ck0001683471-20231231
RiverNorth
Patriot ETF(FLDZ)
RiverNorth
Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPCZ)
each
a series of Listed Funds Trust
Listed
on the Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.
STATEMENT
OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
April 30,
2024
This
Statement of Additional Information (the “SAI”) is not a prospectus and should
be read in conjunction with the prospectus of the RiverNorth Patriot ETF (the
“Patriot ETF”) and the RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (the “Enhanced
Pre-Merger SPAC ETF”) (each, a “Fund,” and collectively, the “Funds”), each a
series of Listed Funds Trust (the “Trust”), dated April 30, 2024, as may be
supplemented from time to time (the “Prospectus”). Capitalized terms used in
this SAI that are not defined have the same meaning as in the Prospectus, unless
otherwise noted. A copy of the Prospectus may be obtained, without charge, by
calling the Funds at 1-800-617-0004, visiting www.true-shares.com, or writing to
the Funds, c/o U.S. Bank Global Fund Services, P.O. Box 701, Milwaukee,
Wisconsin 53201-0701.
The
Funds’ audited financial statements for the most recent fiscal year are
incorporated into this SAI by reference to the Funds’ most recent Annual
Report
to Shareholders (File No. 811-23226). You may obtain a copy of the Funds’ Annual
Report at no charge by contacting the Funds at the address or phone number noted
above.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
GENERAL
INFORMATION ABOUT THE TRUST
The
Trust is an open-end management investment company consisting of multiple
investment series. This SAI relates only to the Funds. The Trust was organized
as a Delaware statutory trust on August 26, 2016. The Trust is registered with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (together with the rules and regulations adopted thereunder,
the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company, and the offering
of each Fund’s shares (collectively, the “Shares”) is registered under the
Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”). The Trust is governed by its
Board of Trustees (the “Board”).
TrueMark
Investments, LLC (the “Adviser”) serves as the Funds’ investment adviser and
RiverNorth Capital Management, LLC (the “Sub-Adviser”) serves as the Funds’
investment sub-adviser.
Each
Fund offers and issues Shares at their net asset value (“NAV”) only in
aggregations of a specified number of Shares (each, a “Creation Unit”). Each
Fund generally offers and issues Shares in exchange for a basket of securities
(“Deposit Securities”) together with the deposit of a specified cash payment
(“Cash Component”). The Trust reserves the right to permit or require the
substitution of a “cash in lieu” amount (“Deposit Cash”) to be added to the Cash
Component to replace any Deposit Security or other instrument in a Fund’s
portfolio. Shares are listed on the Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the “Exchange”) and
trade on the Exchange at market prices that may differ from the Shares’ NAV.
Shares also are redeemable only in Creation Unit aggregations, primarily for a
basket of Deposit Securities together with a Cash Component. A Creation Unit of
each Fund generally consists of 10,000 Shares, though this may change from time
to time. As a practical matter, only institutions or large investors purchase or
redeem Creation Units. Except when aggregated in Creation Units, Shares are not
redeemable securities.
Shares
may be issued in advance of receipt of Deposit Securities subject to various
conditions, including a requirement to maintain on deposit with the Trust cash
at least equal to a specified percentage of the value of the missing Deposit
Securities, as set forth in the Participant Agreement (as defined below). The
Trust may impose a transaction fee for each creation or redemption. In all
cases, such fees will be limited in accordance with the requirements of the SEC
applicable to management investment companies offering redeemable securities. As
in the case of other publicly traded securities, brokers’ commissions on
transactions in the secondary market will be based on negotiated commission
rates at customary levels.
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION ABOUT INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, AND RELATED
RISKS
Each
Fund’s investment objective and principal investment strategies are described in
the Prospectus. The following information supplements, and should be read in
conjunction with, the Prospectus. For a description of certain permitted
investments, see “Description
of Permitted Investments”
in this SAI.
With
respect to each Fund’s investments, unless otherwise noted, if a percentage
limitation on investment is adhered to at the time of investment or contract, a
subsequent increase or decrease as a result of market movement or redemption
will not result in a violation of such investment limitation.
Non-Diversification
Each
Fund is classified as a non-diversified investment company under the 1940 Act. A
“non-diversified” classification means that a Fund is not limited by the 1940
Act with regard to the percentage of its total assets that may be invested in
the securities of a single issuer. This means that a Fund may invest a greater
portion of its total assets in the securities of a single issuer or a smaller
number of issuers than if it was a diversified fund. The securities of a
particular issuer may constitute a greater portion of a Fund’s portfolio. This
may have an adverse effect on a Fund’s performance or subject Shares to greater
price volatility than more diversified investment companies. Moreover, in
pursuing its objective, a Fund may hold the securities of a single issuer in an
amount exceeding 10% of the value of the outstanding securities of the issuer,
subject to restrictions imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the “Code”). In particular, as a Fund’s size grows and its assets increase, it
will be more likely to hold more than 10% of the securities of a single issuer
if the issuer has a relatively small public float as compared to other
components in a Fund’s portfolio.
Although
each Fund is non-diversified for purposes of the 1940 Act, the Funds intend to
maintain the required level of diversification and otherwise conduct its
operations so as to qualify as a “regulated investment company” (“RIC”) within
the meaning of Subchapter M of the Code. Compliance with the diversification
requirements of the Code may limit the investment flexibility of the Funds and
may make it less likely that the Funds will meet their investment objectives. To
qualify as a RIC under the Code, a Fund must meet the Diversification
Requirement described in the section titled “Federal Income Taxes” in this SAI.
General
Risks
The
value of a Fund’s portfolio securities may fluctuate with changes in the
financial condition of an issuer or counterparty, changes in specific economic
or political conditions that affect a particular security or issuer and changes
in general economic or political conditions. An investor in a Fund could lose
money over short or long periods of time.
There
can be no guarantee that a liquid market for the securities held by a Fund will
be maintained. The existence of a liquid trading market for certain securities
may depend on whether dealers will make a market in such securities. There can
be no assurance that a market will be made or maintained or that any such market
will be or remain liquid. The price at which securities may be sold and the
value
of Shares will be adversely affected if trading markets for a Fund’s portfolio
securities are limited or absent, or if bid/ask spreads are wide.
Cybersecurity
Risk. Investment
companies, such as the Funds, and their service providers may be subject to
operational and information security risks resulting from cyber-attacks.
Cyber-attacks include, among other behaviors, stealing or corrupting data
maintained online or digitally, denial of service attacks on websites, the
unauthorized release of confidential information or various other forms of
cybersecurity breaches. Cyber-attacks affecting a Fund or the Adviser,
Sub-Adviser, custodian, transfer agent, intermediaries and other third-party
service providers may adversely impact a Fund. For instance, cyber-attacks may
interfere with the processing of shareholder transactions, impact a Fund’s
ability to calculate its NAV, cause the release of private shareholder
information or confidential company information, impede trading, subject a Fund
to regulatory fines or financial losses, and cause reputational damage. A Fund
also may incur additional costs for cybersecurity risk management purposes.
Similar types of cybersecurity risks also are present for issuers of securities
in which a Fund invests, which could result in material adverse consequences for
such issuers and may cause a Fund’s investments in such portfolio companies to
lose value.
Recent
Events.
Beginning in the first quarter of 2020, financial markets in the United States
and around the world experienced extreme and, in many cases, unprecedented
volatility and severe losses due to the global pandemic caused by COVID-19, a
novel coronavirus. The pandemic resulted in a wide range of social and economic
disruptions, including closed borders, voluntary or compelled quarantines of
large populations, stressed healthcare systems, reduced or prohibited domestic
or international travel, and supply chain disruptions affecting the United
States and many other countries. Some sectors of the economy and individual
issuers experienced particularly large losses as a result of these disruptions.
Although the immediate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have dissipated, global
markets and economies continue to contend with the ongoing and long-term impact
of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resultant market volatility and economic
disruptions. It is unknown how long events related to the pandemic will persist,
whether they will reoccur in the future, whether efforts to support the economy
and financial markets will be successful, and what additional implications may
follow from the pandemic. The impact of these events and other epidemics or
pandemics in the future could adversely affect Fund performance.
Geopolitical
tensions introduce uncertainty into global markets. Russia’s military invasion
of Ukraine in February 2022, the resulting responses by the United States and
other countries, and the potential for wider conflict could increase volatility
and uncertainty in the financial markets and adversely affect regional and
global economies. The United States and other countries have imposed
broad-ranging economic sanctions on Russia, certain Russian individuals, banking
entities and corporations, and Belarus as a response to Russia’s invasion of
Ukraine and may impose sanctions on other countries that provide military or
economic support to Russia. The extent and duration of Russia’s military actions
and the repercussions of such actions (including any retaliatory actions or
countermeasures that may be taken by those subject to sanctions, including
cyber-attacks) are impossible to predict, but could result in significant market
disruptions, including in certain industries or sectors, such as the oil and
natural gas markets, and may negatively affect global supply chains, inflation
and global growth.
Similarly,
escalations beginning in October 2023 of the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict
present a potential risk for wider conflict that could negatively affect
financial markets due to a myriad of interconnected factors. This conflict could
disrupt regional trade and supply chains, potentially affecting U.S. businesses
with exposure to the region. For example, the Red Sea crisis has led to
disruption of international maritime trade and the global supply chain, which
has had a direct impact on countries and regions that rely on such routes for
the supply of energy and/or food and companies that typically ship goods or
receive components by way of the Red Sea. Additionally, the Middle East plays a
pivotal role in the global energy sector, and prolonged instability could impact
oil prices, leading to increased costs for businesses and consumers.
Furthermore, the U.S.’s diplomatic ties and commitments in the region mean that
it might become more directly involved, either diplomatically or militarily,
diverting attention and resources. These and any related events could
significantly impact a Fund’s performance and the value of an investment in a
Fund, even if the Fund does not have direct exposure.
DESCRIPTION
OF PERMITTED INVESTMENTS
The
following are descriptions of the Funds’ permitted investments and investment
practices and the associated risk factors. A Fund will only invest in any of the
following instruments, or ETFs that invest in such instruments, or engage in any
of the following investment practices if such investment or activity is
consistent with that Fund’s investment objective and permitted by the Fund’s
stated investment policies.
Borrowing
Although
the Patriot ETF does not intend to borrow money, the Fund may do so to the
extent permitted by the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, the Patriot ETF may borrow
up to one-third (1/3) of its total assets. The Patriot ETF will borrow money
only for short-term or emergency purposes. Such borrowing is not for investment
purposes and will be repaid by the borrowing Fund promptly. Borrowing will tend
to exaggerate the effect on NAV of any increase or decrease in the market value
of the borrowing Fund’s portfolio. Money borrowed will be subject to interest
costs that may or may not be recovered by earnings on the securities purchased.
The Patriot ETF also may be required to maintain minimum average balances in
connection with a borrowing or to pay a commitment or other fee to maintain a
line of credit; either of these requirements would increase the cost of
borrowing over the stated interest rate.
The
Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF may borrow money to the extent permitted under the
1940 Act, as such may be interpreted or modified by regulatory authorities
having jurisdiction, from time to time. Borrowing for investment purposes is one
form of leverage. Leveraging investments, by purchasing securities with borrowed
money, is a speculative technique that increases investment risk, but also
increases investment opportunity. Because substantially all of the Fund’s assets
will fluctuate in value, whereas the interest obligations on borrowings may be
fixed, the NAV per share of the Fund will increase more when the Fund’s
portfolio assets increase in value and decrease more when the Fund’s portfolio
assets decrease in value than would otherwise be the case. Moreover, interest
costs on borrowings may fluctuate with changing market rates of interest and may
partially offset or exceed the returns on the borrowed funds. Under adverse
conditions, the Fund might have to sell portfolio securities to meet interest or
principal payments at a time when investment considerations would not favor such
sales.
The
Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF also may borrow money to facilitate management of
the Fund’s portfolio by enabling the Fund to meet redemption requests when the
liquidation of portfolio instruments would be inconvenient or disadvantageous.
Such borrowing is not for investment purposes and will be repaid by the Fund
promptly. As required by the 1940 Act, the Fund must maintain continuous asset
coverage (total assets, including assets acquired with borrowed funds, less
liabilities exclusive of borrowings) of 300% of all amounts borrowed. If, at any
time, the value of the Fund’s assets should fail to meet this 300% coverage
test, the Fund, within three days (not including Sundays and holidays), will
reduce the amount of the Fund’s borrowings to the extent necessary to meet this
300% coverage requirement. Maintenance of this percentage limitation may result
in the sale of portfolio securities at a time when investment considerations
otherwise indicate that it would be disadvantageous to do so.
Borrowing
will tend to exaggerate the effect on NAV of any increase or decrease in the
market value of the borrowing Fund’s portfolio. Money borrowed will be subject
to interest costs that may or may not be recovered by earnings on the securities
purchased. The Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF also may be required to maintain
minimum average balances in connection with a borrowing or to pay a commitment
or other fee to maintain a line of credit; either of these requirements would
increase the cost of borrowing over the stated interest rate. In addition to the
foregoing, the Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF is authorized to borrow money as a
temporary measure for extraordinary or emergency purposes in amounts not in
excess of 5% of the value of the Fund’s total assets. Borrowings for
extraordinary or emergency purposes are not subject to the foregoing 300% asset
coverage requirement.
Depositary
Receipts
To
the extent a Fund invests in stocks of foreign corporations, such Fund’s
investment in securities of foreign companies may be in the form of depositary
receipts or other securities convertible into securities of foreign issuers.
American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) are dollar-denominated receipts
representing interests in the securities of a foreign issuer, which securities
may not necessarily be denominated in the same currency as the securities into
which they may be converted. ADRs are receipts typically issued by U.S. banks
and trust companies which evidence ownership of underlying securities issued by
a foreign corporation. Generally, ADRs in registered form are designed for use
in domestic securities markets and are traded on exchanges or over-the-counter
in the United States.
Global
Depositary Receipts (“GDRs”), European Depositary Receipts (“EDRs”), and
International Depositary Receipts (“IDRs”) are similar to ADRs in that they are
certificates evidencing ownership of shares of a foreign issuer; however, GDRs,
EDRs, and IDRs may be issued in bearer form and denominated in other currencies
and are generally designed for use in specific or multiple securities markets
outside the U.S. EDRs, for example, are designed for use in European securities
markets, while GDRs are designed for use throughout the world. Depositary
receipts will not necessarily be denominated in the same currency as their
underlying securities.
The
Funds will not invest in any unlisted depositary receipts or any depositary
receipt that the Adviser or Sub-Adviser deems to be illiquid or for which
pricing information is not readily available. In addition, all depositary
receipts generally must be sponsored. However, a Fund may invest in unsponsored
depositary receipts under certain limited circumstances. The issuers of
unsponsored depositary receipts are not obligated to disclose material
information in the United States and, therefore, there may be less information
available regarding such issuers and there may not be a correlation between such
information and the value of the depositary receipts.
Equity
Securities
Equity
securities, such as the common stock of an issuer, are subject to stock market
fluctuations and therefore may experience volatile changes in value as market
conditions, consumer sentiment or the financial condition of the issuers change.
A decrease in value of the equity securities in a Fund’s portfolio also may
cause the value of such Fund’s Shares to decline.
An
investment in the Funds should be made with an understanding of the risks
inherent in an investment in equity securities, including the risk that the
financial condition of issuers may become impaired or that the general condition
of the stock market may deteriorate (either of which may cause a decrease in the
value of a Fund’s portfolio securities and therefore a decrease in the value of
Shares). Common stocks are susceptible to general stock market fluctuations and
to volatile increases and decreases in value as market confidence and
perceptions change. These investor perceptions are based on various and
unpredictable factors, including expectations regarding government, economic,
monetary and fiscal policies; inflation and interest rates; economic expansion
or contraction; and global or regional political, economic or banking
crises.
Holders
of common stocks incur more risk than holders of preferred stocks and debt
obligations because common stockholders, as owners of the issuer, generally have
inferior rights to receive payments from the issuer in comparison with the
rights of creditors or
holders
of debt obligations or preferred stocks. Further, unlike debt securities, which
typically have a stated principal amount payable at maturity (whose value,
however, is subject to market fluctuations prior thereto), or preferred stocks,
which typically have a liquidation preference and which may have stated optional
or mandatory redemption provisions, common stocks have neither a fixed principal
amount nor a maturity. Common stock values are subject to market fluctuations as
long as the common stock remains outstanding.
Types
of Equity Securities:
Common
Stocks
— Common stocks represent units of ownership in a company. Common stocks usually
carry voting rights and earn dividends. Unlike preferred stocks, which are
described below, dividends on common stocks are not fixed but are declared at
the discretion of the company’s board of directors.
Preferred
Stocks —
Preferred stocks also are units of ownership in a company. Preferred stocks
normally have preference over common stock in the payment of dividends and the
liquidation of the company. However, in all other respects, preferred stocks are
subordinated to the liabilities of the issuer. Unlike common stocks, preferred
stocks are generally not entitled to vote on corporate matters. Types of
preferred stocks include adjustable-rate preferred stock, fixed dividend
preferred stock, perpetual preferred stock, and sinking fund preferred
stock.
Generally,
the market values of preferred stock with a fixed dividend rate and no
conversion element vary inversely with interest rates and perceived credit
risk.
Initial
Public Offerings (“IPOs”)
— IPOs may be more volatile than other securities, and may have a magnified
performance impact on funds with small asset bases. The impact of IPOs on the
Fund’s performance likely will decrease as the Fund’s asset size increases,
which could reduce the Fund’s total returns. IPOs may not be consistently
available to the Fund for investing, particularly as the Fund’s asset base
grows. Because IPO shares frequently are volatile in price, the Fund may hold
IPO shares for a very short period of time. This may increase the turnover of
the Fund’s portfolio and may lead to increased expenses for the Fund, such as
commissions and transaction costs. By selling IPO shares, the Fund may realize
taxable gains it will subsequently distribute to shareholders. In addition, the
market for IPO shares can be speculative and/or inactive for extended periods of
time. The limited number of shares available for trading in some IPOs may make
it more difficult for the Fund to buy or sell significant amounts of shares
without an unfavorable impact on prevailing prices. Holders of IPO shares can be
affected by substantial dilution in the value of their shares, by sales of
additional shares and by concentration of control in existing management and
principal shareholders. The Fund’s investments in IPO shares may include the
securities of unseasoned companies (companies with less than three years of
continuous operations), which presents risks considerably greater than common
stocks of more established companies. These companies may have limited operating
histories and their prospects for profitability may be uncertain. These
companies may be involved in new and evolving businesses and may be vulnerable
to competition and changes in technology, markets and economic conditions. They
may be more dependent on key managers and third parties and may have limited
product lines.
Rights
and Warrants —
A right is a privilege granted to existing shareholders of a corporation to
subscribe to shares of a new issue of common stock before it is issued. Rights
normally have a short life of usually two to four weeks, are freely transferable
and entitle the holder to buy the new common stock at a lower price than the
public offering price. Warrants are securities that are usually issued together
with a debt security, preferred stock or the common shares of publicly listed
special purpose acquisition companies (“SPACs”) and that give the holder the
right to buy a proportionate amount of common stock at a specified price.
Warrants are freely transferable and are traded on major exchanges. Unlike
rights, warrants normally have a life that is measured in years and entitles the
holder to buy common stock of a company at a price that is usually higher than
the market price at the time the warrant is issued. Corporations often issue
warrants to make the accompanying debt security more attractive.
An
investment in warrants and rights may entail greater risks than certain other
types of investments. Generally, rights and warrants do not carry the right to
receive dividends or exercise voting rights with respect to the underlying
securities, and they do not represent any rights in the assets of the issuer. In
addition, their value does not necessarily change with the value of the
underlying securities, and they cease to have value if they are not exercised on
or before their expiration date. Investing in rights and warrants increases the
potential profit or loss to be realized from the investment as compared with
investing the same amount in the underlying securities.
Large-Capitalization
Companies —
Investments in large-capitalization companies may go in and out of favor based
on market and economic conditions and may underperform other market segments.
Some large-capitalization companies may be unable to respond quickly to new
competitive challenges, such as changes in technology and consumer tastes, and
may not be able to attain the high growth rate of successful smaller companies,
especially during extended periods of economic expansion. As such, returns on
investments in stocks of large-capitalization companies could trail the returns
on investments in stocks of small- and mid-capitalization companies.
Small-
and Mid-Capitalization Companies —
The securities of small- and mid-capitalization companies may be more vulnerable
to adverse issuer, market, political, or economic developments than securities
of larger-capitalization companies. The securities of small- and
mid-capitalization companies generally trade in lower volumes and are subject to
greater and more unpredictable price changes than larger capitalization stocks
or the stock market as a whole. Some small- or mid-capitalization companies have
limited product lines, markets, and financial and managerial resources and tend
to concentrate on fewer geographical markets relative to larger
capitalization
companies. There is typically less publicly available information concerning
small- and mid-capitalization companies than for larger, more established
companies. Small- and mid-capitalization companies also may be particularly
sensitive to changes in interest rates, government regulation, borrowing costs,
and earnings.
Tracking
Stocks —
A tracking stock is a separate class of common stock whose value is linked to a
specific business unit or operating division within a larger company, and which
is designed to “track” the performance of such business unit or division. The
tracking stock may pay dividends to shareholders independent of the parent
company. The parent company, rather than the business unit or division,
generally is the issuer of tracking stock. However, holders of the tracking
stock may not have the same rights as holders of the company’s common
stock.
Illiquid
Investments
A
Fund may not acquire any illiquid investment if, immediately after the
acquisition, the Fund would have invested more than 15% of its net assets in
illiquid investments. An illiquid investment means any investment that a Fund
reasonably expects cannot be sold or disposed of in current market conditions in
seven calendar days or less without the sale or disposition significantly
changing the market value of the investment. If illiquid investments exceed 15%
of the Fund’s net assets, certain remedial actions will be taken as required by
Rule 22e-4 under the 1940 Act and the Fund’s policies and procedures.
A
Fund may not be able to sell illiquid securities when the Adviser or
Sub-Adviser, as applicable, considers it desirable to do so or may have to sell
such securities at a price that is lower than the price that could be obtained
if the securities were more liquid. In addition, the sale of illiquid securities
also may require more time and may result in higher dealer discounts and other
selling expenses than does the sale of securities that are not illiquid.
Illiquid securities also may be more difficult to value due to the
unavailability of reliable market quotations for such securities, and investment
in illiquid securities may have an adverse impact on NAV.
Investment
Company Securities
The
Funds may invest in the securities of other investment companies, including ETFs
and money market funds, subject to applicable limitations under
Section 12(d)(1) of the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder. Pursuant to
Section 12(d)(1), a Fund may invest in the securities of another investment
company (the “acquired company”) provided that such Fund, immediately after such
purchase or acquisition, does not own in the aggregate: (i) more than 3% of the
total outstanding voting stock of the acquired company; (ii) securities issued
by the acquired company having an aggregate value in excess of 5% of the value
of the total assets of such Fund; or (iii) securities issued by the acquired
company and all other investment companies (other than treasury stock of such
Fund) having an aggregate value in excess of 10% of the value of the total
assets of the applicable Fund. Under certain circumstances, including in
compliance with Rule 12d1-4 under the 1940 Act, the Funds may invest its assets
in securities of investment companies, including money market funds, in excess
of the limits discussed above.
Investing
in another pooled vehicle exposes a Fund to all the risks of that pooled
vehicle. In addition, if a Fund invests in and, thus, is a shareholder of,
another investment company, the Fund’s shareholders will indirectly bear the
Fund’s proportionate share of the fees and expenses paid by such other
investment company, including advisory fees, in addition to both the management
fees payable directly by the Fund to the Fund’s own investment adviser and the
other expenses that the Fund bears directly in connection with the Fund’s own
operations.
Other
Short-Term Instruments
The
Funds may invest in short-term instruments, including money market instruments,
on an ongoing basis to provide liquidity or for other reasons. Money market
instruments are generally short-term investments that may include but are not
limited to: (i) shares of money market funds; (ii) obligations issued
or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities
(including government-sponsored enterprises); (iii) negotiable certificates
of deposit (“CDs”), bankers’ acceptances, fixed time deposits and other
obligations of U.S. and foreign banks (including foreign branches) and similar
institutions; (iv) commercial paper rated at the date of purchase “Prime-1”
by Moody’s or “A‑1” by S&P or, if unrated, of comparable quality as
determined by the Sub-Adviser; (v) non-convertible corporate debt
securities (e.g.,
bonds and debentures) with remaining maturities at the date of purchase of not
more than 397 days and that satisfy the rating requirements set forth in Rule
2a-7 under the 1940 Act; and (vi) short-term U.S. dollar-denominated
obligations of foreign banks (including U.S. branches) that, in the opinion of
the Sub-Adviser, are of comparable quality to obligations of U.S. banks which
may be purchased by a Fund. Any of these instruments may be purchased on a
current or a forward-settled basis. Money market instruments also include shares
of money market funds. Time deposits are non-negotiable deposits maintained in
banking institutions for specified periods of time at stated interest rates.
Bankers’ acceptances are time drafts drawn on commercial banks by borrowers,
usually in connection with international transactions.
Real
Estate Investment Trusts (“REITs”)
A
U.S. REIT is a corporation or business trust (that would otherwise be taxed as a
corporation) which meets the definitional requirements of the Code. The Code
permits a qualifying REIT to deduct from taxable income the dividends paid,
thereby effectively eliminating corporate level federal income tax. To meet the
definitional requirements of the Code, a REIT must, among other things: invest
substantially all of its assets in interests in real estate (including mortgages
and other REITs), cash and government securities;
derive
most of its income from rents from real property or interest on loans secured by
mortgages on real property; and, in general, distribute annually 90% or more of
its taxable income (other than net capital gains) to shareholders.
REITs
are sometimes informally characterized as Equity REITs and Mortgage REITs. An
Equity REIT invests primarily in the fee ownership or leasehold ownership of
land and buildings (e.g.,
commercial equity REITs and residential equity REITs); a Mortgage REIT invests
primarily in mortgages on real property, which may secure construction,
development, or long-term loans.
REITs
may be affected by changes in underlying real estate values, which may have an
exaggerated effect to the extent that REITs in which a Fund invests may
concentrate investments in particular geographic regions or property types.
Additionally, rising interest rates may cause investors in REITs to demand a
higher annual yield from future distributions, which may in turn decrease market
prices for equity securities issued by REITs. Rising interest rates also
generally increase the costs of obtaining financing, which could cause the value
of a Fund’s investments to decline. During periods of declining interest rates,
certain Mortgage REITs may hold mortgages that the mortgagors elect to prepay,
which prepayment may diminish the yield on securities issued by such Mortgage
REITs. In addition, Mortgage REITs may be affected by the ability of borrowers
to repay when due the debt extended by the REIT and Equity REITs may be affected
by the ability of tenants to pay rent.
Certain
REITs have relatively small market capitalization, which may tend to increase
the volatility of the market price of securities issued by such REITs.
Furthermore, REITs are dependent upon specialized management skills, have
limited diversification and are, therefore, subject to risks inherent in
operating and financing a limited number of projects. By investing in REITs
indirectly through a Fund, a shareholder will bear not only his or her
proportionate share of the expenses of the Fund, but also, indirectly, similar
expenses of the REITs. REITs depend generally on their ability to generate cash
flow to make distributions to shareholders.
In
addition to these risks, Equity REITs may be affected by changes in the value of
the underlying property owned by the trusts, while Mortgage REITs may be
affected by the quality of any credit extended. Further, Equity and Mortgage
REITs are dependent upon management skills and generally may not be diversified.
Equity and Mortgage REITs are also subject to heavy cash flow dependency
defaults by borrowers and self-liquidation. In addition, Equity and Mortgage
REITs could possibly fail to qualify for the favorable U.S. federal income tax
treatment generally available to U.S. REITs under the Code or fail to maintain
their exemptions from registration under the 1940 Act. The above factors also
may adversely affect a borrower’s or a lessee’s ability to meet its obligations
to the REIT. In the event of default by a borrower or lessee, the REIT may
experience delays in enforcing its rights as a mortgagee or lessor and may incur
substantial costs associated with protecting its investments.
Repurchase
Agreements
Each
Fund may invest in repurchase agreements with commercial banks, brokers, or
dealers to generate income from its excess cash balances and to invest in
securities lending cash collateral. A repurchase agreement is an agreement under
which a Fund acquires a financial instrument (e.g.,
a security issued by the U.S. government or an agency thereof, a banker’s
acceptance or a certificate of deposit) from a seller, subject to resale to the
seller at an agreed upon price and date (normally, the next Business Day). A
repurchase agreement may be considered a loan collateralized by securities. The
resale price reflects an agreed upon interest rate effective for the period the
instrument is held by the applicable Fund and is unrelated to the interest rate
on the underlying instrument.
In
these repurchase agreement transactions, the securities acquired by a Fund
(including accrued interest earned thereon) must have a total value in excess of
the value of the repurchase agreement and are held by the Custodian until
repurchased. No more than an aggregate of 15% of a Fund’s net assets will be
invested in illiquid investments, including repurchase agreements having
maturities longer than seven days and securities subject to legal or contractual
restrictions on resale, or for which there are no readily available market
quotations.
The
use of repurchase agreements involves certain risks. For example, if the other
party to the agreement defaults on its obligation to repurchase the underlying
security at a time when the value of the security has declined, a Fund may incur
a loss upon disposition of the security. If the other party to the agreement
becomes insolvent and subject to liquidation or reorganization under the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code or other laws, a court may determine that the underlying
security is collateral for a loan by a Fund not within the control of the Fund
and, therefore, the Fund may not be able to substantiate its interest in the
underlying security and may be deemed an unsecured creditor of the other party
to the agreement.
Securities
Lending
Each
Fund may lend portfolio securities in an amount up to one-third of its total
assets to brokers, dealers and other financial institutions. In a portfolio
securities lending transaction, a Fund receives from the borrower an amount
equal to the interest paid or the dividends declared on the loaned securities
during the term of the loan as well as the interest on the collateral
securities, less any fees (such as finders or administrative fees) the Fund pays
in arranging the loan. A Fund may share the interest it receives on the
collateral securities with the borrower. The terms of each Fund’s loans permit
it to reacquire loaned securities on five business days’ notice or in time to
vote on any important matter. Loans are subject to termination at the option of
the applicable Fund or borrower at any time, and the borrowed securities must be
returned when the loan is terminated. The Funds may pay fees to arrange for
securities loans.
The
SEC currently requires that the following conditions must be met whenever a
Fund’s portfolio securities are loaned: (1) the Fund must receive at least 100%
cash collateral from the borrower; (2) the borrower must increase such
collateral whenever the market
value
of the securities rises above the level of such collateral; (3) the Fund must be
able to terminate the loan at any time; (4) the Fund must receive reasonable
interest on the loan, as well as any dividends, interest or other distributions
on the loaned securities, and any increase in market value; (5) the Fund may pay
only reasonable custodian fees approved by the Board in connection with the
loan; (6) while voting rights on the loaned securities may pass to the
borrower, the Board must terminate the loan and regain the right to vote the
securities if a material event adversely affecting the investment occurs; and
(7) the Fund may not loan its portfolio securities so that the value of the
loaned securities is more than one-third of its total asset value, including
collateral received from such loans. These conditions may be subject to future
modification. Such loans will be terminable at any time upon specified notice. A
Fund might experience the risk of loss if the institution with which it has
engaged in a portfolio loan transaction breaches its agreement with the Fund. In
addition, the Funds will not enter into any portfolio security lending
arrangement having a duration of longer than one year. The principal risk of
portfolio lending is potential default or insolvency of the borrower. In either
of these cases, a Fund could experience delays in recovering securities or
collateral or could lose all or part of the value of the loaned securities. As
part of participating in a lending program, the applicable Fund may be required
to invest in collateralized debt or other securities that bear the risk of loss
of principal. In addition, all investments made with the collateral received are
subject to the risks associated with such investments. If such investments lose
value, a Fund will have to cover the loss when repaying the
collateral.
Any
loans of portfolio securities are fully collateralized based on values that are
marked-to-market daily. Any securities that a Fund may receive as collateral
will not become part of a Fund’s investment portfolio at the time of the loan
and, in the event of a default by the borrower, the Fund will, if permitted by
law, dispose of such collateral except for such part thereof that is a security
in which the Fund is permitted to invest. During the time securities are on
loan, the borrower will pay a Fund any accrued income on those securities, and
the Fund may invest the cash collateral and earn income or receive an
agreed-upon fee from a borrower that has delivered cash-equivalent collateral.
Special
Purpose Acquisition Companies
Each
Fund may, and the Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF intends to, invest in stock,
warrants, and other securities of SPACs or similar special purpose entities that
pool funds to seek potential acquisition opportunities. Unless and until an
acquisition is completed, a SPAC generally invests its assets (less a portion
retained to cover expenses) in U.S. Government securities, money market fund
securities, and cash. If an acquisition that meets the requirements for the SPAC
is not completed within a pre-established period of time, the invested funds are
returned to the entity’s shareholders, less certain permitted expense, and any
warrants issued by the SPAC will expire worthless. Because SPACs and similar
entities are in essence blank check companies without an operating history or
ongoing business other than seeking acquisitions, the value of their securities
is particularly dependent on the ability of the entity’s management to identify
and complete a profitable acquisition. SPACs may pursue acquisitions only within
certain industries or regions, which may increase the volatility of their
prices. In addition, these securities, may be traded in the over-the-counter
market, may be considered illiquid and/or be subject to restrictions on resale.
In addition, the Fund may invest in vehicles formed by SPAC sponsors to hold
founder shares. Founder shares are generally subject to all of the risks of
SPACs (including the risk that the founder shares will expire worthless to the
extent an acquisition or merger is not completed). Founder shares are also
subject to restrictions on transferability, which significantly reduces their
liquidity. In addition, an investor in founder shares may be required to forfeit
all or a portion of any founder shares it holds, including, for example, (i) if
the investor does not purchase additional units of the SPAC pursuant to the
terms of any forward purchase agreement it enters into; (ii) if the investor
sells shares that it purchased in the IPO prior to the SPAC effecting a merger
or acquisition; or (iii) if the SPAC’s sponsor forfeits its founders shares to
effect a merger or acquisition.
Swap
Agreements
Each
Fund may, and the Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF intends to, enter into swap
agreements, including total return swaps. Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act imposes
requirements on the use of certain derivatives, including swaps, by a Fund that
may oblige the Fund to make payments or incur additional obligations in the
future. Rule 18f-4 imposes limits on the amount of leverage risk to which a Fund
can be exposed through such transactions. If a Fund’s derivatives exposure is
more than 10% of its net assets, it must apply a value-at-risk (“VaR”) test to
limit its use of derivatives, establish and maintain a derivatives risk
management program, and appoint a derivatives risk manager to implement such
program.
New
rules and regulations could, among other things, restrict a Fund’s ability to
engage in, or increase the cost to the Fund of, derivatives transactions, for
example, by making some types of derivatives no longer available to the Fund,
increasing margin or capital requirements, or otherwise limiting liquidity or
increasing transaction costs. The costs of derivatives transactions also may
increase due to regulatory requirements imposed on clearing members, which may
cause clearing members to raise their fees to cover the costs of additional
capital requirements and other regulatory changes applicable to the clearing
members. Certain aspects of these regulations are still being implemented, so
their potential impact on a Fund and the financial system are not yet known.
While the regulations and central clearing of some derivatives transactions are
designed to reduce systemic risk (i.e.,
the risk that the interdependence of large derivatives dealers could cause them
to suffer liquidity, solvency or other challenges simultaneously), there is no
assurance that the mechanisms imposed under the regulations will achieve that
result, and in the meantime, as noted above, central clearing, minimum margin
requirements and related requirements expose a Fund to new kinds of risks and
costs.
A
Fund may utilize swap agreements in an attempt to gain exposure to the
securities in a market without actually purchasing those securities, or to hedge
a position. Swap agreements are two-party contracts entered into primarily by
institutional investors for periods ranging from a day to more than one-year. In
a standard “swap” transaction, two parties agree to exchange the returns (or
differentials in rates of return) earned or realized on particular predetermined
investments or instruments. The gross returns to be exchanged or “swapped”
between the parties are calculated with respect to a “notional amount,”
(i.e.,
the return on or increase in value of a particular dollar amount invested in a
basket of securities representing a particular index). A total return swap is a
swap agreement in which one party makes payments based on a set rate, either
fixed or variable, while the other party makes payments based on the return of
an underlying asset, which includes both the income it generates and any capital
gains. In total return swaps, the underlying asset, referred to as the reference
asset, is usually an equity index, a basket of loans, or bonds. The asset is
owned by the party receiving the set rate payment.
Forms
of swap agreements include interest rate caps, under which, in return for a
premium, one party agrees to make payments to the other to the extent that
interest rates exceed a specified rate, or “cap” interest rate floors, under
which, in return for a premium, one party agrees to make payments to the other
to the extent that interest rates fall below a specified level, or “floor;” and
interest rate collars, under which a party sells a cap and purchases a floor or
vice versa in an attempt to protect itself against interest rate movements
exceeding given minimum or maximum levels.
Because
they are two-party contracts which may have terms of greater than seven days,
swap agreements may be considered to be illiquid for purposes of a Fund’s
illiquid investment limitations. A Fund will not enter into any swap agreement
unless the Sub-Adviser believes that the other party to the transaction is
creditworthy. A Fund bears the risk of loss of the amount expected to be
received under a swap agreement in the event of the default or bankruptcy of a
swap agreement counterparty.
A
Fund may utilize swap agreements in an attempt to gain exposure to the
securities in a market without actually purchasing those securities, or to hedge
a position. For example, a Fund may enter into swap agreements to invest in a
market without owning or taking physical custody of the underlying securities in
circumstances in which direct investment is restricted for legal reasons or is
otherwise impracticable. The counterparty to any swap agreement will typically
be a bank, investment banking firm or broker-dealer. The counterparty will
generally agree to pay the Fund the amount, if any, by which the notional amount
of the swap agreement would have increased in value had it been invested in the
particular stocks, plus the dividends that would have been received on those
stocks. The Fund will agree to pay to the counterparty a floating rate of
interest on the notional amount of the swap agreement plus the amount, if any,
by which the notional amount would have decreased in value had it been invested
in such stocks. Therefore, the return to the Fund on any swap agreement should
be the gain or loss on the notional amount plus dividends on the stocks less the
interest paid by the Fund on the notional amount.
Swap
agreements typically are settled on a net basis, which means that the two
payment streams are netted out, with the Fund receiving or paying, as the case
may be, only the net amount of the two payments. Payments may be made at the
conclusion of a swap agreement or periodically during its term. Other swap
agreements, may require initial premium (discount) payments as well as periodic
payments (receipts) related to the interest leg of the swap or to the default of
a reference obligation. The Fund will earmark and reserve assets necessary to
meet any accrued payment obligations when it is the buyer of a credit default
swap.
The
swap market has grown substantially in recent years with a large number of banks
and investment banking firms acting both as principals and as agents utilizing
standardized swap documentation. As a result, the swap market has become
relatively liquid in comparison with the markets for other similar instruments,
which are traded in the OTC market. The Adviser, under the oversight of the
Board, is responsible for determining and monitoring the liquidity of Fund
transactions in swap agreements.
Swap
agreements generally do not involve the delivery of securities or other
underlying assets. Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to swap agreements
is limited to the net amount of payments that a Fund is contractually obligated
to make. If a swap counterparty defaults, the Fund’s risk of loss consists of
the net amount of payments the Fund is contractually entitled to receive, if
any. However, total return swaps can have the potential for unlimited
losses.
The
use of swap agreements is a highly specialized activity which involves
investment techniques and risks different from those associated with ordinary
portfolio securities transactions. If a counterparty’s creditworthiness
declines, the value of the swap would likely decline. Moreover, there is no
guarantee that a Fund could eliminate its exposure under an outstanding swap
agreement by entering into an offsetting swap agreement with the same or another
party.
Tax
Risks
As
with any investment, you should consider how your investment in Shares will be
taxed. The tax information in the Prospectus and this SAI is provided as general
information. You should consult your own tax professional about the tax
consequences of an investment in Shares.
Unless
your investment in Shares is made through a tax-exempt entity or tax-deferred
retirement account, such as an individual retirement account (“IRA”), you need
to be aware of the possible tax consequences when a Fund makes distributions or
you sell Shares.
U.S.
Government Securities
Each
Fund may invest in U.S. government securities. Securities issued or guaranteed
by the U.S. government or its agencies or instrumentalities include U.S.
Treasury securities, which are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S.
Treasury and which differ only in their interest rates, maturities, and times of
issuance. U.S. Treasury bills have initial maturities of one-year or less; U.S.
Treasury notes have initial maturities of one to ten years; and U.S. Treasury
bonds generally have initial maturities of greater than ten years. Certain U.S.
government securities are issued or guaranteed by agencies or instrumentalities
of the U.S. government including, but not limited to, obligations of U.S.
government agencies or instrumentalities such as the Federal National Mortgage
Association (“Fannie Mae”), the Government National Mortgage Association
(“Ginnie Mae”), the Small Business Administration, the Federal Farm Credit
Administration, the Federal Home Loan Banks, Banks for Cooperatives (including
the Central Bank for Cooperatives), the Federal Land Banks, the Federal
Intermediate Credit Banks, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Export-Import
Bank of the United States, the Commodity Credit Corporation, the Federal
Financing Bank, the Student Loan Marketing Association, the National Credit
Union Administration and the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (“Farmer
Mac”).
Some
obligations issued or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies and
instrumentalities, including, for example, Ginnie Mae pass- through
certificates, are supported by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Treasury.
Other obligations issued by or guaranteed by federal agencies, such as those
securities issued by Fannie Mae, are supported by the discretionary authority of
the U.S. government to purchase certain obligations of the federal agency, while
other obligations issued by or guaranteed by federal agencies, such as those of
the Federal Home Loan Banks, are supported by the right of the issuer to borrow
from the U.S. Treasury, while the U.S. government provides financial support to
such U.S. government-sponsored federal agencies, no assurance can be given that
the U.S. government will always do so, since the U.S. government is not so
obligated by law. U.S. Treasury notes and bonds typically pay coupon interest
semi- annually and repay the principal at maturity.
On
September 7, 2008, the U.S. Treasury announced a federal takeover of Fannie Mae
and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), placing the two
federal instrumentalities in conservatorship. Under the takeover, the U.S.
Treasury agreed to acquire $1 billion of senior preferred stock of each
instrumentality and obtained warrants for the purchase of common stock of each
instrumentality (the “Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement” or
“Agreement”). Under the Agreement, the U.S. Treasury pledged to provide up to
$200 billion per instrumentality as needed, including the contribution of cash
capital to the instrumentalities in the event their liabilities exceed their
assets. This was intended to ensure that the instrumentalities maintain a
positive net worth and meet their financial obligations, preventing mandatory
triggering of receivership. On December 24, 2009, the U.S. Treasury announced
that it was amending the Agreement to allow the $200 billion cap on the U.S.
Treasury’s funding commitment to increase as necessary to accommodate any
cumulative reduction in net worth over the next three years. As a result of this
Agreement, the investments of holders, including a Fund, of mortgage-backed
securities and other obligations issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are
protected.
The
total public debt of the United States as a percentage of gross domestic product
has grown rapidly since the beginning of the 2008-2009 financial downturn.
Although high debt levels do not necessarily indicate or cause economic
problems, they may create certain systemic risks if sound debt management
practices are not implemented. A high national debt can raise concerns that the
U.S. government will not be able to make principal or interest payments when
they are due. In August 2011, S&P lowered its long-term sovereign credit
rating on the U.S. In explaining the downgrade at that time, S&P cited,
among other reasons, controversy over raising the statutory debt limit and
growth in public spending. In August 2023, Fitch Ratings also downgraded its
U.S. debt rating from AAA to AA+, citing expected fiscal deterioration over the
next three years and repeated down-to-the-wire debt ceiling negotiations. While
Moody’s sovereign credit rating for the U.S. remains AAA, the agency changed the
outlook from stable to negative in November 2023, signaling an increased risk of
the potential for a downgrade.
An
increase in national debt levels also may necessitate the need for the U.S.
Congress to negotiate adjustments to the statutory debt ceiling to increase the
cap on the amount the U.S. government is permitted to borrow to meet its
existing obligations and finance current budget deficits. Future downgrades
could increase volatility in domestic and foreign financial markets, result in
higher interest rates, lower prices of U.S. Treasury securities and increase the
costs of different kinds of debt. Any controversy or ongoing uncertainty
regarding the statutory debt ceiling negotiations may impact the U.S. long-term
sovereign credit rating and may cause market uncertainty. As a result, market
prices and yields of securities supported by the full faith and credit of the
U.S. government may be adversely affected.
When-Issued
Securities
A
when-issued security is one whose terms are available and for which a market
exists, but which has not been issued. When a Fund engages in when-issued
transactions, it relies on the other party to consummate the sale. If the other
party fails to complete the sale, a Fund may miss the opportunity to obtain the
security at a favorable price or yield.
When
purchasing a security on a when-issued basis, a Fund assumes the rights and
risks of ownership of the security, including the risk of price and yield
changes. At the time of settlement, the value of the security may be more or
less than the purchase price. The yield available in the market when the
delivery takes place also may be higher than those obtained in the transaction
itself. Because a Fund does not pay for the security until the delivery date,
these risks are in addition to the risks associated with its other
investments.
Decisions
to enter into “when-issued” transactions will be considered on a case-by-case
basis when necessary to maintain continuity in a company’s index membership.
INVESTMENT
RESTRICTIONS
The
Trust has adopted the following investment restrictions as fundamental policies
with respect to the Funds. These restrictions cannot be changed with respect to
a Fund without the approval of the holders of a majority of a Fund’s outstanding
voting securities. For the purposes of the 1940 Act, a “majority of outstanding
shares” means the vote of the lesser of: (1) 67% or more of the voting
securities of a Fund present at the meeting if the holders of more than 50% of a
Fund’s outstanding voting securities are present or represented by proxy; or (2)
more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of a Fund.
Except
with the approval of a majority of the outstanding voting securities, each Fund
will not:
1.Concentrate
its investments (i.e.,
hold more than 25% of its total assets) in any industry or group of related
industries. For purposes of this limitation, securities of the U.S. government
(including its agencies and instrumentalities), repurchase agreements
collateralized by U.S. government securities, investment companies, and
tax-exempt securities of state or municipal governments and their political
subdivisions are not considered to be issued by members of any
industry.*
2.Borrow
money or issue senior securities (as defined under the 1940 Act), except to the
extent permitted under the 1940 Act.
3.Make
loans, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act.
4.Purchase
or sell real estate unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or
other instruments, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act. This shall
not prevent the Fund from investing in securities or other instruments backed by
real estate, real estate investment trusts or securities of companies engaged in
the real estate business.
5.Purchase
or sell physical commodities unless acquired as a result of ownership of
securities or other instruments, except to the extent permitted under the 1940
Act. This shall not prevent the Fund from purchasing or selling options and
futures contracts or from investing in securities or other instruments backed by
physical commodities.
6.Underwrite
securities issued by other persons, except to the extent permitted under the
1940 Act.
In
addition to the investment restriction adopted as fundamental policies as set
forth above, the Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF observes the following
non-fundamental restriction, which may be changed without a shareholder
vote.
1.Under
normal circumstances, at least 80% of the Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF’s net
assets (plus the amount of any borrowing for investment purposes) will be
invested in Pre-Merger SPACs (along with the warrants or rights issued in
connection with the IPOs of SPACs). Such policy has been adopted as a
non-fundamental investment policy and may be changed without shareholder
approval upon 60 days’ written notice to shareholders.
The
following descriptions of certain provisions of the 1940 Act may assist
investors in understanding the above policies and restrictions:
Borrowing.
The 1940 Act presently allows a fund to borrow from any bank (including
pledging, mortgaging or hypothecating assets) in an amount up to 33 1/3% of its
total assets (not including temporary borrowings not in excess of 5% of its
total assets).
Senior
Securities.
For purposes of fundamental policy no. 2 above, senior securities may include
any obligation or instrument constituting a security issued by a Fund and
evidencing indebtedness or a future payment obligation. The 1940 Act generally
prohibits funds from issuing senior securities other than borrowing from a bank
subject to specific asset coverage requirements. The 1940 Act prohibitions and
restrictions on the issuance of senior securities are designed to protect
shareholders from the potentially adverse effects of a fund’s issuance of senior
securities, including, in particular, the risks associated with excessive
leverage of a fund’s assets. Certain types of derivatives give rise to future
payment obligations and therefore, also may be considered to be senior
securities. Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act permits funds that comply with the
conditions therein to enter into certain types of derivatives transactions
notwithstanding the prohibitions and restrictions on the issuance of senior
securities under the 1940 Act. To the extent consistent with its investment
strategies, a Fund may invest in derivatives in compliance with the conditions
set forth in Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act.
Lending.
Under the 1940 Act, a fund may only make loans if expressly permitted by its
investment policies.
Real
Estate and Commodities.
The 1940 Act does not directly restrict an investment company’s ability to
invest in real estate or commodities, but does require that every investment
company have a fundamental investment policy governing such investments.
Underwriting.
Under the 1940 Act, underwriting securities involves a fund purchasing
securities directly from an issuer for the purpose of selling (distributing)
them or participating in any such activity either directly or indirectly.
If
a percentage limitation is adhered to at the time of investment or contract, a
later increase or decrease in percentage resulting from any change in value or
total or net assets will not result in a violation of such restriction, except
that the percentage limitation with respect to the borrowing of money will be
observed continuously.
*
For purposes of this policy, the issuer of the underlying security will be
deemed to be the issuer of any respective depositary receipt.
EXCHANGE
LISTING AND TRADING
Shares
are listed for trading and trade throughout the day on the
Exchange.
There
can be no assurance that a Fund will continue to meet the requirements of the
Exchange necessary to maintain the listing of Shares. The Exchange will consider
the suspension of trading in, and will initiate delisting proceedings of, the
Shares under any of the following circumstances: (i) if any of the requirements
set forth in the Exchange rules are not continuously maintained, including
compliance with Rule 6c-11(c) under the 1940 Act; (ii) if, following the initial
12-month period beginning at the commencement of trading of a Fund, there are
fewer than 50 beneficial owners of the Shares of such Fund; or (iii)
if such other event shall occur or condition shall exist that, in the
opinion of the Exchange, makes further dealings on the Exchange inadvisable. The
Exchange will remove the Shares of a Fund from listing and trading upon
termination of such Fund.
The
Trust reserves the right to adjust the price levels of Shares in the future to
help maintain convenient trading ranges for investors. Any adjustments would be
accomplished through stock splits or reverse stock splits, which would have no
effect on the net assets of the applicable Fund.
MANAGEMENT
OF THE TRUST
Board
Responsibilities. The
management and affairs of the Trust and its series are overseen by the Board,
which elects the officers of the Trust who are responsible for administering the
day-to-day operations of the Trust and the Funds. The Board has approved
contracts, as described below, under which certain companies provide essential
services to the Trust.
The
day-to-day business of the Trust, including the management of risk, is performed
by third-party service providers, such as the Adviser, the Sub-Adviser, the
Distributor, or the Administrator. The Board is responsible for overseeing the
Trust’s service providers and, thus, has oversight responsibility with respect
to risk management performed by those service providers. Risk management seeks
to identify and address risks, i.e.,
events or circumstances that could have material adverse effects on the
business, operations, shareholder services, investment performance or reputation
of a Fund. The Funds and their service providers employ a variety of processes,
procedures and controls to identify various of those possible events or
circumstances, to lessen the probability of their occurrence and/or to mitigate
the effects of such events or circumstances if they do occur. Each service
provider is responsible for one or more discrete aspects of the Trust’s business
(e.g.,
the Adviser is responsible for the day-to-day management of each Fund’s
portfolio investments) and, consequently, for managing the risks associated with
that business. The Board has emphasized to the Funds’ service providers the
importance of maintaining vigorous risk management.
The
Board’s role in risk oversight begins before the inception of the Funds, at
which time certain of the Funds’ service providers present the Board with
information concerning the investment objectives, strategies and risks of the
Funds as well as proposed investment limitations for the Funds. Additionally,
the Adviser and the Sub-Adviser provide the Board with an overview of, among
other things, its investment philosophy, brokerage practices and compliance
infrastructure. Thereafter, the Board continues its oversight function of
various personnel, including the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer, as well as
personnel of the Sub-Adviser, and other service providers such as the Funds’
independent registered public accounting firm, make periodic reports to the
Audit Committee or to the Board with respect to various aspects of risk
management. The Board and the Audit Committee oversee efforts by management and
service providers to manage risks to which the Funds may be
exposed.
The
Board is responsible for overseeing the nature, extent, and quality of the
services provided to the Funds by the Adviser and the Sub-Adviser and receives
information about those services at its regular meetings. In addition, on an
annual basis (following the initial two-year period), in connection with its
consideration of whether to renew the Advisory Agreement (defined below) with
the Adviser, and the Sub-Advisory Agreement with the Sub-Adviser, the Board or
its designee may meet with the Adviser and/or the Sub-Adviser to review such
services. Among other things, the Board regularly considers the Adviser’s and
the Sub-Adviser’s adherence to each Fund’s investment restrictions and
compliance with various Fund policies and procedures and with applicable
securities regulations. The Board also reviews information about each Fund’s
performance and investments, including, for example, portfolio holdings
schedules.
The
Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer reports regularly to the Board to review and
discuss compliance issues and Fund and Adviser or Sub-Adviser risk assessments.
At least annually, the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer provides the Board with
a report reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of the Trust’s policies and
procedures and those of its service providers, including the Adviser and the
Sub-Adviser. The report addresses the operation of the policies and procedures
of the Trust and each service provider since the date of the last report; any
material changes to the policies and procedures since the date of the last
report; any recommendations for material changes to the policies and procedures;
and any material compliance matters since the date of the last
report.
The
Board receives reports from the Funds’ service providers regarding operational
risks and risks related to the valuation and liquidity of portfolio securities.
Annually, the Funds’ independent registered public accounting firm reviews with
the Audit Committee its audit of the Funds’ financial statements, focusing on
major areas of risk encountered by the Funds and noting any significant
deficiencies or material weaknesses in the Funds’ internal controls.
Additionally, in connection with its oversight function, the Board oversees Fund
management’s implementation of disclosure controls and procedures, which are
designed to ensure that information
required
to be disclosed by the Trust in its periodic reports with the SEC are recorded,
processed, summarized, and reported within the required time periods. The Board
also oversees the Trust’s internal controls over financial reporting, which
comprise policies and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of the Trust’s financial reporting and the preparation
of the Trust’s financial statements.
From
their review of these reports and discussions with the Adviser and the
Sub-Adviser, the Chief Compliance Officer, the independent registered public
accounting firm and other service providers, the Board and the Audit Committee
learn in detail about the material risks of each Fund, thereby facilitating a
dialogue about how management and service providers identify and mitigate those
risks.
The
Board recognizes that not all risks that may affect a Fund can be identified
and/or quantified, that it may not be practical or cost-effective to eliminate
or mitigate certain risks, that it may be necessary to bear certain risks (such
as investment-related risks) to achieve a Fund’s goals, and that the processes,
procedures and controls employed to address certain risks may be limited in
their effectiveness. Moreover, reports received by the Board as to risk
management matters are typically summaries of the relevant information. Most of
the Funds’ investment management and business affairs are carried out by or
through the Adviser, the Sub-Adviser, and other service providers, each of which
has an independent interest in risk management but whose policies and the
methods by which one or more risk management functions are carried out may
differ from the Funds’ and each other’s in the setting of priorities, the
resources available or the effectiveness of relevant controls. As a result of
the foregoing and other factors, the Board’s ability to monitor and manage risk,
as a practical matter, is subject to limitations.
Members
of the Board.
There are four members of the Board, three of whom are not interested persons of
the Trust, as that term is defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”).
The Chairman of the Board, Paul R. Fearday, is an interested person of the Trust
as that term is defined in the 1940 Act.
The
Board is comprised of a super-majority (75 percent) of Independent Trustees.
There is an Audit Committee of the Board that is chaired by an Independent
Trustee and comprised solely of Independent Trustees. The Audit Committee chair
presides at the Audit Committee meetings, participates in formulating agendas
for Audit Committee meetings, and coordinates with management to serve as a
liaison between the Independent Trustees and management on matters within the
scope of responsibilities of the Audit Committee as set forth in its
Board-approved charter. The Trust has not designated a lead Independent Trustee
but has determined its leadership structure is appropriate given the specific
characteristics and circumstances of the Trust. The Trust made this
determination in consideration of, among other things, the fact that the
Independent Trustees of the Trust constitute a super-majority of the Board, the
number of Independent Trustees that constitute the Board, the amount of assets
under management in the Trust, and the number of funds overseen by the Board.
The Board also believes that its leadership structure facilitates the orderly
and efficient flow of information to the Independent Trustees from Fund
management.
Additional
information about each Trustee of the Trust is set forth below. The address of
each Trustee of the Trust is c/o U.S. Bank Global Fund Services, 615 East
Michigan Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Name
and Year of Birth |
Position
Held with the Trust |
Term
of Office and Length of Time Served |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Number
of Portfolios in Fund Complex* Overseen by Trustee |
Other
Directorships Held by Trustee During Past 5 Years |
Independent
Trustees |
John
L. Jacobs Year of birth: 1959 |
Trustee
and Audit Committee Chair |
Indefinite
term; since 2017** |
Chairman
of VettaFi, LLC (since June 2018); Founder and CEO of Q3 Advisors, LLC
(financial consulting firm) (since 2015); Executive Director of Center for
Financial Markets and Policy (2016–2022); Distinguished Policy Fellow and
Executive Director, Center for Financial Markets and Policy, Georgetown
University (2015–2022) |
53 |
Independent
Trustee, TEMA ETF Trust (since 2023) (1 portfolio); NEOS ETF Trust (since
2021) (3 portfolios); Director, tZERO Group, Inc. (since 2020);
Independent Trustee, Procure ETF Trust II (since 2018)
(2 portfolios); Independent Trustee, Horizons ETF Trust I
(2015-2019) |
Koji
Felton Year of birth: 1961 |
Trustee |
Indefinite
term; since 2019 |
Retired;
formerly Counsel, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. (investment firm)
(2013–2015) |
53 |
Independent
Trustee, Series Portfolios Trust (since 2015)
(19 portfolios) |
Pamela
H. Conroy Year of birth: 1961 |
Trustee
and Nominating and Governance Committee Chair |
Indefinite
term; since 2019 |
Retired;
formerly Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer & Chief
Compliance Officer, Institutional Capital Corporation (investment firm)
(1994–2008) |
53 |
Independent
Trustee, Frontier Funds, Inc. (since 2020)
(4 portfolios) |
Interested
Trustee*** |
Paul
R. Fearday, CPA Year of birth: 1979 |
Trustee
and Chairman |
Indefinite
term; since 2019 |
Senior
Vice President, U.S. Bank, N.A. (since 2022); Senior Vice President, U.S.
Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (2008–2022) |
53 |
None |
* The
Trust is the only registered investment company in the Fund Complex.
** Mr.
Jacobs began serving as a Trustee when the Trust was known by its former name,
Active Weighting Funds ETF Trust.
*** Mr.
Fearday is deemed to be an “interested person” of the Trust under the 1940 Act
by reason of his position with the parent company of the Trust’s administrator,
U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, which also provides other third-party services
to the Trust.
Individual
Trustee Qualifications.
The Trust has concluded that each of the Trustees should serve on the Board
because of their ability to review and understand information about the Funds
provided to them by management, to identify and request other information they
may deem relevant to the performance of their duties, to question management and
other service providers regarding material factors bearing on the management and
administration of the Funds, and to exercise their business judgment in a manner
that serves the best interests of the Funds’ shareholders. The Trust has
concluded that each of the Trustees should serve as a Trustee based on his or
her own experience, qualifications, attributes and skills as described
below.
The
Trust has concluded that Mr. Jacobs should serve as a Trustee because of his
substantial industry experience. He most recently served as the CEO of Q3
Advisors, LLC and as the Distinguished Policy Fellow and Executive Director of
the Center for Financial Markets and Policy, and as Adjunct Professor of Finance
at the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University. He also served as
Senior Advisor and principal consultant to Nasdaq’s CEO and President. Mr.
Jacobs has been determined to qualify as an Audit Committee Financial Expert for
the Trust.
The
Trust has concluded that Mr. Felton should serve as a Trustee because of his
substantial industry experience, including over two decades working in the asset
management industry providing legal, regulatory compliance, governance and risk
management advice to registered investment companies, their advisers and boards.
Prior to that, he gained experience and perspective as a regulator while serving
as an enforcement attorney and branch chief for the SEC. He also represented
public companies and their boards of directors in securities class actions,
derivative litigation and SEC investigations as a litigation associate at a
national law firm. Mr. Felton currently serves as an independent trustee and
chair of the nominating and governance committee of a mutual fund complex.
The
Trust has concluded that Ms. Conroy should serve as a Trustee because of her
substantial industry experience, including over 25 years of achievements at both
a large, multi-location financial institution as well as a small,
entrepreneurial firm. She has expertise in all facets of portfolio accounting,
securities processing, trading operations, marketing, as well as legal and
compliance.
The
Trust has concluded that Mr. Fearday should serve as Trustee because of the
experience he gained as a senior officer of U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC,
doing business as U.S. Bank Global Fund Services, since 2008, and in his past
role with a national audit firm.
In
its periodic assessment of the effectiveness of the Board, the Board considers
the complementary individual skills and experience of the individual Trustees
primarily in the broader context of the Board’s overall composition so that the
Board, as a body, possesses the appropriate (and appropriately diverse) skills
and experience to oversee the business of the series of the Trust.
Board
Committees.
The Board has established the following standing committees of the
Board:
Audit
Committee.
The Board has a standing Audit Committee that is composed of each of the
Independent Trustees of the Trust. The Audit Committee operates under a written
charter approved by the Board. The principal responsibilities of the Audit
Committee include: recommending which firm to engage as the Funds’ independent
registered public accounting firm and when and whether to terminate this
relationship, as necessary; reviewing the independent registered public
accounting firm’s compensation, the proposed scope and terms of its engagement,
and the firm’s independence; pre-approving audit and non-audit services provided
by the Funds’ independent registered public accounting firm to the Trust and
certain other affiliated entities; serving as a channel of communication between
the independent registered public accounting firm and the Trustees; reviewing
the results of each external audit, including any qualifications in the
independent registered public accounting firm’s opinion, any related management
letter, management’s responses to recommendations made by the independent
registered public accounting firm in connection with the audit, reports
submitted to the Audit Committee by the internal auditing department of the
Trust’s Administrator that are material to the Trust as a whole, if any, and
management’s responses to any such reports; reviewing the Funds’ audited
financial statements and considering any significant disputes between the
Trust’s management and the independent registered public accounting firm that
arose in connection with the preparation of those financial statements;
considering, in consultation with the independent registered public accounting
firm and the Trust’s senior internal accounting executive, if any, the
independent registered public accounting firms’ report on the adequacy of the
Trust’s internal financial controls; reviewing, in consultation with the Funds’
independent registered public accounting firm, major changes regarding auditing
and accounting principles and practices to be followed when preparing the Funds’
financial statements; and other audit related matters. During the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2023, the Audit Committee met five times.
The
Audit Committee also serves as the Qualified Legal Compliance Committee (“QLCC”)
for the Trust for the purpose of compliance with Rules 205.2(k) and 205.3(c) of
the Code of Federal Regulations, regarding alternative reporting procedures for
attorneys retained or employed by an issuer who appear and practice before the
SEC on behalf of the issuer (the “issuer attorneys”). An issuer attorney who
becomes aware of evidence of a material violation by the Trust, or by any
officer, director, employee, or agent of the Trust, may report evidence of such
material violation to the QLCC as an alternative to the reporting requirements
of Rule 205.3(b) (which requires reporting to the chief legal officer and
potentially “up the ladder” to other entities).
Nominating
and Governance Committee.
The Board has a standing Nominating and Governance Committee that is composed of
each of the Independent Trustees of the Trust. The Nominating and Governance
Committee operates under a written charter approved by the Board. The principal
responsibility of the Nominating and Governance Committee is to consider,
recommend and nominate candidates to fill vacancies on the Board, if any. The
Nominating and Governance Committee generally will not consider nominees
recommended by shareholders. The Nominating and Governance Committee meets
periodically, as necessary. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023,
the Nominating and Governance Committee met one time.
Principal
Officers of the Trust. The
officers of the Trust conduct and supervise the Trust’s and each Fund’s daily
business. The address of each officer of the Trust is c/o U.S. Bank Global Fund
Services, 615 East Michigan Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202. Additional
information about each officer of the Trust is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Name
and Year of Birth |
Position(s)
Held with the Trust |
Term
of Office and Length of Time Served |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Gregory
C. Bakken Year of birth: 1983 |
President
and Principal Executive Officer |
Indefinite
term, February 2019 |
Vice
President, U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (since 2006) |
Travis
G. Babich Year of birth: 1980 |
Treasurer
and Principal Financial Officer |
Indefinite
term, September 2019 |
Vice
President, U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (since 2005) |
Kacie
G. Briody Year of birth: 1992 |
Assistant
Treasurer |
Indefinite
term, March 2019 |
Assistant
Vice President, U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (since 2021); Officer,
U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (2014 to 2021) |
Rachel
A. Spearo Year of birth: 1979 |
Interim
Secretary |
Indefinite
term, November 2023 |
Vice
President (since 2021), Vice President (2004 to 2019), U.S. Bancorp Fund
Services, LLC |
Christi
C. Powitzky Year of birth: 1974 |
Chief
Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Officer |
Indefinite
term, July 2022 |
Senior
Vice President, U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (since 2022); Principal
Consultant, ACA Group (2021 to 2022); Lead Manager, Communications
Compliance, T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc. (2018 to
2021) |
Jay
S. Fitton Year of birth: 1970 |
Assistant
Secretary |
Indefinite
term, May 2023 |
Vice
President, U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (since 2022); Assistant Vice
President, U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (2019 to 2022); Partner,
Practus, LLP (2018 to 2019) |
Trustee
Ownership of Shares.
The Funds are required to show the dollar amount ranges of each Trustee’s
“beneficial ownership” of Shares and each other series of the Trust as of the
end of the most recently completed calendar year. Dollar amount ranges disclosed
are
established by the SEC. “Beneficial ownership” is determined in accordance with
Rule 16a-1(a)(2) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange
Act”).
As
of December 31, 2023, no Trustee or officer of the Trust owned Shares of
the Funds or any other fund within the Trust’s Fund Complex.
Board
Compensation. Each
Independent Trustee receives an annual stipend of $110,000 (prior to January 1,
2024, $85,000) and reimbursement for all reasonable travel expenses relating to
their attendance at Board Meetings. The chair of the Audit Committee receives an
annual stipend of $5,000 and the chair of the Nominating and Governance
Committee receives an annual stipend of $2,500. The Interested Trustee is not
compensated for his service as a Trustee. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement,
the Adviser has agreed to pay all expenses of the Funds, except those specified
in the Funds’ Prospectus. As a result, the Adviser is responsible for
compensating the Independent Trustees. Trustee compensation disclosed in the
table does not include reimbursed reasonable travel expenses relating to their
attendance at Board Meetings. The following table shows the compensation earned
by each Trustee during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2023.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Name |
Aggregate
Compensation From the Trust |
Total
Compensation From Fund Complex* Paid to Trustees |
Interested
Trustee |
Paul
R. Fearday |
$0 |
$0 |
Independent
Trustees |
John
L. Jacobs |
$90,000 |
$90,000 |
Koji
Felton |
$85,000 |
$85,000 |
Pamela
H. Conroy |
$87,500 |
$87,500 |
* The
Trust is the only registered investment company in the Fund Complex.
PRINCIPAL
SHAREHOLDERS, CONTROL PERSONS, AND MANAGEMENT OWNERSHIP
A
principal shareholder is any person who owns of record or beneficially 5% or
more of the outstanding shares of a fund. A control person is a shareholder that
owns beneficially or through controlled companies more than 25% of the voting
securities of a company or acknowledges the existence of control. Shareholders
owning voting securities in excess of 25% may determine the outcome of any
matter affecting and voted on by shareholders of a fund. As of April 1, 2024,
the Trustees and officers, as a group, owned less than 1% of Shares of the
Funds, and the following shareholders were considered to be principal
shareholders of the Funds:
RiverNorth
Patriot ETF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Name
and Address |
%
Ownership |
Type
of Ownership |
|
| |
National
Financial Services, LLC 200 Liberty Street New York, NY
10281 |
74.89% |
Record |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Goldman
Sachs & Co., LLC 200 West Street New York, NY 10282 |
19.78% |
Record |
RiverNorth
Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Name
and Address |
%
Ownership |
Type
of Ownership |
|
| |
National
Financial Services, LLC 200 Liberty Street New York, NY
10281 |
92.92% |
Record |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CODES
OF ETHICS
The
Trust, the Adviser, and the Sub-Adviser have each adopted codes of ethics
pursuant to Rule 17j-1 of the 1940 Act. These codes of ethics are designed to
prevent affiliated persons of the Trust, the Adviser, and the Sub-Adviser from
engaging in deceptive, manipulative or fraudulent activities in connection with
securities held or to be acquired by the Funds (which also may be held by
persons subject to the codes of ethics). Each code of ethics permits personnel
subject to that code of ethics to invest in securities for their personal
investment accounts, subject to certain limitations, including limitations
related to securities that may be purchased or held by the Funds. The
Distributor (as defined below) relies on the principal underwriters exception
under Rule 17j-1(c)(3), specifically where the Distributor is not affiliated
with the Trust, the Adviser, or the Sub-Adviser, and no officer, director, or
general partner of the Distributor serves as an officer, director, or general
partner of the Trust, the Adviser, or the Sub-Adviser.
There
can be no assurance that the codes of ethics will be effective in preventing
such activities. Each code of ethics may be examined at the office of the SEC in
Washington, D.C. or on the Internet at the SEC’s website at
https://www.sec.gov.
PROXY
VOTING POLICIES
The
Funds have delegated proxy voting responsibilities to the Adviser, subject to
the Board’s oversight. In delegating proxy responsibilities, the Board has
directed that proxies be voted consistent with each Fund’s and its shareholders’
best interests and in compliance with all applicable proxy voting rules and
regulations. The Adviser has engaged Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.
(“ISS”) to make recommendations to the Adviser on the voting of proxies relating
to securities held by each Fund and has adopted the ISS Proxy Voting Guidelines
as part of the Adviser’s proxy voting policies (the “Proxy Voting Policies”) for
such purpose. A copy of the ISS Proxy Voting Guidelines is set forth in
Appendix
A
to this SAI. The Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer is responsible for monitoring
the effectiveness of the Proxy Voting Policies. The Proxy Voting Policies have
been adopted by the Trust as the policies and procedures that the Adviser will
use when voting proxies on behalf of the Funds.
When
available, information on how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio
securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 will be
available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-617-0004,
and
(2) on the SEC’s website at https://www.sec.gov.
INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT
Investment
Adviser
TrueMark
Investments, LLC (“TrueMark”), a Delaware limited liability company located at
433 West Van Buren Street, 1150-E, Chicago, Illinois 60607, and is an SEC
registered investment adviser. The Adviser is controlled by TrueMark Group, LLC,
which in turn is controlled by Michael Loukas.
The
Adviser oversees the day-to-day operations of each Fund, subject to the general
supervision and oversight of the Board and the officers of the Trust. The
Adviser, in addition to maintaining its overall responsibility to manage each
Fund, oversees the investment and reinvestment of the assets of each Fund by the
Sub-Adviser, in accordance with the investment objective, policies, and
limitations of each Fund. In addition, the Adviser arranges for transfer agency,
custody, fund administration, distribution, and all other services necessary for
each Fund to operate. For the services it provides to the Funds, the Adviser is
entitled to a unified management fee, which is calculated daily and paid
monthly, at an annual rate based on each Fund’s average daily net assets as set
forth in the table below.
|
|
|
|
| |
Fund
|
Management
Fee |
RiverNorth
Patriot ETF |
0.70% |
RiverNorth
Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF |
0.89% |
Pursuant
to an investment advisory agreement between the Trust, on behalf of each Fund,
and the Adviser (the “Advisory Agreement”), the Adviser has agreed to pay all
expenses of the Funds except the fee payable to the Adviser under the Advisory
Agreement, interest charges on any borrowings, dividends and other expenses on
securities sold short, taxes, brokerage commissions and other expenses incurred
in placing orders for the purchase and sale of securities and other investment
instruments, acquired fund fees and expenses, accrued deferred tax liability,
extraordinary expenses, and distribution (12b‑1) fees and expenses (if any). The
Adviser, in turn, compensates the Sub-Adviser from the management fee it
receives from each Fund.
The
table below shows the advisory fees paid by each Fund for the fiscal period/year
ended December 31, as applicable to each Fund:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fund |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
RiverNorth
Patriot ETF |
$22,466 |
$22,896 |
$0* |
RiverNorth
Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF |
$52,607 |
$15,399** |
N/A |
* For
the fiscal period December 31, 2021 (commencement of operations) through
December 31, 2021.
** For
the fiscal period July 11, 2022 (commencement of operations) through December
31, 2022.
Investment
Sub-Adviser
RiverNorth
Capital Management, LLC (“RiverNorth”), a Delaware limited liability company
located at 360 South Rosemary Avenue, Suite 1420, West Palm Beach, Florida
33401, serves as the sub-adviser to each Fund. The Sub-Adviser is majority owned
by RiverNorth Financial Holdings, LLC. Pursuant to a Sub-Advisory Agreement
between the Adviser and the Sub-Adviser (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”), the
Sub-Adviser is responsible for trading portfolio securities on behalf of each
Fund, including selecting broker-dealers to execute purchase and sale
transactions as instructed by the Adviser or in connection with any rebalancing
or reconstitution of each Fund, subject to the supervision of the Adviser and
the Board. For its services with respect to each Fund, the Sub-Adviser is
entitled to a fee by the Adviser, which fee is calculated daily and paid
monthly, as set forth in the table below.
|
|
|
|
| |
Fund
|
Sub-Advisory
Fee |
RiverNorth
Patriot ETF |
0.60%
based on the daily net assets of the Fund |
RiverNorth
Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF |
75%
of the Adviser’s net profits* |
*
“Net profits” refers to the amount remaining (if any) of the advisory fee
following the payment of the Fund’s operating expenses by the
Adviser.
The
Sub-Advisory Agreement provides that the Sub-Adviser will formulate and
implement a continuous investment program for each Fund, in accordance with the
Fund’s objective, policies and limitations and any investment guidelines
established by the Adviser. The Sub-Adviser will, subject to the supervision and
control of the Adviser and the Board, determine in its discretion which issuers
and securities will be purchased, held, sold or exchanged by each Fund, and will
place orders with and give instruction to brokers and dealers to cause the
execution of such transactions. The Sub-Adviser is required to furnish, at its
own expense, all investment facilities necessary to perform its obligations
under the Sub-Advisory Agreement.
The
table below shows the sub-advisory fees paid by the Adviser to the Sub-Adviser
for the fiscal period/year ended December 31, as applicable to each
Fund:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fund |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
RiverNorth
Patriot ETF |
$0 |
$19,308 |
$0* |
RiverNorth
Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF |
$0 |
$0** |
N/A |
* For
the fiscal period December 31, 2021 (commencement of operations) through
December 31, 2021.
** For
the fiscal period July 11, 2022 (commencement of operations) through December
31, 2022.
Portfolio
Managers
The
following individuals (collectively, the “Portfolio Managers”) are responsible
for day-to-day management of a Fund’s portfolio, as indicated in the below
table.
|
|
|
|
| |
Fund |
Portfolio
Managers |
RiverNorth
Patriot ETF |
Patrick
W. Galley and Joseph Bailey |
RiverNorth
Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF |
Patrick
W. Galley and Eric Pestrue |
This
section includes information about the Portfolio Managers, including information
about compensation, other accounts managed, and the dollar range of Shares
owned.
Share
Ownership of the Portfolio Managers
The
Funds are required to show the dollar ranges of the Portfolio Managers’
“beneficial ownership” of Shares as of the end of the most recently completed
fiscal year or a more recent date for a new portfolio manager. Dollar amount
ranges disclosed are established by the SEC. “Beneficial ownership” is
determined in accordance with Rule 16a-1(a)(2) under the Exchange Act. As of
December 31, 2023, the Portfolio Managers owned the following Shares of the
Funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Portfolio
Manager |
RiverNorth
Patriot ETF |
RiverNorth
Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF |
Patrick
W. Galley |
$50,001
- $100,000 |
$100,001
- $500,000 |
Joseph
Bailey |
$1
- $10,000 |
n/a |
Eric
Pestrue |
n/a |
$100,001
- $500,000 |
Other
Accounts Managed by the Portfolio Managers
In
addition to the Fund, the Portfolio Managers managed the following other
accounts for the Sub-Adviser as of December 31, 2023, none of which were
subject to a performance-based fee (unless otherwise footnoted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Portfolio
Manager |
Registered
Investment
Companies |
Other
Pooled
Investment
Vehicles |
Other
Accounts |
Number
of Accounts |
Total
Assets in the Accounts |
Number
of Accounts |
Total
Assets in the Accounts |
Number
of Accounts |
Total
Assets in the Accounts |
Patrick
W. Galley |
14 |
$3.9
billion |
4 |
$973
million |
11*,** |
$79.2
million |
Joseph
Bailey |
0 |
$0 |
0 |
$0 |
0 |
$0 |
Eric
Pestrue |
1 |
$187
million |
0 |
$0 |
0 |
$0 |
*
Advisory fee is based on performance.
**
Eleven accounts with $79.2 million in assets are subject to advisory fee based
on performance.
Portfolio
Manager Compensation
The
Portfolio Managers receive a fixed base salary and discretionary bonus that are
not tied to the performance of the Funds.
Material
Conflicts of Interest
A
Portfolio Manager’s management of “other accounts” may give rise to potential
conflicts of interest in connection with his management of a Fund’s investments,
on the one hand, and the investments of the other accounts, on the other. The
other accounts may have similar investment objectives or strategies as a Fund. A
potential conflict of interest may arise as a result, whereby a Portfolio
Manager could favor one account over another. Another potential conflict could
include a Portfolio Manager’s knowledge about the size, timing, and possible
market impact of Fund trades, whereby the portfolio manager could use this
information to the advantage of other accounts and to the disadvantage of a
Fund. However, the Adviser and Sub-Adviser have established policies and
procedures to ensure that the purchase and sale of securities among all accounts
the Adviser and Sub-Adviser, respectively, manages are fairly and equitably
allocated.
DISTRIBUTOR
The
Trust and Foreside Fund Services, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Foreside
Financial Group, LLC (doing business as ACA Group) (the “Distributor”), are
parties to a distribution agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”), whereby the
Distributor acts as principal underwriter for the Trust and distributes Shares
of each Fund. Shares are continuously offered for sale by the Distributor only
in Creation Units. The Distributor will not distribute Shares in amounts less
than a Creation Unit and does not maintain a secondary market in Shares. The
principal business address of the Distributor is Three Canal Plaza, Suite 100,
Portland, Maine 04101.
Under
the Distribution Agreement, the Distributor, as agent for the Trust, will
receive orders for the purchase and redemption of Creation Units, provided that
any subscriptions and orders will not be binding on the Trust until accepted by
the Trust. The Distributor is a broker-dealer registered under the Exchange Act
and a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
(“FINRA”).
The
Distributor also may enter into agreements with securities dealers (“Soliciting
Dealers”) who will solicit purchases of Creation Units of Shares. Such
Soliciting Dealers also may be Authorized Participants (as discussed in
“Procedures
for Purchase of Creation Units”
below) or DTC participants (as defined below).
The
Distribution Agreement will continue for two years from its effective date and
is renewable annually thereafter. The continuance of the Distribution Agreement
must be specifically approved at least annually (i) by the vote of the Trustees
or by a vote of the shareholders of a Fund and (ii) by the vote of a majority of
the Independent Trustees who have no direct or indirect financial interest in
the operations of the Distribution Agreement or any related agreement, cast in
person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval. The
Distribution Agreement is terminable without penalty by the Trust on 60 days’
written notice when authorized either by majority vote of its outstanding voting
Shares or by a vote of a majority of the Board (including a majority of the
Independent Trustees), or by the Distributor on 60 days’ written notice, and
will automatically terminate in the event of its assignment. The Distribution
Agreement provides that in the absence of willful misfeasance, bad faith or
gross negligence on the part of the Distributor, or reckless disregard by it of
its obligations thereunder, the Distributor shall not be liable for any action
or failure to act in accordance with its duties thereunder.
Intermediary
Compensation.
The
Adviser, the Sub-Adviser, or their affiliates, out of their own resources and
not out of Fund assets (i.e., without
additional cost to a Fund or its shareholders), may pay certain broker dealers,
banks and other financial intermediaries (“Intermediaries”) for certain
activities related to a Fund, including participation in activities that are
designed to make Intermediaries more knowledgeable about exchange-traded
products, including the Fund, or for other activities, such as marketing and
educational training or support. These arrangements are not financed by a Fund
and, thus, do not result in increased Fund expenses. They are not reflected in
the fees and expenses listed in the fees and expenses sections of a Fund’s
Prospectus and they do not change the price paid by investors for the purchase
of Shares or the amount received by a shareholder as proceeds from the
redemption of Shares.
Such
compensation may be paid to Intermediaries that provide services to a Fund,
including marketing and education support (such as through conferences, webinars
and printed communications). The Adviser and the Sub-Adviser will periodically
assess the advisability of continuing to make these payments. Payments to an
Intermediary may be significant to the Intermediary, and amounts that
Intermediaries pay to your adviser, broker or other investment professional, if
any, also may be significant to such adviser, broker or investment professional.
Because an Intermediary may make decisions about what investment options it will
make available or recommend, and what services to provide in connection with
various products, based on payments it receives or is eligible to receive, such
payments create conflicts of interest between the Intermediary and its clients.
For example, these financial incentives may cause the Intermediary to recommend
a Fund rather than other investments. The same conflict of interest exists with
respect to your financial adviser, broker or investment professional if he or
she receives similar payments from his or her Intermediary firm.
Intermediary
information is current only as of the date of this SAI. Please contact your
adviser, broker, or other investment professional for more information regarding
any payments his or her Intermediary firm may receive. Any payments made by the
Adviser, the Sub-Adviser, or their affiliates to an Intermediary may create the
incentive for an Intermediary to encourage customers to buy Shares.
If
you have any additional questions, please call 1-800-617-0004.
Distribution
and Service Plan. The
Board has adopted a Distribution and Service Plan (the “Plan”) in accordance
with the provisions of Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act, which regulates
circumstances under which an investment company may directly or indirectly bear
expenses
relating to the distribution of its shares. No payments pursuant to the Plan are
expected to be made during the twelve (12) month period from the date of this
SAI. Rule 12b-1 fees to be paid by a Fund under the Plan may only be imposed
after approval by the Board.
Continuance
of the Plan must be approved annually by a majority of the Trustees of the Trust
and by a majority of the Trustees who are not interested persons (as defined in
the 1940 Act) of the Trust and have no direct or indirect financial interest in
the Plan or in any agreements related to the Plan (“Qualified Trustees”). The
Plan requires that quarterly written reports of amounts spent under the Plan and
the purposes of such expenditures be furnished to and reviewed by the Trustees.
The Plan may not be amended to increase materially the amount that may be spent
thereunder without approval by a majority of the outstanding shares of a Fund.
All material amendments of the Plan will require approval by a majority of the
Trustees of the Trust and of the Qualified Trustees.
The
Plan provides that each Fund pays the Distributor an annual fee of up to a
maximum of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of its Shares. Under the Plan,
the Distributor may make payments pursuant to written agreements to financial
institutions and intermediaries such as banks, savings and loan associations and
insurance companies including, without limit, investment counselors,
broker-dealers and the Distributor’s affiliates and subsidiaries (collectively,
“Agents”) as compensation for services and reimbursement of expenses incurred in
connection with distribution assistance. The Plan is characterized as a
compensation plan since the distribution fee will be paid to the Distributor
without regard to the distribution expenses incurred by the Distributor or the
amount of payments made to other financial institutions and intermediaries. The
Trust intends to operate the Plan in accordance with its terms and with FINRA’s
rules concerning sales charges.
Under
the Plan, subject to the limitations of applicable law and regulations, each
Fund is authorized to compensate the Distributor up to the maximum amount to
finance any activity primarily intended to result in the sale of Creation Units
of the Fund or for providing or arranging for others to provide shareholder
services and for the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Such activities may
include, but are not limited to: (i) delivering copies of a Fund’s then current
reports, prospectuses, notices, and similar materials, to prospective purchasers
of Creation Units; (ii) marketing and promotional services, including
advertising; (iii) paying the costs of and compensating others, including
Authorized Participants with whom the Distributor has entered into written
Authorized Participant Agreements, for performing shareholder servicing on
behalf of a Fund; (iv) compensating certain Authorized Participants for
providing assistance in distributing the Creation Units of a Fund, including the
travel and communication expenses and salaries and/or commissions of sales
personnel in connection with the distribution of the Creation Units of a Fund;
(v) payments to financial institutions and intermediaries such as banks, savings
and loan associations, insurance companies and investment counselors,
broker-dealers, mutual fund supermarkets and the affiliates and subsidiaries of
the Trust’s service providers as compensation for services or reimbursement of
expenses incurred in connection with distribution assistance; (vi) facilitating
communications with beneficial owners of Shares, including the cost of providing
(or paying others to provide) services to beneficial owners of Shares,
including, but not limited to, assistance in answering inquiries related to
Shareholder accounts; and (vii) such other services and obligations as are set
forth in the Distribution Agreement.
TRANSFER
AGENT AND ADMINISTRATOR
U.S.
Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, doing business as U.S. Bank Global Fund Services
(“Fund Services” or the “Transfer Agent”), located at 615 East Michigan Street,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202, serves as the Funds’ transfer agent and
administrator.
Pursuant
to a fund servicing agreement between the Trust and Fund Services, Fund Services
provides the Trust with administrative and management services (other than
investment advisory services) and accounting services, including portfolio
accounting services, tax accounting services, and furnishing financial reports.
In this capacity, Fund Services does not have any responsibility or authority
for the management of the Funds, the determination of investment policy, or for
any matter pertaining to the distribution of Shares. As compensation for the
administration, accounting and management services, the Adviser pays Fund
Services a fee based on each Fund’s average daily net assets, subject to a
minimum annual fee. Fund Services also is entitled to certain out-of-pocket
expenses for the services mentioned above, including pricing
expenses.
The
Adviser was responsible for paying the amounts in the table below to Fund
Services for the fiscal years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fund |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
RiverNorth
Patriot ETF |
$28,325 |
$28,938 |
$3,796* |
RiverNorth
Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF |
$68,170 |
$32,339** |
N/A |
* For
the fiscal period December 31, 2021 (commencement of operations) through
December 31, 2021.
** For
the fiscal period July 11, 2022 (commencement of operations) through December
31, 2022.
CUSTODIAN
Pursuant
to a custody agreement between the Trust and U.S. Bank National Association
(“U.S. Bank” or the “Custodian”) (the “Custody Agreement”), U.S. Bank, located
at 1555 North Rivercenter Drive, Suite 302, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212, serves
as the custodian of the Funds’ assets. The Custodian holds and administers the
assets in each Fund’s portfolio. Pursuant to the Custody Agreement, U.S. Bank
receives an annual fee from the Adviser based on the Trust’s total average daily
net assets, subject to a minimum annual fee, and certain settlement charges. The
Custodian also is entitled to certain out-of-pocket expenses.
LEGAL
COUNSEL
Morgan,
Lewis & Bockius LLP, located at 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC
20004-2541, serves as legal counsel for the Trust.
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Cohen
& Company, Ltd., located at 1350 Euclid Avenue, Suite 800, Cleveland, Ohio
44115, serves as the independent registered public accounting firm for the
Funds.
PORTFOLIO
HOLDINGS DISCLOSURE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
The
Board has adopted a policy regarding the disclosure of information about each
Fund’s security holdings. Each Fund’s entire portfolio holdings are publicly
disseminated each day a Fund is open for business and may be available through
financial reporting and news services, including publicly available internet web
sites. In addition, the composition of the Deposit Securities is publicly
disseminated daily prior to the opening of the Exchange via the facilities of
the National Securities Clearing Corporation (“NSCC”).
DESCRIPTION
OF SHARES
The
Declaration of Trust authorizes the issuance of an unlimited number of funds and
shares. Each share represents an equal proportionate interest in the applicable
Fund with each other share. Shares are entitled upon liquidation to a pro rata
share in the net assets of the applicable Fund. Shareholders have no preemptive
rights. The Declaration of Trust provides that the Trustees may create
additional series or classes of shares. All consideration received by the Trust
for shares of any additional funds and all assets in which such consideration is
invested would belong to that fund and would be subject to the liabilities
related thereto. Share certificates representing Shares will not be issued.
Shares, when issued, are fully paid and non-assessable.
Each
Share has one vote with respect to matters upon which a shareholder vote is
required, consistent with the requirements of the 1940 Act and the rules
promulgated thereunder. Shares of all funds in the Trust vote together as a
single class, except that if the matter being voted on affects only a particular
fund it will be voted on only by that fund and if a matter affects a particular
fund differently from other funds, that fund will vote separately on such
matter. As a Delaware statutory trust, the Trust is not required, and does not
intend, to hold annual meetings of shareholders. Approval of shareholders will
be sought, however, for certain changes in the operation of the Trust and for
the election of Trustees under certain circumstances. Upon the written request
of shareholders owning at least 10% of the Trust’s shares, the Trust will call
for a meeting of shareholders to consider the removal of one or more Trustees
and other certain matters. In the event that such a meeting is requested, the
Trust will provide appropriate assistance and information to the shareholders
requesting the meeting.
Under
the Declaration of Trust, the Trustees have the power to liquidate a Fund
without shareholder approval. While the Trustees have no present intention of
exercising this power, they may do so if a Fund fails to reach a viable size
within a reasonable amount of time or for such other reasons as may be
determined by the Board.
LIMITATION
OF TRUSTEES’ LIABILITY
The
Declaration of Trust provides that a Trustee shall be liable only for his or her
own willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of
the duties involved in the conduct of the office of Trustee and shall not be
liable for errors of judgment or mistakes of fact or law. The Trustees shall not
be responsible or liable in any event for any neglect or wrongdoing of any
officer, agent, employee, adviser or principal underwriter of the Trust, nor
shall any Trustee be responsible for the act or omission of any other Trustee.
The Declaration of Trust also provides that the Trust shall indemnify each
person who is, or has been, a Trustee, officer, employee or agent of the Trust,
any person who is serving or has served at the Trust’s request as a Trustee,
officer, trustee, employee or agent of another organization in which the Trust
has any interest as a shareholder, creditor or otherwise to the extent and in
the manner provided in the Amended and Restated By-laws. However, nothing in the
Declaration of Trust shall protect or indemnify a Trustee against any liability
for his or her willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless
disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of the office of Trustee.
Nothing contained in this section attempts to disclaim a Trustee’s individual
liability in any manner inconsistent with the federal securities
laws.
BROKERAGE
TRANSACTIONS
The
policy of the Trust regarding purchases and sales of securities for a Fund is
that primary consideration will be given to obtaining the most favorable prices
and efficient executions of transactions. Consistent with this policy, when
securities transactions are effected on a stock exchange, the Trust’s policy is
to pay commissions which are considered fair and reasonable without necessarily
determining that the lowest possible commissions are paid in all circumstances.
The Trust believes that a requirement always to seek the lowest possible
commission cost could impede effective portfolio management and preclude the
Funds from obtaining a high quality of brokerage and research services. In
seeking to determine the reasonableness of brokerage commissions paid in any
transaction, the Sub-Adviser will rely upon its experience and knowledge
regarding commissions generally charged by various brokers and on its judgment
in evaluating the brokerage services received from the broker effecting the
transaction. Such determinations are necessarily subjective and imprecise, as in
most cases, an exact dollar value for those services is not ascertainable. The
Trust has
adopted
policies and procedures that prohibit the consideration of sales of Shares as a
factor in the selection of a broker or dealer to execute its portfolio
transactions.
The
Sub-Adviser owes a fiduciary duty to its clients to seek to provide best
execution on trades effected. In selecting a broker/dealer for each specific
transaction, the Sub-Adviser chooses the broker/dealer deemed most capable of
providing the services necessary to obtain the most favorable execution. “Best
execution” is generally understood to mean the most favorable cost or net
proceeds reasonably obtainable under the circumstances. The full range of
brokerage services applicable to a particular transaction may be considered when
making this judgment, which may include, but is not limited to: liquidity,
price, commission, timing, aggregated trades, capable floor brokers or traders,
competent block trading coverage, ability to position, capital strength and
stability, reliable and accurate communications and settlement processing, use
of automation, knowledge of other buyers or sellers, arbitrage skills,
administrative ability, underwriting and provision of information on a
particular security or market in which the transaction is to occur. The specific
criteria will vary depending upon the nature of the transaction, the market in
which it is executed, and the extent to which it is possible to select from
among multiple broker/dealers. The Sub-Adviser also will use electronic crossing
networks (“ECNs”) when appropriate.
Subject
to the foregoing policies, brokers or dealers selected to execute a Fund’s
portfolio transactions may include such Fund’s Authorized Participants (as
discussed in “Procedures for Purchase of Creation Units” below) or their
affiliates. An Authorized Participant or its affiliates may be selected to
execute a Fund’s portfolio transactions in conjunction with an all-cash creation
unit order or an order including “cash-in-lieu” (as described below under
“Purchase and Redemption of Shares in Creation Units”), so long as such
selection is in keeping with the foregoing policies. As described below under
“Purchase and Redemption of Shares in Creation Units— Creation Transaction Fee”
and “—Redemption Transaction Fee”, each Fund may determine to not charge a
variable fee on certain orders when the Adviser has determined that doing so is
in the best interests of Fund shareholders, e.g.,
for creation orders that facilitate the rebalance of the applicable Fund’s
portfolio in a more tax efficient manner than could be achieved without such
order, even if the decision to not charge a variable fee could be viewed as
benefiting the Authorized Participant or its affiliate selected to execute a
Fund’s portfolio transactions in connection with such orders.
The
Sub-Adviser may use a Fund’s assets for, or participate in, third-party soft
dollar arrangements, in addition to receiving proprietary research from various
full-service brokers, the cost of which is bundled with the cost of the broker’s
execution services. The Sub-Adviser does not “pay up” for the value of any such
proprietary research. Section 28(e) of the Exchange Act permits the Sub-Adviser,
under certain circumstances, to cause a Fund to pay a broker or dealer a
commission for effecting a transaction in excess of the amount of commission
another broker or dealer would have charged for effecting the transaction in
recognition of the value of brokerage and research services provided by the
broker or dealer. The Sub-Adviser may receive a variety of research services and
information on many topics, which it can use in connection with its management
responsibilities with respect to the various accounts over which it exercises
investment discretion or otherwise provides investment advice. The research
services may include qualifying order management systems, portfolio attribution
and monitoring services and computer software and access charges which are
directly related to investment research. Accordingly, a Fund may pay a broker
commission higher than the lowest available in recognition of the broker’s
provision of such services to the Sub-Adviser, but only if the Sub-Adviser
determines the total commission (including the soft dollar benefit) is
comparable to the best commission rate that could be expected to be received
from other brokers. The amount of soft dollar benefits received depends on the
amount of brokerage transactions effected with the brokers. A conflict of
interest exists because there is an incentive to: 1) cause clients to pay a
higher commission than the firm might otherwise be able to negotiate;
2) cause clients to engage in more securities transactions than would
otherwise be optimal; and 3) only recommend brokers that provide soft dollar
benefits.
The
Sub-Adviser faces a potential conflict of interest when it uses client trades to
obtain brokerage or research services. This conflict exists because the
Sub-Adviser can use the brokerage or research services to manage client accounts
without paying cash for such services, which reduces the Sub-Adviser’s expenses
to the extent that the Sub-Adviser would have purchased such products had they
not been provided by brokers. Section 28(e) permits the Sub-Adviser to use
brokerage or research services for the benefit of any account it manages.
Certain accounts managed by the Sub-Adviser may generate soft dollars used to
purchase brokerage or research services that ultimately benefit other accounts
managed by the Sub-Adviser, effectively cross subsidizing the other accounts
managed by the Sub-Adviser that benefit directly from the product. The
Sub-Adviser may not necessarily use all of the brokerage or research services in
connection with managing a Fund whose trades generated the soft dollars used to
purchase such products.
The
Sub-Adviser is responsible, subject to oversight by the Adviser and the Board,
for placing orders on behalf of each Fund for the purchase or sale of portfolio
securities. If purchases or sales of portfolio securities of a Fund and one or
more other investment companies or clients supervised by the Sub-Adviser are
considered at or about the same time, transactions in such securities are
allocated among the several investment companies and clients in a manner deemed
equitable and consistent with its fiduciary obligations to all by the
Sub-Adviser. In some cases, this procedure could have a detrimental effect on
the price or volume of the security so far as a Fund is concerned. However, in
other cases, it is possible that the ability to participate in volume
transactions and to negotiate lower brokerage commissions will be beneficial to
a Fund. The primary consideration is prompt execution of orders at the most
favorable net price.
A
Fund may deal with affiliates in principal transactions to the extent permitted
by exemptive order or applicable rule or regulation.
The
table below shows the aggregate brokerage commissions paid by the Funds for the
fiscal years ended December 31, as applicable to each Fund:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fund |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
RiverNorth
Patriot ETF |
$1,651 |
$973 |
0* |
RiverNorth
Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF |
$5,321 |
$1,474** |
N/A |
*
For
the fiscal period December 31, 2021 (commencement of operations) through
December 31, 2021.
**
for
the fiscal period July 11, 2022 (commencement of operations) through December
31, 2022.
Directed
Brokerage. For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, the Funds did not pay any
commissions on brokerage transactions directed to brokers pursuant to an
agreement or understanding whereby the broker provides research or other
brokerage services to the Sub-Adviser.
Brokerage
with Fund Affiliates.
A Fund may execute brokerage or other agency transactions through registered
broker-dealer affiliates of the Funds, the Adviser, the Sub-Adviser, or the
Distributor for a commission in conformity with the 1940 Act, the Exchange Act
and rules promulgated by the SEC. These rules require that commissions paid to
the affiliate by the Funds for exchange transactions not exceed “usual and
customary” brokerage commissions. The rules define “usual and customary”
commissions to include amounts which are “reasonable and fair compared to the
commission, fee or other remuneration received or to be received by other
brokers in connection with comparable transactions involving similar securities
being purchased or sold on a securities exchange during a comparable period of
time.” The Trustees, including those who are not “interested persons” of the
Funds, have adopted procedures for evaluating the reasonableness of commissions
paid to affiliates and review these procedures periodically. During the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2023, December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the
Funds did not pay brokerage commissions to any registered broker-dealer
affiliates of the Funds, the Adviser, the Sub-Adviser, or the Distributor.
Securities
of “Regular Broker-Dealers.” Each
Fund is required to identify any securities of its “regular brokers or dealers”
(as such term is defined in the 1940 Act) that it may hold at the close of its
most recent fiscal year. “Regular brokers or dealers” of a Fund are the ten
brokers or dealers that, during the most recent fiscal year: (i) received the
greatest dollar amounts of brokerage commissions from the Fund’s portfolio
transactions; (ii) engaged as principal in the largest dollar amounts of
portfolio transactions of the Fund; or (iii) sold the largest dollar amounts of
Shares. As of December 31, 2023, the Funds did not hold any securities of
their “regular broker-dealers.”
PORTFOLIO
TURNOVER RATE
Portfolio
turnover may vary from year to year, as well as within a year. High turnover
rates are likely to result in comparatively greater brokerage expenses. The
overall reasonableness of brokerage commissions is evaluated by the Sub-Adviser
based upon its knowledge of available information as to the general level of
commissions paid by other institutional investors for comparable services.
For
the fiscal years ended December 31, the Funds’ portfolio turnover rates
were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fund |
2023 |
2022 |
RiverNorth
Patriot ETF |
46% |
31% |
RiverNorth
Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF |
132%* |
43%** |
* The
increase in portfolio rate for the Fund is due to the fact that, during the
fiscal period ended December 31, 2022, the Fund had been in operation for less
than six months.
** For
the fiscal period July 11, 2022 (commencement of operations) through December
31, 2022.
BOOK
ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM
The
Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) acts as securities depositary for Shares.
Shares are represented by securities registered in the name of DTC or its
nominee, Cede & Co., and deposited with, or on behalf of, DTC. Except in
limited circumstances set forth below, certificates will not be issued for
Shares.
DTC
is a limited-purpose trust company that was created to hold securities of its
participants (the “DTC Participants”) and to facilitate the clearance and
settlement of securities transactions among the DTC Participants in such
securities through electronic book-entry changes in accounts of the DTC
Participants, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of securities
certificates. DTC Participants include securities brokers and dealers, banks,
trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other organizations, some of
whom (and/or their representatives) own DTC. More specifically, DTC is owned by
a number of its DTC Participants and by the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and
FINRA. Access to the DTC system is also available to others such as banks,
brokers, dealers, and trust companies that clear through or maintain a custodial
relationship with a DTC Participant, either directly or indirectly (the
“Indirect Participants”).
Beneficial
ownership of Shares is limited to DTC Participants, Indirect Participants, and
persons holding interests through DTC Participants and Indirect Participants.
Ownership of beneficial interests in Shares (owners of such beneficial interests
are referred to in
this
SAI as “Beneficial Owners”) is shown on, and the transfer of ownership is
effected only through, records maintained by DTC (with respect to DTC
Participants) and on the records of DTC Participants (with respect to Indirect
Participants and Beneficial Owners that are not DTC Participants). Beneficial
Owners will receive from or through the DTC Participant a written confirmation
relating to their purchase of Shares. The Trust recognizes DTC or its nominee as
the record owner of all Shares for all purposes. Beneficial Owners of Shares are
not entitled to have Shares registered in their names and will not receive or be
entitled to physical delivery of Share certificates. Each Beneficial Owner must
rely on the procedures of DTC and any DTC Participant and/or Indirect
Participant through which such Beneficial Owner holds its interests, to exercise
any rights of a holder of Shares.
Conveyance
of all notices, statements, and other communications to Beneficial Owners is
effected as described in the ensuing paragraphs. DTC will make available to the
Trust upon request and for a fee a listing of Shares held by each DTC
Participant. The Trust shall obtain from each such DTC Participant the number of
Beneficial Owners holding Shares, directly or indirectly, through such DTC
Participant. The Trust shall provide each such DTC Participant with copies of
such notice, statement, or other communication, in such form, number and at such
place as such DTC Participant may reasonably request, in order that such notice,
statement or communication may be transmitted by such DTC Participant, directly
or indirectly, to such Beneficial Owners. In addition, the Trust shall pay to
each such DTC Participant a fair and reasonable amount as reimbursement for the
expenses attendant to such transmittal, all subject to applicable statutory and
regulatory requirements.
Share
distributions shall be made to DTC or its nominee, Cede & Co., as the
registered holder of all Shares. DTC or its nominee, upon receipt of any such
distributions, shall credit immediately DTC Participants’ accounts with payments
in amounts proportionate to their respective beneficial interests in a Fund as
shown on the records of DTC or its nominee. Payments by DTC Participants to
Indirect Participants and Beneficial Owners of Shares held through such DTC
Participants will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices,
as is now the case with securities held for the accounts of customers in bearer
form or registered in a “street name,” and will be the responsibility of such
DTC Participants.
The
Trust has no responsibility or liability for any aspect of the records relating
to or notices to Beneficial Owners, or payments made on account of beneficial
ownership interests in Shares, or for maintaining, supervising, or reviewing any
records relating to such beneficial ownership interests, or for any other aspect
of the relationship between DTC and the DTC Participants or the relationship
between such DTC Participants and the Indirect Participants and Beneficial
Owners owning through such DTC Participants.
DTC
may determine to discontinue providing its service with respect to a Fund at any
time by giving reasonable notice to the Fund and discharging its
responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. Under such
circumstances, the applicable Fund shall take action either to find a
replacement for DTC to perform its functions at a comparable cost or, if such
replacement is unavailable, to issue and deliver printed certificates
representing ownership of Shares, unless the Trust makes other arrangements with
respect thereto satisfactory to the Exchange.
PURCHASE
AND REDEMPTION OF CREATION UNITS
Each
Fund issues and redeems its shares on a continuous basis, at NAV, only in a
large, specified number of shares called a “Creation Unit,” either principally
in-kind for securities or in cash for the value of such securities. The NAV of a
Fund’s Shares is determined once each Business Day, as described below under
“Determination
of Net Asset Value.”
The Creation Unit size may change. Authorized Participants will be notified of
such change.
Purchase
(Creation).
The Trust issues and sells Shares only in Creation Units on a continuous basis
through the Distributor, without a sales load (but subject to transaction fees,
if applicable), at the NAV per share next determined after receipt, on any
Business Day, of an order in proper form. The NAV of Shares is calculated each
Business Day as of the scheduled close of regular trading on the NYSE, generally
4:00 p.m., Eastern time. The Funds will not issue fractional Creation Units. A
“Business Day” is any day on which the NYSE is open for business. As of the date
of this SAI, the NYSE observes the following holidays: New Year’s Day, Martin
Luther King, Jr. Day, President’s Day (Washington’s Birthday), Good Friday,
Memorial Day, Juneteenth Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and
Christmas Day.
Fund
Deposit.
Each Fund has adopted policies and procedures governing the process of
constructing baskets of Deposit Securities (defined below), Fund Securities
(defined below) and/or cash, and acceptance of the same (the “Basket
Procedures”). The consideration for purchase of a Creation Unit of a Fund
generally consists of either: (i) the in-kind deposit of a designated portfolio
of securities (the “Deposit Securities”) per each Creation Unit, constituting a
substantial replication, or a portfolio sampling representation, of the
securities included in a Fund’s portfolio and the Cash Component (defined
below), computed as described below, or (ii) the cash value of the Deposit
Securities (“Deposit Cash”) and the Cash Component to replace any Deposit
Security. When accepting purchases of Creation Units for cash, a Fund may incur
additional costs associated with the acquisition of Deposit Securities that
would otherwise be provided by an in-kind purchaser. These additional costs may
be recoverable from the purchaser of Creation Units.
Together,
the Deposit Securities or Deposit Cash, as applicable, and the Cash Component
constitute the “Fund Deposit,” which represents the minimum initial and
subsequent investment amount for a Creation Unit of a Fund. The “Cash Component”
is an amount equal to the difference between the NAV of Shares (per Creation
Unit) and the market value of the Deposit Securities or Deposit Cash, as
applicable. If the Cash Component is a positive number (i.e.,
the NAV per Creation Unit exceeds the value of the Deposit Securities
or
Deposit Cash, as applicable), the Cash Component shall be such positive amount.
If the Cash Component is a negative number (i.e.,
the NAV per Creation Unit is less than the value of the Deposit Securities or
Deposit Cash, as applicable), the Cash Component shall be such negative amount
and the creator will be entitled to receive cash in an amount equal to the Cash
Component. The Cash Component serves the function of compensating for any
differences between the NAV per Creation Unit and the market value of the
Deposit Securities or Deposit Cash, as applicable. Computation of the Cash
Component excludes any stamp duty or other similar fees and expenses payable
upon transfer of beneficial ownership of the Deposit Securities, if applicable,
which shall be the sole responsibility of the Authorized Participant (as defined
below).
The
Funds, through NSCC, makes available on each Business Day, prior to the opening
of business on the Exchange (currently, 9:30 a.m., Eastern time), the list of
the names and the required number of Shares of each Deposit Security or the
required amount of Deposit Cash, as applicable, to be included in the current
Fund Deposit (based on information at the end of the previous Business Day) for
a Fund. Such Fund Deposit is subject to any applicable adjustments as described
below, to effect purchases of Creation Units of a Fund until such time as the
next-announced composition of the Deposit Securities or the required amount of
Deposit Cash, as applicable, is made available.
The
identity and number of Shares of the Deposit Securities or the amount of Deposit
Cash, as applicable, required for a Fund Deposit for a Fund may be changed from
time to time by the Adviser, in accordance with the Basket Procedures, with a
view to the investment objective of such Fund. Information regarding the Fund
Deposit necessary for the purchase of a Creation Unit is made available to
Authorized Participants and other market participants seeking to transact in
Creation Unit aggregations. The composition of the Deposit Securities also may
change in response to portfolio adjustments, interest payments and corporate
action events.
The
Trust reserves the right to permit or require the substitution of Deposit Cash
to replace any Deposit Security, which shall be added to the Cash Component,
including, without limitation, in situations where the Deposit Security: (i) may
not be available in sufficient quantity for delivery; (ii) may not be eligible
for transfer through the systems of DTC for corporate securities and municipal
securities; (iii) may not be eligible for trading by an Authorized Participant
or the investor for which it is acting; (iv) would be restricted under the
securities laws or where the delivery of the Deposit Security to the Authorized
Participant would result in the disposition of the Deposit Security by the
Authorized Participant becoming restricted under the securities laws; or (v) in
certain other situations (collectively, “custom orders”). The Trust also
reserves the right to permit or require the substitution of Deposit Securities
in lieu of Deposit Cash.
Cash
Purchase. The
Trust may at its discretion permit full or partial cash purchases of Creation
Units of a Fund. When full or partial cash purchases of Creation Units are
available or specified for a Fund, they will be effected in essentially the same
manner as in-kind purchases thereof. In the case of a full or partial cash
purchase, the Authorized Participant must pay the cash equivalent of the Deposit
Securities it would otherwise be required to provide through an in-kind
purchase, plus the same Cash Component required to be paid by an in-kind
purchaser together with a creation transaction fee and non-standard charges, as
may be applicable.
Procedures
for Purchase of Creation Units.
To be eligible to place orders with the Distributor to purchase a Creation Unit
of a Fund, an entity must be (i) a “Participating Party” (i.e.,
a broker-dealer or other participant in the clearing process through the
Continuous Net Settlement System of the NSCC (the “Clearing Process”)), a
clearing agency that is registered with the SEC; or (ii) a DTC Participant (see
“Book
Entry Only System”).
In addition, each Participating Party or DTC Participant (each, an “Authorized
Participant”) must execute a Participant Agreement that has been agreed to by
the Distributor, and that has been accepted by the Transfer Agent, with respect
to purchases and redemptions of Creation Units. Each Authorized Participant will
agree, pursuant to the terms of a Participant Agreement, on behalf of itself or
any investor on whose behalf it will act, to certain conditions, including that
it will pay to the Trust, an amount of cash sufficient to pay the Cash Component
together with the creation transaction fee (described below), if applicable, and
any other applicable fees and taxes.
All
orders to purchase Shares directly from a Fund, including custom orders, must be
placed for one or more Creation Units and in the manner and by the time set
forth in the Participant Agreement and/or applicable order form. With respect to
the Funds, the order cut-off time for orders to purchase Creation Units is 4:00
p.m. Eastern time. In addition, orders for the Patriot ETF to purchase Creation
Units on the next Business Day may be submitted as a “Future Dated Trade”
between 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time and 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time on the prior Business
Day. Such times may be modified by the Funds from time-to-time by amendment to
the Participant Agreement and/or applicable order form. The date on which an
order to purchase Creation Units (or an order to redeem Creation Units, as set
forth below) is received and accepted is referred to as the “Order Placement
Date.”
An
Authorized Participant may require an investor to make certain representations
or enter into agreements with respect to the order (e.g.,
to provide for payments of cash, when required). Investors should be aware that
their particular broker may not have executed a Participant Agreement and that,
therefore, orders to purchase Shares directly from a Fund in Creation Units have
to be placed by the investor’s broker through an Authorized Participant that has
executed a Participant Agreement. In such cases there may be additional charges
to such investor. At any given time, there may be only a limited number of
broker-dealers that have executed a Participant Agreement and only a small
number of such Authorized Participants may have international
capabilities.
On
days when the Exchange closes earlier than normal, the Funds may require orders
to create Creation Units to be placed earlier in the day. In addition, if a
market or markets on which a Fund’s investments are primarily traded is closed,
such Fund also will generally not accept orders on such day(s). Orders must be
transmitted by an Authorized Participant by telephone or other transmission
method
acceptable
to the Transfer Agent pursuant to procedures set forth in the Participant
Agreement and in accordance with the applicable order form. On behalf of the
Funds, the Transfer Agent will notify the Custodian of such order. The Custodian
will then provide such information to the appropriate local sub-custodian(s).
Those placing orders through an Authorized Participant should allow sufficient
time to permit proper submission of the purchase order to the Transfer Agent by
the cut-off time on such Business Day. Economic or market disruptions or
changes, or telephone or other communication failure may impede the ability to
reach the Transfer Agent or an Authorized Participant.
Fund
Deposits must be delivered by an Authorized Participant through the Federal
Reserve System (for cash) or through DTC (for corporate securities), through a
sub-custody agent (for foreign securities) and/or through such other
arrangements allowed by the Trust or its agents. With respect to foreign Deposit
Securities, the Custodian shall cause the sub-custodian of the applicable Fund
to maintain an account into which the Authorized Participant shall deliver, on
behalf of itself or the party on whose behalf it is acting, such Deposit
Securities (or Deposit Cash for all or a part of such securities, as permitted
or required), with any appropriate adjustments as advised by the Trust. Foreign
Deposit Securities must be delivered to an account maintained at the applicable
local sub-custodian. A Fund Deposit transfer must be ordered by the Authorized
Participant in a timely fashion to ensure the delivery of the requisite number
of Deposit Securities or Deposit Cash, as applicable, to the account of the
applicable Fund or its agents by no later than 12:00 p.m. Eastern time (or such
other time as specified by the Trust) on the Settlement Date. If a Fund or its
agents do not receive all of the Deposit Securities, or the required Deposit
Cash in lieu thereof, by such time, then the order may be deemed rejected and
the Authorized Participant shall be liable to such Fund for losses, if any,
resulting therefrom. The “Settlement Date” for a Fund is generally the second
Business Day after the Order Placement Date. All questions as to the number of
Deposit Securities or Deposit Cash to be delivered, as applicable, and the
validity, form and eligibility (including time of receipt) for the deposit of
any tendered securities or cash, as applicable, will be determined by the Trust,
whose determination shall be final and binding. The amount of cash represented
by the Cash Component must be transferred directly to the Custodian through the
Federal Reserve Bank wire transfer system in a timely manner to be received by
the Custodian no later than the Settlement Date. If the Cash Component and the
Deposit Securities or Deposit Cash, as applicable, are not received by the
Custodian in a timely manner by the Settlement Date, the creation order may be
cancelled. Upon written notice to the Transfer Agent, such canceled order may be
resubmitted the following Business Day using a Fund Deposit as newly constituted
to reflect the then current NAV of the applicable Fund.
The
order shall be deemed to be received on the Business Day on which the order is
placed provided that the order is placed in proper form prior to the applicable
cut-off time and the federal funds in the appropriate amount are deposited with
the Custodian on the Settlement Date. If the order is not placed in proper form
as required, or federal funds in the appropriate amount are not received on the
Settlement Date, then the order may be deemed to be rejected and the Authorized
Participant shall be liable to the applicable Fund for losses, if any, resulting
therefrom. A creation request is in “proper form” if all procedures set forth in
the Participant Agreement, order form and this SAI are properly
followed.
Issuance
of a Creation Unit. Except
as provided in this SAI, Creation Units will not be issued until the transfer of
good title to the Trust of the Deposit Securities or payment of Deposit Cash, as
applicable, and the payment of the Cash Component have been completed. When the
sub-custodian has confirmed to the Custodian that the required Deposit
Securities (or the cash value thereof) have been delivered to the account of the
relevant sub-custodian or sub-custodians, the Distributor and the Adviser shall
be notified of such delivery, and the Trust will issue and cause the delivery of
the Creation Units. The delivery of Creation Units so created generally will
occur no later than the second Business Day following the day on which the
purchase order is deemed received by the Transfer Agent. The Authorized
Participant shall be liable to the applicable Fund for losses, if any, resulting
from unsettled orders.
In
instances where the Trust accepts Deposit Securities for the purchase of a
Creation Unit, the Creation Units may be purchased in advance of receipt by the
Trust of all or a portion of the applicable Deposit Securities as described
below. In these circumstances, the initial deposit will have a value greater
than the NAV of Shares on the date the order is placed in proper form since, in
addition to available Deposit Securities, cash must be deposited in an amount
equal to the sum of (i) the Cash Component, plus (ii) an additional amount of
cash equal to a percentage of the value as set forth in the Participant
Agreement, of the undelivered Deposit Securities (the “Additional Cash
Deposit”), which shall be maintained in a separate non-interest bearing
collateral account. The Authorized Participant must deposit with the Custodian
the Additional Cash Deposit, as applicable, by 12:00 p.m. Eastern time (or such
other time as specified by the Trust) on the Settlement Date. If a Fund or its
agents do not receive the Additional Cash Deposit in the appropriate amount, by
such time, then the order may be deemed rejected and the Authorized Participant
shall be liable to the applicable Fund for losses, if any, resulting therefrom.
An additional amount of cash shall be required to be deposited with the Trust,
pending delivery of the missing Deposit Securities to the extent necessary to
maintain the Additional Cash Deposit with the Trust in an amount at least equal
to the applicable percentage, as set forth in the Participant Agreement, of the
daily market value of the missing Deposit Securities. The Participant Agreement
will permit the Trust to buy the missing Deposit Securities at any time.
Authorized Participants will be liable to the Trust for the costs incurred by
the Trust in connection with any such purchases. These costs will be deemed to
include the amount by which the actual purchase price of the Deposit Securities
exceeds the value of such Deposit Securities on the day the purchase order was
deemed received by the Transfer Agent plus the brokerage and related transaction
costs associated with such purchases. The Trust will return any unused portion
of the Additional Cash Deposit once all of the missing Deposit Securities have
been properly received by the Custodian or purchased by the Trust and deposited
into the Trust. In addition, a transaction fee, as described below under
“Creation Transaction Fee,” may be charged and additional variable charge also
may be applied, as described below. The delivery of Creation Units so created
generally will occur no later than the Settlement Date.
Acceptance
of Orders of Creation Units.
Provided that such action does not result in a suspension of sales of Creation
Units in contravention of Rule 6c-11 under the 1940 Act and the SEC’s positions
thereunder, the Trust reserves the right to reject an order for Creation Units
transmitted in respect of a Fund at its discretion, including, without
limitation, if (a) the order is not in proper form or the Fund Deposit delivered
does not consist of the securities the Custodian specified; (b) the investor(s),
upon obtaining the Shares ordered, would own 80% or more of the currently
outstanding Shares of the Fund; (c) the Deposit Securities or Deposit Cash, as
applicable, delivered by the Authorized Participant are not as disseminated
through the facilities of the NSCC for that date by the Custodian; (d) the
acceptance of the Fund Deposit would, in the opinion of counsel, be unlawful;
(e) the acceptance or receipt of the order for a Creation Unit would, in the
opinion of counsel, be unlawful; or (f) in the event that circumstances outside
the control of the Trust, the Custodian, the Transfer Agent, the Distributor
and/or the Adviser make it for all practical purposes not feasible to process
orders for Creation Units. Examples of such circumstances include acts of God or
public service or utility problems such as fires, floods, extreme weather
conditions and power outages resulting in telephone, telecopy and computer
failures; market conditions or activities causing trading halts; systems
failures involving computer or other information systems affecting the Trust,
the Distributor, the Custodian, the Transfer Agent, DTC, NSCC, Federal Reserve
System, or any other participant in the creation process, and other
extraordinary events. The Trust or its agents shall communicate to the
Authorized Participant its rejection of an order. The Trust, the Transfer Agent,
the Custodian and the Distributor are under no duty, however, to give
notification of any defects or irregularities in the delivery of Fund Deposits
nor shall either of them incur any liability for the failure to give any such
notification. The Trust, the Transfer Agent, the Custodian and the Distributor
shall not be liable for the rejection of any purchase order for Creation Units.
Given the importance of the ongoing issuance of Creation Units to maintaining a
market price that is at or close to the underlying NAV of a Fund, the Trust does
not intend to suspend the acceptance of orders for Creation Units, unless it
believes doing so would be in the best interests of the Fund.
All
questions as to the number of shares of each security in the Deposit Securities
and the validity form, eligibility and acceptance for deposit of any securities
to be delivered shall be determined by the Trust, and the Trust’s determination
shall be final and binding.
Creation
Unit Transaction Fee.
A fixed purchase (i.e.,
creation) transaction fee, payable to the Funds’ custodian, may be imposed for
the transfer and other transaction costs associated with the purchase of
Creation Units (“Creation Order Costs”). The standard fixed creation unit
transaction fee for each Fund, regardless of the number of Creation Units
created in the transaction, can be found in the table below. Each Fund may
adjust the standard fixed creation unit transaction fee from time to time. The
fixed creation unit transaction fee may be waived on certain orders if the
applicable Fund’s custodian has determined to waive some or all of the Creation
Order Costs associated with the order or another party, such as the Adviser, has
agreed to pay such fee.
In
addition, a variable fee, payable to the Funds, of up to the maximum percentage
listed in the table below of the value of the Creation Units subject to the
transaction may be imposed for cash purchases, non-standard orders, or partial
cash purchases of Creation Units. The variable charge is primarily designed to
cover additional costs (e.g.,
brokerage, taxes) involved with buying the securities with cash. Each Fund may
determine to not charge a variable fee on certain orders when the Adviser has
determined that doing so is in the best interests of Fund shareholders,
e.g.,
for creation orders that facilitate the rebalance of the applicable Fund’s
portfolio in a more tax efficient manner than could be achieved without such
order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fund |
Fixed
Creation Unit Transaction Fee |
Maximum
Variable Transaction Fee |
RiverNorth
Patriot ETF |
$500 |
2% |
RiverNorth
Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF |
$500 |
2% |
Investors
who use the services of a broker or other such intermediary may be charged a fee
for such services. Investors are responsible for the fixed costs of transferring
the Fund Securities from the Trust to their account or on their order.
Risks
of Purchasing Creation Units.
There are certain legal risks unique to investors purchasing Creation Units
directly from a Fund. Because Shares may be issued on an ongoing basis, a
“distribution” of Shares could be occurring at any time. Certain activities that
a shareholder performs as a dealer could, depending on the circumstances, result
in the shareholder being deemed a participant in the distribution in a manner
that could render the shareholder a statutory underwriter and subject to the
prospectus delivery and liability provisions of the Securities Act. For example,
a shareholder could be deemed a statutory underwriter if it purchases Creation
Units from a Fund, breaks them down into the constituent Shares, and sells those
Shares directly to customers, or if a shareholder chooses to couple the creation
of a supply of new Shares with an active selling effort involving solicitation
of secondary-market demand for Shares. Whether a person is an underwriter
depends upon all of the facts and circumstances pertaining to that person’s
activities, and the examples mentioned here should not be considered a complete
description of all the activities that could cause you to be deemed an
underwriter.
Dealers
who are not “underwriters” but are participating in a distribution (as opposed
to engaging in ordinary secondary-market transactions), and thus dealing with
Shares as part of an “unsold allotment” within the meaning of Section 4(a)(3)(C)
of the Securities Act, will be unable to take advantage of the prospectus
delivery exemption provided by Section 4(a)(3) of the Securities Act.
Redemption.
Shares may be redeemed only in Creation Units at their NAV next determined after
receipt of a redemption request in proper form by a Fund through the Transfer
Agent and only on a Business Day. EXCEPT UPON LIQUIDATION OF A FUND, THE
TRUST
WILL NOT REDEEM SHARES IN AMOUNTS LESS THAN CREATION UNITS. Investors must
accumulate enough Shares in the secondary market to constitute a Creation Unit
in order to have such Shares redeemed by the Trust. There can be no assurance,
however, that there will be sufficient liquidity in the public trading market at
any time to permit assembly of a Creation Unit. Investors should expect to incur
brokerage and other costs in connection with assembling a sufficient number of
Shares to constitute a redeemable Creation Unit.
With
respect to the Funds, the Custodian, through the NSCC, makes available prior to
the opening of business on the Exchange (currently, 9:30 a.m., Eastern time) on
each Business Day, the list of the names and Share quantities of each Fund’s
portfolio securities that will be applicable (subject to possible amendment or
correction) to redemption requests received in proper form (as defined below) on
that day (“Fund Securities”). Fund Securities received on redemption may not be
identical to Deposit Securities.
Redemption
proceeds for a Creation Unit are paid either in-kind or in cash, or a
combination thereof, as determined by the Trust in accordance with the Basket
Procedures. With respect to in-kind redemptions of a Fund, redemption proceeds
for a Creation Unit will consist of Fund Securities—as announced by the
Custodian on the Business Day of the request for redemption received in proper
form plus cash in an amount equal to the difference between the NAV of Shares
being redeemed, as next determined after a receipt of a request in proper form,
and the value of the Fund Securities (the “Cash Redemption Amount”), less a
fixed redemption transaction fee, as applicable, and additional variable charge
as set forth below. In the event that the Fund Securities have a value greater
than the NAV of Shares, a compensating cash payment equal to the differential is
required to be made by or through an Authorized Participant by the redeeming
shareholder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at the Trust’s discretion, an
Authorized Participant may receive the corresponding cash value of the
securities in lieu of the in-kind securities value representing one or more Fund
Securities.
Cash
Redemption. Full
or partial cash redemptions of Creation Units will be effected in essentially
the same manner as in-kind redemptions thereof. In the case of full or partial
cash redemptions, the Authorized Participant receives the cash equivalent of the
Fund Securities it would otherwise receive through an in-kind redemption, plus
the same Cash Redemption Amount to be paid to an in-kind redeemer.
Redemption
Transaction Fee.
A fixed redemption transaction fee, payable to the Funds’ custodian, may be
imposed for the transfer and other transaction costs associated with the
redemption of Creation Units (“Redemption Order Costs”). The standard fixed
redemption transaction fee for each Fund, regardless of the number of Creation
Units redeemed in the transaction, can be found in the table below. Each Fund
may adjust the redemption transaction fee from time to time. The fixed
redemption fee may be waived on certain orders if the applicable Fund’s
custodian has determined to waive some or all of the Redemption Order Costs
associated with the order or another party, such as the Adviser, has agreed to
pay such fee.
In
addition, a variable fee, payable to the Funds, of up to the maximum percentage
listed in the table below of the value of the Creation Units subject to the
transaction may be imposed for cash redemptions, non-standard orders, or partial
cash redemptions (when cash redemptions are available) of Creation Units. The
variable charge is primarily designed to cover additional costs (e.g.,
brokerage, taxes) involved with selling portfolio securities to satisfy a cash
redemption. Each Fund may determine to not charge a variable fee on certain
orders when the Adviser has determined that doing so is in the best interests of
Fund shareholders, e.g.,
for redemption orders that facilitate changes to the Funds’ portfolio in a more
tax efficient manner than could be achieved without such order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fund |
Fixed
Redemption Transaction Fee |
Maximum
Variable Transaction Fee |
RiverNorth
Patriot ETF |
$500 |
2% |
RiverNorth
Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF |
$500 |
2% |
Investors
who use the services of a broker or other such intermediary may be charged a fee
for such services. Investors are responsible for the fixed costs of transferring
the Fund Securities from the Trust to their account or on their order.
Procedures
for Redemption of Creation Units.
Orders to redeem Creation Units of a Fund on any Business Day must be submitted
in proper form to the Transfer Agent prior to 4:00 p.m. Eastern time. A
redemption request is considered to be in “proper form” if (i) an Authorized
Participant has transferred or caused to be transferred to the Trust’s Transfer
Agent the Creation Unit(s) being redeemed through the book-entry system of DTC
so as to be effective by the time as set forth in the Participant Agreement and
(ii) a request in form satisfactory to the Trust is received by the Transfer
Agent from the Authorized Participant on behalf of itself or another redeeming
investor within the time periods specified in the Participant Agreement. If the
Transfer Agent does not receive the investor’s Shares through DTC’s facilities
by the times and pursuant to the other terms and conditions set forth in the
Participant Agreement, the redemption request shall be rejected.
The
Authorized Participant must transmit the request for redemption, in the form
required by the Trust, to the Transfer Agent in accordance with procedures set
forth in the Authorized Participant Agreement. Investors should be aware that
their particular broker may not have executed an Authorized Participant
Agreement, and that, therefore, requests to redeem Creation Units may have to be
placed by the investor’s broker through an Authorized Participant who has
executed an Authorized Participant Agreement. Investors making a redemption
request should be aware that such request must be in the form specified by such
Authorized Participant. Investors making a request to redeem Creation Units
should allow sufficient time to permit proper submission of the request by an
Authorized Participant and transfer of the Shares to the Transfer Agent; such
investors should allow for the additional time that may
be
required to effect redemptions through their banks, brokers or other financial
intermediaries if such intermediaries are not Authorized Participants.
Additional
Redemption Procedures. In
connection with taking delivery of Shares of Fund Securities upon redemption of
Creation Units, a redeeming shareholder or Authorized Participant acting on
behalf of such shareholder must maintain appropriate custody arrangements with a
qualified broker-dealer, bank, or other custody providers in each jurisdiction
in which any of the Fund Securities are customarily traded, to which account
such Fund Securities will be delivered. Deliveries of redemption proceeds
generally will be made within two business days of the trade date.
The
Trust may, in its discretion and in accordance with the Basket Procedures,
exercise its option to redeem such Shares in cash, and the redeeming investor
will be required to receive its redemption proceeds in cash. In addition, an
investor may request a redemption in cash that a Fund may, in its sole
discretion, permit. In either case, the investor will receive a cash payment
equal to the NAV of its Shares based on the NAV of Shares of the applicable Fund
next determined after the redemption request is received in proper form (minus a
redemption transaction fee, if applicable, and additional charge for requested
cash redemptions specified above, to offset the Trust’s brokerage and other
transaction costs associated with the disposition of Fund Securities). A Fund
also may, in its sole discretion, and in accordance with the Basket Procedures,
upon request of a shareholder, provide such redeemer a portfolio of securities
that differs from the exact composition of the Fund Securities but does not
differ in NAV.
Redemptions
of Shares for Fund Securities will be subject to compliance with applicable
federal and state securities laws and the Funds (whether or not it otherwise
permits cash redemptions) reserves the right to redeem Creation Units for cash
to the extent that the Trust could not lawfully deliver specific Fund Securities
upon redemptions or could not do so without first registering the Fund
Securities under such laws. An Authorized Participant or an investor for which
it is acting subject to a legal restriction with respect to a particular
security included in the Fund Securities applicable to the redemption of
Creation Units may be paid an equivalent amount of cash. The Authorized
Participant may request the redeeming investor of the Shares to complete an
order form or to enter into agreements with respect to such matters as
compensating cash payment. Further, an Authorized Participant that is not a
“qualified institutional buyer,” (“QIB”) as such term is defined under Rule 144A
of the Securities Act, will not be able to receive Fund Securities that are
restricted securities eligible for resale under Rule 144A. An Authorized
Participant may be required by the Trust to provide a written confirmation with
respect to QIB status to receive Fund Securities.
Because
the portfolio securities of the Funds may trade on other exchanges on days that
the Exchange is closed or are otherwise not Business Days for such Fund,
shareholders may not be able to redeem their Shares, or to purchase or sell
Shares on the Exchange, on days when the NAV of the applicable Fund could be
significantly affecting by events in the relevant foreign markets.
The
right of redemption may be suspended or the date of payment postponed with
respect to a Fund (1) for any period during which the Exchange is closed (other
than customary weekend and holiday closings); (2) for any period during which
trading on the Exchange is suspended or restricted; (3) for any period during
which an emergency exists as a result of which disposal of the Shares of the
applicable Fund or determination of the NAV of the Shares is not reasonably
practicable; or (4) in such other circumstance as is permitted by the SEC.
DETERMINATION
OF NET ASSET VALUE
NAV
per Share for a Fund is computed by dividing the value of the net assets of the
applicable Fund (i.e.,
the value of its total assets less total liabilities) by the total number of
Shares outstanding, rounded to the nearest cent. Expenses and fees, including
the management fees, are accrued daily and taken into account for purposes of
determining NAV. The NAV of each Fund is calculated by Fund Services and
determined at the scheduled close of the regular trading session on the NYSE
(ordinarily 4:00 p.m., Eastern time) on each day that the NYSE is open, provided
that fixed-income assets may be valued as of the announced closing time for
trading in fixed-income instruments on any day that the Securities Industry and
Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”) announces an early closing
time.
In
calculating each Fund’s NAV per Share, the Fund’s investments are generally
valued using market quotations to the extent such market quotations are readily
available. If market quotations are not readily available or, are deemed to be
unreliable by the Adviser, a Fund will value such investments at fair value, as
determined by the Adviser, for purposes of calculating such Fund’s NAV. Pursuant
to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act, the Board has designated the Adviser to perform
the fair value determinations for each Fund’s portfolio holdings subject to the
Board’s oversight. The Adviser has established procedures for its fair valuation
of each Fund’s portfolio investments. These procedures address, among other
things, determining when market quotations are not readily available or reliable
and the methodologies to be used for determining the fair value of investments,
as well as the use and oversight of third-party pricing services for fair
valuation. The Adviser’s fair value determinations will be carried out in
compliance with Rule 2a-5 and based on fair value methodologies established and
applied by the Adviser and periodically tested to ensure such methodologies are
appropriate and accurate with respect to a Fund’s portfolio investments. The
Adviser’s fair value methodologies may involve obtaining inputs and prices from
third-party pricing services.
When
fair value pricing is employed, the prices of securities used by the Funds to
calculate their NAV may differ from quoted or published prices for the same
securities. Due to the subjective and variable nature of fair value pricing, it
is possible that the fair value determined for a particular security may be
materially different (higher or lower) from the price of the security quoted or
published by
others,
or the value when trading resumes or is realized upon its sale. There may be
multiple methods that can be used to value a portfolio investment when market
quotations are not readily available. The value established for any portfolio
investment at a point in time might differ from what would be produced using a
different methodology or if it had been priced using market
quotations.
DIVIDENDS
AND DISTRIBUTIONS
The
following information supplements and should be read in conjunction with the
section in the Prospectus entitled “Dividends, Distributions and
Taxes.”
General
Policies.
Dividends from net investment income, if any, are declared and paid at least
annually by each Fund. Distributions of net realized securities gains, if any,
generally are declared and paid once a year, but a Fund may make distributions
on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the
Code, in all events in a manner consistent with the provisions of the 1940
Act.
Dividends
and other distributions on Shares are distributed, as described below, on a pro
rata basis to Beneficial Owners of such Shares. Dividend payments are made
through DTC Participants and Indirect Participants to Beneficial Owners then of
record with proceeds received from the Trust.
Each
Fund makes additional distributions to the extent necessary (i) to distribute
the entire annual taxable income of the applicable Fund, plus any net capital
gains and (ii) to avoid imposition of the excise tax imposed by Section 4982 of
the Code. Management of the Trust reserves the right to declare special
dividends if, in its reasonable discretion, such action is necessary or
advisable to preserve a Fund’s eligibility for treatment as a RIC or to avoid
imposition of income or excise taxes on undistributed income.
Dividend
Reinvestment Service.
The Trust will not make the DTC book-entry dividend reinvestment service
available for use by Beneficial Owners for reinvestment of their cash proceeds,
but certain individual broker-dealers may make available the DTC book-entry
Dividend Reinvestment Service for use by Beneficial Owners of the Funds through
DTC Participants for reinvestment of their dividend distributions. Investors
should contact their brokers to ascertain the availability and description of
these services. Beneficial Owners should be aware that each broker may require
investors to adhere to specific procedures and timetables to participate in the
dividend reinvestment service and investors should ascertain from their brokers
such necessary details. If this service is available and used, dividend
distributions of both income and realized gains will be automatically reinvested
in additional whole Shares issued by the Trust of the applicable Fund at NAV per
Share. Distributions reinvested in additional Shares will nevertheless be
taxable to Beneficial Owners acquiring such additional Shares to the same extent
as if such distributions had been received in cash.
FEDERAL
INCOME TAXES
The
following is only a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations
generally affecting a Fund and its shareholders that supplements the discussion
in the Prospectus. No attempt is made to present a comprehensive explanation of
the federal, state, local or foreign tax treatment of a Fund or its
shareholders, and the discussion here and in the Prospectus is not intended to
be a substitute for careful tax planning. In particular, it does not address tax
consequences to investors subject to special rules, such as investors who hold
Shares through IRAs, 401(k)s, or other tax-advantaged accounts.
The
following general discussion of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences is
based on provisions of the Code and the regulations issued thereunder as in
effect on the date of this SAI. New legislation, as well as administrative
changes or court decisions, may significantly change the conclusions expressed
herein, and may have a retroactive effect with respect to the transactions
contemplated herein.
Unless
your investment in Shares is made through a tax-exempt entity or tax-deferred
retirement account, such as an IRA, you need to be aware of the possible tax
consequences when the Fund makes distributions or you sell Shares.
Shareholders
are urged to consult their own tax advisers regarding the application of the
provisions of tax law described in this SAI in light of the particular tax
situations of the shareholders and regarding specific questions as to federal,
state, foreign or local taxes.
Taxation
of the Funds.
Each Fund has elected and intends to qualify each year to be treated as a RIC
under Subchapter M of the Code. As such, the Funds should not be subject to
federal income taxes on their net investment income and capital gains, if any,
to the extent that they timely distribute such income and capital gains to their
shareholders. To qualify for treatment as a RIC, a Fund must distribute annually
to its shareholders at least the sum of 90% of its net investment income
(generally including dividends, taxable interest, and the excess of net
short-term capital gains over net long-term capital losses, less operating
expenses) and at least 90% of its net tax-exempt interest income, if any (the
“Distribution Requirement”) and must meet several additional requirements. Among
these requirements are the following: (i) at least the sum of 90% of a Fund’s
gross income each taxable year must be derived from dividends, interest,
payments with respect to certain securities loans, gains from the sale or other
disposition of stock, securities or foreign currencies, or other income derived
with respect to its business of investing in such stock, securities or foreign
currencies and net income derived from interests in qualified publicly traded
partnerships (the “Qualifying Income Requirement”); and (ii) at the end of each
quarter of such Fund’s taxable year, such Fund’s assets must be diversified so
that (a) at least 50% of the value of the Fund’s total assets is represented by
cash and cash items, U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and
other securities, with such other securities limited, in respect to any one
issuer, to an amount not greater in value than 5% of the value of the Fund’s
total assets and to not more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of
such issuer, including the equity securities of a qualified publicly
traded
partnership, and (b) not more than 25% of the value of its total assets is
invested, including through corporations in which the Fund owns a 20% or more
voting stock interest, in the securities (other than U.S. government securities
or securities of other RICs) of any one issuer, the securities (other than
securities of other RICs) of two or more issuers which such Fund controls and
which are engaged in the same, similar, or related trades or businesses, or the
securities of one or more qualified publicly traded partnerships (the
“Diversification Requirement”).
To
the extent a Fund makes investments that may generate income that is not
qualifying income, including certain derivatives, the Fund will seek to restrict
the resulting income from such investments so that such Fund’s non-qualifying
income does not exceed 10% of its gross income.
Although
the Funds intend to distribute substantially all of their net investment income
and may distribute their capital gains for any taxable year, the Funds will be
subject to federal income taxation to the extent any such income or gains are
not distributed. Each Fund is treated as a separate corporation for federal
income tax purposes. A Fund therefore is considered a separate entity in
determining its treatment under the rules for RICs described herein,
i.e.,
losses in one Fund do not offset gains in another. The requirements (other than
certain organizational requirements) for qualifying RIC status are determined at
the Fund level rather than at the Trust level.
If
a Fund fails to satisfy the Qualifying Income Requirement or the Diversification
Requirement in any taxable year, such Fund may be eligible for relief provisions
if the failures are due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect and if a
penalty tax is paid with respect to each failure to satisfy the applicable
requirements. Additionally, relief is provided for certain de
minimis
failures of the Diversification Requirement where a Fund corrects the failure
within a specified period of time. To be eligible for the relief provisions with
respect to a failure to meet the Diversification Requirement, a Fund may be
required to dispose of certain assets. If these relief provisions were not
available to a Fund and it were to fail to qualify for treatment as a RIC for a
taxable year, all of its taxable income would be subject to federal income tax
at the regular 21% corporate rate without any deduction for distributions to
shareholders, and its distributions (including capital gains distributions)
generally would be taxable to the shareholders of the applicable Fund as
dividends to the extent of the Fund’s current and accumulated earnings and
profits, subject to the dividends received deduction for corporate shareholders
and the lower tax rates on qualified dividend income received by non-corporate
shareholders, subject to certain limitations. To requalify for treatment as a
RIC in a subsequent taxable year, a Fund would be required to satisfy the RIC
qualification requirements for that year and to distribute any earnings and
profits from any year in which the applicable Fund failed to qualify for tax
treatment as a RIC. If a Fund failed to qualify as a RIC for a period greater
than two taxable years, it would generally be required to pay a Fund-level tax
on certain net built in gains recognized with respect to certain of its assets
upon disposition of such assets within five years of qualifying as a RIC in a
subsequent year. The Board reserves the right not to maintain the qualification
of a Fund for treatment as a RIC if it determines such course of action to be
beneficial to shareholders. If a Fund determines that it will not qualify as a
RIC, the applicable Fund will establish procedures to reflect the anticipated
tax liability in the Fund’s NAV.
A
Fund may elect to treat part or all of any “qualified late year loss” as if it
had been incurred in the succeeding taxable year in determining such Fund’s
taxable income, net capital gain, net short-term capital gain, and earnings and
profits. The effect of this election is to treat any such “qualified late year
loss” as if it had been incurred in the succeeding taxable year in
characterizing Fund distributions for any calendar year. A “qualified late year
loss” generally includes net capital loss, net long-term capital loss, or net
short-term capital loss incurred after October 31 of the current taxable year
(commonly referred to as “post-October losses”) and certain other late-year
losses.
Capital
losses in excess of capital gains (“net capital losses”) are not permitted to be
deducted against a RIC’s net investment income. Instead, for U.S. federal income
tax purposes, potentially subject to certain limitations, a Fund may carry a net
capital loss from any taxable year forward indefinitely to offset its capital
gains, if any, in years following the year of the loss. To the extent subsequent
capital gains are offset by such losses, they will not result in U.S. federal
income tax liability to the applicable Fund and may not be distributed as
capital gains to its shareholders. Generally, a Fund may not carry forward any
losses other than net capital losses. The carryover of capital losses may be
limited under the general loss limitation rules if a Fund experiences an
ownership change as defined in the Code.
As
of December 31, 2023, the Funds had accumulated short-term and long-term
capital loss carryforwards in the amounts provided in the table below. These
amounts do not expire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fund |
Short-Term
Capital Loss Carryover |
Long-Term
Capital Loss Carryover |
RiverNorth
Patriot ETF |
$296,924 |
$172,843 |
RiverNorth
Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF |
— |
— |
A
Fund will be subject to a nondeductible 4% federal excise tax on certain
undistributed income if it does not distribute to its shareholders in each
calendar year an amount at least equal to 98% of its ordinary income for the
calendar year plus 98.2% of its capital gain net income for the one-year period
ending on October 31 of that year, subject to an increase for any shortfall in
the prior year’s distribution. For this purpose, any ordinary income or capital
gain net income retained by a Fund and subject to corporate income tax will be
considered to have been distributed. The Funds intend to declare and distribute
dividends and distributions in the amounts and at the times necessary to avoid
the application of the excise tax but can make no assurances that all such tax
liability will
be
eliminated. For example, a Fund may receive delayed or corrected tax reporting
statements from its investments that cause such Fund to accrue additional income
and gains after such Fund has already made its excise tax distributions for the
year. In such a situation, a Fund may incur an excise tax liability resulting
from such delayed receipt of such tax information statements. In addition, a
Fund may in certain circumstances be required to liquidate Fund investments to
make sufficient distributions to avoid federal excise tax liability at a time
when the investment adviser might not otherwise have chosen to do so, and
liquidation of investments in such circumstances may affect the ability of the
Fund to satisfy the requirement for qualification as a RIC.
If
a Fund meets the Distribution Requirement but retains some or all of its income
or gains, it will be subject to federal income tax to the extent that any such
income or gains are not distributed. A Fund may designate certain amounts
retained as undistributed net capital gain in a notice to its shareholders, who
(i) will be required to include in income for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
as long-term capital gain, their proportionate shares of the undistributed
amount so designated, (ii) will be entitled to credit their proportionate shares
of the income tax paid by the Fund on that undistributed amount against their
federal income tax liabilities and to claim refunds to the extent such credits
exceed their tax liabilities, and (iii) will be entitled to increase their tax
basis, for federal income tax purposes, in their Shares by an amount equal to
the excess of the amount of undistributed net capital gain included in their
respective income over their respective income tax credits.
Taxation
of Shareholders – Distributions.
Each Fund intends to distribute annually to its shareholders substantially all
of its investment company taxable income (computed without regard to the
deduction for dividends paid), its net tax-exempt income, if any, and any net
capital gain (net recognized long-term capital gains in excess of net recognized
short-term capital losses, taking into account any capital loss carryforwards).
The distribution of investment company taxable income (as so computed) and net
realized capital gain will be taxable to Fund shareholders regardless of whether
the shareholder receives these distributions in cash or reinvests them in
additional Shares.
Each
Fund (or your broker) will report to shareholders annually the amounts of
dividends paid from ordinary income, the amount of distributions of net capital
gain, the portion of dividends which may qualify for the dividends received
deduction for corporations, and the portion of dividends which may qualify for
treatment as qualified dividend income, which, subject to certain limitations
and requirements, is taxable to non-corporate shareholders at rates of up to
20%.
Qualified
dividend income includes, in general, subject to certain holding period and
other requirements, dividend income from taxable domestic corporations and
certain foreign corporations. Subject to certain limitations, eligible foreign
corporations include those incorporated in possessions of the United States,
those incorporated in certain countries with comprehensive tax treaties with the
United States, and other foreign corporations if the stock with respect to which
the dividends are paid is readily tradable on an established securities market
in the United States. Dividends received by a Fund from an underlying fund
taxable as a RIC or from a REIT may be treated as qualified dividend income
generally only to the extent so reported by such underlying fund or REIT. If 95%
or more of a Fund’s gross income (calculated without taking into account net
capital gain derived from sales or other dispositions of stock or securities)
consists of qualified dividend income, the Fund may report all distributions of
such income as qualified dividend income.
Fund
dividends will not be treated as qualified dividend income if a Fund does not
meet holding period and other requirements with respect to dividend paying
stocks in its portfolio, and the shareholder does not meet holding period and
other requirements with respect to the Shares on which the dividends were paid.
Distributions by a Fund of its net short-term capital gains will be taxable as
ordinary income. Distributions from a Fund’s net capital gain will be taxable to
shareholders at long-term capital gains rates, regardless of how long
shareholders have held their Shares. Distributions may be subject to state and
local taxes.
In
the case of corporate shareholders, certain dividends received by a Fund from
U.S. corporations (generally, dividends received by the Fund in respect of any
share of stock (1) with a tax holding period of at least 46 days during the
91-day period beginning on the date that is 45 days before the date on which the
stock becomes ex-dividend as to that dividend and (2) that is held in an
unleveraged position) and distributed and appropriately so reported by the Fund
may be eligible for the 50% dividends received deduction. Certain preferred
stock must have a holding period of at least 91 days during the 181-day period
beginning on the date that is 90 days before the date on which the stock becomes
ex-dividend as to that dividend to be eligible. Capital gain dividends
distributed to a Fund from other RICs and dividends distributed to a Fund from
REITs are generally not eligible for the dividends received deduction. To
qualify for the deduction, corporate shareholders must meet the minimum holding
period requirement stated above with respect to their Shares, taking into
account any holding period reductions from certain hedging or other transactions
or positions that diminish their risk of loss with respect to their Shares, and,
if they borrow to acquire or otherwise incur debt attributable to Shares, they
may be denied a portion of the dividends received deduction with respect to
those Shares.
Although
dividends generally will be treated as distributed when paid, any dividend
declared by a Fund in October, November or December and payable to shareholders
of record in such a month that is paid during the following January will be
treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as received by shareholders on
December 31 of the calendar year in which it was declared.
Shareholders
who have not held Shares for a full year should be aware that a Fund may report
and distribute, as ordinary dividends or capital gain dividends, a percentage of
income that is not equal to the percentage of a Fund’s ordinary income or net
capital gain, respectively, actually earned during the applicable shareholder’s
period of investment in the Fund. A taxable shareholder may wish to
avoid
investing in a Fund shortly before a dividend or other distribution, because the
distribution will generally be taxable even though it may economically represent
a return of a portion of the shareholder’s investment.
To
the extent that a Fund makes a distribution of income received by such Fund in
lieu of dividends (a “substitute payment”) with respect to securities on loan
pursuant to a securities lending transaction, such income will not constitute
qualified dividend income to individual shareholders and will not be eligible
for the dividends received deduction for corporate shareholders.
If
a Fund’s distributions exceed its current and accumulated earnings and profits
for the taxable year (as calculated for federal income tax purposes), all or a
portion of the distributions made for the taxable year may be recharacterized as
a return of capital to shareholders. A return of capital distribution will
generally not be taxable but will reduce each shareholder’s cost basis in a Fund
and result in a higher capital gain or lower capital loss when the Shares on
which the distribution was received are sold. After a shareholder’s basis in the
Shares has been reduced to zero, distributions in excess of earnings and profits
will be treated as gain from the sale of the shareholder’s Shares.
Taxation
of Shareholders – Sale or Exchange of Shares.
A sale or exchange of Shares may give rise to a gain or loss for federal and
state income tax purposes. Assuming a shareholder holds Shares as a capital
asset, any gain or loss realized upon a taxable disposition of Shares will be
treated as long-term capital gain or loss if Shares have been held for more than
12 months. Otherwise, the gain or loss on the taxable disposition of Shares will
generally be treated as short-term capital gain or loss. Any loss realized upon
a taxable disposition of Shares held for six months or less will be treated as
long-term capital loss, rather than short-term capital loss, to the extent of
any amounts treated as distributions to the shareholder of long-term capital
gain (including any amounts credited to the shareholder as undistributed capital
gains). All or a portion of any loss realized upon a taxable disposition of
Shares may be disallowed if substantially identical Shares of a Fund are
acquired (through the reinvestment of dividends or otherwise) within a 61-day
period beginning 30 days before and ending 30 days after the disposition. In
such a case, the basis of the newly acquired Shares will be adjusted to reflect
the disallowed loss.
The
cost basis of Shares acquired by purchase will generally be based on the amount
paid for Shares and then may be subsequently adjusted for other applicable
transactions as required by the Code. The difference between the selling price
and the cost basis of Shares generally determines the amount of the capital gain
or loss realized on the sale or exchange of Shares. Contact the broker through
whom you purchased your Shares to obtain information with respect to the
available cost basis reporting methods and elections for your
account.
An
Authorized Participant who exchanges securities for Creation Units generally
will recognize a gain or a loss. The gain or loss will be equal to the
difference between the market value of the Creation Units at the time and the
sum of the exchanger’s aggregate basis in the securities surrendered plus the
amount of cash paid for such Creation Units. The ability of Authorized
Participants to receive a full or partial cash redemption of Creation Units of a
Fund may limit the tax efficiency of the Fund. An Authorized Participant who
redeems Creation Units will generally recognize a gain or loss equal to the
difference between the exchanger’s basis in the Creation Units and the sum of
the aggregate market value of any securities received plus the amount of any
cash received for such Creation Units. The Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”),
however, may assert that a loss realized upon an exchange of securities for
Creation Units cannot currently be deducted, under the rules governing “wash
sales” (for a person who does not mark-to-market its portfolio) or, on the basis
that there has been no significant change in economic position.
Any
gain or loss realized upon a creation or redemption of Creation Units will be
treated as capital or ordinary gain or loss, depending on the holder’s
circumstances.
The
Trust, on behalf of the Funds, has the right to reject an order for Creation
Units if the purchaser (or a group of purchasers) would, upon obtaining the
Creation Units so ordered, own 80% or more of the outstanding Shares and if,
pursuant to Section 351 of the Code, a Fund would have a basis in the deposit
securities different from the market value of such securities on the date of
deposit. The Trust also has the right to require the provision of information
necessary to determine beneficial Share ownership for purposes of the 80%
determination. If a Fund does issue Creation Units to a purchaser (or a group of
purchasers) that would, upon obtaining the Creation Units so ordered, own 80% or
more of the outstanding Shares, the purchaser (or a group of purchasers) will
not recognize gain or loss upon the exchange of securities for Creation
Units.
Authorized
Participants purchasing or redeeming Creation Units should consult their own tax
advisers with respect to the tax treatment of any creation or redemption
transaction and whether the wash sales rule applies and when a loss may be
deductible.
Taxation
of Shareholders – Net Investment Income Tax.
U.S. individuals with adjusted gross income (subject to certain adjustments)
exceeding certain threshold amounts ($250,000 if married filing jointly or if
considered a “surviving spouse” for federal income tax purposes, $125,000 if
married filing separately, and $200,000 in other cases) are subject to a 3.8%
tax on all or a portion of their “net investment income,” which includes taxable
interest, dividends, and certain capital gains (generally including capital gain
distributions and capital gains realized on the sale of Shares). This 3.8% tax
also applies to all or a portion of the undistributed net investment income of
certain shareholders that are estates and trusts.
Foreign
Investments.
Dividends and interest received by a Fund from sources within foreign countries
may be subject to withholding and other taxes imposed by such countries. Tax
treaties between certain countries and the United States may reduce or eliminate
such taxes. Each Fund does not expect to satisfy the requirements for passing
through to its shareholders any share of foreign taxes paid by
the
Fund, with the result that shareholders will not include such taxes in their
gross incomes and will not be entitled to a tax deduction or credit for such
taxes on their own tax returns.
If
more than 50% of the value of a Fund’s assets at the close of any taxable year
consists of stock or securities of foreign corporations, which for this purpose
may include obligations of foreign governmental issuers, the Fund may elect, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, to treat any foreign income or withholding
taxes paid by the Fund as paid by its shareholders. For any year that a Fund is
eligible for and makes such an election, each shareholder of the Fund will be
required to include in income an amount equal to his or her allocable share of
qualified foreign income taxes paid by the Fund, and shareholders will be
entitled, subject to certain holding period requirements and other limitations,
to credit their portions of these amounts against their U.S. federal income tax
due, if any, or to deduct their portions from their U.S. taxable income, if any.
No deductions for foreign taxes paid by a Fund may be claimed, however, by
non-corporate shareholders who do not itemize deductions. No deduction for such
taxes will be permitted to individuals in computing their alternative minimum
tax liability. Shareholders that are not subject to U.S. federal income tax, and
those who invest in a Fund through tax-advantaged accounts (including those who
invest through IRAs or other tax-advantaged retirement plans), generally will
receive no benefit from any tax credit or deduction passed through by the Fund.
Foreign taxes paid by a Fund will reduce the return from the Fund’s investments.
If a Fund makes the election, the Fund’s shareholders will be notified annually
by the Fund (or their broker) of the respective amounts per share of the Fund’s
income from sources within, and taxes paid to, foreign countries and U.S.
possessions. If a Fund does not hold sufficient foreign securities to meet the
above threshold, then shareholders will not be entitled to claim a credit or
further deduction with respect to foreign taxes paid by the Fund.
Tax
Treatment of Complex Securities.
Certain
of a Fund’s investments may be subject to complex provisions of the Code
(including provisions relating to hedging transactions, straddles, integrated
transactions, foreign currency contracts, forward foreign currency contracts,
and notional principal contracts) that, among other things, may affect a Fund’s
ability to qualify as a RIC, may affect the character of gains and losses
realized by the applicable Fund (e.g.,
may affect whether gains or losses are ordinary or capital), accelerate
recognition of income to the applicable Fund and defer losses. These rules could
therefore affect the character, amount and timing of distributions to
shareholders. These provisions also may require a Fund to mark to market certain
types of positions in its portfolio (i.e.,
treat them as if they were closed out) which may cause a Fund to recognize
income without the applicable Fund receiving cash with which to make
distributions in amounts sufficient to enable the applicable Fund to satisfy the
RIC distribution requirements for avoiding income and excise taxes. Each Fund
intends to monitor its transactions, intends to make appropriate tax elections,
and intends to make appropriate entries in its books and records to mitigate the
effect of these rules and preserve the applicable Fund’s qualification for
treatment as a RIC.
If
a Fund owns shares in certain foreign investment entities, which may include a
foreign SPAC, referred to as “passive foreign investment companies” or “PFICs,”
such Fund will generally be subject to one of the following special tax regimes:
(i) the Fund may be liable for U.S. federal income tax, and an additional
interest charge, on a portion of any “excess distribution” from such foreign
entity or any gain from the disposition of such shares, even if the entire
distribution or gain is paid out by the Fund as a dividend to its shareholders;
(ii) if the Fund were able and elected to treat a PFIC as a “qualified electing
fund” or “QEF,” the Fund would be required each year to include in income, and
distribute to shareholders in accordance with the distribution requirements set
forth above, the Fund’s pro rata share of the ordinary earnings and net capital
gains of the PFIC, whether or not such earnings or gains are distributed to the
Fund; or (iii) the Fund may be entitled to mark-to-market annually shares of the
PFIC, and in such event would be required to distribute to shareholders any such
mark-to-market gains in accordance with the distribution requirements set forth
above. Amounts included in income each year by a Fund arising from a QEF
election will be “qualifying income” under the Qualifying Income Requirement (as
described above) even if not distributed to such Fund, if the Fund derives such
income from its business of investing in stock, securities or
currencies.
Backup
Withholding.
Each Fund will be required in certain cases to withhold (as “backup
withholding”) on amounts payable to any shareholder who (1) fails to provide a
correct taxpayer identification number certified under penalty of perjury; (2)
is subject to backup withholding by the IRS for failure to properly report all
payments of interest or dividends; (3) fails to provide a certified statement
that he or she is not subject to “backup withholding”; or (4) fails to provide a
certified statement that he or she is a U.S. person (including a U.S. resident
alien). The backup withholding rate is currently 24%. Backup withholding is not
an additional tax and any amounts withheld may be credited against the
shareholder’s ultimate U.S. tax liability. Backup withholding will not be
applied to payments that have been subject to the 30% withholding tax on
shareholders who are neither citizens nor permanent residents of the U.S.
Non-U.S.
Shareholders.
Any non-U.S. investors in a Fund may be subject to U.S. withholding and estate
tax and are encouraged to consult their tax advisers prior to investing in the
Fund. Foreign shareholders (i.e.,
nonresident alien individuals and foreign corporations, partnerships, trusts and
estates) are generally subject to U.S. withholding tax at the rate of 30% (or a
lower tax treaty rate) on distributions derived from taxable ordinary income.
Each Fund may, under certain circumstances, report all or a portion of a
dividend as an “interest-related dividend” or a “short-term capital gain
dividend,” which would generally be exempt from this 30% U.S. withholding tax,
provided certain other requirements are met. Short-term capital gain dividends
received by a nonresident alien individual who is present in the U.S. for a
period or periods aggregating 183 days or more during the taxable year are not
exempt from this 30% withholding tax. Gains realized by foreign shareholders
from the sale or other disposition of Shares of a Fund generally are not subject
to U.S. taxation, unless the recipient is an individual who is physically
present in the U.S. for 183 days or more per year. Foreign shareholders who fail
to provide an applicable IRS form may be subject to backup withholding on
certain payments from a
Fund.
Backup withholding will not be applied to payments that are subject to the 30%
(or lower applicable treaty rate) withholding tax described in this paragraph.
Different tax consequences may result if the foreign shareholder is engaged in a
trade or business within the United States. In addition, the tax consequences to
a foreign shareholder entitled to claim the benefits of a tax treaty may be
different than those described above.
Under
legislation generally known as “FATCA” (the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act),
a Fund is required to withhold 30% of certain ordinary dividends it pays to
shareholders that fail to meet prescribed information reporting or certification
requirements. In general, no such withholding will be required with respect to a
U.S. person or non-U.S. person that timely provides the certifications required
by a Fund or its agent on a valid IRS Form W-9 or applicable series of IRS Form
W-8, respectively. Shareholders potentially subject to withholding include
foreign financial institutions (“FFIs”), such as non-U.S. investment funds, and
non-financial foreign entities (“NFFEs”). To avoid withholding under FATCA, an
FFI generally must enter into an information sharing agreement with the IRS in
which it agrees to report certain identifying information (including name,
address, and taxpayer identification number) with respect to its U.S. account
holders (which, in the case of an entity shareholder, may include its direct and
indirect U.S. owners), and an NFFE generally must identify and provide other
required information to a Fund or other withholding agent regarding its U.S.
owners, if any. Such non-U.S. shareholders also may fall into certain exempt,
excepted or deemed compliant categories as established by regulations and other
guidance. A non-U.S. shareholder resident or doing business in a country that
has entered into an intergovernmental agreement with the United States to
implement FATCA will be exempt from FATCA withholding provided that the
shareholder and the applicable foreign government comply with the terms of the
agreement.
A
non-U.S. entity that invests in a Fund will need to provide the fund with
documentation properly certifying the entity’s status under FATCA in order to
avoid FATCA withholding. Non-U.S. investors in the Funds should consult their
tax advisers in this regard.
Tax-Exempt
Shareholders.
Certain tax-exempt shareholders, including qualified pension plans, IRAs, salary
deferral arrangements, 401(k) plans, and other tax-exempt entities, generally
are exempt from federal income taxation except with respect to their unrelated
business taxable income (“UBTI”). Tax-exempt entities are not permitted to
offset losses from one unrelated trade or business against the income or gain of
another unrelated trade or business. Certain net losses incurred prior to
January 1, 2018 are permitted to offset gain and income created by an
unrelated trade or business, if otherwise available. Under current law, each
Fund generally serves to block UBTI from being realized by its tax-exempt
shareholders with respect to their shares of Fund income. However,
notwithstanding the foregoing, tax-exempt shareholders could realize UBTI by
virtue of their investment in a Fund if, for example, (i) the Fund invests in
residual interests of Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits (“REMICs”), (ii)
the Fund invests in a REIT that is a taxable mortgage pool (“TMP”) or that has a
subsidiary that is a TMP or that invests in the residual interest of a REMIC, or
(iii) Shares constitute debt-financed property in the hands of the tax-exempt
shareholders within the meaning of section 514(b) of the Code. Charitable
remainder trusts are subject to special rules and should consult their tax
advisers. The IRS has issued guidance with respect to these issues and
prospective shareholders, especially charitable remainder trusts, are strongly
encouraged to consult with their tax advisers regarding these issues.
A
Fund’s shares held in a tax-qualified retirement account will generally not be
subject to federal taxation on income and capital gains distributions from the
Fund until a shareholder begins receiving payments from their retirement
account.
Certain
Potential Tax Reporting Requirements.
Under U.S. Treasury regulations, if a shareholder recognizes a loss on
disposition of Shares of $2 million or more for an individual shareholder or $10
million or more for a corporate shareholder (or certain greater amounts over a
combination of years), the shareholder must file with the IRS a disclosure
statement on IRS Form 8886. Direct shareholders of portfolio securities are in
many cases excepted from this reporting requirement, but under current guidance,
shareholders of a RIC are not excepted. Significant penalties may be imposed for
the failure to comply with the reporting requirements. The fact that a loss is
reportable under these regulations does not affect the legal determination of
whether the taxpayer’s treatment of the loss is proper. Shareholders should
consult their tax advisers to determine the applicability of these regulations
in light of their individual circumstances.
Other
Issues.
In those states which have income tax laws, the tax treatment of a Fund and of
Fund shareholders with respect to distributions by such Fund may differ from
federal tax treatment.
The
foregoing discussion is based on U.S. federal tax laws and regulations which are
in effect on the date of this SAI. Such laws and regulations may be changed by
legislative or administrative action. Shareholders are advised to consult their
tax advisers concerning their specific situations and the application of
foreign, federal, state, or local taxes.
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
The
Annual Report for the Funds for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 is
a separate document and the financial statements and accompanying notes
appearing therein are incorporated by reference into this SAI. You may request a
copy of the Funds’ Annual
Report
at no charge by calling 800-617-0004, or through the Funds’ website at
www.true-shares.com.
APPENDIX
A
PROXY
VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
TrueMark
Investments, LLC
Effective:
03/01/2021
GENERAL
PROXY VOTING POLICIES
The
Firm understands and appreciates the importance of proxy voting. To the extent
that Firm has discretion to vote the proxies of its advisory clients, Firm will
vote any such proxies in the best interests of advisory clients and investors
(as applicable) and in accordance with the policies of the Proxy Service
Providers1
and ISS Governance ("Proxy Service Providers") and the procedures outlined
below.
PROXY
VOTING PROCEDURES
1.All
proxies sent to advisory clients that are actually received by Firm or recorded
by the Proxy Service Providers (to vote on behalf of the advisory clients) will
be provided to the Chief Operations Officer (“COO”) or her
delegate.
2.The
COO will instruct the Proxy Service Providers to generally adhere to the
following procedures (subject to limited exception):
a.A
written record of each proxy received by Firm or recorded by the Proxy Service
Providers (on behalf of its advisory clients) will be kept in Firm’s
files;
b.The
Proxy Service Providers and the COO will determine which of Firm’s advisory
clients hold the security to which the proxy relates;
c.The
Portfolio Manager will review the proxy and, based upon the
advice/recommendation from the Proxy Service Providers, determine how to vote
the proxy in question in accordance with the guidelines set forth
below.
d.Prior
to voting any proxies, the Portfolio Manager will attempt to determine if there
are any conflicts of interest related to the proxy in question. If a conflict is
identified, the Chief Compliance Officer will be notified so a determination can
be made as to whether the conflict is material or not.
i.If
no material conflict is identified pursuant to these procedures, the Portfolio
Manager will make a decision on how to vote the proxy in question.
e.Although
not presently intended to be used on a regular basis, Firm is empowered to
retain an independent third party to vote proxies in certain situations
(including situations where a material conflict of interest is
identified).
HANDLING
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
1.As
stated above, in evaluating how to vote a proxy, the Portfolio Manager will
first determine whether there is a conflict of interest related to the proxy in
question between Firm and its advisory clients. This examination will include
(but will not be limited to) an evaluation of whether the Firm (or any affiliate
of Firm has any relationship with the company or an affiliate of the company) to
which the proxy relates outside an investment in such company by an advisory
client of Firm.
2.If
a conflict is identified and deemed “material” by the Portfolio Manager after
consultation with the CCO, Firm will determine whether voting in accordance with
these proxy voting guidelines is in the best interests of affected advisory
clients (which may include utilizing an independent third-party to vote such
proxies).
3.With
respect to material conflicts, Firm will determine whether it is appropriate to
disclose the conflict to affected advisory clients and investors and give
advisory clients and investors the opportunity to vote the proxies in question
themselves, if applicable. If an advisory client is subject to the requirements
of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”),
and the investment management agreement between Firm and the ERISA advisory
client reserves the right to vote proxies when Firm has determined that a
material conflict exists that does affect its best judgment as a fiduciary to
the ERISA advisory client, Firm will:
a.Give
the ERISA advisory client the opportunity to vote the proxies in question
themselves; or
b.Follow
designated special proxy voting procedures related to voting proxies pursuant to
the terms of the investment management agreement with such ERISA Advisory
Clients (if any).
1
Before
engaging
a
proxy
provider
and
during
the
course
of
the
relationship,
the
Firm
will
conduct
appropriate
due
diligence/oversight.
Records
of this due diligence/oversight will be maintained in the Firm’s
records.
VOTING
GUIDELINES
In
the absence of specific voting guidelines mandated by a particular advisory
client, Firm will endeavor to vote proxies in the best interests of each
advisory client via the Proxy Service Providers policy.
In
some foreign markets where proxy voting demands fee payment for agent services,
the Firm will balance the cost and benefit of proxy voting and may give up the
proxy voting if the cost associated is greater than the benefits from
voting.
1.Although
voting certain proxies may be subject to the discretion of the Firm, the Firm is
of the view that voting proxies in accordance with the following general
guidelines is in the best interests of its advisory clients:
a.The
Firm will generally vote in favor of routine corporate housekeeping proposals
including, but not limited to, the following:
i.Election
of directors (where there are no related corporate governance
issues);
ii.Selection
or reappointment of auditors; or
iii.Increasing
or reclassification of common stock.
b.The
Firm will generally vote against proposals that:
i.Make
it more difficult to replace members of the issuer’s board of directors or board
of managers; and
ii.Introduce
unequal voting rights (although there may be regulatory reasons that would make
such a proposal favorable to certain advisory clients of the Firm).
c.The
Firm will generally vote against proposals that make it more difficult for an
issuer to be taken over by outsiders, and in favor of proposals to do the
opposite.
d.The
Firm will generally vote in favor of proposals by management or shareholders
concerning various compensation and stock option plans that will act to make
management and employee compensation more dependent on long-term stock price
performance.
e.The
Firm will generally vote against proposals to move the company to another state
less favorable to shareholders’ interests, or to restructure classes of stock in
such a way as to benefit one class of shareholders at the expense of another,
such as dual classes (A and B shares) of stock.
DISCLOSURE
OF PROCEDURES
A
brief summary of these proxy voting procedures will be included in the Firm’s
Form ADV Part 2A and will be updated whenever these policies and procedures are
updated. For registered investment company clients, the Firm will work with the
RIC to provide the necessary information for the Form N-PX and will review such
information for accuracy.
RECORD-KEEPING
REQUIREMENTS
The
COO via the Proxy Service Providers will be responsible for maintaining files
relating to the Firm’s proxy voting procedures. Records will be maintained and
preserved for five (5) years from the end of the fiscal year during which the
last entry was made on a record, with records for the first two years kept in
the offices of the Firm. Records of the following will be included in the
files:
1.Copies
of these proxy voting policies and procedures, and any amendments
thereto;
2.A
copy of each proxy statement that the Firm or the Proxy Service Providers
actually receives; provided, however, that the Firm may rely on obtaining a copy
of proxy statements from the SEC’s EDGAR system for those proxy statements that
are so available;
3.A
record of each vote that the Firm via the Proxy Service Providers
casts;
4.A
copy of any document that the Firm created that was material to making a
decision how to vote the proxies, or memorializes that decision (if any);
and
5.A
copy of each written request for information on how the Firm voted such advisory
client’s proxies and a copy of any written response to any request for
information on how the Firm voted proxies on behalf of advisory
clients.
APPENDIX
B
ISS
Proxy Voting Guidelines
U
N
I
T
E
DS
T
A
T
E
S
Proxy
Voting
Guidelines
Benchmark
Policy
Recommendations
Effective
for
Meetings
on
or
after
February
1,
2024
Published
early January, 2024
W
W
W
.
I S S
G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E
.
C
O
M
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Coverage8
1.Board of Directors9
Voting on Director Nominees in Uncontested Elections9
Independence9
ISS Classification of Directors – U.S.10
Composition12
Attendance12
Overboarded Directors12
Gender Diversity12
Racial and/or Ethnic Diversity12
Responsiveness13
Accountability13
Poison Pills13
Unequal Voting Rights14
Classified Board Structure14
Removal of Shareholder Discretion on Classified
Boards14
Problematic Governance Structure14
Unilateral Bylaw/Charter Amendments15
Restricting Binding Shareholder Proposals15
Director Performance Evaluation15
Management Proposals to Ratify Existing Charter or Bylaw
Provisions16
Problematic Audit-Related Practices16
Problematic Compensation Practices16
Problematic Pledging of Company Stock17
Climate Accountability17
Governance Failures17
Voting on Director Nominees in Contested Elections18
Vote-No Campaigns18
Proxy Contests/Proxy Access18
Other Board-Related Proposals18
Adopt Anti-Hedging/Pledging/Speculative Investments
Policy18
Board Refreshment18
Term/Tenure Limits19
Age Limits19
Board Size19
Classification/Declassification of the Board19
CEO Succession Planning19
Cumulative Voting19
Director and Officer Indemnification, Liability
Protection, and Exculpation20
Establish/Amend Nominee Qualifications20
Establish Other Board Committee Proposals21
Filling Vacancies/Removal of Directors21
Independent Board Chair21
Majority of Independent Directors/Establishment of
Independent Committees22
Majority Vote Standard for the Election of Directors22
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Proxy Access22
Require More Nominees than Open Seats22
Shareholder Engagement Policy (Shareholder Advisory
Committee)23
2.Audit-Related24
Auditor Indemnification and Limitation of Liability24
Auditor Ratification24
Shareholder Proposals Limiting Non-Audit Services24
Shareholder Proposals on Audit Firm Rotation25
3.Shareholder Rights & Defenses26
Advance Notice Requirements for Shareholder
Proposals/Nominations26
Amend Bylaws without Shareholder Consent26
Control Share Acquisition Provisions26
Control Share Cash-Out Provisions26
Disgorgement Provisions27
Fair Price Provisions27
Freeze-Out Provisions27
Greenmail27
Shareholder Litigation Rights27
Federal Forum Selection Provisions27
Exclusive Forum Provisions for State Law Matters28
Fee shifting28
Net Operating Loss (NOL) Protective Amendments29
Poison Pills (Shareholder Rights Plans)29
Shareholder Proposals to Put Pill to a Vote and/or Adopt a
Pill Policy29
Management Proposals to Ratify a Poison Pill29
Management Proposals to Ratify a Pill to Preserve Net
Operating Losses (NOLs)30
Proxy Voting Disclosure, Confidentiality, and
Tabulation30
Ratification Proposals: Management Proposals to Ratify
Existing Charter or Bylaw Provisions30
Reimbursing Proxy Solicitation Expenses31
Reincorporation Proposals31
Shareholder Ability to Act by Written Consent31
Shareholder Ability to Call Special Meetings32
Stakeholder Provisions32
State Antitakeover Statutes32
Supermajority Vote Requirements32
Virtual Shareholder Meetings33
4.Capital/Restructuring34
Capital34
Adjustments to Par Value of Common Stock34
Common Stock Authorization34
General Authorization Requests34
Specific Authorization Requests35
Dual Class Structure35
Issue Stock for Use with Rights Plan35
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Preemptive Rights35
Preferred Stock Authorization35
General Authorization Requests35
Recapitalization Plans37
Reverse Stock Splits37
Share Issuance Mandates at U.S. Domestic Issuers
Incorporated Outside the U.S.37
Share Repurchase Programs38
Share Repurchase Programs Shareholder Proposals38
Stock Distributions: Splits and Dividends38
Tracking Stock38
Restructuring38
Appraisal Rights38
Asset Purchases39
Asset Sales39
Bundled Proposals39
Conversion of Securities39
Corporate
Reorganization/Debt Restructuring/Prepackaged Bankruptcy Plans/Reverse Leveraged
Buyouts/Wrap Plans39
Formation of Holding Company40
Going Private and Going Dark Transactions (LBOs and
Minority Squeeze-outs)40
Joint Ventures41
Liquidations41
Mergers and Acquisitions41
Private Placements/Warrants/Convertible Debentures42
Reorganization/Restructuring Plan (Bankruptcy)43
Special Purpose Acquisition Corporations (SPACs)43
Special Purpose Acquisition Corporations (SPACs) -
Proposals for Extensions44
Spin-offs44
Value Maximization Shareholder Proposals44
5.Compensation45
Executive Pay Evaluation45
Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation—Management
Proposals (Say-on-Pay)45
Pay-for-Performance Evaluation46
Problematic Pay Practices47
Compensation Committee Communications and
Responsiveness48
Frequency of Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation ("Say
When on Pay")48
Voting on Golden Parachutes in an Acquisition, Merger,
Consolidation, or Proposed Sale48
Equity-Based and Other Incentive Plans49
Shareholder Value Transfer (SVT)50
Three-Year Value-Adjusted Burn Rate50
Egregious Factors50
Liberal Change in Control Definition50
Repricing Provisions51
Problematic Pay Practices or Significant
Pay-for-Performance Disconnect51
Amending Cash and Equity Plans (including Approval for Tax
Deductibility (162(m))51
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Specific Treatment of Certain Award Types in Equity Plan
Evaluations52
Dividend Equivalent Rights52
Operating
Partnership (OP) Units in Equity Plan Analysis of Real Estate Investment Trusts
(REITs)52
Other Compensation Plans52
401(k) Employee Benefit Plans52
Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs)53
Employee Stock Purchase Plans—Qualified Plans53
Employee Stock Purchase Plans—Non-Qualified Plans53
Option Exchange Programs/Repricing Options53
Stock Plans in Lieu of Cash54
Transfer Stock Option (TSO) Programs54
Director Compensation55
Shareholder Ratification of Director Pay Programs55
Equity Plans for Non-Employee Directors55
Non-Employee Director Retirement Plans56
Shareholder Proposals on Compensation56
Bonus Banking/Bonus Banking “Plus”56
Compensation Consultants—Disclosure of Board or Company’s
Utilization56
Disclosure/Setting Levels or Types of Compensation for
Executives and Directors56
Golden Coffins/Executive Death Benefits57
Hold Equity Past Retirement or for a Significant Period of
Time57
Pay Disparity57
Pay for Performance/Performance-Based Awards57
Pay for Superior Performance58
Pre-Arranged Trading Plans (10b5-1 Plans)58
Prohibit Outside CEOs from Serving on Compensation
Committees59
Recoupment of Incentive or Stock Compensation in Specified
Circumstances59
Severance Agreements for Executives/Golden Parachutes59
Share Buyback Impact on Incentive Program Metrics59
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (SERPs)60
Tax Gross-Up Proposals60
Termination
of Employment Prior to Severance Payment/Eliminating Accelerated Vesting of
Unvested Equity60
6.Routine/Miscellaneous61
Adjourn Meeting61
Amend Quorum Requirements61
Amend Minor Bylaws61
Change Company Name61
Change Date, Time, or Location of Annual Meeting61
Other Business62
7.Social and Environmental Issues63
Global Approach – E&S Shareholder Proposals63
Endorsement of Principles63
Animal Welfare63
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Animal Welfare Policies63
Animal Testing64
Animal Slaughter64
Consumer Issues64
Genetically Modified Ingredients64
Reports on Potentially Controversial Business/Financial
Practices64
Pharmaceutical Pricing, Access to Medicines, and
Prescription Drug Reimportation65
Product Safety and Toxic/Hazardous Materials65
Tobacco-Related Proposals66
Climate Change66
Say on Climate (SoC) Management Proposals66
Say on Climate (SoC) Shareholder Proposals67
Climate Change/Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions67
Energy Efficiency68
Renewable Energy68
Diversity68
Board Diversity68
Equality of Opportunity69
Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation, and Domestic Partner
Benefits69
Gender, Race/Ethnicity Pay Gap69
Racial Equity and/or Civil Rights Audit Guidelines69
Environment and Sustainability70
Facility and Workplace Safety70
General Environmental Proposals and Community Impact
Assessments70
Hydraulic Fracturing70
Operations in Protected Areas71
Recycling71
Sustainability Reporting71
Water Issues71
General Corporate Issues72
Charitable Contributions72
Data Security, Privacy, and Internet Issues72
ESG Compensation-Related Proposals72
Human Rights, Human Capital Management, and International
Operations72
Human Rights Proposals72
Mandatory Arbitration73
Operations in High-Risk Markets73
Outsourcing/Offshoring74
Sexual Harassment74
Weapons and Military Sales74
Political Activities74
Lobbying74
Political Contributions75
Political Expenditures and Lobbying Congruency75
Political Ties75
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
8.Mutual Fund Proxies77
Election of Directors77
Closed End Funds- Unilateral Opt-In to Control Share
Acquisition Statutes77
Converting Closed-end Fund to Open-end Fund77
Proxy Contests77
Investment Advisory Agreements77
Approving New Classes or Series of Shares78
Preferred Stock Proposals78
1940 Act Policies78
Changing a Fundamental Restriction to a Nonfundamental
Restriction78
Change Fundamental Investment Objective to
Nonfundamental78
Name Change Proposals78
Change in Fund's Subclassification79
Business
Development Companies—Authorization to Sell Shares of Common Stock at a Price
below Net Asset Value79
Disposition of Assets/Termination/Liquidation79
Changes to the Charter Document79
Changing the Domicile of a Fund80
Authorizing the Board to Hire and Terminate Subadvisers
Without Shareholder Approval80
Distribution Agreements80
Master-Feeder Structure80
Mergers80
Shareholder Proposals for Mutual Funds80
Establish Director Ownership Requirement80
Reimburse Shareholder for Expenses Incurred81
Terminate the Investment Advisor81
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Coverage
The
U.S. research team provides proxy analyses and voting recommendations for the
common shareholder
meetings
of U.S. - incorporated companies that are publicly-traded on U.S. exchanges, as
well as certain OTC
companies,
if they are held in our institutional investor clients' portfolios. Coverage
generally includes corporate
actions
for common equity holders, such as written consents and bankruptcies. ISS’ U.S.
coverage includes
investment
companies (including open-end funds, closed-end funds, exchange-traded funds,
and unit investment
trusts),
limited partnerships (“LPs”), master limited partnerships (“MLPs”), limited
liability companies (“LLCs”), and
business
development companies. ISS reviews its universe of coverage on an annual basis,
and the coverage is
subject
to change based on client need and industry trends.
Foreign-incorporated
companies
In
addition to U.S.- incorporated, U.S.- listed companies, ISS’ U.S. policies are
applied to certain foreign-
incorporated
company analyses. Like the SEC, ISS distinguishes two types of companies that
list but are not
incorporated
in the U.S.:
▪U.S.
Domestic Issuers – which have a majority of outstanding shares held in the U.S.
and meet other criteria, as
determined
by the SEC, and are subject to the same disclosure and listing standards as U.S.
incorporated
companies
(e.g. they are required to file DEF14A proxy statements) – are generally covered
under standard
U.S.
policy guidelines.
▪Foreign
Private Issuers (FPIs)
– which are allowed to take exemptions from most disclosure requirements
(e.g.,
they
are allowed to file 6-K for their proxy materials) and U.S. listing standards –
are generally covered under a
combination
of policy guidelines:
▪FPI
Guidelines (see the Americas
Regional Proxy Voting Guidelines),
may apply to companies incorporated
in
governance havens, and apply certain minimum independence and disclosure
standards in the
evaluation
of key proxy ballot items, such as the election of directors; and/or
▪Guidelines
for the market that is responsible for, or most relevant to, the item on the
ballot.
U.S.
incorporated companies listed only on non-U.S. exchanges are generally covered
under the ISS guidelines for
the
market on which they are traded.
An
FPI is generally covered under ISS’ approach to FPIs outlined above, even if
such FPI voluntarily files a proxy
statement
and/or other filing normally required of a U.S. Domestic Issuer, so long as the
company retains its FPI
status.
In
all cases – including with respect to other companies with cross-market features
that may lead to ballot items
related
to multiple markets – items that are on the ballot solely due to the
requirements of another market (listing,
incorporation,
or national code) may be evaluated under the policy of the relevant market,
regardless of the
“assigned”
primary market coverage.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
1.Board
of Directors
Voting
on Director Nominees in Uncontested Elections
Four
fundamental principles apply when determining votes on director nominees:
Independence:
Boards should be sufficiently independent from management (and significant
shareholders) to
ensure
that they are able and motivated to effectively supervise management's
performance for the benefit of all
shareholders,
including in setting and monitoring the execution of corporate strategy, with
appropriate use of
shareholder
capital, and in setting and monitoring executive compensation programs that
support that strategy.
The
chair of the board should ideally be an independent director, and all boards
should have an independent
leadership
position or a similar role in order to help provide appropriate counterbalance
to executive
management,
as well as having sufficiently independent committees that focus on key
governance concerns such
as
audit, compensation, and nomination of directors.
Composition:
Companies should ensure that directors add value to the board through their
specific skills and
expertise
and by having sufficient time and commitment to serve effectively. Boards should
be of a size
appropriate
to accommodate diversity, expertise, and independence, while ensuring active and
collaborative
participation
by all members. Boards should be sufficiently diverse to ensure consideration of
a wide range of
perspectives.
Responsiveness:
Directors should respond to investor input, such as that expressed through
significant opposition
to
management proposals, significant support for shareholder proposals (whether
binding or non-binding), and
tender
offers where a majority of shares are tendered.
Accountability:
Boards should be sufficiently accountable to shareholders, including through
transparency of the
company's
governance practices and regular board elections, by the provision of sufficient
information for
shareholders
to be able to assess directors and board composition, and through the ability of
shareholders to
remove
directors.
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for director nominees, except under the following circumstances (with
new
nominees1
considered
on case-by-case basis):
Independence
Vote
against2
or withhold from non-independent directors (Executive Directors and
Non-Independent Non-
Executive
Directors per ISS’
Classification of Directors)
when:
▪Independent
directors comprise 50 percent or less of the board;
▪The
non-independent director serves on the audit, compensation, or nominating
committee;
▪The
company lacks an audit, compensation, or nominating committee so that the full
board functions as that
committee;
or
▪The
company lacks a formal nominating committee, even if the board attests that the
independent directors
fulfill
the functions of such a committee.
1
A
"new nominee" is a director who is being presented for election by shareholders
for the first time. Recommendations on
new
nominees who have served for less than one year are made on a case-by-case basis
depending on the timing of their
appointment
and the problematic governance issue in question.
2
In general, companies with a plurality vote standard use “Withhold” as the
contrary vote option in director elections; companies
with
a majority vote standard use “Against”. However, it will vary by company and the
proxy must be checked to determine the
valid
contrary vote option for the particular company.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
ISS
Classification of Directors – U.S.
1.Executive
Director
1.1.Current
officer1
of
the company or one of its affiliates2.
2.Non-Independent
Non-Executive Director
Board
Identification
2.1.Director
identified as not independent by the board.
Controlling/Significant
Shareholder
2.2.Beneficial
owner of more than 50 percent of the company's voting power (this may be
aggregated if
voting
power is distributed among more than one member of a group).
Current
Employment at Company or Related Company
2.3.Non-officer
employee of the firm (including employee representatives).
2.4.Officer1,
former officer, or general or limited partner of a joint venture or partnership
with the
company.
Former
Employment
2.5.Former
CEO of the company. 3,
4
2.6.Former
non-CEO officer1
of
the company or an affiliate2
within
the past five years.
2.7.Former
officer1
of
an acquired company within the past five years.4
2.8.Officer1
of
a former parent or predecessor firm at the time the company was sold or split
off within the
past
five years.
2.9.Former
interim officer if the service was longer than 18 months. If the service was
between 12 and 18
months
an assessment of the interim officer’s employment agreement will be made.5
Family
Members
2.10.Immediate
family member6
of
a current or former officer1
of
the company or its affiliates2
within
the
last five years.
2.11.Immediate
family member6
of
a current employee of company or its affiliates2
where
additional factors
raise
concern (which may include, but are not limited to, the following: a director
related to numerous
employees;
the company or its affiliates employ relatives of numerous board members; or a
non-
Section
16 officer in a key strategic role).
Professional,
Transactional, and Charitable Relationships
2.12.Director
who (or whose immediate family member6)
currently provides professional services7
in
excess
of
$10,000 per year to: the company, an affiliate2,
or an individual officer of the company or an affiliate;
or
who is (or whose immediate family member6
is)
a partner, employee, or controlling shareholder of
an
organization which provides the services.
2.13.Director
who (or whose immediate family member6)
currently has any material transactional
relationship8
with
the company or its affiliates2;
or who is (or whose immediate family member6
is)
a
partner in, or a controlling shareholder or an executive officer of, an
organization which has the
material
transactional relationship8
(excluding
investments in the company through a private
placement).
2.14.Director
who (or whose immediate family member6)
is
a trustee, director, or employee of a charitable
or
non-profit organization that receives material grants or endowments8
from
the company or its
affiliates2.
Other
Relationships
2.15.Party
to a voting agreement9
to
vote in line with management on proposals being brought to
shareholder
vote.
2.16.Has
(or an immediate family member6
has)
an interlocking relationship as defined by the SEC involving
members
of the board of directors or its Compensation Committee.10
2.17.Founder11
of
the company but not currently an employee.
2.18.Director
with pay comparable to Named Executive Officers.
2.19.Any
material12
relationship
with the company.
3.Independent
Director
3.1.No
material12
connection
to the company other than a board seat.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Footnotes:
1.The
definition of officer will generally follow that of a “Section 16 officer”
(officers subject to Section 16 of the Securities and
Exchange
Act of 1934) and includes the chief executive, operating, financial, legal,
technology, and accounting officers of a
company
(including the president, treasurer, secretary, controller, or any vice
president in charge of a principal business unit,
division,
or policy function). Current interim officers are included in this category. For
private companies, the equivalent positions
are
applicable. A non-employee director serving as an officer due to statutory
requirements (e.g. corporate secretary) will generally
be
classified as a Non-Independent Non-Executive Director under “Any material
relationship with the company.” However, if the
company
provides explicit disclosure that the director is not receiving additional
compensation exceeding $10,000 per year for
serving
in that capacity, then the director will be classified as an Independent
Director.
2.“Affiliate”
includes a subsidiary, sibling company, or parent company. ISS uses 50 percent
control ownership by the parent
company
as the standard for applying its affiliate designation. The manager/advisor of
an externally managed issuer (EMI) is
considered
an affiliate.
3.Includes
any former CEO of the company prior to the company’s initial public offering
(IPO).
4.When
there is a former CEO of a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) serving on
the board of an acquired company, ISS will
generally
classify such directors as independent unless determined otherwise taking into
account the following factors: the
applicable
listing standards determination of such director’s independence; any operating
ties to the firm; and the existence of any
other
conflicting relationships or related party transactions.
5.ISS
will look at the terms of the interim officer’s employment contract to determine
if it contains severance pay, long-term health
and
pension benefits, or other such standard provisions typically contained in
contracts of permanent, non-temporary CEOs. ISS
will
also consider if a formal search process was under way for a full-time officer
at the time.
6.“Immediate
family member” follows the SEC’s definition of such and covers spouses, parents,
children, step-parents, step- children,
siblings,
in-laws, and any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household
of any director, nominee for director,
executive
officer, or significant shareholder of the company.
7.Professional
services can be characterized as advisory in nature, generally involve access to
sensitive company information or to
strategic
decision-making, and typically have a commission- or fee-based payment
structure. Professional services generally include
but
are not limited to the following: investment banking/financial advisory
services, commercial banking (beyond deposit services),
investment
services, insurance services, accounting/audit services, consulting services,
marketing services, legal services, property
management
services, realtor services, lobbying services, executive search services, and IT
consulting services. The following would
generally
be considered transactional relationships and not professional services: deposit
services, IT tech support services,
educational
services, and construction services. The case of participation in a banking
syndicate by a non-lead bank should be
considered
a transactional (and hence subject to the associated materiality test) rather
than a professional relationship. “Of
Counsel”
relationships are only considered immaterial if the individual does not receive
any form of compensation (in excess of
$10,000
per year) from, or is a retired partner of, the firm providing the professional
service. The case of a company providing a
professional
service to one of its directors or to an entity with which one of its directors
is affiliated, will be considered a
transactional
rather than a professional relationship. Insurance services and marketing
services are assumed to be professional
services
unless the company explains why such services are not advisory.
8.A
material transactional relationship, including grants to non-profit
organizations, exists if the company makes annual payments to,
or
receives annual payments from, another entity, exceeding the greater of:
$200,000 or 5 percent of the recipient’s gross
revenues,
for a company that follows NASDAQ listing standards; or the greater of
$1,000,000 or 2 percent of the recipient’s gross
revenues,
for a company that follows NYSE listing standards. For a company that follows
neither of the preceding standards, ISS will
apply
the NASDAQ-based materiality test. (The recipient is the party receiving the
financial proceeds from the transaction).
9.Dissident
directors who are parties to a voting agreement pursuant to a settlement or
similar arrangement may be classified as
Independent
Directors if an analysis of the following factors indicates that the voting
agreement does not compromise their
alignment
with all shareholders’ interests: the terms of the agreement; the duration of
the standstill provision in the agreement;
the
limitations and requirements of actions that are agreed upon; if the dissident
director nominee(s) is subject to the standstill;
and
if there any conflicting relationships or related party transactions.
10.Interlocks
include: executive officers serving as directors on each other’s compensation or
similar committees (or, in the absence of
such
a committee, on the board); or executive officers sitting on each other’s boards
and at least one serves on the other’s
compensation
or similar committees (or, in the absence of such a committee, on the
board).
11.The
operating involvement of the founder with the company will be considered; if the
founder was never employed by the
company,
ISS may deem him or her an Independent Director.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
12.For
purposes of ISS’s director independence classification, “material” will be
defined as a standard of relationship (financial,
personal,
or otherwise) that a reasonable person might conclude could potentially
influence one’s objectivity in the boardroom in a
manner
that would have a meaningful impact on an individual's ability to satisfy
requisite fiduciary standards on behalf of
shareholders.
Composition
Attendance
at Board and Committee Meetings:
Generally
vote against or withhold from directors (except
nominees
who served only part of the fiscal year3)
who attend less than 75 percent of the aggregate of their board
and
committee meetings for the period for which they served, unless an acceptable
reason for absences is
disclosed
in the proxy or another SEC filing. Acceptable reasons for director absences are
generally limited to the
following:
▪Medical
issues/illness;
▪Family
emergencies; and
▪Missing
only one meeting (when the total of all meetings is three or fewer).
In
cases of chronic poor attendance without reasonable justification, in addition
to voting against the director(s)
with
poor attendance, generally vote against or withhold from appropriate members of
the nominating/
governance
committees or the full board.
If
the proxy disclosure is unclear and insufficient to determine whether a director
attended at least 75 percent of
the
aggregate of his/her board and committee meetings during his/her period of
service, vote against or withhold
from
the director(s) in question.
Overboarded
Directors:
Generally
vote against or withhold from individual directors who:
▪Sit
on more than five public company boards; or
▪Are
CEOs of public companies who sit on the boards of more than two public companies
besides their own—
withhold
only at their outside boards4.
Gender
Diversity:
Generally vote against or withhold from the chair of the nominating committee
(or other
directors
on a case-by-case basis) at companies where there are no women on the company's
board. An exception
will
be made if there was at least one woman on the board at the preceding annual
meeting and the board makes
a
firm commitment to return to a gender-diverse status within a year.
Racial
and/or Ethnic Diversity:
For
companies in the Russell 3000 or S&P 1500 indices, generally vote against or
withhold
from the chair of the nominating committee (or other directors on a case-by-case
basis) where the board
has
no apparent racially or ethnically diverse members5.
An exception will be made if there was racial and/or
ethnic
diversity on the board at the preceding annual meeting and the board makes a
firm commitment to appoint
at
least one racial and/or ethnic diverse member within a year.
3
Nominees
who served for only part of the fiscal year are generally exempted from the
attendance policy.
4
Although
all of a CEO’s subsidiary boards with publicly-traded common stock will be
counted as separate boards, ISS will not
recommend
a withhold vote for the CEO of a parent company board or any of the controlled
(>50 percent ownership)
subsidiaries
of that parent but may do so at subsidiaries that are less than 50 percent
controlled and boards outside the
parent/subsidiary
relationships.
5
Aggregate
diversity statistics provided by the board will only be considered if specific
to racial and/or ethnic diversity.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Responsiveness
Vote
case-by-case on individual directors, committee members, or the entire board of
directors as appropriate if:
▪The
board failed to act on a shareholder proposal that received the support of a
majority of the shares cast in
the
previous year or failed to act on a management proposal seeking to ratify an
existing charter/bylaw
provision
that received opposition of a majority of the shares cast in the previous year.
Factors that will be
considered
are:
▪Disclosed
outreach efforts by the board to shareholders in the wake of the vote;
▪Rationale
provided in the proxy statement for the level of implementation;
▪The
subject matter of the proposal;
▪The
level of support for and opposition to the resolution in past meetings;
▪Actions
taken by the board in response to the majority vote and its engagement with
shareholders;
▪The
continuation of the underlying issue as a voting item on the ballot (as either
shareholder or
management
proposals); and
▪Other
factors as appropriate.
▪The
board failed to act on takeover offers where the majority of shares are
tendered; or
▪At
the previous board election, any director received more than 50 percent
withhold/against votes of the
shares
cast and the company has failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high
withhold/against vote.
Vote
case-by-case on Compensation Committee members (or, in exceptional cases, the
full board) and the Say on
Pay
proposal if:
▪The
company’s previous say-on-pay received the support of less than 70 percent of
votes cast. Factors that
will
be considered are:
▪The
company's response, including:
▪Disclosure
of engagement efforts with major institutional investors, including the
frequency and
timing
of engagements and the company participants (including whether independent
directors
participated);
▪Disclosure
of the specific concerns voiced by dissenting shareholders that led to the
say-on-pay
opposition;
and
▪Disclosure
of specific and meaningful actions taken to address shareholders' concerns;
▪Other
recent compensation actions taken by the company;
▪Whether
the issues raised are recurring or isolated;
▪The
company's ownership structure; and
▪Whether
the support level was less than 50 percent, which would warrant the highest
degree of
responsiveness.
▪The
board implements an advisory vote on executive compensation on a less frequent
basis than the
frequency
that received the plurality of votes cast.
Accountability
Problematic
Takeover Defenses, Capital Structure, and Governance Structure
Poison
Pills:
Generally vote against or withhold from all nominees (except new nominees1,
who should be
considered
case- by-case) if:
▪The
company has a poison pill with a deadhand or slowhand feature6;
6
If a short-term pill with a deadhand or slowhand feature is enacted but expires
before the next shareholder vote, ISS will
generally
still recommend withhold/against nominees at the next shareholder meeting
following its adoption.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪The
board makes a material adverse modification to an existing pill, including, but
not limited to, extension,
renewal,
or lowering the trigger, without shareholder approval; or
▪The
company has a long-term poison pill (with a term of over one year) that was not
approved by the public
shareholders7.
Vote
case-by-case on nominees if the board adopts an initial short-term pill6
(with a term of one year or less) without
shareholder
approval, taking into consideration:
▪
The disclosed rationale for the adoption;
▪
The trigger;
▪
The company's market capitalization (including absolute level and sudden
changes);
▪
A commitment to put any renewal to a shareholder vote; and
▪
Other factors as relevant.
Unequal
Voting Rights:
Generally
vote withhold or against directors individually, committee members, or the
entire
board
(except new nominees1,
who should be considered case-by-case), if the company employs a common stock
structure
with unequal voting rights8.
Exceptions
to this policy will generally be limited to:
▪Newly-public
companies9
with
a sunset provision of no more than seven years from the date of going
public;
▪Limited
Partnerships and the Operating Partnership (OP) unit structure of REITs;
▪Situations
where the super-voting shares represent less than 5% of total voting power and
therefore considered
to
be de
minimis;
or
▪The
company provides sufficient protections for minority shareholders, such as
allowing minority shareholders
a
regular binding vote on whether the capital structure should be maintained.
Classified
Board Structure:
The
board is classified, and a continuing director responsible for a problematic
governance
issue at the board/committee level that would warrant a withhold/against vote
recommendation is
not
up for election. All appropriate nominees (except new) may be held
accountable.
Removal
of Shareholder Discretion on Classified Boards:
The company has opted into, or failed to opt out of,
state
laws requiring a classified board structure.
Problematic
Governance Structure:
For companies that hold or held their first annual meeting9
of
public
shareholders
after Feb. 1, 2015, generally vote against or withhold from directors
individually, committee
members,
or the entire board (except new nominees1,
who should be considered case-by-case) if, prior to or in
connection
with the company's public offering, the company or its board adopted the
following bylaw or charter
provisions
that are considered to be materially adverse to shareholder rights:
▪Supermajority
vote requirements to amend the bylaws or charter;
▪A
classified board structure; or
▪Other
egregious provisions.
7
Approval prior to, or in connection, with a company’s becoming publicly-traded,
or in connection with a de-SPAC transaction,
is
insufficient.
8
This
generally includes classes of common stock that have additional votes per share
than other shares; classes of shares that
are
not entitled to vote on all the same ballot items or nominees; or stock with
time-phased voting rights (“loyalty shares”).
9
Includes
companies that emerge from bankruptcy, SPAC transactions, spin-offs, direct
listings, and those who complete a
traditional
initial public offering.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
A
provision which specifies that the problematic structure(s) will be sunset
within seven years of the date of going
public
will be considered a mitigating factor.
Unless
the adverse provision is reversed or removed, vote case-by-case on director
nominees in subsequent years.
Unilateral
Bylaw/Charter Amendments:
Generally
vote against or withhold from directors individually, committee
members,
or the entire board (except new nominees1,
who should be considered case-by-case) if the board
amends
the company's bylaws or charter without shareholder approval in a manner that
materially diminishes
shareholders'
rights or that could adversely impact shareholders, considering the following
factors:
▪The
board's rationale for adopting the bylaw/charter amendment without shareholder
ratification;
▪Disclosure
by the company of any significant engagement with shareholders regarding the
amendment;
▪The
level of impairment of shareholders' rights caused by the board's unilateral
amendment to the
bylaws/charter;
▪The
board's track record with regard to unilateral board action on bylaw/charter
amendments or other
entrenchment
provisions;
▪The
company's ownership structure;
▪The
company's existing governance provisions;
▪The
timing of the board's amendment to the bylaws/charter in connection with a
significant business
development;
and
▪Other
factors, as deemed appropriate, that may be relevant to determine the impact of
the amendment on
shareholders.
Unless
the adverse amendment is reversed or submitted to a binding shareholder vote, in
subsequent years vote
case-by-case
on director nominees. Generally vote against (except new nominees1,
who should be considered
case-by-case)
if the directors:
▪Classified
the board;
▪Adopted
supermajority vote requirements to amend the bylaws or charter;
▪Eliminated
shareholders' ability to amend bylaws;
▪Adopted
a fee-shifting
provision;
or
▪Adopted
another provision deemed egregious.
Restricting
Binding Shareholder Proposals:
Generally
vote against or withhold from the members of the governance
committee
if:
▪The
company’s governing documents impose undue restrictions on shareholders’ ability
to amend the bylaws.
Such
restrictions include but are not limited to: outright prohibition on the
submission of binding shareholder
proposals
or share ownership requirements, subject matter restrictions, or time holding
requirements in excess
of
SEC Rule 14a-8. Vote against or withhold on an ongoing basis.
Submission
of management proposals to approve or ratify requirements in excess of SEC Rule
14a-8 for the
submission
of binding bylaw amendments will generally be viewed as an insufficient
restoration of
shareholders'
rights. Generally continue to vote against or withhold on an ongoing basis until
shareholders are
provided
with an unfettered ability to amend the bylaws or a proposal providing for such
unfettered right is
submitted
for shareholder approval.
Director
Performance Evaluation:
The
board lacks mechanisms to promote accountability and oversight,
coupled
with sustained poor performance relative to peers. Sustained poor performance is
measured by one-,
three-,
and five-year total shareholder returns in the bottom half of a company’s
four-digit GICS industry group
(Russell
3000 companies only). Take into consideration the company’s operational metrics
and other factors as
warranted.
Problematic provisions include but are not limited to:
▪A
classified board structure;
▪A
supermajority vote requirement;
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪Either
a plurality vote standard in uncontested director elections, or a majority vote
standard in contested
elections;
▪The
inability of shareholders to call special meetings;
▪The
inability of shareholders to act by written consent;
▪A
multi-class capital structure; and/or
▪A
non-shareholder-approved poison pill.
Management
Proposals to Ratify Existing Charter or Bylaw Provisions:
Vote
against/withhold from individual
directors,
members of the governance committee, or the full board, where boards ask
shareholders to ratify
existing
charter or bylaw provisions considering the following factors:
▪The
presence of a shareholder proposal addressing the same issue on the same
ballot;
▪The
board's rationale for seeking ratification;
▪Disclosure
of actions to be taken by the board should the ratification proposal fail;
▪Disclosure
of shareholder engagement regarding the board’s ratification request;
▪The
level of impairment to shareholders' rights caused by the existing
provision;
▪The
history of management and shareholder proposals on the provision at the
company’s past meetings;
▪Whether
the current provision was adopted in response to the shareholder proposal;
▪The
company's ownership structure; and
▪Previous
use of ratification proposals to exclude shareholder proposals.
Problematic
Audit-Related Practices
Generally
vote against or withhold from the members of the Audit Committee if:
▪The
non-audit fees paid to the auditor are excessive;
▪The
company receives an adverse opinion on the company’s financial statements from
its auditor; or
▪There
is persuasive evidence that the Audit Committee entered into an inappropriate
indemnification
agreement
with its auditor that limits the ability of the company, or its shareholders, to
pursue legitimate legal
recourse
against the audit firm.
Vote
case-by-case on members of the Audit Committee and potentially the full board
if:
▪Poor
accounting practices are identified that rise to a level of serious concern,
such as: fraud; misapplication of
GAAP;
and material weaknesses identified in Section 404 disclosures. Examine the
severity, breadth,
chronological
sequence, and duration, as well as the company’s efforts at remediation or
corrective actions, in
determining
whether withhold/against votes are warranted.
Problematic
Compensation Practices
In
the absence of an Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Say on Pay) ballot
item or in egregious situations,
vote
against or withhold from the members of the Compensation Committee and
potentially the full board if:
▪There
is an unmitigated misalignment between CEO pay and company performance (pay
for performance);
▪The
company maintains significant problematic
pay practices;
or
▪The
board exhibits a significant level of poor
communication and responsiveness to
shareholders.
Generally
vote against or withhold from the Compensation Committee chair, other committee
members, or
potentially
the full board if:
▪The
company fails to include a Say on Pay ballot item when required under SEC
provisions, or under the
company’s
declared frequency of say on pay; or
▪The
company fails to include a Frequency of Say on Pay ballot item when required
under SEC provisions.
Generally
vote against members of the board committee responsible for approving/setting
non-employee director
compensation
if there is a pattern (i.e. two or more years) of awarding excessive
non-employee director
compensation
without disclosing a compelling rationale or other mitigating factors.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Problematic
Pledging of Company Stock:
Vote
against the members of the committee that oversees risks related to
pledging,
or the full board, where a significant level of pledged company stock by
executives or directors raises
concerns.
The following factors will be considered:
▪The
presence of an anti-pledging policy, disclosed in the proxy statement, that
prohibits future pledging
activity;
▪The
magnitude of aggregate pledged shares in terms of total common shares
outstanding, market value, and
trading
volume;
▪Disclosure
of progress or lack thereof in reducing the magnitude of aggregate pledged
shares over time;
▪Disclosure
in the proxy statement that shares subject to stock ownership and holding
requirements do not
include
pledged company stock; and
▪Any
other relevant factors.
Climate
Accountability
For
companies that are significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters, through their
operations or value chain10,
generally
vote against or withhold from the incumbent chair of the responsible committee
(or other directors on a
case-by-case
basis) in cases where ISS determines that the company is not taking the minimum
steps needed to
understand,
assess, and mitigate risks related to climate change to the company and the
larger economy.
Minimum
steps to understand and mitigate those risks are considered to be the following.
Both minimum criteria
will
be required to be in alignment with the policy:
▪Detailed
disclosure of climate-related risks, such as according to the framework
established by the Task Force
on
Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), including:
▪Board
governance measures;
▪Corporate
strategy;
▪Risk
management analyses; and
▪Metrics
and targets.
▪Appropriate
GHG emissions reduction targets.
At
this time, “appropriate GHG emissions reductions targets” will be medium-term
GHG reduction targets or Net
Zero-by-2050
GHG reduction targets for a company's operations (Scope 1) and electricity use
(Scope 2). Targets
should
cover the vast majority of the company’s direct emissions.
Governance
Failures
Under
extraordinary circumstances, vote against or withhold from directors
individually, committee members, or
the
entire board, due to:
▪Material
failures of governance, stewardship, risk oversight11,
or fiduciary responsibilities at the company;
▪Failure
to replace management as appropriate; or
▪Egregious
actions related to a director’s service on other boards that raise substantial
doubt about his or her
ability
to effectively oversee management and serve the best interests of shareholders
at any company.
10
Companies defined as “significant GHG emitters” will be those on the current
Climate Action 100+ Focus Group list.
11
Examples of failure of risk oversight include but are not limited to: bribery;
large or serial fines or sanctions from regulatory
bodies;
demonstrably poor risk oversight of environmental and social issues, including
climate change; significant adverse legal
judgments
or settlement; or hedging of company stock.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Voting
on Director Nominees in Contested Elections
Vote-No
Campaigns
General
Recommendation:
In
cases where companies are targeted in connection with public “vote-no”
campaigns,
evaluate director nominees under the existing governance policies for voting on
director nominees in
uncontested
elections. Take into consideration the arguments submitted by shareholders and
other publicly
available
information.
Proxy
Contests/Proxy Access
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on the election of directors in contested elections, considering
the
following
factors:
▪Long-term
financial performance of the company relative to its industry;
▪Management’s
track record;
▪Background
to the contested election;
▪Nominee
qualifications and any compensatory arrangements;
▪Strategic
plan of dissident slate and quality of the critique against management;
▪Likelihood
that the proposed goals and objectives can be achieved (both slates); and
▪Stock
ownership positions.
In
the case of candidates nominated pursuant to proxy access, vote case-by-case
considering any applicable factors
listed
above or additional factors which may be relevant, including those that are
specific to the company, to the
nominee(s)
and/or to the nature of the election (such as whether there are more candidates
than board seats).
Other
Board-Related Proposals
Adopt
Anti-Hedging/Pledging/Speculative Investments Policy
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for proposals seeking a policy that prohibits named executive officers
from
engaging in derivative or speculative transactions involving company stock,
including hedging, holding stock in a
margin
account, or pledging stock as collateral for a loan. However, the company’s
existing policies regarding
responsible
use of company stock will be considered.
Board
Refreshment
Board
refreshment is best implemented through an ongoing program of individual
director evaluations, conducted
annually,
to ensure the evolving needs of the board are met and to bring in fresh
perspectives, skills, and diversity as
needed.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Term/Tenure
Limits
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on management proposals regarding director term/tenure limits,
considering:
▪The
rationale provided for adoption of the term/tenure limit;
▪The
robustness of the company’s board evaluation process;
▪Whether
the limit is of sufficient length to allow for a broad range of director
tenures;
▪Whether
the limit would disadvantage independent directors compared to non-independent
directors; and
▪Whether
the board will impose the limit evenly, and not have the ability to waive it in
a discriminatory manner.
Vote
case-by-case on shareholder proposals asking for the company to adopt director
term/tenure limits,
considering:
▪The
scope of the shareholder proposal; and
▪Evidence
of problematic issues at the company combined with, or exacerbated by, a lack of
board refreshment.
Age
Limits
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote against management and shareholder proposals to limit the tenure of
independent
directors through mandatory retirement ages. Vote for proposals to remove
mandatory age limits.
Board
Size
General
Recommendation:
Vote
for proposals seeking to fix the board size or designate a range for the board
size.
Vote
against proposals that give management the ability to alter the size of the
board outside of a specified range
without
shareholder approval.
Classification/Declassification
of the Board
General
Recommendation:
Vote
against proposals to classify (stagger) the board.
Vote
for proposals to repeal classified boards and to elect all directors
annually.
CEO
Succession Planning
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for proposals seeking disclosure on a CEO succession planning policy,
considering,
at a minimum, the following factors:
▪The
reasonableness/scope of the request; and
▪The
company’s existing disclosure on its current CEO succession planning
process.
Cumulative
Voting
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote against management proposals to eliminate cumulate voting, and for
shareholder
proposals to restore or provide for cumulative voting, unless:
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪The
company has proxy access12,
thereby allowing shareholders to nominate directors to the company’s
ballot;
and
▪The
company has adopted a majority vote standard, with a carve-out for plurality
voting in situations where
there
are more nominees than seats, and a director resignation policy to address
failed elections.
Vote
for proposals for cumulative voting at controlled companies (insider voting
power > 50%).
Director
and Officer Indemnification, Liability Protection, and Exculpation
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals on director and officer indemnification, liability
protection,
and exculpation13.
Consider
the stated rationale for the proposed change. Also consider, among other
factors, the extent to which the
proposal
would:
▪Eliminate
directors' and officers' liability for monetary damages for violating the duty
of care.
▪Eliminate
directors' and officers' liability for monetary damages for violating the duty
of loyalty.
▪Expand
coverage beyond just legal expenses to liability for acts that are more serious
violations of fiduciary
obligation
than mere carelessness; and.
▪Expand
the scope of indemnification to provide for mandatory indemnification of company
officials in
connection
with acts that previously the company was permitted to provide indemnification
for, at the
discretion
of the company's board (i.e.,
"permissive indemnification"), but that previously the company was
not
required to indemnify.
Vote
for those proposals providing such expanded coverage in cases when a director’s
or officer’s legal defense was
unsuccessful
if both of the following apply:
▪If
the individual was found to have acted in good faith and in a manner that the
individual reasonably
believed
was in the best interests of the company; and
If
only the individual’s legal expenses would be covered.
Establish/Amend
Nominee Qualifications
General
Recommendation: Vote
case-by-case on proposals that establish or amend director qualifications. Votes
should
be based on the reasonableness of the criteria and the degree to which they may
preclude dissident
nominees
from joining the board.
Vote
case-by-case on shareholder resolutions seeking a director nominee who possesses
a particular subject
matter
expertise, considering:
▪The
company’s board committee structure, existing subject matter expertise, and
board nomination
provisions
relative to that of its peers;
12
A
proxy access right that meets the recommended
guidelines.
13
Indemnification:
the condition of being secured against loss or damage.
Limited
liability:
a person's financial liability is limited to a fixed sum, or personal financial
assets are not at risk if the individual
loses
a lawsuit that results in financial award/damages to the plaintiff.
Exculpation:
to eliminate or limit the personal liability of a director or officer to the
corporation or its shareholders for
monetary
damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪The
company’s existing board and management oversight mechanisms regarding the issue
for which board
oversight
is sought;
▪The
company’s disclosure and performance relating to the issue for which board
oversight is sought and any
significant
related controversies; and
▪The
scope and structure of the proposal.
Establish
Other Board Committee Proposals
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote against shareholder proposals to establish a new board committee, as
such
proposals seek a specific oversight mechanism/structure that potentially limits
a company’s flexibility to
determine
an appropriate oversight mechanism for itself. However, the following factors
will be considered:
▪Existing
oversight mechanisms (including current committee structure) regarding the issue
for which board
oversight
is sought;
▪Level
of disclosure regarding the issue for which board oversight is sought;
▪Company
performance related to the issue for which board oversight is sought;
▪Board
committee structure compared to that of other companies in its industry sector;
and
▪The
scope and structure of the proposal.
Filling
Vacancies/Removal of Directors
General
Recommendation: Vote
against proposals that provide that directors may be removed only for
cause.
Vote
for proposals to restore shareholders’ ability to remove directors with or
without cause.
Vote
against proposals that provide that only continuing directors may elect
replacements to fill board vacancies.
Vote
for proposals that permit shareholders to elect directors to fill board
vacancies.
Independent
Board Chair
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for shareholder proposals requiring that the board chair position be
filled
by an independent director, taking into consideration the following:
▪The
scope and rationale of the proposal;
▪The
company's current board leadership structure;
▪The
company's governance structure and practices;
▪Company
performance; and
▪Any
other relevant factors that may be applicable.
The
following factors will increase the likelihood of a “for” recommendation:
▪A
majority non-independent board and/or the presence of non-independent directors
on key board
committees;
▪A
weak or poorly-defined lead independent director role that fails to serve as an
appropriate counterbalance
to
a combined CEO/chair role;
▪The
presence of an executive or non-independent chair in addition to the CEO, a
recent recombination of the
role
of CEO and chair, and/or departure from a structure with an independent
chair;
▪Evidence
that the board has failed to oversee and address material risks facing the
company;
▪A
material governance failure, particularly if the board has failed to adequately
respond to shareholder
concerns
or if the board has materially diminished shareholder rights; or
▪Evidence
that the board has failed to intervene when management’s interests are contrary
to shareholders'
interests.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Majority
of Independent Directors/Establishment of Independent Committees
General
Recommendation:
Vote
for shareholder proposals asking that a majority or more of directors be
independent
unless the board composition already meets the proposed threshold by ISS’
definition of
Independent
Director (See ISS'
Classification of Directors.)
Vote
for shareholder proposals asking that board audit, compensation, and/or
nominating committees be
composed
exclusively of independent directors unless they currently meet that
standard.
Majority
Vote Standard for the Election of Directors
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for management proposals to adopt a majority of votes cast standard
for
directors in uncontested elections. Vote against if no carve-out for a plurality
vote standard in contested
elections
is included.
Generally
vote for precatory and binding shareholder resolutions requesting that the board
change the company’s
bylaws
to stipulate that directors need to be elected with an affirmative majority of
votes cast, provided it does
not
conflict with the state law where the company is incorporated. Binding
resolutions need to allow for a carve-
out
for a plurality vote standard when there are more nominees than board
seats.
Companies
are strongly encouraged to also adopt a post-election policy (also known as a
director resignation
policy)
that will provide guidelines so that the company will promptly address the
situation of a holdover director.
Proxy
Access
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for management and shareholder proposals for proxy access with the
following
provisions:
▪Ownership
threshold: maximum
requirement not more than three percent (3%) of the voting power;
▪Ownership
duration: maximum
requirement not longer than three (3) years of continuous ownership for each
member
of the nominating group;
▪Aggregation:
minimal
or no limits on the number of shareholders permitted to form a nominating group;
and
▪Cap:
cap
on nominees of generally twenty-five percent (25%) of the board.
Review
for reasonableness any other restrictions on the right of proxy access.
Generally
vote against proposals that are more restrictive than these guidelines.
Require
More Nominees than Open Seats
General
Recommendation:
Vote
against shareholder proposals that would require a company to nominate more
candidates
than the number of open board seats.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Shareholder
Engagement Policy (Shareholder Advisory Committee)
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for shareholder proposals requesting that the board establish an
internal
mechanism/process, which may include a committee, in order to improve
communications between
directors
and shareholders, unless the company has the following features, as
appropriate:
▪Established
a communication structure that goes beyond the exchange requirements to
facilitate the
exchange
of information between shareholders and members of the board;
▪Effectively
disclosed information with respect to this structure to its shareholders;
▪Company
has not ignored majority-supported shareholder proposals, or a majority withhold
vote on a director
nominee;
and
▪The
company has an independent chair or a lead director, according to ISS’
definition.
This individual must be
made
available for periodic consultation and direct communication with major
shareholders.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
2.Audit-Related
Auditor
Indemnification and Limitation of Liability
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on the issue of auditor indemnification and limitation of
liability.
Factors
to be assessed include, but are not limited to:
▪The
terms of the auditor agreement—the degree to which these agreements impact
shareholders' rights;
▪The
motivation and rationale for establishing the agreements;
▪The
quality of the company’s disclosure; and
▪The
company’s historical practices in the audit area.
Vote
against or withhold from members of an audit committee in situations where there
is persuasive evidence
that
the audit committee entered into an inappropriate indemnification agreement with
its auditor that limits the
ability
of the company, or its shareholders, to pursue legitimate legal recourse against
the audit firm.
Auditor
Ratification
General
Recommendation:
Vote
for proposals to ratify auditors unless any of the following apply:
▪An
auditor has a financial interest in or association with the company, and is
therefore not independent;
▪There
is reason to believe that the independent auditor has rendered an opinion that
is neither accurate nor
indicative
of the company’s financial position;
▪Poor
accounting practices are identified that rise to a serious level of concern,
such as fraud or misapplication
of
GAAP; or
▪Fees
for non-audit services (“Other” fees) are excessive.
Non-audit
fees are excessive if:
▪Non-audit
(“other”) fees > audit fees + audit-related fees + tax compliance/preparation
fees
Tax
compliance and preparation include the preparation of original and amended tax
returns and refund claims,
and
tax payment planning. All other services in the tax category, such as tax
advice, planning, or consulting, should
be
added to “Other” fees. If the breakout of tax fees cannot be determined, add all
tax fees to “Other” fees.
In
circumstances where "Other" fees include fees related to significant one-time
capital structure events (such as
initial
public offerings, bankruptcy emergence, and spin-offs) and the company makes
public disclosure of the
amount
and nature of those fees that are an exception to the standard "non-audit fee"
category, then such fees
may
be excluded from the non-audit fees considered in determining the ratio of
non-audit to audit/audit-related
fees/tax
compliance and preparation for purposes of determining whether non-audit fees
are excessive.
Shareholder
Proposals Limiting Non-Audit Services
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on shareholder proposals asking companies to prohibit or limit
their
auditors from engaging in non-audit services.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Shareholder
Proposals on Audit Firm Rotation
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on shareholder proposals asking for audit firm rotation, taking
into
account:
▪The
tenure of the audit firm;
▪The
length of rotation specified in the proposal;
▪Any
significant audit-related issues at the company;
▪The
number of Audit Committee meetings held each year;
▪The
number of financial experts serving on the committee; and
▪Whether
the company has a periodic renewal process where the auditor is evaluated for
both audit quality
and
competitive price.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
3.Shareholder
Rights & Defenses
Advance
Notice Requirements for Shareholder Proposals/Nominations
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on advance notice proposals, giving support to those proposals
which
allow shareholders to submit proposals/nominations as close to the meeting date
as reasonably possible
and
within the broadest window possible, recognizing the need to allow sufficient
notice for company, regulatory,
and
shareholder review.
To
be reasonable, the company’s deadline for shareholder notice of a
proposal/nominations must be no earlier
than
120 days prior to the anniversary of the previous year’s meeting and have a
submittal window of no shorter
than
30 days from the beginning of the notice period (also known as a 90-120-day
window). The submittal window
is
the period under which shareholders must file their proposals/nominations prior
to the deadline.
In
general, support additional efforts by companies to ensure full disclosure in
regard to a proponent’s economic
and
voting position in the company so long as the informational requirements are
reasonable and aimed at
providing
shareholders with the necessary information to review such proposals.
Amend
Bylaws without Shareholder Consent
General
Recommendation:
Vote
against proposals giving the board exclusive authority to amend the bylaws.
Vote
case-by-case on proposals giving the board the ability to amend the bylaws in
addition to shareholders, taking
into
account the following:
▪Any
impediments to shareholders' ability to amend the bylaws (i.e. supermajority
voting requirements);
▪The
company's ownership structure and historical voting turnout;
▪Whether
the board could amend bylaws adopted by shareholders; and
▪Whether
shareholders would retain the ability to ratify any board-initiated
amendments.
Control
Share Acquisition Provisions
General
Recommendation: Vote
for proposals to opt out of control share acquisition statutes unless doing so
would
enable the completion of a takeover that would be detrimental to
shareholders.
Vote
against proposals to amend the charter to include control share acquisition
provisions.
Vote
for proposals to restore voting rights to the control shares.
Control
share acquisition statutes function by denying shares their voting rights when
they contribute to
ownership
in excess of certain thresholds. Voting rights for those shares exceeding
ownership limits may only be
restored
by approval of either a majority or supermajority of disinterested shares. Thus,
control share acquisition
statutes
effectively require a hostile bidder to put its offer to a shareholder vote or
risk voting disenfranchisement
if
the bidder continues buying up a large block of shares.
Control
Share Cash-Out Provisions
General
Recommendation:
Vote
for proposals to opt out of control share cash-out statutes.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Control
share cash-out statutes give dissident shareholders the right to "cash-out" of
their position in a company at
the
expense of the shareholder who has taken a control position. In other words,
when an investor crosses a preset
threshold
level, remaining shareholders are given the right to sell their shares to the
acquirer, who must buy them
at
the highest acquiring price.
Disgorgement
Provisions
General
Recommendation:
Vote
for proposals to opt out of state disgorgement provisions.
Disgorgement
provisions require an acquirer or potential acquirer of more than a certain
percentage of a company's
stock
to disgorge, or pay back, to the company any profits realized from the sale of
that company's stock purchased
24
months before achieving control status. All sales of company stock by the
acquirer occurring within a certain
period
of time (between 18 months and 24 months) prior to the investor's gaining
control status are subject to these
recapture-of-profits
provisions.
Fair
Price Provisions
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals to adopt fair price provisions (provisions that
stipulate
that
an acquirer must pay the same price to acquire all shares as it paid to acquire
the control shares), evaluating
factors
such as the vote required to approve the proposed acquisition, the vote required
to repeal the fair price
provision,
and the mechanism for determining the fair price.
Generally
vote against fair price provisions with shareholder vote requirements greater
than a majority of
disinterested
shares.
Freeze-Out
Provisions
General
Recommendation:
Vote
for proposals to opt out of state freeze-out provisions. Freeze-out provisions
force
an
investor who surpasses a certain ownership threshold in a company to wait a
specified period of time before
gaining
control of the company.
Greenmail
General
Recommendation:
Vote
for proposals to adopt anti-greenmail charter or bylaw amendments or otherwise
restrict
a company’s ability to make greenmail payments.
Vote
case-by-case on anti-greenmail proposals when they are bundled with other
charter or bylaw amendments.
Greenmail
payments are targeted share repurchases by management of company stock from
individuals or groups
seeking
control of the company. Since only the hostile party receives payment, usually
at a substantial premium over
the
market value of its shares, the practice discriminates against all other
shareholders.
Shareholder
Litigation Rights
Federal
Forum Selection Provisions
Federal
forum selection provisions require that U.S. federal courts be the sole forum
for shareholders to litigate
claims
arising under federal securities law.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for federal forum selection provisions in the charter or bylaws that
specify
"the
district courts of the United States" as the exclusive forum for federal
securities law matters, in the absence of
serious
concerns about corporate governance or board responsiveness to
shareholders.
Vote
against provisions that restrict the forum to a particular federal district
court; unilateral adoption (without a
shareholder
vote) of such a provision will generally be considered a one-time failure under
the Unilateral
Bylaw/
Charter
Amendments policy.
Exclusive
Forum Provisions for State Law Matters
Exclusive
forum provisions in the charter or bylaws restrict shareholders’ ability to
bring derivative lawsuits against
the
company, for claims arising out of state corporate law, to the courts of a
particular state (generally the state of
incorporation).
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for charter or bylaw provisions that specify courts located within the
state
of Delaware as the exclusive forum for corporate law matters for Delaware
corporations, in the absence of
serious
concerns about corporate governance or board responsiveness to
shareholders.
For
states other than Delaware, vote case-by-case on exclusive forum provisions,
taking into consideration:
▪The
company's stated rationale for adopting such a provision;
▪Disclosure
of past harm from duplicative shareholder lawsuits in more than one forum;
▪The
breadth of application of the charter or bylaw provision, including the types of
lawsuits to which it would
apply
and the definition of key terms; and
▪Governance
features such as shareholders' ability to repeal the provision at a later date
(including the vote
standard
applied when shareholders attempt to amend the charter or bylaws) and their
ability to hold
directors
accountable through annual director elections and a majority vote standard in
uncontested
elections.
Generally
vote against provisions that specify a state other than the state of
incorporation as the exclusive forum
for
corporate law matters, or that specify a particular local court within the
state; unilateral adoption of such a
provision
will generally be considered a one-time failure under the Unilateral
Bylaw/Charter Amendments policy.
Fee
shifting
Fee-shifting
provisions in the charter or bylaws require that a shareholder who sues a
company unsuccessfully pay
all
litigation expenses of the defendant corporation and its directors and
officers.
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote against provisions that mandate fee-shifting whenever plaintiffs are
not
completely successful on the merits (i.e., including cases where the plaintiffs
are partially successful).
Unilateral
adoption of a fee-shifting provision will generally be considered an ongoing
failure under the Unilateral
Bylaw/Charter
Amendments policy.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Net
Operating Loss (NOL) Protective Amendments
General
Recommendation:
Vote
against proposals to adopt a protective amendment for the stated purpose of
protecting
a company's net operating losses (NOL) if the effective term of the protective
amendment would
exceed
the shorter of three years and the exhaustion of the NOL.
Vote
case-by-case, considering the following factors, for management proposals to
adopt an NOL protective
amendment
that would remain in effect for the shorter of three years (or less) and the
exhaustion of the NOL:
▪The
ownership threshold (NOL protective amendments generally prohibit stock
ownership transfers that
would
result in a new 5-percent holder or increase the stock ownership percentage of
an existing 5-percent
holder);
▪The
value of the NOLs;
▪Shareholder
protection mechanisms (sunset provision or commitment to cause expiration of the
protective
amendment
upon exhaustion or expiration of the NOL);
▪The
company's existing governance structure including: board independence, existing
takeover defenses, track
record
of responsiveness to shareholders, and any other problematic governance
concerns; and
▪Any
other factors that may be applicable.
Poison
Pills (Shareholder Rights Plans)
Shareholder
Proposals to Put Pill to a Vote and/or Adopt a Pill Policy
General
Recommendation:
Vote
for shareholder proposals requesting that the company submit its poison pill to
a
shareholder
vote or redeem it unless the company has: (1) A shareholder-approved poison pill
in place; or (2) The
company
has adopted a policy concerning the adoption of a pill in the future specifying
that the board will only
adopt
a shareholder rights plan if either:
▪Shareholders
have approved the adoption of the plan; or
▪The
board, in its exercise of its fiduciary responsibilities, determines that it is
in the best interest of
shareholders
under the circumstances to adopt a pill without the delay in adoption that would
result from
seeking
stockholder approval (i.e., the “fiduciary out” provision). A poison pill
adopted under this fiduciary out
will
be put to a shareholder ratification vote within 12 months of adoption or
expire. If the pill is not approved
by
a majority of the votes cast on this issue, the plan will immediately
terminate.
If
the shareholder proposal calls for a time period of less than 12 months for
shareholder ratification after
adoption,
vote for the proposal, but add the caveat that a vote within 12 months would be
considered sufficient
implementation.
Management
Proposals to Ratify a Poison Pill
General
Recommendation: Vote
case-by-case on management proposals on poison pill ratification, focusing on
the
features of the shareholder rights plan. Rights plans should contain the
following attributes:
▪No
lower than a 20 percent trigger, flip-in or flip-over;
▪A
term of no more than three years;
▪No
deadhand, slowhand, no-hand, or similar feature that limits the ability of a
future board to redeem the pill;
and
▪Shareholder
redemption feature (qualifying offer clause); if the board refuses to redeem the
pill 90 days after
a
qualifying offer is announced, 10 percent of the shares may call a special
meeting or seek a written consent
to
vote on rescinding the pill.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
In
addition, the rationale for adopting the pill should be thoroughly explained by
the company. In examining the
request
for the pill, take into consideration the company’s existing governance
structure, including: board
independence,
existing takeover defenses, and any problematic governance concerns.
Management
Proposals to Ratify a Pill to Preserve Net Operating Losses (NOLs)
General
Recommendation: Vote
against proposals to adopt a poison pill for the stated purpose of protecting a
company's
net operating losses (NOL) if the term of the pill would exceed the shorter of
three years and the
exhaustion
of the NOL.
Vote
case-by-case on management proposals for poison pill ratification, considering
the following factors, if the
term
of the pill would be the shorter of three years (or less) and the exhaustion of
the NOL:
▪The
ownership threshold to transfer (NOL pills generally have a trigger slightly
below 5 percent);
▪The
value of the NOLs;
▪Shareholder
protection mechanisms (sunset provision, or commitment to cause expiration of
the pill upon
exhaustion
or expiration of NOLs);
▪The
company's existing governance structure, including: board independence, existing
takeover defenses,
track
record of responsiveness to shareholders, and any other problematic governance
concerns; and
▪Any
other factors that may be applicable.
Proxy
Voting Disclosure, Confidentiality, and Tabulation
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals regarding proxy voting mechanics, taking into
consideration
whether implementation of the proposal is likely to enhance or protect
shareholder rights. Specific
issues
covered under the policy include, but are not limited to, confidential voting of
individual proxies and
ballots,
confidentiality of running vote tallies, and the treatment of abstentions and/or
broker non-votes in the
company's
vote-counting methodology.
While
a variety of factors may be considered in each analysis, the guiding principles
are: transparency, consistency,
and
fairness in the proxy voting process. The factors considered, as applicable to
the proposal, may include:
▪The
scope and structure of the proposal;
▪The
company's stated confidential voting policy (or other relevant policies) and
whether it ensures a "level
playing
field" by providing shareholder proponents with equal access to vote information
prior to the annual
meeting;
▪The
company's vote standard for management and shareholder proposals and whether it
ensures consistency
and
fairness in the proxy voting process and maintains the integrity of vote
results;
▪Whether
the company's disclosure regarding its vote counting method and other relevant
voting policies with
respect
to management and shareholder proposals are consistent and clear;
▪Any
recent controversies or concerns related to the company's proxy voting
mechanics;
▪Any
unintended consequences resulting from implementation of the proposal; and
▪Any
other factors that may be relevant.
Ratification
Proposals: Management Proposals to Ratify Existing Charter or Bylaw
Provisions
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote against management proposals to ratify provisions of the company’s
existing
charter or bylaws, unless these governance provisions align with best
practice.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
In
addition, voting against/withhold from individual directors, members of the
governance committee, or the full
board
may be warranted, considering:
▪The
presence of a shareholder proposal addressing the same issue on the same
ballot;
▪The
board's rationale for seeking ratification;
▪Disclosure
of actions to be taken by the board should the ratification proposal fail;
▪Disclosure
of shareholder engagement regarding the board’s ratification request;
▪The
level of impairment to shareholders' rights caused by the existing
provision;
▪The
history of management and shareholder proposals on the provision at the
company’s past meetings;
▪Whether
the current provision was adopted in response to the shareholder proposal;
▪The
company's ownership structure; and
▪Previous
use of ratification proposals to exclude shareholder proposals.
Reimbursing
Proxy Solicitation Expenses
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals to reimburse proxy solicitation expenses.
When
voting in conjunction with support of a dissident slate, vote for the
reimbursement of all appropriate proxy
solicitation
expenses associated with the election.
Generally
vote for shareholder proposals calling for the reimbursement of reasonable costs
incurred in connection
with
nominating one or more candidates in a contested election where the following
apply:
▪The
election of fewer than 50 percent of the directors to be elected is contested in
the election;
▪One
or more of the dissident’s candidates is elected;
▪Shareholders
are not permitted to cumulate their votes for directors; and
▪The
election occurred, and the expenses were incurred, after the adoption of this
bylaw.
Reincorporation
Proposals
General
Recommendation:
Management
or shareholder proposals to change a company's state of incorporation
should
be evaluated case-by-case, giving consideration to both financial and corporate
governance concerns
including
the following:
▪Reasons
for reincorporation;
▪Comparison
of company's governance practices and provisions prior to and following the
reincorporation; and
▪Comparison
of corporation laws of original state and destination state.
Vote
for reincorporation when the economic factors outweigh any neutral or negative
governance changes.
Shareholder
Ability to Act by Written Consent
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote against management and shareholder proposals to restrict or prohibit
shareholders'
ability to act by written consent.
Generally
vote for management and shareholder proposals that provide shareholders with the
ability to act by
written
consent, taking into account the following factors:
▪Shareholders'
current right to act by written consent;
▪The
consent threshold;
▪The
inclusion of exclusionary or prohibitive language;
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪Investor
ownership structure; and
▪Shareholder
support of, and management's response to, previous shareholder proposals.
Vote
case-by-case on shareholder proposals if, in addition to the considerations
above, the company has the
following
governance and antitakeover provisions:
▪An
unfettered14
right for shareholders to call special meetings at a 10 percent threshold;
▪A
majority vote standard in uncontested director elections;
▪No
non-shareholder-approved pill; and
▪An
annually elected board.
Shareholder
Ability to Call Special Meetings
General
Recommendation: Vote
against management or shareholder proposals to restrict or prohibit
shareholders’
ability to call special meetings.
Generally
vote for management or shareholder proposals that provide shareholders with the
ability to call special
meetings
taking into account the following factors:
▪Shareholders’
current right to call special meetings;
▪Minimum
ownership threshold necessary to call special meetings (10 percent
preferred);
▪The
inclusion of exclusionary or prohibitive language;
▪Investor
ownership structure; and
▪Shareholder
support of, and management’s response to, previous shareholder proposals.
Stakeholder
Provisions
General
Recommendation:
Vote
against proposals that ask the board to consider non-shareholder constituencies
or
other non-financial effects when evaluating a merger or business
combination.
State
Antitakeover Statutes
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals to opt in or out of state takeover statutes (including
fair
price provisions, stakeholder laws, poison pill endorsements, severance pay and
labor contract provisions,
and
anti-greenmail provisions).
Supermajority
Vote Requirements
General
Recommendation:
Vote
against proposals to require a supermajority shareholder vote.
Vote
for management or shareholder proposals to reduce supermajority vote
requirements. However, for companies
with
shareholder(s) who have significant ownership levels, vote case-by-case, taking
into account:
▪Ownership
structure;
▪Quorum
requirements; and
▪Vote
requirements.
14
"Unfettered" means no restrictions on agenda items, no restrictions on the
number of shareholders who can group together
to
reach the 10 percent threshold, and only reasonable limits on when a meeting can
be called: no greater than 30 days after
the
last annual meeting and no greater than 90 prior to the next annual
meeting.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Virtual
Shareholder Meetings
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for management proposals allowing for the convening of shareholder
meetings
by electronic means, so long as they do not preclude in-person meetings.
Companies are encouraged to
disclose
the circumstances under which virtual-only15
meetings
would be held, and to allow for comparable rights
and
opportunities for shareholders to participate electronically as they would have
during an in-person meeting.
Vote
case-by-case on shareholder proposals concerning virtual-only meetings,
considering:
▪Scope
and rationale of the proposal; and
▪Concerns
identified with the company’s prior meeting practices.
15
Virtual-only
shareholder meeting” refers to a meeting of shareholders that is held
exclusively using technology without a
corresponding
in-person meeting.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
4.Capital/Restructuring
Capital
Adjustments
to Par Value of Common Stock
General
Recommendation:
Vote
for management proposals to reduce the par value of common stock unless the
action
is being taken to facilitate an anti-takeover device or some other negative
corporate governance action.
Vote
for management proposals to eliminate par value.
Common
Stock Authorization
General
Authorization Requests
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals to increase the number of authorized shares of
common
stock that are to be used for general corporate purposes:
▪If
share usage (outstanding plus reserved) is less than 50% of the current
authorized shares, vote for an
increase
of up to 50%
of current authorized share;
▪If
share usage is 50% to 100% of the current authorized, vote for an increase of up
to 100%
of current
authorized
shares;
▪If
share usage is greater than current authorized shares, vote for an increase of
up to the current share usage; or
▪In
the case of a stock split, the allowable increase is calculated (per above)
based on the post-split adjusted
authorization.
Generally
vote against proposed increases, even if within the above ratios, if the
proposal or the company’s prior or
ongoing
use of authorized shares is problematic, including, but not limited to:
▪The
proposal seeks to increase the number of authorized shares of the class of
common stock that
has
superior voting rights to other share classes;
▪On
the same ballot is a proposal for a reverse split for which support is warranted
despite the fact that it
would
result in an excessive increase in the share authorization;
▪The
company has a non-shareholder approved poison pill (including an NOL pill);
or
▪The
company has previous sizeable placements (within the past 3 years) of stock with
insiders at prices
substantially
below market value, or with problematic voting rights, without shareholder
approval.
However,
generally vote for proposed increases beyond the above ratios or problematic
situations when there is
disclosure
of specific and severe risks to shareholders of not approving the request, such
as:
▪In,
or subsequent to, the company's most recent 10-K filing, the company discloses
that there is substantial
doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern;
▪The
company states that there is a risk of imminent bankruptcy or imminent
liquidation if shareholders do not
approve
the increase in authorized capital; or
▪A
government body has in the past year required the company to increase its
capital ratios.
For
companies incorporated in states that allow increases in authorized capital
without shareholder approval,
generally
vote withhold or against all nominees if a unilateral capital authorization
increase does not conform to
the
above policies.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Specific
Authorization Requests
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for proposals to increase the number of authorized common shares
where
the primary purpose of the increase is to issue shares in connection with
transaction(s) (such as
acquisitions,
SPAC transactions, private placements, or similar transactions) on the same
ballot, or disclosed in
the
proxy statement, that warrant support. For such transactions, the allowable
increase will be the greater of:
▪twice
the amount needed to support the transactions on the ballot, and
▪the
allowable increase as calculated for general issuances above.
Dual
Class Structure
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote against proposals to create a new class of common stock unless:
▪The
company discloses a compelling rationale for the dual-class capital structure,
such as:
▪The
company's auditor has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the
company's ability to continue
as
a going concern; or
▪The
new class of shares will be transitory;
▪The
new class is intended for financing purposes with minimal or no dilution to
current shareholders in both
the
short term and long term; and
▪The
new class is not designed to preserve or increase the voting power of an insider
or significant shareholder.
Issue
Stock for Use with Rights Plan
General
Recommendation:
Vote
against proposals that increase authorized common stock for the explicit
purpose
of implementing a non-shareholder-approved shareholder rights plan (poison
pill).
Preemptive
Rights
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on shareholder proposals that seek preemptive rights, taking into
consideration:
▪The
size of the company;
▪The
shareholder base; and
▪The
liquidity of the stock.
Preferred
Stock Authorization
General
Authorization Requests
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals to increase the number of authorized shares of
preferred
stock that are to be used for general corporate purposes:
▪If
share usage (outstanding plus reserved) is less than 50% of the current
authorized shares, vote for an
increase
of up to 50%
of current authorized shares.
▪If
share usage is 50% to 100% of the current authorized, vote for an increase of up
to 100%
of current
authorized
shares.
▪If
share usage is greater than current authorized shares, vote for an increase of
up to the current share usage.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪In
the case of a stock split, the allowable increase is calculated (per above)
based on the post-split adjusted
authorization;
or
▪If
no preferred shares are currently issued and outstanding, vote against the
request, unless the company
discloses
a specific use for the shares.
Generally
vote against proposed increases, even if within the above ratios, if the
proposal or the company’s prior or
ongoing
use of authorized shares is problematic, including, but not limited to:
▪If
the shares requested are blank check preferred shares that can be used for
antitakeover purposes;16
▪The
company seeks to increase a class of non-convertible preferred shares entitled
to more than one vote per
share
on matters that do not solely affect the rights of preferred stockholders
"supervoting shares");
▪The
company seeks to increase a class of convertible preferred shares entitled to a
number of votes greater
than
the number of common shares into which they are convertible ("supervoting
shares") on matters that do
not
solely affect the rights of preferred stockholders;
▪The
stated intent of the increase in the general authorization is to allow the
company to increase an existing
designated
class of supervoting preferred shares;
▪On
the same ballot is a proposal for a reverse split for which support is warranted
despite the fact that it
would
result in an excessive increase in the share authorization;
▪The
company has a non-shareholder approved poison pill (including an NOL pill);
and
▪The
company has previous sizeable placements (within the past 3 years) of stock with
insiders at prices
substantially
below market value, or with problematic voting rights, without shareholder
approval.
However,
generally vote for proposed increases beyond the above ratios or problematic
situations when there is
disclosure
of specific and severe risks to shareholders of not approving the request, such
as:
▪In,
or subsequent to, the company's most recent 10-K filing, the company discloses
that there is substantial
doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern;
▪The
company states that there is a risk of imminent bankruptcy or imminent
liquidation if shareholders do not
approve
the increase in authorized capital; or
▪A
government body has in the past year required the company to increase its
capital ratios.
For
companies incorporated in states that allow increases in authorized capital
without shareholder approval,
generally
vote withhold or against all nominees if a unilateral capital authorization
increase does not conform to
the
above policies.
Specific
Authorization Requests
General
Recommendation: Generally
vote for proposals to increase the number of authorized preferred shares
where
the primary purpose of the increase is to issue shares in connection with
transaction(s) (such as
acquisitions,
SPAC transactions, private placements, or similar transactions) on the same
ballot, or disclosed in
the
proxy statement, that warrant support. For such transactions, the allowable
increase will be the greater of:
▪twice
the amount needed to support the transactions on the ballot, and
▪the
allowable increase as calculated for general issuances above.
16
To
be acceptable, appropriate disclosure would be needed that the shares are
“declawed”: i.e., representation by the board
that
it will not, without prior stockholder approval, issue or use the preferred
stock for any defensive or anti-takeover purpose or
for
the purpose of implementing any stockholder rights plan.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Recapitalization
Plans
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on recapitalizations (reclassifications of securities), taking into
account
the following:
▪More
simplified capital structure;
▪Enhanced
liquidity;
▪Fairness
of conversion terms;
▪Impact
on voting power and dividends;
▪Reasons
for the reclassification;
▪Conflicts
of interest; and
▪Other
alternatives considered.
Reverse
Stock Splits
General
Recommendation:
Vote
for management proposals to implement a reverse stock split if:
▪The
number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced; or
▪The
effective increase in authorized shares is equal to or less than the allowable
increase calculated in
accordance
with ISS' Common
Stock Authorization
policy.
Vote
case-by-case on proposals that do not meet either of the above conditions,
taking into consideration the
following
factors:
▪Stock
exchange notification to the company of a potential delisting;
▪Disclosure
of substantial doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern
without additional
financing;
▪The
company's rationale; or
▪Other
factors as applicable.
Share
Issuance Mandates at U.S. Domestic Issuers Incorporated Outside the U.S.
General
Recommendation:
For U.S. domestic issuers incorporated outside the U.S. and listed solely
on a U.S.
exchange,
generally vote for resolutions to authorize the issuance of common shares up to
20 percent of currently
issued
common share capital, where not tied to a specific transaction or financing
proposal.
For
pre-revenue or other early-stage companies that are heavily reliant on periodic
equity financing, generally
vote
for resolutions to authorize the issuance of common shares up to 50 percent of
currently issued common
share
capital. The burden of proof will be on the company to establish that it has a
need for the higher limit.
Renewal
of such mandates should be sought at each year’s annual meeting.
Vote
case-by-case on share issuances for a specific transaction or financing
proposal.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Share
Repurchase Programs
General
Recommendation:
For
U.S.-incorporated companies, and foreign-incorporated U.S. Domestic Issuers
that
are traded solely on U.S. exchanges, vote for management proposals to institute
open-market share
repurchase
plans in which all shareholders may participate on equal terms, or to grant the
board authority to
conduct
open- market repurchases, in the absence of company-specific concerns
regarding:
▪Greenmail;
▪The
use of buybacks to inappropriately manipulate incentive compensation
metrics;
▪Threats
to the company's long-term viability; or
▪Other
company-specific factors as warranted.
Vote
case-by-case on proposals to repurchase shares directly from specified
shareholders, balancing the stated
rationale
against the possibility for the repurchase authority to be misused, such as to
repurchase shares from
insiders
at a premium to market price.
Share
Repurchase Programs Shareholder Proposals
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote against shareholder proposals prohibiting executives from selling
shares
of company stock during periods in which the company has announced that it may
or will be repurchasing
shares
of its stock. Vote for the proposal when there is a pattern of abuse by
executives exercising options or
selling
shares during periods of share buybacks.
Stock
Distributions: Splits and Dividends
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for management proposals to increase the common share
authorization
for stock split or stock dividend, provided that the effective increase in
authorized shares is equal to
or
is less than the allowable increase calculated in accordance with ISS' Common
Stock Authorization policy.
Tracking
Stock
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on the creation of tracking stock, weighing the strategic value of
the
transaction against such factors as:
▪Adverse
governance changes;
▪Excessive
increases in authorized capital stock;
▪Unfair
method of distribution;
▪Diminution
of voting rights;
▪Adverse
conversion features;
▪Negative
impact on stock option plans; and
▪Alternatives
such as spin-off.
Restructuring
Appraisal
Rights
General
Recommendation:
Vote
for proposals to restore or provide shareholders with rights of appraisal.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Asset
Purchases
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on asset purchase proposals, considering the following
factors:
▪Purchase
price;
▪Fairness
opinion;
▪Financial
and strategic benefits;
▪How
the deal was negotiated;
▪Conflicts
of interest;
▪Other
alternatives for the business; and
▪Non-completion
risk.
Asset
Sales
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on asset sales, considering the following factors:
▪Impact
on the balance sheet/working capital;
▪Potential
elimination of diseconomies;
▪Anticipated
financial and operating benefits;
▪Anticipated
use of funds;
▪Value
received for the asset;
▪Fairness
opinion;
▪How
the deal was negotiated; and
▪Conflicts
of interest.
Bundled
Proposals
General
Recommendation: Vote
case-by-case on bundled or “conditional” proxy proposals. In the case of items
that
are conditioned upon each other, examine the benefits and costs of the packaged
items. In instances when
the
joint effect of the conditioned items is not in shareholders’ best interests,
vote against the proposals. If the
combined
effect is positive, support such proposals.
Conversion
of Securities
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals regarding conversion of securities. When evaluating
these
proposals, the investor should review the dilution to existing shareholders, the
conversion price relative to
market
value, financial issues, control issues, termination penalties, and conflicts of
interest.
Vote
for the conversion if it is expected that the company will be subject to onerous
penalties or will be forced to
file
for bankruptcy if the transaction is not approved.
Corporate
Reorganization/Debt Restructuring/Prepackaged Bankruptcy Plans/Reverse
Leveraged
Buyouts/Wrap Plans
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals to increase common and/or preferred shares and to
issue
shares as part of a debt restructuring plan, after evaluating:
▪Dilution
to existing shareholders' positions;
▪Terms
of the offer - discount/premium in purchase price to investor, including any
fairness opinion;
termination
penalties; exit strategy;
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪Financial
issues - company's financial situation; degree of need for capital; use of
proceeds; effect of the
financing
on the company's cost of capital;
▪Management's
efforts to pursue other alternatives;
▪Control
issues - change in management; change in control, guaranteed board and committee
seats; standstill
provisions;
voting agreements; veto power over certain corporate actions; and
▪Conflict
of interest - arm's length transaction, managerial incentives.
Vote
for the debt restructuring if it is expected that the company will file for
bankruptcy if the transaction is not
approved.
Formation
of Holding Company
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals regarding the formation of a holding company, taking
into
consideration the following:
▪The
reasons for the change;
▪Any
financial or tax benefits;
▪Regulatory
benefits;
▪Increases
in capital structure; and
▪Changes
to the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the company.
Absent
compelling financial reasons to recommend for the transaction, vote against the
formation of a holding
company
if the transaction would include either of the following:
▪Increases
in common or preferred stock in excess of the allowable maximum (see discussion
under “Capital”);
or
▪Adverse
changes in shareholder rights.
Going
Private and Going Dark Transactions (LBOs and Minority Squeeze-outs)
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on going private transactions, taking into account the
following:
▪Offer
price/premium;
▪Fairness
opinion;
▪How
the deal was negotiated;
▪Conflicts
of interest;
▪Other
alternatives/offers considered; and
▪Non-completion
risk.
Vote
case-by-case on going dark transactions, determining whether the transaction
enhances shareholder value by
taking
into consideration:
▪Whether
the company has attained benefits from being publicly-traded (examination of
trading volume,
liquidity,
and market research of the stock); and
▪Balanced
interests of continuing vs. cashed-out shareholders, taking into account the
following:
▪Are
all shareholders able to participate in the transaction?
▪Will
there be a liquid market for remaining shareholders following the
transaction?
▪Does
the company have strong corporate governance?
▪Will
insiders reap the gains of control following the proposed transaction? and
▪Does
the state of incorporation have laws requiring continued reporting that may
benefit shareholders?
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Joint
Ventures
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals to form joint ventures, taking into account the
following:
▪Percentage
of assets/business contributed;
▪Percentage
ownership;
▪Financial
and strategic benefits;
▪Governance
structure;
▪Conflicts
of interest;
▪Other
alternatives; and
▪Non-completion
risk.
Liquidations
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on liquidations, taking into account the following:
▪Management’s
efforts to pursue other alternatives;
▪Appraisal
value of assets; and
▪The
compensation plan for executives managing the liquidation.
Vote
for the liquidation if the company will file for bankruptcy if the proposal is
not approved.
Mergers
and Acquisitions
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on mergers and acquisitions. Review and evaluate the merits and
drawbacks
of the proposed transaction, balancing various and sometimes countervailing
factors including:
▪Valuation
-
Is the value to be received by the target shareholders (or paid by the acquirer)
reasonable? While
the
fairness opinion may provide an initial starting point for assessing valuation
reasonableness, emphasis is
placed
on the offer premium, market reaction, and strategic rationale.
▪Market
reaction -
How has the market responded to the proposed deal? A negative market reaction
should
cause
closer scrutiny of a deal.
▪Strategic
rationale -
Does the deal make sense strategically? From where is the value derived? Cost
and
revenue
synergies should not be overly aggressive or optimistic, but reasonably
achievable. Management
should
also have a favorable track record of successful integration of historical
acquisitions.
▪Negotiations
and process -
Were the terms of the transaction negotiated at arm's-length? Was the process
fair
and
equitable? A fair process helps to ensure the best price for shareholders.
Significant negotiation "wins"
can
also signify the deal makers' competency. The comprehensiveness of the sales
process (e.g., full auction,
partial
auction, no auction) can also affect shareholder value.
▪Conflicts
of interest -
Are insiders benefiting from the transaction disproportionately and
inappropriately as
compared
to non-insider shareholders? As the result of potential conflicts, the directors
and officers of the
company
may be more likely to vote to approve a merger than if they did not hold these
interests. Consider
whether
these interests may have influenced these directors and officers to support or
recommend the
merger.
The CIC figure presented in the "ISS Transaction Summary" section of this report
is an aggregate
figure
that can in certain cases be a misleading indicator of the true value transfer
from shareholders to
insiders.
Where such figure appears to be excessive, analyze the underlying assumptions to
determine
whether
a potential conflict exists.
▪Governance
-
Will the combined company have a better or worse governance profile than the
current
governance
profiles of the respective parties to the transaction? If the governance profile
is to change for the
worse,
the burden is on the company to prove that other issues (such as valuation)
outweigh any deterioration
in
governance.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Private
Placements/Warrants/Convertible Debentures
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals regarding private placements, warrants, and
convertible
debentures taking into consideration:
▪Dilution
to existing shareholders' position: The amount and timing of shareholder
ownership dilution should
be
weighed against the needs and proposed shareholder benefits of the capital
infusion. Although newly
issued
common stock, absent preemptive rights, is typically dilutive to existing
shareholders, share price
appreciation
is often the necessary event to trigger the exercise of "out of the money"
warrants and
convertible
debt. In these instances from a value standpoint, the negative impact of
dilution is mitigated by
the
increase in the company's stock price that must occur to trigger the dilutive
event.
▪Terms
of the offer (discount/premium in purchase price to investor, including any
fairness opinion, conversion
features,
termination penalties, exit strategy):
▪The
terms of the offer should be weighed against the alternatives of the company and
in light of
company's
financial condition. Ideally, the conversion price for convertible debt and the
exercise price for
warrants
should be at a premium to the then prevailing stock price at the time of private
placement.
▪When
evaluating the magnitude of a private placement discount or premium, consider
factors that
influence
the discount or premium, such as, liquidity, due diligence costs, control and
monitoring costs,
capital
scarcity, information asymmetry, and anticipation of future performance.
▪Financial
issues:
▪The
company's financial condition;
▪Degree
of need for capital;
▪Use
of proceeds;
▪Effect
of the financing on the company's cost of capital;
▪Current
and proposed cash burn rate; and
▪Going
concern viability and the state of the capital and credit markets.
▪Management's
efforts to pursue alternatives and whether the company engaged in a process to
evaluate
alternatives:
A fair, unconstrained process helps to ensure the best price for shareholders.
Financing
alternatives
can include joint ventures, partnership, merger, or sale of part or all of the
company.
▪Control
issues:
▪Change
in management;
▪Change
in control;
▪Guaranteed
board and committee seats;
▪Standstill
provisions;
▪Voting
agreements;
▪Veto
power over certain corporate actions; and
▪Minority
versus majority ownership and corresponding minority discount or majority
control premium.
▪Conflicts
of interest:
▪Conflicts
of interest should be viewed from the perspective of the company and the
investor; and
▪Were
the terms of the transaction negotiated at arm's length? Are managerial
incentives aligned with
shareholder
interests?
▪Market
reaction:
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪The
market's response to the proposed deal. A negative market reaction is a cause
for concern. Market
reaction
may be addressed by analyzing the one-day impact on the unaffected stock
price.
Vote
for the private placement, or for the issuance of warrants and/or convertible
debentures in a private
placement,
if it is expected that the company will file for bankruptcy if the transaction
is not approved.
Reorganization/Restructuring
Plan (Bankruptcy)
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals to common shareholders on bankruptcy plans of
reorganization,
considering the following factors including, but not limited to:
▪Estimated
value and financial prospects of the reorganized company;
▪Percentage
ownership of current shareholders in the reorganized company;
▪Whether
shareholders are adequately represented in the reorganization process
(particularly through the
existence
of an Official Equity Committee);
▪The
cause(s) of the bankruptcy filing, and the extent to which the plan of
reorganization addresses the
cause(s);
▪Existence
of a superior alternative to the plan of reorganization; and
▪Governance
of the reorganized company.
Special
Purpose Acquisition Corporations (SPACs)
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on SPAC mergers and acquisitions taking into account the
following:
▪Valuation
-
Is the value being paid by the SPAC reasonable? SPACs generally lack an
independent fairness
opinion
and the financials on the target may be limited. Compare the conversion price
with the intrinsic value
of
the target company provided in the fairness opinion. Also, evaluate the
proportionate value of the
combined
entity attributable to the SPAC IPO shareholders versus the pre-merger value of
SPAC. Additionally,
a
private company discount may be applied to the target if it is a private
entity.
▪Market
reaction -
How has the market responded to the proposed deal? A negative market reaction
may be a
cause
for concern. Market reaction may be addressed by analyzing the one-day impact on
the unaffected
stock
price.
▪Deal
timing -
A main driver for most transactions is that the SPAC charter typically requires
the deal to be
complete
within 18 to 24 months, or the SPAC is to be liquidated. Evaluate the valuation,
market reaction, and
potential
conflicts of interest for deals that are announced close to the liquidation
date.
▪Negotiations
and process -
What was the process undertaken to identify potential target companies within
specified
industry or location specified in charter? Consider the background of the
sponsors.
▪Conflicts
of interest -
How are sponsors benefiting from the transaction compared to IPO shareholders?
Potential
conflicts could arise if a fairness opinion is issued by the insiders to qualify
the deal rather than a
third
party or if management is encouraged to pay a higher price for the target
because of an 80 percent rule
(the
charter requires that the fair market value of the target is at least equal to
80 percent of net assets of the
SPAC).
Also, there may be sense of urgency by the management team of the SPAC to close
the deal since its
charter
typically requires a transaction to be completed within the 18-24-month
timeframe.
▪Voting
agreements -
Are the sponsors entering into enter into any voting agreements/tender offers
with
shareholders
who are likely to vote against the proposed merger or exercise conversion
rights?
▪Governance
-
What is the impact of having the SPAC CEO or founder on key committees following
the
proposed
merger?
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Special
Purpose Acquisition Corporations (SPACs) - Proposals for Extensions
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on SPAC extension proposals taking into account the length of the
requested
extension, the status of any pending transaction(s) or progression of the
acquisition process, any
added
incentive for non-redeeming shareholders, and any prior extension requests.
▪Length
of request:
Typically, extension requests range from two to six months, depending on the
progression
of
the SPAC's acquisition process.
▪Pending
transaction(s) or
progression
of the acquisition process: Sometimes
an initial business combination
was
already put to a shareholder vote, but, for varying reasons, the transaction
could not be consummated by
the
termination date and the SPAC is requesting an extension. Other times, the SPAC
has entered into a
definitive
transaction agreement, but needs additional time to consummate or hold the
shareholder meeting.
▪Added
incentive for non-redeeming shareholders:
Sometimes the SPAC sponsor (or other insiders) will
contribute,
typically as a loan to the company, additional funds that will be added to the
redemption value of
each
public share as long as such shares are not redeemed in connection with the
extension request. The
purpose
of the "equity kicker" is to incentivize shareholders to hold their shares
through the end of the
requested
extension or until the time the transaction is put to a shareholder vote, rather
than electing
redemption
at the extension proposal meeting.
▪Prior
extension requests:
Some SPACs request additional time beyond the extension period sought in prior
extension
requests.
Spin-offs
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on spin-offs, considering:
▪Tax
and regulatory advantages;
▪Planned
use of the sale proceeds;
▪Valuation
of spinoff;
▪Fairness
opinion;
▪Benefits
to the parent company;
▪Conflicts
of interest;
▪Managerial
incentives;
▪Corporate
governance changes; and
▪Changes
in the capital structure.
Value
Maximization Shareholder Proposals
General
Recommendation: Vote
case-by-case on shareholder proposals seeking to maximize shareholder value
by:
▪Hiring
a financial advisor to explore strategic alternatives;
▪Selling
the company; or
▪Liquidating
the company and distributing the proceeds to shareholders.
These
proposals should be evaluated based on the following factors:
▪Prolonged
poor performance with no turnaround in sight;
▪Signs
of entrenched board and management (such as the adoption of takeover
defenses);
▪Strategic
plan in place for improving value;
▪Likelihood
of receiving reasonable value in a sale or dissolution; and
▪The
company actively exploring its strategic options, including retaining a
financial advisor.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
5.Compensation
Executive
Pay Evaluation
Underlying
all evaluations are five global principles that most investors expect
corporations to adhere to in
designing
and administering executive and director compensation programs:
1.Maintain
appropriate pay-for-performance alignment, with emphasis on long-term
shareholder value: This
principle
encompasses overall executive pay practices, which must be designed to attract,
retain, and
appropriately
motivate the key employees who drive shareholder value creation over the long
term. It will take
into
consideration, among other factors, the link between pay and performance; the
mix between fixed and
variable
pay; performance goals; and equity-based plan costs;
2.Avoid
arrangements that risk “pay for failure”: This principle addresses the
appropriateness of long or indefinite
contracts,
excessive severance packages, and guaranteed compensation;
3.Maintain
an independent and effective compensation committee: This principle promotes
oversight of
executive
pay programs by directors with appropriate skills, knowledge, experience, and a
sound process for
compensation
decision-making (e.g.,
including access to independent expertise and advice when needed);
4.Provide
shareholders with clear, comprehensive compensation disclosures: This principle
underscores the
importance
of informative and timely disclosures that enable shareholders to evaluate
executive pay practices
fully
and fairly; and
5.Avoid
inappropriate pay to non-executive directors: This principle recognizes the
interests of shareholders in
ensuring
that compensation to outside directors is reasonable and does not compromise
their independence
and
ability to make appropriate judgments in overseeing managers’ pay and
performance. At the market level,
it
may incorporate a variety of generally accepted best practices.
Advisory
Votes on Executive Compensation—Management Proposals (Say-on-Pay)
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on ballot items related to executive pay and practices, as well as
certain
aspects of outside director compensation.
Vote
against Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay or “SOP”) if:
▪There
is an unmitigated misalignment between CEO pay and company performance (pay
for performance);
▪The
company maintains significant problematic
pay practices;
or
▪The
board exhibits a significant level of poor
communication and responsiveness
to
shareholders.
Vote
against or withhold from the members of the Compensation Committee and
potentially the full board if:
▪There
is no SOP on the ballot, and an against vote on an SOP would otherwise be
warranted due to pay-for-
performance
misalignment, problematic pay practices, or the lack of adequate responsiveness
on
compensation
issues raised previously, or a combination thereof;
▪The
board fails to respond adequately to a previous SOP proposal that received less
than 70 percent support
of
votes cast;
▪The
company has recently practiced or approved problematic pay practices, such as
option repricing or option
backdating;
or
▪The
situation is egregious.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Primary
Evaluation Factors for Executive Pay
Pay-for-Performance
Evaluation
ISS
annually conducts a pay-for-performance analysis to identify strong or
satisfactory alignment between pay and
performance
over a sustained period. With respect to companies in the S&P1500, Russell
3000, or Russell 3000E
Indices17,
this analysis considers the following:
1.Peer
Group18
Alignment:
▪The
degree of alignment between the company's annualized TSR rank and the CEO's
annualized total pay rank
within
a peer group, each measured over a three-year period.
▪The
rankings of CEO total pay and company financial performance within a peer group,
each measured over a
three-year
period.
▪The
multiple of the CEO's total pay relative to the peer group median in the most
recent fiscal year.
2.Absolute
Alignment19
– the absolute alignment between the trend in CEO pay and company TSR over the
prior
five
fiscal years – i.e., the difference between the trend in annual pay changes and
the trend in annualized TSR
during
the period.
If
the above analysis demonstrates significant unsatisfactory long-term
pay-for-performance alignment or, in the
case
of companies outside the Russell indices, a misalignment between pay and
performance is otherwise
suggested,
our analysis may include any of the following qualitative factors, as relevant
to an evaluation of how
various
pay elements may work to encourage or to undermine long-term value creation and
alignment with
shareholder
interests:
▪The
ratio of performance- to time-based incentive awards;
▪The
overall ratio of performance-based compensation to fixed or discretionary
pay;
▪The
rigor of performance goals;
▪The
complexity and risks around pay program design;
▪The
transparency and clarity of disclosure;
▪The
company's peer group benchmarking practices;
▪Financial/operational
results, both absolute and relative to peers;
▪Special
circumstances related to, for example, a new CEO in the prior FY or anomalous
equity grant practices
(e.g.,
bi-annual awards);
▪Realizable
pay20
compared to grant pay; and
▪Any
other factors deemed relevant.
17
The Russell
3000E Index
includes approximately 4,000 of the largest U.S. equity securities.
18
The
revised peer group is generally comprised of 14-24 companies that are selected
using market cap, revenue (or assets for
certain
financial firms), GICS industry group, and company's selected peers' GICS
industry group, with size constraints, via a
process
designed to select peers that are comparable to the subject company in terms of
revenue/assets and industry, and also
within
a market-cap bucket that is reflective of the company's market cap. For Oil, Gas
& Consumable Fuels companies, market
cap
is the only size determinant.
19
Only
Russell 3000 Index companies are subject to the Absolute Alignment
analysis.
20
ISS
research reports include realizable pay for S&P1500 companies.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Problematic
Pay Practices
Problematic
pay elements are generally evaluated case-by-case considering the context of a
company's overall pay
program
and demonstrated pay-for-performance philosophy. The focus is on executive
compensation practices that
contravene
the global pay principles, including:
▪Problematic
practices related to non-performance-based compensation elements;
▪Incentives
that may motivate excessive risk-taking or present a windfall risk; and
▪Pay
decisions that circumvent pay-for-performance, such as options backdating or
waiving performance
requirements.
The
list of examples below highlights certain problematic practices that carry
significant weight in this overall
consideration
and may result in adverse vote recommendations:
▪Repricing
or replacing of underwater stock options/SARs without prior shareholder approval
(including cash
buyouts
and voluntary surrender of underwater options);
▪Extraordinary
perquisites or tax gross-ups;
▪New
or materially amended agreements that provide for:
▪Excessive
termination or CIC severance payments (generally exceeding 3 times base salary
and
average/target/most
recent bonus);
▪CIC
severance payments without involuntary job loss or substantial diminution of
duties ("single" or
"modified
single" triggers) or in connection with a problematic Good Reason
definition;
▪CIC
excise tax gross-up entitlements (including "modified" gross-ups); and/or
▪Multi-year
guaranteed awards that are not at risk due to rigorous performance
conditions;
▪Liberal
CIC definition combined with any single-trigger CIC benefits;
▪Insufficient
executive compensation disclosure by externally-managed issuers (EMIs) such that
a reasonable
assessment
of pay programs and practices applicable to the EMI's executives is not
possible;
▪Severance
payments made when the termination is not clearly disclosed as involuntary (for
example, a
termination
without cause or resignation for good reason); and/or
▪Any
other provision or practice deemed to be egregious and present a significant
risk to investors.
The
above examples are not an exhaustive list. Please refer to ISS' U.S.
Compensation Policies FAQ
document for
additional
detail on specific pay practices that have been identified as problematic and
may lead to negative vote
recommendations.
Options
Backdating
The
following factors should be examined case-by-case to allow for distinctions to
be made between “sloppy” plan
administration
versus deliberate action or fraud:
▪Reason
and motive for the options backdating issue, such as inadvertent vs. deliberate
grant date changes;
▪Duration
of options backdating;
▪Size
of restatement due to options backdating;
▪Corrective
actions taken by the board or compensation committee, such as canceling or
re-pricing backdated
options,
the recouping of option gains on backdated grants; and
▪Adoption
of a grant policy that prohibits backdating and creates a fixed grant schedule
or window period for
equity
grants in the future.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Compensation
Committee Communications and Responsiveness
Consider
the following factors case-by-case when evaluating ballot items related to
executive pay on the board’s
responsiveness
to investor input and engagement on compensation issues:
▪Failure
to respond to majority-supported shareholder proposals on executive pay topics;
or
▪Failure
to adequately respond to the company's previous say-on-pay proposal that
received the support of less
than
70 percent of votes cast, taking into account:
▪Disclosure
of engagement efforts with major institutional investors, including the
frequency and timing of
engagements
and the company participants (including whether independent directors
participated);
▪Disclosure
of the specific concerns voiced by dissenting shareholders that led to the
say-on-pay
opposition;
▪Disclosure
of specific and meaningful actions taken to address shareholders' concerns;
▪Other
recent compensation actions taken by the company;
▪Whether
the issues raised are recurring or isolated;
▪The
company's ownership structure; and
▪Whether
the support level was less than 50 percent, which would warrant the highest
degree of
responsiveness.
Frequency
of Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation ("Say When on Pay")
General
Recommendation:
Vote
for annual advisory votes on compensation, which provide the most consistent
and
clear communication channel for shareholder concerns about companies' executive
pay programs.
Voting
on Golden Parachutes in an Acquisition, Merger, Consolidation, or Proposed
Sale
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on say on Golden Parachute proposals, including consideration of
existing
change-in-control arrangements maintained with named executive officers but also
considering new or
extended
arrangements.
Features
that may result in an “against” recommendation include one or more of the
following, depending on the
number,
magnitude, and/or timing of issue(s):
▪Single-
or modified-single-trigger cash severance;
▪Single-trigger
acceleration of unvested equity awards;
▪Full
acceleration of equity awards granted shortly before the change in control;
▪Acceleration
of performance awards above the target level of performance without compelling
rationale;
▪Excessive
cash severance (generally >3x base salary and bonus);
▪Excise
tax gross-ups triggered and payable;
▪Excessive
golden parachute payments (on an absolute basis or as a percentage of
transaction equity value); or
▪Recent
amendments that incorporate any problematic features (such as those above) or
recent actions (such
as
extraordinary equity grants) that may make packages so attractive as to
influence merger agreements that
may
not be in the best interests of shareholders; or
▪The
company's assertion that a proposed transaction is conditioned on shareholder
approval of the golden
parachute
advisory vote.
Recent
amendment(s) that incorporate problematic features will tend to carry more
weight on the overall analysis.
However,
the presence of multiple legacy problematic features will also be closely
scrutinized.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
In
cases where the golden parachute vote is incorporated into a company's advisory
vote on compensation
(management
say-on-pay), ISS will evaluate the say-on-pay proposal in accordance with these
guidelines, which
may
give higher weight to that component of the overall evaluation.
Equity-Based
and Other Incentive Plans
Please
refer to ISS' U.S.
Equity Compensation Plans FAQ document
for additional details on the Equity Plan
Scorecard
policy.
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on certain equity-based compensation plans21
depending on a
combination
of certain plan features and equity grant practices, where positive factors may
counterbalance
negative
factors, and vice versa, as evaluated using an "Equity Plan Scorecard" (EPSC)
approach with three pillars:
▪Plan
Cost: The
total estimated cost of the company’s equity plans relative to industry/market
cap peers,
measured
by the company's estimated Shareholder Value Transfer (SVT) in relation to peers
and considering
both:
▪SVT
based on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants, plus
outstanding
unvested/unexercised
grants; and
▪SVT
based only on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants.
▪Plan
Features:
▪Quality
of disclosure around vesting upon a change in control (CIC);
▪Discretionary
vesting authority;
▪Liberal
share recycling on various award types;
▪Lack
of minimum vesting period for grants made under the plan; and
▪Dividends
payable prior to award vesting.
▪Grant
Practices:
▪The
company’s three-year burn rate relative to its industry/market cap peers;
▪Vesting
requirements in CEO's recent equity grants (3-year look-back);
▪The
estimated duration of the plan (based on the sum of shares remaining available
and the new shares
requested,
divided by the average annual shares granted in the prior three years);
▪The
proportion of the CEO's most recent equity grants/awards subject to performance
conditions;
▪Whether
the company maintains a sufficient claw-back policy; and
▪Whether
the company maintains sufficient post-exercise/vesting share-holding
requirements.
Generally
vote against the plan proposal if the combination of above factors indicates
that the plan is not, overall,
in
shareholders' interests, or if any of the following egregious factors
("overriding factors") apply:
▪Awards
may vest in connection with a liberal change-of-control definition;
▪The
plan would permit repricing or cash buyout of underwater options without
shareholder approval (either
by
expressly permitting it – for NYSE and Nasdaq listed companies – or by not
prohibiting it when the company
has
a history of repricing – for non-listed companies);
▪The
plan is a vehicle for problematic pay practices or a significant
pay-for-performance disconnect under
certain
circumstances;
▪The
plan is excessively dilutive to shareholders' holdings;
▪The
plan contains an evergreen (automatic share replenishment) feature; or
21
Proposals evaluated under the EPSC policy generally include those to approve or
amend (1) stock option plans for employees
and/or
employees and directors, (2) restricted stock plans for employees and/or
employees and directors, and (3) omnibus
stock
incentive plans for employees and/or employees and directors; amended plans will
be further evaluated case-by-case.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪Any
other plan features are determined to have a significant negative impact on
shareholder interests.
Further
Information on certain EPSC Factors:
Shareholder
Value Transfer (SVT)
The
cost of the equity plans is expressed as Shareholder Value Transfer (SVT), which
is measured using a binomial
option
pricing model that assesses the amount of shareholders’ equity flowing out of
the company to employees
and
directors. SVT is expressed as both a dollar amount and as a percentage of
market value, and includes the new
shares
proposed, shares available under existing plans, and shares granted but
unexercised (using two measures,
in
the case of plans subject to the Equity Plan Scorecard evaluation, as noted
above). All award types are valued.
For
omnibus plans, unless limitations are placed on the most expensive types of
awards (for example, full-value
awards),
the assumption is made that all awards to be granted will be the most expensive
types.
For
proposals that are not subject to the Equity Plan Scorecard evaluation,
Shareholder Value Transfer is
reasonable
if it falls below a company-specific benchmark. The benchmark is determined as
follows: The top
quartile
performers in each industry group (using the Global Industry Classification
Standard: GICS) are identified.
Benchmark
SVT levels for each industry are established based on these top performers’
historic SVT. Regression
analyses
are run on each industry group to identify the variables most strongly
correlated to SVT. The benchmark
industry
SVT level is then adjusted upwards or downwards for the specific company by
plugging the company-
specific
performance measures, size, and cash compensation into the industry cap
equations to arrive at the
company’s
benchmark.22
Three-Year
Value-Adjusted Burn Rate
A
"Value-Adjusted Burn Rate" is used for stock plan evaluations. Value-Adjusted
Burn Rate benchmarks are
calculated
as the greater of: (1) an industry- specific threshold based on three-year burn
rates within the
company's
GICS group segmented by S&P 500, Russell 3000 index (less the S&P 500)
and non-Russell 3000 index;
and
(2) a de
minimis
threshold established separately for each of the S&P 500, the Russell 3000
index less the S&P
500,
and the non-Russell 3000 index. Year-over-year burn-rate benchmark changes will
be limited to a
predetermined
range above or below the prior year's burn-rate benchmark.
The
Value-Adjusted Burn Rate is calculated as follows:
Value-Adjusted
Burn Rate = ((# of options * option’s dollar value using a Black-Scholes model)
+ (# of full-value
awards
* stock price)) / (Weighted average common shares * stock price).
Egregious
Factors
Liberal
Change in Control Definition
Generally
vote against equity plans if the plan has a liberal definition of change in
control and the equity awards
could
vest upon such liberal definition of change in control, even though an actual
change in control may not
occur.
Examples of such a definition include, but are not limited to, announcement or
commencement of a tender
22
For plans evaluated under the Equity Plan Scorecard policy, the company's SVT
benchmark is considered along with other
factors.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
offer,
provisions for acceleration upon a “potential” takeover, shareholder approval of
a merger or other
transactions,
or similar language.
Repricing
Provisions
Vote
against plans that expressly permit the repricing or exchange of underwater
stock options/stock appreciate
rights
(SARs) without prior shareholder approval. "Repricing" typically includes the
ability to do any of the
following:
▪Amend
the terms of outstanding options or SARs to reduce the exercise price of such
outstanding options or
SARs;
▪Cancel
outstanding options or SARs in exchange for options or SARs with an exercise
price that is less than the
exercise
price of the original options or SARs;
▪Cancel
underwater options in exchange for stock awards; or
▪Provide
cash buyouts of underwater options.
While
the above cover most types of repricing, ISS may view other provisions as akin
to repricing depending on the
facts
and circumstances.
Also,
vote against or withhold from members of the Compensation Committee who approved
repricing (as defined
above
or otherwise determined by ISS), without prior shareholder approval, even if
such repricings are allowed in
their
equity plan.
Vote
against plans that do not expressly prohibit repricing or cash buyout of
underwater options without
shareholder
approval if the company has a history of repricing/buyouts without shareholder
approval, and the
applicable
listing standards would not preclude them from doing so.
Problematic
Pay Practices or Significant Pay-for-Performance Disconnect
If
the equity plan on the ballot is a vehicle for problematic
pay practices,
vote against the plan.
ISS
may recommend a vote against the equity plan if the plan is determined to be a
vehicle for pay-for-
performance
misalignment. Considerations in voting against the equity plan may include, but
are not limited to:
▪Severity
of the pay-for-performance misalignment;
▪Whether
problematic equity grant practices are driving the misalignment; and/or
▪Whether
equity plan awards have been heavily concentrated to the CEO and/or the other
NEOs.
Amending
Cash and Equity Plans (including Approval for Tax Deductibility (162(m))
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on amendments to cash and equity incentive plans.
Generally
vote for proposals to amend executive cash, stock, or cash and stock incentive
plans if the proposal:
▪Addresses
administrative features only; or
▪Seeks
approval for Section 162(m) purposes only, and the plan administering committee
consists entirely of
independent
directors, per ISS’
Classification of Directors.
Note that if the company is presenting the plan to
shareholders
for the first time for any reason (including after the company’s initial public
offering), or if the
proposal
is bundled with other material plan amendments, then the recommendation will be
case-by-case (see
below).
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Vote
against proposals to amend executive cash, stock, or cash and stock incentive
plans if the proposal:
▪Seeks
approval for Section 162(m) purposes only, and the plan administering committee
does not consist
entirely
of independent directors, per ISS’
Classification of Directors.
Vote
case-by-case on all other proposals to amend cash incentive plans. This includes
plans presented to
shareholders
for the first time after the company's IPO and/or proposals that bundle material
amendment(s) other
than
those for Section 162(m) purposes.
Vote
case-by-case on all other proposals to amend equity incentive plans, considering
the following:
▪If
the proposal requests additional shares and/or the amendments include a term
extension or addition of full
value
awards as an award type, the recommendation will be based on the Equity Plan
Scorecard evaluation as
well
as an analysis of the overall impact of the amendments;
▪If
the plan is being presented to shareholders for the first time (including after
the company's IPO), whether or
not
additional shares are being requested, the recommendation will be based on the
Equity Plan Scorecard
evaluation
as well as an analysis of the overall impact of any amendments; and
▪If
there is no request for additional shares and the amendments do not include a
term extension or addition of
full
value awards as an award type, then the recommendation will be based entirely on
an analysis of the
overall
impact of the amendments, and the EPSC evaluation will be shown only for
informational purposes.
In
the first two case-by-case evaluation scenarios, the EPSC evaluation/score is
the more heavily weighted
consideration.
Specific
Treatment of Certain Award Types in Equity Plan Evaluations
Dividend
Equivalent Rights
Options
that have Dividend Equivalent Rights (DERs) associated with them will have a
higher calculated award
value
than those without DERs under the binomial model, based on the value of these
dividend streams. The
higher
value will be applied to new shares, shares available under existing plans, and
shares awarded but not
exercised
per the plan specifications. DERS transfer more shareholder equity to employees
and non-employee
directors
and this cost should be captured.
Operating
Partnership (OP) Units in Equity Plan Analysis of Real Estate Investment Trusts
(REITs)
For
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITS), include the common shares issuable upon
conversion of outstanding
Operating
Partnership (OP) units in the share count for the purposes of determining: (1)
market capitalization in
the
Shareholder Value Transfer (SVT) analysis and (2) shares outstanding in the burn
rate analysis.
Other
Compensation Plans
401(k)
Employee Benefit Plans
General
Recommendation:
Vote
for proposals to implement a 401(k) savings plan for employees.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Employee
Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs)
General
Recommendation:
Vote
for proposals to implement an ESOP or increase authorized shares for existing
ESOPs,
unless the number of shares allocated to the ESOP is excessive (more than five
percent of outstanding
shares).
Employee
Stock Purchase Plans—Qualified Plans
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on qualified employee stock purchase plans. Vote for employee
stock
purchase plans where all of the following apply:
▪Purchase
price is at least 85 percent of fair market value;
▪Offering
period is 27 months or less; and
▪The
number of shares allocated to the plan is 10 percent or less of the outstanding
shares.
Vote
against qualified employee stock purchase plans where when the plan features do
not meet all of the above
criteria.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plans—Non-Qualified Plans
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on nonqualified employee stock purchase plans. Vote for
nonqualified
employee stock purchase plans with all the following features:
▪Broad-based
participation;
▪Limits
on employee contribution, which may be a fixed dollar amount or expressed as a
percent of base salary;
▪Company
matching contribution up to 25 percent of employee’s contribution, which is
effectively a discount
of
20 percent from market value; and
▪No
discount on the stock price on the date of purchase when there is a company
matching contribution.
Vote
against nonqualified employee stock purchase plans when the plan features do not
meet all of the above
criteria.
If the matching contribution or effective discount exceeds the above, ISS may
evaluate the SVT cost of the
plan
as part of the assessment.
Option
Exchange Programs/Repricing Options
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on management proposals seeking approval to exchange/reprice
options
taking into consideration:
▪Historic
trading patterns--the stock price should not be so volatile that the options are
likely to be back “in-
the-money”
over the near term;
▪Rationale
for the re-pricing--was the stock price decline beyond management's
control?;
▪Is
this a value-for-value exchange?;
▪Are
surrendered stock options added back to the plan reserve?;
▪Timing--repricing
should occur at least one year out from any precipitous drop in company's stock
price;
▪Option
vesting--does the new option vest immediately or is there a black-out
period?;
▪Term
of the option--the term should remain the same as that of the replaced
option;
▪Exercise
price--should be set at fair market or a premium to market; and
▪Participants--executive
officers and directors must be excluded.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
If
the surrendered options are added back to the equity plans for re-issuance, then
also take into consideration the
company’s
total cost of equity plans and its three-year average burn rate.
In
addition to the above considerations, evaluate the intent, rationale, and timing
of the repricing proposal. The
proposal
should clearly articulate why the board is choosing to conduct an exchange
program at this point in time.
Repricing
underwater options after a recent precipitous drop in the company’s stock price
demonstrates poor
timing
and warrants additional scrutiny. Also, consider the terms of the surrendered
options, such as the grant
date,
exercise price and vesting schedule. Grant dates of surrendered options should
be far enough back (two to
three
years) so as not to suggest that repricings are being done to take advantage of
short-term downward price
movements.
Similarly, the exercise price of surrendered options should be above the 52-week
high for the stock
price.
Vote
for shareholder proposals to put option repricings to a shareholder vote.
Stock
Plans in Lieu of Cash
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on plans that provide participants with the option of taking all or
a
portion
of their cash compensation in the form of stock.
Vote
for non-employee director-only equity plans that provide a dollar-for-dollar
cash-for-stock exchange.
Vote
case-by-case on plans which do not provide a dollar-for-dollar cash for stock
exchange. In cases where the
exchange
is not dollar-for-dollar, the request for new or additional shares for such
equity program will be
considered
using the binomial option pricing model. In an effort to capture the total cost
of total compensation,
ISS
will not make any adjustments to carve out the in-lieu-of cash
compensation.
Transfer
Stock Option (TSO) Programs
General
Recommendation:
One-time
Transfers: Vote against or withhold from compensation committee
members
if they fail to submit one-time transfers to shareholders for approval.
Vote
case-by-case on one-time transfers. Vote for if:
▪Executive
officers and non-employee directors are excluded from participating;
▪Stock
options are purchased by third-party financial institutions at a discount to
their fair value using option
pricing
models such as Black-Scholes or a Binomial Option Valuation or other appropriate
financial models;
and
▪There
is a two-year minimum holding period for sale proceeds (cash or stock) for all
participants.
Additionally,
management should provide a clear explanation of why options are being
transferred to a third-party
institution
and whether the events leading up to a decline in stock price were beyond
management's control. A
review
of the company's historic stock price volatility should indicate if the options
are likely to be back “in-the-
money”
over the near term.
Ongoing
TSO program: Vote against equity plan proposals if the details of ongoing TSO
programs are not provided
to
shareholders. Since TSOs will be one of the award types under a stock plan, the
ongoing TSO program, structure,
and
mechanics must be disclosed to shareholders. The specific criteria to be
considered in evaluating these
proposals
include, but not limited, to the following:
▪Eligibility;
▪Vesting;
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪Bid-price;
▪Term
of options;
▪Cost
of the program and impact of the TSOs on company’s total option expense;
and
▪Option
repricing policy.
Amendments
to existing plans that allow for introduction of transferability of stock
options should make clear that
only
options granted post-amendment shall be transferable.
Director
Compensation
Shareholder
Ratification of Director Pay Programs
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on management proposals seeking ratification of non-employee
director
compensation, based on the following factors:
▪If
the equity plan under which non-employee director grants are made is on the
ballot, whether or not it
warrants
support; and
▪An
assessment of the following qualitative factors:
▪The
relative magnitude of director compensation as compared to companies of a
similar profile;
▪The
presence of problematic pay practices relating to director compensation;
▪Director
stock ownership guidelines and holding requirements;
▪Equity
award vesting schedules;
▪The
mix of cash and equity-based compensation;
▪Meaningful
limits on director compensation;
▪The
availability of retirement benefits or perquisites; and
▪The
quality of disclosure surrounding director compensation.
Equity
Plans for Non-Employee Directors
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on compensation plans for non-employee directors, based on:
▪The
total estimated cost of the company’s equity plans relative to industry/market
cap peers, measured by the
company’s
estimated Shareholder Value Transfer (SVT) based on new shares requested plus
shares remaining
for
future grants, plus outstanding unvested/unexercised grants;
▪The
company’s three-year burn rate relative to its industry/market cap peers (in
certain circumstances); and
▪The
presence of any egregious plan features (such as an option repricing provision
or liberal CIC vesting risk).
On
occasion, non-employee director stock plans will exceed the plan cost or
burn-rate benchmarks when
combined
with employee or executive stock plans. In such cases, vote case-by-case on the
plan taking into
consideration
the following qualitative factors:
▪The
relative magnitude of director compensation as compared to companies of a
similar profile;
▪The
presence of problematic pay practices relating to director compensation;
▪Director
stock ownership guidelines and holding requirements;
▪Equity
award vesting schedules;
▪The
mix of cash and equity-based compensation;
▪Meaningful
limits on director compensation;
▪The
availability of retirement benefits or perquisites; and
▪The
quality of disclosure surrounding director compensation.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Non-Employee
Director Retirement Plans
General
Recommendation: Vote
against retirement plans for non-employee directors. Vote for shareholder
proposals
to eliminate retirement plans for non-employee directors.
Shareholder
Proposals on Compensation
Bonus
Banking/Bonus Banking “Plus”
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals seeking deferral of a portion of annual bonus pay,
with
ultimate payout linked to sustained results for the performance metrics on which
the bonus was earned
(whether
for the named executive officers or a wider group of employees), taking into
account the following
factors:
▪The
company’s past practices regarding equity and cash compensation;
▪Whether
the company has a holding period or stock ownership requirements in place, such
as a meaningful
retention
ratio (at least 50 percent for full tenure); and
▪Whether
the company has a rigorous claw-back policy in place.
Compensation
Consultants—Disclosure of Board or Company’s Utilization
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for shareholder proposals seeking disclosure regarding the company,
board,
or compensation committee’s use of compensation consultants, such as company
name, business
relationship(s),
and fees paid.
Disclosure/Setting
Levels or Types of Compensation for Executives and Directors
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for shareholder proposals seeking additional disclosure of executive
and
director pay information, provided the information requested is relevant to
shareholders' needs, would not
put
the company at a competitive disadvantage relative to its industry, and is not
unduly burdensome to the
company.
Generally
vote against shareholder proposals seeking to set absolute levels on
compensation or otherwise dictate
the
amount or form of compensation (such as types of compensation elements or
specific metrics) to be used for
executive
or directors.
Generally
vote against shareholder proposals that mandate a minimum amount of stock that
directors must own in
order
to qualify as a director or to remain on the board.
Vote
case-by-case on all other shareholder proposals regarding executive and director
pay, taking into account
relevant
factors, including but not limited to: company performance, pay level and design
versus peers, history of
compensation
concerns or pay-for-performance disconnect, and/or the scope and prescriptive
nature of the
proposal.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Golden
Coffins/Executive Death Benefits
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for proposals calling for companies to adopt a policy of obtaining
shareholder
approval for any future agreements and corporate policies that could oblige the
company to make
payments
or awards following the death of a senior executive in the form of unearned
salary or bonuses,
accelerated
vesting or the continuation in force of unvested equity grants, perquisites and
other payments or
awards
made in lieu of compensation. This would not apply to any benefit programs or
equity plan proposals for
which
the broad-based employee population is eligible.
Hold
Equity Past Retirement or for a Significant Period of Time
General
Recommendation: Vote
case-by-case on shareholder proposals asking companies to adopt policies
requiring
senior executive officers to retain a portion of net shares acquired through
compensation plans. The
following
factors will be taken into account:
▪The
percentage/ratio of net shares required to be retained;
▪The
time period required to retain the shares;
▪Whether
the company has equity retention, holding period, and/or stock ownership
requirements in place
and
the robustness of such requirements;
▪Whether
the company has any other policies aimed at mitigating risk taking by
executives;
▪Executives'
actual stock ownership and the degree to which it meets or exceeds the
proponent’s suggested
holding
period/retention ratio or the company’s existing requirements; and
▪Problematic
pay practices, current and past, which may demonstrate a short-term versus
long-term focus.
Pay
Disparity
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals calling for an analysis of the pay disparity between
corporate
executives and other non-executive employees. The following factors will be
considered:
▪The
company’s current level of disclosure of its executive compensation setting
process, including how the
company
considers pay disparity;
▪If
any problematic pay practices or pay-for-performance concerns have been
identified at the company; and
▪The
level of shareholder support for the company's pay programs.
Generally
vote against proposals calling for the company to use the pay disparity analysis
or pay ratio in a specific
way
to set or limit executive pay.
Pay
for Performance/Performance-Based Awards
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on shareholder proposals requesting that a significant amount of
future
long-term incentive compensation awarded to senior executives shall be
performance-based and
requesting
that the board adopt and disclose challenging performance metrics to
shareholders, based on the
following
analytical steps:
▪First,
vote for shareholder proposals advocating the use of performance-based equity
awards, such as
performance
contingent options or restricted stock, indexed options, or premium-priced
options, unless the
proposal
is overly restrictive or if the company has demonstrated that it is using a
“substantial” portion of
performance-based
awards for its top executives. Standard stock options and
performance-accelerated
awards
do not meet the criteria to be considered as performance-based awards. Further,
premium-priced
options
should have a meaningful premium to be considered performance-based awards;
and
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪Second,
assess the rigor of the company’s performance-based equity program. If the bar
set for the
performance-based
program is too low based on the company’s historical or peer group comparison,
generally
vote
for the proposal. Furthermore, if target performance results in an above target
payout, vote for the
shareholder
proposal due to program’s poor design. If the company does not disclose the
performance metric
of
the performance-based equity program, vote for the shareholder proposal
regardless of the outcome of the
first
step to the test.
In
general, vote for the shareholder proposal if the company does not meet both of
the above two steps.
Pay
for Superior Performance
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on shareholder proposals that request the board establish a
pay-
for-
superior performance standard in the company's executive compensation plan for
senior executives. These
proposals
generally include the following principles:
▪Set
compensation targets for the plan’s annual and long-term incentive pay
components at or below the peer
group
median;
▪Deliver
a majority of the plan’s target long-term compensation through
performance-vested, not simply time-
vested,
equity awards;
▪Provide
the strategic rationale and relative weightings of the financial and
non-financial performance metrics
or
criteria used in the annual and performance-vested long-term incentive
components of the plan;
▪Establish
performance targets for each plan financial metric relative to the performance
of the company’s
peer
companies; and
▪Limit
payment under the annual and performance-vested long-term incentive components
of the plan to
when
the company’s performance on its selected financial performance metrics exceeds
peer group median
performance.
Consider
the following factors in evaluating this proposal:
▪What
aspects of the company’s annual and long-term equity incentive programs are
performance driven?
▪If
the annual and long-term equity incentive programs are performance driven, are
the performance criteria
and
hurdle rates disclosed to shareholders or are they benchmarked against a
disclosed peer group?
▪Can
shareholders assess the correlation between pay and performance based on the
current disclosure? and
▪What
type of industry and stage of business cycle does the company belong to?
Pre-Arranged
Trading Plans (10b5-1 Plans)
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for shareholder proposals calling for the addition of certain safeguards
in
prearranged trading plans (10b5-1 plans) for executives. Safeguards may
include:
▪Adoption,
amendment, or termination of a 10b5-1 Plan must be disclosed in a Form 8-K;
▪Amendment
or early termination of a 10b5-1 Plan allowed only under extraordinary
circumstances, as
determined
by the board;
▪Request
that a certain number of days that must elapse between adoption or amendment of
a 10b5-1 Plan
and
initial trading under the plan;
▪Reports
on Form 4 must identify transactions made pursuant to a 10b5-1 Plan;
▪An
executive may not trade in company stock outside the 10b5-1 Plan; and
▪Trades
under a 10b5-1 Plan must be handled by a broker who does not handle other
securities transactions
for
the executive.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Prohibit
Outside CEOs from Serving on Compensation Committees
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote against proposals seeking a policy to prohibit any outside CEO from
serving
on a company’s compensation committee, unless the company has demonstrated
problematic pay
practices
that raise concerns about the performance and composition of the committee.
Recoupment
of Incentive or Stock Compensation in Specified Circumstances
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals to recoup incentive cash or stock compensation made to
senior
executives if it is later determined that the figures upon which incentive
compensation is earned turn out to
have
been in error, or if the senior executive has breached company policy or has
engaged in misconduct that may
be
significantly detrimental to the company's financial position or reputation, or
if the senior executive failed to
manage
or monitor risks that subsequently led to significant financial or reputational
harm to the company. Many
companies
have adopted policies that permit recoupment in cases where an executive's
fraud, misconduct, or
negligence
significantly contributed to a restatement of financial results that led to the
awarding of unearned
incentive
compensation. However, such policies may be narrow given that not all misconduct
or negligence may
result
in significant financial restatements. Misconduct, negligence, or lack of
sufficient oversight by senior
executives
may lead to significant financial loss or reputational damage that may have
long-lasting impact.
In
considering whether to support such shareholder proposals, ISS will take into
consideration the following
factors:
▪If
the company has adopted a formal recoupment policy;
▪The
rigor of the recoupment policy focusing on how and under what circumstances the
company may recoup
incentive
or stock compensation;
▪Whether
the company has chronic restatement history or material financial problems;
▪Whether
the company’s policy substantially addresses the concerns raised by the
proponent;
▪Disclosure
of recoupment of incentive or stock compensation from senior executives or lack
thereof; and
▪Any
other relevant factors.
Severance
and Golden Parachute Agreements
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case
on
shareholder
proposals
requiring
that
executive
severance
(including
change-in-control related) arrangements or payments be submitted for shareholder
ratification.
Factors
that
will
be
considered
include,
but
are
not
limited
to:
▪The
company’s
severance
or
change-in-control
agreements
in
place,
and
the
presence
of
problematic
features
(such
as excessive severance entitlements, single triggers, excise tax gross-ups,
etc.);
▪Any
existing
limits
on
cash
severance
payouts
or
policies
which
require
shareholder
ratification
of
severance
payments
exceeding a certain level;
▪Any
recent
severance-related
controversies;
and
▪Whether
the
proposal
is
overly
prescriptive,
such
as
requiring
shareholder
approval
of
severance
that
does
not
exceed
market norms.
Share
Buyback Impact on Incentive Program Metrics
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals requesting the company exclude the impact of share
buybacks
from the calculation of incentive program metrics, considering the following
factors:
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪The
frequency and timing of the company's share buybacks;
▪The
use of per-share metrics in incentive plans;
▪The
effect of recent buybacks on incentive metric results and payouts; and
▪Whether
there is any indication of metric result manipulation.
Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plans (SERPs)
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for shareholder proposals requesting to put extraordinary benefits
contained
in SERP agreements to a shareholder vote unless the company’s executive pension
plans do not
contain
excessive benefits beyond what is offered under employee-wide plans.
Generally
vote for shareholder proposals requesting to limit the executive benefits
provided under the company’s
supplemental
executive retirement plan (SERP) by limiting covered compensation to a senior
executive’s annual
salary
or those pay elements covered for the general employee population.
Tax
Gross-Up Proposals
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for proposals calling for companies to adopt a policy of not providing
tax
gross-up payments to executives, except in situations where gross-ups are
provided pursuant to a plan, policy,
or
arrangement applicable to management employees of the company, such as a
relocation or expatriate tax
equalization
policy.
Termination
of Employment Prior to Severance Payment/Eliminating Accelerated Vesting of
Unvested
Equity
General
Recommendation: Vote
case-by-case on shareholder proposals seeking a policy requiring termination of
employment
prior to severance payment and/or eliminating accelerated vesting of unvested
equity.
The
following factors will be considered:
▪The
company's current treatment of equity upon employment termination and/or in
change-in-control
situations
(i.e., vesting is double triggered and/or pro rata, does it allow for the
assumption of equity by
acquiring
company, the treatment of performance shares, etc.); and
▪Current
employment agreements, including potential poor pay practices such as gross-ups
embedded in those
agreements.
Generally
vote for proposals seeking a policy that prohibits automatic acceleration of the
vesting of equity awards
to
senior executives upon a voluntary termination of employment or in the event of
a change in control (except for
pro
rata vesting considering the time elapsed and attainment of any related
performance goals between the award
date
and the change in control).
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
6.Routine/Miscellaneous
Adjourn
Meeting
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote against proposals to provide management with the authority to
adjourn
an annual or special meeting absent compelling reasons to support the
proposal.
Vote
for proposals that relate specifically to soliciting votes for a merger or
transaction if supporting that merger
or
transaction. Vote against proposals if the wording is too vague or if the
proposal includes "other business."
Amend
Quorum Requirements
General
Recommendation: Vote
case-by-case on proposals to reduce quorum requirements for shareholder
meetings
below a majority of the shares outstanding, taking into consideration:
▪The
new quorum threshold requested;
▪The
rationale presented for the reduction;
▪The
market capitalization of the company (size, inclusion in indices);
▪The
company's ownership structure;
▪Previous
voter turnout or attempts to achieve quorum;
▪Any
provisions or commitments to restore quorum to a majority of shares outstanding,
should voter turnout
improve
sufficiently; and
▪Other
factors as appropriate.
In
general, a quorum threshold kept as close to a majority of shares outstanding as
is achievable
is
preferred. Vote case-by-case on directors who unilaterally lower the quorum
requirements below a majority of the
shares
outstanding, taking into consideration the factors listed above.
Amend
Minor Bylaws
General
Recommendation:
Vote
for bylaw or charter changes that are of a housekeeping nature (updates or
corrections).
Change
Company Name
General
Recommendation: Vote
for proposals to change the corporate name unless there is compelling evidence
that
the change would adversely impact shareholder value.
Change
Date, Time, or Location of Annual Meeting
General
Recommendation:
Vote
for management proposals to change the date, time, or location of the annual
meeting
unless the proposed change is unreasonable.
Vote
against shareholder proposals to change the date, time, or location of the
annual meeting unless the current
scheduling
or location is unreasonable.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Other
Business
General
Recommendation:
Vote
against proposals to approve other business when it appears as a voting
item.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
7.Social
and Environmental Issues
Global
Approach – E&S Shareholder Proposals
ISS
applies a common approach globally to evaluating social and environmental
proposals which cover a wide
range
of topics, including consumer and product safety, environment and energy, labor
standards and human
rights,
workplace and board diversity, and corporate political issues. While a variety
of factors goes into each
analysis,
the overall principle guiding all vote recommendations focuses on how the
proposal may enhance or
protect
shareholder value in either the short or long term.
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote case-by-case, examining primarily whether implementation of the
proposal
is likely to enhance or protect shareholder value. The following factors will be
considered:
▪If
the issues presented in the proposal are being appropriately or effectively
dealt with through legislation
or
government regulation;
▪If
the company has already responded in an appropriate and sufficient manner to the
issue(s) raised in the
proposal;
▪Whether
the proposal's request is unduly burdensome (scope or timeframe) or overly
prescriptive;
▪The
company's approach compared with any industry standard practices for addressing
the issue(s) raised by
the
proposal;
▪Whether
there are significant controversies, fines, penalties, or litigation associated
with the company's
practices
related to the issue(s) raised in the proposal;
▪If
the proposal requests increased disclosure or greater transparency, whether
reasonable and sufficient
information
is currently available to shareholders from the company or from other publicly
available sources;
and
▪If
the proposal requests increased disclosure or greater transparency, whether
implementation would reveal
proprietary
or confidential information that could place the company at a competitive
disadvantage.
Endorsement
of Principles
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote against proposals seeking a company's endorsement of principles that
support
a particular public policy position. Endorsing a set of principles may require a
company to take a stand on
an
issue that is beyond its own control and may limit its flexibility with respect
to future developments.
Management
and the board should be afforded the flexibility to make decisions on specific
public policy positions
based
on their own assessment of the most beneficial strategies for the company.
Animal
Welfare
Animal
Welfare Policies
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for proposals seeking a report on a company’s animal welfare
standards,
or animal welfare-related risks, unless:
▪The
company has already published a set of animal welfare standards and monitors
compliance;
▪The
company’s standards are comparable to industry peers; and
▪There
are no recent significant fines, litigation, or controversies related to the
company’s and/or its suppliers'
treatment
of animals.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Animal
Testing
General
Recommendation: Generally
vote against proposals to phase out the use of animals in product testing,
unless:
▪The
company is conducting animal testing programs that are unnecessary or not
required by regulation;
▪The
company is conducting animal testing when suitable alternatives are commonly
accepted and used by
industry
peers; or
▪There
are recent, significant fines or litigation related to the company’s treatment
of animals.
Animal
Slaughter
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote against proposals requesting the implementation of Controlled
Atmosphere
Killing (CAK) methods at company and/or supplier operations unless such methods
are required by
legislation
or generally accepted as the industry standard.
Vote
case-by-case on proposals requesting a report on the feasibility of implementing
CAK methods at company and/
or
supplier operations considering the availability of existing research conducted
by the company or industry groups
on
this topic and any fines or litigation related to current animal processing
procedures at the company.
Consumer
Issues
Genetically
Modified Ingredients
General
Recommendation: Generally
vote against proposals requesting that a company voluntarily label
genetically
engineered (GE) ingredients in its products. The labeling of products with GE
ingredients is best left to
the
appropriate regulatory authorities.
Vote
case-by-case on proposals asking for a report on the feasibility of labeling
products containing GE ingredients,
taking
into account:
▪The
potential impact of such labeling on the company's business;
▪The
quality of the company’s disclosure on GE product labeling, related voluntary
initiatives, and how this
disclosure
compares with industry peer disclosure; and
▪Company’s
current disclosure on the feasibility of GE product labeling.
Generally
vote against proposals seeking a report on the social, health, and environmental
effects of genetically
modified
organisms (GMOs). Studies of this sort are better undertaken by regulators and
the scientific community.
Generally
vote against proposals to eliminate GE ingredients from the company's products,
or proposals asking for
reports
outlining the steps necessary to eliminate GE ingredients from the company’s
products. Such decisions are
more
appropriately made by management with consideration of current regulations.
Reports
on Potentially Controversial Business/Financial Practices
General
Recommendation: Vote
case-by-case on requests for reports on a company’s potentially controversial
business
or financial practices or products, taking into account:
▪Whether
the company has adequately disclosed mechanisms in place to prevent abuses;
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪Whether
the company has adequately disclosed the financial risks of the
products/practices in question;
▪Whether
the company has been subject to violations of related laws or serious
controversies; and
▪Peer
companies’ policies/practices in this area.
Pharmaceutical
Pricing, Access to Medicines, and Prescription Drug Reimportation
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote against proposals requesting that companies implement specific price
restraints
on pharmaceutical products unless the company fails to adhere to legislative
guidelines or industry
norms
in its product pricing practices.
Vote
case-by-case on proposals requesting that a company report on its product
pricing or access to medicine
policies,
considering:
▪The
potential for reputational, market, and regulatory risk exposure;
▪Existing
disclosure of relevant policies;
▪Deviation
from established industry norms;
▪Relevant
company initiatives to provide research and/or products to disadvantaged
consumers;
▪Whether
the proposal focuses on specific products or geographic regions;
▪The
potential burden and scope of the requested report; and
▪Recent
significant controversies, litigation, or fines at the company.
Generally
vote for proposals requesting that a company report on the financial and legal
impact of its prescription
drug
reimportation policies unless such information is already publicly
disclosed.
Generally
vote against proposals requesting that companies adopt specific policies to
encourage or constrain
prescription
drug reimportation. Such matters are more appropriately the province of
legislative activity and may
place
the company at a competitive disadvantage relative to its peers.
Product
Safety and Toxic/Hazardous Materials
General
Recommendation: Generally
vote for proposals requesting that a company report on its policies,
initiatives/procedures,
and oversight mechanisms related to toxic/hazardous materials or product safety
in its
supply
chain, unless:
▪The
company already discloses similar information through existing reports such as a
supplier code of conduct
and/or
a sustainability report;
▪The
company has formally committed to the implementation of a toxic/hazardous
materials and/or product
safety
and supply chain reporting and monitoring program based on industry norms or
similar standards
within
a specified time frame; or
▪The
company has not been recently involved in relevant significant controversies,
fines, or litigation.
Vote
case-by-case on resolutions requesting that companies develop a feasibility
assessment to phase-out of
certain
toxic/hazardous materials, or evaluate and disclose the potential financial and
legal risks associated with
utilizing
certain materials, considering:
▪The
company’s current level of disclosure regarding its product safety policies,
initiatives, and oversight
mechanisms;
▪Current
regulations in the markets in which the company operates; and
▪Recent
significant controversies, litigation, or fines stemming from toxic/hazardous
materials at the company.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Generally
vote against resolutions requiring that a company reformulate its products.
Tobacco-Related
Proposals
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on resolutions regarding the advertisement of tobacco products,
considering:
▪Recent
related fines, controversies, or significant litigation;
▪Whether
the company complies with relevant laws and regulations on the marketing of
tobacco;
▪Whether
the company’s advertising restrictions deviate from those of industry
peers;
▪Whether
the company entered into the Master Settlement Agreement, which restricts
marketing of tobacco
to
youth; and
▪Whether
restrictions on marketing to youth extend to foreign countries.
Vote
case-by-case on proposals regarding second-hand smoke, considering;
▪Whether
the company complies with all laws and regulations;
▪The
degree that voluntary restrictions beyond those mandated by law might hurt the
company’s
competitiveness;
and
▪The
risk of any health-related liabilities.
Generally
vote against resolutions to cease production of tobacco-related products, to
avoid selling products to
tobacco
companies, to spin-off tobacco-related businesses, or prohibit investment in
tobacco equities. Such
business
decisions are better left to company management or portfolio managers.
Generally
vote against proposals regarding tobacco product warnings. Such decisions are
better left to public
health
authorities.
Climate
Change
Say
on Climate (SoC) Management Proposals
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on management proposals that request shareholders to approve
the
company’s climate transition action plan23,
taking into account the completeness and rigor of the plan.
Information
that will be considered where available includes the following:
▪The
extent to which the company’s climate related disclosures are in line with TCFD
recommendations and
meet
other market standards;
▪Disclosure
of its operational and supply chain GHG emissions (Scopes 1, 2, and 3);
▪The
completeness and rigor of company’s short-, medium-, and long-term targets for
reducing operational and
supply
chain GHG emissions (Scopes 1, 2, and 3 if relevant);
▪Whether
the company has sought and received third-party approval that its targets are
science-based;
▪Whether
the company has made a commitment to be “net zero” for operational and supply
chain emissions
(Scopes
1, 2, and 3) by 2050;
▪Whether
the company discloses a commitment to report on the implementation of its plan
in subsequent
years;
▪Whether
the company’s climate data has received third-party assurance;
23
Variations
of this request also include climate transition related ambitions, or commitment
to reporting on the
implementation
of a climate plan.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪Disclosure
of how the company’s lobbying activities and its capital expenditures align with
company strategy;
▪Whether
there are specific industry decarbonization challenges; and
▪The
company’s related commitment, disclosure, and performance compared to its
industry peers.
Say
on Climate (SoC) Shareholder Proposals
General
Recommendation: Vote
case-by-case on shareholder proposals that request the company to disclose a
report
providing its GHG emissions levels and reduction targets and/or its
upcoming/approved climate transition
action
plan and provide shareholders the opportunity to express approval or disapproval
of its GHG emissions
reduction
plan, taking into account information such as the following:
▪The
completeness and rigor of the company’s climate-related disclosure;
▪The
company’s actual GHG emissions performance;
▪Whether
the company has been the subject of recent, significant violations, fines,
litigation, or controversy
related
to its GHG emissions; and
▪Whether
the proposal’s request is unduly burdensome (scope or timeframe) or overly
prescriptive.
Climate
Change/Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for resolutions requesting that a company disclose information on the
financial,
physical, or regulatory risks it faces related to climate change on its
operations and investments or on
how
the company identifies, measures, and manages such risks, considering:
▪Whether
the company already provides current, publicly-available information on the
impact that climate
change
may have on the company as well as associated company policies and procedures to
address related
risks
and/or opportunities;
▪The
company's level of disclosure compared to industry peers; and
▪Whether
there are significant controversies, fines, penalties, or litigation associated
with the company's
climate
change-related performance.
Generally
vote for proposals requesting a report on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from
company operations
and/or
products and operations, unless:
▪The
company already discloses current, publicly-available information on the impacts
that GHG emissions may
have
on the company as well as associated company policies and procedures to address
related risks and/or
opportunities;
▪The
company's level of disclosure is comparable to that of industry peers; or
▪There
are no significant, controversies, fines, penalties, or litigation associated
with the company's GHG
emissions.
Vote
case-by-case on proposals that call for the adoption of GHG reduction goals from
products and operations,
taking
into account:
▪Whether
the company provides disclosure of year-over-year GHG emissions performance
data;
▪Whether
company disclosure lags behind industry peers;
▪The
company's actual GHG emissions performance;
▪The
company's current GHG emission policies, oversight mechanisms, and related
initiatives; and
▪Whether
the company has been the subject of recent, significant violations, fines,
litigation, or controversy
related
to GHG emissions.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Energy
Efficiency
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for proposals requesting that a company report on its energy
efficiency
policies, unless:
▪The
company complies with applicable energy efficiency regulations and laws, and
discloses its participation in
energy
efficiency policies and programs, including disclosure of benchmark data,
targets, and performance
measures;
or
▪The
proponent requests adoption of specific energy efficiency goals within specific
timelines.
Renewable
Energy
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for requests for reports on the feasibility of developing renewable
energy
resources unless the report would be duplicative of existing disclosure or
irrelevant to the company’s line
of
business.
Generally
vote against proposals requesting that the company invest in renewable energy
resources. Such decisions
are
best left to management’s evaluation of the feasibility and financial impact
that such programs may have on the
company.
Generally
vote against proposals that call for the adoption of renewable energy goals,
taking into account:
▪The
scope and structure of the proposal;
▪The
company's current level of disclosure on renewable energy use and GHG emissions;
and
▪The
company's disclosure of policies, practices, and oversight implemented to manage
GHG emissions and
mitigate
climate change risks.
Diversity
Board
Diversity
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for requests for reports on a company's efforts to diversify the board,
unless:
▪The
gender and racial minority representation of the company’s board is reasonably
inclusive in relation to
companies
of similar size and business; or
▪The
board already reports on its nominating procedures and gender and racial
minority initiatives on the
board
and within the company.
Vote
case-by-case on proposals asking a company to increase the gender and racial
minority representation on its
board,
taking into account:
▪The
degree of existing gender and racial minority diversity on the company’s board
and among its executive
officers;
▪The
level of gender and racial minority representation that exists at the company’s
industry peers;
▪The
company’s established process for addressing gender and racial minority board
representation;
▪Whether
the proposal includes an overly prescriptive request to amend nominating
committee charter
language;
▪The
independence of the company’s nominating committee;
▪Whether
the company uses an outside search firm to identify potential director nominees;
and
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪Whether
the company has had recent controversies, fines, or litigation regarding equal
employment practices.
Equality
of Opportunity
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for proposals requesting a company disclose its diversity policies or
initiatives,
or proposals requesting disclosure of a company’s comprehensive workforce
diversity data, including
requests
for EEO-1 data, unless:
▪The
company publicly discloses equal opportunity policies and initiatives in a
comprehensive manner;
▪The
company already publicly discloses comprehensive workforce diversity data;
or
▪The
company has no recent significant EEO-related violations or litigation.
Generally
vote against proposals seeking information on the diversity efforts of suppliers
and service providers.
Such
requests may pose a significant burden on the company.
Gender
Identity, Sexual Orientation, and Domestic Partner Benefits
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for proposals seeking to amend a company’s EEO statement or
diversity
policies to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and/or gender
identity, unless the change
would
be unduly burdensome.
Generally
vote against proposals to extend company benefits to, or eliminate benefits
from, domestic partners.
Decisions
regarding benefits should be left to the discretion of the company.
Gender,
Race/Ethnicity Pay Gap
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on requests for reports on a company's pay data by gender or
race/
ethnicity, or a report on a company’s policies and goals to reduce any gender or
race/ethnicity pay gaps,
taking
into account:
▪The
company's current policies and disclosure related to both its diversity and
inclusion policies and practices
and
its compensation philosophy on fair and equitable compensation practices;
▪Whether
the company has been the subject of recent controversy, litigation, or
regulatory actions related to
gender,
race, or ethnicity pay gap issues;
▪The
company’s disclosure regarding gender, race, or ethnicity pay gap policies or
initiatives compared to its
industry
peers; and
▪Local
laws regarding categorization of race and/or ethnicity and definitions of ethnic
and/or racial minorities.
Racial
Equity and/or Civil Rights Audit Guidelines
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals asking a company to conduct an independent racial
equity
and/or civil rights audit, taking into account:
▪The
company’s established process or framework for addressing racial inequity and
discrimination internally;
▪Whether
the company adequately discloses workforce diversity and inclusion metrics and
goals;
▪Whether
the company has issued a public statement related to its racial justice efforts
in recent years, or has
committed
to internal policy review;
▪Whether
the company has engaged with impacted communities, stakeholders, and civil
rights experts;
▪The
company’s track record in recent years of racial justice measures and outreach
externally; and
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪Whether
the company has been the subject of recent controversy, litigation, or
regulatory actions related to
racial
inequity or discrimination.
Environment
and Sustainability
Facility
and Workplace Safety
General
Recommendation: Vote
case-by-case on requests for workplace safety reports, including reports on
accident
risk reduction efforts, taking into account:
▪The
company’s current level of disclosure of its workplace health and safety
performance data, health and
safety
management policies, initiatives, and oversight mechanisms;
▪The
nature of the company’s business, specifically regarding company and employee
exposure to health and
safety
risks;
▪Recent
significant controversies, fines, or violations related to workplace health and
safety; and
▪The
company's workplace health and safety performance relative to industry
peers.
Vote
case-by-case on resolutions requesting that a company report on safety and/or
security risks associated with its
operations
and/or facilities, considering:
▪The
company’s compliance with applicable regulations and guidelines;
▪The
company’s current level of disclosure regarding its security and safety
policies, procedures, and compliance
monitoring;
and
▪The
existence of recent, significant violations, fines, or controversy regarding the
safety and security of the
company’s
operations and/or facilities.
General
Environmental Proposals and Community Impact Assessments
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on requests for reports on policies and/or the potential
(community)
social and/or environmental impact of company operations, considering:
▪Current
disclosure of applicable policies and risk assessment report(s) and risk
management procedures;
▪The
impact of regulatory non-compliance, litigation, remediation, or reputational
loss that may be associated
with
failure to manage the company’s operations in question, including the management
of relevant
community
and stakeholder relations;
▪The
nature, purpose, and scope of the company’s operations in the specific
region(s);
▪The
degree to which company policies and procedures are consistent with industry
norms; and
▪The
scope of the resolution.
Hydraulic
Fracturing
General
Recommendation: Generally
vote for proposals requesting greater disclosure of a company's (natural
gas)
hydraulic fracturing operations, including measures the company has taken to
manage and mitigate the
potential
community and environmental impacts of those operations, considering:
▪The
company's current level of disclosure of relevant policies and oversight
mechanisms;
▪The
company's current level of such disclosure relative to its industry peers;
▪Potential
relevant local, state, or national regulatory developments; and
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪Controversies,
fines, or litigation related to the company's hydraulic fracturing
operations.
Operations
in Protected Areas
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for requests for reports on potential environmental damage as a result
of
company operations in protected regions, unless:
▪Operations
in the specified regions are not permitted by current laws or regulations;
▪The
company does not currently have operations or plans to develop operations in
these protected regions; or
▪The
company’s disclosure of its operations and environmental policies in these
regions is comparable to
industry
peers.
Recycling
General
Recommendation: Vote
case-by-case on proposals to report on an existing recycling program, or adopt a
new
recycling program, taking into account:
▪The
nature of the company’s business;
▪The
current level of disclosure of the company's existing related programs;
▪The
timetable and methods of program implementation prescribed by the proposal;
▪The
company’s ability to address the issues raised in the proposal; and
▪How
the company's recycling programs compare to similar programs of its industry
peers.
Sustainability
Reporting
General
Recommendation: Generally
vote for proposals requesting that a company report on its policies,
initiatives,
and oversight mechanisms related to social, economic, and environmental
sustainability, unless:
▪The
company already discloses similar information through existing reports or
policies such as an
environment,
health, and safety (EHS) report; a comprehensive code of corporate conduct;
and/or a diversity
report;
or
▪The
company has formally committed to the implementation of a reporting program
based on Global
Reporting
Initiative (GRI) guidelines or a similar standard within a specified time
frame.
Water
Issues
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals requesting a company report on, or adopt a new
policy
on, water-related risks and concerns, taking into account:
▪The
company's current disclosure of relevant policies, initiatives, oversight
mechanisms, and water usage
metrics;
▪Whether
or not the company's existing water-related policies and practices are
consistent with relevant
internationally
recognized standards and national/local regulations;
▪The
potential financial impact or risk to the company associated with water-related
concerns or issues; and
▪Recent,
significant company controversies, fines, or litigation regarding water use by
the company and its
suppliers.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
General
Corporate Issues
Charitable
Contributions
General
Recommendation:
Vote
against proposals restricting a company from making charitable contributions.
Charitable
contributions are generally useful for assisting worthwhile causes and for
creating goodwill in the
community.
In the absence of bad faith, self-dealing, or gross negligence, management
should determine which,
and
if, contributions are in the best interests of the company.
Data
Security, Privacy, and Internet Issues
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals requesting the disclosure or implementation of data
security,
privacy, or information access and management policies and procedures,
considering:
▪The
level of disclosure of company policies and procedures relating to data
security, privacy, freedom of
speech,
information access and management, and Internet censorship;
▪Engagement
in dialogue with governments or relevant groups with respect to data security,
privacy, or the
free
flow of information on the Internet;
▪The
scope of business involvement and of investment in countries whose governments
censor or monitor the
Internet
and other telecommunications;
▪Applicable
market-specific laws or regulations that may be imposed on the company; and
▪Controversies,
fines, or litigation related to data security, privacy, freedom of speech, or
Internet censorship.
ESG
Compensation-Related Proposals
General
Recommendation: Vote
case-by-case on proposals seeking a report or additional disclosure on the
company's
approach, policies, and practices on incorporating environmental and social
criteria into its executive
compensation
strategy, considering:
▪The
scope and prescriptive nature of the proposal;
▪The
company's current level of disclosure regarding its environmental and social
performance and governance;
▪The
degree to which the board or compensation committee already discloses
information on whether it has
considered
related E&S criteria; and
▪Whether
the company has significant controversies or regulatory violations regarding
social or environmental
issues.
Human
Rights, Human Capital Management, and International
Operations
Human
Rights Proposals
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote for proposals requesting a report on company or company supplier
labor
and/or human rights standards and policies unless such information is already
publicly disclosed.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Vote
case-by-case on proposals to implement company or company supplier labor and/or
human rights standards
and
policies, considering:
▪The
degree to which existing relevant policies and practices are disclosed;
▪Whether
or not existing relevant policies are consistent with internationally recognized
standards;
▪Whether
company facilities and those of its suppliers are monitored and how;
▪Company
participation in fair labor organizations or other internationally recognized
human rights initiatives;
▪Scope
and nature of business conducted in markets known to have higher risk of
workplace labor/human
rights
abuse;
▪Recent,
significant company controversies, fines, or litigation regarding human rights
at the company or its
suppliers;
▪The
scope of the request; and
▪Deviation
from industry sector peer company standards and practices.
Vote
case-by-case on proposals requesting that a company conduct an assessment of the
human rights risks in its
operations
or in its supply chain, or report on its human rights risk assessment process,
considering:
▪The
degree to which existing relevant policies and practices are disclosed,
including information on the
implementation
of these policies and any related oversight mechanisms;
▪The
company’s industry and whether the company or its suppliers operate in countries
or areas where there is
a
history of human rights concerns;
▪Recent
significant controversies, fines, or litigation regarding human rights involving
the company or its
suppliers,
and whether the company has taken remedial steps; and
▪Whether
the proposal is unduly burdensome or overly prescriptive.
Mandatory
Arbitration
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on requests for a report on a company’s use of mandatory
arbitration
on employment-related claims, taking into account:
▪The
company's current policies and practices related to the use of mandatory
arbitration agreements on
workplace
claims;
▪Whether
the company has been the subject of recent controversy, litigation, or
regulatory actions related to
the
use of mandatory arbitration agreements on workplace claims; and
▪The
company's disclosure of its policies and practices related to the use of
mandatory arbitration agreements
compared
to its peers.
Operations
in High-Risk Markets
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on requests for a report on a company’s potential financial and
reputational
risks associated with operations in “high-risk” markets, such as a
terrorism-sponsoring state or
politically/socially
unstable region, taking into account:
▪The
nature, purpose, and scope of the operations and business involved that could be
affected by social or
political
disruption;
▪Current
disclosure of applicable risk assessment(s) and risk management procedures;
▪Compliance
with U.S. sanctions and laws;
▪Consideration
of other international policies, standards, and laws; and
▪Whether
the company has been recently involved in recent, significant controversies,
fines, or litigation
related
to its operations in "high-risk" markets.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Outsourcing/Offshoring
General
Recommendation: Vote
case-by-case on proposals calling for companies to report on the risks
associated
with outsourcing/plant closures, considering:
▪Controversies
surrounding operations in the relevant market(s);
▪The
value of the requested report to shareholders;
▪The
company’s current level of disclosure of relevant information on outsourcing and
plant closure
procedures;
and
▪The
company’s existing human rights standards relative to industry peers.
Sexual
Harassment
General
Recommendation: Vote
case-by-case on requests for a report on company actions taken to strengthen
policies
and oversight to prevent workplace sexual harassment, or a report on risks posed
by a company’s failure
to
prevent workplace sexual harassment, taking into account:
▪The
company's current policies, practices, oversight mechanisms related to
preventing workplace sexual
harassment;
▪Whether
the company has been the subject of recent controversy, litigation, or
regulatory actions related to
workplace
sexual harassment issues; and
▪The
company's disclosure regarding workplace sexual harassment policies or
initiatives compared to its
industry
peers.
Weapons
and Military Sales
General
Recommendation: Vote
against reports on foreign military sales or offsets. Such disclosures may
involve
sensitive
and confidential information. Moreover, companies must comply with government
controls and
reporting
on foreign military sales.
Generally
vote against proposals asking a company to cease production or report on the
risks associated with the
use
of depleted uranium munitions or nuclear weapons components and delivery
systems, including disengaging
from
current and proposed contracts. Such contracts are monitored by government
agencies, serve multiple
military
and non-military uses, and withdrawal from these contracts could have a negative
impact on the
company’s
business.
Political
Activities
Lobbying
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals requesting information on a company’s lobbying
(including
direct, indirect, and grassroots lobbying) activities, policies, or procedures,
considering:
▪The
company’s current disclosure of relevant lobbying policies, and management and
board oversight;
▪The
company’s disclosure regarding trade associations or other groups that it
supports, or is a member of, that
engage
in lobbying activities; and
▪Recent
significant controversies, fines, or litigation regarding the company’s
lobbying-related activities.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Political
Contributions
General
Recommendation: Generally
vote for proposals requesting greater disclosure of a company's political
contributions
and trade association spending policies and activities, considering:
▪The
company's policies, and management and board oversight related to its direct
political contributions and
payments
to trade associations or other groups that may be used for political
purposes;
▪The
company's disclosure regarding its support of, and participation in, trade
associations or other groups that
may
make political contributions; and
▪Recent
significant controversies, fines, or litigation related to the company's
political contributions or political
activities.
Vote
against proposals barring a company from making political contributions.
Businesses are affected by
legislation
at the federal, state, and local level; barring political contributions can put
the company at a competitive
disadvantage.
Vote
against proposals to publish in newspapers and other media a company's political
contributions. Such
publications
could present significant cost to the company without providing commensurate
value to shareholders.
Political
Expenditures and Lobbying Congruency
General
Recommendation:
Generally vote case-by-case on proposals requesting greater disclosure of a
company’s
alignment
of political contributions, lobbying, and electioneering spending with a
company’s publicly stated values
and
policies, considering:
▪The
company’s policies, management, board oversight, governance processes, and level
of disclosure related
to
direct political contributions, lobbying activities, and payments to trade
associations, political action
committees,
or other groups that may be used for political purposes;
▪The
company’s disclosure regarding: the reasons for its support of candidates for
public offices; the reasons
for
support of and participation in trade associations or other groups that may make
political contributions;
and
other political activities;
▪Any
incongruencies identified between a company’s direct and indirect political
expenditures and its publicly
stated
values and priorities.
▪Recent
significant controversies related to the company’s direct and indirect lobbying,
political contributions,
or
political activities.
Generally
vote case-by-case on proposals requesting comparison of a company’s political
spending to objectives
that
can mitigate material risks for the company, such as limiting global
warming.
Political
Ties
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote against proposals asking a company to affirm political nonpartisanship
in
the workplace, so long as:
▪There
are no recent, significant controversies, fines, or litigation regarding the
company’s political
contributions
or trade association spending; and
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪The
company has procedures in place to ensure that employee contributions to
company-sponsored political
action
committees (PACs) are strictly voluntary and prohibit coercion.
Vote
against proposals asking for a list of company executives, directors,
consultants, legal counsels, lobbyists, or
investment
bankers that have prior government service and whether such service had a
bearing on the business of
the
company. Such a list would be burdensome to prepare without providing any
meaningful information to
shareholders.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
8.Mutual
Fund Proxies
Election
of Directors
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on the election of directors and trustees, following the same
guidelines
for uncontested directors for public company shareholder meetings. However,
mutual fund boards do
not
usually have compensation committees, so do not withhold for the lack of this
committee.
Closed
End Funds- Unilateral Opt-In to Control Share Acquisition Statutes
General
Recommendation:
For
closed-end management investment companies (CEFs), vote against or withhold
from
nominating/governance committee members (or other directors on a case-by-case
basis) at CEFs that have
not
provided a compelling rationale for opting-in to a Control Share Acquisition
statute, nor submitted a by-law
amendment
to a shareholder vote.
Converting
Closed-end Fund to Open-end Fund
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on conversion proposals, considering the following factors:
▪Past
performance as a closed-end fund;
▪Market
in which the fund invests;
▪Measures
taken by the board to address the discount; and
▪Past
shareholder activism, board activity, and votes on related proposals.
Proxy
Contests
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proxy contests, considering the following factors:
▪Past
performance relative to its peers;
▪Market
in which the fund invests;
▪Measures
taken by the board to address the issues;
▪Past
shareholder activism, board activity, and votes on related proposals;
▪Strategy
of the incumbents versus the dissidents;
▪Independence
of directors;
▪Experience
and skills of director candidates;
▪Governance
profile of the company; and
▪Evidence
of management entrenchment.
Investment
Advisory Agreements
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on investment advisory agreements, considering the following
factors:
▪Proposed
and current fee schedules;
▪Fund
category/investment objective;
▪Performance
benchmarks;
▪Share
price performance as compared with peers;
▪Resulting
fees relative to peers; and
▪Assignments
(where the advisor undergoes a change of control).
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Approving
New Classes or Series of Shares
General
Recommendation: Vote
for the establishment of new classes or series of shares.
Preferred
Stock Proposals
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on the authorization for or increase in preferred shares,
considering
the following factors:
▪Stated
specific financing purpose;
▪Possible
dilution for common shares; and
▪Whether
the shares can be used for antitakeover purposes.
1940
Act Policies
General
Recommendation: Vote
case-by-case on policies under the Investment Advisor Act of 1940, considering
the
following factors:
▪Potential
competitiveness;
▪Regulatory
developments;
▪Current
and potential returns; and
▪Current
and potential risk.
Generally
vote for these amendments as long as the proposed changes do not fundamentally
alter the investment
focus
of the fund and do comply with the current SEC interpretation.
Changing
a Fundamental Restriction to a Nonfundamental Restriction
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals to change a fundamental restriction to a non-
fundamental
restriction, considering the following factors:
▪The
fund's target investments;
▪The
reasons given by the fund for the change; and
▪The
projected impact of the change on the portfolio.
Change
Fundamental Investment Objective to Nonfundamental
General
Recommendation: Vote
against proposals to change a fund’s fundamental investment objective to non-
fundamental.
Name
Change Proposals
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on name change proposals, considering the following factors:
▪Political/economic
changes in the target market;
▪Consolidation
in the target market; and
▪Current
asset composition.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Change
in Fund's Subclassification
General
Recommendation: Vote
case-by-case on changes in a fund's sub-classification, considering the
following
factors:
▪Potential
competitiveness;
▪Current
and potential returns;
▪Risk
of concentration; and
▪Consolidation
in target industry.
Business
Development Companies—Authorization to Sell Shares of Common Stock at a Price
below
Net Asset Value
General
Recommendation: Vote
for proposals authorizing the board to issue shares below Net Asset Value (NAV)
if:
▪The
proposal to allow share issuances below NAV has an expiration date no more than
one year from the date
shareholders
approve the underlying proposal, as required under the Investment Company Act of
1940;
▪The
sale is deemed to be in the best interests of shareholders by (1) a majority of
the company's independent
directors
and (2) a majority of the company's directors who have no financial interest in
the issuance; and
▪The
company has demonstrated responsible past use of share issuances by either:
▪Outperforming
peers in its 8-digit GICS group as measured by one- and three-year median TSRs;
or
▪Providing
disclosure that its past share issuances were priced at levels that resulted in
only small or moderate
discounts
to NAV and economic dilution to existing non-participating shareholders.
Disposition
of Assets/Termination/Liquidation
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals to dispose of assets, to terminate or liquidate,
considering
the following factors:
▪Strategies
employed to salvage the company;
▪The
fund’s past performance; and
▪The
terms of the liquidation.
Changes
to the Charter Document
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on changes to the charter document, considering the following
factors:
▪The
degree of change implied by the proposal;
▪The
efficiencies that could result;
▪The
state of incorporation; and
▪Regulatory
standards and implications.
Vote
against any of the following changes:
▪Removal
of shareholder approval requirement to reorganize or terminate the trust or any
of its series;
▪Removal
of shareholder approval requirement for amendments to the new declaration of
trust;
▪Removal
of shareholder approval requirement to amend the fund's management contract,
allowing the
contract
to be modified by the investment manager and the trust management, as permitted
by the 1940 Act;
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
▪Allow
the trustees to impose other fees in addition to sales charges on investment in
a fund, such as deferred
sales
charges and redemption fees that may be imposed upon redemption of a fund's
shares;
▪Removal
of shareholder approval requirement to engage in and terminate subadvisory
arrangements; or
▪Removal
of shareholder approval requirement to change the domicile of the fund.
Changing
the Domicile of a Fund
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on re-incorporations, considering the following factors:
▪Regulations
of both states;
▪Required
fundamental policies of both states; and
▪The
increased flexibility available.
Authorizing
the Board to Hire and Terminate Subadvisers Without Shareholder Approval
General
Recommendation:
Vote
against proposals authorizing the board to hire or terminate subadvisers
without
shareholder approval if the investment adviser currently employs only one
subadviser.
Distribution
Agreements
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on distribution agreement proposals, considering the following
factors:
▪Fees
charged to comparably sized funds with similar objectives;
▪The
proposed distributor’s reputation and past performance;
▪The
competitiveness of the fund in the industry; and
▪The
terms of the agreement.
Master-Feeder
Structure
General
Recommendation:
Vote
for the establishment of a master-feeder structure.
Mergers
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on merger proposals, considering the following factors:
▪Resulting
fee structure;
▪Performance
of both funds;
▪Continuity
of management personnel; and
▪Changes
in corporate governance and their impact on shareholder rights.
Shareholder
Proposals for Mutual Funds
Establish
Director Ownership Requirement
General
Recommendation:
Generally
vote against shareholder proposals that mandate a specific minimum
amount
of stock that directors must own in order to qualify as a director or to remain
on the board.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
Reimburse
Shareholder for Expenses Incurred
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on shareholder proposals to reimburse proxy solicitation
expenses.
When
supporting the dissidents, vote for the reimbursement of the proxy solicitation
expenses.
Terminate
the Investment Advisor
General
Recommendation:
Vote
case-by-case on proposals to terminate the investment advisor, considering the
following
factors:
▪Performance
of the fund’s Net Asset Value (NAV);
▪The
fund’s history of shareholder relations; and
▪The
performance of other funds under the advisor’s management.
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|
We
empower investors and companies to build
for
long-term and sustainable growth by providing
high-quality
data, analytics, and insight.
GET
STARTED WITH ISS SOLUTIONS
Founded
in 1985, Institutional Shareholder Services group of companies (ISS) empowers
investors and companies
to
build for long-term and sustainable growth by providing high-quality data,
analytics and insight. ISS, which is
majority
owned by Deutsche Bourse Group, along with Genstar Capital and ISS management,
is a leading provider
of
corporate governance and responsible investment solutions, market intelligence,
fund services, and events and
editorial
content for institutional investors and corporations, globally. ISS’ 2,600
employees operate worldwide
across
29 global locations in 15 countries. Its approximately 3,400 clients include
many of the world’s leading
institutional
investors who rely on ISS’ objective and impartial offerings, as well as public
companies focused on
ESG
and governance risk mitigation as a shareholder value enhancing measure. Clients
rely on ISS’ expertise to help
them
make informed investment decisions. This document and all of the information
contained in it, including
without
limitation all text, data, graphs, and charts (collectively, the "Information")
is the property of Institutional
Shareholder
Services Inc. (ISS), its subsidiaries, or, in some cases third party
suppliers.
The
Information has not been submitted to, nor received approval from, the United
States Securities and Exchange
Commission
or any other regulatory body. None of the Information constitutes an offer to
sell (or a solicitation of
an
offer to buy), or a promotion or recommendation of, any security, financial
product or other investment vehicle
or
any trading strategy, and ISS does not endorse, approve, or otherwise express
any opinion regarding any issuer,
securities,
financial products or instruments or trading strategies.
The
user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit
to be made of the Information.
ISS
MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE
INFORMATION
AND
EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY
IMPLIED
WARRANTIES
OF ORIGINALITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, NON-INFRINGEMENT, COMPLETENESS,
MERCHANTABILITY,
AND FITNESS for A PARTICULAR PURPOSE) WITH RESPECT TO ANY OF THE
INFORMATION.
Without
limiting any of the foregoing and to the maximum extent permitted by law, in no
event shall ISS have any
liability
regarding any of the Information for any direct, indirect, special, punitive,
consequential (including lost
profits),
or any other damages even if notified of the possibility of such damages. The
foregoing shall not exclude
or
limit any liability that may not by applicable law be excluded or limited.
©
2024 | Institutional Shareholder Services and/or its affiliates
|
| |
UNITED
STATES
Proxy
Voting Guidelines |
|
|