UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 
OR 15d-16 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Report on Form 6-K for August 23, 2016

Commission File Number 1-31615

Sasol Limited
1 Sturdee Avenue
Rosebank 2196
South Africa

(Name and address of registrant's principal executive office)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will 
file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F __X__ Form 40-F _____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 
6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1) only permits the submission 
in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted solely to provide an attached 
annual report to security holders.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 
6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7) only permits the submission 
in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted to furnish a report or other 
document that the registrant foreign private issuer must furnish 
and make public under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the 
registrant is incorporated, domiciled or legally organized 
(the registrant's "home country"), or under the rules of the home 
country exchange on which the registrant's securities are traded, 
as long as the report or other document is not a press release, 
is not required to be and has not been distributed to the 
registrant's security holders, and, if discussing a material 
event, has already been the subject of a Form 6-K submission or 
other Commission filing on EDGAR.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the 
information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing 
the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) 
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes _____ No __X__

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the 
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):
82-_______________.


Enclosures: Outcome of the Lake Charles Chemicals Project review


Sasol Limited
(Incorporated in the Republic of South Africa)
(Registration number 1979/003231/06)
Sasol Ordinary Share codes:	JSE : SOL	NYSE : SSL      
Sasol Ordinary ISIN codes: 	ZAE000006896  	US8038663006  
Sasol BEE Ordinary Share code:  JSE : SOLBE1   
Sasol BEE Ordinary ISIN code:   ZAE000151817
("Sasol" or "the Company")


Outcome of the Lake Charles Chemicals Project review


On 6 June 2016, Sasol announced the preliminary findings of the 
detailed review of the Lake Charles Chemical Project (LCCP), 
which was initiated in March 2016. The review has been completed, 
and involved a verification of the details and quantities of 
approximately 60 000 individual line items, based on actual 
costs, detailed engineering, benchmarking against other projects 
as well as actual field construction productivity factors. These 
factors were then combined with the updated execution strategy to 
prepare an updated project cost and schedule. An independent 
third party review of the estimate has also been carried out.

The LCCP consists of a world-scale 1,5 million ton per year 
ethane cracker, and six downstream chemical units - two large 
polymers plants (low-density and linear low-density polyethylene) 
and an ethylene oxide/ethylene glycol plant, which together will 
consume around two thirds of the ethylene produced by the 
cracker; and three smaller, higher-value derivative plants, which 
will produce specialty alcohols, ethoxylates and other products. 
The project is under construction near Lake Charles, Louisiana in 
the USA, adjacent to Sasol's existing chemical operations.

The detailed review has confirmed that the total capital cost for 
the project is expected to be US$11 billion, which includes site 
infrastructure and utility improvements. This is an increase of 
$2,1 billion from the original estimate at the time of final 
investment decision (FID) in October 2014. This estimate includes 
a contingency, which measured against industry norms for this 
stage of project completion, we consider being sufficient to 
effectively take the project to beneficial operation within the 
revised cost estimate. At 30 June 2016, the capital expenditure 
to date on LCCP was $4,8 billion, and the overall project 
completion was around 50%.

The schedule for LCCP remains the same as communicated on 6 June 
2016. The first unit, the linear low-density polyethylene unit, 
is expected to achieve beneficial operation in the second half of 
calendar year 2018, which will be followed by the ethane cracker 
and ethylene oxide and mono ethylene glycol units later that 
year, with the low-density polyethylene unit shortly thereafter. 
This will result in over 80% of the total output from LCCP 
reaching beneficial operation by early 2019. The remaining 
derivative units will reach beneficial operation by the second 
half of 2019.

An investor fact sheet for the LCCP has been compiled, which 
contains more granular information pertaining to the outcome of 
the project review as well as updated capital cost, cash flow, 
schedule execution, key project assumptions and other relevant 
project information. The investor fact sheet is posted under the 
LCCP tab in the Investor Centre section of the Sasol website, 
www.sasol.com. Please note that any forward looking information 
contained in this investor fact sheet has not been reviewed or 
reported on by Sasol's external auditors.

The detailed review process has confirmed that the $2,1 billion 
capital cost increase is mostly attributable to the following 
factors, in an approximately equal proportion: 

* a significant increase in site and civil costs due to much 
more ground works required to establish the site compared to 
what was estimated at FID as a result of poorer than 
anticipated subsurface conditions, 50 % more weather day 
delays over the site construction period compared to the 
average norm, and much lower field productivity resulting 
from a conscious decision to proceed with out-of-sequence 
site preparation activities while waiting for a variation of 
permit conditions to be granted. Site and civil works are 
now substantially complete;

* an increase in the home office and construction costs of the 
Engineering, Procurement, Construction and Management 
Contractor (EPCm) mainly as a result of a increase in 
contractor wage rates compared to what were assumed at FID, 
lower engineering productivity, and an increase in 
contractor engineering hours as a result of the increased 
material quantities; and

* an increase in labour costs as a result of higher quantities 
of material for installation, the decision to change to a 
higher-skilled and thus higher cost crew mix to enable 
planned labour productivity improvements for the remainder 
of the project, and lump-sum contracts placed at higher 
rates than estimated.

Notwithstanding these challenges, various other savings 
opportunities have been identified and are being implemented 
to mitigate the increase in the overall capital cost estimate.

With the project now over 50% complete, several changes have 
been, or are in the process of being, implemented which are 
intended to ensure that the project has a good probability of 
being completed within the updated capital cost estimate of 
$11 billion.  Mitigation actions to ensure successful project 
delivery, amongst others, include improved productivity and 
construction readiness that will be achieved through focused 
risk management processes, improved phasing of engineering, 
cost-effective mobilisation of resources and synchronised 
workface planning; improved change management practices; 
and key project leadership personnel changes.

Although unplanned event-driven risks may still impact the 
execution and cost of the project, we are confident that the 
remaining construction, procurement, execution and business 
readiness risks can be managed within the estimate as a 
result of these changes.

Even though the expected capital expenditure for LCCP has 
increased, we do not expect this to result in the Company 
exceeding its self-imposed gearing targets. Details of the 
project's updated funding requirements have been included in 
the LCCP investor fact sheet. Sasol will be publishing its 
2016 financial year results on 12 September 2016, and will 
provide an update on the group's gearing levels and funding 
plans at that time. The cash savings that have been achieved 
from the Company's low oil price Response Plan, and the cost 
savings resulting from the Business Performance Enhancement 
Programme, are both well ahead of previously communicated 
targets. 

The expected returns from the LCCP have also been updated, 
taking into account our updated oil, natural gas and 
petrochemical price forecasts as well as the revised cost 
and schedule resulting from the review process. On an 
unlevered basis, the returns from LCCP are expected to be 
slightly above the Company's US dollar weighted average cost 
of capital of 8%, although below the returns expected at the 
time of FID in October 2014. We still consider the LCCP to be 
a sound strategic investment that will return value to our 
shareholders for many years into the future. Key project 
assumptions, value contribution development and sensitivities 
have been included in the LCCP investor fact sheet.   

An impairment review, in conjunction with the preparation of 
our annual financial statements, has been completed as a result 
of the changes in macro-economic assumptions as well as the 
expected increase in the LCCP capital cost estimate. In terms 
of International Financial Reporting Standards, the derivative 
units are separately tested for impairment. An impairment of 
$65 million has been recognised for our 2016 financial year 
pertaining to the low-density polyethylene unit. 

The Chairman of the Sasol Limited Board of directors, 
Dr Mandla Gantsho, said "The Lake Charles Chemicals Project is 
an important part of Sasol's prudent growth strategy, and the 
substantial increase in the estimated capital cost has been an 
issue of concern. The detailed project review was therefore 
critical. We have taken decisive action to address the issues 
raised and have learned lessons for the benefit of future 
projects. This project still represents a world-scale chemicals 
facility, based on a sustainable feedstock cost advantage, and 
remains a value accretive pillar of our future business."

Sasol will be hosting a conference call at 15:00 South African 
time (09:00 Eastern time) on 24 August 2016 to discuss this 
announcement, which will be webcast via Sasol's website 
www.sasol.com.


23 August 2016
Johannesburg


Sponsor: Deutsche Securities (SA) Proprietary Limited


Disclaimer - Forward-looking statements: Sasol may, in this 
document, make certain statements that are not historical 
facts and relate to analyses and other information which are 
based on forecasts of future results and estimates of amounts 
not yet determinable. These statements may also relate to our 
future prospects, developments and, business strategies and 
industry dynamics including commodity prices. Examples of such 
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, 
statements regarding anticipated capital expenditure, project 
completion schedule, availability of funding, impact on gearing 
ratio and projected returns of our LCCP project, as well as 
commodity prices, exchange rate fluctuations, volume growth, 
increases in market share, total shareholder return, executing 
our growth projects and cost reductions, including in connection 
with our BPEP and RP. Words such as "believe", "anticipate", 
"expect", "intend", "seek", "will", "plan", "could", "may", 
"endeavour", "target", "forecast", "consider", "project", 
"confident" and similar expressions are intended to identify 
such forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means 
of identifying such statements. By their very nature, 
forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and 
uncertainties, both general and specific, and there are risks 
that the predictions, forecasts, projections and other 
forward-looking statements will not be achieved. If one or 
more of these risks materialise, or should underlying 
assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may differ 
materially from those anticipated. You should understand 
that a number of important factors could cause actual 
results to differ materially from the plans, objectives, 
expectations, estimates and intentions expressed in such 
forward-looking statements. These factors are discussed more 
fully herein and in our most recent annual report on Form 
20-F filed on 9 October 2015 and in other filings with the 
United States Securities and Exchange Commission. The list 
of factors discussed therein is not exhaustive; when relying 
on forward-looking statements to make investment decisions, 
you should carefully consider both these factors and other 
uncertainties and events. Forward-looking statements apply 
only as of the date on which they are made, and we do not 
undertake any obligation to update or revise any of them, 
whether as a result of new information, future events or 
otherwise.


SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 
the registrant, Sasol Limited, has duly caused this report to be signed 
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. 


Date August 23, 2016			By: 	/s/ V D Kahla 
					Name: 	Vuyo Dominic Kahla 
					Title: 	Company Secretary