HARTFORD HLS SERIES FUND II INC

COMBINED STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
FOR HARTFORD HLS FUNDS

This Combined Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) is not a prospectus, and it should be read in conjunction with the prospectus, as may be amended, restated or supplemented from time to time, of the series of Hartford Series Fund, Inc. and Hartford HLS Series Fund II, Inc. (each a “Company” and together, the “Companies”) in the charts below (each an “HLS Fund” or a “Fund” and collectively, the “HLS Funds” or “Funds”). Each Company is an open-end management investment company currently consisting of eleven and one separate series, respectively. This SAI relates only to the HLS Funds.

HARTFORD SERIES FUND, INC.

	Class IA	Class IB	Class IC
Hartford Balanced HLS Fund	HADAX	HAIBX	—
Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund	HIACX	HIBCX	HCPCX
Hartford Disciplined Equity HLS Fund	HIAGX	HBGIX	HLSCX
Hartford Dividend and Growth HLS Fund	HIADX	HDGBX	—
Hartford Healthcare HLS Fund	HIAHX	HBGHX	—
Hartford International Opportunities HLS Fund	HIAOX	HBIOX	—
Hartford MidCap HLS Fund	HIMCX	HBMCX	—
Hartford Small Company HLS Fund	HIASX	HDMBX	—
Hartford Stock HLS Fund	HSTAX	HIBSX	—
Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund	HIABX	HBNBX	—
Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund	HUBAX	HUBBX	—

HARTFORD HLS SERIES FUND II, INC.

	Class IA	Class IB	Class IC
Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS Fund	HISCX	HBSGX	—

The Funds’ prospectus is incorporated by reference into this SAI. This SAI is incorporated by reference in its entirety into the prospectus. The Funds’ audited financial statements and the notes thereto, which are included in the Funds’ Annual Report to shareholders dated December 31, 2021 are incorporated into this SAI by reference. No other portions of the audited financials are incorporated by reference herein. The Annual Report for the series of Hartford Series Fund, Inc. was filed with the SEC and is available at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1053425/000119312522056615/d509084dncsr.htm. The Annual Report for the Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS Fund was filed with the SEC and is available at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/790558/000119312522056837/d310284dncsr.htm . A free copy of the Annual and Semi-Annual Report and the Funds’ prospectus is available on the Funds’ website at hartfordfunds.com/prospectuses.html#hls, upon request by writing to: Hartford Funds, P.O. Box 219060, Kansas City, MO 64121-9060; or by calling 1-888-843-7824.

Date of Prospectus: April 29, 2022, as may be amended, restated or supplemented from time to time

Date of Statement of Additional Information: April 29, 2022

Table of Contents

	Page No.
GENERAL INFORMATION	3
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES	4
INVESTMENT RISKS	7
PORTFOLIO TURNOVER	60
DISCLOSURE OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS	61
FUND MANAGEMENT	63
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS	70
PORTFOLIO MANAGERS	75
PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS AND BROKERAGE	80
HLS FUND EXPENSES	83
TRANSFER AGENT	83
HLS FUND ACCOUNTING SERVICES	83
DISTRIBUTION ARRANGEMENTS	84
PURCHASE AND REDEMPTION OF SHARES	85
SUSPENSION OF REDEMPTIONS	86
SECURITIES LENDING	86
DETERMINATION OF NET ASSET VALUE	86
CAPITALIZATION AND VOTING RIGHTS	86
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL SECURITY HOLDERS	87
TAXES	87
CUSTODIAN	90
DISTRIBUTOR	90
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM	90
CODE OF ETHICS	90
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	90
PROXY VOTING POLICY AND PROCEDURES	91
APPENDIX A: PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES	92
APPENDIX B: CREDIT RATINGS	104
APPENDIX C: CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL SECURITY HOLDERS	109

GENERAL INFORMATION

This SAI relates to all of the HLS Funds on the cover page. Each HLS Fund, except Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS Fund, is an investment portfolio (series) of Hartford Series Fund, Inc., a Maryland corporation. Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS Fund is an investment portfolio (series) of Hartford HLS Series Fund II, Inc., a Maryland corporation. This SAI relates to Class IA, IB and IC shares. Each HLS Fund offers the classes set forth in the table on the cover page next to its name.

The Board of Directors of the relevant Company (the “Board of Directors” or “Board”) may reclassify authorized shares to increase or decrease the allocation of shares in each HLS Fund. Each Company’s Board of Directors is also authorized, from time to time and without further shareholder approval, to authorize additional shares of any HLS Fund or to classify and reclassify existing and new funds into one or more classes. A reference to the “Board of Directors” shall refer to the Board of Directors of the Company in question (or, as the case may be, to the Board of Directors of the Company of which the HLS Fund in question is a series).

The date of each HLS Fund’s inception is indicated below:

Funds	Inception Date
Hartford Balanced HLS Fund (“Balanced HLS Fund”)*	March 31, 1983
Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund (“Capital Appreciation HLS Fund”)*	April 2, 1984
Hartford Disciplined Equity HLS Fund (“Disciplined Equity HLS Fund”)	May 29, 1998
Hartford Dividend and Growth HLS Fund (“Dividend and Growth HLS Fund”)*	March 9, 1994
Hartford Healthcare HLS Fund (“Healthcare HLS Fund”)	May 1, 2000
Hartford International Opportunities HLS Fund (“International Opportunities HLS Fund”)*	July 2, 1990
Hartford MidCap HLS Fund (“MidCap HLS Fund”)*	July 14, 1997
Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS Fund (“Small Cap Growth HLS Fund”)**	May 2, 1994
Hartford Small Company HLS Fund (“Small Company HLS Fund”)*	August 9, 1996
Hartford Stock HLS Fund (“Stock HLS Fund”)*	August 31, 1977
Hartford Total Return Bond HLS Fund (“Total Return Bond HLS Fund”)*	August 31, 1977
Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund (“Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund”)*	June 30, 1980

Prior to their reorganizations as series of a Maryland corporation on August 28, 2002, these HLS Funds were each organized as a separate Maryland corporation.

Prior to the reorganization as a series of a Maryland corporation on April 30, 2002, this HLS Fund was organized as a series of a Minnesota corporation.

Hartford Funds Management Company, LLC (“HFMC” or the “Investment Manager”) is the investment manager to each HLS Fund. HFMC is an indirect subsidiary of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (“The Hartford”), a Connecticut-based financial services company. The Hartford may be deemed to control HFMC through its indirect ownership of such entity. In addition, Wellington Management Company LLP (“Wellington Management” or the “sub-adviser”) is the sub-adviser to each HLS Fund and performs the daily investment of the assets for each HLS Fund.

HFMC also serves as the investment manager to the series of each of the following registrants: Hartford Funds Exchange-Traded Trust, The Hartford Mutual Funds, Inc., and The Hartford Mutual Funds II, Inc. Hartford Funds Distributors, LLC (“HFD” or the “distributor”), an indirect subsidiary of The Hartford, is principal underwriter to the series of The Hartford Mutual Funds, Inc. and The Hartford Mutual Funds II, Inc. (collectively, the “Retail Funds”) and the HLS Funds. The Hartford may be deemed to control HFD through the indirect ownership of such entity. Some of the Retail Funds have names and investment objectives and strategies similar to those of certain Funds described in this SAI. The HLS Funds are not duplicates of the Retail Funds and their performance will differ. The Retail Funds are separate funds and should not be confused with the Hartford HLS Funds’ investment options described in this SAI.

Investments in the HLS Funds are not:

•

Deposits or obligations of any bank;

•

Guaranteed or endorsed by any bank; or

•

Federally insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board or any other federal agency.

The prospectus and SAI do not purport to create any contractual obligations between a Company or any HLS Fund and its shareholders. Further, shareholders are not intended third-party beneficiaries of any contracts entered into by (or on behalf of) the HLS Funds, including contracts with HFMC or other parties who provide services to the HLS Funds.

INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

The investment objectives and principal investment strategies of each HLS Fund are described in the HLS Funds’ prospectus. Additional information concerning certain of the HLS Funds’ investments, strategies and risks is set forth below. Except for the investment restrictions listed below as fundamental or to the extent designated as such in any prospectus, each HLS Fund’s investment objective and the other investment policies described in this SAI or in any prospectus are not fundamental and may be changed without shareholder approval.

FUNDAMENTAL INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS OF THE HLS FUNDS

Each HLS Fund has adopted the fundamental investment restrictions set forth below. Fundamental investment restrictions may not be changed with respect to an HLS Fund without the approval of a majority of the HLS Fund’s outstanding voting securities as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). Under the 1940 Act and as used in the prospectus and this SAI, a “majority of the outstanding voting securities” means the lesser of (1) the holders of 67% or more of the outstanding shares of an HLS Fund (or a class of the outstanding shares of an HLS Fund) represented at a meeting if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the HLS Fund (or class) are present in person or by proxy or (2) the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the HLS Fund (or of the class).

Unless otherwise provided below, all references below to the assets of each HLS Fund are in terms of current market value.

Each HLS Fund:

1. will not borrow money or issue any class of senior securities, except to the extent consistent with the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, or as may otherwise be permitted from time to time by regulatory authority;

2. will not "concentrate" its investments in a particular industry or group of industries, except as permitted under the 1940 Act, and the rules and regulations thereunder as such may be interpreted or modified from time to time by regulatory authorities having appropriate jurisdiction, except that Healthcare HLS Fund will normally invest at least 25% of its total assets, in the aggregate, in the following industries: pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, medical products and health services;

3. will not make loans, except to the extent consistent with the 1940 Act, and the rules and regulations thereunder, or as may otherwise be permitted from time to time by regulatory authority;

4. will not act as an underwriter of securities of other issuers, except to the extent that, in connection with the disposition of portfolio securities, the HLS Fund may be deemed an underwriter under applicable laws;

5. will not purchase or sell real estate, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, as such may be interpreted or modified from time to time by regulatory authorities having appropriate jurisdiction;

6. will not invest in physical commodities or contracts relating to physical commodities, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act and other applicable laws, rules and regulations, as such may be interpreted or modified by regulatory authorities having jurisdiction, from time to time and as set forth in the HLS Fund's prospectus and SAI.

NON-FUNDAMENTAL INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS OF THE HLS FUNDS

The following restrictions are non-fundamental restrictions and may be changed by the Board of Directors without shareholder approval.

Each HLS Fund may not:

1. Pledge its assets other than to secure permitted borrowings or to secure investments permitted by the HLS Fund’s investment policies as set forth in its prospectus and this SAI, as they may be amended from time to time, and applicable law.

2. Purchase securities on margin except to the extent permitted by applicable law.

3. Purchase securities while outstanding borrowings exceed 5% of the HLS Fund’s total assets, except where the borrowing is for temporary or emergency purposes. Reverse repurchase agreements, dollar rolls, securities lending, and other investments or transactions described in the HLS Fund’s prospectus and this SAI, as they may be amended from time to time, are not deemed to be borrowings for purposes of this restriction.

4. Make short sales of securities or maintain a short position, except to the extent permitted by the HLS Fund’s prospectus and SAI, as amended from time to time, and applicable law.

5. Invest more than 15% of its net assets in illiquid investments as determined pursuant to Rule 22e-4 under the 1940 Act and the HLS Fund’s procedures adopted thereunder.

NON-FUNDAMENTAL TAX RESTRICTIONS OF THE HLS FUNDS

The tax-related limitations discussed below are subject to cure provisions under applicable tax laws and may be changed by the Board of Directors to the extent appropriate in light of changes to applicable tax law requirements.

Each HLS Fund must:

1. Maintain its assets so that, at the close of each quarter of its taxable year,

(a) at least 50 percent of the fair market value of its total assets is comprised of cash, cash items, U.S. Government securities, securities of other regulated investment companies and other securities (including bank loans), limited in respect of any one issuer to no more than 5 percent of the fair market value of the HLS Fund’s total assets and 10 percent of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer, and

(b) no more than 25 percent of the fair market value of its total assets is invested in the securities (including bank loans) of any one issuer (other than U.S. Government securities and securities of other regulated investment companies), or of two or more issuers controlled by the HLS Fund and engaged in the same, similar, or related trades or businesses, or of one or more qualified publicly traded partnerships.

2. Maintain its assets so that it is adequately diversified within the meaning of Section 817(h) of the Internal Revenue Code and regulations thereunder. Generally, this means that at the close of each calendar quarter, or within 30 days thereafter,

(a) no more than 55% of the value of the assets in the HLS Fund is represented by any one investment,

(b) no more than 70% of the value of the assets in the HLS Fund is represented by any two investments,

(d) no more than 90% of the value of the total assets of the HLS Fund is represented by any four investments.

In determining whether the above diversification standards are met, each U.S. Government agency or instrumentality shall be treated as a separate issuer.

CLASSIFICATION

Each HLS Fund has elected to be classified as a diversified series of an open-end management investment company. As a diversified fund, at least 75% of the value of each such HLS Fund’s total assets must be represented by cash and cash items (including receivables), U.S. Government securities, securities of other investment companies and other securities for the purposes of this calculation limited in respect of any one issuer (i) to an amount not greater in value than 5% of the value of the total assets of such HLS Fund and (ii) to not more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer.

A Fund may not change its classification status from diversified to non-diversified without the prior approval of shareholders but may change its classification status from non-diversified to diversified without such approval.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS

The information below is not considered to be part of a Fund’s fundamental policy and is provided for informational purposes only.

With respect to percentage restrictions on investments described in this SAI or in the prospectus, except with respect to the limitations on borrowing from banks set forth above under “Fundamental Investment Restrictions of the HLS Funds,” if such percentage restrictions are adhered to at the time of investment, a later increase or decrease in such percentage resulting from a change in the values of securities or loans, a change in a Fund’s net assets or a change in security characteristics is not a violation of any of such restrictions.

With respect to investment restriction A.2, the 1940 Act does not define what constitutes “concentration” in an industry. However, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has taken the position that an investment in excess of 25% of a Fund’s total assets in one or more issuers conducting their principal business activities in the same industry generally constitutes concentration. The Funds do not apply this restriction to municipal securities, repurchase agreements collateralized by securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities, or other investment companies.

With respect to investment restriction A.5, the 1940 Act does not directly restrict a Fund’s ability to invest in real estate, but does require that every fund have a fundamental investment policy governing such investments. A Fund may acquire real estate as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments and a Fund may invest in securities or other instruments backed by real estate or securities of companies engaged in the real estate business or real estate investment trusts. A Fund is limited in the amount of illiquid assets it may purchase, and to the extent that investments in real estate are considered illiquid, Rule 22e-4 generally limits the Fund’s purchases of illiquid investments to 15% of its net assets.

With respect to investment restriction A.6, although the 1940 Act does not directly limit a Fund’s ability to invest in physical commodities or contracts relating to physical commodities, a Fund’s investments in physical commodities or contracts relating to physical commodities may be limited by a Fund’s intention to qualify as a registered investment company, as at least 90% of its gross income must come from certain qualifying sources of income, and income from physical commodities or contracts relating to

physical commodities does not constitute qualifying income for this purpose. In addition, to the extent that any physical commodity or contracts relating to a physical commodity is considered to be an illiquid investment, Rule 22e-4 generally limits the Fund’s purchases of illiquid investments to 15% of its net assets. Other restrictions that could also limit a Fund’s investment in physical commodities or contracts relating to physical commodities include where that investment implicates a Fund’s diversification, concentration, or securities-related issuer policies, and where the Fund would need to take certain steps as set forth in its policies to avoid being considered to issue any class of senior securities.

CERTAIN INVESTMENT STRATEGIES, RISKS AND CONSIDERATIONS

The rules under the Commodity Exchange Act require that HFMC either operate within certain guidelines and restrictions with respect to a Fund’s use of futures, options on such futures, commodity options and certain swaps, or be subject to registration with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) as a “commodity pool operator” (“CPO”) with respect to the Fund and be required to operate the Fund in compliance with certain disclosure, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements.

Under current CFTC rules, the investment adviser of a registered investment company may claim an exemption from registration as a CPO only if the registered investment company that it advises uses futures contracts, options on such futures, commodity options and certain swaps solely for “bona fide hedging purposes,” or limits its use of such instruments for non-bona fide hedging purposes to certain de minimis amounts.

The Investment Manager operates Total Return Bond HLS Fund as a commodity pool as of April 29, 2022. The Investment Manager has elected to claim an exclusion from the definition of CPO with respect to each HLS Fund, other than Total Return Bond HLS Fund. As a result, each Fund, except Total Return Bond HLS Fund, will not purchase commodity futures, commodity options contracts, or swaps if, immediately after and as a result of such purchase, (i) the HLS Fund’s aggregate initial margin and premiums posted for its non-bona fide hedging trading in these instruments exceeds 5% of the liquidation value of the HLS Fund’s portfolio (after taking into account unrealized profits and losses and excluding the in-the- money amount of an option at the time of purchase) or (ii) the aggregate net notional value of the HLS Fund’s positions in such instruments not used solely for bona fide hedging purposes exceeds 100 percent of the liquidation value of the Fund’s portfolio (after taking into account unrealized profits and losses). This election for each Fund may be changed at any time. If a Fund operates subject to CFTC regulation, it may incur additional expenses.

INVESTMENT RISKS

The following supplements the information contained in the HLS Funds’ prospectus concerning the investment objective and policies of the HLS Funds. The table and discussion set forth below provide descriptions of some of the types of investments and investment strategies that one or more of the HLS Funds may use, and the risks and considerations associated with those investments and investment strategies. The information below does not describe every type of investment, technique or risk to which an HLS Fund may be exposed. Please see the HLS Funds’ prospectus and the “Investment Objectives and Policies” section of this SAI for further information on each HLS Fund’s investment policies and risks. Information contained in this section about the risks and considerations associated with an HLS Fund’s investments and/or investment strategies applies only to those HLS Funds specifically identified in the tables below as making each type of investment or using each investment strategy (each, a “Covered Fund”). Information that does not apply to a Covered Fund does not form a part of that Covered Fund’s SAI and should not be relied on by investors in that Covered Fund. Only information that is clearly identified as applicable to a Covered Fund is considered to form a part of the Covered Fund’s SAI.

Balanced HLS

Capital Appreciation HLS

Disciplined Equity HLS

Dividend and Growth HLS

Healthcare HLS

International Opportunities HLS

MidCap HLS

Small Cap Growth HLS

Small Company HLS

Stock HLS

Total Return Bond HLS

Ultrashort Bond HLS

Active Investment

Management Risk

Active Trading Risk

Asset Allocation Risk

Asset-Backed

Securities Risk

Collateralized Debt

Obligations (CDOs)

Risk

Asset Segregation

Risk

Bond Forwards Risk

Borrowing Risk

Call Risk

Commodities

Regulatory Risk

Convertible

Securities Risk

Contingent

Convertibles Risk

Synthetic

Convertibles Risk

Counterparty Risk

Credit Risk

Credit Risk Transfer

Securities Risk

Currency Risk

Cybersecurity Risk

Depositary Receipts

Risk

Derivatives Risk

Hedging Risk

Options Contracts

Risk

Futures Contracts

and Options on

Futures Contracts

Risk

Swap Agreements

and Swaptions Risk

Inflation-Linked

Instruments Risk

Hybrid Instruments

Risk

Credit-Linked

Securities Risk

Balanced HLS

Capital Appreciation HLS

Disciplined Equity HLS

Dividend and Growth HLS

Healthcare HLS

International Opportunities HLS

MidCap HLS

Small Cap Growth HLS

Small Company HLS

Stock HLS

Total Return Bond HLS

Ultrashort Bond HLS

Indexed Securities

and Structured

Notes Risk

Event-Linked Bonds

Risk

Foreign Currency

Transactions Risk

Risk Factors in

Derivative

Instruments

Dividend Risk

Dollar Rolls Risk

Equity Risk

Special Purpose

Acquisition

Companies Risk

ESG Integration and

ESG Consideration

Risk

Exchange-Traded

Funds (ETFs) Risk

Exchange-Traded

Notes (ETNs) Risk

Event Risk

Fixed Income

Securities Risk

Focused Portfolio

Risk

Foreign Investments

Risk

Currency Risk and

Exchange Risk

Principal Exchange

Rate Linked Securi-

ties Risk

Performance

Indexed Paper Risk

Settlement Risk

Government

Intervention in

Financial Markets

Risk

Growth Investing

Style Risk

Healthcare-Related

Securities Risk

High Yield Invest-

ments

(“Junk Bonds”) Risk

Distressed

Securities Risk

Illiquid Investments

Risk

Industry

Concentration Risk

Inflation Protected

Debt Securities Risk

Inflation Risk

Initial Public

Offerings (“IPO”)

Risk

Interest Rate Risk

Interfund Lending

Program Risk

Balanced HLS

Capital Appreciation HLS

Disciplined Equity HLS

Dividend and Growth HLS

Healthcare HLS

International Opportunities HLS

MidCap HLS

Small Cap Growth HLS

Small Company HLS

Stock HLS

Total Return Bond HLS

Ultrashort Bond HLS

Inverse Floating Rate

Securities Risk

Investment Grade

Securities Risk

Investments in

Emerging Market

Securities Risk

Sukuk Risk

Large Cap Securities

Risk

Large Shareholder

Transaction Risk

Lending Portfolio

Securities Risk

LIBOR Risk

Liquidation of Funds

Risk

Liquidity Risk

Loans and Loan

Participations Risk

Floating Rate

Loans Risk

Loan Participations

Risk

Senior Loans Risk

Unsecured Loans

Risk

Delayed Settlement

Risk

Market Risk

Master Limited

Partnership (“MLP”)

Risk

Mid Cap Securities

Risk

Money Market

Instruments and

Temporary Invest-

ment Strategies

Mortgage-Related

Securities Risk

Municipal Securities

Risk

Operational Risks

Other Capital

Securities Risk

Other Investment

Companies Risk

Preferred Stock Risk

Private Placement

Risk

Private Investments

in Public Equity

(PIPEs) Risk

Quantitative

Investing Risk

Real Estate Invest-

ment Trusts

(“REITs”) Risk

Real Estate Related

Securities Risks

Regional/Country

Focus Risk

Balanced HLS

Capital Appreciation HLS

Disciplined Equity HLS

Dividend and Growth HLS

Healthcare HLS

International Opportunities HLS

MidCap HLS

Small Cap Growth HLS

Small Company HLS

Stock HLS

Total Return Bond HLS

Ultrashort Bond HLS

Investments in

Central and South

America Risk

Investments in

Europe Risk

Investments in Asia

Risk

Investments in

China Risk

Investments in

Japan Risk

Investments in

Russia Risk

Repurchase and

Reverse Repurchase

Agreements Risk

Restricted Securities

Risk

Risks of Qualified

Financial Contracts

Sector Risk

Consumer

Discretionary Sec-

tor Risk

Communication

Services Sector

Risk

Health Care Sector

Risk

Financials Sector

Risk

Industrials Sector

Risk

Information

Technology Sector

Risk

Utilities Sector Risk

Securities Trusts

Risk

Small Capitalization

Securities Risk

Sovereign Debt Risk

Structured Securities

Risk

To Be Announced

(TBA) Transactions

Risk

Short Sales of TBA

Investments Risk

U.S. Government

Securities Risk

Treasury Inflation-

Protection Securi-

ties Risk

Valuation Risk

Value Investing Style

Risk

Volatility Risk

Warrants and Rights

Risk

Zero Coupon

Securities Risk

ACTIVE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT RISK. The risk that, if the investment decisions and strategy of the portfolio manager(s) do not perform as expected, a Fund could underperform its peers or lose money. A Fund’s performance depends on the judgment of the portfolio manager(s) about a variety of factors, such as markets, interest rates and/or the attractiveness, relative value, liquidity, or potential appreciation of particular investments made for the Fund’s portfolio. The portfolio manager(s)’ investment models may not adequately take into account certain factors, may perform differently than anticipated and may result in a Fund having a lower return than if the portfolio managers used another model or investment strategy. In addition, to the extent a Fund allocates a portion of its assets to specialist portfolio managers, the styles employed by the different portfolio managers may not be complementary, which could adversely affect the Fund’s performance.

ACTIVE TRADING RISK. Active or frequent trading of a Fund’s portfolio securities could increase a Fund’s transaction costs (thus adversely affecting performance).

ASSET ALLOCATION RISK. Asset allocation risk is the risk that, if a Fund’s strategy for allocating assets among different asset classes and/or portfolio management teams does not work as intended, the Fund may not achieve its investment objective or may underperform other funds with similar investment strategies. To the extent a Fund employs a multiple portfolio manager structure and combines different strategies into a single fund, the investment styles employed by the portfolio managers of such Fund may not be complementary, which could adversely affect the performance of the Fund.

ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES RISK. Asset-backed securities are securities backed by a pool of some underlying asset, including but not limited to home equity loans, installment sale contracts, credit card receivables or other assets. Asset-backed securities are “pass-through” securities, meaning that principal and interest payments — net of expenses — made by the borrower on the underlying assets (such as credit card receivables) are passed through to a Fund. The value of asset-backed securities, like that of traditional fixed income securities, typically increases when interest rates fall and decreases when interest rates rise. However, asset-backed securities differ from traditional fixed income securities because of their potential for prepayment. The price paid by a Fund for its asset-backed securities, the yield the Fund expects to receive from such securities and the average life of the securities are based on a number of factors, including the anticipated rate of prepayment of the underlying assets. In a period of declining interest rates, borrowers may prepay the underlying assets more quickly than anticipated, thereby reducing the yield to maturity and the average life of the asset-backed securities. Moreover, when a Fund reinvests the proceeds of a prepayment in these circumstances, it will likely receive a rate of interest that is lower than the rate on the security that was prepaid. To the extent that a Fund purchases asset-backed securities at a premium, prepayments may result in a loss to the extent of the premium paid. If a Fund buys such securities at a discount, both scheduled payments and unscheduled prepayments will increase current and total returns and unscheduled prepayments will also accelerate the recognition of income which, when distributed to shareholders, will be taxable as ordinary income. In a period of rising interest rates, prepayments of the underlying assets may occur at a slower than expected rate, creating maturity extension risk. This particular risk may effectively change a security that was considered short- or intermediate-term at the time of purchase into a longer term security. Since the value of longer-term securities generally fluctuates more widely in response to changes in interest rates than does the value of shorter term securities, maturity extension risk could increase the volatility of the Fund. When interest rates decline, the value of an asset-backed security with prepayment features may not increase as much as that of other fixed-income securities, and, as noted above, changes in market rates of interest may accelerate or retard prepayments and thus affect maturities.

Asset-backed securities do not always have the benefit of a security interest in the underlying asset. For example, credit card receivables are generally unsecured, and the debtors are entitled to the protection of a number of state and federal consumer credit laws, many of which give such debtors the right to set off amounts owed. The ability of an issuer of asset-backed securities to enforce its security interest in the underlying securities may be limited, and recoveries on repossessed collateral may not, in some cases, be available to support payments on these securities. If a Fund purchases asset-backed securities that are “subordinated” to other interests in the same asset-backed pool, the Fund as a holder of those securities may only receive payments after the pool’s obligations to other investors have been satisfied. Tax-exempt structured securities, such as tobacco bonds, are not considered asset-backed securities for purposes of each Fund’s investments.

Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) Risk. A Fund may invest in collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”), which include collateralized bond obligations (“CBOs”), collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) and other similarly structured securities. CBOs and CLOs are types of asset-backed securities. A CBO is a trust that is typically backed by a diversified pool of high risk, below investment grade fixed income securities. The collateral can be from many different types of fixed income securities such as high yield debt, residential privately issued mortgage-related securities, commercial privately issued mortgage-related securities, trust preferred securities and emerging market debt. A CLO is a trust typically collateralized by a pool of loans, which may include, among others, domestic and foreign senior secured loans, senior unsecured loans, and subordinate corporate loans, including loans that may be rated below investment grade or equivalent unrated loans. Other CDOs are trusts backed by other types of assets representing obligations of various parties. CDOs may charge management fees and administrative expenses.

For CBOs, CLOs and other CDOs, the cash flows from the trust are split into two or more portions, called tranches, varying in risk and yield. The riskiest portion is the “equity” tranche which bears the bulk of defaults from the bonds or loans in the trust and serves to protect the other, more senior tranches from default in all but the most severe circumstances. Since they are partially

protected from defaults, senior tranches from a CBO trust, CLO trust or trust of another CDO typically have higher ratings and lower yields than their underlying securities, and can be rated investment grade. Despite the protection from the equity tranche, CBO, CLO or other CDO tranches can experience substantial losses due to actual defaults, increased sensitivity to defaults due to collateral default and disappearance of protecting tranches, market anticipation of defaults, as well as aversion to CBO, CLO or other CDO securities as a class.

The risks of an investment in a CDO depend largely on the type of collateral held by the special purpose entity (“SPE”) and the tranche of the CDO in which the Fund invests. Investment risk may also be affected by the performance of a CDO’s collateral manager (the entity responsible for selecting and managing the pool of collateral securities held by the SPE trust), especially during a period of market volatility. CDOs may be deemed to be illiquid investments and subject to Rule 22e-4’s restrictions on investments in illiquid investments. However, an active dealer market may exist for CDOs allowing a CDO to qualify for Rule 144A transactions. Normally, CBOs, CLOs and other CDOs are privately offered and sold, and thus, are not registered under the securities laws. The Fund’s investment in CDOs will not receive the same investor protection as an investment in registered securities. In addition, prices of CDO tranches can decline considerably. In addition to the normal risks associated with debt securities and asset backed securities (e.g., interest rate risk, credit risk and default risk), CDOs carry additional risks including, but not limited to: (i) the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments; (ii) the quality of the collateral may decline in value or quality or go into default or be downgraded; (iii) a Fund may invest in tranches of a CDO that are subordinate to other classes; and (iv) the complex structure of the security may not be fully understood at the time of investment and may produce disputes with the issuer, difficulty in valuing the security or unexpected investment results.

ASSET SEGREGATION RISK. To the extent required by the current SEC guidelines, if a Fund engages in transactions that expose it to an obligation to another party, the Fund will either (i) hold an offsetting position for the same type of financial asset or (ii) maintain cash or liquid securities, designated on the Fund’s books or held in a segregated account, with a value sufficient at all times to cover its potential obligations not covered pursuant to clause (i). Assets used as offsetting positions, designated on the Fund’s books or held in a segregated account cannot be sold while the position(s) requiring cover is/are open unless replaced with other appropriate assets. As a result, the commitment of a large portion of assets to be used as offsetting positions or to be designated or segregated in such a manner could impede portfolio management or the Fund’s ability to meet shareholder redemption requests or other current obligations. Each Fund reserves the right to modify its asset segregation policies in the future to comply with any changes in the SEC’s positions regarding asset segregation. See "Recent SEC Regulatory Change" herein.

BOND FORWARDS RISK. A bond forward is a contractual agreement between a Fund and another party to buy or sell an underlying asset at an agreed-upon future price and date. When a Fund enters into a bond forward, it will also simultaneously enter into a reverse repurchase agreement. In a bond forward transaction, no cash premium is paid when the parties enter into the bond forward. If the transaction is collateralized, an exchange of margin collateral will take place according to an agreed-upon schedule. Otherwise, no asset of any kind changes hands until the bond forward matures (typically in 30 days) or is rolled over for another agreed-upon period. Generally, the value of the bond forward will change based on changes in the value of the underlying asset. Bond forwards are subject to market risk (the risk that the market value of the underlying bond may change), non-correlation risk (the risk that the market value of the bond forward might move independently of the market value of the underlying bond) and counterparty credit risk (the risk that a counterparty will be unable to meet its obligation under the contract). If there is no cash exchanged at the time a Fund enters into the bond forward, counterparty risk may be limited to the loss of any marked-to-market profit on the contract and any delays or limitations on the Fund’s ability to sell or otherwise use the investments used as collateral for the bond forward. Reverse repurchase agreements involve the sale of securities held by a Fund with an agreement to repurchase the securities at an agreed-upon price, date and interest payment. Reverse repurchase agreements carry the risk that the market value of the securities that a Fund is obligated to repurchase may decline below the repurchase price. A Fund could also lose money if it is unable to recover the securities and the value of the collateral held or assets segregated by the Fund to cover the transaction is less than the value of securities. The use of reverse repurchase agreements may increase the possibility of fluctuation in a Fund’s net asset value.

In order to reduce the risk associated with leveraging, a Fund may “set aside” liquid assets (as described in “Asset Segregation Risk” above), or otherwise “cover” its position in bond forwards in a manner consistent with the 1940 Act or the current rules and SEC interpretations thereunder. As discussed in "Risk Factors in Derivative Instruments" below, the SEC adopted a final rule related to the use of derivatives, short sales, reverse repurchase agreements and certain other transactions by registered investment companies that rescinds and withdraws the guidance of the SEC and its staff regarding asset segregation and coverage transactions reflected in the Funds' asset segregation and cover practices discussed herein.

BORROWING RISK. Each Fund may borrow money to the extent set forth under “Investment Objectives and Policies.” The Funds do not intend to borrow for leverage purposes, except as may be set forth under “Investment Objectives and Policies.” Interest paid on borrowings will decrease the net earnings of a Fund and will not be available for investment.

Each Fund participates in a 364-day committed line of credit pursuant to a credit agreement and may borrow under the line of credit for temporary or emergency purposes.

CALL RISK. Call risk is the risk that an issuer, especially during periods of falling interest rates, may redeem a security by repaying it early. Issuers may call outstanding securities prior to their maturity due to a decline in interest rates, a change in credit spreads or changes to or improvements in the issuer’s credit quality. If an issuer calls a security in which a Fund has invested, the Fund may not recoup the full amount of its initial investment and may be forced to reinvest the money it receives in lower-yielding securities, securities with greater credit risks or securities with other, less favorable features. This could potentially lower the Fund’s income, yield and its distributions to shareholders.

COMMODITIES REGULATORY RISK. Commodity-related companies are subject to significant federal, state and local government regulation in virtually every aspect of their operations, including how facilities are constructed, maintained and operated, environmental and safety controls, and the prices they may charge for the products and services they provide. In addition, certain derivatives (for example, interest rate swaps) are considered to be commodities for regulatory purposes. The CFTC and the exchanges are authorized to take extraordinary actions in the event of a market emergency, including, for example, the retroactive implementation of speculative position limits or higher margin requirements, the establishment of daily limits and the suspension of trading. Any of these actions, if taken, could adversely affect the returns of a Fund by limiting or precluding investment decisions the Fund might otherwise make. The CFTC in October 2020 adopted amendments to its position limits rules that establish certain new and amended position limits for 25 specified physical commodity futures and related options contracts traded on exchanges, other futures contracts and related options directly or indirectly linked to such 25 specified contracts, and any OTC transactions that are economically equivalent to the 25 specified contracts. To the extent these contracts are traded, the sub-adviser will need to consider whether the exposure created under these contracts might exceed the new and amended limits in anticipation of the applicable compliance dates, and the limits may constrain the ability of a Fund to use such contracts. The amendments also modify the bona fide hedging exemption for which certain swap dealers are currently eligible, which could limit the amount of speculative OTC transaction capacity each such swap dealer would have available for an applicable Fund prior to the applicable compliance date. In addition, various national governments have expressed concern regarding the derivatives markets and the need to regulate such markets. Stricter laws, regulations or enforcement policies, with respect to the derivatives market, could be enacted in the future which would likely increase compliance costs and may adversely affect the operations and financial performance of commodity-related companies. The effect of any future regulatory change on a Fund is impossible to predict, but could be substantial and adverse to the Fund. Also, future regulatory developments may impact a Fund’s ability to invest in commodity-linked derivatives.

CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES RISK. The market value of a convertible security typically performs like that of a regular debt security; this means that if market interest rates rise, the value of a convertible security usually falls. Convertible securities are also subject to the risk that the issuer will not be able to pay interest or dividends when due, and their market value may change based on changes in the issuer’s credit rating or the market’s perception of the issuer’s creditworthiness. Since it derives a portion of its value from the common stock into which it may be converted, a convertible security is also subject to the same types of market and issuer risk that apply to the underlying common stock. A convertible security tends to perform more like a stock when the underlying stock price is high relative to the conversion price (because more of the security’s value resides in the option to convert) and more like a debt security when the underlying stock price is low relative to the conversion price (because the option to convert is less valuable).

Contingent Convertibles Risk. Contingent convertible securities (also known as contingent capital securities or CoCos) (“CoCos”) are a form of hybrid debt security that are intended to either convert into equity or have their principal written down upon the occurrence of certain “triggers.” The triggers are generally linked to regulatory capital thresholds or regulatory actions calling into question the issuing banking institution’s continued viability as a going-concern. CoCos’ unique equity conversion or principal write-down features are tailored to the issuing banking institution and its regulatory requirements. Some additional risks associated with CoCos include, but are not limited to:

Loss absorption risk – CoCos have no stated maturity and have fully discretionary coupons. This means coupons can potentially be cancelled at the banking institution’s discretion or at the request of the relevant regulatory authority in order to help the bank absorb losses.

Subordinated instruments – CoCos will, in the majority of circumstances, be issued in the form of subordinated debt instruments in order to provide the appropriate regulatory capital treatment prior to a conversion. Accordingly, in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of an issuer prior to a conversion having occurred, the rights and claims of the holders of the CoCos, such as a Fund, against the issuer in respect of or arising under the terms of the CoCos shall generally rank junior to the claims of all holders of unsubordinated obligations of the issuer. In addition, if the CoCos are converted into the issuer’s underlying equity securities following a conversion event (i.e., a “trigger”), each holder will be subordinated due to their conversion from being the holder of a debt instrument to being the holder of an equity instrument.

Market value will fluctuate based on unpredictable factors – The value of CoCos is unpredictable and will be influenced by many factors including, without limitation: (i) the creditworthiness of the issuer and/or fluctuations in such issuer’s applicable capital ratios; (ii) supply and demand for the CoCos; (iii) general market conditions and available liquidity; and (iv) economic, financial and political events that affect the issuer, its particular market or the financial markets in general.

Synthetic Convertibles Risk. Synthetic convertible securities involve the combination of separate securities that possess the two principal characteristics of a traditional convertible security (i.e., an income-producing component and a right to acquire an equity security). Synthetic convertible securities are often achieved, in part, through investments in warrants or options to buy common stock (or options on a stock index), and therefore are subject to the risks associated with derivatives. The value of a synthetic convertible security will respond differently to market fluctuations than a traditional convertible security because a synthetic convertible is composed of two or more separate securities or instruments, each with its own market value. Because the convertible component is typically achieved by investing in warrants or options to buy common stock at a certain exercise price, or options on a stock index, synthetic convertible securities are subject to the risks associated with derivatives. In addition, if the value of the underlying common stock or the level of the index involved in the convertible component falls below the exercise price of the warrant or option, the warrant or option may lose all value.

COUNTERPARTY RISK. With respect to certain transactions, such as over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives contracts or repurchase agreements, a Fund will be exposed to the risk that the counterparty to the transaction may be unable or unwilling to make timely principal, interest or settlement payments, or otherwise to honor its obligations. In the event of a bankruptcy or insolvency of a counterparty, a Fund could experience delays in liquidating its positions and significant losses, including declines in the value of its investment during the period in which the Fund seeks to enforce its rights, the inability to realize any gains on its investment during such period and any fees and expenses incurred in enforcing its rights. A Fund also bears the risk of loss of the amount expected to be received under a derivative transaction in the event of the default or bankruptcy of a counterparty. OTC derivatives may not offer a Fund the same level of protection as exchange traded derivatives.

CREDIT RISK. Credit risk is the risk that the issuer of a security will not be able to make timely principal and interest payments. Changes in an issuer’s financial strength, credit rating or the market’s perception of an issuer’s creditworthiness may also affect the value of a Fund’s investment in that issuer. The degree of credit risk depends on both the financial condition of the issuer and the terms of the obligation. Although the U.S. government has honored its credit obligations, it remains possible that the U.S. could default on its obligations. A U.S. credit rating downgrade or a U.S. credit default could decrease the value and increase the volatility of a Fund’s investments. While it is impossible to predict the consequences of such an event, a default by the U.S. or credit downgrade could be highly disruptive to the U.S. and global securities markets and could significantly impair the value of a Fund’s investments. Periods of market volatility may increase credit risk.

CREDIT RISK TRANSFER SECURITIES RISK. Credit risk transfer (“CRT”) securities are fixed income securities that transfer the credit risk related to certain types of mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) to the owner of the CRT securities. If the underlying mortgages default, the principal of the CRT securities is used to pay back holders of the MBS. As a result, all or part of the mortgage default or credit risk associated with the underlying mortgage pools is transferred to a Fund. Therefore, a Fund could lose all or part of its investments in CRT securities in the event of default by the underlying mortgages.

CURRENCY RISK. The risk that the value of a Fund’s investments in foreign securities or currencies will be affected by the value of the applicable currency relative to the U.S. dollar. Foreign currency exchange rates may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time for a number of reasons, including: interest rates, inflation, changes in balance or payments and governmental surpluses or deficits, intervention (or the failure to intervene) by U.S. or foreign governments, central banks or supranational entities such as the International Monetary Fund, or by the imposition of currency controls or other political developments in the U.S. or abroad. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates will affect the U.S. dollar market value of securities denominated in such foreign currencies and any income received or expenses paid by a Fund in that foreign currency. This may affect the Fund’s share price, income and distributions to shareholders. When a Fund sells a foreign currency or foreign currency denominated security, its value may be worth less in U.S. dollars even if the investment increases in value in its local market. U.S. dollar-denominated securities of foreign issuers may also be affected by currency risk, as the revenue earned by issuers of these securities may also be affected by changes in the issuer’s local currency. Currency markets generally are not as regulated as securities markets. Currency risk may be particularly high to the extent that the Fund invests in foreign securities or currencies that are economically tied to emerging market countries. Some countries may have fixed or managed currencies that are not free-floating against the U.S. dollar. The dollar value of foreign investments may be affected by exchange controls. A Fund may be positively or negatively affected by governmental strategies intended to make the U.S. dollar, or other currencies in which the Fund invests, stronger or weaker. For example, the Chinese government heavily regulates the domestic exchange of foreign currencies and renminbi ("RMB") exchange rates in China, which may adversely affect the operations and financial results of a Fund’s investments in China. At times, there may be insufficient offshore RMB for a Fund to remain fully invested in Chinese equities. Although offshore RMB (CNH) and onshore RMB (CNY) are the same currency, they trade at different rates. Any divergence between CNH and CNY may adversely impact investors. Under exceptional circumstances, payment of proceeds from underlying investments and/or dividend payments in RMB may be delayed due to the exchange controls and restrictions applicable to RMB. Certain currencies may not be internationally traded, which could cause illiquidity with respect to a Fund’s investments in that currency and any securities denominated in that currency. Some countries may adopt policies that would prevent a Fund from transferring cash out of the country or withhold portions of interest and dividends at the source. Certain currencies have experienced a steady devaluation relative to the U.S. dollar. Any devaluations in the currencies in which a Fund’s portfolio securities are denominated may have a detrimental impact on the Fund. Where the exchange rate for a currency declines materially after a Fund’s income has been accrued and translated into U.S. dollars, the

Fund may need to redeem portfolio securities to make required distributions. Similarly, if an exchange rate declines between the time a Fund incurs expenses in U.S. dollars and the time such expenses are paid, the Fund will have to convert a greater amount of the currency into U.S. dollars in order to pay the expenses. Investing in foreign currencies for purposes of gaining from projected changes in exchange rates further increases a Fund's exposure to foreign securities losses.

CYBERSECURITY RISK. Cybersecurity breaches are either intentional or unintentional events that allow an unauthorized party to gain access to Fund assets, customer data, or proprietary information, or cause a Fund or Fund service provider to suffer data corruption or lose operational functionality. Intentional cybersecurity incidents include: unauthorized access to systems, networks, or devices (such as through “hacking” activity); infection from computer viruses or other malicious software code; and attacks that shut down, disable, slow, or otherwise disrupt operations, business processes, or website access or functionality. In addition, unintentional incidents can occur, such as the inadvertent release of confidential information.

A cybersecurity breach could result in the loss or theft of customer data or funds, the inability to access electronic systems (“denial of services”), loss or theft of proprietary information or corporate data, physical damage to a computer or network system, or costs associated with system repairs, any of which could have a substantial impact on the Funds. For example, in a denial of service, Fund shareholders could lose access to their electronic accounts indefinitely, and employees of the Investment Manager, the sub-adviser(s), or the Funds' other service providers may not be able to access electronic systems to perform critical duties for the Funds, such as trading, NAV calculation, shareholder accounting, or fulfillment of Fund share purchases and redemptions. Cybersecurity incidents could cause the Funds, the Investment Manager, the sub-adviser(s), or other service provider to incur regulatory penalties, reputational damage, compliance costs associated with corrective measures, or financial loss. They may also result in violations of applicable privacy and other laws. In addition, such incidents could affect issuers in which a Fund invests, thereby causing the Fund’s investments to lose value.

The Investment Manager, the sub-adviser(s), and their affiliates have established risk management systems that seek to reduce cybersecurity risks, and business continuity plans in the event of a cybersecurity breach. However, there are inherent limitations in such plans, including that certain risks have not been identified, and there is no guarantee that such efforts will succeed, especially since none of the Investment Manager, the sub-adviser(s), or their affiliates controls the cybersecurity systems of the Funds' third-party service providers (including the Funds' custodian), or those of the issuers of securities in which the Funds invest.

DEPOSITARY RECEIPTS RISK. A Fund may invest in securities of foreign issuers in the form of depositary receipts or other securities that are convertible into securities of foreign issuers, including depositary receipts that are not sponsored by a financial institution (“Unsponsored Depositary Receipts”). Examples of depositary receipts include American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”), European Depositary Receipts (“EDRs”), Global Depositary Receipts (“GDRs”) and Chinese Depositary Receipts (“CDRs”). ADRs are receipts typically issued by a U.S. bank or trust company that evidence underlying securities issued by a foreign corporation. ADRs are traded on U.S. securities exchanges, or in over-the-counter markets, and are denominated in U.S. dollars. EDRs and GDRs are similar instruments that are issued in Europe (EDRs) or globally (GDRs), traded on foreign securities exchanges and denominated in foreign currencies. Generally, CDRs, in registered from, are designed for use in the Chinese securities markets. CDRs may involve certain risks not applicable to investing in U.S. issuers, including changes in currency rates, application of local tax laws, changes in governmental administration or economic or monetary policy or changed circumstances in dealings between nations. The value of a depositary receipt will fluctuate with the value of the underlying security, reflect changes in exchange rates and otherwise involve the same risks associated with the foreign securities that they evidence or into which they may be converted. Depositary receipts are generally subject to the same risks as the foreign securities that they evidence or into which they may be converted. The issuers of Unsponsored Depositary Receipts are not obligated to disclose information that would be considered material in the United States. Therefore, there may be less information available regarding their issuers and there may not be a correlation between such information and the market value of the depositary receipts.

A Fund may also invest in Global Depositary Notes (“GDN”), a form of depositary receipt. A GDN is a debt instrument created by a bank that evidences ownership of a local currency-denominated debt security. An investment in GDNs involves further risks due to certain features of GDNs. GDNs emulate the terms (interest rate, maturity date, credit quality, etc.) of particular local currency-denominated bonds; however, they trade, settle, and pay interest and principal in U.S. dollars, and are Depository Trust Company/Euroclear/Clearstream eligible. Any distributions paid to the holders of GDNs are usually subject to a fee charged by the depositary. Certain investment restrictions in certain countries may adversely impact the value of GDNs because such restrictions may limit the ability to convert bonds into GDNs and vice versa. Such restrictions may cause bonds of the underlying issuer to trade at a discount or premium to the market price of the GDN. See also “Foreign Investments” below.

DERIVATIVES RISK. A Fund may use instruments called derivatives or derivative investments. A derivative is a financial instrument the value of which is derived from the value of one or more underlying securities, commodities, currencies, indices, debt instruments, other derivatives or any other agreed upon pricing index or arrangement (e.g., the movement over time of the Consumer Price Index or freight rates) (each an “Underlying Instrument”). Derivatives contracts are either physically settled, which means the

parties trade the Underlying Instrument itself, or cash settled, which means the parties simply make cash payments based on the value of the Underlying Instrument (and do not actually deliver or receive the Underlying Instrument). Derivatives may allow a Fund to increase or decrease the level of risk to which the Fund is exposed more quickly and efficiently than transactions in other types of instruments.

Many derivative contracts are traded on securities or commodities exchanges, the contract terms are generally standard, and the parties make payments due under the contracts through the exchange. Most exchanges require the parties to post margin against their obligations under the contracts, and the performance of the parties’ obligations under such contracts is usually guaranteed by the exchange or a related clearing corporation. Other derivative contracts are traded over-the-counter (“OTC”) in transactions negotiated directly between the counterparties. OTC derivative contracts do not have standard terms, so they are generally less liquid and more difficult to value than exchange-traded contracts. OTC derivatives also expose a Fund to additional credit risks to the extent a counterparty defaults on a contract. See “Additional Risk Factors and Considerations of OTC Transactions” below.

Depending on how a Fund uses derivatives and the relationships between the market values of the derivative and the Underlying Instrument, derivatives could increase or decrease a Fund’s exposure to the risks of the Underlying Instrument. Derivative contracts may also expose the Fund to additional liquidity and leverage risks. See “Risk Factors in Derivative Instruments” below.

A Fund may use derivatives for various purposes, including for cash flow management, as part of its overall investment strategy, to seek to replicate the performance of a particular index, or to seek to enhance returns. The use of derivatives to seek to enhance returns is considered speculative because a Fund is primarily seeking to achieve gains rather than to offset, or hedge, the risks of other positions. When a Fund invests in a derivative for speculative purposes, the Fund is fully exposed to the risks of loss of that derivative, which may sometimes be greater than the cost of the derivative itself. No Fund may use any derivative to gain exposure to an asset or class of assets that it would be prohibited by its investment restrictions from purchasing directly.

Hedging Risk. Each Fund may use derivative instruments to offset the risks, or to “hedge” the risks, associated with other Fund holdings. For example, derivatives may be used to hedge against movements in interest rates, currency exchange rates and the equity markets through the use of options, futures transactions and options on futures. Derivatives may also be used to hedge against duration risk in fixed-income investments. Losses on one Fund investment may be substantially reduced by gains on a derivative that reacts to the same market movements in an opposite manner. However, while hedging can reduce losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains or cause losses if the market moves in a manner different from that anticipated by the Fund or if the cost of the derivative offsets the advantage of the hedge.

Among other risks, hedging involves correlation risk, which is the risk that changes in the value of the derivative will not match (i.e., will not offset) changes in the value of the holdings being hedged as expected by a Fund. In such a case, any losses on the Fund holdings being hedged may not be reduced or may even be increased as a result of the use of the derivative. The inability to close options and futures positions also could have an adverse impact on a Fund’s ability effectively to hedge its portfolio.

There can be no assurance that the use of hedging transactions will be effective. Each Fund is not required to engage in hedging transactions, and each Fund may choose not to do so. A decision as to whether, when and how to hedge involves the exercise of skill and judgment, and even a well-conceived hedge may be unsuccessful to some degree because of market behavior or unexpected interest rate trends.

The Funds might not employ any of the derivatives strategies described below, and there can be no assurance that any strategy used will succeed. A Fund’s success in employing derivatives strategies may depend on a sub-adviser’s correctly forecasting interest rates, market values or other economic factors, and there can be no assurance that the sub-adviser’s forecasts will be accurate. If a sub-adviser’s forecasts are not accurate, the Fund may end up in a worse position than if derivatives strategies had not been employed at all. A Fund’s ability to use certain derivative transactions may be limited by tax considerations and certain other legal considerations. Further, suitable derivative transactions might not be available at all times or in all circumstances. Described below are certain derivative instruments and trading strategies the Funds may use (either separately or in combination) in seeking to achieve their overall investment objectives.

Options Contracts Risk. An options contract, or an “option,” is a type of derivative. An option is an agreement between two parties in which one gives the other the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell an Underlying Instrument at a set price (the “exercise price” or “strike price”) for a specified period of time, or to receive a cash settlement payment. The buyer of an option pays a premium for the opportunity to decide whether to carry out the transaction (exercise the option) when it is beneficial. The option seller (writer) receives the initial premium and is obligated to carry out the transaction if and when the buyer exercises the option. Options can trade on exchanges or in the OTC market and may be bought or sold on a wide variety of Underlying Instruments. Options that are written on futures contracts, or futures options (discussed below), are subject to margin requirements similar to those applied to futures contracts. A Fund may engage in options transactions on any security or instrument in which it may invest, on any securities index based on securities in which it may invest or on any aggregates of equity and debt securities consisting of securities in which it may invest (aggregates are composites of equity or debt securities that are not tied to a commonly known index). A Fund may also enter into options on foreign currencies. As with futures and swaps (discussed below), the success of any

strategy involving options depends on a sub-adviser’s analysis of many economic and mathematical factors, and a Fund’s return may be higher if it does not invest in such instruments at all. The sections below describe certain types of options and related techniques that a Fund may use.

Call Options – A call option gives the holder the right to purchase the Underlying Instrument at the exercise price, or to receive a cash settlement payment, for a fixed period of time. A Fund would typically purchase a call option in anticipation of an increase in value of the Underlying Instrument because owning the option allows the Fund to participate in price increases on a more limited risk basis than if the Fund had initially directly purchased the Underlying Instrument. If, during the option period, the market value of the Underlying Instrument exceeds the exercise price, plus the option premium paid by the Fund and any transaction costs the Fund incurs in purchasing the option, the Fund realizes a gain upon exercise of the option. Otherwise, the Fund realizes either no gain or a loss on its purchase of the option.

A Fund is also permitted to write (i.e., sell) “covered” call options, which obligate a Fund, in return for the option premium, to sell the Underlying Instrument to the option holder for the exercise price, or to make a cash settlement payment, if the option is exercised at any time before or on its expiration date. In order for a call option to be covered, a Fund must have at least one of the following in place with respect to the option and for so long as the option is outstanding: (i) the Fund owns the Underlying Instrument subject to the option (or, in the case of an option on an index, owns securities whose price changes are expected to be similar to those of the underlying index), (ii) the Fund has an absolute and immediate right to acquire the Underlying Instrument without additional cash consideration (or for additional cash consideration so long as the Fund segregates such additional cash amount) upon conversion or exchange of other securities in its portfolio, (iii) the Fund enters into an offsetting forward contract and/or purchases an offsetting option or any other option that, by virtue of its exercise price or otherwise, reduces the Fund’s net exposure on its written option position, or (iv) the Fund segregates assets with an aggregate value equal to the exercise price of the option.

A Fund would typically write a call option to generate income from the option premium and/or in anticipation of a decrease, or only a limited increase (i.e., an increase that is less than the option premium received by the Fund in writing the option), in the market value of the Underlying Instrument. In writing a call option, however, a Fund would not profit if the market value of the Underlying Instrument increases to an amount that exceeds the sum of the exercise price plus the premium received by the Fund. Also, a Fund cannot sell the Underlying Instrument while the option is in effect unless the Fund enters into a closing purchase transaction. A closing purchase transaction cancels out the Fund’s position as option writer by means of an offsetting purchase of an identical option prior to the expiration or exercise of the option it has written.

Put Options – A put option gives the holder the right to sell the Underlying Instrument at the exercise price, or to receive a cash settlement payment, for a fixed period of time. A Fund would typically purchase a put option in anticipation of a decline in market values of securities. This limits the Fund’s potential for loss in the event that the market value of the Underlying Instrument falls below the exercise price.

A Fund is also permitted to write covered put options on the securities or instruments in which it may invest. In order for a put option to be covered, a Fund must have at least one of the following in place with respect to the option and for so long as the option is outstanding: (i) the Fund enters into an offsetting forward contract and/or purchases an offsetting option or any other option that, by virtue of its exercise price or otherwise, reduces the Fund’s net exposure on its written option position or (ii) the Fund segregates assets or cash with an aggregate value equal to the exercise price of the option.

A Fund would typically write a put option on an Underlying Instrument to generate income from premiums and in anticipation of an increase or only a limited decrease in the value of the Underlying Instrument. However, as writer of the put and in return for the option premium, a Fund takes the risk that it may be required to purchase the Underlying Instrument at a price in excess of its market value at the time of purchase. Because the purchaser may exercise its right under the option contract at any time during the option period, a Fund has no control over when it may be required to purchase the Underlying Instrument unless it enters into a closing purchase transaction.

Collars and Straddles – A Fund may employ collars, which are options strategies in which a call with an exercise price greater than the price of the Underlying Instrument (an “out-of-the-money call”) is sold and an in-the-money put (where the exercise price is again above the price of the Underlying Instrument) is purchased, to preserve a certain return within a predetermined range of values. A Fund may also write covered straddles consisting of a combination of a call and a put written on the same Underlying Instrument. A straddle is covered when sufficient assets are deposited to meet a Fund’s immediate obligations. A Fund may use the same liquid assets to cover both the call and put options where the exercise price of the call and put are the same, or the exercise price of the call is higher than that of the put. In such cases, a Fund will also segregate or designate on their books liquid assets equivalent to the amount, if any, by which the put is “in the money.”

Options on Indices – A Fund is permitted to invest in options on any index made up of securities or other instruments in which the Fund itself may invest. Options on indices are similar to options on securities except that index options are always cash settled, which means that upon exercise of the option the holder receives cash equal to the difference between the closing price of the index and the exercise price of the option times a specified multiple that determines the total monetary value for each point of such difference. As with other written options, all index options written by a Fund must be covered.

Risks Associated with Options – There are several risks associated with options transactions. For example, there are significant differences between the options market and the securities markets that could result in imperfect correlation between the two markets. Such imperfect correlation could then cause a given transaction to fail to achieve its objectives. Options are also subject to the risks of an illiquid secondary market, whether those options are traded over-the-counter or on a national securities exchange. There can be no assurance that a liquid secondary market on an options exchange will exist for any particular exchange-traded option at any particular time. If a Fund is unable to effect a closing purchase transaction with respect to options it has written, the Fund will not be able to sell the Underlying Instruments or dispose of the segregated assets used to cover the options until the options expire or are exercised. Similarly, if a Fund is unable to effect a closing sale transaction with respect to options it has purchased, it would have to exercise the options in order to realize any profit and would incur transaction costs upon the purchase or sale of the Underlying Instruments. Moreover, a Fund’s ability to engage in options transactions may be limited by tax considerations and other legal considerations.

The presence of a liquid secondary market on an options exchange may dry up for any or all of the following reasons: (i) there may be insufficient trading interest in certain options; (ii) the exchange may impose restrictions on opening or closing transactions or both; (iii) the exchange may halt or suspend trading, or impose other restrictions, on particular classes or series of options; (iv) unusual or unforeseen circumstances may interrupt normal exchange operations; (v) the facilities of the exchange or its related clearing corporation may at times be inadequate to handle trading volume; and/or (vi) one or more exchanges could, for economic or other reasons, decide or be compelled at some future date to discontinue the trading of options (or particular classes or series of options), in which event the secondary market on that exchange (or in such classes or series of options) would cease to exist. However, if the secondary market on an exchange ceases to exist, it would be expected (though it cannot be guaranteed) that outstanding options on that exchange, if any, that had been issued as a result of trades on that exchange would continue to be exercisable in accordance with their terms.

A Fund’s options transactions will also be subject to limitations, established by exchanges, boards of trade or other trading facilities, governing the maximum number of options in each class that may be written or purchased by any single investor or a group of investors acting in concert. As such, the number of options any single Fund can write or purchase may be affected by options already written or purchased by other Hartford Funds. An exchange, board of trade or other trading facility may order the liquidation of positions found to be in excess of these limits and/or impose sanctions. Also, the hours of trading for options may not conform to the hours during which the Underlying Instruments are traded. To the extent that the options markets close before the markets for the Underlying Instruments, significant price movements can take place in the underlying markets that would not be reflected in the options markets.

OTC options implicate additional liquidity and credit risks. Unlike exchange-listed options, where an intermediary or clearing corporation assures that the options transactions are properly executed, the responsibility for performing OTC options transactions rests solely on the writer and holder of those options. See “Additional Risk Factors and Considerations of OTC Transactions” below.

The writing and purchase of options is a highly specialized activity that involves investment techniques and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. The successful use of options depends on a sub-adviser’s ability to predict correctly future price fluctuations and the degree of correlation between the options and securities markets. See “Risk Factors in Derivative Instruments” below.

Additional Risk Associated with Options on Indices – The writer’s payment obligation under an index option (which is a cash-settled option) usually equals a multiple of the difference between the exercise price, which was set at initiation of the option, and the closing index level on the date the option is exercised. As such, index options implicate a “timing risk” that the value of the underlying index will change between the time the option is exercised by the option holder and the time the obligation thereunder is settled in cash by the option writer.

Futures Contracts and Options on Futures Contracts Risk. A futures contract, which is a type of derivative, is a standardized, exchange-traded contract that obligates the purchaser to take delivery, and the seller to make delivery, of a specified quantity of an Underlying Instrument at a specified price and specified future time, or to make a cash settlement payment. A Fund is generally permitted to invest in futures contracts and options on futures contracts with respect to, but not limited to, equity and debt securities and foreign currencies, aggregates of equity and debt securities (aggregates are composites of equity or debt securities that are not tied to a commonly known index), interest rates, indices, commodities and other financial instruments.

No price is paid upon entering into a futures contract. Rather, when a Fund purchases or sells a futures contract it is required to post margin (“initial margin”) with the futures commission merchant (“FCM”) executing the transaction. The margin required for a futures contract is usually less than ten percent of the contract value, but it is set by the exchange on which the contract is traded

and may by modified during the term of the contract. Subsequent payments, known as “variation margin,” to and from the FCM, will then be made daily as the currency, financial instrument or securities index underlying the futures contract fluctuates (a process known as “marking to market”). If a Fund has insufficient cash available to meet daily variation margin requirements, it might need to sell securities at a time when such sales are disadvantageous. Futures involve substantial leverage risk.

An option on a futures contract (“futures option”) gives the option holder the right (but not the obligation) to buy or sell its position in the underlying futures contract at a specified price on or before a specified expiration date. As with a futures contract itself, a Fund is required to deposit and maintain margin with respect to futures options it writes. Such margin deposits will vary depending on the nature of the underlying futures contract (and the related initial margin requirements), the current market value of the option and other futures positions held by the Fund.

The sale of a futures contract limits a Fund’s risk of loss, prior to the futures contract’s expiration date, from a decline in the market value of portfolio holdings correlated with the futures contract. In the event the market values of the portfolio holdings correlated with the futures contract increase rather than decrease, however, a Fund will realize a loss on the futures position and a lower return on the portfolio than would have been realized without the purchase of the futures contract.

Positions taken in the futures markets are usually not held to maturity but instead liquidated through offsetting transactions that may result in a profit or loss. While the Fund’s futures contracts will usually be liquidated in this manner, a Fund may instead make or take delivery of the Underlying Instrument whenever it appears economically advantageous to do so.

A Fund is permitted to enter into a variety of futures contracts, including interest rate futures, index futures, currency futures and commodity futures, and options on such futures contracts. A Fund may also invest in instruments that have characteristics similar to futures contracts, such as debt securities with interest or principal payments determined by reference to the value of a security, an index of securities or a commodity or currency at a future point in time. The risks of such investments reflect the risks of investing in futures and derivatives generally, including volatility and illiquidity.

Risks Associated with Futures and Futures Options – The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts and options are: (a) imperfect correlation between the change in market value of instruments held by a Fund and the price of the futures contract or option; (b) the possible lack of an active market for a futures contract or option, or the lack of a liquid secondary market for a futures option, and the resulting inability to close the futures contract or option when desired; (c) losses, which are potentially unlimited, caused by unanticipated market movements; (d) a sub-adviser’s failure to predict correctly the direction of securities prices, interest rates, currency exchange rates and other economic factors; and (e) the possibility that the counterparty will default in the performance of its obligations. Futures contracts and futures options also involve brokerage costs, require margin deposits and, under current regulatory requirements in the case of contracts and options obligating a Fund to purchase securities or currencies, require the Fund to segregate assets to cover such contracts and options. Moreover, futures are inherently volatile, and a Fund’s ability to engage in futures transactions may be limited by tax considerations and other legal considerations.

U.S. futures exchanges and some foreign exchanges limit the amount of fluctuation in futures contract prices which may occur in a single business day (generally referred to as “daily price fluctuation limits”). The maximum or minimum price of a contract as a result of these limits is referred to as a “limit price.” If the limit price has been reached in a particular contract, no trades may be made beyond the limit price. Limit prices have the effect of precluding trading in a particular contract or forcing the liquidation of contracts at disadvantageous times or prices.

Additional Considerations of Commodity Futures Contracts – In addition to the risks described above, there are several additional risks associated with transactions in commodity futures contracts. In particular, the costs to store underlying physical commodities are reflected in the price of a commodity futures contract. To the extent that storage costs for an underlying commodity change while a Fund is invested in futures contracts on that commodity, the value of the futures contract may change proportionately. Further, the commodities that underlie commodity futures contracts may be subject to additional economic and non-economic variables, such as drought, floods, weather, livestock disease, pandemics, embargoes, tariffs and international economic, political and regulatory developments and may be subject to broad price fluctuations.

Other Considerations Related to Options and Futures Options – A Fund will engage in transactions in futures contracts and related options only to the extent such transactions are consistent with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the “Code”) for maintaining qualification as a regulated investment company for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Swap Agreements and Swaptions Risk. A swap agreement, or a swap, is a type of derivative instrument. Swap agreements are entered into for periods ranging from a few weeks to more than one year. In a standard swap, two parties exchange the returns (or differentials in rates of return) earned or realized on an Underlying Instrument. The gross returns to be exchanged (or “swapped”) between the parties are calculated with respect to a “notional amount,” which is a predetermined dollar principal that represents the hypothetical underlying quantity upon which the parties’ payment obligations are computed. The notional amount may be, among

other things, a specific dollar amount invested, for example, at a particular interest rate, in a particular foreign currency or in a “basket” of securities or commodities that represents a particular index. The notional amount itself normally is not exchanged between the parties, but rather it serves as a reference amount from which to calculate the parties’ obligations under the swap.

A Fund will usually enter into swap agreements on a “net basis,” which means that the two payment streams are netted out with each party receiving or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the payments. A Fund’s obligations under a swap agreement are generally accrued daily (offset against any amounts owing to the Fund), and under current regulatory requirements, accrued but unpaid net amounts owed to a counterparty are covered by segregating liquid assets, marked to market daily, to avoid leveraging the Fund’s portfolio. If a Fund enters into a swap on other than a net basis, the Fund will segregate the full amount of its obligations under such swap. A Fund may enter into swaps, caps, collars, floors and related instruments with member banks of the Federal Reserve System, members of the New York Stock Exchange or other entities determined by a sub-adviser to be creditworthy. If a default occurs by the other party to such transaction, a Fund will have contractual remedies under the transaction documents, but such remedies may be subject to bankruptcy and insolvency laws that could affect the Fund’s rights as a creditor.

A Fund may engage in a wide variety of swap transactions, including, but not limited to, credit- and event-linked swaps, interest rate swaps, swaps on specific securities or indices, swaps on rates (such as mortgage prepayment rates) and other types of swaps, such as caps, collars, and floors. In addition, to the extent a Fund is permitted to invest in foreign currency-denominated securities, it may invest in currency swaps. A Fund may also enter into options on swap agreements (“swaptions”). Depending on how they are used, swap agreements may increase or decrease the overall volatility of a Fund’s investments and its share price and yield. The sections below describe certain swap arrangements and related techniques that the Funds may use.

Interest Rate Swaps, Caps, Floors and Collars – Interest rate swaps consist of an agreement between two parties to exchange their respective commitments to pay or receive interest (e.g., an exchange of floating rate payments for fixed-rate payments). Interest rate swaps are generally entered into on a net basis. Interest rate swaps do not involve the delivery of securities, other underlying assets, or principal. Accordingly, the risk of market loss with respect to interest rate and total rate of return swaps is typically limited to the net amount of interest payments that a Fund is contractually obligated to make.

Among other techniques, a Fund may use interest rate swaps to hedge interest rate and duration risk, which can be particularly sensitive to interest rate changes. Duration measures the sensitivity in prices of fixed-income securities to changes in interest rates; the duration of a portfolio or basket of bonds is the weighted average of the individual component durations. Longer maturity bonds typically have a longer duration than shorter maturity bonds and, therefore, higher sensitivity to interest rate changes. In an environment where interest rates are expected to rise, a Fund may use interest rate swaps to hedge interest rate and duration risk across a portfolio at particular duration points (such as two-, five- and 10- year duration points).

A Fund may also buy or sell interest rate caps, floors and collars. The purchase of an interest rate cap entitles the purchaser, to the extent that a specified interest rate index exceeds a predetermined level, to receive payments of interest on a specified notional amount from the party selling the interest rate cap. The purchase of an interest rate floor entitles the purchaser, to the extent that a specified interest rate falls below a predetermined level, to receive payments of interest on a specified notional amount from the party selling the interest rate floor. A collar is a combination of a cap and a floor that preserves a certain return within a predetermined range of interest rates. Caps, floors and collars may be less liquid than other types of derivatives.

Commodity Swaps – A commodity swap agreement is a contract in which one party agrees to make periodic payments to another party based on the change in market value of a commodity-based Underlying Instrument (such as a specific commodity or commodity index) in return for periodic payments based on a fixed or variable interest rate or the total return from another commodity-based Underlying Instrument. In a total return commodity swap, a Fund receives the price appreciation of a commodity index, a portion of a commodity index or a single commodity in exchange for paying an agreed-upon fee. As with other types of swap agreements, if the commodity swap lasts for a finite period of time, the swap may be structured such that the Fund pays a single fixed fee established at the outset of the swap. However, if the term of the commodity swap is ongoing, with interim swap payments, the Fund may pay a variable or “floating” fee. Such a variable fee may be pegged to a base rate and is adjusted at specific intervals. As such, if interest rates increase over the term of the swap contract, the Fund may be required to pay a higher fee at each swap reset date. See “LIBOR Risk” below.

Currency Swaps – A currency swap agreement is a contract in which two parties exchange one currency (e.g., U.S. dollars) for another currency (e.g., Japanese yen) on a specified schedule. The currency exchange obligations under currency swaps could be either interest payments calculated on the notional amount or payments of the entire notional amount (or a combination of both). A Fund may engage in currency swap agreements as a tool to protect against uncertainty and fluctuations in foreign exchange rates in the purchase and sale of securities. However, the use of currency swap agreements does not eliminate, or even always mitigate, potential losses arising from fluctuations in exchange rates. In the case of

currency swaps that involve the delivery of the entire notional amount of currency in exchange for another currency, the entire notional principal of the currency swap is subject to the risk that the counterparty will default on its contractual delivery obligations.

Credit Default Swaps – A credit default swap (“CDS”) is an agreement between two parties whereby one party (the “protection buyer”) makes an up-front payment or a stream of periodic payments over the term of the CDS to the other party (the “protection seller”), provided generally that no event of default or other credit-related event (a “credit event”) with respect to an Underlying Instrument occurs. In return, the protection seller agrees to make a payment to the protection buyer if a credit event does occur with respect to the Underlying Instrument. The CDS market allows a Fund to manage credit risk through buying and selling credit protection on a specific issuer, asset or basket of assets. Credit default swaps typically last between six months and three years, provided that no credit event occurs. Credit default swaps may be physically settled or cash settled.

A Fund may be either the protection buyer or the protection seller in a CDS. A Fund generally will not buy protection on issuers that are not currently held by that particular Fund. However, a Fund may engage in credit default swap trades on single names, indices and baskets to manage asset class exposure and to capitalize on spread differentials in instances where there is not complete overlap between such Fund’s holdings or exposures and the reference entities in the credit default swap. If the Fund is the protection buyer and no credit event occurs, the Fund loses its entire investment in the CDS (i.e., an amount equal to the aggregate amount of payments made by the Fund to the protection seller over the term of the CDS). However, if a credit event does occur, the Fund (as protection buyer), will deliver the Underlying Instrument to the protection seller and is entitled to a payment from the protection seller equal to the full notional value of the Underlying Instrument, even though the Underlying Instrument at that time may have little or no value. If the Fund is the protection seller and no credit event occurs, the Fund receives a fixed income throughout the term of the CDS (or an up-front payment at the beginning of the term of the CDS) in the form of payments from the protection buyer. However, if the Fund is the protection seller and a credit event occurs, the Fund is obligated to pay the protection buyer the full notional value of the Underlying Instrument in return for the Underlying Instrument (which may at that time be of little or no value).

A Fund may also invest in transactions on credit default swap indices, including CDX and iTraxx indices (collectively referred to as “CDSIs”). A CDSI is based on a portfolio of credit default swaps with similar characteristics, such as credit default swaps on high-yield bonds. In a typical CDSI transaction, one party — the protection buyer — is obligated to pay the other party — the protection seller — a stream of periodic payments over the term of the contract. If a credit event, such as a default or restructuring, occurs with respect to any of the underlying reference obligations, the protection seller must pay the protection buyer the loss on those credits. Also, if a restructuring credit event occurs in an iTraxx index, the Fund as protection buyer may receive a single name CDS contract representing the relevant constituent.

A Fund may enter into a CDSI transaction as either protection buyer or protection seller. If the Fund is a protection buyer, it would pay the counterparty a periodic stream of payments over the term of the contract and would not recover any of those payments if no credit events were to occur with respect to any of the underlying reference obligations. However, if a credit event did occur, the Fund, as a protection buyer, would have the right to deliver the referenced debt obligations or a specified amount of cash, depending on the terms of the applicable agreement, and to receive the par value of such debt obligations from the counterparty protection seller. As a protection seller, the Fund would receive fixed payments throughout the term of the contract if no credit events were to occur with respect to any of the underlying reference obligations. If a credit event were to occur, however, the value of any deliverable obligation received by the Fund, coupled with the periodic payments previously received by the Fund, may be less than the full notional value that the Fund, as a protection seller, pays to the counterparty protection buyer, effectively resulting in a loss of value to the Fund. Furthermore, as a protection seller, the Fund would effectively add leverage to its portfolio because it would have investment exposure to the notional amount of the swap transaction.

The use of CDSI, like all other swap agreements, is subject to certain risks, including the risk that a Fund’s counterparty will default on its obligations. If such a default were to occur, any contractual remedies that the Fund might have may be subject to applicable bankruptcy laws, which could delay or limit the Fund’s recovery. Thus, if the Fund’s counterparty to a CDSI transaction defaults on its obligation to make payments thereunder, the Fund may lose such payments altogether or collect only a portion thereof, which collection could involve substantial costs or delays. Certain CDSI transactions are subject to mandatory central clearing or may be eligible for voluntary central clearing. Because clearing interposes a central clearinghouse as the ultimate counterparty to each participant’s swap, central clearing is intended to decrease (but not eliminate) counterparty risk relative to uncleared bilateral swaps.

Total return swaps, asset swaps, inflation swaps and similar instruments – A Fund may enter into total return swaps, asset swaps, inflation swaps and other types of swap agreements. In a total return swap, the parties exchange the total return (i.e., interest payments plus any capital gains or losses) of an Underlying Instrument (or basket of such instruments) for the proceeds of another Underlying Instrument (or basket of such instruments). Asset swaps combine an interest rate swap with

a bond and are generally used to alter the cash flow characteristics of the Underlying Instrument. For example, the parties may exchange a fixed investment, such as a bond with guaranteed coupon payments, for a floating investment like an index. Inflation swaps are generally used to transfer inflation risk. See "Inflation-Linked Instruments Risk" herein.

Swaptions – A Fund may also enter into swap options, or “swaptions.” A swaption is a contract that gives one party the right (but not the obligation), in return for payment of the option premium, to enter into a new swap agreement or to shorten, extend, cancel or otherwise modify an existing swap agreement at some designated future time and on specified terms. A Fund may write (sell) and purchase put and call swaptions. Depending on the terms of the particular option agreement, a Fund will generally incur a greater degree of risk when it writes a swaption than it will incur when it purchases a swaption. When a Fund purchases a swaption, it risks losing only the option premium it paid should it decide not to exercise the option. When a Fund writes a swaption, however, it is obligated according to the terms of the underlying agreement if the option holder exercises the option.

Risks Associated with Swaps and Swaptions – Investing in swaps and swaptions, and utilizing these and related techniques in managing a Fund portfolio, are highly specialized activities that involve investment techniques and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio transactions. These investments involve significant risk of loss. Whether a Fund’s use of swaps will be successful in furthering its investment objective will depend on a sub-adviser’s ability to predict correctly whether certain types of investments are likely to produce greater returns than other investments. If a sub-adviser is incorrect in its forecast of market values, the sub-adviser’s utilization of swap arrangements and related techniques could negatively impact the Fund’s performance.

The swaps market is largely unregulated. It is possible that developments in the swaps market, including potential government regulation, could adversely affect a Fund’s ability to terminate existing swap agreements or to realize amounts to be received under such agreements. Also, certain restrictions imposed by the Code may limit a Fund’s ability to use swap agreements.

If the creditworthiness of a Fund’s swap counterparty declines, it becomes more likely that the counterparty will fail to meet its obligations under the contract, and consequently the Fund will suffer losses. Although there can be no assurance that a Fund will be able to do so, a Fund may be able to reduce or eliminate its exposure under a swap agreement either by assignment or other disposition, or by entering into an offsetting swap agreement with the same party or another creditworthy party. However, a Fund may have limited ability to eliminate its exposure under a credit default swap if the credit of the reference entity or underlying asset has declined. There can be no assurance that a Fund will be able to enter into swap transactions at prices or on terms a sub-adviser believes are advantageous to such Fund. In addition, although the terms of swaps, caps, collars and floors may provide for termination, there can be no assurance that a Fund will be able to terminate a swap or to sell or offset caps, collars or floors that it has purchased. Investing in swaps and related techniques involves the risks associated with investments in derivative instruments. Please see “Risk Factors in Derivative Instruments” and “Additional Risk Factors and Considerations of OTC Transactions” below.

Inflation-Linked Instruments Risk. A Fund is permitted to invest in a variety of inflation-linked instruments, such as inflation-indexed securities and inflation-linked derivatives, to manage inflation risk or to obtain inflation exposure. Inflation – a general rise in the prices of goods and services – is measured by inflation indices like the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which is calculated monthly by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the Retail Prices Index (RPI), which is calculated by the United Kingdom’s Office for National Statistics. The CPI is a measurement of changes in the cost of living, made up of components such as housing, food, transportation and energy.

Inflation-linked derivatives are derivative instruments that tie payments to an inflation index. Currently, most inflation derivatives are in the form of inflation swaps, such as CPI swaps. A CPI swap is a fixed-maturity, over-the-counter derivative where one party pays a fixed rate in exchange for payments tied to the CPI. The fixed rate, which is set by the parties at the initiation of the swap, is often referred to as the “breakeven inflation” rate and generally represents the current difference between Treasury yields and Treasury inflation protected securities (“TIPS”) yields of similar maturities at the initiation of the swap agreement. CPI swaps are typically designated as “zero coupon,” where all cash flows are exchanged at maturity. The value of a CPI swap is expected to fluctuate in response to changes in the relationship between nominal interest rates and the rate of inflation, as measured by the CPI. A CPI swap can lose value if the realized rate of inflation over the life of the swap is less than the fixed market implied inflation rate (the breakeven inflation rate) the investor agreed to pay at the initiation of the swap.

Other types of inflation derivatives include inflation options and futures. There can be no assurance that the CPI, or any foreign inflation index, will accurately measure the rate of inflation in the prices of consumer goods and services. Further, there can be no assurance that the rate of inflation in a foreign country will be correlated to the rate of inflation in the United States. Moreover, inflation-linked instruments are subject to the risks inherent in derivative transactions generally. See “Risk Factors in Derivative Instruments” herein. The market for inflation-linked instruments is still developing. Each Fund reserves the right to use the instruments discussed above and similar instruments that may be available in the future.

Hybrid Instruments Risk. A hybrid instrument is an interest in an issuer that combines the characteristics of an equity security, a debt security, a commodity and/or a derivative. For example, an oil company might issue a commodity-linked bond that pays a fixed level of interest plus additional interest that accrues in correlation with the extent to which oil prices exceed a certain predetermined level. This is a hybrid instrument combining a bond with an option on oil.

Depending on the types and terms of hybrid instruments, they present risks that may be similar to, different from or greater than those associated with more traditional investments with similar characteristics. Hybrid instruments are potentially more volatile than more traditional investments and, depending on the structure of the particular hybrid, may expose a Fund to additional leverage and liquidity risks. Moreover, the purchase of hybrids exposes a Fund to the credit risk of the issuers of the hybrids. Described below are certain hybrid instruments a Fund may use in seeking to achieve its investment objective. Each Fund reserves the right to use the instruments mentioned below and similar instruments that may be available in the future.

Credit-Linked Securities Risk. Credit-linked securities are issued by a limited purpose trust or other vehicle that, in turn, invests in a basket of derivative instruments, such as credit default swaps, interest rate swaps and other securities. Investments in credit-linked securities normally consist of the right to receive periodic payments during the term and payment of principal at the end of the term. However, these payments depend on the issuer’s own investments in derivative instruments and are, accordingly, subject to the risks associated with derivative instruments, which include volatility, illiquidity and counterparty risk.

Indexed Securities and Structured Notes Risk. Indexed securities are derivative securities the interest rate or principal of which is determined by an unrelated indicator (e.g., a currency, security, commodity or index). Structured notes are debt indexed securities. Indexed securities implicate a high degree of leverage, which magnifies the potential for gain and the risk of loss, when they include a multiplier that multiplies the indexed element by a specific factor.

Structured notes and indexed securities can be very volatile investments because, depending on how they are structured, their value may either increase or decrease in response to the value of the Underlying Instruments. The terms of these securities may also provide that in some instances no principal is due at maturity, which may result in a loss of invested capital. These instruments also may entail a greater degree of market risk than other types of securities because the investor bears the risk not only of the instrument but also of the unrelated indicator. Indexed securities may involve significant credit risk and liquidity risk and, as with other sophisticated strategies, a Fund’s use of these instruments may not work as intended.

Event-Linked Bonds Risk. A Fund may invest in “event-linked bonds” (or “catastrophe bonds”). The event-linked bond market is a growing sector of the global fixed income market that provides investors with high return potentials in exchange for taking on “event risk,” such as the risk of a major hurricane, earthquake or pandemic. If such trigger event occurs, a Fund may lose a portion or its entire principal invested in the bond. Some event-linked bonds provide for an extension of maturity to process and audit loss claims if a trigger has, or possibly has, occurred. Such extension may increase volatility. Event-linked bonds may also expose a Fund to other unanticipated risks including credit risk, counterparty risk, liquidity risk, adverse regulatory or jurisdictional interpretations and adverse tax consequences. Event-linked bonds are subject to the risks inherent in derivative transactions. See “Risk Factors in Derivative Instruments” below.

Foreign Currency Transactions Risk. A Fund also may purchase and sell foreign currency options and foreign currency futures contracts and futures options, and they may engage in foreign currency transactions either on a spot (cash) basis at prevailing currency exchange rates or through forward currency contracts. A Fund may engage in these transactions to hedge, directly or indirectly, against currency fluctuations, for other investment purposes and/or to seek to enhance returns. A Fund may enter into currency transactions only with counterparties that a sub-adviser deems to be creditworthy. Certain of the foreign currency transactions the Funds may use are described below.

Forward Currency Contracts – A Fund may enter into forward currency contracts (“forwards”) in connection with settling purchases or sales of securities, to hedge the currency exposure associated with some or all of the Fund’s investments or as part of its investment strategy. Forwards are contracts to purchase or sell a specified amount of a specified currency or multinational currency unit at a set price or to make a cash settlement payment on a future date. The market value of a forward fluctuates with changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Forwards are marked to market daily based upon foreign currency exchange rates from an independent pricing service, and the change in value is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. Forwards are highly volatile, involve substantial currency risk and may also involve credit and liquidity risks.

A Fund may use a forward in a “settlement hedge,” or “transaction hedge,” to lock in the U.S. dollar price on the purchase or sale of securities denominated in a foreign currency between the time when the security is purchased or sold and the time at which payment is received. Forward contracts on foreign currency may also be used by a Fund in anticipation generally of the Fund’s making investments denominated in a foreign currency, even if the specific investments have not yet been selected by a sub-adviser.

In a “position hedge,” a Fund uses a forward contract to hedge against a decline in the value of existing investments denominated in foreign currency. For example, a Fund may enter into a forward contract to sell Japanese yen in return for U.S. dollars in order to hedge against a possible decline in the yen’s value. Position hedges tend to offset both positive and

negative currency fluctuations. Alternately, a Fund could hedge its position by selling another currency expected to perform similarly to the Japanese yen. This is called a “proxy hedge” and may offer advantages in terms of cost, yield or efficiency. However, proxy hedges may result in losses if the currency used to hedge does not move in tandem with the currency in which the hedged securities are denominated.

A Fund may also engage in cross-hedging by entering into forward contracts in one currency against a different currency. Cross-hedging may be used to limit or increase exposure to a particular currency or to establish active exposure to the exchange rate between the two currencies.

Options on foreign currencies are affected by the factors that influence foreign exchange rates and investments generally. A Fund’s ability to establish and close out positions on foreign currency options is subject to the maintenance of a liquid secondary market, and there can be no assurance that a liquid secondary market will exist for a particular option at any specific time.

Forward Rate Agreements – A Fund may also enter into forward rate agreements. Under a forward rate agreement, the buyer locks in an interest rate at a future settlement date. If the interest rate on the settlement date exceeds the lock rate, the buyer pays the seller the difference between the two rates. If the lock rate exceeds the interest rate on the settlement date, the seller pays the buyer the difference between the two rates. Any such gain received by a Fund would be taxable. These instruments may be traded in the OTC market. These transactions involve risks, including counterparty risk. See “Risk Factors in Derivative Instruments” below.

Currency Swaps, Options and Futures – In order to protect against currency fluctuations and for other investment purposes, a Fund may enter into currency swaps, options and futures. Options on foreign currencies are affected by the factors that influence foreign exchange rates and investments generally. A Fund’s ability to establish and close out positions on foreign currency options is subject to the maintenance of a liquid secondary market, and there can be no assurance that a liquid secondary market will exist for a particular option at any specific time. See “Swap Agreements and Swaptions Risk – Currency Swaps,” “Options Contracts Risk,” and “Futures Contracts and Options on Futures Contracts Risk” herein.

Additional Risks Associated with Foreign Currency Transactions – It is extremely difficult to forecast currency market movements, and whether any hedging or other investment strategy will be successful is highly uncertain. Further, it is impossible to forecast with precision the market value of portfolio securities at the expiration of a foreign currency forward. Therefore, a Fund may be required to buy or sell additional currency on the spot market (and bear the expense of such transaction) if a sub-adviser’s predictions regarding the movement of foreign currency or securities markets prove inaccurate. To the extent a Fund hedges against anticipated currency movements that do not occur, the Fund may realize losses and reduce its total return as a result of its hedging transactions. It is impossible to hedge fully or perfectly against the effects of currency fluctuations on the value of non-U.S. securities because currency movements impact the value of different securities in differing degrees. Foreign currency transactions, like currency exchange rates, can be affected unpredictably by intervention (or the failure to intervene) by U.S. or foreign governments or central banks, or by currency controls or political developments. Such events may prevent or restrict a Fund’s ability to enter into foreign currency transactions, force a Fund to exit a foreign currency transaction at a disadvantageous time or price or result in penalties for the Fund, any of which may result in a loss to the Fund.

A Fund may buy or sell foreign currency options either on exchanges or in the OTC market. Foreign currency transactions on foreign exchanges may not be regulated to the same extent as similar transactions in the United States, may not involve a clearing mechanism and related guarantees and are subject to the risk of governmental actions affecting trading in, or the prices of, foreign securities. The value of such positions also could be adversely affected by (i) other complex foreign political, legal and economic factors, (ii) lesser availability than in the United States of data on which to make trading decisions, (iii) delays in a Fund’s ability to act upon economic events occurring in foreign markets during non-business hours in the United States, (iv) the imposition of different exercise and settlement terms and procedures and margin requirements than in the United States and (v) lesser trading volume. Foreign currency transactions are also subject to the risks inherent in investments in foreign markets. Please see “Foreign Investments Risk” below.

Risk Factors in Derivative Instruments. Derivatives are volatile and involve significant risks, including:

Correlation Risk – the risk that changes in the value of a derivative instrument will not match the changes in the value of the Fund holdings that are being hedged.

Counterparty Risk – the risk that the party on the other side of an OTC derivatives contract or a borrower of a Fund’s securities may be unable or unwilling to make timely principal, interest or settlement payments, or otherwise to honor its obligations.

Credit Risk – the risk that the issuer of a security will not be able to make timely principal and interest payments. Changes in an issuer’s credit rating or the market’s perception of an issuer’s creditworthiness may affect the value of a Fund’s investment in and/or exposure to that issuer. The degree of credit risk depends on both the financial condition of the issuer and the terms of the obligation.

Currency Risk – the risk that changes in the exchange rate between currencies will adversely affect the value (in U.S. dollar terms) of an investment.

Index Risk – in respect of index-linked derivatives, the risks associated with changes in the underlying indices. If an underlying index changes, a Fund may receive lower interest payments or experience a reduction in the value of the derivative to below what the Fund paid. Certain indexed securities, including inverse securities (which move in an opposite direction from the reference index), may create leverage to the extent that they increase or decrease in value at a rate that is a multiple of the changes in the applicable index.

Interest Rate Risk – the risk that the value of an investment may decrease when interest rates rise because when interest rates rise, the prices of bonds and fixed rate loans fall. Generally, the longer the maturity of a bond or fixed rate loan, the more sensitive it is to this risk (interest rate risk is commonly measured by a fixed income investment’s duration). Falling interest rates also create the potential for a decline in a Fund’s income.

Leverage Risk – the risk associated with certain types of investments or trading strategies (for example, borrowing money to increase the amount being invested) that relatively small market movements may result in large changes in the value of an investment. Certain investments or trading strategies that involve leverage can result in losses that substantially exceed the amount originally invested.

Liquidity Risk – the risk that certain securities may be difficult or impossible to sell at the time that the seller would like to sell them or at the price the seller believes the security is currently worth.

Short Position Risk – A Fund may also take a short position in a derivative instrument, such as a future, forward or swap. A short position in a derivative instrument involves the risk of a theoretically unlimited increase in the value of the underlying instrument which could cause a Fund to suffer a (potentially unlimited) loss.

The potential loss on derivative instruments may be substantial relative to the initial investment therein. A Fund incurs transaction costs in opening and closing positions in derivative instruments. There can be no assurance that the use of derivative instruments will be advantageous.

Recent SEC Regulatory Change - In late October 2020, the SEC adopted new Rule 18f-4 related to the use of derivatives and certain other transactions by registered investment companies that will, at the time of the compliance date on August 18, 2022, rescind and withdraw the guidance of the SEC and the SEC staff regarding asset segregation and coverage. Under Rule 18f-4, each Fund will need to trade derivatives and other transactions that potentially create senior securities (except reverse repurchase agreements) subject to a value-at-risk (“VaR”) leverage limit, certain other testing and derivatives risk management program requirements and requirements related to board reporting. These new requirements will apply unless a Fund qualifies as a “limited derivatives user,” as defined in Rule 18f-4. Reverse repurchase agreements will continue to be subject to the current asset coverage requirements, and a Fund trading reverse repurchase agreements will need to aggregate the amount of indebtedness associated with the reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions with the aggregate amount of any other senior securities representing indebtedness when calculating the Fund’s asset coverage ratio (unless the Fund determines to treat such agreements and transactions as derivatives for all purposes under the rule). Reverse repurchase agreements will not be included in the calculation of whether a Fund is a limited derivatives user (unless the Fund determines to treat such agreements and transactions as derivatives for all purposes under the rule), but if the Fund is subject to the VaR testing, reverse repurchase agreements and similar financing transactions will be included for purposes of such testing. The SEC also provided guidance in connection with the new rule regarding the use of securities lending collateral that may limit the Funds' securities lending activities. Compliance with these new requirements will be required after an eighteen-month transition period in August 2022. Following the compliance date, these new requirements may limit a Fund’s ability to use derivatives and reverse repurchase agreements and similar financing transactions as part of the Fund’s investment strategies. These new requirements may increase the cost of a Fund’s investments and cost of doing business, which could adversely affect investors.

Additional Risk Factors and Considerations of OTC Transactions. Certain derivatives traded in OTC markets, including swaps, OTC options and indexed securities, involve substantial liquidity risk. This risk may be increased in times of financial stress if the trading market for OTC derivatives contracts or otherwise becomes restricted. The absence of liquidity may make it difficult or impossible for a Fund to ascertain a market value for such instruments and/or to sell them promptly and at an acceptable price.

Because derivatives traded in OTC markets are not guaranteed by an exchange or clearing corporation, to the extent that a Fund has unrealized gains in such instruments or has deposited collateral with its counterparty, the Fund is at risk that its counterparty will become bankrupt or otherwise fail to honor its obligations. The counterparty’s failure to honor its obligations would result in the loss of any premium paid by a Fund as well as the loss of any expected benefit of the transaction. Certain swaps traded in the OTC markets require exchange of variation margin payments between the parties, which can reduce but does not eliminate counterparty

credit risk. In addition, closing transactions can be made for OTC options only by negotiating directly with the counterparty or effecting a transaction in the secondary market (if any such market exists). There can be no assurance that a Fund will in fact be able to close out an OTC option position at a favorable price prior to expiration. In the event of insolvency of the counterparty, a Fund might be unable to close out an OTC option at any time prior to its expiration, if at all.

DIVIDEND RISK. Income provided by a Fund may be affected by changes in the dividend policies of the companies in which the Fund invests and the capital resources available for such payments at such companies. Issuers that have paid regular dividends or distributions to shareholders may not continue to do so at the same level or at all in the future. In addition, securities that pay dividends as a group can fall out of favor with the market, causing a Fund to underperform funds that do not focus on dividends. A Fund’s focus on dividend yielding investments may cause the Fund’s share price and total return to fluctuate more than the share price and total return of funds that do not focus their investments on dividend paying securities.

DOLLAR ROLLS RISK. A Fund may enter into “dollar rolls” in which a Fund sells securities for delivery in the current month and simultaneously contracts with the same counterparty to repurchase substantially similar (same type, coupon and maturity) but not identical securities on a specified future date. A Fund gives up the right to receive principal and interest paid on the securities sold. However, a Fund would benefit to the extent that the price received for the securities sold is higher than the forward price for the future purchase plus any fee income received. Unless such benefits exceed the income and capital appreciation that would have been realized on the securities sold as part of the dollar roll, the use of this technique would adversely affect the Fund’s investment performance. The benefits derived from the use of dollar rolls may depend, among other things, upon the ability of a Fund’s sub-adviser to predict interest rates correctly. There can be no assurance that dollar rolls can be successfully employed. In addition, if a Fund uses dollar rolls while remaining substantially fully invested, the amount of a Fund’s assets that are subject to market risk would exceed such Fund’s net asset value, which could result in increased volatility of the price of the Fund’s shares. Further, entering into dollar rolls involves potential risks that are different from those related to the securities underlying the transactions. For example, if the counterparty becomes insolvent, a Fund’s right to purchase from the counterparty may be restricted. Also, the value of the underlying security may change adversely before a Fund is able to purchase it, or a Fund may be required to purchase securities in connection with a dollar roll at a higher price than may be otherwise available on the open market. Further, because the counterparty may deliver a similar, but not identical, security, a Fund may be required to buy a security under the dollar roll that may be of less value than an identical security would have been.

EQUITY RISK. Equity securities represent an ownership interest, or the right to acquire an ownership interest, in a company. Equity securities include but are not limited to common stock, preferred stock, securities convertible into common or preferred stock and warrants or rights to acquire common stock, including options. The value of an equity security may be based on the real or perceived success or failure of the particular company’s business, any income paid to stockholders in the form of a dividend, the value of the company’s assets, general market conditions, or investor sentiment generally. Equity securities may have greater price volatility than other types of investments. These risks are generally magnified in the case of equity investments in distressed companies.

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies Risk – A Fund may invest in special purpose acquisition companies (“SPACs”) or similar special purpose entities. SPACs are collective investment structures that pool funds in order to seek potential acquisition opportunities. SPACs and similar entities may be blank check companies with no operating history or ongoing business other than to seek a potential acquisition. Because SPACs and similar entities have no operating history or ongoing business other than seeking acquisitions, the value of their securities is particularly dependent on the ability of the entity’s management to identify and complete a profitable acquisition. Some SPACs may pursue acquisitions only within certain industries or regions, which may increase the volatility of their securities’ prices. In addition, these securities, which are typically traded in the OTC market, may be considered illiquid and/or be subject to restrictions on resale.

ESG INTEGRATION AND ESG CONSIDERATION RISK. The ESG characteristics that may be evaluated as part of a Fund’s investment process are anticipated to evolve over time and one or more characteristics may not be relevant with respect to all issuers that are eligible for investment. The relevance and weightings of specific ESG characteristics to the investment process varies across asset classes, sectors and strategies. With respect to a Fund that integrates or may consider ESG characteristics as part of the investment process, ESG characteristics are not the only factors that may be considered by the portfolio manager(s) and as a result, the companies (or issuers) in which a Fund invests may not be companies (or issuers) with favorable ESG characteristics or high ESG ratings. ESG characteristics may be evaluated differently by different portfolio manager(s) and may not carry the same meaning to all investors and portfolio manager(s). While the portfolio manager(s) believe that the integration or consideration of material ESG characteristics into a Fund’s investment process has the potential to identify financial risks and contribute to a Fund’s long-term performance, there is no guarantee that the integration or consideration of ESG characteristics will result in better performance. Investors can differ in their views of what constitutes positive or negative ESG characteristics. Further, the regulatory landscape with respect to ESG investing in the United States is still developing and future rules and regulations may require a Fund to modify or alter its investment process with respect to ESG integration or consideration.

EXCHANGE-TRADED FUNDS (ETFs) RISK. ETFs are registered investment companies that trade their shares on stock exchanges (such as the NYSE Arca, Cboe BZX, and NASDAQ) at market prices (rather than net asset value) and only are redeemable from the fund itself in large increments or in exchange for baskets of securities. As an exchange traded security, an ETF’s shares are priced continuously and trade throughout the day. ETFs may track a securities index, a particular market sector, a particular segment of a securities index or market sector, or they may be actively managed. An investment in an ETF generally implicates the following risks: (i) the same primary risks as an investment in a fund that is not exchange-traded that has the same investment objectives, strategies and policies of the ETF; (ii) the risk that the ETF may fail to accurately track the market segment or index that underlies its investment objective; (iii) the risk that, to the extent the ETF does not fully replicate the underlying index, the ETF’s investment strategy may not produce the intended results; (iv) the risk of more frequent price fluctuations due to secondary market trading, which may result in a loss to the Fund; (v) the risk that an ETF may trade at a price that is lower than its net asset value; and (vi) the risk that an active market for the ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained. Also, a Fund will indirectly pay a proportional share of the asset-based fees of the ETFs in which it invests. ETFs are also subject to specific risks depending on the nature of the ETF, such as liquidity risk, sector risk and foreign and emerging market risk, as well as risks associated with fixed income securities, real estate investments and commodities. An investment in an ETF presents the risk that the ETF may no longer meet the listing requirements of any applicable exchanges on which the ETF is listed. Further, trading in an ETF may be halted if the trading in one or more of the securities held by an ETF is halted. A Fund may pay brokerage commissions in connection with the purchase and sale of shares of ETFs. Please see “Other Investment Companies Risk” below.

EXCHANGE-TRADED NOTES (ETNs) RISK. ETNs are a type of unsecured, unsubordinated debt security that have characteristics and risks, including credit risk, similar to those of fixed-income securities and trade on a major exchange similar to shares of ETFs. Unlike other types of fixed income securities, however, the performance of ETNs is based upon that of a market index or other reference asset minus fees and expenses, no coupon payments are made and no principal protection exists. The value of an ETN may be affected by time to maturity, level of supply and demand for the ETN, volatility and lack of liquidity in underlying commodities or securities markets, changes in the applicable interest rates, changes in the issuer’s credit rating and economic, legal, political or geographic events that affect the referenced commodity or security. A Fund’s ability to sell its ETN holdings also may be limited by the availability of a secondary market and a Fund may have to sell such holdings at a discount. ETNs also are subject to counterparty credit risk, fixed-income risk and tracking error risk (where the ETN’s performance may not match or correlate to that of its market index). ETNs also incur certain expenses not incurred by their applicable index.

EVENT RISK. Event risk is the risk that corporate issuers may undergo restructurings, such as mergers, leveraged buyouts, takeovers or similar events financed by the issuer’s taking on additional debt. As a result of the added debt, the credit quality and market value of a company’s bonds and/or other debt securities may decline significantly.

FIXED INCOME SECURITIES RISK. A Fund is permitted to invest in fixed income securities including, but not limited to: (1) securities issued or guaranteed as to principal or interest by the U.S. Government, its agencies or instrumentalities; (2) non-convertible debt securities issued or guaranteed by U.S. corporations or other issuers (including foreign issuers); (3) asset-backed securities; (4) mortgage-related securities, including collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”); (5) securities issued or guaranteed as to principal or interest by a foreign issuer, including supranational entities such as development banks, non-U.S. corporations, banks or bank holding companies or other foreign issuers; (6) commercial mortgage-backed securities; and (7) other capital securities issued or guaranteed by U.S. corporations or other issuers (including foreign issuers).

FOCUSED PORTFOLIO RISK. A Fund, because it may invest in a limited number of companies, may have more volatility in its NAV and may be considered to have more risk than a fund that invests in a greater number of companies because changes in the value of a single security may have a more significant effect, either negative or positive, on the Fund’s NAV. To the extent a Fund invests its assets in fewer securities, the Fund is subject to greater risk of loss if any of those securities decline in price.

FOREIGN INVESTMENTS RISK. A Fund may invest in foreign issuers and borrowers, which include: (1) companies organized outside of the United States, including in emerging market countries; (2) foreign sovereign governments and their agencies, authorities, instrumentalities and political subdivisions, including foreign states, provinces or municipalities; and (3) issuers and borrowers whose economic fortunes and risks are primarily linked with markets outside the United States. These securities may be denominated or quoted in, or pay income in, U.S. dollars or in a foreign currency. Certain companies organized outside the United States may not be deemed to be foreign issuers or borrowers if the issuer’s or borrower’s economic fortunes and risks are primarily linked with U.S. markets.

Investing in securities of foreign issuers and loans to foreign borrowers involves considerations and potential risks not typically associated with investing in obligations issued by U.S. entities. Less information may be available about foreign entities compared with U.S. entities. For example, foreign issuers and borrowers generally are not subject to uniform accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards or to other regulatory practices and requirements comparable to those applicable to U.S. issuers and borrowers. In addition, prices of foreign securities may fluctuate more than prices of securities traded in the United States. Other potential foreign market risks include difficulties in pricing securities, defaults on foreign government securities, difficulties

in enforcing favorable legal judgments in foreign courts and political and social conditions, such as diplomatic relations, confiscatory taxation, expropriation, limitation on the removal of funds or assets or imposition of (or change in) exchange control regulations. Legal remedies available to investors in certain foreign countries may be less extensive than those available to investors in the United States or other foreign countries. In addition, changes in government administrations or economic or monetary policies in the United States or abroad could result in appreciation or depreciation of portfolio securities. Any of these actions could severely affect security prices, impair a Fund’s ability to purchase or sell foreign securities or transfer the Fund’s assets or income back into the United States, or otherwise adversely affect a Fund’s operations.

Geopolitical and other events (e.g., wars, military conflicts, terrorism or natural disasters) may disrupt securities markets and adversely affect global economies and markets, thereby decreasing the value of a Fund’s investments. Such developments could lead to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on world economies and markets generally. Those events as well as other changes in regional economic and political conditions could adversely affect individual issuers or related groups of issuers, securities markets, interest rates, credit ratings, inflation, investor sentiment, and other factors affecting the value of a Fund’s investments. For example, the imposition of sanctions, exchange controls (including repatriation restrictions), confiscations, trade restrictions (including tariffs) and other government restrictions by the United States and other governments, or from problems in share registration, settlement or custody, may also result in losses. The type and severity of sanctions and other similar measures, including counter sanctions and other retaliatory actions, that may be imposed could vary broadly in scope, and their impact is impossible to predict. These types of measures may include, but are not limited to, banning a sanctioned country from global payment systems that facilitate cross-border payments, restricting the settlement of securities transactions by certain investors, and freezing the assets of particular countries, entities, or persons. The imposition of sanctions and other similar measures could, among other things, cause a decline in the value and/or liquidity of securities issued by the sanctioned country or companies located in or economically tied to the sanctioned country, downgrades in the credit ratings of the sanctioned country or companies located in or economically tied to the sanctioned country, devaluation of the sanctioned country’s currency, and increased market volatility and disruption in the sanctioned country and throughout the world. Sanctions and other similar measures could limit or prevent a Fund from buying and selling securities (in the sanctioned country and other markets), significantly delay or prevent the settlement of securities transactions, and significantly impact a Fund’s liquidity and performance. Given the increasing interdependence among global economies and markets, conditions in one country, market, or region might adversely affect markets, issuers, and/or foreign exchange rates in other countries. Please see “Regional/Country Focus Risk” below, which sets forth additional information regarding risks associated with investing in certain geographic regions and countries.

Currency Risk and Exchange Risk. Because foreign securities generally are denominated and pay dividends or interest in foreign currencies, the value of a Fund that invests in foreign securities as measured in U.S. dollars will be affected by changes in exchange rates. Please see “Currency Risk” above.

Principal Exchange Rate Linked Securities Risk. Principal exchange rate linked securities (“PERLs”) are debt obligations the principal on which is payable at maturity in an amount that may vary based on the exchange rate between the U.S. Dollar and a particular foreign currency at or about that time. The return on “standard” PERLs is enhanced if the foreign currency to which the security is linked appreciates against the U.S. dollar, and is adversely affected by increases in the foreign exchange value of the U.S. dollar; “reverse” PERLs are like the “standard” securities, except that their return is enhanced by increases in the value of the U.S. dollar and adversely impacted by increases in the value of foreign currency. Interest payments on the securities are generally made in U.S. dollars at rates that reflect the degree of foreign currency risk assumed or given up by the purchaser of the notes (i.e., at relatively higher interest rates if the purchaser has assumed some of the foreign exchange risk, or relatively lower interest rates if the issuer has assumed some of the foreign exchange risk, based on the expectations of the current market). PERLs may in limited cases be subject to acceleration of maturity (generally, not without the consent of the holders of the securities), which may have an adverse impact on the value of the principal payment to be made at maturity.

Performance Indexed Paper Risk. Performance indexed paper (“PIPs”) is U.S. dollar-denominated commercial paper the yield of which is linked to certain foreign exchange rate movements. The yield to the investor on PIPs is established at maturity as a function of spot exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and a designated currency as of or about that time (generally, the index maturity two days prior to maturity). The yield to the investor will be within a range stipulated at the time of purchase of the obligation, generally with a guaranteed minimum rate of return that is below, and a potential maximum rate of return that is above, market yields on U.S. dollar-denominated commercial paper, with both the minimum and maximum rates of return on the investment corresponding to the minimum and maximum values of the spot exchange rate two business days prior to maturity.

Settlement Risk. Settlement and clearance procedures in certain foreign markets differ significantly from those in the United States. Foreign settlement procedures and trade regulations may involve certain risks (such as delays in payment for or delivery of securities) not typically generated in the settlement of U.S. investments. Settlements in certain foreign countries at times have not kept pace with the number of securities transactions being undertaken; these problems may make it difficult for a Fund to carry out transactions. If a Fund cannot settle or is delayed in settling a purchase of securities, it may miss attractive investment opportunities and certain of its assets may remain uninvested with no return earned thereon for some period. There may also be the danger that, because of uncertainties in the operation of settlement systems in individual markets, competing claims may arise in respect

of securities held by or to be transferred to a Fund. Further, compensation schemes may be non-existent, limited or inadequate to meet a Fund’s claims in any of these events. In connection with any of these events, and other similar circumstances, a Fund may experience losses because of failures of or defects in settlement systems.

There are additional and magnified risks involved with investments in emerging or developing markets, which may exhibit greater price volatility and risk of principal, have less liquidity and have settlement arrangements that are less efficient than in developed markets. In addition, the economies of emerging market countries generally are heavily dependent on international trade and, accordingly, have been and may continue to be adversely affected by trade barriers, managed adjustments in relative currency values and other protectionist measures imposed or negotiated by the countries with which they trade. Emerging market economies also have been and may continue to be adversely affected by economic conditions in the countries with which they trade. See “Investments in Emerging Market Securities” below.

GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION IN FINANCIAL MARKETS RISK. Governmental and quasi-governmental authorities and regulators throughout the world have in the past responded to major economic disruptions with a variety of significant fiscal and monetary policy changes, including but not limited to, direct capital infusions into companies, new monetary programs and dramatically lower interest rates. For example, in response to the outbreak of COVID-19, the U.S. Government passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) into law in March 2020 and the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (the "Rescue Act") into law in March 2021. There can be no guarantee that the CARES Act, the Rescue Act or other economic stimulus bills (within the United States or other affected countries throughout the world) will be sufficient or will have their intended effect. In addition, an unexpected or quick reversal of such policies could increase volatility in securities markets, which could adversely affect a Fund’s investments.

In addition, instability in the financial markets during and after the 2008-2009 financial downturn also led the U.S. Government and governments across the world to take a number of actions designed to support certain financial institutions and segments of the financial markets that experienced extreme volatility, and in some cases a lack of liquidity. Most significantly, the U.S. Government has enacted a broad-reaching regulatory framework over the financial services industry and consumer credit markets. Federal, state, and other governments, their regulatory agencies, or self-regulatory organizations may take actions that affect the regulation of the instruments in which a Fund invests, or the issuers of such instruments, in ways that are unforeseeable. Legislation or regulation may also change the way in which a Fund itself is regulated. Such legislation or regulation could limit or preclude a Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objective.

Governments or their agencies may also acquire distressed assets from financial institutions and acquire ownership interests in those institutions. The implications of government ownership and disposition of these assets are unclear, and such a program may have positive or negative effects on the liquidity, valuation and performance of a Fund’s portfolio holdings. Furthermore, volatile financial markets can expose a Fund to greater market and liquidity risk and potential difficulty in valuing portfolio instruments held by the Fund. Each Fund has established procedures to assess the liquidity of portfolio holdings and to value instruments for which market prices may not be readily available. HFMC and the sub-adviser(s), as applicable, will monitor developments and seek to manage the Funds in a manner consistent with achieving each Fund’s investment objective, but there can be no assurance that they will be successful in doing so.

The value of a Fund’s holdings is also generally subject to the risk of future local, national, or global economic disturbances based on unknown weaknesses in the markets in which a Fund invests. In the event of such a disturbance, issuers of securities held by a Fund may experience significant declines in the value of their assets and even cease operations, or may receive government assistance accompanied by increased restrictions on their business operations or other government intervention. In addition, it is not certain that the U.S. Government will intervene in response to a future market disturbance and the effect of any such future intervention cannot be predicted. It is difficult for issuers to prepare for the impact of future financial downturns, although companies can seek to identify and manage future uncertainties through risk management programs.

GROWTH INVESTING STYLE RISK. Growth companies are companies whose earnings and stock prices are expected to grow at a faster rate than the overall market. The price of a growth company’s stock may decrease, or may not increase to the level anticipated by a sub-adviser. Growth companies are often newer or smaller companies, or established companies that may be entering a growth cycle in their business. Growth stocks may be more volatile than other stocks because they are more sensitive to investors’ perceptions of the issuing company’s growth potential. Also, the growth investing style may over time go in and out of favor. At times when the growth investing style is out of favor, the Fund may underperform other equity funds that use different investing styles.

HEALTHCARE-RELATED SECURITIES RISK. Many healthcare-related companies are smaller and less seasoned than companies in other sectors. Healthcare-related companies may also be strongly affected by scientific or technological developments, and their products may quickly become obsolete. The profitability of healthcare-related companies may be affected by extensive government regulation, restrictions on government reimbursement for medical expenses, rising or falling costs of medical products and services, pricing pressure, an increased emphasis on outpatient services, a limited number of products, industry innovation, changes in technologies and other market developments. Many healthcare companies are heavily dependent on patent protection and the actual or perceived safety and efficiency of their products. Patents have a limited duration, and, upon expiration, other companies

may market substantially similar “generic” products that are typically sold at a lower price than the patented product, which can cause the original developer of the product to lose market share and/or reduce the price charged for the product, resulting in lower profits for the original developer. As a result, the expiration of patents may adversely affect the profitability of these companies.

Many healthcare companies are subject to extensive litigation based on product liability and similar claims. Further, many healthcare-related companies offer products and services that are subject to governmental regulation and may be adversely affected by changes in governmental policies or laws. Changes in governmental policies or laws may span a wide range of topics, including cost control, national health insurance, incentives for compensation in the provision of healthcare services, tax incentives and penalties related to healthcare insurance premiums, and promotion of prepaid healthcare plans. In addition, a number of legislative proposals concerning healthcare have been considered by the U.S. Congress in recent years. It is unclear what proposals will ultimately be enacted, if any, and what effect they may have on companies in the healthcare sector. Many new products in the healthcare sector may be subject to regulatory approvals. The process of obtaining such approvals may be long and costly, which can result in increased development costs, delayed cost recovery and loss of competitive advantage to the extent that rival companies have developed competing products or procedures, adversely affecting the company’s revenues and profitability. In other words, delays in the regulatory approval process may diminish the opportunity for a company to profit from a new product or to bring a new product to market, which could have a material adverse effect on a company’s business.

Healthcare companies are subject to competitive forces that may make it difficult to raise prices and, in fact, may result in price discounting. Additionally, the expansion of facilities by healthcare-related providers may be subject to “determinations of need” by certain government authorities. This process not only generally increases the time and costs involved in these expansions, but also makes expansion plans uncertain, limiting the revenue and profitability growth potential of healthcare-related facilities operators and negatively affecting the prices of their securities. Moreover, in recent years, both local and national governmental budgets have come under pressure to reduce spending and control healthcare costs, which could both adversely affect regulatory processes and public funding available for healthcare products, services and facilities.

HIGH YIELD INVESTMENTS (“JUNK BONDS”) RISK. Unless stated otherwise in a Fund’s prospectus, any security or loan with a long-term credit rating of “Ba” or lower by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), “BB” or lower by Standard and Poor’s Corporation (“S&P”) or “BB” or lower by Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”), as well as any security or loan that is unrated but determined by a sub-adviser to be of comparable quality, is below investment grade.

Securities and bank loans rated below investment grade are commonly referred to as “high yield-high risk debt securities,” “junk bonds,” “leveraged loans” or “emerging market debt,” as the case may be. Each rating category has within it different gradations or sub-categories. Descriptions of the debt securities and bank loans ratings system, including the speculative characteristics attributable to each ratings category, are set forth in Appendix B to this SAI.

Although junk bonds generally pay higher rates of interest than investment grade bonds, junk bonds are high risk investments that may cause income and principal losses for a Fund. Junk bonds may be issued by less creditworthy issuers. Issuers of junk bonds may have a larger amount of outstanding debt relative to their assets than issuers of investment grade bonds. In the event of an issuer’s bankruptcy, claims of other creditors may have priority over the claims of junk bond holders, leaving few or no assets available to repay junk bond holders. Junk bonds are also subject to extreme price fluctuations. Adverse changes in an issuer’s industry and general economic conditions may have a greater impact on the prices of junk bonds than on other higher rated fixed income securities. Further, issuers of junk bonds may be unable to meet their interest or principal payment obligations because of an economic downturn, specific issuer developments or the unavailability of additional financing.

In addition, junk bonds frequently have redemption features that permit an issuer to repurchase the security before it matures. If an issuer redeems junk bonds owned by a Fund, the Fund may have to invest the proceeds in bonds with lower yields and may lose income. Junk bonds may also be less liquid than higher rated fixed income securities, even under normal economic conditions. Moreover, there are relatively few dealers in the junk bond market, and there may be significant differences among these dealers’ price quotes. Because they are less liquid, judgment may play a greater role in valuing these securities than is the case with securities that trade in a more liquid market.

A Fund may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting issuer. The credit rating of a junk bond does not necessarily take into account its market value risk. Ratings and market value may change from time to time, positively or negatively, to reflect new developments regarding the issuer. These securities and bank loans generally entail greater risk (including the possibility of default or bankruptcy of the issuer), involve greater volatility of price and risk to principal and income and may be less liquid than securities and bank loans in higher rating categories. Securities and bank loans in the highest category below investment grade are considered to be of poor standing and predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the obligations. As such, these investments often have reduced values that, in turn, negatively impact the value of the Fund’s shares. If a security or bank loan is downgraded to a rating category that does not qualify for investment, a sub-adviser will use its discretion on whether to hold or sell based upon its opinion on the best method to maximize value for shareholders over the long term.

Distressed Securities Risk. A Fund may invest in debt securities issued by companies that are involved in reorganizations, financial restructurings or bankruptcy. Investments in such distressed securities are speculative and involve substantial risks in addition to the risks of investing in junk bonds. A Fund will generally not receive interest payments on the distressed securities and may incur costs to protect its investment. In addition, distressed securities involve the substantial risk that principal will not be repaid. These securities may present a substantial risk of default or may be in default at the time of investment. A Fund may incur additional expenses to the extent it is required to seek recovery upon a default in the payment of principal of or interest on its portfolio holdings. In any reorganization or liquidation proceeding relating to a portfolio company, a Fund may lose its entire investment or may be required to accept cash or securities, including equity securities, with a value less than its original investment. Distressed securities and any securities received in an exchange for such securities may be subject to restrictions on resale, and sales may be possible only at substantial discounts. Distressed securities and any securities received in exchange for such securities may also be difficult to value and/or liquidate.

ILLIQUID INVESTMENTS RISK. An illiquid investment means an investment that a Fund reasonably expects cannot be sold or disposed of in current market conditions within seven calendar days without the sale or disposition significantly changing the market value of the investment, as determined under the Fund's liquidity risk management program. A Fund may not be able to sell illiquid securities or other investments when a sub-adviser considers it desirable to do so or may have to sell such securities or other investments at a price that is lower than the price that could be obtained if the securities or other investments were more liquid. Illiquid investments also may be more difficult to value due to the lack of reliable market quotations for such securities or investments, and investments in them may have an adverse impact on a Fund’s net asset value.

Securities and other investments purchased by a Fund that are liquid at the time of purchase may subsequently become illiquid due to events relating to the issuer of the security, market events, economic conditions or investor perceptions. Domestic and foreign markets are becoming more and more complex and interrelated such that events in one sector of the market or the economy, or in one geographical region, can reverberate and have negative consequences for other market, economic or regional sectors in a manner that may not be reasonably foreseen. With respect to OTC securities, the continued viability of any OTC secondary market depends on the continued willingness of dealers and other participants to purchase the securities.

If one or more instruments in a Fund’s portfolio become illiquid, the Fund may exceed its limit on illiquid instruments. If this occurs, the Fund must take steps to bring the aggregate amount of illiquid instruments back within the prescribed limitations as soon as reasonably practicable. However, this requirement will not force a Fund to liquidate any portfolio instrument where the Fund would suffer a loss on the sale of that instrument.

INDUSTRY CONCENTRATION RISK. Because a Fund focuses its investments in a specific industry or group of industries, the Fund is subject to the risk that (1) its performance will be closely tied to the performance of those particular industries; (2) its performance will be adversely impacted when such industries experience a downturn; and (3) it will perform poorly during a slump in demand for securities of companies in such industries. As a result, the Fund may be subject to increased price volatility and may be more susceptible to adverse developments than a fund that invests more widely.

INFLATION PROTECTED DEBT SECURITIES RISK. A Fund may invest in inflation-protected debt securities, which are fixed income securities whose principal value is periodically adjusted according to the rate of inflation. The value of inflation protected securities generally fluctuates in response to changes in real interest rates (stated interest rates adjusted to factor in inflation). In general, the price of an inflation-indexed security decreases when real interest rates increase, and increases when real interest rates decrease. Interest payments on inflation protected debt securities will fluctuate as the principal and/or interest is adjusted for inflation and can be unpredictable.

Inflation protected securities include fixed and floating rate debt securities of varying maturities issued by the U.S. government, its agencies and instrumentalities, such as Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (“TIPS”), as well as securities issued by other entities such as corporations, municipalities, foreign governments and foreign issuers, including foreign issuers from emerging markets. Typically, such securities are structured as fixed income investments whose principal value is periodically adjusted according to the rate of inflation. The U.S. Treasury, among some other issuers, issues inflation protected securities that accrue inflation into the principal value of the security and other issuers may pay out the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) accruals as part of a semi-annual coupon. Other types of inflation protected securities exist which use an inflation index other than the CPI. Inflation protected securities issued by the U.S. Treasury, such as TIPS, have maturities of varying length.

Repayment of the original security principal upon maturity (as adjusted for inflation) is generally guaranteed in the case of TIPS, even during a period of deflation. However, the current market value of the securities is not guaranteed and will fluctuate. Other inflation related securities may not provide a similar guarantee. If a guarantee of principal is not provided, the adjusted principal value of the security repaid at maturity may be less than the original principal.

The value of inflation-linked securities is expected to change in response to changes in real interest rates. Real interest rates in turn are tied to the relationship between nominal interest rates and the rate of inflation. Therefore, if the rate of inflation rises at a faster rate than nominal interest rates, real interest rates might decline, leading to an increase in value of inflation-linked securities. While these securities are expected to be protected from long-term inflationary trends, short-term increases in inflation may

lead to declines in value. If interest rates rise due to reasons other than inflation (for example, due to changes in currency exchange rates), investors in these securities may not be protected to the extent that the increase is not reflected in the security’s inflation measure. The market for inflation-protected securities may be less developed or liquid, and more volatile, than certain other securities markets.

The periodic adjustment of U.S. inflation-protected debt securities is tied to the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”), which is calculated monthly by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The CPI-U is an index of changes in the cost of living, made up of components such as housing, food, transportation and energy. Inflation-protected debt securities issued by a foreign government are generally adjusted to reflect a comparable inflation index calculated by that government. There can be no assurance that the CPI-U or any foreign inflation index will accurately measure the real rate of inflation in the prices of goods and services. Moreover, there can be no assurance that the rate of inflation in a foreign country will be correlated to the rate of inflation in the United States.

Any increase in the principal amount of an inflation-protected debt security will be considered taxable ordinary income, even though investors do not receive their principal until maturity.

INFLATION RISK. A Fund's investments may be subject to inflation risk, which is the risk that the real value (i.e., nominal price of the asset adjusted for inflation) of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the purchasing power and value of money (i.e., as inflation increases, the real value of a Fund's assets can decline). Inflation rates may change frequently and significantly as a result of various factors, including unexpected shifts in the domestic or global economy and changes in monetary or economic policies (or expectations that these policies may change), and a Fund's investments may not keep pace with inflation, which would generally adversely affect the real value of Fund shareholders’ investment in a Fund. This risk is greater for fixed-income instruments with longer maturities. In addition, this risk may be significantly elevated compared to normal conditions because of recent monetary policy measures and the current interest rate environment.

INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS (“IPO”) RISK. Securities issued in IPOs have no trading history, and information about the companies may be available for very limited periods. Some of the companies involved in new industries may be regarded as developmental stage companies, without revenues or operating income, or the near-term prospects of them. Many IPOs are by small- or micro-cap companies that are undercapitalized. In addition, the prices of securities sold in IPOs may be highly volatile or may decline shortly after the IPO is complete. The effect of IPOs on a Fund’s performance depends on a variety of factors, including the number of IPOs the Fund invests in relative to the size of the Fund and whether and to what extent a security purchased in an IPO appreciates and depreciates in value. Although investments in IPOs have the potential to produce substantial gains in a short period of time, there is no assurance that a Fund will have access to profitable IPOs, that any particular IPO will be successful, or that any gains will be sustainable. Investors should not rely on past gains attributable to IPOs as an indication of future performance.

INTEREST RATE RISK. Interest rate risk is the risk that an investment held by a Fund may go down in value when interest rates rise because when interest rates rise, the prices of bonds and fixed rate loans fall. Generally, the longer the maturity of a bond or fixed rate loan, the more sensitive it is to this risk. For this reason, the longer a Fund’s average weighted portfolio maturity, the greater the impact a change in interest rates will have on its share price. A variety of factors can cause interest rates to rise, including central bank monetary policies and inflation rates. Falling interest rates may also lead to a decline in a Fund’s income. Risks associated with rising rates are currently heightened and inflation is elevated. To the extent the Federal Reserve Board (the “Fed”) raises interest rates, there is a risk that interest rates across the U.S. financial system may rise. Actions taken by the Fed or foreign central banks to stimulate or stabilize economic growth, such as decreases or increases in short-term interest rates, may adversely affect markets, which could, in turn, negatively impact Fund performance. Moreover, rising interest rates may lead to decreased liquidity in the bond markets, making it more difficult for a Fund to value or sell some or all of its bond holdings at any given time. A rise in interest rates could also cause investors to rapidly move out of fixed-income securities, which may increase redemptions in a Fund and subject the Fund to increased liquidity risk. A substantial increase in interest rates may also have an adverse impact on the liquidity of one or more portfolio securities, especially those with longer maturities.

Moreover, in response to the outbreak of COVID-19, as with other serious economic disruptions, governmental authorities and regulators have enacted significant fiscal and monetary policy changes, including, among other things, lowering interest rates. During periods when interest rates are low (or negative), a Fund’s yield (or total return) may also be low and fall below zero. Very low or negative interest rates may magnify interest rate risk. Changing interest rates, including rates that fall below zero, may have unpredictable effects on markets, may result in heightened market volatility and may detract from Fund performance to the extent a Fund is exposed to such interest rates and/or volatility. Certain European countries and Japan have pursued negative interest rate policies. A negative interest rate policy is an unconventional central bank monetary policy tool where nominal target interest rates are set with negative value intended to help create self-sustaining growth in the local economy. To the extent a Fund holds a debt instrument with a negative interest rate, the Fund would generate a negative return on that investment. If negative interest rates become more prevalent in the market, investors may seek to reallocate their investment to other income-producing assets, which could further reduce the value of instruments with a negative yield.

INTERFUND LENDING PROGRAM RISK. The Funds have received exemptive relief from the SEC, which permits the Funds to participate in an interfund lending program. The interfund lending program allows each participating Fund to borrow money from and loan money to each other for temporary or emergency purposes. All interfund loans would consist only of uninvested cash reserves that the lending Fund otherwise would invest in short-term repurchase agreements or other short-term instruments. A Fund may participate in the interfund lending program only to the extent that such participation is consistent with the Fund’s investment objectives, restrictions, policies, and limitations.

The program is subject to a number of conditions designed to ensure fair and equitable treatment of all participating Funds, including the following: (1) a Fund may not borrow money through the program unless it receives a more favorable interest rate than a rate approximating the lowest interest rate at which bank loans would be available to any of the participating Funds under a loan agreement; and (2) a Fund may not lend money through the program unless it receives a more favorable return than that available from an investment in repurchase agreements. Interfund loans and borrowings have a maximum duration of seven days, and loans may be called on one business day’s notice. If a Fund has outstanding bank borrowings, any interfund loan to the Fund would: (a) be at an interest rate equal to or lower than that of any outstanding bank loan, (b) be secured at least on an equal priority basis with at least an equivalent percentage of collateral to loan value as any outstanding bank loan that requires collateral, (c) have a maturity no longer than any outstanding bank loan (and in any event not over seven days), and (d) provide that, if an event of default occurs under any agreement evidencing an outstanding bank loan to the Fund, that event of default will automatically (without need for action or notice by the lending Fund) constitute an immediate event of default under the interfund lending agreement, entitling the lending Fund to call the interfund loan (and exercise all rights with respect to any collateral), and cause such call to be made if the lending bank exercises its right to call its loan under its agreement with the borrowing Fund.

A Fund may borrow on an unsecured basis through the interfund lending program only if its outstanding borrowings from all sources immediately after the borrowing total 10% or less of its total assets, provided that if the Fund has a secured loan outstanding from any other lender, including but not limited to another Fund, the Fund’s borrowing will be secured on at least an equal priority basis with at least an equivalent percentage of collateral to loan value as any outstanding loan that requires collateral. If a borrowing Fund’s total outstanding borrowings immediately after an interfund loan under the interfund lending program exceed 10% of its total assets, the Fund may borrow through the interfund lending program on a secured basis only. A Fund may not borrow under the interfund lending program or from any other source if its total outstanding borrowings immediately after the borrowing would be more than 33 1/3% of its total assets or any lower threshold provided for by the Fund’s investment restrictions.

A Fund may not lend to another Fund through the interfund lending program if the loan would cause the lending Fund’s aggregate outstanding loans through the interfund lending program to exceed 15% of its current net assets at the time of the loan. A Fund’s interfund loans to any one fund shall not exceed 5% of the lending Fund’s net assets.

Funds participating in the interfund lending program are subject to certain risks. A Fund borrowing through the program may have to borrow from a bank at a higher interest rate if an interfund loan is called or not renewed. Any delay in repayment to a lending Fund could result in a lost investment opportunity or additional costs. As of April 29, 2022, each Fund does not engage in interfund lending.

INVERSE FLOATING RATE SECURITIES RISK. Inverse floating rate securities, also called inverse floaters or residual interest bonds, are variable-rate securities whose coupon changes in a direction opposite from that of a specified interest rate. Generally, income on inverse floaters decreases when interest rates rise and increases when interest rates fall. Inverse floaters may be subject to leverage risk and counterparty risk. These risks are greater for inverse floaters that are structured as tender option bonds (“TOBs”). Inverse floaters can have the effect of providing a degree of investment leverage because they may increase or decrease in value in response to changes (e.g., changes in market interest rates) at a rate that is a multiple of the rate at which fixed-rate securities increase or decrease in response to the same changes. Therefore, the market values of such securities are generally more volatile than the market values of fixed-rate securities (especially during periods when interest rates are fluctuating). A Fund could lose money and its net asset value could decline if movements in interest rates are incorrectly anticipated. Moreover, the markets for this type of security may be less developed and less liquid than the markets for traditional municipal securities. Investments in inverse floaters in the form of TOBs are also subject to risks related to the termination of the trust that issues the TOB, which could expose a Fund to losses associated with such termination.

A Fund may invest in municipal inverse floaters, which are a type of inverse floater in which a municipal bond is deposited with a special purpose vehicle (SPV), which issues, in return, the municipal inverse floater (which is comprised of a residual interest in the cash flows and assets of the SPV) plus proceeds from the issuance by the SPV of floating rate certificates to third-parties. This type of municipal inverse floater generally includes the right to “unwind” the transaction by (1) causing the holders of the floating rate certificates to tender their certificates at par and (2) returning the municipal inverse floater to the SPV in exchange for the original municipal bond. If the holder of the inverse floater exercises this right, it would pay the par amount due on the floating rate certificates and exchange the municipal inverse floater for the underlying municipal bond. The SPV may also be terminated for other reasons (as defined in its operative documents), such as a downgrade in the credit rating of the underlying municipal bond, a payment failure by or the bankruptcy of the issuer of the underlying municipal bond, the inability to remarket floating rate certificates

or the SPV’s failure to obtain renewal of the liquidity agreement relating to the floating rate certificates. In the event of such a termination, an investor, such as a Fund, shall have the option but not the obligation to effect the economic equivalent of an “unwind” of the transaction. The holder of a municipal inverse floater generally bears all of the investment risk associated with the underlying bond.

Inverse floating rate securities are subject to the risks inherent in derivative instruments. See “Derivative Instruments” herein.

INVESTMENT GRADE SECURITIES RISK. A Fund is permitted to invest in debt securities rated within the four highest rating categories (e.g., “Aaa”, “Aa”, “A” or “Baa” by Moody’s, “AAA”, “AA”, “A” or “BBB” by S&P or “AAA”, “AA”, “A” or “BBB” by Fitch) (or, if unrated, securities of comparable quality as determined by a sub-adviser) (see Appendix B to this SAI for a description of applicable securities ratings). These investments are generally referred to as “investment grade investments.” Each rating category has within it different gradations or sub-categories. If a Fund is authorized to invest in a certain rating category, the Fund is also permitted to invest in any of the sub-categories or gradations within that rating category. If a security is downgraded to a rating category that does not qualify for investment, a sub-adviser will use its discretion on whether to hold or sell based upon its opinion on the best method to maximize value for shareholders over the long term. Debt securities carrying the fourth highest rating (e.g., “Baa” by Moody’s, “BBB” by S&P and “BBB” by Fitch) and unrated securities of comparable quality (as determined by a sub-adviser) are considered to have speculative characteristics with respect to the issuer’s continuing ability to meet principal and interest payments, involve a higher degree of risk and are more sensitive to economic change than higher rated securities.

INVESTMENTS IN EMERGING MARKET SECURITIES RISK. A Fund may invest in securities of issuers that conduct their principal business activities in, or whose securities are traded principally on exchanges located in, less developed countries considered to be “emerging markets.” Emerging countries are generally located in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, Eastern and Central Europe and Central and South America. Investing in emerging market securities involves not only the risks described above with respect to investing in foreign securities, but also other risks that may be more severe and pervasive than those present in foreign countries with more developed markets. Emerging markets are riskier than more developed markets because they tend to develop unevenly and may never fully develop. The value of a Fund’s investments in emerging markets securities may be adversely affected by changes in the political, economic or social conditions, expropriation, nationalization, limitation on the removal of funds or assets, controls, tax regulations and other restrictions in emerging market countries. In the past, governments of such nations have expropriated substantial amounts of private property, and most claims of the property owners have never been fully settled. There is no assurance that such expropriations will not reoccur. In such circumstances, it is possible that a Fund could lose the entire amount of its investments in the affected market.

Some countries have pervasive corruption and crime that may hinder investments. Certain emerging markets may also face other significant internal or external risks, including the risk of war and ethnic, religious and racial conflicts. A Fund’s emerging market investments may introduce exposure to economic structures that are generally less diverse and mature than, and to political systems that can be expected to have less stability than, those of developed countries. Other characteristics of emerging markets that may affect investments include national policies that may restrict investment by foreigners in issuers or industries deemed sensitive to relevant national interests and the absence of developed legal structures governing private and foreign investments and private property, and the ability of U.S. authorities (e.g., SEC and the U.S. Department of Justice) and investors (e.g., the Funds) to bring actions against bad actors may be limited. As a result of these legal structures and limitations, a Fund faces the risk of being unable to enforce its rights with respect to its investments in emerging markets, which may cause losses to the Fund. Settlements of trades in emerging markets may be subject to significant delays. The inability to make intended purchases of securities due to settlement problems could cause missed investment opportunities. Losses could also be caused by an inability to dispose of portfolio securities due to settlement problems. Also, the typically small size of the markets for securities of issuers located in emerging markets and the possibility of a low or nonexistent volume of trading in those securities may result in lack of liquidity and price volatility of those securities. In addition, traditional measures of investment value used in the United States, such as price to earnings ratios, may not apply to certain small markets. Also, there may be less publicly available information about issuers in emerging markets than would be available about issuers in more developed capital markets, and such issuers may not be subject to accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards and requirements comparable to those to which U.S. companies are subject. In addition to withholding taxes on investment income, some countries with emerging markets may impose differential capital gains taxes on foreign investors.

The risks outlined above are often more pronounced in “frontier markets” in which a Fund may invest. Frontier markets are those emerging markets that are considered to be among the smallest, least mature and least liquid, and as a result, the risks of investing in emerging markets are magnified in frontier markets. This magnification of risks is the result of a number of factors, including: government ownership or control of parts of the private sector and of certain companies; trade barriers; exchange controls, managed adjustments in relative currency values and other protectionist measures imposed or negotiated by the countries with which frontier market countries trade; less uniformity in accounting and reporting requirements; unreliable securities valuation; greater risk associated with custody of securities; and the relatively new and unsettled securities laws in many frontier market countries. In addition, the markets of frontier countries typically have low trading volumes, leading to a greater potential for extreme price volatility and illiquidity. This volatility may be further increased by the actions of a few major investors. For example, a substantial increase or decrease in cash flows of funds investing in these markets could significantly affect local securities prices and, therefore,

the net asset value of a Fund. All of these factors make investing in frontier market countries significantly riskier than investing in other countries, including more developed and traditional emerging market countries, and any one of them could cause the net asset value of a Fund’s shares to decline.

In addition to the risks of foreign investing and the risks of investing in emerging or frontier markets, investments in certain countries with recently developed markets and structures, such as Nigeria, Croatia and Russia, implicate certain specific risks. Because of the recent formation of these securities markets and the underdeveloped state of these countries’ banking systems, settlement, clearing and registration of securities transactions are subject to significant risks. Share ownership is often defined and evidenced by extracts from entries in a company’s share register, but such extracts are neither negotiable instruments nor effective evidence of securities ownership. Further, the registrars in these countries are not necessarily subject to effective state supervision or licensed by any governmental entity, there is no central registration system for shareholders and it is possible for a Fund to lose its entire ownership rights through fraud, negligence or mere oversight. In addition, while applicable regulations may impose liability on registrars for losses resulting from their errors, it may be difficult for a Fund to enforce any rights it may have against the registrar or issuer of the securities in the event of loss of share registration. In Croatia, these risks are limited to investments in securities that are not traded on the national stock exchange. However, in other countries, including Nigeria and Russia, all securities investments are subject to these risks. In addition, as much of China’s growth over recent decades has been a result of significant investment in substantial export trade, international trade tensions may arise from time to time which can result in trade tariffs, embargoes, trade limitations, trade wars and other negative consequences. These consequences may trigger a significant reduction in international trade, the oversupply of certain manufactured goods, substantial price reductions of goods and possible failure of individual companies and/or large segments of China’s export industry with a potentially severe negative impact to the Funds. In addition, it is possible that the continuation or worsening of the current political climate could result in regulatory restrictions being contemplated or imposed in the U.S. or in China that could have a material adverse effect on a Fund’s ability to invest in accordance with its investment policies and/or achieve its investment objective. Please see “Regional/Country Focus Risk” below.

Sukuk Risk. Sukuk are similar to conventional senior, unsecured bonds but are structured to comply with Sharia, or Islamic, law and its investment principles, which, inter alia, prohibit the charging or paying of interest. Sukuk represent undivided shares in the income generated by an underlying asset or pool of assets (the “Underlying Assets”) and/or contractual payment obligations of an obligor.

Obligors include international financial institutions, corporations, foreign governments and agencies of foreign governments (each, an “Obligor”). Obligors typically arrange for the issue of sukuk through a special purpose vehicle or similar corporate entity (the “Sukuk Issuer”). For sukuk linked to Underlying Assets, title to the Underlying Assets is transferred to the Sukuk Issuer; for sukuk that are not linked to Underlying Assets, the sukuk represents an interest in the income stream generated by one or more contractual payment obligations of the Obligor to the Sukuk Issuer. In either event, the payments received by the investor do not come from interest on such investor’s money.

Since the investors in sukuk purchase an instrument with income or periodic payments linked to a specific income stream, investors are subject to the risk that the relevant Underlying Assets or the contractual payment obligations may not perform as expected, and the flow of income may, accordingly, be slower than expected or may cease altogether. In particular, Sukuk Issuers typically agree to redeem the sukuk at the end of a contractual term at an agreed price, similar to a maturity date. The ability of a Sukuk Issuer to redeem such sukuk is dependent on the income generated by the sukuk during its life and the ability and willingness of the Obligor to make payments to the Sukuk Issuer for payment to the investors.

No collateral, including the Underlying Assets, is pledged as security for sukuk. As unsecured investments, sukuk are backed only by the credit of the Obligor. Sukuk are also subject to the risks associated with developing and emerging market economies, which include, among others, inconsistent accounting and legal principles.

The process to resolve a default or other non-payment event in respect of sukuk is likely to take longer than resolving a default in respect of a bond. In addition, it is possible that evolving interpretations of Sharia law by courts or Islamic scholars on sukuk structures and sukuk transferability, or a determination subsequent to the issuance of a sukuk by courts or Islamic scholars that such sukuk does not comply with Sharia law and its investment principles, could have an adverse effect on the price and liquidity of a such sukuk, similarly-structured sukuk or the sukuk market in general and give rise to defenses of the Obligor and the Sukuk Issuer that amounts under the sukuk are not payable either in full or in part. In addition, investors’ ability to pursue and enforce actions with respect to these payment obligations or to otherwise enforce the terms of the sukuk, restructure the sukuk, obtain a judgment in a court of competent jurisdiction or attach assets of the Sukuk Issuer or the Obligor may be limited. In addition, as with conventional debt instruments, sukuk prices may change in response to global interest rate changes.

While the global sukuk market has grown in recent years, it is significantly smaller than bond market and there may be times when the market is illiquid and it is difficult to make an investment in, or dispose of, sukuk. Unlike bonds, sukuk are generally held to maturity, and trading is limited to the primary market.

LARGE CAP SECURITIES RISK. The securities of large market capitalization companies may underperform other segments of the market because such companies may be less responsive to competitive challenges and opportunities and may be unable to attain high growth rates during periods of economic expansion.

LARGE SHAREHOLDER TRANSACTION RISK. A Fund may experience adverse effects when certain large shareholders purchase or redeem large numbers of shares of the Fund. These shareholders (or a single shareholder) may redeem or purchase shares of a Fund in large amounts unexpectedly or rapidly, including as a result of an asset allocation decision made by a Fund’s investment manager or sub-adviser(s). Such transactions could adversely affect the ability of a Fund to conduct its investment program. Such large shareholder redemptions may cause a Fund to sell portfolio securities at times when it would not otherwise do so or borrow money (at a cost to the Fund), which may negatively impact the Fund’s net asset value and liquidity. Similarly, large Fund share purchases may adversely affect a Fund’s performance to the extent that the Fund is delayed in investing new cash and is required to maintain a larger cash position than it ordinarily would. These transactions may also increase transaction costs. In addition, a large redemption could result in a Fund’s current expenses being allocated over a smaller asset base, leading to an increase in the Fund’s expense ratio.

LENDING PORTFOLIO SECURITIES RISK. A Fund may lend portfolio securities to broker-dealers and other institutions as a means of seeking to earn additional income. A Fund may lend portfolio securities to certain borrowers in U.S. and non-U.S. markets in an amount not to exceed one third (33 1/3%) of the value of its total assets. A Fund may lend portfolio securities, provided that the borrower provides collateral that is maintained in an amount at least equal to the current market value of the securities loaned. Cash collateral is invested for the benefit of a Fund by the Fund’s lending agent pursuant to collateral investment guidelines. The borrower is also required to pay a Fund any dividends or distributions accruing on the loaned securities. Substitute payments for dividends received by a Fund while its securities are loaned out will not be considered qualified dividend income. As of April 29, 2022, the securities lending program in which a Fund may participate generally does not restrict a security from being loaned based on the security’s anticipated dividend distributions, but the program may restrict lending of securities domiciled in certain non-US jurisdictions based on local law considerations.

A Fund does not have the right to vote proxies for securities that are on loan, but in order to vote the proxies it may restrict securities or recall loaned securities. However, the Board has approved guidelines that define circumstances under which a Fund security should be restricted from lending so that its proxies can be voted. Therefore, a Fund’s right to restrict or recall loaned securities for purposes of voting proxies may not be exercised if, for example, the Board-approved guidelines did not require the security to be restricted from lending or recalled, or if it is determined to be in the best interests of the Fund not to restrict or recall the security in order instead to earn additional income on the loan. For more information about proxy voting policies and instances in which a Fund’s sub-adviser(s) may choose not to vote proxies, see “Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures” below.

A Fund is subject to certain risks while its securities are on loan, including the following: (i) the risk that the borrower defaults on the loan and the collateral is inadequate to cover the Fund’s loss; (ii) the risk that the earnings on the collateral invested are not sufficient to pay fees incurred in connection with the loan; (iii) the risk that a Fund could lose money in the event of a decline in the value of the collateral provided for loaned securities or a decline in the value of any investments made with cash collateral; (iv) the risk that the borrower may use the loaned securities to cover a short sale, which may in turn place downward pressure on the market prices of the loaned securities; (v) the risk that return of loaned securities could be delayed and interfere with portfolio management decisions; (vi) the risk that any efforts to restrict or recall the securities for purposes of voting may not be effective; and (vii) operational risks (i.e., the risk of losses resulting from problems in the settlement and accounting process – especially so in certain international markets).

LIBOR RISK. The use of certain London Interbank Offered Rates (collectively, “LIBOR”) was generally phased out by the end of 2021, and some regulated entities (such as banks) have ceased to enter into new LIBOR-based contracts beginning January 1, 2022. However, it is expected that the most widely used tenors of U.S. LIBOR may continue to be provided on a representative basis until mid-2023. There remains uncertainty regarding the future use of LIBOR and the nature of any replacement rate. As such, the potential effect of a transition away from LIBOR on a Fund or the LIBOR-based instruments in which the Fund invests cannot yet be determined. The transition process away from LIBOR may involve, among other things, increased volatility or illiquidity in markets for instruments that currently rely on LIBOR. The transition process may also result in a reduction in the value of certain instruments held by a Fund or reduce the effectiveness of related Fund transactions, such as hedges. Volatility, the potential reduction in value, and/or the hedge effectiveness of financial instruments may be heightened for financial instruments that do not include fallback provisions that address the cessation of LIBOR. Any potential effects of the transition away from LIBOR on a Fund or on financial instruments in which the Fund invests, as well as other unforeseen effects, could result in losses to the Fund, and the use of an alternative reference rate may adversely affect a Fund's performance. Since the usefulness of LIBOR as a benchmark or reference rate could deteriorate during the transition period, these effects could occur prior to and/or subsequent to mid-2023.

LIQUIDATION OF FUNDS RISK. The Board may determine to close and liquidate a Fund at any time. Reasonable advance notice of the liquidation will be provided to shareholders. The timing of any liquidation may not be favorable to certain individual shareholders.

LIQUIDITY RISK. Liquidity risk exists when the markets for particular investments or types of investments are or become relatively illiquid so that it is difficult or impossible for a Fund to sell the investment at the price at which the Fund has valued it. Illiquidity may result from political, economic or issuer specific events; changes in a specific market’s size or structure, including the number of participants; or overall market disruptions. Securities with reduced liquidity or that become illiquid involve greater risk than securities with more liquid markets. If a Fund and its affiliates hold a significant portion of a single issuer’s outstanding securities, the Fund may be subject to greater liquidity risk than if the issuer’s securities were more widely held.

Market quotations for illiquid or less liquid securities may be volatile and/or subject to large spreads between bid and ask prices. Reduced liquidity may have a negative impact on market price and a Fund’s ability to sell particular securities when necessary to meet the Fund’s liquidity needs or in response to a specific economic event. In addition, during periods of reduced market liquidity or in the absence of readily available market quotations for particular investments in a Fund’s portfolio, it may be difficult for a Fund to value these investments and it may be necessary to fair value the investments. There can be no assurance that a security’s fair value accurately reflects the price at which a Fund could sell that security at that time, which could affect the proceeds of any redemption or the number of Fund shares you receive upon purchase.

Bond markets have consistently grown over the past three decades while the capacity for traditional dealer counterparties to engage in fixed income trading has not kept pace and in some cases has decreased. As a result, dealer inventories of corporate bonds are at or near historic lows in relation to market size. The significant reduction in dealer inventories could potentially lead to decreased liquidity and increased volatility in the fixed income markets. Such issues may be worse during periods of economic uncertainty.

LOANS AND LOAN PARTICIPATIONS RISK. Commercial banks and other financial institutions or institutional investors make corporate loans to companies that need capital to grow or restructure. Borrowers generally pay interest on corporate loans at rates that change in response to changes in market interest rates such as LIBOR or the prime rates of U.S. banks. As a result, the value of corporate loan investments is generally less exposed to the adverse effects of shifts in market interest rates than investments that pay a fixed rate of interest. However, because the trading market for certain corporate loans may be less developed than the secondary market for bonds and notes, a Fund may experience difficulties in selling its corporate loans. A Fund may make certain corporate loan investments as part of a broader group of lenders (together often referred to as a “syndicate”) that is represented by a leading financial institution (or agent bank). The syndicate’s agent arranges the corporate loans, holds collateral and accepts payments of principal and interest. If the agent develops financial problems or is terminated, the Fund may not recover its investment or recovery may be delayed. Corporate loans may be denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars and are subject to the credit risk of nonpayment of principal or interest. Further, substantial increases in interest rates may cause an increase in loan defaults. Although the loans will generally be fully collateralized at the time of acquisition, the collateral may decline in value, be relatively illiquid or lose all or substantially all of its value subsequent to investment. If a borrower files for protection from its creditors under the U.S. bankruptcy laws, these laws may limit the Fund’s rights to the collateral. In addition, the value of collateral may erode during a bankruptcy case. In the event of a bankruptcy, the holder of a corporate loan may not recover its principal, may experience a long delay in recovering its investment and may not receive interest during the delay.

A Fund may also invest in second lien loans (secured loans with a claim on collateral subordinate to a senior lender’s claim on such collateral) and unsecured loans. Holders’ claims under unsecured loans are subordinated to claims of creditors holding secured indebtedness and possibly other classes of creditors holding unsecured debt. Unsecured loans have a greater risk of default than secured loans, particularly during periods of deteriorating economic conditions. Also, since they do not afford the lender recourse to collateral, unsecured loans are subject to greater risk of nonpayment in the event of default than secured loans. Such loans generally have greater price volatility than more senior loans and may be less liquid.

Some bank loans are subject to the risk that a court, pursuant to fraudulent conveyance or other similar laws, could subordinate the bank loans to presently existing or future indebtedness of the borrower or take other action detrimental to the holders of the bank loans, including, in certain circumstances, invalidating such bank loans or causing interest previously paid to be refunded to the borrower. If interest were required to be refunded, it could negatively affect Fund performance.

Indebtedness of companies whose creditworthiness is poor involves substantially greater risks and may be highly speculative. Some companies may never pay off their indebtedness or pay only a small fraction of the amount owed. Consequently, when investing in indebtedness of companies with poor credit, a Fund bears a substantial risk of losing the entire amount invested.

Investments in bank loans through a direct assignment of the financial institution’s interest with respect to the bank loan may involve additional risks. For example, if a secured bank loan is foreclosed, a Fund could become part owner of any collateral, and would bear the costs and liabilities associated with owning and disposing of the collateral. In addition, it is conceivable that under emerging legal theories of lender liability, a Fund could be held liable as a co-lender.

Bank loans may be structured to include both term loans, which are generally fully funded at the time of investment, and revolving credit facilities, which would require a Fund to make additional investments in the bank loans as required under the terms of the credit facility at the borrower’s demand.

A financial institution’s employment as agent bank may be terminated in the event that it fails to observe a requisite standard of care or becomes insolvent. A successor agent bank would generally be appointed to replace the terminated agent bank, and assets held by the agent bank under the loan agreement would remain available to the holders of such indebtedness. However, if assets held by the agent bank for the benefit of a Fund were determined to be subject to the claims of the agent bank’s general creditors, such Fund may incur certain costs and delays in realizing payments on a bank loan or loan participation and could suffer a loss of principal and/or interest.

Floating Rate Loans Risk. A Fund may invest in interests in floating rate loans (often referred to as “floaters”). Senior floating rate loans hold the most senior position in the capital structure of a business entity (the “Borrower”), are typically secured by specific collateral and have a claim on the assets and/or stock of the Borrower that is senior to that held by subordinated debtholders and stockholders of the Borrower. A Fund may also invest in second lien loans (secured loans with a claim on collateral subordinate to a senior lender’s claim on such collateral) and unsecured loans. The Funds may also invest in companies whose financial condition is uncertain and that may be involved in bankruptcy proceedings, reorganizations or financial restructurings. Floating rate loans typically have rates of interest that are reset or redetermined daily, monthly, quarterly or semi-annually by reference to a base lending rate, plus a spread. The base lending rates are primarily the LIBOR, and secondarily the prime rate offered by one or more major United States banks (the “Prime Rate”) and the certificate of deposit (“CD”) rate or other base lending rates used by commercial lenders. Floating rate loans are typically structured and administered by a financial institution that acts as the agent of the lenders participating in the floating rate loan. Floating rate loans may be acquired directly through the agent, as an assignment from another lender who holds a direct interest in the floating rate loan or as a participation interest in another lender’s portion of the floating rate loan.

The value of the collateral securing a floating rate loan can decline, be insufficient to meet the obligations of the borrower or be difficult to liquidate. As a result, a floating rate loan may not be fully collateralized and can decline significantly in value. Floating rate loans generally are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. The liquidity of floating rate loans, including the volume and frequency of secondary market trading in such loans, varies significantly over time and among individual floating rate loans. For example, if the credit quality of a floating rate loan unexpectedly declines significantly, secondary market trading in that floating rate loan can also decline for a period of time. During periods of infrequent trading, valuing a floating rate loan can be more difficult, and buying and selling a floating rate loan at an acceptable price can be more difficult and delayed. Difficulty in selling a floating rate loan can result in a loss and can hinder a Fund’s ability to meet redemption requests.

Many loans in which a Fund may invest may not be rated by a rating agency, and many, if not all, loans will not be registered with the SEC or any state securities commission and will not be listed on any national securities exchange. The amount of public information available with respect to loans will generally be less extensive than that available for registered or exchange-listed securities. In evaluating the creditworthiness of Borrowers, the Investment Manager and/or each sub-adviser considers, and may rely in part, on analyses performed by others. In the event that loans are not rated, they are likely to be the equivalent of below investment grade quality. Debt securities that are rated below-investment-grade and comparable unrated bonds are viewed by the rating agencies as having speculative characteristics and are commonly known as “junk bonds”. Historically, senior-secured floating rate loans tend to have more favorable loss recovery rates than more junior types of below-investment-grade debt obligations. A sub-adviser does not view ratings as the primary factor in its investment decisions and relies more upon its credit analysis abilities than upon ratings.

Loans and other corporate debt obligations are subject to the risk of non-payment of scheduled interest or principal. Floating rate loans are rated below-investment-grade, which means that rating agencies view them as more likely to default in payment than investment-grade loans. Such non-payment would result in a reduction of income to a Fund, a reduction in the value of the investment and a potential decrease in the net asset value of the Fund. Some floating rate loans are also subject to the risk that a court, pursuant to fraudulent conveyance or other similar laws, could subordinate such floating rate loans to presently existing or future indebtedness of the Borrower or take other action detrimental to the holders of floating rate loans including, in certain circumstances, invalidating such floating rate loans or causing interest previously paid to be refunded to the Borrower. If interest were required to be refunded, it could negatively affect the Fund’s performance.

Prepayment Risk – Most floating rate loans and certain debt securities allow for prepayment of principal without penalty. Loans and securities subject to prepayment risk generally offer less potential for gains when interest rates decline, and may offer a greater potential for loss when interest rates rise. In addition, with respect to fixed-rate investments, rising interest rates may cause prepayments to occur at a slower than expected rate, thereby effectively lengthening the maturity of the investment and making the investment more sensitive to interest rate changes. Accordingly, the potential for the value of a floating rate loan or security to increase in response to interest rate declines is limited. Further, loans or debt securities purchased to replace a prepaid loan or debt security may have lower yields than the yield on the prepaid loan or debt security.

Market Risk – Significant events, such as turmoil in the financial and credit markets, terrorist events, and other market disruption events, such as weather or infrastructure disruptions that affect the markets generally, can affect the liquidity of the markets and cause spreads to widen or interest rates to rise, resulting in a reduction in value of a Fund’s assets. Other

economic factors (such as a large downward movement in security prices, a disparity in supply of and demand for certain loans and securities or market conditions that reduce liquidity) can also adversely affect the markets for debt obligations. Rating downgrades of holdings or their issuers will generally reduce the value of such holdings. A Fund is also subject to income risk, which is the potential for a decline in the Fund’s income due to falling interest rates or market reductions in spread. Please see “Market Risk” below.

Material Non-Public Information – A Fund may be in possession of material non-public information about a Borrower or issuer as a result of its ownership of a loan or security of such Borrower or issuer. Because of prohibitions on trading in securities of issuers while in possession of such information, a Fund may be unable to enter into a transaction in a loan or security of such a Borrower or issuer when it would otherwise be advantageous to do so.

Regulatory Risk – To the extent that legislation or federal regulators impose additional requirements or restrictions on the ability of financial institutions to make loans, particularly in connection with highly leveraged transactions, floating rate loans for investment may become less available. Any such legislation or regulation could also depress the market values of floating rate loans. Loan interests may not be considered “securities,” and purchasers, such as a Fund, may, therefore, not be entitled to rely on the anti-fraud protections of the federal securities laws.

Loan Participations Risk. A participation interest is a fractional interest in a loan, issued by a lender or other financial institution. The lender selling the participation interest remains the legal owner of the loan. Where a Fund is a participant in a loan, it does not have any direct claim on the loan or any rights of set-off against the borrower and may not benefit directly from any collateral supporting the loan. As a result, the Fund is subject to the credit risk of both the borrower and the lender that is selling the participation. In the event of the insolvency of the lender selling a participation, a Fund may be treated as a general creditor of the lender and may not benefit from any set-off between the lender and the borrower.

The lack of a highly liquid secondary market may have an adverse impact on the ability to dispose of particular loan participations when necessary to meet redemption of a Fund’s shares, to meet a Fund’s liquidity needs or when necessary in response to a specific economic event, such as deterioration in the creditworthiness of the borrower. The lack of a highly liquid secondary market for loan participations also may make it more difficult for a Fund to value these investments for purposes of calculating its net asset value.

Senior Loans Risk. Senior debt (frequently issued in the form of senior notes or referred to as senior loans) is debt that takes priority over other unsecured or otherwise more “junior” debt owed by the issuer. Senior debt has greater seniority in the issuer’s capital structure than subordinated debt. In the event the issuer goes bankrupt, senior debt theoretically must be repaid before other creditors receive any payment. There is less readily available, reliable information about most senior loans than is the case for many other types of securities. In addition, there is no minimum rating or other independent evaluation of a borrower or its securities limiting a Fund’s investments in senior loans, and thus a sub-adviser relies primarily on its own evaluation of a borrower’s credit quality rather than on any available independent sources. As a result, a Fund that invests in senior loans is particularly dependent on the analytical abilities of its sub-adviser(s).

An economic downturn generally leads to a higher non-payment rate, and a senior loan may lose significant value even before a default occurs. Further, any specific collateral used to secure a senior loan may decline in value or become illiquid, which would adversely affect a senior loan’s value.

No active trading market may exist for certain senior loans, which may impair a Fund’s ability to realize full value in the event that it needs to sell a senior loan and may make it difficult to value senior loans. Adverse market conditions may impair the liquidity of some actively traded senior loans. To the extent that a secondary market does exist for certain senior loans, the market may be subject to irregular trading activity, wide bid/ask spreads and extended trade settlement periods.

Although senior loans in which a Fund invests generally will be secured by specific collateral, there can be no assurance that liquidation of such collateral would satisfy the borrower’s obligation in the event of non-payment of scheduled interest or principal or that such collateral could be readily liquidated. In the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, a Fund could experience delays or limitations with respect to its ability to realize the benefits of the collateral securing a senior loan. If the terms of a senior loan do not require the borrower to pledge additional collateral in the event of a decline in the value of the already pledged collateral, a Fund will be exposed to the risk that the value of the collateral will not at all times equal or exceed the amount of the borrowers’ obligations under the senior loans. To the extent that a senior loan is collateralized by stock in the borrower or its subsidiaries, such stock may lose all of its value in the event of the bankruptcy of the borrower. Uncollateralized senior loans involve a greater risk of loss. Some senior loans are subject to the risk that a court, pursuant to fraudulent conveyance or other similar laws, could subordinate the senior loans to presently existing or future indebtedness of the borrower or take other action detrimental to lenders, including a Fund. Such court action could under certain circumstances include the invalidation of senior loans.

If a senior loan is acquired through an assignment, a Fund may not be able unilaterally to enforce all rights and remedies under the loan and with regard to any associated collateral. If a senior loan is acquired through a participation, the acquiring Fund generally will have no right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement, and the Fund may not directly benefit from the collateral supporting the debt obligation in which it has purchased the participation. As a result, a Fund will be exposed to the credit risk of both the borrower and the entity selling the participation.

Senior loans in which a Fund may invest may be rated below investment grade. The risks associated with these senior loans are similar to the risks of below investment grade securities, although senior loans are typically senior and secured in contrast to other below investment grade securities, which are often subordinated and unsecured. This higher standing of senior loans has historically resulted in generally higher recoveries in the event of a corporate reorganization. In addition, because their interest rates are typically adjusted for changes in short-term interest rates, senior loans generally are subject to less interest rate risk than other below investment grade securities (which are typically fixed rate).

Unsecured Loans Risk. The claims of holders of unsecured loans are subordinated to, and thus lower in priority of payment to, claims of creditors holding secured indebtedness and possibly other classes of creditors holding unsecured debt. Unsecured loans have a greater risk of default than secured loans, particularly during periods of deteriorating economic conditions. In addition, since they do not afford the lender recourse to collateral, unsecured loans are subject to greater risk of nonpayment in the event of default than secured loans.

Delayed Settlement Risk. Compared to securities and to certain other types of financial assets, purchases and sales of senior loans take relatively longer to settle, partly due to the fact that senior loans require a written assignment agreement and various ancillary documents for each transfer, and frequently require discretionary consents from both the borrower and the administrative agent. In addition, recent regulatory changes have increasingly caused dealers to insist on matching their purchases and sales, which can lead to delays in a Fund's settlement of a purchase or sale of a senior loan in circumstances where the dealer's corresponding transaction with another party is delayed. Dealers will also sometimes sell senior loans short, and hold their trades open for an indefinite period while waiting for a price movement or looking for inventory to purchase.

This extended settlement process can (i) increase the counterparty credit risk borne by a Fund; (ii) leave a Fund unable to timely vote, or otherwise act with respect to, senior loans it has agreed to purchase; (iii) delay a Fund from realizing the proceeds of a sale of a senior loan; (iv) inhibit a Fund's ability to re-sell a senior loan that it has agreed to purchase if conditions change (leaving the Fund more exposed to price fluctuations); (v) prevent a Fund from timely collecting principal and interest payments; and (vi) expose a Fund to adverse tax or regulatory consequences.

MARKET RISK. Market risk is the risk that one or more markets in which a Fund invests will go down in value, including the possibility that such markets will go down sharply and unpredictably. Securities or other investments may decline in value due to factors affecting securities markets generally or individual issuers. The value of a security or other investment may change in value due to general market conditions that are not related to a particular issuer, such as real or perceived adverse economic conditions, changes in the general outlook for revenues or corporate earnings, changes in interest or currency rates or adverse investor sentiment generally. The value of a security or other investment may also change in value due to factors that affect an individual issuer or a particular sector or industry. During a general downturn in the securities or other markets, multiple asset classes may decline in value simultaneously. When markets perform well, there can be no assurance that securities or other investments held by a Fund will participate in or otherwise benefit from the advance. Any market disruptions, including those arising out of geopolitical events, pandemics, epidemics or natural/environmental disasters, could also prevent a Fund from executing advantageous investment decisions in a timely manner. A widespread health crisis, such as a global pandemic, could cause substantial market volatility, exchange trading suspensions or restrictions and closures of securities exchanges and businesses, impact the ability to complete redemptions, and adversely impact Fund performance. A recent outbreak of COVID-19, a respiratory disease caused by a novel coronavirus, has negatively affected the worldwide economy, created supply chain disruptions and labor shortages, and impacted the financial health of individual companies and the market in significant and unforeseen ways. The future impact of COVID-19 is currently unknown. The effects to public health, business and market conditions resulting from COVID-19 pandemic may have a significant negative impact on the performance of a Fund’s investments, including exacerbating other pre-existing political, social and economic risks. Relatively high market volatility and reduced liquidity in credit and fixed-income markets may adversely affect many issuers worldwide. Actions taken by the Fed or foreign central banks to stimulate or stabilize economic growth, such as interventions in currency markets, could cause high volatility in the equity and fixed-income markets. Reduced liquidity may result in less money being available to purchase raw materials, goods, and services from emerging markets, which may, in turn, bring down the prices of these economic staples. It may also result in emerging-market issuers having more difficulty obtaining financing, which may, in turn, cause a decline in their securities prices. The fixed income markets at times have experienced periods of extreme volatility that has negatively impacted a broad range of mortgage- and asset-backed and other fixed income securities, including those rated investment grade, the U.S. and international credit and interbank money markets generally, and a wide range of financial institutions and markets, asset classes and sectors. As a result, fixed income instruments have at times experienced reduced liquidity, increased price volatility, credit downgrades and increased likelihood of default. Domestic and international equity markets have also experienced heightened volatility and turmoil that has particularly affected issuers with exposure to the real estate,

mortgage and credit markets. During times of market turmoil, investors tend to look to the safety of securities issued or backed by the U.S. Treasury, causing the prices of these securities to rise, and their yields to decline. These events as well as continuing market upheavals may have an adverse effect on the Funds and may result in increased redemptions of Fund shares.

In addition, while interest rates have been unusually low in recent years in the U.S. and abroad, any decision by the Fed to adjust the target federal funds rate, among other factors, could cause markets to experience continuing high volatility. A significant increase in interest rates may cause a decline in the market for equity securities. Also, regulators have expressed concern that rate increases may contribute to price volatility. These events and the possible resulting market volatility may have an adverse effect on a Fund. Political turmoil within the U.S. and abroad may also impact a Fund. Similarly, political events within the U.S. at times have resulted, and may in the future result, in a shutdown of government services, which could negatively affect the U.S. economy, decrease the value of Fund investments, and increase uncertainty in or impair the operation of the U.S. or other securities markets. In 2008, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) placed Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) into conservatorship. As the conservator, FHFA succeeded to all rights, titles, powers and privileges of FNMA and FHLMC and of any stockholder, officer or director of FNMA and FHLMC with respect to FNMA and FHLMC and the assets of FNMA and FHLMC.

Under the Federal Housing Finance Regulatory Reform Act of 2008 (the “Reform Act”), which was included as part of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, FHFA, as conservator or receiver, has broad authority to promote the orderly administration of FNMA’s and FHLMC’s affairs, including the power to repudiate any contract entered into by FNMA or FHLMC prior to FHFA’s appointment as conservator or receiver, as applicable, and the right to transfer or sell any asset or liability of FNMA or FHLMC without any approval, assignment or consent. Although FHFA has indicated that it has no present intention to repudiate or to transfer any guaranty obligations, holders of FNMA or FHLMC mortgage-backed securities would be adversely affected in the event that the FHFA exercised either of these powers granted to it under the Reform Act. In addition, certain rights provided to holders of mortgage-backed securities issued by FNMA and FHLMC under the operative documents related to such securities may not be enforced against FHFA, or enforcement of such rights may be delayed, during the conservatorship or any future receivership. The operative documents for FNMA and FHLMC mortgage-backed securities may provide (or with respect to securities issued prior to the date of the appointment of the conservator may have provided) that upon the occurrence of an event of default on the part of FNMA or FHLMC, in its capacity as guarantor, which includes the appointment of a conservator or receiver, holders of such mortgage-backed securities have the right to replace FNMA or FHLMC as trustee if the requisite percentage of mortgage-backed securities holders consent. The Reform Act prevents mortgage-backed security holders from enforcing such rights if the event of default arises solely because a conservator or receiver has been appointed.

In addition, following the global financial crisis, the Fed attempted to stabilize the economy and support the economic recovery by keeping the federal funds rate (the interest rate at which depository institutions lend reserve balances to other depository institutions overnight) at or near zero percent. The Fed has taken steps in recent years to raise the federal funds rate and is expected to continue to do so in the near term. In addition, as part of its monetary stimulus program known as quantitative easing, the Fed purchased on the open market large quantities of securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities. The Fed discontinued purchasing securities through its quantitative easing program in 2014 and has since focused on reducing its holdings in such securities. To the extent that the Fed reduces its holdings in securities and raises the federal funds rate, there is a risk that interest rates across the financial industry will rise. A general rise in interest rates has the potential to cause investors to move out of fixed-income securities on a large scale, which may increase redemptions from funds that hold large amounts of fixed-income securities.

MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (“MLP”) RISK. Equity securities of MLPs are listed and traded on U.S. securities exchanges. The value of an MLP equity security fluctuates based predominately on the MLP’s financial performance, as well as changes in overall market conditions. Investments in MLP equity securities involve risks that differ from investments in common stocks, including risks related to the fact that investors have limited control of and limited rights to vote on matters affecting the MLP; dilution risks; and risks related to the general partner’s right to require investors to sell their holdings at an undesirable time or price. Debt securities of MLPs have characteristics similar to debt securities of other types of issuers, and are subject to the risks applicable to debt securities in general, such as credit risk, interest rate risk, and liquidity risk. Investments in debt securities of MLPs may not offer the tax characteristics of equity securities of MLPs. To the extent a Fund invests in debt securities of MLPs that are rated below investment grade, such investments are also subject to the risks in discussed in “High Yield Investments (‘Junk Bonds’)” above. Investments in MLPs are subject to cash flow risk and risks related to potential conflicts of interest between the MLP and the MLP’s general partner. Certain MLP securities may trade in lower volumes due to their smaller capitalizations, and may be subject to more abrupt or erratic price movements and lower market liquidity. MLP securities are generally considered interest-rate sensitive investments. During periods of interest rate volatility, these investments may not provide attractive returns. MLPs may be subject to state taxation in certain jurisdictions, which may reduce the amount of income an MLP pays to its investors. In addition, if the tax treatment of an MLP changes, a Fund’s after-tax return from its MLP investment would be materially reduced.

MID CAP SECURITIES RISK. Mid capitalization securities involve greater risks than those associated with larger, more established companies and may be subject to more abrupt or erratic price movements. Securities of such issuers may lack sufficient market liquidity to enable a Fund to effect sales at an advantageous time or without a substantial drop in price. These companies often

have narrower markets, more limited operating or business history and more limited managerial or financial resources than larger, more established companies. As a result, their performance can be more volatile and they face greater risk of business failure, which could increase the volatility of a Fund’s portfolio. Generally, the smaller the company’s size, the greater these risks.

MONEY MARKET INSTRUMENTS AND TEMPORARY INVESTMENT STRATEGIES. Each Fund may hold cash and invest in money market instruments at any time. Each Fund may invest some or all of its assets in cash, high quality money market instruments and shares of money market investment companies for temporary defensive purposes in response to adverse market, economic or political conditions when HFMC or a Fund’s sub-adviser(s) subject to the overall supervision of HFMC, as applicable, deems it appropriate. Money market instruments include, but are not limited to: (1) banker’s acceptances; (2) obligations of governments (whether U.S. or foreign) and their agencies and instrumentalities; (3) short-term corporate obligations, including commercial paper, notes, and bonds; (4) other short-term debt obligations; (5) obligations of U.S. banks, foreign branches of U.S. banks (Eurodollars), U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks (Yankee dollars) and foreign branches of foreign banks; (6) asset-backed securities; and (7) repurchase agreements. In addition, each Fund may invest some or all of its assets in these instruments to maintain liquidity or in response to atypical circumstances such as unusually large cash inflows or redemptions. Under such conditions, a Fund may not invest in accordance with its investment objective or principal investment strategy. As a result, there is no assurance that a Fund will achieve its investment objective and it may lose the benefit of market upswings. Each Fund may also invest in affiliated and unaffiliated money market funds that invest in money market instruments, as permitted by regulations adopted under the 1940 Act. A Fund’s ability to redeem shares of a money market fund may be impacted by liquidity fees and redemption gates under certain circumstances.

MORTGAGE-RELATED SECURITIES RISK. The mortgage-related securities in which a Fund may invest include interests in pools of mortgage loans made by lenders such as savings and loan institutions, mortgage bankers, commercial banks, various governmental, government-related and private organizations and others. A Fund may also invest in similar mortgage-related securities that provide funds for multi-family residences or commercial real estate properties. Mortgage-related securities are subject to certain specific risks. Generally, rising interest rates tend to extend the duration of fixed rate mortgage-backed securities, making them more sensitive to changes in interest rates. As a result, in a period of rising interest rates, if a Fund holds mortgage-backed securities, it may exhibit additional volatility. This is known as “extension risk.” In addition, adjustable and fixed rate mortgage-backed securities are subject to “prepayment risk.” When interest rates decline, borrowers may pay off their mortgages sooner than expected. This can reduce the returns of a Fund because the Fund may have to reinvest that money at lower prevailing interest rates. Mortgage-related securities are also subject to the risk that the underlying loans may not be repaid. The value of mortgage-related securities can also be significantly affected by the market’s perception of the issuers and the creditworthiness of the parties involved. These risks are elevated given the current distressed economic, market, health and labor conditions, notably, increased levels of unemployment, delays and delinquencies in payments of mortgage and rent obligations, and uncertainty regarding the effects and extent of government intervention with respect to mortgage payments and other economic matters.

In addition, legislative, regulatory and enforcement actions seeking to prevent or restrict foreclosures or providing forbearance relief to borrowers of residential mortgage loans may adversely affect the value of mortgage-related securities (e.g., the CARES Act or the Rescue Act). Legislative or regulatory initiatives by federal, state or local legislative bodies or administrative agencies, if enacted or adopted, could delay foreclosure or the exercise of other remedies, provide new defenses to foreclosure, or otherwise impair the ability of the loan servicer to foreclose or realize on a defaulted residential mortgage loan included in a pool of residential mortgage loans backing such residential mortgage-related securities. While the nature or extent of limitations on foreclosure or exercise of other remedies that may be enacted cannot be predicted, any such governmental actions that interfere with the foreclosure process or are designed to protect customers could increase the costs of such foreclosures or exercise of other remedies in respect of residential mortgage loans which collateralize mortgage-related securities held by a Fund, delay the timing or reduce the amount of recoveries on defaulted residential mortgage loans which collateralize mortgage-related securities held by a Fund, and consequently, could adversely impact the yields and distributions a Fund may receive in respect of its ownership of mortgage-related securities collateralized by residential mortgage loans.

The yield characteristics of mortgage securities differ from those of traditional debt securities. Among the major differences are that interest and principal payments are made more frequently on mortgage securities, usually monthly, and that principal may be prepaid at any time. The risks associated with prepayment and the rate at which prepayment may occur are influenced by a variety of economic, geographic, demographic, social and other factors including interest rate levels, changes in housing needs, net equity built by mortgagors in the mortgaged properties, job transfers and unemployment rates.

Mortgage securities differ from conventional bonds in that principal is paid back over the life of the mortgage securities rather than at maturity. As a result, the holder of the mortgage securities (e.g., a Fund) receives monthly scheduled payments of principal and interest, and may receive unscheduled principal payments representing prepayments on the underlying mortgages. When the holder reinvests the payments and any unscheduled prepayments of principal it receives, it may receive a rate of interest which is lower than the rate on the existing mortgage securities. For this reason, mortgage securities are less effective than other types of U.S. Government securities as a means of “locking in” long-term interest rates.

FNMA and FHLMC have entered into a joint initiative under the direction of the FHFA to develop a common securitization platform for the issuance of a uniform mortgage-backed security (the “Single Security Initiative”), which generally aligns the characteristics of FNMA and FHLMC certificates. Uniform mortgage-backed securities are a recent innovation and the effect they may have on the market for mortgage-related securities is uncertain.

Mortgage-related securities may be composed of one or more classes and may be structured either as pass-through securities or collateralized debt obligations (which include CBOs and CLOs). A CBO is ordinarily issued by a trust or other SPE and is typically backed by a diversified pool of fixed income securities (which may include high risk, below investment grade securities) held by such issuer. A CLO is ordinarily issued by a trust or other SPE and is typically collateralized by a pool of loans, which may include, among others, domestic and non-U.S. senior secured loans, senior unsecured loans, and subordinate corporate loans, including loans that may be rated below investment grade or equivalent unrated loans, held by such issuer. Multiple-class mortgage-related securities are referred to herein as “CMOs.” Some CMOs are directly supported by other CMOs, which in turn are supported by mortgage pools. Investors typically receive payments out of the interest and principal on the underlying mortgages, which payments and the priority thereof are determined by the specific terms of the CMO class. CMOs may be issued by U.S. or non-U.S. issuers. CMOs involve special risks, and evaluating them requires special knowledge.

CMO classes may be specially structured in a manner that provides any of a wide variety of investment characteristics, such as yield, effective maturity and interest rate sensitivity. As market conditions change, however, and particularly during periods of rapid or unanticipated changes in market interest rates, any given CMO structure may react differently from the way anticipated and thus affect a Fund’s portfolio in different, and possibly negative, ways. Market changes may also result in increased volatility in market values and reduced liquidity. CMOs may lack a readily available secondary market and be difficult to sell at the price at which a Fund values them.

Certain classes of CMOs and other mortgage-related securities are structured in a manner that makes them extremely sensitive to changes in prepayment rates, such as interest-only (“IO”) and principal-only (“PO”) classes. These securities are frequently referred to as “mortgage derivatives” and may be sensitive to changing interest rates and deteriorating credit environments. IOs are entitled to receive all or a portion of the interest, but none (or only a nominal amount) of the principal payments, from the underlying mortgage assets. If the mortgage assets underlying an IO experience greater than anticipated principal prepayments, then the total amount of interest payments allocable to the IO class, and therefore the yield to investors, generally will be reduced. In some instances, an investor in an IO may fail to recoup all of his or her initial investment, even if the security is government issued or guaranteed or rated AAA or the equivalent. Conversely, PO classes are entitled to receive all or a portion of the principal payments, but none of the interest, from the underlying mortgage assets. PO classes are purchased at substantial discounts from par, and the yield to investors will be reduced if principal payments are slower than expected. Inverse floating rate CMOs, which pay interest at a rate that decreases when a specified index of market rates increases (and vice versa), also may be extremely volatile. If a Fund purchases mortgage-backed securities that are “subordinated” to other interests in the same mortgage pool, the Fund may only receive payments after the pool’s obligations to other investors have been satisfied. For example, an unexpectedly high rate of defaults on the mortgages held by a mortgage pool may limit substantially the pool’s ability to make payments of principal or interest to holders of the securities, which would thus reduce the values of the securities or in some cases render them worthless. A Fund may invest in mortgage-backed securities issued by the U.S. Government. See “U.S. Government Securities Risk” below. To the extent a Fund invests in mortgage-backed securities offered by non-governmental issuers, such as commercial banks, savings and loan institutions, private mortgage insurance companies, mortgage bankers and other secondary market issuers, the Fund may be subject to additional risks. Mortgage-related securities issued by private issuers are subject to the credit risks of the issuers, as well as to interest rate risks. Timely payment of interest and principal of non-governmental issuers are supported by various forms of private insurance or guarantees, including individual loan, title, pool and hazard insurance purchased by the issuer. There can be no assurance that the private insurers can meet their obligations under the policies. An unexpectedly high rate of defaults on the mortgages held by a mortgage pool may adversely affect the value of a mortgage-backed security and could result in losses to a Fund. The risk of such defaults is generally higher in the case of mortgage pools that include subprime mortgages. Subprime mortgages refer to loans made to borrowers with weakened credit histories or with a lower capacity to make timely payments on their mortgages.

Issuers of certain CMOs may have limited ability to enforce the security interest in the underlying assets, and credit enhancements provided to support the securities, if any, may be inadequate to protect investors in the event of default. In addition, as a result of its investment in asset-backed securities, a Fund would be subject to the risk that in certain states it may be difficult to perfect the liens securing the collateral backing certain asset-backed securities. Certain asset-backed securities are based on loans that are unsecured, which means that there is no collateral to seize if the underlying borrower defaults.

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RISK. Municipal securities primarily include debt obligations that are issued by or on behalf of the District of Columbia, states, territories, commonwealths and possessions of the United States and their political subdivisions (e.g., cities, towns, counties, school districts, authorities and commissions) and agencies, authorities and instrumentalities, which are issued to obtain funds for public purposes, including the construction or improvement of a range of public facilities such as airports, bridges, highways, hospitals, housing, jails, mass transportation, nursing homes, parks, public buildings, recreational facilities, school facilities, streets and water and sewer works. Municipal securities may also be issued for other public purposes such as the

refunding of outstanding obligations, the anticipation of taxes or state aids, the payment of judgments, the funding of student loans, community redevelopment, district heating, the purchase of street maintenance and firefighting equipment or any authorized corporate purpose of the issuer, except for the payment of current expenses. Certain types of industrial development (or private activity) bonds may be issued by or on behalf of public corporations to finance privately operated housing facilities, air or water pollution control facilities and certain local facilities for water supply, gas, electricity or sewage or solid waste disposal. In addition, structured securities, such as tobacco bonds, may be issued by municipal entities to securitize future payment streams. Such obligations are included within the term municipal securities if the interest payable thereon is, in the opinion of bond counsel, exempt from federal income taxation (but, note that municipal securities may include securities that pay interest income subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax).

The two principal classifications of municipal securities are general obligation bonds and limited obligation (or revenue) bonds. General obligation bonds are obligations payable from the issuer’s general unrestricted revenues and not from any particular fund or revenue source. The characteristics and methods of enforcement of general obligation bonds vary according to the laws applicable to the particular issuer. Limited obligation bonds are payable only from the revenues derived from a particular facility or class of facilities or, in some cases, from the proceeds of a specific revenue source, such as the user of the facility. Industrial development bonds are in most cases limited obligation bonds payable solely from specific revenues, pledged to payment of the bonds, of the project to be financed. The credit quality of industrial development bonds is usually directly related to the credit standing of the user of the facilities (or the credit standing of a third-party guarantor or other credit enhancement participant, if any). There are, of course, variations in the quality of municipal securities, both within a particular classification and between classifications, depending on various factors (see Appendix B of this SAI). The yields on municipal securities are dependent on a variety of factors, including general money market conditions, the financial condition of the issuer, general conditions of the municipal securities market, the size of the particular offering, the maturity of the obligation and the rating of the issue. The ratings of the various rating agencies represent their opinions as to the quality of the municipal securities which they undertake to rate. However, the ratings are general, not absolute, standards of quality. Consequently, municipal securities of the same maturity, interest rate and rating may have different yields, while municipal securities of the same maturity and interest rate with different ratings may have the same yield.

Municipal securities risks include the possibility that the issuer may not be able to pay interest or repay principal when due; the relative lack of information about certain issuers of municipal securities; and the possibility of future legislative changes that could affect the market for and value of municipal securities. Municipal securities are subject to interest rate risk, credit risk and market risk. Because municipal securities are issued to finance similar projects, conditions in those sectors may affect the overall municipal securities market. In addition, changes in the financial condition of an individual municipal issuer can affect the overall municipal market. Furthermore, many states and municipalities have been adversely impacted by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic as a result of declines in revenues and increased expenditures required to manage and mitigate the outbreak.

For the purpose of diversification under the 1940 Act, identifying the issuer of a municipal security depends on the terms of the security. If a state or a political subdivision of such state pledges its full faith and credit to payment of a security, the state or the political subdivision will be deemed the sole issuer of the security. If the security is backed only by the assets and revenues of an agency, authority or instrumentality of the state or a political subdivision, but not by the state or political subdivision itself, such agency, authority or instrumentality will be deemed to be the sole issuer. Similarly, if the security is backed only by revenues of an enterprise or specific projects of the state, a political subdivision or agency, authority or instrumentality (e.g., utility revenue bonds), and the full faith and credit of the governmental unit is not pledged to the payment thereof, such enterprise or projects will be deemed the sole issuer. In the case of an industrial development bond, if the bond is backed only by certain revenues to be received from the non-governmental user of the project financed by the bond, such non-governmental user will be deemed to be the sole issuer. If, however, in any of the above cases, the state, the political subdivision or some other entity guarantees a security, and the value of all securities issued or guaranteed by the guarantor and owned by a Fund exceeds 10% of the value of the Fund’s total assets, the guarantee will be considered a separate security and will be treated as an issue of the guarantor.

Municipal bonds are traded in the “over-the-counter” market among dealers and other large institutional investors, which, together with the broader fixed-income markets, began in the latter months of 2008 to experience increased volatility and decreased liquidity in response to challenging economic conditions and credit tightening. If market liquidity decreases, a Fund may not be able to sell bonds readily at prices reflecting the values at which the bonds are carried on the Fund's books. An imbalance in supply and demand in the municipal market may result in valuation uncertainties and greater volatility, less liquidity, widening credit spreads and a lack of price transparency in the market.

In addition to these risks, investment in municipal securities is also subject to:

General Obligation Bonds Risk – The full faith, credit and taxing power of the municipality that issues a general obligation bond secures payment of interest and repayment of principal. Timely payments depend on the issuer’s credit quality, ability to raise tax revenues and ability to maintain an adequate tax base.

Revenue (or Limited Obligation) Bonds Risk – Payments of interest and principal on revenue bonds are made only from the revenues generated by a particular facility, class of facilities or the proceeds of a special tax or other revenue source. These payments depend on the money earned by the particular facility or class of facilities, or the amount of revenues derived from another source.

Private Activity (or Industrial Development) Bonds Risk – Municipalities and other public authorities issue private activity bonds to finance development of industrial facilities for use by a private enterprise. The private enterprise pays the principal and interest on the bond, and the issuer does not pledge its full faith, credit and taxing power for repayment. If the private enterprise defaults on its payments, a Fund may not receive any income or get its money back from the investment.

Moral Obligation Bonds Risk – Moral obligation bonds are generally issued by special purpose public authorities of a state or municipality. If the issuer is unable to meet its obligations, repayment of these bonds becomes a moral commitment, but not a legal obligation, of the state or municipality.

Municipal Notes Risk – Municipal notes are shorter term municipal debt obligations. They may provide interim financing in anticipation of, and are secured by, tax collection, bond sales or revenue receipts. If there is a shortfall in the anticipated proceeds, the notes may not be fully repaid and a Fund may lose money.

Municipal Bankruptcy Risk – The City of Detroit filed for federal bankruptcy protection on July 18, 2013. The bankruptcy of large cities such as Detroit is relatively rare, making the consequences of such bankruptcy filings difficult to predict. Accordingly, it is unclear what impact a large city’s bankruptcy filing would have on the city's outstanding obligations or on the obligations of other municipal issuers in that state. It is possible that the city could default on, restructure or otherwise avoid some or all of these obligations, which may negatively affect the marketability, liquidity and value of securities issued by the city and other municipalities in that state. If a Fund holds securities that are affected by a city's bankruptcy filing, a Fund's investments in those securities may lose value, which could cause the Fund's performance to decline.

Municipal Lease Obligations Risks – In a municipal lease obligation, the issuer agrees to make payments when due on the lease obligation. The issuer will generally appropriate municipal funds for that purpose, but is not obligated to do so. Although the issuer does not pledge its unlimited taxing power for payment of the lease obligation, the lease obligation is secured by the leased property. However, if the issuer does not fulfill its payment obligation (i.e., annually appropriate money to make the lease payments) it may be difficult to sell the property and the proceeds of a sale may not cover a Fund’s loss.

Tax-Exempt Status Risk – Municipal securities are subject to the risk that the IRS may determine that an issuer has not complied with applicable tax requirements and that interest from the municipal security is taxable, which may result in a significant decline in the value of the security.

Investment in Bonds Issued by Puerto Rico. As with state municipal securities, events in any of the territories, such as Puerto Rico, where a Fund may invest may affect the Fund’s investments and its performance. Certain municipal issuers in Puerto Rico have experienced and continue to experience significant financial difficulties and repeated credit rating downgrades. For example, in recent years, Puerto Rico has experienced difficult financial and economic conditions, which may negatively affect the value of a Fund's holdings in Puerto Rico municipal securities. In addition, Puerto Rico has recently experienced other events that have adversely affected its economy, infrastructure, and financial condition, which may prolong any debt restructuring and economic recovery efforts and processes. Puerto Rico’s continued financial difficulties could reduce its ability to access financial markets, potentially increasing the likelihood of a restructuring or default for Puerto Rico municipal securities that may affect a Fund’s investments and its performance.

OPERATIONAL RISKS. An investment in a Fund, like any fund, can involve operational risks arising from factors such as processing errors, inadequate or failed processes, failure in systems and technology, changes in personnel and errors caused by third-party service providers. Among other things, these errors or failures as well as other technological issues may adversely affect the Funds' ability to calculate their net asset values in a timely manner, including over a potentially extended period. While the Funds seek to minimize such events through controls and oversight, there may still be failures that could causes losses to a Fund. In addition, as the use of technology increases, a Fund may be more susceptible to operational risks through breaches in cybersecurity. A breach in cybersecurity refers to both intentional and unintentional events that may cause a Fund to lose proprietary information, suffer data corruption, or operational capacity. As a result, a Fund may incur regulatory penalties, reputational damage, additional compliance costs associated with corrected measures and/or financial loss. In addition, cybersecurity breaches of a Fund’s third-party service providers or issuers in which a Fund invests may also subject a Fund to many of the same risks associated with direct cybersecurity breaches. In addition, the Funds may rely on various third-party sources to calculate its net asset value. As a result, each Fund is subject to certain operational risks associated with reliance on service providers and service providers’ data sources. In particular, errors or system failures and other technological issues may adversely impact a Fund’s calculation of its net asset value, and such net asset value calculation issues may result in inaccurately calculated net asset values, delays in net asset value calculation, and/or the inability to calculate net asset value over extended periods. The Funds may be unable to recover any losses associated with such failures.

OTHER CAPITAL SECURITIES RISK. Other capital securities encompass a group of instruments referred to in capital markets as “Hybrids,” “Tier I and Tier 2” and “TRUPS.” These securities give issuers flexibility in managing their capital structure. The features associated with these securities are predominately debt like in that they have coupons, pay interest and in most cases have a final stated maturity. There are certain features that give the companies flexibility not commonly found in fixed income securities, which include, but are not limited to, deferral of interest payments under certain conditions and subordination to debt securities in the event of default. The deferral of interest payments, even for an extended period of time, is generally not an event of default, and the ability of the holders of such instruments to accelerate payment is generally more limited than with other debt securities.

OTHER INVESTMENT COMPANIES RISK. A Fund may invest in securities of other investment companies, such as open-end or closed-end management investment companies, including ETFs, or in pooled accounts, or other unregistered accounts or investment vehicles to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, the rules thereunder and applicable SEC staff interpretations thereof, or applicable exemptive relief granted by the SEC.

Generally, under the 1940 Act, a Fund will not purchase securities of an investment company if, as a result: (1) more than 10% of the Fund’s total assets would be invested in securities of other investment companies; (2) such purchase would result in more than 3% of the total outstanding voting securities of any such investment company being held by the Fund; or (3) more than 5% of the Fund’s total assets would be invested in any one such investment company. In some instances, a Fund may invest in an investment company in excess of these limits. For example, a Fund may invest in other registered investment companies, such as mutual funds, closed-end funds and exchange-traded funds, and in business development companies ("BDCs") in excess of the statutory limits imposed by the 1940 Act in reliance on Rule 12d1-4 under the 1940 Act. These investments would be subject to the applicable conditions of Rule 12d1-4, which in part would affect or otherwise impose certain limits on the investments and operations of the underlying fund. Accordingly, if a Fund serves as an “underlying fund" to another Hartford Fund or an unaffiliated investment company, the Fund’s ability to invest in other investment companies, private funds and other investment vehicles may be limited and, under these circumstances, the Fund’s investments in other investment companies, private funds and other investment vehicles will be consistent with applicable law and/or exemptive relief obtained from the SEC.

Investments in ETFs and listed closed-end funds are subject to the additional risk that shares of the ETF or closed-end fund may trade at a premium or discount to their net asset value per share. There may also not be an active trading market available for shares of some ETFs or closed-end funds. Additionally, trading of ETF and closed-end fund shares may be halted and ETF and closed-end fund shares may be delisted by the listing exchange. In addition, a Fund pays brokerage commissions in connection with the purchase and sale of shares of ETF and closed-end funds. ETFs and closed-end funds are also subject to specific risks depending on the nature of the ETF or closed-end fund, such as liquidity risk, sector risk, and foreign and emerging markets risk, as well as risks associated with fixed income securities, real estate investments and commodities. Closed-end funds may utilize more leverage than other types of investment companies. They can utilize leverage by issuing preferred stocks or debt securities to raise additional capital which can, in turn, be used to buy more securities and leverage its portfolio. A BDC, which is a type of closed-end fund, typically invests in small and medium-sized companies. A BDC’s portfolio is subject to the risks inherent in investing in smaller companies, including that portfolio companies may be dependent on a small number of products or services and may be more adversely affected by poor economic or market conditions. Some BDCs invest substantially, or even exclusively, in one sector or industry group and therefore the BDC may be susceptible to adverse conditions and economic or regulatory occurrences affecting the sector or industry group, which tends to increase volatility and result in higher risk. The Small Business Credit Availability Act permits BDCs to adopt a lower asset coverage ratio, thereby enhancing their ability to use leverage. Investments in BDCs that use greater leverage may be subject to heightened risks.

A Fund will indirectly bear a pro rata share of fees and expenses incurred by any investment companies in which the Fund is invested. A Fund’s pro rata portion of the cumulative expenses charged by the investment companies is calculated as a percentage of the Fund’s average net assets. The pro rata portion of the cumulative expenses may be higher or lower depending on the allocation of a Fund’s assets among the investment companies and the actual expenses of the investment companies. BDC expenses are similar to the expenses paid by any operating company held by a Fund. They are not direct costs paid by Fund shareholders and are not used to calculate a Fund’s net asset value. They have no impact on the costs associated with Fund operations.

PREFERRED STOCK RISK. The prices and yields of nonconvertible preferred stocks generally move with changes in interest rates and the issuer’s credit quality, similar to debt securities. The value of convertible preferred stocks varies in response to many factors, including, for example, the value of the underlying equity securities, general market and economic conditions and convertible market valuations, as well as changes in interest rates, credit spreads and the credit quality of the issuer.

PRIVATE PLACEMENT RISK. Investments in private placements are generally considered to be illiquid. Privately placed securities may be difficult to sell promptly or at reasonable prices and might thereby cause a Fund difficulty in satisfying redemption requests. In addition, less information may be available about companies that make private placements than about publicly offered companies and such companies may not be subject to the disclosure and other investor protection requirements that would be applicable if their securities were publicly traded. Privately placed securities are typically fair valued and generally have no secondary trading market; therefore, such investments may be more difficult to value than publicly traded securities. Difficulty in valuing

a private placement may make it difficult to accurately determine a Fund’s exposure to private placement investments, which could cause the Fund to invest to a greater extent than permitted in illiquid investments and subject the Fund to increased risks. Private placement investments may subject a Fund to contingent liabilities in the event a private issuer is acquired by another company during the period it is held by the Fund. Private placement investments may involve a high degree of business and financial risk and may result in substantial losses. These factors may have a negative effect on a Fund’s performance.

Some privately placed companies in which a Fund may invest may be operating at a loss or with substantial variations in operating results from period to period and may need substantial additional capital to support expansion or to achieve or maintain competitive positions. Such companies may face intense competition, including competition from companies with much greater financial resources, much more extensive development, production, marketing and service capabilities and a much larger number of qualified managerial and technical personnel. There is no assurance that the marketing efforts of any particular company will be successful or that its business will succeed. In addition, timely or accurate information may at times not be readily available about the business, financial condition and results of operations of the privately held companies in which a Fund invests. Private debt investments also are subject to interest rate risk, credit risk and duration risk.

Private Investments in Public Equity (PIPEs) Risk. PIPEs are equity securities issued in a private placement by companies that have outstanding, publicly traded equity securities of the same class. Shares in PIPEs generally are not registered with the SEC until after a certain time period from the date the private sale is completed. PIPE transactions will generally result in a Fund acquiring either restricted stock or an instrument convertible into restricted stock. As with investments in other types of restricted securities, such an investment may be illiquid. A Fund's ability to dispose of securities acquired in PIPE transactions may depend upon the registration of such securities for resale. Any number of factors may prevent or delay a proposed registration. Alternatively, it may be possible for securities acquired in a PIPE transaction to be resold in transactions exempt from registration in accordance with Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), or otherwise under the federal securities laws. There is no guarantee, however, that an active trading market for the securities will exist at the time of disposition of the securities, and the lack of such a market could hurt the market value of the Fund's investments. As a result, even if the Fund is able to have securities acquired in a PIPE transaction registered or sell such securities through an exempt transaction, the Fund may not be able to sell all the securities on short notice, and the sale of the securities could lower the market price of the securities.

QUANTITATIVE INVESTING RISK. A Fund may use quantitative analysis techniques to manage all or a portion of the Fund’s portfolio. The value of securities or other investments selected using quantitative analysis may perform differently from the market as a whole or from their expected performance for many reasons, including, but not limited to, factors used in building the quantitative analytical framework, the weights placed on each factor, the accuracy of historical data supplied by third-parties, and changing sources of market returns. The models used may be predictive in nature and such models may result in an incorrect assessment of future events. There may also be technical issues with the construction and implementation of quantitative models (for example, software or other technology malfunctions, or programming inaccuracies). The use of quantitative analysis to support investment decisions may cause a Fund to underperform other funds that have similar investment strategies or that select securities or other investments using other types of analysis. In addition, considerations that affect a security’s value can change over time and these changes may not be reflected in the quantitative model. There can be no assurance that quantitative investing will help a Fund to achieve its investment objective.

REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (“REITs”) RISK. A Fund may invest in REITs. REITs pool funds for investment primarily in income producing real estate or real estate loans or interests. A REIT is not taxed on income distributed to shareholders if it complies with several requirements relating to its organization, ownership, assets, and income and a requirement that it distribute to its shareholders generally at least 90% of its taxable income (other than net capital gains) for each taxable year. REITs can generally be classified as Equity REITs, Mortgage REITs or Hybrid REITs. Equity REITs, which invest the majority of their assets directly in real property, derive their income primarily from rents. Equity REITs can also realize capital gains by selling properties that have appreciated in value. Mortgage REITs, which invest the majority of their assets in real estate mortgages, derive their income primarily from interest payments. Hybrid REITs combine the characteristics of both Equity REITs and Mortgage REITs. A Fund will not invest in real estate directly, but only in securities issued by real estate companies. However, a Fund may be subject to risks similar to those associated with the direct ownership of real estate (in addition to securities markets risks). These include declines in the value of real estate, risks related to general and local economic conditions, dependency on management skill, heavy cash flow dependency, possible lack of availability of mortgage funds, overbuilding, extended vacancies of properties, increased competition, increases in property taxes and operating expenses, changes in zoning laws, losses due to costs resulting from the clean-up of environmental problems, liability to third parties for damages resulting from environmental problems, casualty or condemnation losses, limitations on rents, changes in neighborhood values, the appeal of properties to tenants and changes in interest rates. Investments in REITs may subject Fund shareholders to duplicate management and administrative fees.

In addition to these risks, Equity REITs may be affected by changes in the value of the underlying property owned by the trusts, while Mortgage REITs may be affected by the quality of any credit extended. Further, Equity and Mortgage REITs are dependent upon management skills and generally may not be diversified. Equity and Mortgage REITs are also subject to heavy cash flow dependency, defaults by borrowers and self-liquidation. In addition, if applicable, Equity and Mortgage REITs could possibly fail to qualify for the beneficial tax treatment available to REITs under the Code, or to maintain their exemptions from registration under

the 1940 Act. The above factors may also adversely affect a borrower’s or a lessee’s ability to meet its obligations to the REIT. In the event of a default by a borrower or lessee, the REIT may experience delays in enforcing its rights as a mortgagee or lessor and may incur substantial costs associated with protecting investments.

REAL ESTATE RELATED SECURITIES RISKS. The main risk of real estate related securities is that the value of the underlying real estate may go down. Many factors may affect real estate values, including the general and local economies, vacancy rates, tenant bankruptcies, the ability to re-lease space under expiring leases on attractive terms, the amount of new construction in a particular area, the laws and regulations (including zoning and tax laws) affecting real estate and the costs of owning, maintaining and improving real estate. The availability of mortgages and changes in interest rates, a decline in rents resulting from unanticipated economic, legal or technological developments or a decline in the price of securities of real estate companies due to a failure of borrowers to pay their loans or poor management may also affect real estate values. Further, the real estate industry is particularly sensitive to economic downturns. When economic growth is slow, demand for property decreases and prices may decline. If a Fund’s real estate related investments are concentrated in one geographic area or in one property type, the Fund will be particularly subject to the risks associated with that area or property type.

REGIONAL/COUNTRY FOCUS RISK. To the extent that a Fund focuses its investments in a particular geographic region or country, the Fund may be subject to increased currency, political, social, environmental, regulatory and other risks not typically associated with investing in a larger number of regions or countries. In addition, certain foreign economies may themselves be focused in particular industries or more vulnerable to political changes than the U.S. economy, which may have a pronounced impact on the Fund’s investments. As a result, such Fund may be subject to greater price volatility and risk of loss than a fund holding more geographically diverse investments. Regional and country focus risk is heightened in emerging markets.

The following sets forth additional information regarding risks associated with investing in certain geographic regions and countries.

Investments in Central and South America Risk. The economies of certain Central and South American countries are generally considered emerging markets and are generally characterized by high interest rates, economic volatility, inflation, currency devaluations, government defaults, high unemployment rates, and political, economic and social instability. Currency devaluations in any one Latin American country can have a significant effect on the entire Latin American region. In addition, commodities (such as oil, gas and minerals) represent a significant percentage of exports for these regions and many economies in these regions are particularly sensitive to fluctuations in commodity prices. Certain Latin American countries may experience sudden and large adjustments in their currency which, in turn, can have a disruptive and negative effect on foreign investors. Certain Latin American countries may impose restrictions on the free conversion of their currency into foreign currencies, including the U.S. dollar. There is no significant foreign exchange market for many currencies and it would, as a result, be difficult for a Fund to engage in foreign currency transactions designed to protect the value of the Fund’s interests in securities denominated in such currencies. A relatively small number of Latin American companies represents a large portion of Latin America’s total market and thus may be more sensitive to adverse political or economic circumstances and market movements. Adverse economic events in one country may have a significant adverse effect on other countries in these regions. Governmental actions and political instability in the future could have a significant effect on economic conditions in Latin American countries, which could affect the companies in which a Fund invests and, therefore, the value of Fund shares. Latin American economies that depend on foreign credit and loans could fall into recession because of tighter international credit supplies in a global economic crisis. Substantial limitations may exist in certain countries with respect to a Fund’s ability to repatriate investment income, capital or the proceeds of sales of securities. A Fund could be adversely affected by delays in, or a refusal to grant, any required governmental approval for repatriation of capital, as well as by the application to the Fund of any restrictions on investments.

Certain Latin American countries have entered into regional trade agreements that are designed to, among other things, reduce barriers between countries, increase competition among companies and reduce government subsidies in certain industries. No assurance can be given that these changes will be successful in the long term, or that these changes will result in the economic stability intended. There is a possibility that these trade arrangements will not be fully implemented, or will be partially or completely unwound. It is also possible that a significant participant could choose to abandon a trade agreement, which could diminish its credibility and influence. Any of these occurrences could have adverse effects on the markets of both participating and non-participating countries, including sharp appreciation or depreciation of participants’ national currencies and a significant increase in exchange rate volatility, a resurgence in economic protectionism, an undermining of confidence in the Latin American markets, an undermining of Latin American economic stability, the collapse or slowdown of the drive towards Latin American economic unity, and/or reversion of the attempts to lower government debt and inflation rates that were introduced in anticipation of such trade agreements. Such developments could have an adverse impact on a Fund’s investments in Latin America generally or in specific countries participating in such trade agreements.

For certain countries in Latin America, political risks have created significant uncertainty in financial markets and may further limit the economic recovery in the region. Additionally, recent political and social unrest in Venezuela has resulted in a massive disruption in the Venezuelan economy, including a deep recession and near hyperinflation. Terrorism and related geo-political risks have led, and may in the future lead, to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on world economies and markets generally.

Investments in Europe Risk. The Economic and Monetary Union of the European Union requires compliance with restrictions on inflation rates, deficits, interest rates, debt levels and fiscal and monetary controls, each of which may significantly affect every country in Europe. Decreasing imports or exports, changes in governmental or European Union regulations on trade, changes in the exchange rate of the euro (the common currency of certain European Union countries), the default or threat of default by an European Union member country on its sovereign debt, and/or an economic recession in an European Union member country may have a significant adverse effect on the economies of European Union member countries and their trading partners. The European financial markets have experienced volatility and adverse trends due to concerns about economic downturns or rising government debt levels in several European countries. These events have adversely affected the exchange rate of the euro and may continue to significantly affect every country in Europe, including countries that do not use the euro. Responses to the financial problems by European governments, central banks and others, including austerity measures and reforms, may not produce the desired results, may result in social unrest and may limit future growth and economic recovery or have other unintended consequences. Further defaults or restructurings by governments and other entities of their debt could have additional adverse effects on economies, financial markets and asset valuations around the world. A default or debt restructuring by any European country would adversely impact holders of that country’s debt, and sellers of credit default swaps linked to that country’s creditworthiness (which may be located in other countries). These events may have an adverse effect on the value and exchange rate of the euro and may continue to significantly affect the economies of every country in Europe, including European Union member countries that do not use the euro and non-European Union member countries. If any member country exits the European Monetary Union, the departing country would face the risks of currency devaluation and its trading partners and banks and others around the world that hold the departing country’s debt would face the risk of significant losses. In addition, the resulting economic instability of Europe and the currency markets in general could have a severe adverse effect on the value of securities held by a Fund.

The impact of the United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union, commonly known as “Brexit,” and the potential departure of one or more other countries from the European Union has and may have significant political and financial consequences for global markets. These consequences include greater market volatility and illiquidity, currency fluctuations, deterioration in economic activity, a decrease in business confidence and an increased likelihood of a recession in such markets. Uncertainty relating to the United Kingdom’s post-departure framework and relationships may have adverse effects on asset valuations and the renegotiation of trade agreements, as well as an increase in financial regulation in such markets. This may adversely impact Fund performance.

Certain European countries have also developed increasingly strained relationships with the U.S., and if these relations were to worsen, they could adversely affect European issuers that rely on the U.S. for trade. Secessionist movements, such as the Catalan movement in Spain and the independence movement in Scotland, as well as governmental or other responses to such movements, may also create instability and uncertainty in the region. In addition, the national politics of countries in the European Union have been unpredictable and subject to influence by disruptive political groups and ideologies. The governments of European Union countries may be subject to change and such countries may experience social and political unrest. Unanticipated or sudden political or social developments may result in sudden and significant investment losses. The occurrence of terrorist incidents throughout Europe also could impact financial markets. The impact of these events is not clear but could be significant and far-reaching and could adversely affect the value (and liquidity) of a Fund’s investments.

Investments in Asia Risk. Certain Asian economies have experienced high inflation, high unemployment, currency devaluations and restrictions, and over-extension of credit. Many Asian economies have experienced rapid growth and industrialization, and there is no assurance that this growth rate will be maintained. During the global recession that began in 2009, many of the export-driven Asian economies experienced the effects of the economic slowdown in the United States and Europe, and certain Asian governments implemented stimulus plans, low-rate monetary policies and currency devaluations. Economic events in any one Asian country may have a significant economic effect on the entire Asian region, as well as on major trading partners outside Asia. Any adverse event in the Asian markets may have a significant adverse effect on some or all of the economies of the countries in which a Fund invests. Many Asian countries are subject to political risk, including corruption and regional conflict with neighboring countries. In addition, many Asian countries are subject to social and labor risks associated with demands for improved political, economic and social conditions.

Investments in China Risk. Investments in securities of companies domiciled in the People’s Republic of China (“China” or the “PRC”) involve a high degree of risk and special considerations not typically associated with investing in the U.S. securities markets. Such heightened risks include, among others, an authoritarian government, popular unrest associated with demands for improved political, economic and social conditions, the impact of regional conflict on the economy and hostile relations with neighboring countries. Military conflicts, either in response to internal social unrest or conflicts with other countries, could disrupt economic development. The Chinese economy is vulnerable to the long-running disagreements with Hong Kong related to integration. China

has a complex territorial dispute regarding the sovereignty of Taiwan; Taiwan-based companies and individuals are significant investors in China. Potential military conflict between China and Taiwan may adversely affect securities of Chinese issuers. In addition, China has strained international relations with Japan, India, Russia and other neighbors due to territorial disputes, historical animosities and other defense concerns. China could be affected by military events on the Korean peninsula or internal instability within North Korea. These situations may cause uncertainty in the Chinese market and may adversely affect the performance of the Chinese economy.

The U.S. government may occasionally place restrictions on investments in Chinese companies. For example, on June 3, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order prohibiting U.S. persons from purchasing or selling publicly traded securities (including publicly traded securities that are derivative of, or are designed to provide exposure to, such securities) of any Chinese company identified as a Chinese Military Industrial Complex Company (“CMIC”). This executive order superseded a prior similar order from then-President Trump. A number of Chinese issuers have been designated under this program and more could be added. Certain implementation matters related to the scope of, and compliance with, the executive order have not yet been resolved, and the ultimate application and enforcement of the executive order may change. As a result, the executive order and related guidance may significantly reduce the liquidity of such securities, force a Fund to sell certain positions at inopportune times or for unfavorable prices, and restrict future investments by a Fund.

The Chinese government has implemented significant economic reforms in order to liberalize trade policy, promote foreign investment in the economy, reduce government control of the economy and develop market mechanisms. But there can be no assurance that these reforms will continue or that they will be effective. Despite reforms and privatizations of companies in certain sectors, the Chinese government still exercises substantial influence over many aspects of the private sector and may own or control many companies. The Chinese government continues to maintain a major role in economic policy making and investing in China involves risks of losses due to expropriation, nationalization, confiscation of assets and property, and the imposition of restrictions on foreign investments and on repatriation of capital invested. In addition, the imposition of sanctions and other government restrictions by the United States and other governments may also result in losses.

The Chinese government may intervene in the Chinese financial markets, such as by the imposition of trading restrictions, a ban on “naked” short selling or the suspension of short selling for certain stocks. This may affect market price and liquidity of these stocks, and may have an unpredictable impact on the investment activities of a Fund. Furthermore, such market interventions may have a negative impact on market sentiment which may in turn affect the performance of the securities markets and as a result the performance of a Fund.

In addition, there is less regulation and monitoring of the securities markets and the activities of investors, brokers and other participants in China than in the United States. Accordingly, issuers of securities in China are not subject to the same degree of regulation as those in the United States with respect to such matters as insider trading rules, tender offer regulation, stockholder proxy requirements and the requirements mandating timely and accurate disclosure of information. Stock markets in China are in the process of change and further development. This may lead to trading volatility, and difficulties in the settlement and recording of transactions and interpretation and application of the relevant regulations. Custodians may not be able to offer the level of service and safe-keeping in relation to the settlement and administration of securities in China that is customary in more developed markets. In particular, there is a risk that a Fund may not be recognized as the owner of securities that are held on behalf of a Fund by a sub-custodian. A Fund thus faces the risk of being unable to enforce its rights with respect to its holdings of Chinese investments.

The RMB, China’s official currency, is currently not a freely convertible currency and is subject to foreign exchange control policies and repatriation restrictions imposed by the Chinese government. The imposition of currency controls may negatively impact performance and liquidity of a Fund as capital may become trapped in the PRC. A Fund could be adversely affected by delays in, or a refusal to grant, any required governmental approval for repatriation of capital, as well as by the application to a Fund of any restrictions on investments. At times, there may be insufficient offshore RMB for a Fund to remain fully invested in Chinese equities. Investing in entities either in, or which have a substantial portion of their operations in, the PRC may require a Fund to adopt special procedures, seek local government approvals or take other actions, each of which may involve additional costs and delays to a Fund.

While the Chinese economy has grown rapidly in recent years, there is no assurance that this growth rate will be maintained. China may experience substantial rates of inflation or economic recessions, causing a negative effect on the economy and securities market. China’s economy is heavily dependent on export growth. Reduction in spending on Chinese products and services, institution of tariffs or other trade barriers or a downturn in any of the economies of China’s key trading partners may have an adverse impact on the securities of Chinese issuers. The tax laws and regulations in the PRC are subject to change, including the issuance of authoritative guidance or enforcement, possibly with retroactive effect. The interpretation, applicability and enforcement of such laws by the PRC tax authorities are not as consistent and transparent as those of more developed nations, and may vary over time and from region to region. The application and enforcement of the PRC tax rules could have a significant adverse effect on a Fund and its investors, particularly in relation to capital gains withholding tax imposed upon non-residents. In addition, the

accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards and practices applicable to Chinese companies may be less rigorous, and may result in significant differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with PRC accounting standards and practices and those prepared in accordance with international accounting standards.

Investments in China A-Shares – China A-shares are equity securities of companies located in China that trade on Chinese stock exchanges such as the Shanghai Stock Exchange (“SSE”) and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (“SZSE”) (“China A-shares”). Foreign investment in China A-shares on the SSE and SZSE has historically not been permitted, other than through a license granted under regulations in the PRC known as the Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (“QFII”) and Renminbi Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (“RQFII”) systems. On May 7, 2020, the People’s Bank of China (“PBOC”) and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (“SAFE”) jointly issued the Regulations on Funds of Securities and Futures Investment by Foreign Institutional Investors (PBOC & SAFE Announcement [2020] No. 2, hereinafter referred to as the “FII Regulations”), which came into effect on June 6, 2020. The FII Regulations unify and supersede the rules applicable to QFII and RQFII regimes. One of the key changes of the FII Regulations is the removal of quota restrictions on investment.

Investment in eligible China A-shares listed and traded on the SSE or SZSE is also permitted through the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect program or the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect program, as applicable (each, a “Stock Connect” and collectively, “Stock Connects”). Each Stock Connect is a securities trading and clearing links program established by The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (“SEHK”), the Hong Kong Securities Clearing Company Limited (“HKSCC”), the SSE or SZSE, as applicable, and China Securities Depository and Clearing Corporation Limited (“CSDCC”) that aims to provide mutual stock market access between the PRC and Hong Kong by permitting investors to trade and settle shares on each market through their local securities brokers. Under Stock Connects, a Fund’s trading of eligible China A-shares listed on the SSE or SZSE, as applicable, would be effectuated through its Hong Kong broker and a securities trading service company established by SEHK.

Although no individual investment quotas or licensing requirements apply to investors in Stock Connects, trading through a Stock Connect’s Northbound Trading Link is subject to daily investment quota limitations which require that buy orders for China A-shares be rejected once the daily quota is exceeded (although a Fund will be permitted to sell China A-shares regardless of the quota). These limitations may restrict a Fund from investing in China A-shares on a timely basis, which could affect a Fund’s ability to effectively pursue its investment strategy. Investment quotas are also subject to change. Investment in eligible China A-shares through a Stock Connect is subject to trading, clearance and settlement procedures that could pose risks to a Fund. China A-shares purchased through Stock Connects generally may not be sold or otherwise transferred other than through Stock Connects in accordance with applicable rules. For example, the PRC regulations require that in order for an investor to sell any China A-share on a certain trading day, there must be sufficient China A-shares in the investor’s account before the market opens on that day. If there are insufficient China A-shares in the investor’s account, the sell order will be rejected by the SSE or SZSE, as applicable. SEHK carries out pre-trade checking on sell orders of certain stocks listed on the SSE market (“SSE Securities”) or SZSE market (“SZSE Securities”) of its participants (i.e., stock brokers) to ensure that this requirement is satisfied. While shares must be designated as eligible to be traded under a Stock Connect, those shares may also lose such designation, and if this occurs, such shares may be sold but cannot be purchased through a Stock Connect. In addition, Stock Connects will only operate on days when both the Chinese and Hong Kong markets are open for trading, and banking services are available in both markets on the corresponding settlement days. Therefore, an investment in China A-shares through a Stock Connect may subject a Fund to a risk of price fluctuations on days when the Chinese market is open, but a Stock Connect is not trading. Moreover, day (turnaround) trading is not permitted on the China A-shares market. If an investor buys China A-shares on day “T,” the investor will only be able to sell the China A-shares on or after day T+1. Further, since all trades of eligible China A-shares must be settled in RMB, investors must have timely access to a reliable supply of offshore RMB, which cannot be guaranteed. RMB could potentially be subject to devaluation. Any devaluation of RMB could adversely affect a Fund’s investments. If a Fund holds a class of shares denominated in a local currency other than RMB, a Fund will be exposed to currency exchange risk if a Fund converts the local currency into RMB for investments in China A-shares. A Fund may also incur conversion costs.

China A-shares held through the nominee structure under a Stock Connect will be held through HKSCC as nominee on behalf of investors. The precise nature and rights of a Fund as the beneficial owner of the SSE Securities or SZSE Securities through HKSCC as nominee is not well defined under the PRC laws. There is a lack of a clear definition of, and distinction between, legal ownership and beneficial ownership under the PRC laws and there have been few cases involving a nominee account structure in the PRC courts. The exact nature and methods of enforcement of the rights and interests of a Fund under the PRC laws is also uncertain. In the unlikely event that HKSCC becomes subject to winding up proceedings in Hong Kong, there is a risk that the SSE Securities or SZSE Securities may not be regarded as held for the beneficial ownership of a Fund or as part of the general assets of HKSCC available for general distribution to its creditors. Notwithstanding the fact that HKSCC does not claim proprietary interests in the SSE Securities or SZSE Securities held in its omnibus stock account in the CSDCC, the CSDCC as the share registrar for SSE- or SZSE-listed companies will still treat HKSCC as one of the shareholders when it handles corporate actions in respect of such SSE Securities or SZSE Securities. HKSCC monitors the corporate actions affecting SSE Securities and SZSE Securities and keeps participants of Central Clearing and Settlement

System (“CCASS”) informed of all such corporate actions that require CCASS participants to take steps in order to participate in them. Investors may only exercise their voting rights by providing their voting instructions to HKSCC through participants of CCASS. All voting instructions from CCASS participants will be consolidated by HKSCC, who will then submit a combined single voting instruction to the relevant SSE- or SZSE-listed company.

For defaults occurring on or after January 1, 2020, Hong Kong's Investor Compensation Fund covers investors' losses in relation to securities traded on a stock market operated by the SSE or the SZSE and in respect of which an order for sale or purchase is permitted to be routed through the northbound link of a Stock Connect arrangement. On the other hand, since a Fund carries out northbound trading through securities brokers in Hong Kong but not Mainland Chinese brokers, they are not protected by the China Securities Investor Protection Fund in Mainland China.

Market participants are able to participate in Stock Connects subject to meeting certain information technology capability, risk management and other requirements as may be specified by the relevant exchange and/or clearing house. Further, the “connectivity” in Stock Connects requires routing of orders across the border of Hong Kong and mainland China. This requires the development of new information technology systems on the part of SEHK and exchange participants. There is no assurance that the systems of SEHK and market participants will function properly or will continue to be adapted to changes and developments in both markets. In the event that the relevant systems fail to function properly, trading in China A-shares through Stock Connects could be disrupted.

The Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect program launched in November 2014 and the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect program launched in December 2016 are both in their initial stages. The current regulations are relatively untested and there is no certainty as to how they will be applied or interpreted going forward. In addition, the current regulations are subject to change and there can be no assurance that a Stock Connect will not be discontinued. New regulations may be issued from time to time by the regulators and stock exchanges in mainland China and Hong Kong in connection with operations, legal enforcement and cross-border trades under Stock Connects. A Fund may be adversely affected as a result of such changes. Furthermore, the securities regimes and legal systems of mainland China and Hong Kong differ significantly and issues may arise from the differences on an on-going basis. In the event that the relevant systems fail to function properly, trading in both markets through Stock Connects could be disrupted and a Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objective may be adversely affected. In addition, a Fund’s investments in China A-shares through Stock Connects are generally subject to Chinese securities regulations and listing rules, among other restrictions. Further, different fees, costs and taxes are imposed on foreign investors acquiring China A-shares through Stock Connects, and these fees, costs and taxes may be higher than comparable fees, costs and taxes imposed on owners of other securities providing similar investment exposure.

China A-shares may only be bought from, or sold to, a Fund at times when the relevant China A-shares may be sold or purchased on the relevant Chinese stock exchange. The China A-shares market has a higher propensity for trading suspensions than many other global equity markets. In addition, the SSE and SZSE may close for extended periods for holidays or otherwise, which impacts a Fund’s ability to trade in China A-shares during those periods. Trading suspensions in certain stocks and extended market closures could lead to greater market execution risk, valuation risks, liquidity risks and costs for a Fund. The SSE and SZSE currently apply a daily price limit, generally set at 10%, of the amount of fluctuation permitted in the prices of China A-shares during a single trading day. The daily price limit refers to price movements only and does not restrict trading within the relevant limit. There can be no assurance that a liquid market on an exchange will exist for any particular China A-share or for any particular time.

China Bond Connect Risk – There are risks associated with a Fund’s investment in Chinese government bonds and other PRC-based debt instruments traded on the mainland China inter-bank bond market through the Bond Connect program. Bond Connect refers to the arrangement between Hong Kong and mainland China that enables mainland China and overseas investors to trade various types of debt securities in each other’s bond markets through connection between the relevant respective financial infrastructure institutions. Such trading is subject to a number of restrictions that may affect a Fund’s investments and returns. For example, investments made through Bond Connect are subject to order, clearance and settlement procedures that are relatively untested in the PRC, which could pose risks to a Fund. Furthermore, securities purchased through Bond Connect will be held on behalf of ultimate investors (such as a Fund) via a book entry omnibus account in the name of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority Central Money Markets Unit maintained with either the China Central Depository & Clearing Co. (“CDCC”) or the Shanghai Clearing House (“SCH”), each a PRC-based custodian. A Fund’s ownership interest in Bond Connect securities will not be reflected directly in book entry with CDCC or SCH and will instead only be reflected on the books of its Hong Kong sub-custodian. This recordkeeping system also subjects a Fund to various risks, such as the risks of settlement delays and counterparty default of the Hong Kong sub-custodian, or the risk that the Fund may have a limited ability to enforce rights as a bondholder. While the ultimate investors hold a beneficial interest in Bond Connect securities, the mechanisms that beneficial owners may use to enforce their rights are untested and courts in the PRC have limited experience in applying the concept of beneficial ownership. As such, a Fund may not be able to participate in corporate actions affecting its rights as a bondholder, such as timely payment of distributions, due to time

constraints or for other operational reasons. Bond Connect trades are settled in RMB and investors must have timely access to a reliable supply of RMB in Hong Kong, which cannot be guaranteed. Furthermore, securities purchased through Bond Connect generally may not be sold, purchased or otherwise transferred other than through Bond Connect in accordance with applicable rules.

A primary feature of Bond Connect is the application of the home market’s laws and rules applicable to investors in Chinese fixed-income instruments. Therefore, a Fund’s investments in securities through Bond Connect are generally subject to Chinese securities regulations and listing rules, among other restrictions. Such securities may lose their eligibility at any time, in which case they could be sold but could no longer be purchased through Bond Connect. A Fund will not benefit from access to Hong Kong investor compensation funds, which are designed to protect against defaults of trades, when investing through Bond Connect. Bond Connect is only available on days when markets in both the mainland China and Hong Kong are open. As a result, prices of securities purchased through Bond Connect may fluctuate at times when a Fund is unable to add to or exit its position and, therefore, may limit the Fund’s ability to trade when it would be otherwise attractive to do so.

The Bond Connect program is relatively new and may be subject to further interpretation and guidance. The trading, settlement and IT systems required for non-Chinese investors in Bond Connect are also relatively new and are continuing to evolve. In the event that the relevant systems do not function properly, trading through Bond Connect could be disrupted. There can be no assurance that further regulations will not affect the availability of securities in the program, the frequency of redemptions or other limitations. In addition, the application and interpretation of the laws and regulations of Hong Kong and mainland China, and the rules, policies or guidelines published or applied by relevant regulators and exchanges in respect of the Bond Connect program are uncertain, and they may have an adverse effect on a Fund’s performance.

PRC Taxation – Under current PRC tax laws, regulations and practice, a Fund, the Investment Manager and/or a sub-adviser may be subject to PRC tax, directly or indirectly, with respect to the assets held through Stock Connect, Bond Connect and/or QFII and RQFII systems (collectively, the “QFII Programs”). A Fund will be responsible to reimburse the Investment Manager and/or a sub-adviser for all PRC taxes and duties of any kind incurred by the Investment Manager and/or sub-adviser and attributable to the assets of a Fund held through Stock Connect, Bond Connect and/or QFII Programs. The tax law and regulations of the PRC are constantly changing, and they may be changed with retrospective effect. The interpretation and applicability of the tax law and regulations by tax authorities are not as consistent and transparent as those of more developed nations, and may vary from region to region. Moreover, the PRC taxes and duties payable by the Investment Manager and/or the sub-advisers and which are to be reimbursed by a Fund to the extent attributable to the assets held through Stock Connect, Bond Connect and/or QFII Programs may change at any time.

The treatment of tax under the Investment Regulations (defined below) is not clear. Accordingly, where the relevant regulations applicable to the QFII Programs, Stock Connect and/or Bond Connect (“Investment Regulations”) require a custodian, clearing house, any other agent stipulated by such rules to withhold any tax, or where such custodian, clearing house, any other agent has a reasonable basis for believing that such withholding may be required, the custodian, clearing house and any other agent may do so at the rate required by the regulation, or if in the custodian’s opinion the Investment Regulations are not clear on the rate, at such rate as the custodian, clearing house, and any other agent may, reasonably determine to be appropriate. Tax may be withheld on a retroactive basis.

Given the uncertainty surrounding a Fund’s potential PRC tax liabilities or reimbursement obligations, the net asset value of a Fund on any business day may not accurately reflect such liabilities. As a result, incoming shareholders of a Fund may pay more for their shares than they otherwise would or should have done. In the event of a redemption of shares at such net asset value, the remaining shareholders will bear the burden of any liabilities which had not been accrued in the net asset value. In addition, investors should be aware that under-accrual or over-accrual for PRC tax liabilities may impact the performance of a Fund during the period of such under-accrual or over-accrual and following any subsequent adjustments to the net asset value.

Corporate Income Tax – Under current PRC Corporate Income Tax Law and regulations, any company considered to be a tax resident of the PRC would be subject to PRC Corporate Income Tax (“CIT”) at the rate of 25% on its worldwide taxable income. If a company were considered to be a non-resident enterprise with a “permanent establishment” (“PE”) in the PRC, it would be subject to CIT at the rate of 25% on the profits attributable to the PE. A Fund, together with the sub-adviser and the Investment Manager, does not intend to operate in a way that would cause a Fund to be treated as tax resident of the PRC and to have a PE in the PRC, though this cannot be guaranteed. It is possible, however, that the PRC could disagree with such an assessment or that changes in PRC tax law could affect the PRC CIT status of a Fund.

If a Fund is a non-PRC tax resident enterprise without PE in the PRC, the PRC-sourced income (including cash dividends, distributions, interest and capital gains) derived by it from any investment in PRC securities would be subject to PRC withholding income tax (“WHT”) at the rate of 10%, unless exempt or reduced under the PRC CIT Law or a relevant tax treaty as discussed below.

A Fund is also subject to a stamp duty at the rate of 0.1% arising from the sale of China A-shares and the transfer of China A-shares by way of reorganization in accordance with the prevailing PRC taxation regulations.

Specific considerations for Stock Connect and Bond Connect – Especially, in respect of trading of China A-shares through the Stock Connect and pursuant to the circular dated October 31, 2014 on the Taxation Policy of the Pilot Programme for the Mutual Stock Market Access between Shanghai and Hong Kong Stock Markets under Caishui [2014] No. 81, the circular dated November 5, 2016 on the Taxation Policy of the Pilot Programme for the Mutual Stock Access between Shenzhen and Hong Kong Stock Markets under Caishui [2016] No. 127 and other relevant applicable PRC taxation rules:

- CIT and value-added tax (“VAT”) shall be exempt on a temporary basis on the gains earned by Hong Kong and overseas investors (“Stock Connect Investors”) (including corporate and individual investors) from the transfer of China A-shares listed on SSE and/or SZSE; and

- Stock Connect Investors are required to pay tax on dividends and other income payments from China A-shares at a standard rate of 10%, which will be withheld and paid to the relevant PRC tax authority by the respective listed companies (before the HKSCC is able to provide details such as investor identities and holding periods to CSDCC, the policy of differentiated rates of taxation based on holding periods will temporarily not be implemented) and are entitled to a tax refund if a lower tax rate is applicable under a relevant tax treaty, subject to the approval by the relevant PRC tax authority; and

- In addition, except for interest income from certain bonds (i.e. government bonds and local government bonds which are entitled to a 100% CIT exemption and railway bonds which are entitled to a 50% CIT exemption in accordance with the Implementation Rules to the Enterprise Income Tax Law and a circular dated March 10, 2016 on the Circular on Income Tax Policies on Interest Income from Railway Bonds under Caishui [2016] No. 30), interest income derived by non-resident institutional investors from other bonds traded through Bond Connect is PRC-sourced income and should be subject to PRC withholding income tax at a rate of 10% and VAT at a rate of 6%. On November 22, 2021, the Ministry of Finance and State Administration of Taxation jointly issued Announcement No. 34 of 2021, to clarify that foreign institutional investors (including foreign institutional investors under Bond Connect) will continue to be temporarily exempt from PRC withholding income tax and VAT with respect to bond interest income derived in the PRC bond market for the period from November 7, 2021 to December 31, 2025. It remains to be clarified as to what the PRC withholding income tax and VAT treatment is with respect to non-government bond interest derived prior to November 7, 2018.

Capital gains derived by non-resident institutional investors (with no place or establishment or PE in the PRC) from the trading of bonds through the Bond Connect are technically non PRC-sourced income under the current CIT law and regulations, therefore, not subject to PRC CIT. While the PRC tax authorities are currently enforcing such non-taxable treatment in practice, the non-taxable treatment under the current CIT regulations is not clear.

According to Cai Shui [2016] No. 70 ("Circular 70"), the Supplementary Notice of the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation on VAT Policies for Interbank Dealings of Financial Institutions, gains derived by foreign institutions approved by People’s Bank of China from the investment in the inter-bank RMB markets (including currency market, bond market and derivative market) shall be exempt from VAT.

Specific considerations for the QFII Programs – In respect of trading of China A-shares through QFII Programs and pursuant to the circular dated November 17, 2014 on PRC withholding income tax treatment with respect to gains derived by the QFII Programs from the trading of shares in PRC resident enterprises under Caishui [2014] No. 79, circular dated March 23, 2016 regarding VAT pilot arrangements under Caishui [2016] No. 36, circular dated June 30, 2016 on expanded categories of VAT exemption affecting the financial services sector under Caishui [2016] No. 70 and other relevant applicable PRC taxation rules:

- CIT shall be exempt on a temporary basis on capital gains derived from the disposal of shares and other equity investments (including China A-shares) through the QFII Programs; and

- VAT shall be exempt on a temporary basis in respect of gains derived from trading of PRC securities via the QFII Programs. Consequentially, urban maintenance and construction tax, educational surcharges and local educational surcharges (which are all imposed based on VAT liabilities) are exempt on gains derived from trading of PRC securities via the QFII Programs.

There is no guarantee that the temporary tax exemption or non-taxable treatment with respect to assets traded via Stock Connect, Bond Connect, the QFII Programs described above will continue to apply, will not be repealed and re-imposed retrospective, or that no new tax regulations and practice in China specifically relating to such programs will not be promulgated in the future. Such uncertainties may operate to the advantage or disadvantage of shareholders in a Fund and may result in an increase or decrease in net asset value of a Fund. For example, to the extent that the PRC tax authority retrospectively imposes taxes on the capital gains realized by a Fund through the QFII Programs, the net asset value of a Fund would be adversely affected but the amount previously paid to a redeeming shareholder would not be adjusted. As a result, any detriment from such change would be suffered by the remaining shareholders.

Investments in Japan Risk. The Japanese economy is heavily dependent upon international trade and may be subject to considerable degrees of economic, political and social instability, which could negatively impact a Fund. The Japanese yen has fluctuated widely during recent periods and may be affected by currency volatility elsewhere in Asia, especially Southeast Asia. In

addition, the yen has had a history of unpredictable and volatile movements against the U.S. dollar. The performance of the global economy could have a major impact upon equity returns in Japan. Since the mid-2000s, Japan’s economic growth has remained relatively low. A recent economic recession was likely compounded by an unstable financial sector, low domestic consumption, and certain corporate structural weaknesses, which remain some of the major issues facing the Japanese economy. The Japanese economic growth rate could be impacted by Bank of Japan monetary policies, rising interest rates, tax increases, budget deficits, consumer confidence and volatility in the Japanese yen. Japan’s geography also subjects it to an increased risk of natural disasters, such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, typhoons and tsunamis.

Investments in Russia Risk. A Fund may invest a portion of its assets in securities issued by companies located in Russia. Because of the recent formation of the Russian securities markets as well as the underdeveloped state of Russia’s banking system, settlement, clearing and registration of securities transactions are subject to significant risks. Ownership of shares is defined according to entries in the company’s share register and normally evidenced by extracts from the register. These extracts are not negotiable instruments and are not effective evidence of securities ownership. The registrars are not necessarily subject to effective state supervision nor are they licensed with any governmental entity. Also, there is no central registration system for shareholders and it is possible for a Fund to lose its registration through fraud, negligence or mere oversight. While a Fund will endeavor to ensure that its interest continues to be appropriately recorded either itself or through a custodian or other agent inspecting the share register and by obtaining extracts of share registers through regular confirmations, these extracts have no legal enforceability and it is possible that subsequent illegal amendment or other fraudulent act may deprive the Fund of its ownership rights or improperly dilute its interest. In addition, while applicable Russian regulations impose liability on registrars for losses resulting from their errors, it may be difficult for a Fund to enforce any rights it may have against the registrar or issuer of the securities in the event of loss of share registration. To the extent that a Fund invests in Russian securities, the Fund intends to invest directly in Russian companies that use an independent registrar. There can be no assurance that such investments will not result in a loss to a Fund.

Certain of the companies in which a Fund may invest may operate in, or have dealings with, countries subject to sanctions or embargos imposed by the U.S. government, foreign governments, or the United Nations or other international organizations. In particular, as a result of Russia’s large-scale invasion of Ukraine, the United States and other countries have imposed economic sanctions on Russian sovereign debt and on certain Russian individuals, financial institutions, and others. The United States or other countries could also institute broader sanctions on Russia. These sanctions, or even the threat of further sanctions, may result in the decline of the value and liquidity of Russian securities, a weakening of the ruble or other adverse consequences to the Russian economy. These sanctions could also result in the immediate freeze of Russian securities, impairing the ability of a Fund to buy, sell, receive or deliver those securities. Sanctions could also result in Russia taking counter measures or retaliatory actions which may further impair the value and liquidity of Russian securities. These sanctions could also impair a Fund’s ability to meet its investment objective. For example, a Fund may be prohibited from investing in securities issued by companies subject to such sanctions. In addition, the sanctions may require a Fund to freeze its existing investments in companies operating in or having dealings with sanctioned countries, prohibiting the Fund from selling or otherwise transacting in these investments. This could impact a Fund's ability to sell securities or other financial instruments as needed to meet shareholder redemptions. A Fund could seek to suspend redemptions in the event that an emergency exists in which it is not reasonably practicable for the Fund to dispose of its securities or to determine the value of its net assets. In addition, sanctions, and the Russian government’s response, could result in a downgrade in Russia’s credit rating, devaluation of its currency and/or increased volatility with respect to Russian securities. Moreover, disruptions caused by Russian military action or other actions (including cyberattacks and espionage) or resulting actual and threatened responses to such activity, including purchasing and financing restrictions, boycotts or changes in consumer or purchaser preferences, sanctions, tariffs or cyberattacks on the Russian government, Russian companies or Russian individuals, including politicians, may impact Russia’s economy and Russian issuers of securities in which the Fund invests.

REPURCHASE AND REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS RISK. A repurchase agreement is an agreement between two parties whereby one party sells the other a security at a specified price with a commitment to repurchase the security later at an agreed-upon price, date and interest payment. A reverse repurchase agreement is a term used to describe the opposite side of a repurchase transaction. The party that purchases and later resells a security is said to perform a repurchase; the other party, that sells and later repurchases a security is said to perform a reverse repurchase. Each Fund is permitted to enter into fully collateralized repurchase agreements. Each Company’s Board of Directors has delegated to the sub-adviser(s) the responsibility of evaluating the creditworthiness of the banks and securities dealers with which the Funds will engage in repurchase agreements. The sub-adviser(s) will monitor such transactions to ensure that the value of underlying collateral will be at least equal to the total amount of the repurchase obligation as required by the valuation provision of the repurchase agreement, including the accrued interest. Repurchase agreements carry the risk that the market value of the securities declines below the repurchase price. A Fund could also lose money if it is unable to recover the securities and the value of any collateral held or assets segregated by the Fund to cover the transaction is less than the value of the securities. In the event the borrower commences bankruptcy proceedings, a court may characterize the transaction as a loan. If a Fund has not perfected a security interest in the underlying collateral, the Fund may be required to return the underlying collateral to the borrower’s estate and be treated as an unsecured creditor. As an unsecured creditor, the Fund could lose some or all of the principal and interest involved in the transaction. The use of reverse repurchase agreements may increase the possibility of fluctuation in a Fund’s net asset value.

As discussed in “Risk Factors in Derivative Instruments” above, the SEC adopted a final rule related to the use of derivatives, short sales, reverse repurchase agreements and certain other transactions by registered investment companies that rescinds and withdraws as of August 2022 the guidance of the SEC and its staff regarding asset segregation and coverage transactions reflected in the Funds' asset segregation and cover practices discussed herein. Following the compliance date, these new requirements may limit a Fund’s ability to use derivatives and reverse repurchase agreements and similar financing transactions as part of the Fund’s investment strategies.

RESTRICTED SECURITIES RISK. A Fund may invest in securities that cannot be offered for public resale unless registered under the applicable securities laws or that have a contractual restriction that prohibits or limits their resale (“restricted securities”). Restricted securities may be sold in private placement transactions between issuers and their purchasers and may be neither listed on an exchange nor traded in other established markets. Restricted securities include private placement securities that have not been registered under the applicable securities laws, such as Rule 144A securities, and securities of U.S. and non-U.S. issuers that are issued pursuant to Regulation S. In many cases, privately placed securities may not be freely transferable under the laws of the applicable jurisdiction or due to contractual restrictions on resale. As a result of the absence of a public trading market, privately placed securities may be less liquid and more difficult to value than publicly traded securities. To the extent that privately placed securities may be resold in privately negotiated transactions, the prices realized from the sales, due to illiquidity, could be less than those originally paid by the Fund or less than their fair market value. In addition, issuers whose securities are not publicly traded may not be subject to the disclosure and other investor protection requirements that may be applicable if their securities were publicly traded. If any privately placed securities held by a Fund are required to be registered under the securities laws of one or more jurisdictions before being resold, the Fund may be required to bear the expenses of registration. Certain of the Funds' investments in private placements may consist of direct investments and may include investments in smaller, less seasoned issuers, which may involve greater risks. These issuers may have limited product lines, markets or financial resources, or they may be dependent on a limited management group. In making investments in such securities, a Fund may obtain access to material nonpublic information, which may restrict the Fund’s ability to conduct portfolio transactions in such securities.

Some of these securities are new and complex, and trade only among institutions; the markets for these securities are still developing, and may not function as efficiently as established markets. Owning a large percentage of restricted securities could hamper a Fund’s ability to raise cash to meet redemptions. Also, because there may not be an established market price for these securities, the Fund may have to estimate their value, which means that their valuation (and, to a much smaller extent, the valuation of the Fund) may have a subjective element. Transactions in restricted securities may entail registration expense and other transaction costs that are higher than those for transactions in unrestricted securities. Where registration is required for restricted securities a considerable time period may elapse between the time the Fund decides to sell the security and the time it is actually permitted to sell the security under an effective registration statement. If during such period, adverse market conditions were to develop, the Fund might obtain less favorable pricing terms that when it decided to sell the security. A Fund may purchase securities that may have restrictions on transfer or resale (including Rule 144A securities and Regulation S securities). “Rule 144A” securities are privately placed, restricted securities that may only be resold under certain circumstances to other qualified institutional buyers. Rule 144A investments are subject to certain additional risks compared to publicly traded securities. If there are not enough qualified buyers interested in purchasing Rule 144A securities when a Fund wishes to sell such securities, the Fund may be unable to dispose of such securities promptly or at reasonable prices. For this reason, although Rule 144A securities are generally considered to be liquid, a Fund’s holdings in Rule 144A securities may adversely affect the Fund’s overall liquidity if qualified buyers become uninterested in buying them at a particular time. Issuers of Rule 144A securities are required to furnish information to potential investors upon request. However, the required disclosure is much less extensive than that required of public companies and is not publicly available. Further, issuers of Rule 144A securities can require recipients of the information (such as a Fund) to agree contractually to keep the information confidential, which could also adversely affect a Fund’s ability to dispose of a security. Offerings of Regulation S securities may be conducted outside of the United States. Regulation S securities are generally less liquid than registered securities, as a result, a Fund may take longer to liquidate these positions than would be the case for publicly traded securities. Although Regulation S securities may be resold in privately negotiated transactions, the price realized from these sales could be less than those originally paid by a Fund. Further, companies whose securities are not publicly traded may not be subject to the disclosure and other investor protection requirements that would be applicable if their securities were publicly traded. Accordingly, Regulation S securities may involve a high degree of business and financial risk and may result in substantial losses.

Depending upon the circumstances, a Fund may only be able to sell these securities in the United States if an exemption from registration under the federal and state securities laws is available or may only be able to sell these securities outside of the United States (such as on a foreign exchange). These securities may either be determined to be liquid or illiquid pursuant to policies and guidelines established by the respective Company’s Board of Directors. See also “Private Placement Risk” above.

RISKS OF QUALIFIED FINANCIAL CONTRACTS. Regulations adopted by federal banking regulators under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act require that certain qualified financial contracts (“QFCs”) with counterparties that are part of U.S. or foreign global systemically important banking organizations be amended to include contractual restrictions on close-out and cross default rights. QFCs include, but are not limited to, securities contracts, commodities contracts, forward contracts, repurchase agreements, securities lending agreements and swaps agreements, as well as related master agreements, security

agreements, credit enhancements, and reimbursement obligations. If a covered counterparty of a Fund or certain of the covered counterparty’s affiliates were to become subject to certain insolvency proceedings, the Fund may be temporarily unable to exercise certain default rights, and the QFC may be transferred to another entity. These requirements may impact a Fund’s credit and counterparty risks.

SECTOR RISK. To the extent a Fund invests more heavily in particular sectors, its performance will be especially sensitive to developments that significantly affect those sectors. Individual sectors may be more volatile, and may perform differently, than the broader market. The following summarizes the risks associated with investing in certain sectors:

Consumer Discretionary Sector Risk. Companies in the consumer discretionary sector are subject to the risks associated with adverse changes in consumer sentiment and buying patterns, the effects of inflation and disruptions in the supply chain that negatively impact the availability of products. Companies in this sector may also be adversely affected by supply and demand for certain products and services, price fluctuations, product obsolescence and product liability claims, governmental regulation, exchange rates, world events, general economic conditions and other factors. In addition, certain companies in the consumer discretionary sector may be cyclical and have occasional sharp price movements resulting from changes in the economy, fuel prices, labor agreements and insurance costs.

Communication Services Sector Risk. Companies in the communication services sector may be greatly affected by technological advancements and market competition, including research and development costs, substantial capital requirements, pricing competition and government regulations. Certain communication services companies may also be susceptible to network security breaches and may be targets of hacking and potential theft of proprietary or consumer information or disruptions in service. This sector may be impacted by fluctuating market demands, as well as shifting demographics and unpredictable changes in consumer preferences.

Health Care Sector Risk. Companies in the health care sector are subject to extensive government regulation and their profitability can be significantly affected by restrictions on government reimbursement for medical expenses, rising costs of medical products and services, pricing pressure (including price discounting), limited product lines and an increased emphasis on the delivery of healthcare through outpatient services. These companies may also be subject to extensive litigation based on product liability and similar claims.

Financials Sector Risk. Companies in the financial services sector are subject to extensive governmental regulation and their profitability is largely dependent on the availability and cost of capital and can fluctuate significantly when interest rates change or due to increased competition. Credit losses resulting from financial difficulties of borrowers and financial losses associated with investment activities can negatively impact the sector. Insurance companies may be subject to severe price competition. Adverse economic, business or political developments could adversely affect financial institutions engaged in mortgage finance or other lending or investing activities directly or indirectly connected to the value of real estate.

Industrials Sector Risk. The prices of securities in the industrials sector can be volatile and can be impacted significantly by supply and demand for certain products and services, product obsolescence and product liability claims, government regulation, exchange rates, world events, general economic conditions and other factors. In addition, certain companies in the industrials sector may be cyclical and have occasional sharp price movements resulting from changes in the economy, fuel prices, labor agreements and insurance costs.

Information Technology Sector Risk. Companies in the information technology sector face intense competition, both domestically and internationally, which may have an adverse effect on their profit margins. Companies in this sector may have limited product lines, markets, financial resources or personnel. The products of information technology companies may face obsolescence due to rapid technological developments, frequent new product introduction, unpredictable changes in growth rates and competition for the services of qualified personnel. Companies in the information technology sector are heavily dependent on patent and intellectual property rights. The loss or impairment of these rights may adversely affect the profitability of these companies.

Utilities Sector Risk. The prices of securities in the utilities sector can be volatile and can be impacted significantly by supply and demand for services or fuel, financing costs, government regulation, conservation programs, commodity price fluctuations and other factors. Government regulation of utility companies may limit such companies’ profits or the dividends they can pay to investors. In addition, utility companies may face regulatory restrictions with respect to expansion to new markets, limiting their potential.

SECURITIES TRUSTS RISK. A Fund may invest in securities trusts, which are investment trust vehicles that maintain portfolios comprised of underlying debt securities that are generally unsecured. These instruments are purchased in the cash markets and vary as to the type of underlying security, but include such underlying securities as corporate investment grade and high yield bonds and credit default swaps. Examples include TRAINS, TRACERS, CORE and funded CDX. Holders of interests in these structured notes receive income from the trusts in respect of principal or interest paid on the underlying securities. By investing in such notes, a Fund will indirectly bear its proportionate share of any expenses paid by such notes in addition to the expenses of such Fund.

Investments in these types of structured products are subject to the same risks that would be associated with direct investments in the underlying securities of the structured notes. These risks include substantial market price volatility resulting from changes in prevailing interest rates; default or bankruptcy of issuers of the underlying securities; subordination to the prior claims

of banks and other senior lenders in the case of default; and early repayment by issuers during periods of declining interest rates because of mandatory call or redemption provisions. In addition, structured note products may have difficulty disposing of the underlying securities because of thin trading markets.

SMALL CAPITALIZATION SECURITIES RISK. A Fund may invest in equity securities (including securities issued in initial public offerings) of companies with smaller market capitalizations. Because the issuers of small capitalization securities tend to be smaller or less well-established companies, they may have limited product lines, market share or financial resources, may have less historical data with respect to operations and management and may be more dependent on a limited number of key employees. As a result, small capitalization securities are often less marketable than securities of larger or more well-established companies. Historically, small market capitalization securities and securities of recently organized companies are subject to increased price volatility due to: (i) less certain growth prospects; (ii) lower degrees of liquidity in the markets for such securities; (iii) thin trading that could result in the securities being sold at a discount or in small lots over an extended period of time; (iv) limited product lines, markets or financial resources; (v) dependence on a few key management personnel; (vi) increased sensitivity to changes in interest rates, borrowing costs and earnings; (vii) difficulty in obtaining information on smaller capitalization companies as compared with larger capitalization companies; (viii) greater sensitivity to changing economic conditions and increased risk of bankruptcy due to adverse developments or management changes affecting the company; and (ix) greater difficulty borrowing money to continue or expand operations. When a Fund invests in smaller company stocks that might trade infrequently, investors might seek to trade Fund shares based on their knowledge or understanding of the value of those securities (this is sometimes referred to as “price arbitrage”). If such price arbitrage were successful, it might interfere with the efficient management of a Fund’s portfolio and the Fund may be required to sell securities at disadvantageous times or prices to satisfy the liquidity requirements created by that activity. Successful price arbitrage might also dilute the value of Fund shares held by other shareholders.

SOVEREIGN DEBT RISK. In addition to the risks associated with investment in debt securities and foreign securities generally, investments in sovereign debt involve special risks. The issuer of the debt or the governmental authorities that control the repayment of the debt may be unable or unwilling to repay principal or interest when due, or otherwise meet its obligations, in accordance with the terms of such debt, and a Fund may have limited legal recourse in the event of default. Countries such as those in which a Fund may invest have historically experienced, and may continue to experience, high rates of inflation, high interest rates, exchange rate trade difficulties and unemployment. Some of these countries are also characterized by political uncertainty or instability. Additional factors that may influence the ability or willingness to service debt include, but are not limited to, a country’s cash flow situation, the availability of sufficient foreign exchange on the date a payment is due, the relative size of its debt service burden to the economy as a whole and its government’s policy towards the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and other international agencies. Furthermore, there is the possibility of contagion that could occur if one country defaults on its debt, and that a default in one country could trigger declines and possible additional defaults in other countries in the region. If a government entity defaults, it may ask for more time in which to pay or for further loans. There is no legal process for collecting sovereign debt that a government does not pay, and there are no bankruptcy proceedings through which all or part of the sovereign debt that a governmental entity has not repaid may be collected. Further, if a sovereign debtor defaults (or threatens to default) on its sovereign debt obligations, the indebtedness may be restructured. Unlike most corporate debt restructurings, the fees and expenses of financial and legal advisers to the creditors in connection with a restructuring may be borne by the holders of the sovereign debt securities instead of the sovereign entity itself. Some sovereign debtors have in the past been able to restructure their debt payments without the approval of some or all debt holders or to declare moratoria on payments, and similar occurrences may happen in the future. In addition, the financial markets have at times seen an increase in volatility and adverse trends due to uncertainty surrounding the level and sustainability of sovereign debt of certain countries (for example in countries that are part of the European Union, including Greece, Spain, Ireland, Italy and Portugal). These developments adversely affected the exchange rate of the euro and may continue to significantly affect every country in Europe. Outside of the European Union, Iceland has also experienced adverse trends due to high debt levels and excessive lending during the height of the financial crisis that began in 2008.

A Fund may have difficulty disposing of certain sovereign debt obligations because there may be a limited trading market for such securities. Because there is no liquid secondary market for many of these securities, the Funds anticipate that such securities could be sold only to a limited number of dealers or institutional investors. The lack of a liquid secondary market may have an adverse impact on the market price of such securities and a Fund’s ability to dispose of particular issues when necessary to meet its liquidity needs or in response to a specific economic event, such as deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuer. The lack of a liquid secondary market for certain securities also may make it more difficult for a Fund to obtain accurate market quotations for purposes of valuing its portfolio and calculating its net asset value.

Sub-sovereign bonds represent the debt of state, provincial, territorial, municipal, local or other political sub-divisions, including other governmental entities or agencies. Quasi-sovereign bonds represent the debt of corporations that have significant government ownership. Sub-sovereign and quasi-sovereign bonds are subject to the risks of investing in sovereign debt generally. In addition, sub-sovereign and quasi-sovereign debt may or may not be issued by or guaranteed as to principal and interest by a governmental authority. Certain foreign government securities may be backed by the issuer’s right to borrow from a central bank or other regional banking entity while others may be backed only by the assets and credit of the issuing foreign entity. If an issuer of sub-sovereign or quasi-sovereign bonds defaults on payments of principal and/or interest, a Fund may have limited recourse against the issuer.

A Fund may invest in obligations issued or guaranteed by supranational entities, which may include, for example, entities such as the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the World Bank). If one or more shareholders of a supranational entity fails to make necessary additional capital contributions, the entity may be unable to pay interest or repay principal on its debt securities, and the Fund may lose money on such investments. Please see also “Foreign Investments Risk” above.

STRUCTURED SECURITIES RISK. Structured securities and other related instruments purchased by a Fund are generally privately negotiated debt obligations where the principal and/or interest is determined by reference to the performance of a specific asset, benchmark asset, market or interest rate. Depending on the terms of the particular instrument and the nature of the underlying instrument, structured securities may be subject to equity market risk, commodity market risk, currency market risk or interest rate risk. Structured securities that do not involve any type of credit enhancement, are subject to credit risk that generally will be equivalent to that of the underlying instruments. Credit enhanced securities will be subject to the credit risk associated with the provider of the enhancement. A Fund is permitted to invest in classes of structured securities that are either subordinated or unsubordinated with respect to the right to payment of another class. Subordinated structured securities typically have higher yields and present greater risks than unsubordinated structured securities. Structured securities are typically sold in private placement transactions, and there currently is no active trading market for structured securities. Certain issuers of such securities may be deemed to be “investment companies” as defined in the 1940 Act; therefore, a Fund’s investment in structured securities may be limited by certain investment restrictions contained therein. Structured securities may be leveraged, increasing the volatility of each structured security’s value relative to the change in the reference measure. Structured securities may also be more difficult to price accurately than less complex securities and instruments or more traditional debt securities.

TO BE ANNOUNCED (TBA) TRANSACTIONS RISK. TBA investments include when-issued and delayed delivery securities and forward commitments. A Fund is permitted to purchase or sell securities on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis. When-issued or delayed-delivery transactions arise when securities are purchased or sold with payment and delivery taking place in the future in order to secure what is considered to be an advantageous price and yield at the time of entering into the transaction. A Fund may sell the securities before the settlement date if a sub-adviser deems it advisable. Distributions attributable to any gains realized on such a sale are taxable to shareholders. When-issued and delayed delivery securities and forward commitments involve the risk that the security a Fund buys will lose value prior to its delivery. A Fund is subject to this risk whether or not the Fund takes delivery of the securities on the settlement date for a transaction. There also is the risk that the security will not be issued or that the other party to the transaction will not meet its obligation. If this occurs, the Fund loses both the investment opportunity for the assets it set aside to pay for the security and any gain in the security’s price. A Fund may also take a short position in a TBA investment when it owns or has the right to obtain, at no added cost, identical securities. If a Fund takes such a short position, it may reduce the risk of a loss if the price of the securities declines in the future, but will lose the opportunity to profit if the price rises. A Fund may purchase or sell undrawn or delayed draw loans.

Short Sales of TBA Investments Risk. A Fund may also engage in shorting of TBAs. When a Fund enters into a short sale of a TBA investment it effectively agrees to sell at a future price and date a security it does not own. Although most TBA short sales transactions are closed before a Fund would be required to deliver the security, if the Fund does not close the position, such Fund may have to purchase the securities needed to settle the short sale at a higher price than anticipated, which would cause the Fund to lose money. A Fund may not always be able to purchase the securities required to settle a short sale at a particular time or at an attractive price. A Fund may incur increased transaction costs associated with selling TBA securities short. In addition, taking short positions in TBA securities results in a form of leverage, which could increase the volatility of the Fund’s returns.

U.S. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES RISK. Treasury obligations may differ in their interest rates, maturities, times of issuance and other characteristics. Securities backed by the U.S. Treasury or the full faith and credit of the United States are guaranteed only as to the timely payment of interest and principal when held to maturity. Accordingly, the current market values for these securities will fluctuate with changes in interest rates. Obligations of U.S. Government agencies and authorities are supported by varying degrees of credit but generally are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. No assurance can be given that the U.S. Government will provide financial support to its agencies and authorities if it is not obligated by law to do so. In addition, the value of U.S. Government securities may be affected by changes in the credit rating of the U.S. Government. U.S. Government securities are also subject to default risk, which is the risk that the U.S. Treasury will be unable to meet its payment obligations. The maximum potential liability of the issuers of some U.S. Government securities held by a Fund may greatly exceed their current resources, including their legal right to support from the U.S. Treasury. It is possible that these issuers will not have the funds to meet their payment obligations in the future.

Treasury Inflation-Protection Securities Risk. TIPS are U.S. Treasury securities designed to protect against inflation. The interest rate paid on TIPS is fixed. The principal value rises or falls semi-annually based on published changes to the Consumer Price Index. If inflation occurs, the principal amount will be adjusted upwards, resulting in increased interest payments. If deflation occurs, the principal amount will be adjusted downwards, resulting in lower interest payments. The principal amount payable at maturity will be the greater of the adjusted principal amount and the original principal amount. While U.S. Treasury securities are generally considered to have relatively little credit risk, they are subject to price fluctuations from changes in interest rates prior to their maturity. See “Inflation Protected Debt Securities Risk” above.

VALUATION RISK. This is the risk that a Fund has valued a security at a price different from the price at which it can be sold. This risk may be especially pronounced for investments that may be illiquid or may become illiquid and for securities that trade in relatively thin markets and/or markets that experience extreme volatility. A Fund’s ability to value its investments in an accurate and timely manner may be impacted by technological issues and/or errors by third party service providers, such as pricing services or accounting agents. If market conditions make it difficult to value certain investments, a Fund may value these investments using more subjective methods, such as fair-value methodologies. Investors who purchase or redeem Fund shares on days when the Fund is holding fair-valued securities may receive fewer or more shares, or lower or higher redemption proceeds, than they would have received if the Fund had not fair-valued the securities or had used a different valuation methodology. The value of foreign securities, certain fixed income securities and currencies, as applicable, may be materially affected by events after the close of the markets on which they are traded, but before a Fund determines its NAV.

VALUE INVESTING STYLE RISK. Using a value investing style to select investments involves special risks, particularly if it is used as part of a “contrarian” approach to evaluating issuers. Value investing seeks to identify companies that are priced below their intrinsic or prospective worth. Overlooked or otherwise undervalued securities are subject to a significant risk that they may never attain their potential value. A value stock may decrease in price or may not increase in price as anticipated by a sub-adviser if it continues to be undervalued by the market or the factors that the portfolio manager believes will cause the stock price to increase do not occur. Also, the value investing style may over time go in and out of favor. At times when the value investing style is out of favor, a Fund may underperform other equity funds that use different investing styles.

VOLATILITY RISK. A Fund's investments may fluctuate in value over a short period of time. This may cause a Fund’s net asset value per share to experience significant changes in value over short periods of time.

WARRANTS AND RIGHTS RISK. Warrants are instruments giving holders the right, but not the obligation, to buy equity or fixed income securities of a company at a specific price during a specified period. Rights are similar to warrants but normally have a short life span to expiration. The purchase of rights or warrants involves the risk that a Fund could lose the purchase value of a right or warrant if the right to subscribe to additional shares is not exercised prior to the right’s or warrant’s expiration. Also, the purchase of rights and/or warrants involves the risk that the effective price paid for the right and/or warrant added to the subscription price of the related security may exceed the value of the subscribed security’s market price such as when there is no movement in the level of the underlying security. Buying a warrant does not make the Fund a shareholder of the underlying stock. The warrant holder has no voting or dividend rights with respect to the underlying stock. A warrant does not carry any right to assets of the issuer, and for this reason investment in warrants may be more speculative than other equity-based investments. The market for warrants may be limited and it may be difficult for a Fund to sell a warrant promptly at an advantageous price.

ZERO COUPON SECURITIES RISK. Zero-coupon securities pay no interest prior to their maturity date or another specified date in the future but are issued and traded at a discount to their face value. The discount varies as the securities approach their maturity date (or the date on which interest payments are scheduled to begin). While interest payments are not made on such securities, holders of such securities are deemed to have received income (“phantom income”) annually, notwithstanding that cash may not be received currently. As with other fixed income securities, zero coupon bonds are subject to interest rate and credit risk. Some of these securities may be subject to substantially greater price fluctuations during periods of changing market rates than comparable securities that pay interest currently. Longer term zero coupon bonds have greater interest rate risk than shorter term zero coupon bonds.

PORTFOLIO TURNOVER

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the portfolio turnover rate for each Fund was as follows:

FUND	PORTFOLIO TURNOVER 12/31/21	PORTFOLIO TURNOVER 12/31/20
Balanced HLS Fund	48%(1)	43%(1)
Capital Appreciation HLS Fund	58%	80%
Disciplined Equity HLS Fund	14%	23%
Dividend and Growth HLS Fund	21%	24%
Healthcare HLS Fund	51%	42%
International Opportunities HLS Fund	95%	107%
MidCap HLS Fund	28%	50%
Small Cap Growth HLS Fund	44%	61%
Small Company HLS Fund	111%	105%
Stock HLS Fund	15%	15%
Total Return Bond HLS Fund	61%(2)	62%(2)
Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund	73%	76%

(1) Portfolio turnover excludes TBA roll transactions. Had TBA roll transactions been included, the portfolio turnover rate would have been 49% and 48% for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.

(2) Portfolio turnover excludes TBA roll transactions. Had TBA roll transactions been included, the portfolio turnover rate would have been 494% and 564% for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.

DISCLOSURE OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS

Each HLS Fund will publicly disclose its complete month-end portfolio holdings, which may exclude certain de minimis or short-term investments, on the HLS Funds’ website at hartfordfunds.com no earlier than 25 calendar days after the end of each month.

Each HLS Fund also will publicly disclose on its website the largest ten holdings by issuer, in the case of equity funds, or largest ten issuers, in the case of fixed income funds, in which it invests (and the percentage invested in each) no earlier than 15 calendar days after the end of each month, except that if the HLS Fund is a “balanced fund” or “multi asset” fund (i.e., a fund that invests in both equity and fixed income securities), the HLS Fund will publicly disclose its largest ten fixed income issuers and equity holdings (and the percentage invested in each holding) (currently, Balanced HLS Fund). For purposes of the top ten holdings, the Funds will not include derivative positions. In addition, any Fund may delay posting its holdings or may not post any holdings, if HFMC believes that would be in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders.

HFMC and HFD and their affiliates may release or authorize others to release portfolio-related information (i.e., portfolio statistics, sector information and portfolio commentary) to third parties; provided however that if the portfolio-related information is deemed to be material in the reasonable judgment of the Funds’ Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) (or his designee) on the advice and counsel of the Funds’ Chief Legal Officer (or his designee), it shall be publicly disclosed prior to disclosure to a third-party.

The HLS Funds may disclose portfolio holdings on a more frequent basis if (1) public disclosure of such holdings is made and both the Funds’ CCO and the Funds’ Chief Legal Officer approve the disclosure in accordance with the Funds’ portfolio holdings disclosure policy; or (2) the nonpublic disclosure is made to a third-party that (i) has been approved by the CCO and at least one other Fund officer, based on a finding that the applicable Fund has a legitimate business purpose for the arrangement or practice and that it is in the interest of Fund shareholders, and (ii) is subject to an agreement with the appropriate confidentiality and/or non-trading provisions as determined by the CCO. This requirement does not apply to portfolio holdings disclosure to the Funds’ service providers such as the custodian, transfer agent, sub-transfer agent, administrator, sub-administrator, independent registered public accounting firm, counsel, financial printer, proxy voting agent, lenders, securities lending agent, and other entities that provide systems or software support in connection with Fund operations, including accounting, compliance support and pricing (each a “Service Provider” and together, “Service Providers”), provided that such Service Provider is otherwise subject to the duty of confidentiality, imposed by law and/or contract. The portfolio holdings information may be provided to the Service Providers as soon as the information is available.

In addition to Service Providers, an HLS Fund’s investment manager or sub-adviser may disclose the HLS Fund’s portfolio holdings to third-party vendors that provide analytical systems services to the HLS Fund’s investment manager or sub-adviser on behalf of the HLS Fund and to certain third-party industry information vendors, institutional investment consultants, and asset allocation service providers. With respect to each of these entities, portfolio holdings information will be released only in accordance with the HLS Fund’s portfolio holdings disclosure policy.

Nothing contained herein is intended to prevent the disclosure of portfolio holdings or portfolio-related information as may be required by applicable laws and regulations. For example, the Funds or any of their affiliates or service providers may file any report required by applicable law, respond to requests from regulators, and comply with valid subpoenas. From time to time, an HLS Fund may disclose portfolio holdings to other parties to the extent necessary in connection with actual or threatened litigation.

The “Hartford Funds” for purposes of this section consist of the series of The Hartford Mutual Funds, Inc., The Hartford Mutual Funds II, Inc., Hartford Series Fund, Inc., and Hartford HLS Series Fund II, Inc. One or more of the Hartford Funds have entered into ongoing arrangements to disclose portfolio holdings to the following entities:

Accenture
Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.
Citibank N.A.
FactSet Research Systems Inc.
Financial Recovery Technologies LLC
Glass, Lewis & Company, LLC

Markit WSO Corporation
MSCI, Inc.
State Street Bank and Trust Company
Seismic Software Inc.
Wipro
Wolters Kluwer Financial Services

Portfolio holdings are disclosed on a daily basis to Accenture, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., Citibank N.A., FactSet Research Systems Inc., Financial Recovery Technologies LLC, Glass Lewis & Company, LLC, Markit WSO Corporation (for certain Hartford Funds), MSCI, Inc., State Street Bank and Trust Company, and Wolters Kluwer Financial Services. Portfolio holdings are disclosed to Seismic Software Inc. and Wolters Kluwer Financial Services on a monthly basis, with lag times of approximately twelve business days and one business day, respectively. Portfolio holdings are disclosed to Wipro as needed, with a lag time of one day. When purchasing and selling portfolio securities through broker-dealers, requesting bids on securities, or obtaining price quotations on securities, the Hartford Funds may disclose one or more of their portfolio securities to the party effecting the transaction or providing the information.

Additionally, each Fund, the Fund’s investment manager, the Fund’s distributor (collectively, “Hartford”) or the sub-adviser may provide oral or written information (“portfolio commentary”) about an HLS Fund, including, but not limited to, how the HLS Fund’s investments are divided among (i) various sectors, industries and countries, (ii) value and growth investments and small, mid and large-cap investments, (iii) stocks, bonds, currencies and cash and, as applicable, (iv) types of bonds, bond maturities, bond coupons and bond credit quality ratings. This portfolio commentary may also include information on factors that contributed to the HLS Fund’s performance, including these relative weightings. Hartford or the sub-adviser may also provide oral or written information (“statistical information”) about various financial characteristics of an HLS Fund or its underlying portfolio securities including, but not limited to, beta, duration, maturity, Sharpe ratio, earnings growth, payout ratio, price/book value, projected earnings growth, return on equity, tracking error, weighted average quality, market capitalization, percent debt to equity, dividend yield or growth, default rate, portfolio turnover, risk and style characteristics or other similar information. This portfolio commentary and statistical information about an HLS Fund may be based on the HLS Fund’s most recent quarter-end portfolio, month-end or on some other interim period. Portfolio commentary and statistical information may be available on the HLS Funds’ website or may be provided to members of the press, financial intermediaries, fiduciaries of a 401(k) plan or a trust and their advisers or current or potential shareholders in a Fund or their representatives. The content and nature of the information provided to each of these persons may differ.

In no event will Hartford or the sub-adviser or any affiliate thereof be permitted to receive compensation or other consideration in connection with the disclosure of HLS Fund portfolio holdings. The CCO is responsible for addressing conflicts of interest between the interests of HLS Fund shareholders, on the one hand, and the interests of an HLS Fund’s investment manager, investment sub-adviser, principal underwriter, or any affiliated person of an HLS Fund, its investment manager, investment sub-adviser, or its principal underwriter, on the other. Every violation of the portfolio holdings disclosure policy must be reported to the HLS Funds’ CCO. The CCO is responsible for maintaining records under the policy and will provide periodic reporting to the Board.

The Investment Manager and sub-adviser may serve as the investment adviser and sub-adviser, respectively, to one or more exchange traded funds (ETFs) and separate accounts that have the same or substantially similar investment strategies as one or more of the Funds. These separate accounts are not subject to the HLS Funds’ portfolio holdings disclosure policy and the ETFs are not subject to the same portfolio holdings disclosure restrictions as the other Hartford Funds. The portfolio holdings of Hartford Funds’ actively managed ETFs (other than any active semi-transparent ETF) will be made publicly available on a daily basis. It is possible that a person could trade ahead of or against an HLS Fund based on this information, which could negatively impact the HLS Funds’ execution of purchase and sale transactions. In addition, the sub-adviser may manage certain accounts and/or funds that are not part of the Hartford Funds family in a style substantially similar to that of an HLS Fund. These accounts and/or funds are not subject to the HLS Funds’ portfolio holdings disclosure policy. The Investment Manager also may receive compensation for providing one or more model portfolios to third party sponsors of separately managed account programs. Where a model portfolio and an HLS Fund both employ similar investment strategies, the composition of the model portfolio may be similar to that of the HLS Fund.

FUND MANAGEMENT

The Board of Directors and officers of the Companies, their business addresses, principal occupations for at least the past five years and years of birth are listed in the tables below. Each Company’s Board of Directors (i) provides broad supervision over the affairs of the Company and the HLS Funds and (ii) elects officers who are responsible for the day-to-day operations of the HLS Funds and the execution of policies formulated by the Boards. The first table below provides information about those directors who are deemed not to be “interested persons” of the Companies, as that term is defined in the 1940 Act (i.e., “non-interested directors”), and the second table below provides information about the Companies’ “interested” director and the Companies’ officers.

NON-INTERESTED DIRECTORS

NAME, YEAR OF BIRTH AND ADDRESS*	POSITION HELD WITH EACH COMPANY	TERM OF OFFICE** AND LENGTH OF TIME SERVED	PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(S) DURING PAST 5 YEARS	NUMBER OF PORTFOLIOS IN FUND COMPLEX*** OVERSEEN BY DIRECTOR	OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS FOR PUBLIC COMPANIES AND OTHER REGISTERED INVESTMENT COMPANIES HELD BY DIRECTOR
HILARY E. ACKERMANN (1956)	Director	Since 2014	Ms. Ackermann served as Chief Risk Officer at Goldman Sachs Bank USA from October 2008 to November 2011.	77	Ms. Ackermann served as a Director of Dynegy, Inc. from October 2012 until its acquisition by Vistra Energy Corporation (“Vistra”) in 2018, and since that time she has served as a Director of Vistra. Ms. Ackermann serves as a Director of Credit Suisse Holdings (USA), Inc. from January 2017 to present.
ROBIN C. BEERY (1967)	Director	Since 2017	Ms. Beery has served as a consultant to ArrowMark Partners (an alternative asset manager) since March of 2015 and since November 2018 has been employed by ArrowMark Partners as a Senior Advisor. Previously, she was Executive Vice President, Head of Distribution, for Janus Capital Group, and Chief Executive Officer and President of the Janus Mutual Funds (a global asset manager) from September 2009 to August 2014.	77	Ms. Beery serves as an independent Director of UMB Financial Corporation (January 2015 to present), has chaired the Compensation Committee since April 2017, and serves on the Audit Committee and the Risk Committee.

NAME, YEAR OF BIRTH AND ADDRESS*	POSITION HELD WITH EACH COMPANY	TERM OF OFFICE** AND LENGTH OF TIME SERVED	PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(S) DURING PAST 5 YEARS	NUMBER OF PORTFOLIOS IN FUND COMPLEX*** OVERSEEN BY DIRECTOR	OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS FOR PUBLIC COMPANIES AND OTHER REGISTERED INVESTMENT COMPANIES HELD BY DIRECTOR
DERRICK D. CEPHAS (1952)	Director	Since 2020	Mr. Cephas currently serves as Of Counsel to Squire Patton Boggs LLP, an international law firm with 45 offices in 20 countries. Until his retirement in October 2020, Mr. Cephas was a Partner of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, an international law firm headquartered in New York, where he served as the Head of the Financial Institutions Practice (April 2011 to October 2020).	77	Mr. Cephas currently serves as a Director of Signature Bank, a New York-based commercial bank, and is a member of the Credit Committee, Examining Committee and Risk Committee. Mr. Cephas currently serves as a Director of Claros Mortgage Trust, Inc., a real estate investment trust.
CHRISTINE R. DETRICK (1958)	Director and Chair of the Board	Director since 2016; Chair of the Board since 2021	From 2002 until 2012, Ms. Detrick was a Senior Partner, Leader of the Financial Services Practice, and a Senior Advisor at Bain & Company (“Bain”). Before joining Bain, she served in various senior management roles for other financial services firms and was a consultant at McKinsey and Company.	77	Ms. Detrick serves as a Director and Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee of Reinsurance Group of America (“RGA”) (from January 2014 to present). She has announced her plans not to stand for re-election as a member of RGA’s board of directors and will no longer serve in such capacity as of May 25, 2022. Ms. Detrick also currently serves as a Director of Charles River Associates (May 2020 to present); currently serves as a Director of Capital One Financial Corporation (since November 2021); and currently serves as a Director of Altus Power, Inc (since December 2021).

NAME, YEAR OF BIRTH AND ADDRESS*	POSITION HELD WITH EACH COMPANY	TERM OF OFFICE** AND LENGTH OF TIME SERVED	PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(S) DURING PAST 5 YEARS	NUMBER OF PORTFOLIOS IN FUND COMPLEX*** OVERSEEN BY DIRECTOR	OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS FOR PUBLIC COMPANIES AND OTHER REGISTERED INVESTMENT COMPANIES HELD BY DIRECTOR
JOHN J. GAUTHIER (1961)	Director	Since 2022	Mr. Gauthier currently is the Principal Owner of JJG Advisory, LLC, an investment consulting firm, and Co- Founder and Principal Owner of Talcott Capital Partners (a placement agent for investment managers serving insurance companies). From 2008 to 2018, Mr. Gauthier served as a Senior Vice President (2008- 2010), Executive Vice President (2010-2012), and President (2012-2018) of Allied World Financial Services (a global provider of property, casualty and specialty insurance and reinsurance solutions).	77	Mr. Gauthier serves as a Director of Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. (from 2018 to present) and chairs the Investment Committee and is a member of the Audit and Risk Committees.
ANDREW A. JOHNSON (1962)	Director	Since 2020	Mr. Johnson currently serves as a Diversity and Inclusion Advisor at Neuberger Berman, a private, global investment management firm. Prior to his current role, Mr. Johnson served as Chief Investment Officer and Head of Global Investment Grade Fixed Income at Neuberger Berman (January 2009 to December 2018).	77	Mr. Johnson currently serves as a Director of AGNC Investment Corp., a real estate investment trust.
PAUL L. ROSENBERG (1953)	Director	Since 2020	Mr. Rosenberg is a Partner of The Bridgespan Group, a global nonprofit consulting firm that is a social impact advisor to nonprofits, non-governmental organizations, philanthropists and institutional investors (October 2007 to present).	77	None
DAVID SUNG (1953)	Director	Since 2017	Mr. Sung was a Partner at Ernst & Young LLP from October 1995 to July 2014.	77	Mr. Sung serves as a Trustee of Ironwood Institutional Multi- Strategy Fund, LLC and Ironwood Multi-Strategy Fund, LLC (October 2015 to present).

The address for each Director is c/o Hartford Funds 690 Lee Road, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087.

Term of Office: Each Director holds an indefinite term until his or her retirement, resignation, removal, or death. Directors generally must retire no later than December 31 of the year in which the Director turns 75 years of age.

***

The portfolios of the “Fund Complex” are operational series of The Hartford Mutual Funds, Inc., The Hartford Mutual Funds II, Inc., Hartford Series Fund, Inc., Hartford HLS Series Fund II, Inc., Lattice Strategies Trust, and Hartford Funds Exchange-Traded Trust.

OFFICERS AND INTERESTED DIRECTOR

NAME, YEAR OF BIRTH AND ADDRESS*	POSITION HELD WITH EACH COMPANY	TERM OF OFFICE** AND LENGTH OF TIME SERVED	PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(S) DURING PAST 5 YEARS	NUMBER OF PORTFOLIOS IN FUND COMPLEX*** OVERSEEN BY DIRECTOR	OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS HELD BY DIRECTOR
JAMES E. DAVEY**** (1964)	Director, President and Chief Executive Officer	President and Chief Executive Officer since 2010; Director since 2012	Mr. Davey serves as Executive Vice President of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. Mr. Davey has served in various positions within The Hartford and its subsidiaries and joined The Hartford in 2002. Additionally, Mr. Davey serves as Director, Chairman, President, and Senior Managing Director for Hartford Funds Management Group, Inc. ("HFMG"). Mr. Davey also serves as President, Manager, Chairman of the Board, and Senior Managing Director for Hartford Funds Management Company, LLC (“HFMC”); Manager, Chairman of the Board, and President of Lattice Strategies LLC (“Lattice”); Chairman of the Board, Manager, and Senior Managing Director of Hartford Funds Distributors, LLC (“HFD”); and Chairman of the Board, President and Senior Managing Director of Hartford Administrative Services Company (“HASCO”), each of which is an affiliate of HFMG.	77	None
ANDREW S. DECKER (1963)	AML Compliance Officer	Since 2015	Mr. Decker serves as Chief Compliance Officer and AML Compliance Officer of HASCO (since April 2015) and Vice President of HASCO (since April 2018). Mr. Decker serves as AML Officer of HFD (since May 2015). Mr. Decker also serves as Vice President of HFMG (since April 2018). Prior to joining The Hartford, Mr. Decker served as Vice President and AML Officer at Janney Montgomery Scott (a broker dealer) from April 2011 to January 2015.	N/A	N/A
AMY N. FURLONG (1979)	Vice President	Since 2018	Ms. Furlong serves as Vice President and Assistant Treasurer of HFMC (since September 2019). From 2018 through March 15, 2021, Ms. Furlong served as the Treasurer of each Company. Ms. Furlong has served in various positions within The Hartford and its subsidiaries in connection with the operation of the Hartford Funds. Ms. Furlong joined The Hartford in 2004.	N/A	N/A
WALTER F. GARGER (1965)	Vice President and Chief Legal Officer	Since 2016	Mr. Garger serves as Secretary, Managing Director and General Counsel of HFMG, HFMC, HFD, and HASCO (since 2013). Mr. Garger also serves as Secretary and General Counsel of Lattice (since July 2016). Mr. Garger has served in various positions within The Hartford and its subsidiaries in connection with the operation of the Hartford Funds. Mr. Garger joined The Hartford in 1995.	N/A	N/A
THEODORE J. LUCAS (1966)	Vice President	Since 2017	Mr. Lucas serves as Executive Vice President of HFMG (since July 2016) and as Executive Vice President of Lattice (since June 2017). Previously, Mr. Lucas served as Managing Partner of Lattice (2003 to 2016).	N/A	N/A

NAME, YEAR OF BIRTH AND ADDRESS*	POSITION HELD WITH EACH COMPANY	TERM OF OFFICE** AND LENGTH OF TIME SERVED	PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(S) DURING PAST 5 YEARS	NUMBER OF PORTFOLIOS IN FUND COMPLEX*** OVERSEEN BY DIRECTOR	OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS HELD BY DIRECTOR
JOSEPH G. MELCHER (1973)	Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer	Since 2013	Mr. Melcher serves as Executive Vice President of HFMG and HASCO (since December 2013). Mr. Melcher also serves as Executive Vice President (since December 2013) and Chief Compliance Officer (since December 2012) of HFMC, serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Lattice (since July 2016), serves as Executive Vice President of HFD (since December 2013), and has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of HFD (from April 2018 to June 2019).	N/A	N/A
VERNON J. MEYER (1964)	Vice President	Since 2006	Mr. Meyer serves as Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of HFMC and Managing Director of HFMG (since 2013). Mr. Meyer also serves as Senior Vice President-Investments of Lattice (since March 2019). Mr. Meyer has served in various positions within The Hartford and its subsidiaries in connection with the operation of the Hartford Funds. Mr. Meyer joined The Hartford in 2004.	N/A	N/A
DAVID A. NAAB (1985)	Vice President and Treasurer	Since March 15, 2021	Mr. Naab serves as Vice President and Assistant Treasurer of HFMC (since June 2021). Prior to joining HFMC in 2021, Mr. Naab served in various positions as an associate, senior associate, manager, senior manager, and director within the investment management, financial services, and asset & wealth management practice groups of PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP from 2007 to 2020.	N/A	N/A
ALICE A. PELLEGRINO (1960)	Vice President and Assistant Secretary	Since 2016	Ms. Pellegrino is Deputy General Counsel for HFMG (since April 2022) and currently serves as Vice President of HFMG (since December 2013). Ms. Pellegrino also serves as Vice President and Assistant Secretary of Lattice (since June 2017). Ms. Pellegrino has served in various positions within The Hartford and its subsidiaries in connection with the operation of the Hartford Funds. Ms. Pellegrino joined The Hartford in 2007.	N/A	N/A
THOMAS R. PHILLIPS (1960)	Vice President and Secretary	Since 2017	Mr. Phillips is Deputy General Counsel for HFMG and currently serves as a Senior Vice President (since June 2021) and Assistant Secretary (since June 2017) for HFMG. Mr. Phillips also serves as Vice President of HFMC (since June 2021). Prior to joining HFMG in 2017, Mr. Phillips was a Director and Chief Legal Officer of Saturna Capital Corporation from 2014–2016. Prior to that, Mr. Phillips was a Partner and Deputy General Counsel of Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC.	N/A	N/A

The address for each officer and Director is c/o Hartford Funds 690 Lee Road, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087.

Term of Office: Each Director holds an indefinite term until the Director’s retirement, which must be no later than December 31 of the year in which the Director turns 75 years of age, or the Director’s resignation, removal, or death prior to the Director’s retirement. Each Fund officer generally serves until his or her resignation, removal, or death.

***

****

“Interested person,” as defined in the 1940 Act, of each Company because of the person’s affiliation with, or equity ownership of, HFMC, HFD or affiliated companies.

All directors and officers of Hartford Series Fund, Inc. and Hartford HLS Series Fund II, Inc. also hold corresponding positions with The Hartford Mutual Funds, Inc., The Hartford Mutual Funds II, Inc., Hartford Funds Exchange-Traded Trust, and Lattice Strategies Trust.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS. Each Company has a Board of Directors. The Boards are responsible for oversight of the Funds. The same directors serve on the Board of each Company. The Board elects officers who are responsible for the day–to-day operations of the Funds. The Board oversees the Investment Manager and the other principal service providers of the Funds. As described in more detail below, the Board has established five standing committees that assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities: the Audit Committee, Compliance and Risk Oversight Committee, Contracts Committee, Investment Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee (collectively, the “Committees”).

The Board is chaired by an Independent Director (as defined below). The Independent Chair (i) presides at Board meetings and participates in the preparation of agendas for the meetings, (ii) acts as a liaison with the Funds’ officers, Investment Manager and other directors between meetings and (iii) coordinates Board activities and functions with the Chair of the Committees. The Independent Chair may also perform such other functions as may be requested by the Board from time to time. The Board has determined that the Board’s leadership and committee structure is appropriate because it provides a foundation for the Board to work effectively with management and service providers and facilitates the exercise of the Board’s independent judgment. In addition, the committee structure permits an efficient allocation of responsibility among the Directors.

The Board oversees risk as part of its general oversight of the Funds and risk is addressed as part of various Board and Committee activities. The Funds are subject to a number of risks, including investment, compliance, financial, operational and valuation risks. The Funds’ service providers, which are responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Funds, apply risk management in conducting their activities. The Board recognizes that it is not possible to identify all of the risks that may affect the Funds, and that it is not possible to develop processes and controls to eliminate all risks and their possible effects. The Audit Committee, Compliance and Risk Oversight Committee, and Investment Committee receive reports or other information from management regarding risk assessment and management. In addition, the Investment Manager has established an internal committee focused on risk assessment and risk management related to the operations of the Funds and the Investment Manager, and the Chair of that committee reports to the Compliance and Risk Oversight Committee on a semi-annual basis (or more frequently if appropriate). The Compliance and Risk Oversight Committee assists the Board in overseeing the activities of the Funds’ Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”), and the CCO provides an annual report to the Compliance and Risk Oversight Committee and the Board regarding material compliance matters. The Compliance and Risk Oversight Committee and the Board receive and consider other reports from the CCO throughout the year. The Investment Committee assists the Board in overseeing investment matters. The Investment Committee receives reports from the Investment Manager relating to investment performance, including information regarding investment risk. The Audit Committee assists the Board in reviewing financial matters, including matters relating to financial reporting risks and valuation risks. The Board may, at any time and in its discretion, change the manner in which it conducts its risk oversight role.

STANDING COMMITTEES. Each Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee, a Compliance and Risk Oversight Committee, a Contracts Committee, an Investment Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee. The Companies do not have standing compensation committees. However, each Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for making recommendations to the applicable Board regarding the compensation of the non-interested members of the Board. Each Board has adopted written charters for the Audit Committee, the Compliance and Risk Oversight Committee, the Investment Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee.

Each Audit Committee currently consists of the following non-interested directors: Hilary E. Ackermann, Derrick D. Cephas, Paul L. Rosenberg, and David Sung. Each Audit Committee (i) oversees the Funds’ accounting and financial reporting policies and practices, their internal controls and, as appropriate, the internal controls of certain service providers; (ii) assists the applicable Board of Directors in its oversight of the qualifications, independence and performance of the Funds’ independent registered public accounting firm; the quality, objectivity and integrity of the Funds’ financial statements and the independent audit thereof; and the performance of the Funds’ internal audit function; and (iii) acts as a liaison between the Funds’ independent registered public accounting firm and the respective full board. The Funds’ independent registered public accounting firm reports directly to each Audit Committee, and each Audit Committee regularly reports to its applicable Board of Directors.

Management is responsible for maintaining appropriate systems for accounting. Each Company's independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for conducting a proper audit of the Company's financial statements and is ultimately accountable to the applicable Audit Committee. The Audit Committees have the ultimate authority and responsibility to select (subject to approval by the non-interested directors and ratification by the Company shareholders, as required) and evaluate the applicable Company's independent registered public accounting firm, to determine the compensation of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm and, when appropriate, to replace the Company's independent registered public accounting firm.

Each Compliance and Risk Oversight Committee currently consists of Hilary E. Ackermann, Derrick D. Cephas, Paul L. Rosenberg, and David Sung. Each Compliance and Risk Oversight Committee assists the applicable Board in its oversight of the adoption and implementation of compliance and enterprise risk management policies and procedures.

Each Contracts Committee currently consists of all non-interested directors of the Funds: Hilary E. Ackermann; Robin C. Beery; Derrick D. Cephas; Christine R. Detrick; John J. Gauthier; Andrew A. Johnson; Paul L. Rosenberg; and David Sung. Each Contracts Committee assists the applicable Board in its consideration and review of fund contracts and the consideration of strategy-related matters.

Each Investment Committee currently consists of Robin C. Beery, John J. Gauthier, and Andrew A. Johnson. Each Investment Committee assists the applicable Board in its oversight of the Funds’ investment performance and related matters.

Each Nominating and Governance Committee currently consists of all non-interested directors of the Funds: Hilary E. Ackermann; Robin C. Beery; Derrick D. Cephas; Christine R. Detrick; John J. Gauthier; Andrew A. Johnson; Paul L. Rosenberg; and David Sung. Each Nominating and Governance Committee: (i) screens and selects candidates to the applicable Board of Directors and (ii) periodically reviews and evaluates the compensation of the non-interested directors and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding the compensation of, and expense reimbursement policies with respect to, non-interested directors. Each Nominating and Governance Committee is also authorized to consider and make recommendations to the Board regarding governance

policies, including, but not limited to, any retirement policy for non-interested directors. Each Nominating and Governance Committee will consider nominees recommended by shareholders for non-interested director positions if a vacancy among the non-interested directors occurs and if the nominee meets the Committee’s criteria.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, the above referenced committees (or sub-committee thereof) met the following number of times: Audit Committee — 5 times, Investment Committee — 5 times, Nominating and Governance Committee — 8 times, Contracts Committee — 1 time and Compliance and Risk Oversight Committee — 5 times.

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS. The governing documents for the Companies do not set forth any specific qualifications to serve as a Director. The Charter for the Nominating and Governance Committee sets forth criteria that the Committee should consider as minimum requirements for consideration as an independent director, including: 15 years of business or academic experience in a management, administrative or other oversight capacity; a college degree or business experience equivalent to a college degree; an ability to invest in the HLS Funds; a person of high ethical standards; and a person able to think through and discuss complicated regulatory and financial issues and arrive at reasonable decisions on these issues on behalf of HLS Fund shareholders.

Each Board has concluded that, based on each director’s experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills, on an individual basis and in combination with those of other directors, each director is qualified to serve as a director for the Funds. Among the attributes and skills common to all directors are the ability to review, evaluate and discuss information and proposals provided to them regarding the Funds, the ability to interact effectively with management and service providers, and the ability to exercise independent business judgment. Where applicable, the Boards have considered the actual service of each director in concluding that the director should continue to serve. Each director’s ability to perform his or her duties effectively has been attained through the director’s education and work experience, as well as service as a director for the Funds and/or other entities. Set forth below is a brief description of the specific experience of each director. Additional details regarding the background of each director is included in the chart earlier in this section.

Hilary E. Ackermann. Ms. Ackermann has served as a director of the Companies since September 2014. She has served as Chair of the Compliance and Risk Oversight Committee since 2016. Ms. Ackermann has over 25 years of credit, financial and risk management experience, including serving as the chief risk officer at a New York-chartered bank.

Robin C. Beery. Ms. Beery has served as a director of the Companies since 2017. She has served as Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee since January 1, 2021. Ms. Beery is an experienced business executive with over 30 years of experience in the financial services industry, including extensive experience as a senior executive overseeing the global distribution of mutual funds and institutional strategies for a large investment adviser.

Derrick D. Cephas. Mr. Cephas has more than forty years of experience as an attorney practicing in the banking, corporate, and financial services industries. He currently is a Partner of an international law firm and also serves as a director of a commercial bank. Mr. Cephas previously served in senior executive roles in state banking and other regulatory agencies and served as the chief executive officer of one of the largest privately owned banks in the U.S.

Christine R. Detrick. Ms. Detrick has served as a director of the Companies since 2016. She has served as Chair of the Board and the Contracts Committee since November 2021. She served as Chair of the Investment Committee from August 2019 until November 2021. Ms. Detrick has over 30 years of experience leading and advising financial services companies and investors. She previously served as a director, head of the Americas financial services practice and senior advisor at a management consulting firm, and as the chief executive officer of a private savings bank.

John J. Gauthier. Mr. Gauthier has served as a director of the Companies since January 2022 and is a member of the Board’s Investment Committee. Mr. Gauthier is an investment senior executive with 30 years of experience overseeing investment portfolios for insurance companies and has served as a chief investment officer and in chief executive officer positions. Mr. Gauthier also is the principal owner of an investment consulting firm and a principal owner of an investment manager placement agency, each of which serves clients in the insurance industry.

Andrew A. Johnson. Mr. Johnson has served as Chair of the Investment Committee since November 2021. Mr. Johnson has over 30 years of experience as an investment professional responsible for a range of fixed-income and multi-asset class products. He currently serves as a diversity and inclusion advisor at a global investment management firm. In his previous roles, Mr. Johnson served as a chief investment officer, senior executive and portfolio manager.

Paul L. Rosenberg. Mr. Rosenberg has over 40 years of experience as a senior executive, strategy consultant, and senior official serving in the U.S. government. He currently is a partner of a non-profit strategy consulting firm. Mr. Rosenberg was previously a partner of a premier for-profit strategy consulting firm.

David Sung. Mr. Sung has served as a director of the Companies since 2017. He has served as Chair of the Audit Committee since November 2019. Mr. Sung is an experienced financial services and auditing professional with over 37 years of experience serving clients in the investment management business.

James E. Davey. Mr. Davey has served as a director of the Companies since 2012 and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Companies since 2010. Mr. Davey joined The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (“The Hartford”) in 2002 and has served in various positions within The Hartford and its subsidiaries. Prior to joining The Hartford, Mr. Davey served in various management roles at Merrill Lynch, including director of 401(k) alliance management and director of corporate and institutional 401(k) product management, overseeing product profitability and marketing strategy. Mr. Davey has served on the Board of Governors for the Investment Company Institute (ICI).

OWNERSHIP OF FUND SHARES. The following table discloses the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by each director as of December 31, 2021 (i) in each HLS Fund and (ii) on an aggregate basis in any registered investment companies overseen by the director within the same family of investment companies.

NON-INTERESTED DIRECTORS

NAME OF DIRECTOR	DOLLAR RANGE OF EQUITY SECURITIES IN THE HLS FUNDS	AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF EQUITY SECURITIES IN ALL REGISTERED INVESTMENT COMPANIES OVERSEEN BY DIRECTOR IN FAMILY OF INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Hilary E. Ackermann	None	Over $100,000
Robin C. Beery	None	Over $100,000
Derrick D. Cephas	None	None
Christine R. Detrick	None	Over $100,000
John J. Gauthier*	None	Over $100,000
Andrew A. Johnson	None	None
Paul L. Rosenberg	None	None
David Sung	None	None

* Mr. Gauthier became a Director of each Company effective January 1, 2022.

INTERESTED DIRECTOR

NAME OF DIRECTOR	DOLLAR RANGE OF EQUITY SECURITIES IN THE HLS FUNDS	AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF EQUITY SECURITIES IN ALL REGISTERED INVESTMENT COMPANIES OVERSEEN BY DIRECTOR IN FAMILY OF INVESTMENT COMPANIES
James E. Davey	None	Over $100,000

COMPENSATION OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS. The HLS Funds pay a portion of the chief compliance officer’s compensation, but otherwise do not pay salaries or compensation to any of their officers or directors who are employed by Hartford Funds or its affiliates. The chart below sets forth the compensation paid by each Company to the following directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.

NAME OF PERSON, POSITION	AGGREGATE COMPENSATION FROM HARTFORD SERIES FUND, INC.	AGGREGATE COMPENSATION FROM HARTFORD HLS SERIES FUND II, INC.	PENSION OR RETIREMENT BENEFITS ACCRUED AS PART OF HLS FUND EXPENSES	ESTIMATED ANNUAL BENEFITS UPON RETIREMENT	TOTAL COMPENSATION FROM THE FUND COMPLEX PAID TO DIRECTORS
Hilary E. Ackermann, Director	$52,996	$3,392	$0	$0	$350,000
Robin C. Beery, Director	$51,192	$3,272	$0	$0	$338,750
Lynn S. Birdsong, Director*	$75,330	$4,824	$0	$0	$496,500
Derrick D. Cephas, Director	$46,136	$2,951	$0	$0	$305,000
Christine R. Detrick, Director	$52,996	$3,392	$0	$0	$350,000
John J. Gauthier, Director**	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Andrew A. Johnson, Director	$46,136	$2,951	$0	$0	$305,000
Paul L. Rosenberg, Director	$46,136	$2,951	$0	$0	$305,000
Lemma W. Senbet, Director*	$46,136	$2,951	$0	$0	$305,000
David Sung, Director	$52,996	$3,392	$0	$0	$350,000

Each of Messrs. Birdsong and Senbet retired as a Director of each Company effective December 31, 2021.

Mr. Gauthier became a Director of each Company effective January 1, 2022.

Each Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide that the Company to the full extent permitted by Maryland General Corporate Law and the federal securities laws shall indemnify the directors and officers of the Company. The Articles of Incorporation do not authorize the Companies to indemnify any director or officer against any liability to which he or she would otherwise be subject by reason of or for willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of such person’s duties.

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS

Each Company, on behalf of its respective HLS Funds, has entered into an investment management agreement with HFMC. HFMC, whose principal business address is 690 Lee Road, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087, was organized in 2012. The investment management agreement provides that HFMC, subject to the supervision and approval of the applicable Company’s Board of Directors, is responsible for the management of each HLS Fund. HFMC is responsible for investment management supervision of all HLS Funds. In addition, pursuant to the investment management agreement, HFMC or its affiliate(s) provides administrative services to both Companies and their Funds, including personnel, services, equipment and facilities and office space for proper operation of the Companies and the Funds. The investment management agreement does not require HFMC to bear the costs of the HLS Funds’ transfer agent, registrar and dividend disbursing agent. Although HFMC, or its affiliates, have agreed to arrange for the provision of additional services necessary for the proper operation of the Companies, each Fund pays for these services directly. HFMC administers the business and affairs of each Fund. With respect to each Fund, HFMC may retain and compensate the sub-adviser that invests and reinvests the assets of the Fund pursuant to the sub-advisory agreement with HFMC. In this regard, HFMC will, whether directly

or through engagement of a sub-adviser, regularly provide each Fund with research, advice and supervision, and will furnish continuously an investment program for each Fund consistent with the investment objectives and policies of the Fund. HFMC shall also monitor, supervise and oversee the sub-adviser. Among other services, HFMC: (i) provides and, as necessary, re-evaluates and updates the investment objectives and parameters, asset classes, and risk profiles of the Funds; (ii) determines, as permitted through the engagement of the sub-adviser, what securities and other financial instruments should be purchased for the Funds and the portion of the Funds' portfolios to be held in cash; (iii) monitors the Funds' performance and examines and recommends ways to improve performance; (iv) meets with and monitors the sub-adviser to confirm its compliance with the Funds' investment strategies and policies and for its adherence to legal and compliance procedures; (v) researches and recommends the sub-adviser or portfolio managers for the Funds; and (vi) reports to the Board on the performance of each Fund and recommends action as appropriate.

Among other services, HFMC: (i) assists in all aspects of the Funds' operations, including the supervision and coordination of service providers (e.g., the custodian, transfer agent or other shareholder servicing agents, accountants, and attorneys), and serves as the liaison between such service providers and the Board; (ii) drafts and negotiates agreements between service providers and the applicable Company; (iii) prepares meeting materials for each Company's Board and produces such other materials as the Board may request; (iv) coordinates and oversees filings with the SEC; (v) develops and implements compliance programs for the Funds; (vi) provides day-to-day legal and regulatory support for the Funds; (vii) assists the Funds in the handling of regulatory examinations; and (viii) makes reports to the Board regarding the performance of the Funds' investment adviser.

HFMC, on behalf of the relevant HLS Funds, has entered into investment sub-advisory agreements with Wellington Management. Wellington Management is a Delaware limited liability partnership with principal offices at 280 Congress Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210. Under each investment sub-advisory agreement, Wellington Management, subject to the general supervision of the Board of Directors and HFMC, is responsible for (among other things) the investment and reinvestment of the assets of the HLS Funds allocated to it by HFMC and furnishing such HLS Fund with advice and recommendations with respect to investments and the purchase and sale of appropriate securities for such HLS Fund.

Pursuant to the investment management agreement, HFMC is not liable to the Funds or its shareholders for an error of judgment or mistake of law or for a loss suffered by the Funds in connection with the matters to which its agreement relates, except a loss resulting from willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence on the part of HFMC in the performance of its duties or from its reckless disregard of the obligations and duties under the agreement.

Pursuant to each investment sub-advisory agreement, the sub-adviser must discharge its duties under each sub-advisory agreement with the care, skill, prudence and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent investment professional acting in a similar capacity and familiar with such matters would use. Unless the sub-adviser breaches this standard of care or under applicable law, the sub-adviser is not liable to either Company, any Fund, HFMC or its affiliates for any of its acts or omissions, or any acts or omissions of any other person or entity, in the course of or connected with the sub-adviser performing its obligations under the sub-advisory agreements. If the sub-adviser breaches this standard of care or under applicable law, the sub- adviser is responsible for indemnifying and holding harmless HFMC and its affiliates from all claims, losses, expenses, obligations and liabilities (including reasonable attorney’s fees) resulting from: (1) the sub-adviser causing a Fund to be in material violation of any applicable federal or state law, rule or regulation or in violation of any investment policy set forth in such Fund’s current registration statement; (2) any untrue statement of a material fact contained in the registration statement or certain other materials or the omission to state therein a material fact known to the sub-adviser that was required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, if the statement or omission was made in reliance upon information provided by the sub-adviser in writing for use in such materials; (3) a material breach of each investment sub-advisory agreement; or (4) any willful misfeasance, bad faith, negligence or reckless disregard on the part of the sub-adviser in the performance of its duties and obligations under each investment sub-advisory agreement (except to the extent that the loss results from HFMC’s or a Company’s willful misfeasance, bad faith, negligence, or reckless disregard in the performance of their respective duties and obligations under the sub-advisory agreements or the applicable investment management agreement).

As provided by the investment management agreement, each HLS Fund pays a monthly management fee to HFMC (which covers, in addition to investment management services, certain administrative services). These fees are accrued daily and paid monthly, equal on an annual basis to a stated percentage of such HLS Fund’s average daily net assets. HFMC (not the applicable HLS Fund) pays the sub-advisory fees to the sub-adviser.

MANAGEMENT FEES

Each HLS Fund pays a monthly management fee to HFMC based on a stated percentage of the Fund’s average daily net asset value, as follows:

Healthcare HLS Fund

AVERAGE DAILY NET ASSETS	ANNUAL RATE
First $250 million	0.8500%
Next $250 million	0.8000%
Next $4.5 billion	0.7500%
Next $5 billion	0.7475%
Amount Over $10 billion	0.7450%

Capital Appreciation HLS Fund and International Opportunities HLS Fund

AVERAGE DAILY NET ASSETS	ANNUAL RATE
First $250 million	0.7750%
Next $250 million	0.7250%
Next $500 million	0.6750%
Next $1.5 billion	0.6250%
Next $2.5 billion	0.6200%
Next $5 billion	0.6150%
Amount Over $10 billion	0.6100%

Dividend and Growth HLS Fund

AVERAGE DAILY NET ASSETS	ANNUAL RATE
First $250 million	0.6900%
Next $250 million	0.6425%
Next $500 million	0.6325%
Next $1.5 billion	0.6250%
Next $2.5 billion	0.6200%
Next $5 billion	0.6150%
Amount Over $10 billion	0.6100%

MidCap HLS Fund

AVERAGE DAILY NET ASSETS	ANNUAL RATE
First $250 million	0.7750%
Next $250 million	0.7250%
Next $500 million	0.6750%
Next $4 billion	0.6250%
Next $5 billion	0.6225%
Amount Over $10 billion	0.6200%

Disciplined Equity HLS Fund

AVERAGE DAILY NET ASSETS	ANNUAL RATE
First $1 billion	0.6000%
Next $4 billion	0.5500%
Next $5 billion	0.5300%
Amount Over $10 billion	0.5000%

Small Company HLS Fund

AVERAGE DAILY NET ASSETS	ANNUAL RATE
First $250 million	0.7750%
Next $250 million	0.7250%
Next $500 million	0.6750%
Next $500 million	0.6000%
Next $3.5 billion	0.5500%
Next $5 billion	0.5300%
Amount Over $10 billion	0.5200%

Small Cap Growth HLS Fund

AVERAGE DAILY NET ASSETS	ANNUAL RATE
First $100 million	0.7000%
Next $4.9 billion	0.6000%
Next $5 billion	0.5800%
Amount Over $10 billion	0.5700%

Balanced HLS Fund

AVERAGE DAILY NET ASSETS	ANNUAL RATE
First $250 million	0.6800%
Next $250 million	0.6550%
Next $500 million	0.6450%
Next $4 billion	0.5950%
Next $5 billion	0.5925%
Amount Over $10 billion	0.5900%

Stock HLS Fund

AVERAGE DAILY NET ASSETS	ANNUAL RATE
First $250 million	0.5250%
Next $250 million	0.5000%
Next $500 million	0.4750%
Next $4 billion	0.4500%
Next $5 billion	0.4475%
Amount Over $10 billion	0.4450%

Total Return Bond HLS Fund

AVERAGE DAILY NET ASSETS	ANNUAL RATE
First $250 million	0.5250%
Next $250 million	0.5000%
Next $500 million	0.4750%
Next $1.5 billion	0.4500%
Next $2.5 billion	0.4450%
Next $5 billion	0.4300%
Amount Over $10 billion	0.4200%

Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund

AVERAGE DAILY NET ASSETS	ANNUAL RATE
First $5 billion	0.4000%
Next $5 billion	0.3800%
Amount Over $10 billion	0.3700%

ADVISORY FEE PAYMENT HISTORY

The following charts show for each of the last three fiscal years: (i) the gross and net amount of advisory fees paid by each HLS Fund to HFMC; and (ii) the net aggregate amount of sub-advisory fees, if any, paid by HFMC, with respect to the applicable HLS Fund, to any sub-advisers with which HFMC is not affiliated (“Unaffiliated Managers”). The fees paid to Unaffiliated Managers are shown both in dollars and as a percentage of the HLS Fund’s average daily net assets that they managed during the applicable period.

Fund Name	Gross Fees Paid to HFMC For fiscal year ended 12/31/21	Investment Advisory Fee Waiver For fiscal year ended 12/31/21	Net Fees Paid to HFMC For fiscal year ended 12/31/21	Net Aggregate Sub-advisory Fees Paid to Unaffiliated Managers For fiscal year ended 12/31/21	% Net Aggregate Sub-advisory Fees Paid to Unaffiliated Managers For fiscal year ended 12/31/21
Balanced HLS Fund	$13,426,307	$646,074	$12,780,233	$2,689,297	0.12%
Capital Appreciation HLS Fund	$29,282,645	$0	$29,282,645	$14,628,822	0.32%
Disciplined Equity HLS Fund	$18,739,518	$0	$18,739,518	$5,002,786	0.15%
Dividend and Growth HLS Fund	$24,355,572	$0	$24,355,572	$7,227,032	0.19%

Fund Name	Gross Fees Paid to HFMC For fiscal year ended 12/31/21	Investment Advisory Fee Waiver For fiscal year ended 12/31/21	Net Fees Paid to HFMC For fiscal year ended 12/31/21	Net Aggregate Sub-advisory Fees Paid to Unaffiliated Managers For fiscal year ended 12/31/21	% Net Aggregate Sub-advisory Fees Paid to Unaffiliated Managers For fiscal year ended 12/31/21
Healthcare HLS Fund	$1,808,918	$0	$1,808,918	$844,849	0.40%
International Opportunities HLS Fund	$8,605,819	$0	$8,605,819	$3,642,328	0.29%
MidCap HLS Fund	$15,122,366	$0	$15,122,366	$5,823,946	0.26%
Small Cap Growth HLS Fund	$8,749,052	$0	$8,749,052	$3,258,017	0.23%
Small Company HLS Fund	$4,733,330	$0	$4,733,330	$2,421,294	0.38%
Stock HLS Fund	$7,459,221	$0	$7,459,221	$2,703,073	0.17%
Total Return Bond HLS Fund	$10,947,766	$0	$10,947,766	$3,140,237	0.13%
Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund	$2,961,696	$0	$2,961,696	$816,382	0.11%

Fund Name	Gross Fees Paid to HFMC For fiscal year ended 12/31/20	Investment Advisory Fee Waiver For fiscal year ended 12/31/20	Net Fees Paid to HFMC For fiscal year ended 12/31/20	Net Aggregate Sub-advisory Fees Paid to Unaffiliated Managers For fiscal year ended 12/31/20	% Net Aggregate Sub-advisory Fees Paid to Unaffiliated Managers For fiscal year ended 12/31/20
Balanced HLS Fund	$12,174,016	$582,934	$11,591,083	$2,436,734	0.13%
Capital Appreciation HLS Fund	$26,236,540	$0	$26,236,540	$13,105,770	0.32%
Disciplined Equity HLS Fund	$7,711,571	$0	$7,711,571	$2,141,847	0.17%
Dividend and Growth HLS Fund	$19,524,803	$0	$19,524,803	$5,778,284	0.19%
Healthcare HLS Fund	$1,859,988	$0	$1,859,988	$865,878	0.40%
International Opportunities HLS Fund	$7,658,200	$0	$7,658,200	$3,261,327	0.30%
MidCap HLS Fund	$13,163,739	$0	$13,163,739	$5,040,495	0.26%
Small Cap Growth HLS Fund	$7,386,706	$0	$7,386,706	$2,803,902	0.23%
Small Company HLS Fund	$3,671,830	$0	$3,671,830	$1,843,352	0.38%
Stock HLS Fund	$6,691,321	$0	$6,691,321	$2,447,107	0.18%
Total Return Bond HLS Fund	$10,023,421	$0	$10,023,421	$2,893,746	0.14%
Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund	$2,126,488	$0	$2,126,488	$624,282	0.12%

Fund Name	Gross Fees Paid to HFMC For fiscal year ended 12/31/19	Investment Advisory Fee Waiver For fiscal year ended 12/31/19	Net Fees Paid to HFMC For fiscal year ended 12/31/19	Net Aggregate Sub-advisory Fees Paid to Unaffiliated Managers For fiscal year ended 12/31/19	% Net Aggregate Sub-advisory Fees Paid to Unaffiliated Managers For fiscal year ended 12/31/19
Balanced HLS Fund	$12,786,411	$613,810	$12,172,601	$2,560,243	0.13%
Capital Appreciation HLS Fund	$27,851,982	$0	$27,851,982	$13,913,491	0.32%
Disciplined Equity HLS Fund	$4,584,984	$0	$4,584,984	$1,298,052	0.21%
Dividend and Growth HLS Fund	$20,757,445	$0	$20,757,445	$6,067,364	0.19%
Healthcare HLS Fund	$2,045,917	$0	$2,045,917	$945,493	0.39%
International Opportunities HLS Fund	$8,346,731	$0	$8,346,731	$3,538,692	0.30%
MidCap HLS Fund	$13,990,951	$0	$13,990,951	$5,371,381	0.26%
Small Cap Growth HLS Fund	$7,729,686	$0	$7,729,686	$2,918,327	0.23%
Small Company HLS Fund	$4,452,378	$0	$4,452,378	$2,265,477	0.38%
Stock HLS Fund	$7,025,084	$0	$7,025,084	$2,558,361	0.17%
Total Return Bond HLS Fund	$9,886,054	$0	$9,886,054	$2,857,114	0.14%
Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund	$1,928,688	$0	$1,928,688	$582,169	0.12%

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT HFMC

HFMC, and its affiliates, may make payments from time to time from their own resources, which may include the management fees paid by the HLS Funds, to compensate broker dealers, financial institutions, and other persons for providing distribution assistance and administrative services and to otherwise indirectly promote the sale of shares of the HLS Funds by promoting the sale of variable contracts including paying for the preparation, printing and distribution of prospectuses and sales literature or other promotional activities.

PORTFOLIO MANAGERS

OTHER ACCOUNTS MANAGED OR SUB-ADVISED BY WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT PORTFOLIO MANAGERS

The following table lists the number and types of other accounts managed or sub-advised by the Funds’ portfolio managers and assets under management in those accounts as of December 31, 2021:

FUND AND PORTFOLIO MANAGER	NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS	ASSETS MANAGED (in millions)	NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS WHERE ADVISORY FEE IS BASED ON ACCOUNT PERFORMANCE	TOTAL ASSETS IN ACCOUNTS WHERE ADVISORY FEE IS BASED ON ACCOUNT PERFORMANCE (in millions)
Balanced HLS Fund
Adam H. Illfelder
Other Registered Investment Companies	7	$17,188	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	3	$427	0	$0
Other Accounts	1	$33	0	$0
Loren L. Moran
Other Registered Investment Companies	9	$91,828	5	$86,125
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	4	$182	1	$33
Other Accounts	1	$738	0	$0
Matthew C. Hand
Other Registered Investment Companies	3	$14,124	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	2	$921	0	$0
Other Accounts	0	$0	0	$0
Capital Appreciation HLS Fund
Gregg R. Thomas
Other Registered Investment Companies	9	$11,648	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	18	$3,421	5	$1,478
Other Accounts	8	$6,003	0	$0
Thomas S. Simon
Other Registered Investment Companies	9	$9,786	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	7	$231	0	$0
Other Accounts	4	$3,901	0	$0
Disciplined Equity HLS Fund
Mammen Chally
Other Registered Investment Companies	12	$24,631	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	12	$2,808	1	$0
Other Accounts	16	$2,861	1	$308
David A. Siegle
Other Registered Investment Companies	12	$24,631	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	11	$2,808	0	$0
Other Accounts	15	$2,804	1	$308
Douglas W. McLane
Other Registered Investment Companies	12	$24,631	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	24	$3,414	4	$207
Other Accounts	44	$3,009	1	$308
Dividend and Growth HLS Fund
Matthew G. Baker
Other Registered Investment Companies	2	$15,692	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	6	$2,583	0	$0
Other Accounts	1	$418	0	$0
Nataliya Kofman
Other Registered Investment Companies	3	$16,939	1	$1,246
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	5	$508	1	$61
Other Accounts	7	$1,395	0	$0
Healthcare HLS Fund
Ann C. Gallo
Other Registered Investment Companies	4	$1,030	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	27	$8,111	12	$1,496
Other Accounts	9	$4,351	2	$3,598
Robert L. Deresiewicz
Other Registered Investment Companies	4	$1,211	0	$0

FUND AND PORTFOLIO MANAGER	NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS	ASSETS MANAGED (in millions)	NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS WHERE ADVISORY FEE IS BASED ON ACCOUNT PERFORMANCE	TOTAL ASSETS IN ACCOUNTS WHERE ADVISORY FEE IS BASED ON ACCOUNT PERFORMANCE (in millions)
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	15	$2,455	6	$904
Other Accounts	5	$2,114	2	$1,910
Rebecca D. Sykes
Other Registered Investment Companies	12	$1,010	1	$7
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	52	$2,472	14	$579
Other Accounts	61	$5,854	14	$4,322
Wen Shi
Other Registered Investment Companies	5	$69	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	21	$210	5	$24
Other Accounts	70	$583	8	$80
David M. Khtikian(1)
Other Registered Investment Companies	5	$238	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	21	$386	5	$79
Other Accounts	70	$982	8	$151
Fayyaz Mujtaba(1)
Other Registered Investment Companies	8	$398	1	$43
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	30	$616	5	$98
Other Accounts	80	$1,506	11	$283
International Opportunities HLS Fund
Nicolas M. Choumenkovitch
Other Registered Investment Companies	5	$5,296	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	9	$3,877	1	$0
Other Accounts	22	$10,048	2	$1,158
Tara C. Stilwell
Other Registered Investment Companies	5	$5,231	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	13	$6,752	0	$0
Other Accounts	12	$4,049	1	$821
MidCap HLS Fund
Philip W. Ruedi
Other Registered Investment Companies	6	$16,395	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	3	$2,205	0	$0
Other Accounts	14	$2,915	3	$1,033
Mark A. Whitaker
Other Registered Investment Companies	8	$16,418	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	10	$3,210	1	$0
Other Accounts	25	$4,253	3	$1,033
Small Cap Growth HLS Fund
Mammen Chally
Other Registered Investment Companies	12	$24,631	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	12	$2,808	1	$0
Other Accounts	16	$2,861	1	$308
David A. Siegle
Other Registered Investment Companies	12	$24,631	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	11	$2,808	0	$0
Other Accounts	15	$2,804	1	$308
Douglas W. McLane
Other Registered Investment Companies	12	$24,631	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	24	$3,414	4	$207
Other Accounts	44	$3,009	1	$308
Small Company HLS Fund
Steven C. Angeli
Other Registered Investment Companies	10	$2,621	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	21	$3,338	7	$558
Other Accounts	11	$3,375	1	$797
Ranjit Ramachandran
Other Registered Investment Companies	2	$958	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	8	$32	1	$3
Other Accounts	3	$9	1	$5

FUND AND PORTFOLIO MANAGER	NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS	ASSETS MANAGED (in millions)	NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS WHERE ADVISORY FEE IS BASED ON ACCOUNT PERFORMANCE	TOTAL ASSETS IN ACCOUNTS WHERE ADVISORY FEE IS BASED ON ACCOUNT PERFORMANCE (in millions)
John V. Schneider
Other Registered Investment Companies	4	$1,698	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	2	$56	0	$0
Other Accounts	0	$0	0	$0
Stock HLS Fund
Donald J. Kilbride
Other Registered Investment Companies	11	$69,015	2	$56,446
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	12	$679	4	$112
Other Accounts	26	$3,523	3	$965
Peter C. Fisher
Other Registered Investment Companies	6	$4,720	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	5	$651	1	$76
Other Accounts	5	$566	1	$43
Total Return Bond HLS Fund
Joseph F. Marvan
Other Registered Investment Companies	20	$35,968	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	28	$12,502	0	$0
Other Accounts	75	$37,796	1	$164
Campe Goodman
Other Registered Investment Companies	17	$11,313	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	21	$9,381	0	$0
Other Accounts	47	$18,748	1	$164
Robert D. Burn
Other Registered Investment Companies	17	$11,252	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	17	$7,390	0	$0
Other Accounts	47	$18,686	1	$164
Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund
Timothy E. Smith
Other Registered Investment Companies	11	$10,310	0	$0
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	7	$6,538	0	$0
Other Accounts	64	$24,734	1	$36

(1) Effective March 1, 2022, Mr. Khtikian and Mr. Mujtaba became a portfolio manager to the Healthcare HLS Fund.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BETWEEN THE HLS FUNDS SUB-ADVISED BY WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT PORTFOLIO MANAGERS AND OTHER ACCOUNTS

Individual investment professionals at Wellington Management manage multiple accounts for multiple clients. These accounts may include mutual funds, separate accounts (assets managed on behalf of institutions such as pension funds, insurance companies, foundations, or separately managed account programs sponsored by financial intermediaries), bank common trust accounts, and hedge funds. The portfolio managers listed in the prospectus who are primarily responsible for the daily investment of the assets of the HLS Funds (“Investment Professionals”) generally manage accounts in several different investment styles. These accounts may have investment objectives, strategies, time horizons, tax considerations and risk profiles that differ from those of the HLS Funds. The Investment Professionals make investment decisions for each account, including the relevant HLS Fund, based on the investment objectives, policies, practices, benchmarks, cash flows, tax and other relevant investment considerations applicable to that account. Consequently, the Investment Professionals may purchase or sell securities, including IPOs, for one account and not another account, and the performance of securities purchased for one account may vary from the performance of securities purchased for other accounts. Alternatively, these accounts may be managed in a similar fashion to the relevant HLS Fund and thus the accounts may have similar, and in some cases nearly identical, objectives, strategies and/or holdings to that of the relevant HLS Fund.

An Investment Professional or other investment professionals at Wellington Management may engage in transactions on behalf of other accounts that are directly or indirectly contrary to investment decisions made on behalf of the relevant HLS Fund, or make investment decisions that are similar to those made for the relevant HLS Fund, both of which have the potential to adversely impact the relevant HLS Fund depending on market conditions. For example, an Investment Professional may purchase a security in one account while appropriately selling that same security in another account. Similarly, an Investment Professional may purchase the same security for the relevant HLS Fund and one or more other accounts at or about the same time. In those instances the investors in the other accounts may have access to their respective holdings prior to the public disclosure of the relevant HLS Fund’s

holdings. In addition, some of these accounts have fee structures, including performance fees, that are or have the potential to be higher, in some cases significantly higher, than the fees Wellington Management receives for managing the HLS Funds. The Investment Professionals may also manage accounts that pay performance allocations to Wellington Management or its affiliates (as indicated in the notes to the chart above entitled “Other Accounts Managed or Sub-Advised by Wellington Management Portfolio Managers”). Because incentive payments paid by Wellington Management to the Investment Professionals are tied to revenues earned by Wellington Management and, where noted, to the performance achieved by the manager in each account, the incentives associated with any given account may be significantly higher or lower than those associated with other accounts managed by a given Investment Professional. Finally, the Investment Professionals may hold shares or investments in the other pooled investment vehicles and/or other accounts identified above.

Wellington Management’s goal is to meet its fiduciary obligation to treat all clients fairly and provide high quality investment services to all of its clients. For this reason, Wellington Management has adopted and implemented policies and procedures, including brokerage and trade allocation policies and procedures, which it believes address the conflicts associated with managing multiple accounts for multiple clients. In addition, Wellington Management monitors a variety of areas, including compliance with primary account guidelines, the allocation of IPOs, and compliance with the firm’s Code of Ethics, and places additional investment restrictions on investment professionals who manage hedge funds and certain other accounts. Furthermore, senior investment and business personnel at Wellington Management periodically review the performance of Wellington Management’s investment professionals. Although Wellington Management does not track the time an investment professional spends on a single account, Wellington Management does periodically assess whether an investment professional has adequate time and resources to effectively manage the investment professional’s various client mandates.

COMPENSATION OF WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT PORTFOLIO MANAGERS

Wellington Management receives a fee based on the assets under management of each HLS Fund it sub-advises as set forth in the investment sub-advisory agreements between Wellington Management and HFMC. Wellington Management pays its Investment Professionals out of its total revenues, including the advisory fees earned with respect to each HLS Fund. The following information relates to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.

Wellington Management’s compensation structure is designed to attract and retain high-caliber investment professionals necessary to deliver high quality investment management services to its clients. Wellington Management’s compensation of each Fund’s portfolio managers listed in the prospectus who are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Funds (the “Investment Professionals”) includes a base salary and incentive components. The base salary for each Investment Professional who is a partner (“Partner”) of Wellington Management Group LLP, the ultimate holding company of Wellington Management, is generally a fixed amount that is determined by the managing partners of Wellington Management Group LLP. The base salaries for the other Investment Professionals are determined by the Investment Professionals’ experience and performance in their roles as Investment Professionals. Base salaries for Wellington Management’s employees are reviewed annually and may be adjusted based on the recommendation of an Investment Professional’s manager, using guidelines established by Wellington Management’s Compensation Committee, which has final oversight responsibility for base salaries of employees of the firm. Each Investment Professional managing a Hartford HLS Fund, with the exception of Gregg R. Thomas and Thomas S. Simon, is eligible to receive an incentive payment based on the revenues earned by Wellington Management from the relevant HLS Fund managed by the Investment Professional and generally each other account managed by such Investment Professional. Most Investment Professionals’ incentive payment relating to the relevant HLS Fund is linked to the gross pre-tax performance of the portion of the HLS Fund managed by the Investment Professional compared to the benchmark index and/or peer group identified below over one, three and five year periods, with an emphasis on five year results. Wellington Management applies similar incentive compensation structures (although the benchmarks or peer groups, time periods and rates may differ) to other accounts managed by these Investment Professionals, including accounts with performance fees.

Portfolio-based incentives across all accounts managed by an investment professional can, and typically do, represent a significant portion of an investment professional’s overall compensation; incentive compensation varies significantly by individual and can vary significantly from year to year. The Investment Professionals may also be eligible for bonus payments based on their overall contribution to Wellington Management’s business operations. Senior management at Wellington Management may reward individuals as it deems appropriate based on other factors. Each Partner is eligible to participate in a Partner-funded tax qualified retirement plan, the contributions to which are made pursuant to an actuarial formula.

The following portfolio managers are Partners as of January 1, 2022:

Steven C. Angeli	Joseph F. Marvan
Matthew G. Baker	Douglas W. McLane
Mammen Chally	Loren L. Moran
Nicolas M. Choumenkovitch	Philip W. Ruedi
Robert L. Deresiewicz	Thomas S. Simon
Peter C. Fisher	Timothy E. Smith
Ann C. Gallo	Tara C. Stilwell
Campe Goodman	Rebecca D. Sykes
Matthew C. Hand	Gregg R. Thomas
Adam H. Illfelder	Mark A. Whitaker
Donald J. Kilbride

Wellington Management’s incentive payments to the Investment Professionals are based on comparisons of each Investment Professional’s performance relative to the following benchmark and/or relevant peer group as of December 31, 2021 which are used to measure one, three and five year performance, except where noted:

HLS FUND	BENCHMARK(S) / PEER GROUPS FOR INCENTIVE PERIOD(1)
Balanced HLS Fund	S&P 500 Index (Illfelder and Hand) Lipper Large Cap Core (Illfelder and Hand) Bloomberg US Government/Credit (Moran)
Disciplined Equity HLS Fund	S&P 500 Index Lipper Large Cap Core
Dividend and Growth HLS Fund	S&P 500 Index Morningstar Large Cap Value
Healthcare HLS Fund	S&P Composite 1500 Health Care Index Lipper Global Health/Biotechnology
International Opportunities HLS Fund	MSCI ACWI ex USA Index (Net) Lipper International Large Cap Core
MidCap HLS Fund	S&P MidCap 400 Index Lipper MidCap Core
Small Cap Growth HLS Fund	Russell 2000 Growth Index Lipper Small Cap Growth
Small Company HLS Fund	Russell 2000 Growth Index Lipper Small Cap Growth
Stock HLS Fund	Russell 1000 Index Lipper Large Cap Core
Total Return Bond HLS Fund	Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index Lipper Core Bond Funds
Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund	N/A(2)

(1)

For HLS Funds with multiple benchmarks/peer groups, allocations are weighted equally, unless otherwise noted.

(2)

The incentive paid to Timothy E. Smith, which has no performance-related component, is based on the revenues earned by Wellington Management.

EQUITY SECURITIES BENEFICIALLY OWNED BY WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT PORTFOLIO MANAGERS

The dollar ranges of equity securities beneficially owned by Wellington Management portfolio managers in each HLS Fund they manage are as follows for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021:

PORTFOLIO MANAGER	HLS FUND(S) SUB-ADVISED	DOLLAR RANGE OF EQUITY SECURITIES BENEFICIALLY OWNED
Steven C. Angeli	Small Company HLS Fund	None
Matthew G. Baker	Dividend and Growth HLS Fund	$100,001-$500,000
Robert D. Burn	Total Return Bond HLS Fund	None
Mammen Chally	Disciplined Equity HLS Fund Small Cap Growth HLS Fund	None None
Nicolas M. Choumenkovitch	International Opportunities HLS Fund	None
Robert L. Deresiewicz	Healthcare HLS Fund	None
Peter C. Fisher	Stock HLS Fund	None
Ann C. Gallo	Healthcare HLS Fund	None
Campe Goodman	Total Return Bond HLS Fund	None

PORTFOLIO MANAGER	HLS FUND(S) SUB-ADVISED	DOLLAR RANGE OF EQUITY SECURITIES BENEFICIALLY OWNED
Matthew C. Hand	Balanced HLS Fund	None
Adam H. Illfelder	Balanced HLS Fund	None
David M. Khtikian(1)	Healthcare HLS Fund	$10,001-$50,000
Donald J. Kilbride	Stock HLS Fund	None
Nataliya Kofman	Dividend and Growth HLS Fund	None
Joseph F. Marvan	Total Return Bond HLS Fund	None
Douglas W. McLane	Disciplined Equity HLS Fund Small Cap Growth HLS Fund	None None
Loren L. Moran	Balanced HLS Fund	None
Fayyaz Mujtaba(1)	Healthcare HLS Fund	None
Ranjit Ramachandran	Small Company HLS Fund	None
Philip W. Ruedi	MidCap HLS Fund	None
John V. Schneider	Small Company HLS Fund	None
Wen Shi	Healthcare HLS Fund	None
David A. Siegle	Disciplined Equity HLS Fund Small Cap Growth HLS Fund	None None
Thomas S. Simon	Capital Appreciation HLS Fund	None
Timothy E. Smith	Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund	None
Tara C. Stilwell	International Opportunities HLS Fund	None
Rebecca D. Sykes	Healthcare HLS Fund	None
Gregg R. Thomas	Capital Appreciation HLS Fund	None
Mark A. Whitaker	MidCap HLS Fund	None

(1) Effective March 1, 2022, Mr. Khtikian and Mr. Mujtaba became a portfolio manager to the Healthcare HLS Fund.

With respect to the Capital Appreciation HLS Fund, Gregg R. Thomas, CFA, selects and oversees the Fund’s portfolio management teams and determines how Fund assets are allocated among the Fund’s portfolio management teams. Mr. Simon supports Mr. Thomas and is involved in overseeing the allocation of assets among the Fund’s portfolio management teams. Mr. Thomas and Mr. Simon may change the underlying “sleeve” portfolio managers at any time based on market conditions and/or Fund performance. The following sets forth the “sleeve” portfolio managers as of April 29, 2022.

CAPITAL APPRECIATION HLS FUND
ADDITIONAL PORTFOLIO MANAGERS	COMPENSATION BENCHMARKS/PEER GROUP*
Donald J. Kilbride	Russell 1000 Index / Lipper Multi-Cap Core
Stephen Mortimer	Russell 3000 Growth Index / Lipper Multi-Cap Core
David W. Palmer	Russell 3000 Value Index / Lipper Multi-Cap Core
Philip W. Ruedi	Russell 3000 Index / Lipper Multi-Cap Core

Benchmark/Peer groups weighted 90%/10%, respectively.

PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS AND BROKERAGE

The Companies have no obligation to deal with any dealer or group of dealers in the execution of transactions in portfolio securities. Subject to any policy established by each Company’s Board of Directors and HFMC, the sub-adviser is primarily responsible for the investment decisions of each applicable HLS Fund and the placing of its portfolio transactions. In placing brokerage orders, it is the policy of each HLS Fund to obtain the most favorable net results, taking into account various factors, including price, dealer spread or commission, if any, size of the transaction and difficulty of execution. While the sub-adviser generally seeks reasonably competitive spreads or commissions, the HLS Funds do not necessarily pay the lowest possible spread or commission. HFMC may instruct the sub-adviser to direct certain brokerage transactions, using best efforts, subject to obtaining best execution, to broker/dealers in connection with a commission recapture program used to defray fund expenses for the HLS Funds.

The sub-adviser generally deals directly with the dealers who make a market in the securities involved (unless better prices and execution are available elsewhere) if the securities are traded primarily in the over-the-counter market. Such dealers usually act as principals for their own account. On occasion, securities may be purchased directly from the issuer. In addition, the sub-adviser may effect certain “riskless principal” transactions through certain dealers in the over-the-counter market under which “commissions” are paid on such transactions. Bonds and money market securities are generally traded on a net basis and do not normally involve either brokerage commissions or transfer taxes.

While the sub-adviser seeks to obtain the most favorable net results in effecting transactions in an HLS Fund’s portfolio securities, broker-dealers who provide investment research to the sub-adviser may receive orders for transactions from the sub-adviser. Such research services ordinarily consist of assessments and analyses of or affecting the business or prospects of a

company, industry, economic sector or financial market. To the extent consistent with Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”), the sub-adviser may cause an HLS Fund to pay a broker-dealer that provides “brokerage and research services” (as defined in the 1934 Act) to the sub-adviser an amount in respect of securities transactions for the HLS Fund in excess of the amount that another broker-dealer would have charged in respect of that transaction. See “Soft Dollar Practices” below.

To the extent that accounts managed by the sub-adviser are simultaneously engaged in the purchase of the same security as an HLS Fund then, as authorized by the applicable Company’s Board of Directors, available securities may be allocated to the HLS Fund and another client account and may be averaged as to price in a manner determined by the sub-adviser to be fair and equitable. Such allocation and pricing may affect the amount of brokerage commissions paid by each HLS Fund. In some cases, this system might adversely affect the price paid by an HLS Fund (for example, during periods of rapidly rising or falling interest rates) or limit the size of the position obtainable for an HLS Fund (for example, in the case of a small issue).

Accounts managed by the sub-adviser (or its affiliates) may hold securities also held by an HLS Fund. Because of different investment objectives or other factors, a particular security may be purchased by the sub-adviser for one client when one or more other clients are selling the same security.

For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021, December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the HLS Funds paid the following brokerage commissions:

FUND	2021(1)	2020	2019
Balanced HLS Fund	$198,841	$315,938	$395,275
Capital Appreciation HLS Fund	$995,302	$1,672,202	$1,581,477
Disciplined Equity HLS Fund	$217,869	$122,946	$43,873
Dividend and Growth HLS Fund	$400,850	$518,736	$526,916
Healthcare HLS Fund	$97,551	$81,610	$127,071
International Opportunities HLS Fund	$1,167,506	$1,301,392	$1,441,436
MidCap HLS Fund	$495,414	$764,406	$464,567
Small Cap Growth HLS Fund	$557,731	$799,113	$678,267
Small Company HLS Fund	$541,073	$423,759	$438,459
Stock HLS Fund	$84,844	$118,129	$88,887
Total Return Bond HLS Fund	$192,417	$185	None
Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund	None	None	None

(1) Brokerage commissions include any commissions on derivatives transactions.

Commission rates are established by country and trade method used to execute a given order. Changes in the amount of brokerage commissions paid by an HLS Fund are due to these factors as well as the Fund’s asset growth, cash flows and changes in portfolio turnover.

SOFT DOLLAR PRACTICES. The sub-adviser is responsible for effecting securities transactions. To the extent consistent with Section 28(e) of the 1934 Act, the sub-adviser may obtain “soft dollar” benefits in connection with the execution of transactions for a Fund. The sub-adviser may cause a Fund to pay a broker-dealer an amount in excess of the amount that another broker-dealer would have charged for the same transaction, in exchange for “brokerage and research services” (as defined in the 1934 Act). Information so received is in addition to and not in lieu of the services that the sub-adviser is required to perform under the applicable investment sub-advisory agreement. In circumstances where two or more broker-dealers are equally capable of providing best execution, the sub-adviser may, but is under no obligation to, choose the broker-dealer that provides superior research or analysis as determined by the sub-adviser in its sole discretion. Neither the management fees nor the sub-advisory fees are reduced because the sub-adviser or its affiliates receive these services even though the sub-adviser or its affiliates might otherwise be required to purchase some of these services for cash. Some of these services are of value to the sub-adviser or its affiliates in advising various of their clients (including the Funds), although not all of these services are necessarily useful and of value in managing the Funds. These products and services may include research reports, access to management personnel, financial newsletters and trade journals, seminar and conference fees, quantitative analytical software, data services, communication services relating to (or incidental to) the execution, clearing and settlement of securities transactions, post-trade services relating to functions incidental to trade execution, and other products and services that are permitted under Section 28(e), as interpreted by the SEC from time to time. In certain instances, these products and services may have additional uses that are not related to brokerage or research. For such “mixed use” items, in accordance with SEC guidance, the sub-adviser will make a reasonable allocation of the cost of the item according to its expected use, and will pay for that portion of the item that does not have a brokerage or research-related component out of its own pocket.

The following table shows the dollar amount of brokerage commissions paid to firms selected in recognition of research services and the approximate dollar amount of the transactions involved for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.

FUND NAME*	COMMISSIONS PAID TO FIRMS SELECTED IN RECOGNITION OF RESEARCH SERVICES	TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTIONS TO FIRMS SELECTED IN RECOGNITION OF RESEARCH SERVICES
Balanced HLS Fund	$24,552	$1,051,972,771
Capital Appreciation HLS Fund	$156,482	$5,701,931,045
Disciplined Equity HLS Fund	$47,322	$1,338,938,706
Dividend and Growth HLS Fund	$61,497	$2,005,376,832
Healthcare HLS Fund	$11,015	$258,369,115
International Opportunities HLS Fund	$154,950	$2,423,585,010
MidCap HLS Fund	$77,631	$1,866,348,362
Small Cap Growth HLS Fund	$76,658	$1,360,026,338
Small Company HLS Fund	$121,861	$2,142,002,784
Stock HLS Fund	$10,262	$590,457,841
Total Return Bond HLS Fund	N/A	N/A
Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund	N/A	N/A

The commissions identified as being paid to brokers selected in recognition of research services include third-party research services only, and are calculated by applying the sub-adviser’s firmwide percentage of commissions paid to the broker that would have been applied to the third-party research services as a percentage of the sub-adviser’s total activity with that broker. This calculated percentage is then applied across all of the sub-adviser’s client accounts to provide a pro rata reporting of the estimated third-party soft dollar commission amount. The sub-adviser also receives proprietary research services provided directly by firms. However, the amounts of commissions attributable to such research services are not readily ascertainable and are not included in the table.

The following table identifies the HLS Funds’ regular brokers or dealers (as defined under Rule 10b-1 of the 1940 Act) whose securities the HLS Funds have acquired during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 and the value of each HLS Fund’s aggregate holdings of each such issuer as of December 31, 2021.

FUND	REGULAR BROKER OR DEALER	AGGREGATE VALUE
Balanced HLS Fund
	Bank of America Securities LLC	$13,258,987
	Credit Suisse Group	$7,285,171
	Goldman Sachs & Co.	$4,711,531
	JPMorgan Securities, Inc.	$42,878,220
	Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.	$30,378,126
	UBS AG	$1,654,484
Capital Appreciation HLS Fund
	Bank of America Securities LLC	$31,713,451
	JPMorgan Securities, Inc.	$14,809,842
Disciplined Equity HLS Fund
	Bank of America Securities LLC	$77,046,803
	JPMorgan Securities, Inc.	$78,438,039
	Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.	$54,898,336
Dividend and Growth HLS Fund
	Bank of America Securities LLC	$93,002,964
	JPMorgan Securities, Inc.	$114,966,850
Healthcare HLS Fund
	N/A	N/A
International Opportunities HLS Fund
	N/A	N/A
MidCap HLS Fund
	N/A	N/A
Small Cap Growth HLS Fund
	N/A	N/A
Small Company HLS Fund
	N/A	N/A
Stock HLS Fund
	N/A	N/A

FUND	REGULAR BROKER OR DEALER	AGGREGATE VALUE
Total Return Bond HLS Fund
	Bank of America Securities LLC	$21,298,466
	Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.	$18,067,447
	Credit Suisse Group	$9,318,994
	Goldman Sachs & Co.	$28,746,876
	JPMorgan Securities, Inc.	$28,614,462
	Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.	$20,142,654
	UBS AG	$6,982,302
Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund
	Bank of America Securities LLC	$4,647,129
	Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.	$4,588,849
	Credit Suisse Group	$10,572,792
	Goldman Sachs & Co.	$5,836,792
	JPMorgan Securities, Inc.	$3,905,136
	Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.	$9,000,296
	UBS AG	$7,507,095

HLS FUND EXPENSES

Each HLS Fund pays its own expenses including, without limitation: (1) expenses of maintaining the Fund and continuing its existence; (2) registration of the Fund under the 1940 Act; (3) auditing, accounting and legal expenses; (4) taxes and interest; (5) governmental fees; (6) expenses of issue, sale, repurchase and redemption of Fund shares; (7) expenses of registering and qualifying the Fund and its shares under federal and state securities laws; (8) expenses of preparing and printing prospectuses and for distributing the same to shareholders and investors; (9) fees and expenses of registering and maintaining the registrations of the Fund and of the Fund’s principal underwriter, if any, as broker-dealer or agent under state securities laws; (10) expenses of reports and notices to shareholders and of meetings of shareholders and proxy solicitations thereof; (11) expenses of reports to governmental officers and commissions; (12) insurance expenses; (13) fees, expenses and disbursements of custodians for all services to the Fund; (14) fees, expenses and disbursements of transfer agents, dividend disbursing agents, shareholder servicing agents and registrars for all services to the Fund; (15) expenses for servicing shareholder accounts; (16) any direct charges to shareholders approved by the directors of the applicable Company; (17) compensation and expenses of directors of the applicable Company, other than those who are also officers of HFMC or its affiliates; and (18) such nonrecurring items as may arise, including expenses incurred in connection with litigation, proceedings and claims and the obligation of the Fund to indemnify its directors and officers with respect thereto.

TRANSFER AGENT

Hartford Administrative Services Company (“HASCO”), 690 Lee Road, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087, an affiliate of HFMC, serves as Transfer and Dividend Disbursing Agent for the HLS Funds. The transfer agent issues and redeems shares of the HLS Funds and disburses any dividends declared by the HLS Funds. For its services, the transfer agent receives a per Fund fee and is reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses and other costs associated with the services it provides to the HLS Funds, including costs invoiced by sub-contractors.

Pursuant to a sub-transfer agency agreement between HASCO and DST Asset Manager Solutions, Inc. (“DST”), HASCO has delegated certain transfer agent, dividend disbursing agent and shareholder servicing agent functions to DST. The costs and expenses of such delegation are borne by HASCO, not by the Funds. DST is located at 2000 Crown Colony Drive, Quincy, Massachusetts 02169.

HLS FUND ACCOUNTING SERVICES

HFMC also provides fund accounting services to the HLS Funds pursuant to a fund accounting agreement by and between each Company, on behalf of its respective HLS Funds, and HFMC. Such fund accounting services include, but are not limited to: (i) daily pricing of portfolio securities; (ii) computation of the net asset value and the net income of the HLS Funds in accordance with the HLS Funds’ prospectus and statement of additional information; (iii) calculation of dividend and capital gain distributions, if any; (iv) calculation of yields on all applicable HLS Funds and all classes thereof; (v) preparation of various reports; and (vi) such other similar services with respect to an HLS Fund as may be reasonably requested by the HLS Funds. HFMC has delegated certain accounting and administrative service functions to State Street Bank and Trust Company ("State Street”). In consideration of services rendered and expenses assumed pursuant to this agreement, each HLS Fund pays HFMC a fee. As of April 29, 2022, HFMC is entitled to receive the following fee with respect to each Fund: the fund accounting fee for each HLS Fund shall equal the greater of: (A) the sum of (i) the sub-accounting fee payable by HFMC with respect to the HLS Fund; (ii) the fee payable for tax preparation services for the HLS Fund; and (iii) the amount of expenses that HFMC allocates for providing the fund accounting services to the

HLS Fund; plus a target profit margin; or (B) $40,000 per year; provided, however, that to the extent the annual amount of the fund accounting fee exceeds 0.02% of the HLS Fund’s average net assets (calculated during its current fiscal year), HFMC shall waive such portion of the fund accounting fee.

The following table reflects the amounts paid for fund accounting services for each Fund for the last three fiscal years.

FUND	2021	2020	2019
Balanced HLS Fund	$321,108	$289,380	$368,286
Capital Appreciation HLS Fund	$664,001	$605,821	$746,335
Disciplined Equity HLS Fund	$484,413	$185,212	$87,318
Dividend and Growth HLS Fund	$561,436	$448,588	$446,136
Healthcare HLS Fund	$38,766	$32,599	$33,820
International Opportunities HLS Fund	$192,561	$161,615	$167,367
MidCap HLS Fund	$340,948	$292,219	$293,797
Small Cap Growth HLS Fund	$221,635	$180,936	$228,890
Small Company HLS Fund	$108,487	$72,930	$108,730
Stock HLS Fund	$236,585	$206,817	$204,947
Total Return Bond HLS Fund	$348,319	$316,858	$377,942
Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund	$121,611	$78,650	$67,504

DISTRIBUTION ARRANGEMENTS

Each HLS Fund’s shares are sold by Hartford Funds Distributors, LLC (“HFD” or the “distributor”), a registered broker-dealer and member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), on a continuous basis. Each Board has approved the adoption of separate distribution plans for Class IB shares (“Class IB Distribution Plans”). The Board of Hartford Series Fund, Inc. has approved the adoption of a distribution plan for Class IC shares (“Class IC Distribution Plan” and, together with Class IB Distribution Plans, the “Distribution Plans”) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act and the requirements of the applicable market conduct rules of FINRA concerning asset based sales charges.

HFD is authorized by the Companies to receive purchase and redemption orders on behalf of the HLS Funds. HFD has authorized one or more financial services institutions and/or qualified plan intermediaries (“Financial Intermediaries”) to receive purchase and redemption orders on behalf of the HLS Funds, subject to the HLS Funds’ policies and procedures with respect to frequent purchases and redemptions of HLS Fund shares and applicable law. In these circumstances, an HLS Fund will be deemed to have received a purchase or redemption order when a Financial Intermediary receives the order. Orders will be priced at that HLS Fund’s next net asset value computed after the orders are received by a Financial Intermediary and accepted by the HLS Fund. Each Fund’s net asset value is determined in the manner described in that Fund’s prospectus.

Pursuant to the Class IB Distribution Plans, an HLS Fund may compensate the distributor for its expenditures in financing any activity primarily intended to result in the sale of Class IB shares. The expenses of an HLS Fund pursuant to the applicable Class IB Distribution Plan may not exceed the annual rate of 0.25% of the HLS Fund’s average daily net assets attributable to Class IB shares. All or any portion of this fee may be remitted to dealers who provide distribution or shareholder account services, and the entire amount of the fee may be used for shareholder servicing expenses and/or distribution expenses.

Pursuant to the Class IC Distribution Plan, an HLS Fund may compensate the distributor for its expenditures in financing any activity primarily intended to result in the sale of Class IC shares. The expenses of an HLS Fund pursuant to the Class IC Distribution Plan may not exceed the annual rate of 0.25% of the HLS Fund’s average daily net assets attributable to Class IC shares. All or any portion of this fee may be remitted to dealers who provide distribution services.

Distribution fees paid to the distributor may be spent on any activities or expenses primarily intended to result in the sale of an HLS Fund’s shares including but not limited to (a) compensation to and expenses, including overhead and telephone expenses, of employees of the distributor engaged in the distribution of the applicable share class of the HLS Fund; (b) printing and mailing of prospectuses, statements of additional information, and reports for prospective purchasers of variable annuity contracts or variable life insurance contracts (“Variable Contracts”) investing indirectly in the applicable share class of the HLS Fund; (c) compensation to financial intermediaries and broker-dealers to pay or reimburse them for their services or expenses in connection with the distribution of Variable Contracts investing indirectly in the applicable share class of the HLS Fund; (d) expenses relating to the development, preparation, printing, and mailing of HLS Fund advertisements, sales literature, and other promotional materials describing and/or relating to the applicable share class of the HLS Fund; (e) expenses of holding seminars and sales meetings designed to promote the distribution of the applicable share class of the HLS Fund; (f) expenses of training sales personnel regarding the applicable share class of an HLS Fund; (g) expenses of compensating sales personnel in connection with the allocation of cash values and premiums of the Variable Contracts to the applicable share class of an HLS Fund; (h) financing any other activity that the Distributor determines is primarily intended to result in the sale of the applicable share class; and, with respect to the Class IB Distribution Plans, (i) expenses of obtaining information and providing explanations to Variable Contract owners regarding HLS Fund investment objectives and policies and other information about the HLS Fund, including performance; and (j) expenses of personal

services and/or maintenance of Variable Contract accounts with respect to the applicable share class of an HLS Fund attributable to such accounts. These Distribution Plans are considered compensation type plans, which means the distributor is paid the agreed upon fee regardless of the distributor’s expenditures. Even if HFD’s actual expenditures exceed the fee payable to HFD at any given time, the HLS Funds will not be obligated to pay more than that fee. If HFD’s actual expenditures are less than the fee payable to HFD at any given time, HFD may realize a profit from the arrangement.

In accordance with the terms of the Distribution Plans, the distributor provides to each HLS Fund, for review by the Board of Directors of the applicable Company, a quarterly written report of the amounts expended under the respective Distribution Plans and the purpose for which such expenditures were made. In its quarterly review of the Distribution Plans, the applicable Company’s Board of Directors reviews the level of compensation the Distribution Plans provide.

The Distribution Plans were adopted by a majority vote of the Board of Directors of the applicable Company, including at least a majority of directors who are not, and were not at the time they voted, interested persons of each HLS Fund as defined in the 1940 Act and do not and did not have any direct or indirect financial interest in the operation of the Distribution Plans, cast at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on the Distribution Plans. In approving the Distribution Plans, the directors identified and considered a number of potential benefits that the Distribution Plans may provide to the HLS Funds and their shareholders, including shareholder servicing, the potential to increase assets and possibly benefit from economies of scale, the potential to avoid a decrease in assets through redemption activity and the ability to sell shares of the HLS Funds through adviser and broker distribution channels. The Board of Directors of each Company believes that there is a reasonable likelihood that the Distribution Plans will benefit the shareholders of each applicable share class of each HLS Fund. Under its terms, each Distribution Plan remains in effect from year to year provided such continuance is approved annually by vote of the directors of the applicable Company in the manner described above. The Distribution Plans may not be amended to increase materially the amount to be spent for distribution without approval of the shareholders of each HLS Fund affected by the increase, and material amendments to the Distribution Plans must also be approved by the applicable Board of Directors in the manner described above. A Distribution Plan may be terminated at any time, without payment of any penalty, by vote of the majority of the directors of the applicable Board who are not interested persons of each HLS Fund and have no direct or indirect financial interest in the operations of the Distribution Plan, or by a vote of a “majority of the outstanding voting securities” of the relevant HLS Fund. A Distribution Plan will automatically terminate in the event of its assignment.

In addition to distribution fees paid under the Distribution Plans, HLS Funds with Class IC shares may pay an administrative services fee (“Class IC Service Fee”) to third-party insurance companies annually up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Hartford HLS Fund attributable to its Class IC shares for recordkeeping and/or other administrative services provided to such Class IC shares.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, the Class IB and Class IC shares of the HLS Funds paid the 12b-1 fees listed below.

Fund	Class IB	Class IC
Balanced HLS Fund	$633,512	N/A
Capital Appreciation HLS Fund	$1,227,976	$103,635
Disciplined Equity HLS Fund	$937,037	$209,950
Dividend and Growth HLS Fund	$1,118,865	N/A
Healthcare HLS Fund	$106,045	N/A
International Opportunities HLS Fund	$306,230	N/A
MidCap HLS Fund	$345,771	N/A
Small Cap Growth HLS Fund	$553,705	N/A
Small Company HLS Fund	$162,673	N/A
Stock HLS Fund	$336,253	N/A
Total Return Bond HLS Fund	$631,543	N/A
Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund	$257,901	N/A

The entire amount of 12b-1 fees listed above was paid as compensation to the distributor. The distributor may remit all or a portion of the entire amount, either directly or indirectly through affiliated insurance companies, to dealers as compensation.

The distributor and its affiliates may pay, out of their own assets, compensation to brokers, financial institutions and other persons for the sale and distribution of the HLS Funds’ shares and/or for the servicing of those shares.

PURCHASE AND REDEMPTION OF SHARES

For information regarding the purchase or sale (redemption) of HLS Fund shares, see “Purchase and Redemption of Fund Shares” in the HLS Funds’ prospectus.

SUSPENSION OF REDEMPTIONS

An HLS Fund may not suspend a shareholder’s right of redemption or postpone payment for a redemption for more than seven days, unless permitted by law, when the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is closed for other than customary weekends or holidays, or trading on the NYSE is restricted, or for any period during which an emergency exists as a result of which (1) disposal by an HLS Fund of securities owned by it is not reasonably practicable, or (2) it is not reasonably practicable for an HLS Fund to fairly determine the value of its assets, or for such other periods as the SEC may permit for the protection of investors.

SECURITIES LENDING

Pursuant to an agreement between each Company and Citibank, N.A., certain Funds may lend their portfolio securities to certain qualified borrowers. As securities lending agent, Citibank, N.A. administers the Funds’ securities lending program. The services provided to the Funds by Citibank, N.A. with respect to the Funds’ securities lending activities during the most recent fiscal year included, among other things: locating approved borrowers and arranging loans; collecting fees and rebates due to a Fund from a borrower; monitoring daily the value of the loaned securities and collateral and marking to market the daily value of securities on loan; collecting and maintaining necessary collateral; managing qualified dividends; negotiating loan terms; selecting securities to be loaned; recordkeeping and account servicing; monitoring dividend activity relating to loaned securities; and arranging for return of loaned securities to a Fund at loan termination and pursuing contractual remedies on behalf of the lending Fund if a borrower defaults on a loan. Amounts shown below may differ from amounts disclosed in the Funds’ Annual Report as a result of timing differences, reconciliation, and certain other adjustments.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, the following sets forth any earned income and incurred costs and expenses as a result of securities lending activities and the receipt of related services:

Fund Name	Gross Income from securities lending activities	Fees paid to securities lending agent from a revenue split	Rebates (paid to borrower)	Aggregate fees/ compensation from securities lending activities	Net income from securities lending activities
Balanced HLS Fund	$253,937	$25,392	$22	$25,414	$228,523
Capital Appreciation HLS Fund	$398,267	$39,825	$19	$39,844	$358,423
Disciplined Equity HLS Fund	$18,344	$1,834	$0	$1,834	$16,510
Dividend and Growth HLS Fund	$38,937	$3,892	$20	$3,912	$35,025
Healthcare HLS Fund	$37,655	$3,766	$4	$3,770	$33,885
International Opportunities HLS Fund	$168,117	$16,812	$0	$16,812	$151,305
MidCap HLS Fund	$138,182	$13,816	$15	$13,831	$124,351
Small Cap Growth HLS Fund	$252,680	$25,268	$5	$25,273	$227,407
Small Company HLS Fund	$139,719	$13,972	$4	$13,976	$125,743
Stock HLS Fund	$561	$56	$0	$56	$505
Total Return Bond HLS Fund	$58,848	$5,884	$4	$5,888	$52,960
Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund	$13,704	$1,373	$0	$1,373	$12,331

During the Funds’ fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, the Funds did not pay separate cash collateral management fees, administrative fees, fees for indemnification, or other fees relating to the Funds’ securities lending activities that are not reflected above.

DETERMINATION OF NET ASSET VALUE

The net asset value per share (NAV) is determined for each class of an HLS Fund’s shares as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (the “Exchange”) (typically 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time) on each day that the Exchange is open. The HLS Funds are closed for business and do not price their shares on the following business holidays: New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King Day, Presidents’ Day, Good Friday, Memorial Day, Juneteenth National Independence Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and other holidays observed by the Exchange. If the Exchange is closed due to weather or other extraordinary circumstances on a day it would typically be open for business, the HLS Fund may treat such day as a typical business day and accept purchase and redemption orders and calculate the HLS Fund’s NAV in accordance with applicable law. The NAV for each class of shares is determined by dividing the value of that HLS Fund’s net assets attributable to a class of shares by the number of shares outstanding for that class. Information that becomes known to the HLS Fund after the NAV has been calculated on a particular day will not generally be used to retroactively adjust the NAV determined earlier that day.

CAPITALIZATION AND VOTING RIGHTS

CAPITAL STOCK

The Board of Directors for each Company is authorized, without further shareholder approval, to authorize additional shares and to classify and reclassify shares of the HLS Funds into one or more classes. The Directors of each Company have authorized the issuance of the classes of stock for each Fund that are listed on the cover page.

Share Classes

Under each applicable HLS Fund’s multi-class plan, shares of each class of an HLS Fund represent an equal pro rata interest in that HLS Fund and, generally, shall have identical voting, dividend, liquidation, and other rights, preferences, powers, restrictions, limitations, qualifications and terms and conditions, except that: (a) each class shall have a different designation; (b) each class of shares shall bear its “Class Expenses;” (c) each class shall have exclusive voting rights on any matter submitted to shareholders that relates solely to its distribution arrangements; (d) each class shall have separate voting rights on any matter submitted to shareholders in which the interests of one class differ from the interests of any other class; (e) each class may have separate exchange privileges; and (f) each class may have different conversion features.

VOTING

Each shareholder is entitled to one vote for each share of the HLS Funds held upon all matters submitted to the shareholders generally.

OTHER RIGHTS

Each share of HLS Fund stock, when issued and paid for in accordance with the terms of the offering, will be fully paid and non-assessable. Shares of HLS Fund stock have no pre-emptive, subscription or conversion rights. Upon liquidation of an HLS Fund, the shareholders of that HLS Fund shall be entitled to share, pro rata, in any assets of the HLS Fund after discharge of all liabilities and payment of the expenses of liquidation.

CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL SECURITY HOLDERS

Information about the ownership of each class of each Fund’s shares by beneficial or record owners of the Fund and ownership of Fund shares by directors and officers as a group is found in Appendix C.

TAXES

FEDERAL TAX STATUS OF THE HLS FUNDS

The following discussion of the federal tax status of the HLS Funds is a general and abbreviated summary based on tax laws and regulations in effect on the date of this SAI. Tax law is subject to change by legislative, administrative or judicial action.

Each HLS Fund is treated as a separate taxpayer for federal income tax purposes. Each HLS Fund has elected or intends to elect to be treated as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of Chapter 1 of the Code, and to qualify as a regulated investment company each year. If an HLS Fund: (1) continues to qualify as a regulated investment company, and (2) distributes to its shareholders an amount at least equal to the sum of: (i) 90% of its investment company taxable income (including for this purpose its net ordinary investment income and net realized short-term capital gains); and (ii) 90% of its tax-exempt interest income (reduced by certain expenses) (the “90% distribution requirement”), which the Companies intend each HLS Fund to do, then under the provisions of Subchapter M, the HLS Fund would not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of its investment company taxable income and net capital gain (i.e., net long-term capital gain in excess of short-term capital loss) it distributes to shareholders (or is treated as having been distributed to shareholders).

An HLS Fund must meet several requirements to maintain its status as a regulated investment company. These requirements include the following: (1) at least 90% of the HLS Fund’s gross income for each taxable year must be derived from dividends, interest, payments with respect to loaned securities, gains from the sale or disposition of securities (including gains from related investments in foreign currencies), or other income (including gains from options, futures or forward contracts) derived with respect to its business of investing in such securities or currencies, as well as net income from interests in certain publicly traded partnerships; and (2) at the close of each quarter of the HLS Fund’s taxable year, (a) at least 50% of the value of the HLS Fund’s total assets must consist of cash, cash items, securities of other regulated investment companies, U.S. Government securities and other securities which, with respect to any one issuer, do not represent more than 5% of all of the HLS Fund’s assets nor more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer, and (b) the HLS Fund must not invest more than 25% of its total assets in the securities of any one issuer (other than U.S. Government securities or the securities of other regulated investment companies), or of any two or more issuers that are controlled by the HLS Fund and that are engaged in the same or similar trades or businesses or related trades or businesses, or of one or more qualified publicly traded partnerships.

If a Fund fails to satisfy either the income requirement or asset diversification requirement described above, in certain cases, the Fund may be able to avoid losing its status as a regulated investment company by timely providing notices to the IRS, curing such failure and possibly paying an additional tax or penalty.

Each Fund generally will endeavor to distribute (or treat as deemed distributed) to its shareholders all of its investment company taxable income and its net capital gain, if any, for each taxable year so that it will not incur federal income or excise taxes on its earnings.

Unless seed capital exceeds the amounts specified in the Code, the HLS Funds should not be subject to the 4% federal excise tax imposed on regulated investment companies that do not distribute substantially all their income and gains each calendar year, if the HLS Funds’ only shareholders are segregated asset accounts of life insurance companies supporting variable life insurance contracts or variable annuity contracts, certain qualified retirement plans and certain tax-exempt entities. If the HLS Funds are subject to the 4% federal excise tax, each Fund generally must distribute in a timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (1) 98% of its ordinary income (taking into account certain deferrals and elections) for each calendar year, (2) 98.2% of its capital gain net income for the one-year period ending October 31 in that calendar year, and (3) any income not distributed in prior years (the “excise tax avoidance requirements”). For purposes of determining whether an HLS Fund has met this distribution requirement, the Fund will be deemed to have distributed any income or gains on which it has been subject to U.S. federal income tax.

Each of the HLS Funds also intends to comply with Section 817(h) of the Code and the regulations issued thereunder, which impose certain investment diversification requirements on life insurance companies’ separate accounts that are used to support variable life insurance contracts and variable annuity contracts. Such separate accounts may meet these requirements by investing solely in the shares of a mutual fund registered under the 1940 Act as an open-end management investment company such as the HLS Funds which meets certain additional requirements. These requirements are in addition to the diversification requirements of subchapter M and of the 1940 Act, and may affect the securities in which an HLS Fund may invest. In order to comply with future requirements of Section 817(h) (or related provisions of the Code), an HLS Fund may be required, for example, to alter its investment objectives. In addition, certain HLS Fund shares may also be sold to tax-qualified plans pursuant to an exemptive order and applicable tax laws. If HLS Fund shares are sold to non-qualified plans, or to tax-qualified plans that later lose their tax-qualified status, the affected HLS Funds may fail the diversification requirements of Section 817(h) of the Code, which could have adverse tax consequences for contract owners with premiums allocated to the affected HLS Funds.

The 817(h) requirements place certain limitations on the percentage of assets of each separate account (or underlying mutual fund) that may be invested in securities of a single issuer. These limitations apply to how much of each HLS Fund’s assets may be invested in securities of a single issuer. Specifically, the regulations provide that, except as permitted by a “safe harbor” described below, as of the end of each calendar quarter, or within 30 days thereafter:

•

no more than 55% of an HLS Fund’s total assets may be represented by any one investment;

•

no more than 70% by any two investments;

•

no more than 80% by any three investments; and

•

no more than 90% by any four investments.

Section 817(h) provides, as a safe harbor, that a separate account will be treated as being adequately diversified if the diversification requirements under Subchapter M are satisfied and no more than 55% of the value of the account’s total assets are cash and cash items, government securities, and securities of other regulated investment companies. For purposes of Section 817(h), all securities of the same issuer, all interests in the same real property project, and all interests in the same commodity are treated as a single investment. In addition, each U.S. Government agency or instrumentality is treated as a separate issuer, while the securities of a particular foreign government and its agencies, instrumentalities, and political subdivisions are considered securities issued by the same issuer.

Investment income received from sources within foreign countries, or capital gains earned by an HLS Fund from investing in securities of foreign issuers, may be subject to foreign income taxes withheld at the source. In this regard, withholding tax rates in countries with which the United States does not have a tax treaty are often as high as 35% or more. The United States has entered into tax treaties with many foreign countries that may entitle the HLS Funds to a reduced rate of tax or exemption from tax on this related income and gains. The effective rate of foreign tax cannot be determined at this time since the amount of these HLS Funds’ assets to be invested within various countries is not now known. The Companies intend that the HLS Funds will seek to operate so as to qualify for treaty-reduced rates of tax when applicable. Owners of variable life insurance and variable annuity contracts investing in such an HLS Fund bear the costs of any foreign tax, but are not able to claim a foreign tax credit or deduction for these foreign taxes.

Any gains derived from short sales will generally be taxed as short-term capital gains that would be taxed to shareholders on distributions as ordinary income.

An HLS Fund’s transactions in options contracts and futures contracts are subject to special provisions of the Code that, among other things, may affect the character of gains and losses realized by the HLS Fund (that is, may affect whether gains or losses are ordinary or capital), accelerate recognition of income to the HLS Fund and defer losses of the HLS Fund. These rules: (1) could affect the character, amount and timing of distributions to shareholders of the HLS Fund, (2) could require such an HLS Fund to “mark to market” certain types of the positions in its portfolio (that is, treat them as if they were closed out), and (3) may cause the HLS Fund to recognize income without receiving cash with which to make distributions in amounts necessary to satisfy the distribution requirements for avoiding income and excise taxes described above. The Companies seek to monitor transactions of

each HLS Fund, seek to make the appropriate tax elections on behalf of the HLS Fund and seek to make the appropriate entries in the HLS Fund’s books and records when the HLS Fund acquires any option, futures contract or hedged investment, to mitigate the effect of these rules.

If, for any taxable year, an HLS Fund fails to qualify as a regulated investment company, all of its taxable income becomes subject to federal, and possibly state and local, income tax at the regular corporate rates (without any deduction for distributions to its shareholders). In addition, if for any taxable year an HLS Fund fails to qualify as a regulated investment company, owners of variable life insurance contracts and variable annuity contracts who have indirectly invested in the HLS Fund might be taxed currently on the investment earnings under their contracts and thereby lose the benefit of tax deferral. Likewise, if an HLS Fund fails to comply with the diversification requirements of section 817(h) of the Code and the regulations thereunder, owners of variable life insurance contracts and variable annuity contracts who have indirectly invested in the HLS Fund would be taxed on the investment earnings under their contracts and thereby lose the benefit of tax deferral. Accordingly, compliance with the above rules is carefully monitored by the HLS Funds’ investment adviser and each HLS Fund intends to comply with these rules as they exist or as they may be modified from time to time. Compliance with the tax requirements described above may result in lower total return for an HLS Fund than would otherwise be the case, since, to comply with the above rules, the investments utilized (and the time at which such investments are entered into and closed out) may be different from what the HLS Fund’s investment sub- adviser might otherwise select.

Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, the Funds are permitted to carry forward capital losses for an unlimited period. Additionally, capital loss carryforwards retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered all short-term as permitted under prior regulation.

As of December 31, 2021, the Funds had the following capital loss carryforwards as indicated below. Each such Fund’s capital loss carryover is available to offset that Fund’s future realized capital gains to the extent provided in the Code and regulations thereunder. The Funds are generally permitted to carry forward capital losses for an unlimited period.

FUND	SHORT-TERM CAPITAL LOSS CARRYFORWARD WITH NO EXPIRATION	LONG-TERM CAPITAL LOSS CARRYFORWARD WITH NO EXPIRATION
Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund*	$293,691	$11,188,055

* Future utilization of losses are subject to limitation under current tax laws.

If an HLS Fund acquires stock in certain foreign corporations that receive at least 75% of their annual gross income from passive sources (such as interest, dividends, rents, royalties or capital gain) or hold at least 50% of their total assets in investments producing such passive income (“passive foreign investment companies”), that HLS Fund could be subject to federal income tax and additional interest charges on “excess distributions” received from such companies or gain from the sale of stock in such companies, even if all income or gain actually received by the HLS Fund is timely distributed to its shareholders. The HLS Fund would not be able to pass through to its shareholders any credit or deduction for such a tax. As a result, owners of variable life insurance contracts and variable annuity contracts investing in such HLS Funds would bear the cost of these taxes and interest charges. Certain elections may, if available, ameliorate these adverse tax consequences, but any such election may require the applicable HLS Fund to recognize taxable income or gain without the concurrent receipt of cash. Any HLS Fund may limit and/or manage its holdings in passive foreign investment companies to minimize its tax liability.

Foreign exchange gains and losses realized by an HLS Fund in connection with certain transactions involving non-dollar debt securities, certain foreign currency futures contracts, foreign currency option contracts, foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currencies, or payables or receivables denominated in a foreign currency are subject to Code provisions which generally treat such gains and losses as ordinary income and losses and may affect the amount, timing and character of distributions to shareholders. Any such transactions that are not directly related to an HLS Fund’s investment in securities (possibly including speculative currency positions or currency derivatives not used for hedging purposes) could, under future Treasury regulations, produce income not among the types of “qualifying income” from which the HLS Fund must derive at least 90% of its annual gross income.

Pay-in-kind instruments (“PIKs”) are securities that pay interest in either cash or additional securities, at the issuer’s option, for a specified period. PIKs, like zero-coupon bonds, are designed to give an issuer flexibility in managing cash flow. PIK bonds can be either senior or subordinated debt and trade flat (i.e., without accrued interest). The price of PIK bonds is expected to reflect the market value of the underlying debt plus an amount representing accrued interest since the last payment. PIKs are usually less volatile than zero-coupon bonds, but more volatile than cash pay securities.

Each HLS Fund that invests in certain PIKs, zero coupon securities or certain deferred interest securities (and, in general, any other securities with original issue discount or with market discount if the HLS Fund elects to include market discount in current income) must accrue income on such investments prior to the receipt of the corresponding cash. However, because an HLS Fund must meet the 90% distribution requirement to qualify as a regulated investment company, it may have to dispose of its portfolio investments under disadvantageous circumstances to generate cash, or may have to leverage itself by borrowing the cash, to satisfy the applicable distribution requirements.

The federal income tax rules applicable to interest rate swaps, caps and floors are unclear in certain respects, and an HLS Fund may be required to account for these transactions in a manner that, in certain circumstances, may limit the degree to which it may use these transactions.

The Funds that receive dividend income from U.S. sources will annually report certain amounts of their dividends paid as eligible for the dividends received deduction, and the Funds incurring foreign taxes will elect to pass-through allowable foreign tax credits. With respect to Fund shares held by insurance company separate accounts, the benefits, which may be potentially material, of these reports and elections will inure only to the applicable insurance company and will not be shared with the contract holders.

INVESTOR TAXATION

Under current law, owners of variable life insurance contracts and variable annuity contracts and pension or retirement plan participants who are indirectly invested in an HLS Fund generally are not subject to federal income tax on HLS Fund earnings or distributions or on gains realized upon the sale or redemption of HLS Fund shares until they are withdrawn from the contract or plan. For information concerning the federal income tax consequences to the owners of variable life insurance contracts and variable annuity contracts, see the prospectus for such contracts. For information concerning the federal income tax consequences to plan participants, see the summary plan description or contact your plan administrator.

CUSTODIAN

Portfolio securities of each HLS Fund are held pursuant to a Custodian Agreement between each Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company, State Street Financial Center, One Lincoln Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02111.

DISTRIBUTOR

Hartford Funds Distributors, LLC (“HFD”), 690 Lee Road, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087, an affiliate of HFMC, acts as the HLS Funds’ distributor.

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP served as the Funds’ Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is located at Two Commerce Square, 2001 Market Street, Suite 1800, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.

CODE OF ETHICS

Each HLS Fund, HFMC, HFD and the sub-adviser have each adopted a code of ethics designed to protect the interests of each HLS Fund’s shareholders. Under each code of ethics, personnel subject to the code are permitted to trade securities for their own account, including securities that may be purchased or held by an HLS Fund, subject to certain restrictions. Each code of ethics has been filed with the SEC and may be viewed by the public.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The audited financial statements of each HLS Fund for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, together with the notes thereto, and the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, are incorporated by reference from the HLS Funds’ Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 into this SAI (meaning such document is legally a part of this SAI) and are on file with the SEC. No other portions of the audited financials are incorporated by reference herein. The Annual Report for the series of Hartford Series Fund, Inc. is available on the SEC website at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1053425/000119312522056615/d509084dncsr.htm . The Annual Report for the Small Cap Growth HLS Fund is available on the SEC website at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/790558/000119312522056837/d310284dncsr.htm .

The most recent HLS Funds’ Annual Report and Semi-Annual Report are available without charge by calling the Funds at 1-888-843-7824 or by visiting the HLS Funds’ website at hartfordfunds.com or on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

PROXY VOTING POLICY AND PROCEDURES

The Board of each Company believes that the voting of proxies with respect to securities held by each HLS Fund is an important element of the overall investment process. Pursuant to the HLS Funds’ Policy Related to Proxy Voting, as approved by the Board of each Company, HFMC has delegated to the sub-adviser the authority to vote all proxies relating to each sub-advised HLS Fund’s portfolio securities, subject to oversight by HFMC. The sub-adviser’s exercise of this delegated proxy voting authority is subject to oversight by the HLS Funds’ investment manager. The sub-adviser has a duty to vote or not vote such proxies in the best interests of the HLS Fund it sub-advises and its shareholders, and to avoid the influence of conflicts of interest. If a security has not been restricted from securities lending and the security is on loan over a record date, the Fund’s sub-adviser may not be able to vote any proxies for that security. For more information about the impact of lending securities on proxy voting, see “Lending Portfolio Securities.” In addition, if a sub-adviser requests that HFMC vote a proxy in any Fund because the sub-adviser believes it has a conflict of interest with respect to said proxy, HFMC may vote such securities. HFMC may choose to echo vote, vote in accordance with stated guidelines set forth by a proxy voting service or in accordance with its recommendations, abstain or hire a third-party fiduciary. The policies and procedures used by the sub-adviser to determine how to vote certain proxies relating to portfolio securities are set forth in Appendix A. However, more complete information should be obtained by reviewing the HLS Funds’ voting records. Each Fund is required to file annually its proxy voting record on Form N-PX with the SEC. Form N-PX is required to be filed by August 31 of each year. Information on how the HLS Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-888-843-7824 and (2) on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

APPENDIX A: PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Wellington Management Company LLP

Global Proxy Policy and Procedures

INTRODUCTION

Wellington Management Company LLP (“Wellington Management”) has adopted and implemented policies and procedures that it believes are reasonably designed to ensure that proxies are voted in the best interests of clients for whom it exercises proxy-voting discretion.

Wellington Management's Proxy Voting Guidelines (the "Guidelines") set forth broad guidelines and positions on common proxy issues that Wellington Management uses in voting on proxies. In addition, Wellington Management also considers each proposal in the context of the issuer, industry and country or countries in which the issuer's business is conducted. The Guidelines are not rigid rules and the merits of a particular proposal may cause Wellington Management to enter a vote that differs from the Guidelines. Wellington Management seeks to vote all proxies with the goal of increasing long-term client value and, while client investment strategies may differ, applying this common set of guidelines is consistent with the investment objective of achieving positive long-term investment performance for each client.

STATEMENT OF POLICY

Wellington Management:

Votes client proxies for which clients have affirmatively delegated proxy-voting authority, in writing, unless it has arranged in advance with the client to limit the circumstances in which it would exercise voting authority or determines that it is in the best interest of one or more clients to refrain from voting a given proxy.

Votes all proxies in the best interests of the client for whom it is voting.

Identifies and resolves all material proxy-related conflicts of interest between the firm and its clients in the best interests of the client.

RESPONSIBILITY AND OVERSIGHT

The Investment Research Group ("Investment Research") monitors regulatory requirements with respect to proxy voting and works with the firm's Legal and Compliance Group and the Investment Stewardship Committee to develop practices that implement those requirements. Investment Research also acts as a resource for portfolio managers and research analysts on proxy matters as needed. Day-to-day administration of the proxy voting process is the responsibility of Investment Research. The Investment Stewardship Committee is responsible for oversight of the implementation of the Global Proxy Policy and Procedures, review and approval of the Guidelines, identification and resolution of conflicts of interest, and for providing advice and guidance on specific proxy votes for individual issuers. The Investment Stewardship Committee reviews the Global Proxy Policy and Procedures annually.

PROCEDURES

Use of Third-Party Voting Agent

Wellington Management uses the services of a third-party voting agent for research, voting recommendations, and to manage the administrative aspects of proxy voting. The voting agent processes proxies for client accounts, casts votes based on the Guidelines and maintains records of proxies voted. Wellington Management complements the research received by its primary voting agent with research from another voting agent.

Receipt of Proxy

If a client requests that Wellington Management votes proxies on its behalf, the client must instruct its custodian bank to deliver all relevant voting material to Wellington Management or its voting agent.

Reconciliation

Each public security proxy received by electronic means is matched to the securities eligible to be voted and a reminder is sent to any custodian or trustee that has not forwarded the proxies as due. This reconciliation is performed at the ballot level. Although proxies received for private securities, as well as those received in non-electronic format, are voted as received, Wellington Management is not able to reconcile these ballots, nor does it notify custodians of non-receipt.

Research

In addition to proprietary investment research undertaken by Wellington Management investment professionals, Investment Research conducts proxy research internally, and uses the resources of a number of external sources including third-party voting agents to keep abreast of developments in corporate governance and of current practices of specific companies.

Proxy Voting

Following the reconciliation process, each proxy is compared against the Guidelines, and handled as follows:

Generally, issues for which explicit proxy voting guidance is provided in the Guidelines (i.e., "For", "Against", "Abstain") are voted in accordance with the Guidelines.

Issues identified as "case-by-case" in the Guidelines are further reviewed by Investment Research. In certain circumstances, further input is needed, so the issues are forwarded to the relevant research analyst and/or portfolio manager(s) for their input.

Absent a material conflict of interest, the portfolio manager has the authority to decide the final vote. Different portfolio managers holding the same securities may arrive at different voting conclusions for their clients' proxies.

Wellington Management reviews a subset of the voting record to ensure that proxies are voted in accordance with these Global Proxy Policy and Procedures and the Guidelines; and ensures that documentation and reports, for clients and for internal purposes, relating to the voting of proxies are promptly and properly prepared and disseminated.

Material Conflict of Interest Identification and Resolution Processes

Wellington Management's broadly diversified client base and functional lines of responsibility serve to minimize the number of, but not prevent, material conflicts of interest it faces in voting proxies. Annually, the Investment Stewardship Committee sets standards for identifying material conflicts based on client, vendor, and lender relationships, and publishes those standards to individuals involved in the proxy voting process. In addition, the Investment Stewardship Committee encourages all personnel to contact Investment Research about apparent conflicts of interest, even if the apparent conflict does not meet the published materiality criteria. Apparent conflicts are reviewed by designated members of the Investment Stewardship Committee to determine if there is a conflict and if so whether the conflict is material.

If a proxy is identified as presenting a material conflict of interest, the matter must be reviewed by designated members of the Investment Stewardship Committee, who will resolve the conflict and direct the vote. In certain circumstances, the designated members may determine that the full Investment Stewardship Committee should convene.

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

In certain instances, Wellington Management may be unable to vote or may determine not to vote a proxy on behalf of one or more clients. While not exhaustive, the following are potential instances in which a proxy vote might not be entered.

Securities Lending

In general, Wellington Management does not know when securities have been lent out pursuant to a client’s securities lending program and are therefore unavailable to be voted. Efforts to recall loaned securities are not always effective, but, in rare circumstances, Wellington Management may determine voting would outweigh the benefit to the client resulting from use of securities for lending and recommend that a client attempt to have its custodian recall the security to permit voting of related proxies.

Share Blocking and Re-registration

Certain countries impose trading restrictions or requirements regarding re-registration of securities held in omnibus accounts in order for shareholders to vote a proxy. The potential impact of such requirements is evaluated when determining whether to vote such proxies.

Lack of Adequate Information, Untimely Receipt of Proxy Materials, or Excessive Costs

Wellington Management may abstain from voting a proxy when the proxy statement or other available information is inadequate to allow for an informed vote, when the proxy materials are not delivered in a timely fashion or when, in Wellington Management’s judgment, the costs exceed the expected benefits to clients (such as when powers of attorney or consularization are required).

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Wellington Management maintains records related to proxies pursuant to Rule 204-2 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”), the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), and other applicable laws. In addition, Wellington Management discloses annually how it has exercised its voting rights for significant votes, as require by the EU Shareholder Rights Directive II (“SRD II”).

Wellington Management provides clients with a copy of its Global Proxy Policy and Procedures, including the Guidelines, upon written request. In addition, Wellington Management will provide specific client information relating to proxy voting to a client upon written request.

Dated: 1 September 2020

Wellington Management Company LLP

Wellington Management established these guidelines to document positions generally taken on
common proxy issues voted on behalf of clients.

GLOBAL PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES

March 2021

Upon a client’s written request, Wellington Management Company LLP (“Wellington Management”) votes securities that are held in the client’s account in response to proxies solicited by the issuers of such securities. These guidelines are based on Wellington Management’s fiduciary obligation to act in the best interest of its clients as shareholders. Hence, Wellington Management examines and votes each proposal so that the long-term effect of the vote will ultimately increase shareholder value for our clients. Because ethical considerations can have an impact on the long-term value of assets, our voting practices are also attentive to these issues, and votes will be cast against unlawful and unethical activity. Further, Wellington Management’s experience in voting proposals has shown that similar proposals often have different consequences for different companies.

Moreover, while these Global Proxy Voting Guidelines are written to apply globally, differences in local practice and law make universal application impractical. Therefore, each proposal is evaluated on its merits, considering its effects on the specific company in question and on the company within its industry. It should be noted that the following are guidelines, and not rigid rules, and Wellington Management reserves the right in all cases to vote contrary to guidelines where doing so is judged to represent the best interest of its clients.

OUR APPROACH TO STEWARDSHIP

The goal of our stewardship activities — engaging with companies and voting proxies on our clients’ behalf — is to support decisions that we believe will maximize the long-term value of securities we hold in client portfolios. The mechanisms we use to implement our stewardship activities vary by asset class. Engagement applies to all our investments across equity and credit, in both private and public markets. Proxy voting applies only to public equities.

In addition to our extensive research on sustainable investing, we partner with leading organizations to educate ourselves and provide leadership on asset management perspectives relevant to our stewardship activities. These include the Principles of Responsible Investment (PRI), Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), Ceres, the Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN), Toniic, Climate Action 100+, the Investor Forum, Net Zero Asset Managers Initiatives (NZAMI), and the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

We are signatories and members of the following stewardship codes and industry initiatives: UK Stewardship Code, Japan Stewardship Code, Hong Kong Principles of Responsible Ownership, Investor Stewardship Group (US), the International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN), the Asian Corporate Governance Association (ACGA), the Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI), CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project), the PRI Statement on ESG in credit ratings, Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC), and GRESB.

Asset manager stewardship extends beyond consideration of ESG issues to any area that may affect the long-term sustainability of an investment. While the objectives of ESG integration could be limited to risk mitigation and sustainable value assessment, stewardship’s aim is sustainable value creation. In our view, this can be accomplished by monitoring company behavior, engaging with boards and management teams, and voting proxies. These activities have long been part of Wellington’s investment ethos, so we embrace the industry’s heightened focus on stewardship.

Engagement

Direct engagement with company management on strategy, financial performance and risk, capital structure, and ESG considerations, is central to our investment process and is coordinated with voting in our stewardship practices. Direct, persistent contact with company management and boards of directors, both in our offices and with on-site company visits, informs a substantial portion of our company research. Our investors host more than 15,000 company meetings around the world each year. Maintaining this ongoing dialogue is central to how we implement our stewardship responsibilities and informs the investment decisions we make on behalf of our clients.

Prioritization of stewardship activities is a bottom-up process that requires numerous inputs, including level of ownership and materiality of industry- and company-specific risks. Through engagement we seek to gain differentiated insights, develop productive ongoing dialogue, and impact company behavior. In addition to the objectives established for specific company engagements, the ESG Research Team annually sets stewardship priorities relevant across companies and sectors for the coming year.

As a large firm that has been investing in nearly all sectors of the global securities markets for decades, we have ongoing, direct access to company management. Given the number of meetings we conduct, the breadth of our contacts, and the quality of discourse we require, this degree of access is invaluable. We prefer to engage privately with investee companies, which encourages an open, constructive, lasting dialogue. We seek to ensure that companies are acting in the best interest of their capital providers, in the same way we are responsible for acting in the best interest of our clients.

We take a multidisciplinary approach in our engagement process, including perspectives from equity, industry, fixed income, and ESG analysts for a richer dialogue. Our company meetings are open to all interested investment personnel. Our central-research collaboration platform and other forums, such as our daily Morning Meeting, facilitate insight and information sharing. Diversity of perspectives is a key strength of our model, as it encourages debate, which can ultimately help reinforce conviction in investment decisions.

Cultivating relationships with other asset management firms, academia, and broader industry organizations allows us to share insights on corporate governance trends and local market considerations. Whenever permissible under applicable laws and regulations we may communicate with other firms to reach an outcome that is in our clients’ best interest. We also speak with business partners, employee representatives, suppliers, and nongovernmental organizations, where this dialogue may provide incremental insight into how a company considers its various stakeholders.

Board engagement

We believe meeting directly with corporate boards which can enhance discussions about long-term material ESG issues, complements our ongoing conversations with management teams, and helps us assess a board’s effectiveness — all of which is challenging to do using company disclosures alone. We believe this ongoing dialogue benefits board members as well. Engagement with active managers provides an opportunity for directors to ask questions, gain market insights, and hear how the company compares with peers. Questions from investors often signal emerging areas of emphasis for a company. We view it as a missed opportunity and negative signal when directors appear defensive or dismissive of external perspectives. We believe continuous dialogue with investors can help ensure honest feedback and foster trust and transparency, which may enable both parties to anticipate and manage potential issues.

Please see Wellington’s Engagement Policy for more information.

OUR APPROACH TO VOTING

We vote proxies in what we consider to be the best interests of our clients as shareholders and in a manner that we believe maximizes the value of their holdings. Our approach to voting is investment-led and serves as an influential component of our engagement and escalation strategy. We prefer that clients delegate voting responsibility to their portfolio managers. The Investment Stewardship Committee, a cross-functional group of experienced professionals, establishes Wellington Management’s Proxy Voting Guidelines.

The ESG Research Team examines proxy proposals on their merits and recommends voting against proposals that we believe would have a negative effect on shareholder rights or the current or future market value of the company’s securities. This team also provides recommendations to each portfolio manager who makes the final decision for their client portfolios, absent a material conflict of interest. Consistent with our community-of-boutiques model, portfolio managers occasionally arrive at different voting conclusions for their clients, resulting in a split decision for the same security. This robust set of voting procedures and the deliberation that occurs prior to a vote decision are aligned with our role as active owners and fiduciaries for our clients.

VOTING GUIDELINES

Board composition and role of directors

We believe that shareholders’ ability to elect directors annually is an important shareholder right. While we generally support management nominees, we will withhold votes for any director who acts against shareholders’ best economic interests. We may also withhold votes from directors who fail to implement shareholder proposals that have received majority support, implement poison pills without shareholder approval, fail to attend at least 75% of scheduled board meetings, or serve on an excessive number of public company boards (see Director attendance and commitment below). We support proposals to declassify a board and enable annual director elections.

In our assessment of board effectiveness, we seek to understand how the board collaborates with management and delineates responsibilities. This is why direct engagement with board members is such an important part of our investment process. We look for indications that directors foster healthy debate in the boardroom, develop constructive relationships with management, and challenge the team when appropriate. Where we see opportunities for improvement, we use these discussions to provide feedback and explain how changes we suggest can benefit our clients, the ultimate owner of the company’s securities.

We do not have specific voting policies relating to director age or tenure. We prefer to take a holistic view, evaluating whether the company is balancing the perspectives of new directors with the institutional knowledge of longer serving board members. Succession planning is a key topic during many of our board engagements. Companies in certain markets are governed by multi-tiered boards, with each tier having different responsibilities. We hold supervisory board members to similar standards, subject to prevailing local governance best practices.

Board independence

In our view, boards can best represent shareholders when enough directors are present to challenge and counsel management. We believe that most board members should be independent, as defined by the local market regulatory authority. This is particularly true of audit, compensation, and nominating committees.

At times, we may withhold approval for non-independent directors or those responsible for the board composition. We typically vote in support of proposals calling for improved independence. To determine appropriate minimum levels of board independence, we look to the prevailing market best practices; two-thirds in the US, for example, and majority in the UK and France. In Japan, we will consider voting against the board chair (or most senior executive on the ballot) in cases where the board — including statutory auditors — is less than one-third independent.

Because boards are responsible for overseeing execution, evaluating and compensating top management, and coordinating CEO succession, we believe that having an independent chair is the preferred structure for board leadership. Having an independent chair avoids the inherent conflict of self-oversight and helps ensure robust debate and diversity of thought in the boardroom. We will generally support management proposals to separate the chair and CEO or establish a lead director, but we take a case-by-case approach in assessing corporate leadership structures. For example, we may support the involvement of an outgoing CEO as executive chair for a limited period to ensure a smooth transition to new management. However, after the transition, we expect the board to appoint an independent chair and account for separate roles in succession planning. Through engagement and voting, we continue to encourage boards to signal the importance of oversight on behalf of shareholders through the adoption of this leadership structure.

Board diversity

We believe boards that reflect a wide range of perspectives create shareholder value. In our view, businesses create shareholder value by appointing boards that thoughtfully debate company strategy and direction. Such debate is not possible unless boards elect highly qualified and diverse directors who contribute insights from a range of perspectives. By setting a leadership example, diverse boardrooms encourage an organizational culture that promotes diverse thinkers, enabling better strategic decisions and the navigation of increasingly complex issues facing companies today.

We think it is not in shareholders’ best interests for the full board to be comprised of directors from the same industry, gender, race, nationality, or ethnic group. We have an expectation for our portfolio companies to be thoughtful and intentional in considering the widest possible pool of skilled candidates who bring diverse perspectives into the boardroom. We encourage companies to disclose the racial and ethnic composition of their board and to communicate their ambitions and strategies for creating and fostering a diverse board. We reserve the right to vote against the reelection of the Nominating/Governance Committee Chair if we think a board is not meeting local market standards from a diversity perspective. In defining the market standard, we refer to quotas established by local governance codes, which exist in many European markets. In the US and Japan, we look for at least one female on the board as a minimum standard. To hold companies accountable to emerging best practice standards regarding racial diversity, beginning in 2021 we will vote against the reelection of Nominating/Governance Committee Chairs at S&P 500 companies that do not disclose the racial and ethnic composition of their boards. We will also support shareholder proposals asking for improved workforce diversity disclosure, e.g. EEO-1 reporting. If the Nomination and/or Governance Chair is not up for reelection, we may vote against other committee members, including the Board Chair. In the UK, we expect portfolio companies to adopt the recommendations of the Parker Review. In 2022, we plan to vote against the reelection of Nominating/Governance Committee Chairs at S&P 500 companies that lack racial/ethnic diversity on their boards, and we will consider expanding our approach beyond the S&P 500 constituents.

Director attendance and commitment

We consider attending at least 75% of board meetings to be a minimum requirement and may vote against directors who fall below that threshold. We also expect directors to have the time and energy to fully commit to the company and fulfill their board-related responsibilities. Our internal voting guidelines define professional directors as “overboarded” when serving on five or more public company boards; and public company executives when serving on three or more public company boards, including their own. Representation on boards of affiliate or subsidiary public companies do not count toward these thresholds, as we recognize that

these are extensions of the directorship on the parent company board. We may make exceptions to this approach to accommodate prevailing market standards. We may also consider a director’s role on the board in assessing his or her overall commitments. For example, we would look less favorably on a director serving as chair of multiple audit committees given the time commitment required by this role.

Majority vote on election of directors

Because we believe the election of directors by a majority of votes cast is the appropriate standard, we will generally support proposals that seek to adopt such a standard. Our support will typically extend to situations where the relevant company has an existing resignation policy for directors that receive a majority of “withhold” votes. We believe majority voting should be defined in the company’s charter and not simply in its corporate governance policy.

Generally, we will not support proposals that fail to provide for the exceptional use of a plurality standard in the case of contested elections. Further, we will not support proposals that seek to adopt a standard of majority of votes outstanding (total votes eligible as opposed to votes cast). We likely will support shareholder and management proposals to remove existing supermajority vote requirements.

Contested director elections

We approach contested director elections on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific circumstances of each situation to determine what we believe to be in the best interest of our clients. In each case, we welcome the opportunity to engage with both the company and the proponent to ensure that we understand both perspectives and are making an informed decision on our clients’ behalf.

COMPENSATION

Executive compensation plans establish the incentive structure that plays a role in strategy-setting, decision-making, and risk management. While design and structure vary widely, we believe the most effective compensation plans attract and retain high caliber executives, foster a culture of performance and accountability, and align management’s interests with those of long-term shareholders.

Due to each company’s unique circumstances and wide range of plan structures, Wellington determines support for a compensation plan on a case-by-case basis. We support plans that we believe lead to long-term value creation for our clients. We may also support poorly structured plans where we have seen some improvement, recognizing compensation committees’ willingness to engage with shareholder and implement recommendations that enhance the plan. We support the right to vote on compensation plans annually.

In evaluating compensation plans, we consider the following attributes in the context of the company’s business, size, industry, and geographic location:

•

Alignment — We believe in pay-for-performance and encourage plan structures that align executive compensation with shareholder experience. We compare total compensation to performance metrics on an absolute and relative basis over various timeframes, and we look for strong positive correlation. To ensure shareholder alignment, executives should maintain meaningful equity ownership in the company while they are employed, and for a period thereafter.

•

Transparency — We expect compensation committees to articulate the decision-making process and rationale behind the plan structure, and to provide adequate disclosure so shareholders can evaluate actual compensation relative to the committee’s intentions. Disclosure should include how metrics, targets, and timeframes are chosen, and detail desired outcomes. We also seek to understand how the compensation committee determines the target level of compensation and constructs the peer group for benchmarking purposes.

•

Structure — The plan should be clear and comprehensible. We look for a mix of cash versus equity, fixed versus variable, and short- versus long-term pay that incentivizes appropriate risk-taking and aligns with industry practice. Performance targets should be achievable but rigorous, and equity awards should be subject to performance and/or vesting periods of at least three years, to discourage executives from managing the business with a near-term focus. Unless otherwise specified by local market regulators, performance-based compensation should be based primarily on quantitative financial and non-financial criteria such as ESG-related criteria. There is scope, however, for qualitative criteria related to strategic, individual, or ESG goals, that are critical to the business. Qualitative goals may be acceptable if a compensation committee has demonstrated a fair and consistent approach to evaluating qualitative performance and applying discretion over time.

•

Accountability — Compensation committees should be able to use discretion, positive and negative, to ensure compensation aligns with performance, and provide a cogent explanation to shareholders. We generally oppose one-time awards aimed at retention or achieving a pre-determined goal. Barring an extenuating circumstance, we view retesting provisions unfavorably.

We seek to establish mutually beneficial dialogues with companies regarding their compensation policies. Where we see opportunities for improvement, we provide feedback and explain how the suggestions can benefit our clients. We use voting, an extension of our engagement efforts, to convey our views and drive change, if necessary. We expect compensation committees to respond to shareholder engagement and voting outcomes, and to disclose how these external perspectives are considered in the committee’s decisions.

Approving equity incentive plans

A well-designed equity incentive plan facilitates the alignment of interests of long-term shareholders, management, employees, and directors. We evaluate equity-based compensation plans on a case-by-case basis, considering projected plan costs, plan features, and grant practices. We reconsider our support for a plan if we believe these factors, on balance, are not in the best interest of shareholders. Specific items of concern may include excessive cost or dilution, unfavorable change-in-control features, insufficient performance conditions, holding/vesting periods, or stock ownership requirements, repricing stock options/stock appreciate rights (SARs) without prior shareholder approval, or automatic share replenishment (an “evergreen” feature).

Employee stock purchase plans

We generally support employee stock purchase plans, as they may align employees’ interests with those of shareholders. That said, we typically vote against plans that do not offer shares to a broad group of employees (e.g. if only executives can participate) or plans that offer shares at a significant discount.

Non-executive director compensation

Finding highly qualified individuals that bring unique skillsets to a board is not easy. When a potential fit is found, we want companies to be able to compensate a director competitively. We understand that excessive compensation may undermine a director’s independence, however, so we expect companies to strike this balance accordingly.

We expect companies to disclose non-executive director compensation. We prefer the use of an annual retainer or fee, delivered as cash, equity, or a combination. We do not believe non-executive directors should receive performance-based compensation, as this creates a potential conflict of interest. Non-executive directors oversee executive compensation plans; their objectivity is compromised if they design a plan that they also participate in.

Severance arrangements

We will oppose excessively generous arrangements but may support agreements that encourage management to negotiate in shareholders’ best interest. Because we believe severance arrangements require special scrutiny, we generally support proposals calling for shareholder ratification. We are also mindful of the board’s need for flexibility in recruitment and retention; therefore, we will oppose limitations on board compensation where respect for industry practice and reasonable overall levels of compensation have been demonstrated.

Clawback policies

We believe companies should be able to recoup incentive compensation from members of management who received awards based on fraudulent activities, accounting misstatements, or breaches in standards of conduct that lead to corporate reputational damage. Consequently, we may support shareholder proposals requesting that a company establish a clawback provision if existing policies do not cover these circumstances. We also support proposals seeking greater transparency about the application of clawback policies.

AUDIT QUALITY AND OVERSIGHT

Scrutiny of auditors, particularly audit quality and oversight, has been increasing. The Big Four global audit firms currently control the market but face minimal regulation. In the UK, recent corporate audit failures have increased regulatory pressures, leading to proposed rules such as mandating joint audits and operational splits. While scrutiny in the US is less intense and regulation is less likely in the near term, in our view, regulatory boards, including the SEC and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) are becoming more active. When we assess financial statement reporting and audit quality, we will generally support management’s choice of auditors, unless the auditors have demonstrated failure to act in shareholders’ best economic interest. We also pay close attention to the non-audit services provided by auditors and consider the potential for the revenue from those services to create conflicts of interest that could compromise the integrity of financial statement audits.

SHAREHOLDER VOTING RIGHTS

Shareholder rights plans

Also known as poison pills, these plans can enable boards of directors to negotiate higher takeover prices on behalf of shareholders. Such plans also may be misused, however, as a means of entrenching management. Consequently, we may support plans that include a shareholder approval requirement, a sunset provision, or a permitted bid feature (e.g., bids that are made for all shares and demonstrate evidence of financing must be submitted to a shareholder vote). Because boards generally have the authority to adopt shareholder rights plans without shareholder approval, we are equally vigilant in our assessment of requests for authorization of blank-check preferred shares (see below).

Multiple voting rights

More companies choose to go public with a dual-class share structure, a controversial practice that can raise governance and performance concerns. In our view, dual-class shares are problematic because of the misalignment they can create between shareholders’ economic stake and their voting power, and for the control they often give a small number of insiders who may make decisions that are not in the interests of all shareholders. Index providers’ actions to address this issue and encourage one share, one vote structures could have significant implications for investors, but we believe these can be mitigated by active management and thoughtful stewardship.

We believe sunset clauses are a reasonable compromise between founders seeking to defend against takeover attempts in pivotal early years, and shareholders demanding a mechanism for holding management accountable, especially in the event of leadership changes. The Council of Institutional Investors, a nonprofit association of pension funds, endowments, and foundations, recommends that newly public companies that adopt structures with unequal voting rights do away with the structure within three to five years.

Without a sunset clause, we would prefer that a company eliminate a dual-class share structure, as shareholders’ voting power should be reflected by their economic stake in a company. Similarly, we generally do not support the introduction of loyalty shares, which grant increased voting rights to investors who hold shares over multiple years, because they create misalignment of voting power and economic interest.

Proxy access

We believe shareholders should have the right to nominate director candidates on management’s proxy card. We will generally support shareholder proposals seeking proxy access unless current policy is in-line with market norms.

Special meeting rights

We believe the right to call a special meeting is a shareholder right, and we will support such proposals at companies that lack a special-meeting ownership threshold. We also will support proposals lowering thresholds not in-line with market norms. If shareholders are granted the right to call special meetings, we generally do not support written consent.

Mergers and acquisitions

We approach votes to approve mergers and acquisitions on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific circumstances of each proposal to determine what we believe to be in the best interest of our clients. In conducting our assessment, equity and ESG analysts collaborate to analyze the fundamental and governance implications, if applicable, to advise portfolio managers in their vote decisions.

CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION

Increases in authorized common stock

We generally support requests for increases up to 100% of the shares currently authorized. Exceptions will be made when the company has clearly articulated a reasonable need for a greater increase. Conversely, at companies trading in less liquid markets, we may impose a lower threshold. When companies seek to issue shares without preemptive rights, we consider potential dilution and generally support requests when dilution is below 20%. For issuance with preemptive rights, we review on a case-by-case basis, considering the size of issuance relative to peers.

100

Capital allocation (Japan)

Because poor capital stewardship has led to a lack of shareholder value creation in some Japanese companies, we have begun to hold board chairs accountable for persistently low returns on equity (ROE), using a five-year average ROE of below 5% as a guide. Our assessment of a company’s capital stewardship complements our assessment of board effectiveness without dictating specific capital allocation decisions. We may make exceptions where ROE is improving, where a long-cycle business warrants a different standard, or where new management is in place and we feel they shouldn’t be punished for the past CEO/Chair’s record.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES

Consistent with our ESG integration philosophy, we assess portfolio companies’ performance on environmental and social issues we deem to be material to long-term financial performance, and we support shareholder proposals where we think doing so can encourage improvement on relevant issues. We evaluate shareholder proposals related to environmental and social issues on a case-by-case basis, and we expect portfolio companies to comply with applicable laws and regulations with regards to environmental and social standards. We consider the spirit of the proposal, not just the letter, and generally support proposals addressing material issues even when management has been responsive to our engagement on the issue. In this way, we seek to align our voting with our engagement activities. If our views differ from any specific suggestions in the proposals, we will provide clarification via direct engagement.

Climate change

As an asset manager entrusted with investing on our clients’ behalf, we aim to assess, monitor, and manage the potential effects of climate change on our investment processes and portfolios, as well as on our business operations. As supporters of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations, we actively engage with portfolio companies to encourage adoption. We believe that climate change poses a material risk across sectors and geographies, so understanding how companies are assessing and managing climate risk is key to making informed investment decisions for our clients. For this reason, we generally support shareholder proposals asking for improved disclosure on climate risk management and we expect to support those that request alignment of business strategies with the Paris Agreement or similar language. We also generally support proposals asking for board oversight of political contributions and lobbying activities or those asking for improved disclosures where material inconsistencies in reporting and strategy may exist, especially as it relates to climate strategy.

In December 2020, Wellington Management became a founding member of the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative. Through this initiative, we are committing to work in partnership with clients on their decarbonization goals and to set an interim target for the proportion of assets to be managed in line with the attainment of net-zero emissions by 2050. This commitment is grounded in our belief — forged by extensive research — that climate change poses material risks for companies, economies, and society, and therefore, our clients’ investment portfolios. We have been pleased to see rising adoption of the TCFD framework in response to shareholder recommendations. Reporting on climate readiness will help stakeholders understand companies’ willingness and ability to adapt to or mitigate climate-related risks. However, so far, many disclosures have been incomplete. Most make scant mention of the physical risks posed to their business by a changing climate. We will continue to focus our stewardship activities in this area, and we are encouraging companies to provide more detail.

To help us do this, we are leveraging findings from our collaborative initiative with Woodwell Climate Research Center, the world’s leading independent climate research organization, and established disclosure guidance to help companies improve their physical risk disclosures. We believe integrating the work of Woodwell’s climate scientists and our investment research teams enables us to ask nuanced questions about specific physical risks and more accurately test climate-risk assumptions embedded in companies’ strategies. By narrowing our engagement dialogue to address relevant threats, we believe we can encourage companies to take early action to address these threats, potentially improving long-term investment outcomes for shareholders.

Corporate culture, human capital, and diversity & inclusion

The ability to perpetuate a strong, inclusive culture; align management incentives accordingly; and incorporate employee feedback contributes to a company’s competitive position. Since culture is challenging to assess from the outside, we examine a company’s holistic approach. For example, we evaluate whether a company has a well-articulated culture statement and talent development strategy. To us, these efforts suggest that a company appreciates culture and talent as competitive advantages that can drive long-term value creation. It also sends a strong message when management compensation is linked, when appropriate, to employee satisfaction. If the company conducts regular employee engagement surveys, we look for leadership to disclose the results — both positive and negative — so we can monitor patterns and hold them accountable for implementing changes based on the feedback they receive, we consider workplace locations and how a company balances attracting talent with the costs of operating in desirable cities.

101

Understanding how a company cultivates its human capital is integral to our assessment of culture. In our view, attracting and retaining talent can create a competitive long-term advantage for any company. These efforts may take time to implement and realize results, but we maintain that a deliberate human capital management strategy should foster a collaborative, productive workplace in which all talent can thrive. Companies that invest in and cultivate human capital are well-positioned to realize a competitive advantage and deliver better business outcomes.

As part of our focus on human capital, diversity and inclusion is an ongoing engagement issue. We seek to better understand how and to what extent a company’s approach to diversity is integrated with talent management at all levels. A sound long-term plan holds more weight than a company’s current demographics, so we look for a demonstrable diversity and inclusion strategy that seeks to improve metrics over time and align management incentives accordingly. We expect companies in the US to publicly disclose their EEO-1 reporting and their strategy to create an inclusive, diverse, and equitable workplace. We see DEI practices as a material input to long-term performance, so as our clients’ fiduciaries, we seek to better understand how and to what extent a company’s approach to diversity is integrated with talent management at all levels. This is only possible when there is consistent, robust disclosure in place.

Gender and racial pay equity is an important part of our assessment of a company’s diversity efforts. Pay equity can impact shareholder value by exposing a company to challenges with recruiting & retaining talent, job dissatisfaction, workforce turnover, and costly lawsuits. Consequently, we may support proposals asking for improved transparency on a company’s gender and/or racial pay gap if existing disclosures are lagging best practice and if the company has not articulated its efforts to eliminate disparities and promote equal opportunities for women and minorities to advance to senior roles.

We believe diversity among directors, leaders, and employees contributes positively to shareholder value by imbuing a company with myriad perspectives that help it better navigate complex challenges. A strong culture of diversity and inclusion begins in the boardroom. See the Board Diversity section above for more on our approach.

Stakeholders and risk management

In our assessment of social risks, we pay attention to how companies treat a key stakeholder: their workforce. We look for signs of constructive labor relations if employees are unionized, and a focus on key employee concerns, such as safe working conditions and competitive compensation.

In recent years, discourse on opioids, firearms, and sexual harassment has put the potential for social externalities — the negative effects that companies can have on society through their products, cultures, or policies — into sharp focus. These nuanced, often misunderstood issues can affect the value of corporate securities. Today, these are no longer just shareholder concerns; companies need to consider the opinions and actions of broader stakeholder constituencies, including employees, customers, and the public.

In our engagement with companies facing these risks, we encourage companies to disclose risk management strategies that acknowledge their societal impacts. When a company faces litigation or negative press, we inquire about lessons learned and request evidence of substantive changes that aim to prevent recurrence and mitigate downside risk. In these cases, we may also support proposals requesting enhanced disclosure on actions taken by management.

Human rights

Following the 2015 passage of the UK’s Modern Slavery Act, a handful of countries have passed laws requiring companies to report on how they are addressing risks related to human rights abuses in their global supply chains. While human rights have been a part of our research and engagement in this context, we seek to assess companies’ exposures to these risks, determine the sectors for which this risk is most material (highest possibility of supply-chain exposure), enhance our own engagement questions, and potentially work with external data providers to gain insights on specific companies or industries. To help us assess company practices and drive more substantive engagement with companies on this issue, we will support proposals requesting enhanced disclosure on companies’ approach to mitigating the risk of human rights violations in their business.

Cybersecurity

Robust cybersecurity practices are imperative for maintaining customer trust, preserving brand strength, and mitigating regulatory risk. Companies that fail to strengthen their cybersecurity platforms may end up bearing large costs. Through engagement, we aim to compare companies’ approaches to cyber threats, regardless of region or sector, to distinguish businesses that lag from those that are better prepared.

102

Political Contributions and Lobbying

We generally support proposals asking for board oversight of a company’s political contributions and lobbying activities or those asking for improved disclosures where material inconsistencies in reporting and strategy may exist. In assessing shareholder proposals focused on lobbying, we also focus on the level of transparency of existing disclosures and whether companies clearly explain how they will respond if policy engagement of trade association membership to which they belong do not align with company policy.

CONCLUSION

At Wellington, stewardship is a core part of how we deliver on our goal of maximizing the long-term value of the investments we make on behalf of our clients. In order to be the best possible stewards of that capital we engage meaningfully and continuously with our investee companies and do so with a multifaceted approach that brings our collective expertise to bear across financial, industry, credit, and ESG analysis. We look forward to continuing to engage with the management teams and directors of the companies we invest in as we seek to help them build long-term, sustainable value in their enterprises.

103

APPENDIX B: CREDIT RATINGS

The credit rating information which follows describes how the credit rating services mentioned presently rate the described securities or loans. No reliance is made upon the credit rating firms as “experts” as that term is defined for securities purposes. Rather, reliance on this information is on the basis that such ratings have become generally accepted in the investment business. In the case of “split-rated” securities or loans (i.e., securities or loans assigned non-equivalent credit quality ratings, such as Baa by Moody’s but BB by Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings Services (“S&P Global Ratings”) or Ba by Moody’s Investor Services, Inc. (“Moody’s”) and BB by S&P Global Ratings but B by Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”)), the sub-adviser will determine whether a particular security or loan is considered investment grade or below-investment grade for each of the Fund’s portfolios as follows: (a) if all three credit rating agencies have rated a security or loan the median credit rating is used for this determination and (b) if only two credit rating agencies have rated a security, the lower (e.g., most conservative) credit rating is used.

LONG-TERM CREDIT RATINGS:

MOODY’S

Aaa –– Obligations rated Aaa are judged to be of the highest quality, subject to the lowest level of credit risk.

Aa –– Obligations rated Aa are judged to be of high quality and are subject to very low credit risk.

A –– Obligations rated A are judged to be upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit risk.

Baa –– Obligations rated Baa are judged to be medium-grade and subject to moderate credit risk and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics.

Ba –– Obligations rated Ba are judged to be speculative and are subject to substantial credit risk.

B –– Obligations rated B are considered speculative and are subject to high credit risk.

Caa –– Obligations rated Caa are judged to be speculative of poor standing and are subject to very high credit risk.

Ca –– Obligations rated Ca are highly speculative and are likely in, or very near, default, with some prospect of recovery of principal and interest.

C –– Obligations rated C are the lowest rated and are typically in default, with little prospect for recovery of principal or interest.

Note: Moody’s appends numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 to each generic rating classification from Aa through Caa. The modifier 1 indicates that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of that generic rating category. Additionally, a “(hyb)” indicator is appended to all ratings of hybrid securities issued by banks, insurers, finance companies, and securities firms. By their terms, hybrid securities allow for the omission of scheduled dividends, interest, or principal payments, which can potentially result in impairment if such an omission occurs. Hybrid securities may also be subject to contractually allowable write-downs of principal that could result in impairment. Together with the hybrid indicator, the long-term obligation rating assigned to a hybrid security is an expression of the relative credit risk associated with that security.

S&P GLOBAL RATINGS

AAA –– An obligation rated 'AAA' has the highest rating assigned by S&P Global Ratings. The obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is extremely strong.

AA –– An obligation rated 'AA' differs from the highest-rated obligations only to a small degree. The obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is very strong.

A –– An obligation rated 'A' is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher-rated categories. However, the obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is still strong.

BBB –– An obligation rated ‘BBB’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to weaken the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

BB, B, CCC, CC, and C –– Obligations rated 'BB', 'B', 'CCC', 'CC', and 'C' are regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. 'BB' indicates the least degree of speculation and 'C' the highest. While such obligations will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these may be outweighed by large uncertainties or major exposure to adverse conditions.

BB –– An obligation rated 'BB' is less vulnerable to nonpayment than other speculative issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions that could lead to the obligor's inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

104

B –– An obligation rated 'B' is more vulnerable to nonpayment than obligations rated 'BB', but the obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation. Adverse business, financial, or economic conditions will likely impair the obligor's capacity or willingness to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

CCC –– An obligation rated ‘CCC’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitments on the obligation. In the event of adverse business, financial, or economic conditions, the obligor is not likely to have the capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

CC –– An obligation rated 'CC' is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment. The 'CC' rating is used when a default has not yet occurred, but S&P Global Ratings expects default to be a virtual certainty, regardless of the anticipated time to default.

C –– An obligation rated 'C' is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment, and the obligation is expected to have lower relative seniority or lower ultimate recovery compared to obligations that are rated higher.

D –– An obligation rated 'D' is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the 'D' rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P Global Ratings believes that such payments will be made within the next five business days in the absence of a stated grace period or within the earlier of the stated grace period or the next 30 calendar days. The 'D' rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. A rating on an obligation is lowered to 'D' if it is subject to a distressed debt restructuring.

Ratings from ‘AA’ to ‘CCC’ may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the rating categories.

SHORT-TERM CREDIT RATINGS:

MOODY’S

P-1 – Ratings of Prime-1 reflect a superior ability to repay short-term obligations.

P-2 – Ratings of Prime-2 reflect a strong ability to repay short-term obligations.

P-3 – Ratings of Prime-3 reflect an acceptable ability to repay short-term obligations.

NP – Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories.

S&P GLOBAL RATINGS

A-1 –– A short-term obligation rated ‘A–1’ is rated in the highest category by S&P Global Ratings. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is strong. Within this category, certain obligations are designated with a plus sign (+). This indicates that the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on these obligations is extremely strong.

A-2 –– A short-term obligation rated ‘A–2’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher rating categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is satisfactory.

A-3 –– A short-term obligation rated ‘A–3’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to weaken an obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

B –– A short-term obligation rated ‘B’ is regarded as vulnerable and has significant speculative characteristics. The obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitments; however, it faces major ongoing uncertainties that could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments.

C –– A short-term obligation rated ‘C’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.

D –– A short-term obligation rated ‘D’ is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the 'D' rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P Global Ratings believes that such payments will be made within any stated grace period. However, any stated grace period longer than five business days will be treated as five business days. The 'D' rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of a similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. A rating on an obligation is lowered to 'D' if it is subject to a distressed debt restructuring.

105

RATING OF MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS:

S&P GLOBAL RATINGS

MUNICIPAL NOTES

An S&P Global Ratings U.S. municipal note rating reflects S&P Global Ratings' opinion about the liquidity factors and market access risks unique to the notes. Notes due in three years or less will likely receive a note rating. Notes with an original maturity of more than three years will most likely receive a long-term debt rating. In determining which type of rating, if any, to assign, S&P Global Ratings' analysis will review the following considerations:

1. Amortization schedule - - the larger the final maturity relative to other maturities, the more likely it will be treated as a note; and

2. Source of payment -- the more dependent the issue is on the market for its refinancing, the more likely it will be treated as a note.

Municipal Short-Term Note Ratings are as follows:

SP-1 – Strong capacity to pay principal and interest. An issue determined to possess a very strong capacity to pay debt service is given a plus (+) designation.

SP-2 – Satisfactory capacity to pay principal and interest, with some vulnerability to adverse financial and economic changes over the term of the notes.

SP-3 – Speculative capacity to pay principal and interest.

D – 'D' is assigned upon failure to pay the note when due, completion of a distressed debt restructuring, or the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions.

MOODY’S

SHORT-TERM OBLIGATION RATINGS

Moody’s uses the Municipal Investment Grade (MIG) scale for US municipal cash flow notes, bond anticipation notes and certain other short-term obligations, which typically mature in three years or less. Under certain circumstances, Moody’s uses the MIG scale for bond anticipation notes with maturities of up to five years.

MIG 1. This designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by established cash flows, highly reliable liquidity support, or demonstrated broad-based access to the market for refinancing.

MIG 2. This designation denotes strong credit quality. Margins of protection are ample, although not as large as in the preceding group.

MIG 3. This designation denotes acceptable credit quality. Liquidity and cash-flow protection may be narrow, and market access for refinancing is likely to be less well-established.

SG. This designation denotes speculative-grade credit quality. Debt instruments in this category may lack sufficient margins of protection.

DEMAND OBLIGATION RATINGS

In the case of variable rate demand obligations (VRDOs), a two-component rating is assigned. The components are a long-term rating and a short-term demand obligation rating. The long-term rating addresses the issuer’s ability to meet scheduled principal and interest payments. The short-term demand obligation rating addresses the ability of the issuer or the liquidity provider to make payments associated with the purchase-price-upon-demand feature (“demand feature”) of the VRDO. The short-term demand obligation rating uses the Variable Municipal Investment Grade (VMIG) scale. VMIG ratings with liquidity support use as an input the short-term Counterparty Risk Assessment of the support provider, or the long-term rating of the underlying obligor in the absence of third party liquidity support. Transitions of VMIG ratings of demand obligations with conditional liquidity support differ from transitions on the Prime scale to reflect the risk that external liquidity support will terminate if the issuer’s long-term rating drops below investment grade. For VRDOs, Moody’s typically assigns the VMIG short-term demand obligation rating if the frequency of the demand feature is less than every three years. If the frequency of the demand feature is less than three years but the purchase price is payable only with remarketing proceeds, the short-term demand obligation rating is “NR”. Industrial development bonds in the US where the obligor is a corporate may carry a VMIG rating that reflects Moody’s view of the relative likelihood of default and loss. In these cases, liquidity assessment is based on the liquidity of the corporate obligor.

VMIG 1. This designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by the superior short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections.

VMIG 2. This designation denotes strong credit quality. Good protection is afforded by the strong short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections.

106

VMIG 3. This designation denotes acceptable credit quality. Adequate protection is afforded by the satisfactory short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections.

SG. This designation denotes speculative-grade credit quality. Demand features rated in this category may be supported by a liquidity provider that does not have a sufficiently strong short-term rating or may lack the structural or legal protections.

DUAL RATINGS:

S&P Global Ratings

Dual ratings may be assigned to debt issues that have a put option or demand feature. The first component of the rating addresses the likelihood of repayment of principal and interest as due, and the second component of the rating addresses only the demand feature. The first component of the rating can relate to either a short-term or long-term transaction and accordingly use either short-term or long-term rating symbols. The second component of the rating relates to the put option and is assigned a short-term rating symbol (for example, 'AAA/A-1+' or 'A-1+/A-1'). With U.S. municipal short-term demand debt, the U.S. municipal short-term note rating symbols are used for the first component of the rating (for example, 'SP-1+/A-1+').

INTERNATIONAL LONG-TERM CREDIT RATINGS:

FITCH

International credit ratings relate to either foreign currency or local currency commitments and, in both cases, assess the capacity to meet these commitments using a globally applicable scale. As such, both foreign currency and local currency international ratings are internationally comparable assessments.

Rated entities in a number of sectors, including financial and non-financial corporations, sovereigns, insurance companies and certain sectors within public finance, are generally assigned Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs). IDRs are also assigned to certain entities or enterprises in global infrastructure, project finance and public finance. IDRs opine on an entity’s relative vulnerability to default (including by way of a distressed debt exchange) on financial obligations. The threshold default risk addressed by the IDR is generally that of the financial obligations whose non-payment would best reflect the uncured failure of that entity. As such, IDRs also address relative vulnerability to bankruptcy, administrative receivership or similar concepts.

In aggregate, IDRs provide an ordinal ranking of issuers based on the agency's view of their relative vulnerability to default, rather than a prediction of a specific percentage likelihood of default.

AAA: Highest credit quality. 'AAA' ratings denote the lowest expectation of default risk. They are assigned only in cases of exceptionally strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is highly unlikely to be adversely affected by foreseeable events.

AA: Very high credit quality. ’AA’ ratings denote expectations of very low default risk. They indicate very strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is not significantly vulnerable to foreseeable events.

A: High credit quality. ‘A’ ratings denote expectations of low default risk. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered strong. This capacity may, nevertheless, be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic conditions than is the case for higher ratings.

BBB: Good credit quality. 'BBB' ratings indicate that expectations of default risk are currently low. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered adequate, but adverse business or economic conditions are more likely to impair this capacity.

BB: Speculative. 'BB' ratings indicate an elevated vulnerability to default risk, particularly in the event of adverse changes in business or economic conditions over time; however, business or financial flexibility exists which supports the servicing of financial commitments.

B: Highly speculative. 'B' ratings indicate that material default risk is present, but a limited margin of safety remains. Financial commitments are currently being met; however, capacity for continued payment is vulnerable to deterioration in the business and economic environment.

CCC: Substantial credit risk. Default is a real possibility.

CC: Very high levels of credit risk. Default of some kind appears probable.

C: Near default. A default or default-like process has begun, or the issuer is in standstill, or for a closed funding vehicle, payment capacity is irrevocably impaired. Conditions that are indicative of a 'C' category rating for an issuer include:

a. the issuer has entered into a grace or cure period following non-payment of a material financial obligation;

b. the issuer has entered into a temporary negotiated waiver or standstill agreement following a payment default on a material financial obligation;

c. the formal announcement by the issuer or their agent of a distressed debt exchange;

107

d. a closed financing vehicle where payment capacity is irrevocably impaired such that it is not expected to pay interest and/or principal in full during the life of the transaction, but where no payment default is imminent

RD: Restricted default. ‘RD' ratings indicate an issuer that in Fitch’s opinion has experienced:

a. an uncured payment default or distressed debt exchange on a bond, loan or other material financial obligation, but

b. has not entered into bankruptcy filings, administration, receivership, liquidation, or other formal winding-up procedure, and

c. has not otherwise ceased operating. This would include:

i. the selective payment default on a specific class or currency of debt;

ii. the uncured expiry of any applicable grace period, cure period or default forbearance period following a payment default on a bank loan, capital markets security or other material financial obligation;

iii. the extension of multiple waivers or forbearance periods upon a payment default on one or more material financial obligations, either in series or in parallel; ordinary execution of a distressed debt exchange on one or more material financial obligations.

D: Default. ‘D' ratings indicate an issuer that in Fitch’s opinion has entered into bankruptcy filings, administration, receivership, liquidation or other formal winding-up procedure or that has otherwise ceased business.

Default ratings are not assigned prospectively to entities or their obligations; within this context, non-payment on an instrument that contains a deferral feature or grace period will generally not be considered a default until after the expiration of the deferral or grace period, unless a default is otherwise driven by bankruptcy or other similar circumstance, or by a distressed debt exchange.

In all cases, the assignment of a default rating reflects the agency's opinion as to the most appropriate rating category consistent with the rest of its universe of ratings and may differ from the definition of default under the terms of an issuer's financial obligations or local commercial practice.

Within rating categories, Fitch may use modifiers. The modifiers “+” or “-” may be appended to a rating to denote relative status within major rating categories.

INTERNATIONAL SHORT-TERM CREDIT RATINGS:

FITCH

A short-term issuer or obligation rating is based in all cases on the short-term vulnerability to default of the rated entity and relates to the capacity to meet financial obligations in accordance with the documentation governing the relevant obligation. Short-term deposit ratings may be adjusted for loss severity. Short-Term Ratings are assigned to obligations whose initial maturity is viewed as "short term" based on market convention. A long-term rating can also be used to rate an issue with short maturity. Typically, this means up to 13 months for corporate, sovereign, and structured obligations and up to 36 months for obligations in U.S. public finance markets.

F1: Highest Short-Term Credit Quality. Indicates the strongest intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments; may have an added "+" to denote any exceptionally strong credit feature.

F2: Good Short-Term Credit Quality. Good intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments.

F3: Fair Short-Term Credit Quality. The intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments is adequate.

B: Speculative Short-Term Credit Quality. Minimal capacity for timely payment of financial commitments, plus heightened vulnerability to near term adverse changes in financial and economic conditions.

C: High Short-Term Default Risk. Default is a real possibility.

RD: Restricted Default. Indicates an entity that has defaulted on one or more of its financial commitments, although it continues to meet other financial obligations. Typically applicable to entity ratings only.

D: Default. Indicates a broad-based default event for an entity, or the default of a short-term obligation.

Within rating categories, Fitch may use modifiers. The modifiers “+” or “-” may be appended to a rating to denote relative status within major rating categories.

108

APPENDIX C: CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL SECURITY HOLDERS

Persons or organizations beneficially owning 25% or more of the outstanding shares of a Fund are presumed to “control” the Fund within the meaning of the 1940 Act. As a result, those persons or organizations could have the ability to take action with respect to the Fund without the consent or approval of other shareholders. As of March 18, 2022, to the knowledge of each Company’s management, the officers and directors of each Company as a group beneficially owned less than 1% of the outstanding shares of each class of each Fund. As of March 18, 2022, to the knowledge of a Fund, the following shareholders owned beneficially or of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of any class of a Fund:

Fund Name/Shareholder	Class IA	Class IB	Class IC
BALANCED HLS FUND
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE & ANNUITY INS COMPANY SEPARATE ACCOUNT ILIF REG HARTFORD CT	9.67%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY* HARTFORD CT	44.03%	72.97%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY* HARTFORD CT	32.00%	25.77%
CAPITAL APPRECIATION HLS FUND
AXA EQUITABLE LIFE SEPARATE NEW YORK NY			54.81%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE & ANNUITY INS COMPANY SEPARATE ACCOUNT ILIF REG HARTFORD CT	12.39%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY* HARTFORD CT	43.05%	68.50%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY* HARTFORD CT	8.05%	25.25%
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS CO FORT WAYNE IN			42.98%
DISCIPLINED EQUITY HLS FUND
AXA EQUITABLE LIFE SEPARATE NEW YORK NY			100.00%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE & ANNUITY INS COMPANY SEPARATE ACCOUNT ILIF REG HARTFORD CT	8.84%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY* HARTFORD CT	28.49%	65.55%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY HARTFORD CT	13.86%	11.55%
UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO SEPARATE ACCT NON REG* HARTFORD CT	29.34%
UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY SEPARATE ACCT IANN REG HARTFORD CT	13.45%
DIVIDEND AND GROWTH HLS FUND
STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST CO FBO THE HARTFORD INVESTMENT AND SAVING PLAN 401K WESTWOOD MA	10.57%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE & ANNUITY INS COMPANY SEPARATE ACCOUNT ILIF REG HARTFORD CT	9.99%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY* HARTFORD CT	41.07%	65.05%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY HARTFORD CT	6.43%	8.31%
HEALTHCARE HLS FUND
RELIANCE TRUST COMPANY CUST FBO MASSMUTUAL REGISTERED PRODUCT ATLANTA GA	10.70%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY* HARTFORD CT	25.55%	60.79%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY HARTFORD CT	19.19%	9.87%
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES HLS FUND
FIIOC CUST/TTEE FBO CERTAIN EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS COVINGTON KY	8.70%
STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST CO FBO THE HARTFORD INVESTMENT AND SAVING PLAN 401K WESTWOOD MA	10.20%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE & ANNUITY INS COMPANY SEPARATE ACCOUNT ILIF REG HARTFORD CT	10.13%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY* HARTFORD CT	28.07%	77.36%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY HARTFORD CT	5.99%	19.69%
MIDCAP HLS FUND
FIIOC CUST/TTEE FBO CERTAIN EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS COVINGTON KY	12.09%
STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST CO FBO THE HARTFORD INVESTMENT AND SAVING PLAN 401K WESTWOOD MA	7.95%

109

Fund Name/Shareholder	Class IA	Class IB	Class IC
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE & ANNUITY INS COMPANY SEPARATE ACCOUNT ILIF REG HARTFORD CT	10.19%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY HARTFORD CT	20.10%	66.87%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY HARTFORD CT	11.96%	12.42%
SMALL CAP GROWTH HLS FUND
FBO INSPERITY 401(K) PLAN PITTSBURGH PA	18.40%
DCGT AS TTEE CUST FBO ABB INC RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN ATTN NPIO TRADE DESK DES MOINES IA	9.95%
NATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC FBO THE EXCL BENEFIT OF OUR CUST ATTN MF DEPT* JERSEY CITY NJ	30.23%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY HARTFORD CT	7.37%	17.31%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY HARTFORD CT		5.20%
UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO SEPARATE ACCT NON REG HARTFORD CT	10.62%
VOYA INSTITUTIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS CUST FOR CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN CITY HALL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OFFICE LOS ANGELES CA		73.72%
SMALL COMPANY HLS FUND
FIIOC CUST/TTEE FBO CERTAIN EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS COVINGTON KY	24.58%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE & ANNUITY INS COMPANY SEPARATE ACCOUNT ILIF REG HARTFORD CT	13.76%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY* HARTFORD CT	28.94%	59.55%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY HARTFORD CT	10.68%	13.19%
STOCK HLS FUND
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE & ANNUITY INS COMPANY SEPARATE ACCOUNT ILIF REG HARTFORD CT	14.09%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY* HARTFORD CT	39.23%	69.17%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INS CO SEPARATE ACCNT ILIF REG HARTFORD CT	5.37%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY* HARTFORD CT	29.17%	28.07%
TOTAL RETURN BOND HLS FUND
STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST CO FBO THE HARTFORD INVESTMENT AND SAVING PLAN 401K WESTWOOD MA	10.94%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE & ANNUITY INS COMPANY SEPARATE ACCOUNT ILIF REG HARTFORD CT	10.65%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY* HARTFORD CT	47.81%	66.25%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY HARTFORD CT	18.96%	6.34%
ULTRASHORT BOND HLS FUND
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE & ANNUITY INS COMPANY SEPARATE ACCOUNT ILIF REG HARTFORD CT	12.59%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY* HARTFORD CT	49.84%	65.47%
TALCOTT RESOLUTION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY* HARTFORD CT	25.39%	14.79%

May be deemed to control the Fund because it owned beneficially more than 25% of the outstanding shares of the Fund.

HLSSAI04292022

110