OCTOBER 1, 2024

This Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) contains additional information that you should consider before investing in the above listed series, which are investment portfolios or “Funds” of the TIAA-CREF Funds (the “Trust”). The SAI is not a prospectus, but is incorporated by reference into and made a part of each prospectus issued and filed by the above-referenced Funds on or after October 1, 2024 (each, a “Prospectus”).

The SAI should be read carefully in conjunction with the Prospectuses. The Prospectuses may be obtained, without charge, by writing the Funds at Nuveen Funds, 730 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017–3206 or by calling 800-257-8787.

This SAI describes 32 Funds: thirteen Nuveen Lifecycle Funds, thirteen Nuveen Lifecycle Index Funds, five Nuveen Lifestyle Funds and the Nuveen Managed Allocation Fund. Each Fund may offer up to five share classes: Class A, Class I, Premier Class, Class R6 and Retirement Class.

Capitalized terms used, but not defined, herein have the same meaning as in the Prospectuses. The Funds’ audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2024 are incorporated into this SAI by reference to the Funds Annual Reports for that year to shareholders and filed on Form N-CSR. The Funds will furnish you, without charge, a copy of the Annual Reports or Form N-CSR on request by calling 800-257-8787.

Table of contents

 Statement of Additional Information     3

Investment objectives, policies, restrictions and risks

The investment objectives and policies of each Fund are discussed in their respective Prospectuses. Because each Fund invests in either Class W shares or Class R6 shares of other Nuveen mutual funds and potentially in other investment pools or investment products, including other funds or exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”) advised by the Funds’ investment adviser, Teachers Advisors, LLC (“Advisors”), or its affiliates (the “Underlying Funds”), investors in each Fund will be affected by an Underlying Fund’s investment strategies in direct proportion to the amount of assets the Fund allocates to the Underlying Fund pursuing such strategies. Accordingly, each Fund is subject to the same risks as the Underlying Funds in direct proportion to the allocation of its assets among the Underlying Funds. The following discussion of investment policies and restrictions supplements the descriptions in the Prospectuses of the Funds as well as the prospectuses of the Underlying Funds described in this SAI. Under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), any fundamental policy of a registered investment company may not be changed without the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities (as defined in the 1940 Act) of that series. However, the investment objective of each Fund as described in its Prospectus, and its non-fundamental investment restrictions as described in “Investment policies” below, may be changed by the Board of Trustees of the Trust (the “Board of Trustees” or the “Board”) at any time without shareholder approval. The Trust is an open-end management investment company.

Each Fund is classified as “diversified” within the meaning of the 1940 Act. In addition, each Fund has qualified and intends to continue to meet the diversification requirements of Subchapter M of Chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

Unless otherwise noted, each of the following investment policies and risk considerations applies to each Fund.

Fundamental policies

The following restrictions are fundamental policies of each Fund:

1.  The Fund will not issue senior securities except as permitted by law.

2.  The Fund will not borrow money, except: (a) each Fund may purchase securities on margin, as described in restriction 7 below; and (b) from banks (only in amounts not in excess of 33¹/₃% of the market value of that Fund’s assets at the time of borrowing), and, from other sources for temporary purposes (only in amounts not exceeding 5%, or such greater amount as may be permitted by law, of that Fund’s total assets taken at market value at the time of borrowing).

3.  The Fund will not underwrite the securities of other companies, except to the extent that it may be deemed an underwriter in connection with the disposition of securities from its portfolio.

4.  The Fund will not purchase real estate or mortgages directly, except that the Fund may invest in investment vehicles that purchase real estate or mortgages directly.

5.  The Fund will not purchase commodities or commodities contracts, except to the extent futures are purchased as described herein.

6.  The Fund will not lend any security or make any other loan if, as a result, more than 33¹/₃% of its total assets would be lent to other parties, but this limit does not apply to repurchase agreements.

7.  The Fund will not purchase any security on margin except that the Fund may obtain such short-term credit as may be necessary for the clearance of purchases and sales of portfolio securities.

8.  The Fund will not invest 25% or more of its total assets in the securities of one or more issuers conducting their principal business activities in the same industry (excluding the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities). With respect to investment restriction number 8, each Fund may invest more than 25% of its assets in any one Underlying Fund. For concentration purposes, each Fund will look through to the holdings of its affiliated Underlying Funds to assess its industry concentration. Currently, none of the Funds nor any of the Underlying Funds, other than the Nuveen Real Estate Securities Select Fund and the privately offered Nuveen Real Property Fund LP, concentrates, or intends to concentrate, its investments in a particular industry.

The following restriction is a fundamental policy of each Fund other than the Nuveen Managed Allocation Fund:

9. The Fund will not, with respect to at least 75% of the value of its total assets, invest more than 5% of its total assets in the securities of any one issuer, other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies and instrumentalities or securities of other investment companies, or hold more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer.

The following restriction is a fundamental policy of the Nuveen Managed Allocation Fund:

10. The Fund will not invest in securities other than securities of other registered investment companies or other permissible investment products or pools that are approved by the Board of Trustees, government securities or short-term securities.

4     Statement of Additional Information 

With the exception of percentage restrictions relating to borrowings, if a percentage restriction is adhered to at the time of investment, a later increase or decrease in percentage beyond the specified limit resulting from a change in the values of portfolio securities will not be considered a violation by the Fund.

Investment policies

The following policies and restrictions are non-fundamental policies of each Fund. These restrictions may be changed by the Board without the approval of Fund shareholders. Since each Fund will invest primarily in shares of other investment companies, rather than investing directly in individual securities, the investment policies listed below are applicable to the Underlying Funds (other than Nuveen Real Property Fund LP (the “Real Property Fund”) unless specifically noted below) in which the Funds invest. References to “Advisors” in the investment policies listed below may refer to Advisors or another investment adviser or sub-adviser of an Underlying Fund. 

Non-Equity Investments of the Equity and Real Estate Securities Select Underlying Funds. The equity Underlying Funds (the “Equity Funds”) and the Nuveen Real Estate Securities Select Fund can, in addition to stocks, hold other types of securities with equity characteristics, such as convertible bonds, preferred stock, warrants and depository receipts or rights for such securities. Pending more permanent investments or to use cash balances effectively, these Funds may hold the same types of money market instruments as held by money market funds, as well as other short-term instruments. These other instruments are the same type of instruments a money market fund may hold, but they have longer maturities than the instruments allowed in money market funds, or otherwise do not meet the requirements for “Eligible Securities” (as defined in Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act).

When market conditions warrant, the Equity Funds and the Nuveen Real Estate Securities Select Fund may invest directly in investment-grade debt securities similar to those the Nuveen Core Bond Fund may invest in. The Equity Funds and the Nuveen Real Estate Securities Select Fund may also hold debt securities that they acquire because of mergers, recapitalizations or otherwise.

The Equity Funds and the Nuveen Real Estate Securities Select Fund also may invest in options and futures, as well as newly developed financial instruments, such as equity swaps and equity-linked fixed-income securities, so long as these are consistent with their investment objectives and regulatory requirements.

These investments and other Underlying Fund investment strategies are discussed in detail below.

Temporary Defensive Positions. The Underlying Funds may take temporary defensive positions. During periods when Advisors believes there are unstable market, economic, political or currency conditions domestically or abroad, Advisors may assume, on behalf of a Fund or an Underlying Fund, a temporary defensive posture and (1) without limitation, hold cash and/or invest in money market instruments, and/or the Nuveen Money Market Fund (the “Money Market Fund”), or (2) restrict the securities markets in which the Fund’s or the Underlying Fund’s assets will be invested by investing those assets in securities markets deemed by Advisors to be conservative in light of the Fund’s or the Underlying Fund’s investment objective and policies. Under normal circumstances, each Fund and Underlying Fund may invest a portion of its total assets in cash or money market instruments for cash management purposes, pending investment in accordance with the Fund’s or Underlying Fund’s investment objective and policies and to meet operating expenses. To the extent that a Fund or an Underlying Fund holds cash or invests in money market instruments, it may not achieve its investment objective. Cash assets are generally not income-generating and would impact the Fund’s or Underlying Fund’s performance.

Credit Facility and Inter-Fund Borrowing and Lending. Certain Underlying Funds, along with certain other funds managed by Advisors or Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC (“Participating Funds”), are parties to a 364-day, approximately $2.7 billion credit agreement with a group of lenders (the “Credit Agreement”), which expires in June 2025, unless extended or renewed. An Underlying Fund may borrow under the Credit Agreement to meet shareholder redemptions and for other lawful temporary purposes. Borrowing results in interest expense and being a Participating Fund results in other fees and expenses, which may increase an Underlying Fund’s net expenses and reduce the Underlying Fund’s return. In addition, borrowing by an Underlying Fund may create leverage by increasing the Underling Fund’s investment exposure. This will result in any changes in an Underlying Fund’s net asset value (“NAV”), either positive or negative, being greater than they would have been if the Underlying Fund had not borrowed. Participating Funds have been allocated different first priority portions of the committed amount of the credit facility based primarily on the expected likelihood and extent of the need to borrow under the Credit Agreement. Administration, legal, arrangement, upfront and undrawn fees under the Credit Agreement are allocated among Participating Funds based upon these first priority portions of the aggregate commitment available to them and other factors deemed relevant by Advisors and the Board of each Participating Fund, while fees on any amounts drawn by a Participating Fund under the Credit Agreement are borne by that Participating Fund.

Additionally, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has granted an exemptive order (the “Order”) permitting the Funds to participate in an inter-fund lending facility whereby the participating Funds may directly lend to and borrow money from each other for temporary purposes (e.g., to satisfy redemption requests or to cover unanticipated cash shortfalls) (the “Inter-Fund Program”). Certain accounts or series of College Retirement Equities Fund (“CREF”), TIAA-CREF Life Funds (“TCLF”) and TIAA Separate Account VA-1 (“VA-1”), as well as certain other series of the Trust, each of which is managed by Advisors or an

 Statement of Additional Information     5

affiliate of Advisors, also participate in the Inter-Fund Program, and each such account or series is considered to be a “Fund” for the purpose of the description of the Inter-Fund Program in this section. The Inter-Fund Program is subject to a number of conditions, including, among other things, the requirements that: (i) no Fund may borrow or lend money through the Inter-Fund Program unless it receives a more favorable interest rate than is available from a bank or other financial institution for a comparable transaction; (ii) no Fund may borrow on an unsecured basis through the Inter-Fund Program unless the Fund’s outstanding borrowings from all sources immediately after the inter-fund borrowing total 10% or less of its total assets; provided that if the borrowing Fund has a secured borrowing outstanding from any other lender, including but not limited to another Fund, the inter-fund loan must be secured on at least an equal priority basis with at least an equivalent percentage of collateral to loan value; (iii) if a Fund’s total outstanding borrowings immediately after an inter-fund borrowing would be greater than 10% of its total assets, the Fund may borrow through the inter-fund loan on a secured basis only; (iv) no Fund may lend money if the loan would cause its aggregate outstanding loans through the Inter-Fund Program to exceed 15% of its current net assets at the time of the loan; (v) a Fund’s inter-fund loans to any one Fund shall not exceed 5% of the lending Fund’s net assets; (vi) the duration of inter-fund loans will be limited to the time required to receive payment for securities sold, but in no event more than seven days; and (vii) each inter-fund loan may be called on one business day’s notice by a lending Fund and may be repaid on any day by a borrowing Fund. In addition, a Fund may participate in the Inter-Fund Program only if and to the extent that such participation is consistent with the Fund’s investment objective and investment policies, including the fundamental investment policies on borrowing and lending set forth above, and authorized by its portfolio manager(s). The Board has approved the Funds’ participation in the Inter-Fund Program and is responsible for ongoing oversight of the Inter-Fund Program, as required by the Order.

The limitations detailed above and the other conditions of the SEC exemptive order permitting the Inter-Fund Program are designed to minimize the risks associated with the Inter-Fund Program for both the lending Fund and the borrowing Fund. However, no borrowing or lending activity is without risk. When a Fund borrows money from another Fund, there is a risk that the loan could be called on one day’s notice or not renewed, in which case the Fund may have to borrow from a bank at a higher rate or take other actions to pay off such loan if an inter-fund loan is not available from another Fund. Any delay in repayment to a lending Fund could result in a lost investment opportunity or additional costs. The Nuveen Dividend Value Fund and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund participate in a separate inter-fund lending facility than the Underlying Funds of the Trust and the Funds.

Additional Risks Resulting From Market or Other Events and Government Intervention in Financial Markets and Regulatory Matters. National and regional economies and financial markets are becoming increasingly interconnected, which increases the possibilities that conditions in one country, region or market might adversely impact issuers in a different country, region or market. Changes in legal, political, regulatory, tax and economic conditions may cause fluctuations in markets and securities prices around the world, which could negatively impact the value of a Fund’s or an Underlying Fund’s investments. Major economic or political disruptions, particularly in large economies, may have global negative economic and market repercussions. Events such as war (for example, the ongoing armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine, as well as that between Israel and Hamas and other militant groups in the Middle East), terrorism, natural and environmental disasters and the spread of infectious illnesses or other public health emergencies, conflicts, social unrest, recessions, inflation, rapid interest rate changes and supply chain disruptions may adversely affect the global economy and the markets and issuers in which a Fund or an Underlying Fund invests. Additionally, the spread of infectious outbreaks, epidemics or pandemics have caused volatility, severe market dislocations and liquidity constraints in many markets, including markets for the investments the Funds or the Underlying Funds hold, and have, at times, adversely affected the Funds’ or Underlying Funds’ investments and operations. These events could reduce consumer demand or economic output, result in market closures, travel restrictions or quarantines, and generally have a significant impact on the economy. These events could also impair the information technology and other operational systems upon which a Fund’s or an Underlying Fund’s service providers, including Advisors, rely, and could otherwise disrupt the ability of employees of a Fund’s or an Underlying Fund’s service providers to perform essential tasks on behalf of a Fund or an Underlying Fund.

U.S. and global markets, in recent years, have experienced increased volatility, including as a result of the failures of certain U.S. and non-U.S. banks, which could be harmful to the Funds or the Underlying Funds and issuers in which they invest. For example, if a bank in which a Fund and/or an Underlying Fund or an issuer in which a Fund and/or an Underlying Fund invests has an account that fails, any cash or other assets in bank accounts may be temporarily inaccessible or permanently lost by the Fund or Underlying Fund or issuer. If a bank that provides a subscription line credit facility, asset-based facility, other credit facility and/or other services to an issuer fails, the issuer could be unable to draw funds under its credit facilities or obtain replacement credit facilities or other services from other lending institutions with similar terms. Even if banks remain solvent, continued volatility in the banking sector could cause or intensify an economic recession, increase the costs of capital and banking services or result in the issuers in which the Funds or the Underlying Funds invest being unable to obtain or refinance indebtedness at all or on as favorable terms as could otherwise have been obtained. Conditions in the banking sector are evolving, and the scope of any potential impacts to the Funds or the Underlying Funds and issuers, both from market conditions and also potential legislative or regulatory responses, are uncertain. Such conditions and responses, as well as a changing interest rate environment, can contribute to decreased market liquidity and erode the value of certain holdings. Continued

6     Statement of Additional Information 

market volatility and uncertainty and/or a downturn in market and economic and financial conditions, as a result of developments in the banking industry or otherwise (including as a result of delayed access to cash or credit facilities), could have an adverse impact on the Funds or the Underlying Funds and issuers in which they invest.

Changing interest rate environments (whether downward or upward) impact the various sectors of the economy in different ways. During periods when interest rates are low (or negative), a Fund and/or an Underlying Fund’s yield (or total return) may also be low and fall below zero. Very low or negative interest rates may magnify interest rate risk. An Underlying Fund may be subject to heightened levels of interest rate risk because the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) has increased interest rates significantly over recent periods. To the extent the Fed further raises interest rates, there is a risk that rates across the financial system may rise. Changing interest rates may have unpredictable effects on markets, may result in heightened market volatility and may detract from Fund or Underlying Fund performance to the extent a Fund and/or an Underlying Fund is exposed to such interest rates and/or volatility.

Governments or their agencies may also acquire distressed assets from financial institutions and acquire ownership interests in those institutions. The implications of government ownership and disposition of these assets are unclear, and such a program may have positive or negative effects on the liquidity, valuation and performance of a Fund and/or an Underlying Fund’s portfolio holdings. Furthermore, volatile financial markets can expose a Fund and/or an Underlying Fund to greater market and liquidity risk and potential difficulty in valuing portfolio holdings, as well as potentially higher portfolio turnover and related transaction costs. Advisors will monitor developments and seek to manage each Fund or Underlying Fund in a manner consistent with achieving its investment objective, but there can be no assurance that Advisors will be successful in doing so.

In November 2022, the SEC proposed rule amendments which, among other things, would require funds to adopt swing pricing in order to mitigate dilution of shareholders’ interests in a fund by requiring the adjustment of fund NAV per share to pass on costs stemming from shareholder purchase or redemption activity. In addition, the proposed rule would amend the existing liquidity rule framework. The proposal’s impact on the Funds or the Underlying Funds will not be known unless and until any final rulemaking is adopted.

In December 2023, the SEC adopted rule amendments providing that any covered clearing agency (“CCA”) for U.S. Treasury securities require that every direct participant of the CCA (which generally would be a bank or broker-dealer) submit for clearance and settlement all eligible secondary market transactions in U.S. Treasury securities to which it is a counterparty. The clearing mandate includes in its scope all repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements of such direct participants collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities (collectively, “Treasury repo transactions”) of a type accepted for clearing by a registered CCA, including both bilateral Treasury repo transactions and triparty Treasury repo transactions where a bank agent provides custody, collateral management and settlement services.

The Treasury repo transactions of registered funds with any direct participants of a CCA will be subject to the mandatory clearing requirement. Currently, the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”) is the only CCA for U.S. Treasury securities. FICC currently operates a “Sponsored Program” for clearing of Treasury repo transactions pursuant to which a registered fund may enter into a clearing arrangement with a “sponsoring member” bank or broker-dealer that is a direct participant of FICC as a “sponsored member” of FICC.

Compliance with the clearing mandate for Treasury repo transactions is scheduled to be required by June 30, 2026. The clearing mandate is expected to result in each Fund or Underlying Fund being required to clear all or substantially all of its Treasury repo transactions as of the compliance date, and may necessitate expenditures by each Fund or Underlying Fund that trades in Treasury repo transactions in connection with entering into new agreements with sponsoring members and taking other actions to comply with the new requirements. Advisors will monitor developments in the Treasury repo transactions market as the implementation period progresses.

Until any policy or regulatory changes are made, it is not possible to predict the impact such changes may have on the value of portfolio holdings of a Fund and/or an Underlying Fund, the issuers thereof or Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (“TIAA”) (or their affiliates). Financial entities, such as investment companies and investment advisers, are generally subject to extensive government regulation and intervention. Legislation or regulation may change the way in which the Funds and the Underlying Funds themselves are regulated. Such legislation or regulation may also affect the expenses incurred directly by a Fund and/or an Underlying Fund and the value of its investments, and could limit or preclude a Fund’s or an Underlying Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objective. Government regulation may change frequently and may have significant adverse consequences. Moreover, government regulation may have unpredictable and unintended effects.

The value of a Fund’s or an Underlying Fund’s holdings is also generally subject to the risk of future local, national, or global economic disturbances based on unknown weaknesses in the markets in which an Underlying Fund invests. For example, any public health emergency could reduce consumer demand or economic output, result in market closures, travel restrictions or quarantines, and generally have a significant impact on the economy, which in turn could adversely affect a Fund’s or an Underlying Fund’s investments. In the event of such a disturbance, issuers of securities held by an Underlying Fund may experience significant declines in the value of their assets and even cease operations, or may receive government assistance accompanied by increased restrictions on their business operations or other government intervention. In addition, it is not certain that the U.S. Government will intervene in response to a future market disturbance and the effect of any such future

 Statement of Additional Information     7

intervention cannot be predicted. It is difficult for issuers to prepare for the impact of future financial downturns, although companies can seek to identify and manage future uncertainties through risk management programs.

Money Market Funds. The Money Market Fund is a “government money market fund,” as defined in the applicable rules governing money market funds, and as such invests at least 99.5% of its total assets in cash, U.S. Government securities and/or repurchase agreements that are collateralized fully by cash or U.S. Government securities. With respect pursuant to Rule 2a-7, a money market fund that satisfies the applicable diversification requirements of Rule 2a-7 shall be deemed to have satisfied the diversification requirements of the 1940 Act and the rules adopted thereunder. As a “government” money market fund, the Money Market Fund is exempt from the provisions under Rule 2a-7 relating to mandatory and discretionary liquidity fees (although the Fund or Underlying Fund would be permitted to rely on the ability to impose discretionary (but not mandatory) liquidity fees after providing at least sixty days’ prior notice to shareholders).

Illiquid Investments. The Funds and the Underlying Funds (except the Money Market Fund) have implemented a written liquidity risk management program (the “Liquidity Risk Program”), as required by applicable SEC regulation, reasonably designed to assess and manage the Funds’ and Underlying Funds’ liquidity risk. As a result of its designation as the Liquidity Risk Program administrator by the Board, Advisors is also responsible for determining the liquidity of investments held by each Fund and Underlying Fund of the Trust. Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC (“Nuveen Fund Advisors”) has been designated as the Liquidity Risk Program administrator for the Nuveen Dividend Value Fund, Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund and Nuveen Growth Opportunities ETF (collectively, the “Non-Trust Underlying Funds”). Each Fund and Underlying Fund (except the Money Market Fund) may invest up to 15% of its net assets, measured at the time of investment, in illiquid investments that are assets. The Money Market Fund may not acquire any illiquid investment if, immediately after the acquisition, the Fund would have invested more than 5% of its total assets in illiquid investments. Illiquid investments are those that are not reasonably expected to be sold or disposed of in current market conditions in seven calendar days or less without the sale or disposition significantly changing the market value of the investment. Investments may be illiquid because of, among other factors, the absence of a trading market or distress in a trading market, making it difficult to value the investments or dispose of them promptly at the value at which they are carried. Investments in illiquid investments or holding securities that have become illiquid pose risks of potential delays in resale. Limitations on or delays in resale may have an adverse effect on the marketability of portfolio securities, and it may be difficult for the Funds or Underlying Funds to dispose of illiquid investments promptly or to sell such investments for the value at which they are carried, if at all, or at any price within the desired time frame. Each Fund and Underlying Fund (except the Money Market Fund) may receive distressed prices and incur higher transaction costs when selling illiquid investments. There is also a risk that unusually high redemption requests, including redemption requests from certain large shareholders (such as institutional investors), asset allocation changes, or other unusual market conditions may make it difficult for a Fund or an Underlying Fund to sell investments in sufficient time to allow it to meet redemptions. Redemption requests could require a Fund or an Underlying Fund to sell illiquid investments at reduced prices or under unfavorable conditions, which may negatively impact a Fund’s or an Underlying Fund’s performance. The regulations adopted by the SEC may limit a Fund or an Underlying Fund’s ability to invest in illiquid investments, which may adversely affect a Fund’s or an Underlying Fund’s performance and ability to achieve its investment objective.

Inflation/Deflation Risk. A Fund’s or an Underlying Fund’s investments may be subject to inflation risk, which is the risk that the real value (i.e., nominal price of the asset adjusted for inflation) of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the purchasing power and value of money (i.e., as inflation increases, the real value of a Fund’s or an Underlying Fund’s assets can decline). Inflation rates may change frequently and significantly as a result of various factors, including unexpected shifts in the domestic or global economy and changes in monetary or economic policies (or expectations that these policies may change), and a Fund’s or an Underlying Fund’s investments may not keep pace with inflation, which would generally adversely affect the real value of Fund or Underlying Fund shareholders’ investments in the Fund or Underlying Fund. This risk is generally greater for fixed-income instruments with longer durations.

Deflation risk is the risk that prices throughout the economy decline over time. Deflation may have an adverse effect on the creditworthiness of issuers and may make issuer default more likely, which may result in a decline in the value of a Fund’s or an Underlying Fund’s assets.

Restricted Securities. The Funds and certain Underlying Funds may invest in restricted securities. A restricted security is one that has a contractual restriction on resale or cannot be resold publicly until it is registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”). From time to time, restricted securities can be considered illiquid under the Funds’ and Underlying Funds’ Liquidity Risk Program. However, purchases by a Fund or an Underlying Fund of securities of foreign issuers offered and sold outside the United States may not be considered illiquid even though they are restricted. The Board of Trustees of the Funds and Underlying Funds of the Trust has designated Advisors to determine the value and liquidity of restricted securities and other investments held by each Fund and Underlying Fund of the Trust.

Preferred Stock. Some Underlying Funds can invest in preferred stock consistent with their investment objectives. Preferred stock pays dividends at a specified rate and generally has preference over common stock in the payment of dividends and the liquidation of the issuer’s assets but is junior to the debt securities of the issuer in those same respects. Unlike interest payments on debt securities, dividends on preferred stock are generally payable at the discretion of the issuer’s board of

8     Statement of Additional Information 

directors, and shareholders may suffer a loss of value if dividends are not paid. Preferred shareholders generally have no legal recourse against the issuer if dividends are not paid. The market prices of preferred stocks are subject to changes in interest rates and are more sensitive to changes in the issuer’s creditworthiness than are the prices of debt securities. Under ordinary circumstances, preferred stock does not carry voting rights.

Small and Medium Capitalization Companies. Some Underlying Funds may invest in common stocks of issuers with small or medium market capitalizations. An investment in common stocks of issuers with small or medium market capitalizations generally involves greater risk and price volatility than an investment in common stocks of larger, more established companies. This increased risk may be due to the greater business risks of their small or medium size, limited markets and financial resources, narrow product lines and frequent lack of management depth. The securities of small and medium capitalization companies are often traded in the over-the-counter market, and might not be traded in volumes typical of securities traded on a national securities exchange. Thus, the securities of small and medium capitalization companies are likely to be less liquid and subject to more abrupt or erratic market movements than securities of larger, more established companies.

Initial Public Offerings (“IPOs”). Some Underlying Funds may invest a portion of their assets in securities of companies offering shares in IPOs. IPOs may have a magnified performance impact on an Underlying Fund with a small asset base. The impact of IPOs on an Underlying Fund’s performance likely will decrease as the Underlying Fund’s asset size increases. IPOs may not be consistently available to an Underlying Fund for investing, particularly as the Underlying Fund’s asset base grows. Because IPO shares frequently are volatile in price, an Underlying Fund may hold IPO shares for a very short period of time. This may increase the portfolio turnover of an Underlying Fund and may lead to increased expenses for the Underlying Fund, such as commissions and transaction costs. By selling shares, an Underlying Fund may realize taxable gains it will subsequently distribute to shareholders. In addition, the market for IPO shares can be speculative and/or inactive for extended periods of time. The limited number of shares available for trading in some IPOs may make it more difficult for an Underlying Fund to buy or sell significant amounts of shares without an unfavorable impact on prevailing prices. Holders of IPO shares (including an Underlying Fund) can be affected by substantial dilution in the value of the IPO issuer’s shares, by sales of additional shares and by concentration of control in existing management and principal shareholders.

An Underlying Fund’s investment in IPO shares may include the securities of unseasoned companies (companies with less than three years of continuous operations), which present risks considerably greater than common stocks of more established companies. These companies may have limited operating histories and their prospects for profitability may be uncertain. These companies may be involved in new and evolving businesses and may be vulnerable to competition and changes in technology, markets and economic conditions. These companies may also be more dependent on key managers and third parties and may have limited product lines.

Options and Futures. Some of the Underlying Funds may engage in options (puts and calls) and futures strategies to the extent permitted by the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”). The Underlying Funds may use options and futures contracts for a variety of purposes. These purposes include the following: (i) hedging; (ii) cash management; (iii) risk management; (iv) seeking to stay fully invested; (v) seeking to increase total return; (vi) seeking to reduce transaction costs; (vii) seeking to simulate an investment in equity or debt securities or other investments; (viii) seeking to add value by using derivatives to more efficiently implement portfolio positions when derivatives are favorably priced relative to equity or debt securities or other investments; and (ix) for other purposes.

Options and futures transactions may increase an Underlying Fund’s transaction costs and portfolio turnover rate and will be initiated only when consistent with the Underlying Fund’s investment objective.

Options. Options-related activities could include: (1) the sale of call option contracts (including covered call options) and the purchase of call option contracts, including for the purpose of closing a purchase transaction; (2) buying put option contracts (including covered put options) and selling put option contracts, including to close out a position acquired through the purchase of such options; and (3) selling call option contracts or buying put option contracts on groups of securities and on futures on groups of securities, and buying similar call option contracts or selling put option contracts, including to close out a position acquired through a sale of such options. This list of options-related activities is not intended to be exclusive, and the Underlying Funds may engage in other types of options transactions consistent with their investment objectives and policies and applicable law.

A call option is a short-term contract (generally for nine months or less) that gives the purchaser of the option the right but not the obligation to purchase the underlying security at a fixed exercise price at any time (American style) or at a set time (European style) prior to the expiration of the option regardless of the market price of the security during the option period. As consideration for the call option, the purchaser pays the seller a premium, which the seller retains whether or not the option is exercised. The seller of a call option has the obligation, upon the exercise of the option by the purchaser, to sell the underlying security at the exercise price. Selling a call option would benefit the seller if, over the option period, the underlying security declines in value or does not appreciate above the aggregate of the exercise price and the premium. However, the seller risks an “opportunity loss” of profits if the underlying security appreciates above the aggregate value of the exercise price and the premium.

 Statement of Additional Information     9

An Underlying Fund may close out a position acquired through selling a call option by buying a call option on the same security with the same exercise price and expiration date as the call option that it had previously sold on that security. Depending on the premium for the call option purchased by an Underlying Fund, the Underlying Fund will realize a profit or loss on the transaction on that security.

A put option is a similar short-term contract that gives the purchaser of the option the right to sell the underlying security at a fixed exercise price at any time prior to the expiration of the option regardless of the market price of the security during the option period. As consideration for the put option, the purchaser pays the seller a premium, which the seller retains whether or not the option is exercised. The seller of a put option has the obligation, upon the exercise of the option by the purchaser, to purchase the underlying security at the exercise price. The buying of a covered put contract limits the downside exposure for the investment in the underlying security. The risk of purchasing a put option is that the market price of the underlying stock prevailing on the expiration date may be above the option’s exercise price. In that case, the option would expire worthless and the entire premium would be lost.

Selling a put or call option may require the payment of initial and variation margin, and adverse market movements against the underlying security or instrument may require the seller to make additional margin payments. An Underlying Fund may have to sell securities or other instruments at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so to meet margin and settlement payment requirements in connection with the sale of put or call options.

An Underlying Fund may close out a position acquired through buying a put option by selling an identical put option on the same security with the same exercise price and expiration date as the put option that it had previously bought on the security. Depending on the premium for the put option purchased by an Underlying Fund, the Underlying Fund would realize a profit or loss on the transaction.

In addition to options (both calls and puts) on individual securities, there are also options on groups of securities, such as the options on the Standard & Poor’s 100 Index, which are traded on the Chicago Board Options Exchange. There are also options on the futures of groups of securities such as the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and the New York Stock Exchange Composite Index. The selling of such calls can be used in anticipation of, or in, a general market or market sector decline that may adversely affect the market value of an Underlying Fund’s portfolio of securities. To the extent that an Underlying Fund’s portfolio of securities changes in value in correlation with a given stock index, the sale of call options on the futures of that index would substantially reduce the risk to the portfolio of a market decline, and, by so doing, provide an alternative to the liquidation of securities positions in the portfolio with resultant transaction costs. A risk in all options, particularly the relatively new options on groups of securities and on the futures on groups of securities, is a possible lack of liquidity. This will be a major consideration of Advisors before it deals in any option on behalf of an Underlying Fund.

There is another risk in connection with selling a call option on a group of securities or on the futures of groups of securities. This arises because of the imperfect correlation between movements in the price of the call option on a particular group of securities and the price of the underlying securities held in the portfolio. Unlike a covered call on an individual security, where a large movement on the upside for the call option will be offset by a similar move on the underlying stock, a move in the price of a call option on a group of securities may not be offset by a similar move in the price of securities held due to the difference in the composition of the particular group and the portfolio itself.

Futures. To the extent permitted by applicable regulatory authorities, certain Underlying Funds may purchase and sell futures contracts on securities or other instruments, or on groups or indices of securities or other instruments. The purpose of hedging techniques using financial futures is to protect the principal value of the Underlying Fund against adverse changes in the market value of securities or instruments in its portfolio, and to obtain better returns on investments than available in the cash market. Since these are hedging techniques, the gains or losses on the futures contract normally will be offset by losses or gains, respectively, on the hedged investment. Futures contracts also may be offset prior to the future date by executing an opposite futures contract transaction.

A futures contract on an investment is a binding contractual commitment which, if held to maturity, generally will result in an obligation to make or accept delivery, during a particular future month, of the securities or instrument underlying the contract.

By purchasing a futures contract—assuming a “long” position—Advisors will legally obligate an Underlying Fund to accept the future delivery of the underlying security or instrument and pay the agreed price. By selling a futures contract—assuming a “short” position—Advisors will legally obligate an Underlying Fund to make the future delivery of the security or instrument against payment of the agreed price.

Positions taken in the futures markets are not normally held to maturity, but are instead liquidated through offsetting transactions that may result in a profit or a loss. While futures positions taken by an Underlying Fund usually will be liquidated in this manner, an Underlying Fund may instead make or take delivery of the underlying securities or instruments whenever it appears economically advantageous to an Underlying Fund to do so. A clearing corporation associated with the exchange on which futures are traded assumes responsibility for closing out positions and guarantees that the sale and purchase obligations will be performed with regard to all positions that remain open at the termination of the contract.

10     Statement of Additional Information 

A stock index futures contract, unlike a contract on a specific security, does not provide for the physical delivery of securities, but merely provides for profits and losses resulting from changes in the market value of the contract to be credited or debited at the close of each trading day to the respective accounts of the parties to the contract. On the contract’s expiration date, a final cash settlement occurs and the futures positions are closed out. Changes in the market value of a particular stock index futures contract reflect changes in the specified index of equity securities on which the future is based.

Stock index futures may be used to hedge the equity investments of the Underlying Funds with regard to market (systematic) risk (involving the market’s assessment of overall economic prospects), as distinguished from stock specific risk (involving the market’s evaluation of the merits of the issuer of a particular security). By establishing an appropriate “short” position in stock index futures, Advisors may seek to protect the value of the Underlying Funds’ securities portfolio against an overall decline in the market for equity securities. Alternatively, in anticipation of a generally rising market, Advisors can seek to avoid losing the benefit of apparently low current prices by establishing a “long” position in stock index futures and later liquidating that position as particular equity securities are in fact acquired. To the extent that these hedging strategies are successful, the Underlying Fund will be affected to a lesser degree by adverse overall market price movements, unrelated to the merits of specific portfolio equity securities, than would otherwise be the case.

Unlike the purchase or sale of a security, no price is paid or received by an Underlying Fund upon the purchase or sale of a futures contract. Initially, an Underlying Fund will be required to deposit in a segregated account with the broker (futures commission merchant) carrying the futures account on behalf of the Underlying Fund an amount of cash, U.S. Treasury securities, or other permissible assets equal to a percentage of the contract amount as determined by the clearinghouse. This amount is known as “initial margin.” The nature of initial margin in futures transactions is different from that of margin in security transactions in that futures contract margin does not involve the borrowing of funds by the customer to finance the transactions. Rather, the initial margin is in the nature of a performance bond or good faith deposit on the contract that is returned to an Underlying Fund upon termination of the futures contract assuming all contractual obligations have been satisfied. Subsequent payments to and from the broker, called “variation margin,” will be made on a daily basis as the price of the underlying stock index fluctuates, making the long and short positions in the futures contract more or less valuable, a process known as “marking to the market.”

For example, when the Underlying Fund has purchased a stock index futures contract and the price of the underlying stock index has risen, that position will have increased in value, and the Underlying Fund will receive from the broker a variation margin payment equal to that increase in value. Conversely, where the Underlying Fund has purchased a stock index futures contract and the price of the underlying stock index has declined, the position would be less valuable and the Underlying Fund would be required to make a variation margin payment to the broker. At any time prior to expiration of the futures contract, the Underlying Fund may elect to close the position by taking an opposite position that will operate to terminate the Underlying Fund’s position in the futures contract. A final determination of variation margin is then made, additional cash is required to be paid by or released to the Underlying Fund, and the Underlying Fund realizes a loss or a gain.

There are several risks in connection with the use of a futures contract as a hedging device. One risk arises because of the imperfect correlation between movements in the prices of the futures contracts and movements in the securities or instruments that are the subject of the hedge. Advisors, on behalf of an Underlying Fund, will attempt to reduce this risk by engaging in futures transactions, to the extent possible, where, in Advisors’ judgment, there is a significant correlation between changes in the prices of the futures contracts and the prices of the Underlying Fund’s portfolio securities or instruments sought to be hedged.

Successful use of futures contracts for hedging purposes also is subject to Advisors’ ability to correctly predict movements in the direction of the market. For example, it is possible that where an Underlying Fund has sold futures to hedge its portfolio against declines in the market, the index on which the futures are written may advance and the values of securities or instruments held in the Underlying Fund’s portfolio may decline. If this occurred, the Underlying Fund would lose money on the futures and also experience a decline in value in its portfolio investments. However, Advisors believes that over time the value of an Underlying Fund’s portfolio will tend to move in the same direction as the market indices that are intended to correlate to the price movements of the portfolio securities or instruments sought to be hedged.

It also is possible that, for example, if an Underlying Fund has hedged against the possibility of a decline in the market adversely affecting stocks held in its portfolio and stock prices increased instead, the Underlying Fund will lose part or all of the benefit of increased value of those stocks that it has hedged because it will have offsetting losses in its futures positions. In addition, in such situations, if an Underlying Fund has insufficient cash, it may have to sell securities or instruments to meet daily variation margin requirements. Such sales may be, but will not necessarily be, at increased prices that reflect the rising market. The Underlying Fund may have to sell securities or instruments at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so.

In addition to the possibility that there may be an imperfect correlation, or no correlation at all, between movements in the futures contracts and the portion of the portfolio being hedged, the prices of futures contracts may not correlate perfectly with movements in the underlying security or instrument due to certain market distortions. First, all transactions in the futures market are subject to margin deposit and maintenance requirements. Rather than meeting additional margin deposit requirements, investors may close futures contracts through offsetting transactions that could distort the normal relationship

 Statement of Additional Information     11

between the index and futures markets. Second, the margin requirements in the futures market are less onerous than margin requirements in the securities market, and as a result the futures market may attract more speculators than the securities market does. Increased participation by speculators in the futures market also may cause temporary price distortions. Due to the possibility of price distortion in the futures market and also because of the imperfect correlation between movements in the futures contracts and the portion of the portfolio being hedged, even a correct forecast of general market trends by Advisors still may not result in a successful hedging transaction over a very short time period.

Use of Options and Futures by the Funds. Each of the Funds may directly engage in options (puts and calls) and futures strategies to the extent permitted by the SEC and the CFTC. The Funds may use options and futures strategies for cash management, efficient portfolio management and other purposes. The Funds may also use options for purposes such as rebalancing and tactical asset allocation. Options and futures transactions may increase a Fund’s transaction costs and portfolio turnover rate and will be initiated only when consistent with a Fund’s investment objective. The terms and risks of such instruments are provided in more detail under the sections above.

Firm Commitment Agreements and Purchase of “When-Issued” Securities. Some Underlying Funds can enter into firm commitment agreements for the purchase of securities on a specified future date. Thus, an Underlying Fund may purchase, for example, issues of fixed-income instruments on a “when-issued” basis, whereby the payment obligation, or yield to maturity, or coupon rate on the instruments may not be fixed at the time of the transaction. In addition, the Underlying Funds may invest in asset-backed securities on a delayed delivery basis. This reduces an Underlying Fund’s risk of early repayment of principal, but exposes the Underlying Fund to some additional risk that the transaction will not be consummated.

When an Underlying Fund enters into a firm commitment agreement, liability for the purchase price—and the rights and risks of ownership of the securities—accrues to the Underlying Fund at the time it becomes obligated to purchase such securities, although delivery and payment occur at a later date. Accordingly, if the market price of the security should decline, the effect of the agreement would be to obligate the Underlying Fund to purchase the security at a price above the current market price on the date of delivery and payment. In addition, certain rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) include mandatory margin requirements that will require the Underlying Funds to post collateral in connection with their to-be-announced (“TBA”) transactions. There is no similar requirement applicable to the Underlying Funds’ TBA counterparties. The required collateralization of TBA trades could increase the cost of TBA transactions to the Underlying Funds and impose added operational complexity. An Underlying Fund may have to sell securities or other instruments at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so to meet such payment requirements. An Underlying Fund must comply with the SEC rule related to the use of derivatives and certain other transactions when engaging in the transactions discussed above. See “Derivatives and Other Similar Instruments” below.

Participatory Notes. Some of the Underlying Funds may invest in participatory notes issued by banks or broker-dealers that are designed to replicate the performance of certain non-U.S. companies traded on a non-U.S. exchange. Participatory notes are a type of equity-linked derivative which generally are traded over-the-counter. Even though a participatory note is intended to reflect the performance of the underlying equity securities on a one-to-one basis so that investors will not normally gain or lose more in absolute terms than they would have made or lost had they invested in the underlying securities directly, the performance results of participatory notes will not replicate exactly the performance of the issuers or markets that the participatory notes seek to replicate due to transaction costs and other expenses. Investments in participatory notes involve risks normally associated with a direct investment in the underlying securities. In addition, participatory notes are subject to counterparty risk, which is the risk that the broker-dealer or bank that issues the notes will not fulfill its contractual obligation to complete the transaction with an Underlying Fund. Participatory notes constitute general unsecured, unsubordinated contractual obligations of the banks or broker-dealers that issue them, and an Underlying Fund is relying on the creditworthiness of such banks or broker-dealers and has no rights under a participatory note against the issuers of the securities underlying such participatory notes. There can be no assurance that the trading price or value of participatory notes will equal the value of the underlying equity securities they seek to replicate.

Master Limited Partnerships. Some of the Underlying Funds may invest in equity securities issued by master limited partnerships (“MLPs”). An MLP is an entity, most commonly a limited partnership that is taxed as a partnership, publicly traded and listed on a national securities exchange. Holders of common units of MLPs typically have limited control and limited voting rights as compared to holders of a corporation’s common shares. Preferred units issued by MLPs are not typically listed or traded on an exchange. Holders of preferred units can be entitled to a wide range of voting and other rights. MLPs are limited by the Code to only apply to enterprises that engage in certain businesses, mostly pertaining to the use of natural resources, such as petroleum and natural gas extraction, and transportation, although some other enterprises may also qualify as MLPs.

There are certain tax risks associated with investments in MLPs. The benefit derived from an investment in an MLP is largely dependent on the MLP being treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. A change to current tax law, or a change in the underlying business mix of a given MLP, could result in an MLP being treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes. If an MLP were treated as a corporation, the MLP would be required to pay federal income tax on its taxable income. This would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution by the MLP, which could result in a reduction of the value of an Underlying Fund’s investment in the MLP and lower income to the Underlying Fund. Additionally, since MLPs generally conduct

12     Statement of Additional Information 

business in multiple states, an Underlying Fund may be subject to income or franchise tax in each of the states in which the partnership does business. The additional cost of preparing and filing the tax returns and paying the related taxes may adversely impact an Underlying Fund’s return on its investment in MLPs.

Investments held by MLPs may be relatively illiquid, limiting the MLPs’ ability to vary their portfolios promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions, and MLPs may have limited financial resources. Securities of MLPs may trade infrequently and in limited volume, and they may be subject to more abrupt or erratic price movements than common shares of larger or more broadly based companies. An Underlying Fund’s investment in MLPs also subjects the Underlying Fund to the risks associated with the specific industry or industries in which the MLP invests. MLPs are generally considered interest rate sensitive investments, and during periods of interest rate volatility, may not provide attractive returns. A portion of any gain or loss recognized by an Underlying Fund on a disposition of an MLP equity security may be separately computed and taxed as ordinary income or loss under the Code. Any such gain may exceed net taxable gain realized on the disposition and will be recognized even if there is a net taxable loss on the disposition.

Short Sales Against the Box. Some of the Underlying Funds may engage in “short sales against the box” if their portfolio managers believe that the price of a particular security held by the Underlying Fund may decline in order to hedge the unrealized gain on such security. Selling short against the box involves selling a security which an Underlying Fund owns for delivery at a specified date in the future. An Underlying Fund will limit its transactions in short sales against the box to 5% of its net assets. If, for example, an Underlying Fund bought 100 shares of ABC at $40 per share in January and the price appreciates to $50 in March, the Underlying Fund might “sell short” the 100 shares at $50 for delivery the following July. Thereafter, if the price of the stock declines to $45, it will realize the full $1,000 gain rather than the $500 gain it would have received had it sold the stock in the market. On the other hand, if the price appreciates to $55 per share, an Underlying Fund would be required to sell at $50 and thus receive a $1,000 gain rather than the $1,500 gain it would have received had it sold the stock in the market. An Underlying Fund may also be required to pay a premium for short sales which would partially offset any gain.

Royalty Trust. Some of the Underlying Funds may invest in publicly traded royalty trusts. Royalty trusts are income-oriented equity investments that indirectly, through the ownership of trust units, provide investors (called “unit holders”) with exposure to energy sector assets such as coal, oil and natural gas. A royalty trust generally acquires an interest in natural resource companies or chemical companies and distributes the income it receives to the investors of the royalty trust. A sustained decline in demand for crude oil, natural gas and refined petroleum products could adversely affect income and royalty trust revenues and cash flows. Factors that could lead to a decrease in market demand include a recession or other adverse economic conditions, an increase in the market price of the underlying commodity, higher taxes or other regulatory actions that increase costs, or a shift in consumer demand for such products. A rising interest rate environment could adversely impact the performance of royalty trusts. Rising interest rates could limit the capital appreciation of royalty trusts because of the increased availability of alternative investments at more competitive yields.

Private Investments in Public Equity. Some of the Underlying Funds may purchase equity securities in a private placement that are issued by issuers who have outstanding, publicly traded equity securities of the same class (“private investments in public equity” or “PIPES”). Shares in PIPES generally are not registered with the SEC until after a certain time period from the date the private sale is completed. This restricted period can last many months. Until the public registration process is completed, PIPES are restricted as to resale and an Underlying Fund cannot freely trade the securities. Generally, such restrictions cause the PIPES to be illiquid during this time. PIPES may contain provisions that the issuer will pay specified financial penalties to the holder if the issuer does not publicly register the restricted equity securities within a specified period of time, but there is no assurance that the restricted equity securities will be publicly registered, or that the registration will remain in effect.

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies. Some of the Underlying Funds may invest in equity securities of special purpose acquisition companies (“SPACs”). Also known as a “blank check company,” a SPAC is a company with no commercial operations that is formed solely to raise capital from investors for the purpose of acquiring one or more existing private companies. SPACs often have pre-determined time frames to make an acquisition (typically two years) or the SPAC will liquidate. An Underlying Fund may purchase units or shares of SPACs that have completed an IPO on a secondary market, during a SPAC’s IPO or through a PIPES offering. See “Private Investments in Public Equity” above for information about PIPES offerings.

Unless and until an acquisition is completed, a SPAC generally invests its assets in U.S. Government securities, money market securities and cash. Because SPACs have no operating history or ongoing business other than seeking acquisitions, the value of their securities is particularly dependent on the ability of the entity’s management to identify and complete a profitable acquisition. There is no guarantee that the SPACs in which an Underlying Fund invests will complete an acquisition or that any acquisitions that are completed will be profitable. Public stockholders of SPACs such as an Underlying Fund may not be afforded a meaningful opportunity to vote on a proposed initial business combination because certain stockholders, including stockholders affiliated with the management of the SPAC, may have sufficient voting power, and a financial incentive, to approve such a transaction without support from public stockholders. As a result, a SPAC may complete a business combination even though a majority of its public stockholders do not support such a combination. An investment in a SPAC may

 Statement of Additional Information     13

be diluted by additional, later offerings of securities by the SPAC or by other investors exercising existing rights to purchase securities of the SPAC. Additionally, a significant portion of the funds raised by a SPAC may be expended during the search for a target acquisition or merger. Some SPACs may pursue acquisitions only within certain industries or regions, which may increase the volatility of their prices.

The private companies that SPACs acquire are often unseasoned and lack a trading history, a track record of reporting to investors and widely available research coverage. Securities of SPAC-derived companies are thus subject to extreme price volatility and speculative trading. In addition, the ownership of many SPAC-derived companies often includes large holdings by venture capital and private equity investors who seek to sell their shares in the public market in the months following a business combination transaction when shares restricted by lock-up are released, causing even greater price volatility and possible downward pressure during the time that locked-up shares are released.

Debt instruments generally

A debt instrument held by an Underlying Fund will be affected by general changes in interest rates that will, in turn, result in increases or decreases in the market value of the instrument. The market value of non-convertible debt instruments (particularly fixed-income instruments) in an Underlying Fund’s portfolio can be expected to vary inversely to changes in prevailing interest rates. In periods of declining interest rates, the yield of an Underlying Fund holding a significant amount of debt instruments will tend to be somewhat higher than prevailing market rates, and in periods of rising interest rates, the Underlying Fund’s yield will tend to be somewhat lower. In addition, when interest rates are falling, money received by such an Underlying Fund from the continuous sale of its shares will likely be invested in portfolio instruments producing lower yields than the balance of its portfolio, thereby reducing the Underlying Fund’s current yield. In periods of rising interest rates, the opposite result can be expected to occur. During periods of declining interest rates, because the interest rates on adjustable-rate securities generally reset downward, their market value is unlikely to rise to the same extent as the value of comparable fixed-rate securities. Interest rate risk is generally heightened during periods when prevailing interest rates are low or negative, and during such periods, an Underlying Fund may not be able to maintain a positive yield or yields on par with historical levels. Risks associated with rising interest rates are heightened given that the Fed has increased interest rates over recent periods. Further, rising interest rates may cause issuers to not make principal and interest payments on fixed-income investments when due. Additionally, rising interest rates could lead to heightened credit risk if issuers are less willing or able to make payments when due. Changes in interest rates, among other factors, may also adversely affect the liquidity of an Underlying Fund’s fixed-income investments.

The market for fixed-income instruments has consistently grown over the past decades while the growth of capacity for traditional dealers to engage in fixed-income trading and provide liquidity to markets has not kept pace and in some cases has decreased. Because dealers acting as market makers provide stability to a market, a reduction in dealer inventories could potentially lead to decreased liquidity and increased volatility in the fixed-income markets. Such issues may be exacerbated during periods of economic uncertainty or market volatility (including rapid interest rate changes).

Ratings as Investment Criteria. Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”) ratings represent the opinions of those organizations as to the quality of securities that they rate. Although these ratings, which are relative and subjective and are not absolute standards of quality, are used by Advisors as one of many criteria for the selection of portfolio securities on behalf of the Underlying Funds, Advisors also relies upon its own analysis to evaluate potential investments.

Subsequent to its purchase by an Underlying Fund, an issue of securities may cease to be rated or its rating may be reduced below the minimum required for purchase by the Underlying Fund. These events will not require the sale of the securities by an Underlying Fund. However, Advisors will consider the event in its determination of whether the Underlying Fund should continue to hold the securities. To the extent that a NRSRO’s rating changes as a result of a change in the NRSRO or its rating system, Advisors will attempt to use comparable ratings as standards for the Underlying Funds’ investments in accordance with their investment objectives and policies.

Certain Investment-Grade Debt Obligations. Although obligations rated in the top four credit categories by a NRSRO or deemed to be of the same quality by Advisors using its own credit analysis, for example, are considered investment-grade, they may be viewed as being subject to greater risks than other investment-grade obligations. Obligations rated Baa by Moody’s Investors Services, Inc. (“Moody’s”) are considered medium-grade obligations that lack outstanding investment characteristics and have speculative characteristics as well, while obligations rated BBB by Standard and Poor’s (“S&P”) are regarded as having only an adequate capacity to pay principal and interest.

U.S. Government Debt Securities. Some of the Underlying Funds may invest in U.S. Government securities. These include: debt obligations of varying maturities issued by the U.S. Treasury or issued or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration, Farmers Home Administration, Export-Import Bank of the United States, Small Business Administration, Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”), General Services Administration, any of the various institutions that previously were, or currently are, part of the Farm Credit System, including the National Bank for Cooperatives, the Farm Credit Banks and the Banks for Cooperatives, Federal Home Loan Banks, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), Federal Intermediate Credit Banks, Federal Land Banks, Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”), Maritime

14     Statement of Additional Information 

Administration, Tennessee Valley Authority and District of Columbia Armory Board. Direct obligations of the U.S. Treasury include a variety of securities that differ in their interest rates, maturities and issue dates. Certain of the foregoing U.S. Government securities are supported by the full faith and credit of the United States. These U.S. Government securities present limited credit risk compared to other types of debt securities but are not free of risk. Other U.S. Government securities are supported by the right of the agency or instrumentality to borrow an amount limited to a specific line of credit from the U.S. Treasury or by the discretionary authority of the U.S. Government or GNMA to purchase financial obligations of the agency or instrumentality, which are thus subject to a greater amount of credit risk than those supported by the full faith and credit of the United States. Still other U.S. Government securities are only supported by the credit of the issuing agency or instrumentality, which are subject to greater credit risk as compared to other U.S. Government securities. The maximum potential liability of the issuers of some U.S. Government securities may exceed then current resources, including any legal right to support from the U.S. Treasury. Because the U.S. Government is not obligated by law to support an agency or instrumentality that it sponsors, or such agency’s or instrumentality’s securities, an Underlying Fund only invests in U.S. Government securities when Advisors determines that the credit risk associated with the obligation is suitable for the Underlying Fund.

It is possible that issuers of U.S. Government securities will not have the funds to meet their payment obligations in the future. FHLMC and FNMA have been operating under conservatorship, with the Federal Housing Finance Administration (“FHFA”) acting as their conservator, since September 2008. The FHFA and U.S. Presidential administration have made public statements regarding plans to consider ending the conservatorships. Under a letter agreement between the FHFA (in its role as conservator) and the U.S. Treasury, the FHFA is prohibited from removing its conservatorship of each enterprise until litigation regarding the conservatorship has ended and each enterprise has retained equity capital levels equal to three percent of their total assets. It is unclear how long it will be before the FHFA will be able to remove its conservatorship of the enterprises under this letter agreement. The FHFA has indicated that the conservatorship of each enterprise will end when the director of the FHFA determines that FHFA’s plan to restore the enterprise to a safe and solvent condition has been completed. Under amendments to the Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework (“ERCF”), FHLMC and FNMA have published capital disclosures that provide additional information about their capital position and capital requirements on a quarterly basis since the first quarter of 2023 and delivered their first capital plans to FHFA in May 2023. The FHFA finalized amendments to certain provisions of the ERCF in November 2023 that modify various capital requirements for FHLMC and FNMA. In the event that FHLMC or FNMA are taken out of conservatorship, it is unclear how their respective capital structure would be constructed and what impact, if any, there would be on FHLMC’s or FNMA’s creditworthiness and guarantees of certain mortgage-backed securities. The ERCF requires FHLMC and FNMA, upon exit from conservatorship, to maintain higher levels of capital than prior to conservatorship to satisfy their risk-based capital requirements, leverage ratio requirements, and prescribed buffer amounts. The entities are dependent upon the continued support of the U.S. Department of the Treasury and FHFA in order to continue their business operations. These factors, among others, could affect the future status and role of FHLMC and FNMA and the value of their securities and the securities which they guarantee.

Uncertainty regarding the status of negotiations in the U.S. Congress to increase the statutory debt ceiling, which may occur from time to time, may increase the risk that the U.S. Government may default on payments on certain U.S. Government securities, including those held by the Underlying Funds. In August 2023, the long-term credit rating of the United States was downgraded by S&P and Fitch Investors Service, Inc. respectively, as a result of disagreements within the U.S. Government over raising the debt ceiling to repay outstanding obligations. Similar situations in the future could result in higher interest rates, lower prices of U.S. Treasury securities and could increase the costs of various kinds of debt, which may adversely affect the Underlying Funds.

Risks of Lower-Rated, Lower-Quality Debt Instruments. Lower-rated debt securities (i.e., those securities rated in the fifth or lower rating categories) are sometimes referred to as “high-yield” or “junk” bonds. Each of the Underlying Funds (except for the Money Market Fund) may invest in lower-rated debt securities. In particular, under normal market conditions, the Nuveen High Yield Fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in below-investment-grade securities. These securities are considered, on balance, as predominantly speculative with respect to capacity to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the obligation and will generally involve more credit risk than securities in the higher-rated categories. Reliance on credit ratings entails greater risks with regard to lower-rated securities than it does with regard to higher-rated securities, and Advisors’ success is more dependent upon its own credit analysis with regard to lower-rated securities than is the case with regard to higher-rated securities. The market values of such securities tend to reflect individual corporate developments to a greater extent than do higher-rated securities, which react primarily to fluctuations in the general level of interest rates. Such lower-rated securities also tend to be more sensitive to economic conditions than are higher-rated securities. Adverse publicity and investor perceptions, whether or not based on fundamental analysis, regarding lower-rated bonds may depress prices and liquidity for such securities. To the extent an Underlying Fund invests in these securities, factors adversely affecting the market value of lower-rated securities will adversely affect the Underlying Fund’s NAV. In addition, an Underlying Fund may incur additional expenses to the extent it is required to seek recovery upon a default in the payment of principal or interest on its portfolio holdings.

 Statement of Additional Information     15

An Underlying Fund may have difficulty disposing of certain lower-rated securities for which there is a thin trading market. Because not all dealers maintain markets in lower-rated securities, there is no established retail secondary market for many of these securities, and Advisors anticipates that they could be sold only to a limited number of dealers or institutional investors. To the extent there is a secondary trading market for lower-rated securities, it is generally not as liquid as that for higher-rated securities. The lack of a liquid secondary market for certain securities may make it more difficult for the Underlying Funds to obtain accurate market quotations for purposes of valuing their assets. Market quotations are generally available on many lower-rated issues only from a limited number of dealers and may not necessarily represent firm bids of such dealers or prices for actual sales. When market quotations are not readily available, lower-rated securities must be fair valued by Advisors, in its role as valuation designee, in accordance with Advisors’ fair valuation procedures, which have been approved by the Board of Trustees. This valuation is more difficult and judgment plays a greater role in such valuation when there are less reliable objective data available.

Any debt instrument, no matter its initial rating, may, after purchase by an Underlying Fund, have its rating lowered due to the deterioration of the issuer’s financial position. Advisors may determine that an unrated security is of comparable quality to securities with a particular rating. Such unrated securities are treated as if they carried the rating of securities with which Advisors compares them.

Lower-rated debt securities may be issued by corporations in the growth stage of their development. They may also be issued in connection with a corporate reorganization or as part of a corporate takeover. Companies that issue such lower-rated securities are often highly leveraged and may not have available to them more traditional methods of financing. Therefore, the risk associated with acquiring the securities of such issuers is greater than would be the case with higher-rated securities. For example, during an economic downturn or a sustained period of rising interest rates, highly leveraged issuers of lower-rated securities may experience financial stress. During such periods, such issuers may not have sufficient revenues to meet their interest payment obligations. The issuer’s ability to service its debt obligations may also be adversely affected by specific corporate developments, the issuer’s inability to meet specific projected business forecasts or the unavailability of additional financing.

The risk of loss due to default by the issuer is significantly greater for the holders of lower-rated securities because such securities are generally unsecured and are often subordinated to other creditors of the issuer.

It is possible that a major economic recession could adversely affect the market for lower-rated securities. Any such recession might severely affect the market for and the values of such securities, as well as the ability of the issuers of such securities to repay principal and pay interest thereon.

Certain Underlying Funds may acquire lower-rated securities that are sold without registration under the federal securities laws and therefore carry restrictions on resale. The Underlying Funds may incur special costs in disposing of such securities, but will generally incur no costs when the issuer is responsible for registering the securities.

Certain Underlying Funds may also acquire lower-rated securities during an initial underwriting. Such securities involve special risks because they are new issues. The Underlying Funds have no arrangement with any person concerning the acquisition of such securities, and Advisors will carefully review the credit and other characteristics pertinent to such new issues. An Underlying Fund may from time to time participate on committees formed by creditors to negotiate with the management of financially troubled issuers of securities held by the Underlying Fund. Such participation may subject the Underlying Fund to expenses such as legal fees and may make the Underlying Fund an “insider” of the issuer for purposes of the federal securities laws, and, therefore, may restrict the Underlying Fund’s ability to trade in or acquire additional positions in a particular security when it might otherwise desire to do so. Participation by an Underlying Fund on such committees also may expose the Underlying Fund to potential liabilities under the federal bankruptcy laws or other laws governing the rights of creditors and debtors. The Underlying Fund would participate on such committees only when Advisors believes that such participation is necessary or desirable to enforce the Underlying Fund’s rights as a creditor or to protect the value of securities held by the Underlying Fund.

Although most of the Underlying Funds can invest a percentage of their assets in lower-rated securities, the Nuveen High Yield Fund can invest up to 100% of its assets in debt instruments that are unrated or rated lower than the four highest rating categories assigned by Moody’s or S&P. Up to 20% of the Nuveen High Yield Fund’s assets may be invested in securities rated lower than B– or its equivalent by at least two rating agencies. Thus, the preceding information about lower-rated securities is especially applicable to the Nuveen High Yield Fund.

Corporate Debt Securities. Some Underlying Funds may invest in corporate debt securities of U.S. and foreign issuers and/or hold its assets in these securities for cash management purposes. The investment return of corporate debt securities reflects interest earnings and changes in the market value of the security. The market value of a corporate debt obligation may be expected to rise and fall inversely with interest rates generally. There also exists the risk that the issuers of the securities may not be able to meet their obligations on interest or principal payments at the time called for by an instrument.

Zero Coupon Obligations. Some of the Underlying Funds may invest in zero coupon obligations. Zero coupon securities generally pay no cash interest (or dividends in the case of preferred stock) to their holders prior to maturity. Accordingly, such

16     Statement of Additional Information 

securities usually are issued and traded at a deep discount from their face or par value and generally are subject to greater fluctuations of market value in response to changing interest rates than securities of comparable maturities and credit quality that pay cash interest (or dividends in the case of preferred stock) on a current basis. Although an Underlying Fund will receive no payments on its zero coupon securities prior to their maturity or disposition, it will be required for federal income tax purposes generally to include in its dividends to shareholders each year an amount equal to the annual income that accrues on its zero coupon securities. Such dividends will be paid from the cash assets of the Underlying Fund, from borrowings or by liquidation of portfolio securities, if necessary, at a time that the Underlying Fund otherwise would not have done so. To the extent an Underlying Fund is required to liquidate thinly traded securities, the Underlying Fund may be able to sell such securities only at prices lower than if such securities were more widely traded. The risks associated with holding securities that are not readily marketable may be accentuated at such time. To the extent the proceeds from any such dispositions are used by an Underlying Fund to pay distributions, the Underlying Fund will not be able to purchase additional income-producing securities with such proceeds, and as a result its current income ultimately may be reduced.

Floating and Variable Rate Instruments. Variable and floating rate securities provide for a periodic adjustment in the interest rate paid on the obligations. The terms of such obligations provide that interest rates are adjusted periodically based upon an interest rate adjustment index as provided in the respective obligations. The adjustment intervals may be regular, and range from daily up to annually, or may be event based, such as based on a change in the prime rate. The interest rate on a floater is a variable rate which is tied to another interest rate, such as a money market index or U.S. Treasury bill rate. The interest rate on a floater resets periodically, typically every 1–3 months. Some of the Underlying Funds may invest in floating and variable rate instruments. Income securities may provide for floating or variable rate interest or dividend payments. The floating or variable rate may be determined by reference to a known lending rate, such as a bank’s prime rate, a certificate of deposit rate, the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) (use of which has generally been phased out and is anticipated to cease publication), the Federal Funds Rate, the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) or other rates based on SOFR. Alternatively, the rate may be determined through an auction or remarketing process. The rate also may be indexed to changes in the values of the interest rate of securities indexed, currency exchange rate or other commodities. Variable and floating rate securities tend to be less sensitive than fixed-rate securities to interest rate changes and to have higher yields when interest rates increase. However, during rising interest rates, changes in the interest rate of an adjustable-rate security may lag changes in market rates. The amount by which the rates are paid on an income security may increase or decrease and may be subject to periodic or lifetime caps. Fluctuations in interest rates above these caps could cause adjustable-rate securities to behave more like fixed-rate securities in response to extreme movements in interest rates.

Some Underlying Funds may also invest in inverse floating rate debt instruments (“inverse floaters”). The interest rate on an inverse floater resets in the opposite direction from the market rate of interest to which the inverse floater is indexed. An inverse floating rate security may exhibit greater price volatility than a fixed-rate obligation of similar credit quality. Such securities may also pay a rate of interest determined by applying a multiple to the variable rate. The extent of increases and decreases in the value of securities whose rates vary inversely with changes in market rates of interest generally will be larger than comparable changes in the value of an equal principal amount of a fixed-rate security having similar credit quality redemption provisions and maturity.

As a result of benchmark reforms, publication of most LIBOR settings has ceased. Some U.S. dollar LIBOR settings continue to be published, but only on a temporary, synthetic and non-representative basis. It is expected that all synthetic U.S. dollar LIBOR settings will be discontinued at the end of September 2024. Many contracts have already transitioned away from LIBOR reference as a result of contractual fallback mechanics, negotiated amendments or as a result of statutory fallback mechanisms; some contracts continue to use synthetic U.S. dollar LIBOR and may continue to do so until synthetic LIBOR is discontinued. Instruments which transitioned from LIBOR to an alternative reference rate or which continue to use synthetic LIBOR may experience increased volatility and illiquidity or other adverse consequences, such as decreased yields and reduction in value for these instruments. This may adversely affect an Underlying Fund and its investment in such instruments.

Although some LIBOR-based or formerly LIBOR-based instruments may have contemplated a scenario where LIBOR is no longer available by providing for an alternative rate-setting methodology and/or increased costs for certain LIBOR-related instruments or financing transactions, others may not have had such provisions and there may be significant uncertainty regarding the effect of any such alternative methodologies. Instruments that included robust fallback provisions to facilitate the transition from LIBOR to an alternative reference rate may also have included adjustments that do not adequately compensate the holder for the different characteristics of the alternative reference rate. Such fallback provisions may have resulted in a value transfer from one party to the instrument to the counterparty. Additionally, because such provisions may differ across instruments (e.g., hedges versus cash positions hedged or investments in structured finance products transitioning to a different rate or at a different time as the assets underlying those structured finance products), the transition from LIBOR to differing alternative reference rates or using different adjustments may give rise to basis risk and render hedges less effective. Any such effects of the transition process, including unforeseen effects, could result in losses to an Underlying Fund. In many cases, in the event that an instrument falls back to an alternative reference rate, including SOFR, the alternative reference rate will not perform the same as LIBOR because the alternative reference rate does not include a credit sensitive component in the

 Statement of Additional Information     17

calculation of the rate. These developments could negatively impact financial markets in general and present heightened risks, including with respect to an Underlying Fund’s investments.

The Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) has issued regulations regarding the tax consequences of the transition from LIBOR or another interbank offered rate (“IBOR”) to a new reference rate in debt instruments and non-debt contracts. Under the regulations, alteration or modification of the terms of a debt instrument to replace an operative rate that uses a discontinued IBOR with a qualified rate (as defined in the regulations), including true up payments equalizing the fair market value of contracts before and after such IBOR transition, to add a qualified rate as a fallback rate to a contract whose operative rate uses a discontinued IBOR or to replace a fallback rate that uses a discontinued IBOR with a qualified rate would not be taxable. The IRS may provide additional guidance, with potential retroactive effect.

Foreign Debt Obligations. The debt obligations of foreign governments and entities may or may not be supported by the full faith and credit of the foreign government. Some Underlying Funds may buy securities issued by certain “supra-national” entities, which include entities designated or supported by governments to promote economic reconstruction or development, international banking organizations and related government agencies. Examples are the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (more commonly known as the “World Bank”), the Asian Development Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank.

The governmental members of these supra-national entities are “stockholders” that typically make capital contributions and may be committed to make additional capital contributions if the entity is unable to repay its borrowings. A supra-national entity’s lending activities may be limited to a percentage of its total capital, reserves and net income. There can be no assurance that the constituent foreign governments will continue to be able or willing to honor their capitalization commitments for those entities.

Structured or Indexed Securities (including Exchange-Traded Notes, Equity-Linked Notes and Inflation-Indexed Bonds). Some of the Underlying Funds may invest in structured or indexed securities. The value of the principal of and/or interest on such securities is based on a reference such as a specific currency, interest rate, commodity, index or other financial indicator (the “Reference”) or the relative change in two or more References. The interest rate or the principal amount payable upon maturity or redemption may be increased or decreased depending upon changes in the applicable Reference. The terms of the structured or indexed securities may provide that in certain circumstances no principal is due at maturity and, therefore, may result in a loss of an Underlying Fund’s investment. Structured or indexed securities may be positively or negatively indexed, so that appreciation of the Reference may produce an increase or a decrease in the interest rate or value of the security at maturity. In addition, changes in interest rates or the value of the security at maturity may be some multiple of the change in the value of the Reference. Consequently, structured or indexed securities may entail a greater degree of market risk than other types of debt securities. Structured or indexed securities may also be more volatile, have lower overall liquidity and be more difficult to accurately price than less complex securities. Structured and indexed securities are generally subject to the same risks as other fixed-income securities in addition to the special risks associated with linking the payment of principal and/or interest payments (or other payable amounts) to the performance of a Reference.

Certain Underlying Funds may also invest in inflation-indexed bonds. Inflation-indexed bonds are fixed-income securities whose principal value is periodically adjusted according to the rate of inflation. Two structures are common. The U.S. Treasury and some other issuers use a structure that accrues inflation into the principal value of the bond. Most other issuers pay out the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) accruals as part of a semi-annual coupon.

If the periodic adjustment rate measuring inflation falls, the principal value of inflation-indexed bonds will be adjusted downward, and consequently the interest payable on these securities (calculated with respect to a smaller principal amount) will be reduced. Repayment of the original bond principal upon maturity (as adjusted for inflation) is guaranteed in the case of a U.S. Treasury inflation-indexed bond, even during a period of deflation, although the inflation-adjusted principal received could be less than the inflation-adjusted principal that had accrued to the bond at the time of purchase. However, the current market value of the bonds is not guaranteed and will fluctuate. An Underlying Fund may also invest in other inflation-related bonds which may or may not provide a similar guarantee. If a guarantee of principal is not provided, the adjusted principal value of the bond repaid at maturity may be less than the original principal.

The value of inflation-indexed bonds is expected to change in response to changes in real interest rates. Real interest rates in turn are tied to the relationship between nominal interest rates and the rate of inflation. Therefore, if the rate of inflation rises at a faster rate than nominal interest rates, real interest rates might decline, leading to an increase in value of inflation-indexed bonds. In contrast, if nominal interest rates increase at a faster rate than inflation, real interest rates might rise, leading to a decrease in value of inflation-indexed bonds.

While these securities are expected to be protected from long-term inflationary trends, short-term increases in inflation may lead to a decline in value. If interest rates rise due to reasons other than inflation (for example, due to changes in currency exchange rates), investors in these securities may not be protected to the extent that the increase is not reflected in the bond’s inflation measure.

18     Statement of Additional Information 

The periodic adjustment of U.S. inflation-indexed bonds is tied to the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”), which is not seasonally adjusted and which is calculated monthly by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The CPI-U is a measurement of changes in the cost of living, made up of components such as housing, food, transportation and energy. Inflation-indexed bonds issued by a foreign government are generally adjusted to reflect a comparable inflation index calculated by that government. There can be no assurance that the CPI-U or any foreign inflation index will accurately measure the real rate of inflation in the prices of goods and services. Moreover, there can be no assurance that the rate of inflation in a foreign country will be correlated to the rate of inflation in the United States.

Convertible Securities. Certain of the Underlying Funds may invest in convertible securities. Convertible securities generally have less potential for gain or loss than common stocks. Convertible securities generally provide yields higher than the underlying common stocks, but generally lower than comparable non-convertible securities. Because of this higher yield, convertible securities generally sell at prices above their “conversion value,” which is the current market value of the stock to be received upon conversion. The difference between this conversion value and the price of convertible securities will vary over time depending on changes in the value of the underlying common stocks and interest rates. When the underlying common stocks decline in value, convertible securities will tend not to decline to the same extent because of the interest or dividend payments and the repayment of principal at maturity for certain types of convertible securities. However, securities that are convertible other than at the option of the holder generally do not limit the potential for loss to the same extent as securities convertible at the option of the holder. When the underlying common stocks rise in value, the value of convertible securities may also be expected to increase. At the same time, however, the difference between the market value of convertible securities and their conversion value will narrow, which means that the value of convertible securities will generally not increase to the same extent as the value of the underlying common stocks. Because convertible securities may also be interest rate sensitive, their value may increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. Convertible securities are also subject to credit risk, and are often lower-quality securities.

Contingent Capital Securities. Contingent capital securities (sometimes referred to as “CoCos”) are issued primarily by non-U.S. financial institutions, which have loss absorption mechanisms benefitting the issuer built into their terms. CoCos generally provide for mandatory conversion into the common stock of the issuer or a write-down of the principal amount or value of the CoCos upon the occurrence of certain “triggers.” These triggers are generally linked to regulatory capital thresholds or regulatory actions calling into question the issuing banking institution’s continued viability as a going concern. Equity conversion or principal write-down features are tailored to the issuer and its regulatory requirements and, unlike traditional convertible securities, conversions are not voluntary.

A trigger event for CoCos would likely be the result of, or related to, the deterioration of the issuer’s financial condition (e.g., a decrease in the issuer’s capital ratio) and status as a going concern. In such a case, with respect to CoCos that provide for conversion into common stock upon the occurrence of the trigger event, the market price of the issuer’s common stock received by an Underlying Fund will have likely declined, perhaps substantially, and may continue to decline, which may adversely affect the Underlying Fund’s NAV. Further, the issuer’s common stock would be subordinate to the issuer’s other classes of securities and therefore would worsen an Underlying Fund’s standing in a bankruptcy proceeding. In addition, because the common stock of the issuer may not pay a dividend, investors in these instruments could experience a reduced income rate, potentially to zero. In view of the foregoing, CoCos are often rated below investment-grade and are subject to the risks of high-yield securities.

CoCos may be subject to an automatic write-down (i.e., the automatic write-down of the principal amount or value of the securities, potentially to zero, and the cancellation of the securities) under certain circumstances, which could result in an Underlying Fund losing a portion or all of its investment in such securities. In addition, an Underlying Fund may not have any rights with respect to repayment of the principal amount of the securities that has not become due or the payment of interest or dividends on such securities for any period from (and including) the interest or dividend payment date falling immediately prior to the occurrence of such automatic write-down. An automatic write-down could also result in a reduced income rate if the dividend or interest payment is based on the security’s par value. Coupon payments on CoCos may be discretionary and may be cancelled by the issuer for any reason or may be subject to approval by the issuer’s regulator and may be suspended in the event there are insufficient distributable reserves.

In certain scenarios, investors in CoCos may suffer a loss of capital ahead of equity holders or when equity holders do not. The prices of CoCos may be volatile. There is no guarantee that an Underlying Fund will receive a return of principal on CoCos. Any indication that an automatic write-down or conversion event may occur can be expected to have a material adverse effect on the market price of CoCos.

Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities

Mortgage-Backed and Asset-Backed Securities Generally. Some of the Underlying Funds may invest in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, which represent direct or indirect participation in, or are collateralized by and payable from, mortgage loans secured by real property or instruments derived from such loans. Mortgage-backed securities include various types of mortgage-related securities such as government stripped mortgage-related securities, adjustable-rate mortgage-related

 Statement of Additional Information     19

securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. Some of the Underlying Funds may also invest in asset-backed securities, which represent participation in, or are secured by and payable from, assets such as motor vehicle installment sales contracts, installment loan contracts, leases of various types of real and personal property, receivables from revolving credit (i.e., credit card) agreements and other categories of receivables. These assets are typically pooled and securitized by governmental, government-related or private organizations through the use of trusts and special purpose entities established specifically to hold assets and to issue debt obligations backed by those assets. Asset-backed or mortgage-backed securities are normally created or “sponsored” by banks or other financial institutions or by certain government-sponsored enterprises such as FNMA or FHLMC.

Payments or distributions of principal and interest may be guaranteed up to certain amounts and for certain time periods by letters of credit or pool insurance policies issued by a financial institution unaffiliated with the trust or corporation. Other credit enhancements also may exist.

Mortgage Pass-Through Securities. Some of the Underlying Funds may invest in mortgage pass-through securities. Mortgage-related securities represent pools of mortgage loans assembled for sale to investors by various governmental agencies, such as GNMA, by government-related organizations, such as FNMA and FHLMC, as well as by private issuers, such as commercial banks, savings and loan institutions, mortgage bankers and private mortgage insurance companies.

Interests in pools of mortgage-related securities differ from other forms of debt securities, which normally provide for periodic payment of interest in fixed amounts with principal payments at maturity or specified call dates. Instead, these securities provide a monthly payment which consists of both interest and principal payments. In effect, these payments are a “pass-through” of the monthly payments made by the individual borrowers on their residential or commercial mortgage loans, net of any fees paid to the issuer or guarantor of such securities. Additional payments are caused by repayments of principal resulting from the sale of the underlying property, refinancing or foreclosure, net of fees or costs which may be incurred. Some mortgage-related securities are described as “modified pass-through.” These securities entitle the holder to receive all interest and principal payments owed on the mortgage pool, net of certain fees, at the scheduled payment dates regardless of whether or not the mortgagor actually makes the payment.

Commercial banks, savings and loan institutions, private mortgage insurance companies, mortgage bankers and other secondary market issuers also create pass-through pools of conventional residential mortgage loans. Such issuers may, in addition, be the originators and/or servicers of the underlying mortgage loans as well as the guarantors of the mortgage-related securities. Pools created by such non-governmental issuers generally offer a higher rate of interest than government and government-related pools because there are no direct or indirect government or agency guarantees of payments in the former pools. However, timely payment of interest and principal of these pools may be supported by various forms of insurance or guarantees, including individual loan, title, pool and hazard insurance and letters of credit. The insurance and guarantees are issued by governmental entities, private insurers and the mortgage poolers. Such insurance and guarantees, and the creditworthiness of the issuers thereof, will be considered in determining whether a mortgage-related security meets an Underlying Fund’s investment quality standards. There can be no assurance that the private insurers or guarantors can meet their obligations under the insurance policies or guarantee arrangements. An Underlying Fund may buy mortgage-related securities without insurance or guarantees if, through an examination of the loan experience and practices of the originator/servicers and poolers, Advisors determines that the securities meet the Underlying Fund’s quality standards. Although the market for such securities is becoming increasingly liquid, securities issued by certain private organizations may not be readily marketable, especially in the current financial environment. In addition, recent developments in the fixed-income and credit markets may have an adverse impact on the liquidity of mortgage-related securities.

Under the direction of FHFA, GNMA and FHLMC have entered into a joint initiative to develop a common securitization platform for the issuance of a uniform Mortgage-Backed Security (the “Single Security Initiative”), which would generally align the characteristics of FNMA and FHLMC certificates. The Single Security Initiative launched in June 2019, and is intended to maximize liquidity for both FNMA and FHLMC mortgage-backed securities in the TBA market. While the initial effects of the issuance of a uniform Mortgage-Backed Security on the market for mortgage-related securities have been relatively minimal, the long-term effects that the Single Security Initiative may have on the market for mortgage-backed securities are uncertain.

Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (“CMOs”). CMOs are structured into multiple classes, each bearing a different stated maturity. Similar to a bond, interest and prepaid principal are paid, in most cases, on a monthly basis. Actual maturity and average life will depend upon the prepayment experience of the collateral. CMOs provide for a modified form of call protection through a de facto breakdown of the underlying pool of mortgages according to how quickly the loans are repaid. Monthly payment of principal received from the pool of underlying mortgages, including prepayments, is first returned to investors holding the shortest maturity class. Investors holding the longer maturity classes receive principal only after the first class has been retired. An investor is partially guarded against a sooner than desired return of principal because of the sequential payments.

In a typical CMO transaction, a corporation (“issuer”) issues multiple series (e.g., A, B, C, Z) of CMO bonds (“Bonds”). Proceeds of the Bond offering are used to purchase mortgages or mortgage pass-through certificates (“Collateral”). The Collateral is pledged to a third-party trustee as security for the Bonds.

20     Statement of Additional Information 

Principal and interest payments from the Collateral are used to pay principal on the Bonds in the order A, B, C, Z. The Series A, B, and C Bonds all bear current interest. Interest on the Series Z Bond is accrued and added to principal and a like amount is paid as principal on the Series A, B, or C Bond currently being paid off. When the Series A, B, and C Bonds are paid in full, interest and principal on the Series Z Bond begin to be paid currently. With some CMOs, the issuer serves as a conduit to allow loan originators (primarily builders or savings and loan associations) to borrow against their loan portfolios.

The average maturity of pass-through pools of mortgage-related securities in which some of the Underlying Funds may invest varies with the maturities of the underlying mortgage instruments. In addition, a pool’s stated maturity may be shortened by unscheduled payments on the underlying mortgages. Factors affecting mortgage prepayments include the level of interest rates, general economic and social conditions, developments in the commercial or residential real estate markets, location of the mortgaged property and age of the mortgage. For example, in periods of falling interest rates, the rate of prepayment tends to increase, thereby shortening the actual average life of the mortgage-related security. Conversely, when interest rates are rising, the rate of prepayment tends to decrease, thereby lengthening the actual average life of the mortgage-related security. Accordingly, it is not possible to accurately predict the average life of a particular pool. Reinvestment of prepayments may occur at higher or lower rates than originally expected. Therefore, the actual maturity and realized yield on pass-through or modified pass-through mortgage-related securities will vary based upon the prepayment experience of the underlying pool of mortgages. For purposes of calculating the average life of the assets of the relevant Underlying Fund, the maturity of each of these securities will be the average life of such securities based on the most recent estimated annual prepayment rate.

Asset-Backed Securities Unrelated to Mortgage Loans. Some of the Underlying Funds may invest in asset-backed securities that are unrelated to mortgage loans. These include, but are not limited to, credit card securitizations, auto and equipment lease and loan securitizations and rate reduction bonds. In the case of credit card securitizations, it is typical to have a revolving master trust issue “soft bullet” maturities representing a fractional interest in trusts whose assets consist of revolving credit card receivables. Auto and equipment lease and loan securitizations reference specific static asset pools whereby monthly payments of principal and interest are passed through directly to certificate holders typically in order of seniority. The ultimate performance of these securities is a function of both the creditworthiness of the borrowers as well as recovery obtained on collateral foreclosed upon by the respective trust(s). Rate reduction bonds represent a secured interest in future rate recovery on stranded utility assets that may result from, for example, storm damages or environmental costs. Typically these costs are recouped over time from a broad rate payer base. The performance of these securities would depend primarily upon a continuance of sufficient rate base to repay the notes in the specified time frame and a stable regulatory environment.

Mortgage Dollar Rolls. Some of the Underlying Funds may enter into mortgage “dollar rolls” in which the Underlying Fund sells securities for delivery in the current month and simultaneously contracts with a counterparty to repurchase either similar or substantially identical securities on a specified future date. To be considered “substantially identical,” the securities returned to an Underlying Fund generally must: (1) be collateralized by the same types of underlying mortgages; (2) be issued by the same agency and be part of the same program; (3) have the same original stated maturity; (4) have identical net coupon rates; (5) have identical form and type so as to provide the same risks and rights; and (6) satisfy “good delivery” requirements, meaning that the aggregate principal amounts of the securities delivered and received back must be within 2.5% of the initial amount delivered. The Underlying Fund loses the right to receive principal and interest paid on the securities sold. However, the Underlying Fund would benefit to the extent of any price received for the securities sold and the lower forward price for the future purchase (often referred to as the “drop”) plus the interest earned on the short-term investment awaiting the settlement date of the forward purchase. Unless such benefits exceed the income and gain or loss due to mortgage repayments that would have been realized on the securities sold as part of the mortgage dollar roll, the use of this technique will diminish the investment performance of the Underlying Fund compared with what such performance would have been without the use of mortgage dollar rolls. An Underlying Fund must comply with the SEC rule related to the use of derivatives and certain other transactions when engaging in the transactions discussed above. See “Derivatives and Other Similar Instruments” below. The benefits derived from the use of mortgage dollar rolls may depend upon Advisors’ ability to correctly predict mortgage prepayments and interest rates. There is no assurance that mortgage dollar rolls can be successfully employed. In connection with mortgage dollar roll transactions, an Underlying Fund could receive securities with investment characteristics that are different than those originally sold by the Underlying Fund, which may adversely affect the sensitivity of the Underlying Fund to changes in interest rates.

Other investment policies

Securities Lending. Subject to the Underlying Funds’ fundamental investment policies relating to loans of portfolio securities set forth above, each Underlying Fund may lend its securities. The Underlying Funds of the Trust may lend their securities to brokers and dealers that are not affiliated with TIAA, are registered with the SEC and are members of FINRA, and also to certain other financial institutions. All loans will be fully collateralized. Any borrower of an Underlying Fund’s portfolio securities must maintain acceptable collateral, marked to market daily, with the Underlying Fund’s custodian (or a sub-custodian or a special “tri-party” custodian). In connection with the lending of its securities, an Underlying Fund of the Trust will receive as collateral cash, securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government (e.g., Treasury securities), or other collateral permitted by

 Statement of Additional Information     21

applicable law, which at all times while the loan is outstanding will be maintained in amounts equal to at least 102% of the current market value of the outstanding loaned securities for U.S. equities and fixed-income assets and 105% for non-U.S. equities, or such lesser percentage as may be permitted by the SEC (including a decline in the value of the collateral) (not to fall below 100% of the market value of the loaned securities not including a decline in the value of the collateral), as reviewed daily. Cash collateral received by an Underlying Fund of the Trust will generally be invested in high-quality short-term instruments, or in one or more funds maintained by the securities lending agent for the purpose of investing cash collateral, including a fund that qualifies as a “government money market fund” under the SEC rules governing money market funds. During the term of the loan, an Underlying Fund of the Trust will continue to have investment risks with respect to the securities being loaned, as well as risk with respect to the investment of the cash collateral, and the Underlying Fund may lose money as a result of the investment of such collateral. In addition, an Underlying Fund of the Trust could suffer a loss if the loan terminates and the Underlying Fund is forced to liquidate investments at a loss in order to return the cash collateral to the borrower.

By lending its securities, an Underlying Fund of the Trust will receive amounts equal to the interest or dividends paid on the securities loaned and, in addition, will expect to receive a portion of the income generated by the short-term investment of cash received as collateral or, alternatively, where securities or letter of credit are used as collateral, a lending fee paid directly to the Underlying Fund by the borrower of the securities. Under certain circumstances, a portion of the lending fee may be paid or rebated to the borrower by the Underlying Fund of the Trust. Such loans will be terminable by the Underlying Fund of the Trust at any time and will not be made to affiliates of TIAA. An Underlying Fund of the Trust may terminate a loan of securities in order to regain record ownership of, and to exercise beneficial rights related to, the loaned securities, including, but not necessarily limited to, voting or subscription rights or certain tax benefits, and Advisors may, in the exercise of its fiduciary duties, terminate a loan in the event that a vote of holders of those securities is required on a material matter. An Underlying Fund of the Trust may pay reasonable fees to persons unaffiliated with the Underlying Fund for services, for arranging such loans, or for acting as securities lending agent (each an “Agent”). Loans of securities will be made only to firms deemed creditworthy. In lending its securities, an Underlying Fund of the Trust bears the market risk with respect to the investment of collateral and the risk the Agent may default on its contractual obligations to the Underlying Fund. An Agent bears the risk that the borrower may default on its obligation to return the loaned securities as the Agent is contractually obligated to indemnify the Underlying Fund of the Trust if at the time of a default by a borrower some or all of the loaned securities have not been returned. Substitute payments for dividends received by an Underlying Fund of the Trust for securities loaned out by the Underlying Fund will not be considered as qualified dividend income or as eligible for the corporate dividend received deduction.

The Non-Trust Underlying Funds may lend their securities on terms that differ from those of the Underlying Funds of the Trust. Each Agent is authorized to engage a third-party bank as a special “tri-party” custodian for securities lending activities and enter into a separate custodian undertaking with each applicable borrower under the Underlying Funds’ of the Trust securities lending program.

Regulations adopted by federal banking regulators under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act require that certain qualified financial contracts (“QFCs”) with counterparties that are part of U.S. or foreign global systemically important banking organizations be amended to include contractual restrictions on close-out and cross-default rights. QFCs include, but are not limited to, securities contracts, commodities contracts, forward contracts, repurchase agreements, securities lending agreements and swap agreements, as well as related master agreements, security agreements, credit enhancements, and reimbursement obligations. If a covered counterparty of an Underlying Fund or certain of the covered counterparty’s affiliates were to become subject to certain insolvency proceedings, the Underlying Fund may be temporarily unable to exercise certain default rights, and the QFC may be transferred to another entity. These requirements may impact an Underlying Fund’s credit and counterparty risks.

Repurchase Agreements. Repurchase agreements are one of several short-term vehicles certain Underlying Funds can use to manage cash balances effectively. In a repurchase agreement, the Underlying Fund buys an underlying debt instrument on the condition that the seller agrees to buy it back at a fixed price and time (usually no more than a week and never more than a year). Repurchase agreements have the characteristics of loans, and will be fully collateralized (either with physical securities or evidence of book entry transfer to the account of the custodian bank) at all times. During the term of the repurchase agreement, the Underlying Fund entering into the agreement retains the security subject to the repurchase agreement as collateral securing the seller’s repurchase obligation, continually monitors the market value of the security subject to the agreement, and requires the Underlying Fund’s seller to deposit with the Underlying Fund additional collateral equal to any amount by which the market value of the security subject to the repurchase agreement falls below the resale amount provided under the repurchase agreement. Each Underlying Fund will enter into repurchase agreements only with member banks of the Fed, or with primary dealers in U.S. Government securities or their wholly owned subsidiaries whose creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by Advisors and who have, therefore, been determined to present minimal credit risk.

Securities underlying repurchase agreements will be limited to certificates of deposit, commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances, or obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies or instrumentalities, in which the Underlying Fund entering into the agreement may otherwise invest.

22     Statement of Additional Information 

If a seller of a repurchase agreement defaults and does not repurchase the security subject to the agreement, the Underlying Fund entering into the agreement would look to the collateral underlying the seller’s repurchase agreement, including the securities subject to the repurchase agreement, for satisfaction of the seller’s obligation to the Underlying Fund. In such event, the Underlying Fund might incur disposition costs in liquidating the collateral and might suffer a loss if the value of the collateral declines. In addition, if bankruptcy proceedings are instituted against a seller of a repurchase agreement, realization upon the collateral may be delayed or limited.

Swap Transactions. Some of the Underlying Funds may, to the extent permitted by the applicable state and federal regulatory authorities, enter into privately negotiated “swap” transactions with other financial institutions in order to take advantage of investment opportunities generally not available in public markets (generally known as an over-the-counter, “OTC” or “uncleared” swap). In general, these transactions involve “swapping” a return based on certain securities, instruments, or financial indices with another party, such as a commercial bank, in exchange for a return based on different securities, instruments, or financial indices.

By entering into a swap transaction, an Underlying Fund may be able to protect the value of a portion of its portfolio against declines in market value. Each Underlying Fund may also enter into swap transactions to facilitate implementation of allocation strategies between different market segments or countries or to take advantage of market opportunities that may arise from time to time. An Underlying Fund may be able to enhance its overall performance if the return offered by the other party to the swap transaction exceeds the return swapped by the Underlying Fund. However, there can be no assurance that the return an Underlying Fund receives from the counterparty to the swap transaction will exceed the return it swaps to that party.

While the Underlying Funds will only enter into swap transactions with counterparties considered creditworthy (and will monitor the creditworthiness of parties with which they enter into swap transactions), a risk inherent in swap transactions is that the other party to the transaction may default on its obligations under the swap agreement. In times of general market turmoil, the creditworthiness of even large, well-established counterparties may decline rapidly. If the other party to a swap transaction defaults on its obligations, the Underlying Fund entering into the agreement would be limited to the agreement’s contractual remedies. There can be no assurance that an Underlying Fund will succeed when pursuing its contractual remedies. To minimize an Underlying Fund’s exposure in the event of default, it will usually enter into swap transactions on a net basis (i.e., the parties to the transaction will net the payments payable to each other before such payments are made). When an Underlying Fund enters into swap transactions on a net basis, the net amount of the excess, if any, of the Underlying Fund’s obligations over its entitlements with respect to each such swap agreement will be accrued on a daily basis. An Underlying Fund must comply with the SEC rule related to the use of derivatives and certain other transactions when engaging in the transactions discussed above. See “Derivatives and Other Similar Instruments” below.

Additionally, certain standardized swaps that were historically traded OTC must now be transacted through a futures commission merchant and cleared through a clearinghouse that serves as a central counterparty (generally known as a “cleared” swap). Exchange trading and central clearing are intended to reduce counterparty credit risk and increase liquidity, but it does not make cleared swap transactions risk-free. Depending on the size of an Underlying Fund and other factors, the margin required under the rules of a clearinghouse and by a clearing member may be in excess of the collateral required to be posted by the Underlying Fund to support its obligations under a similar uncleared swap. However, the CFTC and other applicable regulators have adopted rules imposing certain margin requirements, including minimums, on uncleared swaps which may result in an Underlying Fund and its counterparties posting higher amounts for uncleared swaps.

In addition to other swap transactions certain Underlying Funds (including the Nuveen Quant International Equity Fund) may purchase and sell Contracts for Difference (“CFDs”). A CFD is a form of equity swap in which its value is based on the fluctuating value of some underlying asset (e.g., shares of a particular stock or a stock index). A CFD is a contract between two parties, buyer and seller, stipulating that the seller will pay to the buyer the difference between the nominal value of the underlying stock at the opening of the contract and the stock’s value at the close of the contract. The size of the contract and the contract’s expiration date are typically negotiated by the parties to the CFD transaction. CFDs enable an Underlying Fund to take short or long positions on an underlying stock and thus potentially capture gains on movements in the share prices of the stock without the need to own the underlying stock.

By entering into a CFD transaction, an Underlying Fund could incur losses because it would face many of the same types of risks as owning the underlying equity security directly. For example, an Underlying Fund might buy a short position in a CFD and the contract value at the close of the transaction may be greater than the contract value at the opening of the transaction. This may be due to, among other factors, an increase in the market value of the underlying equity security. In such a situation, the Underlying Fund would have to pay the difference in value of the contract to the seller of the CFD. As with other types of swap transactions, CFDs also carry counterparty risk, i.e., the risk that the counterparty to the CFD transaction may be unable or unwilling to make payments or to otherwise honor its financial obligations under the terms of the contract. If the counterparty were to do so, the value of the contract, and of the Underlying Fund’s shares, may be reduced.

Entry into a swap or CFD transaction may, in certain circumstances, require the payment of initial margin and adverse market movements against the underlying stock may require the buyer to make additional margin payments and make settlement

 Statement of Additional Information     23

payments. An Underlying Fund may have to sell securities or instruments at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so to meet such payment requirements.

Certain Underlying Funds may also invest in credit default swaps (“CDS”). CDS are contracts in which the buyer makes a payment or series of payments to the seller in exchange for a payment if the reference security or asset (e.g., a bond or an index) undergoes a “credit event” (e.g., a default). CDS share many risks common to other types of swaps and derivatives, including credit risk, counterparty risk and market risk. Certain Underlying Funds may also invest in credit default swap indices (“CDX”). A CDX is a portfolio of credit default swaps with similar characteristics, such as credit default swaps on high-yield bonds. Certain CDX indices are subject to mandatory central clearing and exchange trading, which may reduce counterparty credit risk and increase liquidity compared to other CDS or CDX transactions. In addition, there may be disputes between the buyer and seller of a CDS agreement or within the swaps market as a whole as to whether a credit event has occurred or what the payment should be. Such disputes could result in litigation or other delays, and the outcome could be adverse for the buyer or seller.

Swap agreements may be illiquid and, in such circumstances, could be subject to the limitations on illiquid investments. See “Illiquid Investments” above.

To the extent that there is an imperfect correlation between the return on an Underlying Fund’s obligation to its counterparty under the swap and the return on related assets in its portfolio, the swap transaction may increase the Underlying Fund’s financial risk. No Underlying Fund will enter into a swap transaction that is inconsistent with its investment objective, policies and strategies. Certain Underlying Funds may engage in swap transactions to hedge or manage the risks associated with assets held in, or to facilitate the implementation of portfolio strategies of purchasing and selling assets for, the Underlying Fund, to manage their cash flow more efficiently and to seek to increase total return.

Derivatives and Other Similar Instruments. Under Rule 18f-4, which regulates a registered investment company’s use of derivatives and certain other investments, a registered investment company’s derivatives exposure is limited through a value-at-risk test and the rule requires the adoption and implementation of a derivatives risk management program for certain derivatives users. However, subject to certain conditions, limited derivatives users (as defined in Rule 18f-4) are not subject to the full requirements of Rule 18f-4. In addition, under Rule 18f-4, a Fund or Underlying Fund is permitted to invest in when-issued securities, and the transaction will be deemed not to involve a senior security, provided that (i) the Fund or Underlying Fund intends to physically settle the transaction and (ii) the transaction will settle within 35 days of its trade date (the “Delayed-Settlement Securities Provision”). A Fund or Underlying Fund may otherwise engage in such transactions that do not meet the conditions of the Delayed-Settlement Securities Provision so long as the Fund or Underlying Fund treats any such transaction as a “derivatives transaction” for purposes of compliance with the rule. Rule 18f­4 could limit a Fund’s or an Underlying Fund’s ability to engage in certain derivatives transactions and/or increase the costs of such derivatives transactions, which could adversely affect the value or performance of the Fund or Underlying Fund.

Certain Underlying Funds may also use futures contracts, options on futures contracts and swaps as hedging techniques to manage their cash flow more effectively and to seek to increase total return and the Funds may directly engage in certain derivatives strategies. These instruments will, however, only be used in accordance with certain CFTC exemptive provisions that permit Advisors to claim an exclusion from the definition of a “commodity pool operator” under the Commodity Exchange Act with regard to the Funds and the Underlying Funds of the Trust. Advisors has claimed an exclusion from the definition of the term “commodity pool operator” under the Commodity Exchange Act and the regulations thereunder and, therefore, is not currently subject to registration or regulation as a commodity pool operator with regard to the Funds and the Underlying Funds of the Trust. A similar exclusion has been claimed on behalf of the Non-Trust Underlying Funds. If the exclusion becomes unavailable, a Fund or an Underlying Fund may incur additional expenses.

Investment Companies. Subject to certain exceptions and limitations, each Underlying Fund may invest up to 5% of its assets in any single investment company and up to 10% of its assets in all other investment companies in the aggregate. However, no Underlying Fund can hold more than 3% of the total outstanding voting stock of any single investment company. These restrictions would not apply to any Fund that the Trust introduces in the future that invests substantially all of its assets in the securities of other funds of the Trust. When a Fund or Underlying Fund invests in another investment company, it bears a proportionate share of expenses charged by the investment company in which it invests. Registered investment companies may invest in an underlying fund in excess of these percentage limits imposed by the 1940 Act in reliance on certain exemptions, such as Rule 12d1-4 under the 1940 Act. When a Fund or Underlying Fund serves as an underlying fund in reliance on Rule 12d1-4, or in reliance on Section 12(d)(1)(G) of the 1940 Act while relying on Rule 12d1-4 to invest in other investment companies, such Fund’s or Underlying Fund’s ability to invest in other investment companies and private funds will generally be limited to 10% of the Fund’s or Underlying Fund’s assets. Each Fund is required to comply with Rule 12d1-4. Complying with the requirements of Rule 12d1-4 may adversely impact a Fund’s investment strategies and operations, as well as those of the Underlying Funds in which the Fund invests.

Note that any Fund or Underlying Fund that serves as an underlying fund investment for an affiliated fund of funds (such as the Nuveen Lifecycle Funds, the Nuveen Lifecycle Index Funds, the Nuveen Lifestyle Funds and the Nuveen Managed Allocation

24     Statement of Additional Information 

Fund) pursuant to Section 12(d)(1)(G) of the 1940 Act has a policy not to, in turn, rely on Sections 12(d)(1)(F) or (G) to invest in other affiliated or unaffiliated funds beyond the limits of Sections 12(d)(1)(A) or (B).

Exchange-Traded Funds. Additionally, a Fund or an Underlying Fund may invest in other investment companies, which may include ETFs, for cash management, investment exposure or defensive purposes. ETFs generally seek to track the performance of an equity, fixed-income or balanced index by holding in its portfolio either the contents of the index or a representative sample of the securities in the index. Some ETFs, however, select securities consistent with the ETF’s investment objectives and policies without reference to the composition of an index. Typically, a Fund or an Underlying Fund would purchase ETF shares to obtain exposure to all or a portion of the stock or bond market. An investment in an ETF generally presents the same primary risks as an investment in a conventional stock, bond or balanced mutual fund (i.e., one that is not exchange-traded) that has the same investment objective, strategies, and policies. The price of an ETF can fluctuate within a wide range, and a Fund or an Underlying Fund could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down. In addition, ETFs are subject to the following risks that do not apply to conventional mutual funds: (1) the market price of the ETF’s shares may trade at a discount or premium to their NAV; (2) an active trading market for an ETF’s shares may not develop or be maintained; or (3) trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem such action appropriate, the shares are de-listed from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally. Most ETFs are investment companies. As with other investment companies, when a Fund or an Underlying Fund invests in an ETF, it will bear certain investor expenses charged by the ETF. Generally, a Fund or an Underlying Fund will treat an investment in an ETF as an investment in the type of security or index to which the ETF is attempting to provide investment exposure. For example, an investment in an ETF that attempts to provide the return of the equity securities represented in the Russell 3000^® Index will be considered as an equity investment by the Fund or Underlying Fund.

Exchange-Traded Notes (“ETNs”) and Equity-Linked Notes (“ELNs”). A Fund or an Underlying Fund may purchase shares of ETNs or ELNs. ETNs and ELNs are fixed-income securities with principal and/or interest payments (or other payments) linked to the performance of referenced currencies, interest rates, commodities, indices or other financial indicators (each, a “Reference”), or linked to the performance of a specified investment strategy (such as an options or currency trading program). ETNs are traded on an exchange, while ELNs are not. Often, ETNs and ELNs are structured as uncollateralized medium-term notes. Typically, a Fund or an Underlying Fund would purchase ETNs or ELNs to obtain exposure to all or a portion of the financial markets or specific investment strategies. Because ETNs and ELNs are structured as fixed-income securities, they are generally subject to the risks of fixed-income securities, including (among other risks) the risk of default by the issuer of the ETN or ELN. The price of an ETN or ELN can fluctuate within a wide range, and a Fund or an Underlying Fund could lose money investing in an ETN or ELN if the value of the Reference or the performance of the specified investment strategy goes down. In addition, ETNs and ELNs are subject to the following risks that do not apply to most fixed-income securities: (1) the market price of the ETNs or ELNs may trade at a discount to the market price of the Reference or the performance of the specified investment strategy; (2) an active trading market for ETNs or ELNs may not develop or be maintained; or (3) trading of ETNs may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem such action appropriate, the ETNs are de-listed from the exchange or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

When a Fund or an Underlying Fund invests in an ETN or ELN, it will bear certain investor expenses charged by these products. While ETNs and ELNs are structured as fixed-income obligations, rather than as investment companies, they generally provide exposure to a specified market sector or index like ETFs, but are also subject to the general risks of fixed-income securities, including risk of default by their issuers.

Generally, a Fund or an Underlying Fund will treat an investment in an ETN or ELN as an investment in the type of security or index to which the ETN or ELN is attempting to provide investment exposure. For example, an investment in an ELN that attempts to provide the return of the equity securities represented in the Russell 3000 Index will be considered as an equity investment by a Fund or an Underlying Fund, and not a fixed-income investment.

Borrowing. Each Fund may generate cash by borrowing money from banks (no more than 33¹/₃% of the market value of its assets at the time of borrowing), rather than through the sale of portfolio securities, when such borrowing appears more attractive for the Fund. Each Fund may also borrow money from other sources temporarily (no more than 5% of the total market value of its assets at the time of borrowing), when, for example, the Fund needs to meet liquidity requirements caused by greater than anticipated redemptions. See “Fundamental policies” above.

Currency transactions

The value of an Underlying Fund’s assets as measured in U.S. dollars may be affected favorably or unfavorably by changes in foreign currency exchange rates and exchange control regulations, and the Underlying Fund may incur costs in connection with conversions between various currencies. To manage the impact of such factors on NAVs, certain Underlying Funds may engage in foreign currency transactions in connection with their investments in foreign securities.

The Underlying Funds will conduct their currency exchange transactions either on a spot (i.e., cash) basis at the rate prevailing in the currency exchange market, or through forward contracts to purchase or sell foreign currencies. A forward currency contract involves an obligation to purchase or sell a specific currency at a future date, which may be any fixed number

 Statement of Additional Information     25

of days from the date of the contract agreed upon by the parties, at a price set at the time of the contract. These contracts are entered into with large commercial banks or other currency traders that are participants in the interbank market.

By entering into a forward contract for the purchase or sale of foreign currency involved in an underlying security transaction, an Underlying Fund is able to protect itself against possible loss between trade and settlement dates for that purchase or sale resulting from an adverse change in the relationship between the U.S. dollar and such foreign currency. This practice is sometimes referred to as “transaction hedging.” In addition, when it appears that a particular foreign currency may suffer a substantial decline against the U.S. dollar, an Underlying Fund may enter into a forward contract to sell an amount of foreign currency approximating the value of some or all of its portfolio securities denominated in such foreign currency. This practice is sometimes referred to as “portfolio hedging.” Similarly, when it appears that the U.S. dollar may suffer a substantial decline against a foreign currency, an Underlying Fund may enter into a forward contract to buy that foreign currency for a fixed dollar amount. Although such transactions tend to minimize the risk of loss due to a decline in the value of a hedged currency, they also may limit any potential gain that might result should the value of such currency increase.

Some of the Underlying Funds may also hedge their foreign currency exchange rate risk by engaging in currency financial futures, options and “cross-hedge” transactions. In “cross-hedge” transactions, an Underlying Fund holding securities denominated in one foreign currency will enter into a forward currency contract to buy or sell a different foreign currency (one that generally tracks the currency being hedged with regard to price movements). Such cross-hedges are expected to help protect an Underlying Fund against an increase or decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar against certain foreign currencies.

Some of the Underlying Funds may hold a portion of their respective assets in bank deposits denominated in foreign currencies, so as to facilitate investment in foreign securities as well as protect against currency fluctuations and the need to convert such assets into U.S. dollars (thereby also reducing transaction costs). Currency rates in foreign countries may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time for a number of reasons, including changes in interest rates, intervention (or the failure to intervene) by U.S. or foreign governments, central banks or supra-national entities such as the International Monetary Fund, or by the imposition of currency controls or other political developments in the United States or abroad. To the extent these monies are converted back into U.S. dollars, the value of the assets so maintained will be affected favorably or unfavorably by changes in foreign currency exchange rates and exchange control regulations.

The forecasting of short-term currency market movement is extremely difficult and whether a short-term hedging strategy will be successful is highly uncertain. Moreover, it is impossible to correctly forecast with absolute precision the market value of portfolio securities at the expiration of a foreign currency forward contract. Accordingly, an Underlying Fund may be required to buy or sell additional currency on the spot market (and bear the expense of such transaction) if Advisors’ predictions regarding the movement of foreign currency or securities markets prove inaccurate. In addition, the use of cross-hedging transactions may involve special risks, and may leave an Underlying Fund in a less advantageous position than if such a hedge had not been established. Because foreign currency forward contracts are privately negotiated transactions, there can be no assurance that an Underlying Fund will have flexibility to rollover the foreign currency forward contract upon its expiration if it desires to do so. Additionally, there can be no assurance that the other party to the contract will perform its obligations thereunder. Entry into a foreign currency transaction may, in certain circumstances, require the payment of initial margin, and adverse market movements against the underlying currency may require an Underlying Fund to make additional margin payments and make settlement payments. An Underlying Fund may have to sell securities or other instruments at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so to meet such payment requirements.

Real estate securities

As described more fully in the Prospectuses, certain Funds may invest in the Nuveen Real Estate Securities Select Fund. The Nuveen Real Estate Securities Select Fund will invest primarily in the equity and fixed-income securities of companies that are principally engaged in or related to the real estate industry, including those that own significant real estate assets, such as real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). Certain other Underlying Funds may also invest in REITs and other real-estate-related securities. An issuer is principally “engaged in” or principally “related to” the real estate industry if at least 50% of its total assets, gross income, or net profits are attributable to ownership, construction, management or sale of residential, commercial or industrial real estate, or to products or services related to the real estate industry. Issuers engaged in the real estate industry include equity REITs (which directly own real estate), mortgage REITs (which make short-term construction or real estate development loans or invest in long-term mortgages or mortgage pools), real estate brokers and developers, homebuilders, companies that manage real estate and companies that own substantial amounts of real estate. Businesses related to the real estate industry include manufacturers and distributors of building supplies and financial institutions that make or service mortgage loans.

The Nuveen Real Estate Securities Select Fund generally invests in common stocks, but may also, without limitation, invest in preferred stock, convertible securities, rights and warrants, and debt securities of issuers that are principally engaged in or related to the real estate industry, as well as publicly traded limited partnerships that are principally engaged in or related to the real estate industry. In addition to these securities, the Nuveen Real Estate Securities Select Fund may invest up to 20% of its total assets in equity and debt securities of issuers that are not principally engaged in or related to the real estate industry,

26     Statement of Additional Information 

including debt securities and convertible preferred stock and convertible debt securities rated in the fifth or lower categories by a NRSRO. If held by the Nuveen Real Estate Securities Select Fund in significant amounts, such lower-rated debt securities would increase financial risk and income volatility. The Nuveen Real Estate Securities Select Fund may make investments or engage in investment practices that involve special risks, which include convertible securities, “when-issued” securities, securities issued on a delayed-delivery basis, options on securities and securities indices, financial futures contracts and options thereon, restricted securities, illiquid investments, repurchase agreements, structured or indexed securities and lending portfolio securities.

Investments in the securities of companies that own, construct, manage or sell residential, commercial or industrial real estate will be subject to all of the risks associated with the ownership of real estate. These risks include, among others: declines in the value of real estate, negative changes in the climate for real estate, risks related to local, regional, national and global economic conditions, the availability of and economic cost associated with financing properties, overbuilding and increased competition, decreases in property revenues, changes in prevailing interest rates and lending standards, property taxes and operating expenses, overconcentration of properties by geography, sector or tenant mix, changes in zoning laws, casualty or condemnation losses, limitations on rents, tenant defaults, population shifts and other demographic changes, increase in vacancies (potentially for extended periods), reduced demand for real estate space as well as maintenance, tenant improvement costs and costs to convert properties for other uses, changing preferences (such as for remote work arrangements), changes in neighborhood values or the appeal of properties to tenants, fluctuation in property values due to geographically specific health issues, leveraging of interests in real estate, uninsured losses at properties due to terrorism, natural disasters or acts of violence, and costs resulting from the cleanup of environmental problems (collectively “Direct Real Estate Ownership Risks”). The occurrence of any of the foregoing developments would likely increase default risk for the properties and loans underlying these investments as well as impact the value of, and income generated by, these investments. These developments could also result in reduced liquidity for such real-estate-related investments.

REIT-Related Risks. REITs will generally not be liable for federal corporate income taxes as long as they continue to distribute no less than 100% of their taxable income, and meet certain Code requirements. To maintain REIT status, a REIT must distribute at least 90% of its taxable income each year and satisfy certain asset diversification and income tests.

In addition to the risks discussed above, equity REITs may be affected by changes in the value of the underlying property of the trusts, while mortgage REITs may be affected by changes in the quality of any credit extended. Moreover, changes in consumer behavior that affect the use of commercial spaces could negatively impact the value of properties underlying certain REITs. Both equity and mortgage REITs are dependent upon management skill and may not be diversified themselves. REITs are also subject to heavy cash flow dependency, defaults by borrowers, self-liquidation, and the possibility of failing to qualify for the special tax treatment discussed above, or failing to meet other applicable regulatory requirements. The value of a REIT may be affected by changes in interest rates. In general, during periods of high interest rates, REITs may lose some of their appeal for investors who may be able to obtain higher yields from other income-producing investments, such as long-term bonds. Rising interest rates generally increase the cost of financing for real estate projects, which could cause the value of an equity REIT to decline. For example, the value of these securities may decline when interest rates rise and will also be affected by the real estate market and by the management or development of the underlying properties, which may also be subject to mortgage loans and the underlying mortgage loans may be subject to the risks of default. During periods of declining interest rates, mortgagors may elect to prepay mortgages held by mortgage REITs, which could lower or diminish the yield on the REIT. Finally, certain REITs may be self-liquidating in that a specific term of existence is provided for in their trust document. In acquiring the securities of REITs, an Underlying Fund runs the risk that it will sell them at an inopportune time.

Exposure to direct real estate

As described in the Nuveen Lifecycle Funds Prospectuses, each Nuveen Lifecycle Fund may gain exposure to direct real estate through direct or indirect investment in one or more limited partnerships and/or REITs that are managed by Advisors or its affiliate (each, a “Direct Real Estate Underlying Fund”). The Nuveen Lifecycle Funds have obtained exemptive relief from the SEC to permit investment in affiliated Direct Real Estate Underlying Funds. To the extent a Nuveen Lifecycle Fund invests in a Direct Real Estate Underlying Fund, the Fund would be exposed to the risks of such Direct Real Estate Underlying Fund in direct proportion to the amount of assets the Fund allocates to such Direct Real Estate Underlying Fund. More specifically, each Nuveen Lifecycle Fund, through its investment in one or more Direct Real Estate Underlying Funds, would be subject to the risks associated with acquiring and owning real estate including the Direct Real Estate Ownership Risks explained above in the “Real estate securities” section.

In addition to the risks of acquiring and owning real estate, each Lifecycle Fund, through its investment in one or more Direct Real Estate Underlying Funds, would be subject to the risks associated with selling real estate including, among others, that the sales price may differ, perhaps significantly, from its estimated or appraised value leading to losses or reduced profits, that the Direct Real Estate Underlying Fund might not be able to sell a property at a particular time for a price which Advisors believes represents its fair or full value, the availability of financing (for potential purchasers of the properties to be sold), disruptions in

 Statement of Additional Information     27

the credit and capital markets, and that the Direct Real Estate Underlying Fund may be required to make significant expenditures before it is able to market and/or sell a property.

The Nuveen Lifecycle Funds are also subject to certain valuation risks associated with an investment in Direct Real Estate Underlying Funds because the valuation of real property involves significant judgment and is based on appraisals, which are estimates of property values based on a professional’s opinion and may not be accurate predictors of the amount a Direct Real Estate Underlying Fund would receive in a sale. Appraisals can be subjective and can rely on a variety of assumptions in the local real estate market in which the property is located, demonstrating that the value of real property is highly susceptible to even minor market shifts. For example, if there has been a lack of transaction activity in a particular market, prices for comparable real estate may be more volatile than in a market with more frequent transactions. The valuation difficulties associated with real property in general, combined with the challenges of valuing private REITs, could result in a gap between the realizable value of real property and the fair value of such real property.

A Nuveen Lifecycle Fund’s direct or indirect investment in a Direct Real Estate Underlying Fund operating as a REIT is subject to the REIT-Related Risks identified in the “Real estate securities” section above. Because private REITs are not traded on a national securities exchange, such products may be generally illiquid, reducing the ability of a Direct Real Estate Underlying Fund to redeem its investment in a REIT early. Also, private REITs are harder to value and may bear higher fees than public REITs.

The Direct Real Estate Underlying Funds are not registered as investment companies under the 1940 Act. As a result, in addition to the risks associated with a Direct Real Estate Underlying Fund’s portfolio holdings, the Nuveen Lifecycle Funds would also be subject to risks related to investment in private investment funds including, but not limited to, the absence of regulatory oversight and a secondary market for Direct Real Estate Underlying Fund shares or interests, restrictions on the transfer or sale of Direct Real Estate Underlying Fund shares or interests by the Nuveen Lifecycle Fund, and the absence of protections typically afforded to investors when purchasing securities registered under the 1933 Act or any state or other U.S. or non-U.S. securities laws. When a Nuveen Lifecycle Fund invests in a Direct Real Estate Underlying Fund, it bears a proportionate share of the fees and expenses borne by the Direct Real Estate Underlying Fund in which it invests.

Foreign investments

As described more fully in the Prospectuses and the prospectuses for the Underlying Funds, certain of the Underlying Funds (but especially the Nuveen Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Nuveen Emerging Markets Equity Fund, Nuveen Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund, Nuveen International Bond Fund, Nuveen International Equity Fund, Nuveen International Equity Index Fund, Nuveen International Opportunities Fund and Nuveen Quant International Small Cap Equity Fund) may invest in foreign securities, including those in emerging markets. The Money Market Fund may only invest in foreign securities that are U.S. dollar denominated. In addition to the general risk factors discussed in the Prospectuses and below, there are a number of country- or region-specific risks and other considerations that may adversely affect these investments. These are also discussed in the Underlying Funds’ Statements of Additional Information. Many of the risks are more pronounced for investments in emerging market countries, as described below.

General. Since foreign companies may not be subject to accounting, auditing or financial reporting practices, disclosure and other requirements comparable to those applicable to U.S. companies, there may be less publicly available information about a foreign company than about a U.S. company, and it may be difficult to interpret the information that is available. There may be difficulties in obtaining or enforcing judgments against foreign issuers and it also is often more difficult to keep currently informed of corporate actions which affect the prices of portfolio securities. In certain countries, there is less government supervision and regulation of stock exchanges, brokers and listed companies than in the United States. Volume and liquidity in most foreign markets are less than in the United States, and securities of many foreign companies have lower overall liquidity and are more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies. Notwithstanding the fact that each Underlying Fund generally intends to acquire the securities of foreign issuers only where there are public trading markets, investments by an Underlying Fund in the securities of foreign issuers may tend to increase the risks with respect to the liquidity of the Underlying Fund’s portfolio and the Underlying Fund’s ability to meet a large number of shareholder redemption requests should there be economic or political turmoil in a country in which the Underlying Fund has a substantial portion of its assets invested or should relations between the United States and foreign countries deteriorate markedly. Securities may trade at price/earnings multiples higher than comparable U.S. securities and such levels may not be sustainable. Fixed commissions on some foreign securities exchanges are higher than negotiated commissions on U.S. exchanges, although the Underlying Funds endeavor to achieve the most favorable net results on their portfolio transactions.

Foreign markets have different clearance and settlement procedures, and in certain markets there have been times when settlements have been unable to keep pace with the volume of securities transactions, making it difficult to conduct these transactions. Settlement practices for transactions in foreign markets may differ from those in the U.S. markets. Such differences include delays beyond periods customary in the United States and practices, such as delivery of securities prior to receipt of payment, which increase the likelihood of “failed settlement.” The inability of an Underlying Fund to make intended security purchases due to settlement problems could cause the Underlying Fund to miss attractive investment opportunities.

28     Statement of Additional Information 

Losses to the Underlying Fund due to subsequent declines in the value of portfolio securities, or liabilities arising out of the Underlying Fund’s inability to fulfill a contract to sell these securities, could result from failed settlements. In addition, evidence of securities ownership may be uncertain in many foreign countries. As a result, there is a risk that an Underlying Fund’s trade details could be incorrectly or fraudulently entered at the time of the transaction, resulting in a loss to the Underlying Fund.

With respect to certain foreign countries, there is the possibility of expropriation or confiscatory taxation, political or social instability, or diplomatic developments that could affect the Underlying Fund’s investments in those countries. The economies of some countries differ unfavorably from the U.S. economy in such respects as growth of national product, rate of inflation, capital reinvestment, resource self-sufficiency, and balance of payments position. In addition, the internal politics of some foreign countries are not as stable as in the United States. Governments in certain foreign countries continue to participate to a significant degree, through ownership interest or regulation, in their respective economies. Action by these governments could have a significant effect on market prices of securities and payment of dividends. The economies of many foreign countries are heavily dependent upon international trade and are accordingly affected by protective trade barriers and economic conditions of their trading partners. The enactment by these trading partners of protectionist trade legislation could have a significant adverse effect upon the securities markets of such countries.

Terrorism and related geopolitical risks have led, and may in the future lead, to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on world economies and markets generally.

Investment and Repatriation Restrictions. Foreign investment in the securities markets of certain foreign countries is restricted or controlled to varying degrees. These restrictions limit and, at times, preclude investment in certain of such countries (especially emerging market countries) and increase the cost and expenses of Underlying Funds investing in them. These restrictions may take the form of prior governmental approval, limits on the amount or type of securities held by foreigners, and limits on the types of companies in which foreigners may invest. Additional or different restrictions may be imposed at any time by these or other countries in which the Underlying Funds invest. In addition, the repatriation (i.e., remitting back to the United States) of both investment income and capital from several foreign countries is restricted and controlled under certain regulations, including in some cases the need for certain government consents. The Underlying Funds could be adversely affected by delays in or a refusal to grant any required governmental registration or approval for repatriation.

Taxes. The dividends and interest payable on certain of the Underlying Funds’ foreign portfolio securities may be subject to foreign withholding and, in some cases, other taxes, thus reducing the net amount of income available for distribution to the Underlying Funds’ shareholders, including the Funds.

Emerging Market Securities. An “emerging market security” is a security that is principally traded on a securities exchange of an emerging market or that is issued by an issuer that is located or has primary operations in an emerging market. Note that the Nuveen Emerging Markets Equity Fund and Nuveen Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund primarily invest in emerging market securities, but other Underlying Funds may invest in emerging market securities as well.

Emerging Markets. Investments in companies domiciled in emerging market countries may be subject to potentially higher risks than investments in companies in developed countries. The term “emerging market” describes any country or market that is generally considered to be emerging or developing by major organizations in the international financial community, such as the International Finance Corporation, or by financial industry analysts like MSCI, Inc., which compiles the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., which compiles several fixed-income emerging markets benchmarks; or other countries or markets with similar emerging characteristics. Emerging markets can include every nation in the world except the United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, New Zealand and most nations located in Western Europe. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the fixed-income portfolio management team generally views Israel as an emerging market.

Risks of investing in emerging markets and emerging market securities include: (i) less social, political and economic stability; (ii) the smaller size of the markets for these securities and the currently low or nonexistent volume of trading that results in a lack of liquidity and in greater price volatility; (iii) the lack of publicly available information, including reports of payments of dividends or interest on outstanding securities, and less stringent regulation of accounting, auditing, financial reporting and recordkeeping requirements, which could render financial information and related audits to be unreliable and unverifiable and affect an Underlying Fund’s ability to evaluate potential portfolio companies; (iv) certain national policies that may restrict an Underlying Fund’s investment opportunities, including restrictions on investment in issuers or industries deemed sensitive to national interests; (v) local taxation; (vi) the absence of developed structures governing private or foreign investment or allowing for judicial redress for injury to private property; (vii) the absence until recently, in certain countries, of a capital structure or market-oriented economy; (viii) the possibility that recent favorable economic developments in certain countries may be slowed or reversed by unanticipated political or social events as well as armed conflicts in these countries; (ix) restrictions that may make it difficult or impossible for the Underlying Fund to vote proxies, exercise shareholder rights, pursue legal remedies, and obtain judgments in foreign courts; (x) the risk of uninsured loss due to lost, stolen, or counterfeit stock certificates; (xi) possible losses through the holding of securities in domestic and foreign custodial banks and depositories; (xii) heightened opportunities for governmental corruption; (xiii) large amounts of foreign debt to finance basic governmental duties that could lead to restructuring or default; (xiv) limited legal remedies for investors in emerging markets (including derivative litigation) and a limited ability of U.S. authorities (e.g., SEC and U.S. Department of Justice) to bring actions

 Statement of Additional Information     29

against bad actors; (xv) heavy reliance on exports that may be severely affected by global economic downturns; and (xvi) the risk of man-made or natural disasters. Additionally, the degree of cooperation between issuers in emerging market countries with foreign and U.S. financial regulators may vary significantly. The type and severity of sanctions and other similar measures, including counter sanctions and other retaliatory actions, that may be imposed could vary broadly in scope, and their impact is highly uncertain. Changes in exchange rates and interest rates and the imposition of sanctions could, among other things, cause a decline in the value and/or liquidity of securities issued by the sanctioned country or companies located in or economically tied to the sanctioned country and increase market volatility and disruption in the sanctioned country and throughout the world. Sanctions and other similar measures could limit or prevent the Underlying Fund from buying and selling securities (in the sanctioned country and other markets), significantly delay or prevent the settlement of securities transactions, and significantly impact an Underlying Fund’s liquidity and performance.

In addition, some countries in which the Underlying Funds may invest have experienced substantial, and in some periods, extremely high rates of inflation for many years. Inflation and rapid fluctuations in inflation rates have had and may continue to have negative effects on the economies and securities markets of certain countries. Further, the economies of emerging market countries generally are heavily dependent upon international trade and, accordingly, have been and may continue to be adversely affected by trade barriers, exchange controls, managed adjustments in relative currency values and other protectionist measures imposed or negotiated by the countries with which they trade.

Governments of many emerging market countries have become overly reliant on the international capital markets and other forms of foreign credit to finance large public spending programs that cause huge budget deficits. As a result of either an inability to pay or submission to political pressure, certain of these governments have sought to restructure their loan and/or bond obligations, have declared a temporary suspension of interest payments, or have defaulted (in part or full) on their outstanding debt obligations. These events have adversely affected the values of securities issued by such governments and corporations domiciled in these emerging market countries and have negatively affected not only their cost of borrowing but also their ability to borrow in the future. The economic and political environment has presented significant challenges to the economies of emerging markets, including, among others, rising inflation, food insecurity, subdued employment growth, and economic setback caused by supply chain disruption and the reduction in exports.

The risks outlined above are often more pronounced in “frontier markets” in which an Underlying Fund may invest. Frontier markets are those emerging markets that are considered to be among the smallest, least mature and least liquid, and as a result, the risks of investing in emerging markets are magnified in frontier markets. This magnification of risks is the result of a number of factors, including: government ownership or control of parts of the private sector and of certain companies; trade barriers; exchange controls; managed adjustments in relative currency values and other protectionist measures imposed or negotiated by the countries with which frontier market countries trade; less uniformity in accounting and reporting requirements; unreliable securities valuation; greater risk associated with custody of securities; and the relatively new and unsettled securities laws in many frontier market countries. In addition, the markets of frontier countries typically have low trading volumes, leading to a greater potential for extreme price volatility and illiquidity. This volatility may be further increased by the actions of a few large investors. For example, a substantial increase or decrease in cash flows of mutual funds investing in these markets could significantly affect local securities prices and, therefore, the NAV of an Underlying Fund. All of these factors may make investing in frontier market countries significantly riskier than investing in other countries, including more developed and traditional emerging market countries, and any one of them could cause the NAV of an Underlying Fund’s shares to decline.

Investment in Canada. The United States is Canada’s largest trading partner and foreign investor, and developments in economic policy do have a significant impact on the Canadian economy. The expanding economic and financial integration of the United States, Canada, and Mexico through the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (“USMCA”) has made, and will likely continue to make, the Canadian economy and securities market more sensitive to North American trade patterns. Any disruption in the continued operation of USMCA may have a significant and adverse impact on Canada’s economic outlook and the value of an Underlying Fund’s investments in Canada. Growth has continued to slow in recent years for certain sectors of the Canadian economy, particularly energy extraction and manufacturing. Forecasts on growth remain modest. Oil prices have fluctuated greatly over time and the enduring volatility in the relative strength of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar from time to time may negatively affect Canada’s exporting industries. Decreasing imports from Asian and European Union (“EU”) producers, new or changing trade regulations, changes in exchange rates or a recession of the Chinese or EU economies may have an adverse impact on the economy of Canada.

Canada’s parliamentary system of government is, in general, stable. However, one of the provinces, Quebec, does have a separatist party whose objective is to achieve sovereignty and increased self-governing legal and financial powers. In addition, the Canadian market is relatively concentrated in issuers involved in the production and distribution of natural resources such as forest products, metals, agricultural products, and energy related products like oil, gas, and hydroelectricity. Accordingly, changes in the supply and demand of such commodity resources, both domestically and internationally, can have a significant effect on Canadian market performance.

Investment in Europe. The EU is an intergovernmental and supra-national union of certain European countries, known as member states. A key activity of the EU is the establishment and administration of a common single market, consisting of,

30     Statement of Additional Information 

among other things, a single currency and a common trade policy. The most widely used currency in the EU (and the unit of currency of the European Economic and Monetary Union (“EMU”)) is the euro, which is in use in many of the member states. In addition to adopting a single currency, EMU member states generally no longer control their own monetary policies. Instead, the authority to direct monetary policy is exercised by the European Central Bank and, as a result, EMU member states are significantly affected by fiscal and monetary policies implemented by the EMU and European Central Bank.

While economic and monetary convergence in the EU may offer new opportunities for those investing in the region, investors should be aware that the success of the EU is not wholly assured. Europe must grapple with a number of challenges, any one of which could threaten the survival of this monumental undertaking. Many disparate economies continue to adjust to a unified monetary system, the absence of exchange rate flexibility, and the loss of economic sovereignty. Europe’s economies are diverse, its governments are decentralized, and its cultures differ widely. As member states unify their economic and monetary policies, movements in European markets will lose the benefit of diversification within the region. High unemployment could pose political risk. One or more member states might exit the union, placing the currency and banking system in jeopardy. Major issues currently facing the EU relate to its membership, structure, procedures and policies; they include the adoption, abandonment or adjustment of the constitutional treaty, the EU’s enlargement to the south and east, and resolving the EU’s problematic fiscal and democratic accountability. Any or all of these challenges may affect the value of an Underlying Fund’s investments economically tied to the EU.

The EU has been extending its influence to the south and east. For former Iron Curtain member states, membership serves as a strong political impetus to employ tight fiscal and monetary policies. Nevertheless, several entrants that most recently joined the EU are former Soviet satellites that remain burdened to various extents by the inherited inefficiencies of centrally planned economies similar to that which existed under the old Soviet Union.

In addition, certain member states in the EU have had to accept assistance from supra-governmental agencies such as the International Monetary Fund and the European Financial Stability Facility. The European Central Bank has also intervened to purchase eurozone debt in order to seek to stabilize markets and reduce borrowing costs. Responses to these financial problems by European governments, central banks and others, including austerity measures and reforms, may not work, may result in social unrest, and may limit future growth and economic recovery or have other unintended consequences. Further defaults or restructurings by governments and others of their debt could have additional adverse effects on economies, financial markets and asset valuations around the world.

The EU’s economy may grow further as more countries join. However, the EU’s economic growth has been below that of the United States most years since 1990, and the economic performance of certain of its key members is a matter of serious concern to policy makers. Although economic conditions vary among EU member states, there is continued concern about national level support for the euro and the accompanying coordination of fiscal and wage policy of EU member states.

Further, it is possible that the euro could be abandoned in the future by EU member states that have already adopted its use, and the effects of such an abandonment or a member state’s forced expulsion from the euro on that member state, on the EMU, and on global markets are impossible to predict and could be negative. The exit of any member state out of the euro would likely have a significant destabilizing effect on all eurozone countries and their economies and a negative effect on the global economy as a whole. In addition, under these circumstances, it may be difficult to value investments denominated in euros or in a replacement currency.

In a June 2016 referendum, citizens of the UK voted to leave the EU. On January 31, 2020, the UK withdrew from the EU. Negotiators representing the UK and EU signed a trade agreement on December 30, 2020 on the terms governing certain aspects of the EU’s and UK’s relationship, the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (the “TCA”). The TCA became effective May 1, 2021 and many aspects of the UK-EU trade relationship remain subject to further negotiation. Notwithstanding the TCA, there is likely to be considerable uncertainty as to the UK’s post-transition framework, and in particular as to the arrangements which will apply to the UK’s relationships with the EU and with other countries, and the framework will likely continue to develop and could result in increased volatility and illiquidity and potentially lower economic growth. It is not possible to anticipate the longer term impact to the economic, legal, political, regulatory and social framework that will result from any agreements between the UK and the EU. The effects will depend, in part, on whether the UK is able to negotiate agreements to retain access to EU markets including, but not limited to, trade and finance agreements. In addition, such agreements may lead to ongoing political, regulatory and economic uncertainty and periods of exacerbated volatility in both the UK and in wider European markets for some time.

The impact of the UK’s withdrawal on the UK and European economies and the broader global economy could be significant, resulting in negative impacts, such as increased volatility and illiquidity, potentially lower economic growth and decreased asset valuations. The UK’s withdrawal from the EU may have a destabilizing impact on the EU to the extent other member states similarly seek to withdraw from the union and may cause additional market disruption globally and introduce new legal and regulatory uncertainties. It may also have a negative impact on the economy and currency of the UK as a result of anticipated, perceived or actual changes to the UK’s economic and political relations with the EU. The UK’s withdrawal could result in lower growth for companies in the UK, EU and globally, which could have an adverse effect on the value of an Underlying Fund’s investments. An Underlying Fund may make investments in the UK (during the transition period and

 Statement of Additional Information     31

afterwards), other EU members and in non-EU countries that are directly or indirectly affected by the exit of the UK from the EU. Any or all of these challenges may affect the value of an Underlying Fund’s investments economically tied to the UK or EU and may have an adverse effect on the Underlying Fund’s performance. Additionally, the willingness or ability of financial and other counterparties to enter into transactions may be affected by the UK’s withdrawal.

An increasingly assertive Russia poses its own set of risks for the EU, as evidenced by the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and the ongoing Russian-Ukraine conflict. Opposition to EU expansion to members of the former Soviet bloc may prompt more intervention by Russia in the affairs of its neighbors. This interventionist stance may carry various negative consequences, including direct effects, such as export restrictions on Russia’s natural resources, Russian support for separatist groups of pro-Russian parties located in EU countries, Russian interference in the internal political affairs of current or potential EU members or the EU itself, externalities of ongoing conflict, such as an influx of refugees from Ukraine and Syria, or collateral damage to foreign assets in conflict zones, all of which could negatively impact EU economic activity.

Investment in Eastern Europe. Investing in the securities of Eastern European issuers involves risks not usually associated with investing in the more developed markets of Western Europe. Changes occurring in Eastern Europe today could have long-term potential consequences. These changes could result in rising standards of living, lower manufacturing costs, growing consumer spending and substantial economic growth.

Political and economic reforms may not have eliminated the possibility of a return to centrally planned economies and state-owned industries. Investments in Eastern European countries may involve risks of nationalization, expropriation and confiscatory taxation. In many of the countries of Eastern Europe, there is no stock exchange or formal market for securities. Such countries may also have government exchange controls, currencies with no recognizable market value relative to the established currencies of Western market economies, little or no experience in trading in securities, no accounting or financial reporting standards, a lack of a banking and securities infrastructure to handle such trading and a legal tradition which does not recognize rights in private property.

Eastern European markets are particularly sensitive to social, political, economic, and currency events in Russia and may suffer heavy losses as a result of their trading and investment links to the Russian economy and currency. Russia also may attempt to assert its influence in the region through economic or even military measures. The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine poses great risk to Eastern European countries’ economic stability. In particular, the value and liquidity of securities issued by Ukrainian companies have been adversely affected and the disruption to the Russian economy as a result of sanctions imposed on Russia by the U.S. and EU may hurt Eastern European countries with close trade links to Russia. Eastern European markets will be significantly affected by the fiscal and monetary controls of the EMU. Changes in regulations on trade, decreasing imports or exports, changes in the exchange rate of the euro and recessions among European countries may have a significant adverse effect on the economies of other European countries including those of Eastern Europe.

Several Eastern European countries on the periphery of the EU have recently been the destination for a surge of refugees and migrants fleeing global conflict zones, particularly the civil wars in Syria and Afghanistan, the Russian invasion of Ukraine and economic hardship across Africa and the developing world. While these countries have borne many of the direct costs of managing the flow of refugees and migrants seeking resettlement in Europe, they have also faced significant international criticism over their treatment of migrants and refugees which may affect foreign investor confidence in the attractiveness of such markets.

Investment in Saudi Arabia. The Saudi Arabian government exerts substantial influence over many aspects of the private sector. While the political situation in Saudi Arabia is generally stable, future political instability or instability in the larger Middle East region could adversely impact the economy of Saudi Arabia, particularly with respect to foreign investments. Certain issuers located in Saudi Arabia may operate in, or have dealings with, countries subject to sanctions and/or embargoes imposed by the U.S. Government and the United Nations and/or countries identified by the U.S. Government as state sponsors of terrorism. Investments in Saudi Arabia are also subject to the risk of expropriation or nationalization of assets or the risk of restrictions on foreign investments and repatriation of capital.

Saudi Arabian issuers may be impacted by the significant ties in the Saudi Arabian economy to petroleum exports. As a result, changes within the petroleum industry could have a significant impact on the overall health of the Saudi Arabian economy. Additionally, the Saudi Arabian economy relies heavily on foreign labor, and changes in the availability of this labor supply could have an adverse effect on the economy.

The ability of foreign investors to invest in Saudi Arabian issuers is relatively new and untested, and such ability may be revoked or restricted by the government of Saudi Arabia in the future, which may materially affect an Underlying Fund. An Underlying Fund may be unable to obtain or maintain the required licenses, which would affect the Underlying Fund’s ability to buy and sell securities at full value. Additionally, an Underlying Fund’s ownership of any single issuer listed on the Saudi Arabian Stock Exchange may be limited by the Saudi Arabia Capital Market Authority (“CMA”). The securities markets in Saudi Arabia may not be as developed as those in other countries. As a result, securities markets in Saudi Arabia are subject to greater risks associated with market volatility, lower market capitalization, lower trading volume, illiquidity, inflation, greater price fluctuations, uncertainty regarding the existence of trading markets, governmental control and heavy regulation of labor

32     Statement of Additional Information 

and industry. Major disruptions or regulatory changes may occur in the Saudi Arabian market, which could negatively impact an Underlying Fund.

An Underlying Fund’s ability to invest in Saudi Arabian securities depends on the ability of Advisors’ and/or the Underlying Fund to maintain its respective status as a Foreign Portfolio Manager and/or a Qualified Foreign Investor (“QFI”), as applicable, with the CMA and, if applicable, an Underlying Fund as a client of a QFI who has been approved by the CMA (“QFI Client”). QFI regulations and local market infrastructure are relatively new and have not been tested and the CMA may discontinue the QFI regime at any time. Any change in the QFI system generally, including the possibility of Advisors’ or an Underlying Fund losing its Foreign Portfolio Manager, QFI and/or QFI Client status, as applicable, may adversely affect the Underlying Fund.

There may also be a limited number of brokers who can provide services to an Underlying Fund that invests in Saudi Arabian securities, which may have an adverse impact on the prices, quantity or timing of Underlying Fund transactions. The limited number of brokers may impact an Underlying Fund’s ability to achieve best execution on securities transactions, make the Underlying Fund more susceptible to credit loss or trading disruptions in the event of a default or business disruptions by one or more of the available brokers, disrupt the operations of the Underlying Fund and cause the Underlying Fund to incur losses due to the acts or omissions of its brokers in the execution or settlement of any transaction or in the transfer of any funds or securities.

Investment in Russia. Russia has experienced political, social and economic turbulence as a result of decades of Communist rule. In addition, there is a heightened risk of political corruption and weak and variable government oversight. To date, many of the country’s economic reform initiatives have not yet been implemented or successful. In this environment, there is always the risk that the nation’s government will abandon the current program of economic reform and replace it with drastically different political and economic policies that would be detrimental to the interests of foreign investors.

Along with the general risks of investing in emerging markets, investing in the Russian market is subject to significant risks due to the less developed state of Russia’s banking system and its settlement, clearing and securities registration processes as compared to more developed markets. With the implementation of the National Settlement Depository in Russia (“NSD”) as a recognized central securities depository, title to Russian equities is now based on the records of the NSD and not the local registrars. The implementation of the NSD is generally expected to decrease the risk of loss in connection with recording and transferring title to securities; however, loss may still occur. To the extent that an Underlying Fund suffers a loss relating to title or corporate actions relating to its portfolio securities, it may be difficult for the Underlying Fund to enforce its rights or otherwise remedy the loss.

There is relatively little long-term historical data on the Russian securities market because it is relatively new, and a substantial proportion of securities transactions in Russia are privately negotiated outside of stock exchanges. The inexperience of the Russian securities market and the limited volume of trading in securities in the market may make obtaining accurate prices on portfolio securities from independent sources more difficult than in more developed markets. Additionally, because of less stringent auditing and financial reporting standards that apply to companies operating in Russia, there is little solid corporate information available to investors. Investments in Russia may be subject to the risk of nationalization or expropriation of assets. Regional armed conflict and its collateral economic and market effects may also pose risks for investments in Russia. As a result, it may be difficult to assess the value or prospects of an investment in Russian companies.

The United States and the regulatory bodies of certain other countries, as well as the EU, have imposed economic sanctions against Russia in response to recent military actions. The imposition of sanctions and other similar measures and the threat of additional sanctions could, among other things, have further adverse consequences, including a decline in the value and/or liquidity of securities issued by Russia or companies located in or economically tied to Russia, downgrades in the credit ratings of Russian securities or those of companies located in or economically tied to Russia, devaluation of Russia’s currency, and increased market volatility and disruption in Russia and throughout the world. Sanctions and other similar measures, including banning Russia from global payment systems that facilitate cross-border payments, could limit or prevent an Underlying Fund from buying and selling securities (in Russia and other markets), significantly delay or prevent the settlement of securities transactions, and significantly impact an Underlying Fund’s liquidity and performance. In particular, U.S. sanctions prohibit any “new investment” in Russia which is defined to include any new purchases of Russian securities. U.S. persons also are required to freeze securities issued by certain Russian entities identified on the List of Specially Designated Nationals, which includes several large publicly traded Russian banks and other companies. Russia has issued various countermeasures that affect the ability of non-Russian persons to trade in Russian securities which may prohibit an Underlying Fund from selling or transacting in these securities and potentially impact the Underlying Fund’s liquidity. Moreover, disruptions caused by Russian military action or other actions (including cyberattacks and espionage) or resulting actual and threatened responses to such activity, including cyberattacks on the Russian government, Russian companies, or Russian individuals, including politicians, may impact Russia’s economy and Russian issuers of securities in which an Underlying Fund invests. The Russian military action, as well as the resulting sanctions and negative consumer and investor sentiment, could have a severe negative and long-term impact on Russia’s economy. The scope and magnitude of the sanctions and negative sentiment could make it difficult for Russia’s economy to recover even if the sanctions were to be lifted.

 Statement of Additional Information     33

The EU could also broaden, strengthen and/or otherwise change existing sanctions. These sanctions, or even the threat of further sanctions, could impair an Underlying Fund’s ability to invest in securities it views as attractive investment opportunities or to sell securities or other financial instruments as needed to meet shareholder redemptions. Such sanctions may result in the decline of the value and liquidity profile of Russian securities, a weakening of the ruble or other adverse consequences to the Russian economy. Sanctions, as well as other political actions, could also result in Russia taking countermeasures or retaliatory actions which may further impair the value and liquidity of Russian securities or depositary receipts tied to Russian securities. Such retaliatory measures include prohibiting individuals and companies from sanctioned countries from obtaining loans, transferring securities, and engaging in certain foreign currency transactions. Additional retaliatory sanctions may be imposed in the future. The impact that sanctions and countermeasures have are highly uncertain at this time. These and any related events could have a significant impact on Underlying Fund performance and the value of Underlying Fund investments.

Investment in Latin America. The history of certain Latin American countries has been characterized by political, economic and social instability, intervention by the military in civilian and economic spheres, and political corruption. For investors, this has meant additional risk caused by periods of regional conflict, political corruption, totalitarianism, protectionist measures, nationalizations, hyperinflation, debt crises, sudden and large currency devaluation, and military intervention. However, there have been changes in this regard, particularly in the past decade. Democracy is becoming well established in some countries. A move to a more mature and accountable political environment is well under way. Domestic economies have been deregulated, privatization of state-owned companies has progressed, and foreign trade restrictions have been relaxed. Nonetheless, to the extent that events such as those listed above that increase the risk of investment in this region continue in the future, they could reverse favorable trends toward market and economic reform, privatization, and removal of trade barriers, and result in significant disruption in securities markets.

Economies of most Latin American countries are highly dependent on commodity exports and, for certain countries, oil exports. Fluctuations in commodity and oil prices and currency rates can therefore have a pronounced effect on Latin American countries’ economies. The 2008–2009 worldwide economic downturn and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have in the past weakened demand for commodities and oil, and led to recession or economic difficulties in these countries. Certain Latin American countries recently have shown signs of recovery and have entered into regional trade agreements.

For example, USMCA has facilitated economic and financial integration among the United States, Canada and Mexico. However, any disruption and uncertainty regarding USMCA may have a significant and adverse impact on Mexico’s outlook and the value of an Underlying Fund’s investments in securities economically tied to Mexico. More broadly, the prices of oil and other commodities are in the midst of a period of high volatility driven, in part, by a continued slowdown in growth in China and the conflict in Ukraine. If growth in China remains slow, the conflict in Ukraine continues or if global economic conditions worsen, Latin American countries may face significant economic difficulties. Thus, there can be no assurance that any recent growth will be sustained and that Latin American countries will not face further recessionary pressures.

Most Latin American countries have experienced, at one time or another, and including for some, continue to experience severe and persistent levels of inflation, including in some cases, hyperinflation. This has, in turn, led to high interest rates, extreme measures by governments to keep inflation in check, and a generally debilitating effect on economic growth. For example, recent political instability in Venezuela has resulted in social unrest and a massive disruption in the Venezuelan economy, including a deep recession and near hyperinflation. Although inflation in many countries has lessened, there is no guarantee it will remain at lower levels.

Certain Latin American countries may experience sudden and large adjustments in their currency which, in turn, can have a disruptive and negative effect on foreign investors. Certain Latin American countries may impose restrictions on the free conversion of their currency into foreign currencies, including the U.S. dollar. There is no significant foreign exchange market for many currencies and it would, as a result, be difficult for the Underlying Funds to engage in foreign currency transactions designed to protect the value of the Underlying Funds’ interests in securities denominated in such currencies.

Almost all of the region’s economies have become highly dependent upon foreign credit and loans from external sources to fuel their state-sponsored economic plans. Government plans for modernization have exhausted these resources with little benefit accruing to the economy and most countries have been forced to restructure their loans or risk default on their debt obligations. In addition, interest on the debt is subject to market conditions and may reach levels that would impair economic activity and create a difficult and costly environment for borrowers. Accordingly, these governments may be forced to reschedule or freeze their debt repayment, which could negatively affect the market for Latin American securities. Latin American economies that depend on foreign credit and loans may also face significant economic difficulties if the Fed raises interest rates, which could potentially jeopardize various countries’ ability to service debt obligations or to service such obligations in a timely manner. Any ongoing or future deterioration of global economic conditions may reduce demand for exports from Latin America and limit the availability of foreign credit for some countries in the region.

Investment in Japan. Government-industry cooperation, a strong work ethic, mastery of high technology, emphasis on education, and a comparatively small defense allocation helped Japan advance with extraordinary speed to become one of the largest economic powers along with the United States and the EU. Despite its impressive history, investors face special risks when investing in Japan.

34     Statement of Additional Information 

The growth of Japan’s economy has recently lagged that of its Asian neighbors and other major developed countries. Since the early 2000s, Japan’s economic growth rate has remained low relative to other advanced economies and may remain low in the future. The Japanese economy is heavily reliant on international trade and has been adversely affected in the past by trade tariffs, other protectionist measures, competition from emerging economies, and the economic conditions of its trading partners. In addition, China has become an important trading partner with Japan, and therefore, changes in China’s growth rates may significantly impact the Japanese economy. The animosity between Japan and other Asian countries, such as China and Korea, may affect the trading relations between these countries. China’s territorial ambition over Taiwan may negatively impact Japan’s relationship with China given Japan’s historical and economic interests in Taiwan. Japan is also heavily dependent on oil and other commodity imports, and higher commodity prices could therefore have a negative impact on the Japanese economy. Although Japan has recently worked to reduce its dependence on oil by encouraging energy conservation and the use of alternative fuels, there is no guarantee that this trend will continue. The yen has had a history of unpredictable and volatile movements against the U.S. dollar; a weakening yen hurts U.S. investors holding yen-denominated securities. The Japanese stock market has also experienced wild swings in value over time and has often been considered significantly overvalued. Furthermore, Japan’s economic growth rate could be impacted by the Bank of Japan’s monetary policies, changing interest rates and global inflation, tax increases, budget deficits and volatility in the yen.

Beginning in the late 1990s, the nation’s financial institutions were successfully overhauled under the strong leadership of the government. The successful financial sector reform coincided with a Japanese economic recovery, which had set the stage for a comparatively brighter outlook for Japanese companies. However, Japan has an aging workforce and has experienced a significant population decline in recent years. Japan’s labor market appears to be undergoing fundamental structural changes, as a labor market traditionally accustomed to lifetime employment adjusts to meet the need for increased labor mobility, which may affect Japan’s economic competitiveness.

Japan is susceptible to natural disasters such as earthquakes and tsunamis, and an Underlying Fund’s investment in Japan may be more likely to be affected by such events than its investments in other geographic regions. There are special risks associated with investments in Japan, including foreign trade policy, regional economic disruption, government debt, aging and shrinking of the population, an uncertain financial sector, economic, political or social instability, low domestic consumption and certain corporate structural weaknesses.

Investment in Asia Other Than Japan. The political history of some Asian countries has been characterized by political uncertainty, intervention by the military in civilian and economic spheres, regional conflicts and government corruption. Such developments, if they continue to occur, could reverse favorable trends toward market and economic reform, privatization, and removal of trade barriers and result in significant disruption in securities markets. The economies of many countries in the region are heavily dependent on international trade and are accordingly affected by protective trade barriers and the economic conditions of their trading partners, principally, the United States, Japan, China and the EU.

Unlike in the United States, the currencies of certain Asian countries are not determined by the market but are instead managed at artificial levels to the U.S. dollar. This type of system can lead to sudden and large adjustments in the currency which, in turn, can have a disruptive and negative effect on foreign investors. Certain Asian countries also may restrict the free conversion of their currency into foreign currencies, including the U.S. dollar. There is no significant foreign exchange market for certain currencies and it would, as a result, be difficult for the Underlying Funds to engage in foreign currency transactions designed to protect the value of the Underlying Funds’ interests in securities denominated in such currencies.

Asian countries have historically been prone to natural disasters, such as droughts, floods and tsunamis, and the region’s economies may be affected by such environmental events in the future. Given the particular vulnerability of the region to the effects of climate change, disruptions in international efforts to address climate-related issues may have a disproportionate impact on an Underlying Fund’s investments in the region. An Underlying Fund’s investment in or exposure to Asian countries is, therefore, subject to the risk of such events.

By investing in securities or instruments that are economically tied to the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) excluding Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan for the purpose of this disclosure or other developing market Asian countries, an Underlying Fund is subject to certain risks in addition to those generally applicable to investment in foreign and emerging markets. In many Asian securities markets, including but not limited to the PRC qualified foreign institutional investors program (“FII” program, including the qualified foreign institutional investor (“QFII”) program based on recent PRC regulatory developments), there is a high concentration of market capitalization and trading volume in a small number of issuers representing a limited number of industries, as well as a high concentration of investors and financial intermediaries. Many of these markets also may be affected by developments with respect to more established markets in the region. Special risks associated with investments in the PRC include exposure to currency fluctuations, less liquidity, expropriation, confiscatory taxation, nationalization and exchange control regulations (including currency blockage). Inflation and rapid fluctuations in inflation and interest rates have had, and may continue to have, negative effects on the economy and securities markets of PRC, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Brokers in developing market Asian countries typically are fewer in number and less well capitalized than brokers in the United States. A number of Asian companies are also highly dependent on foreign loans for their operation, which could impose strict repayment term schedules and require significant economic and financial restructuring. In addition, there is a lack of clarity and

 Statement of Additional Information     35

more frequent changes in the laws and regulations in certain Asian countries compared to more developed international markets, and there could potentially be a lack of consistency in interpreting and applying the relevant regulations. These factors may severely restrict an Underlying Fund’s ability to pursue its investment objective or strategies, may result in fewer investment opportunities for an Underlying Fund and may have an adverse impact on the investment performance of an Underlying Fund.

Investment in securities or instruments that are economically tied to the PRC is also subject to the risk of political instability in the PRC. Including those risks associated with investing in emerging markets, an Underlying Fund’s investment in or exposure to the PRC is also subject to risks associated with, among other things, (a) inefficiencies resulting from erratic growth; (b) the unavailability of consistently reliable economic data; (c) potentially high rates of inflation; (d) dependence on exports and international trade; (e) relatively high levels of asset price volatility; (f) potential shortage of liquidity and limited accessibility by foreign investors; (g) greater competition from regional economies; (h) fluctuations in currency exchange rates or currency devaluation by the PRC government or central bank, particularly in light of the relative lack of currency hedging instruments and controls on the ability to exchange local currency for U.S. dollars; (i) the relatively small size and absence of operating history of many PRC companies; (j) the developing nature of the legal and regulatory framework for securities markets, custody arrangements and commerce; (k) uncertainty and potential changes with respect to the rules and regulations of the FII program and other market access programs through which such investments are made; (l) the commitment of the PRC government to continue with its economic reforms; and (m) the fact that Chinese regulators may suspend trading in Chinese issuers (or permit such issuers to suspend trading) during market disruptions, and that such suspensions may be widespread. In addition, certain securities are, or may in the future become, restricted and an Underlying Fund may be forced to sell such restricted security and incur a loss as a result. In addition, the relationship between the PRC and Taiwan is particularly sensitive, and hostilities between the PRC and Taiwan may present a risk to an Underlying Fund’s investment in either the PRC or Taiwan. Moreover, as demonstrated by past protests in Hong Kong over political, economic, and legal freedoms, and the PRC government’s response to them, political uncertainty exists within Hong Kong and there is no guarantee that additional protests will not arise in the future. Hostilities between the PRC and Hong Kong may present a risk to an Underlying Fund’s investment in the PRC or Hong Kong.

There also exists control on foreign investment in the PRC and limitations on repatriation of invested capital. Under the FII program, which is a market access program through which PRC investments are made available, or through investments in companies listed on exchanges outside of the PRC that provide exposure to companies that are based or operated in the PRC, there are certain regulatory restrictions imposed, particularly on (without limitation) investment scope, repatriation of funds, foreign shareholding limit and account structure. Although the relevant regulations have recently been revised to relax regulatory restrictions on the onshore capital management by FIIs (including but not limited to removing the investment quota limit and simplifying routine repatriation of investment proceeds), it is a new development and is therefore subject to uncertainties as to whether and how it will be implemented in practice, especially at this early stage. On the other hand, the recently amended FII regulations are also enhancing ongoing supervision on FIIs in terms of information disclosure among other aspects. In particular, FIIs are required to procure their underlying clients (such as any Underlying Fund investing in PRC securities via the FII program) to comply with PRC disclosure of interests rules and make the required disclosure on behalf of such underlying investors. As a result of PRC regulatory requirements, an Underlying Fund may be limited in its ability to invest in securities or instruments tied to the PRC and/or may be required to liquidate its holdings in securities or instruments tied to the PRC, including at an inopportune time. Under certain instances, such involuntary liquidations may result in losses for an Underlying Fund. In addition, securities exchanges in the PRC typically have the right to suspend or limit trading in any security traded on the relevant exchange. The PRC government or relevant PRC regulators may also implement policies that may adversely affect the PRC financial markets. Such suspensions, limitations or policies may have a negative impact on the performance of an Underlying Fund’s investments.

The PRC has historically been prone to natural or human disasters such as droughts, floods, pandemics, epidemics, earthquakes and tsunamis, and the region’s economy may be affected by such environmental events in the future. An Underlying Fund’s investment in the PRC is, therefore, subject to the risk of such events.

Investments in the PRC may subject an Underlying Fund’s investments to a number of PRC tax rules, and the application of many of those rules may be uncertain. Moreover, the PRC has implemented a number of tax reforms in recent years, and may amend or revise its existing tax laws and/or procedures in the future, possibly with retroactive effect. Changes in applicable PRC tax law could reduce the after-tax profits of the Underlying Funds, directly or indirectly, including by reducing the after-tax profits of companies in the PRC in which an Underlying Fund invests. PRC taxes that may apply to an Underlying Fund’s investments include income tax or withholding tax on dividends, interest or gains earned by the Underlying Fund, business tax and stamp duty. Uncertainties in the PRC tax rules could result in unexpected tax liabilities for the Underlying Funds. In addition, because the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) is generally restricted from inspecting the audit work and practices of registered accountants in the PRC, there is the risk that material accounting and financial information about PRC issuers may be unavailable or unreliable. The PCAOB signed a Statement of Protocol with the China Securities Regulatory Commission and the Ministry of Finance of the PRC to grant the PCAOB access to inspect and investigate registered public

36     Statement of Additional Information 

accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong completely, consistent with U.S. law. To the extent the PCAOB remains unable to inspect audit work papers and practices of the PCAOB-registered accounting firms in China with respect to their audit work of U.S. reporting companies, such inability may impose significant additional risks associated with investments in China. Further, to the extent an Underlying Fund invests in the securities of a company whose securities become subject to a trading prohibition, the Underlying Fund’s ability to transact in such securities, and the liquidity of the securities, as well as their market price, would likely be adversely affected. Foreign companies listed on U.S. exchanges, including offshore companies that utilize a variable interest entity (“VIE”) structure, also could face delisting or other ramifications for failure to meet the requirements of the listing exchange, the SEC, the PCAOB or other United States regulators, which could adversely affect the liquidity or value of the securities and have negative implications for U.S. investors and result in significant investment losses.

Variable Interest Entities. An Underlying Fund may invest in companies based or operated in the PRC by investing through legal structures known as VIEs. Certain PRC companies have used VIEs in order to facilitate foreign investment without distributing ownership of the PRC-based companies primarily due to the PRC governmental restrictions on non-PRC ownership of companies in certain industries and sectors. In such cases, the PRC-based operating company typically establishes an offshore company in another jurisdiction, and the offshore company enters into contractual arrangements (such as powers of attorney, equity pledge agreements, and other exclusive services or business cooperation agreements) with the PRC-based operating company. These contractual arrangements are intended to give the offshore company the ability to exercise power over and obtain economic rights from the PRC-based operating company. Shares of the offshore company, in turn, are listed and traded on exchanges outside of the PRC and are available to non-PRC investors such as an Underlying Fund. This arrangement allows non-PRC investors to hold stock in the offshore company, rather than the PRC-based operating company, to obtain economic exposure without direct equity ownership.

VIE structures are longstanding and well known to officials and regulators in the PRC. However, VIEs are not formally recognized under PRC law. Intervention by the PRC government with respect to VIEs could significantly affect the PRC operating company’s performance and the enforceability of the VIE’s contractual arrangements with the PRC company. There is a risk that the PRC may cease to allow VIEs at any time or impose new restrictions on the structure, such as penalties, revocation of business and operating licenses or forfeiture of ownership interests. Investments involving a VIE may also pose additional risks because such investments are made through a company whose interests in the underlying operating company are established through contract rather than through direct equity ownership. For example, the non-PRC offshore company’s contractual arrangement may be less effective than direct equity ownership, and the company may incur substantial costs to enforce the terms of the arrangements. If the parties to the contractual arrangements do not meet their obligations as intended or there are effects on the enforceability of these arrangements from changes in PRC law or practice, a breach of the contractual arrangement between the listed company and VIE, or if any physical instruments are used without authorization (such as PRC chops and seals), the listed company may lose control over the PRC-based operating company, and investments in the listed company’s securities may suffer significant economic losses. Also, the terms of such arrangements may be deemed unenforceable in the PRC, thus limiting (or eliminating) the remedies and rights available to the non-PRC offshore company and its investors and potentially resulting in significant economic losses with little or no recourse available. Such legal uncertainty may also be exploited against the interests of the offshore company and its investors. Further, the interests of the equity owners of the operating company may conflict with the interests of the investors of the offshore company, and the fiduciary duties of the officers and directors of the operating company may differ from, or conflict with, the fiduciary duties of the officers and directors of the offshore company. Any of the foregoing risks and events could negatively impact an Underlying Fund’s performance and NAV.

China A-Shares and China Stock Connect Risk. The following risks are in addition to the risks described under “Investment in Asia Other Than Japan” and “Emerging Markets.” Certain Underlying Funds may invest in eligible renminbi (“RMB”)-denominated shares of mainland China-based companies that trade on Chinese stock markets such as the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (referred to as “China A-Shares”) through the Shanghai and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect programs (“Stock Connect”). Stock Connect allows non-Chinese investors (such as the Underlying Funds) to purchase certain PRC-listed equities via brokers in Hong Kong. There are significant risks and limitations inherent in investing in China A-Shares through Stock Connect. For example, an Underlying Fund’s investment in China A-Shares may only be traded through Stock Connect and is not otherwise transferable. Further, the list of eligible China A-Shares may change from time to time. When a China A-Shares issue is recalled from the scope of securities eligible for trading through Stock Connect, an Underlying Fund invested in such China A-Shares issue traded through Stock Connect may only sell, not buy, the China A-Shares issue, which may adversely affect the Underlying Fund’s investment strategy.

Stock Connect is not subject to individual investment quotas but market-wide daily and aggregate investment quotas apply to all Stock Connect participants. Once a daily quota limit is reached, orders to purchase additional China A-Shares of such issuance through Stock Connect will be rejected. Once such daily quotas are used up, acceptance of the corresponding buy orders will be immediately suspended and no further buy orders will be accepted for the remainder of the trading day. Buy orders which have been accepted will not be affected by the using up of the daily quota, while sell orders will continue to be accepted. Such quotas, which are subject to change from time to time, may restrict or preclude an Underlying Fund from investing in China A-Shares on a timely basis, which could affect the Underlying Fund’s ability to effectively pursue its

 Statement of Additional Information     37

investment strategy. Further, an investor cannot purchase and sell the same security on the same trading day, which may restrict an Underlying Fund’s ability to invest in China A-Shares through Stock Connect and to enter into or exit trades where it is advantageous to do so on the same trading day. In addition, because Stock Connect trades are routed through Hong Kong brokers and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, Stock Connect is affected by trading holidays in either the PRC or Hong Kong, and there are trading days in the PRC when Stock Connect investors will not be able to trade. As a result, prices of Stock Connect may fluctuate at times when an Underlying Fund is unable to add to or exit its position, which could adversely affect the Underlying Fund’s investment performance. Both the PRC and Hong Kong regulators are permitted, independently of each other, to suspend Stock Connect (or to permit such issues to suspend trading) in response to certain market conditions. Stock Connect trades are settled in RMB and investors must have timely access to a reliable supply of RMB in Hong Kong, which cannot be guaranteed.

Stock Connect regulations provide that investors enjoy the rights and benefits of Shanghai Stock Exchange equities purchased through Stock Connect, but the nominee structure under Stock Connect requires that China A-Shares be held through the Hong Kong Securities Clearing Company (“HKSCC”), as nominee for investors. An Underlying Fund’s ownership of China A-Shares will be reflected on the custodian’s records but the Underlying Fund itself will have only beneficial rights in such China A-Shares, and the mechanisms that beneficial owners may use to enforce their rights are untested. For instance, courts in China have limited experience in applying the concept of beneficial ownership and the law surrounding beneficial ownership will continue to evolve. An Underlying Fund may not be able to participate in corporate actions affecting Stock Connect securities due to time constraints or for other operational reasons. Similarly, an Underlying Fund will not be able to vote in shareholders’ meetings except through HKSCC and will not be able to attend shareholders’ meetings. Taken together with Stock Connect’s omnibus clearing structure, this structure may limit Advisors’ ability to effectively manage an Underlying Fund and may expose the Underlying Fund to the credit risk of its custodian or to greater risk of expropriation. While certain aspects of the Stock Connect trading process are subject to Hong Kong law, PRC rules applicable to share ownership will apply.

Additionally, China generally has less established legal, accounting and financial reporting systems than those in more developed markets, which may reduce the scope or quality of financial information relating to Chinese issuers. China A-Shares traded via Stock Connect are subject to risks associated with the legal and technical framework of Stock Connect. The trading, settlement and information technology (“IT”) systems required to operate Stock Connect are continuing to evolve. If relevant Stock Connect systems fail to function properly, trading in China A-Shares on Stock Connect could be disrupted. Further, in the event of high trading volume or unexpected market conditions, Stock Connect may be available on a limited basis.

The risks related to investments in China A Shares through Stock Connect are heightened to the extent that an Underlying Fund invests in China A Shares listed on the Science and Technology Innovation Board of the Shanghai Stock Exchange (“STAR Market”) and/or the ChiNext Market of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (“ChiNext Market”). Listed companies on the STAR Market and ChiNext Market are usually of an emerging nature with smaller operating scale. They are subject to higher fluctuation in stock prices and liquidity. It may be more common and faster for companies listed on the STAR Market and ChiNext Market to delist.

China Bond Connect Risk. There are risks associated with an Underlying Fund’s investment in Chinese government bonds and other PRC-based debt instruments traded on the China Interbank Bond Market (“CIBM”) through the Bond Connect program. Bond Connect refers to the arrangement between Hong Kong and the PRC that enables Hong Kong and overseas investors to trade various types of debt securities in each other’s bond markets through connection between the relevant respective financial infrastructure institutions. Such trading is subject to a number of restrictions that may affect an Underlying Fund’s investments and returns. For example, investments made through Bond Connect are subject to order, clearance and settlement procedures that are relatively untested in the PRC, which could pose risks to an Underlying Fund. Furthermore, securities purchased through Bond Connect will be held on behalf of ultimate investors (such as an Underlying Fund) via a book entry omnibus account in the name of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority Central Money Markets Unit maintained with either the China Central Depository & Clearing Co. (“CCDC”) or the Shanghai Clearing House (“SCH”), each a PRC-based custodian. An Underlying Fund’s ownership interest in Bond Connect securities will not be reflected directly in book entry with CCDC or SCH and will instead only be reflected on the books of its Hong Kong sub-custodian. This recordkeeping system also subjects an Underlying Fund to various risks, such as the risks of settlement delays and counterparty default of the Hong Kong sub-custodian, or the risk that the Underlying Fund may have a limited ability to enforce rights as a bondholder. While the ultimate investors hold a beneficial interest in Bond Connect securities, the mechanisms that beneficial owners may use to enforce their rights are untested and courts in the PRC have limited experience in applying the concept of beneficial ownership. As such, an Underlying Fund may not be able to participate in corporate actions affecting its rights as a bondholder, such as timely payment of distributions, due to time constraints or for other operational reasons. Bond Connect trades are settled in RMB and investors must have timely access to a reliable supply of RMB in Hong Kong, which cannot be guaranteed. Furthermore, securities purchased through Bond Connect generally may not be sold, purchased or otherwise transferred other than through Bond Connect in accordance with applicable rules.

A primary feature of Bond Connect is the application of the home market’s laws and rules applicable to investors in Chinese fixed-income instruments. Therefore, an Underlying Fund’s investments in securities through Bond Connect are generally subject

38     Statement of Additional Information 

to Chinese securities regulations and listing rules, among other restrictions. Such securities may lose their eligibility at any time, in which case they could be sold but could no longer be purchased through Bond Connect. An Underlying Fund will not benefit from access to Hong Kong investor compensation underlying funds, which are designed to protect against defaults of trades, when investing through Bond Connect. Bond Connect is only available on days when markets in both the PRC and Hong Kong are open. As a result, prices of securities purchased through Bond Connect may fluctuate at times when an Underlying Fund is unable to add to or exit its position and, therefore, may limit the Underlying Fund’s ability to trade when it would be otherwise attractive to do so.

The Bond Connect program may be subject to further interpretation, guidance and regulatory change. The trading, settlement and IT systems required for non-Chinese investors in Bond Connect are continuing to evolve. In the event that the relevant systems do not function properly, trading through Bond Connect could be disrupted. An Underlying Fund’s ability to trade through Bond Connect (and hence to pursue its investment strategy) may therefore be adversely affected. There can be no assurance that further regulations will not affect the availability of securities in the program, the frequency of redemptions or other limitations. In addition, the application and interpretation of the laws and regulations of Hong Kong and the PRC, and the rules, policies or guidelines published or applied by relevant regulators and exchanges in respect of the Bond Connect program are uncertain, and they may have an adverse effect on an Underlying Fund’s performance.

Potential lack of liquidity due to low trading volume of certain Underlying Fund investments in securities through Bond Connect may result in prices of certain fixed-income securities traded on such market fluctuating significantly, which may expose an Underlying Fund to liquidity risks. The bid and offer spreads of the prices of securities through Bond Connect may be large, and the Underlying Funds may therefore incur significant trading and realization costs and may even suffer losses when disposing of such investments.

Depositary Receipts. The Equity Funds and the Nuveen Real Estate Securities Select Fund can invest in American, European and Global Depositary Receipts (“ADRs,” “EDRs” and “GDRs,” respectively). They are alternatives to the purchase of the underlying securities in their national markets and currencies. Although their prices are quoted in U.S. dollars, they do not eliminate all the risks of foreign investing.

ADRs represent the right to receive securities of foreign issuers deposited in a domestic bank or a foreign correspondent bank. To the extent that an Underlying Fund acquires ADRs through banks which do not have a contractual relationship with the foreign issuer of the security underlying the ADR to issue and service such ADRs, there may be an increased possibility that the Underlying Fund would not become aware of, and be able to respond to, corporate actions such as stock splits or rights offerings involving the foreign issuer in a timely manner. In addition, the lack of information may result in inefficiencies in the valuation of such instruments. However, by investing in ADRs rather than directly in the stock of foreign issuers, an Underlying Fund will avoid currency risks during the settlement period for either purchases or sales. In general, there is a large, liquid market in the United States for ADRs quoted on a national securities exchange or the national market system, including the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. (“NASDAQ”). The information available for ADRs is subject to the accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards of the domestic market or exchange on which they are traded, which standards are more uniform and more exacting than those to which many foreign issuers may be subject.

EDRs and GDRs are receipts evidencing an arrangement with a non-U.S. bank similar to that for ADRs and are designed for use in non-U.S. securities markets. EDRs and GDRs are not necessarily quoted in the same currency as the underlying security.

Other policies

Other Investment Techniques and Opportunities. The Underlying Funds may take certain actions with respect to merger proposals, tender offers, conversion of equity-related securities and other investment opportunities with the objective of enhancing the portfolio’s overall return, regardless of how these actions may affect the weight of the particular securities in the Underlying Funds’ portfolios.

In the future, upon approval by the Board of Trustees, a portion of each Fund may invest in certain annuity or other contracts issued by TIAA or in real estate or other real asset pools, to the extent that it is determined that they are appropriate in light of the Funds’ desired levels of risk and potential return at the particular time, and provided that the Funds have received the necessary exemptive relief from the SEC.

Industry Concentration. Currently, none of the Funds or the Underlying Funds, other than the Nuveen Real Estate Securities Select Fund and the privately offered Real Property Fund, will concentrate more than 25% of its total assets in any one industry. While the Funds will not concentrate their investments in a particular industry, the Funds may indirectly concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries through their investments in one or more Underlying Funds. Currently, no Underlying Fund, other than the Nuveen Real Estate Securities Select Fund and the privately offered Real Property Fund, concentrates 25% or more of its total assets in any one industry.

Special Risks Related to Cybersecurity. With the increased use of technologies such as the internet to conduct business, the Funds, the Underlying Funds and their service providers (including, but not limited to, a Fund’s or an Underlying Fund’s custodian, transfer agent and financial intermediaries) are susceptible to cybersecurity risks. In general, cybersecurity attacks

 Statement of Additional Information     39

can result from infection by computer viruses or other malicious software or from deliberate actions or unintentional events, including gaining unauthorized access through hacking or other means to digital systems, networks, or devices that are used to service the Funds’ and Underlying Funds’ operations in order to misappropriate assets or sensitive information, corrupt data, or cause operational disruption. Cybersecurity attacks can also be carried out in a manner that does not require gaining unauthorized access, including by carrying out a “denial-of-service” attack on a Fund or an Underlying Fund or its service providers’ websites. In addition, authorized persons could inadvertently or intentionally release confidential or proprietary information stored on the Trust’s, a Fund’s or an Underlying Fund’s systems.

Cybersecurity failures by Advisors or its affiliated investment advisers, other service providers, or the issuers of the portfolio securities in which a Fund or an Underlying Fund invests have the ability to result in disruptions to and impacts on business operations. Such disruptions or impacts may result in financial losses, interference with the Funds’ or an Underlying Funds’ ability to calculate their NAVs, barriers to trading, Fund or an Underlying Fund shareholders’ inability to transact business with a Fund or an Underlying Fund, violations of applicable federal and state privacy or other laws, regulatory fines, penalties, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, or additional compliance costs. The Funds, the Underlying Funds and their service providers may also maintain sensitive information (including relating to personally identifiable information of investors) and a cybersecurity breach may cause such information to be lost or improperly accessed, used or disclosed. The Funds and Underlying Funds may incur additional, incremental costs to prevent and mitigate the risks of cybersecurity attacks or incidents in the future. The Funds, Underlying Funds and their shareholders could be negatively impacted by such attacks or incidents. Although Advisors and its affiliated investment advisers have established business continuity plans and risk-based processes and controls to address such cybersecurity risks, there are inherent limitations in such plans and systems in part due to the evolving nature of technology and cybersecurity attack tactics. The use of cloud-based service providers could heighten or change these risks. In addition, work-from-home arrangements by the Funds, Underlying Funds, Advisors or their service providers could increase all of the above risks, create additional data and information accessibility concerns, and make the Funds, Underlying Funds, Advisors or their service providers more susceptible to operational disruptions, any of which could adversely impact their operations. As a result, it is possible that the Funds, Underlying Funds, Advisors or its affiliated investment advisers or a Fund’s or an Underlying Fund’s service providers will not be able to adequately identify or prepare for all cybersecurity attacks. In addition, the Funds and Underlying Funds cannot directly control the cybersecurity plans or systems implemented by their service providers or issuers in which they invest.

Liquidation of Funds. The Board of Trustees or similar governing body of an Underlying Fund that is not offered by the Trust may determine to close and/or liquidate a Fund or an Underlying Fund at any time, which may have adverse tax consequences to the shareholders of such Fund. In the event of the liquidation of a Fund or an Underlying Fund, shareholders will receive a liquidating distribution in cash or in-kind equal to their proportionate interest in the Fund or an Underlying Fund. A liquidating distribution may be a taxable event to shareholders, resulting in a gain or loss for tax purposes, depending upon a shareholder’s basis in their shares of the Fund. A shareholder of a liquidating Fund or an Underlying Fund will not be entitled to any refund or reimbursement of expenses borne, directly or indirectly, by the shareholder (such as shareholder account fees (if any) or fund operating expenses), and a shareholder may receive an amount in liquidation less than the shareholder’s original investment.

Portfolio Turnover. Generally, the transactions in which a Fund or an Underlying Fund engages are reflected in the Fund’s and Underlying Fund’s respective portfolio turnover rate (although the Money Market Fund does not have a portfolio turnover rate). The rate of portfolio turnover is calculated by dividing the lesser of the amount of purchases or sales of portfolio securities during the fiscal year by the monthly average of the value of the Fund’s or the Underlying Fund’s portfolio securities (excluding from the computation all securities, including options, with maturities at the time of acquisition of one year or less). A high rate of portfolio turnover generally involves correspondingly greater brokerage commission expenses, which must be borne directly by the Fund or the Underlying Fund and ultimately by the Fund’s and/or the Underlying Fund’s shareholders. However, because portfolio turnover is not a limiting factor in determining whether or not to sell portfolio securities, a particular investment may be sold at any time, if investment judgment or account operations make a sale advisable. As a result, each Fund will purchase and sell the principal portion of its portfolio securities (i.e., shares of the Underlying Funds) by dealing directly with the issuer (the Underlying Funds), and the Funds will not incur any brokerage commissions on most of their portfolio trades.

For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2024, the portfolio turnover rates of none of the Funds significantly changed from portfolio turnover rates in 2023.

Disclosure of portfolio holdings

The Funds have adopted a portfolio holdings disclosure policy that governs the dissemination of a Fund’s portfolio holdings. In accordance with this policy, a Fund may provide portfolio holdings information to third parties no earlier than the time a report is filed with the SEC that is required to contain such information or one day after the information is posted on the Fund’s publicly accessible website, www.nuveen.com. A complete list of portfolio holdings information is generally made available on the Fund’s website ten business days after the end of the month. Additionally, the Fund publishes on the website a list of its top ten holdings as of the end of each month, approximately two to five business days after the end of the month for which the

40     Statement of Additional Information 

information is current. This information will remain available on the website at least until the Fund files with the SEC its Form N-CSR or Form N-PORT for the period that includes the date as of which the website information is current.

Additionally, a Fund may disclose portfolio holdings information that has not been included in a filing with the SEC or posted on the Fund’s website (i.e., non-public portfolio holdings information) only if there is a legitimate business purpose for doing so and if the recipient is required, either by explicit agreement or by virtue of the recipient’s duties to the Fund as an agent or service provider, to maintain the confidentiality of the information and to not use the information in an improper manner (e.g., personal trading). In this context, portfolio holdings information does not include summary information from which the identity of the Fund’s specific portfolio holdings cannot reasonably be derived. A Fund may disclose on an ongoing basis non-public portfolio holdings information in the normal course of its investment and administrative operations to various service providers, including, but not limited to, Nuveen and TIAA employees, fund accounting agents, auditors, custodians, pricing vendors, financial printers, proxy voting agents, securities lending agents, counsel to the Funds or the independent trustees, regulatory authorities, stock exchanges and other listing organizations. Also, Advisors may transmit to service providers non-public portfolio holdings information to enable Advisors to perform portfolio attribution analysis using third-party systems and software programs. Advisors may also provide certain portfolio holdings information to broker-dealers from time to time in connection with the purchase or sale of securities or requests for price quotations or bids on one or more securities. In providing this information, reasonable precautions are taken in an effort to avoid potential misuse of the disclosed information, including limitations on the scope of the portfolio holdings information disclosed, when appropriate. The Funds and Advisors do not receive compensation or other consideration in exchange for the disclosure of portfolio holdings.

Non-public portfolio holdings information may be provided to other persons if approved by a Managing Director in the Legal Department or Secretary of the Funds upon a determination that there is a legitimate business purpose for doing so, the disclosure is consistent with the interests of the shareholders of the Fund, and the recipient is obligated to maintain the confidentiality of the information and not misuse it, which includes a prohibition on trading on such non-public information. Notification must be provided to the Funds’ Chief Compliance Officer prior to the holdings information being released.

Compliance officers of the Funds and Advisors periodically monitor overall compliance with the policy to ascertain whether portfolio holdings information is disclosed in a manner that is consistent with the Funds’ policies.

There is no assurance that the Funds’ policies on portfolio holdings information will protect a Fund from the potential misuse of portfolio holdings information by individuals or firms in possession of such information.

The following parties currently receive non-public portfolio holdings information regarding one or more of the Funds on an ongoing basis pursuant to the various arrangements described above: Advent; Adviser Compliance Associates, LLC; Bank of America PriceServe; Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc.; Broadridge Systems; Chapman and Cutler, LLP; Compliance Solutions Strategies; Confluence NXT; Eagle Investment Systems, LLC; Electra Information Systems; Ernst & Young; Financial Graphic Services; Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC; ICE Benchmark Administration Limited; ICE Data Services; ISS; Investortools; KPMG, LLP; Lipper, Inc., a Reuters Company; Moody’s; Morningstar, Inc.; Mellon Analytical Solutions; Northern Trust Corp; Omgeo, LLC; PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP; S&P Global; PricingDirect Inc.; Refinitiv; Rimes Technologies Corporation; SS&C; State Street Bank and Trust Co.; Strategic Insight; Wolters Kluwer; The Thomson Corporation; Command Financial Press; the Investment Company Institute; Donnelley Financial Solutions; Bloomberg Finance, L.P.; Data Explorers Limited; eA Data Automation Services LLC; Objectiva Software (d/b/a Nu:Pitch); CoreOne Technologies; Cabot Research, LLC; Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.; Fidelity Information Services, LLC; EquiLend Holdings LLC; FactSet Research Systems Inc. and Sherpa Funds Technology Pte Ltd.

You can request more frequent portfolio holdings information, subject to the Funds’ policy as stated above, by writing to the Funds at Nuveen Funds, 730 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017-3206.

In addition, Advisors has adopted a policy regarding distribution of portfolio attribution analyses and related data and commentary (“Portfolio Data”). This policy permits Advisors to provide oral or written information about the Funds, including, but not limited to, how each Fund’s investments are divided among: various sectors; industries; countries; value and growth stocks; small-, mid- and large-cap stocks; and various asset classes such as stocks, bonds, currencies and cash; as well as types of bonds, bond maturities, bond coupons and bond credit quality ratings. Portfolio Data may also include information on how these various weightings and factors contributed to Fund performance including the attribution of a Fund’s return by asset class, sector, industry and country. Portfolio Data may also include various financial characteristics of a Fund or its underlying portfolio securities, including, but not limited to, alpha, beta, R-squared, duration, maturity, information ratio, Sharpe ratio, earnings growth, payout ratio, price/book value, projected earnings growth, return on equity, standard deviation, tracking error, weighted average quality, market capitalization, percent debt to equity, price to cash flow, dividend yield or growth, default rate, portfolio turnover and risk and style characteristics.

Portfolio Data may be based on a Fund’s most recent quarter-end portfolio, month-end portfolio or some other interim period. Portfolio Data may be provided to members of the press, participants in the Fund, persons considering investing in the Fund, or representatives of such participants or potential participants, such as consultants, financial intermediaries, fiduciaries of a 401(k) plan or a trust and their advisers and rating and ranking organizations. While Advisors will provide Portfolio Data to persons upon appropriate request, the content and nature of the information provided to any person or category of persons may

 Statement of Additional Information     41

differ. Please contact TIAA for information about obtaining Portfolio Data. Advisors may restrict access to any or all Portfolio Data in its sole discretion, including, but not limited to, if Advisors believes the release of such Portfolio Data may be harmful to the Fund.

Advisors serves as investment adviser to various other funds and accounts that may have investment objectives, strategies and portfolio holdings that are substantially similar to or overlap with those of the Funds, and in some cases, these funds may publicly disclose portfolio holdings on a more frequent basis than is required for the Funds. As a result, it is possible that other market participants may use such information for their own benefit, which could negatively impact the Funds’ execution of purchase and sale transactions.

Management

The Trust is governed by its Board, which oversees the Trust’s business and affairs. The Board delegates the day-to-day management of the Funds to Advisors and the officers of the Trust (see below). The number of trustees of the Trust is twelve, all of whom are not interested persons of the Funds as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act (referred to herein as “independent trustees”). None of the independent trustees has ever been a trustee, director or employee of, or consultant to, Advisors or its affiliates. The names, business addresses and years of birth of the Trustees and officers of the Funds, their principal occupations and other affiliations during the past five years, the number of portfolios each Trustee oversees and other directorships they hold are set forth below. Except as noted in the table below, the Trustees of the Trust are directors or trustees, as the case may be, of 216 Nuveen-sponsored registered investment companies (the “Nuveen Funds”), which include 147 open-end mutual funds, including the Funds (the “Nuveen Mutual Funds”), 46 closed-end funds and 23 exchange-traded funds.

42     Statement of Additional Information 

 Statement of Additional Information     43

44     Statement of Additional Information 

 Statement of Additional Information     45

46     Statement of Additional Information 

 Statement of Additional Information     47

48     Statement of Additional Information 

Board leadership structure and risk oversight

The Board of Trustees (including the Board of Trustees of the Trust) or the Board of Directors (as the case may be, each is referred to hereafter as the “Board” or “Board of Trustees” and the directors or trustees of the Nuveen Funds, as applicable, are each referred to herein as “trustees”) oversees the operations and management of the Nuveen Funds, including the duties performed for the Nuveen Funds by Advisors or its affiliates. The Board has adopted a unitary board structure. A unitary board consists of one group of trustees who serve on the board of every fund in the Nuveen Fund complex (except with respect to certain Nuveen Funds where certain trustees may instead serve as consultants, as indicated in the “Independent Trustees” table included herein). In adopting a unitary board structure, the trustees seek to provide effective governance through establishing a board, the overall composition of which will, as a body, possess the appropriate skills, diversity (including, among other things, gender, race and ethnicity), independence and experience to oversee the Nuveen Funds’ business. With this overall framework in mind, when the Board, through its Nominating and Governance Committee discussed below, seeks nominees for the Board, the trustees consider, not only the candidate’s particular background, skills and experience, among other things, but also whether such background, skills and experience enhance the Board’s diversity and at the same time complement the Board given its current composition and the mix of skills and experiences of the incumbent trustees. The Nominating and Governance Committee believes that the Board generally benefits from diversity of background (including, among other things, gender, race and ethnicity), skills, experience and views among its members, and considers this a factor in evaluating the composition of the Board, but has not adopted any specific policy on diversity or any particular definition of diversity.

The Board believes the unitary board structure enhances good and effective governance, particularly given the nature of the structure of the investment company complex. Funds in the same complex generally are served by the same service providers and personnel and are governed by the same regulatory scheme which raises common issues that must be addressed by the trustees across the fund complex (such as compliance, valuation, liquidity, brokerage, trade allocation or risk management). The Board believes it is more efficient to have a single board review and oversee common policies and procedures which increases the Board’s knowledge and expertise with respect to the many aspects of fund operations that are complex-wide in nature. The unitary structure also enhances the Board’s influence and oversight over the investment adviser and other service providers.

In an effort to enhance the independence of the Board, the Board also has Co-Chairs that are independent trustees. The Board recognizes that a chair can perform an important role in setting the agenda for the Board, establishing the boardroom culture, establishing a point person on behalf of the Board for Fund management, and reinforcing the Board’s focus on the long-term interests of shareholders. The Board recognizes that a chair may be able to better perform these functions without any conflicts of interests arising from a position with Fund management. Accordingly, the trustees have elected Mr. Kenny to serve as an independent Co-Chair of the Board for a one-year term expiring on December 31, 2024 and Mr. Young to serve as an independent Co-Chair of the Board for a six-month term from July 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024. Specific responsibilities of the Co-Chairs include: (i) coordinating with Fund management in the preparation of the agenda for each meeting of the Board; (ii) presiding at all meetings of the Board and of the shareholders; and (iii) serving as a liaison with other trustees, the Trust’s officers and other Fund management personnel, and counsel to the independent trustees. The Co-Chairs perform such other duties as the Board may from time to time determine.

Although the Board has direct responsibility over various matters (such as advisory contracts and underwriting contracts), the Board also exercises certain of its oversight responsibilities through several committees that it has established and which report back to the full Board. The Board believes that a committee structure is an effective means to permit trustees to focus on particular operations or issues affecting the Nuveen Funds, including risk oversight. More specifically, with respect to risk oversight, the Board has delegated matters relating to valuation, compliance and investment risk to certain committees (as summarized below). In addition, the Board believes that the periodic rotation of trustees among the different committees allows the trustees to gain additional and different perspectives of the Nuveen Funds’ operations. The Board has established seven standing committees: the Executive Committee, the Dividend Committee, the Audit Committee, the Compliance, Risk Management and Regulatory Oversight Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Investment Committee and the Open-End Funds Committee. Prior to January 1, 2024, the Board had established different standing committees. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2024, the former Audit and Compliance Committee met two times, the former Investment Committee met three times, the former Nominating and Governance Committee met two times, and the former Operations Committee met two times. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2024, the former Executive Committee and the former Special Emergency Valuation Committee did not meet. The Board may also from time to time create ad hoc committees to focus on particular issues as the need arises. The membership and functions of the standing committees are summarized below. For more information on the Board, please visit www.nuveen.com/fundgovernance.

The Executive Committee, which may meet between regular meetings of the Board, is authorized to exercise all of the powers of the Board. The members of the Executive Committee are Mr. Kenny and Mr. Young, Co-Chairs, Mr. Nelson and Mr. Toth. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2024, the Executive Committee, in its current structure, met four times.

 Statement of Additional Information     49

The Audit Committee assists the Board in the oversight and monitoring of the accounting and financial reporting policies, processes and practices of the Nuveen Funds, and the audits of the financial statements of the Nuveen Funds; the quality and integrity of the financial statements of the Nuveen Funds; the Nuveen Funds’ compliance with legal and regulatory requirements relating to the Nuveen Funds’ financial statements; the independent auditors’ qualifications, performance and independence; and the Valuation Policy of the Nuveen Funds and the internal valuation group of Advisors, as valuation designee for the Nuveen Funds. It is the responsibility of the Audit Committee to select, evaluate and replace any independent auditors (subject only to Board approval and, if applicable, shareholder ratification) and to determine their compensation. The Audit Committee is also responsible for, among other things, overseeing the valuation of securities comprising the Nuveen Funds’ portfolios. The Audit Committee is also primarily responsible for the oversight of the Valuation Policy and actions taken by Advisors, as valuation designee of the Funds, through its internal valuation group, which provides regular reports to the committee, reviews any issues relating to the valuation of the Nuveen Funds’ securities brought to its attention and considers the risks to the Nuveen Funds in assessing the possible resolutions to these matters. The Audit Committee may also consider any financial risk exposures for the Nuveen Funds in conjunction with performing its functions.

To fulfill its oversight duties, the Audit Committee regularly meets with Fund management to discuss the Nuveen Funds’ annual and semi-annual reports and has regular meetings with the external auditors for the Nuveen Funds and Advisors’ internal audit group. In assessing financial risk disclosure, the Audit Committee also may review in a general manner the processes the Board or other Board committees have in place with respect to risk assessment and risk management as well as compliance with legal and regulatory matters relating to the Nuveen Funds’ financial statements. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted and approved by the Board. Members of the Audit Committee shall be independent (as set forth in the charter) and free of any relationship that, in the opinion of the trustees, would interfere with their exercise of independent judgment as an Audit Committee member. The members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Nelson, Chair, Mr. Boateng, Mr. Moschner, Mr. Starr, Ms. Wolff and Mr. Young, each of whom is an independent trustee of the Funds. Mr. Boateng, Mr. Moschner, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Starr and Mr. Young have each been designated as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules of the SEC. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2024, the Audit Committee, in its current structure, met six times.

The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for seeking, identifying and recommending to the Board qualified candidates for election or appointment to the Board. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee oversees matters of corporate governance, including the evaluation of Board performance and processes, the assignment and rotation of committee members, and the establishment of corporate governance guidelines and procedures, to the extent necessary or desirable, and matters related thereto. The committee recognizes that as demands on the Board evolve over time (such as through an increase in the number of funds overseen or an increase in the complexity of the issues raised), the committee must continue to evaluate the Board and committee structures and their processes and modify the foregoing as may be necessary or appropriate to continue to provide effective governance. Accordingly, the Nominating and Governance Committee has a separate meeting each year to, among other things, review the Board and committee structures, their performance and functions, and recommend any modifications thereto or alternative structures or processes that would enhance the Board’s governance of the Nuveen Funds.

In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee, among other things, makes recommendations concerning the continuing education of trustees; monitors performance of legal counsel; establishes and monitors a process by which security holders are able to communicate in writing with members of the Board; and periodically reviews and makes recommendations about any appropriate changes to trustee compensation. In the event of a vacancy on the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee receives suggestions from various sources, including shareholders, as to suitable candidates. Suggestions should be sent in writing to William Siffermann, Manager of Fund Board Relations, Nuveen, LLC, 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL 60606. The Nominating and Governance Committee sets appropriate standards and requirements for nominations for new trustees and reserves the right to interview any and all candidates and to make the final selection of any new trustees. In considering a candidate’s qualifications, each candidate must meet certain basic requirements, including relevant skills and experience, time availability (including the time requirements for due diligence meetings with sub-advisers and service providers) and, if qualifying as an independent trustee candidate, independence from Advisors and other service providers, including any affiliates of these entities. These skill and experience requirements may vary depending on the current composition of the Board, since the goal is to ensure an appropriate range of skills, diversity and experience, in the aggregate. Accordingly, the particular factors considered and weight given to these factors will depend on the composition of the Board and the skills and backgrounds of the incumbent trustees at the time of consideration of the nominees. All candidates, however, must meet high expectations of personal integrity, independence, governance experience and professional competence. All candidates must be willing to be critical within the Board and with Fund management and yet maintain a collegial and collaborative manner toward other Board members. The Nominating and Governance Committee operates under a written charter adopted and approved by the Board. This committee is composed of the independent trustees of the Nuveen Funds. Accordingly, the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are Mr. Kenny and Mr. Young, Co-Chairs, Mr. Boateng,

50     Statement of Additional Information 

Mr. Forrester, Ms. Lancellotta, Ms. Medero, Mr. Moschner, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Starr, Mr. Thornton, Mr. Toth and Ms. Wolff. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2024, the Nominating and Governance Committee, in its current structure, met two times.

The Dividend Committee is authorized to declare distributions (with subsequent ratification by the Board) on the Nuveen Funds’ shares, including, but not limited to, regular and special dividends, capital gains and ordinary income distributions. The Dividend Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. The members of the Dividend Committee are Mr. Thornton, Chair, Ms. Lancellotta, Mr. Nelson and Mr. Starr. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2024, the Dividend Committee, in its current structure, met four times.

The Compliance, Risk Management and Regulatory Oversight Committee (the “Compliance Committee”) is responsible for the oversight of compliance issues, risk management and other regulatory matters affecting the Nuveen Funds that are not otherwise the jurisdiction of the other committees. The Board has adopted and periodically reviews policies and procedures designed to address the Nuveen Funds’ compliance and risk matters. As part of its duties, the Compliance Committee reviews the policies and procedures relating to compliance matters and recommends modifications thereto as necessary or appropriate to the full Board; develops new policies and procedures as new regulatory matters affecting the Nuveen Funds arise from time to time; evaluates or considers any comments or reports from examinations from regulatory authorities and responses thereto; and performs any special reviews, investigations or other oversight responsibilities relating to risk management, compliance and/or regulatory matters as requested by the Board.

In addition, the Compliance Committee is responsible for risk oversight, including, but not limited to, the oversight of general risks related to investments which are not reviewed by other committees, such as liquidity and derivatives usage; risks related to product structure elements, such as leverage; techniques that may be used to address the foregoing risks, such as hedging and swaps and Fund operational risk and risks related to the overall operation of the TIAA/Nuveen enterprise and, in each case, the controls designed to address or mitigate such risks. In assessing issues brought to the Compliance Committee’s attention or in reviewing a particular policy, procedure, investment technique or strategy, the Compliance Committee evaluates the risks to the Nuveen Funds in adopting a particular approach compared to the anticipated benefits to the Nuveen Funds and their shareholders. In fulfilling its obligations, the Compliance Committee meets on a quarterly basis. The Compliance Committee receives written and oral reports from the Nuveen Funds’ Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) and meets privately with the CCO at each of its quarterly meetings. The CCO also provides an annual report to the full Board regarding the operations of the Nuveen Funds’ and service providers’ compliance programs as well as any recommendations for modifications thereto. Certain matters not addressed at the committee level may be addressed by another committee or directly by the full Board. The Compliance Committee operates under a written charter adopted and approved by the Board. The members of the Compliance Committee are Ms. Wolff, Chair, Mr. Forrester, Mr. Kenny, Ms. Lancellotta, Ms. Medero, Mr. Thornton and Mr. Toth. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2024, the Compliance Committee, in its current structure, met three times.

The Investment Committee is responsible for the oversight of Nuveen Fund performance, investment risk management and other portfolio-related matters affecting the Nuveen Funds which are not otherwise the jurisdiction of the other Board committees. As part of such oversight, the Investment Committee reviews each Nuveen Fund’s investment performance and investment risks, which may include, but is not limited to, an evaluation of Nuveen Fund performance relative to investment objectives, benchmarks and peer group; a review of risks related to portfolio investments, such as exposures to particular issuers, market sectors, or types of securities, as well as consideration of other factors that could impact or are related to Nuveen Fund performance; and an assessment of Nuveen Fund objectives, policies and practices as such may relate to Nuveen Fund performance. In assessing issues brought to the Investment Committee’s attention or in reviewing an investment policy, technique or strategy, the Investment Committee evaluates the risks to the Nuveen Funds in adopting or recommending a particular approach or resolution compared to the anticipated benefits to the Nuveen Funds and their shareholders.

In fulfilling its obligations, the Investment Committee receives quarterly reports from the investment oversight and the investment risk groups at Nuveen, including from Advisors. Such groups also report to the full Board on a quarterly basis and the full Board participates in further discussions with Fund management at its quarterly meetings regarding matters relating to Nuveen Fund performance and investment risks, including with respect to the various drivers of performance and Nuveen Fund use of leverage and hedging. Accordingly, the Board directly and/or in conjunction with the Investment Committee oversees the investment performance and investment risk management of the Nuveen Funds. The Investment Committee operates under a written charter adopted and approved by the Board. This Investment Committee is composed of the independent trustees of the Nuveen Funds. Accordingly, the members of the Investment Committee are Mr. Boateng and Ms. Lancellotta, Co-Chairs, Mr. Forrester, Mr. Kenny, Ms. Medero, Mr. Moschner, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Starr, Mr. Thornton, Mr. Toth, Ms. Wolff and Mr. Young. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2024, the Investment Committee, in its current structure, met two times.

The Open-End Funds Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in the oversight and monitoring of the Nuveen Funds that are registered as open-end management investment companies (“Open-End Funds”). The committee may review and evaluate matters related to the formation and the initial presentation to the Board of any new Open-End Fund and may review and evaluate any matters relating to any existing Open-End Fund. The Open-End Funds Committee operates under a written charter adopted and approved by the Board. The members of the Open-End Funds Committee are Mr. Forrester and

 Statement of Additional Information     51

Ms. Medero, Co-Chairs, Mr. Boateng, Mr. Kenny, Mr. Thornton, Mr. Toth and Mr. Young. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2024, the Open-End Funds Committee, in its current structure, met two times.

Board diversification and Trustee qualifications

In determining that a particular trustee was qualified to serve on the Board, the Board has considered each trustee’s background, skills, experience and other attributes in light of the composition of the Board with no particular factor controlling. The Board believes that trustees need to have the ability to critically review, evaluate, question and discuss information provided to them, and to interact effectively with Fund management, service providers and counsel, in order to exercise effective business judgment in the performance of their duties, and the Board believes each trustee satisfies this standard. An effective trustee may achieve this ability through his or her educational background; business, professional training or practice; public service or academic positions; experience from service as a board member or executive of investment funds, public companies or significant private or not-for-profit entities or other organizations; and/or other life experiences. Accordingly, set forth below is a summary of the experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills that led to the conclusion, as of the date of this document, that each trustee should continue to serve in that capacity. References to the experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills of directors are pursuant to requirements of the SEC, do not constitute holding out of the Board or any director as having any special expertise or experience and shall not impose any greater responsibility or liability on any such person or on the Board by reason thereof.

Joseph A. Boateng

Since 2007, Mr. Boateng has served as the Chief Investment Officer for Casey Family Programs. He was previously Director of U.S. Pension Plans for Johnson & Johnson from 2002-2006. Mr. Boateng is a board member of the Lumina Foundation and Waterside School, an emeritus board member of Year Up Puget Sound, member of the Investment Advisory Committee and former Chair for the Seattle City Employees’ Retirement System, and an Investment Committee Member for The Seattle Foundation. Mr. Boateng previously served on the Board of Trustees for the College Retirement Equities Fund from 2018 to 2023 and on the Management Committee for TIAA Separate Account VA-1 from 2019 to 2023. Mr. Boateng received a B.S. from the University of Ghana and an M.B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles.

Michael A. Forrester

From 2007 to 2021, Mr. Forrester held various positions with Copper Rock Capital Partners, LLC (“Copper Rock”), including Chief Executive Officer (2014-2021), Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) (2007-2014) and Board Member (2007-2021). Mr. Forrester is currently a member of the Independent Directors Council Governing Council of the Investment Company Institute. He also serves on the Board of Trustees of the Dexter Southfield School. Mr. Forrester previously served on the Board of Trustees for the College Retirement Equities Fund and on the Management Committee for TIAA Separate Account VA-1 from 2007 to 2023. Mr. Forrester has a B.A. from Washington and Lee University.

Thomas J. Kenny

Mr. Kenny, the Nuveen Funds’ Independent Co-Chair for a one year-term expiring on December 31, 2024, served as an Advisory Director (2010-2011), Partner (2004-2010), Managing Director (1999-2004) and Co-Head (2002-2010) of Goldman Sachs Asset Management’s Global Cash and Fixed Income Portfolio Management team, having worked at Goldman Sachs since 1999. Mr. Kenny is a Director and the Chair of the Finance and Investment Committee of Aflac Incorporated and a Director of ParentSquare. He is a former Director and Finance Committee Chair for the Sansum Clinic; former Advisory Board Member, B’Box; former Member of the University of California at Santa Barbara Arts and Lectures Advisory Council; former Investment Committee Member, Cottage Health System; and former President of the Board of Crane Country Day School. Mr. Kenny previously served on the Board of Trustees (2011-2023) and as Chairman (2017-2023) for the College Retirement Equities Fund and on the Management Committee (2011-2023) and as Chairman (2017-2023) for TIAA Separate Account VA-1. He received a B.A. from the University of California, Santa Barbara, and an M.S. from Golden Gate University. He is also a Chartered Financial Analyst.

Amy B. R. Lancellotta

After 30 years of service, Ms. Lancellotta retired at the end of 2019 from the Investment Company Institute (ICI), which represents regulated investment companies on regulatory, legislative and securities industry initiatives that affect funds and their shareholders. From November 2006 until her retirement, Ms. Lancellotta served as Managing Director of ICI’s Independent Directors Council (IDC), which supports fund independent directors in fulfilling their responsibilities to promote and protect the interests of fund shareholders. At IDC, Ms. Lancellotta was responsible for all ICI and IDC activities relating to the fund independent director community. In conjunction with her responsibilities, Ms. Lancellotta advised and represented IDC, ICI, independent directors and the investment company industry on issues relating to fund governance and the role of fund

52     Statement of Additional Information 

directors. She also directed and coordinated IDC’s education, communication, governance and policy initiatives. Prior to serving as Managing Director of IDC, Ms. Lancellotta held various other positions with ICI beginning in 1989. Before joining ICI, Ms. Lancellotta was an associate at two Washington, D.C. law firms. In addition, she has been President, since 2023, and a member, since 2020, of the Board of Directors of the Jewish Coalition Against Domestic Abuse (JCADA), an organization that seeks to end power-based violence, empower survivors and ensure safe communities. Ms. Lancellotta received a B.A. degree from Pennsylvania State University in 1981 and a J.D. degree from the National Law Center, George Washington University (currently known as George Washington University Law School) in 1984.

Joanne T. Medero

Ms. Medero has over 30 years of financial services experience and, most recently, from December 2009 until her retirement in July 2020, she was a Managing Director in the Government Relations and Public Policy Group at BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock). From July 2018 to July 2020, she was also Senior Advisor to BlackRock’s Vice Chairman, focusing on public policy and corporate governance issues. In 1996, Ms. Medero joined Barclays Global Investors (BGI), which merged with BlackRock in 2009. At BGI, she was a Managing Director and served as Global General Counsel and Corporate Secretary until 2006. Then, from 2006 to 2009, Ms. Medero was a Managing Director and Global Head of Government Relations and Public Policy at Barclays Group (IBIM), where she provided policy guidance and directed legislative and regulatory advocacy programs for the investment banking, investment management and wealth management businesses. Before joining BGI, Ms. Medero was a Partner at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP from 1993 to 1995, where she specialized in derivatives and financial markets regulation issues. Additionally, she served as General Counsel of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) from 1989 to 1993 and, from 1986 to 1989, she was Deputy Associate Director/Associate Director for Legal and Financial Affairs at The White House Office of Presidential Personnel. Further, from 2006 to 2010, Ms. Medero was a member of the CFTC Global Markets Advisory Committee and she has been actively involved in financial industry associations, serving as Chair of the Steering Committee of the SIFMA (Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association) Asset Management Group (2016-2018) and Chair of the CTA (Commodity Trading Advisor), CPO (Commodity Pool Operator) and Futures Committee of the Managed Funds Association (2010-2012). Ms. Medero also chaired the Corporations, Antitrust and Securities Practice Group of The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy (from 2010 to 2022 and 2000 to 2002). In addition, since 2019, she has been a member of the Board of Directors of the Baltic-American Freedom Foundation, which seeks to provide opportunities for citizens of the Baltic States to gain education and professional development through exchanges in the United States. Ms. Medero received a B.A. degree from St. Lawrence University in 1975 and a J.D. degree from the National Law Center, George Washington University (currently known as George Washington University Law School) in 1978.

Albin F. Moschner

Mr. Moschner is a consultant in the wireless industry and, in July 2012, founded Northcroft Partners, LLC, a management consulting firm that provides operational, management and governance solutions. Prior to founding Northcroft Partners, LLC, Mr. Moschner held various positions at Leap Wireless International, Inc., a provider of wireless services, where he was a consultant from February 2011 to July 2012, Chief Operating Officer from July 2008 to February 2011, and Chief Marketing Officer from August 2004 to June 2008. Before he joined Leap Wireless International, Inc., Mr. Moschner was President of the Verizon Card Services division of Verizon Communications, Inc. from 2000 to 2003, and President of One Point Services at One Point Communications from 1999 to 2000. Mr. Moschner also served at Zenith Electronics Corporation as Director, President and Chief Executive Officer from 1995 to 1996, and as Director, President and Chief Operating Officer from 1994 to 1995. Mr. Moschner was Chairman of the Board (2019) and a member of the Board of Directors (2012-2019) of USA Technologies, Inc. and, from 1996 until 2016, he was a member of the Board of Directors of Wintrust Financial Corporation. In addition, he is emeritus (since 2018) of the Advisory Boards of the Kellogg School of Management (1995-2018) and the Archdiocese of Chicago Financial Council (2012-2018). Mr. Moschner received a Bachelor of Engineering degree in Electrical Engineering from The City College of New York in 1974 and a Master of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from Syracuse University in 1979.

 Statement of Additional Information     53

John K. Nelson

Mr. Nelson formerly served on the Board of Directors of Core12, LLC from 2008 to 2023, a private firm that develops branding, marketing, and communications strategies for clients. Mr. Nelson has extensive experience in global banking and markets, having served in several senior executive positions with ABN AMRO Holdings N.V. and its affiliated entities and predecessors, including LaSalle Bank Corporation from 1996 to 2008, ultimately serving as Chief Executive Officer of ABN AMRO N.V. North America. During his tenure at the bank, he also served as Global Head of its Financial Markets Division, which encompassed the bank's Currency, Commodity, Fixed Income, Emerging Markets, and Derivatives businesses. He was a member of the Foreign Exchange Committee of the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States and during his tenure with ABN AMRO served as the bank's representative on various committees of The Bank of Canada, European Central Bank, and The Bank of England. Mr. Nelson previously served as a senior, external advisor to the financial services practice of Deloitte Consulting LLP (2012-2014). At Fordham University, he served as a director of The President's Council (2010- 2019) and previously served as a director of The Curran Center for Catholic American Studies (2009-2018). He served as a trustee and Chairman of The Board of Trustees of Marian University (2011-2013). Mr. Nelson is a graduate of Fordham University, holding a BA in Economics and an MBA in Finance.

Loren M. Starr

Mr. Starr was Vice Chair, Senior Managing Director from 2020 to 2021, and Chief Financial Officer, Senior Managing Director from 2005 to 2020, for Invesco Ltd. Mr. Starr is also a Director and member of the Audit Committee for AMG. He is former Chair and member of the Board of Directors, Georgia Leadership Institute for School Improvement (GLISI); former Chair and member of the Board of Trustees, Georgia Council on Economic Education (GCEE). Mr. Starr previously served on the Board of Trustees for the College Retirement Equities Fund and on the Management Committee for TIAA Separate Account VA-1 (2022-2023). Mr. Starr received a B.A. and a B.S. from Columbia College, an M.B.A. from Columbia Business School, and an M.S. from Carnegie Mellon University.

Matthew Thornton III

Mr. Thornton has over 40 years of broad leadership and operating experience from his career with FedEx Corporation (“FedEx”), which, through its portfolio of companies, provides transportation, e-commerce and business services. In November 2019, Mr. Thornton retired as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of FedEx Freight Corporation (FedEx Freight), a subsidiary of FedEx, where, from May 2018 until his retirement, he had been responsible for day-to-day operations, strategic guidance, modernization of freight operations and delivering innovative customer solutions. From September 2006 to May 2018, Mr. Thornton served as Senior Vice President, U.S. Operations at Federal Express Corporation (FedEx Express), a subsidiary of FedEx. Prior to September 2006, Mr. Thornton held a range of positions of increasing responsibility with FedEx, including various management positions. In addition, Mr. Thornton currently (since 2014) serves on the Board of Directors of The Sherwin-Williams Company, where he is a member of the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and the Board of Directors of Crown Castle International (since 2020), where he is a member of the Strategy Committee and the Compensation Committee. Formerly (2012-2018), he was a member of the Board of Directors of Safe Kids Worldwide^®, a non-profit organization dedicated to the prevention of childhood injuries. Mr. Thornton is a member (since 2014) of the Executive Leadership Council (ELC), the nation’s premier organization of global black senior executives. He is also a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD). Mr. Thornton has been recognized by Black Enterprise on its 2017 list of the Most Powerful Executives in Corporate America and by Ebony on its 2016 Power 100 list of the world’s most influential and inspiring African Americans. Mr. Thornton received a B.B.A. degree from the University of Memphis in 1980 and an M.B.A. from the University of Tennessee in 2001.

Terence J. Toth

Mr. Toth was a Co-Founding Partner of Promus Capital (2008-2017). From 2012 to 2021, he was a Director of Quality Control Corporation, from 2010 to 2019, he was a Director of Fulcrum IT Service LLC and from 2012 to 2016, he was a Director of LogicMark LLC. From 2008 to 2013, he was a Director of Legal & General Investment Management America, Inc. From 2004 to 2007, he was Chief Executive Officer and President of Northern Trust Global Investments, and Executive Vice President of Quantitative Management & Securities Lending from 2000 to 2004. He also formerly served on the Board of the Northern Trust Mutual Funds. He joined Northern Trust in 1994 after serving as Managing Director and Head of Global Securities Lending at Bankers Trust (1986 to 1994) and Head of Government Trading and Cash Collateral Investment at Northern Trust from 1982 to 1986. He currently serves as Chair of the Board of the Kehrein Center for the Arts (since 2021) and is on the Board of Catalyst Schools of Chicago (since 2008). He is on the Mather Foundation Board (since 2012) and was Chair of its Investment Committee from 2017 to 2022. Mr. Toth graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Illinois, and received his MBA from New York University. In 2005, he graduated from the CEO Perspectives Program at Northwestern University.

54     Statement of Additional Information 

Margaret L. Wolff

Ms. Wolff retired from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP in 2014 after more than 30 years of providing client service in the Mergers & Acquisitions Group. During her legal career, Ms. Wolff devoted significant time to advising boards and senior management on U.S. and international corporate, securities, regulatory and strategic matters, including governance, shareholder, fiduciary, operational and management issues. From 2013 to 2017, she was a Board member of Travelers Insurance Company of Canada and The Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company (each of which is a part of Travelers Canada, the Canadian operation of The Travelers Companies, Inc.). Ms. Wolff has been a trustee of New York-Presbyterian Hospital since 2005 and, since 2004, she has served as a trustee of The John A. Hartford Foundation (a philanthropy dedicated to improving the care of older adults) where she formerly served as Chair from 2015 to 2022. From 2005 to 2015, she was a trustee of Mt. Holyoke College and served as Vice Chair of the Board from 2011 to 2015. Ms. Wolff received her Bachelor of Arts from Mt. Holyoke College and her Juris Doctor from Case Western Reserve University School of Law.

Robert L. Young

Mr. Young, the Nuveen Funds’ Independent Co-Chair for a six-month term from July 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024, has more than 30 years of experience in the investment management industry. From 1997 to 2017, he held various positions with J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. (“J.P. Morgan Investment”) and its affiliates (collectively, “J.P. Morgan”). Most recently, he served as Chief Operating Officer and Director of J.P. Morgan Investment (from 2010 to 2016) and as President and Principal Executive Officer of the J.P. Morgan Funds (from 2013 to 2016). As Chief Operating Officer of J.P. Morgan Investment, Mr. Young led service, administration and business platform support activities for J.P. Morgan’s domestic retail mutual fund and institutional commingled and separate account businesses, and co-led these activities for J.P. Morgan’s global retail and institutional investment management businesses. As President of the J.P. Morgan Funds, Mr. Young interacted with various service providers to these funds, facilitated the relationship between such funds and their boards, and was directly involved in establishing board agendas, addressing regulatory matters, and establishing policies and procedures. Before joining J.P. Morgan, Mr. Young, a former Certified Public Accountant (CPA), was a Senior Manager (Audit) with Deloitte & Touche LLP (formerly, Touche Ross LLP), where he was employed from 1985 to 1996. During his tenure there, he actively participated in creating, and ultimately led, the firm’s midwestern mutual fund practice. Mr. Young holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting from the University of Dayton and, from 2008 to 2011, he served on the Investment Committee of its Board of Trustees.

Board compensation

The following table shows, for each independent trustee, (1) the aggregate compensation (including deferred amounts), as well as any amounts related to special, ad hoc committees that are temporary in nature and not expected to be long-term, ongoing compensation, paid by the Funds for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2024, (2) the amount of total compensation paid by the Funds that has been deferred, and (3) the total compensation (including deferred amounts), as well as any amounts related to special, ad hoc committees that are temporary in nature and not expected to be long-term, ongoing compensation, paid to each trustee by the Nuveen Funds during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2024. Pursuant to the Board’s deferred compensation plan, a portion of the independent trustees’ compensation may be deferred and treated as though an equivalent dollar amount has been invested in shares of one or more eligible Nuveen Funds. The amount of total compensation that has been deferred provided below represents the total deferred fees payable from the Funds, including fees deferred under the Trust’s different deferred compensation plans prior to January 1, 2024.

 Statement of Additional Information     55

Effective January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 for Mr. Berkley, Mr. Boateng, Ms. Carrier, Prof. Eberly, Ms. Eckl, Mr. Forrester, Prof. Jackson, Dean Jenkins, Mr. Kenny, Prof. Poterba and Mr. Starr, independent trustee compensation was based on the following rates: an annual retainer of $225,000; an annual long-term compensation contribution of $110,000; an annual committee chair fee of $20,000 for the former Nominating and Governance Committee and $30,000 for the chairs of the former Investment Committee, former Operations Committee and former Audit and Compliance Committee; an annual Board chair fee of $136,000; and an annual committee retainer of $20,000 for the former Nominating and Governance Committee and $30,000 for the former Investment Committee, former Operations Committee and former Audit and Compliance Committee.

Effective January 1, 2024, independent trustees receive a $350,000 annual retainer, plus they receive (a) an annual retainer of $30,000 for membership on the Audit Committee and Compliance, Risk Management and Regulatory Oversight Committee, respectively; and (b) an annual retainer of $20,000 for membership on the Dividend Committee, Investment Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee and Open-End Funds Committee, respectively. In addition to the payments described above, the Chair and/or Co-Chair of the Board receives $140,000 annually; the chair and/or co-chair of the Audit Committee and Compliance, Risk Management and Regulatory Oversight Committee receive $30,000 annually; and the chair and/or co-chair of the Dividend Committee, Investment Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee and Open-End Funds Committee receive $20,000 annually. Trustees will be paid either $1,000 or $2,500 for any ad hoc meetings of the Board or its Committees depending upon the meeting’s length and immediacy. For any special assignment committees, the chair and/or co-chair will be paid a quarterly fee of $1,250 and members will be paid a quarterly fee of $5,000. The annual retainers, fees and expenses of the Board are allocated among the funds in the Nuveen Fund complex on the basis of relative net assets, although a minimum amount may be established to be allocated to each fund. In certain instances, fees and expenses will be allocated only to those funds that are discussed at a given meeting.

The Trust does not have a retirement or pension plan. The Trust is a participant in a deferred compensation plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) that permits any independent trustee to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of his or her compensation as an independent trustee. The deferred compensation of a participating trustee is credited to a book reserve account of the participating Nuveen Funds when the compensation would otherwise have been paid to the trustee. The value of the trustee’s deferral account at any time is equal to the value that the account would have had if contributions to the account had been invested and reinvested in shares of one or more of the eligible Nuveen Funds. An independent trustee may elect to receive distributions in a lump sum or over a period of two to 20 years. No participating Nuveen Fund will be liable for any other fund’s obligations to make distributions under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Prior to January 1, 2024, the Trust was a participant in different deferred compensation plans.

56     Statement of Additional Information 

Share ownership

The information in the table below discloses the dollar ranges of (i) each trustee’s beneficial ownership in each Fund, and (ii) each trustee’s aggregate beneficial ownership in all funds within the Nuveen Funds complex, including in each case the value of fund shares elected by the trustee in the trustees’ deferred compensation plan(s) then in effect, based on the value of fund shares as of December 31, 2023:

As of August 28, 2024, the officers and trustees of the Trust, in the aggregate, owned less than 1% of the shares of each of the Funds.

Other than as noted in the table below, as of August 28, 2024, none of the independent trustees or their immediate family members owned, beneficially, or of record, any securities in (i) an investment adviser or principal underwriter of the Funds or (ii) a person (other than a registered investment company) directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with an investment adviser or principal underwriter of the Funds.

The table below presents information on trustees who own securities in companies (other than investment companies) that are advised by entities that are under common control with Advisors as of December 31, 2023:

(1) Mr. Kenny owns 6.6% of KSHFO, LLC.

(2) Advisors, as well as the investment advisers to these Companies, are indirectly commonly controlled by Nuveen, LLC.

(3) These amounts reflect the current value of holdings as of December 31, 2023. As of the date of this SAI, that is the most recent information available regarding the Companies.

(4) These percentages reflect the overall amount committed to invest in the Companies, not current ownership percentages.

Proxy voting policies

The Trust has adopted policies and procedures to govern the Funds’ voting of proxies of portfolio companies. The Trust seeks to use proxy voting as a tool to promote positive returns for long-term shareholders. The Trust believes that sound

 Statement of Additional Information     57

corporate governance practices and responsible corporate behavior create the framework from which public companies can be managed in the long-term interests of shareholders.

As a general matter, the Trust’s Board has delegated to Advisors responsibility for voting proxies of the Funds’ portfolio companies in accordance with the Nuveen Proxy Voting Policies, attached as an Appendix to this SAI.

Advisors votes proxies solicited by an Underlying Fund in the same proportion as the vote of the Underlying Fund’s shareholders other than the Funds (sometimes called “mirror” or “echo” voting).

Advisors has a dedicated team of professionals responsible for reviewing and voting proxies. In analyzing a proposal, in addition to exercising their professional judgment, these professionals utilize various sources of information to enhance their ability to evaluate the proposal. These sources may include research from third-party proxy advisory firms and other consultants, various corporate governance-focused organizations, related publications and Nuveen investment professionals. Based on their analysis of proposals and guided by the Nuveen Proxy Voting Policies, these professionals then vote in a manner intended solely to advance the best interests of the Funds’ shareholders. Occasionally, when a proposal relates to issues not addressed in the Nuveen Proxy Voting Policies, Advisors may seek guidance from the Trust’s Board or a designated committee thereof.

The Trust and Advisors believe that they have implemented policies, procedures and processes designed to prevent conflicts of interest from influencing proxy voting decisions. These include (i) oversight by the Board or a designated committee thereof; (ii) a clear separation of proxy voting functions from external client relationship and sales functions; and (iii) the active monitoring of required annual disclosures of potential conflicts of interest by individuals who have direct roles in executing or influencing the Funds’ proxy voting (e.g., Advisors’ proxy voting professionals, a Trustee, or a senior executive of the Trust, Advisors or Advisors’ affiliates) by Advisors’ legal and compliance professionals.

There could be rare instances in which an individual who has a direct role in executing or influencing the Funds’ proxy voting (e.g., Advisors’ proxy voting professionals, a Trustee, or a senior executive of the Trust, Advisors or Advisors’ affiliates) is either a director or executive of a portfolio company or may have some other association with a portfolio company. In such cases, this individual is required to recuse himself or herself from all decisions related to proxy voting for that portfolio company.

A record of all proxy votes cast for the Funds for the 12-month period ended June 30 can be obtained, free of charge, at www.nuveen.com, and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

58     Statement of Additional Information 

Principal holders of securities

As of August 28, 2024, the following investors were known to hold beneficially or of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of any class of a Fund:

 Statement of Additional Information     59

60     Statement of Additional Information