ck0001612930-20240131
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
THE
TRUST
Angel
Oak Funds Trust (the “Trust”) is a Delaware statutory trust organized on June
20, 2014 and registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“SEC”) as an open-end management investment company. The Trust’s Declaration of
Trust (the “Declaration of Trust”) permits the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the
“Board”) to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of
beneficial interest, without par value, which may be issued in any number of
series. The Board may from time to time issue other series, the assets and
liabilities of which will be separate and distinct from any other series. This
SAI relates to the Class A, Class A1, Class C, and Institutional Class shares of
the Funds (as applicable), each a series of the Trust.
The
Declaration of Trust also provides for indemnification and reimbursement of
expenses out of a Fund’s assets for any shareholder held personally liable for
obligations of the Fund or the Trust. The Declaration of Trust provides that the
Trust shall, upon request, assume the defense of any claim made against any
shareholder for any act or obligation of a Fund or the Trust and satisfy any
judgment thereon. All such rights are limited to the assets of the applicable
Fund(s). The Declaration of Trust further provides that the Trust may maintain
appropriate insurance (for example, fidelity bonding and errors and omissions
insurance) for the protection of the Trust, its shareholders, trustees,
officers, employees and agents to cover possible tort and other liabilities.
However, the activities of the Trust as an investment company would not likely
give rise to liabilities in excess of the Trust’s total assets. Thus, the risk
of a shareholder incurring financial loss on account of shareholder liability is
limited to circumstances in which both inadequate insurance exists and the
applicable Funds are unable to meet their obligations. The Declaration of Trust
also provides that shareholders of the Trust may not bring derivative actions,
unless certain conditions are met, including, among other conditions: (i)
shareholders make a pre-suit written demand upon the Board to bring the action,
(ii) shareholders owning shares representing at least a majority of the
outstanding applicable shares join the derivative action (except with respect to
claims arising under the federal securities laws), and (iii) the Board is given
a 30-day period to consider and investigate the request. In addition, if the
Board determines that such an action is not in the best interest of the Trust or
of a particular Fund or class, as applicable, then (except with respect to
claims arising under the federal securities laws) the complaining shareholders
may not bring the derivative action. In the event that the Board determines that
the action should be brought, such action shall be brought directly by the Trust
and not as a derivative action.
The
Declaration of Trust also provides that the Trust shall not in any way be
limited by any present or future law or custom in regard to investment by
fiduciaries. However, nothing in the Declaration of Trust that modifies or
restricts the duties or liabilities of the Trust’s trustees shall apply to, or
in any way limit, their duties or liabilities with respect to matters arising
under the federal securities laws.
The
Multi-Strategy Income Fund and UltraShort Income Fund are each diversified
series of the Trust. Please see the Prospectus for a discussion of the principal
investment policies and risks of investing in the Funds.
The
Multi-Strategy Income Fund is the successor in interest to a fund having the
same name and investment objective that was included as a series (the
“Predecessor Multi-Strategy Income Fund”) of another investment company, Valued
Advisers Trust (the “VAT Trust”), and that was also advised by the Fund’s
investment adviser, Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC. On March 26, 2015, the
shareholders of the Predecessor Multi-Strategy Income Fund approved the
reorganization of the Class A and Institutional Class shares of the Predecessor
Multi-Strategy Income Fund with and into the Class A and Institutional Class
shares of the Multi-Strategy Income Fund, respectively, and effective as of the
close of business on April 10, 2015, the assets and liabilities of the Class A
and Institutional Class shares of the Predecessor Multi-Strategy Income Fund
were transferred to the Trust in exchange for the Class A and Institutional
Class shares of the Multi-Strategy Income Fund.
The
Funds’ Prospectus and this SAI are a part of the Trust’s Registration Statement
filed with the SEC. Copies of the Trust’s complete Registration Statement may be
obtained from the SEC upon payment of the prescribed fee or may be accessed free
of charge at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
INVESTMENT
POLICIES AND RISKS
The
Funds’ principal investment strategies and the risks associated with the same
are described in the “Fund Summary” and “Additional Information About the Funds’
Objectives, Principal Investment Strategies, and Principal Investment Risks”
sections of the Prospectus. The following discussion provides additional
information about those principal investment strategies and related risks, as
well as information about investment strategies (and related risks) that the
Funds may utilize, even though they are not considered to be “principal”
investment strategies. Accordingly, an investment strategy (and related risk)
that is described below, but which is not described in the Prospectus with
respect to a Fund, should not be considered to be a principal strategy (or
related risk) applicable to the Fund.
Corporate
Debt Securities.
Corporate debt securities are long- and short-term debt obligations issued by
companies (such as publicly issued and privately placed bonds, notes and
commercial paper). The Funds’ investment adviser, Angel Oak Capital Advisors,
LLC (“Angel Oak” or the “Adviser”), considers corporate debt securities to be of
investment grade quality if they are
rated
BBB- or higher by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group (“S&P”) or an
equivalent rating from another National Recognized Statistical Ratings
Organization, or if unrated, determined by the Adviser to be of comparable
quality. Investment grade debt securities generally have adequate to strong
protection of principal and interest payments. In the lower end of this
category, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely
to lead to a weakened capacity to pay interest and repay principal than in
higher rated categories. For additional information about these rating rankings,
see Appendix A - Description of Securities Ratings.
Mortgage-Backed
and Asset-Backed Securities.
The
Funds may invest in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. Mortgage-backed
securities are mortgage-related securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S.
government, its agencies and instrumentalities, or issued by non-government
entities. Mortgage-related securities represent ownership in pools of mortgage
loans assembled for sale to investors by various government agencies such as the
Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) and government-related
organizations such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and the
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), as well as by nongovernment
issuers such as commercial banks, savings and loan institutions, mortgage
bankers and private mortgage insurance companies. Although certain
mortgage-related securities are guaranteed by a third party or otherwise
similarly secured, the market value of the security, which may fluctuate, is not
so secured. These securities differ from conventional bonds in that the
principal is paid back to the investor as payments are made on the underlying
mortgages in the pool. Accordingly, the Funds receive monthly scheduled payments
of principal and interest along with any unscheduled principal prepayments on
the underlying mortgages. Because these scheduled and unscheduled principal
payments must be reinvested at prevailing interest rates, mortgage-backed
securities do not provide an effective means of locking in long-term interest
rates for the investor.
In
addition, there are a number of important differences among the agencies and
instrumentalities of the U.S. government that issue mortgage-related securities
and among the securities they issue. Mortgage-related securities issued by GNMA
include GNMA Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates (also known as Ginnie Maes)
which are guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest. That
guarantee is backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Treasury. GNMA is a
corporation wholly owned by the U.S. government within the Department of Housing
and Urban Development. Mortgage-related securities issued by FNMA include FNMA
Guaranteed Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates (also known as Fannie Maes) and
are guaranteed as to payment of principal and interest by FNMA itself and backed
by a line of credit with the U.S. Treasury. FNMA is a government-sponsored
entity wholly owned by public stockholders. Mortgage-related securities issued
by FHLMC include FHLMC Mortgage Participation Certificates (also known as
Freddie Macs) guaranteed as to payment of principal and interest by FHLMC itself
and backed by a line of credit with the U.S. Treasury. FHLMC is a
government-sponsored entity wholly owned by public stockholders.
In
September 2008, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) placed Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac into conservatorship. As the conservator, FHFA succeeded to all
rights, titles, powers and privileges of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and of any
stockholder, officer or director of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with respect to
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the assets of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In
connection with the conservatorship, the U.S. Treasury entered into a Senior
Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (SPA) with each of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
pursuant to which the U.S. Treasury agreed to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of
senior preferred stock with an aggregate initial liquidation preference of $1
billion and obtained warrants and options to for the purchase of common stock of
each of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Under the SPAs as currently amended, the
U.S. Treasury has pledged to provide financial support to a government-sponsored
enterprise (“GSE”) in any quarter in which the GSE has a net worth deficit as
defined in the respective SPA.
Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac are continuing to operate as going concerns while in
conservatorship and each remain liable for all of its obligations, including its
guaranty obligations, associated with its mortgage-backed securities. The SPAs
are intended to enhance each of Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s ability to meet
its obligations. Under a letter agreement entered into in January 2021, the GSEs
are permitted to retain earnings and raise private capital to enable them to
meet the minimum capital requirements under the FHFA’s Enterprise Regulatory
Capital Framework. The letter agreement also permits the GSEs to develop a plan
to exit conservatorship, but may not do so until all litigation involving the
conservatorships is resolved and the GSEs have the minimum capital required by
FHFA’s rules. Should Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac be taken out of conservatorship,
it is unclear whether the U.S. Treasury would continue to enforce its rights or
perform its obligations under the SPAs. It is also unclear how the capital
structure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would be constructed
post-conservatorship, and what effects, if any, the privatization of Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac will have on their creditworthiness and guarantees of certain
mortgage-backed securities. Accordingly, should the FHFA take Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac out of conservatorship, there could be an adverse impact on the
value of their securities which could cause the Funds’ investments to lose
value.
Asset-backed
securities are structured like mortgage-backed securities, but instead of
mortgage loans or interests in mortgage loans, the underlying assets may include
such items as motor vehicle installment sales contracts or installment loan
contracts, leases of various types of real and personal property, and
receivables from credit card agreements and from sales of personal property.
Regular payments received on asset-backed securities include both interest and
principal. Asset-backed securities typically have no U.S. government backing.
Additionally, the ability of an issuer of asset-backed securities to enforce its
security interest in the underlying assets may be limited.
If
the Funds purchase a mortgage-backed or other asset-backed security at a
premium, the premium may be lost if there is a decline in the market value of
the security whether resulting from changes in interest rates or prepayments in
the underlying collateral. As with other interest-bearing securities, the prices
of such securities are inversely affected by changes in interest rates. Although
the value of a mortgage-backed or other asset-backed security may decline when
interest rates rise, the converse is not necessarily true, since in periods of
declining interest rates the mortgages and loans underlying the securities are
prone to prepayment, thereby shortening the average life of the security and
shortening the period of time over which income at the higher rate is received.
When interest rates are rising, the rate of prepayment tends to decrease,
thereby lengthening the period of time over which income at the lower rate is
received. For these and other reasons, a mortgage-backed or other asset-backed
security’s average maturity may be shortened or lengthened as a result of
interest rate fluctuations and, therefore, it is not possible to predict
accurately the security’s return. In addition, while the trading market for
short-term mortgages and asset-backed securities is ordinarily quite liquid, in
times of financial stress the trading market for these securities may become
restricted.
Collateralized
Mortgage Obligations (“CMOs”).
The Funds may invest in CMOs. A CMO is a hybrid between a mortgage-backed bond
and a mortgage pass-through security. A CMO is a type of mortgage-backed
security that creates separate classes with varying maturities and interest
rates, called tranches. Similar to a bond, interest and prepaid principal is
paid, in most cases, semiannually. CMOs may be collateralized by whole mortgage
loans, but are more typically collateralized by portfolios of mortgage
pass-through securities guaranteed by GNMA, FHLMC, or FNMA, and their income
streams.
CMOs
are structured into multiple classes, each bearing a different fixed or floating
interest rate and stated maturity. Actual maturity and average life will depend
upon the prepayment experience of the collateral. CMOs provide for a modified
form of call protection through a de facto breakdown of the underlying pool of
mortgages according to how quickly the loans are repaid. Monthly payment of
principal received from the pool of underlying mortgages, including prepayments,
is first returned to investors holding the shortest maturity class. Investors
holding the longer maturity classes receive principal only after the first class
has been retired. An investor is partially guarded against a sooner than desired
return of principal because of the sequential payments.
In
a typical CMO transaction, a corporation (issuer) issues multiple series (e.g.,
Series A, B, C and Z) of CMO bonds (Bonds). Proceeds of the Bond offering are
used to purchase mortgages or mortgage pass-through certificates (Collateral).
The Collateral is pledged to a third party trustee as security for the Bonds.
Principal and interest payments from the Collateral are used to pay principal on
the Bonds in the following order: Series A, B, C and Z. The Series A, B, and C
Bonds all bear current interest. Interest on a Series Z Bond is accrued and
added to principal and a like amount is paid as principal on the Series A, B, or
C Bond currently being paid off. Only after the Series A, B, and C Bonds are
paid in full does the Series Z Bond begin to receive payment. With some CMOs,
the issuer serves as a conduit to allow loan originators (primarily builders or
savings and loan associations) to borrow against their loan portfolios.
CMOs
that are issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or by any of its agencies
or instrumentalities will be considered U.S. government securities by the Funds,
while other CMOs, even if collateralized by U.S. government securities, will
have the same status as other privately issued securities for purposes of
applying the Funds’ diversification tests.
FHLMC
CMOs are debt obligations of FHLMC issued in multiple classes having different
maturity dates which are secured by the pledge of a pool of conventional
mortgage loans purchased by FHLMC. Payments of principal and interest on the
FHLMC CMOs are made semiannually. The amount of principal payable on each
semiannual payment date is determined in accordance with FHLMC’s mandatory
sinking fund schedule, which, in turn, is equal to approximately 100% of FHA
prepayment experience applied to the mortgage collateral pool. All sinking fund
payments in the FHLMC CMOs are allocated to the retirement of the individual
classes of bonds in the order of their stated maturities. Payment of principal
on the mortgage loans in the collateral pool in excess of the amount of FHLMC’s
minimum sinking fund obligation for any payment date are paid to the holders of
the FHLMC CMOs as additional sinking fund payments. Because of the
“pass-through” nature of all principal payments received on the collateral pool
in excess of FHLMC’s minimum sinking fund requirement, the rate at which
principal of the FHLMC CMOs is actually repaid is likely to be such that each
class of bonds will be retired in advance of its scheduled maturity date. If
collection of principal (including prepayments) on the mortgage loans during any
semiannual payment period is not sufficient to meet FHLMC CMO’s minimum sinking
fund obligation on the next sinking fund payment date, FHLMC agrees to make up
the deficiency from its general funds.
Classes
of CMOs may also include interest only (“IOs”) and principal only (“POs”). IOs
and POs are stripped mortgage-backed securities representing interests in a pool
of mortgages the cash flow from which has been separated into interest and
principal components. IOs (interest only securities) receive the interest
portion of the cash flow while POs (principal only securities) receive the
principal portion. IOs and POs can be extremely volatile in response to changes
in interest rates. As interest rates rise and fall, the value of IOs tends to
move in the same direction as interest rates. POs perform best when prepayments
on the underlying mortgages rise since this increases the rate at which the
investment is returned and the yield to
maturity
on the PO. When payments on mortgages underlying a PO are slow, the life of the
PO is lengthened and the yield to maturity is reduced.
CMOs
are generally subject to the same risks as mortgage-backed securities. In
addition, CMOs may be subject to credit risk because the issuer or credit
enhancer has defaulted on its obligations and the Funds may not receive all or
part of its principal. Obligations issued by U.S. government-related entities
are guaranteed as to the payment of principal and interest, but are not backed
by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. The performance of private
label mortgage-backed securities, issued by private institutions, is based on
the financial health of those institutions. Although GNMA guarantees timely
payment of GNMA certificates even if homeowners delay or default, tracking the
“pass-through” payments may, at times, be difficult.
Collateralized
Debt Obligations (“CDOs”).
The Funds may invest in CDOs. A CDO is a security backed by a pool of bonds,
loans and other debt obligations. CDOs are not limited to investing in one type
of debt and accordingly, a CDO may own corporate bonds, commercial loans,
asset-backed securities, residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial
mortgage-backed securities, and emerging market debt. The CDO’s securities are
typically divided into several classes, or bond tranches, that have differing
levels of investment grade or credit tolerances. Most CDO issues are structured
in a way that enables the senior bond classes and mezzanine classes to receive
investment-grade credit ratings. Credit risk is shifted to the most junior class
of securities. If any defaults occur in the assets backing a CDO, the senior
bond classes are first in line to receive principal and interest payments,
followed by the mezzanine classes and finally by the lowest rated (or non-rated)
class, which is known as the equity tranche. Similar in structure to a
collateralized mortgage obligation (described above) CDOs are unique in that
they represent different types of debt and credit risk.
Collateralized
Loan Obligations (“CLOs”).
The Funds may invest in CLOs, which are debt instruments typically backed by a
pool of loans. The risks of an investment in a CLO depend largely on the type of
the collateral securities and the class of the CLO in which the Funds invest.
Some CLOs have credit ratings, but are typically issued in various classes with
various priorities. Normally, CLOs are privately offered and sold (that is, they
are not registered under the securities laws) and may be characterized by the
Funds as illiquid investments; however, an active dealer market may exist for
CLOs that qualify for Rule 144A transactions. In addition to the normal
interest rate, default and other risks of fixed income securities, CLOs carry
additional risks, including the possibility that distributions from collateral
securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments, the quality
of the collateral may decline in value or default, the Funds may invest in CLOs
that are subordinate to other classes, values may be volatile, and disputes with
the issuer may produce unexpected investment results.
Banks
and Diversified Financials Risk.
Companies in the group of industries related to banks and diversified financials
are often subject to extensive governmental regulation and intervention, which
may adversely affect the scope of their activities, the prices they can charge
and the amount of capital they must maintain. Governmental regulation may change
frequently and may have significant adverse consequences for companies in the
group of industries related to banks and diversified financials, including
effects not intended by such regulation. The impact of recent or future
regulation in various countries on any individual financial company or on the
industries as a whole cannot be predicted. A Fund’s emphasis on community banks
may make the Fund more economically vulnerable in the event of a downturn in the
banking industry. Community banks may face heightened risks of failure during
times of economic downturns than larger banks. Community banks may also be
subject to greater lending risks than larger banks.
Certain
risks may impact the value of investments in the group of industries related to
banks and diversified financials more severely than those of investments outside
these industries, including the risks associated with companies that operate
with substantial financial leverage. Companies in the group of industries
related to banks and diversified financials may also be adversely affected by
increases in interest rates and loan losses, decreases in the availability of
money or asset valuations, credit rating downgrades and adverse conditions in
other related markets.
Insurance
companies, in particular, may be subject to severe price competition and/or rate
regulation, which may have an adverse impact on their profitability. Insurance
companies are subject to extensive government regulation in some countries and
can be significantly affected by changes in interest rates, general economic
conditions, price and marketing competition, the imposition of premium rate
caps, or other changes in government regulation or tax law. Different segments
of the insurance industry can be significantly affected by mortality and
morbidity rates, environmental clean-up costs and catastrophic events such as
earthquakes, hurricanes and terrorist acts.
During
the financial crisis that began in 2007, the deterioration of the credit markets
impacted a broad range of mortgage, asset-backed, auction rate, sovereign debt
and other markets, including U.S. and non-U.S. credit and interbank money
markets, thereby affecting a wide range of financial institutions and markets. A
number of large financial institutions failed during that time, merged with
stronger institutions or had significant government infusions of capital.
Instability in the financial markets caused certain financial companies to incur
large losses. Some financial companies experienced declines in the valuations of
their assets, took actions to raise capital (such as the issuance of debt or
equity securities), or even ceased operations. Some financial companies borrowed
significant amounts of capital from government sources and may face future
government-imposed
restrictions
on their businesses or increased government intervention. Those actions caused
the securities of many financial companies to decline in value.
The
group of industries related to banks and diversified financials is also a target
for cyber attacks and may experience technology malfunctions and disruptions. In
recent years, cyber attacks and technology failures have become increasingly
frequent and have caused significant losses.
Risks
specific to the bank and diversified financial group of industries also may
include:
Asset
Quality and Credit Risk.
When financial institutions loan money, commit to loan money or enter into a
letter of credit or other contract with a counterparty, they incur credit risk,
or the risk of losses if their borrowers do not repay their loans or their
counterparties fail to perform according to the terms of their contract. The
financial companies in which a Fund will invest offer a number of products which
expose them to credit risk, including loans, leases and lending commitments,
derivatives, trading account assets and assets held-for-sale. Financial
institutions allow for and create loss reserves against credit risks based on an
assessment of credit losses inherent in their credit exposure (including
unfunded credit commitments). This process, which is critical to their financial
results and condition, requires difficult, subjective and complex judgments,
including forecasts of economic conditions and how these economic predictions
might impair the ability of their borrowers to repay their loans. As is the case
with any such assessments, there is always the chance that the financial
institutions in which a Fund invests will fail to identify the proper factors or
that they will fail to accurately estimate the impacts of factors that they
identify. Failure to identify credit risk factors or the impact of credit
factors may result in increased non-performing assets, which will result in
increased loss reserve provisioning and reduction in earnings. Poor asset
quality can also affect earnings through reduced interest income which can
impair a bank’s ability to service debt obligations or to generate sufficient
income for equity holders. Bank failure may result due to inadequate loss
reserves, inadequate capital to sustain credit losses or reduced earnings due to
non-performing assets. A Fund will not have control over the asset quality of
the financial institutions in which the Fund will invest, and these institutions
may experience substantial increases in the level of their non-performing assets
which may have a material adverse impact on the Fund’s investments.
Capital
Risk.
A bank’s capital position is extremely important to its overall financial
condition and serves as a cushion against losses. U.S. banking regulators have
established specific capital requirements for regulated banks. Federal banking
regulators proposed amended regulatory capital regulations in response to the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”)
and the international capital and liquidity requirements set forth by the Basel
Committee on Banking Supervision (“Basel III”) protocols which would impose even
more stringent capital requirements. In the event that a regulated bank falls
below certain capital adequacy standards, it may become subject to regulatory
intervention including, but not limited to, being placed into a
FDIC-administered receivership or conservatorship. The regulatory provisions
under which the regulatory authorities act are intended to protect depositors.
The deposit insurance fund and the banking system are not intended to protect
stockholders or other investors in other securities issued by a bank or its
holding company. The effect of inadequate capital can have a potentially adverse
consequence on the institution’s financial condition, its ability to operate as
a going concern and its ability to operate as a regulated financial institution
and may have a material adverse impact on a Fund’s investments.
Earnings
Risk.
Earnings are the primary means for financial institutions to generate capital to
support asset growth, to provide for loan losses and to support their ability to
pay dividends to stockholders. The quantity as well as the quality of earnings
can be affected by excessive or inadequately managed credit risk that may result
in losses and require additions to loss reserves, or by high levels of market
risk that may unduly expose an institution’s earnings to volatility in interest
rates. The quality of earnings may also be diminished by undue reliance on
extraordinary gains, nonrecurring events, or favorable tax effects. Future
earnings may be adversely affected by an inability to forecast or control
funding and operating expenses, net interest margin compression improperly
executed or ill-advised business strategies, or poorly managed or uncontrolled
exposure to other risks. Deficient earnings can result in inadequate capital
resources to support asset growth or insufficient cash flow to meet the
financial institution’s near term obligations. Under certain circumstances, this
may result in the financial institution being required to suspend operations or
the imposition of a cease-and-desist order by regulators which could potentially
impair a Fund’s investments.
Management
Risk.
The ability of management to identify, measure, monitor and control the risks of
an institution’s activities and to ensure a financial institution’s safe, sound
and efficient operation in compliance with applicable laws and regulations are
critical. Depending on the nature and scope of an institution’s activities,
management practices may need to address some or all of the following risks:
credit, market, operating, reputation, strategic, compliance, legal, liquidity
and other risks. A Fund will not have direct or indirect control over the
management of the financial institutions in which the Fund will invest and,
given the Funds’ long-term investment strategies, it is likely that the
management teams and their policies may change. The inability of management to
operate their financial institution in a safe, sound and efficient manner in
compliance with applicable laws and regulations, or changes in management of
financial institutions in which a Fund invests, may have an adverse impact on
the Fund’s investment.
Litigation
Risk.
Financial institutions face significant legal risks in their businesses, and the
volume of claims and amount of damages and penalties claimed in litigation and
regulatory proceedings against financial institutions remain high. Substantial
legal liability or significant regulatory action against the companies in which
a Fund invests could have material adverse financial effects or cause
significant reputational harm to these companies, which in turn could seriously
harm their business prospects. Legal liability or regulatory action against the
companies in which a Fund invests could have material adverse financial effects
on the Fund and adversely affect the Fund’s earnings and book
value.
Market
Risk.
The financial institutions in which a Fund may invest are directly and
indirectly affected by changes in market conditions. Market risk generally
represents the risk that values of assets and liabilities or revenues will be
adversely affected by changes in market conditions. Market risk is inherent in
the financial instruments associated with the operations and activities
including loans, deposits, securities, short-term borrowings, long-term debt,
trading account assets and liabilities, and derivatives of the financial
institutions in which a Fund may invest. Market risk includes, but is not
limited to, fluctuations in interest rates, equity and futures prices, changes
in the implied volatility of interest rates, equity and futures prices and price
deterioration or changes in value due to changes in market perception or actual
credit quality of the issuer. Accordingly, depending on the instruments or
activities impacted, market risks can have wide ranging, complex adverse effects
on the operations and overall financial condition of the financial institutions
in which a Fund may invest as well as adverse effects on the Fund’s results from
operations and overall financial condition.
Monetary
Policy Risk.
Monetary policies have had, and will continue to have, significant effects on
the operations and results of financial institutions. There can be no assurance
that a particular financial institution will not experience a material adverse
effect on its net interest income in a changing interest rate environment.
Factors such as the liquidity of the global financial markets, and the
availability and cost of credit may significantly affect the activity levels of
customers with respect to the size, number and timing of transactions.
Fluctuation in interest rates, which affect the value of assets and the cost of
funding liabilities, are not predictable or controllable, may vary and may
impact economic activity in various regions.
Competition.
The group of industries related to banks and diversified financials, including
the banking sector, is extremely competitive, and it is expected that the
competitive pressures will increase. Merger activity in the financial services
industry has resulted in and is expected to continue to result in, larger
institutions with greater financial and other resources that are capable of
offering a wider array of financial products and services. The group of
industries related to banks and diversified financials has become considerably
more concentrated as numerous financial institutions have been acquired by or
merged into other institutions. The majority of financial institutions in which
a Fund may invest will be relatively small with significantly fewer resources
and capabilities than larger institutions; this size differential puts them at a
competitive disadvantage in terms of product offering and access to capital.
Technological advances and the growth of e-commerce have made it possible for
non-financial institutions and non-bank financial institutions to offer products
and services that have traditionally been offered by banking and other financial
institutions. It is expected that the cross-industry competition and
inter-industry competition will continue to intensify and may be adverse to the
financial institutions in which the Funds may invest.
Regulatory
Risk.
Financial institutions, including community banks, are subject to various state
and federal banking regulations that impact how they conduct business, including
but not limited to how they obtain funding, their ability to operate, and the
value of a Fund’s investments. Changes to these regulations could have an
adverse effect on their operations and operating results and the Funds’
investments. The Funds expect to make long-term investments in financial
institutions that are subject to various state and federal regulations and
oversight. Congress, state legislatures and the various bank regulatory agencies
frequently introduce proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the
banking industry in response to the Dodd-Frank Act, Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) rulemaking or otherwise. The likelihood and timing of
any proposals or legislation and the impact they might have on a Fund’s
investments in financial institutions affected by such changes cannot be
determined and any such changes may be adverse to the Fund’s investments.
Ownership of the stock of certain types of regulated banking institutions may
subject a Fund to additional regulations. Investments in banking institutions
and transactions related to the Fund’s investments may require approval from one
or more regulatory authorities. If a Fund were deemed to be a bank holding
company or thrift holding company, bank holding companies or thrift holding
companies that invest in the Fund would be subject to certain restrictions and
regulations.
Certificates
of Deposit (“CDs”).
The Funds may invest in CDs. CDs are negotiable certificates issued against
funds deposited in a commercial bank for a definite period of time and earn a
specified return. CDs are subject to inflation, liquidity, and interest rate
risks. CDs are also subject to the risk of incurring monetary penalties if
withdrawn within a certain period of time. CDs are also subject to the risk of
the failure of the issuing bank.
Credit
Linked Notes (“CLNs”).
The Funds may invest in CLNs. A CLN is a security with an embedded credit
default swap allowing the issuer to transfer a specific credit risk to credit
investors.
Convertible
Securities.
The Funds may invest in convertible securities which are preferred stocks or
bonds that pay a fixed dividend or interest payment and are convertible into
common stock or other equity interests at a specified price or conversion ratio
during a specified period. Although convertible bonds, convertible preferred
stocks, and other securities convertible into equity securities may have some
attributes of income securities or debt securities, the Funds generally treat
such securities as equity securities. By investing in convertible securities,
the Funds may seek income, and may also seek the opportunity, through the
conversion feature, to participate in the capital appreciation of the common
stock or other interests into which the securities are convertible, while
potentially earning a higher fixed rate of return than is ordinarily available
in common stocks. While the value of convertible securities depends in part on
interest rate changes and the credit quality of the issuers, the value of these
securities will also change based on changes in the value of the underlying
stock. Income paid by a convertible security may provide a limited cushion
against a decline in the price of the security; however, convertible securities
generally have less potential for gain than common stocks. Also, convertible
bonds generally pay less income than non-convertible bonds.
The
Funds may invest in contingent securities structured as contingent convertible
securities, also known as “CoCos.” Contingent convertible securities are hybrid
debt securities typically issued by non-U.S. banks and are designed to behave
like bonds in times of economic health and either convert into equity at a
predetermined share price or are written down in value based on the specific
terms of the individual security if a pre-specified trigger event occurs. Unlike
traditional convertible securities, the conversion of a contingent convertible
security from debt to equity is “contingent” and will occur only in the case of
a trigger event. Trigger events vary by instrument and are defined by the
documents governing the contingent convertible security. Trigger events may
include a decline in the issuer’s capital below a specified threshold level,
increase in the issuer’s risk weighted assets, the share price of the issuer
falling to a particular level for a certain period of time and certain
regulatory events.
Contingent
convertible securities are subject to the credit, interest rate, high yield
security, foreign security and markets risks associated with bonds and equities,
and to the risks specific to convertible securities in general. Contingent
convertible securities are also subject to additional risks specific to their
structure including conversion risk. Because trigger events are not consistently
defined among contingent convertible securities, this risk is greater for
contingent convertible securities that are issued by banks with capital ratios
close to the level specified in the trigger event.
In
addition, coupon payments on contingent convertible securities are discretionary
and may be cancelled by the issuer at any point, for any reason, and for any
length of time. Due to the uncertainty surrounding coupon payments, contingent
convertible securities may be volatile and their price may decline rapidly in
the event that coupon payments are suspended.
Convertible
contingent securities are a newer form of instrument and the regulatory
environment for these instruments continues to evolve. Because the market for
contingent convertible securities is evolving, it is uncertain how the larger
market for contingent convertible securities would react to a trigger event or
coupon suspension applicable to a single issuer.
Foreign
Securities.
The Funds may invest directly in foreign securities. Investing in securities of
foreign companies and countries involves certain considerations and risks that
are not typically associated with investing in U.S. government securities and
securities of domestic companies. There may be less publicly available
information about a foreign issuer than a domestic one, and foreign companies
are not generally subject to uniform accounting, auditing and financial
standards and requirements comparable to those applicable to U.S. companies.
There may also be less government supervision and regulation of foreign
securities exchanges, brokers and listed companies than exists in the United
States. Interest and dividends paid by foreign issuers as well as gains or
proceeds realized from the sale or other disposition of foreign securities may
be subject to withholding and other foreign taxes, which may decrease the net
return on such investments as compared to dividends and interest paid to the
Funds by domestic companies or the U.S. government. There may be the possibility
of expropriations, seizure or nationalization of foreign deposits, the
imposition of economic sanctions and other similar measures, confiscatory
taxation, political, economic or social instability or diplomatic developments
that could affect assets of the Funds held in foreign countries. The type and
severity of sanctions and other similar measures, including counter sanctions
and other retaliatory actions, that may be imposed could vary broadly in scope,
and their impact is difficult to ascertain. These types of measures may include,
but are not limited to, banning a sanctioned country or certain persons or
entities associated with such country from global payment systems that
facilitate cross-border payments, restricting the settlement of securities
transactions by certain investors, and freezing the assets of particular
countries, entities or persons. The imposition of sanctions and other similar
measures could, among other things, result in a decline in the value and/or
liquidity of securities issued by the sanctioned country or companies located in
or economically tied to the sanctioned country, downgrades in the credit ratings
of the sanctioned country's securities or those of companies located in or
economically tied to the sanctioned country, currency devaluation or volatility,
and increased market volatility and disruption in the sanctioned country and
throughout the world. Sanctions and other similar measures could directly or
indirectly limit or prevent a Fund from buying and selling securities (in the
sanctioned country and other markets), significantly delay or prevent the
settlement of securities transactions, and adversely impact a Fund's liquidity
and performance. In addition, investing in foreign securities will generally
result in higher commissions than investing in similar domestic securities.
Decreases
in the value of currencies of the foreign countries in which the Funds will
invest relative to the U.S. dollar will result in a corresponding decrease in
the U.S. dollar value of the Funds’ assets denominated in those currencies (and
possibly a corresponding increase in the amount of securities required to be
liquidated to meet distribution requirements). Conversely, increases in the
value of currencies of the foreign countries in which the Funds invest relative
to the U.S. dollar will result in a corresponding increase in the U.S. dollar
value of the Funds’ assets (and possibly a corresponding decrease in the amount
of securities to be liquidated).
Investing
in emerging markets can have more risk than investing in developed foreign
markets. The risks of investing in these markets may be exacerbated relative to
investments in foreign markets. Governments of developing and emerging market
countries may be more unstable as compared to more developed countries.
Developing and emerging market countries may have less developed securities
markets or exchanges, and legal and accounting systems. It may be more difficult
to sell securities at acceptable prices and security prices may be more volatile
than in countries with more mature markets. Currency values may fluctuate more
in developing or emerging markets. Developing or emerging market countries may
be more likely to impose government restrictions, including confiscatory
taxation, expropriation or nationalization of a company’s assets, and
restrictions on foreign ownership of local companies. In addition, emerging
markets may impose restrictions on the Funds’ ability to repatriate investment
income or capital and thus, may adversely affect the operations of the Funds.
Certain emerging markets may impose constraints on currency exchange and some
currencies in emerging markets may have been devalued significantly against the
U.S. Dollar. For these and other reasons, the prices of securities in emerging
markets can fluctuate more significantly than the prices of securities of
companies in developed countries. The less developed the country, the greater
effect these risks may have on the Funds.
International
trade tensions may arise from time to time which could result in trade tariffs,
embargos or other restrictions or limitations on trade. The imposition of any
actions on trade could trigger a significant reduction in international trade,
an oversupply of certain manufactured goods, substantial price reductions of
goods and possible failure of individual companies or industries which could
have a negative impact on a fund’s performance. Events such as these are
difficult to predict and may or may not occur in the future.
European
Securities.
European
countries can be significantly affected by the actions of their own individual
governments as well as the actions of other European institutions, such as the
European Union (“EU”), the European Economic and Monetary Union (“EMU”) and the
European Central Bank. The EU is an intergovernmental and supranational union
consisting of 27 member states. One of the key responsibilities of the EU is to
create and administer a unified trade policy. The member states created the EMU
that established different stages and commitments that member states need to
follow to achieve greater economic policy coordination and monetary cooperation.
Member states relinquish their monetary control to the European Central Bank and
use a single unified currency, the euro.
Investments
in Europe are also subject to currency risks. Further, because many countries
are dependent on foreign exports, any fluctuations in the euro exchange rate
could have a negative effect on an issuer’s profitability and performance.
The
EU has been extending its influence to the east as it has accepted several new
Eastern European countries as members. Some of the new members remain burdened
by the inherited inefficiencies of centrally planned economies. Additionally,
these countries are dependent on Western Europe for trade and credit. Russia has
attempted, and may attempt in the future, to assert its influence in Eastern
Europe through economic or military measures. In February 2022, Russia invaded
Ukraine, which amplified existing geopolitical tensions. The current and future
status of the EU continues to be the subject of political and regulatory
controversy, with widely differing views both within and between member
countries.
The
European financial markets have experienced uncertainty over the past few years,
largely because of concerns about rising government debt levels and increased
budget deficits. Political and regulatory responses to address structural and
policy issues have created even greater instability throughout the region. The
high levels of public debt increases the likelihood that certain European
issuers will either default or restructure their debt obligations, which would
have a negative effect on asset values. The use of austerity measures in
countries such as Spain, Italy, Greece, Portugal and Ireland during times in
which the Eurozone has high levels of unemployment has limited economic growth.
European countries can be adversely affected by the tight fiscal and monetary
controls that the EMU requires its members to comply with.
The
United Kingdom (“UK”) withdrew from the EU on January 31, 2020 following a June
2016 referendum referred to as “Brexit.” After an initial transition period, a
provisional trade and cooperation agreement between the UK and EU was agreed to
and went into force on January 1, 2021. Further discussions are to be held
between the UK and the EU in relation to matters not covered by the trade
agreement, such as in relation to financial services. Though the ramifications
of Brexit will not be fully known for some time, the uncertainty surrounding the
UK's economy, and its legal, political, and economic relationship with the
remaining member states of the EU, may cause considerable disruption in
securities markets, including decreased liquidity and increased volatility, as
well as currency fluctuations in the British pound's exchange rate against the
U.S. dollar.
Market
Disruptions Risk.
The
Funds are subject to investment and operational risks associated with financial,
economic and other global market developments and disruptions, including those
arising from, but not limited to, war; terrorism; market manipulation;
government interventions, defaults and shutdowns; political changes or
diplomatic developments; embargoes, tariffs, sanctions and other trade barriers;
public health emergencies (such as the spread of infectious diseases, pandemics
and epidemics); and natural/environmental disasters. Any of these events could
negatively impact the securities markets and cause a Fund to lose value. These
events can also impair the technology and other operational systems upon which
the Funds’ service providers, including Angel Oak as the Funds’ investment
adviser, rely, and could otherwise disrupt the Funds’ service providers’ ability
to fulfill their obligations to the Funds.
Beginning
in 2020, the global spread of an infectious respiratory illness caused by a
novel strain of coronavirus (known as COVID-19) caused volatility, severe market
dislocations and liquidity constraints in many markets. The transmission of
COVID-19 and efforts to contain its spread resulted in travel restrictions and
disruptions, closed international borders, enhanced health screenings at ports
of entry and elsewhere, disruption of and delays in healthcare service
preparation and delivery, quarantines, event and service cancellations or
interruptions, disruptions to business operations (including staff reductions),
supply chains and consumer activity, as well as general concern and uncertainty
that negatively affected the economic environment. The long-term impact of
COVID-19, and other infectious illness outbreaks, epidemics or pandemics that
may arise in the future, could adversely affect the economies of many nations or
the entire global economy, the financial performance of individual issuers,
borrowers and sectors and the health of the markets generally in potentially
significant and unforeseen ways.
In
addition, U.S. and global markets recently have experienced increased
volatility, including as a result of the recent failures of certain U.S. and
non-U.S. banks, which could be harmful to a Fund and issuers in which it
invests. For example, if a bank in which the Fund or an issuer has an account
fails, any cash or other assets in bank accounts may be temporarily inaccessible
or permanently lost by the Fund or issuer. If a bank that provides a
subscription line credit facility, asset-based facility, other credit facility
and/or other services to an issuer fails, the issuer could be unable to draw
funds under its credit facilities or obtain replacement credit facilities or
other services from other lending institutions with similar terms. Even if banks
used by issuers in which a Fund invests remain solvent, continued volatility in
the banking sector could cause or intensify an economic recession, increase the
costs of banking services or result in the issuers being unable to obtain or
refinance indebtedness at all or on as favorable terms as could otherwise have
been obtained. Conditions in the banking sector are evolving, and the scope of
any potential impacts to a Fund and issuers, both from market conditions and
also potential legislative or regulatory responses, are uncertain.
The
foregoing could lead to a significant economic downturn or recession, increased
market volatility, a greater number of market closures, higher default rates and
adverse effects on the values and liquidity of securities or other assets. Such
impacts, which may vary across asset classes, may adversely affect the
performance of the Funds. In certain cases, an exchange or market may close or
issue trading halts on specific securities or even the entire market, which may
result in the Funds being, among other things, unable to buy or sell certain
securities or financial instruments or to accurately price their investments.
To
satisfy any shareholder redemption requests during periods of extreme
volatility, it is more likely the Funds may be required to dispose of portfolio
investments at unfavorable prices compared to their intrinsic value.
Exchange-Traded
Notes (“ETNs”).
The Funds may invest in ETNs. ETNs are a type of senior, unsecured,
unsubordinated debt security issued by financial institutions that combines
aspects of both bonds and exchange traded funds ETFs. An ETN’s returns are based
on the performance of a market index minus fees and expenses. Similar to ETFs,
ETNs are listed on an exchange and traded in the secondary market. However,
unlike an ETF, an ETN can be held until the ETN’s maturity, at which time the
issuer will pay a return linked to the performance of the market index to which
the ETN is linked minus certain fees.
Unlike
regular bonds, ETNs do not make periodic interest payments and principal is not
protected. ETNs are subject to credit risk and the value of an ETN may drop due
to a downgrade in the issuer’s credit rating, despite the underlying market
benchmark or strategy remaining unchanged. The value of an ETN may also be
influenced by time to maturity, level of supply and demand for the ETN,
volatility and lack of liquidity in underlying assets, changes in the applicable
interest rates, changes in the issuer’s credit rating, and economic, legal,
political, or geographic events that affect the referenced underlying asset.
When a Fund invests in ETNs it will bear its proportionate share of any fees and
expenses borne by the ETN. A Fund’s decision to sell its ETN holdings may be
limited by the availability of a secondary market. In addition, although an ETN
may be listed on an exchange, the issuer may not be required to maintain the
listing and there can be no assurance that a secondary market will exist for an
ETN.
ETNs
are also subject to tax risk. No assurance can be given that the U.S. Internal
Revenue Service (“IRS”) will accept, or a court will uphold, how the Funds
characterize and treat ETNs for tax purposes. Further, the IRS and Congress have
considered proposals that would change the timing and character of income and
gains from ETNs.
An
ETN that is tied to a specific market benchmark or strategy may not be able to
replicate and maintain exactly the composition and relative weighting of
securities, commodities or other components in the applicable market benchmark
or strategy. Some ETNs that use leverage can, at times, be relatively illiquid
and, thus, they may be difficult to purchase or sell at a fair price. Leveraged
ETNs are subject to the same risk as other instruments that use leverage in any
form.
The
market value of ETN shares may differ from their market benchmark or strategy.
This difference in price may be due to the fact that the supply and demand in
the market for ETN shares at any point in time is not always identical to the
supply and demand in the market for the securities, commodities or other
components underlying the market benchmark or strategy that the ETN seeks to
track. As a result, there may be times when an ETN share trades at a premium or
discount to its market benchmark or strategy.
Fixed
Income Securities.
The Funds may invest in fixed income securities. Even though interest-bearing
securities are investments that promise a stable stream of income, the prices of
such securities are affected by changes in interest rates. In general, fixed
income security prices rise when interest rates fall and fall when interest
rates rise. Securities with shorter maturities, while offering lower yields,
generally provide greater price stability than longer term securities and are
less affected by changes in interest rates. The values of fixed income
securities also may be affected by changes in the credit rating or financial
condition of the issuing entities. Once the rating of a portfolio security has
been changed, the Funds will consider all circumstances deemed relevant in
determining whether to continue to hold the security. A Fund with a negative
average portfolio duration may increase in value when interest rates rise, and
generally incurs a loss when interest rates decline. If an issuer calls or
redeems an instrument held by the Fund during a time of declining interest
rates, the Fund might need to reinvest the proceeds in an investment offering a
lower yield, and therefore may not benefit from any increase in value as a
result of declining interest rates. A Fund with a negative average portfolio
duration may decline in value as interest rates decrease.
Fixed
income investments bear certain risks, including credit risk, or the ability of
an issuer to pay interest and principal as they become due. Generally, higher
yielding bonds are subject to more credit risk than lower yielding bonds.
Interest rate risk refers to the fluctuations in value of fixed income
securities resulting from the inverse relationship between the market value of
outstanding fixed income securities and changes in interest rates. An increase
in interest rates will generally reduce the market value of fixed income
investments and a decline in interest rates will tend to increase their value.
Call
risk is the risk that an issuer will pay principal on an obligation earlier than
scheduled or expected, which would accelerate cash flows from, and shorten the
average life of, the security. Bonds are typically called when interest rates
have declined. In the event of a bond being called, a Fund may have to reinvest
the proceeds in lower yielding securities to the detriment of the Fund.
Extension
risk is the risk that an issuer may pay principal on an obligation slower than
expected, having the effect of extending the average life and duration of the
obligation. This typically happens when interest rates have increased.
A
number of factors, including changes in a central bank’s monetary policies or
general improvements in the economy, may cause interest rates to rise. Fixed
income securities with longer durations are more sensitive to interest rate
changes than securities with shorter durations, making them more volatile. This
means their prices are more likely to experience a considerable reduction in
response to a rise in interest rates.
High
Yield Securities.
When investing in fixed income securities, the Funds may purchase securities
regardless of their rating, including fixed income securities rated below
investment grade. Securities rated below investment grade are often referred to
as high yield securities or “junk bonds.” Investments in securities rated below
investment grade that are eligible for purchase by a Fund are described as
“speculative” by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch. Investments in lower rated
corporate debt securities generally provide greater income and increased
opportunity for capital appreciation than investments in higher quality
securities, but they also typically entail greater price volatility and
principal and income risk. These high yield securities are regarded as
predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer’s continuing ability to
meet principal and interest payments. Analysis of the creditworthiness of
issuers of debt securities that are high yield may be more complex than for
issuers of higher quality debt securities.
High
yield securities may be more susceptible to real or perceived adverse economic
and competitive industry conditions than investment grade securities. The prices
of high yield securities have been found to be more sensitive to adverse
economic downturns or individual corporate developments. A projection of an
economic downturn or of a period of rising interest rates, for example, could
cause a decline in high yield security prices because the advent of a recession
could lessen the ability of a highly leveraged company to make principal and
interest payments on its debt securities. If an issuer of high yield securities
defaults, in addition to risking payment of all or a portion of interest and
principal, the Fund by investing in such securities may incur additional
expenses to obtain recovery. In the case of high yield securities structured as
zero-coupon or pay-in-kind securities, their market prices are affected to a
greater extent by interest rate changes, and therefore tend to be more volatile
than securities that pay interest periodically and in cash.
The
secondary market on which high yield securities are traded may be less liquid
than the market for higher grade securities. Less liquidity in the secondary
trading market could adversely affect the price at which the Fund could sell a
high yield security, and could adversely affect the daily net asset value
(“NAV”) of the shares. Adverse publicity and investor perceptions, whether or
not based on fundamental analysis, may decrease the values and liquidity of high
yield securities, especially in a thinly-traded market. When secondary markets
for high yield securities are less liquid than the market for higher grade
securities, it may be more difficult to value the securities because such
valuation may require more research, and elements of judgment may play a greater
role in the valuation because there is less reliable, objective data available.
The
use of credit ratings to evaluate high yield securities can involve certain
risks. For example, credit ratings evaluate the safety of principal and interest
payments, not the market value risk of high yield securities. Also, credit
rating agencies may fail to change credit ratings in a timely fashion to reflect
events since the security was last rated. The Adviser does not rely solely on
credit ratings when selecting securities for the Fund, and develops its own
analysis of issuer credit quality. If a credit rating agency changes the rating
of a portfolio security held by the Fund, the Fund may retain the security if
the Adviser deems it in the best interest of shareholders.
U.S.
Government Obligations.
U.S. government securities include direct obligations issued by the United
States Treasury, such as U.S. Treasury bills (maturities of one year or less),
U.S. Treasury notes (maturities of one to ten years) and U.S. Treasury bonds
(generally maturities of greater than ten years). They also include U.S.
government agencies and instrumentalities that issue or guarantee securities,
such as the Federal Home Loan Banks, FNMA and the Student Loan Marketing
Association. Except for U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of U.S. government
agencies and instrumentalities may or may not be supported by the full faith and
credit of the United States. Some, such as those of the Federal Home Loan Banks,
are backed by the right of the issuer to borrow from the U.S. Treasury, others
by discretionary authority of the U.S. government to purchase the agencies’
obligations, while still others, such as the Student Loan Marketing Association,
are supported only by the credit of the instrumentality. In the case of
securities not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, the
investor must look principally to the agency issuing or guaranteeing the
obligation for ultimate repayment and may not be able to assess a claim against
the United States itself in the event the agency or instrumentality does not
meet its commitment.
The
total public debt of the United States as a percentage of gross domestic product
has grown rapidly since the beginning of the 2008–2009 financial downturn.
Although high debt levels do not necessarily indicate or cause economic
problems, they may create certain systemic risks if sound debt management
practices are not implemented. A high national debt can raise concerns that the
U.S. government will not be able to make principal or interest payments when
they are due. This increase has also necessitated the need for the U.S. Congress
to negotiate adjustments to the statutory debt limit to increase the cap on the
amount the U.S. government is permitted to borrow to meet its existing
obligations and finance current budget deficits. In August 2011, S&P lowered
its long term sovereign credit rating on the U.S. In explaining the downgrade at
that time, S&P cited, among other reasons, controversy over raising the
statutory debt limit and growth in public spending. Any
controversy or ongoing uncertainty regarding the statutory debt limit
negotiations may impact the U.S. long term sovereign credit rating and may cause
market uncertainty. As a result, market prices and yields of securities
supported by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government may be adversely
affected.
Investment
Company Securities.
The
Funds may invest in the securities of other investment companies, including
ETFs, closed-end funds and open-end (mutual) funds (also called “underlying
funds”). The Funds may invest in inverse ETFs, including leveraged ETFs. Inverse
ETFs seek to provide investment results that match a certain percentage of the
inverse of the results of a specific index on a daily or monthly basis.
To
the extent such underlying funds are index-based, these underlying funds will
generally attempt to replicate the performance of a particular index. An
underlying fund may not always hold all of the same securities as the index it
attempts to track. An underlying fund may use statistical sampling techniques to
attempt to replicate the returns of an index. Statistical sampling techniques
attempt to match the investment characteristics of the index and the fund by
taking into account such factors as capitalization, industry exposures, dividend
yield, price/earnings (“P/E”) ratio, price/book (“P/B”) ratio, and earnings
growth. An underlying fund may not track the index perfectly because differences
between the index and the fund’s portfolio can cause differences in performance.
In addition, expenses and transaction costs, the size and frequency of cash flow
into and out of the fund, and differences between how and when the fund and the
index are valued can cause differences in performance.
When
a Fund invests in underlying funds it will indirectly bear its proportionate
share of any fees and expenses payable directly by the underlying fund. In
connection with its investments in other investment companies, a Fund will incur
higher expenses, many of which may be duplicative. Furthermore, because the
Funds invest in shares of ETFs and underlying funds their performances are
directly related to the ability of the ETFs and underlying funds to meet their
respective investment objectives, as well as the allocation of each Fund’s
assets among the ETFs and underlying funds by the Adviser. Accordingly, the
Funds’ investment performance will be influenced by the investment strategies of
and risks associated with the ETFs and
underlying
funds in direct proportion to the amount of assets the Funds allocate to the
ETFs and underlying funds utilizing such strategies.
Investments
in ETFs involve certain inherent risks generally associated with investments in
a broadly-based portfolio of stocks, including risks that: (1) the general level
of stock prices may decline, thereby adversely affecting the value of each unit
of the ETF or other instrument; (2) an ETF, to the extent such ETF is
index-based, may not fully replicate the performance of its benchmark index
because of the temporary unavailability of certain index securities in the
secondary market or discrepancies between the ETF and the index with respect to
the weightings of securities or number of stocks held; (3) an ETF may also be
adversely affected by the performance of the specific index, market sector or
group of industries on which it is based; and (4) an ETF, to the extent such ETF
is index-based, may not track an index as well as a traditional index mutual
fund because ETFs are valued by the market and, therefore, there may be a
difference between the market value and the ETF’s NAV. Additionally, investments
in fixed income ETFs involve certain inherent risks generally associated with
investments in fixed income securities, including the risk of fluctuation in
market value based on interest rates rising or declining and risks of a decrease
in liquidity, such that no assurances can be made that an active trading market
for underlying ETFs will be maintained.
There
is also a risk that the underlying funds or ETFs may terminate due to
extraordinary events. For example, any of the service providers to the
underlying fund or ETF, such as the trustee or sponsor, may close or otherwise
fail to perform their obligations to the underlying fund or ETF, and the
underlying fund or ETF may not be able to find a substitute service provider.
Also, the underlying fund or ETF may be dependent upon licenses to use the
various indices as a basis for determining their compositions and/or otherwise
to use certain trade names. If these licenses are terminated, the respective
underlying fund or ETF may also terminate. In addition, an underlying fund or
ETF may terminate if its net assets fall below a certain amount. Although the
Funds believe that in the event of the termination of an underlying fund or ETF,
the applicable Fund will be able to invest instead in shares of an alternate
underlying fund or ETF tracking the same market index or another index covering
the same general market, there can be no assurance that shares of an alternate
underlying fund or ETF would be available for investment at that time.
Inverse
and leveraged ETFs are subject to additional risks not generally associated with
traditional ETFs. To the extent that a Fund invests in inverse ETFs, the value
of the Fund’s investments will decrease when the index underlying the ETF’s
benchmark rises, a result that is the opposite from traditional equity or bond
funds. The NAV and market price of leveraged or inverse ETFs are usually more
volatile than the value of the tracked index or of other ETFs that do not use
leverage. This is because inverse and leveraged ETFs use investment techniques
and financial instruments that may be considered aggressive, including the use
of derivative transactions and short selling techniques. The use of these
techniques may cause the inverse or leveraged ETFs to lose more money in market
environments that are adverse to their investment strategies than other funds
that do not use such techniques.
Generally,
under the 1940 Act, a Fund may not acquire shares of another investment company
(including ETFs) if, immediately after such acquisition, (i) such fund would
hold more than 3% of the other investment company’s total outstanding shares,
(ii) if such fund’s investment in securities of the other investment company
would be more than 5% of the value of the total assets of the fund, or (iii) if
more than 10% of such fund’s total assets would be invested in investment
companies. In accordance with Section 12(d)(1)(F) of the 1940 Act, the Funds may
invest in underlying funds in excess of the 5% and 10% limits described above as
long as the Funds (and all of their affiliated persons, including the Adviser)
do not acquire more than 3% of the total outstanding stock of such underlying
fund. If a Fund seeks to redeem shares of an underlying fund purchased in
reliance on Section 12(d)(1)(F), the underlying fund is not obligated to redeem
an amount exceeding 1% of the underlying fund’s outstanding shares during a
period of less than 30 days.
In
addition, Rule 12d1-4 under the 1940 Act allows a fund to acquire shares of an
underlying fund in excess of the limits described above. Fund of funds
arrangements relying on Rule 12d1-4 are subject to several conditions, certain
of which are specific to a fund’s position in the arrangement (i.e., as an
acquiring or acquired fund). Notable conditions include those relating to: (i)
control and voting that prohibit an acquiring fund, its investment adviser (or a
subadviser) and their respective affiliates from beneficially owning more than
25% of the outstanding voting securities of an unaffiliated acquired fund;
(ii) certain required findings relating to complexity, fees and undue
influence (among other things); (iii) fund of funds investment agreements; and
(iv) general limitations on an acquired fund’s investments in other investment
companies and private funds to no more than 10% of the acquired fund’s assets,
except in certain circumstances. To the extent a Fund is an acquired fund in
reliance on Rule 12d1-4, the limitations placed on acquired funds under Rule
12d1-4 may limit or restrict the Fund’s ability to acquire certain investments.
Money
Market Funds.
A Fund may invest in underlying money market funds that either seek to maintain
a stable $1 NAV (“stable NAV money market funds”) or that have a share price
that fluctuates (“variable NAV money market funds”). Although an underlying
stable NAV money market fund seeks to maintain a stable $1 NAV, it is possible
for a Fund to lose money by investing in such a money market fund. Because the
share price of an underlying variable NAV money market fund will fluctuate, when
a Fund sells the shares it owns they may be worth more or less than what the
Fund originally paid for them. In addition, neither
type
of money market fund is designed to offer capital appreciation. Certain
underlying money market funds may impose a fee upon the sale of
shares.
Illiquid
Investments.
The Funds may invest in illiquid investments (i.e., investments that are not
readily marketable). Illiquid investments may include, but are not limited to,
certain restricted investments (investments the disposition of which is
restricted under the federal securities laws), investments that may only be
resold pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
“Securities Act”); and repurchase agreements with maturities in excess of seven
days. However, a Fund will not acquire illiquid investments if, as a result,
such investments would comprise more than 15% of the value of the Fund’s net
assets. The Funds have implemented a written liquidity risk management program
and related procedures in accordance with SEC requirements (the “Liquidity
Program”) that is reasonably designed to assess and manage the Funds’ “liquidity
risk” (defined by the SEC as the risk that a Fund could not meet requests to
redeem shares issued by the Fund without significant dilution of remaining
investors’ interest in the Fund). Liquidity classifications will be made after
reasonable inquiry and taking into account, among other things, market, trading
and investment-specific considerations deemed to be relevant to the liquidity
classification of the Funds’ investments in accordance with the Liquidity
Program.
An
institutional market has developed for certain restricted investments.
Accordingly, contractual or legal restrictions on the resale of a security may
not be indicative of the liquidity classification of the security.
Restricted
investments may be sold only in privately negotiated transactions or in a public
offering with respect to which a registration statement is in effect under the
Securities Act. Where registration is required, the applicable Fund may be
obligated to pay all or part of the registration expenses and a considerable
period may elapse between the time of the decision to sell and the time the Fund
may be permitted to sell a security under an effective registration statement.
If, during such a period, adverse market conditions were to develop, the Fund
might obtain a less favorable price than that which prevailed when it decided to
sell.
Illiquid
investments will be priced at fair value as determined in good faith under
procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. If, through the appreciation of
illiquid investments or the depreciation of liquid investments, a Fund should be
in a position where more than 15% of the value of its net assets are invested in
illiquid investments, the Fund will take appropriate steps to bring its illiquid
investments to or below 15% of its net assets within a reasonable period of
time.
Borrowing.
The Funds may borrow for investment purposes and for other purposes permitted by
the 1940 Act. Under current law as interpreted by the SEC and its staff, the
Fund may borrow money in the amount of up to one-third of the Fund’s total
assets for any purpose and up to 5% of the Fund’s total assets from banks or
other lenders for temporary purposes. The Fund’s total assets include the
amounts being borrowed. Under the 1940 Act, a Fund is required to maintain
continuous asset coverage of 300% with respect to permitted borrowings.
Borrowing subjects a Fund to costs in the form of interest, which the Fund may
not recover through investment earnings. A Fund may also be required to maintain
minimum average balances in connection with a borrowing or to pay a commitment
or other fee to maintain a line of credit. These types of requirements would
increase the cost of borrowing to the Fund over the stated interest rate.
Pursuant
to an exemptive order issued by the SEC on April 25, 2017, a Fund may engage in
interfund lending transactions, to the extent such participation is consistent
with the Fund’s investment objective and investment policies. As part of the
interfund lending program, the Funds will have the ability to lend to each
other, as detailed in the exemptive relief (the “InterFund Lending Program”).
Any loan made through the InterFund Lending Program always would be more
beneficial to a borrowing Fund (i.e., at a lower interest rate) than borrowing
from a bank and more beneficial to a lending Fund (i.e., at a higher rate of
return) than an alternative short-term investment. The term of an interfund loan
is limited to the time required to receive payment for securities sold, but in
no event more than seven days. In addition, an interfund loan is callable with
one business day’s notice. All loans are for temporary cash management purposes
and the interest rates to be charged will be the average of the overnight
repurchase agreement rate and the bank loan rate.
The
limitations detailed above and the other conditions of the SEC exemptive order
permitting interfund lending are designed to minimize the risks associated with
interfund lending for both the lending Fund and the borrowing Fund. No Fund may
borrow more than the amount permitted by its investment limitations and all
loans are subject to numerous conditions designed to ensure fair and equitable
treatment of all participating Funds. The interfund lending facility is subject
to the oversight and periodic review of the Board.
No
borrowing or lending activity is without risk. When a Fund borrows money from
another Fund, there is a risk that the interfund loan could be called on one
business day’s notice or not renewed, in which case the Fund may have to borrow
from a bank at higher rates if an interfund loan is not available. If a
borrowing Fund is unable to repay the loan when due, a delay in repayment to the
lending Fund could result in a lost investment opportunity for the lending Fund.
Repurchase
Agreements.
Each Fund may engage in repurchase agreement transactions involving the type of
securities in which it is permitted to invest. Repurchase agreements are
transactions by which a Fund purchases a security and simultaneously commits to
resell that security to the seller (a bank or securities dealer) at an agreed
upon price on an agreed upon date (usually within seven days of purchase). The
resale price reflects the purchase price plus an agreed upon market rate of
interest which is unrelated to the coupon rate or date of maturity of the
purchased security. Repurchase agreements involve certain risks not associated
with direct investments in the underlying securities. In the event of a default
or bankruptcy by the seller, the applicable Fund will seek to liquidate such
collateral. The exercise of a Fund’s right to liquidate such collateral could
involve certain costs or delays and, to the extent that proceeds from any sale
upon a default of the obligation to repurchase were less than the repurchase
price, the Fund could suffer a loss. Repurchase agreements are considered to be
loans by an investment company under the 1940 Act. Each Fund will not invest
more than 33 1/3% of its net assets in repurchase agreements.
The
use of repurchase agreements involves certain risks. For example, if the seller
of the agreements defaults on its obligation to repurchase the underlying
securities at a time when the value of these securities has declined, the
applicable Fund may incur a loss upon disposition of them. If the seller of the
agreement becomes insolvent and subject to liquidation or reorganization under
the Bankruptcy Code or other laws, a bankruptcy court may determine that the
underlying securities are collateral not within the control of the Funds and
therefore subject to sale by the trustee in bankruptcy. Finally, it is possible
that the Funds may not be able to substantiate their interest in the underlying
securities. While the management of the Trust acknowledges these risks, it is
expected that they can be controlled through stringent security selection
criteria and careful monitoring procedures.
Reverse
Repurchase Agreements.
The
Funds may engage in reverse repurchase agreements. Reverse repurchase agreements
are agreements that involve the sale of securities held by a Fund to financial
institutions such as banks and broker-dealers, with an agreement that the Fund
will repurchase the securities at an agreed upon price and date. During the
reverse repurchase agreement period, the applicable Fund continues to receive
interest and principal payments on the securities sold. The Funds may employ
reverse repurchase agreements (i) for temporary emergency purposes or to
meet repurchase requests so as to avoid liquidating other portfolio securities
during unfavorable market conditions; (ii) to cover short-term cash
requirements resulting from the timing of trade settlements; or (iii) to
take advantage of market situations where the interest income to be earned from
the investment of the proceeds of the transaction is greater than the interest
expense of the transaction.
Reverse
repurchase agreements involve the risk that the market value of securities to be
purchased by a Fund may decline below the price at which the Fund is obligated
to repurchase the securities, or that the other party may default on its
obligation, so that the Fund is delayed or prevented from completing the
transaction. In the event the buyer of securities under a reverse repurchase
agreement files for bankruptcy or becomes insolvent, the Fund’s use of the
proceeds from the sale of the securities may be restricted pending a
determination by the other party, or its trustee or receiver, whether to enforce
the Fund’s obligations to repurchase the securities.
Hybrid
Securities.
Preferred stock, including trust-preferred stocks, has a preference in
liquidation (and, generally dividends) over common stock but is subordinated in
liquidation to debt. As a general rule the market value of preferred stocks with
fixed dividend rates and no conversion rights varies inversely with interest
rates and perceived credit risk, with the price determined by the dividend rate.
Some preferred stocks are convertible into other securities (for example, common
stock) at a fixed price and ratio or upon the occurrence of certain events. The
market price of convertible preferred stocks generally reflects an element of
conversion value. Because many preferred stocks lack a fixed maturity date,
these securities generally fluctuate substantially in value when interest rates
change; such fluctuations often exceed those of long-term bonds of the same
issuer. Some preferred stocks pay an adjustable dividend that may be based on an
index, formula, auction procedure or other dividend rate reset mechanism. In the
absence of credit deterioration, adjustable rate preferred stocks tend to have
more stable market values than fixed rate preferred stocks. All preferred stocks
are also subject to the same types of credit risks of the issuer as corporate
bonds. In addition, because preferred stock is junior to debt securities and
other obligations of an issuer, deterioration in the credit rating of the issuer
will cause greater changes in the value of a preferred stock than in a more
senior debt security with similar yield characteristics. Preferred stocks may be
rated by S&P and Moody’s although there is no minimum rating which a
preferred stock must have (and a preferred stock may not be rated) to be an
eligible investment for the Funds. The Adviser expects, however, that generally
the preferred stocks in which the Funds invest will be rated at least CCC by
S&P or Caa by Moody’s or, if unrated, of comparable quality in the opinion
of the Adviser. Preferred stocks rated CCC by S&P are regarded as
predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay preferred
stock obligations and represent the highest degree of speculation among
securities rated between BB and CCC; preferred stocks rated Caa by Moody’s are
likely to be in arrears on dividend payments. Moody’s rating with respect to
preferred stocks does not purport to indicate the future status of payments of
dividends.
Derivative
Instruments.
The Funds’ derivatives and other similar instruments (collectively referred to
in this section as “derivatives” or “derivative investments”) have risks,
including the leverage, market, counterparty, liquidity, operational, and legal
risks. They also involve the risk of imperfect correlation between the value of
such instruments and the underlying assets
of
the applicable Fund, which creates the possibility that the loss on such
instruments may be greater than the gain in the value of the underlying assets
in the Fund’s portfolio; the loss of principal; the possible default of the
other party to the transaction; and illiquidity of the derivative investments.
If a counterparty becomes bankrupt or otherwise fails to perform its obligations
under a derivative contract due to financial difficulties, the applicable Fund
may experience significant delays in obtaining any recovery under the derivative
contract in a bankruptcy or other reorganization proceeding. Counterparty risk
also includes the risks of having concentrated exposure to a counterparty. In
addition, in the event of the insolvency of a counterparty to a derivative
transaction, the derivative contract would typically be terminated at its fair
market value. If a Fund is owed this fair market value in the termination of the
derivative contract and its claim is unsecured, the Fund will be treated as a
general creditor of such counterparty, and will not have any claim with respect
to the underlying security. Using derivatives is also subject to operational and
legal risks. Operational risk generally refers to risk related to potential
operational issues, including documentation issues, settlement issues, systems
failures, inadequate controls, and human error. Legal risk generally refers to
insufficient documentation, insufficient capacity or authority of counterparty,
or legality or enforceability of a contract.
The
counterparty risk for cleared derivative transactions is generally lower than
for uncleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives because generally a clearing
organization becomes substituted for each counterparty to a cleared derivative
contract and, in effect, guarantees the parties’ performance under the contract
as each party to a trade looks only to the clearing house for performance of
financial obligations. However, there can be no assurance that the clearing
house, or its members, will satisfy its obligations to the Funds.
Certain
of the derivative investments in which the Funds may invest may, in certain
circumstances, give rise to a form of financial leverage, which may magnify a
Fund’s gains or losses and the risk of owning such instruments. Like most other
investments, derivatives are subject to the risk that the market value of the
instrument will change in a way detrimental to a Fund’s interest. The ability to
successfully use derivative investments depends on the ability of the Adviser to
predict pertinent market movements, which cannot be assured. In addition,
amounts paid by the Funds as premiums and cash or other assets held in margin
accounts with respect to the Funds’ derivative investments would not be
available to the Funds for other investment purposes, which may result in lost
opportunities for gain.
The
use of derivatives may also subject a Fund to liquidity risk which generally
refers to risk involving the liquidity demands that derivatives can create to
make payments of margin, collateral, or settlement payments to counterparties.
Liquidity risk also refers to the risk that a Fund may be required to hold
additional cash or sell other investments in order to obtain cash to close out
derivatives or meet the liquidity demands noted above. A Fund may have to sell a
security at a disadvantageous time or price to meet such obligations. OTC
derivatives may be more difficult to purchase, sell or value than other
investments. Although both OTC and exchange-traded derivatives markets may
experience a lack of liquidity, OTC non-standardized derivative transactions are
generally less liquid than exchange-traded instruments. The illiquidity of the
derivatives markets may be due to various factors, including congestion,
disorderly markets, limitations on deliverable supplies, the participation of
speculators, government regulation and intervention, and technical and
operational or system failures. In addition, the liquidity of a secondary market
in an exchange-traded derivative contract may be adversely affected by “daily
price fluctuation limits” established by the exchanges which limit the amount of
fluctuation in an exchange-traded contract price during a single trading day.
Once the daily limit has been reached in the contract, no trades may be entered
into at a price beyond the limit, thus preventing the liquidation of open
positions. Prices have in the past moved beyond the daily limit on a number of
consecutive trading days. If it is not possible to close an open derivative
position entered into by a Fund, the Fund would continue to be required to make
cash payments of variation (or mark-to-market) margin in the event of adverse
price movements. In such a situation, if the Fund has insufficient cash, it may
have to sell portfolio securities to meet variation margin requirements at a
time when it may be disadvantageous to do so. The absence of liquidity may also
make it more difficult for a Fund to ascertain a market value for such
instruments. The inability to close derivatives transactions positions also
could have an adverse impact on a Fund’s ability to effectively hedge its
portfolio. OTC derivatives that are not cleared are also subject to counterparty
risk, which is the risk that the other party to the contract will not fulfill
its contractual obligation to complete the transaction with a Fund. If a
counterparty were to default on its obligations, a Fund’s contractual remedies
against such counterparty may be subject to bankruptcy and insolvency laws,
which could affect the Fund’s rights as a creditor (e.g., the Fund may not
receive the net amount of payments that it is contractually entitled to
receive). In addition, the use of certain derivatives may cause the Funds to
realize higher amounts of income or short-term capital gains (generally taxed at
ordinary income tax rates).
The
Adviser, with respect to the Funds, has filed a notice of eligibility with the
National Futures Association (“NFA”) claiming an exclusion from the definition
of the term Commodity Pool Operator (“CPO”) pursuant to Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (“CFTC”) Regulation 4.5, as promulgated under the Commodity
Exchange Act, as amended (“CEA”), with respect to the Funds’ operations.
Therefore, neither the Funds nor the Adviser (with respect to the Funds) is
subject to registration or regulation as a commodity pool or CPO under the CEA.
If the Adviser or a Fund becomes subject to these requirements, as well as
related NFA rules, the Funds may incur additional compliance and other expenses.
The
derivatives markets have become subject to comprehensive statutes, regulations
and margin requirements. In particular, in the United States the Dodd-Frank Act
regulates the OTC derivatives market by, among other things, requiring many
derivative transactions to be cleared and traded on an exchange, expanding
entity registration requirements, imposing business conduct requirements on
dealers and requiring banks to move some derivatives trading units to a
non-guaranteed affiliate separate from the deposit-taking bank or divest them
altogether. Rulemaking proposed or implemented under the Dodd-Frank Act could
potentially limit or completely restrict the ability of the Funds to use these
instruments as a part of their investment strategies, increase the costs of
using these instruments or make them less effective. Limits or restrictions
applicable to the counterparties with which the Funds engage in derivative
transactions could also prevent the Funds from using these instruments or affect
the pricing or other factors relating to these instruments, or may change
availability of certain investments.
Regulation
of the derivatives market presents additional risks to the Fund and may limit
the ability of the Fund to use, and the availability or performance of such
instruments. Pursuant to Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act, a fund’s derivatives
exposure is limited through a value-at-risk (“VaR”) test and requires the
adoption and implementation of a derivatives risk management program for certain
derivatives users. However, subject to certain conditions, funds that do not
invest heavily in derivatives may be deemed limited derivatives users (as
defined in Rule 18f-4) and would not be subject to the full requirements of Rule
18f-4. When the Fund trades reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing
transactions, including certain tender option bonds, it needs to aggregate the
amount of indebtedness associated with the reverse repurchase agreements or
similar financing transactions with the aggregate amount of any other senior
securities representing indebtedness (e.g., bank borrowings, if applicable) when
calculating the Fund’s asset coverage ratio or treat all such transactions as
derivatives transactions. Reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing
transactions aggregated with other indebtedness do not need to be included in
the calculation of whether a fund satisfies the limited derivatives users
exception, but for funds subject to the VaR testing requirement, reverse
repurchase agreements and similar financing transactions must be included for
purposes of such testing whether treated as derivatives transactions or not. In
addition, Rule 18f-4 could limit the Fund’s ability to engage in certain
derivatives and other transactions.
The
Funds’ investments in regulated derivatives instruments, such as swaps, futures
and options, will be subject to maximum position limits established by the U.S.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) and U.S. and foreign futures
exchanges. Under the exchange rules all accounts owned or managed by advisers,
such as Angel Oak, their principals and affiliates would be combined for
position limit purposes. To comply with the position limits established by the
CFTC and the relevant exchanges, the Adviser may in the future reduce the size
of positions that would otherwise be taken for a Fund or not trade in certain
markets on behalf of the Fund to avoid exceeding such limits. A violation of
position limits by the Adviser could lead to regulatory action resulting in
mandatory liquidation of certain positions held by the Adviser on behalf of the
Funds. There can be no assurance that the Adviser will liquidate positions held
on behalf of all the Adviser’s accounts in a proportionate manner or at
favorable prices, which may result in substantial losses to the Funds. Such
policies could affect the nature and extent of derivatives use by the Funds.
Swaps.
The Funds may invest in credit default swaps, total return swaps, interest rate
swaps, equity swaps, currency swaps and other types of swaps. Such transactions
are subject to market risk, liquidity risk, risk of default by the other party
to the transaction, known as “counterparty risk,” regulatory risk and risk of
imperfect correlation between the value of such instruments and the underlying
assets and may involve commissions or other costs.
A
credit default swap agreement may reference one or more debt securities or
obligations that are not currently held by the Funds. The Funds are permitted to
enter into a credit default swap as either the protection buyer or seller in the
discretion of the Adviser. When buying protection under a credit default swap,
the Fund is generally obligated to pay the protection seller an upfront or
periodic stream of payments over the term of the contract until a credit event
occurs, such as a default of the reference obligation. If no credit event
occurs, the Fund may recover nothing if the swap is held through the termination
date. However, if a credit event does occur, the Fund may receive the full
notional value of the swap in exchange for the face amount of the obligations
underlying the swap, the value of which may have significantly decreased. When
selling protection under a credit default swap, the Fund receives an upfront or
periodic stream of payments over the term of the contract provided that a credit
event does not occur. However, as the seller of protection, the Fund effectively
adds leverage to its portfolio because it gains exposure to the notional amount
of the swap. Entering into a credit default swap may subject a Fund to greater
risk than if the Fund had invested in the reference obligation directly. In
addition to general market risks, credit default swaps also involve illiquidity
risk, counter-party risk (for OTC swaps) and credit risk.
Swap
agreements are primarily entered into by institutional investors and the value
of such agreements may be extremely volatile. Certain swap agreements are traded
OTC between two parties, while other more standardized swaps must be transacted
through a Futures Commission Merchant and centrally cleared and exchange-traded.
While central clearing and exchange-trading are intended to reduce counterparty
credit and liquidity risk, they do not make a swap transaction risk-free. The
current regulatory environment regarding swap agreements is subject to change.
The Adviser will continue to monitor these developments, particularly to the
extent regulatory changes affect the Funds’ ability to enter into swap
agreements.
The
swap market has matured in recent years with a large number of banks and
investment banking firms acting both as principals and as agents utilizing
standardized swap documentation. As a result, the swap market has become
relatively liquid; however there is no guarantee that the swap market will
continue to provide liquidity and may be subject to liquidity risk, which exists
when a particular swap is difficult to purchase or sell. The absence of
liquidity may also make it more difficult for a Fund to ascertain a market value
for such instruments. The inability to close derivative positions also could
have an adverse impact on a Fund’s ability to effectively hedge its portfolio.
If the Adviser is incorrect in its forecasts of market values, interest rates or
currency exchange rates, the investment performance of the applicable Fund would
be less favorable than it would have been if these investment techniques were
not used. In a total return swap, a Fund pays the counterparty a floating
short-term interest rate and receive in exchange the total return of underlying
loans or debt securities. The Fund bears the risk of default on the underlying
loans or debt securities, based on the notional amount of the swap and,
therefore, incurs a form of leverage. The Fund would typically have to post
collateral to cover this potential obligation.
Options
and Futures Risk.
The Funds may utilize options and futures contracts and so-called “synthetic”
options or other derivatives written by broker-dealers or other permissible
financial intermediaries. Options transactions may be effected on securities
exchanges or in the OTC market. When options are purchased OTC, the applicable
Fund’s portfolio bears the risk that the counterparty that wrote the option will
be unable or unwilling to perform its obligations under the option contract.
Options may also be illiquid and, in such cases, a Fund may have difficulty
closing out its position. OTC options also may include options on baskets of
specific securities.
A
Fund may purchase call and put options on specific securities in pursuing its
investment objectives. A put option gives the purchaser of the option the right
to sell, and obligates the writer to buy, the underlying security at a stated
exercise price, typically at any time prior to the expiration of the option for
American options or only at expiration for European options. A call option gives
the purchaser of the option the right to buy, and obligates the writer to sell,
the underlying security at a stated exercise price, typically at any time prior
to the expiration of the option.
A
Fund may close out a position when writing options by purchasing an option on
the same underlying security with the same exercise price and expiration date as
the option that it has previously written on the security. In such a case, the
applicable Fund will realize a profit or loss if the amount paid to purchase an
option is less or more than the amount received from the sale of the option.
Engaging
in transactions in futures contracts and options involves risk of loss to a
Fund. No assurance can be given that a liquid market will exist for any
particular futures contract or option at any particular time. Many futures
exchanges and boards of trade limit the amount of fluctuation permitted in
futures contract prices during a single trading day. Once the daily limit has
been reached in a particular contract, no trades may be made that day at a price
beyond that limit or trading may be suspended for specified periods during the
trading day. Futures contract prices could move to the limit for several
consecutive trading days with little or no trading, preventing prompt
liquidation of futures positions and potentially subjecting the applicable Fund
to substantial losses.
A
market could become unavailable if one or more exchanges were to stop trading
options or it could become unavailable with respect to options on a particular
underlying security if the exchanges stopped trading options on that security.
In addition, a market could become temporarily unavailable if unusual events
(e.g., volume exceeds clearing capability) were to interrupt normal exchange
operations. If an options market were to become illiquid or otherwise
unavailable, an option holder would be able to realize profits or limit losses
only by exercising and an options seller or writer would remain obligated until
it is assigned an exercise or until the option expires.
If
trading is interrupted in an underlying security, the trading of options on that
security is usually halted as well. Holders and writers of options will then be
unable to close out their positions until options trading resumes, and they may
be faced with considerable losses if the security reopens at a substantially
different price. Even if options trading is halted, holders of options will
generally be able to exercise them. However, if trading has also been halted in
the underlying security, option holders face the risk of exercising options
without knowing the security’s current market value. If exercises do occur when
trading of the underlying security is halted, the party required to deliver the
underlying security may be unable to obtain it, which may necessitate a
postponed settlement and/or the fixing of cash settlement prices.
Structured
Notes.
Structured notes are derivative debt securities, the interest rate and/or
principal of which is determined by an unrelated indicator. The value of the
principal of and/or interest on structured notes is determined by reference to
changes in the return, interest rate or value at maturity of a specific asset,
reference rate or index (the “reference instrument”) or the relative change in
two or more reference instruments. The interest rate or the principal amount
payable upon maturity or redemption may be increased or decreased, depending
upon changes in the applicable reference instruments. Structured notes may be
positively or negatively indexed, so that an increase in value of the reference
instrument may produce an increase or a decrease in the interest rate or value
of the structured note at maturity. In addition, changes in the interest rate or
the value of the structured note at maturity may be calculated as a specified
multiple of the change in the value of the
reference;
therefore, the value of such note may be very volatile. Structured notes may
entail a greater degree of market risk than other types of debt securities
because the investor bears the risk of the reference instrument. Structured
notes may also be more volatile, less liquid and more difficult to accurately
price than less complex securities or more traditional debt securities.
Cash
Investments.
When the Adviser believes market, economic or political conditions are
unfavorable for investors, the Adviser may invest up to 100% of a Fund’s net
assets in cash, cash equivalents or other short-term investments. Unfavorable
market or economic conditions may include excessive volatility or a prolonged
general decline in the securities markets, or the U.S. economy. The Adviser also
may invest in these types of securities or hold cash while looking for suitable
investment opportunities or to maintain liquidity.
Restricted
Securities.
Within its limitation on investment in illiquid investments, a Fund may purchase
restricted securities that generally can be sold in privately negotiated
transactions, pursuant to an exemption from registration under the federal
securities laws, or in a registered public offering. Where registration is
required, a Fund may be obligated to pay all or part of the registration expense
and a considerable period may elapse between the time it decides to seek
registration and the time the Fund may be permitted to sell a security under an
effective registration statement. If during such a period adverse market
conditions were to develop, the Fund might obtain a less favorable price than
prevailed when it decided to seek registration of the security. Restricted
securities that can be offered and sold to qualified institutional buyers under
Rule 144A of the Securities Act (“144A Securities”) and are determined to be
liquid are not subject to the limitations on illiquid investments.
Short
Sales.
A Fund may make short sales as part of its overall portfolio management
strategies or to offset a potential decline in value of a security. The Funds
may engage in short sales with respect to stocks, ETFs and other securities. A
short sale involves the sale of a security that is borrowed from a broker or
other institution to complete the sale. The Funds may engage in short sales with
respect to securities they own, as well as securities that they do not own.
Short sales expose a Fund to the risk that it will be required to acquire,
convert or exchange securities to replace the borrowed security at a time when
the security sold short has appreciated in value, thus resulting in a loss to
the Fund. A Fund’s investment performance may also suffer if the Fund is
required to close out a short position earlier than it had intended. In
addition, the Funds may be subject to expenses related to short sales that are
not typically associated with investing in securities directly, such as costs of
borrowing and margin account maintenance costs associated with the applicable
Fund’s open short positions. These types of short sales expenses are sometimes
referred to as the “negative cost of carry,” and will tend to cause a Fund to
lose money on a short sale even in instances where the price of the security
sold short does not change over the duration of the short sale. Dividend
expenses on securities sold short are not covered under the Adviser’s expense
limitation agreements with the Funds and, therefore, these expenses will be
borne by the shareholders of the applicable Fund.
Variable
and Floating Rate Securities.
The Funds may invest in variable and floating rate securities. Fixed Income
securities that have variable or floating rates of interest may, under certain
limited circumstances, have varying principal amounts. These securities pay
interest at rates that are adjusted periodically according to a specified
formula, usually with reference to one or more interest rate indices or market
interest rates (the “underlying index”). The interest paid on these securities
is a function primarily of the underlying index upon which the interest rate
adjustments are based. These adjustments minimize changes in the market value of
the obligation. Similar to fixed rate debt instruments, variable and floating
rate instruments are subject to changes in value based on changes in market
interest rates or changes in the issuer’s creditworthiness. The rate of interest
on securities may be tied to U.S. government securities or indices on those
securities as well as any other rate of interest or index.
Variable
and floating rate demand notes of corporations are redeemable upon a specified
period of notice. These obligations include master demand notes that permit
investment of fluctuating amounts at varying interest rates under direct
arrangements with the issuer of the instrument. The issuer of these obligations
often has the right, after a given period, to prepay the outstanding principal
amount of the obligations upon a specified number of days’ notice.
Certain
securities may have an initial principal amount that varies over time based on
an interest rate index, and, accordingly, a Fund might be entitled to less than
the initial principal amount of the security upon the security’s maturity. The
Funds intend to purchase these securities only when the Adviser believes the
interest income from the instrument justifies any principal risks associated
with the instrument. The Adviser may attempt to limit any potential loss of
principal by purchasing similar instruments that are intended to provide an
offsetting increase in principal. There can be no assurance that the Adviser
will be able to limit the effects of principal fluctuations and, accordingly, a
Fund may incur losses on those securities even if held to maturity without
issuer default.
There
may not be an active secondary market for any particular floating or variable
rate instruments, which could make it difficult for a Fund to dispose of the
instrument during periods that the Fund is not entitled to exercise any demand
rights it may have. The Fund could, for this or other reasons, suffer a loss
with respect to those instruments. The Adviser monitors the liquidity of the
Funds’ investments in variable and floating rate instruments, but there can be
no guarantee that an active secondary market will exist.
Zero-Coupon,
Delayed Interest, Pay-In-Kind, and Capital Appreciation Securities.
Zero-coupon, delayed interest, pay-in-kind (“PIK”) and capital appreciation
securities are securities that make no periodic interest payments, but are sold
at a discount from their face value. The buyer recognizes a rate of return
determined by the gradual appreciation of the security, which is redeemed at
face value on a specified maturity date. The discount varies depending on the
time remaining until maturity, as well as market interest rates, liquidity of
the security, and the issuer’s perceived credit quality. The discount, in the
absence of financial difficulties of the issuer, typically decreases as the
final maturity date approaches. If the issuer defaults, a Fund may not receive
any return on its investment. Because such securities bear no interest and
generally compound periodically at the rate fixed at the time of issuance, their
value generally is more volatile than the value of other fixed income
securities. Since such bondholders do not receive interest payments, when
interest rates rise, zero-coupon, delayed interest and capital appreciation
securities fall more dramatically in value than bonds paying interest on a
current basis. When interest rates fall, zero-coupon, delayed interest and
capital appreciation securities rise more rapidly in value because the bonds
reflect a fixed rate of return. An investment in zero-coupon, delayed interest
and capital appreciation securities may cause a Fund to recognize income and
make distributions to shareholders before it receives any cash payments on its
investment. To generate cash to satisfy distribution requirements, a Fund may
have to sell portfolio securities that it otherwise would have continued to hold
or to use cash flows from other sources such as the sale of Fund shares.
PIK
securities may be debt obligations or preferred shares that provide the issuer
with the option of paying interest or dividends on such obligations in cash or
in the form of additional securities rather than cash. Similar to zero-coupon
bonds and delayed interest securities, PIK securities are designed to give an
issuer flexibility in managing cash flow. PIK securities that are debt
securities can be either senior or subordinated debt and generally trade flat
(i.e., without interest). The trading price of PIK debt securities generally
reflects the market value of the underlying debt plus an amount representing
accrued interest since the last interest payment.
Municipal
Securities.
The Funds may invest in municipal securities, such as industrial development
bonds that are backed only by the assets and revenues of the non-governmental
user (such as hospitals and airports). Municipal securities are issued to obtain
funds for a variety of public purposes, including general financing for state
and local governments, or financing for specific projects or public facilities.
The
two principal classifications of municipal securities are “general obligations”
and “revenue obligations.” General obligations are secured by the issuer’s
pledge of its full faith and credit for the payment of principal and interest,
although the characteristics and enforcement of general obligations may vary
according to the law applicable to the particular issuer. Revenue obligations,
which include, but are not limited to, private activity bonds, resource recovery
bonds, certificates of participation and certain municipal notes, are not backed
by the credit and taxing authority of the issuer, and are payable solely from
the revenues derived from a particular facility or class of facilities or, in
some cases, from the proceeds of a special excise or other specific revenue
source. Nevertheless, the obligations of the issuer of a revenue obligation may
be backed by a letter of credit, guarantee or insurance. General obligations and
revenue obligations may be issued in a variety of forms, including commercial
paper, fixed, variable and floating rate securities, tender option bonds,
auction rate bonds, zero coupon bonds, deferred interest bonds and capital
appreciation bonds. Private activity bonds and industrial revenue bonds do not
carry the pledge of the credit of the issuing municipality, but generally are
guaranteed by the corporate entity on whose behalf they are issued.
Municipal
leases are entered into by state and local governments and authorities to
acquire equipment and facilities such as fire and sanitation vehicles,
telecommunications equipment, and other assets. Municipal leases (which normally
provide for title to the leased assets to pass eventually to the government
issuer) have evolved as a means for governmental issuers to acquire property and
equipment without meeting the constitutional and statutory requirements for the
issuance of debt. The debt-issuance limitations of many state constitutions and
statutes are deemed to be inapplicable because of the inclusion in many leases
or contracts of “non-appropriation” clauses that provide that the governmental
issuer has no obligation to make future payments under the lease or contract
unless money is appropriated for such purpose by the appropriate legislative
body on a yearly or periodic basis.
The
marketability, valuation or liquidity of municipal securities may be negatively
affected in the event that states, localities or their authorities default on
their debt obligations or other market events arise, which in turn may
negatively affect fund performance, sometimes substantially. A credit rating
downgrade relating to, default by, or insolvency or bankruptcy of, one or
several municipal issuers of a particular state, territory, commonwealth, or
possession could affect the market value or marketability of any one or all such
states, territories, commonwealths, or possessions.
The
value of municipal securities may also be affected by uncertainties with respect
to the rights of holders of municipal securities in the event of bankruptcy or
the taxation of municipal securities as a result of legislation or litigation.
The obligations of the issuer to pay the principal of and interest on municipal
securities are subject to the provisions of bankruptcy, insolvency and other
laws affecting the rights and remedies of creditors, such as the Federal
Bankruptcy Code, and laws, if any, that may be enacted by Congress or state
legislatures extending the time for payment of principal or interest or imposing
other
constraints
upon the enforcement of such obligations. There is also the possibility that, as
a result of litigation or other conditions, the power or ability of the issuer
to pay when due principal of or interest on a municipal security may be
materially affected.
Securities
Lending.
Each Fund may lend portfolio securities in an amount up to one-third of its
total assets to brokers, dealers and other financial institutions. In a
portfolio securities lending transaction, a Fund receives from the borrower an
amount equal to the interest paid or the dividends declared on the loaned
securities during the term of the loan as well as the interest on the collateral
securities, less any fees (such as finders or administrative fees) the Fund pays
in arranging the loan. The terms of each Fund’s loans permit each Fund to
reacquire loaned securities upon demand within a customary settlement period.
Loans are subject to termination at the option of the applicable Fund or
borrower at any time, and the borrowed securities must be returned when the loan
is terminated. The Funds may pay fees to arrange for securities loans.
The
SEC currently requires that the following conditions must be met whenever a
Fund’s portfolio securities are loaned: (1) the Fund must receive at least
100% collateral from the borrower; (2) the borrower must increase such
collateral whenever the market value of the securities rises above the level of
such collateral; (3) the Fund must be able to terminate the loan at any time;
(4) the Fund must receive reasonable interest on the loan, as well as any
dividends, interest or other distributions on the loaned securities, and any
increase in market value; (5) the Fund may pay only reasonable custodian fees
approved by the Board in connection with the loan; and (6) while voting rights
on the loaned securities may pass to the borrower, the Board must terminate the
loan and regain the right to vote the securities if a material event adversely
affecting the investment occurs. These conditions may be subject to future
modification. Such loans will be terminable at any time upon specified notice. A
Fund might experience the risk of loss if the institution with which it has
engaged in a portfolio loan transaction breaches its agreement with the Fund. In
addition, the Funds will not enter into any portfolio security lending
arrangement having a duration of longer than one year. The principal risk of
portfolio lending is potential default or insolvency of the borrower. In either
of these cases, a Fund could experience delays in recovering securities or
collateral or could lose all or part of the value of the loaned securities. As
part of participating in a lending program, the applicable Fund may be required
to invest in securities that bear the risk of loss of principal. In addition,
all investments made with the collateral received are subject to the risks
associated with such investments. If such investments lose value, a Fund will
have to cover the loss when repaying the collateral.
Any
loans of portfolio securities are fully collateralized based on values that are
marked-to-market daily. Any securities that a Fund may receive as collateral
will not become part of the Fund’s investment portfolio at the time of the loan
and, in the event of a default by the borrower, the Fund will, if permitted by
law, dispose of such collateral except for such part thereof that is a security
in which the Fund is permitted to invest. During the time securities are on
loan, the borrower will pay a Fund any accrued income on those securities, and
the Fund may invest the cash collateral and earn income or receive an
agreed-upon fee from a borrower that has delivered cash-equivalent collateral.
Subordinated
Debt Securities.
Subordinated debt securities, sometimes also called “junior debt” are debt
securities for which the issuer’s obligations to make principal and interest
payment are secondary to the issuer’s payment obligations to more senior debt
securities. Subordinated debt securities are subject to the same risks as other
fixed income securities and are also subject to increased credit risk because
the issuer, by definition, has issued other, more senior debt securities. The
Funds may invest in subordinated debt securities, including those issued by
banks.
When-Issued
Securities and Forward Commitments.
The Funds may purchase securities offered on a “when-issued” and “forward
commitment” basis (including a delayed delivery basis). Securities purchased on
a “when-issued” or “forward commitment basis” are securities not available for
immediate delivery despite the fact that a market exists for those securities. A
purchase is made on a “delayed delivery” basis when the transaction is
structured to occur sometime in the future.
When
these transactions are negotiated, the price, which is generally expressed in
yield terms, is fixed at the time the commitment is made, but delivery and
payment for the securities take place at a later date. Normally, the settlement
date occurs within two months after the transaction, but delayed settlements
beyond two months may be negotiated. During the period between a commitment and
settlement, no payment is made for the securities purchased by the purchaser
and, thus, no interest accrues to the purchaser from the transaction. At the
time a Fund makes the commitment to purchase securities on a when-issued basis
or forward commitment, the Fund will record the transaction as a purchase and
thereafter reflect the value each day of such securities in determining its
NAV.
Dollar
Rolls.
A dollar roll transaction involves a sale by a Fund of a security concurrently
with an agreement by the Fund to repurchase a similar security at a later date
at an agreed-upon price. A dollar roll may be considered a borrowing giving rise
to leverage. The securities that are repurchased will bear the same interest
rate and a similar maturity as those sold, but the assets collateralizing these
securities may have different prepayment histories than those sold. During the
period between the sale and repurchase, the applicable Fund will not be entitled
to receive interest and principal payments on the securities sold. Proceeds of
the sale will be invested in additional investments, and the income from these
investments will generate income for the Fund.
If
such income does not exceed the income, capital appreciation and gain or loss
that would have been realized on the securities sold as part of the dollar roll,
the use of this technique will diminish the investment performance of a Fund
compared with what the performance would have been without the use of dollar
rolls. Dollar rolls involve the risk that the market value of the securities
subject to a Fund’s forward purchase commitment may decline below, or the market
value of the securities subject to a Fund’s forward sale commitment may increase
above, the exercise price of the forward commitment. In the event the buyer of
the securities files for bankruptcy or becomes insolvent, a Fund’s use of the
proceeds of the current sale portion of the transaction may be restricted.
Equity
Securities.
Common
and Preferred Stock.
The Funds may invest in common stock. Common stock represents an equity
(ownership) interest in a company, and usually possesses voting rights and earns
dividends. Dividends on common stock are not fixed but are declared at the
discretion of the issuer. Common stock generally represents the riskiest
investment in a company. In addition, common stock generally has the greatest
appreciation and depreciation potential because increases and decreases in
earnings are usually reflected in a company’s stock price.
The
Funds may invest in preferred stock. Preferred stock is a class of stock having
a preference over common stock as to the payment of dividends and the recovery
of investment should a company be liquidated, although preferred stock is
usually junior to the debt securities of the issuer. Preferred stock typically
does not possess voting rights and its market value may change based on changes
in interest rates.
A
risk of investing in common and preferred stock is that the value of the stock
might decrease. Stock values fluctuate in response to the activities of an
individual company or in response to general market and/or economic conditions.
Historically, common stocks have provided greater long-term returns and have
entailed greater short-term risks than preferred stocks, fixed-income and money
market investments. The market value of all securities, including common and
preferred stocks, is based upon the market’s perception of value and not
necessarily the book value of an issuer or other objective measures of a
company’s worth. If you invest in the Fund, you should be willing to accept the
risks of the stock market and should consider an investment in the Fund only as
a part of your overall investment portfolio.
Warrants.
The Funds may invest in warrants. Warrants are securities, typically issued with
preferred stock or bonds that give the holder the right to purchase a given
number of shares of common stock at a specified price and time. The price of the
warrant usually represents a premium over the applicable market value of the
common stock at the time of the warrant’s issuance. Warrants have no voting
rights with respect to the common stock, receive no dividends and have no rights
with respect to the assets of the issuer. Investments in warrants involve
certain risks, including the possible lack of a liquid market for the resale of
the warrants, potential price fluctuations due to adverse market conditions or
other factors and failure of the price of the common stock to rise. If the
warrant is not exercised within the specified time period, it becomes worthless.
Depositary
Receipts.
The Funds may invest in sponsored and unsponsored American Depositary Receipts
(“ADR”), European Depositary Receipts (“EDRs”), Global Depositary Receipts
(“GDRs”), Holding Company Depositary Receipts (“HOLDRs”), New York Registered
Shares (“NYRs”) or American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”). ADRs typically are
issued by a U.S. bank or trust company, evidence ownership of underlying
securities issued by a foreign company, and are designed for use in U.S.
securities markets. EDRs are issued by European financial institutions and
typically trade in Europe and GDRs are issued by European financial institutions
and typically trade in both Europe and the United States. HOLDRs trade on the
American Stock Exchange and are fixed baskets of U.S. or foreign stocks that
give an investor an ownership interest in each of the underlying stocks. NYRs,
also known as Guilder Shares since most of the issuing companies are Dutch, are
dollar-denominated certificates issued by foreign companies specifically for the
U.S. market. ADSs are shares issued under a deposit agreement that represents an
underlying security in the issuer’s home country. (An ADS is the actual share
trading, while an ADR represents a bundle of ADSs.) The Funds invest in
depositary receipts to obtain exposure to foreign securities markets. For
purposes of the Funds’ investment policies, the Funds’ investments in an ADR
will be considered an investment in the underlying securities of the applicable
foreign company.
Unsponsored
depositary receipts may be created without the participation of the foreign
issuer. Holders of these receipts generally bear all the costs of the depositary
receipt facility, whereas foreign issuers typically bear certain costs of a
sponsored depositary receipt. The bank or trust company depositary
of an unsponsored depositary receipt may be under no obligation to distribute
shareholder communications received from the foreign issuer or to pass through
voting rights. Accordingly, available information concerning the issuer may not
be current and the prices of unsponsored depositary receipts may be more
volatile than the prices of sponsored depositary receipts.
General
Risk.
The value of a Fund’s portfolio securities may fluctuate with changes in the
financial condition of an issuer or counterparty, changes in specific economic
or political conditions that affect a particular security or issuer and changes
in general economic or political conditions. An investor in a Fund could lose
money over short or long periods of time.
There
can be no guarantee that a liquid market for the securities held by a Fund will
be maintained. The existence of a liquid trading market for certain securities
may depend on whether dealers will make a market in such securities. There can
be no assurance that a market will be made or maintained or that any such market
will be or remain liquid. The price at which securities may be sold and the
value of a Fund will be adversely affected if trading markets for a Fund’s
portfolio securities are limited or absent, or if bid/ask spreads are wide.
Operational
and Reputational Risk.
An
investment in the Funds involves operational risk arising from factors such as
processing errors, human errors, inadequate or failed internal or external
processes, failures in systems and technology, changes in personnel and errors
caused by third-party service providers. Any of these errors, failures or
breaches could result in a loss of information, regulatory scrutiny,
reputational damage or other events, any of which could have a materially
adverse effect on a Fund. While the Funds seek to minimize such events through
controls and oversight, there is no guarantee that a Fund will not suffer losses
due to operational risk.
The
Funds may be adversely affected if the reputation of the Adviser, its
affiliates, or counterparties with whom the Funds associate is harmed.
Reputational harm could result from, among other things: real or perceived legal
or regulatory violations; failure in performance, risk management, governance,
technology, or operations; or claims related to employee misconduct, allegations
of employee wrongful termination, conflict of interests, ethical issues, or
failure to protect private information. Similarly, market rumors and actual or
perceived association with counterparties whose own reputations may become under
question could ultimately harm the Funds as well. These harms could include, for
example, large redemptions of shares of a Fund, a negative effect on the Funds’
ability to conduct business with counterparties, or hindering of the Adviser’s
abilities to attract and/or retain personnel, including key
personnel.
Cyber
Security Risk.
As technology becomes more integrated into the Funds’ operations, the Funds will
face greater operational risks through breaches in cyber security. A breach in
cyber security refers to both intentional and unintentional events that may
cause a Fund to lose proprietary information, suffer data corruption, or lose
operational capacity. This in turn could cause the Fund to incur regulatory
penalties, reputational damage, additional compliance costs associated with
corrective measures, and/or financial loss. Cyber security threats may result
from unauthorized access to a Fund’s digital information systems (e.g., through
“hacking” or malicious software coding), but may also result from outside
attacks such as denial-of-service attacks (i.e., efforts to make network
services unavailable to intended users). In addition, because each Fund works
closely with third-party service providers (e.g., administrators, transfer
agents, and custodians), cyber security breaches at such third-party service
providers may subject a Fund to many of the same risks associated with direct
cyber security breaches. The same is true for cyber security breaches at any of
the issuers in which a Fund may invest. While the Funds have established risk
management systems designed to reduce the risks associated with cyber security,
there can be no assurance that such measures will succeed.
PORTFOLIO
TURNOVER
The
frequency of portfolio transactions of each Fund (the portfolio turnover rate)
will vary from year to year depending on many factors. From time to time, each
Fund may engage in active short-term trading to take advantage of price
movements affecting individual issues, groups of issues or markets. An annual
portfolio turnover rate of 100% would occur if all the securities in a Fund were
replaced once in a period of one year. Higher portfolio turnover rates (more
than 100%) may result in increased brokerage costs to the applicable Fund and a
possible increase in short-term capital gains or losses.
Portfolio
turnover for the Funds during the fiscal periods ended January 31, 2024, and
January 31, 2023, is shown in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fiscal
Years Ended January 31, |
2024 |
2023 |
| |
Multi-Strategy
Income Fund |
32% |
14% |
| |
UltraShort
Income Fund |
46% |
31% |
| |
INVESTMENT
POLICIES
Fundamental.
The investment policies described below have been adopted by the Trust with
respect to each Fund and are fundamental (i.e.,
they may not be changed without the affirmative vote of a majority of the
outstanding shares of the applicable Fund). As used in the Prospectus and
this SAI, the term “majority of the outstanding shares of the Fund” means the
lesser of:
(1) 67%
or more of the outstanding shares of the Fund present at a meeting, if the
holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Fund are present or
represented at such meeting; or (2) more than 50% of the outstanding shares
of the Fund. Except for those investment policies specifically identified as
fundamental in the Prospectus and this SAI, each Fund’s investment objective as
described in the Prospectus and all other investment policies and practices
described in the Prospectus and this SAI are non-fundamental and may be changed
by the Board without the approval of shareholders.
The
fundamental policies adopted with respect to each of the Funds are as
follows:
1.Borrowing
Money. The
Fund will not borrow money, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act,
as such may be interpreted or modified by regulatory authorities having
jurisdiction, from time to time.
2.Senior
Securities. The
Fund will not issue senior securities, except to the extent permitted under the
1940 Act, as such may be interpreted or modified by regulatory authorities
having jurisdiction, from time to time.
3.Underwriting. The
Fund will not act as an underwriter of securities within the meaning of the
Securities Act of 1933, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act, as
such may be interpreted or modified by regulatory authorities having
jurisdiction, from time to time.
4.Real
Estate. The
Fund will not purchase or sell real estate, except to the extent permitted under
the 1940 Act, as such may be interpreted or modified by regulatory authorities
having jurisdiction, from time to time.
5.Commodities. The
Fund will not purchase or sell commodities, except to the extent permitted under
the 1940 Act, as such may be interpreted or modified by regulatory authorities
having jurisdiction, from time to time.
6.Loans. The
Fund will not make loans to other persons, except to the extent permitted under
the 1940 Act, as such may be interpreted or modified by regulatory authorities
having jurisdiction, from time to time.
7.Concentration. Each
of the Multi-Strategy Income Fund and UltraShort Income Fund will concentrate
its respective investments in residential mortgage-backed securities (agency and
non-agency) and commercial mortgage-backed securities.
The
following are interpretations of the fundamental investment policies of the
Funds and may be revised without shareholder approval, consistent with current
laws and regulations as such may be interpreted or modified by regulatory
authorities having jurisdiction, from time to time:
Borrowing
Money.
Under current law as interpreted by the SEC and its staff, a Fund may borrow
from: (a) a bank, provided that immediately after such borrowing there is an
asset coverage of 300% for all borrowings of the Fund; or (b) a bank or other
persons for temporary purposes only, provided that such temporary borrowings are
in an amount not exceeding 5% of the Fund’s total assets at the time when the
borrowing is made. This limitation does not preclude the Fund from entering into
reverse repurchase transactions, provided that the Fund, in accordance with Rule
18f-4, aggregates the amount of indebtedness associated with the reverse
repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions with the aggregate
amount of any other senior securities representing indebtedness when calculating
the Fund’s asset coverage ratio or treats all such transactions as derivatives
transactions.
Senior
Securities.
Senior securities may include any obligation or instrument issued by an
investment company evidencing indebtedness. The Fund’s limitation with respect
to issuing senior securities is not applicable to activities that may be deemed
to involve the issuance or sale of a senior security by the Fund, provided that
the Fund’s engagement in such activities is consistent with or permitted by the
1940 Act, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. The SEC adopted Rule
18f-4 related to the use of derivatives and other similar transactions by an
investment company. The Fund’s trading of derivatives and other similar
transactions that create future payment or delivery obligations is generally
subject to value-at-risk leverage limits, derivatives risk management program
and reporting requirements, unless the Fund satisfies a “limited derivatives
users” exception that is included in the rule.
Underwriting.
Under the 1940 Act, underwriting securities generally involves an investment
company purchasing securities directly from an issuer for the purpose of selling
(distributing) them or participating in any such activity either directly or
indirectly. The Fund’s limitation with respect to underwriting securities is not
applicable to the extent that, in connection with the disposition of portfolio
securities (including restricted securities), the Fund may be deemed an
underwriter under certain federal securities laws.
Real
Estate.
The 1940 Act does not directly restrict an investment company’s ability to
invest in real estate, but does require that every investment company have a
fundamental investment policy governing such investments. The Fund’s limitation
with respect to investing in real estate is not applicable to investments in
securities or mortgages or loans that are secured by or represent interests in
real estate. This limitation does not preclude the Fund from purchasing or
selling mortgage-
related
securities or securities of companies engaged in the real estate business or
that have a significant portion of their assets in real estate (including real
estate investment trusts). In addition, this limitation does not preclude the
Fund from holding or selling real estate acquired as a result of ownership
through securities or other instruments.
Commodities.
The 1940 Act does not directly restrict an investment company’s ability to
invest in commodities, but does require that every investment company have a
fundamental investment policy governing such investments. The Fund may hold
commodities acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other
investments. This limitation does not preclude the Fund from purchasing or
selling options or futures contracts, from investing in securities or other
instruments backed by commodities or from investing in companies that are
engaged in a commodities business or have a significant portion of their assets
in commodities.
Loans.
Under current law as interpreted by the SEC and its staff, the Fund may not lend
any security or make any other loan if, as a result, more than 33 1/3% of its
total assets would be lent to other parties (this restriction does not apply to
purchases of debt securities or repurchase agreements). Subject to this
limitation, the Fund may make loans, for example: (a) by loaning portfolio
securities; (b) by engaging in repurchase agreements; (c) by making loans
secured by real estate; (d) by making loans to affiliated funds as permitted by
the SEC; or (e) by purchasing non-publicly offered debt securities. For purposes
of this limitation, the term “loans” shall not include the purchase of a portion
of an issue of publicly distributed bonds, debentures or other securities.
Concentration.
Under current SEC and SEC staff interpretation, the Fund would “concentrate” its
investments if more than 25% of the Fund’s total assets would be invested in
securities of issuers conducting their principal business activities in the same
industry. For purposes of this limitation, there is no limit on: (1) investments
in U.S. government securities, in repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S.
government securities, or in tax-exempt securities issued by the states,
territories, or possessions of the United States (“municipal securities”),
excluding private activity municipal securities whose principal and interest
payments are derived principally from the assets and revenues of a
non-governmental entity; (2) investments in issuers domiciled in a single
jurisdiction provided that the Fund does not invest greater than 25% in a
particular industry; or (3) certain asset-backed securities that are backed
by a pool of loans issued to companies in a wide variety of industries unrelated
to each other such that the economic characteristics of such a security are not
predominantly related to a single industry to the extent permitted by the 1940
Act. The residential mortgage-backed securities (agency and non-agency) and
commercial mortgage-backed securities in which each of the Multi-Strategy Income
Fund and the UltraShort Income Fund invests, under normal circumstances, more
than 25% of its respective total assets (measured at the time of purchase)
represent investments in the real estate industry. Notwithstanding anything to
the contrary, to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, the Fund may invest in
one or more investment companies; provided that, except to the extent the Fund
invests in other investment companies pursuant to Section 12(d)(1)(A) or (F) of
the 1940 Act, the Fund treats the assets of the investment companies in which it
invests as its own for purposes of this policy.
With
respect to the percentages adopted by the Trust as maximum limitations on its
investment policies and limitations, an excess above the fixed percentage will
not be a violation of the policy or limitation unless the excess results
immediately and directly from the acquisition of any security or the action
taken. This paragraph does not apply to fundamental policy 1 for the Funds
set forth above.
Notwithstanding
any of the foregoing policies, any investment company, whether organized as a
trust, association or corporation, or a personal holding company, may be merged
or consolidated with or acquired by the Trust, provided that if such merger,
consolidation or acquisition results in an investment in the securities of any
issuer prohibited by said paragraphs, the Trust shall, within 90 days after the
consummation of such merger, consolidation or acquisition, dispose of all of the
securities of such issuer so acquired or such portion thereof as shall bring the
total investment therein within the limitations imposed by said paragraphs above
as of the date of consummation.
MANAGEMENT
Trustees
and Officers
The
Board is responsible for the overall management of the Trust, including general
supervision and review of the investment activities of the Funds. The Board, in
turn, elects the officers of the Trust, who are responsible for administering
the day-to-day operations of the Trust and the Funds. Unless otherwise indicated
in the table below, the address of each Trustee and officer of the Trust is c/o
Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC, 3344 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 1725, Atlanta,
Georgia 30326. Additional information about the Trustees and officers of the
Trust is provided in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Name
and Year of Birth |
Position
with the Trust |
Term
of Office and Length of Time Served |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Number
of Portfolios in Fund Complex(1)
Overseen by Trustee |
Other
Directorships Held During the Past 5 Years |
Independent
Trustees of the Trust(2) |
Ira
P. Cohen 1959 |
Independent Trustee,
Chair |
Trustee
since 2014, Chair since 2017; indefinite terms |
Executive
Vice President, Recognos Financial (2015–2021); Independent financial
services consultant (since 2005). |
9 |
Trustee,
Valued Advisers Trust (since 2010); Trustee, Apollo Diversified Real
Estate Fund (formerly, Griffin Institutional Access Real Estate Fund)
(since 2014); Trustee, Angel Oak Strategic Credit Fund (since 2017);
Trustee, Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust (since 2018);
Trustee, U.S. Fixed Income Trust (since 2019); Trustee, Angel Oak Credit
Opportunities Term Trust (since 2021); Trustee, Angel Oak Dynamic
Financial Strategies Income Term Trust (2019-2022); Trustee, Apollo Credit
Fund (formerly, Griffin Institutional Access Credit Fund)
(2017-2022). |
Alvin
R. Albe, Jr. 1953 |
Independent
Trustee |
Since
2014; indefinite term |
Retired. |
9 |
Trustee,
Angel Oak Strategic Credit Fund (since 2017); Trustee, Angel Oak Financial
Strategies Income Term Trust (since 2018); Trustee, Angel Oak Credit
Opportunities Term Trust (since 2021); Trustee, Angel Oak Dynamic
Financial Strategies Income Term Trust (2019-2022). |
Keith
M. Schappert 1951 |
Independent
Trustee |
Since
2014; indefinite term |
President,
Schappert Consulting LLC (since 2008); Retired, President and CEO of
JP Morgan Investment Management. |
9 |
Trustee,
Angel Oak Strategic Credit Fund (since 2017); Trustee, Angel Oak Financial
Strategies Income Term Trust (since 2018); Trustee, Angel Oak Credit
Opportunities Term Trust (since 2021); Trustee, Angel Oak Dynamic
Financial Strategies Income Term Trust (2019-2022); Director, Commonfund
Capital, Inc. (2015-2022); Trustee, Mirae Asset Discovery Funds
(2010-2023). |
Andrea
N. Mullins 1967 |
Independent
Trustee |
Since
2019; indefinite term |
Private
Investor; Independent Contractor, SWM Advisors (since 2014). |
9 |
Trustee
and Audit Committee Chair, Valued Advisers Trust (since 2013, Chair since
2017); Trustee, Angel Oak Strategic Credit Fund (since 2019); Trustee,
Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust (since 2019); Trustee,
Angel Oak Credit Opportunities Term Trust (since 2021); Trustee and Audit
Committee Chair, NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund (formerly, Cushing MLP
& Infrastructure Fund)(since 2021); Trustee and Audit Committee Chair,
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (formerly, Cushing NextGen
Infrastructure Income Fund) (since 2021); Trustee, Angel Oak Dynamic
Financial Strategies Income Term Trust (2019-2022); Trustee and Audit
Committee Chair, Cushing Mutual Funds Trust (2021-2023). |
Interested
Trustees of the Trust |
Cheryl
M. Pate 1976 |
Interested
Trustee |
Since
2022; indefinite term |
Senior
Portfolio Manager, Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC (since 2017). |
9 |
Trustee,
Angel Oak Strategic Credit Fund (since 2022); Trustee, Angel Oak Credit
Opportunities Term Trust (since 2022); Trustee, Angel Oak Financial
Strategies Income Term Trust (since 2023); Trustee, Angel Oak Dynamic
Financial Strategies Income Term Trust (2022-2022). |
Clayton
Triick(3)
1986
|
Interested
Trustee |
Since
2024, indefinite term |
Head
of Portfolio Management, Public Strategies, Angel Oak Capital Advisors,
LLC (since 2024); Senior Portfolio Manager, Angel Oak Capital Advisors,
LLC (since 2011). |
8 |
Trustee,
Angel Oak Strategic Credit Fund (since 2024); Trustee, Angel Oak Credit
Opportunities Term Trust (since 2024). |
(1)The
Fund Complex includes each series of the Trust, and Angel Oak Strategic Credit
Fund, Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust, and Angel Oak Credit
Opportunities Term Trust, affiliated registrants not discussed in this SAI.
(2)The
Trustees of the Trust who are not “interested persons” of the Trust as defined
in the 1940 Act (“Independent Trustees”).
(3) Mr.
Triick was appointed Interested Trustee on May 30, 2024.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Name
and Year of Birth |
Position
with the Trust |
Term
of Office and Length of Time Served |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Officers
of the Trust |
|
Adam
Langley 1967 |
President |
Since
2022; indefinite term (other offices held 2015-2022) |
Chief
Operating Officer, Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC (since 2021); Chief
Compliance Officer, Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC (2015-2022); Chief
Compliance Officer of Falcons I, LLC (2018-2022); Chief Compliance
Officer, Angel Oak Strategic Credit Fund (2017-2022); Chief Compliance
Officer, Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust (2018-2022);
Chief Compliance Officer, Angel Oak Dynamic Financial Strategies Income
Term Trust (2019-2022); Chief Compliance Officer, Angel Oak Credit
Opportunities Term Trust (2021-2022); Chief Compliance Officer, Angel Oak
Commercial Real Estate Solutions (2021-2022); Chief Compliance Officer,
Buckhead One Financial Opportunities, LLC (2015-2022); Chief Compliance
Officer, Angel Oak Capital Partners II, LLC (2016-2022); Chief Compliance
Officer, Hawks I, LLC (2018-2022). |
Michael
Colombo 1984 |
Secretary |
Since
2023; indefinite term
|
Chief
Risk Officer, Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC (since 2023); Director of
Valuation, Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC (2022-2023); Director of Trade
Operations, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (2022); Manager of Trade
Operations, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (2019-2022); Lead Analyst,
Trade Operations, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(2018-2019). |
William
Richardson 1991 |
Treasurer |
Since
2024; indefinite term |
Senior
Fund Analyst, Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC (since 2021), Senior
Associate, Aprio, LLP (2016-2021). |
Chase
Eldredge 1989 |
Chief
Compliance Officer |
Since
2022; indefinite term |
Chief
Compliance Officer, Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC (since 2022); Chief
Compliance Officer of Falcons I, LLC (since 2022); Chief Compliance
Officer, Angel Oak Strategic Credit Fund (since 2022); Chief Compliance
Officer, Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust (since 2022);
Chief Compliance Officer, Angel Oak Credit Opportunities Term Trust (since
2022); Senior Compliance Officer, Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC
(2020-2022); Compliance Officer, Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC
(2017-2020). |
Additional
Information Concerning the Board of Trustees.
The
Role of the Board
The
Board oversees the management and operations of the Trust. Like most registered
investment companies, the day-to-day management and operation of the Trust is
the responsibility of the various service providers to the Trust, such as the
Adviser, the distributor, administrator, the custodian and the transfer agent,
each of whom are discussed in greater detail in this SAI. The Board has
appointed various senior employees of the Adviser as officers of the Trust, with
responsibility to monitor and report to the Board on the Trust’s operations. In
conducting this oversight, the Board receives regular reports from these
officers and the service providers. For example, the Treasurer reports as to
financial reporting matters. In addition, the Adviser provides regular reports
on the investment strategy and performance of the Funds. The Board has appointed
a Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) who administers the Trust’s compliance
program and regularly reports to the Board as to compliance matters. These
reports are provided as part of the Board’s regular Board Meetings, which are
typically held quarterly, and involve the Board’s review of recent operations.
While Angel Oak compensates the CCO for his services to the Trust, the Funds
reimburse Angel Oak for a portion of the CCO’s salary.
Board
Structure, Leadership
The
Board has structured itself in a manner that it believes allows it to perform
its oversight function effectively. It has established four standing
committees—an Audit, Financial and Administrative Oversight Committee, a
Nominating and Governance Committee, a Compliance Oversight Committee and a
Valuation and Risk Management Oversight Committee—that are discussed in greater
detail below under “Board Committees.” At least a majority of the Board is
comprised of Independent Trustees who are not affiliated with the Adviser, the
principal underwriter, or their affiliates. The Committees are each comprised
entirely of Independent Trustees.
The
Board has an Independent Chairman. Except for any duties specified herein or
pursuant to the Trust’s Declaration of Trust and By-Laws, the designation of
Chairman does not impose on Mr. Cohen any duties, obligations or liability that
are greater than the duties, obligations or liability imposed on such person as
a member of the Board. As Chairman, Mr. Cohen acts as a spokesperson for the
Trustees in between meetings of the Board, serves as a liaison for the Trustees
with the Trust’s service providers, officers, and legal counsel to discuss ideas
informally, and participates in setting the agenda for meetings of the Board and
separate meetings or executive sessions of the Independent Trustees. As noted,
the majority of the Board is comprised of Independent Trustees, and the Board
believes that maintaining a Board that has a majority of Independent
Trustees
allows the Board to operate in a manner that provides for an appropriate level
of independent oversight and action. In accordance with applicable regulations
regarding the governance of the Trust, the Independent Trustees have an
opportunity to meet in a separate quarterly executive session in conjunction
with each quarterly meeting of the Board during which they may review matters
relating to their independent oversight of the Trust.
The
Board reviews annually the structure and operation of the Board and its
committees. The Board has determined that the composition of the Board and the
function and composition of its various committees provide the appropriate means
and communication channels to address any potential conflicts of interest that
may arise.
Board
Oversight of Risk Management
As
part of its oversight function, the Board receives and reviews various risk
management reports and discusses these matters with appropriate management and
other personnel. Because risk management is a broad concept comprised of many
elements (e.g., investment risk, issuer and counterparty risk, compliance risk,
operational risks, business continuity risks), the oversight of different types
of risks is handled in different ways. For example, the Audit, Financial and
Administrative Oversight Committee meets with the Treasurer and the Trust’s
independent registered public accounting firm to discuss, among other things,
the internal control structure of the Trust’s financial reporting function. The
Board meets regularly with the Chief Compliance Officer and the Chief Operating
Officer to discuss compliance and operational risks and how they are managed.
The Board also receives reports from the Adviser and its Chief Risk Officer as
to investment and other risks of the Funds.
With
respect to liquidity, the Trust has implemented a liquidity risk management
program on behalf of the Funds (the “Liquidity Program”) that is designed to
assess and manage each Fund’s liquidity risk. The Board has designated the
Adviser to administer the Liquidity Program. Under the Liquidity Program the
Board will review periodic reports concerning Fund liquidity and review, no less
frequently than annually, a written report prepared by the Adviser that
addresses the operation of the Liquidity Program and assesses its adequacy and
effectiveness.
Information
about Each Trustee’s Qualification, Experience, Attributes or Skills
The
Board believes that each of the Trustees has the qualifications, experience,
attributes and skills (“Trustee Attributes”) appropriate to their continued
service as Trustees of the Trust in light of the Trust’s business and structure.
In addition to a demonstrated record of business and/or professional
accomplishment, each of the Trustees has demonstrated a commitment to
discharging their oversight duties as trustees in the interests of shareholders.
The Board annually conducts a “self-assessment” wherein the effectiveness of the
Board is reviewed.
In
addition to the information provided in the table above, certain additional
information concerning each particular Trustee and his or her Trustee Attributes
is provided below.
Mr.
Cohen’s Trustee Attributes.
Mr.
Cohen has over 41 years of experience in the financial services industry. He
served as Executive Vice President of Recognos Financial, a premier provider of
semantic data analysis for the financial services industry, from 2015 to 2021
and he has been an independent financial services consultant since 2005. Mr.
Cohen has served a variety of management roles for various financial and
investment companies throughout his career. Additionally, Mr. Cohen serves as an
independent trustee of the trust in which the Adviser’s first mutual fund was
launched. The Board believes that Mr. Cohen’s experience, qualifications,
attributes and skills on an individual basis and in combination with those of
the other Trustees lead to the conclusion that he possesses the requisite skills
and attributes as a Trustee to carry out oversight responsibilities with respect
to the Trust.
Mr.
Albe’s Trustee Attributes.
Mr.
Albe has over 32 years of experience in the investment management industry,
including having served as executive management for a large asset management
firm and its affiliated investment companies. Mr. Albe is a Certified Public
Accountant (non-practicing) and has past experience as a member of the board and
audit committee of a publicly held company. Mr. Albe is an audit committee
financial expert of the Trust. The Board believes that Mr. Albe’s experience,
qualifications, attributes and skills on an individual basis and in combination
with those of the other Trustees lead to the conclusion that he possesses the
requisite skills and attributes as a Trustee to carry out oversight
responsibilities with respect to the Trust.
Mr.
Schappert’s Trustee Attributes.
Mr.
Schappert has over 47 years of experience in the investment management industry.
He has been an independent financial services consultant for his own consulting
business, Schappert Consulting, LLC, since 2008 and has served a variety of
management roles for various financial and investment companies throughout his
career. The Board believes that Mr. Schappert’s experience, qualifications,
attributes and skills on an individual basis and in combination with those of
the
other
Trustees lead to the conclusion that he possesses the requisite skills and
attributes as a Trustee to carry out oversight responsibilities with respect to
the Trust.
Ms.
Mullins’ Trustee Attributes.
Ms.
Mullins worked in the Asset Management and Mutual Funds industry at Raymond
James from 1990-2010 and her experience includes accounting, compliance, and
operations. Ms. Mullins retired as Chief Financial Officer of Eagle Family of
Funds (now Carillon Family of Funds) in 2010. From 2014-2022, Ms. Mullins was an
independent contractor and CCO with SWM Advisors. She remains an independent
contractor with SWM Advisors. In addition to this experience, Ms. Mullins also
has experience serving as a Trustee for Valued Advisers Trust since 2013 and as
its Chairperson since 2017. Ms. Mullins is also an independent trustee for The
Cushing Family of Funds. The Board believes that Ms. Mullins’ experience,
qualifications, attributes and skills on an individual basis and in combination
with those of the other Trustees lead to the conclusion that she possesses the
requisite skills and attributes as a Trustee to carry out oversight
responsibilities with respect to the Trust.
Ms.
Pate’s Trustee Attributes.
Ms.
Pate has over 15 years of experience in the financial services industry. Ms.
Pate has served in various portfolio management capacities for Angel Oak since
2017, including serving as portfolio manager for certain Angel Oak funds and
managing separately managed accounts. Prior to joining Angel Oak, she spent 10
years with Morgan Stanley, where she worked in equity research focusing on the
financial sector, and led the Consumer & Specialty Finance research team as
an Executive Director and Senior Lead Analyst. The Board believes that Ms.
Pate’s experience, qualifications, attributes and skills on an individual basis
and in combination with those of the other Trustees lead to the conclusion that
she possesses the requisite skills and attributes as a Trustee to carry out
oversight responsibilities with respect to the Trust.
Mr.
Triick’s Trustee Attributes.
Mr.
Triick has served in various portfolio management capacities for Angel Oak since
2011. In addition to serving as portfolio manager for Angel Oak Funds, Mr.
Triick is responsible of managing Angel Oak’s separately managed account
clients, including depository institutions. Prior to joining Angel Oak, he
worked for YieldQuest Advisors, where he was a member of the investment
committee focusing on the interest rate risk, currency risk, and commodity
exposures of the portfolios alongside directly managing the closed-end fund
allocations within the portfolios and individual accounts. The Board believes
that Mr. Triick’s experience, qualifications, attributes and skills on an
individual basis and in combination with those of the other Trustees lead to the
conclusion that he possesses the requisite skills and attributes as a Trustee to
carry out oversight responsibilities with respect to the Trust.
Board
Committees
The
Board has four standing committees: the Audit, Financial, and Administrative
Oversight Committee; the Nominating and Governance Committee; the Compliance
Oversight Committee; and the Valuation and Risk Management Oversight Committee.
The
Audit, Financial and Administrative Oversight Committee is comprised of all of
the Independent Trustees. The function of the Committee is to review the scope
and results of the annual audit of the Funds and any matters bearing on the
audit or the Funds’ financial statements and to ensure the integrity of the
Funds’ financial reporting. The Committee also recommends to the Board of
Trustees the annual selection of the independent registered public accounting
firm for the Funds and it reviews and pre-approves audit and certain non-audit
services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.
The Committee also assists the Board in overseeing the review of financial and
administrative reports and discussing with the Trust’s management financial and
administrative matters relating to the Funds. For the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2024, the Audit, Financial and Administrative Oversight
Committee met four times.
The
Nominating and Governance Committee, comprised of all the Independent Trustees,
is responsible for seeking and reviewing candidates for consideration as
nominees for Trustees. The Committee has a policy in place for considering
Trustee candidates recommended by shareholders. Nomination submissions must be
accompanied by all information relating to the recommended nominee that is
required to be disclosed in solicitations or proxy statements for the election
of Trustees, as well as information sufficient to evaluate the individual’s
qualifications. Nomination submissions must be accompanied by a written consent
of the individual to stand for election if nominated by the Board and to serve
if elected by the shareholders. In addition, a nominee must provide such
additional information as reasonably requested by the Committee. The Committee
will consider recommendations by shareholders for up to one year from receipt.
Nomination submissions should be sent to:
Secretary,
Angel Oak Funds Trust
c/o
Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC
3344
Peachtree Road NE, Suite 1725
Atlanta,
GA 30326
The
Committee meets at least annually. For the fiscal year ended January 31,
2024, the Committee met four times.
The
Compliance Oversight Committee, comprised of all the Independent Trustees,
assists the full Board in connection with matters relating to the compliance of
the Trust and its service providers with applicable laws. The Committee
coordinates the Board’s oversight of the implementation and administration of
the Fund’s compliance program through the periodic review of reports and
discussions with appropriate management of the Adviser, including the CCO, and
other service providers. The Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the
Board regarding the Fund’s compliance matters such as compliance with and any
proposed changes to the Fund’s compliance program and the Codes of Ethics of the
Fund and Adviser. The Committee meets at least annually. For the fiscal year
ended January 31, 2024, the Compliance Oversight Committee met four
times.
The
Valuation and Risk Management Oversight Committee, comprised of all the
Independent Trustees, oversees valuation matters of the Trust delegated to the
Adviser’s Valuation Committee, including the fair valuation determinations and
methodologies proposed and utilized by the Adviser’s Valuation Committee,
reviews the Trust’s valuation procedures and their application by the Adviser’s
Valuation Committee, reviews pricing errors and procedures for calculation of
NAV of each series of the Trust and responds to other matters deemed appropriate
by the Board.
The
Committee also oversees the policies, procedures, practices and systems relating
to identifying and managing the various risks that are or may be applicable to
the Trust. The Committee does not assume any day-to-day risk management
functions or activities. The Adviser and other service providers are responsible
for the day-to-day implementation, maintenance, and administration of policies,
procedures, systems and practices designed to identify, monitor and control
risks to which the Trust is or may be exposed. The Chief Risk Officer of the
Adviser oversees the execution of its risk management responsibilities. The
actions of the Committee are reviewed and ratified by the Board. The Committee
meets at least annually. For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2024, the
Valuation and Risk Management Oversight Committee met four times.
Trustee
Ownership of Fund Shares and Other Interests
The
table below shows, for each Trustee, the amount of the Funds’ equity securities
beneficially owned by each Trustee, and the aggregate value of all investments
in equity securities of the Trust, as of December 31, 2023 and stated as
one of the following ranges: A = None; B = $1-$10,000; C = $10,001-$50,000; D =
$50,001-$100,000; and E = over $100,000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Dollar
Range of Equity
Securities
in the: |
Aggregate
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in all Registered Investment Companies
Overseen by the Trustees in Family of Investment
Companies |
Name
of Trustee |
Multi-Strategy
Income Fund |
UltraShort
Income Fund |
Non-Interested
Trustees |
|
| |
Alvin
R. Albe, Jr. |
E |
A |
E |
Ira
P. Cohen |
A |
A |
A |
Keith
M. Schappert |
E |
A |
E |
Andrea
N. Mullins |
A |
A |
E |
Interested
Trustee |
|
| |
Cheryl
M. Pate |
A |
A |
D |
Clayton
Triick |
A |
E |
E |
Furthermore,
neither the Independent Trustees nor members of their immediate family own
securities beneficially or of record in the Adviser, the Funds’ principal
underwriter, or any of their affiliates. Accordingly, during the two most
recently completed calendar years, neither the Independent Trustees nor members
of their immediate family, have had a direct or indirect interest, the value of
which exceeds $120,000, in the Adviser, the Trust’s principal underwriter or any
of its affiliates.
Compensation
Each
Trustee who is not an “interested person” (i.e., an “Independent Trustee”) of
the Fund Complex (which includes affiliated registrants not disclosed in this
report) receives an annual retainer of $65,000, (pro-rated for any periods less
than one year), paid quarterly as well as $12,000 for attending each regularly
scheduled meeting in person in connection with his or her service on the Board
of the Fund Complex. In addition, each Committee Chairman receives additional
annual compensation of $12,000 (pro-rated for any periods less than one year)
and the Chairman of the Board receives an additional $12,000.
Independent
Trustees are eligible for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
connection with attendance at meetings.
The
Trust does not have any pension or retirement plans. For the fiscal year
ended
January 31,
2024,
the following compensation was paid to the Trustees by the Funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Aggregate
Compensation from the: |
Total
Compensation from the Funds and Fund Complex(1)
Paid to Trustees |
Name
of Person/Position |
Multi-Strategy
Income Fund |
UltraShort
Income Fund |
Non-Interested
Trustees |
|
| |
Alvin
R. Albe, Jr., Trustee |
$49,351 |
$16,059 |
$125,000 |
Ira
P. Cohen, Trustee, Chairman |
$54,084 |
$17,621 |
$137,000 |
Keith
M. Schappert, Trustee |
$49,351 |
$16,059 |
$125,000 |
Andrea
N. Mullins, Trustee |
$49,351 |
$16,059 |
$125,000 |
Interested
Trustee(2) |
|
| |
Cheryl
M. Pate, Trustee |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Clayton
Triick, Trustee(3) |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
(1)The
Fund Complex includes each series of the Trust, and Angel Oak Strategic Credit
Fund, Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust, and Angel Oak Credit
Opportunities Term Trust, affiliated registrants not discussed in this SAI.
(2)As
Interested Trustees, Ms. Pate and Mr. Triick do not receive compensation from
the Fund Complex.
(3)Mr.
Triick was appointed Interested Trustee effective May 30, 2024.
Investment
Adviser
The
Funds’ Adviser is Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC, 3344 Peachtree Road NE, Suite
1725, Atlanta, Georgia 30326. Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC was formed in 2009
by the Managing Partners of the Adviser, Michael A. Fierman, and Sreeniwas
(Sreeni) V. Prabhu. Angel Oak Capital Advisors is 93.3% owned by Angel Oak Asset
Management Holdings, LLC.
Under
the terms of the investment advisory agreement (the “Agreement”), the Adviser
manages the Funds’ investments subject to oversight by the Board of Trustees. As
compensation for its management services, the Multi-Strategy Income Fund is
obligated to pay the Adviser a fee computed and accrued daily and paid monthly
at an annual rate of 0.89% of the average daily net assets of the Fund, and the
UltraShort Income Fund is obligated to pay the Adviser a fee computed and
accrued daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.44% of the average daily
net assets of the Fund.
The
Adviser has contractually agreed to waive its fees and/or reimburse certain
expenses (exclusive of any front-end sales loads, taxes, interest on borrowings,
dividends on securities sold short, brokerage commissions, 12b-1 fees, acquired
fund fees and expenses, expenses incurred in connection with any merger or
reorganization and extraordinary expenses) to limit the Total Annual Fund
Operating Expenses after Fee Waiver/Expense Reimbursement to 0.99% of the
Multi-Strategy Income Fund’s average daily net assets, and 0.35% of the
UltraShort Income Fund’s average daily net assets (each the “Expense Limit”)
through May 31, 2025. The Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses after Fee
Waiver/Expense Reimbursement may be higher than the Expense Limit as a result of
any acquired fund fees and expenses or other expenses that are excluded from the
calculation. The contractual waivers and expense reimbursements may be changed
or eliminated at any time by the Board of Trustees, on behalf of the Fund, upon
60 days’ written notice to the Adviser. The contractual waivers and expense
reimbursements may not be terminated by the Adviser without the consent of the
Board of Trustees. The Adviser may recoup from the Fund any waived amount or
reimbursed expenses with respect to the Fund pursuant to this agreement if such
recoupment does not cause the Fund to exceed the current Expense Limit or the
Expense Limit in place at the time of the waiver or reimbursement (whichever is
lower) and the recoupment is made within three years after the end of month in
which the Adviser incurred the expense.
For
the period February 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, the Adviser also had
voluntarily agreed to waive its fees and/or reimburse certain expenses
(exclusive of any front-end sales loads, taxes, interest on borrowings,
dividends on securities sold short, brokerage commissions, 12b-1 fees, acquired
fund fees and expenses, expenses incurred in connection with any merger or
reorganization and extraordinary expenses) to limit the Total Annual Fund
Operating Expenses after Fee Waiver/Expense Reimbursement to 0.30% of the
UltraShort Income Fund’s average daily net assets. This voluntary waiver was in
addition to the contractual fee waiver/expense limitation agreement discussed
above.
In
addition, the Adviser has contractually agreed through at least May 31,
2025 to waive the amount of each Fund’s management fee to the extent necessary
to offset the proportionate share of the management fees incurred by the Fund
through
its
investment in an underlying fund for which the Adviser also serves as investment
adviser. This arrangement may only be changed or eliminated by the Board of
Trustees upon 60 days’ written notice to the Adviser.
The
following table describes the advisory fees paid to the Adviser by the
Multi-Strategy Income Fund for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fiscal
Year Ended |
Advisory
Fees Accrued |
Fee
Waiver/ Expense Reimbursement |
Advisory
Fees Recouped |
Net Advisory
Fees Paid (or Expenses Reimbursed) |
January
31, 2024 |
$24,846,902 |
($788,267) |
$66,743 |
$24,125,378 |
January
31, 2023 |
$43,551,583 |
($714,385) |
$17,063 |
$42,854,261 |
January
31, 2022 |
$61,533,794 |
($786,925) |
n/a |
$60,746,869 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The
following table describes the advisory fees paid to the Adviser by the
UltraShort Income Fund for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fiscal
Year Ended |
Advisory
Fees
Accrued |
Fee
Waiver/ Expense Reimbursement |
Net Advisory
Fees Paid (or Expenses Reimbursed) |
January
31, 2024 |
$2,479,980 |
($1,346,741) |
$1,133,239 |
January
31, 2023 |
$5,010,365 |
($2,190,925) |
$2,819,440 |
January
31, 2022 |
$5,966,864 |
($3,004,588) |
$2,962,276 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
The
Adviser retains the right to use the name “Angel Oak” in connection with another
investment company or business enterprise with which the Adviser is or may
become associated. The Trust’s right to use the name “Angel Oak” automatically
ceases 90 days after termination of the Agreement and may be withdrawn by the
Adviser on 90 days’ written notice.
The
Adviser may make payments to banks or other financial institutions that provide
shareholder services and administer shareholder accounts. If a bank or other
financial institution were prohibited from continuing to perform all or a part
of such services, management of the Funds believes that there would be no
material impact on the Funds or shareholders. Banks and other financial
institutions may charge their customers fees for offering these services to the
extent permitted by applicable regulatory authorities, and the overall return to
those shareholders availing themselves of the bank services will be lower than
to those shareholders who do not. The Funds may from time to time purchase
securities issued by banks and other financial institutions that provide such
services; however, in selecting investments for the Funds, no preference will be
shown for such securities.
About
the Portfolio Managers
The
following table shows which Portfolio Managers have the primary responsibility
for the day-to-day management of each Fund.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Name
of Portfolio Manager |
Multi-Strategy
Income
Fund |
UltraShort
Income
Fund |
Berkin
Kologlu |
X |
|
Kin
Lee |
X |
|
Sreeniwas
(Sreeni) V. Prabhu |
X |
X |
Namit
Sinha |
X |
X |
Clayton
Triick |
X |
X |
As
of January 31, 2024, the Portfolio Managers were responsible for managing
the following types of accounts for the Adviser, other than the Fund(s) for
which they serve as a portfolio manager:
Berkin
Kologlu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Number
and Assets of Other Accounts |
Number
and Assets of Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Performance
Based |
Registered
Investment Companies |
Other
Pooled Investment Vehicles |
Other
Accounts |
Registered
Investment Companies |
Other
Pooled Investment Vehicles |
Other
Accounts |
3 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
$273,801,087 |
$112,496,477 |
$467,847,243 |
$0 |
$112,496,477 |
$0 |
Kin
Lee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Number
and Assets of Other Accounts |
Number
and Assets of Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Performance
Based |
Registered
Investment Companies |
Other
Pooled Investment Vehicles |
Other
Accounts |
Registered
Investment Companies |
Other
Pooled Investment Vehicles |
Other
Accounts |
0 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
$0 |
$147,651,645 |
$231,302,923 |
$0 |
$147,651,645 |
$0 |
Sreeniwas
(Sreeni) V. Prabhu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Number
and Assets of Other Accounts |
Number
and Assets of Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Performance
Based |
Registered
Investment Companies |
Other
Pooled Investment Vehicles |
Other
Accounts |
Registered
Investment Companies |
Other
Pooled Investment Vehicles |
Other
Accounts |
5 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
$710,269,825 |
$2,537,800,341 |
$0 |
$0 |
$2,127,688,015 |
$0 |
Namit
Sinha
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Number
and Assets of Other Accounts |
Number
and Assets of Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Performance
Based |
Registered
Investment Companies |
Other
Pooled Investment Vehicles |
Other
Accounts |
Registered
Investment Companies |
Other
Pooled Investment Vehicles |
Other
Accounts |
8 |
15 |
9 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
$577,347,578 |
$2,537,800,347 |
$53,418,691 |
$0 |
$2,127,688,015 |
$0 |
Clayton
Triick
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Number
and Assets of Other Accounts |
Number
and Assets of Accounts for which Advisory Fee is Performance
Based |
Registered
Investment Companies |
Other
Pooled Investment Vehicles |
Other
Accounts |
Registered
Investment Companies |
Other
Pooled Investment Vehicles |
Other
Accounts |
8 |
1 |
13 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
$577,347,578 |
$112,496,477 |
$330,207,115 |
$0 |
$112,496,477 |
$0 |
Compensation:
The Portfolio Managers receive an annual base salary from the Adviser. Each of
the Portfolio Managers is eligible to receive a discretionary bonus, which is
based on: profitability of the Adviser; assets under management; investment
performance of managed accounts; compliance with the Adviser’s policies and
procedures; contribution to the Adviser’s goals and objectives; anticipated
compensation levels of competitor firms; effective research; role and
responsibilities; client satisfaction; asset retention; teamwork; leadership;
and risk management. Mr. Prabhu has an ownership interest in the Adviser and the
Adviser’s parent company and may receive distributions from the Adviser, which
may come from profits generated by the Adviser. Some Portfolio Managers have
profit interest units in the Adviser’s parent company in addition to their
salary,
bonus,
and benefits package. These units participate in firm-wide profits and also
convey capital value in the event of certain scenarios.
Potential
Conflicts of Interest:
Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has
day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one fund or
other account. More specifically, portfolio managers who manage multiple funds
and/or other accounts may experience the following potential conflicts: The
management of multiple accounts may result in a portfolio manager devoting
unequal time and attention to the management of each account. Investment
decisions for client accounts are also made consistent with a client’s
individual investment objective and needs. Accordingly, there may be
circumstances when purchases or sales of securities for one or more client
accounts will have an adverse effect on other clients. The Adviser may seek to
manage such competing interests by: (1) having a portfolio manager focus on a
particular investment discipline; (2) utilizing a quantitative model in managing
accounts; and/or (3) reviewing performance differences between similarly managed
accounts on a periodic basis to ensure that any such differences are
attributable by differences in investment guidelines and timing of cash flows.
The Adviser also maintains a Code of Ethics to establish standards and
procedures for the detection and prevention of activities by which persons
having knowledge of the investments and investment intentions of the Funds may
abuse their fiduciary duties to the Funds.
If
a portfolio manager identifies a limited investment opportunity that may be
suitable for more than one client, the Funds may not be able to take full
advantage of that opportunity due to an allocation of filled purchase or sale
orders across all eligible accounts. To deal with these situations, the Adviser
has adopted procedures for allocating portfolio transactions across multiple
accounts.
With
respect to securities transactions for clients, the Adviser determines which
broker to use to execute each order. However, the Adviser may direct securities
transactions to a particular broker/dealer for various reasons including receipt
of research or participation interests in initial public offerings that may or
may not benefit the Funds. To deal with these situations, the Adviser has
adopted procedures to help ensure best execution of all client transactions.
From
time to time, the Adviser may make investments at different levels of an
issuer’s or borrower’s capital structure (including but not limited to
investments in debt versus equity). In managing such investments, the Adviser
will consider the interests of the Fund’s shareholders in deciding what actions
to take with respect to a given issuer or borrower. These potential conflicts of
interests may become more pronounced in situations in which an issuer or
borrower experiences financial or operational challenges, or as a result of a
Fund’s use of certain investment strategies, including small capitalization,
emerging market, distressed or less liquid strategies.
Finally,
the appearance of a conflict of interest may arise where the Adviser has an
incentive, such as a performance-based management fee, which relates to the
management of one but not all accounts for which a portfolio manager has
day-to-day management responsibilities.
Potential
Restrictions and Issues Related to Material Non-Public Information:
The Adviser and its affiliates may acquire confidential or material non-public
information, and as a result, the Adviser may be restricted from trading in
certain securities and instruments. The Adviser will not be free to divulge, or
to act upon, any such confidential or material non-public information and, due
to these restrictions, the Adviser may be unable to initiate a transaction for a
Fund’s account that it otherwise might have initiated. As a result, a Fund may
be frozen in an investment position that it otherwise might have liquidated or
closed out or may not be able to acquire a position that it might otherwise have
acquired.
The
Funds are required to show the dollar amount ranges of the portfolio managers’
beneficial ownership of shares of the Fund(s) they manage as of the fiscal year
ended January 31, 2024.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Portfolio
Manager |
Dollar
Range of Equity Securities in the |
Multi-Strategy
Income Fund |
UltraShort
Income
Fund |
Berkin
Kologlu |
None |
N/A |
Kin
Lee |
$50,001-$100,000 |
N/A |
Sreeni
V. Prabhu |
None |
$500,001-$1,000,000 |
Namit
Sinha |
None |
None |
Clayton
Triick |
None |
$100,001-$500,000 |
CONTROL
PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES
A
“principal shareholder” is any person who owns of record or beneficially 5% or
more of the outstanding shares of a Fund. A “control person” is one who owns
beneficially or through controlled companies more than 25% of the voting
securities of a Fund or acknowledges the existence of control.
As
a controlling shareholder, each of these persons could control the outcome of
any proposal submitted to the shareholders for approval, including changes to a
Fund’s fundamental policies or the terms of the management agreement with the
Adviser. To the best knowledge of the Trust, the names and addresses of the
record and beneficial holders of 5% or more of the outstanding Class A,
Class C, Class A1 and Institutional Class shares, as applicable, of the
Funds’ voting securities and the percentage of the outstanding Class A, Class C,
Class A1 and Institutional Class shares held by such holders as of May 1, 2024
are set forth below. Unless otherwise indicated below, the Trust has no
knowledge as to whether all or any portion of the shares owned of record are
also owned beneficially.
As
of May 1, 2024, the Trustees and officers of the Trust, as a group, owned of
record and beneficially 1.86% of the outstanding Class A1 shares of the
UltraShort Income Fund, and less than 1% of the outstanding Class A, Class C,
and Institutional Class shares, as applicable, of each Fund.
Angel
Oak Multi-Strategy Income Fund - Class A Principal Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Name
and Address |
%
Ownership |
Type
of Ownership |
Record
Owners |
| |
|
| |
Morgan
Stanley Smith Barney LLC
For
the Exclusive Benefit of its Customers
1
New York Plaza, Fl 12
New
York, NY 10004-1932 |
38.50% |
Record |
Charles
Schwab & Co, Inc.
Special
Custody A/C FBO Customers
Attn:
Mutual Funds
211
Main St.
San
Francisco, CA 94105-1901 |
16.67% |
Record |
Merrill
Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith
For
the Sole Benefit of its Customers
4800
Deer Lake Dr. East
Jacksonville,
FL 32246-6484 |
13.34% |
Record |
UBS
WM USA SPEC CDY A/C EBOC UBSFSI 1000 Harbor Blvd. Weehawken, NJ
07086-6761 |
9.58% |
Record |
Wells
Fargo Clearing Services LLC
Special
Custody Acct for the
Exclusive
Benefit of Customers
2801
Market St.
Saint
Louis, MO 63103-2523 |
8.29% |
Record |
|
| |
|
| |
Angel
Oak Multi-Strategy Income Fund - Class C Principal Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Name
and Address |
%
Ownership |
Type
of Ownership |
Record
Owners |
| |
|
| |
Morgan
Stanley Smith Barney LLC
For
the Exclusive Benefit of its Customers
1
New York Plaza, Fl 12
New
York, NY 1004-1965 |
35.63% |
Record |
UBS
WM USA SPEC CDY A/C EBOC UBSFSI 1000 Harbor Blvd. Weehawken, NJ
07086-6761 |
17.10% |
Record |
Merrill
Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith
For
the Sole Benefit of its Customers
4800
Deer Lake Dr. East
Jacksonville,
FL 32246-6484 |
14.72% |
Record |
Wells
Fargo Clearing LLC
1
N. Jefferson Avenue MSC MO3970
Saint
Louis, MO 63103-2254 |
13.78% |
Record |
Angel
Oak Multi-Strategy Income Fund - Institutional Class Principal
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Name
and Address |
%
Ownership |
Type
of Ownership |
Record
Owners |
| |
|
| |
Merrill
Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith
For
the Sole Benefit of its Customers
4800
Deer Lake Dr. East
Jacksonville,
FL 32246-6484 |
18.26% |
Record |
Charles
Schwab & Co, Inc.
Special
Custody A/C FBO Customers
Attn:
Mutual Funds
211
Main St.
San
Francisco, CA 94105-1901 |
12.54% |
Record |
Morgan
Stanley Smith Barney LLC
For
the Exclusive Benefit of its Customers
1
New York Plaza, Fl 12
New
York, NY 10004-1965 |
12.51% |
Record |
UBS
WM USA
SPEC
CDY A/C EBOC UBSFSI
1000
Harbor Blvd.
Weehawken,
NJ 07086-6761 |
11.23% |
Record |
National
Financial Services LLC
499
Washington Blvd.
Jersey
City, NJ 07310-2010 |
9.56% |
Record |
Band
& Co. c/o U.S. Bank NA
1555
N. River Center Drive, Suite 302
Milwaukee,
WI 53212-3958 |
7.51% |
Record |
Wells
Fargo Clearing Services LLC Special Custody Acct for the Exclusive
Benefit of Customer 2801 Market St Stain Louis, MO
63103-2523 |
6.91% |
Record |
Saxon
& Co PO Box 94597 Cleveland, OH 44101-4597 |
5.51% |
Record |
Angel
Oak UltraShort Income Fund – Class A Principal Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Name
and Address |
%
Ownership |
Type
of Ownership |
Record
Owners |
| |
|
| |
Charles
Schwab & Co, Inc.
Special
Custody A/C FBO Customers
Attn:
Mutual Funds
211
Main St.
San
Francisco, CA 94105-1901 |
31.12% |
Record |
RBC
Capital Markets LLC
Mutual
Fund Omnibus Processing
Attn:
Mutual Fund Ops Manager
250
Nicollett Mall Ste 1200 Ste 1800
Minneapolis,
MN 55401-7554 |
16.29% |
Record |
UBS
WM USA
SPEC
CDY A/C EBOC UBSFSI
1000
Harbor Blvd.
Weehawken,
NJ 07086-6761 |
12.47% |
Record |
LPL
Financial Omnibus Customer Account Attn: Lindsay O’Toole 4707
Executive Dr San Diego, CA 92121-3091 |
10.98% |
Record |
National
Financial Services LLC
499
Washington Blvd, Fl 4th
Jersey
City, NJ 07310-2010 |
8.59% |
Record |
Beneficial
Owner |
| |
Marital
Trust U/W/O
Edwin
H. Wegman DTD 8/10/06
Toby
Wegman & Mark N. Wegman TTEES
3344
Peachtree Rd, Suite 1725
Atlanta,
GA 30326-4833 |
15.91% |
Beneficial |
Angel
Oak UltraShort Income Fund – Class A1 Principal Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Name
and Address |
%
Ownership |
Type
of Ownership |
Record
Owners |
| |
|
| |
Wells
Fargo Clearing Services LLC
1
N Jefferson Ave MSC MO3970
Saint
Louis, MO 63103-2254 |
100.00% |
Record |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Angel
Oak UltraShort Income Fund – Institutional Class Principal
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Name
and Address |
%
Ownership |
Type
of Ownership |
Record
Owners |
| |
|
| |
UBS
WM USA
SPEC
CDY A/C EBOC UBSFSI
1000
Harbor Blvd.
Weehawken,
NJ 07086-6761 |
29.32% |
Record |
National
Financial Services LLC
499
Washington Blvd Fl 4th
Jersey
City NJ 07310-2010 |
20.30% |
Record |
Charles
Schwab & Co, Inc.
Special
Custody A/C FBO Customers
Attn:
Mutual Funds
211
Main St.
San
Francisco, CA 94105-1901 |
19.77% |
Record |
Attn:
Mutual Funds
SEI
Private Trust Company
One
Freedom Valley Drive
Oaks,
PA 19456-9989 |
14.75% |
Record |
Wells
Fargo Clearing Services LLC
1
N Jefferson Ave MSC MO3970
Saint
Louis, MO 63103-2254 |
5.26% |
Record |
PORTFOLIO
TRANSACTIONS
How
Securities are Purchased and Sold
Purchases
and sales of portfolio securities that are fixed income securities (for
instance, money market instruments and bonds, notes and bills) usually are
principal transactions. In a principal transaction, the party from whom a Fund
purchases or to whom the Fund sells is acting on their own behalf (and not as
the agent of some other party such as its customers). These securities normally
are purchased directly from the issuer or from an underwriter or market maker
for the securities. There usually are no brokerage commissions paid for these
securities.
Purchases
and sales of portfolio securities that are equity securities (for instance
common stock and preferred stock) are generally effected: (1) if the
security is traded on an exchange, through brokers who charge commissions; and
(2) if the security is traded in the “over-the-counter” markets, in a
principal transaction directly from a market maker. In transactions on stock
exchanges, commissions are negotiated. When transactions are executed in an
over-the-counter market, the Adviser will seek to deal with the primary market
makers; but when necessary to obtain best execution, the Adviser will utilize
the services of others.
The
price of securities purchased from underwriters includes a disclosed fixed
commission or concession paid by the issuer to the underwriter, and prices of
securities purchased from dealers serving as market makers reflects the spread
between the bid and asked price.
In
the case of fixed income and equity securities traded in the over-the-counter
markets, there is generally no stated commission, but the price usually includes
an undisclosed commission or markup.
Commissions
Paid
The
following table sets forth the brokerage commissions paid by the Funds on
portfolio brokerage transactions during the periods shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fiscal
Year Ended |
Multi-Strategy
Income
Fund1 |
UltraShort
Income
Fund2 |
January
31, 2024 |
$23,699 |
| $1,479 |
|
January
31, 2023 |
$56,782 |
| $11,397 |
|
January
31, 2022 |
$101,366 |
| $5,004 |
|
|
| |
1
The aggregate brokerage commissions paid by the Multi-Strategy Income Fund
significantly decreased during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 due to a
decrease in the Fund’s trading of securities that are subject to brokerage
commissions. The
significant
decrease in aggregate brokerage commissions paid by the Fund for the fiscal year
ended January 31, 2024 was due to a decrease in the Fund’s trading securities
that are subject to brokerage commissions.
2
The aggregate brokerage commissions paid by the UltraShort Income Fund
significantly decreased during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2024 due to a
decrease in the Fund’s trading of securities that are subject to brokerage
commissions.
Adviser
Responsibility for Purchases and Sales
The
Adviser places orders for the purchase and sale of securities with
broker-dealers selected by and in the discretion of the Adviser. The Funds do
not have any obligation to deal with a specific broker or dealer in the
execution of portfolio transactions. Allocations of transactions to brokers and
dealers and the frequency of transactions are determined by the Adviser in its
best judgment and in a manner deemed to be in the best interest of the
applicable Fund rather than by any formula.
The
Adviser seeks “best execution” for all portfolio transactions. This means that
the Adviser seeks the most favorable price and execution available. The
Adviser’s primary consideration in executing transactions for a Fund is prompt
execution of orders in an effective manner and at the most favorable price
available.
Choosing
Broker-Dealers
The
Funds may not always pay the lowest commission or spread available. Rather, in
determining the amount of commissions (including certain dealer spreads) paid in
connection with securities transactions, the Adviser takes into account factors
such as size of the order, difficulty of execution, efficiency of the executing
broker’s facilities (including the research services described below) and any
risk assumed by the executing broker.
Consistent
with applicable rules and the Adviser’s duties, the Adviser may consider
payments made by brokers effecting transactions for a Fund. These payments may
be made to the Fund or to other persons on behalf of the Fund for services
provided to the Fund for which those other persons would be obligated to pay.
The
Adviser may also utilize a broker and pay a slightly higher commission if, for
example, the broker has specific expertise in a particular type of transaction
(due to factors such as size or difficulty), or it is efficient in trade
execution.
Securities
of Regular Broker-Dealers
From
time to time, a Fund may acquire and hold securities issued by its “regular
brokers and dealers” or the parents of those brokers and dealers. For this
purpose, regular brokers and dealers are the 10 brokers or dealers that:
(1) received the greatest amount of brokerage commissions during the Fund’s
last fiscal year; (2) engaged in the largest amount of principal
transactions for portfolio transactions of the Fund during the Fund’s last
fiscal year; or (3) sold the largest amount of the Fund’s shares during the
Fund’s last fiscal year.
During
the fiscal year ended January 31, 2024, the Multi-Strategy Income Fund
acquired securities of its regular brokers or dealers (as defined in Rule 10b-1
under the 1940 Act) listed below. The UltraShort Income Fund did not acquire
securities of its regular brokers or dealers during the fiscal
year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fund |
Regular
Broker or
Dealer
(or Parent) Issuer |
Value
of Securities
Owned
(as of 1/31/24)* |
Multi-Strategy
Income Fund |
Goldman
Sachs Group, Inc. |
$2,123,028 |
|
|
JP
Morgan Chase & Co. |
$2,099,789 |
|
|
Morgan
Stanley Bank |
$2,056,604 |
|
*All
of the securities represent corporate debt obligations of the regular
broker-dealer or its affiliate.
Obtaining
Research from Brokers
The
Adviser has full brokerage discretion. The Adviser evaluates the range and
quality of a broker’s services in placing trades such as securing best price,
confidentiality, clearance and settlement capabilities, promptness of execution
and the financial stability of the broker-dealer. The Adviser may give
consideration to research services furnished by brokers to the Adviser for its
use and may cause the Funds to pay these brokers a higher amount of commission
than may be charged by other brokers. This research is designed to augment the
Adviser’s own internal research and investment strategy capabilities. This
research may include reports that are common in the industry such as industry
research reports and periodicals, quotation systems, software for portfolio
management and formal databases. Typically, the research will be used to service
all of the Adviser accounts, although a particular client may not benefit from
all the research received on each occasion. The Adviser fees
are
not reduced by reason of receipt of research services. Most of the brokerage
commissions for research are for investment research on specific companies or
industries. And, because the Adviser will follow a limited number of securities
most of the commission dollars spent on research will directly benefit clients
and the Funds’ investors.
Counterparty
Risk
The
Adviser monitors the creditworthiness of counterparties to the Funds’
transactions and intends to enter into a transaction only when it believes that
the counterparty presents minimal and appropriate credit risks.
Transactions
through Affiliates
The
Adviser may effect brokerage transactions through affiliates of the Adviser (or
affiliates of those persons) pursuant to procedures adopted by the Trust.
Other
Accounts of the Adviser
Investment
decisions for each Fund are made independently from those for any other account
or investment company that is or may in the future become advised by the Adviser
or its respective affiliates. Investment decisions are the product of many
factors, including basic suitability for the particular client involved.
Likewise, a particular security may be bought or sold for certain clients even
though it could have been bought or sold for other clients at the same time.
Likewise, a particular security may be bought for one or more clients when one
or more clients are selling the security. In some instances, one client may sell
a particular security to another client. In addition, two or more clients may
simultaneously purchase or sell the same security, in which event, each day’s
transactions in such security are, insofar as is possible, averaged as to price
and allocated between such clients in a manner which, in the Adviser’s opinion,
is in the best interest of the affected accounts and is equitable to each and in
accordance with the amount being purchased or sold by each. There may be
circumstances when purchases or sales of a portfolio security for one client
could have an adverse effect on another client that has a position in that
security. In addition, when purchases or sales of the same security for a Fund
and other client accounts managed by the Adviser occurs contemporaneously, the
purchase or sale orders may be aggregated to obtain any price advantages
available to large denomination purchases or sales.
DISCLOSURE
OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
The
Trust, on behalf of the Funds, has adopted a portfolio holdings disclosure
policy that governs the timing and circumstances of disclosure of portfolio
holdings of the Funds. Information about the Funds’ portfolio holdings will not
be distributed to any third party except in accordance with the portfolio
holdings policies and the Adviser’s Policy (the “Disclosure Policies”). The
Adviser and the Board considered the circumstances under which the Funds’
portfolio holdings may be disclosed under the Disclosure Policies and the actual
and potential material conflicts that could arise in such circumstances between
the interests of the Funds’ shareholders and the interests of the Adviser,
distributor or any other affiliated person of the Funds. After due
consideration, the Adviser and the Board determined that the Funds have a
legitimate business purpose for disclosing portfolio holdings to persons
described in the Disclosure Policies, including mutual fund rating or
statistical agencies, or persons performing similar functions, and internal
parties involved in the investment process, administration or custody of the
Funds. Pursuant to the Disclosure Policies, the Trust’s CCO is authorized to
consider and authorize dissemination of portfolio holdings information to
additional third parties, after considering whether the disclosure is for a
legitimate business purpose and is in the best interests of the Funds’
shareholders. The Adviser has also adopted a policy with respect to disclosure
of portfolio holdings of the Funds (the “Adviser’s Policy”). The Adviser’s
Policy is consistent with the Trust’s portfolio holdings disclosure policy and
is used in furtherance of the Trust’s policy.
The
Board exercises continuing oversight of the disclosure of the Funds’ portfolio
holdings by (1) overseeing the implementation and enforcement of the Disclosure
Policies, Codes of Ethics and other relevant policies of the Funds and their
service providers by the Trust’s CCO, (2) by considering reports and
recommendations by the Trust’s CCO concerning any material compliance matters
(as defined in Rule 38a-1 under the 1940 Act), and (3) by considering to approve
any amendment to the Disclosure Policies. The Board reserves the right to amend
the Disclosure Policies at any time without prior notice to shareholders in its
sole discretion.
Disclosure
of the Funds’ complete holdings is required to be made after the periods covered
by the Funds’ Annual Report and Semi-Annual Report to Fund shareholders and in
the quarterly holdings report on Form N-PORT. These reports are available, free
of charge, on the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Generally,
between the 5th and 10th business day of the month following each month (or
quarter) end, the Funds may provide, at the Adviser’s discretion, their
portfolio holdings to various rating and ranking organizations, including, but
not limited to, FactSet, Lipper (a Thompson Reuters company), Morningstar, Inc.,
Standard & Poor’s Financial Services, LLC,
Bloomberg
L.P., Thomson Reuters Corporation, Vickers Stock Research Corporation and
Capital-Bridge, Inc. In addition, generally between the 5th and 10th business
day of the month following the month (or quarter) end, the Funds will post to
their website a list of their top ten holdings or full portfolio holdings at the
discretion of the Adviser. The timing, frequency and type (i.e.,
ratings/rankings/holdings) of disclosure may change at the Adviser’s discretion,
as well as whether to post to the Funds’ website. The Board has also approved
the dissemination of each Form N-PORT filed with the SEC, including non-public
data, to the Investment Company Institute.
In
the event of a conflict between the interests of a Fund and the interests of the
Adviser or an affiliated person of the Adviser, the CCO of the Adviser, in
consultation with the Trust’s CCO, shall make a determination in the best
interests of the Fund, and shall report such determination to the Board at the
end of the quarter in which such determination was made. Any employee of the
Adviser who suspects a breach of this obligation must report the matter
immediately to the Adviser’s CCO or to his or her supervisor.
In
addition, material non-public holdings information may be provided without lag
as part of the normal investment activities of the Funds to each of the
following entities, which, by explicit agreement or by virtue of their
respective duties to the Funds, are required to maintain the confidentiality of
the information disclosed, including a duty not to trade on non-public
information: the fund administrator, fund accountant, custodian, transfer agent,
auditors, counsel to the Funds or the Board, broker-dealers (in connection with
the purchase or sale of securities or requests for price quotations or bids on
one or more securities) and regulatory authorities. Portfolio holdings
information not publicly available with the SEC or through the Funds’ website
may only be provided to additional third parties, including mutual fund ratings
or statistical agencies, in accordance with the Disclosure Policies, when the
Funds have a legitimate business purpose and the third party recipient is
subject to a confidentiality agreement that includes a duty not to trade on
non-public information.
Service
providers are subject to a duty of confidentiality pursuant to contract,
applicable policies and procedures, or professional code and may not disclose
non-public portfolio holdings information unless specifically authorized. In
some cases, a service provider may be required to execute a non-disclosure
agreement. Non-disclosure agreements include the following provisions:
•The
recipient agrees to keep confidential any portfolio holdings information
received.
•The
recipient agrees not to trade on the non-public information
received.
•The
recipient agrees to refresh its representation as to confidentiality and
abstention from trading upon request from the Adviser.
Information
about a Fund’s portfolio holdings may be distributed to institutional
consultants evaluating a particular Fund on behalf of potential
investors.
Portfolio
holdings disclosure may also be made pursuant to prior written approval by the
CCO. Prior to approving any such disclosure, the CCO will ensure that
procedures, processes and agreements are in place to provide reasonable
assurance that the portfolio holdings information will only be used in
accordance with the objectives of the Disclosure Policies.
In
no event shall the Adviser, its affiliates or employees, the Funds, or any other
party receive any direct or indirect compensation in connection with the
disclosure of information about the Funds’ portfolio holdings.
There
can be no assurance that the Disclosure Policies will protect the Funds from
potential misuse of portfolio holdings information by individuals or entities to
which it is disclosed.
From
time to time, the Adviser may make additional disclosure of the Funds’ portfolio
holdings on the Funds’ website. Shareholders can access the Funds’ website at
www.angeloakcapital.com for additional information about the Funds, including,
without limitation, the periodic disclosure of their portfolio
holdings.
PROXY
VOTING POLICY
The
Board has adopted Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures (the “Policies”) on
behalf of the Trust which delegate the responsibility for voting proxies to the
Adviser, subject to the Board’s continuing oversight. The Policies require that
the Adviser vote proxies received in a manner consistent with the best interests
of the applicable Fund and its shareholders. The Policies also require the
Adviser to present to the Board, at least annually, the Adviser’s Proxy Policies
(as defined below) and a record of each proxy voted by the Adviser on behalf of
the Funds, including a report on the resolution of all proxies identified by the
Adviser as involving a conflict of interest. The Adviser has also adopted the
following Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures (“Adviser’s Proxy Policies”).
In
its role as investment adviser to the Funds, the Adviser has adopted those proxy
voting policies adopted by the Trust. To the extent that the Trust’s policies do
not cover potential voting issues with respect to proxies received by the Funds,
the Fund has delegated to the Adviser the authority to act on its behalf to
promote each Fund’s investment objective, subject to the provisions of the
Trust’s policies regarding resolution of a conflict of interest with respect to
the Adviser.
The
Adviser will vote proxies in the best interests of the applicable Fund. The
Adviser will generally vote in favor of routine corporate housekeeping proposals
such as the election of directors and the selection of auditors, absent
conflicts of interest (e.g., an auditor’s provision of non-audit services). The
Adviser will generally vote against proposals that cause board members to become
entrenched or cause unequal voting rights. In reviewing proposals, the Adviser
may also consider the opinion of management, the effect on management, the
effect on shareholder value and the issuer’s business practices.
The
Adviser recognizes that under certain circumstances it may have a conflict of
interest in voting proxies on behalf of a Fund. A “conflict of interest,” means
any circumstance when the Adviser (including officers, directors, agents and
employees) knowingly does business with, receives compensation from, or sits on
the board of, a particular issuer or closely affiliated entity, and, therefore,
may appear to have a conflict of interest between its own interests and the
interests of fund shareholders in how proxies of that issuer are voted. The
Adviser has adopted the Trust’s procedures as they relate to the resolution of
conflicts of interest with respect to voting shares of the Funds.
The
Trust will file a Form N-PX, with the Funds’ complete proxy voting record for
the 12 months ended June 30, no later than August 31st of each year. Form
N‑PX for the Funds will be available without charge, upon request, by calling
toll-free (855) 751-4324 and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
ADDITIONAL
PURCHASE AND REDEMPTION INFORMATION
The
information provided below supplements the information contained in the
Prospectus regarding the purchase and redemption of each Fund’s
shares.
How
to Buy or Exchange Shares
In
addition to purchasing or exchanging shares directly from a Fund, you may
purchase or exchange shares of a Fund through certain financial intermediaries
and their agents and other authorized designees that have made arrangements with
the Fund and are authorized to buy and exchange shares of the Fund
(collectively, “Financial Intermediaries”). Investors should contact their
Financial Intermediary directly for appropriate instructions, as well as
information pertaining to accounts and any service or transaction fees that may
be charged. If you transmit your order to these Financial Intermediaries before
the close of a Fund (generally 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time) on a day that the NYSE
is open for business, your order will be priced based on the applicable Fund’s
NAV next computed after it is received by the Financial Intermediary. Investors
should check with their Financial Intermediary to determine if it participates
in these arrangements. A Fund will be deemed to have received a purchase,
redemption or exchange order when the Financial Intermediary receives the
order.
Shares
are priced at the applicable Fund’s NAV plus any applicable sales charge next
determined after U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, doing business as, U.S. Bank
Global Fund Services (“Fund Services”) receives your order in proper form, as
discussed in the Funds’ Prospectus. To receive the applicable price at that
day’s NAV, Fund Services must receive your order in proper form before the close
of the applicable Fund, generally 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time.
The
Trust reserves the right in its sole discretion (i) to suspend the
continued offering of Fund shares, (ii) to reject purchase or exchange
orders in whole or in part when in the judgment of the Adviser or the
distributor such rejection is in the best interest of the applicable Fund, and
(iii) to reduce or waive the minimum for initial and subsequent investments
for certain fiduciary accounts or under circumstances where certain economies
can be achieved in sales of Fund shares.
In
addition to cash purchases, Fund shares may be purchased by tendering payment
in-kind in the form of shares of stock, bonds or other securities. Any
securities used to buy Fund shares must be readily marketable, their acquisition
consistent with the applicable Fund’s objective and otherwise acceptable to the
Adviser and the Board. Please see “Purchases In-Kind” below for more
information.
Automatic
Investment Plan
As
discussed in the Prospectus, each Fund provides an Automatic Investment Plan
(“AIP”) for the convenience of investors who wish to purchase shares of the Fund
on a regular basis. All record keeping and custodial costs of the AIP are paid
by the applicable Fund. The market value of Fund shares is subject to
fluctuation. Prior to participating in the AIP the investor should keep in mind
that this plan does not assure a profit nor protect against depreciation in
declining markets.
How
to Sell Shares and Delivery of Redemption Proceeds
You
can sell your Fund shares any day the NYSE is open for regular trading, either
directly to the Fund or through your Financial Intermediary.
Payments
to shareholders for Fund shares redeemed directly from the Fund will be made as
promptly as possible, but no later than seven days after receipt by the Funds’
transfer agent of the written request in proper form, with the appropriate
documentation as stated in the Prospectus, except that a Fund may suspend the
right of redemption or postpone the date of payment during any period when
(a) trading on the NYSE is restricted as determined by the SEC or the NYSE
is closed for other than weekends and holidays; (b) an emergency exists as
determined by the SEC making disposal of portfolio securities or valuation of
net assets of the Fund not reasonably practicable; or (c) for such other
period as the SEC may permit for the protection of the Fund’s shareholders.
Under unusual circumstances, a Fund may suspend redemptions, or postpone payment
for more than seven days, but only as authorized by SEC rules.
The
value of shares on redemption or repurchase may be more or less than the
investor’s cost, depending upon the market value of the applicable Fund’s
portfolio securities at the time of redemption or repurchase.
Telephone
Redemptions
Shareholders
with telephone transaction privileges established on their account may redeem
Fund shares by telephone. Upon receipt of any instructions or inquiries by
telephone from the shareholder, the applicable Fund or its authorized agents may
carry out the instructions and/or to respond to the inquiry consistent with the
shareholder’s previously established account service options. For joint
accounts, instructions or inquiries from either party will be carried out
without prior notice to the other account owners. In acting upon telephone
instructions, each Fund and its agents use procedures that are reasonably
designed to ensure that such instructions are genuine. These include recording
all telephone calls, requiring pertinent information about the account and
sending written confirmation of each transaction to the registered
owner.
Fund
Services will employ reasonable procedures to confirm that instructions
communicated by telephone are genuine. If Fund Services fails to employ
reasonable procedures, the applicable Fund and Fund Services may be liable for
any losses due to unauthorized or fraudulent instructions. If these procedures
are followed, however, to the extent permitted by applicable law, neither the
Funds nor their agents will be liable for any loss, liability, cost or expense
arising out of any redemption request, including any fraudulent or unauthorized
request. For additional information, contact Fund Services.
Redemptions
In-Kind
Each
Fund has reserved the right to pay the redemption price of its shares, either
totally or partially, by a distribution in-kind of portfolio securities (instead
of cash). The securities so distributed would be valued at the same amount as
that assigned to them in calculating the NAV for the shares being sold. If a
shareholder receives a distribution in-kind, the shareholder could incur
subsequent brokerage or other charges in converting the securities to cash and
will bear any market risks associated with such securities until they are
converted into cash. A redemption in-kind is treated as a taxable transaction
and a sale of the redeemed shares, generally resulting in capital gain or loss
to you, subject to certain loss limitation rules. Shareholders’ ability to
liquidate securities distributed in-kind may be restricted by resale limitations
or substantial restrictions on transfer imposed by the issuers of the securities
or by law. Shareholders may only be able to liquidate securities distributed
in-kind at a substantial discount from their value, and there may be higher
brokerage costs associated with any subsequent disposition of these securities
by the recipient.
Purchases
In-Kind
Securities
received by a Fund in connection with an in-kind purchase will be valued in
accordance with the Fund’s valuation procedures as of the time of the
next-determined NAV per share of the Fund following receipt in good form of the
order. In situations where the purchase is made by an affiliate of a Fund with
securities received by the affiliate through a redemption in-kind from another
fund, the redemption in-kind and purchase in-kind must be effected
simultaneously, the Fund and the redeeming fund must have the same procedures
for determining their NAVs, and the Fund and the redeeming fund must ascribe the
same value to the securities. Please call (855) 751-4324 before
attempting to purchase shares in-kind. The Funds reserve the right to amend or
terminate this practice at any time.
Distributions
Distributions
of net investment income will be reinvested at the applicable Fund’s NAV (unless
you elect to receive distributions in cash) as of the payment date.
Distributions of capital gain will be reinvested at the NAV of the applicable
Fund (unless you elect to receive distributions in cash) on the payment date for
the distribution. Cash payments may be made more than seven days following the
date on which distributions would otherwise be reinvested.
TAXATION
The
tax information set forth in the Prospectus and the information in this section
relates solely to Federal income tax law and assumes that each Fund qualifies as
a regulated investment company (as discussed below). Such information is only a
summary of certain key Federal income tax considerations affecting each Fund and
its shareholders and is in addition to the information provided in the
Prospectus. No attempt has been made to present a complete explanation of the
Federal tax treatment of each Fund or the tax implications to shareholders. The
discussions here and in the Prospectus are not intended as substitutes for
careful tax planning.
This
“Taxation” section is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the “Code”) and applicable regulations in effect on the date of the Prospectus.
Future legislative or administrative changes or court decisions may
significantly change the tax rules applicable to the Fund and its shareholders.
Any of these changes or court decisions may have a retroactive effect.
All
investors should consult their own tax advisors as to the Federal, state, local
and foreign tax consequences of an investment in a Fund.
Qualification
as a Regulated Investment Company
Each
Fund intends, for each tax year, to qualify as a “regulated investment company”
under the Code.
Federal
Income Tax Consequences of Qualification
As
a regulated investment company, each Fund will not be subject to Federal income
tax on the portion of its investment company taxable income (that is, taxable
interest, dividends, net short-term capital gains and other taxable ordinary
income, net of expenses) and net capital gain (that is, the excess of net
long-term capital gains over net short-term capital losses) that it distributes
to shareholders. To be subject to tax as a regulated investment company,
generally a Fund must satisfy the following requirements:
•The
Fund must distribute an amount at least equal to the sum of 90% of its
investment company taxable income, determined without regard to any deduction
for dividends paid, and 90% of its net tax-exempt interest, if any, each tax
year (certain distributions made by the Fund after the close of its tax year are
considered distributions attributable to the previous tax year for purposes of
satisfying this requirement (“Distribution Requirement”)).
•The
Fund must derive at least 90% of its gross income each tax year from dividends,
interest, payments with respect to securities loans, and gains from the sale or
other disposition of securities, or other income (including gains from options
and futures contracts) derived from its business of investing in securities and
net income derived from interests in qualified publicly traded partnerships.
•The
Fund must satisfy the following asset diversification test at the close of each
quarter of the Fund’s tax year: (1) at least 50% of the value of the Fund’s
assets must consist of cash, cash items, U.S. government securities, securities
of other regulated investment companies, and securities of other issuers (as to
which the Fund has not invested more than 5% of the value of the Fund’s total
assets in securities of an issuer and as to which the Fund does not hold more
than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer); and (2) no more
than 25% of the value of the Fund’s total assets may be invested in the
securities of any one issuer (other than U.S. government securities and
securities of other regulated investment companies), or in two or more issuers
which the Fund controls and which are engaged in the same or similar trades or
businesses or in the securities of one or more qualified publicly traded
partnerships.
While
each Fund presently intends to make cash distributions (including distributions
reinvested in Fund shares) for each tax year in an aggregate amount sufficient
to satisfy the Distribution Requirement and eliminate Federal income tax, a Fund
may use “equalization accounting” (in lieu of making some or all cash
distributions) for those purposes. To the extent that a Fund uses equalization
accounting it will allocate a portion of its undistributed investment company
taxable income and net capital gain to redemptions of Fund shares and will
correspondingly reduce the amount of such income and gain that it distributes in
cash. If the IRS determines that the Fund’s allocation is improper and that a
Fund has under-distributed its income and gain for any tax year, the Fund may be
liable for Federal income and/or excise tax, and, if the Distribution
Requirement has not been met, may also be unable to continue to qualify for
treatment as a regulated investment company (see discussion below on what
happens if a Fund fails to qualify for that treatment).
If
a Fund retains any net capital gains for reinvestment, it may elect to treat
such capital gains as having been distributed to shareholders. If the Fund makes
such an election, each shareholder will be required to report its share of such
undistributed net
capital
gains attributed to the Fund as long-term capital gain and will be entitled to
claim its share of the U.S. federal income taxes paid by the Fund on such
undistributed net capital gains as a credit against its own U.S. federal income
tax liability, if any, and to claim a refund on a properly-filed U.S. federal
income tax return to the extent that the credit exceeds such liability. In
addition, each shareholder will be entitled to increase the adjusted tax basis
of its Shares by the difference between its share of such undistributed net
capital gain and the related credit. There can be no assurance that the Fund
will make this election if it retains all or a portion of its net capital gain
for a tax year.
A
Fund is permitted to carry forward a net capital loss to offset its capital gain
indefinitely. The excess of a Fund’s net short-term capital loss over its net
long-term capital gain is treated as a short-term capital loss arising on the
first day of the Fund’s next taxable year and the excess of a Fund’s net
long-term capital loss over its net short-term capital gain is treated as a
long-term capital loss arising on the first day of the Fund’s next taxable year.
If future capital gain is offset by carried-forward capital losses, such future
capital gain is not subject to fund-level U.S. federal income tax, regardless of
whether it is distributed to shareholders. Accordingly, the Funds do not expect
to distribute any such offsetting capital gain. In the event that a Fund were to
experience an ownership change as defined under the Code, the capital loss
carryforwards and other favorable tax attributes of the Fund, if any, may be
subject to limitation. The Funds cannot carry back or carry forward any net
operating losses.
As
of the most recent fiscal year end, the Funds had capital loss carry-forwards
approximating the amount indicated for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
expiring in the year indicated (if applicable):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Multi-Strategy
Income Fund |
UltraShort
Income Fund |
No
expiration short-term |
$490,244,176 |
$30,172,767 |
No
expiration long-term |
$1,030,809,201 |
$15,644,355 |
Total |
$1,521,053,377 |
$45,817,122 |
Failure
to Qualify
If
for any tax year a Fund does not qualify as a regulated investment company, all
of its taxable income (including its net capital gain) will be subject to tax at
regular corporate rates without any deduction for dividends paid to
shareholders, and the dividends will generally be taxable to the shareholders as
ordinary income to the extent of the Fund’s current and accumulated earnings and
profits. In addition, the Fund could be required to recognize unrealized gains,
pay taxes and make distributions (any of which could be subject to interest
charges) before re-qualifying for taxation as a regulated investment company. If
a Fund fails to satisfy either the income test or asset diversification test
described above, in certain cases, however, the Fund may be able to avoid losing
its status as a regulated investment company by timely providing notice of such
failure to the IRS, curing such failure and possibly paying an additional tax or
penalty.
Failure
to qualify as a regulated investment company would thus have a negative impact
on a Fund’s income and performance. It is possible that a Fund will not qualify
as a regulated investment company in any given tax year.
Fund
Distributions
Each
Fund anticipates distributing substantially all of its investment company
taxable income and net tax-exempt interest (if any) for each tax year.
Distributions paid to you out of such income generally would be characterized as
ordinary income. A portion of these distributions may qualify for the
dividends-received deduction when paid to certain corporate shareholders.
A
portion of a Fund’s distributions paid to individuals may be treated as
“qualified dividend income,” and may be subject to a maximum Federal income tax
rate of either 15% or 20% (depending on whether the individual’s income exceeds
certain threshold amounts). A distribution is treated as qualified dividend
income to the extent that the applicable Fund receives dividend income from
taxable domestic corporations and certain qualified foreign corporations,
provided that holding period and other requirements are met by the Fund and the
shareholder. To the extent a Fund’s distributions are attributable to other
sources, such as interest or capital gains, such distributions are not treated
as qualified dividend income.
Given
each Fund’s investment strategies, it is not expected that a significant portion
of any Fund’s dividends will be eligible to be reported as qualified dividend
income or as eligible for the dividends-received deduction.
Individuals
(and certain other non-corporate entities) are generally eligible for a 20%
deduction with respect to taxable ordinary dividends from real estate investment
trusts (“REITs”) through 2025. IRS regulations allow a regulated investment
company to pass through to its shareholders such taxable ordinary REIT
dividends. Accordingly, individual (and certain other non-corporate)
shareholders of a Fund that has received taxable ordinary REIT dividends may be
able to take advantage of this 20% deduction with respect to any such amounts
passed through.
Certain
distributions reported by a Fund as Section 163(j) interest dividends may be
treated as interest income by shareholders for purposes of the tax rules
applicable to interest expense limitations under Section 163(j) of the Code.
Such treatment by the shareholder is generally subject to holding period
requirements and other potential limitations, although the holding period
requirements are generally not applicable to dividends declared by money market
funds and certain other funds that declare dividends daily and pay such
dividends on a monthly or more frequent basis. The amount that a Fund is
eligible to report as a Section 163(j) dividend for a tax year is generally
limited to the excess of the Fund’s business interest income over the sum of the
Fund’s (i) business interest expense and (ii) other deductions properly
allocable to the Fund’s business interest income.
An
additional 3.8% Medicare tax is imposed on certain net investment income
(including ordinary dividends and capital gain distributions received from a
Fund and net gains from redemptions or other taxable dispositions of Fund
shares) of U.S. individuals, estates and trusts to the extent that such person’s
“modified adjusted gross income” (in the case of an individual) or “adjusted
gross income” (in the case of an estate or trust) exceeds certain threshold
amounts.
Each
Fund anticipates distributing substantially all of its net capital gain for each
tax year. These distributions generally are made only once a year, usually in
November or December, but a Fund may make additional distributions of net
capital gain at any time during the year. These distributions to you generally
would be characterized as long-term capital gain, regardless of how long you
have held shares. These distributions do not qualify for the dividends-received
deduction.
Each
Fund intends to operate, each year, using a fiscal and taxable year ending
January 31.
Distributions
by a Fund that exceed its earnings and profits will be treated as a return of
capital. Return of capital distributions reduce your tax basis in the shares and
are treated as gain from the sale of the shares to the extent your basis would
be reduced below zero.
All
distributions by a Fund will be treated in the manner described above regardless
of whether the distribution is paid in cash or reinvested in additional shares
of the Fund (or of another fund). If you receive distributions in the form of
additional shares, you will be treated as receiving a distribution in an amount
equal to the amount of cash that could have been received instead of shares.
You
may purchase shares with a NAV at the time of purchase that reflects
undistributed net investment income or recognized capital gain, or unrealized
appreciation in the value of the assets of the applicable Fund. Distributions of
these amounts are taxable to you in the manner described above, although the
distribution economically constitutes a return of capital to you.
Ordinarily,
you are required to take distributions by a Fund into account in the year in
which they are made. A distribution declared in October, November or December of
any calendar year and payable to shareholders of record on a specified date in
those months, however, is deemed to be paid by a Fund and received by you on
December 31 of that calendar year if the distribution is actually paid in
January of the following year.
The
Funds will send you information annually as to the Federal income tax
consequences of distributions made (or deemed made) during the year.
Certain
Tax Rules Applicable to Fund Transactions
For
Federal income tax purposes, when put and call options purchased by a Fund
expire unexercised, the premiums paid by the Fund give rise to short- or
long-term capital losses at the time of expiration (depending on the length of
the respective exercise periods for the options). When put and call options
written by a Fund expire unexercised, the premiums received by the Fund give
rise to short-term capital gains at the time of expiration. When a Fund
exercises a call, the purchase price of the underlying security is increased by
the amount of the premium paid by the Fund. When a Fund exercises a put, the
proceeds from the sale of the underlying security are decreased by the premium
paid. When a put or call written by a Fund is exercised, the purchase price
(selling price in the case of a call) of the underlying security is decreased
(increased in the case of a call) for tax purposes by the premium received.
Some
of the debt securities that may be acquired by a Fund may be treated as debt
securities that are issued with original issue discount (“OID”). Generally, the
amount of the OID is treated as interest income and is included in income over
the term of the debt security, even though payment of that amount is not
received until a later time, usually when the debt security matures.
Additionally, some of the debt securities that may be acquired by a Fund in the
secondary market may be treated as having market discount. Generally, any gain
recognized on the disposition of, and any partial payment of principal on, a
debt security having market discount is treated as ordinary income to the extent
the gain, or principal payment, does not exceed the “accrued market discount” on
such debt security. A Fund may make one or more of the elections applicable to
debt securities having market discount, which could affect the character and
timing of recognition of income. A Fund generally will be required
to
distribute dividends to shareholders representing discount on debt securities
that is currently includable in income, even though cash representing such
income may not have been received by the Fund. Cash to pay such dividends may be
obtained from sales proceeds of securities held by the Fund.
Each
Fund may invest a portion of its net assets in below investment grade
instruments. Investments in these types of instruments may present special tax
issues for a Fund. U.S. federal income tax rules are not entirely clear about
issues such as when a Fund may cease accruing interest, OID or market discount,
when and to what extent deductions may be taken for bad debts or worthless
instruments, how payments received on obligations in default should be allocated
between principal and income and whether exchanges of debt obligations in a
bankruptcy or workout context are taxable. These and other issues will be
addressed by each Fund to the extent necessary to seek to ensure that it
distributes sufficient income that it does not become subject to U.S. federal
income or excise tax.
Certain
listed options, regulated futures contracts and forward currency contracts are
considered “Section 1256 contracts” for Federal income tax purposes. Section
1256 contracts held by a Fund at the end of each tax year are “marked to market”
and treated for Federal income tax purposes as though sold for fair market value
on the last business day of the tax year. Gains or losses realized by a Fund on
Section 1256 contracts generally are considered 60% long-term and 40% short-term
capital gains or losses. A Fund can elect to exempt its Section 1256 contracts
that are part of a “mixed straddle” (as described below) from the application of
Section 1256 of the Code.
Any
option, futures contract or other position entered into or held by a Fund in
conjunction with any other position held by the Fund may constitute a “straddle”
for Federal income tax purposes. A straddle of which at least one, but not all,
the positions are Section 1256 contracts, may constitute a “mixed straddle.” In
general, straddles are subject to certain rules that may affect the character
and timing of a Fund’s gains and losses with respect to straddle positions by
requiring, among other things, that: (1) the loss realized on disposition of one
position of a straddle may not be recognized to the extent that the Fund has
unrealized gains with respect to the other position in such straddle; (2) the
Fund’s holding period in straddle positions being suspended while the straddle
exists (possibly resulting in a gain being treated as short-term capital gain
rather than long-term capital gain); (3) the losses recognized with respect to
certain straddle positions which are part of a mixed straddle and which are
non-Section 1256 contracts being treated as 60% long-term and 40% short-term
capital loss; (4) losses recognized with respect to certain straddle positions
which would otherwise constitute short-term capital losses be treated as
long-term capital losses; and (5) the deduction of interest and carrying charges
attributable to certain straddle positions may be deferred. Various elections
are available to a Fund, which may mitigate the effects of the straddle rules,
particularly with respect to mixed straddles. In general, the straddle rules
described above do not apply to any straddles held by a Fund if all of the
offsetting positions consist of Section 1256 contracts.
Under
the Code, gains or losses attributable to fluctuations in exchange rates which
occur between the time a Fund accrues interest or other receivables or accrues
expenses or other liabilities denominated in a foreign currency and the time a
Fund actually collects such receivables or pays such liabilities are treated as
ordinary income or ordinary loss. Similarly, gains or losses from the
disposition of foreign currencies, from the disposition of debt securities
denominated in a foreign currency, or from the disposition of a forward
contract, futures contract or similar financial instrument denominated in a
foreign currency which are attributable to fluctuations in the value of the
foreign currency between the date of acquisition of the asset and the date of
disposition also are treated as ordinary income or loss. These gains or losses,
referred to under the Code as “Section 988” gains or losses, increase or
decrease the amount of the applicable Fund’s investment company taxable income
available to be distributed to its shareholders as ordinary income, rather than
increasing or decreasing the amount of a Fund’s net capital gain.
The
Funds may invest in shares of foreign corporations (including equity interests
in certain CLOs) which may be treated as passive foreign investment companies
(“PFICs”) under the Code. In general, a foreign corporation is treated as a PFIC
if at least one-half of its assets constitute investment-type assets or 75% or
more of its gross income is investment-type income. If a Fund receives a
so-called “excess distribution” with respect to PFIC stock, the Fund itself may
be subject to a tax on a portion of the excess distribution, whether or not the
corresponding income is distributed by the Fund to shareholders. In general,
under the PFIC rules, an excess distribution is treated as having been realized
ratably over the period during which a Fund held the PFIC shares. A Fund itself
will be subject to tax on the portion, if any, of an excess distribution that is
so allocated to prior Fund tax years and an interest factor will be added to the
tax, as if the tax had been payable in such prior tax years. Certain
distributions from a PFIC as well as gain from the sale of PFIC shares are
treated as excess distributions. Excess distributions are characterized as
ordinary income even though, absent application of the PFIC rules, certain
excess distributions might have been characterized as capital gain.
A
Fund may be eligible to elect alternative tax treatment with respect to PFIC
shares. Under an election that currently is available in some circumstances (a
qualified electing fund, or “QEF”, election), a Fund generally would be required
to include in its gross income its share of the earnings of a PFIC on a current
basis, regardless of whether distributions are received from the
PFIC
in a given tax year. If this election were made, the special rules, discussed
above, relating to the taxation of excess distributions, would not
apply.
Alternatively,
a Fund may elect to mark-to-market its PFIC shares at the end of each taxable
year, with the result that unrealized gains would be treated as though they were
realized and reported as ordinary income. Any mark-to-market losses would be
deductible as ordinary losses to the extent of any net mark-to-market gains
included in income in prior tax years.
Because
the application of the PFIC rules may affect, among other things, the character
of gains, the amount of gain or loss and the timing of the recognition of income
with respect to PFIC shares, as well as subject a Fund itself to tax on certain
income from PFIC shares, the amount that must be distributed to shareholders,
and which will be taxed to shareholders as ordinary income or long-term capital
gain, may be increased or decreased substantially as compared to a fund that did
not invest in PFIC shares. A Fund’s income inclusion with respect to a PFIC with
respect to which the Fund has made a qualified electing fund, or “QEF”,
election, is generally treated as qualifying income for purposes of determining
the Fund’s ability to be subject to tax as a regulated investment company if (A)
there is a current distribution out of the earnings and profits of the PFIC that
are attributable to such income inclusion or (B) such inclusion is derived with
respect to the Fund’s business of investing in stock, securities, or currencies.
If
a Fund holds more than 10% of the interests treated as equity for U.S. federal
income tax purposes in a foreign corporation that is treated as a controlled
foreign corporation (“CFC”) (including equity tranche investments and certain
debt tranche investments in a CLO treated as CFC), the Fund may be treated as
receiving a deemed distribution (taxable as ordinary income) each tax year from
such foreign corporation in an amount equal to the Fund’s pro rata share of the
corporation’s income for the tax year (including both ordinary earnings and
capital gains), whether or not the corporation makes an actual distribution
during such year. In general, a foreign corporation will be classified as a CFC
if more than 50% of the shares of the corporation, measured by reference to
combined voting power or value, is owned (directly, indirectly or by
attribution) by U.S. Shareholders. A “U.S. Shareholder,” for this purpose, is
any U.S. person that possesses (actually or constructively) 10% or more of the
combined value or voting power of all classes of shares of a corporation. If a
Fund is treated as receiving a deemed distribution from a CFC, the Fund will be
required to include such distribution in the Fund’s investment company taxable
income regardless of whether the Fund receives any actual distributions from
such CFC, and the Fund must distribute such income to satisfy the distribution
requirements applicable to regulated investment companies. A Fund’s income
inclusion with respect to a CFC is generally treated as qualifying income for
purposes of determining the Fund’s ability to be subject to tax as a regulated
investment company either if (A) there is a current distribution out of the
earnings and profits of the CFC that are attributable to such income inclusion
or (B) such inclusion is derived with respect to the Fund’s business of
investing in stock, securities, or currencies.
The
Funds might invest directly or indirectly in residual interests in real estate
mortgage investment conduits (“REMICs”) or equity interests in taxable mortgage
pools (“TMPs”). Under a notice issued by the IRS in October 2006 and Treasury
regulations that have not yet been issued (but may apply with retroactive
effect) a portion of a Fund’s income from a REIT that is attributable to the
REIT’s residual interest in a REMIC or a TMP (referred to in the Code as an
“excess inclusion”) will be subject to Federal income tax in all events. This
notice also provides, and the regulations are expected to provide, that excess
inclusion income of a regulated investment company, such as a Fund, will
generally be allocated to shareholders of the regulated investment company in
proportion to the dividends received by such shareholders, with the same
consequences as if the shareholders held the related REMIC or TMP residual
interest directly.
In
general, excess inclusion income allocated to shareholders (i) cannot be offset
by net operating losses (subject to a limited exception for certain thrift
institutions) and (ii) will constitute unrelated business taxable income
(“UBTI”) to entities (including a qualified pension plan, an individual
retirement account, a 401(k) plan, a Keogh plan or other tax-exempt entity)
subject to tax on UBTI, thereby potentially requiring such an entity that is
allocated excess inclusion income, and otherwise might not be required to file a
tax return, to file a tax return and pay tax on such income. In addition,
because the Code provides that excess inclusion income is ineligible for treaty
benefits, a regulated investment company must withhold tax on excess inclusions
attributable to its foreign shareholders at a 30% rate of withholding,
regardless of any treaty benefits for which a shareholder is otherwise eligible.
Any
investment in residual interests of a CMO that has elected to be treated as a
REMIC can create complex tax problems, especially if a Fund has state or local
governments or other tax-exempt organizations as shareholders. Under current
law, a Fund serves to block UBTI from being realized by its tax-exempt
shareholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a tax-exempt shareholder will
recognize UBTI by virtue of its investment in a Fund if shares in the Fund
constitute debt-financed property in the hands of the tax-exempt shareholder
within the meaning of Section 514(b) of the Code. Furthermore, a tax-exempt
shareholder may recognize UBTI if a Fund recognizes “excess inclusion income”
derived from direct or indirect investments in REMIC residual interests or TMPs
if the amount of such income recognized by the Fund exceeds the Fund’s
investment company taxable income (after taking into account deductions for
dividends paid by the Fund).
In
addition, special tax consequences apply to charitable remainder trusts (“CRTs”)
that invest in regulated investment companies that invest directly or indirectly
in residual interests in REMICs or in TMPs. Under legislation enacted in
December 2006, a CRT, as defined in Section 664 of the Code, that realizes UBTI
for a tax year is subject to an excise tax annually of an amount equal to such
UBTI. Under IRS guidance issued in October 2006, a CRT will not recognize UBTI
solely as a result of investing in a Fund that recognizes “excess inclusion
income.” Rather, if at any time during any tax year a CRT (or one of certain
other tax-exempt shareholders, such as the U.S., a state or political
subdivision, or an agency or instrumentality thereof, and certain energy
cooperatives) is a record holder of a share in a Fund that recognizes “excess
inclusion income,” then the Fund will be subject to a tax on that portion of its
“excess inclusion income” for the tax year that is allocable to such
shareholders at the highest federal corporate income tax rate. The extent to
which this IRS guidance remains applicable in light of the December 2006
legislation is unclear. To the extent permitted under the 1940 Act, a Fund may
elect to specially allocate any such tax to the applicable CRT, or other
shareholder, and thus reduce such shareholder’s distributions for the tax year
by the amount of the tax that relates to such shareholder’s interest in the
Fund. Each Fund has not yet determined whether such an election will be made.
CRTs are urged to consult their tax advisors concerning the consequences of
investing in a Fund.
Federal
Excise Tax
A
4% nondeductible excise tax is imposed on a regulated investment company that
fails to distribute in each calendar year an amount at least equal to the sum
of: (1) 98% of its ordinary taxable income (taking into account certain
deferrals and elections) for the calendar year; (2) 98.2% of its capital gain
net income (adjusted for certain ordinary losses) for the one-year period ended
on October 31 of the calendar year; and (3) all ordinary taxable income and
capital gains for previous years that were not distributed or taxed during such
years and on which the regulated investment company did not incur any Federal
income tax. The balance of a Fund’s income must be distributed during the next
calendar year. Each Fund will be treated as having distributed any amount on
which it is subject to income tax for any tax year ending in the calendar year.
For
purposes of calculating the excise tax, each Fund is generally required to: (1)
reduce its capital gain net income (but not below its net capital gain) by the
amount of any net ordinary loss for the calendar year; and (2) exclude foreign
currency gains and losses (and certain other ordinary gains and losses) incurred
after October 31 of any tax year in determining the amount of ordinary taxable
income for the current calendar year. Each Fund will include such gains and
losses incurred after October 31 in determining ordinary taxable income for the
succeeding calendar year.
Each
Fund intends to make sufficient distributions of its ordinary taxable income and
capital gain net income prior to the end of each calendar year to avoid
liability for the excise tax. Investors should note, however, that a Fund might
in certain circumstances be required to liquidate portfolio investments to make
sufficient distributions to avoid the imposition of any excise tax liability.
Sale,
Exchange or Redemption of Shares
In
general, you will recognize gain or loss on the sale, exchange or redemption of
Fund shares in an amount equal to the difference between the proceeds of the
sale, exchange or redemption and your adjusted tax basis in the shares. All or a
portion of any loss so recognized may be disallowed if you purchase (for
example, by reinvesting dividends) shares of the same Fund within 30 days before
or after the sale, exchange or redemption (a “wash sale”). If disallowed, the
loss will be reflected in an upward adjustment to the basis of the shares
purchased. In general, any gain or loss arising from the sale, exchange or
redemption of Fund shares will be considered capital gain or loss and will be
long-term capital gain or loss if the shares were held for longer than one year.
Any capital loss arising from the sale, exchange or redemption of shares held
for six months or less, however, will be treated as a long-term capital loss to
the extent of the amount of distributions of net capital gain received on such
shares. In determining the holding period of such shares for this purpose, any
period during which your risk of loss is offset by means of options, short sales
or similar transactions is not counted. Capital losses in any tax year are
deductible only to the extent of capital gains plus, in the case of a
non-corporate taxpayer, $3,000 of ordinary income.
Each
Fund (or its administrative agent) is required to report to the IRS and furnish
to shareholders the cost basis information for sale transactions of shares.
Shareholders may elect to have one of several cost basis methods applied to
their account when calculating the cost basis of shares sold, including average
cost, FIFO (“first-in, first-out”) or some other specific identification method.
Unless you instruct otherwise, each Fund will use average cost as its default
cost basis method. The cost basis method a shareholder elects may not be changed
with respect to a redemption of shares after the settlement date of the
redemption. Shareholders should consult with their tax advisors to determine the
best cost basis method for their tax situation. Shareholders that hold their
shares through a financial intermediary should contact such financial
intermediary with respect to reporting of cost basis and available elections for
their accounts.
Backup
Withholding
Each
Fund will be required in certain cases to withhold and remit to the U.S.
Treasury at a rate under current law of 24% of taxable distributions and the
proceeds of redemptions of shares paid to you if you: (1) have failed to provide
your correct taxpayer identification number; (2) are otherwise subject to backup
withholding by the IRS for failure to report the receipt of interest or dividend
income properly; or (3) have failed to certify to the Fund that you are not
subject to backup withholding or that you are a C corporation or other “exempt
recipient.” Backup withholding is not an additional tax; rather any amounts so
withheld may be credited against your Federal income tax liability or refunded
if proper documentation is provided.
State
and Local Taxes
The
tax rules of the various states of the U.S. and their local jurisdictions with
respect to an investment in a Fund can differ from the Federal income taxation
rules described above. These state and local rules are not discussed herein. You
are urged to consult your tax advisor as to the consequences of state and local
tax rules with respect to an investment in a Fund.
Foreign
Income Tax
Investment
income received by a Fund from sources within foreign countries as well as gains
or the proceeds from the sale or other disposition of foreign securities may be
subject to foreign income taxes withheld at the source. The United States has
entered into tax treaties with many foreign countries that may entitle the Funds
to a reduced rate of such taxes or exemption from taxes on such income. It is
impossible to know the effective rate of foreign tax in advance since the amount
of a Fund’s assets to be invested within various countries cannot be determined.
If more than 50% of the value of a Fund’s total assets at the close of its tax
year consists of stocks or securities of foreign corporations, the Fund will be
eligible and intends to file an election with the IRS to pass through to its
shareholders the amount of foreign taxes paid by the Fund subject to certain
exceptions. However, there can be no assurance that a Fund will be able to do
so. Pursuant to this election, you will be required to: (1) include in
gross income (in addition to taxable dividends actually received) your pro rata
share of foreign taxes paid by the Fund; (2) treat your pro rata share of such
foreign taxes as having been paid by you and (3) either deduct such pro rata
share of foreign taxes in computing your taxable income or treat such foreign
taxes as a credit against Federal income taxes. You may be subject to rules
which limit or reduce your ability to fully deduct, or claim a credit for, your
pro rata share of the foreign taxes paid by a Fund.
Foreign
Shareholders
The
foregoing discussion relates only to U.S. Federal income tax law as applicable
to U.S. persons (i.e., U.S. citizens and residents and U.S. domestic
corporations, partnerships, trusts and estates). Shareholders who are not U.S.
persons (“foreign shareholders”) should consult their tax advisers regarding
U.S. and foreign tax consequences of ownership of shares of a Fund including the
likelihood that taxable distributions to them would be subject to withholding of
U.S. tax at a rate of 30% (or a lower treaty rate for eligible investors). An
investment in a Fund may also be included in determining a foreign shareholder’s
U.S. estate tax liability.
Properly
reported dividends received by a foreign shareholder from a regulated investment
company are generally exempt from U.S. Federal withholding tax when they (i) are
paid in respect of the regulated investment company’s “qualified net interest
income” (generally, the regulated investment company’s U.S. source interest
income, reduced by expenses that are allocable to such income), or (ii) are paid
in connection with the regulated investment company’s “qualified short-term
capital gains” (generally, the excess of the regulated investment company’s net
short-term capital gain over the regulated investment company’s long-term
capital loss for such taxable year). A Fund may report all, some or none of the
Fund’s potentially eligible dividends as derived from such qualified net
interest income or as qualified short-term capital gains, and a portion of the
Fund’s distributions (e.g. interest from non-U.S. sources or any foreign
currency gains) would be ineligible for this potential exemption from
withholding. Furthermore, in the case of Fund shares held through an
intermediary, the intermediary may have withheld U.S. Federal income tax, even
if a Fund reported all or a portion of such potentially eligible dividends as
having been derived from qualified net interest or income or from qualified
short-term capital gains.
Each
Fund is required to withhold U.S. tax (at a 30% rate) on payments of taxable
dividends and made to certain non-U.S. entities that fail to comply (or be
deemed compliant) with extensive reporting and withholding requirements designed
to inform the U.S. Department of the Treasury of U.S.-owned foreign investment
accounts. The information required to be reported includes the identity and
taxpayer identification number of each account holder and transaction activity
within the holder’s account. Shareholders may be requested to provide additional
information to the Funds to enable the Funds to determine whether withholding is
required.
OTHER
FUND SERVICE PROVIDERS
Administrator
and Transfer Agent
U.S.
Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, doing business as, U.S. Bank Global Fund Services
(“Fund Services”), 615 East Michigan Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202, acts as
administrator, fund accountant and transfer agent to the Funds pursuant to
respective agreements. Fund Services provides certain administrative services to
the Funds, including, among other responsibilities, coordinating the negotiation
of contracts and fees with, and the monitoring of performance and billing of,
the Funds’ independent contractors and agents; preparation for signature by an
officer of the Trust of all documents required to be filed for compliance by the
Trust and the Funds with applicable laws and regulations excluding those of the
securities laws of various states; arranging for the computation of performance
data, including NAV and yield; responding to shareholder inquiries; and
arranging for the maintenance of books and records of the Funds, and providing,
at its own expense, office facilities, equipment and personnel necessary to
carry out its duties. In this capacity, Fund Services does not have any
responsibility or authority for the management of the Funds, the determination
of investment policy, or for any matter pertaining to the distribution of Fund
shares.
Pursuant
to the Funds’ administration agreement with Fund Services, the administrator
will receive a portion of fees from the Funds as part of a bundled-fees
agreement for services performed as administrator, transfer agent and fund
accountant. The administrator expects to receive a fee based on the average
daily net assets of the Funds, subject to an annual minimum amount.
The
following table provides information regarding fees paid by the Multi-Strategy
Income Fund to Fund Services and its affiliates during the periods indicated
below:
|
|
|
|
| |
Fiscal
Period Ended |
Fees
Paid for Administrative Services |
January
31, 2024 |
$1,949,413 |
January
31, 2023 |
$2,446,979 |
January
31, 2022 |
$2,541,190 |
| |
| |
| |
The
following table provides information regarding fees paid by the UltraShort
Income Fund to Fund Services and its affiliates during the periods indicated
below.
|
|
|
|
| |
Fiscal
Period Ended |
Fees
Paid for Administrative Services |
January
31, 2024 |
$423,036 |
January
31, 2023 |
$578,554 |
January
31, 2022 |
$563,108 |
| |
| |
| |
In
addition, the Adviser serves as the administrator to a wholly-owned and
controlled subsidiary of the Multi-Strategy Income Fund organized as a statutory
trust under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “Subsidiary”) pursuant to the
terms of a Trust Agreement by and among the Subsidiary, U.S. Bank National
Association (as trustee of the Subsidiary), the Multi-Strategy Income Fund and
the Adviser (the “Trust Agreement”). In its capacity as administrator of the
Subsidiary, the Adviser manages and administers the business and affairs of the
Subsidiary in accordance with the Trust Agreement. The Adviser receives no
compensation for these services.
Custodian
U.S.
Bank National Association (the “Custodian”) is the Custodian for the Funds and
safeguards and controls the Funds’ cash and securities, determines income and
collects interest on Fund investments. The Custodian’s address is 1555 North
River Center Drive, Suite 302, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212. The Custodian does
not participate in decisions relating to the purchase and sale of securities by
the Fund. Fund Services and the Custodian, are affiliated entities under the
common control of U.S. Bancorp. The Custodian and its affiliates may participate
in revenue sharing arrangements with the service providers of mutual funds in
which a Fund may invest.
U.S.
Bank National Association also serves as the trustee of the Subsidiary pursuant
to the terms of the Trust Agreement. In addition, the Custodian serves as the
custodian of the Subsidiary pursuant to the terms of a Custody Agreement between
the Custodian and the Subsidiary.
Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
Cohen
& Company, Ltd. (the “Auditor”) has been selected as the independent
registered public accounting firm for the Funds. The Auditor’s address is 342
North Water Street, Suite 830, Milwaukee, WI 53202. The Auditor will perform an
annual audit of the Funds’ financial statements and will provide financial, tax
and accounting services as requested.
Legal
Counsel
Dechert
LLP, located at 1900 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006, serves as legal counsel
to the Trust.
DISTRIBUTOR
Quasar
Distributors, LLC, (the “Distributor” or “Quasar”), located at Three Canal
Plaza, Suite 100, Portland, ME 04101, serves as the Funds’ principal underwriter
in a continuous public offering of the Funds’ shares. Pursuant to a distribution
agreement between the Funds and Quasar (the “Distribution Agreement”), Quasar
acts as the Funds’ principal underwriter and distributor and provides certain
administration services and promotes and arranges for the sale of the Funds’
shares. Quasar is a registered broker-dealer under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (“FINRA”).
The
Distribution Agreement between the Funds and Quasar had an initial term of two
years and subsequently will continue in effect only if such continuance is
specifically approved at least annually by the Board or by vote of a majority of
the applicable Fund’s outstanding voting securities and, in either case, by a
majority of the Independent Trustees. The Distribution Agreement is terminable
without penalty by the Trust on behalf of the Funds upon a 60-day written notice
when authorized either by a majority vote of the applicable Fund’s shareholders
or by vote of a majority of the Board, including a majority of the Independent
Trustees, or by Quasar upon a 60-day written notice, and will automatically
terminate in the event of its “assignment” (as defined in the 1940
Act).
Pursuant
to the Funds’ agreement with the Distributor, the Distributor will receive fees
from the Funds for services performed as the distributor of Shares.
DISTRIBUTION
PLAN
The
Funds have adopted a distribution plan (the “Plan”) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under
the 1940 Act with respect to their Class A, Class A1, and Class C shares (as
applicable), respectively. The Plan was approved by a majority of the Board
of Trustees of the Trust, including a majority of the Trustees who are not
interested persons of the Trust or the Funds, and who have no direct or indirect
financial interest in the operation of the Plan or in any other Rule 12b-1
agreement.
The
Plan provides that each Fund will pay the Distributor and/or any registered
securities dealer, financial institution or any other person (the “Recipient”) a
shareholder servicing fee of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the
Class A shares of the applicable Fund in connection with the promotion and
distribution of such class’s shares or the provision of personal services to
such class’s shareholders, including, but not necessarily limited to,
advertising, compensation to underwriters, dealers and selling personnel, the
printing and mailing of prospectuses to other than current Fund shareholders,
the printing and mailing of sales literature and servicing such class’s
shareholder accounts (“12b-1 Expenses”). The Plan provides that the UltraShort
Income Fund will pay the Recipient a shareholder servicing fee of 0.25% of the
average daily net assets of the Class A1 shares of the UltraShort Income Fund in
connection with 12b-1 Expenses. The Plan allows each Fund (except the UltraShort
Income Fund) to pay a fee of 1.00% of the applicable Fund’s Class C average
daily net assets (0.75% to help defray the cost of distributing Class C shares
and 0.25% for servicing Class C shareholders) in connection with 12b-1 Expenses.
The applicable Fund or the Adviser may pay all or a portion of these fees to any
Recipient who renders assistance in distributing or promoting the sale of such
class’s shares, or who provides certain shareholder services, pursuant to a
written agreement.
The
Plan is a compensation plan, which means that compensation is provided
regardless of 12b-1 Expenses actually incurred. It is anticipated that the
Plan will benefit each Fund’s shareholders because an effective sales program
typically is necessary for the Funds to reach and maintain a sufficient size to
achieve efficiently their investment objectives and to realize economies of
scale.
For
the fiscal year ended January 31, 2024, the following 12b-1 Expenses were
incurred by the Funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Multi-Strategy
Income Fund |
UltraShort
Income Fund |
Advertising/Mailing |
— |
— |
Printing/Mailing |
— |
— |
Compensation
to Underwriter |
$15,411 |
$5,733 |
Compensation
to Broker-Dealer |
$765,873 |
$69,128 |
Compensation
to Sales Personnel |
— |
— |
Interest,
carrying or other financing charges |
— |
— |
Other |
— |
— |
Total |
$781,284 |
$74,861 |
For
the fiscal year ended January 31, 2024, the following unreimbursed expenses
were incurred under the Plan and may be carried over to future
years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fund |
Aggregate
Amount |
Aggregate
Amount as a % of Net Assets |
Multi-Strategy
Income Fund |
$56,893 |
0.00% |
UltraShort
Income Fund |
$5,602 |
0.00% |
OTHER
MATTERS
Code
of Ethics
The
Trust, the Adviser and the Distributor have each adopted a code of ethics under
Rule 17j-1 of the 1940 Act, which are designed to eliminate conflicts of
interest between the Funds and personnel of the Trust, the Adviser and the
Distributor. The codes permit such personnel to invest in securities, including
securities that may be purchased or held by the Funds, subject to certain
limitations.
Registration
Statement
This
SAI and the Prospectus do not contain all the information included in the
Trust’s registration statement filed with the SEC under the Securities Act with
respect to the securities offered hereby. The registration statement, including
the exhibits filed therewith, are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov
or may be examined at the office of the SEC in Washington, D.C.
Statements
contained herein and in the Prospectus as to the contents of any contract or
other documents are not necessarily complete, and, in each instance, are
qualified by, reference to the copy of such contract or other documents filed as
exhibits to the registration statement.
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
The
annual
report
for the Funds for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2024 is a separate
document, and the financial statements, accompanying notes, and report of the
independent registered public accounting firm appearing therein are incorporated
by reference into this SAI.
The
annual report for the Funds is available without charge upon request by calling
(855) 751-4324.
APPENDIX
A – DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES RATINGS
A.
Long-Term Ratings
1.
Moody’s Investors Service – Long-Term Corporate Obligation Ratings
Moody’s
long-term obligation ratings are opinions of the relative credit risk of
fixed-income obligations with an original maturity of one year or more. They
address the possibility that a financial obligation will not be honored as
promised. Such ratings use Moody’s Global Scale and reflect both the likelihood
of default and any financial loss suffered in the event of default.
Aaa Obligations
rated Aaa are judged to be of the highest quality, subject to the lowest level
of credit risk.
Aa Obligations
rated Aa are judged to be of high quality and are subject to very low credit
risk.
A Obligations
rated A are judged to be upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit
risk.
Baa Obligations
rated Baa are judged to be medium-grade and subject to moderate credit risk and
as such may possess certain speculative characteristics.
Ba Obligations
rated Ba are judged to be speculative and are subject to substantial credit
risk.
B Obligations
rated B are considered speculative and are subject to high credit
risk.
Caa Obligations
rated Caa are judged to speculative be of poor standing and are subject to very
high credit risk.
Ca Obligations
rated Ca are highly speculative and are likely in, or very near, default, with
some prospect of recovery of principal and interest.
C Obligations
rated C are the lowest rated and are typically in default, with little prospect
for recovery of principal or interest.
Note
Moody’s appends numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 to each generic rating
classification from Aa through Caa. The modifier 1 indicates that the obligation
ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates
a mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of
that generic rating category.
2.
Standard and Poor’s – Long-Term Issue Credit Ratings (including Preferred
Stock)
Issue
credit ratings are based, in varying degrees, on the following considerations:
•Likelihood
of payment—capacity and willingness of the obligor to meet its financial
commitments on an obligation in accordance with the terms of the
obligation;
•Nature
and provisions of the financial obligation and the promise S&P
imputes;
•Protection
afforded by, and relative position of, the financial obligation in the event of
a bankruptcy, reorganization, or other arrangement under the laws of bankruptcy
and other laws affecting creditors’ rights.
Issue
ratings are an assessment of default risk, but may incorporate an assessment of
relative seniority or ultimate recovery in the event of default. Junior
obligations are typically rated lower than senior obligations, to reflect the
lower priority in bankruptcy, as noted above. (Such differentiation may apply
when an entity has both senior and subordinated obligations, secured and
unsecured obligations, or operating company and holding company
obligations.)
AAA An
obligation rated ‘AAA’ has the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poor’s.
The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is
extremely strong.
AA An
obligation rated ‘AA’ differs from the highest-rated obligations only to a small
degree. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the
obligation is very strong.
A An
obligation rated ‘A’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of
changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in
higher-rated categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial
commitments on the obligation is still strong.
BBB An
obligation rated ‘BBB’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse
economic conditions or changing circumstances are more weaken the obligor’s
capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.
Note Obligations
rated ‘BB’, ‘B’, ‘CCC’, ‘CC’, and ‘C’ are regarded as having significant
speculative characteristics. ‘BB’ indicates the least degree of speculation and
‘C’ the highest. While such obligations will likely have some quality and
protective characteristics, these may be outweighed by large uncertainties or
major exposure to adverse conditions.
BB An
obligation rated ‘BB’ is less vulnerable to nonpayment than other speculative
issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse
business, financial, or economic conditions that could lead to the obligor’s
inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments on the
obligation.
B An
obligation rated ‘B’ is more vulnerable to nonpayment than obligations rated
‘BB’, but the obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial
commitments on the obligation. Adverse business, financial, or economic
conditions will likely impair the obligor’s capacity or willingness to meet its
financial commitments on the obligation.
CCC An
obligation rated ‘CCC’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment, and is dependent
upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to
meet its financial commitments on the obligation. In the event of adverse
business, financial, or economic conditions, the obligor is not likely to have
the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
CC An
obligation rated ‘CC’ is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment. The ‘CC’
rating is used when a default has not yet occurred, but S&P expects default
to be a virtual certainty, regardless of the anticipated time to
default.
C An
obligation rated ‘C’ is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment, and the
obligation is expected to have lower relative seniority or lower ultimate
recovery compared with obligations that are rated higher.
D An
obligation rated ‘D’ is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For
non-hybrid capital instruments, the ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on
an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P believes that such
payments will be made within five business days in the absence of a stated grace
period or within the earlier of the stated grace period or 30 calendar days. The
‘D’ rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the
taking of similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual
certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. A rating on an
obligation is lowered to ‘D’ if it is subject to a distressed debt
restructuring.
Note Plus
(+) or minus (-). The ratings from ‘AA’ to ‘CCC’ may be modified by the addition
of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the major
rating categories.
NR This
indicates that no rating has been requested, that there is insufficient
information on which to base a rating, or that Standard & Poor’s does not
rate a particular obligation as a matter of policy.
3.
Fitch – International Long-Term Credit Ratings
International
Long-Term Credit Ratings (LTCR) may also be referred to as Long-Term Ratings.
When assigned to most issuers, it is used as a benchmark measure of probability
of default and is formally described as an Issuer Default Rating (IDR). The
major exception is within Public Finance, where IDRs will not be assigned as
market convention has always focused on timeliness and does not draw analytical
distinctions between issuers and their underlying obligations. When applied to
issues or securities, the LTCR may be higher or lower than the issuer rating
(IDR) to reflect relative differences in recovery expectations.
The
following rating scale applies to foreign currency and local currency
ratings:
Investment
Grade
AAA Highest
credit quality. ‘AAA’ ratings denote the lowest expectation of credit risk. They
are assigned only in case of exceptionally strong capacity for payment of
financial commitments. This capacity is highly unlikely to be adversely affected
by foreseeable events.
AA Very
high credit quality. ‘AA’ ratings denote expectations of very low credit risk.
They indicate very strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This
capacity is not significantly vulnerable to foreseeable events.
A High
credit quality. ‘A’ ratings denote expectations of low credit risk. The capacity
for payment of financial commitments is considered strong. This capacity may,
nevertheless, be more vulnerable to changes in circumstances or in economic
conditions than is the case for higher ratings.
BBB Good
credit quality. ‘BBB’ ratings indicate that there are currently expectations of
low credit risk. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered
adequate but adverse changes in circumstances and economic conditions are more
likely to impair this capacity. This is the lowest investment grade
category.
Speculative
Grade
BB Speculative.
‘BB’ ratings indicate that there is a possibility of credit risk developing,
particularly as the result of adverse economic change over time; however,
business or financial alternatives may be available to allow financial
commitments to be met. Securities rated in this category are not investment
grade.
B Highly
speculative. ‘B’ ratings indicate that significant credit risk is present, but a
limited margin of safety remains. Financial commitments are currently being met;
however, capacity for continued payment is contingent upon a sustained,
favorable business and economic environment.
CCC Default
is a real possibility. Capacity for meeting financial commitments is solely
reliant upon sustained, favorable business or economic conditions.
CC Default
of some kind appears probable.
C Default
is imminent.
RD Indicates
an entity that has failed to make due payments (within the applicable grace
period) on some but not all material financial obligations, but continues to
honor other classes of obligations.
D Indicates
an entity or sovereign that has defaulted on all of its financial obligations.
Default generally is defined as one of the following:
•Failure
of an obligor to make timely payment of principal and/or interest under the
contractual terms of any financial obligation;
•The
bankruptcy filings, administration, receivership, liquidation or other
winding-up or cessation of business of an obligor;
•The
distressed or other coercive exchange of an obligation, where creditors were
offered securities with diminished structural or economic terms compared with
the existing obligation.
Default
ratings are not assigned prospectively; within this context, non-payment on an
instrument that contains a deferral feature or grace period will not be
considered a default until after the expiration of the deferral or grace
period.
Issuers
will be rated ‘D’ upon a default. Defaulted and distressed obligations typically
are rated along the continuum of ‘C’ to ‘B’ ratings categories, depending upon
their recovery prospects and other relevant characteristics. Additionally, in
structured finance transactions, where analysis indicates that an instrument is
irrevocably impaired such that it is not expected to meet pay interest and/or
principal in full in accordance with the terms of the obligation’s documentation
during the life of the transaction, but where no payment default in accordance
with the terms of the documentation is imminent, the obligation may be rated in
the ‘B’ or ‘CCC-C’ categories.
Default
is determined by reference to the terms of the obligations’ documentation. Fitch
will assign default ratings where it has reasonably determined that payment has
not been made on a material obligation in accordance with the requirements of
the obligation’s documentation, or where it believes that default ratings
consistent with Fitch’s published definition of default are the most appropriate
ratings to assign.
Note The
modifiers “+” or “-” may be appended to a rating to denote relative status
within major rating categories. Such suffixes are not added to the ‘AAA’
Long-term rating category, to categories below ‘CCC’, or to Short-term ratings
other than ‘F1’. (The +/- modifiers are only used to denote issues within the
CCC category, whereas issuers are only rated CCC without the use of
modifiers.)
B.
Preferred Stock Ratings
1.
Moody’s Investors Service
Aaa An
issue which is rated “aaa” is considered to be a top-quality preferred stock.
This rating indicates good asset protection and the least risk of dividend
impairment within the universe of preferred stocks.
Aa An
issue which is rated “aa” is considered a high-grade preferred stock. This
rating indicates that there is a reasonable assurance the earnings and asset
protection will remain relatively well-maintained in the foreseeable
future.
A An
issue which is rated “a” is considered to be an upper-medium grade preferred
stock. While risks are judged to be somewhat greater than in the “aaa” and “aa”
classification, earnings and asset protection are, nevertheless, expected to be
maintained at adequate levels.
Baa An
issue which is rated “baa” is considered to be a medium-grade preferred stock,
neither highly protected nor poorly secured. Earnings and asset protection
appear adequate at present but may be questionable over any great length of
time.
Ba An
issue which is rated “ba” is considered to have speculative elements and its
future cannot be considered well assured. Earnings and asset protection may be
very moderate and not well safeguarded during adverse periods. Uncertainty of
position characterizes preferred stocks in this class.
B An
issue which is rated “b” generally lacks the characteristics of a desirable
investment. Assurance of dividend payments and maintenance of other terms of the
issue over any long period of time may be small.
Caa An
issue which is rated “caa” is likely to be in arrears on dividend payments. This
rating designation does not purport to indicate the future status of
payments.
Ca An
issue which is rated “ca” is speculative in a high degree and is likely to be in
arrears on dividends with little likelihood of eventual payments.
C This
is the lowest rated class of preferred or preference stock. Issues so rated can
be regarded as having extremely poor prospects of ever attaining any real
investment standing.
Note Moody’s
applies numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 in each rating classification; The
modifier 1 indicates that the security ranks in the higher end of its generic
rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking and the modifier 3
indicates that the issue ranks in the lower end of its generic rating
category.
C.
Short Term Ratings
1.
Moody’s Investors Service
Moody’s
short-term ratings are opinions of the ability of issuers to honor short-term
financial obligations. Ratings may be assigned to issuers, short-term programs
or to individual short-term debt instruments. Such obligations generally have an
original maturity not exceeding thirteen months, unless explicitly
noted.
Moody’s
employs the following designations to indicate the relative repayment ability of
rated issuers:
P-1 Issuers
(or supporting institutions) rated Prime-1 have a superior ability to repay
short-term debt obligations.
P-2 Issuers
(or supporting institutions) rated Prime-2 have a strong ability to repay
short-term debt obligations.
P-3 Issuers
(or supporting institutions) rated Prime-3 have an acceptable ability to repay
short-term debt obligations.
NP Issuers
(or supporting institutions) rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime
rating categories.
Note Canadian
issuers rated P-1 or P-2 have their short-term ratings enhanced by the
senior-most long-term rating of the issuer, its guarantor or
support-provider.
2.
Standard and Poor’s
A-1 A
short-term obligation rated ‘A-1’ is rated in the highest category by Standard
& Poor’s. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the
obligation is strong. Within this category, certain obligations are designated
with a plus sign (+). This indicates that the obligor’s capacity to meet its
financial commitment on these obligations is extremely strong.
A-2 A
short-term obligation rated ‘A-2’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse
effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in
higher rating categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial
commitment on the obligation is satisfactory.
A-3 A
short-term obligation rated ‘A-3’ exhibits adequate protection parameters.
However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely
to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitment
on the obligation.
B A
short-term obligation rated ‘B’ is regarded as having significant speculative
characteristics. Ratings of ‘B-1’, ‘B-2’, and ‘B-3’ may be assigned to indicate
finer distinctions within the ‘B’ category. The obligor currently has the
capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation; however, it faces
major ongoing uncertainties which could lead to the obligor’s inadequate
capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
B-1 A
short-term obligation rated ‘B-1’ is regarded as having significant speculative
characteristics, but the obligor has a relatively stronger capacity to meet its
financial commitments over the short-term compared to other speculative-grade
obligors.
B-2 A
short-term obligation rated ‘B-2’ is regarded as having significant speculative
characteristics, and the obligor has an average speculative-grade capacity to
meet its financial commitments over the short-term compared to other
speculative-grade obligors.
B-3 A
short-term obligation rated ‘B-3’ is regarded as having significant speculative
characteristics, and the obligor has a relatively weaker capacity to meet its
financial commitments over the short-term compared to other speculative-grade
obligors.
C A
short-term obligation rated ‘C’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is
dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the
obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
D A
short-term obligation rated ‘D’ is in payment default. The ‘D’ rating category
is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due even if the
applicable grace period has not expired, unless Standard & Poor’s believes
that such payments will be made during such grace period. The ‘D’ rating also
will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of a similar
action if payments on an obligation are jeopardized.
Note Dual
Ratings. Standard & Poor’s assigns “dual” ratings to all debt issues that
have a put option or demand feature as part of their structure. The first rating
addresses the likelihood of repayment of principal and interest as due, and the
second rating addresses only the demand feature. The long-term rating symbols
are used for bonds to denote the long-term maturity and the short-term rating
symbols for the put option (for example, ‘AAA/A-1+’). With U.S. municipal
short-term demand debt, note rating symbols are used with the short-term issue
credit rating symbols (for example, ‘SP-1+/A-1+’).
3.
Fitch
The
following ratings scale applies to foreign currency and local currency ratings.
A Short-term rating has a time horizon of less than 13 months for most
obligations, or up to three years for US public finance, in line with industry
standards, to reflect unique risk characteristics of bond, tax, and revenue
anticipation notes that are commonly issued with terms up to three years.
Short-term ratings thus place greater emphasis on the liquidity necessary to
meet financial commitments in a timely manner.
F1 Highest
credit quality. Indicates the strongest capacity for timely payment of financial
commitments; may have an added “+” to denote any exceptionally strong credit
feature.
F2 Good
credit quality. A satisfactory capacity for timely payment of financial
commitments, but the margin of safety is not as great as in the case of the
higher ratings.
F3 Fair
credit quality. The capacity for timely payment of financial commitments is
adequate; however, near term adverse changes could result in a reduction to
non-investment grade.
B Speculative.
Minimal capacity for timely payment of financial commitments, plus vulnerability
to near term adverse changes in financial and economic conditions.
C High
default risk. Default is a real possibility. Capacity for meeting financial
commitments is solely reliant upon a sustained, favorable business and economic
environment.
D Indicates
an entity or sovereign that has defaulted on all of its financial
obligations.
Note The
modifiers “+” or “-” may be appended to a rating to denote relative status
within major rating categories. Such suffixes are not added to the ‘AAA’
Long-term rating category, to categories below ‘CCC’, or to Short-term ratings
other than ‘F1’. (The +/- modifiers are only used to denote issues within the
CCC category, whereas issuers are only rated CCC without the use of
modifiers.)