22,751 |
|
102,161 |
|
13,397,552 |
|
55,293,502 |
|
Capital shares sold |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
14,483,230 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
1,667 |
|
5,863 |
|
13,606 |
|
9,979 |
|
7,159 |
|
Total Assets |
|
3,214,144 |
|
16,043,620 |
|
6,257,319 |
|
81,120,325 |
|
194,420,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to broker |
|
— |
|
20,062 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Payables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities purchased |
|
15,265 |
|
— |
|
84,912 |
|
22,887,802 |
|
51,592,144 |
|
Capital shares payable |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
17,769,795 |
|
Insurance fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
282 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Advisory fees |
|
9,463 |
|
30,740 |
|
— |
|
106,028 |
|
124,167 |
|
Transfer agent fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
9,859 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Accounting and administration fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
4,969 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Custody fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
10,583 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Professional fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
45,667 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Pricing fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
17,278 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Report to shareholder fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
12,138 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Trustee fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
3,935 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Exchange listing fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
4,776 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
408 |
|
— |
|
528 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
25,136 |
|
50,802 |
|
194,927 |
|
22,993,830 |
|
69,486,106 |
|
Net Assets |
|
$3,189,008 |
|
$15,992,818 |
|
$6,062,392 |
|
$58,126,495 |
|
$124,934,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Consist of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital |
|
$3,799,911 |
|
$16,250,288 |
|
$8,855,537 |
|
$58,085,049 |
|
$122,662,618 |
|
Total distributable earnings (accumulated deficit) |
|
(610,903 |
) |
(257,470 |
) |
(2,793,145 |
) |
41,446 |
|
2,271,952 |
|
Net Assets |
|
$3,189,008 |
|
$15,992,818 |
|
$6,062,392 |
|
$58,126,495 |
|
$124,934,570 |
|
Shares outstanding (unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest authorized, no par value) |
|
150,004 |
|
650,004 |
|
254,000 |
|
2,325,004 |
|
4,200,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per share |
|
$21.26 |
|
$24.60 |
|
$23.87 |
|
$25.00 |
|
$29.75 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
17
|
|
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF1 |
|
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF |
|
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF |
|
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF |
|
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF |
|
Investment Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income (net of foreign withholding taxes) |
|
$16,171 |
|
$— |
|
$5 |
|
$— |
|
$506,548 |
|
Interest income |
|
— |
|
145,419 |
|
177,035 |
|
1,082,490 |
|
21 |
|
Total Investment Income |
|
16,171 |
|
145,419 |
|
177,040 |
|
1,082,490 |
|
506,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advisory fees |
|
10,804 |
|
39,519 |
|
12,226 |
|
135,550 |
|
161,794 |
|
Custody fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
68 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Exchange listing fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
4,650 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Professional fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
17,594 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Insurance fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
50 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Accounting and administration fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
4,981 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Transfer agent fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
6,347 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Trustee fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
4,775 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Report to shareholders fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
6,536 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Pricing fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
10,558 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Other expenses |
|
— |
|
— |
|
101 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Total Expenses |
|
10,804 |
|
39,519 |
|
67,886 |
|
135,550 |
|
161,794 |
|
Less expense waivers/reimbursements |
|
(1,146 |
) |
(8,065 |
) |
(52,524 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
Net Expenses |
|
9,658 |
|
31,454 |
|
15,362 |
|
135,550 |
|
161,794 |
|
Net Investment Income |
|
6,513 |
|
113,965 |
|
161,678 |
|
946,940 |
|
344,775 |
|
Net Realized Gain (Loss) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
(89,561 |
) |
(1,065 |
) |
(7,147 |
) |
238,782 |
|
(5,824,375 |
) |
In-kind redemptions |
|
28,067 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
6,514,662 |
|
Foreign currency transactions |
|
(64 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Total Net Realized Gain (Loss) |
|
(61,558 |
) |
(1,065 |
) |
(7,147 |
) |
238,782 |
|
690,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
(555,808 |
) |
(259,780 |
) |
(198,945 |
) |
(202,549 |
) |
(5,684,213 |
) |
Foreign currency translations |
|
(50 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Total Change in Net Unrealized Depreciation |
|
(555,858 |
) |
(259,780 |
) |
(198,945 |
) |
(202,549 |
) |
(5,684,213 |
) |
Net Realized and Change in Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
(617,416 |
) |
(260,845 |
) |
(206,092 |
) |
36,233 |
|
(4,993,926 |
) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
|
$(610,903 |
) |
$(146,880 |
) |
$(44,414 |
) |
$983,173 |
|
$(4,649,151 |
) |
Foreign withholding taxes |
|
$411 |
|
$— |
|
$— |
|
$— |
|
$— |
|
1From August 3, 2021 (commencement of operations) through January 31, 2022.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
18
|
|
Virtus |
|
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF |
| ||
|
|
For the Period |
|
For the |
|
For the Period |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$6,513 |
|
$113,965 |
|
$49,691 |
|
Net realized gain (loss) |
|
(61,558 |
) |
(1,065 |
) |
39 |
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
|
(555,858 |
) |
(259,780 |
) |
18,918 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
|
(610,903 |
) |
(146,880 |
) |
68,648 |
|
Distributions to Shareholders |
|
— |
|
(126,951 |
) |
(52,287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from shares sold |
|
5,106,368 |
|
1,249,750 |
|
15,000,538 |
|
Cost of shares redeemed |
|
(1,306,457 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from shareholder transactions |
|
3,799,911 |
|
1,249,750 |
|
15,000,538 |
|
Increase in net assets |
|
3,189,008 |
|
975,919 |
|
15,016,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period/year |
|
— |
|
15,016,899 |
|
— |
|
End of period/year |
|
$3,189,008 |
|
$15,992,818 |
|
$15,016,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding, beginning of period/year |
|
— |
|
600,004 |
|
— |
|
Shares sold |
|
200,004 |
|
50,000 |
|
600,004 |
|
Shares redeemed |
|
(50,000 |
) |
— |
|
— |
|
Shares outstanding, end of period/year |
|
150,004 |
|
650,004 |
|
600,004 |
|
1Commencement of operations.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
19
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
|
|
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF |
|
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF |
| ||||
|
|
For the |
|
For the |
|
For the |
|
For the |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$161,678 |
|
$273,655 |
|
$946,940 |
|
$412,506 |
|
Net realized gain (loss) |
|
(7,147 |
) |
113,624 |
|
238,782 |
|
305,292 |
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
|
(198,945 |
) |
200,993 |
|
(202,549 |
) |
44,247 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
|
(44,414 |
) |
588,272 |
|
983,173 |
|
762,045 |
|
Distributions to Shareholders |
|
(165,069 |
) |
(280,886 |
) |
(1,191,456 |
) |
(378,835 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from shares sold |
|
— |
|
— |
|
19,496,029 |
|
32,416,547 |
|
Cost of shares redeemed |
|
— |
|
(1,183,191 |
) |
— |
|
(1,237,882 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from shareholder transactions |
|
— |
|
(1,183,191 |
) |
19,496,029 |
|
31,178,665 |
|
Increase (decrease) in net assets |
|
(209,483 |
) |
(875,805 |
) |
19,287,746 |
|
31,561,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period/year |
|
6,271,875 |
|
7,147,680 |
|
38,838,749 |
|
7,276,874 |
|
End of period/year |
|
$6,062,392 |
|
$6,271,875 |
|
$58,126,495 |
|
$38,838,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding, beginning of period/year |
|
254,000 |
|
304,000 |
|
1,550,004 |
|
300,004 |
|
Shares sold |
|
— |
|
— |
|
775,000 |
|
1,300,000 |
|
Shares redeemed |
|
— |
|
(50,000 |
) |
— |
|
(50,000 |
) |
Shares outstanding, end of period/year |
|
254,000 |
|
254,000 |
|
2,325,004 |
|
1,550,004 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
20
Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)
|
|
Virtus Terranova U.S. |
| ||
|
|
For the |
|
For the Period |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$344,775 |
|
$345,874 |
|
Net realized gain |
|
690,287 |
|
6,747,564 |
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
|
(5,684,213 |
) |
8,655,960 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
|
(4,649,151 |
) |
15,749,398 |
|
Distributions to Shareholders |
|
(587,958 |
) |
(74,408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from shares sold |
|
88,012,896 |
|
138,289,014 |
|
Cost of shares redeemed |
|
(42,616,594 |
) |
(69,188,627 |
) |
Net increase in net assets resulting from shareholder transactions |
|
45,396,302 |
|
69,100,387 |
|
Increase in net assets |
|
40,159,193 |
|
84,775,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period/year |
|
84,775,377 |
|
— |
|
End of period/year |
|
$124,934,570 |
|
$84,775,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding, beginning of period/year |
|
2,800,004 |
|
— |
|
Shares sold |
|
2,800,000 |
|
5,300,004 |
|
Shares redeemed |
|
(1,400,000 |
) |
(2,500,000 |
) |
Shares outstanding, end of period/year |
|
4,200,004 |
|
2,800,004 |
|
1Commencement of operations.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
21
|
|
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF |
|
|
|
For the Period |
|
Per Share Data for a Share Outstanding throughout the period presented: |
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period |
|
$25.55 |
|
Investment operations: |
|
|
|
Net investment income2 |
|
0.05 |
|
Net realized and unrealized loss |
|
(4.34 |
) |
Total from investment operations |
|
(4.29 |
) |
Net Asset Value, End of period |
|
$21.26 |
|
Net Asset Value Total Return3 |
|
(16.80 |
)% |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) |
|
$3,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: |
|
|
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: |
|
|
|
Expenses, net of expense waivers |
|
0.59 |
%4 |
Expenses, prior to expense waivers |
|
0.66 |
%4 |
Net investment income |
|
0.40 |
%4 |
Portfolio turnover rate5 |
|
21 |
%6 |
1Commencement of operations.
2Based on average shares outstanding.
3Net Asset Value Total Return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value on the first day of the period, reinvestment of dividends and distributions at net asset value during the period, and redemptions at net asset value on the last day of the period. Total return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized.
4Annualized.
5Portfolio turnover excludes the value of portfolio securities received or delivered as a result of in-kind creations or redemptions of the Fund’s capital shares.
6Not annualized.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
22
Financial Highlights (continued)
|
|
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF |
| ||
|
|
For the |
|
For the Period |
|
Per Share Data for a Share Outstanding throughout each period presented: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period |
|
$25.03 |
|
$25.00 |
|
Investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income2 |
|
0.18 |
|
0.17 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
|
(0.41 |
) |
0.04 |
|
Total from investment operations |
|
(0.23 |
) |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Distributions from: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
(0.20 |
) |
(0.18 |
) |
Total distributions |
|
(0.20 |
) |
(0.18 |
) |
Net Asset Value, End of period |
|
$24.60 |
|
$25.03 |
|
Net Asset Value Total Return3 |
|
(0.91 |
)% |
0.85 |
% |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) |
|
$15,993 |
|
$15,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses, net of expense waivers |
|
0.39 |
%4 |
0.39 |
%4 |
Expenses, prior to expense waivers |
|
0.49 |
%4 |
0.49 |
%4 |
Net investment income |
|
1.41 |
%4 |
1.49 |
%4 |
Portfolio turnover rate5 |
|
15 |
%6 |
24 |
%6 |
1Commencement of operations.
2Based on average shares outstanding.
3Net Asset Value Total Return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value on the first day of the period, reinvestment of dividends and distributions at net asset value during the period, and redemptions at net asset value on the last day of the period. Total return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized.
4Annualized.
5Portfolio turnover excludes the value of portfolio securities received or delivered as a result of in-kind creations or redemptions of the Fund’s capital shares.
6Not annualized.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
23
Financial Highlights (continued)
|
|
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF |
| ||||||||||
|
|
For the |
|
For the |
|
For the |
|
For the |
|
For the |
|
For the Period |
|
Per Share Data for a Share Outstanding throughout each period presented: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period |
|
$24.69 |
|
$23.51 |
|
$23.93 |
|
$24.61 |
|
$25.28 |
|
$25.00 |
|
Investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income2 |
|
0.64 |
|
1.04 |
|
0.90 |
|
1.32 |
|
1.22 |
|
0.47 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
|
(0.81 |
) |
1.21 |
|
(0.42 |
) |
(0.57 |
) |
(0.57 |
) |
0.22 |
|
Total from investment operations |
|
(0.17 |
) |
2.25 |
|
0.48 |
|
0.75 |
|
0.65 |
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Distributions from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
(0.65 |
) |
(1.07 |
) |
(0.90 |
) |
(1.43 |
) |
(1.24 |
) |
(0.41 |
) |
Net realized gains |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(0.08 |
) |
— |
|
Total distributions |
|
(0.65 |
) |
(1.07 |
) |
(0.90 |
) |
(1.43 |
) |
(1.32 |
) |
(0.41 |
) |
Net Asset Value, End of period |
|
$23.87 |
|
$24.69 |
|
$23.51 |
|
$23.93 |
|
$24.61 |
|
$25.28 |
|
Net Asset Value Total Return3 |
|
(0.74 |
)% |
9.78 |
% |
2.10 |
% |
3.14 |
% |
2.67 |
% |
2.79 |
% |
Net assets, end of period |
|
$6,062 |
|
$6,272 |
|
$7,148 |
|
$12,061 |
|
$82,556 |
|
$121,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses, net of expense waivers |
|
0.49%4 |
|
0.62 |
% |
0.68 |
% |
0.68 |
% |
0.68 |
% |
0.68%4 |
|
Expenses, prior to expense waivers |
|
2.17%4 |
|
1.88 |
% |
2.43 |
% |
1.03 |
% |
0.80 |
% |
0.73%4 |
|
Net investment income |
|
5.16%4 |
|
4.27 |
% |
3.85 |
% |
5.43 |
% |
4.89 |
% |
2.85%4 |
|
Portfolio turnover rate5 |
|
32%6 |
|
121 |
% |
124 |
% |
82 |
% |
96 |
% |
41%6 |
|
1Commencement of operations.
2Based on average shares outstanding.
3Net Asset Value Total Return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value on the first day of the year, reinvestment of dividends and distributions at net asset value during the year, and redemptions at net asset value on the last day of the year. Total return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized.
4Annualized.
5Portfolio turnover excludes the value of portfolio securities received or delivered as a result of in-kind creations or redemptions of the Fund’s capital shares.
6Not annualized.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
24
Financial Highlights (continued)
|
|
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF |
| ||||||
|
|
For the |
|
For the |
|
For the |
|
For the Period |
|
Per Share Data for a Share Outstanding throughout each period presented: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period |
|
$25.06 |
|
$24.26 |
|
$25.02 |
|
$25.00 |
|
Investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income2 |
|
0.50 |
|
0.79 |
|
1.19 |
|
0.29 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
|
0.05 |
|
0.86 |
|
(0.68 |
) |
(0.03 |
) |
Total from investment operations |
|
0.55 |
|
1.65 |
|
0.51 |
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Distributions from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
(0.48 |
) |
(0.85 |
) |
(1.15 |
) |
(0.24 |
) |
Net realized gains |
|
(0.13 |
) |
— |
|
(0.12 |
) |
— |
|
Total distributions |
|
(0.61 |
) |
(0.85 |
) |
(1.27 |
) |
(0.24 |
) |
Net Asset Value, End of period |
|
$25.00 |
|
$25.06 |
|
$24.26 |
|
$25.02 |
|
Net Asset Value Total Return3 |
|
2.23 |
% |
6.94 |
% |
2.11 |
% |
1.08 |
% |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) |
|
$58,126 |
|
$38,839 |
|
$7,277 |
|
$6,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
0.57 |
%4 |
0.57 |
% |
0.57 |
% |
0.57 |
%4 |
Net investment income |
|
3.98 |
%4 |
3.20 |
% |
4.93 |
% |
4.39 |
%4 |
Portfolio turnover rate5 |
|
377 |
%6 |
851 |
% |
546 |
% |
544 |
%6 |
1Commencement of operations.
2Based on average shares outstanding.
3Net Asset Value Total Return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value on the first day of the period, reinvestment of dividends and distributions at net asset value during the period, and redemptions at net asset value on the last day of the period. Total return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized.
4Annualized.
5Portfolio turnover excludes the value of portfolio securities received or delivered as a result of in-kind creations or redemptions of the Fund’s capital shares.
6Not annualized.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
25
Financial Highlights (continued)
|
|
Virtus Terranova U.S. |
| ||
|
|
For the |
|
For the Period |
|
Per Share Data for a Share Outstanding throughout each period presented: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period |
|
$30.28 |
|
$24.92 |
|
Investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income2 |
|
0.10 |
|
0.12 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
|
(0.49 |
) |
5.26 |
|
Total from investment operations |
|
(0.39 |
) |
5.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Distributions from: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
(0.14 |
) |
(0.02 |
) |
Total distributions |
|
(0.14 |
) |
(0.02 |
) |
Net Asset Value, End of period |
|
$29.75 |
|
$30.28 |
|
Net Asset Value Total Return3 |
|
(1.31 |
)% |
21.58 |
% |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) |
|
$124,935 |
|
$84,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
0.29 |
%4 |
0.29 |
%4 |
Net investment income |
|
0.62 |
%4 |
0.62 |
%4 |
Portfolio turnover rate5 |
|
59 |
%6 |
89 |
%6 |
1Commencement of operations.
2Based on average shares outstanding.
3Net Asset Value Total Return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value on the first day of the period, reinvestment of dividends and distributions at net asset value during the period, and redemptions at net asset value on the last day of the period. Total return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized.
4Annualized.
5Portfolio turnover excludes the value of portfolio securities received or delivered as a result of in-kind creations or redemptions of the Fund’s capital shares.
6Not annualized.
26
1.ORGANIZATION
Virtus ETF Trust II (the “Trust”) was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on July 14, 2015 and is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) as an open-end management investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).
As of January 31, 2022, five funds of the Trust are offered for sale. Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF, Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF, Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF, Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF and Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (each a “Fund” and, collectively, the “Funds”), each a separate investment portfolio of the Trust, are presented in this semi-annual report. The offering of each Fund’s shares is registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).
Funds |
|
Commencement |
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF |
|
August 3, 2021 |
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF |
|
February 9, 2021 |
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF. |
|
December 5, 2016 |
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF |
|
April 24, 2019 |
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF |
|
November 17, 2020 |
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF and Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF are “non-diversified” Funds, as defined under the 1940 Act.
The Funds have the following investment objectives:
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF seeks capital appreciation.
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF seeks income.
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF seeks to provide a high level of current income and, secondarily, capital appreciation.
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF seeks to provide a high level of current income.
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF seeks investment results that correspond, before fees and expenses, to the price and yield performance of the Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index.
There is no guarantee that a Fund will achieve its objective(s).
2.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Each Fund is an investment company and accordingly follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standard Codification Topic 946 Financial Services — Investment Companies. Each Fund prepares its financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States of America and follows the significant accounting policies described below.
(a)Use of Estimates
Management makes certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(b)Indemnification
In the normal course of business, the Funds may enter into contracts that contain a variety of representations which provide general indemnifications for certain liabilities. The Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Funds have not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expect the risk of loss to be remote.
(c)Security Valuation
A description of the valuation techniques applied to the Funds’ major categories of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis is as follows:
Equity securities are valued at the official closing price (typically last sale) on the exchange on which the securities are primarily traded. Securities regularly traded in an over the counter market are valued at the latest quoted sale price in such market or in the case of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), at the NYSE Official Closing Price. Such valuations are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. If market quotations are not readily available, or if it is determined that a quotation of a security does not represent fair value, then the security is valued at fair value as determined in good faith using procedures adopted by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”). Such valuations are typically categorized as Level 2 or Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
27
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
January 31, 2022 (unaudited)
Debt securities, including restricted securities, are valued based on evaluated quotations received from independent pricing services or from dealers who make markets in such securities. For most bond types, the pricing service utilizes matrix pricing that considers one or more of the following factors: yield or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity, current cash flows, type, and current day trade information, as well as dealer-supplied prices. Such valuations are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Debt securities that are not widely traded, are illiquid, or are internally fair valued using procedures adopted by the Board are generally categorized as Level 3 in the hierarchy.
Investments in other open-end investment companies are valued based on their net asset value each business day and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
(d)Fair Value Measurement
Accounting Standards Codification, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”) defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP, and requires disclosure about fair value measurements. It also provides guidance on determining when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability, when a transaction is not orderly, and how that information must be incorporated into fair value measurement. Under ASC 820, various inputs are used in determining the value of the Funds’ investments. These inputs are summarized in the following hierarchy:
•Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Funds have the ability to access.
•Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data.
•Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available; representing the Funds’ own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available.
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. The hierarchy classification of inputs used to value each Fund’s investments at January 31, 2022, is disclosed at the end of each Fund’s Schedule of Investments.
(e)Security Transactions and Investment Income
Security transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses on sales of investment securities are calculated using specific identification. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date. Expenses and interest income are recognized on the accrual basis. Amortization of premium and accretion of discount on debt securities are included in interest income. Each Fund amortizes premiums and accretes discounts using the effective interest method. Premiums on callable debt securities are amortized to interest income to the earliest call date using the effective interest method.
(f)Expenses
Each Fund pays all of its expenses not assumed by its Sub-Adviser, if any, as defined in Note 3, or the Adviser. General Trust expenses that are allocated among and charged to the assets of the Funds are done so on a basis that the Board deems fair and equitable, which may be on a basis of relative net assets of each Fund or the nature of the services performed and relative applicability to each Fund.
(g)Distributions to Shareholders
Distributions are recorded by the Funds on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may differ from GAAP in the United States of America.
(h)When-issued Purchases and Forward Commitments (Delayed Delivery)
The Funds may engage in when-issued or forward commitment transactions. Securities purchased on a when-issued or forward commitment basis are also known as delayed delivery transactions. Delayed delivery transactions involve a commitment by a Fund to purchase or sell a security at a future date, ordinarily up to 90 days later. When-issued or forward commitments enable a Fund to lock in what is believed to be an attractive price or yield on a particular security for a period of time, regardless of future changes in interest rates. The Funds record when-issued and delayed delivery securities on the trade date. The Funds maintain collateral for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis begin earning interest on the settlement date.
28
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
January 31, 2022 (unaudited)
(i)Loan Agreements
The Funds may invest in direct debt instruments which are interests in amounts owed by a corporate, governmental, or other borrower to lenders or lending syndicates. Loan agreements are generally non-investment grade and often involve borrowers that are highly leveraged. The Funds may invest in obligations of borrowers who are in bankruptcy proceedings. Loan agreements are typically senior in the corporate capital structure of the borrower. A loan is often administered by a bank or other financial institution (the “lender”) that acts as agent for all holders. The lender administers the terms of the loan, as specified in the loan agreement. A Fund’s investment in loans may be in the form of participations in loans or assignments of all or a portion of loans from third parties. When investing in loan participations, a Fund has the right to receive payments of principal, interest and any fees to which it is entitled only from the lender selling the loan participation and only upon receipt by the lender of payments from the borrower. A Fund generally has no right to enforce compliance with the terms of the loan agreement with the borrower. As a result, a Fund may be subject to the credit risk of both the borrower and the lender that is selling the loan agreement. When a Fund purchases assignments from lenders, it acquires direct rights against the borrower on the loan.
A Fund may invest in multiple series or tranches of a loan, which may have varying terms and carry different associated risks. Loan agreements may involve foreign borrowers, and investments may be denominated in foreign currencies. Direct indebtedness of emerging countries involves a risk that the government entities responsible for the repayment of the debt may be unable, or unwilling, to pay the principal and interest when due.
The loan agreements have floating rate loan interests which generally pay interest at rates that are periodically determined by reference to a base lending rate plus a premium. The base lending rates are generally LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate), the prime rate offered by one or more U.S. banks or the certificate of deposit rate. When a loan agreement is purchased, a Fund may pay an assignment fee. On an ongoing basis, a Fund may receive a commitment fee based on the undrawn portion of the underlying line of credit portion of a loan agreement. Prepayment penalty fees are received upon the prepayment of a loan agreement by a borrower. Prepayment penalty, facility, commitment, consent and amendment fees are recorded to income as earned or paid.
3.INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, RELATED PARTIES AND OTHER AGREEMENTS
Investment Advisory Agreement
The Trust, on behalf of each Fund, has entered into an Investment Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) with Virtus ETF Advisers LLC (the “Adviser”), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (Ticker: VRTS) (together with its affiliates, “Virtus”). Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Adviser has overall supervisory responsibility for the general management and investment of the Funds’ securities portfolios. The Adviser has agreed to pay all of the ordinary operating expenses of each of the Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF, Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF, Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF and Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF, except for the following expenses, each of which is paid by the applicable Fund: the Adviser’s fee; payments under any 12b-1 plan; taxes and other governmental fees; brokerage fees, commissions and other transaction expenses; interest and other costs of borrowing; litigation or arbitration expenses; acquired fund fees and expenses; and extraordinary or other non-routine expenses of the Fund. The Adviser is entitled to receive a fee from each Fund based on each Fund’s average daily net assets, computed and accrued daily and payable monthly, at an annual rate as follows:
Funds |
|
Rate | |
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF |
|
0.66 |
%* |
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF |
|
0.49 |
%** |
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF |
|
0.39 |
% |
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF |
|
0.57 |
% |
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF |
|
0.29 |
% |
*The Adviser has contractually agreed to waive a portion of the Fund’s management fee equal to 0.07% of the Fund’s average daily net assets through at least November 28, 2022, which will have the effect of reducing the Fund’s expenses (the “Fee Waiver Agreement”). While the Adviser or the Fund may discontinue the Fee Waiver Agreement after the contractual period, it may only be terminated during its term by either party upon written notice; provided that such termination shall require the approval of the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
**The Adviser has contractually agreed to waive a portion of the Fund’s management fee equal to 0.10% of the Fund’s average daily net assets through at least November 28, 2022, which will have the effect of reducing the Fund’s expenses (the “Fee Waiver Agreement”). While the Adviser or the Fund may discontinue the Fee Waiver Agreement after the contractual period, it may only be terminated during its term by either party upon written notice; provided that such termination shall require the approval of the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
29
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
January 31, 2022 (unaudited)
The Advisory Agreement may be terminated by the Trust on behalf of each Fund with the approval of each Fund’s Board or by a vote of the majority of the Funds’ shareholders. The Advisory Agreement may also be terminated by the Adviser by not more than 60 days’ nor less than 30 days’ written notice.
Expense Limitation Agreement
The Adviser has contractually agreed to reduce its fees and reimburse expenses in order to limit Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF’s total operating expenses (excluding any taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, expenses incurred in connection with any merger or reorganization, unusual or infrequently occurring expenses (such as litigation) or acquired fund fees, and expenses, if any, payable pursuant to a Rule 12b-1 Distribution Plan) from exceeding 0.49% of the Fund’s average daily net assets through at least November 28, 2022.
The expense limitation agreement with respect to Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF will be terminated upon termination of the Advisory Agreement between the Adviser and the Fund. In addition, while the Adviser or the Fund may discontinue the expense limitation agreement after the contractual period, it may only be terminated during its term with the approval of the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Under certain conditions, the Adviser may recapture operating expenses waived or reimbursed under the expense limitation agreement for a period of three years following the date on which such waiver or reimbursement occurred; provided that such recapture may not cause the Fund’s total operating expenses to exceed 0.49% of the average daily net assets of the Fund (or any lower expense limitation or limitations to which the Fund and the Adviser may otherwise agree). All or a portion of the following expenses reimbursed by the Adviser may be recaptured during the fiscal years indicated:
Fund |
|
2022 |
|
2023 |
|
2024 |
|
2025 |
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF |
|
$194,284 |
|
$161,061 |
|
$80,940 |
|
$52,524 |
Sub-Advisory Agreement
Each Sub-Adviser provides investment advice and management services to its respective Fund. Pursuant to an investment sub-advisory agreement among the Trust, the respective Sub-Adviser and the Adviser, the Adviser pays each Fund’s Sub-Adviser a sub-advisory fee calculated as shown below.
Funds |
|
Sub-Advisers |
|
Sub-Advisory Fees |
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF |
|
Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co.(1) |
|
50% of the net advisory fee(2) |
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF |
|
Newfleet Asset Management, LLC(1) |
|
50% of the net advisory fee(2) |
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF |
|
Newfleet Asset Management, LLC(1) |
|
50% of the net advisory fee(3) |
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF |
|
Seix Investment Advisors LLC(1) |
|
50% of the net advisory fee(2) |
(1)An indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Virtus.
(2)Net advisory fee: The advisory fee paid by the Fund to the Adviser for investment advisory services under the Adviser’s investment advisory agreement with the Fund, after deducting the payment of all of the ordinary operating expenses of the Fund under the Adviser’s unified fee arrangement. In the event that the Adviser waives all or a portion of its fee pursuant to an applicable waiver agreement, then the Sub-Adviser will waive its fee in the same proportion as the Adviser.
(3)Net advisory fee: The advisory fee paid by the Fund to the Adviser for investment advisory services under the Adviser’s investment advisory agreement with the Fund, after accounting for any applicable fee waiver and/or expense limitation agreement, which will not include reimbursement of the Adviser for any expenses or recapture of prior waivers. In the event the Adviser waives its entire fee and also assumes expenses of the Fund pursuant to an applicable expense limitation agreement, the Sub- Adviser will similarly waive its entire fee and will share in the expense assumption by promptly paying to the Adviser (or its designee) 50% of the assumed amount. If during the term of the Sub-Advisory Agreement the Adviser later recaptures some or all of fees waived or expenses reimbursed by the Adviser and the Sub-Adviser together, then the Adviser will pay to the Sub-Adviser 50% of the amount recaptured.
Principal Underwriter
Pursuant to the terms of a Distribution Agreement with the Trust, VP Distributors, LLC (the “Distributor”) serves as the Funds’ principal underwriter. The Distributor receives compensation from the Adviser for the statutory underwriting services it provides to the Funds. The Distributor will not distribute shares in less than Creation Units (as hereinafter defined), and does not maintain a secondary market in shares. The shares are traded in the secondary market. The Distributor is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Virtus.
Distribution and Service (12b-1 Plan)
The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution and service plan under which each of Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF, Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF, Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF and Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF is authorized to pay an amount up to 0.25% of its average daily net assets each year to finance activities primarily intended to result in the sale of Creation Units of the Fund or the provision of investor services. No 12b-1 fees are currently paid by the Funds and there are no current plans to impose these fees.
30
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
January 31, 2022 (unaudited)
Operational Administrator
Virtus ETF Solutions LLC (the “Administrator”) serves as the Funds’ operational administrator. The Administrator supervises the overall administration of the Trust and the Funds including, among other responsibilities, the coordination and day-to-day oversight of the Funds’ operations, the service providers’ communications with the Funds and each other and assistance with Trust, Board and contractual matters related to the Funds and other series of the Trust. The Administrator also provides persons satisfactory to the Board to serve as officers of the Trust. The Administrator is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Virtus.
Accounting Services Administrator, Custodian and Transfer Agent
The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY Mellon”) provides administrative, accounting, tax and financial reporting for the maintenance and operations of the Trust as the Funds’ accounting services administrator. BNY Mellon also serves as the custodian for the Funds’ assets, and serves as transfer agent and dividend paying agent for the Funds.
Affiliated Shareholders
At January 31, 2022, Virtus Partners, Inc. held shares of Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF and Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF which may be sold at any time that aggregated to the following:
|
|
Shares |
|
% of
shares |
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF |
|
200,004 |
|
30.8% |
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF |
|
764,004 |
|
32.9% |
4.CREATION AND REDEMPTION TRANSACTIONS
The Funds, except the Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF and Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF, issue and redeem shares on a continuous basis at Net Asset Value (“NAV”) in groups of 50,000 shares called “Creation Units.” The Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF and Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF issue and redeem shares on a continuous basis at NAV in groups of 25,000 shares per Creation Unit. The Funds’ Creation Units may be issued and redeemed generally for cash or an in-kind deposit of securities held by the Funds. In each instance of cash creations or redemptions, the Trust may impose transaction fees based on transaction expenses related to the particular exchange that will be higher than the transaction fees associated with in-kind purchases or redemptions. Only “Authorized Participants” who have entered into contractual arrangements with the Distributor may purchase or redeem shares directly from the Funds. An Authorized Participant is either (i) a broker-dealer or other participant in the clearing process through the Continuous Net Settlement System of the National Securities Clearing Corporation or (ii) a DTC participant and, in each case, must have executed a Participant Agreement with the Distributor. Most retail investors will not qualify as Authorized Participants or have the resources to buy and sell whole Creation Units. Therefore, they will be unable to purchase or redeem the shares directly from the Funds. Rather, most retail investors will purchase shares in the secondary market with the assistance of a broker and will be subject to customary brokerage commissions or fees.
Authorized participants pay a fixed transaction fee of $500 to the shareholder servicing agent when purchasing and redeeming Creation Units of the Funds. The transaction fee is used to defray the costs associated with the issuance and redemption of Creation Units.
5.FEDERAL INCOME TAX
Each Fund intends to qualify as a “regulated investment company” under Sub-chapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), as amended. Each Fund intends to distribute substantially all of its net investment income and net capital gains to shareholders. Therefore, no federal income or excise tax provision is required. Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes as issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements, and requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing a Fund’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Interest and penalties related to income taxes would be recorded as income tax expense. Management of the Funds is required to analyze all open tax years (2019, 2020 and 2021), as defined by IRS statute of limitations, for all major jurisdictions, including federal tax authorities and certain state tax authorities. As of January 31, 2022, the Funds did not have a liability for any unrecognized tax benefits or uncertain tax positions that would require recognition in the financial statements. The Funds have no examination in progress and are not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.
The Funds recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties as income tax expense. For the period ended January 31, 2022, the Funds had no accrued penalties or interest.
31
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
January 31, 2022 (unaudited)
At July 31, 2021, the adjusted cost basis of investments and gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments for federal income tax purposes during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021 were as follows:
Funds |
|
Federal |
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Net
Unrealized |
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF |
|
$14,980,318 |
|
$35,957 |
|
$(17,039 |
) |
$18,918 |
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF |
|
6,240,492 |
|
212,185 |
|
(60,601 |
) |
151,584 |
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF |
|
39,083,671 |
|
195,250 |
|
(71,009 |
) |
124,241 |
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF |
|
75,080,798 |
|
8,897,463 |
|
(408,874 |
) |
8,488,589 |
Capital losses incurred after October 31 (“Post-October Losses”) and ordinary losses incurred after December 31 (“Late Year Ordinary Losses”) within the taxable year are deemed to arise on the first business day of the Funds’ next taxable year. During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2021, the Funds did not incur or elect to defer Post-October Losses and Late Year Ordinary Losses.
At July 31, 2021, for Federal income tax purposes, the following Funds had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future capital gains for an unlimited period. To the extent that these loss carryforwards are utilized, capital gains so offset will not be distributed to shareholders:
Funds |
|
Short-Term |
|
Long-Term |
|
Total |
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF |
|
$9,470 |
|
$— |
|
$9,470 |
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF |
|
470,373 |
|
2,274,778 |
|
2,745,151 |
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF |
|
1,250,994 |
|
— |
|
1,250,994 |
6.INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS
Purchases and sales of investments (excluding U.S. Government Securities and short-term investments), subscriptions in-kind and redemptions in-kind for the period ended January 31, 2022 were as follows:
Funds |
|
Purchases |
|
Sales |
|
Subscriptions |
|
Redemptions |
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF |
|
$742,937 |
|
$717,980 |
|
$5,062,286 |
|
$1,296,346 |
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF |
|
3,383,926 |
|
2,313,454 |
|
— |
|
— |
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF |
|
1,955,919 |
|
2,152,584 |
|
— |
|
— |
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF |
|
194,582,658 |
|
178,095,958 |
|
— |
|
— |
Virtus Terranova U. S. Quality Momentum ETF |
|
64,569,167 |
|
63,892,162 |
|
88,041,716 |
|
42,884,005 |
7.INVESTMENT RISKS
As with any investment, an investment in a Fund could result in a loss or the performance of a Fund could be inferior to that of other investments. An investor should consider a Fund’s investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing. Each Fund’s prospectus and statement of additional information contain this and other important information.
8.CREDIT RISK
Junk Bonds or High Yield Securities: High yield securities are generally subject to greater levels of credit quality risk than investment grade securities. The retail secondary market for these “junk bonds” may be less liquid than that of higher-rated fixed income securities, and adverse conditions could make it difficult at times to sell these securities or could result in lower prices than higher-rated fixed income securities. These risks can reduce the value of a Fund’s shares and the income it earns.
9.LIBOR REPLACEMENT RISK
The loans in which the Funds invest typically have floating or adjustable interest rates, which are tied to a benchmark lending rate, such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or the prime rate, or are set to a specified floor, whichever is higher. On July 27, 2017, the head of the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority announced a desire to phase out the use of LIBOR by the end of 2021. Although many LIBOR rates will be phased out at the end of 2021 as originally intended, a selection of widely used USD LIBOR rates will continue to be published until June 2023 in order to assist with the transition. There remains uncertainty regarding the future utilization of LIBOR and the nature of any replacement rate. As a result, any impact of a transition away from LIBOR on the Funds or the instruments in which the Funds invest cannot yet be determined. Industry initiatives are underway to identify alternative reference
32
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
January 31, 2022 (unaudited)
rates, such as the Secured Overnight Funding Rate (“SOFR”), which the Federal Reserve Bank of New York began publishing in April 2018; however, there is no assurance that the composition or characteristics of any such alternative reference rate will be similar to or produce the same value or economic equivalence as LIBOR or that instruments using an alternative rate will have the same volume or liquidity. As a result, the transition process might lead to increased volatility and reduced liquidity in markets that currently rely on LIBOR to determine interest rates; a reduction in the value of some LIBOR-based investments; and/or costs incurred in connection with closing out positions and entering into new agreements. These effects could occur prior to the end of 2021 as the utility of LIBOR as a reference rate could deteriorate during the transition period.
10.10% SHAREHOLDERS
As of January 31, 2022, the Funds had individual shareholder account(s) and/or omnibus shareholder account(s) (comprised of a group of individual shareholders), which individually amounted to more than 10% of the total shares outstanding of the Funds as detailed below:
Funds |
|
% of Shares |
|
Number of |
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF |
|
92% |
|
3 |
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF |
|
74% |
|
2 |
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF |
|
77% |
|
4 |
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF |
|
81% |
|
4 |
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF |
|
66% |
|
3 |
11.RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In March 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2020-04 (“ASU 2020-04”), Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) – Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. The amendments in ASU 2020-04 provides optional temporary financial reporting relief from the effect of certain types of contract modifications due to the planned discontinuation of the LIBOR and other interbank-offered based reference rates as of the end of 2021. ASU 2020-04 is effective for certain reference rate-related contract modifications that occur during the period March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. Management is currently evaluating the impact, if any, of applying ASU 2020-04.
12.CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC
The global outbreak of COVID-19 has disrupted economic markets, and the economic impact, duration and spread of the COVID-19 virus is uncertain at this time. The operational and financial performance of the issuers of securities in which the Funds invest may be significantly impacted by COVID-19, which may in turn impact the value of the Funds’ investments.
13.SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Management has evaluated the impact of all subsequent events on the Funds through the date the financial statements were available for issuance, and has determined that there are no subsequent events requiring recognition or disclosure in these financial statements.
33
May 17, 2021 Consideration of Approval of Advisory
Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement for
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean
Energy ETF (the “Fund”)
On May 17, 2021, at a meeting (the “Meeting”) at which all of the Trustees were present and could hear and be heard, including all of the Trustees who were not “interested persons” (as that term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940) of the Trust (the “Independent Trustees”), the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Virtus ETF Trust II (the “Trust”), including the Independent Trustees voting separately, reviewed and unanimously approved an investment advisory agreement between Virtus ETF Advisers LLC (the “Adviser”) and the Trust (the “Advisory Agreement”), and an investment sub-advisory agreement among Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co. (the “Sub-Adviser”), the Adviser and the Trust (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”), each with respect to the Fund.
At the Meeting, the Board received and reviewed information provided by the Adviser and the Sub-Adviser in response to requests of the Board and its counsel, including a memorandum from the Adviser that included a description of the Adviser’s business, a copy of the Adviser’s Form ADV, and certain other information about the Adviser to be considered in connection with the Trustees’ review process (the “Adviser Memorandum”), and a memorandum from the Sub-Adviser that included a description of the Sub-Adviser’s business, a copy of the Sub-Adviser’s Form ADV and certain other information about the Sub-Adviser to be considered in connection with the Trustees’ review process (the “Sub-Adviser Memorandum”). The Board also engaged with representatives of the Adviser and the Sub-Adviser to discuss the Fund.
Advisory Agreement
In deciding on whether to approve the Advisory Agreement with the Adviser on behalf of the Fund, the Board considered numerous factors, including:
The nature, extent, and quality of the services to be provided by the Adviser. The Board considered the responsibilities the Adviser would have under the Advisory Agreement, and the services that would be provided by the Adviser to the Fund, including, without limitation, the management, oversight, and administrative services that the Adviser and its employees will provide to the Fund, the services already provided by the Adviser related to organizing the Fund, the Adviser’s coordination of services for the Fund by the Trust’s service providers, its compliance procedures and practices, and its efforts to promote the Fund. The Board also considered the quality of the services that the Adviser provides to other Virtus ETFs, including other series of the Trust. The Board noted that many of the Trust’s executive officers are employees of the Adviser, and serve the Trust without additional compensation from the Fund. The Board also considered the information in the Adviser Memorandum, including descriptions of the Adviser’s investment advisory services and its related non-advisory business. The Board concluded that the quality, extent, and nature of the services proposed to be provided by the Adviser would be satisfactory and adequate for the Fund.
Investment performance of the Fund and the Adviser. The Board evaluated the investment management experience of the Adviser, in light of the services it will be providing. In conducting its review, the Board considered the fact that the Fund had not yet commenced operations and therefore had no investment performance to consider. Therefore, the Board received information from the Adviser regarding, among other things, the Adviser’s experience in organizing, managing and overseeing other Virtus ETFs and coordinating their operation and administration. After consideration of these factors, the Board determined that the Adviser possessed adequate capabilities and experience for the management of the Fund.
The costs of the services to be provided and profits to be realized by the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund. The Board examined and evaluated the proposed arrangements between the Adviser and the Fund under the Advisory Agreement. The Board considered that the Fund utilizes a “unified fee” structure in which the Fund’s ordinary operating expenses (subject to customary exclusions) would be paid from the Adviser’s management fee. The Board noted that, under the unified fee arrangement, the Adviser would likely supplement a portion of the cost of operating the Fund for some period of time and considered the benefits that would accrue to the Fund. In addition, the Board considered that the Adviser has contractually agreed to waive a portion of the Fund’s management fee equal to 0.07% of the Fund’s average daily net assets, which would have the effect of reducing the Fund’s expenses.
The Board also considered the financial condition of the Adviser and the level of commitment to the Fund by the Adviser, including the Adviser’s payment of startup costs for the Fund; potential benefits to the Adviser in managing the Fund, including promotion of the Adviser’s name; and the interests of the Adviser in providing management and oversight services to the Fund. In addition, at the Meeting, the Board compared the proposed management fee and anticipated net expense ratio of the Fund to the management fees and net expense ratios of other funds considered by the Adviser to have similar investment objectives and strategies to the Fund, and assets under management (“AUM”) comparable to the projected asset levels of the Fund. Specifically, the Board noted that the proposed management fee for the Fund was above the average and median, but below the highest, management fees of its peer group, and the anticipated expense ratio was below the average and median expense ratios of its peer group.
34
Approval of Advisory Agreements & Board Considerations (unaudited) (continued)
Following these comparisons and upon further consideration and discussion of the foregoing, the Board concluded that the fees proposed to be paid to the Adviser by the Fund would be appropriate and representative of arm’s-length negotiations.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Fund grows and whether management fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of the Fund’s investors. The Board considered the fees proposed to be paid to the Adviser (including any capped fees). The Board also considered that the Fund would likely experience benefits from the proposed unified fee arrangement and would continue to do so even after the Adviser reaches firm-wide profitability. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the Fund’s proposed fee arrangement would provide benefits through the unified fee structure, and that, at the Fund’s projected asset levels, the Fund’s proposed arrangement with the Adviser would be appropriate.
Other benefits to be derived by the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund. The Board considered material “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that would accrue to the Adviser as a result of its relationship with the Fund (other than the advisory fee). The Board noted that affiliates of the Adviser will serve as principal underwriter and operational administrator for the Fund, and that the association could result in non-quantifiable reputational benefits for those entities. Based on the foregoing information, the Board concluded that such potential benefits are immaterial to its consideration and approval of the Advisory Agreement.
Conclusion. The Board did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance, and different Trustees may have given different weight to different factors. The Board reviewed with counsel to the Independent Trustees the legal standards applicable to its consideration of the Advisory Agreement. Based on its review, including consideration of each of the factors referenced above, the Board determined, in the exercise of its reasonable business judgment, that the Advisory Agreement was fair and reasonable in light of the services to be performed, expenses to be incurred and such other matters as the Board considered relevant.
After full consideration of the above factors as well as other factors, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, unanimously approved the Advisory Agreement on behalf of the Fund.
Sub-Advisory Agreement
In deciding on whether to approve the Sub-Advisory Agreement with the Sub-Adviser on behalf of the Fund, the Board considered numerous factors, including:
The nature, extent, and quality of the services to be provided by the Sub-Adviser. The Board considered the responsibilities the Sub-Adviser would have under the Sub-Advisory Agreement and the services that would be provided by the Sub-Adviser, including, without limitation, the investment advisory services, the Sub-Adviser’s compliance procedures and practices, and its efforts to promote the Fund. The Board also considered the quality of the services that the Sub-Adviser provides to other Virtus ETFs, including other series of the Trust. After reviewing the foregoing information and further information in the materials, including the Sub-Adviser Memorandum (which included descriptions of the Sub-Adviser’s business and the Sub-Adviser’s Form ADV), the Board concluded that the quality, extent, and nature of the services proposed to be provided by the Sub-Adviser would be satisfactory and adequate for the Fund.
The investment management capabilities and experience of the Sub-Adviser. The Board evaluated the investment management experience of the Sub-Adviser. In particular, the Board considered the Sub-Adviser’s experience, including the experience of its portfolio managers. The Board discussed with the Sub-Adviser, the investment objective and strategies for the Fund and the Sub-Adviser’s plans for implementing the strategies. The Board also considered the ability of the Sub-Adviser to provide day-to-day portfolio management of the Fund’s portfolio. After consideration of these factors, the Board determined that the Sub-Adviser would be an appropriate sub-adviser to the Fund.
The costs of the services to be provided and profits to be realized by the Sub-Adviser from its relationship with the Fund. The Board examined and evaluated the proposed arrangement between the Sub-Adviser and the Adviser under the Sub-Advisory Agreement. The Board considered the fact that the Fund utilizes a “unified fee” structure in which the Fund’s ordinary operating expenses (subject to customary exclusions) would be paid from the Adviser’s management fee. The Board considered the extent to which the Sub-Adviser would bear a portion of Fund expenses. The Board noted that, under the unified fee arrangement, the Sub-Adviser would likely supplement a portion of the cost of operating the Fund for some period of time and considered the benefits that would accrue to the Fund.
The Board considered the Sub-Adviser’s staffing, personnel, and methods of operating; the Sub-Adviser’s compliance policies and procedures; the financial condition of the Sub-Adviser and the level of commitment to the Fund by the Sub-Adviser; the projected asset levels of the Fund; and the overall projected expenses of the Fund. The Board also considered potential benefits to the Sub-Adviser in sub-advising the Fund, including promotion of the Sub-Adviser’s name.
35
Approval of Advisory Agreements & Board Considerations (unaudited) (continued)
The Board compared the proposed fees and anticipated expenses of the Fund (including the sub-advisory fee) to other funds considered by the Adviser to have investment objectives and strategies similar to the Fund and AUM comparable to the Fund’s projected asset levels, as noted above. The Board also noted that the Sub-Adviser was an affiliate of the Adviser. Following these comparisons and upon further consideration and discussion of the foregoing, the Board concluded that the fees proposed to be paid to the Sub-Adviser (pursuant to the Advisory Agreement) would be appropriate and representative of arm’s-length negotiations.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Fund grows and whether sub-advisory fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of the Fund’s investors. The Board considered the fees proposed to be paid to the Sub-Adviser (including any capped fees). The Board considered that the Fund would likely experience benefits from the proposed unified fee arrangement, particularly where the Sub-Adviser is paying or contributing to Fund expenses in excess of its sub-advisory fee. The Board considered that the Fund would likely continue to experience such benefits even after the Fund’s assets grow to a level where the Sub-Adviser is no longer required to pay or contribute to the Fund’s expenses in excess of the amount received by the Sub-Adviser under the Sub-Advisory Agreement. Accordingly, the Board concluded that the Fund’s proposed fee arrangement would provide benefits through the unified fee structure, and that, at the Fund’s projected asset levels, the Fund’s proposed arrangement with the Sub-Adviser would be appropriate.
Other benefits to be derived by the Sub-Adviser from its relationship with the Fund. The Board considered material “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that would accrue to the Sub-Adviser as a result of its relationship with the Fund (other than the sub-advisory fees). For example, the Board noted that the Sub-Adviser may obtain reputational benefits from the success of the Fund or other Virtus ETFs. Based on their review and other considerations, the Board concluded that such potential benefits are immaterial to its consideration and approval of the Sub-Advisory Agreement.
Conclusion. The Board did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance, and different Trustees may have given different weight to different factors. The Board reviewed with counsel to the Independent Trustees the legal standards applicable to its consideration of the Sub-Advisory Agreement. Based on its review, including consideration of each of the factors referenced above, the Board determined, in the exercise of its reasonable business judgment, that the sub-advisory arrangement, as outlined in the Sub-Advisory Agreement, was fair and reasonable in light of the services to be performed, expenses to be incurred, and such other matters as the Board considered relevant.
After full consideration of the above factors as well as other factors, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, unanimously approved the Sub-Advisory Agreement on behalf of the Fund.
36
Approval of Advisory Agreements & Board Considerations (unaudited) (continued)
November 15, 2021 Annual Consideration of Advisory
and Sub-Advisory Agreements for:
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Bond ETF
(“BLHY”)
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (“SEIX”)
Virtus Terranova U.S.
Quality Momentum ETF (“JOET”) (no sub-adviser – Advisory Agreement
only)
(each, a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”)
On November 15, 2021, at a meeting (the “Meeting”) at which all of the Trustees were present and could hear and be heard, including all of the Trustees who were not “interested persons” (as that term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940) of the Trust (the “Independent Trustees”), the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of Virtus ETF Trust II (the “Trust”), including the Independent Trustees voting separately, reviewed and unanimously approved for each of the respective Funds the continuance of an investment advisory agreement between Virtus ETF Advisers LLC (the “Adviser”) and the Trust (each an “Advisory Agreement” and collectively, the “Advisory Agreements”), and an investment sub-advisory agreement among each Sub-Adviser,1 the Adviser and the Trust (each, a “Sub-Advisory Agreement” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisory Agreements”).
At the Meeting, the Board received and reviewed information provided by the Adviser and each Sub-Adviser in response to requests of the Board and its counsel, including a memorandum from the Adviser that included a description of the Adviser’s business, a copy of the Adviser’s Form ADV, and certain other information about the Adviser to be considered in connection with the Trustees’ review process (the “Adviser Memorandum”), and a memorandum from each Sub-Adviser that included a description of the Sub-Adviser’s business, a copy of the Sub-Adviser’s Form ADV and certain other information about the Sub-Adviser to be considered in connection with the Trustees’ review process (each, a “Sub-Adviser Memorandum”). The Board also engaged with representatives of the Adviser to discuss the Funds.
Advisory Agreements
In deciding on whether to approve the continuance of the Advisory Agreements with the Adviser on behalf of the Funds, the Board considered numerous factors, including:
The nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by the Adviser. The Board considered the responsibilities the Adviser has under the respective Advisory Agreement, and the services provided by the Adviser to the Funds, including, without limitation, the management, oversight, and administrative services that the Adviser and its employees provide to the Funds, the Adviser’s coordination of services for the Funds by the Trust’s service providers, and its compliance procedures and practices. The Board noted that many of the Trust’s executive officers are employees of the Adviser, and serve the Trust without additional compensation from the Funds. The Board also considered the information in the Adviser Memorandum, including descriptions of the Adviser’s investment advisory services and its related non-advisory business. The Board concluded that the quality, extent, and nature of the services provided by the Adviser are satisfactory and adequate for the Funds.
Investment performance of the Funds and the Adviser. The Board evaluated the investment management experience of the Adviser, in light of the services it has provided to each Fund. In particular, the Board received information from the Adviser regarding, among other things, the Adviser’s experience in organizing, managing and overseeing the Funds, coordinating their operation and administration, and, with respect to the Adviser’s portfolio management of JOET, its experience in carrying out the day-to-day management of the Fund’s portfolio. In particular, the Board received and reviewed information comparing each Fund’s performance to its applicable peer group. In conducting its review, the Board considered the fact that BLHY and SEIX were sub-advised funds, and thus their performance results were specifically relevant to their respective Sub-Adviser’s portfolio management capabilities. With respect to the Adviser’s portfolio management of JOET, the Board considered that the Fund utilized an index-based strategy, and thus took into account both the Fund’s performance relative to its peer group as well as the Adviser’s performance in tracking the relevant index (i.e., tracking error).
Specifically, with respect to JOET, the Board noted that the Fund underperformed the average and median performance of its peer group for the year-to-date period but still outperformed other funds in its peer group. The Board also noted that the Fund tracked its underlying index with minimal tracking error of less than 300 basis points, which was primarily attributable to trading as well as Fund fees and expenses. After consideration of these factors, the Board determined that the Adviser possessed adequate capabilities and experience for the management of each Fund, and that JOET, the Fund to which the Adviser provided portfolio management services, had satisfactory performance and tracking error results.
1 The Sub-Advisers include Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co., Newfleet Asset Management, LLC, and Seix Investment Advisors LLC.
37
Approval of Advisory Agreements & Board Considerations (unaudited) (continued)
The costs of the services provided and profits to be realized by the Adviser from its relationship with the Funds. The Board examined and evaluated the arrangements between the Adviser and the Funds under the Advisory Agreements. The Board considered that BLHY is subject to an expense limitation agreement (subject to customary exclusions) to cap the Fund’s total expenses. The Board also considered that SEIX and JOET utilize a “unified fee” structure in which a Fund’s ordinary operating expenses (subject to customary exclusions) are paid from the Adviser’s management fee. The Board noted that, under either arrangement, the Adviser would likely supplement a portion of the cost of operating each Fund for some period of time and considered the benefits that would accrue to the Funds.
The Board also considered potential benefits to the Adviser in managing the Funds, including promotion of the Adviser’s name, and the interests of the Adviser in providing management and oversight services to the Funds. In addition, at the Meeting, the Board compared the management fees and net expense ratios of the Funds to the management fees and net expense ratios of other funds considered by the Adviser to have similar investment objectives and strategies to the Funds and comparable assets under management (“AUM”). Specifically, the Board noted that the management fee and expense ratio for BLHY were above the median and average, but below the maximum, management fees and expense ratios of its peer group. For JOET, the Board noted that the management fee and expense ratio were above the median, but below the average, management fees and expense ratios of its peer group. In addition, the Board noted that the management fee and expense ratio for SEIX were below the median and average management fees and expense ratios of its peer group.
Following these comparisons and upon further consideration and discussion of the foregoing, the Board concluded that the fees paid to the Adviser by the Funds are appropriate and representative of arm’s-length negotiations.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds grow and whether management fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of the Funds’ investors. The Board considered the AUM and operational history of each of the Funds, together with the fees paid to the Adviser (including any capped fees). The Board considered that BLHY currently experiences benefits from the capped fees pursuant to the expense limitation agreement, and would continue to do so even after BLHY’s assets grow to a level where the Adviser is no longer required to waive its advisory fee or reimburse the Fund’s expenses in excess of the amount received by the Adviser under the Advisory Agreement. The Board also considered that SEIX and JOET are subject to a unified fee. The Board considered that SEIX and JOET experienced benefits from the unified fee arrangement, and would continue to do so even after the Adviser reaches firm-wide profitability. Accordingly, the Board concluded that each Fund’s fee arrangement would provide benefits through the capped fee arrangement (for BLHY) or the unified fee structure (for SEIX and JOET), and that, at each Fund’s current and projected asset levels, each Fund’s arrangement with the Adviser would be appropriate.
Other benefits derived by the Adviser from its relationship with the Funds. The Board considered material “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that accrue to the Adviser as a result of its relationship with the Funds (other than the advisory fee). The Board noted that affiliates of the Adviser serve as principal underwriter and operational administrator for the Funds, and that the association could result in non-quantifiable reputational benefits for those entities. Based on the foregoing information, the Board concluded that such potential benefits are immaterial to its consideration and approval of the continuance of the Advisory Agreements.
Conclusion. The Board did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance, and different Trustees may have given different weight to different factors. The Board reviewed with counsel to the Independent Trustees the legal standards applicable to its consideration of the Advisory Agreements. Based on its review, including consideration of each of the factors referenced above, the Board determined, in the exercise of its reasonable business judgment, that the Advisory Agreements were fair and reasonable in light of the services performed or to be performed, expenses incurred or to be incurred and such other matters as the Board considered relevant.
After full consideration of the above factors as well as other factors, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, unanimously approved the continuance of the Advisory Agreements on behalf of each Fund.
Sub-Advisory Agreements
In deciding on whether to approve the continuance of the Sub-Advisory Agreements with each Sub-Adviser on behalf of the respective Fund, the Board considered numerous factors, including:
The nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by the Sub-Advisers. The Board considered the responsibilities the Sub-Advisers have under the Sub-Advisory Agreements and the services provided by the Sub-Advisers including, without limitation, the investment advisory services and each Sub-Adviser’s compliance procedures and practices. After reviewing the foregoing information and further information in the materials, including each Sub-Adviser Memorandum (which included descriptions of each Sub-Adviser’s business and each Sub-Adviser’s Form ADV), the Board concluded that the quality, extent, and nature of the services provided by the Sub-Advisers are satisfactory and adequate for the Funds.
38
Approval of Advisory Agreements & Board Considerations (unaudited) (continued)
Investment performance of the Funds and the Sub-Advisers. The Board evaluated the experience of each Sub-Adviser in carrying out the day-to-day management of the respective Fund’s portfolio. In particular, the Board received and reviewed information from the Adviser regarding the performance of each Sub-Adviser in implementing the investment strategies for the respective Fund.
Specifically, with respect to BLHY, the Board noted that the Fund outperformed the average and median performance of its peer group for the year-to-date period and the average performance of its peer group for the one-year period, but underperformed the median performance of its peer group for the one-year period and the average and median performance of its peer group for the three-year period. With respect to SEIX, the Board noted that the Fund outperformed the average and median performance of its peer group for the year-to-date period and slightly underperformed the average and median performance of its peer group for the one-year period. After consideration of these factors, the Board determined that each Sub-Adviser continued to be an appropriate sub-adviser to the respective Fund, and that each Fund had satisfactory performance.
The costs of the services provided and profits to be realized by the Sub-Advisers from their relationship with the respective Funds. The Board examined and evaluated the arrangements between the respective Sub-Adviser and the Adviser under the Sub-Advisory Agreements. The Board considered the fact that BLHY is subject to an expense limitation agreement (subject to customary exclusions) to cap the Fund’s total expenses and that SEIX and JOET utilize a “unified fee” structure in which a Fund’s ordinary operating expenses (subject to customary exclusions) are paid from the Adviser’s management fee. The Board considered the extent to which each Sub-Adviser bears a portion of Fund expenses. The Board noted that, under either arrangement, the Sub-Advisers would likely supplement a portion of the cost of operating the Funds for some period of time and considered the benefits that would accrue to the Funds.
The Board considered the Sub-Advisers’ staffing, personnel, and methods of operating; the Sub-Advisers’ compliance policies and procedures; the financial condition of the Sub-Advisers and the level of commitment to the Funds by the Sub-Advisers; the current and projected asset levels of the Funds; and the overall expenses of the Funds. The Board also considered potential benefits to the Sub-Advisers in sub-advising the respective Fund, including promotion of the Sub-Advisers’ names.
The Board compared the fees and expenses of the Funds (including the sub-advisory fee) to other funds considered by the Adviser to have investment objectives and strategies similar to the Funds and comparable AUM, as noted above. Following these comparisons and upon further consideration and discussion of the foregoing, the Board concluded that the fees paid to the Sub-Advisers (pursuant to the Advisory Agreements) are appropriate and representative of arm’s-length negotiations.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds grow and whether sub-advisory fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of the Funds’ investors. The Board considered the AUM and operational history of each of the sub-advised Funds, together with the fees paid to the respective Sub-Adviser (including any capped fees). The Board considered that SEIX and JOET are subject to a unified fee. The Board considered that SEIX and JOET have experienced benefits from the unified fee arrangement, and that BLHY benefits from any additional capped fees, particularly where the Sub-Adviser is paying or contributing to Fund expenses in excess of its sub-advisory fee. The Board considered that the applicable Fund would continue to experience such benefits even after such Fund’s assets grow to a level where the Sub-Adviser is no longer required to waive its sub-advisory fee or reimburse, pay or contribute to the Fund’s expenses in excess of the amount received by the Sub-Adviser under its Sub-Advisory Agreement. Accordingly, the Board concluded that each Fund’s fee arrangement would provide benefits through the capped fee arrangement (for BLHY) or unified fee structure (for SEIX and JOET), and that, at each Fund’s current and projected asset levels, each Fund’s arrangement with its respective Sub-Adviser would be appropriate.
Other benefits derived by the Sub-Advisers from their relationships with the Funds. The Board considered material “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that accrue to the Sub-Advisers as a result of their relationships with their respective Funds (other than the sub-advisory fees). For example, the Board noted that the Sub-Advisers may obtain reputational benefits from the success of one or more Funds or other Virtus ETFs. Based on their review and other considerations, the Board concluded that such potential benefits are immaterial to its consideration and approval of the continuance of the Sub-Advisory Agreements.
Conclusion. The Board did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance, and different Trustees may have given different weight to different factors. The Board reviewed with counsel to the Independent Trustees the legal standards applicable to its consideration of each Sub-Advisory Agreement. Based on its review, including consideration of each of the factors referenced above, the Board determined, in the exercise of its reasonable business judgment, that the sub-advisory arrangements, as outlined in each Sub-Adviser’s Sub-Advisory Agreement, were fair and reasonable in light of the services performed or to be performed, expenses incurred or to be incurred, and such other matters as the Board considered relevant.
After full consideration of the above factors as well as other factors, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, unanimously approved the continuance of each of the Sub-Advisory Agreements with the respective Sub-Adviser on behalf of each Fund.
39
INFORMATION ABOUT PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
The Trust files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings for each Fund with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT-P. Form N-PORT-P is available on the SEC’s website at https://www.sec.gov.
The Funds’ premium/discount information for the most recently completed calendar year, and the most recently completed calendar quarters since that year is available by visiting www.virtusetfs.com or by calling (888) 383-4184.
INFORMATION ABOUT PROXY VOTING
A description of the policies and procedures the Funds use to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is provided in the Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”). The SAI is available without charge upon request by calling toll-free at (888) 383-0553, by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or by accessing the Funds’ website at www.virtusetfs.com.
Information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30th is available by calling toll-free at (888) 383-0553 or by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
8572(03/22)
c/o VP Distributors, LLC
One
Financial Plaza
Hartford, Connecticut 06103