Prospectus - Investment Objective
Fund |
Ticker |
Fidelity®
SAI Low Duration Income Fund |
FZOLX |
Fidelity®
SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
FZOMX |
Fidelity®
SAI Total Bond Fund |
FSMTX |
Funds of Fidelity Salem Street Trust
STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
October 30, 2023
Offered
exclusively to certain clients of the Adviser, or its affiliates, including
Strategic Advisers LLC (Strategic Advisers) - not available for sale to the
general public. Fidelity® SAI is a product name of Fidelity® funds dedicated to
certain programs affiliated with Strategic Advisers.
This
Statement of Additional Information (SAI) is not a prospectus. Portions of each
fund's
annual report are incorporated herein. The annual
report(s) are supplied with this SAI.
To obtain
a free additional copy of a prospectus or SAI, dated October 30, 2023, or an
annual report, please call Fidelity at 1-800-544-3455 or visit Fidelity's web
site at www.fidelity.com.
For more
information on any Fidelity® fund, including charges and expenses, call Fidelity
at the number indicated above for a free prospectus. Read it carefully before
investing or sending money.
245 Summer
Street, Boston, MA 02210
STB-PTB-1023
1.9887626.105
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INVESTMENT POLICIES AND
LIMITATIONS
The
following policies and limitations supplement those set forth in the prospectus.
Unless otherwise noted, whenever an investment policy or limitation states a
maximum percentage of a fund's assets that may be invested in any security or
other asset, or sets forth a policy regarding quality standards, such standard
or percentage limitation will be determined immediately after and as a result of
the fund's acquisition of such security or other asset. Accordingly, any
subsequent change in values, net assets, or other circumstances will not be
considered when determining whether the investment complies with the fund's
investment policies and limitations.
A
fund's fundamental investment policies and limitations cannot be changed without
approval by a "majority of the outstanding voting securities" (as defined in the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act)) of the fund. However, except for the
fundamental investment limitations listed below, the investment policies and
limitations described in this Statement of Additional Information (SAI) are not
fundamental and may be changed without shareholder approval.
The
following are each fund's fundamental investment limitations set forth in their
entirety.
Diversification
For
each fund:
The
fund may not with respect to 75% of the fund's total assets, purchase the
securities of any issuer (other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S.
Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities, or securities of other
investment companies) if, as a result, (a) more than 5% of the fund's total
assets would be invested in the securities of that issuer, or (b) the fund would
hold more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of that issuer.
Senior
Securities
For
Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income Fund and Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond
Fund:
The
fund may not issue senior securities, except as permitted under the Investment
Company Act of 1940.
For
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund:
The
fund may not issue senior securities, except in connection with the insurance
program established by the fund pursuant to an exemptive order issued by the
Securities and Exchange Commission or as otherwise permitted under the
Investment Company Act of 1940.
Borrowing
For
each fund:
The
fund may not borrow money, except that the fund may borrow money for temporary
or emergency purposes (not for leveraging or investment) in an amount not
exceeding 33 1/3% of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) less
liabilities (other than borrowings). Any borrowings that come to exceed this
amount will be reduced within three days (not including Sundays and holidays) to
the extent necessary to comply with the 33 1/3% limitation.
Underwriting
For
each fund:
The
fund may not underwrite securities issued by others, except to the extent that
the fund may be considered an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities
Act of 1933 in the disposition of restricted securities or in connection with
investments in other investment companies.
Concentration
For
Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income Fund:
The
fund may not purchase the securities of any issuer (other than securities issued
or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or
instrumentalities) if, as a result, more than 25% of the fund's total assets
would be invested in the securities of companies whose principal business
activities are in the same industry, except that the fund will invest more than
25% of its total assets in the financial services industry.
For
purposes of the fund's concentration limitation discussed above, with respect to
any investment in repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Government
securities, Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (FMR) looks through
to the U.S. Government securities.
For
purposes of the fund's concentration limitation discussed above, FMR deems the
financial services industry to include the group of industries within the
financial services sector.
For
purposes of the fund's concentration limitation discussed above, with respect to
any investment in Fidelity® Money Market Central Fund and/or any non-money
market Central fund, FMR looks through to the holdings of the Central
fund.
For
purposes of the fund's concentration limitation discussed above, FMR may analyze
the characteristics of a particular issuer and security and assign an industry
or sector classification consistent with those characteristics in the event that
the third-party classification provider used by FMR does not assign a
classification.
For
Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund and Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund:
The
fund may not purchase the securities of any issuer (other than securities issued
or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or
instrumentalities) if, as a result, more than 25% of the fund's total assets
would be invested in the securities of companies whose principal business
activities are in the same industry.
For
purposes of the fund's concentration limitation discussed above, with respect to
any investment in repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Government
securities, FMR looks through to the U.S. Government securities.
For
purposes of the fund's concentration limitation discussed above, with respect to
any investment in Fidelity® Money Market Central Fund and/or any non-money
market Central fund, FMR looks through to the holdings of the Central
fund.
For
purposes of the fund's concentration limitation discussed above, FMR may analyze
the characteristics of a particular issuer and security and assign an industry
or sector classification consistent with those characteristics in the event that
the third-party classification provider used by FMR does not assign a
classification.
Real
Estate
For
each fund:
The
fund may not purchase or sell real estate unless acquired as a result of
ownership of securities or other instruments (but this shall not prevent the
fund from investing in securities or other instruments backed by real estate or
securities of companies engaged in the real estate business).
Commodities
For
each fund:
The
fund may not purchase or sell physical commodities unless acquired as a result
of ownership of securities or other instruments (but this shall not prevent the
fund from purchasing or selling options and futures contracts or from investing
in securities or other instruments backed by physical commodities).
Loans
For
each fund:
The
fund may not lend any security or make any other loan if, as a result, more than
33 1/3% of its total assets would be lent to other parties, but this limitation
does not apply to purchases of debt securities or to repurchase agreements, or
to acquisitions of loans, loan participations or other forms of debt
instruments.
The
following investment limitations are not fundamental and may be changed without
shareholder approval.
Short
Sales
For
Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income Fund:
The
fund does not currently intend to sell securities short, unless it owns or has
the right to obtain securities equivalent in kind and amount to the securities
sold short, and provided that transactions in futures contracts, options, and
swaps are not deemed to constitute selling securities short.
For
Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund and Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund:
The
fund does not currently intend to sell securities short, unless it owns or has
the right to obtain securities equivalent in kind and amount to the securities
sold short, except for sales of to be announced (TBA) securities, and provided
that transactions in futures contracts, options, and swaps are not deemed to
constitute selling securities short.
Margin
Purchases
For
each fund:
The
fund does not currently intend to purchase securities on margin, except that the
fund may obtain such short-term credits as are necessary for the clearance of
transactions, and provided that margin payments in connection with futures
contracts and options on futures contracts shall not constitute purchasing
securities on margin.
Borrowing
For
each fund:
The
fund may borrow money only (a) from a bank or from a registered investment
company or portfolio for which FMR or an affiliate serves as investment adviser
or (b) by engaging in reverse repurchase agreements with any party (reverse
repurchase agreements are treated as borrowings for purposes of the fundamental
borrowing investment limitation).
Illiquid
Securities
For
each fund:
The
fund does not currently intend to purchase any security if, as a result, more
than 10% of its net assets would be invested in securities that are deemed to be
illiquid because they are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale
or because they cannot be sold or disposed of in the ordinary course of business
at approximately the prices at which they are valued.
For
purposes of each fund's illiquid securities limitation discussed above, if
through a change in values, net assets, or other circumstances, the fund were in
a position where more than 10% of its net assets were invested in illiquid
securities, it would consider appropriate steps to protect liquidity.
Loans
For
Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income Fund and Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond
Fund:
The
fund does not currently intend to lend assets other than securities to other
parties, except by (a) lending money (up to 15% of the fund's net assets) to a
registered investment company or portfolio for which FMR or an affiliate serves
as investment adviser or (b) assuming any unfunded commitments in connection
with the acquisition of loans, loan participations, or other forms of debt
instruments. (This limitation does not apply to purchases of debt securities, to
repurchase agreements, or to acquisitions of loans, loan participations or other
forms of debt instruments.)
For
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund:
The
fund does not currently intend to lend assets other than securities to other
parties, except by (a) making direct loans to companies in which the fund has a
pre-existing investment (b) lending money (up to 15% of the fund's net assets)
to a registered investment company or portfolio for which FMR or an affiliate
serves as investment adviser or (c) assuming any unfunded commitments in
connection with the acquisition of loans, loan participations, or other forms of
debt instruments. (This limitation does not apply to purchases of debt
securities, to repurchase agreements, or to acquisitions of loans, loan
participations or other forms of debt instruments.)
In
addition to each fund's fundamental and non-fundamental investment limitations
discussed above:
In
order to qualify as a "regulated investment company" under Subchapter M of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, each fund currently intends to comply
with certain diversification limits imposed by Subchapter M.
The
following pages contain more detailed information about types of instruments in
which a fund may invest, techniques a fund's adviser (or a sub-adviser) may
employ in pursuit of the fund's investment objective, and a summary of related
risks. A fund's adviser (or a sub-adviser) may not buy all of these instruments
or use all of these techniques unless it believes that doing so will help the
fund achieve its goal. However, a fund's adviser (or a sub-adviser) is not
required to buy any particular instrument or use any particular technique even
if to do so might benefit the fund.
On
the following pages in this section titled "Investment Policies and
Limitations," and except as otherwise indicated, references to "an adviser" or
"the adviser" may relate to a fund's adviser or a sub-adviser, as
applicable.
Affiliated
Bank Transactions. A Fidelity® fund may engage in transactions with financial
institutions that are, or may be considered to be, "affiliated persons" of the
fund under the 1940 Act. These transactions may involve repurchase agreements
with custodian banks; short-term obligations of, and repurchase agreements with,
the 50 largest U.S. banks (measured by deposits); municipal securities; U.S.
Government securities with affiliated financial institutions that are primary
dealers in these securities; short-term currency transactions; and short-term
borrowings. In accordance with exemptive orders issued by the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC), the Board of Trustees has established and
periodically reviews procedures applicable to transactions involving affiliated
financial institutions.
Asset-Backed
Securities represent interests in pools of mortgages, loans, receivables, or
other assets. Payment of interest and repayment of principal may be largely
dependent upon the cash flows generated by the assets backing the securities
and, in certain cases, supported by letters of credit, surety bonds, or other
credit enhancements. Asset-backed security values may also be affected by other
factors including changes in interest rates, the availability of information
concerning the pool and its structure, the creditworthiness of the servicing
agent for the pool, the originator of the loans or receivables, or the entities
providing the credit enhancement. In addition, these securities may be subject
to prepayment risk.
Collateralized
Loan Obligations (CLO) are a type of asset-backed security. A CLO is a trust
typically collateralized by a pool of loans, which may include, among others,
domestic and foreign senior secured loans, senior unsecured loans, and
subordinate corporate loans, including loans that may be rated below investment
grade or equivalent unrated loans. CLOs may charge management fees and
administrative expenses. For CLOs, the cash flows from the trust are split into
two or more portions, called tranches, varying in risk and yield. The riskiest
portion is the "equity" tranche which bears the bulk of defaults from the bonds
or loans in the trust and serves to protect the other, more senior tranches from
default in all but the most severe circumstances. Since they are partially
protected from defaults, senior tranches from a CLO trust typically have higher
ratings and lower yields than their underlying securities and can be rated
investment grade. Despite the protection from the equity tranche, CLO tranches
can experience substantial losses due to actual defaults, increased sensitivity
to defaults due to collateral default and disappearance of protecting tranches,
market anticipation of defaults, as well as aversion to CLO securities as a
class. Normally, CLOs are privately offered and sold, and thus, are not
registered under the securities laws. As a result, investments in CLOs may be
characterized by a fund as illiquid securities, however an active dealer market
may exist allowing them to qualify for Rule 144A transactions.
Borrowing.
If a fund borrows money, its share price may be subject to greater fluctuation
until the borrowing is paid off. If a fund makes additional investments while
borrowings are outstanding, this may be considered a form of leverage.
Cash
Management. A fund may hold uninvested cash or may invest it in cash equivalents
such as money market securities, repurchase agreements, or shares of short-term
bond or money market funds, including (for Fidelity® funds and other advisory
clients only) shares of Fidelity® Central funds. Generally, these securities
offer less potential for gains than other types of securities.
Central
Funds are special types of investment vehicles created by Fidelity for use by
the Fidelity® funds and other advisory clients. Central funds are used to invest
in particular security types or investment disciplines, or for cash management.
Central funds incur certain costs related to their investment activity (such as
custodial fees and expenses), but generally do not pay additional management
fees. The investment results of the portions of a Fidelity® fund's assets
invested in the Central funds will be based upon the investment results of those
funds.
Commodity
Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Notice of Exclusion. The Adviser, on behalf of
the Fidelity® funds to which this SAI relates, has filed with the National
Futures Association a notice claiming an exclusion from the definition of the
term "commodity pool operator" (CPO) under the Commodity Exchange Act, as
amended, and the rules of the CFTC promulgated thereunder, with respect to each
fund's operation. Accordingly, neither a fund nor its adviser is subject to
registration or regulation as a commodity pool or a CPO. As of the date of this
SAI, the adviser does not expect to register as a CPO of the funds. However,
there is no certainty that a fund or its adviser will be able to rely on an
exclusion in the future as the fund's investments change over time. A fund may
determine not to use investment strategies that trigger additional CFTC
regulation or may determine to operate subject to CFTC regulation, if
applicable. If a fund or its adviser operates subject to CFTC regulation, it may
incur additional expenses.
Disruption
to Financial Markets and Related Government Intervention. Economic downturns can
trigger various economic, legal, budgetary, tax, and regulatory reforms across
the globe. Instability in the financial markets in the wake of events such as
the 2008 economic downturn led the U.S. Government and other governments to take
a number of then-unprecedented actions designed to support certain financial
institutions and segments of the financial markets that experienced extreme
volatility, and in some cases, a lack of liquidity. Federal, state, local,
foreign, and other governments, their regulatory agencies, or self-regulatory
organizations may take actions that affect the regulation of the instruments in
which a fund invests, or the issuers of such instruments, in ways that are
unforeseeable. Reforms may also change the way in which a fund is regulated and
could limit or preclude a fund's ability to achieve its investment objective or
engage in certain strategies. Also, while reforms generally are intended to
strengthen markets, systems, and public finances, they could affect fund
expenses and the value of fund investments in unpredictable ways.
Similarly,
widespread disease including pandemics and epidemics, and natural or
environmental disasters, such as earthquakes, droughts, fires, floods,
hurricanes, tsunamis and climate-related phenomena generally, have been and can
be highly disruptive to economies and markets, adversely impacting individual
companies, sectors, industries, markets, currencies, interest and inflation
rates, credit ratings, investor sentiment, and other factors affecting the value
of a fund's investments. Economies and financial markets throughout the world
have become increasingly interconnected, which increases the likelihood that
events or conditions in one region or country will adversely affect markets or
issuers in other regions or countries, including the United States.
Additionally, market disruptions may result in increased market volatility;
regulatory trading halts; closure of domestic or foreign exchanges, markets, or
governments; or market participants operating pursuant to business continuity
plans for indeterminate periods of time. Further, market disruptions can (i)
prevent a fund from executing advantageous investment decisions in a timely
manner, (ii) negatively impact a fund's ability to achieve its investment
objective, and (iii) may exacerbate the risks discussed elsewhere in a fund's
registration statement, including political, social, and economic risks.
The
value of a fund's portfolio is also generally subject to the risk of future
local, national, or global economic or natural disturbances based on unknown
weaknesses in the markets in which a fund invests. In the event of such a
disturbance, the issuers of securities held by a fund may experience significant
declines in the value of their assets and even cease operations, or may receive
government assistance accompanied by increased restrictions on their business
operations or other government intervention. In addition, it remains uncertain
that the U.S. Government or foreign governments will intervene in response to
current or future market disturbances and the effect of any such future
intervention cannot be predicted.
Dollar-Weighted
Average Maturity is derived by multiplying the value of each security by the
time remaining to its maturity, adding these calculations, and then dividing the
total by the value of a fund's portfolio. An obligation's maturity is typically
determined on a stated final maturity basis, although there are some exceptions
to this rule.
Under
certain circumstances, a fund may invest in nominally long-term securities that
have maturity-shortening features of shorter-term securities, and the maturities
of these securities may be deemed to be earlier than their ultimate maturity
dates by virtue of an existing demand feature or an adjustable interest rate.
Under other circumstances, if it is probable that the issuer of an instrument
will take advantage of a maturity-shortening device, such as a call, refunding,
or redemption provision, the date on which the instrument will probably be
called, refunded, or redeemed may be considered to be its maturity date. The
maturities of mortgage securities, including collateralized mortgage
obligations, and some asset-backed securities are determined on a weighted
average life basis, which is the average time for principal to be repaid. For a
mortgage security, this average time is calculated by estimating the timing of
principal payments, including unscheduled prepayments, during the life of the
mortgage. The weighted average life of these securities is likely to be
substantially shorter than their stated final maturity.
Duration
is a measure of a bond's price sensitivity to a change in its yield. For
example, if a bond has a 5-year duration and its yield rises 1%, the bond's
value is likely to fall about 5%. Similarly, if a bond fund has a 5-year average
duration and the yield on each of the bonds held by the fund rises 1%, the
fund's value is likely to fall about 5%. For funds with exposure to foreign
markets, there are many reasons why all of the bond holdings do not experience
the same yield changes. These reasons include: the bonds are spread off of
different yield curves around the world and these yield curves do not move in
tandem; the shapes of these yield curves change; and sector and issuer yield
spreads change. Other factors can influence a bond fund's performance and share
price. Accordingly, a bond fund's actual performance will likely differ from the
example.
Exchange
Traded Funds (ETFs) are shares of other investment companies, commodity pools,
or other entities that are traded on an exchange. Assets underlying the ETF
shares may consist of stocks, bonds, commodities, or other instruments,
depending on an ETF's investment objective and strategies. An ETF may seek to
replicate the performance of a specific index or may be actively managed.
Typically,
shares of an ETF that tracks an index are expected to increase in value as the
value of the underlying benchmark increases. However, in the case of inverse
ETFs (also called "short ETFs" or "bear ETFs"), ETF shares are expected to
increase in value as the value of the underlying benchmark decreases. Inverse
ETFs seek to deliver the opposite of the performance of the benchmark they track
and are often marketed as a way for investors to profit from, or at least hedge
their exposure to, downward moving markets. Investments in inverse ETFs are
similar to holding short positions in the underlying benchmark.
ETF
shares are redeemable only in large blocks of shares often called "creation
units" by persons other than a fund, and are redeemed principally in-kind at
each day's next calculated net asset value per share (NAV). ETFs typically incur
fees that are separate from those fees incurred directly by a fund. A fund's
purchase of ETFs results in the layering of expenses, such that the fund would
indirectly bear a proportionate share of any ETF's operating expenses. Further,
while traditional investment companies are continuously offered at NAV, ETFs are
traded in the secondary market (e.g., on a stock exchange) on an intra-day basis
at prices that may be above or below the value of their underlying
portfolios.
Some
of the risks of investing in an ETF that tracks an index are similar to those of
investing in an indexed mutual fund, including tracking error risk (the risk of
errors in matching the ETF's underlying assets to the index or other benchmark);
and the risk that because an ETF that tracks an index is not actively managed,
it cannot sell stocks or other assets as long as they are represented in the
index or other benchmark. Other ETF risks include the risk that ETFs may trade
in the secondary market at a discount from their NAV and the risk that the ETFs
may not be liquid. ETFs also may be leveraged. Leveraged ETFs seek to deliver
multiples of the performance of the index or other benchmark they track and use
derivatives in an effort to amplify the returns (or decline, in the case of
inverse ETFs) of the underlying index or benchmark. While leveraged ETFs may
offer the potential for greater return, the potential for loss and the speed at
which losses can be realized also are greater. Most leveraged and inverse ETFs
"reset" daily, meaning they are designed to achieve their stated objectives on a
daily basis. Leveraged and inverse ETFs can deviate substantially from the
performance of their underlying benchmark over longer periods of time,
particularly in volatile periods.
Exposure
to Foreign and Emerging Markets. Foreign securities, foreign currencies, and
securities issued by U.S. entities with substantial foreign operations may
involve significant risks in addition to the risks inherent in U.S.
investments.
Foreign
investments involve risks relating to local political, economic, regulatory, or
social instability, military action or unrest, or adverse diplomatic
developments, and may be affected by actions of foreign governments adverse to
the interests of U.S. investors. Such actions may include expropriation or
nationalization of assets, confiscatory taxation, restrictions on U.S.
investment or on the ability to repatriate assets or convert currency into U.S.
dollars, or other government intervention. From time to time, a fund's adviser
and/or its affiliates may determine that, as a result of regulatory requirements
that may apply to the adviser and/or its affiliates due to investments in a
particular country, investments in the securities of issuers domiciled or listed
on trading markets in that country above certain thresholds (which may apply at
the account level or in the aggregate across all accounts managed by the adviser
and its affiliates) may be impractical or undesirable. In such instances, the
adviser may limit or exclude investment in a particular issuer, and investment
flexibility may be restricted. Additionally, governmental issuers of foreign
debt securities may be unwilling to pay interest and repay principal when due
and may require that the conditions for payment be renegotiated. There is no
assurance that a fund's adviser will be able to anticipate these potential
events or counter their effects. In addition, the value of securities
denominated in foreign currencies and of dividends and interest paid with
respect to such securities will fluctuate based on the relative strength of the
U.S. dollar.
It
is anticipated that in most cases the best available market for foreign
securities will be on an exchange or in over-the-counter (OTC) markets located
outside of the United States. Foreign stock markets, while growing in volume and
sophistication, are generally not as developed as those in the United States,
and securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and more volatile than
securities of comparable U.S. issuers. Foreign security trading, settlement and
custodial practices (including those involving securities settlement where fund
assets may be released prior to receipt of payment) are often less developed
than those in U.S. markets, and may result in increased investment or valuation
risk or substantial delays in the event of a failed trade or the insolvency of,
or breach of duty by, a foreign broker-dealer, securities depository, or foreign
subcustodian. In addition, the costs associated with foreign investments,
including withholding taxes, brokerage commissions, and custodial costs, are
generally higher than with U.S. investments.
Foreign
markets may offer less protection to investors than U.S. markets. Foreign
issuers are generally not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial
reporting requirements and standards of practice comparable to those applicable
to U.S. issuers. Adequate public information on foreign issuers may not be
available, and it may be difficult to secure dividends and information regarding
corporate actions on a timely basis. In general, there is less overall
governmental supervision and regulation of securities exchanges, brokers, and
listed companies than in the United States. OTC markets tend to be less
regulated than stock exchange markets and, in certain countries, may be totally
unregulated. Regulatory enforcement may be influenced by economic or political
concerns, and investors may have difficulty enforcing their legal rights in
foreign countries.
Some
foreign securities impose restrictions on transfer within the United States or
to U.S. persons. Although securities subject to such transfer restrictions may
be marketable abroad, they may be less liquid than foreign securities of the
same class that are not subject to such restrictions.
American
Depositary Receipts (ADRs) as well as other "hybrid" forms of ADRs, including
European Depositary Receipts (EDRs) and Global Depositary Receipts (GDRs), are
certificates evidencing ownership of shares of a foreign issuer. These
certificates are issued by depository banks and generally trade on an
established market in the United States or elsewhere. The underlying shares are
held in trust by a custodian bank or similar financial institution in the
issuer's home country. The depository bank may not have physical custody of the
underlying securities at all times and may charge fees for various services,
including forwarding dividends and interest and corporate actions. ADRs are
alternatives to directly purchasing the underlying foreign securities in their
national markets and currencies. However, ADRs continue to be subject to many of
the risks associated with investing directly in foreign securities. These risks
include foreign exchange risk as well as the political and economic risks of the
underlying issuer's country.
The
risks of foreign investing may be magnified for investments in emerging markets.
Security prices in emerging markets can be significantly more volatile than
those in more developed markets, reflecting the greater uncertainties of
investing in less established markets and economies. In particular, countries
with emerging markets may have relatively unstable governments, may present the
risks of nationalization of businesses, restrictions on foreign ownership and
prohibitions on the repatriation of assets, and may have less protection of
property rights than more developed countries. The economies of countries with
emerging markets may be based on only a few industries, may be highly vulnerable
to changes in local or global trade conditions, and may suffer from extreme and
volatile debt burdens or inflation rates. Local securities markets may trade a
small number of securities and may be unable to respond effectively to increases
in trading volume, potentially making prompt liquidation of holdings difficult
or impossible at times.
Foreign
Currency Transactions. A fund may conduct foreign currency transactions on a
spot (i.e., cash) or forward basis (i.e., by entering into forward contracts to
purchase or sell foreign currencies). Although foreign exchange dealers
generally do not charge a fee for such conversions, they do realize a profit
based on the difference between the prices at which they are buying and selling
various currencies. Thus, a dealer may offer to sell a foreign currency at one
rate, while offering a lesser rate of exchange should the counterparty desire to
resell that currency to the dealer. Forward contracts are customized
transactions that require a specific amount of a currency to be delivered at a
specific exchange rate on a specific date or range of dates in the future.
Forward contracts are generally traded in an interbank market directly between
currency traders (usually large commercial banks) and their customers. The
parties to a forward contract may agree to offset or terminate the contract
before its maturity, or may hold the contract to maturity and complete the
contemplated currency exchange.
The
following discussion summarizes the principal currency management strategies
involving forward contracts that could be used by a fund. A fund may also use
swap agreements, indexed securities, and options and futures contracts relating
to foreign currencies for the same purposes. Forward contracts not calling for
physical delivery of the underlying instrument will be settled through cash
payments rather than through delivery of the underlying currency. All of these
instruments and transactions are subject to the risk that the counterparty will
default.
A
"settlement hedge" or "transaction hedge" is designed to protect a fund against
an adverse change in foreign currency values between the date a security
denominated in a foreign currency is purchased or sold and the date on which
payment is made or received. Entering into a forward contract for the purchase
or sale of the amount of foreign currency involved in an underlying security
transaction for a fixed amount of U.S. dollars "locks in" the U.S. dollar price
of the security. Forward contracts to purchase or sell a foreign currency may
also be used to protect a fund in anticipation of future purchases or sales of
securities denominated in foreign currency, even if the specific investments
have not yet been selected.
A
fund may also use forward contracts to hedge against a decline in the value of
existing investments denominated in a foreign currency. For example, if a fund
owned securities denominated in pounds sterling, it could enter into a forward
contract to sell pounds sterling in return for U.S. dollars to hedge against
possible declines in the pound's value. Such a hedge, sometimes referred to as a
"position hedge," would tend to offset both positive and negative currency
fluctuations, but would not offset changes in security values caused by other
factors. A fund could also attempt to hedge the position by selling another
currency expected to perform similarly to the pound sterling. This type of
hedge, sometimes referred to as a "proxy hedge," could offer advantages in terms
of cost, yield, or efficiency, but generally would not hedge currency exposure
as effectively as a direct hedge into U.S. dollars. Proxy hedges may result in
losses if the currency used to hedge does not perform similarly to the currency
in which the hedged securities are denominated.
A
fund may enter into forward contracts to shift its investment exposure from one
currency into another. This may include shifting exposure from U.S. dollars to a
foreign currency, or from one foreign currency to another foreign currency. This
type of strategy, sometimes known as a "cross-hedge," will tend to reduce or
eliminate exposure to the currency that is sold, and increase exposure to the
currency that is purchased, much as if a fund had sold a security denominated in
one currency and purchased an equivalent security denominated in another. A fund
may cross-hedge its U.S. dollar exposure in order to achieve a representative
weighted mix of the major currencies in its benchmark index and/or to cover an
underweight country or region exposure in its portfolio. Cross-hedges protect
against losses resulting from a decline in the hedged currency, but will cause a
fund to assume the risk of fluctuations in the value of the currency it
purchases.
Successful
use of currency management strategies will depend on an adviser's skill in
analyzing currency values. Currency management strategies may substantially
change a fund's investment exposure to changes in currency exchange rates and
could result in losses to a fund if currencies do not perform as an adviser
anticipates. For example, if a currency's value rose at a time when a fund had
hedged its position by selling that currency in exchange for dollars, the fund
would not participate in the currency's appreciation. If a fund hedges currency
exposure through proxy hedges, the fund could realize currency losses from both
the hedge and the security position if the two currencies do not move in tandem.
Similarly, if a fund increases its exposure to a foreign currency and that
currency's value declines, the fund will realize a loss. Foreign currency
transactions involve the risk that anticipated currency movements will not be
accurately predicted and that a fund's hedging strategies will be ineffective.
Moreover, it is impossible to precisely forecast the market value of portfolio
securities at the expiration of a foreign currency forward contract.
Accordingly, a fund may be required to buy or sell additional currency on the
spot market (and bear the expenses of such transaction), if an adviser's
predictions regarding the movement of foreign currency or securities markets
prove inaccurate.
A
fund may be required to limit its hedging transactions in foreign currency
forwards, futures, and options in order to maintain its classification as a
"regulated investment company" under the Internal Revenue Code (Code). Hedging
transactions could result in the application of the mark-to-market provisions of
the Code, which may cause an increase (or decrease) in the amount of taxable
dividends paid by a fund and could affect whether dividends paid by a fund are
classified as capital gains or ordinary income. There is no assurance that an
adviser's use of currency management strategies will be advantageous to a fund
or that it will employ currency management strategies at appropriate
times.
Options
and Futures Relating to Foreign Currencies. Currency futures contracts are
similar to forward currency exchange contracts, except that they are traded on
exchanges (and have margin requirements) and are standardized as to contract
size and delivery date. Most currency futures contracts call for payment or
delivery in U.S. dollars. The underlying instrument of a currency option may be
a foreign currency, which generally is purchased or delivered in exchange for
U.S. dollars, or may be a futures contract. The purchaser of a currency call
obtains the right to purchase the underlying currency, and the purchaser of a
currency put obtains the right to sell the underlying currency.
The
uses and risks of currency options and futures are similar to options and
futures relating to securities or indexes, as discussed below. A fund may
purchase and sell currency futures and may purchase and write currency options
to increase or decrease its exposure to different foreign currencies. Currency
options may also be purchased or written in conjunction with each other or with
currency futures or forward contracts. Currency futures and options values can
be expected to correlate with exchange rates, but may not reflect other factors
that affect the value of a fund's investments. A currency hedge, for example,
should protect a Yen-denominated security from a decline in the Yen, but will
not protect a fund against a price decline resulting from deterioration in the
issuer's creditworthiness. Because the value of a fund's foreign-denominated
investments changes in response to many factors other than exchange rates, it
may not be possible to match the amount of currency options and futures to the
value of the fund's investments exactly over time.
Currency
options traded on U.S. or other exchanges may be subject to position limits
which may limit the ability of the fund to reduce foreign currency risk using
such options.
Funds
of Funds and Other Large Shareholders. Certain Fidelity® funds and accounts
(including funds of funds) invest in other funds ("underlying funds") and, as a
result, may at times have substantial investments in one or more underlying
funds.
An
underlying fund may experience large redemptions or investments due to
transactions in its shares by funds of funds, other large shareholders, or
similarly managed accounts. While it is impossible to predict the overall effect
of these transactions over time, there could be an adverse impact on an
underlying fund's performance. In the event of such redemptions or investments,
an underlying fund could be required to sell securities or to invest cash at a
time when it may not otherwise desire to do so. Such transactions may increase
an underlying fund's brokerage and/or other transaction costs and affect the
liquidity of a fund's portfolio. In addition, when funds of funds or other
investors own a substantial portion of an underlying fund's shares, a large
redemption by such an investor could cause actual expenses to increase, or could
result in the underlying fund's current expenses being allocated over a smaller
asset base, leading to an increase in the underlying fund's expense ratio.
Redemptions of underlying fund shares could also accelerate the realization of
taxable capital gains in the fund if sales of securities result in capital
gains. The impact of these transactions is likely to be greater when a fund of
funds or other significant investor purchases, redeems, or owns a substantial
portion of the underlying fund's shares.
When
possible, Fidelity will consider how to minimize these potential adverse
effects, and may take such actions as it deems appropriate to address potential
adverse effects, including redemption of shares in-kind rather than in cash or
carrying out the transactions over a period of time, although there can be no
assurance that such actions will be successful. A high volume of redemption
requests can impact an underlying fund the same way as the transactions of a
single shareholder with substantial investments. As an additional safeguard,
Fidelity® fund of funds may manage the placement of their redemption requests in
a manner designed to minimize the impact of such requests on the day-to-day
operations of the underlying funds in which they invest. This may involve, for
example, redeeming its shares of an underlying fund gradually over time.
Funds'
Rights as Investors. Fidelity® funds do not intend to direct or administer the
day-to-day operations of any company. A fund may, however, exercise its rights
as a shareholder or lender and may communicate its views on important matters of
policy to a company's management, board of directors, and shareholders, and
holders of a company's other securities when such matters could have a
significant effect on the value of the fund's investment in the company. The
activities in which a fund may engage, either individually or in conjunction
with others, may include, among others, supporting or opposing proposed changes
in a company's corporate structure or business activities; seeking changes in a
company's directors or management; seeking changes in a company's direction or
policies; seeking the sale or reorganization of the company or a portion of its
assets; supporting or opposing third-party takeover efforts; supporting the
filing of a bankruptcy petition; or foreclosing on collateral securing a
security. This area of corporate activity is increasingly prone to litigation
and it is possible that a fund could be involved in lawsuits related to such
activities. Such activities will be monitored with a view to mitigating, to the
extent possible, the risk of litigation against a fund and the risk of actual
liability if a fund is involved in litigation. No guarantee can be made,
however, that litigation against a fund will not be undertaken or liabilities
incurred. A fund's proxy voting guidelines are included in its SAI.
Futures,
Options, and Swaps. The success of any strategy involving futures, options, and
swaps depends on an adviser's analysis of many economic and mathematical factors
and a fund's return may be higher if it never invested in such instruments.
Additionally, some of the contracts discussed below are new instruments without
a trading history and there can be no assurance that a market for the
instruments will continue to exist. Government legislation or regulation could
affect the use of such instruments and could limit a fund's ability to pursue
its investment strategies. If a fund invests a significant portion of its assets
in derivatives, its investment exposure could far exceed the value of its
portfolio securities and its investment performance could be primarily dependent
upon securities it does not own.
The
requirements for qualification as a regulated investment company may limit the
extent to which a fund may enter into futures, options on futures, and forward
contracts.
Futures
Contracts. In purchasing a futures contract, the buyer agrees to purchase a
specified underlying instrument at a specified future date. In selling a futures
contract, the seller agrees to sell a specified underlying instrument at a
specified date. Futures contracts are standardized, exchange-traded contracts
and the price at which the purchase and sale will take place is fixed when the
buyer and seller enter into the contract. Some currently available futures
contracts are based on specific securities or baskets of securities, some are
based on commodities or commodities indexes (for funds that seek commodities
exposure), and some are based on indexes of securities prices (including foreign
indexes for funds that seek foreign exposure). In addition, some currently
available futures contracts are based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate
(SOFR) and other interest rates. Futures on indexes and futures not calling
for physical delivery of the underlying instrument will be settled through cash
payments rather than through delivery of the underlying instrument. Futures can
be held until their delivery dates, or can be closed out by offsetting purchases
or sales of futures contracts before then if a liquid market is available. A
fund may realize a gain or loss by closing out its futures contracts.
The
value of a futures contract tends to increase and decrease in tandem with the
value of its underlying instrument. Therefore, purchasing futures contracts will
tend to increase a fund's exposure to positive and negative price fluctuations
in the underlying instrument, much as if it had purchased the underlying
instrument directly. When a fund sells a futures contract, by contrast, the
value of its futures position will tend to move in a direction contrary to the
market for the underlying instrument. Selling futures contracts, therefore, will
tend to offset both positive and negative market price changes, much as if the
underlying instrument had been sold.
The
purchaser or seller of a futures contract or an option for a futures contract is
not required to deliver or pay for the underlying instrument or the final cash
settlement price, as applicable, unless the contract is held until the delivery
date. However, both the purchaser and seller are required to deposit "initial
margin" with a futures broker, known as a futures commission merchant, when the
contract is entered into. If the value of either party's position declines, that
party will be required to make additional "variation margin" payments to settle
the change in value on a daily basis. This process of "marking to market" will
be reflected in the daily calculation of open positions computed in a fund's
NAV. The party that has a gain is entitled to receive all or a portion of this
amount. Initial and variation margin payments do not constitute purchasing
securities on margin for purposes of a fund's investment limitations. Variation
margin does not represent a borrowing or loan by a fund, but is instead a
settlement between a fund and the futures commission merchant of the amount one
would owe the other if the fund's contract expired. In the event of the
bankruptcy or insolvency of a futures commission merchant that holds margin on
behalf of a fund, the fund may be entitled to return of margin owed to it only
in proportion to the amount received by the futures commission merchant's other
customers, potentially resulting in losses to the fund.
Although
futures exchanges generally operate similarly in the United States and abroad,
foreign futures exchanges may follow trading, settlement, and margin procedures
that are different from those for U.S. exchanges. Futures contracts traded
outside the United States may not involve a clearing mechanism or related
guarantees and may involve greater risk of loss than U.S.-traded contracts,
including potentially greater risk of losses due to insolvency of a futures
broker, exchange member, or other party that may owe initial or variation margin
to a fund. Because initial and variation margin payments may be measured in
foreign currency, a futures contract traded outside the United States may also
involve the risk of foreign currency fluctuation.
There
is no assurance a liquid market will exist for any particular futures contract
at any particular time. Exchanges may establish daily price fluctuation limits
for futures contracts, and may halt trading if a contract's price moves upward
or downward more than the limit in a given day. On volatile trading days when
the price fluctuation limit is reached or a trading halt is imposed, it may be
impossible to enter into new positions or close out existing positions. The
daily limit governs only price movements during a particular trading day and
therefore does not limit potential losses because the limit may work to prevent
the liquidation of unfavorable positions. For example, futures prices have
occasionally moved to the daily limit for several consecutive trading days with
little or no trading, thereby preventing prompt liquidation of positions and
subjecting some holders of futures contracts to substantial losses.
If
the market for a contract is not liquid because of price fluctuation limits or
other market conditions, it could prevent prompt liquidation of unfavorable
positions, and potentially could require a fund to continue to hold a position
until delivery or expiration regardless of changes in its value. These risks may
be heightened for commodity futures contracts, which have historically been
subject to greater price volatility than exists for instruments such as stocks
and bonds.
Because
there are a limited number of types of exchange-traded futures contracts, it is
likely that the standardized contracts available will not match a fund's current
or anticipated investments exactly. A fund may invest in futures contracts based
on securities with different issuers, maturities, or other characteristics from
the securities in which the fund typically invests, which involves a risk that
the futures position will not track the performance of the fund's other
investments.
Futures
prices can also diverge from the prices of their underlying instruments, even if
the underlying instruments match a fund's investments well. Futures prices are
affected by such factors as current and anticipated short-term interest rates,
changes in volatility of the underlying instrument, and the time remaining until
expiration of the contract, which may not affect security prices the same way.
Imperfect correlation may also result from differing levels of demand in the
futures markets and the securities markets, from structural differences in how
futures and securities are traded, or from imposition of daily price fluctuation
limits or trading halts. A fund may purchase or sell futures contracts with a
greater or lesser value than the securities it wishes to hedge or intends to
purchase in order to attempt to compensate for differences in volatility between
the contract and the securities, although this may not be successful in all
cases. If price changes in a fund's futures positions are poorly correlated with
its other investments, the positions may fail to produce anticipated gains or
result in losses that are not offset by gains in other investments.
In addition, the price of a commodity futures contract can reflect the
storage costs associated with the purchase of the physical commodity.
Futures
contracts on U.S. Government securities historically have reacted to an increase
or decrease in interest rates in a manner similar to the manner in which the
underlying U.S. Government securities reacted. To the extent, however, that a
fund enters into such futures contracts, the value of these futures contracts
will not vary in direct proportion to the value of the fund's holdings of U.S.
Government securities. Thus, the anticipated spread between the price of the
futures contract and the hedged security may be distorted due to differences in
the nature of the markets. The spread also may be distorted by differences in
initial and variation margin requirements, the liquidity of such markets and the
participation of speculators in such markets.
Options.
By purchasing a put option, the purchaser obtains the right (but not the
obligation) to sell the option's underlying instrument at a fixed strike price.
In return for this right, the purchaser pays the current market price for the
option (known as the option premium). Options have various types of underlying
instruments, including specific assets or securities, baskets of assets or
securities, indexes of securities or commodities prices, and futures contracts
(including commodity futures contracts). Options may be traded on an exchange or
OTC. The purchaser may terminate its position in a put option by allowing it to
expire or by exercising the option. If the option is allowed to expire, the
purchaser will lose the entire premium. If the option is exercised, the
purchaser completes the sale of the underlying instrument at the strike price.
Depending on the terms of the contract, upon exercise, an option may require
physical delivery of the underlying instrument or may be settled through cash
payments. A purchaser may also terminate a put option position by closing it out
in the secondary market at its current price, if a liquid secondary market
exists.
The
buyer of a typical put option can expect to realize a gain if the underlying
instrument's price falls substantially. However, if the underlying instrument's
price does not fall enough to offset the cost of purchasing the option, a put
buyer can expect to suffer a loss (limited to the amount of the premium, plus
related transaction costs).
The
features of call options are essentially the same as those of put options,
except that the purchaser of a call option obtains the right (but not the
obligation) to purchase, rather than sell, the underlying instrument at the
option's strike price. A call buyer typically attempts to participate in
potential price increases of the underlying instrument with risk limited to the
cost of the option if the underlying instrument's price falls. At the same time,
the buyer can expect to suffer a loss if the underlying instrument's price does
not rise sufficiently to offset the cost of the option.
The
writer of a put or call option takes the opposite side of the transaction from
the option's purchaser. In return for receipt of the premium, the writer assumes
the obligation to pay or receive the strike price for the option's underlying
instrument if the other party to the option chooses to exercise it. The writer
may seek to terminate a position in a put option before exercise by closing out
the option in the secondary market at its current price. If the secondary market
is not liquid for a put option, however, the writer must continue to be prepared
to pay the strike price while the option is outstanding, regardless of price
changes. When writing an option on a futures contract, a fund will be required
to make margin payments to a futures commission merchant as described above for
futures contracts.
If
the underlying instrument's price rises, a put writer would generally expect to
profit, although its gain would be limited to the amount of the premium it
received. If the underlying instrument's price remains the same over time, it is
likely that the writer will also profit, because it should be able to close out
the option at a lower price. If the underlying instrument's price falls, the put
writer would expect to suffer a loss. This loss should be less than the loss
from purchasing the underlying instrument directly, however, because the premium
received for writing the option should mitigate the effects of the
decline.
Writing
a call option obligates the writer to sell or deliver the option's underlying
instrument or make a net cash settlement payment, as applicable, in return for
the strike price, upon exercise of the option. The characteristics of writing
call options are similar to those of writing put options, except that writing
calls generally is a profitable strategy if prices remain the same or fall.
Through receipt of the option premium, a call writer should mitigate the effects
of a price increase. At the same time, because a call writer must be prepared to
deliver the underlying instrument or make a net cash settlement payment, as
applicable, in return for the strike price, even if its current value is
greater, a call writer gives up some ability to participate in price increases
and, if a call writer does not hold the underlying instrument, a call writer's
loss is theoretically unlimited.
Where
a put or call option on a particular security is purchased to hedge against
price movements in a related security, the price to close out the put or call
option on the secondary market may move more or less than the price of the
related security.
There
is no assurance a liquid market will exist for any particular options contract
at any particular time. Options may have relatively low trading volume and
liquidity if their strike prices are not close to the underlying instrument's
current price. In addition, exchanges may establish daily price fluctuation
limits for exchange-traded options contracts, and may halt trading if a
contract's price moves upward or downward more than the limit in a given day. On
volatile trading days when the price fluctuation limit is reached or a trading
halt is imposed, it may be impossible to enter into new positions or close out
existing positions. If the market for a contract is not liquid because of price
fluctuation limits or otherwise, it could prevent prompt liquidation of
unfavorable positions, and potentially could require a fund to continue to hold
a position until delivery or expiration regardless of changes in its
value.
Unlike
exchange-traded options, which are standardized with respect to the underlying
instrument, expiration date, contract size, and strike price, the terms of OTC
options (options not traded on exchanges) generally are established through
negotiation with the other party to the option contract. While this type of
arrangement allows the purchaser or writer greater flexibility to tailor an
option to its needs, OTC options generally are less liquid and involve greater
credit risk than exchange-traded options, which are backed by the clearing
organization of the exchanges where they are traded.
Combined
positions involve purchasing and writing options in combination with each other,
or in combination with futures or forward contracts, to adjust the risk and
return characteristics of the overall position. For example, purchasing a put
option and writing a call option on the same underlying instrument would
construct a combined position whose risk and return characteristics are similar
to selling a futures contract. Another possible combined position would involve
writing a call option at one strike price and buying a call option at a lower
price, to reduce the risk of the written call option in the event of a
substantial price increase. Because combined options positions involve multiple
trades, they result in higher transaction costs and may be more difficult to
open and close out.
A
fund may also buy and sell options on swaps (swaptions), which are generally
options on interest rate swaps. An option on a swap gives a party the right (but
not the obligation) to enter into a new swap agreement or to extend, shorten,
cancel or modify an existing contract at a specific date in the future in
exchange for a premium. Depending on the terms of the particular option
agreement, a fund will generally incur a greater degree of risk when it writes
(sells) an option on a swap than it will incur when it purchases an option on a
swap. When a fund purchases an option on a swap, it risks losing only the amount
of the premium it has paid should it decide to let the option expire
unexercised. However, when a fund writes an option on a swap, upon exercise of
the option the fund will become obligated according to the terms of the
underlying agreement. A fund that writes an option on a swap receives the
premium and bears the risk of unfavorable changes in the preset rate on the
underlying interest rate swap. Whether a fund's use of options on swaps will be
successful in furthering its investment objective will depend on the adviser's
ability to predict correctly whether certain types of investments are likely to
produce greater returns than other investments. Options on swaps may involve
risks similar to those discussed below in "Swap Agreements."
Because
there are a limited number of types of exchange-traded options contracts, it is
likely that the standardized contracts available will not match a fund's current
or anticipated investments exactly. A fund may invest in options contracts based
on securities with different issuers, maturities, or other characteristics from
the securities in which the fund typically invests, which involves a risk that
the options position will not track the performance of the fund's other
investments.
Options
prices can also diverge from the prices of their underlying instruments, even if
the underlying instruments match a fund's investments well. Options prices are
affected by such factors as current and anticipated short-term interest rates,
changes in volatility of the underlying instrument, and the time remaining until
expiration of the contract, which may not affect security prices the same way.
Imperfect correlation may also result from differing levels of demand in the
options and futures markets and the securities markets, from structural
differences in how options and futures and securities are traded, or from
imposition of daily price fluctuation limits or trading halts. A fund may
purchase or sell options contracts with a greater or lesser value than the
securities it wishes to hedge or intends to purchase in order to attempt to
compensate for differences in volatility between the contract and the
securities, although this may not be successful in all cases. If price changes
in a fund's options positions are poorly correlated with its other investments,
the positions may fail to produce anticipated gains or result in losses that are
not offset by gains in other investments.
Swap
Agreements. Swap agreements are two-party contracts entered into primarily by
institutional investors. Cleared swaps are transacted through futures commission
merchants that are members of central clearinghouses with the clearinghouse
serving as a central counterparty similar to transactions in futures contracts.
In a standard "swap" transaction, two parties agree to exchange one or more
payments based, for example, on the returns (or differentials in rates of
return) earned or realized on particular predetermined investments or
instruments (such as securities, commodities, indexes, or other financial or
economic interests). The gross payments to be exchanged between the parties are
calculated with respect to a notional amount, which is the predetermined dollar
principal of the trade representing the hypothetical underlying quantity upon
which payment obligations are computed.
Swap
agreements can take many different forms and are known by a variety of names,
including interest rate swaps (where the parties exchange a floating rate for a
fixed rate), asset swaps (e.g., where parties combine the purchase or sale of a
bond with an interest rate swap), total return swaps, and credit default swaps.
Depending on how they are used, swap agreements may increase or decrease the
overall volatility of a fund's investments and its share price and, if
applicable, its yield. Swap agreements are subject to liquidity risk, meaning
that a fund may be unable to sell a swap contract to a third party at a
favorable price. Certain standardized swap transactions are currently subject to
mandatory central clearing or may be eligible for voluntary central clearing.
Central clearing is expected to decrease counterparty risk and increase
liquidity compared to uncleared swaps because central clearing interposes the
central clearinghouse as the counterpart to each participant's swap. However,
central clearing does not eliminate counterparty risk or illiquidity risk
entirely. In addition depending on the size of a fund and other factors, the
margin required under the rules of a clearinghouse and by a clearing member
futures commission merchant may be in excess of the collateral required to be
posted by a fund to support its obligations under a similar uncleared swap.
However, regulators have adopted rules imposing certain margin requirements,
including minimums, on certain uncleared swaps which could reduce the
distinction.
A
total return swap is a contract whereby one party agrees to make a series of
payments to another party based on the change in the market value of the assets
underlying such contract (which can include a security or other instrument,
commodity, index or baskets thereof) during the specified period. In exchange,
the other party to the contract agrees to make a series of payments calculated
by reference to an interest rate and/or some other agreed-upon amount (including
the change in market value of other underlying assets). A fund may use total
return swaps to gain exposure to an asset without owning it or taking physical
custody of it. For example, a fund investing in total return commodity swaps
will receive the price appreciation of a commodity, commodity index or portion
thereof in exchange for payment of an agreed-upon fee.
In
a credit default swap, the credit default protection buyer makes periodic
payments, known as premiums, to the credit default protection seller. In return
the credit default protection seller will make a payment to the credit default
protection buyer upon the occurrence of a specified credit event. A credit
default swap can refer to a single issuer or asset, a basket of issuers or
assets or index of assets, each known as the reference entity or underlying
asset. A fund may act as either the buyer or the seller of a credit default
swap. A fund may buy or sell credit default protection on a basket of issuers or
assets, even if a number of the underlying assets referenced in the basket are
lower-quality debt securities. In an unhedged credit default swap, a fund buys
credit default protection on a single issuer or asset, a basket of issuers or
assets or index of assets without owning the underlying asset or debt issued by
the reference entity. Credit default swaps involve greater and different risks
than investing directly in the referenced asset, because, in addition to market
risk, credit default swaps include liquidity, counterparty and operational
risk.
Credit
default swaps allow a fund to acquire or reduce credit exposure to a particular
issuer, asset or basket of assets. If a swap agreement calls for payments by a
fund, the fund must be prepared to make such payments when due. If a fund is the
credit default protection seller, the fund will experience a loss if a credit
event occurs and the credit of the reference entity or underlying asset has
deteriorated. If a fund is the credit default protection buyer, the fund will be
required to pay premiums to the credit default protection seller. In the case of
a physically settled credit default swap in which a fund is the protection
seller, the fund must be prepared to pay par for and take possession of debt of
a defaulted issuer delivered to the fund by the credit default protection buyer.
Any loss would be offset by the premium payments the fund receives as the seller
of credit default protection.
If
the creditworthiness of a fund's swap counterparty declines, the risk that the
counterparty may not perform could increase, potentially resulting in a loss to
the fund. To limit the counterparty risk involved in swap agreements, a
Fidelity® fund will enter into swap agreements only with counterparties that
meet certain standards of creditworthiness. This risk for cleared swaps is
generally lower than for uncleared swaps since the counterparty is a
clearinghouse, but there can be no assurance that a clearinghouse or its members
will satisfy its obligations. Although there can be no assurance that a fund
will be able to do so, a fund may be able to reduce or eliminate its exposure
under a swap agreement either by assignment or other disposition, or by entering
into an offsetting swap agreement with the same party or another creditworthy
party. A fund may have limited ability to eliminate its exposure under a credit
default swap if the credit of the reference entity or underlying asset has
declined.
A
fund bears the risk of loss of the amount expected to be received under a swap
agreement in the event of the default or bankruptcy of a swap agreement
counterparty. A fund would generally be required to provide margin or collateral
for the benefit of that counterparty. If a counterparty to a swap transaction
becomes insolvent, the fund may be limited temporarily or permanently in
exercising its right to the return of related fund assets designated as margin
or collateral in an action against the counterparty.
Swap
agreements are subject to the risk that the market value of the instrument will
change in a way detrimental to a fund's interest. A fund bears the risk that an
adviser will not accurately forecast market trends or the values of assets,
reference rates, indexes, or other economic factors in establishing swap
positions for a fund. If an adviser attempts to use a swap as a hedge against,
or as a substitute for, a portfolio investment, a fund may be exposed to the
risk that the swap will have or will develop imperfect or no correlation with
the portfolio investment, which could cause substantial losses for a fund. While
hedging strategies involving swap instruments can reduce the risk of loss, they
can also reduce the opportunity for gain or even result in losses by offsetting
favorable price movements in other fund investments. Swaps are complex and often
valued subjectively.
Hybrid
and Preferred Securities. A hybrid security may be a debt security, warrant,
convertible security, certificate of deposit or other evidence of indebtedness
on which the value of the interest on or principal of which is determined by
reference to changes in the value of a reference instrument or financial
strength of a reference entity (e.g., a security or other financial instrument,
asset, currency, interest rate, commodity, index, or business entity such as a
financial institution). Another example is contingent convertible securities,
which are fixed income securities that, under certain circumstances, either
convert into common stock of the issuer or undergo a principal write-down by a
predetermined percentage if the issuer's capital ratio falls below a
predetermined trigger level. The liquidation value of such a security may be
reduced upon a regulatory action and without the need for a bankruptcy
proceeding. Preferred securities may take the form of preferred stock and
represent an equity or ownership interest in an issuer that pays dividends at a
specified rate and that has precedence over common stock in the payment of
dividends. In the event an issuer is liquidated or declares bankruptcy, the
claims of owners of bonds generally take precedence over the claims of those who
own preferred and common stock.
The
risks of investing in hybrid and preferred securities reflect a combination of
the risks of investing in securities, options, futures and currencies. An
investment in a hybrid or preferred security may entail significant risks that
are not associated with a similar investment in a traditional debt or equity
security. The risks of a particular hybrid or preferred security will depend
upon the terms of the instrument, but may include the possibility of significant
changes in the value of any applicable reference instrument. Such risks may
depend upon factors unrelated to the operations or credit quality of the issuer
of the hybrid or preferred security. Hybrid and preferred securities are
potentially more volatile and carry greater market and liquidity risks than
traditional debt or equity securities. Also, the price of the hybrid or
preferred security and any applicable reference instrument may not move in the
same direction or at the same time. In addition, because hybrid and preferred
securities may be traded over-the-counter or in bilateral transactions with the
issuer of the security, hybrid and preferred securities may be subject to the
creditworthiness of the counterparty of the security and their values may
decline substantially if the counterparty's creditworthiness deteriorates. In
addition, uncertainty regarding the tax and regulatory treatment of hybrid and
preferred securities may reduce demand for such securities and tax and
regulatory considerations may limit the extent of a fund's investments in
certain hybrid and preferred securities.
Illiquid
Investments means any investment that cannot be sold or disposed of in current
market conditions in seven calendar days or less without the sale or disposition
significantly changing the market value of the investment. Difficulty in selling
or disposing of illiquid investments may result in a loss or may be costly to a
fund. Illiquid securities may include (1) repurchase agreements maturing in more
than seven days without demand/redemption features, (2) OTC options and certain
other derivatives, (3) private placements, (4) securities traded on markets and
exchanges with structural constraints, and (5) loan participations.
Under
the supervision of the Board of Trustees, a Fidelity® fund's adviser classifies
the liquidity of a fund's investments and monitors the extent of a fund's
illiquid investments.
Various
market, trading and investment-specific factors may be considered in determining
the liquidity of a fund's investments including, but not limited to (1) the
existence of an active trading market, (2) the nature of the security and the
market in which it trades, (3) the number, diversity, and quality of dealers and
prospective purchasers in the marketplace, (4) the frequency, volume, and
volatility of trade and price quotations, (5) bid-ask spreads, (6) dates of
issuance and maturity, (7) demand, put or tender features, and (8) restrictions
on trading or transferring the investment.
Fidelity
classifies certain investments as illiquid based upon these criteria. Fidelity
also monitors for certain market, trading and investment-specific events that
may cause Fidelity to re-evaluate an investment's liquidity status and may lead
to an investment being classified as illiquid. In addition, Fidelity uses a
third-party to assist with the liquidity classifications of the fund's
investments, which includes calculating the time to sell and settle a specified
size position in a particular investment without the sale significantly changing
the market value of the investment.
Increasing
Government Debt. The total public debt of the United States and other countries
around the globe as a percent of gross domestic product has, at times, grown
rapidly. Although high debt levels do not necessarily indicate or cause economic
problems, they may create certain systemic risks if sound debt management
practices are not implemented.
A
high national debt level may increase market pressures to meet government
funding needs, which may drive debt cost higher and cause a country to sell
additional debt, thereby increasing refinancing risk. A high national debt also
raises concerns that a government will not be able to make principal or interest
payments when they are due. In the worst case, unsustainable debt levels can
decline the valuation of currencies, and can prevent a government from
implementing effective counter-cyclical fiscal policy in economic
downturns.
Rating
services have, in the past, lowered their long-term sovereign credit rating on
the United States. The market prices and yields of securities supported by the
full faith and credit of the U.S. Government may be adversely affected by rating
services' decisions to downgrade the long-term sovereign credit rating of the
United States.
Indexed
Securities are instruments whose prices are indexed to the prices of other
securities, securities indexes, or other financial indicators. Indexed
securities typically, but not always, are debt securities or deposits whose
values at maturity or coupon rates are determined by reference to a specific
instrument, statistic, or measure.
Indexed
securities also include commercial paper, certificates of deposit, and other
fixed-income securities whose values at maturity or coupon interest rates are
determined by reference to the returns of particular stock indexes. Indexed
securities can be affected by stock prices as well as changes in interest rates
and the creditworthiness of their issuers and may not track the indexes as
accurately as direct investments in the indexes.
Mortgage-indexed
securities, for example, could be structured to replicate the performance of
mortgage securities and the characteristics of direct ownership.
Currency-indexed
securities typically are short-term to intermediate-term debt securities whose
maturity values or interest rates are determined by reference to the values of
one or more specified foreign currencies, and may offer higher yields than U.S.
dollar-denominated securities. Currency-indexed securities may be positively or
negatively indexed; that is, their maturity value may increase when the
specified currency value increases, resulting in a security that performs
similarly to a foreign-denominated instrument, or their maturity value may
decline when foreign currencies increase, resulting in a security whose price
characteristics are similar to a put on the underlying currency.
Currency-indexed securities may also have prices that depend on the values of a
number of different foreign currencies relative to each other.
The
performance of indexed securities depends to a great extent on the performance
of the instrument or measure to which they are indexed, and may also be
influenced by interest rate changes in the United States and abroad. Indexed
securities may be more volatile than the underlying instruments or measures.
Indexed securities are also subject to the credit risks associated with the
issuer of the security, and their values may decline substantially if the
issuer's creditworthiness deteriorates. Recent issuers of indexed securities
have included banks, corporations, and certain U.S. Government agencies.
Insolvency
of Issuers, Counterparties, and Intermediaries. Issuers of fund portfolio
securities or counterparties to fund transactions that become insolvent or
declare bankruptcy can pose special investment risks. In each circumstance, risk
of loss, valuation uncertainty, increased illiquidity, and other unpredictable
occurrences may negatively impact an investment. Each of these risks may be
amplified in foreign markets, where security trading, settlement, and custodial
practices can be less developed than those in the U.S. markets, and bankruptcy
laws differ from those of the U.S.
As
a general matter, if the issuer of a fund portfolio security is liquidated or
declares bankruptcy, the claims of owners of bonds and preferred stock have
priority over the claims of common stock owners. These events can negatively
impact the value of the issuer's securities and the results of related
proceedings can be unpredictable.
If
a counterparty to a fund transaction, such as a swap transaction, a short sale,
a borrowing, or other complex transaction becomes insolvent, the fund may be
limited in its ability to exercise rights to obtain the return of related fund
assets or in exercising other rights against the counterparty. Uncertainty may
also arise upon the insolvency of a securities or commodities intermediary such
as a broker-dealer or futures commission merchant with which a fund has pending
transactions. In addition, insolvency and liquidation proceedings take time to
resolve, which can limit or preclude a fund's ability to terminate a transaction
or obtain related assets or collateral in a timely fashion. If an intermediary
becomes insolvent, while securities positions and other holdings may be
protected by U.S. or foreign laws, it is sometimes difficult to determine
whether these protections are available to specific trades based on the
circumstances. Receiving the benefit of these protections can also take time to
resolve, which may result in illiquid positions.
Interfund
Borrowing and Lending Program. Pursuant to an exemptive order issued by the SEC,
a Fidelity® fund may lend money to, and borrow money from, other funds advised
by FMR or its affiliates. A Fidelity® fund will borrow through the program only
when the costs are equal to or lower than the costs of bank loans. A Fidelity®
fund will lend through the program only when the returns are higher than those
available from an investment in repurchase agreements. Interfund loans and
borrowings normally extend overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven
days. Loans may be called on one day's notice. A Fidelity® fund may have to
borrow from a bank at a higher interest rate if an interfund loan is called or
not renewed. Any delay in repayment to a lending fund could result in a lost
investment opportunity or additional borrowing costs.
Investment-Grade
Debt Securities. Investment-grade debt securities include all types of debt
instruments that are of medium and high-quality. Investment-grade debt
securities include repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Government
securities as well as repurchase agreements collateralized by equity securities,
non-investment-grade debt, and all other instruments in which a fund can perfect
a security interest, provided the repurchase agreement counterparty has an
investment-grade rating. Some investment-grade debt securities may possess
speculative characteristics and may be more sensitive to economic changes and to
changes in the financial conditions of issuers. An investment-grade rating means
the security or issuer is rated investment-grade by a credit rating agency
registered as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO)
with the SEC (for example, Moody's Investors Service, Inc.), or is unrated but
considered to be of equivalent quality by a fund's adviser. For purposes of
determining the maximum maturity of an investment-grade debt security, an
adviser may take into account normal settlement periods.
Loans
and Other Direct Debt Instruments. Direct debt instruments are interests in
amounts owed by a corporate, governmental, or other borrower to lenders or
lending syndicates (loans and loan participations), to suppliers of goods or
services (trade claims or other receivables), or to other parties. Direct debt
instruments involve a risk of loss in case of default or insolvency of the
borrower and may offer less legal protection to the purchaser in the event of
fraud or misrepresentation, or there may be a requirement that a fund supply
additional cash to a borrower on demand. A fund may acquire loans by buying an
assignment of all or a portion of the loan from a lender or by purchasing a loan
participation from a lender or other purchaser of a participation. If permitted
by its investment policies, a fund also may originate or otherwise acquire loans
directly at the time of the loan's closing.
Lenders
and purchasers of loans and other forms of direct indebtedness depend primarily
upon the creditworthiness of the borrower and/or any collateral for payment of
interest and repayment of principal. If scheduled interest or principal payments
are not made, the value of the instrument may be adversely affected. Loans that
are fully secured provide more protections than an unsecured loan in the event
of failure to make scheduled interest or principal payments. However, there is
no assurance that the liquidation of collateral from a secured loan would
satisfy the borrower's obligation, or that the collateral could be liquidated.
Indebtedness of borrowers whose creditworthiness is poor involves substantially
greater risks and may be highly speculative. Different types of assets may be
used as collateral for a fund's loans and there can be no assurance that a fund
will correctly evaluate the value of the assets collateralizing the fund's
loans. Borrowers that are in bankruptcy or restructuring may never pay off their
indebtedness, or may pay only a small fraction of the amount owed. In any
restructuring or bankruptcy proceedings relating to a borrower funded by a fund,
a fund may be required to accept collateral with less value than the amount of
the loan made by the fund to the borrower. Direct indebtedness of foreign
countries also involves a risk that the governmental entities responsible for
the repayment of the debt may be unable, or unwilling, to pay interest and repay
principal when due.
Loans
and other types of direct indebtedness (which a fund may originate, acquire or
otherwise gain exposure to) may not be readily marketable and may be subject to
restrictions on resale. Some indebtedness may be difficult to dispose of readily
at what the Adviser believes to be a fair price. In addition, valuation of
illiquid indebtedness involves a greater degree of judgment in determining a
fund's net asset value than if that value were based on readily available market
quotations, and could result in significant variations in a fund's daily share
price. Some loan interests are traded among certain financial institutions and
accordingly may be deemed liquid. As the market for different types of
indebtedness develops, the liquidity of these instruments is expected to
improve.
Direct
lending and investments in loans through direct assignment of a financial
institution's interests with respect to a loan may involve additional risks. For
example, if a loan is foreclosed, the lender/purchaser could become part owner
of any collateral, and would bear the costs and liabilities associated with
owning and disposing of the collateral. In the event of a default by the
borrower, a fund may have difficulty disposing of the assets used as collateral
for a loan. In addition, a purchaser could be held liable as a co-lender. Direct
debt instruments may also involve a risk of insolvency of the lending bank or
other intermediary.
A
loan is often administered by a bank or other financial institution that acts as
agent for all holders. The agent administers the terms of the loan, as specified
in the loan agreement. Unless, under the terms of the loan or other
indebtedness, the purchaser has direct recourse against the borrower, the
purchaser may have to rely on the agent to apply appropriate credit remedies
against a borrower. If assets held by the agent for the benefit of a purchaser
were determined to be subject to the claims of the agent's general creditors,
the purchaser might incur certain costs and delays in realizing payment on the
loan or loan participation and could suffer a loss of principal or interest.
Direct loans are typically not administered by an underwriter or agent bank. The
terms of direct loans are negotiated with borrowers in private transactions.
Direct loans are not publicly traded and may not have a secondary market.
A
fund may seek to dispose of loans in certain cases, to the extent possible,
through selling participations in the loan. In that case, a fund would remain
subject to certain obligations, which may result in expenses for a fund and
certain additional risks.
Direct
indebtedness may include letters of credit, revolving credit facilities, or
other standby financing commitments that obligate lenders/purchasers, including
a fund, to make additional cash payments on demand. These commitments may have
the effect of requiring a lender/purchaser to increase its investment in a
borrower at a time when it would not otherwise have done so, even if the
borrower's condition makes it unlikely that the amount will ever be
repaid.
In
the process of originating, buying, selling and holding loans, a fund may
receive and/or pay certain fees. These fees are in addition to the interest
payments received and may include facility, closing or upfront fees, commitment
fees and commissions. A fund may receive or pay a facility, closing or upfront
fee when it buys or sells a loan. A fund may receive a commitment fee throughout
the life of the loan or as long as the fund remains invested in the loan (in
addition to interest payments) for any unused portion of a committed line of
credit. Other fees received by the fund may include prepayment fees, covenant
waiver fees, ticking fees and/or modification fees. Legal fees related to the
originating, buying, selling and holding loans may also be borne by the fund
(including legal fees to assess conformity of a loan investment with 1940 Act
provisions).
When
engaging in direct lending, if permitted by its investment policies, a fund's
performance may depend, in part, on the ability of the fund to originate loans
on advantageous terms. A fund may compete with other lenders in originating and
purchasing loans. Increased competition for, or a diminished available supply
of, qualifying loans could result in lower yields on and/or less advantageous
terms for such loans, which could reduce fund performance.
For
a Fidelity® fund that limits the amount of total assets that it will invest in
any one issuer or in issuers within the same industry, the fund generally will
treat the borrower as the "issuer" of indebtedness held by the fund. In the case
of loan participations where a bank or other lending institution serves as
financial intermediary between a fund and the borrower, if the participation
does not shift to the fund the direct debtor-creditor relationship with the
borrower, SEC interpretations require a fund, in appropriate circumstances, to
treat both the lending bank or other lending institution and the borrower as
"issuers" for these purposes. Treating a financial intermediary as an issuer of
indebtedness may restrict a fund's ability to invest in indebtedness related to
a single financial intermediary, or a group of intermediaries engaged in the
same industry, even if the underlying borrowers represent many different
companies and industries.
A
fund may choose, at its expense or in conjunction with others, to pursue
litigation or otherwise to exercise its rights as a security holder to seek to
protect the interests of security holders if it determines this to be in the
best interest of the fund's shareholders.
If
permitted by its investment policies, a fund may also obtain exposure to the
lending activities described above indirectly through its investments in
underlying Fidelity® funds or other vehicles that may engage in such activities
directly.
Lower-Quality
Debt Securities. Lower-quality debt securities include all types of debt
instruments that have poor protection with respect to the payment of interest
and repayment of principal, or may be in default. These securities are often
considered to be speculative and involve greater risk of loss or price changes
due to changes in the issuer's capacity to pay. The market prices of
lower-quality debt securities may fluctuate more than those of higher-quality
debt securities and may decline significantly in periods of general economic
difficulty, which may follow periods of rising interest rates.
The
market for lower-quality debt securities may be thinner and less active than
that for higher-quality debt securities, which can adversely affect the prices
at which the former are sold. Adverse publicity and changing investor
perceptions may affect the liquidity of lower-quality debt securities and the
ability of outside pricing services to value lower-quality debt
securities.
Because
the risk of default is higher for lower-quality debt securities, research and
credit analysis are an especially important part of managing securities of this
type. Such analysis may focus on relative values based on factors such as
interest or dividend coverage, asset coverage, earnings prospects, and the
experience and managerial strength of the issuer, in an attempt to identify
those issuers of high-yielding securities whose financial condition is adequate
to meet future obligations, has improved, or is expected to improve in the
future.
A
fund may choose, at its expense or in conjunction with others, to pursue
litigation or otherwise to exercise its rights as a security holder to seek to
protect the interests of security holders if it determines this to be in the
best interest of the fund's shareholders.
Low
or Negative Yielding Securities. During periods of very low or negative interest
rates, a fund may be unable to maintain positive returns. Interest rates in the
U.S. and many parts of the world, including Japan and some European countries,
are at or near historically low levels. Japan and those European countries have,
from time to time, experienced negative interest rates on certain fixed income
instruments. Very low or negative interest rates may magnify interest rate risk
for the markets as a whole and for the funds. Changing interest rates, including
rates that fall below zero, may have unpredictable effects on markets, may
result in heightened market volatility and may detract from fund performance to
the extent a fund is exposed to such interest rates.
Mortgage
Securities are issued by government and non-government entities such as banks,
mortgage lenders, or other institutions. A mortgage security is an obligation of
the issuer backed by a mortgage or pool of mortgages or a direct interest in an
underlying pool of mortgages. Some mortgage securities, such as collateralized
mortgage obligations (or "CMOs"), make payments of both principal and interest
at a range of specified intervals; others make semi-annual interest payments at
a predetermined rate and repay principal at maturity (like a typical bond).
Mortgage securities are based on different types of mortgages, including those
on commercial real estate or residential properties. Stripped mortgage
securities are created when the interest and principal components of a mortgage
security are separated and sold as individual securities. In the case of a
stripped mortgage security, the holder of the "principal-only" security (PO)
receives the principal payments made by the underlying mortgage, while the
holder of the "interest-only" security (IO) receives interest payments from the
same underlying mortgage.
Fannie
Maes and Freddie Macs are pass-through securities issued by Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac, respectively. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which guarantee payment
of interest and repayment of principal on Fannie Maes and Freddie Macs,
respectively, are federally chartered corporations supervised by the U.S.
Government that act as governmental instrumentalities under authority granted by
Congress. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are authorized to borrow from the U.S.
Treasury to meet their obligations. Fannie Maes and Freddie Macs are not backed
by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.
The
value of mortgage securities may change due to shifts in the market's perception
of issuers and changes in interest rates. In addition, regulatory or tax changes
may adversely affect the mortgage securities market as a whole. Non-government
mortgage securities may offer higher yields than those issued by government
entities, but also may be subject to greater price changes than government
issues. Mortgage securities are subject to prepayment risk, which is the risk
that early principal payments made on the underlying mortgages, usually in
response to a reduction in interest rates, will result in the return of
principal to the investor, causing it to be invested subsequently at a lower
current interest rate. Alternatively, in a rising interest rate environment,
mortgage security values may be adversely affected when prepayments on
underlying mortgages do not occur as anticipated, resulting in the extension of
the security's effective maturity and the related increase in interest rate
sensitivity of a longer-term instrument. The prices of stripped mortgage
securities tend to be more volatile in response to changes in interest rates
than those of non-stripped mortgage securities.
A
fund may seek to earn additional income by using a trading strategy (commonly
known as "mortgage dollar rolls" or "reverse mortgage dollar rolls") that
involves selling (or buying) mortgage securities, realizing a gain or loss, and
simultaneously agreeing to purchase (or sell) mortgage securities on a later
date at a set price. During the period between the sale and repurchase in a
mortgage dollar roll transaction, a fund will not be entitled to receive
interest and principal payments on the securities sold but will invest the
proceeds of the sale in other securities that are permissible investments for
the fund. During the period between the purchase and subsequent sale in a
reverse mortgage dollar roll transaction, a fund is entitled to interest and
principal payments on the securities purchased. Losses may arise due to changes
in the value of the securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the
terms of the agreement. If the counterparty files for bankruptcy or becomes
insolvent, a fund's right to repurchase or sell securities may be limited. This
trading strategy may increase interest rate exposure and result in an increased
portfolio turnover rate which increases costs and may increase taxable
gains.
Real
Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). REITs issue debt securities to fund the
purchase and/or development of commercial properties. The value of these debt
securities may be affected by changes in the value of the underlying property
owned by the trusts, the creditworthiness of the trusts, interest rates, and tax
and regulatory requirements. REITs are dependent upon management skill and the
cash flow generated by the properties owned by the trusts. REITs are at the risk
of the possibility of failing to qualify for tax-free status of income under the
Internal Revenue Code and failing to maintain exemption from the 1940 Act.
Repurchase
Agreements involve an agreement to purchase a security and to sell that security
back to the original seller at an agreed-upon price. The resale price reflects
the purchase price plus an agreed-upon incremental amount which is unrelated to
the coupon rate or maturity of the purchased security. As protection against the
risk that the original seller will not fulfill its obligation, the securities
are held in a separate account at a bank, marked-to-market daily, and maintained
at a value at least equal to the sale price plus the accrued incremental amount.
The value of the security purchased may be more or less than the price at which
the counterparty has agreed to purchase the security. In addition, delays or
losses could result if the other party to the agreement defaults or becomes
insolvent. A fund may be limited in its ability to exercise its right to
liquidate assets related to a repurchase agreement with an insolvent
counterparty. A Fidelity® fund may engage in repurchase agreement transactions
with parties whose creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by
the fund's adviser.
Restricted
Securities (including Private Placements) are subject to legal restrictions on
their sale. Difficulty in selling securities may result in a loss or be costly
to a fund. Restricted securities, including private placements of private and
public companies, generally can be sold in privately negotiated transactions,
pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933
(1933 Act), or in a registered public offering. Where registration is required,
the holder of a registered security may be obligated to pay all or part of the
registration expense and a considerable period may elapse between the time it
decides to seek registration and the time it may be permitted to sell a security
under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period, adverse
market conditions were to develop, the holder might obtain a less favorable
price than prevailed when it decided to seek registration of the security.
Reverse
Repurchase Agreements. In a reverse repurchase agreement, a fund sells a
security to another party, such as a bank or broker-dealer, in return for cash
and agrees to repurchase that security at an agreed-upon price and time. A
Fidelity® fund may enter into reverse repurchase agreements with parties whose
creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by the fund's adviser.
Such transactions may increase fluctuations in the market value of a fund's
assets and, if applicable, a fund's yield, and may be viewed as a form of
leverage. Under SEC requirements, a fund needs to aggregate the amount of
indebtedness associated with its reverse repurchase agreements and similar
financing transactions with the aggregate amount of any other senior securities
representing indebtedness (e.g., borrowings, if applicable) when calculating the
fund's asset coverage ratio or treat all such transactions as derivatives
transactions.
SEC
Rule 18f-4. In October 2020, the SEC adopted a final rule related to the
use of derivatives, short sales, reverse repurchase agreements and certain other
transactions by registered investment companies (the "rule"). Subject to certain
exceptions, the rule requires the funds to trade derivatives and certain other
transactions that create future payment or delivery obligations subject to a
value-at-risk (VaR) leverage limit and to certain derivatives risk management
program, reporting and board oversight requirements. Generally, these
requirements apply to any fund engaging in derivatives transactions unless a
fund satisfies a "limited derivatives users" exception, which requires the fund
to limit its gross notional derivatives exposure (with certain exceptions) to
10% of its net assets and to adopt derivatives risk management procedures. Under
the rule, when a fund trades reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing
transactions, it needs to aggregate the amount of indebtedness associated with
the reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions with the
aggregate amount of any other senior securities representing indebtedness (e.g.,
borrowings, if applicable) when calculating the fund's asset coverage ratio or
treat all such transactions as derivatives transactions. The SEC also provided
guidance in connection with the final rule regarding the use of securities
lending collateral that may limit securities lending activities. In addition,
under the rule, a fund may invest in a security on a when-issued or
forward-settling basis, or with a non-standard settlement cycle, and the
transaction will be deemed not to involve a senior security (as defined under
Section 18(g) of the 1940 Act), provided that (i) the fund intends to physically
settle the transaction and (ii) the transaction will settle within 35 days of
its trade date (the "Delayed-Settlement Securities Provision"). A fund may
otherwise engage in when-issued, forward-settling and non-standard settlement
cycle securities transactions that do not meet the conditions of the
Delayed-Settlement Securities Provision so long as the fund treats any such
transaction as a derivatives transaction for purposes of compliance with the
rule. Furthermore, under the rule, a fund will be permitted to enter into an
unfunded commitment agreement, and such unfunded commitment agreement will not
be subject to the asset coverage requirements under the 1940 Act, if the fund
reasonably believes, at the time it enters into such agreement, that it will
have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet its obligations with respect
to all such agreements as they come due. These requirements may limit the
ability of the funds to use derivatives, short sales, reverse repurchase
agreements and similar financing transactions, and the other relevant
transactions as part of its investment strategies. These requirements also may
increase the cost of the fund's investments and cost of doing business, which
could adversely affect investors.
Securities
Lending. A Fidelity® fund may lend securities to parties such as broker-dealers
or other institutions, including an affiliate, National Financial Services LLC
(NFS). Securities lending allows a fund to retain ownership of the securities
loaned and, at the same time, earn additional income. The borrower provides the
fund with collateral in an amount at least equal to the value of the securities
loaned. The fund seeks to maintain the ability to obtain the right to vote or
consent on proxy proposals involving material events affecting securities
loaned. If the borrower defaults on its obligation to return the securities
loaned because of insolvency or other reasons, a fund could experience delays
and costs in recovering the securities loaned or in gaining access to the
collateral. These delays and costs could be greater for foreign securities. If a
fund is not able to recover the securities loaned, the fund may sell the
collateral and purchase a replacement investment in the market. The value of the
collateral could decrease below the value of the replacement investment by the
time the replacement investment is purchased. For a Fidelity® fund, loans will
be made only to parties deemed by the fund's adviser to be in good standing and
when, in the adviser's judgment, the income earned would justify the
risks.
The
Fidelity® funds have retained agents, including NFS, an affiliate of the funds,
to act as securities lending agent. If NFS acts as securities lending agent for
a fund, it is subject to the overall supervision of the fund's adviser, and NFS
will administer the lending program in accordance with guidelines approved by
the fund's Trustees.
Cash
received as collateral through loan transactions may be invested in other
eligible securities, including shares of a money market fund. Investing this
cash subjects that investment, as well as the securities loaned, to market
appreciation or depreciation.
Securities
of Other Investment Companies, including shares of closed-end investment
companies (which include business development companies (BDCs)), unit investment
trusts, and open-end investment companies such as mutual funds and ETFs,
represent interests in professionally managed portfolios that may invest in any
type of instrument. Investing in other investment companies (including
investment companies managed by the Adviser and its affiliates) involves
substantially the same risks as investing directly in the underlying
instruments, but may involve additional expenses at the underlying investment
company-level, such as portfolio management fees and operating expenses, unless
such fees have been waived by the Adviser. Fees and expenses incurred indirectly
by a fund as a result of its investment in shares of one or more other
investment companies generally are referred to as "acquired fund fees and
expenses" and may appear as a separate line item in a fund's prospectus fee
table. For certain investment companies, such as BDCs, these expenses may be
significant. Certain types of investment companies, such as closed-end
investment companies, issue a fixed number of shares that trade on a stock
exchange or over-the-counter at a premium or a discount to their NAV. Others are
continuously offered at NAV, but may also be traded in the secondary market.
Similarly, ETFs trade on a securities exchange and may trade at a premium or a
discount to their NAV.
The
securities of closed-end funds may be leveraged. As a result, a fund may be
indirectly exposed to leverage through an investment in such securities. An
investment in securities of closed-end funds that use leverage may expose a fund
to higher volatility in the market value of such securities and the possibility
that the fund's long-term returns on such securities will be
diminished.
A
fund's ability to invest in securities of other investment companies may be
limited by federal securities laws. To the extent a fund acquires securities
issued by unaffiliated investment companies, the Adviser's access to information
regarding such underlying fund's portfolio may be limited and subject to such
fund's policies regarding disclosure of fund holdings.
A
fund that seeks to track the performance of a particular index could invest in
investment companies that seek to track the performance of indexes other than
the index that the fund seeks to track.
Sources
of Liquidity or Credit Support. Issuers may employ various forms of credit and
liquidity enhancements, including letters of credit, guarantees, swaps, puts,
and demand features, and insurance provided by domestic or foreign entities such
as banks and other financial institutions. An adviser and its affiliates may
rely on their evaluation of the credit of the issuer or the credit of the
liquidity or credit enhancement provider in determining whether to purchase or
hold a security supported by such enhancement. In evaluating the credit of a
foreign bank or other foreign entities, factors considered may include whether
adequate public information about the entity is available and whether the entity
may be subject to unfavorable political or economic developments, currency
controls, or other government restrictions that might affect its ability to
honor its commitment. Changes in the credit quality of the issuer and/or entity
providing the enhancement could affect the value of the security or a fund's
share price.
Special
Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs). A fund may invest in stock, warrants, and
other securities of SPACs or similar special purpose entities that pool money to
seek potential acquisition opportunities. SPACs are collective investment
structures formed to raise money in an initial public offering for the purpose
of merging with or acquiring one or more operating companies (the "de-SPAC
Transaction"). Until an acquisition is completed, a SPAC generally invests its
assets in US government securities, money market securities and cash. In
connection with a de-SPAC Transaction, the SPAC may complete a PIPE (private
investment in public equity) offering with certain investors. A fund may enter
into a contingent commitment with a SPAC to purchase PIPE shares if and when the
SPAC completes its de-SPAC Transaction.
Because
SPACs do not have an operating history or ongoing business other than seeking
acquisitions, the value of their securities is particularly dependent on the
ability of the SPAC's management to identify and complete a profitable
acquisition. Some SPACs may pursue acquisitions only within certain industries
or regions, which may increase the volatility of their prices. An investment in
a SPAC is subject to a variety of risks, including that (i) an attractive
acquisition or merger target may not be identified at all and the SPAC will be
required to return any remaining monies to shareholders; (ii) an acquisition or
merger once effected may prove unsuccessful and an investment in the SPAC may
lose value; (iii) the values of investments in SPACs may be highly volatile and
may depreciate significantly over time; (iv) no or only a thinly traded market
for shares of or interests in a SPAC may develop, leaving a fund unable to sell
its interest in a SPAC or to sell its interest only at a price below what the
fund believes is the SPAC interest's intrinsic value; (v) any proposed merger or
acquisition may be unable to obtain the requisite approval, if any, of
shareholders; (vi) an investment in a SPAC may be diluted by additional later
offerings of interests in the SPAC or by other investors exercising existing
rights to purchase shares of the SPAC; (vii) the warrants or other rights with
respect to the SPAC held by a fund may expire worthless or may be repurchased or
retired by the SPAC at an unfavorable price; (viii) a fund may be delayed in
receiving any redemption or liquidation proceeds from a SPAC to which it is
entitled; and (ix) a significant portion of the monies raised by the SPAC for
the purpose of identifying and effecting an acquisition or merger may be
expended during the search for a target transaction.
Purchased
PIPE shares will be restricted from trading until the registration statement for
the shares is declared effective. Upon registration, the shares can be freely
sold, but only pursuant to an effective registration statement or other
exemption from registration. The securities issued by a SPAC, which are
typically traded either in the over-the-counter market or on an exchange, may be
considered illiquid, more difficult to value, and/or be subject to restrictions
on resale.
Stripped
Securities are the separate income or principal components of a debt security.
The risks associated with stripped securities are similar to those of other debt
securities, although stripped securities may be more volatile, and the value of
certain types of stripped securities may move in the same direction as interest
rates. U.S. Treasury securities that have been stripped by a Federal Reserve
Bank are obligations issued by the U.S. Treasury.
Privately
stripped government securities are created when a dealer deposits a U.S.
Treasury security or other U.S. Government security with a custodian for
safekeeping. The custodian issues separate receipts for the coupon payments and
the principal payment, which the dealer then sells.
Structured
Securities (also called "structured notes") are derivative debt securities, the
interest rate on or principal of which is determined by an unrelated indicator.
The value of the interest rate on and/or the principal of structured securities
is determined by reference to changes in the value of a reference instrument
(e.g., a security or other financial instrument, asset, currency, interest rate,
commodity, or index) or the relative change in two or more reference
instruments. A structured security may be positively, negatively, or both
positively and negatively indexed; that is, its value or interest rate may
increase or decrease if the value of the reference instrument increases.
Similarly, its value or interest rate may increase or decrease if the value of
the reference instrument decreases. Further, the change in the principal amount
payable with respect to, or the interest rate of, a structured security may be
calculated as a multiple of the percentage change (positive or negative) in the
value of the underlying reference instrument(s); therefore, the value of such
structured security may be very volatile. Structured securities may entail a
greater degree of market risk than other types of debt securities because the
investor bears the risk of the reference instrument. Structured securities may
also be more volatile, less liquid, and more difficult to accurately price than
less complex securities or more traditional debt securities. In addition,
because structured securities generally are traded over-the-counter, structured
securities are subject to the creditworthiness of the counterparty of the
structured security, and their values may decline substantially if the
counterparty's creditworthiness deteriorates.
Temporary
Defensive Policies. Each of Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income Fund, Fidelity®
SAI Short-Term Bond Fund, and Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund reserves the right
to invest without limitation in investment-grade, money market or short-term
debt instruments for temporary, defensive purposes.
Transfer
Agent Bank Accounts. Proceeds from shareholder purchases of a Fidelity® fund may
pass through a series of demand deposit bank accounts before being held at the
fund's custodian. Redemption proceeds may pass from the custodian to the
shareholder through a similar series of bank accounts.
If
a bank account is registered to the transfer agent or an affiliate, who acts as
an agent for the funds when opening, closing, and conducting business in the
bank account, the transfer agent or an affiliate may invest overnight balances
in the account in repurchase agreements or money market funds. Any balances that
are not invested in repurchase agreements or money market funds remain in the
bank account overnight. Any risks associated with such an account are investment
risks of the funds. A fund faces the risk of loss of these balances if the bank
becomes insolvent.
Variable
and Floating Rate Securities provide for periodic adjustments in the interest
rate paid on the security. Variable rate securities provide for a specified
periodic adjustment in the interest rate, while floating rate securities have
interest rates that change whenever there is a change in a designated benchmark
rate or the issuer's credit quality, sometimes subject to a cap or floor on such
rate. Some variable or floating rate securities are structured with put features
that permit holders to demand payment of the unpaid principal balance plus
accrued interest from the issuers or certain financial intermediaries. For
purposes of determining the maximum maturity of a variable or floating rate
security, a fund's adviser may take into account normal settlement
periods.
In
addition to other interbank offered rates (IBORs), the most common benchmark
rate for floating rate securities is London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR),
which is the rate of interest offered on short-term interbank deposits, as
determined by trading between major international banks. After the global
financial crisis, regulators globally determined that existing interest rate
benchmarks should be reformed based on concerns that LIBOR and other IBORs were
susceptible to manipulation. Replacement rates that have been identified include
the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR, which is intended to replace U.S.
dollar LIBOR and measures the cost of U.S. dollar overnight borrowings) and the
Sterling Overnight Index Average rate (SONIA, which is intended to replace pound
sterling LIBOR and measures the overnight interest rate paid by banks in the
sterling market). At the end of 2021, certain LIBORs were discontinued, but the
most widely used LIBORs may continue to be provided on a representative basis
until at least mid-2023. In addition, the United Kingdom Financial Conduct
Authority (FCA) has announced that it will require the publication of synthetic
LIBOR for the one-month, three-month and six-month U.S. Dollar LIBOR settings
after June 30, 2023 through at least September 30, 2024. Although the transition
process away from IBORs has become increasingly well-defined, any potential
effects of a transition away from the IBORs on a fund and the financial
instruments in which it invests can be difficult to ascertain, and may depend on
factors that include, but are not limited to: (i) existing fallback or
termination provisions in individual contracts; (ii) the effect of new
legislation relating to the discontinuation of LIBOR and the use of replacement
rates, and (iii) whether, how, and when industry participants develop and adopt
new reference rates and fallbacks for both legacy and new products and
instruments. Moreover, certain aspects of the transition from IBORs will rely on
the actions of third-party market participants, such as clearing houses,
trustees, administrative agents, asset servicers and certain service providers;
the Adviser cannot guarantee the performance of such market participants and any
failure on the part of such market participants to manage their part of the IBOR
transition could impact a fund. Such transition may result in a reduction in the
value of IBOR-based instruments held by a fund, a reduction in the effectiveness
of certain hedging transactions and increased illiquidity and volatility in
markets that currently rely on an IBOR to determine interest rates, any of which
could adversely impact the fund's performance.
When-Issued
and Forward Purchase or Sale Transactions involve a commitment to purchase or
sell specific securities at a predetermined price or yield in which payment and
delivery take place after the customary settlement period for that type of
security. Typically, no interest accrues to the purchaser until the security is
delivered.
When
purchasing securities pursuant to one of these transactions, the purchaser
assumes the rights and risks of ownership, including the risks of price and
yield fluctuations and the risk that the security will not be issued as
anticipated. Because payment for the securities is not required until the
delivery date, these risks are in addition to the risks associated with a fund's
investments. If a fund remains substantially fully invested at a time when a
purchase is outstanding, the purchases may result in a form of leverage. When a
fund has sold a security pursuant to one of these transactions, the fund does
not participate in further gains or losses with respect to the security. If the
other party to a delayed-delivery transaction fails to deliver or pay for the
securities, a fund could miss a favorable price or yield opportunity or suffer a
loss.
A
fund may renegotiate a when-issued or forward transaction and may sell the
underlying securities before delivery, which may result in capital gains or
losses for the fund.
A
fund may also engage in purchases or sales of "to be announced" or "TBA"
securities, which usually are transactions in which a fund buys or sells
mortgage-backed securities on a forward commitment basis. A TBA transaction
typically does not designate the actual security to be delivered and only
includes an approximate principal amount. TBA trades can be used by a fund for
investment purposes in order to gain exposure to certain securities, or for
hedging purposes to adjust the risk exposure of a fund portfolio without having
to restructure a portfolio. Purchases and sales of TBA securities involve risks
similar to those discussed above for other when-issued and forward purchase and
sale transactions. In addition, when a fund sells TBA securities, it incurs
risks similar to those incurred in short sales. For example, when a fund sells
TBA securities without owning or having the right to obtain the deliverable
securities, it incurs a risk of loss because it could have to purchase the
securities at a price that is higher than the price at which it sold them. Also,
a fund may be unable to purchase the deliverable securities if the corresponding
market is illiquid.
Zero
Coupon Bonds do not make interest payments; instead, they are sold at a discount
from their face value and are redeemed at face value when they mature. Because
zero coupon bonds do not pay current income, their prices can be more volatile
than other types of fixed-income securities when interest rates change. In
calculating a fund's dividend, a portion of the difference between a zero coupon
bond's purchase price and its face value is considered income.
In
addition to the investment policies and limitations discussed above, a fund is
subject to the additional operational risk discussed below.
Considerations
Regarding Cybersecurity. With the increased use of technologies such as the
Internet to conduct business, a fund's service providers are susceptible to
operational, information security and related risks. In general, cyber incidents
can result from deliberate attacks or unintentional events and may arise from
external or internal sources. Cyber attacks include, but are not limited to,
gaining unauthorized access to digital systems (e.g., through "hacking" or
malicious software coding) for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive
information; corrupting data, equipment or systems; or causing operational
disruption. Cyber attacks may also be carried out in a manner that does not
require gaining unauthorized access, such as causing denial-of-service attacks
on websites (i.e., efforts to make network services unavailable to intended
users). Cyber incidents affecting a fund's manager, any sub-adviser and other
service providers (including, but not limited to, fund accountants, custodians,
transfer agents and financial intermediaries) have the ability to cause
disruptions and impact business operations, potentially resulting in financial
losses, interference with a fund's ability to calculate its NAV, impediments to
trading, the inability of fund shareholders to transact business, destruction to
equipment and systems, violations of applicable privacy and other laws,
regulatory fines, penalties, reputational damage, reimbursement or other
compensation costs, or additional compliance costs. Similar adverse consequences
could result from cyber incidents affecting issuers of securities in which a
fund invests, counterparties with which a fund engages in transactions,
governmental and other regulatory authorities, exchange and other financial
market operators, banks, brokers, dealers, insurance companies and other
financial institutions (including financial intermediaries and service providers
for fund shareholders) and other parties. In addition, substantial costs may be
incurred in order to prevent any cyber incidents in the future.
While
a fund's service providers have established business continuity plans in the
event of, and risk management systems to prevent, such cyber incidents, there
are inherent limitations in such plans and systems including the possibility
that certain risks have not been identified. Furthermore, a fund cannot control
the cyber security plans and systems put in place by its service providers or
any other third parties whose operations may affect a fund or its shareholders.
A fund and its shareholders could be negatively impacted as a result.
SPECIAL GEOGRAPHIC
CONSIDERATIONS
Emerging
Markets. Emerging markets include countries that have an emerging stock market
as defined by MSCI, countries or markets with low- to middle-income economies as
classified by the World Bank, and other countries or markets that the Adviser
identifies as having similar emerging markets characteristics. Emerging markets
tend to have relatively low gross national product per capita compared to the
world's major economies and may have the potential for rapid economic
growth.
Investments
in companies domiciled in emerging market countries may be subject to
potentially higher risks than investments in developed countries. These risks
include less social, political, and economic stability and greater illiquidity
and price volatility due to smaller or limited local capital markets for such
securities, or low or non-existent trading volumes. Foreign exchanges and
broker-dealers may be subject to less oversight and regulation by local
authorities. Local governments may decide to seize or confiscate securities held
by foreign investors, restrict an investor's ability to sell or redeem
securities, suspend or limit an issuer's ability to make dividend or interest
payments, and/or limit or entirely restrict repatriation of invested capital,
profits, and dividends. Capital gains may be subject to local taxation,
including on a retroactive basis. Issuers facing restrictions on dollar or euro
payments imposed by local governments may attempt to make dividend or interest
payments to foreign investors in the local currency. Investors may experience
difficulty in enforcing legal claims related to the securities and shareholder
claims common in the United States may not exist in emerging markets.
Additionally, local judges may favor the interests of the issuer over those of
foreign investors. U.S. authorities may be unable to investigate, bring, or
enforce actions against non-U.S. companies and non-U.S. persons. Bankruptcy
judgments may only be permitted to be paid in the local currency. Infrequent
financial reporting, substandard disclosure, and differences in financial
reporting, audit and accounting requirements and standards may make it difficult
to ascertain the financial health of an issuer. Moreover, limited public
information regarding an issuer may result in greater difficulty in determining
market valuations of the securities.
In
addition, unlike developed countries, many emerging countries' economic growth
highly depends on exports and inflows of external capital, making them more
vulnerable to the downturns of the world economy. The enduring low growth in the
global economy has weakened the global demand for emerging market exports and
tightened international credit supplies, highlighting the sensitivity of
emerging economies to the performance of their trading partners. Developing
countries may also face disproportionately large exposure to the negative
effects of climate change, due to both geography and a lack of access to
technology to adapt to its effects, which could include increased frequency and
severity of natural disasters as well as extreme weather events such as
droughts, rising sea levels, decreased crop yields, and increased spread of
disease, all of which could harm performance of affected economies. Given the
particular vulnerability of emerging market countries to the effects of climate
change, disruptions in international efforts to address climate-related issues
may have a disproportionate impact on developing countries.
Many
emerging market countries suffer from uncertainty and corruption in their legal
frameworks. Legislation may be difficult to interpret or laws may be too new to
provide any precedential value. Laws regarding foreign investment and private
property may be weak, not enforced consistently, or non-existent. Sudden changes
in governments or the transition of regimes may result in policies that are less
favorable to investors such as the imposition of price controls or policies
designed to expropriate or nationalize "sovereign" assets. Certain emerging
market countries in the past have expropriated large amounts of private
property, in many cases with little or no compensation, and there can be no
assurance that such expropriation will not occur in the future.
The
United States, other nations, or other governmental entities (including
supranational entities) could impose sanctions on a country that limits or
restricts foreign investment, the movement of assets or other economic activity.
In addition, an imposition of sanctions upon certain issuers in a country could
have a materially adverse effect on the value of such companies' securities,
delay a fund's ability to exercise certain rights as security holder, and/or
impair a fund's ability to meet its investment objectives. A fund may be
prohibited from investing in securities issued by companies subject to such
sanctions and may be required to freeze its existing investments in those
companies, prohibiting the fund from selling or otherwise transacting in these
investments. Such sanctions, or other intergovernmental actions that may be
taken in the future, may result in the devaluation of the country's currency, a
downgrade in the country's credit rating, and/or a decline in the value and
liquidity of impacted company stocks.
Many
emerging market countries in which a fund may invest lack the social, political,
and economic stability characteristic exhibited by developed countries.
Political instability among emerging market countries can be common and may be
caused by an uneven distribution of wealth, governmental corruption, social
unrest, labor strikes, civil wars, and religious oppression. Economic
instability in emerging market countries may take the form of: (i) high interest
rates; (ii) high levels of inflation, including hyperinflation; (iii) high
levels of unemployment or underemployment; (iv) changes in government economic
and tax policies, including confiscatory taxation (or taxes on foreign
investments); and (v) imposition of trade barriers.
Currencies
of emerging market countries are subject to significantly greater risks than
currencies of developed countries. Some emerging market currencies may not be
internationally traded or may be subject to strict controls by local
governments, resulting in undervalued or overvalued currencies. Some emerging
market countries have experienced balance of payment deficits and shortages in
foreign exchange reserves, which has resulted in some governments restricting
currency conversions. Future restrictive exchange controls could prevent or
restrict a company's ability to make dividend or interest payments in the
original currency of the obligation (usually U.S. dollars). In addition, even
though the currencies of some emerging market countries may be convertible into
U.S. dollars, the conversion rates may be artificial relative to their actual
market values.
Governments
of many emerging market countries have become overly reliant on the
international capital markets and other forms of foreign credit to finance large
public spending programs that cause huge budget deficits. Often, interest
payments have become too overwhelming for these governments to meet, as these
payments may represent a large percentage of a country's total GDP. Accordingly,
these foreign obligations have become the subject of political debate within
emerging market countries, which has resulted in internal pressure for such
governments to not make payments to foreign creditors, but instead to use these
funds for social programs. As a result of either an inability to pay or
submission to political pressure, the governments have sought to restructure
their loan and/or bond obligations, have declared a temporary suspension of
interest payments, or have defaulted (in part or full) on their outstanding debt
obligations. These events have adversely affected the values of securities
issued by the governments and corporations domiciled in these emerging market
countries and have negatively affected not only their cost of borrowing but also
their ability to borrow in the future. Emerging markets have also benefited from
continued monetary policies adopted by the central banks of developed countries.
Recently, however, the U.S. Federal Reserve and other countries' central banks
have increased interest rates numerous times in response to global inflation. It
is unclear whether interest rates will continue to rise in the future. These
increases may have a disproportionately adverse effect on emerging market
economies.
In
addition to their continued reliance on international capital markets, many
emerging economies are also highly dependent on international trade and exports,
including exports of oil and other commodities. As a result, these economies are
particularly vulnerable to downturns of the world economy. In recent years,
emerging market economies have been subject to tightened international credit
supplies and weakened global demand for their exports and, as a result, certain
of these economies faced significant difficulties and some economies face
recessionary concerns. Over the last decade, emerging market countries, and
companies domiciled in such countries, have acquired significant debt levels.
Any additional increases in U.S. interest rates may further restrict the access
to credit supplies and jeopardize the ability of emerging market countries to
pay their respective debt service obligations. Although certain emerging market
economies have shown signs of growth and recovery, continued growth is dependent
on the uncertain economic outlook of China, Japan, the European Union, and the
United States. The reduced demand for exports and lack of available capital for
investment resulting from the European debt crisis, a slowdown in China, the
continued effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, and persistent low growth in the
global economy may inhibit growth for emerging market countries.
The
COVID-19 pandemic has presented significant challenges to the economies of
emerging markets, including, among others, rising inflation, food insecurity,
subdued employment growth, and economic setback caused by supply chain
disruption and the reduction in exports. Limited supplies of effective
vaccination and medical resources have undermined the productive activities in
emerging markets. The continually evolving variants of the COVID-19 virus have
constantly challenged the existing containment strategy, causing significant
human capital loss and social disturbances. The future direction of the pandemic
is difficult to predict, and emerging markets are more likely to suffer more
heavily from new developments in the virus due to their lack of sufficient
access to medical resources.
All
these economic setbacks have been exacerbated by the ongoing conflict in Ukraine
stemming from Russia's invasion into the country in early 2022, which is causing
higher global inflation and the significant rise in energy and food prices.
These problems may worsen if the war escalates or spreads into neighboring
countries or other regions.
Orders
for the purchase or sale of portfolio securities are placed on behalf of a fund
by Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (FMR or the Adviser) pursuant
to authority contained in the management contract.
To
the extent that the Adviser grants investment management authority to a
sub-adviser (see the section entitled "Management Contracts"), that sub-adviser
is authorized to provide the services described in the respective sub-advisory
agreement, and in accordance with the policies described in this section.
Furthermore, the sub-adviser's trading and associated policies, which may differ
from the Adviser's policies, may apply to that fund, subject to applicable
law.
The
Adviser or a sub-adviser may be responsible for the placement of portfolio
securities transactions for other investment companies and investment accounts
for which it has or its affiliates have investment discretion.
A
fund will not incur any commissions or sales charges when it invests in shares
of mutual funds (including any underlying Central funds), but it may incur such
costs when it invests directly in other types of securities.
Purchases
and sales of equity securities on a securities exchange or OTC are effected
through brokers who receive compensation for their services. Generally,
compensation relating to securities traded on foreign exchanges will be higher
than compensation relating to securities traded on U.S. exchanges and may not be
subject to negotiation. Compensation may also be paid in connection with
principal transactions (in both OTC securities and securities listed on an
exchange) and agency OTC transactions executed with an electronic communications
network (ECN) or an alternative trading system. Equity securities may be
purchased from underwriters at prices that include underwriting fees.
Purchases
and sales of fixed-income securities are generally made with an issuer or a
primary market-maker acting as principal. Although there is no stated brokerage
commission paid by a fund for any fixed-income security, the price paid by a
fund to an underwriter includes the disclosed underwriting fee and prices in
secondary trades usually include an undisclosed dealer commission or markup
reflecting the spread between the bid and ask prices of the fixed-income
security. New issues of equity and fixed-income securities may also be purchased
in underwritten fixed price offerings.
The
Trustees of each fund periodically review the Adviser's performance of its
responsibilities in connection with the placement of portfolio securities
transactions on behalf of each fund. The Trustees also review the compensation
paid by each fund over representative periods of time to determine if it was
reasonable in relation to the benefits to the fund.
The
Selection of Securities Brokers and Dealers
The
Adviser or its affiliates generally have authority to select brokers (whether
acting as a broker or a dealer) to place or execute a fund's portfolio
securities transactions. In selecting brokers, including affiliates of the
Adviser, to execute a fund's portfolio securities transactions, the Adviser or
its affiliates consider the factors they deem relevant in the context of a
particular trade and in regard to the Adviser's or its affiliates' overall
responsibilities with respect to the fund and other investment accounts,
including any instructions from the fund's portfolio manager, which may
emphasize, for example, speed of execution over other factors. Based on the
factors considered, the Adviser or its affiliates may choose to execute an order
using ECNs, including broker-sponsored algorithms, internal crossing, or by
verbally working an order with one or more brokers. Other possibly relevant
factors include, but are not limited to, the following: price; costs; the size,
nature and type of the order; the speed of execution; financial condition and
reputation of the broker; broker specific considerations (e.g., not all brokers
are able to execute all types of trades); broker willingness to commit capital;
the nature and characteristics of the markets in which the security is traded;
the trader's assessment of whether and how closely the broker likely will follow
the trader's instructions to the broker; confidentiality and the potential for
information leakage; the nature or existence of post-trade clearing, settlement,
custody and currency convertibility mechanisms; and the provision of additional
brokerage and research products and services, if applicable and where allowed by
law.
In
seeking best execution for portfolio securities transactions, the Adviser or its
affiliates may from time to time select a broker that uses a trading method,
including algorithmic trading, for which the broker charges a higher commission
than its lowest available commission rate. The Adviser or its affiliates also
may select a broker that charges more than the lowest commission rate available
from another broker. Occasionally the Adviser or its affiliates execute an
entire securities transaction with a broker and allocate all or a portion of the
transaction and/or related commissions to a second broker where a client does
not permit trading with an affiliate of the Adviser or in other limited
situations. In those situations, the commission rate paid to the second broker
may be higher than the commission rate paid to the executing broker. For futures
transactions, the selection of a futures commission merchant is generally based
on the overall quality of execution and other services provided by the futures
commission merchant. The Adviser or its affiliates execute futures transactions
verbally and electronically.
The
Acquisition of Brokerage and Research Products and Services
Brokers
(who are not affiliates of the Adviser) that execute transactions for a fund
managed outside of the European Union may receive higher compensation from the
fund than other brokers might have charged the fund, in recognition of the value
of the brokerage or research products and services they provide to the Adviser
or its affiliates.
Research
Products and Services. These products and services may include, when permissible
under applicable law, but are not limited to: economic, industry, company,
municipal, sovereign (U.S. and non-U.S.), legal, or political research reports;
market color; company meeting facilitation; compilation of securities prices,
earnings, dividends and similar data; quotation services, data, information and
other services; analytical computer software and services; and investment
recommendations. In addition to receiving brokerage and research products and
services via written reports and computer-delivered services, such reports may
also be provided by telephone and in video and in-person meetings with
securities analysts, corporate and industry spokespersons, economists,
academicians and government representatives and others with relevant
professional expertise. The Adviser or its affiliates may request that a broker
provide a specific proprietary or third-party product or service. Some of these
brokerage and research products and services supplement the Adviser's or its
affiliates' own research activities in providing investment advice to the
funds.
Execution
Services. In addition, when permissible under applicable law, brokerage and
research products and services include those that assist in the execution,
clearing, and settlement of securities transactions, as well as other incidental
functions (including, but not limited to, communication services related to
trade execution, order routing and algorithmic trading, post-trade matching,
exchange of messages among brokers or dealers, custodians and institutions, and
the use of electronic confirmation and affirmation of institutional
trades).
Mixed-Use
Products and Services. Although the Adviser or its affiliates do not use fund
commissions to pay for products or services that do not qualify as brokerage and
research products and services or eligible external research under MiFID II and
FCA regulations (as defined below), where allowed by applicable law, they, at
times, will use commission dollars to obtain certain products or services that
are not used exclusively in the Adviser's or its affiliates' investment
decision-making process (mixed-use products or services). In those
circumstances, the Adviser or its affiliates will make a good faith judgment to
evaluate the various benefits and uses to which they intend to put the mixed-use
product or service, and will pay for that portion of the mixed-use product or
service that does not qualify as brokerage and research products and services or
eligible external research with their own resources (referred to as "hard
dollars").
Benefit
to the Adviser. The Adviser's or its affiliates' expenses likely would be
increased if they attempted to generate these additional brokerage and research
products and services through their own efforts, or if they paid for these
brokerage and research products or services with their own resources. Therefore,
an economic incentive exists for the Adviser and/or its affiliates to select or
recommend a broker-dealer based on its interest in receiving the brokerage and
research products and services, rather than on the Adviser's or its affiliates'
funds interest in receiving most favorable execution. The Adviser and its
affiliates manage the receipt of brokerage and research products and services
and the potential for conflicts through its Commission Uses Program. The
Commission Uses Program effectively "unbundles" commissions paid to brokers who
provide brokerage and research products and services, i.e., commissions consist
of an execution commission, which covers the execution of the trade (including
clearance and settlement), and a research charge, which is used to cover
brokerage and research products and services. Those brokers have client
commission arrangements (each a CCA) in place with the Adviser and its
affiliates (each of those brokers referred to as CCA brokers). In selecting
brokers for executing transactions on behalf of the fund, the trading desks
through which the Adviser or its affiliates may execute trades are instructed to
execute portfolio transactions on behalf of the funds based on the quality of
execution without any consideration of brokerage and research products and
services the CCA broker provides. Commissions paid to a CCA broker include both
an execution commission and a research charge, and while the CCA broker receives
the entire commission, it retains the execution commission and either credits or
transmits the research portion (also known as "soft dollars") to a CCA pool
maintained by each CCA broker. Soft dollar credits (credits) accumulated in CCA
pools are used to pay research expenses. In some cases, the Adviser or its
affiliates may request that a broker that is not a party to any particular
transaction provide a specific proprietary or third-party product or service,
which would be paid with credits from the CCA pool. The administration of
brokerage and research products and services is managed separately from the
trading desks, and traders have no responsibility for administering the research
program, including the payment for research. The Adviser and/or its affiliates,
at times, use a third-party aggregator to facilitate payments to research
providers. Where an aggregator is involved, the aggregator would maintain
credits in an account that is segregated from the aggregator's proprietary
assets and the assets of its other clients and uses those credits to pay
research providers as instructed by the Adviser or its affiliates. Furthermore,
where permissible under applicable law, certain of the brokerage and research
products and services that the Adviser or its affiliates receive are furnished
by brokers on their own initiative, either in connection with a particular
transaction or as part of their overall services. Some of these brokerage and
research products or services may be provided at no additional cost to the
Adviser or its affiliates or have no explicit cost associated with them. In
addition, the Adviser or its affiliates may request that a broker provide a
specific proprietary or third-party product or service, certain of which
third-party products or services may be provided by a broker that is not a party
to a particular transaction and is not connected with the transacting broker's
overall services.
The
Adviser's Decision-Making Process. In connection with the allocation of fund
brokerage, the Adviser and/or its affiliates make a good faith determination
that the compensation paid to brokers and dealers is reasonable in relation to
the value of the brokerage and/or research products and services provided to the
Adviser and/or its affiliates, viewed in terms of the particular transaction for
a fund or the Adviser's or its affiliates' overall responsibilities to that fund
or other investment companies and investment accounts for which the Adviser or
its affiliates have investment discretion; however, each brokerage and research
product or service received in connection with a fund's brokerage does not
benefit all funds and certain funds will receive the benefit of the brokerage
and research product or services obtained with other funds' commissions. As
required under applicable laws or fund policy, commissions generated by certain
funds may only be used to obtain certain brokerage and research products and
services. As a result, certain funds will pay more proportionately for certain
types of brokerage and research products and services than others, while the
overall amount of brokerage and research products and services paid by each fund
continues to be allocated equitably. While the Adviser and its affiliates take
into account the brokerage and/or research products and services provided by a
broker or dealer in determining whether compensation paid is reasonable, neither
the Adviser, its affiliates, nor the funds incur an obligation to any broker,
dealer, or third party to pay for any brokerage and research product or service
(or portion thereof) by generating a specific amount of compensation or
otherwise. Typically, for funds managed by the Adviser or its affiliates outside
of the European Union or the United Kingdom, these brokerage and research
products and services assist the Adviser or its affiliates in terms of their
overall investment responsibilities to a fund or any other investment companies
and investment accounts for which the Adviser or its affiliates may have
investment discretion. Certain funds or investment accounts may use brokerage
commissions to acquire brokerage and research products and services that also
benefit other funds or accounts managed by the Adviser or its affiliates, and
not every fund or investment account uses the brokerage and research products
and services that may have been acquired through that fund's commissions.
Research
Contracts. The Adviser and/or its affiliates have arrangements with certain
third-party research providers and brokers through whom the Adviser and/or its
affiliates effect fund trades, whereby the Adviser and/or its affiliates may pay
with fund commissions or hard dollars for all or a portion of the cost of
research products and services purchased from such research providers or
brokers. If hard dollar payments are used, the Adviser and/or its affiliates, at
times, will cause a fund to pay more for execution than the lowest commission
rate available from the broker providing research products and services to the
Adviser and/or its affiliates, or that may be available from another broker. The
Adviser's and/or its affiliates' determination to pay for research products and
services separately is wholly voluntary on the Adviser's or its affiliates' part
and may be extended to additional brokers or discontinued with any broker
participating in this arrangement.
Funds
Managed within the European Union. The Adviser and its affiliates have
established policies and procedures relating to brokerage commission uses in
compliance with the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive in the
European Union, commonly referred to as "MiFID II", as implemented in the United
Kingdom through the Conduct of Business Sourcebook Rules of the UK Financial
Conduct Authority (the FCA), where applicable.
Funds,
or portions thereof, that are managed within the United Kingdom by FMR
Investment Management (UK) Limited (FMR UK) use research payment accounts (RPAs)
to cover costs associated with equity and high income external research that is
consumed by those funds or investment accounts in accordance with MiFID II and
FCA regulations. With RPAs, funds pay for external research through a separate
research charge that is generally assessed and collected alongside the execution
commission1. For funds that use an RPA, FMR UK establishes a research budget.
The budget is set by first grouping funds or investment accounts by strategy
(e.g., asset allocation, blend, growth, etc.), and then determining what
external research is consumed to support the strategies and portfolio management
services provided within the European Union or the United Kingdom. In this
regard, research budgets are set by research needs and are not otherwise linked
to the volume or value of transactions executed on behalf of the fund or
investment account. For funds where portions are managed both within and outside
of the United Kingdom, external research may be paid using both a CCA and an
RPA. Determinations of what is eligible research and how costs are allocated are
made in accordance with the Adviser's and its affiliates' policies and
procedures. Costs for research consumed by funds that use an RPA will be
allocated among the funds or investment accounts within defined strategies pro
rata based on the assets under management for each fund or investment account.
While the research charge paid on behalf of any one fund that uses an RPA varies
over time, the overall research charge determined at the fund level on an annual
basis will not be exceeded.
FMR
UK is responsible for managing the RPA and may delegate its administration to a
third-party administrator for the facilitation of the purchase of external
research and payments to research providers. RPA assets will be maintained in
accounts at a third-party depository institution, held in the name of FMR UK.
FMR UK provides on request, a summary of: (i) the providers paid from the RPA;
(ii) the total amount they were paid over a defined period; (iii) the benefits
and services received by FMR UK; and (iv) how the total amount spent from the
RPA compares to the research budget set for that period, noting any rebate or
carryover if residual funds remain in the RPA.
Impacted
funds, like those funds that participate in CCA pools, at times, will make
payments to a broker that include both an execution commission and a research
charge, but unlike CCAs (for which research charges may be retained by the CCA
broker and credited to the CCA, as described above), the broker will receive
separate payments for the execution commission and the research charge and will
promptly remit the research charge to the RPA. Assets in the RPA are used to
satisfy external research costs consumed by the funds.
If
the costs of paying for external research exceed the amount initially agreed in
relation to funds in a given strategy, the Adviser or its affiliates may
continue to charge those funds or investment accounts beyond the initially
agreed amount in accordance with MiFID II, continue to acquire external research
for the funds or investment accounts using its own resources, or cease to
purchase external research for those funds or investment accounts until the next
annual research budget. If assets for specific funds remain in the RPA at the
end of a period, they may be rolled over to the next period to offset next
year's research charges for those funds or rebated to those funds.
Funds
managed by FMR UK that trade only fixed income securities will not participate
in RPAs because fixed income securities trade based on spreads rather than
commissions, and thus unbundling the execution commission and research charge is
impractical. Therefore, FMR UK and its affiliates have established policies and
procedures to ensure that external research that is paid for through RPAs is not
made available to FMR UK portfolio managers that manage fixed income funds or
investment accounts in any manner inconsistent with MiFID II and FCA
regulations.
1The
staff of the SEC addressed concerns that reliance on an RPA mechanism to pay for
research would be permissible under Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 by indicating that they would not recommend enforcement against
investment advisers who used an RPA to pay for research and brokerage products
and services so long as certain conditions were met. Therefore, references to
"research charges" as part of the RPA mechanism to satisfy MiFID II requirements
can be considered "commissions" for Section 28(e) purposes.
Commission
Recapture
From
time to time, the Adviser or its affiliates engages in brokerage transactions
with brokers (who are not affiliates of the Adviser) who have entered into
arrangements with the Adviser or its affiliates under which the broker will, at
times, rebate a portion of the compensation paid by a fund (commission
recapture). Not all brokers with whom a fund trades have been asked to
participate in brokerage commission recapture.
Affiliated
Transactions
The
Adviser or its affiliates place trades with certain brokers, including NFS,
through its Fidelity Capital Markets (FCM) division, and Luminex Trading &
Analytics LLC (Luminex), with whom they are under common control or otherwise
affiliated, provided the Adviser or its affiliates determine that these
affiliates' trade-execution abilities and costs are comparable to those of
non-affiliated, qualified brokerage firms, and that such transactions be
executed in accordance with applicable rules under the 1940 Act and procedures
adopted by the Board of Trustees of the funds and subject to other applicable
law. In addition, from time to time, the Adviser or its affiliates place trades
with brokers that use NFS or Fidelity Clearing Canada ULC (FCC) as a clearing
agent and/or use Level ATS, an alternative trading system that is deemed to be
affiliated with the Adviser, for execution services.
In
certain circumstances, trades are executed through alternative trading systems
or national securities exchanges in which the Adviser or its affiliates have an
interest. Any decision to execute a trade through an alternative trading system
or exchange in which the Adviser or its affiliates have an interest would be
made in accordance with applicable law, including best execution obligations.
For trades placed on such a system or exchange, not limited to ones in which the
Adviser or its affiliates have an ownership interest, the Adviser or its
affiliates derive benefit in the form of increased valuation(s) of its equity
interest, where it has an ownership interest, or other remuneration, including
rebates.
The
Trustees of each fund have approved procedures whereby a fund is permitted to
purchase securities that are offered in underwritings in which an affiliate of
the adviser or certain other affiliates participate. In addition, for
underwritings where such an affiliate participates as a principal underwriter,
certain restrictions may apply that could, among other things, limit the amount
of securities that the funds could purchase in the underwritings.
Non-U.S.
Securities Transactions
To
facilitate trade settlement and related activities in non-U.S. securities
transactions, the Adviser or its affiliates effect spot foreign currency
transactions with foreign currency dealers. In certain circumstances, due to
local law and regulation, logistical or operational challenges, or the process
for settling securities transactions in certain markets (e.g., short settlement
periods), spot currency transactions are effected on behalf of funds by parties
other than the Adviser or its affiliates, including funds' custodian banks
(working through sub-custodians or agents in the relevant non-U.S. jurisdiction)
or broker-dealers that executed the related securities transaction.
Trade
Allocation
Although
the Trustees and officers of each fund are substantially the same as those of
certain other Fidelity® funds, investment decisions for each fund are made
independently from those of other Fidelity® funds or investment accounts
(including proprietary accounts). The same security is often held in the
portfolio of more than one of these funds or investment accounts. Simultaneous
transactions are inevitable when several funds and investment accounts are
managed by the same investment adviser, or an affiliate thereof, particularly
when the same security is suitable for the investment objective of more than one
fund or investment account.
When
two or more funds or investment accounts are simultaneously engaged in the
purchase or sale of the same security or instrument, the prices and amounts are
allocated in accordance with procedures believed by the Adviser to be
appropriate and equitable to each fund or investment account. In some cases this
could have a detrimental effect on the price or value of the security or
instrument as far as a fund is concerned. In other cases, however, the ability
of the funds to participate in volume transactions will produce better
executions and prices for the funds.
Commissions
Paid
A
fund may pay compensation including both commissions and spreads in connection
with the placement of portfolio transactions. The amount of brokerage
commissions paid by a fund may change from year to year because of, among other
things, changing asset levels, shareholder activity, and/or portfolio
turnover.
For
each of Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income Fund, Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond
Fund, and Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund, the following table shows the fund's
portfolio turnover rate for the fiscal period(s) ended August 31, 2023 and
2022. Variations in turnover rate may be due to a fluctuating volume of
shareholder purchase and redemption orders, market conditions, and/or changes in
the Adviser's investment outlook, as well as changes in mortgage dollar roll
transaction volume.
Turnover Rates |
2023 |
2022 |
Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income
Fund |
46% |
59% |
Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
55% |
74% |
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund |
204% |
132% |
|
|
|
During
the fiscal year ended August 31, 2023, the following fund(s) held
securities issued by one or more of its regular brokers or dealers or a parent
company of its regular brokers or dealers. The following table shows the
aggregate value of the securities of the regular broker or dealer or parent
company held by a fund as of the fiscal year ended August 31, 2023.
Fund |
Regular
Broker or Dealer |
|
Aggregate Value of
Securities Held |
Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income
Fund |
Bank of America Corp. |
$ |
119,565,202 |
|
Citigroup, Inc. |
$ |
152,514,861 |
|
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
$ |
124,410,485 |
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
$ |
155,397,615 |
|
Barclays PLC |
$ |
73,307,051 |
|
Toronto - Dominion Bank |
$ |
46,026,680 |
|
Royal Bank of Canada |
$ |
87,401,954 |
|
Mizuho Financial Group Inc |
$ |
47,410,366 |
Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
Morgan Stanley |
$ |
49,211,998 |
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
$ |
28,388,580 |
|
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
$ |
44,747,444 |
|
BNP Paribas |
$ |
12,565,504 |
|
Citigroup, Inc. |
$ |
32,368,249 |
|
Bank of America Corp. |
$ |
57,547,882 |
|
Societe Generale |
$ |
20,231,642 |
|
Deutsche Bank AG |
$ |
22,576,567 |
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund |
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
$ |
160,127,370 |
|
UBS AG |
$ |
109,612,539 |
|
Morgan Stanley |
$ |
131,063,299 |
|
Barclays PLC |
$ |
90,932,849 |
|
Citigroup, Inc. |
$ |
114,115,491 |
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
$ |
267,266,658 |
|
Bank of America Corp. |
$ |
206,286,285 |
|
BNP Paribas |
$ |
26,923,950 |
The
following table shows the total amount of brokerage commissions paid by the
following fund(s), comprising commissions paid on securities and/or futures
transactions, as applicable, for the fiscal year(s) ended August 31, 2023, 2022,
and 2021. The total amount of brokerage commissions paid is stated as a dollar
amount and a percentage of the fund's average net assets.
Fund |
Fiscal Year
Ended |
|
Dollar
Amount |
Percentage
of
Average
Net Assets |
Fidelity®
SAI Low Duration Income Fund |
2023 |
$ |
0 |
0.00% |
|
2022 |
$ |
0 |
0.00% |
|
2021(A) |
$ |
0 |
0.00% |
Fidelity®
SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
2023 |
$ |
12,104 |
0.00% |
|
2022 |
$ |
862 |
0.00% |
|
2021(A) |
$ |
0 |
0.00% |
Fidelity®
SAI Total Bond Fund |
2023 |
$ |
132,721 |
0.00% |
|
2022 |
$ |
90,038 |
0.00% |
|
2021 |
$ |
103,345 |
0.00% |
(A) Fund commenced operations on
September 15, 2020.
|
The
table below shows the total amount of brokerage commissions paid by the
following fund(s) to an affiliated broker for the fiscal year(s) ended August
31, 2023, 2022, and 2021. The table also shows the approximate amount of
aggregate brokerage commissions paid by a fund to an affiliated broker as a
percentage of the approximate aggregate dollar amount of transactions for which
the fund paid brokerage commissions as well as the percentage of transactions
effected by a fund through an affiliated broker, in each case for the fiscal
year ended August 31, 2023. Affiliated brokers are paid on a commission
basis.
Fund(s) |
Fiscal Year Ended |
Broker |
Affiliated With |
C |
ommissions |
Percentage
of
Aggregate
Brokerage
Commissions |
Percentage
of
Aggregate
Dollar
Amount
of
Brokerage
Transactions |
Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income
Fund |
2023 |
FCM |
FMR LLC |
$ |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
2023 |
Luminex |
FMR LLC |
$ |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
2022 |
FCM |
FMR LLC |
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
2022 |
Luminex |
FMR LLC |
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
2021(A) |
FCM |
FMR LLC |
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
2021(A) |
Luminex |
FMR LLC |
$ |
0 |
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
2023 |
FCM |
FMR LLC |
$ |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
2023 |
Luminex |
FMR LLC |
$ |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
2022 |
FCM |
FMR LLC |
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
2022 |
Luminex |
FMR LLC |
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
2021(A) |
FCM |
FMR LLC |
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
2021(A) |
Luminex |
FMR LLC |
$ |
0 |
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund |
2023 |
FCM |
FMR LLC |
$ |
228 |
0.17% |
0.02% |
|
2023 |
Luminex |
FMR LLC |
$ |
6 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
2022 |
FCM |
FMR LLC |
$ |
123 |
|
|
|
2022 |
Luminex |
FMR LLC |
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
2021 |
FCM |
FMR LLC |
$ |
264 |
|
|
|
2021 |
Luminex |
FMR LLC |
$ |
69 |
|
|
(A)Fund commenced
operations on September 15, 2020.
The following table shows the
dollar amount of brokerage commissions paid to firms that may have provided
research or brokerage services and the approximate dollar amount of the
transactions involved for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2023.
Fund |
Fiscal Year
Ended |
|
$ Amount of
Commissions
Paid to Firms
for Providing
Research or
Brokerage
Services |
|
$ Amount of
Brokerage
Transactions
Involved |
Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income
Fund |
2023 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
0 |
Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
2023 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
0 |
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund |
2023 |
$ |
12,751 |
$ |
49,722,121 |
The
following table shows the brokerage commissions that were allocated for research
or brokerage services for the twelve-month period ended June 30,
2023.
Fund |
Twelve Month
Period Ended |
|
$ Amount of
Commissions
Allocated
for Research
or
Brokerage
Services(A) |
Fidelity®
SAI Low Duration Income Fund |
June 30, 2023 |
$ |
0 |
Fidelity®
SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
June 30, 2023 |
$ |
0 |
Fidelity®
SAI Total Bond Fund |
June 30, 2023 |
$ |
2,256 |
(A)
The staff of the SEC addressed concerns that reliance on an RPA mechanism
to pay for research would not be deemed a "commission" for purposes of
Section 28(e) by indicating that they would not recommend enforcement
against investment advisers who used an RPA to pay for research and
brokerage services so long as certain conditions were met. Therefore,
references to "research charges" as part of the RPA mechanism to satisfy
MiFID II requirements can be considered commissions for Section 28(e)
purposes.
|
The
NAV is the value of a single share. NAV is computed by adding the value of a
fund's investments, cash, and other assets, subtracting its liabilities, and
dividing the result by the number of shares outstanding.
The
Board of Trustees has designated each fund's investment adviser as the valuation
designee responsible for the fair valuation function and performing fair value
determinations as needed. The adviser has established a Fair Value Committee
(the Committee) to carry out the day-to-day fair valuation responsibilities and
has adopted policies and procedures to govern the fair valuation process and the
activities of the Committee.
Shares
of open-end investment companies (including any underlying Central funds) held
by a fund are valued at their respective NAVs. If an underlying fund's NAV is
unavailable, shares of that underlying fund will be fair valued in good faith by
the Committee in accordance with applicable fair value pricing policies.
Generally,
other portfolio securities and assets held by a fund, as well as portfolio
securities and assets held by an underlying Central fund, are valued as
follows:
Most
equity securities are valued at the official closing price or the last reported
sale price or, if no sale has occurred, at the last quoted bid price on the
primary market or exchange on which they are traded.
Debt
securities and other assets for which market quotations are readily available
may be valued at market values in the principal market in which they normally
are traded, as furnished by recognized dealers in such securities or assets. Or,
debt securities and convertible securities may be valued on the basis of
information furnished by a pricing service that uses a valuation matrix which
incorporates both dealer-supplied valuations and electronic data processing
techniques.
Short-term
securities with remaining maturities of sixty days or less for which market
quotations and information furnished by a pricing service are not readily
available may be valued at amortized cost, which approximates current
value.
Futures
contracts are valued at the settlement or closing price. Options are valued at
their market quotations, if available. Swaps are valued daily using quotations
received from independent pricing services or recognized dealers.
Prices
described above are obtained from pricing services that have been approved by
the Committee. A number of pricing services are available and a fund may use
more than one of these services. A fund may also discontinue the use of any
pricing service at any time. A fund's adviser through the Committee engages in
oversight activities with respect to the fund's pricing services, which
includes, among other things, testing the prices provided by pricing services
prior to calculation of a fund's NAV, conducting periodic due diligence
meetings, and periodically reviewing the methodologies and inputs used by these
services.
Foreign
securities and instruments are valued in their local currency following the
methodologies described above. Foreign securities, instruments and currencies
are translated to U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate
quotations supplied by a pricing service as of the close of the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE), which uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate.
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued at an interpolated rate
based on days to maturity between the closest preceding and subsequent
settlement period reported by the third party pricing service.
Other
portfolio securities and assets for which market quotations, official closing
prices, or information furnished by a pricing service are not readily available
or, in the opinion of the Committee, are deemed unreliable will be fair valued
in good faith by the Committee in accordance with applicable fair value pricing
policies. For example, if, in the opinion of the Committee, a security's value
has been materially affected by events occurring before a fund's pricing time
but after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is
principally traded, that security will be fair valued in good faith by the
Committee in accordance with applicable fair value pricing policies. In fair
valuing a security, the Committee may consider factors including, but not
limited to, price movements in futures contracts and ADRs, market and trading
trends, the bid/ask quotes of brokers, and off-exchange institutional trading.
The frequency that portfolio securities or assets are fair valued cannot be
predicted and may be significant.
In
determining the fair value of a private placement security for which market
quotations are not available, the Committee generally applies one or more
valuation methods including the market approach, income approach and cost
approach. The market approach considers factors including the price of recent
investments in the same or a similar security or financial metrics of comparable
securities. The income approach considers factors including expected future cash
flows, security specific risks and corresponding discount rates. The cost
approach considers factors including the value of the security's underlying
assets and liabilities.
Each
fund's adviser reports to the Board information regarding the fair valuation
process and related material matters.
BUYING AND SELLING INFORMATION
Shares
are offered exclusively to certain clients of the Adviser or its
affiliates.
Investors
participating in a discretionary investment program are charged an annual
advisory fee based on a percentage of the average market value of assets in
their account. The stated fee is then reduced by a credit reflecting the amount
of fees, if any, received by Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC or
its affiliates from mutual funds for investment management or certain other
services.
A
fund may make redemption payments in whole or in part in readily marketable
securities or other property pursuant to procedures approved by the Trustees if
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC determines it is in the best
interests of the fund. Such securities or other property will be valued for this
purpose as they are valued in computing the NAV of a fund or class, as
applicable. Shareholders that receive securities or other property will realize,
upon receipt, a gain or loss for tax purposes, and will incur additional costs
and be exposed to market risk prior to and upon the sale of such securities or
other property.
Each
fund, in its discretion, may determine to issue its shares in kind in exchange
for securities held by the purchaser having a value, determined in accordance
with the fund's policies for valuation of portfolio securities, equal to the
purchase price of the fund shares issued. A fund will accept for in-kind
purchases only securities or other instruments that are appropriate under its
investment objective and policies. In addition, a fund generally will not accept
securities of any issuer unless they are liquid, have a readily ascertainable
market value, and are not subject to restrictions on resale. All dividends,
distributions, and subscription or other rights associated with the securities
become the property of the fund, along with the securities. Shares purchased in
exchange for securities in kind generally cannot be redeemed for fifteen days
following the exchange to allow time for the transfer to settle.
Dividends.
Because each fund's income is primarily derived from interest, dividends from
the fund generally will not qualify for the dividends-received deduction
available to corporate shareholders or the long-term capital gains tax rates
available to individuals. Short-term capital gains are taxable at ordinary
income tax rates. A portion of each fund's dividends may be exempt from state
and local taxation to the extent that they are derived from certain U.S.
Government securities and meet certain requirements. Distributions by a fund to
tax-advantaged retirement plan accounts are not taxable currently (but you may
be taxed later, upon withdrawal of your investment from such account).
Capital
Gain Distributions. Unless your shares of a fund are held in a tax-advantaged
retirement plan, each fund's long-term capital gain distributions are federally
taxable to shareholders generally as capital gains.
The
following table shows a fund's aggregate capital loss carryforward as of August
31, 2023, which is available to offset future capital gains. A fund's ability to
utilize its capital loss carryforwards in a given year or in total may be
limited.
Fund |
|
Capital Loss
Carryforward (CLC) |
Fidelity®
SAI Low Duration Income Fund |
$ |
4,625,854 |
Fidelity®
SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
$ |
49,533,125 |
Fidelity®
SAI Total Bond Fund |
$ |
806,555,100 |
Returns
of Capital. If a fund's distributions exceed its taxable income and capital
gains realized during a taxable year, all or a portion of the distributions made
in the same taxable year may be recharacterized as a return of capital to
shareholders. A return of capital distribution will generally not be taxable,
but will reduce each shareholder's cost basis in the fund and result in a higher
reported capital gain or lower reported capital loss when those shares on which
the distribution was received are sold in taxable accounts.
Foreign
Tax Credit or Deduction. Foreign governments may impose withholding taxes on
dividends and interest earned by a fund with respect to foreign securities held
directly by a fund. Foreign governments may also impose taxes on other payments
or gains with respect to foreign securities held directly by a fund. Because
each fund does not currently anticipate that securities of foreign issuers or
underlying regulated investment companies will constitute more than 50% of its
total assets at the end of its fiscal year, or fiscal quarter, respectively,
shareholders should not expect to be eligible to claim a foreign tax credit or
deduction on their federal income tax returns with respect to foreign taxes
withheld.
Tax
Status of the Funds. Each fund intends to qualify each year as a "regulated
investment company" under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code so that it
will not be liable for federal tax on income and capital gains distributed to
shareholders. In order to qualify as a regulated investment company, and avoid
being subject to federal income or excise taxes at the fund level, each fund
intends to distribute substantially all of its net investment income and net
realized capital gains within each calendar year as well as on a fiscal year
basis (if the fiscal year is other than the calendar year), and intends to
comply with other tax rules applicable to regulated investment companies.
Other
Tax Information. The information above is only a summary of some of the tax
consequences generally affecting each fund and its shareholders, and no attempt
has been made to discuss individual tax consequences. It is up to you or your
tax preparer to determine whether the sale of shares of a fund resulted in a
capital gain or loss or other tax consequence to you. In addition to federal
income taxes, shareholders may be subject to state and local taxes on fund
distributions, and shares may be subject to state and local personal property
taxes. Investors should consult their tax advisers to determine whether a fund
is suitable to their particular tax situation.
The
Trustees, Members of the Advisory Board (if any), and officers of the trust and
funds, as applicable, are listed below. The Board of Trustees governs each fund
and is responsible for protecting the interests of shareholders. The Trustees
are experienced executives who meet periodically throughout the year to oversee
each fund's activities, review contractual arrangements with companies that
provide services to each fund, oversee management of the risks associated with
such activities and contractual arrangements, and review each fund's
performance. As of August 31, 2023, except for Laura M. Bishop, Jonathan Chiel,
Robert W. Helm, Christine J. Thompson, and Carol J. Zierhoffer each of the
Trustees oversees 313 funds. As of August 31, 2023, Mr. Chiel oversees 191
funds. As of October 18, 2023, the date of their election as Trustee, Ms.
Bishop, Mr. Helm, Ms. Thompson, and Ms. Zierhoffer each oversees 229
funds.
The
Trustees hold office without limit in time except that (a) any Trustee may
resign; (b) any Trustee may be removed by written instrument, signed by at least
two-thirds of the number of Trustees prior to such removal; (c) any Trustee who
requests to be retired or who has become incapacitated by illness or injury may
be retired by written instrument signed by a majority of the other Trustees; and
(d) any Trustee may be removed at any special meeting of shareholders by a
two-thirds vote of the outstanding voting securities of the trust. Each Trustee
who is not an interested person (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the trust and
the funds is referred to herein as an Independent Trustee. Each Independent
Trustee shall retire not later than the last day of the calendar year in which
his or her 75th birthday occurs. The Independent Trustees may waive this
mandatory retirement age policy with respect to individual Trustees. Officers
and Advisory Board Members hold office without limit in time, except that any
officer or Advisory Board Member may resign or may be removed by a vote of a
majority of the Trustees at any regular meeting or any special meeting of the
Trustees. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or
other offices in the same company for the past five years.
Experience,
Skills, Attributes, and Qualifications of the Trustees. The Governance and
Nominating Committee has adopted a statement of policy that describes the
experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills that are necessary and
desirable for potential Independent Trustee candidates (Statement of Policy).
The Board believes that each Trustee satisfied at the time he or she was
initially elected or appointed a Trustee, and continues to satisfy, the
standards contemplated by the Statement of Policy. The Governance and Nominating
Committee also engages professional search firms to help identify potential
Independent Trustee candidates who have the experience, qualifications,
attributes, and skills consistent with the Statement of Policy. From time to
time, additional criteria based on the composition and skills of the current
Independent Trustees, as well as experience or skills that may be appropriate in
light of future changes to board composition, business conditions, and
regulatory or other developments, have also been considered by the professional
search firms and the Governance and Nominating Committee. In addition, the Board
takes into account the Trustees' commitment and participation in Board and
committee meetings, as well as their leadership of standing and ad hoc
committees throughout their tenure.
In
determining that a particular Trustee was and continues to be qualified to serve
as a Trustee, the Board has considered a variety of criteria, none of which, in
isolation, was controlling. The Board believes that, collectively, the Trustees
have balanced and diverse experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills,
which allow the Board to operate effectively in governing each fund and
protecting the interests of shareholders. Information about the specific
experience, skills, attributes, and qualifications of each Trustee, which in
each case led to the Board's conclusion that the Trustee should serve (or
continue to serve) as a trustee of the funds, is provided below.
Board
Structure and Oversight Function. Abigail P. Johnson is an interested person and
currently serves as Chairman. The Trustees have determined that an interested
Chairman is appropriate and benefits shareholders because an interested Chairman
has a personal and professional stake in the quality and continuity of services
provided to the funds. Independent Trustees exercise their informed business
judgment to appoint an individual of their choosing to serve as Chairman,
regardless of whether the Trustee happens to be independent or a member of
management. The Independent Trustees have determined that they can act
independently and effectively without having an Independent Trustee serve as
Chairman and that a key structural component for assuring that they are in a
position to do so is for the Independent Trustees to constitute a substantial
majority for the Board. The Independent Trustees also regularly meet in
executive session. Michael E. Kenneally serves as Chairman of the Independent
Trustees and as such (i) acts as a liaison between the Independent Trustees and
management with respect to matters important to the Independent Trustees and
(ii) with management prepares agendas for Board meetings.
Fidelity®
funds are overseen by different Boards of Trustees. The funds' Board oversees
Fidelity's investment-grade bond, money market, asset allocation and certain
equity funds, and other Boards oversee Fidelity's alternative investment, high
income and other equity funds. The asset allocation funds may invest in
Fidelity® funds that are overseen by such other Boards. The use of separate
Boards, each with its own committee structure, allows the Trustees of each group
of Fidelity® funds to focus on the unique issues of the funds they oversee,
including common research, investment, and operational issues. On occasion, the
separate Boards establish joint committees to address issues of overlapping
consequences for the Fidelity® funds overseen by each Board.
The
Trustees operate using a system of committees to facilitate the timely and
efficient consideration of all matters of importance to the Trustees, each fund,
and fund shareholders and to facilitate compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements and oversight of the funds' activities and associated risks. The
Board, acting through its committees, has charged FMR and its affiliates with
(i) identifying events or circumstances the occurrence of which could have
demonstrably adverse effects on the funds' business and/or reputation; (ii)
implementing processes and controls to lessen the possibility that such events
or circumstances occur or to mitigate the effects of such events or
circumstances if they do occur; and (iii) creating and maintaining a system
designed to evaluate continuously business and market conditions in order to
facilitate the identification and implementation processes described in (i) and
(ii) above. Because the day-to-day operations and activities of the funds are
carried out by or through FMR, its affiliates, and other service providers, the
funds' exposure to risks is mitigated but not eliminated by the processes
overseen by the Trustees. While each of the Board's committees has
responsibility for overseeing different aspects of the funds' activities,
oversight is exercised primarily through the Operations and Audit Committees. In
addition, an ad hoc Board committee of Independent Trustees has worked with FMR
to enhance the Board's oversight of investment and financial risks, legal and
regulatory risks, technology risks, and operational risks, including the
development of additional risk reporting to the Board. Appropriate personnel,
including but not limited to the funds' Chief Compliance Officer (CCO), FMR's
internal auditor, the independent accountants, the funds' Treasurer and
portfolio management personnel, make periodic reports to the Board's committees,
as appropriate, including an annual review of Fidelity's risk management program
for the Fidelity® funds. The responsibilities of each standing committee,
including their oversight responsibilities, are described further under
"Standing Committees of the Trustees."
Interested
Trustees*:
Correspondence
intended for a Trustee who is an interested person may be sent to Fidelity
Investments, 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210.
Name,
Year of Birth; Principal Occupations and Other Relevant Experience+
Jonathan
Chiel (1957)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2016
Trustee
Mr. Chiel also serves as
Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Mr. Chiel is Executive Vice President and
General Counsel for FMR LLC (diversified financial services company,
2012-present). Previously, Mr. Chiel served as general counsel (2004-2012) and
senior vice president and deputy general counsel (2000-2004) for John Hancock
Financial Services; a partner with Choate, Hall & Stewart (1996-2000) (law
firm); and an Assistant United States Attorney for the United States Attorney's
Office of the District of Massachusetts (1986-95), including Chief of the
Criminal Division (1993-1995). Mr. Chiel is a director on the boards of the
Boston Bar Foundation and the Maimonides School.
Abigail
P. Johnson (1961)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2009
Trustee
Chairman of the Board of
Trustees
Ms. Johnson also serves
as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Ms. Johnson serves as Chairman
(2016-present), Chief Executive Officer (2014-present), and Director
(2007-present) of FMR LLC (diversified financial services company), President of
Fidelity Financial Services (2012-present) and President of Personal, Workplace
and Institutional Services (2005-present). Ms. Johnson is Chairman and Director
of Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (investment adviser firm,
2011-present). Previously, Ms. Johnson served as Chairman and Director of FMR
Co., Inc. (investment adviser firm, 2011-2019), Vice Chairman (2007-2016) and
President (2013-2016) of FMR LLC, President and a Director of Fidelity
Management & Research Company (2001-2005), a Trustee of other investment
companies advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company, Fidelity
Investments Money Management, Inc. (investment adviser firm), and FMR Co., Inc.
(2001-2005), Senior Vice President of the Fidelity® funds (2001-2005), and
managed a number of Fidelity® funds. Ms. Abigail P. Johnson and Mr. Arthur E.
Johnson are not related.
Jennifer
Toolin McAuliffe (1959)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2016
Trustee
Ms. McAuliffe also
serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds and as Trustee of Fidelity Charitable
(2020-present). Previously, Ms. McAuliffe served as Co-Head of Fixed Income of
Fidelity Investments Limited (now known as FIL Limited (FIL)) (diversified
financial services company), Director of Research for FIL's credit and
quantitative teams in London, Hong Kong and Tokyo and Director of Research for
taxable and municipal bonds at Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. Ms.
McAuliffe previously served as a member of the Advisory Board of certain
Fidelity® funds (2016). Ms. McAuliffe was previously a lawyer at Ropes &
Gray LLP and an international banker at Chemical Bank NA (now JPMorgan Chase
& Co.). Ms. McAuliffe also currently serves as director or trustee of
several not-for-profit entities.
Christine
J. Thompson (1958)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2023
Trustee
Ms. Thompson also serves
as a Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Ms. Thompson serves as Leader of Advanced
Technologies for Investment Management at Fidelity Investments (2018-present).
Previously, Ms. Thompson served as Chief Investment Officer in the Bond group at
Fidelity Management & Research Company (2010-2018) and held various other
roles including Director of municipal bond portfolio managers and Portfolio
Manager of certain Fidelity® funds.
*
Determined to be an "Interested Trustee" by virtue of, among other things, his
or her affiliation with the trust or various entities under common control with
FMR.
+
The information includes the Trustee's principal occupation during the last five
years and other information relating to the experience, attributes, and skills
relevant to the Trustee's qualifications to serve as a Trustee, which led to the
conclusion that the Trustee should serve as a Trustee for each fund.
Independent
Trustees:
Correspondence
intended for an Independent Trustee may be sent to Fidelity Investments, P.O.
Box 55235, Boston, Massachusetts 02205-5235.
Name,
Year of Birth; Principal Occupations and Other Relevant Experience+
Elizabeth
S. Acton (1951)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2013
Trustee
Ms. Acton also serves as
Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Prior to her retirement, Ms. Acton served as
Executive Vice President, Finance (2011-2012), Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer (2002-2011) and Treasurer (2004-2005) of Comerica Incorporated
(financial services). Prior to joining Comerica, Ms. Acton held a variety of
positions at Ford Motor Company (1983-2002), including Vice President and
Treasurer (2000-2002) and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Ford Motor Credit Company (1998-2000). Ms. Acton currently serves as a member
of the Board and Audit and Finance Committees of Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
(homebuilding, 2012-present). Ms. Acton previously served as a member of the
Advisory Board of certain Fidelity® funds (2013-2016).
Laura M.
Bishop (1961)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2023
Trustee
Ms. Bishop also serves
as Trustee or Member of the Advisory Board of other Fidelity® funds. Prior to
her retirement, Ms. Bishop held a variety of positions at United Services
Automobile Association (2001-2020), including Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (2014-2020) and Senior Vice President and Deputy Chief
Financial Officer (2012-2014). Ms. Bishop currently serves as a member of the
Audit Committee and Compensation and Personnel Committee (2021-present) of the
Board of Directors of Korn Ferry (global organizational consulting). Previously,
Ms. Bishop served as a Member of the Advisory Board of certain Fidelity® funds
(2022-2023).
Ann
E. Dunwoody (1953)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2018
Trustee
General Dunwoody also
serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. General Dunwoody (United States
Army, Retired) was the first woman in U.S. military history to achieve the rank
of four-star general and prior to her retirement in 2012 held a variety of
positions within the U.S. Army, including Commanding General, U.S. Army Material
Command (2008-2012). General Dunwoody currently serves as a member of the Board,
Chair of Nomination Committee and a member of the Corporate Governance Committee
of Kforce Inc. (professional staffing services, 2016-present) and a member of
the Board of Automattic Inc. (software engineering, 2018-present). Previously,
General Dunwoody served as President of First to Four LLC (leadership and
mentoring services, 2012-2022), a member of the Advisory Board and Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee of L3 Technologies, Inc. (communication,
electronic, sensor and aerospace systems, 2013-2019) and a member of the Board
and Audit and Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committees of Republic
Services, Inc. (waste collection, disposal and recycling, 2013-2016). General
Dunwoody also serves on several boards for non-profit organizations, including
as a member of the Board, Chair of the Nomination and Governance Committee and a
member of the Audit Committee of the Noble Reach Foundation (formerly Logistics
Management Institute) (consulting non-profit, 2012-present) and a member of the
Board of ThanksUSA (military family education non-profit, 2014-present).
Previously, General Dunwoody served as a member of the Board of Florida
Institute of Technology (2015-2022) and a member of the Council of Trustees for
the Association of the United States Army (advocacy non-profit, 2013-2021).
General Dunwoody previously served as a member of the Advisory Board of certain
Fidelity® funds (2018).
John
Engler (1948)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2014
Trustee
Mr. Engler also serves
as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Previously, Mr. Engler served as Governor
of Michigan (1991-2003), President of the Business Roundtable (2011-2017) and
interim President of Michigan State University (2018-2019). Previously, Mr.
Engler served as a member of the Board of Stride, Inc. (formerly K12 Inc.)
(technology-based education company, 2012-2022), a member of the Board of
Universal Forest Products (manufacturer and distributor of wood and
wood-alternative products, 2003-2019) and Trustee of The Munder Funds
(2003-2014). Mr. Engler previously served as a member of the Advisory Board of
certain Fidelity® funds (2014-2016).
Robert
F. Gartland (1951)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2010
Trustee
Mr. Gartland also serves
as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Prior to his retirement, Mr. Gartland held
a variety of positions at Morgan Stanley (financial services, 1979-2007),
including Managing Director (1987-2007) and Chase Manhattan Bank (1975-1978).
Mr. Gartland previously served as Chairman and an investor in Gartland &
Mellina Group Corp. (consulting, 2009-2019), as a member of the Board of
National Securities Clearing Corporation (1993-1996) and as Chairman of TradeWeb
(2003-2004).
Robert
W. Helm (1957)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2023
Trustee
Mr. Helm also serves as
Trustee or Member of the Advisory Board of other Fidelity® funds. Mr. Helm was
formerly Deputy Chairman (2003-2020), partner (1991-2020) and an associate
(1984-1991) of Dechert LLP (formerly Dechert Price & Rhoads). Mr. Helm
currently serves on boards and committees of several not-for-profit
organizations, including as a Trustee and member of the Executive Committee of
the Baltimore Council on Foreign Affairs, a member of the Board of Directors of
the St. Vincent de Paul Society of Baltimore and a member of the Life Guard
Society of Mt. Vernon. Previously, Mr. Helm served as a Member of the
Advisory Board of certain Fidelity® funds (2021-2023).
Arthur
E. Johnson (1947)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2008
Trustee
Mr. Johnson also serves
as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Prior to his retirement, Mr. Johnson served
as Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategic Development of Lockheed Martin
Corporation (defense contractor, 1999-2009). Mr. Johnson currently serves as a
member of the Board of Booz Allen Hamilton (management consulting,
2011-present). Mr. Johnson previously served as a member of the Board of Eaton
Corporation plc (diversified power management, 2009-2019) and a member of the
Board of AGL Resources, Inc. (holding company, 2002-2016). Mr. Johnson
previously served as Chairman (2018-2021) and Vice Chairman (2015-2018) of the
Independent Trustees of certain Fidelity® funds. Mr. Arthur E. Johnson is not
related to Ms. Abigail P. Johnson.
Michael
E. Kenneally (1954)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2009
Trustee
Chairman of the
Independent Trustees
Mr. Kenneally also
serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds and was Vice Chairman (2018-2021) of
the Independent Trustees of certain Fidelity® funds. Prior to retirement in
2005, he was Chairman and Global Chief Executive Officer of Credit Suisse Asset
Management, the worldwide fund management and institutional investment business
of Credit Suisse Group. Previously, Mr. Kenneally was an Executive Vice
President and the Chief Investment Officer for Bank of America. In this role, he
was responsible for the investment management, strategy and products delivered
to the bank's institutional, high-net-worth and retail clients. Earlier, Mr.
Kenneally directed the organization's equity and quantitative research groups.
He began his career as a research analyst and then spent more than a dozen years
as a portfolio manager for endowments, pension plans and mutual funds. He earned
the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation in 1991.
Mark A.
Murray (1954)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2016
Trustee
Mr. Murray also serves
as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Previously, Mr. Murray served as Co-Chief
Executive Officer (2013-2016), President (2006-2013) and Vice Chairman
(2013-2020) of Meijer, Inc. Mr. Murray serves as a member of the Board
(2009-present) and Public Policy and Responsibility Committee (2009-present) and
Chair of the Nuclear Review Committee (2019-present) of DTE Energy Company
(diversified energy company). Mr. Murray previously served as a member of the
Board of Spectrum Health (not-for-profit health system, 2015-2019) and as a
member of the Board and Audit Committee and Chairman of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee of Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufacturer
and distributor of wood and wood-alternative products, 2004-2016). Mr. Murray
also serves as a member of the Board of many community and professional
organizations. Mr. Murray previously served as a member of the Advisory Board of
certain Fidelity® funds (2016).
Carol J.
Zierhoffer (1960)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2023
Trustee
Ms. Zierhoffer also
serves as Trustee or Member of the Advisory Board of other Fidelity®
funds. Prior to her retirement, Ms. Zierhoffer held a variety of positions
at Bechtel Corporation (engineering company, 2013-2019), including Principal
Vice President and Chief Information Officer (2013-2016) and Senior Vice
President and Chief Information Officer (2016-2019). Ms. Zierhoffer currently
serves as a member of the Board of Directors, Audit Committee and Compensation
Committee of Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (healthcare technology,
2020-present) and as a member of the Board of Directors, Audit and Finance
Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee of Atlas Air Worldwide
Holdings, Inc. (aviation operating services, 2021-present). Previously, Ms.
Zierhoffer served as a member of the Board of Directors and Audit Committee and
as the founding Chair of the Information Technology Committee of MedAssets, Inc.
(healthcare technology, 2013-2016), and as a Member of the Advisory Board of
certain Fidelity® funds (2023).
+
The information includes the Trustee's principal occupation during the last five
years and other information relating to the experience, attributes, and skills
relevant to the Trustee's qualifications to serve as a Trustee, which led to the
conclusion that the Trustee should serve as a Trustee for each fund.
Advisory
Board Members and Officers:
Correspondence
intended for a Member of the Advisory Board (if any) may be sent to Fidelity
Investments, P.O. Box 55235, Boston, Massachusetts 02205-5235. Correspondence
intended for an officer may be sent to Fidelity Investments, 245 Summer Street,
Boston, Massachusetts 02210. Officers appear below in alphabetical order.
Name,
Year of Birth; Principal Occupation
Heather
Bonner (1977)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2023
Assistant
Treasurer
Ms. Bonner also serves
as an officer of other funds. Ms. Bonner serves as Senior Vice President
(2022-present), and is an employee of Fidelity Investments. Ms. Bonner serves as
Assistant Treasurer of Fidelity CRET Trustee LLC (2022-present). Prior to
joining Fidelity, Ms. Bonner served as Managing Director at AQR Capital
Management (2013-2022) and was the Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of
the AQR Funds (2013-2022).
Craig S.
Brown (1977)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2019
Assistant
Treasurer
Mr. Brown also serves as
an officer of other funds. Mr. Brown serves as Assistant Treasurer of FIMM, LLC
(2021-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2013-present).
Previously, Mr. Brown served as Assistant Treasurer of certain Fidelity® funds
(2019-2022).
John J.
Burke III (1964)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2018
Chief Financial
Officer
Mr. Burke also serves as
Chief Financial Officer of other funds. Mr. Burke serves as Head of Investment
Operations for Fidelity Fund and Investment Operations (2018-present) and is an
employee of Fidelity Investments (1998-present). Previously Mr. Burke served as
head of Asset Management Investment Operations (2012-2018).
Margaret
Carey (1973)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2023
Secretary and Chief
Legal Officer (CLO)
Ms. Carey also serves as
an officer of other funds and as CLO of certain other Fidelity entities. She is
a Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of FMR LLC (diversified
financial services company, 2019-present), and is an employee of Fidelity
Investments.
David J.
Carter (1973)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2020
Assistant
Secretary
Mr. Carter also serves
as Assistant Secretary of other funds. Mr. Carter serves as Senior Vice
President, Deputy General Counsel (2022-present) and is an employee of Fidelity
Investments (2005-present).
Jonathan
Davis (1968)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2010
Assistant
Treasurer
Mr. Davis also serves as
an officer of other funds. Mr. Davis serves as Vice President Assistant
Treasurer and is an employee of Fidelity Investments. Mr. Davis serves as
Assistant Treasurer of certain Fidelity entities.
Laura M.
Del Prato (1964)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2018
President and
Treasurer
Ms. Del Prato also
serves as an officer of other funds. Ms. Del Prato serves as Assistant Treasurer
of FIMM, LLC (2021-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments
(2017-present). Previously, Ms. Del Prato served as President and Treasurer of
The North Carolina Capital Management Trust: Cash Portfolio and Term Portfolio
(2018-2020). Prior to joining Fidelity Investments, Ms. Del Prato served as a
Managing Director and Treasurer of the JPMorgan Mutual Funds (2014-2017). Prior
to JPMorgan, Ms. Del Prato served as a partner at Cohen Fund Audit Services
(accounting firm, 2012-2013) and KPMG LLP (accounting firm, 2004-2012).
Robin
Foley (1964)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2023
Vice President
Ms. Foley also serves as
Vice President of other funds. Ms. Foley serves as Head of Fidelity's Fixed
Income division (2023-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments.
Previously, Ms. Foley served as Chief Investment Officer of Bonds (2017-2023).
Christopher
M. Gouveia (1973)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2023
Chief Compliance
Officer
Mr. Gouveia also serves
as Chief Compliance Officer of other funds. Mr. Gouveia serves as Senior Vice
President of Asset Management Compliance for Fidelity Investments and is an
employee of Fidelity Investments. Previously, Mr. Gouveia served as Chief
Compliance Officer of the North Carolina Capital Management Trust
(2016-2019).
Colm A.
Hogan (1973)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2016
Assistant
Treasurer
Mr. Hogan also serves as
an officer of other funds. Mr. Hogan serves as Assistant Treasurer of FIMM, LLC
(2021-present) and FMR Capital, Inc. (2017-present) and is an employee of
Fidelity Investments (2005-present). Previously, Mr. Hogan served as Deputy
Treasurer of certain Fidelity® funds (2016-2020) and Assistant Treasurer of
certain Fidelity® funds (2016-2018).
Chris
Maher (1972)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2013
Assistant
Treasurer
Mr. Maher also
serves as an officer of other funds. Mr. Maher serves as Assistant Treasurer of
FIMM, LLC (2021-present) and FMR Capital, Inc. (2017-present), and is an
employee of Fidelity Investments (2008-present). Previously, Mr. Maher served as
Assistant Treasurer of certain funds (2013-2020); Vice President of Asset
Management Compliance (2013), Vice President of the Program Management Group of
FMR (investment adviser firm, 2010-2013), and Vice President of Valuation
Oversight (2008-2010).
Brett
Segaloff (1972)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2021
Anti-Money Laundering
(AML) Officer
Mr. Segaloff also serves
as an AML Officer of other funds and other related entities. He is Director,
Anti-Money Laundering (2007-present) of FMR LLC (diversified financial services
company) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (1996-present).
Stacie
M. Smith (1974)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2013
Assistant
Treasurer
Ms. Smith also serves as
an officer of other funds. Ms. Smith serves as Assistant Treasurer of certain
Fidelity entities, is an employee of Fidelity Investments, and has served in
other fund officer roles.
Jim
Wegmann (1979)
Year of Election or
Appointment: 2021
Deputy Treasurer
Mr. Wegmann also serves
as an officer of other funds. Mr. Wegmann serves as Assistant Treasurer of FIMM,
LLC (2021-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2011-present).
Previously, Mr. Wegmann served as Assistant Treasurer of certain Fidelity® funds
(2019-2021).
Standing
Committees of the Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established various
committees to support the Independent Trustees in acting independently in
pursuing the best interests of the funds and their shareholders. Currently, the
Board of Trustees has four standing committees. The members of each committee
are Independent Trustees.
The
Operations Committee is composed of all of the Independent Trustees, with Mr.
Kenneally currently serving as Chair. The committee normally meets at least six
times a year, or more frequently as called by the Chair, and serves as a forum
for consideration of issues of importance to, or calling for particular
determinations by, the Independent Trustees. The committee considers matters
involving potential conflicts of interest between the funds and FMR and its
affiliates, including matters involving potential claims of one or more funds
(e.g., for reimbursements of expenses or losses) against FMR, and reviews
proposed contracts and the proposed continuation of contracts between the funds
and FMR and its affiliates, and annually reviews and makes recommendations
regarding contracts with third parties unaffiliated with FMR, including
insurance coverage and custody agreements. The committee has oversight of
compliance issues not specifically within the scope of any other committee.
These matters include, but are not limited to, significant non-conformance with
contract requirements and other significant regulatory matters and recommending
to the Board of Trustees the designation of a person to serve as the funds' CCO.
The committee (i) serves as a primary point of contact (generally after the
Independent Trustee who serves as a liaison for the CCO) for the CCO with regard
to Board-related functions; (ii) oversees the annual performance review of the
CCO; (iii) makes recommendations concerning the CCO's compensation; and (iv)
makes recommendations as needed in respect of the removal of the CCO.
The
Audit Committee is composed of all of the Independent Trustees, with Ms. Acton
currently serving as Chair. At least one committee member will be an "audit
committee financial expert" as defined by the SEC. The committee normally meets
four times a year, or more frequently as called by the Chair or a majority of
committee members. The committee meets separately, at least annually, with the
funds' Treasurer, with the funds' Chief Financial Officer, with personnel
responsible for the internal audit function of FMR LLC, with the funds' outside
auditors, and with the funds' CCO. The committee has direct responsibility for
the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of the outside auditors
employed by the funds. The committee assists the Trustees in overseeing and
monitoring: (i) the systems of internal accounting and financial controls of the
funds and the funds' service providers (to the extent such controls impact the
funds' financial statements); (ii) the funds' auditors and the annual audits of
the funds' financial statements; (iii) the financial reporting processes of the
funds; (iv) whistleblower reports; and (v) the accounting policies and
disclosures of the funds. The committee considers and acts upon (i) the
provision by any outside auditor of any non-audit services for any fund, and
(ii) the provision by any outside auditor of certain non-audit services to fund
service providers and their affiliates to the extent that such approval (in the
case of this clause (ii)) is required under applicable regulations of the SEC.
It is responsible for approving all audit engagement fees and terms for the
funds and for resolving disagreements between a fund and any outside auditor
regarding any fund's financial reporting. Auditors of the funds report directly
to the committee. The committee will obtain assurance of independence and
objectivity from the outside auditors, including a formal written statement
delineating all relationships between the auditor and the funds and any service
providers consistent with the rules of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board. It oversees and receives reports on the funds' service providers'
internal controls and reviews the adequacy and effectiveness of the service
providers' accounting and financial controls, including: (i) any significant
deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
controls over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the funds' ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data;
(ii) any change in the fund's internal control over financial reporting that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the fund's
internal control over financial reporting; and (iii) any fraud, whether material
or not, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role
in the funds' or service providers internal controls over financial reporting.
The committee will also review any correspondence with regulators or
governmental agencies or published reports that raise material issues regarding
the funds' financial statements or accounting policies. These matters may also
be reviewed by the Operations Committee. The committee reviews at least annually
a report from each outside auditor describing any material issues raised by the
most recent internal quality control, peer review, or Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board examination of the auditing firm and any material issues raised
by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities of
the auditing firm and in each case any steps taken to deal with such issues. The
committee will oversee and receive reports on the funds' financial reporting
process from the funds' Treasurer and outside auditors and will oversee the
resolution of any disagreements concerning financial reporting among applicable
parties. The committee will discuss with FMR, the funds' Treasurer, outside
auditors and, if appropriate, internal audit personnel of FMR LLC their
qualitative judgments about the appropriateness and acceptability of accounting
principles and financial disclosure practices used or proposed for adoption by
the funds. The committee will review with FMR, the funds' outside auditor,
internal audit personnel of FMR LLC and legal counsel, as appropriate, matters
related to the audits of the funds' financial statements. The committee will
discuss regularly and oversee the review of the internal controls of the funds
and their service providers with respect to accounting, financial matters and
risk management programs related to the funds. The committee will review
periodically the funds' major internal controls exposures and the steps that
have been taken to monitor and control such exposures.
The
Fair Valuation Committee is composed of all of the Independent Trustees, with
Mr. Murray currently serving as Chair. The Committee normally meets quarterly,
or more frequently as called by the Chair. The Fair Valuation Committee oversees
the valuation of securities held by the funds, including the fair valuation of
securities by the funds' valuation designee. The Committee receives and reviews
related reports and information consistent with its oversight obligations.
The
Governance and Nominating Committee is composed of Messrs. Kenneally (Chair) and
Gartland (Vice Chair), and Ms. Acton. The committee meets as called by the
Chair. With respect to fund governance and board administration matters, the
committee periodically reviews procedures of the Board of Trustees and its
committees (including committee charters) and periodically reviews compensation
of Independent Trustees. The committee monitors corporate governance matters and
makes recommendations to the Board of Trustees on the frequency and structure of
the Board of Trustee meetings and on any other aspect of Board procedures. It
acts as the administrative committee under the retirement plan for Independent
Trustees who retired prior to December 30, 1996 and under the fee deferral plan
for Independent Trustees. It monitors the performance of legal counsel employed
by both the funds and the Independent Trustees. The committee will engage and
oversee any counsel utilized by the Independent Trustees as may be necessary or
appropriate under applicable regulations or otherwise. The committee also
approves Board administrative matters applicable to Independent Trustees, such
as expense reimbursement policies and compensation for attendance at meetings,
conferences and other events. The committee oversees compliance with the
provisions of the code of ethics and any supplemental policies regarding
personal securities transactions applicable to the Independent Trustees. The
committee reviews the functioning of each Board committee and makes
recommendations for any changes, including the creation or elimination of
standing or ad hoc Board committees. The committee monitors regulatory and other
developments to determine whether to recommend modifications to the committee's
responsibilities or other Trustee policies and procedures in light of rule
changes, reports concerning "recommended practices" in corporate governance and
other developments in mutual fund governance. The committee meets with
Independent Trustees at least once a year to discuss matters relating to fund
governance. The committee recommends that the Board establish such special or ad
hoc Board committees as may be desirable or necessary from time to time in order
to address ethical, legal, or other matters that may arise. The committee also
oversees the annual self-evaluation of the Board of Trustees and establishes
procedures to allow it to exercise this oversight function. In conducting this
oversight, the committee shall address all matters that it considers relevant to
the performance of the Board of Trustees and shall report the results of its
evaluation to the Board of Trustees, including any recommended amendments to the
principles of governance, and any recommended changes to the funds' or the Board
of Trustees' policies, procedures, and structures. The committee reviews
periodically the size and composition of the Board of Trustees as a whole and
recommends, if necessary, measures to be taken so that the Board of Trustees
reflects the appropriate balance of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise,
and diversity required for the Board as a whole and contains at least the
minimum number of Independent Trustees required by law. The committee makes
nominations for the election or appointment of Independent Trustees and
non-management Members of any Advisory Board, and for membership on committees.
The committee has the authority to retain and terminate any third-party
advisers, including authority to approve fees and other retention terms. Such
advisers may include search firms to identify Independent Trustee candidates and
board compensation consultants. The committee may conduct or authorize
investigations into or studies of matters within the committee's scope of
responsibilities, and may retain, at the funds' expense, such independent
counsel or other advisers as it deems necessary. The committee will consider
nominees to the Board of Trustees recommended by shareholders based upon the
criteria applied to candidates presented to the committee by a search firm or
other source. Recommendations, along with appropriate background material
concerning the candidate that demonstrates his or her ability to serve as an
Independent Trustee of the funds, should be submitted to the Chair of the
committee at the address maintained for communications with Independent
Trustees. If the committee retains a search firm, the Chair will generally
forward all such submissions to the search firm for evaluation. With respect to
the criteria for selecting Independent Trustees, it is expected that all
candidates will possess the following minimum qualifications: (i) unquestioned
personal integrity; (ii) not an interested person of the funds within the
meaning of the 1940 Act; (iii) does not have a material relationship (e.g.,
commercial, banking, consulting, legal, or accounting) with the adviser, any
sub-adviser or their affiliates that could create an appearance of lack of
independence in respect of the funds; (iv) has the disposition to act
independently in respect of FMR and its affiliates and others in order to
protect the interests of the funds and all shareholders; (v) ability to attend
regularly scheduled Board meetings during the year; (vi) demonstrates sound
business judgment gained through broad experience in significant positions where
the candidate has dealt with management, technical, financial, or regulatory
issues; (vii) sufficient financial or accounting knowledge to add value in the
complex financial environment of the funds; (viii) experience on corporate or
other institutional oversight bodies having similar responsibilities, but which
board memberships or other relationships could not result in business or
regulatory conflicts with the funds; and (ix) capacity for the hard work and
attention to detail that is required to be an effective Independent Trustee in
light of the funds' complex regulatory, operational, and marketing setting. The
Governance and Nominating Committee may determine that a candidate who does not
have the type of previous experience or knowledge referred to above should
nevertheless be considered as a nominee if the Governance and Nominating
Committee finds that the candidate has additional qualifications such that his
or her qualifications, taken as a whole, demonstrate the same level of fitness
to serve as an Independent Trustee.
During
the fiscal year ended August 31, 2023, each committee held the number of
meetings shown in the table below:
COMMITTEE |
NUMBER OF MEETINGS HELD |
Operations Committee |
8 |
Audit Committee |
4 |
Fair Valuation Committee |
3 |
Governance and Nominating Committee |
10 |
The
following table sets forth information describing the dollar range of equity
securities beneficially owned by each Trustee in each fund and in all funds in
the aggregate within the same fund family overseen by the Trustee for the
calendar year ended December 31, 2022. (The information is as of August 31, 2023
for Ms. Bishop, Mr. Helm, Ms. Thompson, and Ms. Zierhoffer, Trustee as of
October 18, 2023.)
Interested Trustees
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES |
Jonathan Chiel |
Abigail P Johnson |
Christine J Thompson |
Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe |
Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income
Fund |
none |
none |
none |
$10,001-$50,000 |
Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
none |
none |
none |
$1-$10,000 |
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund |
none |
none |
none |
none |
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY |
over $100,000 |
over $100,000 |
over $100,000 |
over $100,000 |
Independent Trustees
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES |
Elizabeth S Acton |
Laura M Bishop |
Ann E Dunwoody |
John Engler |
Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income
Fund |
none |
none |
none |
none |
Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
none |
none |
none |
none |
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund |
none |
none |
none |
none |
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY |
over $100,000 |
$10,001-$50,000 |
over $100,000 |
over $100,000 |
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES |
Robert F Gartland |
Robert W Helm |
Arthur E Johnson |
Michael E Kenneally |
Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income
Fund |
over $100,000 |
none |
none |
none |
Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
over $100,000 |
none |
none |
none |
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund |
none |
none |
none |
none |
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY |
over $100,000 |
over $100,000 |
over $100,000 |
over $100,000 |
DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES |
Mark A Murray |
Carol J Zierhoffer |
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income
Fund |
none |
none |
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
none |
none |
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund |
none |
none |
|
|
AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS
OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY |
over $100,000 |
none |
|
|
The
following table sets forth information describing the compensation of each
Trustee and Member of the Advisory Board (if any) for his or her services for
the fiscal year ended August 31, 2023, or calendar year ended December 31, 2022,
as applicable.
Compensation Table(A)
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND |
|
Elizabeth S Acton
|
|
Laura M Bishop(B) |
|
Ann E Dunwoody
|
|
John Engler
|
Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income
Fund |
$ |
1,518 |
$ |
1,365 |
$ |
1,360 |
$ |
1,355 |
Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
$ |
713 |
$ |
641 |
$ |
639 |
$ |
637 |
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund |
$ |
5,837 |
$ |
5,257 |
$ |
5,231 |
$ |
5,206 |
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C) |
$ |
563,000 |
$ |
184,000 |
$ |
502,500 |
$ |
496,000 |
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND |
|
Robert F Gartland
|
|
Robert W Helm(D) |
|
Arthur E Johnson
|
|
Michael E Kenneally
|
Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income
Fund |
$ |
1,522 |
$ |
1,404 |
$ |
1,312 |
$ |
1,646 |
Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
$ |
715 |
$ |
661 |
$ |
616 |
$ |
773 |
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund |
$ |
5,851 |
$ |
5,380 |
$ |
5,045 |
$ |
6,321 |
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C) |
$ |
565,000 |
$ |
502,500 |
$ |
492,500 |
$ |
612,500 |
AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND |
|
Mark A Murray
|
|
Carol J Zierhoffer(E) |
|
|
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income
Fund |
$ |
1,349 |
$ |
738 |
|
|
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
$ |
634 |
$ |
364 |
|
|
|
|
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund |
$ |
5,180 |
$ |
2,561 |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX(C) |
$ |
497,500 |
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
(A) Jonathan
Chiel, Abigail P. Johnson, Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe, and Christine J.
Thompson are interested persons and are compensated by
Fidelity.
|
|
(B) Ms. Bishop
served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust
from September 1, 2022 through October 17, 2023. Ms. Bishop serves as a
Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18,
2023.
|
|
(C) Reflects
compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 for
295 funds of 31 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios
II LLC). Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts elected
to be deferred. Certain individuals elected voluntarily to defer a portion
of their compensation as follows: Elizabeth S. Acton, $120,000; Laura M.
Bishop, $73,674; Ann E. Dunwoody, $274,597; John Engler, $274,597; Robert
F. Gartland, $180,000; Robert W. Helm, $274,597; and Mark A. Murray,
$274,597.
|
|
(D) Mr. Helm
served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust
from June 1, 2021 through October 17, 2023. Mr. Helm serves as a Trustee
of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18, 2023.
|
|
(E) Ms. Zierhoffer
served as a Member of the Advisory Board of Fidelity Salem Street Trust
from March 1, 2023 through October 17, 2023. Ms. Zierhoffer serves as a
Trustee of Fidelity Salem Street Trust effective October 18,
2023.
|
|
As
of August 31, 2023, the Trustees, Members of the Advisory Board (if any), and
officers of each fund owned, in the aggregate, less than 1% of each class's
total outstanding shares, with respect to each fund.
As
of August 31, 2023, the following owned of record and/or beneficially 5% or more
of the outstanding shares:
Fund
or Class Name |
Owner
Name |
City |
State |
Ownership
% |
Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® FIDELITY® CORE INCOME
FUND |
BOSTON |
MA |
12.68% |
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund |
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® FIDELITY® CORE INCOME
FUND |
BOSTON |
MA |
75.27% |
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund |
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® CORE INCOME
FUND |
BOSTON |
MA |
24.73% |
As
of August 31, 2023, the following owned of record and/or beneficially 25% or
more of the outstanding shares:
Fund
Name |
Owner
Name |
City |
State |
Ownership
% |
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund |
STRATEGIC ADVISERS® FIDELITY® CORE INCOME
FUND |
BOSTON |
MA |
75.28% |
A
shareholder owning of record or beneficially more than 25% of a fund's
outstanding shares may be considered a controlling person. That shareholder's
vote could have a more significant effect on matters presented at a
shareholders' meeting than votes of other shareholders.
CONTROL OF INVESTMENT
ADVISERS
FMR
LLC, as successor by merger to FMR Corp., is the ultimate parent company of FMR,
FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited, Fidelity Management & Research (Hong
Kong) Limited, and Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited. The
voting common shares of FMR LLC are divided into two series. Series B is held
predominantly by members of the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson,
directly or through trusts, and is entitled to 49% of the vote on any matter
acted upon by the voting common shares. Series A is held predominantly by
non-Johnson family member employees of FMR LLC and its affiliates and is
entitled to 51% of the vote on any such matter. The Johnson family group and all
other Series B shareholders have entered into a shareholders' voting agreement
under which all Series B shares will be voted in accordance with the majority
vote of Series B shares. Under the 1940 Act, control of a company is presumed
where one individual or group of individuals owns more than 25% of the voting
securities of that company. Therefore, through their ownership of voting common
shares and the execution of the shareholders' voting agreement, members of the
Johnson family may be deemed, under the 1940 Act, to form a controlling group
with respect to FMR LLC.
At
present, the primary business activities of FMR LLC and its subsidiaries are:
(i) the provision of investment advisory, management, shareholder, investment
information and assistance and certain fiduciary services for individual and
institutional investors; (ii) the provision of securities brokerage services;
(iii) the management and development of real estate; and (iv) the investment in
and operation of a number of emerging businesses.
FMR,
FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited, Fidelity Management & Research (Hong
Kong) Limited, Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited, Fidelity
Distributors Company LLC (FDC), and the funds have adopted a code of ethics
under Rule 17j-1 of the 1940 Act that sets forth employees' fiduciary
responsibilities regarding the funds, establishes procedures for personal
investing, and restricts certain transactions. Employees subject to the code of
ethics, including Fidelity investment personnel, may invest in securities for
their own investment accounts, including securities that may be purchased or
held by the funds.
Each
fund has entered into a management contract with FMR, pursuant to which FMR
furnishes investment advisory and other services.
Management
Services. Under the terms of its management contract with each fund, FMR acts as
investment adviser and, subject to the supervision of the Board of Trustees, has
overall responsibility for directing the investments of the fund in accordance
with its investment objective, policies and limitations. FMR also provides each
fund with all necessary office facilities and personnel for servicing the fund's
investments, compensates all officers of each fund and all Trustees who are
interested persons of the trust or of FMR, and compensates all personnel of each
fund or FMR performing services relating to research, statistical and investment
activities.
In
addition, FMR or its affiliates, subject to the supervision of the Board of
Trustees, provide the management and administrative services necessary for the
operation of each fund. These services include providing facilities for
maintaining each fund's organization; supervising relations with custodians,
transfer and pricing agents, accountants, underwriters and other persons dealing
with each fund; preparing all general shareholder communications and conducting
shareholder relations; maintaining each fund's records and the registration of
each fund's shares under federal securities laws and making necessary filings
under state securities laws; developing management and shareholder services for
each fund; and furnishing reports, evaluations and analyses on a variety of
subjects to the Trustees.
Management-Related
Expenses. In addition to the management fee payable to FMR and the fees payable
to the transfer agent and pricing and bookkeeping agent, and the costs
associated with securities lending, as applicable, a fund pays all of its
expenses that are not assumed by those parties. A fund pays for the typesetting,
printing, and mailing of its proxy materials to shareholders, legal expenses,
and the fees of the custodian, auditor, and Independent Trustees. A fund's
management contract further provides that the fund will pay for typesetting,
printing, and mailing prospectuses, statements of additional information,
notices, and reports to shareholders. Other expenses paid by a fund include
interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, fees and expenses associated with the
fund's securities lending program, if applicable, the fund's proportionate share
of insurance premiums and Investment Company Institute dues, and the costs of
registering shares under federal securities laws and making necessary filings
under state securities laws. A fund is also liable for such non-recurring
expenses as may arise, including costs of any litigation to which the fund may
be a party, and any obligation it may have to indemnify its officers and
Trustees with respect to litigation.
Management
Fees.
For
the services of FMR under the management contract, Fidelity® SAI Low Duration
Income Fund and Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund each pay FMR a monthly
management fee at the annual rate of 0.20% of the fund's average net assets
throughout the month.
For
the services of FMR under the management contract, Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund
pays FMR a monthly management fee which has two components: a group fee rate and
an individual fund fee rate.
The
group fee rate is based on the monthly average net assets of a group of
registered investment companies with which FMR has management contracts.
The
following is the fee schedule for Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund:
GROUP FEE RATE SCHEDULE |
|
|
|
EFFECTIVE
ANNUAL FEE RATES |
Average Group Assets |
|
|
Annualized
Rate |
Group
Net Assets |
Effective
Annual Fee Rate |
0 |
- |
$3
billion |
.3700% |
$1
billion |
.3700% |
3 |
- |
6 |
.3400 |
50 |
.2188 |
6 |
- |
9 |
.3100 |
100 |
.1869 |
9 |
- |
12 |
.2800 |
150 |
.1736 |
12 |
- |
15 |
.2500 |
200 |
.1652 |
15 |
- |
18 |
.2200 |
250 |
.1587 |
18 |
- |
21 |
.2000 |
300 |
.1536 |
21 |
- |
24 |
.1900 |
350 |
.1494 |
24 |
- |
30 |
.1800 |
400 |
.1459 |
30 |
- |
36 |
.1750 |
450 |
.1427 |
36 |
- |
42 |
.1700 |
500 |
.1399 |
42 |
- |
48 |
.1650 |
550 |
.1372 |
48 |
- |
66 |
.1600 |
600 |
.1349 |
66 |
- |
84 |
.1550 |
650 |
.1328 |
84 |
- |
120 |
.1500 |
700 |
.1309 |
120 |
- |
156 |
.1450 |
750 |
.1291 |
156 |
- |
192 |
.1400 |
800 |
.1275 |
192 |
- |
228 |
.1350 |
850 |
.1260 |
228 |
- |
264 |
.1300 |
900 |
.1246 |
264 |
- |
300 |
.1275 |
950 |
.1233 |
300 |
- |
336 |
.1250 |
1,000 |
.1220 |
336 |
- |
372 |
.1225 |
1,050 |
.1209 |
372 |
- |
408 |
.1200 |
1,100 |
.1197 |
408 |
- |
444 |
.1175 |
1,150 |
.1187 |
444 |
- |
480 |
.1150 |
1,200 |
.1177 |
480 |
- |
516 |
.1125 |
1,250 |
.1167 |
516 |
- |
587 |
.1100 |
1,300 |
.1158 |
587 |
- |
646 |
.1080 |
1,350 |
.1149 |
646 |
- |
711 |
.1060 |
1,400 |
.1141 |
711 |
- |
782 |
.1040 |
1,450 |
.1132 |
782 |
- |
860 |
.1020 |
1,500 |
.1125 |
860 |
- |
946 |
.1000 |
1,550 |
.1117 |
946 |
- |
1,041 |
.0980 |
1,600 |
.1110 |
1,041 |
- |
1,145 |
.0960 |
1,650 |
.1103 |
1,145 |
- |
1,260 |
.0940 |
1,700 |
.1096 |
1,260 |
- |
1,386 |
.0920 |
1,750 |
.1089 |
1,386 |
- |
1,525 |
.0900 |
1,800 |
.1083 |
1,525 |
- |
1,677 |
.0880 |
1,850 |
.1077 |
1,677 |
- |
1,845 |
.0860 |
1,900 |
.1070 |
1,845 |
- |
2,030 |
.0840 |
1,950 |
.1065 |
Over |
|
2,030 |
.0820 |
2,000 |
.1059 |
The
group fee rate is calculated on a cumulative basis pursuant to the graduated fee
rate schedule shown above on the left. The schedule above on the right shows the
effective annual group fee rate at various asset levels, which is the result of
cumulatively applying the annualized rates on the left. For example, the
effective annual fee rate at $3,413 billion of group net assets - the
approximate level for August 2023 - was 0.0960%, which is the weighted average
of the respective fee rates for each level of group net assets up to $3,413
billion.
The
individual fund fee rate for Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund is set forth in the
following table. Based on the average group net assets for August 2023, a fund's
annual management fee rate would be calculated as follows:
Fund |
Group Fee Rate |
|
Individual Fund Fee Rate |
|
Management Fee Rate |
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund |
0.0960% |
+ |
0.2000% |
= |
0.2960% |
One-twelfth
of the management fee rate is applied to the fund's average net assets for the
month, giving a dollar amount which is the fee for that month.
The
following table shows the amount of management fees paid by a fund for the
fiscal year(s) ended August 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 to its current manager and
prior affiliated manager(s), if any.
Fund(s) |
Fiscal
Years
Ended |
|
Management
Fees
Paid to
Investment Adviser |
Fidelity®
SAI Low Duration Income Fund |
2023(A) |
$ |
13,411,912 |
|
2022 |
$ |
13,085,325 |
|
2021(B) |
$ |
10,695,298 |
Fidelity®
SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
2023(C) |
$ |
6,306,968 |
|
2022 |
$ |
5,691,732 |
|
2021(B) |
$ |
4,637,288 |
Fidelity®
SAI Total Bond Fund |
2023 |
$ |
58,492,895 |
|
2022 |
$ |
54,747,769 |
|
2021 |
$ |
49,656,658 |
(A)On April 1, 2023, FMR reduced the
management fee rate paid by Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income Fund from
0.30% to 0.20%.
|
(B)Fund commenced operations on September
15, 2020.
|
(C)On April 1, 2023, FMR replaced
Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund's management fee, which consisted
of a group fee rate component plus an individual fee rate component, with
a flat rate. Effective April 1, 2023, the fund's annual management fee
rate has been reduced to 0.20% of its average net assets.
|
FMR
may, from time to time, voluntarily reimburse all or a portion of a fund's or,
in the case of a multiple class fund, a class's operating expenses. FMR retains
the ability to be repaid for these expense reimbursements in the amount that
expenses fall below the limit prior to the end of the fiscal year.
Expense
reimbursements will increase returns and yield, and repayment of the
reimbursement will decrease returns and yield.
Sub-Advisers
- FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited, Fidelity Management &
Research (Hong Kong) Limited, and Fidelity Management & Research (Japan)
Limited.
On
behalf of each fund, FMR has entered into sub-advisory agreements with
Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited (FMR H.K.) and Fidelity
Management & Research (Japan) Limited (FMR Japan).
On
behalf of each fund, FMR has entered into a sub-advisory agreement with FMR
UK.
Pursuant
to the sub-advisory agreements, FMR may receive from the
sub-advisers investment research and advice on issuers outside the United
States (non-discretionary services) and FMR may grant the sub-advisers
investment management authority and the authority to buy and sell securities if
FMR believes it would be beneficial to the fund (discretionary
services).
FMR,
and not the fund, pays the sub-advisers.
Currently,
FMR UK has day-to-day responsibility for choosing certain types of investments
for Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund.
David
DeBiase is Co-Portfolio Manager of Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income Fund and
Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund and receives compensation for those services.
Rob Galusza is Co-Portfolio Manager of Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income Fund
and Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund and receives compensation for those
services. Julian Potenza is Co-Portfolio Manager of Fidelity® SAI Low Duration
Income Fund and Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund and receives compensation for
those services. Franco Castagliuolo is Co-Portfolio Manager of Fidelity® SAI
Total Bond Fund and receives compensation for those services. Michael Foggin is
Co-Portfolio Manager of Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund and receives compensation
for those services. Celso Munoz is Co-Portfolio Manager of Fidelity® SAI Total
Bond Fund and receives compensation for those services. Ford O'Neil is
Co-Portfolio Manager of Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund and receives compensation
for those services. As of August 31, 2023, portfolio manager compensation
generally consists of a fixed base salary determined periodically (typically
annually), a bonus, and in certain cases, participation in several types of
equity-based compensation plans. A portion of each portfolio manager's
compensation may be deferred based on criteria established by FMR or at the
election of the portfolio manager.
Each
portfolio manager's base salary is determined by level of responsibility and
tenure at FMR or its affiliates. The primary components of each portfolio
manager's bonus are based on (i) the pre-tax investment performance of the
portfolio manager's fund(s) and account(s) measured against a benchmark index
assigned to each fund or account, and (ii) the investment performance of other
taxable bond funds and accounts. The pre-tax investment performance of each
portfolio manager's fund(s) and account(s) is weighted according to the
portfolio manager's tenure on those fund(s) and account(s) and the average asset
size of those fund(s) and account(s) over the portfolio manager's tenure. Each
component is calculated separately over the portfolio manager's tenure on those
fund(s) and account(s) over a measurement period that initially is
contemporaneous with the portfolio manager's tenure, but that eventually
encompasses rolling periods of up to three years for the comparison to a
benchmark index. A smaller, subjective component of each portfolio manager's
bonus is based on the portfolio manager's overall contribution to management of
FMR. The portion of Mr. DeBiase's, Mr. Galusza's, Mr. Potenza's, Mr. Foggin's,
Mr. Munoz's, and Mr. O'Neil's bonus that is linked to the investment performance
of the fund is based on the pre-tax investment performance of the fund measured
against the benchmark index identified below for the fund. Another component of
Mr. Foggin's bonus is based on the pre-tax investment performance of the portion
of the fund's assets the portfolio manager manages measured against the
Bloomberg Global Aggregate Credit Ex U.S. Index Hedged (USD). The portion
of Mr. Castagliuolo's bonus that is linked to the investment performance of
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund is based on the pre-tax investment performance of
the portion of the fund's assets the portfolio manager manages measured against
the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index.
Fund
/ Benchmark Index
Fidelity®
SAI Low Duration Income Fund / Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Bill: 6-9 Months Index
Fidelity®
SAI Short-Term Bond Fund / Bloomberg U.S. 1-3 Year Government/Credit Bond Index
Fidelity®
SAI Total Bond Fund / Bloomberg U.S. Universal Bond Index
Benjamin
Harrison is Co-Portfolio Manager of Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund and receives
compensation for managing the high income bond investments of the fund. As of
August 31, 2023, portfolio manager compensation generally consists of a fixed
base salary determined periodically (typically annually), a bonus, in certain
cases, participation in several types of equity-based compensation plans, and,
if applicable, relocation plan benefits. A portion of the portfolio manager's
compensation may be deferred based on criteria established by FMR or at the
election of the portfolio manager.
The
portfolio manager's base salary is determined by level of responsibility and
tenure at FMR or its affiliates. The primary components of the portfolio
manager's bonus are based on (i) the pre-tax investment performance of the
portfolio manager's fund(s) and account(s) measured against a benchmark index or
within a defined peer group assigned to each fund or account, and (ii) the
investment performance of other high yield funds and accounts. The pre-tax
investment performance of the portfolio manager's fund(s) and account(s) is
weighted according to the portfolio manager's tenure on those fund(s) and
account(s) and the average asset size of those fund(s) and account(s) over the
portfolio manager's tenure. Each component is calculated separately over the
portfolio manager's tenure on those fund(s) and account(s) over a measurement
period that initially is contemporaneous with the portfolio manager's tenure,
but that eventually encompasses rolling periods of up to five years for the
comparison to a benchmark index or a peer group. A smaller, subjective component
of the portfolio manager's bonus is based on the portfolio manager's overall
contribution to management of FMR. The portion of Mr. Harrison's bonus that is
linked to the investment performance of Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund is based
on the pre-tax investment performance of the fund's assets allocated to the high
income asset class of the fund within the Lipper℠ High Yield Funds.
Each
portfolio manager also is compensated under equity-based compensation plans
linked to increases or decreases in the net asset value of the stock of FMR LLC,
FMR's parent company. FMR LLC is a diverse financial services company engaged in
various activities that include fund management, brokerage, retirement and
employer administrative services.
A
portfolio manager's compensation plan may give rise to potential conflicts of
interest. Although investors in a fund may invest through either tax-deferred
accounts or taxable accounts, a portfolio manager's compensation is linked to
the pre-tax performance of the fund, rather than its after-tax performance. A
portfolio manager's base pay tends to increase with additional and more complex
responsibilities that include increased assets under management and a portion of
the bonus relates to marketing efforts, which together indirectly link
compensation to sales. When a portfolio manager takes over a fund or an account,
the time period over which performance is measured may be adjusted to provide a
transition period in which to assess the portfolio. The management of multiple
funds and accounts (including proprietary accounts) may give rise to potential
conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different objectives,
benchmarks, time horizons, and fees as a portfolio manager must allocate time
and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts. In addition, a fund's
trade allocation policies and procedures may give rise to conflicts of interest
if the fund's orders do not get fully executed due to being aggregated with
those of other accounts managed by FMR or an affiliate. A portfolio manager may
execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely impact the
value of securities held by a fund. Securities selected for other funds or
accounts may outperform the securities selected for the fund. Portfolio managers
may be permitted to invest in the funds they manage, even if a fund is closed to
new investors. Trading in personal accounts, which may give rise to potential
conflicts of interest, is restricted by a fund's Code of Ethics.
Portfolio
managers may receive interests in certain funds or accounts managed by FMR or
one of its affiliated advisers (collectively, "Proprietary Accounts"). A
conflict of interest situation is presented where a portfolio manager considers
investing a client account in securities of an issuer in which FMR, its
affiliates or their (or their fund clients') respective directors, officers or
employees already hold a significant position for their own account, including
positions held indirectly through Proprietary Accounts. Because the 1940 Act, as
well as other applicable laws and regulations, restricts certain transactions
between affiliated entities or between an advisor and its clients, client
accounts managed by FMR or its affiliates, including accounts sub-advised by
third parties, are, in certain circumstances, prohibited from participating in
offerings of such securities (including initial public offerings and other
offerings occurring before or after an issuer's initial public offering) or
acquiring such securities in the secondary market. For example, ownership of a
company by Proprietary Accounts has, in certain situations, resulted in
restrictions on FMR's and its affiliates' client accounts' ability to acquire
securities in the company's initial public offering and subsequent public
offerings, private offerings, and in the secondary market, and additional
restrictions could arise in the future; to the extent such client accounts
acquire the relevant securities after such restrictions are subsequently lifted,
the delay could affect the price at which the securities are acquired.
A
conflict of interest situation is presented when FMR or its affiliates acquire,
on behalf of their client accounts, securities of the same issuers whose
securities are already held in Proprietary Accounts, because such investments
could have the effect of increasing or supporting the value of the Proprietary
Accounts. A conflict of interest situation also arises when FMR investment
advisory personnel consider whether client accounts they manage should invest in
an investment opportunity that they know is also being considered by an
affiliate of FMR for a Proprietary Account, to the extent that not investing on
behalf of such client accounts improves the ability of the Proprietary Account
to take advantage of the opportunity. FMR has adopted policies and procedures
and maintains a compliance program designed to help manage such actual and
potential conflicts of interest.
The
following table provides information relating to other accounts managed by David
DeBiase as of August 31, 2023:
|
Registered Investment Companies* |
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles |
|
Other
Accounts |
Number
of Accounts Managed |
16 |
|
5 |
|
52 |
Number
of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
Assets
Managed (in millions) |
$28,922 |
|
$2,588 |
|
$46,664 |
Assets
Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions) |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
*
Includes Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income Fund ($6,246 (in millions) assets
managed). The amount of assets managed of the fund reflects trades and other
assets as of the close of the business day prior to the fund's fiscal
year-end.
As
of August 31, 2023, the dollar range of shares of Fidelity® SAI Low Duration
Income Fund beneficially owned by Mr. DeBiase was none.
The
following table provides information relating to other accounts managed by Rob
Galusza as of August 31, 2023:
|
Registered Investment Companies* |
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles |
|
Other
Accounts |
Number
of Accounts Managed |
16 |
|
5 |
|
55 |
Number
of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
Assets
Managed (in millions) |
$28,922 |
|
$2,588 |
|
$47,423 |
Assets
Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions) |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
*
Includes Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income Fund ($6,246 (in millions) assets
managed). The amount of assets managed of the fund reflects trades and other
assets as of the close of the business day prior to the fund's fiscal
year-end.
As
of August 31, 2023, the dollar range of shares of Fidelity® SAI Low Duration
Income Fund beneficially owned by Mr. Galusza was none.
The
following table provides information relating to other accounts managed by
Julian Potenza as of August 31, 2023:
|
Registered Investment Companies* |
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles |
|
Other
Accounts |
Number
of Accounts Managed |
16 |
|
5 |
|
53 |
Number
of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
Assets
Managed (in millions) |
$28,922 |
|
$2,588 |
|
$47,102 |
Assets
Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions) |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
*
Includes Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income Fund ($6,246 (in millions) assets
managed). The amount of assets managed of the fund reflects trades and other
assets as of the close of the business day prior to the fund's fiscal
year-end.
As
of August 31, 2023, the dollar range of shares of Fidelity® SAI Low Duration
Income Fund beneficially owned by Mr. Potenza was none.
The
following table provides information relating to other accounts managed by David
DeBiase as of August 31, 2023:
|
Registered Investment Companies* |
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles |
|
Other
Accounts |
Number
of Accounts Managed |
16 |
|
5 |
|
52 |
Number
of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
Assets
Managed (in millions) |
$28,922 |
|
$2,588 |
|
$46,664 |
Assets
Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions) |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
*
Includes Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund ($3,192 (in millions) assets
managed). The amount of assets managed of the fund reflects trades and other
assets as of the close of the business day prior to the fund's fiscal
year-end.
As
of August 31, 2023, the dollar range of shares of Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond
Fund beneficially owned by Mr. DeBiase was none.
The
following table provides information relating to other accounts managed by Rob
Galusza as of August 31, 2023:
|
Registered Investment Companies* |
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles |
|
Other
Accounts |
Number
of Accounts Managed |
16 |
|
5 |
|
55 |
Number
of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
Assets
Managed (in millions) |
$28,922 |
|
$2,588 |
|
$47,423 |
Assets
Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions) |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
*
Includes Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund ($3,192 (in millions) assets
managed). The amount of assets managed of the fund reflects trades and other
assets as of the close of the business day prior to the fund's fiscal
year-end.
As
of August 31, 2023, the dollar range of shares of Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond
Fund beneficially owned by Mr. Galusza was none.
The
following table provides information relating to other accounts managed by
Julian Potenza as of August 31, 2023:
|
Registered Investment Companies* |
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles |
|
Other
Accounts |
Number
of Accounts Managed |
16 |
|
5 |
|
53 |
Number
of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
Assets
Managed (in millions) |
$28,922 |
|
$2,588 |
|
$47,102 |
Assets
Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions) |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
*
Includes Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond Fund ($3,192 (in millions) assets
managed). The amount of assets managed of the fund reflects trades and other
assets as of the close of the business day prior to the fund's fiscal
year-end.
As
of August 31, 2023, the dollar range of shares of Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond
Fund beneficially owned by Mr. Potenza was none.
The
following table provides information relating to other accounts managed by
Franco Castagliuolo as of August 31, 2023:
|
Registered Investment Companies* |
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles |
|
Other
Accounts |
Number
of Accounts Managed |
27 |
|
3 |
|
1 |
Number
of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
Assets
Managed (in millions) |
$53,856 |
|
$2,436 |
|
$325 |
Assets
Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions) |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
*
Includes assets of Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund managed by Mr. Castagliuolo
($3,554 (in millions) assets managed). The amount of assets managed of the fund
reflects trades and other assets as of the close of the business day prior to
the fund's fiscal year-end.
As
of August 31, 2023, the dollar range of shares of Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund
beneficially owned by Mr. Castagliuolo was none.
The
following table provides information relating to other accounts managed by
Michael Foggin as of August 31, 2023:
|
Registered Investment Companies* |
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles |
|
Other
Accounts |
Number
of Accounts Managed |
17 |
|
12 |
|
2 |
Number
of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
Assets
Managed (in millions) |
$12,761 |
|
$9,205 |
|
$1,199 |
Assets
Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions) |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
*
Includes assets of Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund managed by Mr. Foggin ($512 (in
millions) assets managed). The amount of assets managed of the fund reflects
trades and other assets as of the close of the business day prior to the fund's
fiscal year-end.
As
of August 31, 2023, the dollar range of shares of Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund
beneficially owned by Mr. Foggin was none.
The
following table provides information relating to other accounts managed by
Benjamin Harrison as of August 31, 2023:
|
Registered Investment Companies* |
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles |
|
Other
Accounts |
Number
of Accounts Managed |
20 |
|
4 |
|
6 |
Number
of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
Assets
Managed (in millions) |
$12,206 |
|
$1,697 |
|
$501 |
Assets
Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions) |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
*
Includes assets of Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund managed by Mr. Harrison ($1,382
(in millions) assets managed). The amount of assets managed of the fund reflects
trades and other assets as of the close of the business day prior to the fund's
fiscal year-end.
As
of August 31, 2023, the dollar range of shares of Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund
beneficially owned by Mr. Harrison was none.
The
following table provides information relating to other accounts managed by Celso
Munoz as of August 31, 2023:
|
Registered Investment Companies* |
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles |
|
Other
Accounts |
Number
of Accounts Managed |
12 |
|
3 |
|
10 |
Number
of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
Assets
Managed (in millions) |
$103,507 |
|
$7,821 |
|
$7,978 |
Assets
Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions) |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
*
Includes Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund ($20,278 (in millions) assets managed).
The amount of assets managed of the fund reflects trades and other assets as of
the close of the business day prior to the fund's fiscal year-end.
As
of August 31, 2023, the dollar range of shares of Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund
beneficially owned by Mr. Munoz was none.
The
following table provides information relating to other accounts managed by Ford
O'Neil as of August 31, 2023:
|
Registered Investment Companies* |
|
Other Pooled
Investment
Vehicles |
|
Other
Accounts |
Number
of Accounts Managed |
17 |
|
10 |
|
7 |
Number
of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
Assets
Managed (in millions) |
$123,631 |
|
$12,958 |
|
$3,167 |
Assets
Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions) |
none |
|
none |
|
none |
*
Includes Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund ($20,278 (in millions) assets managed).
The amount of assets managed of the fund reflects trades and other assets as of
the close of the business day prior to the fund's fiscal year-end.
As
of August 31, 2023, the dollar range of shares of Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund
beneficially owned by Mr. O'Neil was none.
Fidelity®
Funds' Proxy Voting Guidelines
I.
Introduction
These
guidelines are intended to help Fidelity's customers and the companies in
which Fidelity invests understand how Fidelity votes proxies to further
the values that have sustained Fidelity for over 75 years. Our core
principles sit at the heart of our voting philosophy; putting our
customers' and fund shareholders' long-term interests first and investing
in companies that share our approach to creating value over the long-term
guides everything we do. Fidelity generally adheres to these guidelines in
voting proxies and our Stewardship Principles serve as the foundation for
these guidelines. Our evaluation of proxies reflects information from many
sources, including management or shareholders of a company presenting a
proposal and proxy voting advisory firms. Fidelity maintains the
flexibility to vote individual proxies based on our assessment of each
situation.
In
evaluating proxies, Fidelity considers factors that are financially
material to individual companies and investing funds' investment
objectives and strategies in support of maximizing long-term shareholder
value. This includes considering the company's approach to financial and
operational, human, and natural capital and the impact of that approach on
the potential future value of the business.
Fidelity
will vote on proposals not specifically addressed by these guidelines
based on an evaluation of a proposal's likelihood to enhance the long-term
economic returns or profitability of the company or to maximize long-term
shareholder value. Fidelity will not be influenced by business
relationships or outside perspectives that may conflict with the interests
of the funds and their shareholders.
II.
Board of Directors and Corporate Governance
Directors
of public companies play a critical role in ensuring that a company and
its management team serve the interests of its shareholders. Fidelity
believes that through proxy voting, it can help ensure accountability of
management teams and boards of directors, align management and shareholder
interests, and monitor and assess the degree of transparency and
disclosure with respect to executive compensation and board actions
affecting shareholders' rights. The following general guidelines are
intended to reflect these proxy voting principles.
A.
Election of Directors
Fidelity
will generally support director nominees in elections where all directors
are unopposed (uncontested elections), except where board composition
raises concerns, and/or where a director clearly appears to have failed to
exercise reasonable judgment or otherwise failed to sufficiently protect
the interests of shareholders.
Fidelity
will evaluate board composition and generally will oppose the election of
certain or all directors if, by way of example:
1.
Inside or affiliated directors serve on boards that are not composed of a
majority of independent directors.
2.
There are no women on the board or if a board of ten or more members has
fewer than two women directors.
3.
There are no racially or ethnically diverse directors.
4.
The director is a public company CEO who sits on more than two
unaffiliated public company boards.
5.
The director, other than a CEO, sits on more than five unaffiliated public
company boards.
Fidelity
will evaluate board actions and generally will oppose the election of
certain or all directors if, by way of example:
1.
The director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of
the board and its committees on which the director served during the
company's prior fiscal year, absent extenuating circumstances.
2.
The company made a commitment to modify a proposal or practice to conform
to these guidelines, and failed to act on that commitment.
3.
For reasons described below under the sections entitled Compensation and
Anti-Takeover Provisions and Director Elections.
B.
Contested Director Elections
On
occasion, directors are forced to compete for election against outside
director nominees (contested elections). Fidelity believes that strong
management creates long-term shareholder value. As a result, Fidelity
generally will vote in support of management of companies in which the
funds' assets are invested. Fidelity will vote its proxy on a case-by-case
basis in a contested election, taking into consideration a number of
factors, amongst others:
1.
Management's track record and strategic plan for enhancing shareholder
value;
2.
The long-term performance of the company compared to its industry peers;
and
3.
The qualifications of the shareholder's and management's nominees.
Fidelity
will vote for the outcome it believes has the best prospects for
maximizing shareholder value over the long-term.
C.
Cumulative Voting Rights
Under
cumulative voting, each shareholder may exercise the number of votes equal
to the number of shares owned multiplied by the number of directors up for
election. Shareholders may cast all of their votes for a single nominee
(or multiple nominees in varying amounts). With regular (non-cumulative)
voting, by contrast, shareholders cannot allocate more than one vote per
share to any one director nominee. Fidelity believes that cumulative
voting can be detrimental to the overall strength of a board. Generally,
therefore, Fidelity will oppose the introduction of, and support the
elimination of, cumulative voting rights.
D.
Classified Boards
A
classified board is one that elects only a percentage of its members each
year (usually one-third of directors are elected to serve a three-year
term). This means that at each annual meeting only a subset of directors
is up for re-election. Fidelity believes that, in general, classified
boards are not as accountable to shareholders as declassified boards. For
this and other reasons, Fidelity generally will oppose a board's adoption
of a classified board structure and support declassification of existing
boards.
E.
Independent Chairperson
In
general, Fidelity believes that boards should have a process and criteria
for selecting the board chair, and will oppose shareholder proposals
calling for, or recommending the appointment of, a non-executive or
independent chairperson. If, however, based on particular facts and
circumstances, Fidelity believes that appointment of a non-executive or
independent chairperson appears likely to further the interests of
shareholders and promote effective oversight of management by the board of
directors, Fidelity will consider voting to support a proposal for an
independent chairperson under such circumstances.
F.
Majority Voting in Director Elections
In
general, Fidelity supports proposals calling for directors to be elected
by a majority of votes cast if the proposal permits election by a
plurality in the case of contested elections (where, for example, there
are more nominees than board seats). Fidelity may oppose a majority voting
shareholder proposal where a company's board has adopted a policy
requiring the resignation of an incumbent director who fails to receive
the support of a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election.
G.
Proxy Access
Proxy
access proposals generally require a company to amend its by-laws to allow
a qualifying shareholder or group of shareholders to nominate directors on
a company's proxy ballot. Fidelity believes that certain safeguards as to
ownership threshold and duration of ownership are important to assure that
proxy access is not misused by those without a significant economic
interest in the company or those driven by short term goals. Fidelity will
evaluate proxy access proposals on a case-by-case basis, but generally
will support proposals that include ownership of at least 3% (5% in the
case of small-cap companies) of the company's shares outstanding for at
least three years; limit the number of directors that eligible
shareholders may nominate to 20% of the board; and limit to 20 the number
of shareholders that may form a nominating group.
H.
Indemnification of Directors and Officers
In
many instances there are sound reasons to indemnify officers and
directors, so that they may perform their duties without the distraction
of unwarranted litigation or other legal process. Fidelity generally
supports charter and by-law amendments expanding the indemnification of
officers or directors, or limiting their liability for breaches of care
unless Fidelity is dissatisfied with their performance or the proposal is
accompanied by anti-takeover provisions (see Anti-Takeover Provisions and
Shareholders Rights Plans below).
III.
Compensation
Incentive
compensation plans can be complicated and many factors are considered when
evaluating such plans. Fidelity evaluates such plans based on protecting
shareholder interests and our historical knowledge of the company and its
management.
A.
Equity Compensation Plans
Fidelity
encourages the use of reasonably designed equity compensation plans that
align the interest of management with those of shareholders by providing
officers and employees with incentives to increase long-term shareholder
value. Fidelity considers whether such plans are too dilutive to existing
shareholders because dilution reduces the voting power or economic
interest of existing shareholders as a result of an increase in shares
available for distribution to employees in lieu of cash compensation.
Fidelity will generally oppose equity compensation plans or amendments to
authorize additional shares under such plans if:
1.
The company grants stock options and equity awards in a given year at a
rate higher than a benchmark rate ("burn rate") considered appropriate by
Fidelity and there were no circumstances specific to the company or the
compensation plans that leads Fidelity to conclude that the rate of awards
is otherwise acceptable.
2.
The plan includes an evergreen provision, which is a feature that provides
for an automatic increase in the shares available for grant under an
equity compensation plan on a regular basis.
3.
The plan provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity compensation
even though an actual change in control may not occur.
As
to stock option plans, considerations include the following:
1.
Pricing: We believe that options should be priced at 100% of fair market
value on the date they are granted. We generally oppose options priced at
a discount to the market, although the price may be as low as 85% of fair
market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or
cash bonus.
2.
Re-pricing: An "out-of-the-money" (or underwater) option has an exercise
price that is higher than the current price of the stock. We generally
oppose the re-pricing of underwater options because it is not consistent
with a policy of offering options as a form of long-term compensation.
Fidelity also generally opposes a stock option plan if the board or
compensation committee has re-priced options outstanding in the past two
years without shareholder approval.
Fidelity
generally will support a management proposal to exchange, re-price or
tender for cash, outstanding options if the proposed exchange, re-pricing,
or tender offer is consistent with the interests of shareholders, taking
into account a variety of factors such as:
1.
Whether the proposal excludes senior management and directors;
2.
Whether the exchange or re-pricing proposal is value neutral to
shareholders based upon an acceptable pricing model;
3.
The company's relative performance compared to other companies within the
relevant industry or industries;
4.
Economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or
industries in which the company competes; and
5.
Any other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether an
exchange or re-pricing proposal is consistent with the interests of
shareholders.
B.
Employee Stock Purchase Plans
These
plans are designed to allow employees to purchase company stock at a
discounted price and receive favorable tax treatment when the stock is
sold. Fidelity generally will support employee stock purchase plans if the
minimum stock purchase price is equal to or greater than 85% (or at least
75% in the case of non-U.S. companies where a lower minimum stock purchase
price is equal to the prevailing "best practices" in that market) of the
stock's fair market value and the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to
encourage broad based participation in the company's stock.
IV.
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Say on Pay) and Frequency of Say
on Pay Vote
Current
law requires companies to allow shareholders to cast non-binding votes on
the compensation for named executive officers, as well as the frequency of
such votes. Fidelity generally will support proposals to ratify executive
compensation unless the compensation appears misaligned with shareholder
interests or is otherwise problematic, taking into account:
-
The actions taken by the board or compensation committee in the previous
year, including whether the company re-priced or exchanged outstanding
stock options without shareholder approval; adopted or extended a golden
parachute without shareholder approval; or adequately addressed concerns
communicated by Fidelity in the process of discussing executive
compensation;
-
The alignment of executive compensation and company performance relative
to peers; and
-
The structure of the compensation program, including factors such as
whether incentive plan metrics are appropriate, rigorous and transparent;
whether the long-term element of the compensation program is evaluated
over at least a three-year period; the sensitivity of pay to below median
performance; the amount and nature of non-performance-based compensation;
the justification and rationale behind paying discretionary bonuses; the
use of stock ownership guidelines and amount of executive stock ownership;
and how well elements of compensation are disclosed.
When
presented with a frequency of Say on Pay vote, Fidelity generally will
support holding an annual advisory vote on Say on Pay.
A.
Compensation Committee
Directors
serving on the compensation committee of the Board have a special
responsibility to ensure that management is appropriately compensated and
that compensation, among other things, fairly reflects the performance of
the company. Fidelity believes that compensation should align with company
performance as measured by key business metrics. Compensation policies
should align the interests of executives with those of shareholders.
Further, the compensation program should be disclosed in a transparent and
timely manner.
Fidelity
will oppose the election of directors on the compensation committee if:
1.The
compensation appears misaligned with shareholder interests or is otherwise
problematic and results in concerns with:
a)The
alignment of executive compensation and company performance relative to
peers; and
b)The
structure of the compensation program, including factors outlined above
under the section entitled Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Say on
Pay) and Frequency of Say on Pay Vote.
2.
The company has not adequately addressed concerns communicated by Fidelity
in the process of discussing executive compensation.
3.
Within the last year, and without shareholder approval, a company's board
of directors or compensation committee has either:
a)
Re-priced outstanding options, exchanged outstanding options for equity,
or tendered cash for outstanding options; or
b)
Adopted or extended a golden parachute.
B.
Executive Severance Agreements
Executive
severance compensation and benefit arrangements resulting from a
termination following a change in control are known as "golden
parachutes." Fidelity generally will oppose proposals to ratify golden
parachutes where the arrangement includes an excise tax gross-up
provision; single trigger for cash incentives; or may result in a lump sum
payment of cash and acceleration of equity that may total more than three
times annual compensation (salary and bonus) in the event of a termination
following a change in control.
V.
Environmental and Social Issues
Grounded
in our Stewardship Principles, these guidelines outline our views on
corporate governance. As part of our efforts to maximize long-term
shareholder value, we incorporate consideration of human and natural
capital issues into our evaluation of a company, particularly if we
believe an issue is material to that company and the investing fund's
investment objective and strategies.
Fidelity
generally considers management's recommendation and current practice when
voting on shareholder proposals concerning human and natural capital
issues because it generally believes that management and the board are in
the best position to determine how to address these matters. Fidelity,
however, also believes that transparency is critical to sound corporate
governance. Fidelity evaluates shareholder proposals concerning natural
and human capital topics. To engage and vote more effectively on the
growing number of submitted proposals on these topics, we developed a
four-point decision-making framework. In general, Fidelity will more
likely support proposals that:
•Address
a topic that our research has identified as financially material;
•Provide
disclosure of new or additional information to investors, improving
transparency;
•Provide
value to the business or investors by improving the landscape of
investment-decision relevant information or contributing to our
understanding of a company's processes and governance of the topic in
question; and
•Are
realistic or practical for the company to comply with.
VI.
Anti-Takeover Provisions and Shareholders Rights Plans
Fidelity
generally will oppose a proposal to adopt an anti-takeover provision.
Anti-takeover
provisions include:
-
classified boards;
-
"blank check" preferred stock (whose terms and conditions may be expressly
determined by the company's board, for example, with differential voting
rights);
-
golden parachutes;
-
supermajority provisions (that require a large majority (generally between
67-90%) of shareholders to approve corporate changes as compared to a
majority provision that simply requires more than 50% of shareholders to
approve those changes);
-
poison pills;
-
restricting the right to call special meetings;
-
provisions restricting the right of shareholders to set board size; and
-
any other provision that eliminates or limits shareholder rights.
A.
Shareholders Rights Plans ("poison pills")
Poison
pills allow shareholders opposed to a takeover offer to purchase stock at
discounted prices under certain circumstances and effectively give boards
veto power over any takeover offer. While there are advantages and
disadvantages to poison pills, they can be detrimental to the creation of
shareholder value and can help entrench management by deterring
acquisition offers not favored by the board, but that may, in fact, be
beneficial to shareholders.
Fidelity
generally will support a proposal to adopt or extend a poison pill if the
proposal:
1.
Includes a condition in the charter or plan that specifies an expiration
date (sunset provision) of no greater than five years;
2.
Is integral to a business strategy that is expected to result in greater
value for the shareholders;
3.
Requires shareholder approval to be reinstated upon expiration or if
amended;
4.
Contains a mechanism to allow shareholders to consider a bona fide
takeover offer for all outstanding shares without triggering the poison
pill; and
5.
Allows the Fidelity funds to hold an aggregate position of up to 20% of a
company's total voting securities, where permissible.
Fidelity
generally also will support a proposal that is crafted only for the
purpose of protecting a specific tax benefit if it also believes the
proposal is likely to enhance long-term economic returns or maximize
long-term shareholder value.
B.
Shareholder Ability to Call a Special Meeting
Fidelity
generally will support shareholder proposals regarding shareholders' right
to call special meetings if the threshold required to call the special
meeting is no less than 25% of the outstanding stock.
C.
Shareholder Ability to Act by Written Consent
Fidelity
generally will support proposals regarding shareholders' right to act by
written consent if the proposals include appropriate mechanisms for
implementation. This means that proposals must include record date
requests from at least 25% of the outstanding stockholders and consents
must be solicited from all shareholders.
D.
Supermajority Shareholder Vote Requirement
Fidelity
generally will support proposals regarding supermajority provisions if
Fidelity believes that the provisions protect minority shareholder
interests in companies where there is a substantial or dominant
shareholder.
VII.
Anti-Takeover Provisions and Director Elections
Fidelity
will oppose the election of all directors or directors on responsible
committees if the board adopted or extended an anti-takeover provision
without shareholder approval.
Fidelity
will consider supporting the election of directors with respect to poison
pills if:
-
All of the poison pill's features outlined under the Anti-Takeover
Provisions and Shareholders Rights section above are met when a poison
pill is adopted or extended.
-
A board is willing to consider seeking shareholder ratification of, or
adding the features outlined under the Anti-Takeover Provisions and
Shareholders Rights Plans section above to, an existing poison pill. If,
however, the company does not take appropriate action prior to the next
annual shareholder meeting, Fidelity will oppose the election of all
directors at that meeting.
-
It determines that the poison pill was narrowly tailored to protect a
specific tax benefit, and subject to an evaluation of its likelihood to
enhance long-term economic returns or maximize long-term shareholder
value.
VIII.
Capital Structure and Incorporation
These
guidelines are designed to protect shareholders' value in the companies in
which the Fidelity funds invest. To the extent a company's management is
committed and incentivized to maximize shareholder value, Fidelity
generally votes in favor of management proposals; Fidelity may vote
contrary to management where a proposal is overly dilutive to shareholders
and/or compromises shareholder value or other interests. The guidelines
that follow are meant to protect shareholders in these respects.
A.
Increases in Common Stock
Fidelity
may support reasonable increases in authorized shares for a specific
purpose (a stock split or re-capitalization, for example). Fidelity
generally will oppose a provision to increase a company's authorized
common stock if such increase will result in a total number of authorized
shares greater than three times the current number of outstanding and
scheduled to be issued shares, including stock options.
In
the case of real estate investment trusts (REITs), however, Fidelity will
oppose a provision to increase the REIT's authorized common stock if the
increase will result in a total number of authorized shares greater than
five times the current number of outstanding and scheduled to be issued
shares.
B.
Multi-Class Share Structures
Fidelity
generally will support proposals to recapitalize multi-class share
structures into structures that provide equal voting rights for all
shareholders, and generally will oppose proposals to introduce or increase
classes of stock with differential voting rights. However, Fidelity will
evaluate all such proposals in the context of their likelihood to enhance
long-term economic returns or maximize long-term shareholder value.
C.
Incorporation or Reincorporation in another State or Country
Fidelity
generally will support management proposals calling for, or recommending
that, a company reincorporate in another state or country if, on balance,
the economic and corporate governance factors in the proposed jurisdiction
appear reasonably likely to be better aligned with shareholder interests,
taking into account the corporate laws of the current and proposed
jurisdictions and any changes to the company's current and proposed
governing documents. Fidelity will consider supporting these shareholder
proposals in limited cases if, based upon particular facts and
circumstances, remaining incorporated in the current jurisdiction appears
misaligned with shareholder interests.
IX.
Shares of Fidelity Funds or other non-Fidelity Funds
When
a Fidelity fund invests in an underlying Fidelity fund with public
shareholders or a non-Fidelity investment company or business development
company, Fidelity will generally vote in the same proportion as all other
voting shareholders of the underlying fund (this is known as "echo
voting"). Fidelity may not vote if "echo voting" is not operationally
practical or not permitted under applicable laws and regulations. For
Fidelity fund investments in a Fidelity Series Fund, Fidelity generally
will vote in a manner consistent with the recommendation of the Fidelity
Series Fund's Board of Trustees on all proposals, except where not
permitted under applicable laws and regulations.
X.
Foreign Markets
Many
Fidelity funds invest in voting securities issued by companies that are
domiciled outside the United States and are not listed on a U.S.
securities exchange. Corporate governance standards, legal or regulatory
requirements and disclosure practices in foreign countries can differ from
those in the United States. When voting proxies relating to non-U.S.
securities, Fidelity generally will evaluate proposals under these
guidelines and where applicable and feasible, take into consideration
differing laws, regulations and practices in the relevant foreign market
in determining how to vote shares.
In
certain non-U.S. jurisdictions, shareholders voting shares of a company
may be restricted from trading the shares for a period of time around the
shareholder meeting date. Because these trading restrictions can hinder
portfolio management and could result in a loss of liquidity for a fund,
Fidelity generally will not vote proxies in circumstances where such
restrictions apply. In addition, certain non-U.S. jurisdictions require
voting shareholders to disclose current share ownership on a fund-by-fund
basis. When such disclosure requirements apply, Fidelity generally will
not vote proxies in order to safeguard fund holdings information.
XI.
Securities on Loan
Securities
on loan as of a record date cannot be voted. In certain circumstances,
Fidelity may recall a security on loan before record date (for example, in
a particular contested director election or a noteworthy merger or
acquisition). Generally, however, securities out on loan remain on loan
and are not voted because, for example, the income a fund derives from the
loan outweighs the benefit the fund receives from voting the security. In
addition, Fidelity may not be able to recall and vote loaned securities if
Fidelity is unaware of relevant information before record date, or is
otherwise unable to timely recall securities on loan.
XII.
Avoiding Conflicts of Interest
Voting
of shares is conducted in a manner consistent with the best interests of
the Fidelity funds. In other words, securities of a company generally will
be voted in a manner consistent with these guidelines and without regard
to any other Fidelity companies' business relationships.
Fidelity
takes its responsibility to vote shares in the best interests of the funds
seriously and has implemented policies and procedures to address actual
and potential conflicts of interest.
XIII.
Conclusion
Since
its founding more than 75 years ago, Fidelity has been driven by two
fundamental values: 1) putting the long-term interests of our customers
and fund shareholders first; and 2) investing in companies that share our
approach to creating value over the long-term. With these fundamental
principles as guideposts, the funds are managed to provide the greatest
possible return to shareholders consistent with governing laws and the
investment guidelines and objectives of each fund.
Fidelity
believes that there is a strong correlation between sound corporate
governance and enhancing shareholder value. Fidelity, through the
implementation of these guidelines, puts this belief into action through
consistent engagement with portfolio companies on matters contained in
these guidelines, and, ultimately, through the exercise of voting rights
by the funds.
Glossary
- Burn
rate means the total number of stock option and full value equity awards
granted as compensation in a given year divided by the weighted average
common stock outstanding for that same year.
-
For a large-capitalization company, burn rate higher than 1.5%.
-
For a small-capitalization company, burn rate higher than 2.5%.
-
For a micro-capitalization company, burn rate higher than 3.5%.
- Golden
parachute means employment contracts, agreements, or policies that
include an excise tax gross-up provision; single trigger for cash
incentives; or may result in a lump sum payment of cash and acceleration
of equity that may total more than three times annual compensation
(salary and bonus) in the event of a termination following a change in
control.
- Large-capitalization
company means a company included in the Russell 1000® Index or the
Russell Global ex-U.S. Large Cap Index.
- Micro-capitalization
company means a company with market capitalization under US $300
million.
- Poison
pill refers to a strategy employed by a potential takeover / target
company to make its stock less attractive to an acquirer. Poison pills
are generally designed to dilute the acquirer's ownership and value in
the event of a takeover.
- Small-capitalization
company means a company not included in the Russell 1000® Index or the
Russell Global ex-U.S. Large Cap Index that is not a
Micro-Capitalization Company.
|
To
view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period
ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or
visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov. |
Each
fund has entered into a distribution agreement with Fidelity Distributors
Company LLC (FDC), an affiliate of FMR. The principal business address of FDC is
900 Salem Street, Smithfield, Rhode Island 02917. FDC is a broker-dealer
registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and a member of the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
A
fund's distribution agreement calls for FDC to use all reasonable efforts,
consistent with its other business, to secure purchasers for shares of the
funds, which are continuously offered.
Promotional
and administrative expenses in connection with the offer and sale of shares are
paid by FMR.
The
Trustees have approved Distribution and Service Plans with respect to shares of
each fund (the Plans) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act (the
Rule).
The
Rule provides in substance that a fund may not engage directly or indirectly in
financing any activity that is primarily intended to result in the sale of
shares of the fund except pursuant to a plan approved on behalf of the fund
under the Rule.
The
Plans, as approved by the Trustees, allow shares of the funds and/or FMR to
incur certain expenses that might be considered to constitute indirect payment
by the funds of distribution expenses.
The
Plan adopted for each fund or class, as applicable, is described in the
prospectus.
Under
each Plan, if the payment of management fees by the fund to FMR is deemed to be
indirect financing by the fund of the distribution of its shares, such payment
is authorized by the Plan.
Each
Plan specifically recognizes that FMR may use its management fee revenue, as
well as its past profits or its other resources, to pay FDC for expenses
incurred in connection with providing services intended to result in the sale of
shares of the fund and/or shareholder support services. In addition, each Plan
provides that FMR, directly or through FDC, may pay significant amounts to
intermediaries that provide those services.
Currently,
the Board of Trustees has authorized such payments for shares of each
fund.
Prior
to approving each Plan, the Trustees carefully considered all pertinent factors
relating to the implementation of the Plan, and determined that there is a
reasonable likelihood that the Plan will benefit the fund or class, as
applicable, and its shareholders.
In
particular, the Trustees noted that each Plan does not authorize payments by
shares of a fund other than those made to FMR under its management contract with
the fund.
To
the extent that each Plan gives FMR and FDC greater flexibility in connection
with the distribution of shares, additional sales of shares or stabilization of
cash flows may result.
Furthermore,
certain shareholder support services may be provided more effectively under the
Plans by local entities with whom shareholders have other relationships.
TRANSFER AND SERVICE AGENT
AGREEMENTS
Each
fund has entered into a transfer agent agreement with Fidelity Investments
Institutional Operations Company LLC (FIIOC), an affiliate of FMR, which is
located at 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210. Under the terms of
each agreement, FIIOC (or an agent, including an affiliate) performs transfer
agency services.
For
providing transfer agency services, FIIOC receives no fees from each fund.
FIIOC
may collect fees charged in connection with providing certain types of services
such as exchanges, closing out fund balances, maintaining fund positions with
low balances, checkwriting, wire transactions, and providing historical account
research, as applicable.
FIIOC
bears the expense of typesetting, printing, and mailing prospectuses, statements
of additional information, and all other reports, notices, and statements to
existing shareholders, with the exception of proxy statements.
Fund
shares may be owned by intermediaries for the benefit of their customers. In
those instances, a fund may not maintain an account for shareholders, and some
or all of the recordkeeping services for these accounts may be performed by
third parties. FIIOC or an affiliate may make payments to intermediaries
(including affiliates of FIIOC) for recordkeeping and other services.
Retirement
plans may also hold fund shares in the name of the plan or its trustee, rather
than the plan participant. In situations where FIIOC or an affiliate does not
provide recordkeeping services, plan recordkeepers, who may have affiliated
financial intermediaries who sell shares of the funds, may, upon direction, be
paid for providing recordkeeping services to plan participants. Payments may
also be made, upon direction, for other plan expenses. FIIOC may also pay an
affiliate for providing services that otherwise would have been performed by
FIIOC.
In
certain situations where FIIOC or an affiliate provides recordkeeping services
to a retirement plan, payments may be made to pay for plan expenses. The amount
of such payments may be based on investments in particular Fidelity® funds, or
may be fixed for a given period of time. Upon direction, payments may be made to
plan sponsors, or at the direction of plan sponsors, third parties, for expenses
incurred in connection with the plan. FIIOC may also pay an affiliate for
providing services that otherwise would have been performed by FIIOC.
Each
fund has entered into a service agent agreement with Fidelity Service Company,
Inc. (FSC), an affiliate of FMR (or an agent, including an affiliate). Under the
terms of the agreement, FSC calculates the NAV and dividends for shares,
maintains each fund's portfolio and general accounting records, and administers
each fund's securities lending program.
For
providing pricing and bookkeeping services, FSC receives no fee from each
fund.
FMR
bears the cost of transfer agency services and pricing and bookkeeping
services.
During
the fiscal year, the securities lending agent, or the investment adviser (where
the fund does not use a securities lending agent) monitors loan opportunities
for each fund, negotiates the terms of the loans with borrowers, monitors the
value of securities on loan and the value of the corresponding collateral,
communicates with borrowers and the fund's custodian regarding marking to market
the collateral, selects securities to be loaned and allocates those loan
opportunities among lenders, and arranges for the return of the loaned
securities upon the termination of the loan. Income and fees from securities
lending activities for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2023, are shown in the
following table:
Security Lending Activities |
|
Fund(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidelity®
SAI Low Duration Income Fund |
|
Fidelity®
SAI Short-Term Bond Fund |
|
Fidelity®
SAI Total Bond Fund |
Gross income from securities lending
activities |
$ |
1,192,681 |
$ |
1,335,048 |
$ |
8,441,512 |
Fees paid to securities lending agent from a
revenue split |
$ |
0 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
0 |
Administrative fees |
$ |
0 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
0 |
Rebate (paid to borrower) |
$ |
1,129,586 |
$ |
1,219,858 |
$ |
7,641,588 |
Other fees not included in the revenue split
(lending agent fees to NFS) |
$ |
6,185 |
$ |
11,296 |
$ |
75,765 |
Aggregate fees/compensation for securities
lending activities |
$ |
1,135,771 |
$ |
1,231,155 |
$ |
7,717,353 |
Net income from securities lending
activities |
$ |
56,910 |
$ |
103,893 |
$ |
724,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
fund does not pay cash collateral management fees, separate indemnification
fees, or other fees not reflected above.
Trust
Organization.
Fidelity®
SAI Low Duration Income Fund is a fund of Fidelity Salem Street Trust, an
open-end management investment company created under an initial declaration of
trust dated September 5, 1984.
Fidelity®
SAI Short-Term Bond Fund is a fund of Fidelity Salem Street Trust, an open-end
management investment company created under an initial declaration of trust
dated September 5, 1984.
Fidelity®
SAI Total Bond Fund is a fund of Fidelity Salem Street Trust, an open-end
management investment company created under an initial declaration of trust
dated September 5, 1984.
The
Trustees are permitted to create additional funds in the trust and to create
additional classes of a fund.
The
assets of the trust received for the issue or sale of shares of each fund and
all income, earnings, profits, and proceeds thereof, subject to the rights of
creditors, are allocated to such fund, and constitute the underlying assets of
such fund. The underlying assets of each fund in the trust shall be charged with
the liabilities and expenses attributable to such fund. Any general expenses of
the trust shall be allocated between or among any one or more of the
funds.
Shareholder
Liability. The trust is an entity commonly known as a "Massachusetts business
trust." Under Massachusetts law, shareholders of such a trust may, under certain
circumstances, be held personally liable for the obligations of the trust.
The
Declaration of Trust contains an express disclaimer of shareholder liability for
the debts, liabilities, obligations, and expenses of the trust or fund. The
Declaration of Trust provides that the trust shall not have any claim against
shareholders except for the payment of the purchase price of shares and requires
that each agreement, obligation, or instrument entered into or executed by the
trust or the Trustees relating to the trust or to a fund shall include a
provision limiting the obligations created thereby to the trust or to one or
more funds and its or their assets. The Declaration of Trust further provides
that shareholders of a fund shall not have a claim on or right to any assets
belonging to any other fund.
The
Declaration of Trust provides for indemnification out of a fund's property of
any shareholder or former shareholder held personally liable for the obligations
of the fund solely by reason of his or her being or having been a shareholder
and not because of his or her acts or omissions or for some other reason. The
Declaration of Trust also provides that a fund shall, upon request, assume the
defense of any claim made against any shareholder for any act or obligation of
the fund and satisfy any judgment thereon. Thus, the risk of a shareholder
incurring financial loss on account of shareholder liability is limited to
circumstances in which a fund itself would be unable to meet its obligations.
Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC believes that, in view of the
above, the risk of personal liability to shareholders is remote.
Voting
Rights. Each fund's capital consists of shares of beneficial interest.
Shareholders are entitled to one vote for each dollar of net asset value they
own. The voting rights of shareholders can be changed only by a shareholder
vote. Shares may be voted in the aggregate, by fund, and by class.
The
shares have no preemptive or conversion rights. Shares are fully paid and
nonassessable, except as set forth under the heading "Shareholder Liability"
above.
The
trust or a fund or a class may be terminated upon the sale of its assets to, or
merger with, another open-end management investment company, series, or class
thereof, or upon liquidation and distribution of its assets. The Trustees may
reorganize, terminate, merge, or sell all or a portion of the assets of a trust
or a fund or a class without prior shareholder approval. In the event of the
dissolution or liquidation of a trust, shareholders of each of its funds are
entitled to receive the underlying assets of such fund available for
distribution. In the event of the dissolution or liquidation of a fund or a
class, shareholders of that fund or that class are entitled to receive the
underlying assets of the fund or class available for distribution.
Custodian(s).
Citibank,
N.A., 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York, is custodian of the assets of
Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund.
The
Bank of New York Mellon, 1 Wall Street, New York, New York, is custodian of the
assets of Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income Fund and Fidelity® SAI Short-Term
Bond Fund.
Each
custodian is responsible for the safekeeping of a fund's assets and the
appointment of any subcustodian banks and clearing agencies.
The
Bank of New York Mellon and JPMorgan Chase Bank, each headquartered in New York,
also may serve as special purpose custodians of certain assets of taxable funds
in connection with repurchase agreement transactions.
From
time to time, subject to approval by a fund's Treasurer, a Fidelity® fund may
enter into escrow arrangements with other banks if necessary to participate in
certain investment offerings.
FMR,
its officers and directors, its affiliated companies, Members of the Advisory
Board (if any), and Members of the Board of Trustees may, from time to time,
conduct transactions with various banks, including banks serving as custodians
for certain funds advised by FMR or an affiliate. Transactions that have
occurred to date include mortgages and personal and general business loans. In
the judgment of each fund's adviser, the terms and conditions of those
transactions were not influenced by existing or potential custodial or other
fund relationships.
Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firms.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, 101 Seaport Boulevard, Boston, Massachusetts, independent registered public
accounting firm, audits financial statements for Fidelity® SAI Short-Term Bond
Fund and Fidelity® SAI Total Bond Fund and provides other audit, tax, and
related services.
Deloitte
& Touche LLP, 200 Berkeley Street, Boston, Massachusetts, independent
registered public accounting firm, and its affiliates, audit the financial
statements for Fidelity® SAI Low Duration Income Fund and provide other audit,
tax, and related services.
FUND HOLDINGS INFORMATION
Each
fund views holdings information as sensitive and limits its dissemination. The
Board authorized FMR to establish and administer guidelines for the
dissemination of fund holdings information, which may be amended at any time
without prior notice. FMR's Disclosure Policy Committee (comprising executive
officers of FMR) evaluates disclosure policy with the goal of serving a fund's
best interests by striking an appropriate balance between providing information
about a fund's portfolio and protecting a fund from potentially harmful
disclosure. The Board reviews the administration and modification of these
guidelines and receives reports from the funds' chief compliance officer
periodically.
Each
fund will provide a full list of holdings monthly on www.fidelity.com 30 days
after the month-end (excluding high income security holdings, which generally
will be presented collectively monthly and included in a list of full holdings
60 days after month-end).
Unless
otherwise indicated, this information will be available on the web site until
updated for the next applicable period.
A
fund may also from time to time provide or make available to the Board or third
parties upon request specific fund level performance attribution information and
statistics. Third parties may include fund shareholders or prospective fund
shareholders, members of the press, consultants, and ratings and ranking
organizations. Nonexclusive examples of performance attribution information and
statistics may include (i) the allocation of a fund's portfolio holdings and
other investment positions among various asset classes, sectors, industries, and
countries, (ii) the characteristics of the stock and bond components of a fund's
portfolio holdings and other investment positions, (iii) the attribution of fund
returns by asset class, sector, industry, and country and (iv) the volatility
characteristics of a fund.
FMR's
Disclosure Policy Committee may approve a request for fund level performance
attribution and statistics as long as (i) such disclosure does not enable the
receiving party to recreate the complete or partial portfolio holdings of any
Fidelity® fund prior to such fund's public disclosure of its portfolio holdings
and (ii) Fidelity has made a good faith determination that the requested
information is not material given the particular facts and circumstances.
Fidelity may deny any request for performance attribution information and other
statistical information about a fund made by any person, and may do so for any
reason or for no reason.
Disclosure
of non-public portfolio holdings information for a Fidelity® fund's portfolio
may only be provided pursuant to the guidelines below.
The
Use of Holdings In Connection With Fund Operations. Material non-public holdings
information may be provided as part of the activities associated with managing
Fidelity® funds to: entities which, by explicit agreement or by virtue of their
respective duties to the fund, are required to maintain the confidentiality of
the information disclosed; other parties if legally required; or persons FMR
believes will not misuse the disclosed information. These entities, parties, and
persons include, but are not limited to: a fund's trustees; a fund's manager,
its sub-advisers, if any, and their affiliates whose access persons are subject
to a code of ethics (including portfolio managers of affiliated funds of funds);
contractors who are subject to a confidentiality agreement; a fund's auditors; a
fund's custodians; proxy voting service providers; financial printers; pricing
service vendors; broker-dealers in connection with the purchase or sale of
securities or requests for price quotations or bids on one or more securities;
securities lending agents; counsel to a fund or its Independent Trustees;
regulatory authorities; stock exchanges and other listing organizations; parties
to litigation; third parties in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding relating
to a fund holding; and third parties who have submitted a standing request to a
money market fund for daily holdings information. Non-public holdings
information may also be provided to an issuer regarding the number or percentage
of its shares that are owned by a fund and in connection with redemptions in
kind.
Other
Uses Of Holdings Information. In addition, each fund may provide material
non-public holdings information to (i) third parties that calculate information
derived from holdings for use by FMR, a sub-adviser, or their affiliates, (ii)
ratings and rankings organizations, and (iii) an investment adviser, trustee, or
their agents to whom holdings are disclosed for due diligence purposes or in
anticipation of a merger involving a fund. Each individual request is reviewed
by the Disclosure Policy Committee which must find, in its sole discretion that,
based on the specific facts and circumstances, the disclosure appears unlikely
to be harmful to a fund. Entities receiving this information must have in place
control mechanisms to reasonably ensure or otherwise agree that, (a) the
holdings information will be kept confidential, (b) no employee shall use the
information to effect trading or for their personal benefit, and (c) the nature
and type of information that they, in turn, may disclose to third parties is
limited. FMR relies primarily on the existence of non-disclosure agreements
and/or control mechanisms when determining that disclosure is not likely to be
harmful to a fund.
At
this time, the entities receiving information described in the preceding
paragraph are: Factset Research Systems Inc. (full or partial fund holdings
daily, on the next business day); Standard & Poor's Ratings Services (full
holdings weekly (generally as of the previous Friday), generally 5 business days
thereafter); MSCI Inc. and certain affiliates (full or partial fund holdings
daily, on the next business day); and Bloomberg, L.P. (full holdings daily, on
the next business day).
FMR,
its affiliates, or the funds will not enter into any arrangements with third
parties from which they derive consideration for the disclosure of material
non-public holdings information. If, in the future, such an arrangement is
desired, prior Board approval would be sought and any such arrangements would be
disclosed in the funds' SAI.
There
can be no assurance that the funds' policies and procedures with respect to
disclosure of fund portfolio holdings will prevent the misuse of such
information by individuals and firms that receive such information.
Each
fund's financial statements and financial highlights for the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2023, and report of the independent registered public accounting
firm, are included in each fund's
annual report and are
incorporated herein by reference.
Total
annual operating expenses as shown in the prospectus fee table may differ from
the ratios of expenses to average net assets in the financial highlights because
total annual operating expenses as shown in the prospectus fee table include any
acquired fund fees and expenses, whereas the ratios of expenses in the financial
highlights do not, except to the extent any acquired fund fees and expenses
relate to an entity, such as a wholly-owned subsidiary, with which a fund's
financial statements are consolidated. Acquired funds include other investment
companies (such as Central funds or other underlying funds) in which a fund
has invested, if and to the extent it is permitted to do so.
Total
annual operating expenses in the prospectus fee table and the financial
highlights do not include any expenses associated with investments in certain
structured or synthetic products that may rely on the exception from the
definition of "investment company" provided by section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the
1940 Act.
Fidelity,
the Fidelity Investments Logo and all other Fidelity trademarks or service marks
used herein are trademarks or service marks of FMR LLC. Any third-party marks
that are used herein are trademarks or service marks of their respective owners.
© 2023 FMR LLC. All rights reserved.